[Fred Dello Russo]: កិច្ចប្រជុំទៀងទាត់នឹងត្រូវធ្វើឡើងនៅ Medford City នៅថ្ងៃទី 9 ខែកុម្ភៈឆ្នាំ 2016 ។ លោកស្មៀនបានហៅវិក័យប័ត្រនេះ។
[Clerk]: នាយក Carloado ។ ពិព័រណ៍។ នាយក Falco ។ ពិព័រណ៍។ នាយក Caballero ។ ពិព័រណ៍។ អនុប្រធាន Leclerc ។ ពិព័រណ៍។ ដំបូន្មានម៉ាក។ ពិព័រណ៍។ នាយក Scampelli ។ ពិព័រណ៍។ ប្រធានាធិបតីរុស្ស៊ី។
[Fred Dello Russo]: ពិព័រណ៍។ សមាជិកប្រាំពីរនាក់, ប្រាំបួន, ទេ។ សូមលើកទង់ជាតិ។
[Clerk]: គាត់បានយល់ស្របនឹងអ្នកជិះសេះដើម្បីផ្អាកច្បាប់។
[Adam Knight]: ឯកសារ 1602, 16021, 16022, 16023 ត្រូវបានអនុម័ត។ ឯកសារទាំងអស់មានសិទ្ធិទទួលបានការអានទីបីទាក់ទងនឹងការរៀបចំការិយាល័យរដ្ឋបាល។
[Fred Dello Russo]: ទាក់ទងនឹងការផ្អាកចលនាដោយលុបឯកសារចេញពីក្រុមប្រឹក្សាភិបាលសម្រាប់ការអនុម័តមានសំណព្វទាំងអស់? សូមអភ័យទោស 16-09 ការធ្វើវិសោធនកម្មលេខ 4 មន្ត្រីនិងនិយោជិក Cuatro (មេធាវីទីក្រុង) បានណែនាំការណែនាំរបស់ទីក្រុងនៅថ្ងៃទី 19 ខែមករាក្នុងរ៉េអាក់ទ័រមុន។ លោកបានចុះអានមួយលើកទី 2 នៅថ្ងៃទី 28 ខែមករាមានសិទ្ធិទទួលអានទី 3 និងចុងក្រោយរបស់គាត់នៅយប់នេះ។ នោះគឺការងើបឡើងវិញនៃពេលវេលាដ៏ប្រសើរដែលជាការតែងតាំងមេធាវីធ្វើលំហាត់ប្រាណរបស់ទីក្រុង។
[Adam Knight]: ជាការប្រសើរណាស់, ប្រធានាធិបតីខ្ញុំជឿជាក់ថានេះអាចត្រូវបានកាត់និងស្ងួតយ៉ាងខ្លាំង។ បញ្ហាគឺថាមេធាវីរបស់ទីក្រុងផ្តល់ឱ្យរដ្ឋាភិបាលបានណាត់ជួបរដ្ឋាភិបាលចំនួនពីរ។ ប្រធានាធិបតីកាសែតបានឆ្លងកាត់ការអានពីរលើកដំបូង។ ប្រសិនបើពួកគេចង់និយាយអំពីនរណាម្នាក់នៅក្នុងទស្សនិកជនខ្ញុំគិតថាយើងគួរតែផ្តល់ឱកាសដល់ពួកគេ។ ប្រសិនបើទីប្រឹក្សាណាមួយចង់និយាយអំពីវាវាគឺជាវា។ ប៉ុន្តែខ្ញុំនឹងអនុម័តវា។
[Fred Dello Russo]: ចលនាអនុម័តរបស់អ្នកប្រឹក្សាយោបល់។ បង្ហាញដោយការផ្តល់ប្រឹក្សាខារ៉ាវីលឡូ។ តើនេះជាបណ្តឹងឧទ្ធរណ៍ទេ? លោកស្មៀនបានហៅវិក័យប័ត្រនេះ។
[Clerk]: ហើយ។ ហើយ។ ហើយ។
[Fred Dello Russo]: ត្រឹមត្រូវ។ ត្រឹមត្រូវ។ ត្រឹមត្រូវ។ បោះឆ្នោតជាមួយសន្លឹកឆ្នោតចំនួនប្រាំពីរត្រូវប្រាកដថា។ គ្មានអ្វីទេ។ យុទ្ធនាការអវិជ្ជមានត្រូវបានគេបញ្ជាឱ្យមាន 16 លេខដើម្បីជួសជុលបុគ្គលិកនិងបុគ្គលិករបស់ប្រធានបុគ្គលិក។ រឿងនេះបានកើតឡើងនៅចំពោះមុខយើងហើយវាទាក់ទងនឹងជំហររបស់លោកប្រធានាធិបតី។ ថ្ងៃទី 12 ខែមករាខាងមុខ។ វាត្រូវបានស្នើឡើងនៅថ្ងៃទី 19 ខែមករា។ បន្ទាប់ពីការពន្យល់ការអានអានដំបូងបានកន្លងផុតទៅហើយ។ នៅថ្ងៃទី 28 ខែមករាវាត្រូវបានប្រកាសថាជាការអានលើកទី 2 ។ ឥឡូវអ្នកទីបីនិងយប់ចុងក្រោយរបស់អ្នកមានសិទ្ធិទទួលបាន។ កៅអីកំពុងរង់ចាំចលនា។
[Adam Knight]: ជាថ្មីម្តងទៀតច្បាប់នឹងរៀបចំជំហរផ្ទាល់ខ្លួនរបស់ការិយាល័យប្រៃសណីយ៍ហើយរៀបចំការិយាល័យប្រតិបត្តិឡើងវិញ។ គាត់បានទៅអានលើកដំបូង។ យើងមានបញ្ហាខ្លះ។ ប្រសិនបើអ្នកឆ្លើយសំណួរខ្ញុំនឹងផ្លាស់ប្តូរការយល់ព្រម។
[Fred Dello Russo]: នៅក្នុងចលនាមួយដែលត្រូវបានអនុម័តដោយទីប្រឹក្សា Knight ប្រធានាធិបតីប្រធានាធិបតីបានទទួលស្គាល់អនុប្រធានាធិបតី Hanko Kern ។
[Breanna Lungo-Koehn]: សូមអរគុណដល់ប្រធានាធិបតីរុស្ស៊ី។ ក្នុងន័យនេះខ្ញុំគិតថាយើងគ្រាន់តែត្រូវការការធ្វើបច្ចុប្បន្នភាពហើយខ្ញុំគិតថាយើងខ្លះបានស្ទង់មតិថៅកែមួយចំនួននៅក្នុងសហគមន៍ជិតខាង។ 106,000 លេចធ្លោ។ វាស្ទើរតែជិតដល់អ្វីដែលអភិបាលក្រុងបានធ្វើ។ ដូច្នេះយើងស្នើឱ្យអភិបាលក្រុងមានទំនាក់ទំនងជាមួយអ្នកអ្នកដឹងថាហេតុអ្វី ហិរញ្ញវត្ថុសម្រាប់មុខតំណែងនេះគឺខ្ពស់ណាស់។ បន្ទាប់ពីនោះគាត់មាននាយកថវិកាសម្រាប់បុគ្គលិកទិញឥវ៉ាន់ហើយភារកិច្ចទាំងពីរនេះត្រូវបានធ្វើទោះបីមិនតិចជាងគណៈរដ្ឋមន្ត្រីក៏ដោយ។ ដូច្នេះខ្ញុំចង់ទទួលបានចម្លើយ។
[Fred Dello Russo]: ខ្ញុំគិតថាយើងមានការពន្យល់សម្រាប់ទីប្រឹក្សាឃ្វិណី។
[Adam Knight]: មែនហើយដោយការគោរពរបស់ទីប្រឹក្សាប្រធានាធិបតីប្រសិនបើគាត់គិតថាជំហរនោះបានបញ្ចប់គាត់គឺជាច្បាប់។ វាមិនអាចផ្លាស់ប្តូរច្បាប់នៅលើផែនដីបានទេ។ ត្រូវហើយយើងពិភាក្សារឿងនេះ។ ខ្ញុំគិតថានេះគឺ លោកប្រធានាធិបតីនេះគឺជាជំហរល្អវាគឺជាជំហរចាំបាច់ហើយខ្ញុំបានគាំទ្រសំណួររបស់ខ្ញុំអស់ពីសមត្ថភាព។
[Breanna Lungo-Koehn]: ទេខ្ញុំសប្បាយចិត្តធ្វើវា។ នេះមិនមានន័យថាវាមិនគាំទ្រកន្លែងឬរៀបចំឡើងវិញទេខ្ញុំគ្រាន់តែគិតដូចមនុស្សជាច្រើន, ប្រជាជន 106.000 នាក់គិតថាកន្លែងទាំងនេះអាចមានសំលេងបន្តិចព្រោះពួកគេដូចជាទីក្រុងបែបនេះ។ យើងកំពុងស្វែងរកការពន្យល់មួយចំនួន។ តើបុគ្គលនេះនឹងធ្វើការអស់រយៈពេលជាង 40 ម៉ោងទេ? យើងបានទទួលការពិពណ៌នាអំពីការងារនេះ។ ខ្ញុំគិតថាការពិពណ៌នាមួយ តើបុគ្គលនេះនៅចំពោះមុខក្រុមប្រឹក្សាក្រុងទេ? យើងនៅតែត្រូវមើលបុរសនេះនៅក្រុមប្រឹក្សាភិបាលនិងសូម្បីតែនៅគណៈកម្មាធិការក្នុងកិច្ចប្រជុំ។ ដូច្នេះអ្នកដឹងទេតើហេតុផលសម្រាប់មួយរយយ៉ាងដូចម្តេច? នេះគឺជាចំនួនទឹកប្រាក់ដ៏ច្រើន។ ជាថ្មីម្តងទៀតនៅពេលដែលយើងមានមនុស្សដែលទទួលយកការងារនេះពីរដងហើយធ្វើតិចខ្ញុំមិនអាចមើលឃើញវាខ្ញុំគ្រាន់តែចង់បញ្ជាក់ឱ្យច្បាស់។
[George Scarpelli]: បាទ / ចាសវាអាចជាកន្លែងព័ត៌មានមួយ, អ្នកពិគ្រោះយោបល់ Scarpelli ។ ខ្ញុំបានបំភ្លឺសំណួរមួយប៉ុន្តែខ្ញុំគិតថាវាជាក្រុម។ មិនត្រឹមត្រូវ។ បន្ទាប់ពីនោះមានភារកិច្ចពីរ។ មិនត្រឹមត្រូវ។ យល់ព្រមនោះហើយជាអ្វីគ្រប់យ៉ាង។
[Fred Dello Russo]: សូមអរគុណ សូមអរគុណទីប្រឹក្សា។ នាយកថវិកានិងបុគ្គលិកអាចនៅជាមួយពួកនាយកថវិកាគាំទ្រ Tempore ដែលអាចបញ្ជាក់ពីបញ្ហានេះបាន។ អត្ថិភាព។ រោងម៉ាស៊ីនកិនស្រូវ, ប៊ុនសុល។ បញ្ហារបស់ទីប្រឹក្សាគឺត្រូវធ្វើការស៊ើបអង្កេត។ ខ្ញុំមិនដឹងថាតើវាមានចម្លើយឬសូម្បីតែបានស្នើសុំឱ្យមានដំណោះស្រាយជាផ្លូវការប៉ុន្តែនៅដើមខុទ្ទកាល័យ នេះរួមបញ្ចូលទាំងវិធានរបស់អ្នកដែលទទួលបន្ទុកនិងអភិបាលក្រុងក៏ដូចជាសារៈសំខាន់នៃការគ្រប់គ្រងផ្ទាល់ខ្លួន។ បញ្ហាជាមួយទីប្រឹក្សាគឺថាគាត់គិតថាប្រាក់ខែខ្ពស់។
[X_nYXZZ4ChY_SPEAKER_04]: ត្រូវហើយតំណែងគឺជានាយកបុគ្គលិកនិងនាយកគោលនយោបាយ។ ហើយខ្ញុំមិនបានទទួលដំណោះស្រាយដើម្បីប្រៀបធៀបប្រាក់ខែទេ។ ខ្ញុំមិនដឹងថាការិយាល័យរបស់អភិបាលក្រុងមិនមែនទេ ទទួលបាននេះ។ យើងឆ្លើយសំនួរដែលយើងបានទទួលហើយខ្ញុំមិនដឹងថានឹងមានអ្វីកើតឡើងចំពោះការប្រៀបធៀបនេះទេ។
[Fred Dello Russo]: សូមអរគុណ បាទ / ចាសយើងមានចលនាដែលបានយល់ព្រមដែលគាំទ្រដោយទីប្រឹក្សាខារ៉ាវីលឡូ។ តើអ្នករំពឹងថាអ្នកផ្តល់ទីលំនៅ Falco និយាយអំពីរឿងនេះទេ?
[John Falco]: តាមពិតទេ Scapelli បានកត់សម្គាល់ថាទាំងនេះគឺជាមុខតំណែងពីរ។ ខ្ញុំគិតថានេះអាចបង្ហាញមុននឹងប្រាក់ឈ្នួលដូចជាថ្មីនិងទិន្នន័យ។ ទាំងពីរនេះគឺជាជំហររបស់មនុស្សម្នាក់។ នេះជាមូលហេតុដែលខ្ញុំគិតថានេះជាមូលហេតុនៃកោសិកាខាងលើ។ សូមអរគុណ
[Fred Dello Russo]: នៅក្នុងចលនាសម្រាប់ការអនុម័តអ្នកលក់ត្រូវបានគេហៅថាបរិមាណ។
[Clerk]: វ៉ាយ វ៉ាយ មិនមែនទេ។ វ៉ាយ
[Fred Dello Russo]: ត្រូវហើយការបោះឆ្នោតដោយមានសន្លឹកឆ្នោតចំនួន 6 ដែលបានបញ្ជាក់ដោយផ្តល់សំលេងមួយចំនួនដោយបញ្ជាទិញបញ្ហានេះ។ 16-022 មាត្រា 5 វិសោធនកម្មមាត្រា 5 នៃនាយកលទ្ធកម្ម។ វត្ថុដែលបានបង្ហាញខ្លួនជាមួយយើងនៅថ្ងៃទី 12 ខែមករាហើយត្រូវបានបង្ហាញ។ នៅថ្ងៃទី 19 ខែមករាជាលើកដំបូងដែលគាត់បានអាន។ គាត់បានអានការអានទីពីរនៅថ្ងៃទី 28 ។ ការអានទីបីនិងចុងក្រោយត្រូវបានធ្វើឡើងនៅចំពោះមុខយើងនៅយប់នេះ។ កៅអីកំពុងរង់ចាំចលនា។
[Adam Knight]: ជាថ្មីម្តងទៀតប្រធានាធិបតីនេះគឺជាអង្គការមួយនៅការិយាល័យប្រតិបត្តិ។ លោកនឹងបង្កើតនាយកទទួលបានហើយក៏អនុញ្ញាតឱ្យនាយកដើរទិញឥវ៉ាន់បន្តនាយកថវិកាផងដែរ។ លោកប្រធានាធិបតីខ្ញុំបានយល់ព្រម។ គាំទ្រឯកសារ។
[Fred Dello Russo]: ចលនាអនុម័តទាក់ទងនឹងទីប្រឹក្សា Knight ដែលគាំទ្រដោយទីប្រឹក្សា Falco ។ លោកស្មៀនបានហៅវិក័យប័ត្រនេះ។
[Clerk]: ហើយ។ ហើយ។
[Fred Dello Russo]: បាទ / ចាសមាន 7 សន្លឹកមិនមានអវិជ្ជមានចលនាត្រូវបានបញ្ជាទិញ។ 16-022 ជំពូក 66 ការធ្វើវិសោធនកម្មបុគ្គលនិងការផ្តល់សំណងរបស់Uniónសម្រាប់មាត្រា 2 បានបង្ហាញខ្លួនសម្រាប់ថ្ងៃទី 12 ខែមករាដែលបានអនុម័តជាការអានលើកដំបូងនៅថ្ងៃទី 28 ខែមករាបានចេញផ្សាយការអានលើកទី 2 ហើយបច្ចុប្បន្នកំពុងត្រូវបានធ្វើឡើងនៅពេលប្រឈមមុខនឹងសកម្មភាព។ នេះគឺនៅក្នុង រៀបចំចំណាត់ថ្នាក់ផ្ទាល់ខ្លួនខ្ញុំជឿជាក់លើជំហរ។ នេះគឺជាចំណាត់ថ្នាក់។
[Adam Knight]: ថ្ងៃឈប់សម្រាកដែលពាក់ព័ន្ធមួយទៀតត្រូវបានអនុម័ត។ បន្ទាប់ពីនោះកៅអីកំពុងរង់ចាំសកម្មភាព។ ប្រធានាធិបតីនេះគឺជាឯកសារនៃលក្ខណៈសម្បត្តិទូទាត់របស់និយោជិកសម្រាប់មុខតំណែងរបស់យើង។ ចលនាប្រធានាធិបតីត្រូវបានអនុម័ត។
[Fred Dello Russo]: ចលនាសម្រាប់ការយល់ព្រមរបស់អ្នកណែនាំគឺល្អលេចធ្លោដោយ Caraviello ទីប្រឹក្សារបស់ Caraviello ។ លោកស្មៀនបានហៅវិក័យប័ត្រនេះ។
[Clerk]: ព្យាយាម។
[Fred Dello Russo]: ព្យាយាម។
[Clerk]: ហើយ។ ហើយ។
[Fred Dello Russo]: ត្រឹមត្រូវ។ ជាមួយរដ្ឋចំនួន 70 មិនមានការបោះឆ្នោតអវិជ្ជមានទេ។ មែនហើយកីឡានេះត្រូវបានតែងតាំង។ សូមអបអរសាទរឪពុកម្ដាយ។
[Mark Rumley]: ត្រូវហើយប្រធានសមាជិកក្រុមប្រឹក្សា។ ខ្ញុំគ្រាន់តែចង់អរគុណ។ ខ្ញុំពិតជារីករាយណាស់ដែលគាត់បានទៅអានបីដង។ ខ្ញុំគិតថានេះជារដ្ឋាភិបាលល្អនិងល្អ ខ្ញុំគ្រាន់តែចង់អរគុណចំពោះការផ្តល់យោបល់។
[Fred Dello Russo]: សូមអរគុណ សូមអរគុណ
[X_nYXZZ4ChY_SPEAKER_04]: សូមអរគុណច្រើន។
[Adam Knight]: ត្រលប់ទៅការបញ្ជាទិញពាណិជ្ជកម្មធម្មតាវិញ។
[Fred Dello Russo]: លោកប្រធានាធិបតីបានវិលត្រឡប់ទៅរកការបញ្ជាទិញអាជីវកម្មឱ្យបានទៀងទាត់យោងទៅតាមចលនារបស់ក្រុមប្រឹក្សានារាត្រីនោះ។ អនុប្រធានាធិបតី Longo-Khn បានស្នើឱ្យអ្នកគាំទ្រទាំងអស់របស់ពួកគេទាំងអស់សុទ្ធតែជាអ្នកប្រឆាំង។ ពេលវេលាសម្រាប់ការប្រជុំសាធារណៈនីមួយៗត្រូវបានធ្វើឡើង។ អនុប្រធាន។
[Breanna Lungo-Koehn]: សូមអរគុណដល់ប្រធានាធិបតីរុស្ស៊ី។ ខ្ញុំចង់ដឹងថាតើយើងអាចចំណាយពេលចូលរួមការប្រជុំសាធារណៈទាំងអស់បានទេ។ ខ្ញុំដឹងថាមានការបង្រៀនអំពីការកម្សាន្ត។ ខ្ញុំបានដឹងអំពីកិច្ចប្រជុំនៅលើ Haynes Square បានប្រារព្ធកាលពីសប្តាហ៍មុននៅសាលាបឋមសិក្សារ៉ូប៊ឺត។ លោកប្រធានាធិបតីខ្ញុំក៏ដឹងដែរថាគាត់កំពុងធ្វើជាអធិបតីនៃការប្រជុំជាច្រើន។ ដុចក្នា ការប្រជុំនឹងត្រូវបានប្រារព្ធធ្វើ 3 ទៅ 4 ដងក្នុងមួយសប្តាហ៍ហើយខ្ញុំចង់អបអរសាទរអភិបាលក្រុង។ ខ្ញុំគិតថាវាជាការល្អដែលមានព័ត៌មាននៅក្នុងសហគមន៍។ ខ្ញុំគិតថាក្រុមប្រឹក្សាតែងតែតម្រូវឱ្យមានការចូលរួមចំណែករបស់សហគមន៍ឬយោបល់អាជីវកម្មជាច្រើន។ ខ្ញុំដឹងកាលពីមុនយើងបានស្នើសុំឱ្យបរិច្ចាគជាសាធារណៈឱ្យបានសាធារណៈមុនពេលចតហើយមុនពេលចុះហត្ថលេខាលើកិច្ចសន្យាគ្រប់គ្រងកាកសំណល់។ ដូច្នេះខ្ញុំគិតថានេះពិតជាជំហានវិជ្ជមានមួយ។ ជាការពិតនេះមិនមែនជាអ្វីដែលមនុស្សគ្រប់គ្នាអាចធ្វើបានទេហើយអ្នកប្រឹក្សាប្រាំពីរនាក់មិនអាចប្រជុំបាននៅឯការប្រជុំគ្នាបានទេ។ ខ្ញុំដឹងថាខ្ញុំដឹងថាអ្វីដែលកំពុងកើតឡើងអ្នកបោះឆ្នោតកង្វល់របស់យើងចំណូលចិត្តរបស់យើងទាំងអស់នៅក្នុងការប្រជុំទាំងនេះដើម្បីមើលថាតើប៉ុន្មាននាទី។ ចុងបញ្ចប់នេះតែងតែមានប្រយោជន៍ខ្លាំងណាស់សម្រាប់ការបោះឆ្នោតនាពេលអនាគតអ្នកដឹងហើយស្វែងរក យប់នេះយើងបានបើកកិច្ចប្រជុំអំពីគោលដៅក្នុងរយៈពេល 18 ម៉ោង។ ដូច្នេះនេះនឹងជួយយើងសម្រួលដល់ការពិភាក្សាអំពីគោលដៅ។ ហើយអ្នកដឹងទេល្អជានិច្ចដើម្បីទទួលបានព័ត៌មានសាធារណៈ។ ដូច្នេះអ្នកដឹងអ៊ីមែលនិងការហៅដែលយើងទទួលបានគឺមានប្រយោជន៍ខ្លាំងណាស់។ ប៉ុន្តែបើអញ្ចឹងអ្នកដឹងទេអ្នកខ្លះបានចូលរួមយោបល់ជាច្រើនសម្រាប់ការប្រជុំហើយខ្ញុំចង់រំលាយអ្វីៗទាំងអស់មាននៅក្នុងកញ្ចប់ទី 6 បន្ទាប់ពីរាល់សប្តាហ៍យើងដឹងថាអ្នកដឹងទេអ្នកដឹង រក្សាវារួមគ្នាហើយស្វែងយល់ពីរបៀបដែលយើងនឹងរីកចម្រើន។ ដូច្នេះខ្ញុំឆ្ងល់ថាតើយើងអាចផ្ញើមកយើងរាល់សប្តាហ៍ឬពីរសប្តាហ៍ប្រសិនបើយើងមានពីរបីនាទីដូច្នេះយើងអាចប្រមូលព័ត៌មាននេះហើយផ្លាស់ទីបានសមរម្យ។
[Fred Dello Russo]: បើនិយាយពីព័ត៌មានអនុប្រធានក្រុមហ៊ុនស្មាតត្រូវបានផ្សព្វផ្សាយនៅលើគេហទំព័ររបស់ទីក្រុង។
[Fred Dello Russo]: ការវិវត្តន៍។
[Breanna Lungo-Koehn]: តើត្រូវចំណាយពេលប៉ុន្មានដើម្បីផ្សព្វផ្សាយ? ខ្ញុំមិនដឹងទេ។ អូខ្ញុំមិនបានឃើញពួកគេទេ។ នៅទីនោះ។ យូឡា។ ច្បាប់ស្របច្បាប់ស្របច្បាប់។
[George Scarpelli]: ពិគ្រោះយោបល់ Scott ។ សូមអរគុណ ប្រធានាធិបតីនេះគឺជាបញ្ហារបស់ខ្ញុំ។
[Fred Dello Russo]: សូមអរគុណ ដូច្នេះនៅក្នុងចលនារបស់អនុប្រធានដើម្បីអនុម័តមនុស្សគ្រប់គ្នាចូលចិត្តវា។ ខ្ញុំផ្ទុយពីនេះ។ ខ្ញុំចង់បានកាហ្វេ។ សូមអបអរសាទរ។ ផ្តល់ដោយអនុប្រធានាធិបតី Lungo-Khn ។ ថ្វីបើមាន តាមទស្សនៈថ្មីៗនៃការគំរាមកំហែងថ្មីៗនេះនៃវិទ្យាល័យ Medford និងពាក្យបណ្តឹងជាច្រើនជាមួយឪពុកម្តាយក្រុមប្រឹក្សាសាលា Medfort បានសំរេចចិត្តស្វែងរកច្បាប់និងនីតិវិធីរបស់ខ្លួននាយកដ្ឋានសាលាព្រមានភ្លាមៗថាថ្ងៃនេះមើលមិនឃើញ។ ប្រធានាធិបតីបានទទួលស្គាល់អនុប្រធានាធិបតី Mongo Kern ។
[Breanna Lungo-Koehn]: សូមអរគុណប្រធានាធិបតី។
[Fred Dello Russo]: នាយក Falco ។
[John Falco]: ខ្ញុំដឹងថាវាជាសំណួរគួរឱ្យចាប់អារម្មណ៍មួយសម្រាប់ឪពុកខ្ញុំប៉ុន្តែនៅយប់ថ្ងៃស្អែកវិទ្យាល័យ Medford បានជួបជុំក្រុមប្រឹក្សាសាលា Medford ដែលជាអ្នកទទួលខុសត្រូវចំពោះវិធាននិងនីតិវិធីទាំងអស់ដែលទាក់ទងនឹងសុវត្ថិភាពសាលារៀន។ ខ្ញុំគិតថាបាទ / ចាសខ្ញុំចង់បង្កើតចលនានៅលើតុព្រោះខ្ញុំគិតថាវាសំខាន់ណាស់ដែលពួកគេត្រូវមានការប្រជុំជាមុនសិន របៀបដែលវានឹងកើតឡើងមុនពេលប៉ាន់ស្មាននិងពិភាក្សាអំពីអ្វីដែលបានកើតឡើង។ មានកិច្ចព្រមព្រៀងមួយ។ ហើយខ្ញុំគិតថាយើងគួរតែដឹងពីរដ្ឋបាលសាលាមុនពេលមើលការពិភាក្សា។ ខ្ញុំចង់ស្តាប់ពួកគេជាមុនហើយស្តាប់យ៉ាងច្បាស់ពីអ្វីដែលបានកើតឡើង។
[Fred Dello Russo]: Mwen siyal tab la. Mouvman tab la pa kapab ranpli.
[Breanna Lungo-Koehn]: I would ask him to withdraw so that I could speak on the resolution. There's a lot of people that have been complaining to me. And I think it does need to be discussed publicly. It's being thrown out that, you know, no discussion hasn't made. I'm very happy that there's a meeting tomorrow, but there are people here to speak on it tonight. And people have asked me. I think it's a disservice to the city to not publicly broadcast.
[Fred Dello Russo]: All those in favor, say aye. Mr. President. Councilor Falco.
[John Falco]: If we could reverse the tape. I'll reverse the table to hear from the resident, but I firmly believe that this here should be addressed by the school system before we address, this is not our jurisdiction, really. I mean, the way I look at it.
[Fred Dello Russo]: You're withdrawing your motion, Councilor. I'm withdrawing my motion. Point of information, Vice President-Elect O'Connor.
[Breanna Lungo-Koehn]: I think, as one Councilor, I was getting the complaints two weeks ago, the day after this happened, and I went a whole week without saying a word because I agree. should have been brought up by the school committee. It was not, and people were on me to bring it up, and I don't disagree with them. I think people need to be able to hear what we have to say about it, what the school committee has to say about it. We're the ones that decide on the budget in June and decide whether or not the safety budget is enough. There's a reason why we should be able to talk about it. People are here tonight, and I just feel like it's definitely needed.
[Fred Dello Russo]: To take point of clarification, Councilor Knight.
[Adam Knight]: Has there been any communication between the administration of the school department and the council to date, prior to the filing of the resolution? I'm not in possession of anything.
[Fred Dello Russo]: The motion for tabling has been withdrawn. The chair recognizes the presenter of the motion, Vice President Lungo-Koehn.
[Breanna Lungo-Koehn]: Thank you and I appreciate Councilor, I understand where Councilor Falco is coming from and I appreciate the withdrawal of the motion. I learned about this bomb threat through Patch. I read it online and as a parent, I didn't even think of it as a parent, I actually called my mother who works for the school system and said, did you know there was a bomb threat three days ago? Yeah, I found out after the end of the day. So I had my mother in the building with a potential bomb threat, whether or not it was low or no threat, you know, I was concerned. And then I thought, after I started getting the complaints, I thought, you know, I have one child in the school system, soon going to have two, and then eventually have three. And whether or not it was a threat or no threat, I truly believe, and I think it's where a lot of people are coming from, I think that as a parent, I think I should be given the choice And I think a lot of parents do believe the same thing. They should be given the choice because it's not something that happens every day. This is actually the first threat of something like this that I've heard of happening ever in the Medford Public Schools. So I think parents are looking for me to come out and say they should have been notified whether that was through a phone call or some type of communication rather than after the children left school. And I think that's important to say. I think it's important. I have the right to voice my opinion. And that is my opinion. Parents should have been notified in a non-emergency fashion, but a phone call should have went out and said, this is the situation, this is what we're dealing with, and we just want to let you know, there's nothing to be concerned about. But, and parents, I have a number of parents that have called me upset, saying they would have, even though it was low threat or no threat, parents would have went and picked up their children. I know it's happening all over the state. It's unfortunate. It's something that was completely out of control, out of Medford's control. I don't think Medford did any, you know, there's nothing Medford, City of Medford could have done except probably better communication. So I'm very glad it's being addressed tomorrow night. And maybe one of the reasons it is being addressed tomorrow night and not last week is because we did put the resolution on. You know, we are going to talk about it tonight. So I think that it needed to be put on and I think people need and avenues to be able to speak and give their opinions on it. And obviously, that's going to be in a lengthy meeting tomorrow night. But if people want to voice their opinions now, or people looking to other politicians, not just the school committee, to speak out on it, then that's our prerogative. And I think it was wrong the way it was handled. And I hope that new policies are put in place after tomorrow night.
[Fred Dello Russo]: Thank you, Madam Vice President. On the motion, you wish to present yourself, welcome. Please state your name and address for the record.
[2pAQFYhyG5g_SPEAKER_24]: Robert Candy, 128 Grant Avenue, Medford.
[SPEAKER_04]: Monique DeVos, 128 Grant Avenue, Medford.
[2pAQFYhyG5g_SPEAKER_24]: Thank you. You may speak one at a time. Thank you. Well, Councilor, thank you for the motion. And Councilor Falco, thank you for withdrawing it for the time being. I don't think either of us is in any way opposed to the meeting itself or to working things out. There's been zero information other than what was in the transcript. To our knowledge, the bomb threat occurred somewhere around 9 a.m. when kids were in school. Neither the kids nor the teachers knew about it, to our knowledge as well. We don't know if any sweep was done or conducted, and in that regard, we trust the police and we trust that the school has our children's best interests in mind. That said, how dare they not call us? How dare they not give us the option of deciding what to do? And loco parentis, from a legal perspective, does not mean they get to make that decision. And they could be challenged on that, and we're thinking about that. It's very distressing to know we've had three children in the school system, currently one in high school. to know that he's sitting there hoping they got it right. If we wanted to take him home, that should be our option. Let us tell you a little story. We came in to have a meeting with one of the personnel on the third floor. There's an elderly gentleman who sits at the front desk of the high school. Very nice gentleman. He gives you a pass, and you walk up. Doesn't ask for ID. You could be anybody. Off you go. We've seen him before, so he knows us. On our way out, this gentleman was traversing down toward Mr. Belson's area, I guess to go to the men's room. There was nobody there. Anyone could have walked in that high school, and anyone could have done damage. That needs to change. So when they tell us they looked at the videos, really? That's the extent of determining whether or not somebody was doing some harm in a school that size? It's unconscionable. And I think it is your jurisdiction, because one, you approved the budget. Two, as Ms. Cain pointed out, the school committee did nothing. They didn't even raise the issue, and it is something they should be talking about. So I'm just going to say I think it's unconscionable we weren't called. I think we should be given that opportunity. And I think it would be a sad day if you folks did not act on this, if you determine after that meeting. that proper steps have not been taken. Remember, the resolution itself says parents may decide. That's what we're here about. We're not here to question the police or to question Mr. Belson or Dr. Perrella, whom we have trust in. We're here to say we wrote a call. Do you have anything else to add?
[SPEAKER_04]: Just the fact that I support everything you said and that absolutely People need to be informed. You can't make any decision without being informed, period.
[2pAQFYhyG5g_SPEAKER_24]: Thank you for hearing us. Thank you for being here tonight.
[Fred Dello Russo]: Chair recognizes Councilor Falco.
[John Falco]: I can wait. I can wait.
[Fred Dello Russo]: The chair recognizes the citizen at the podium. Please state your name and address for the record. Welcome.
[acqgxK4yhEM_SPEAKER_28]: Thank you, good evening. Jay Spaulding, 3610 Mystic Valley Parkway. As a former teacher in a public school district where we had bomb threats and active weapon reuse and a student was shot on property, I know that this issue is terrifying to both teachers, staff, students, parents, administration. And I understand the desire to have this resolution. However, School policy regarding safety and security is something that we cannot address here at City Council because the people who have the, in my opinion, the expertise, the knowledge on creating safety plans and security plans are not in this room tonight. In this room are parents who are scared. in this room are citizens who work in various areas of both city involvement and private industry. But the chief of police, the superintendent of the school, the principal of the high school, they're not here. Tomorrow night, as Councilor Falco said, a serious conversation where things can be addressed will happen. I will state as a former teacher that the worst thing, in my opinion, one can do during an active, whether it be an active weaponry incident, an injured student, or a bomb threat, is to have Parents show up on site and try to remove their child. That is a great way to cause chaos, to increase injury, and to cause further damage. Whether the bomb, whether the threat is real or not, the rush of parents to remove students from a building because they're making a decision based on emotion, and I understand that emotion. I've worked in those buildings. at those times, and I would like to leave myself. That's chaos. That further endangers everyone in the building. And in my opinion, again, having lived through this, the reason that staff, students, teachers are not informed right away or even that day is, again, chaos theory. We don't want people running through the hallways. We don't want teachers saying, screw this, you guys, I'm out. Good luck, kids. I don't wanna die. That's the reality of the situation. So I am disappointed that this has to come before city council tonight when the issue is coming tomorrow. I think it honestly is a waste of time when we can address this tomorrow with the actual stakeholders. Thank you.
[Robert Cappucci]: Good evening. Welcome. Please state your name and address for the record. Thank you, Mr. President. I'm Bob Capucci, 71 Evans street. Uh, I too am a former educator in, in, in Massachusetts and, uh, there are definite ways and orderly in, in, constructive way for parents to come in and retrieve their kids can happen without it breaking down into chaos. Uh, you know, school could be put on lockdown. Everybody stays in their room. And as parents showed up, you know, they're notified where their kids, uh, they communicate and they get them out in an orderly fashion. Now I went to, uh, chief Sacco of the method. Police holds a informational town hall meeting every first Wednesday of the month. And this was the main topic. The police got this threat and the threat was an automated robotic threat to the school. So that was one of the things that they used to determine the legitimacy of the threat. It came at a very inopportune time around 10 in the morning. The police did go through the school and make a search. But some of the things that they brought up that I think makes it pertinent for this council to talk about was that something like half of the cameras in the school don't work, not every single door is locked and being looked at. Another thing to consider is that it wasn't the police department's decision to put out the information about this bomb threat at six 30 at night, uh, hours after it happened. Uh, uh, I believe that was on, uh, the superintendent of schools, his decision, uh, and, uh, going forward. I, as you do consider the budget budget in, in June in, in the police department that we have, I mean, there's Metro police officer, that was up there on duty that day also has two kids in the school. So they did sweep the school. They did do a search. I don't know the full extent of that. And they did pass on the information of the call to the state police to try to track where this robotic call came from. But in considering the budget in June with our police department, I think it would be pertinent to do what you can to get uh, uh, enough police officers on, on the method police force. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Mr. Capucci.
[Fred Dello Russo]: Good evening. Welcome. Please state your name and address for the record.
[Cheryl Rodriguez]: Hi, my name is Cheryl Rodriguez. I live at 281 Park street. Um, I heard about this bomb threat online as well. I have a student in the Roberts Elementary, but I pretty much get all of my information about the school online because my school doesn't notify. I know other schools call for snow days. So this call coming in at 630 for a bomb threat is no surprise. There's no clear policy in how schools are supposed to notify parents. I thought this was possibly the PR person's job to kind of unify us because at my school, we've had power outages, we've had heat being out, we've had issues where they can't clean things because there's no hot water, there's no parent notification. Somebody needs to unify this because everyone should know. We had the lockdown drill at my school and nobody notified. We had children having anxiety attacks because their parents couldn't prep them for this. This is just a larger issue that we need as parents. When I drop my child off at the school, I don't give up my parental rights. I found out about the power outage last year because I was volunteering in the school building and had to cancel a program for 100 children with less than two hours, walked in the school and found out they had no power. So something needs to be done on a systematic level of notifying parents. We're still the parent, and I need to know what's going on for my child. I don't want her to come home and give me this wild story of we had no heat and had to wear our winter coats, because I don't know to believe that. School didn't tell me that, so it's probably not true. So I think it's bigger than just bomb threat, and we really need to think about that. It's a bigger issue. Thank you.
[Fred Dello Russo]: Thank you. Chair recognizes Vice President Scarpelli. Vice President.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry, I took over. Thank you. Again, I understand why this is put forth, but again, like my fellow colleague, as a former school committee member, these are issues we've vetted. And this is why it's important that we let the due diligence of our elected officials present what needs to be presented tomorrow evening, because it is important. These, as a school committee member, we can list out a litany of answers to all these questions, but it's the job of the school committee to inform everybody tomorrow at their meeting that then would be processed through us, and then we could have that next discussion. But I think right now, putting the cart ahead of the horse, I understand the questions that you have, the parents have. I got the same calls and one of the biggest questions was the notification issue. Well, there's a lot of security issues when and why notifications have to be given. So that's not for me to tell you that right now, that's for the chief of police and the superintendent to talk tomorrow because I have questions too. I have questions about the presentation of the PR. and PR person, and when that was done. But again, we want to make sure that we're not, you know, putting our school base in a frenzy right now until we really know what has transpired. So I think that's very important. So thank you.
[John Falco]: Thank you, Mr. President. I want to thank my consular colleague, Mr. Scarpelli, as well. The point that I was trying to make earlier was basically that we should hear from the school administration. They can give everyone the rundown as to what happened, what time it happened, why they made the decisions they made. If we're gonna comment on things tonight, it's purely speculation, and that is not safe for anything or anyone. So therefore, the important thing is, if you have questions, I think, please, I urge everyone, go to Medford High School tomorrow night, at the library, seven o'clock PM, the superintendent's going to be there. The chief of police is going to be there. All of the decision makers are going to be in the room and they will be able to go right through the timeline as to what happened and when and why they made the decisions they made. And that's what I was trying to put point, uh, put across. I mean, I am a parent of three children in the method public schools. I mean, I completely understand, um, you know, the notification issue. I mean, I have the same concerns, but I think that the administration should at least give us the information so we can, make decisions and ask good questions. So that's the point I was trying to get across. Uh, thank you.
[Fred Dello Russo]: Chair recognizes the citizen Councilor Marks.
[Michael Marks]: Uh, thank, thank you, Mr. President. I want to thank a council longer current for putting this on the agenda for tonight. Um, you know, it was mentioned, I think that this is the first time this has happened in the city and by far that's, this is not the first time there's been, a threat of this nature in the Medford Public Schools. But needless to say, I think Councilor Falco just mentioned about speculation. The reason why there's speculation is because there's no communication. And I think that's the main concern. I have two children in the public schools, and when I received the call that night, the first thing that came to my mind was, geez, I would have liked to have a little more information, and maybe I would have liked to have it a little sooner. And I realize it's a delicate balance because you don't want to create pandemonium. How do you release, you know, if the high school wants to release 800 kids, how do you release them? And how do you go on to do it in a safe manner? I understand that. And I think these are the issues that need to be discussed. But if there's a policy in place, why does it take eight days or tomorrow's nine days? Why does it take nine days to say this is our policy? This is what we implemented. This is what we found out. It shouldn't take that long. And I think that's the concern that I'm hearing. And then as a parent, when they tell me part of the reasoning why they consider this a low threat was they went through 18 hours of videotape. You know, anyone that goes up to the high school and the gentleman that spoke is right. If you had to go up and bring your student a book, say they forgot a book, they used to have you just sign a sheet of paper and you'd go bring the book to the main office. So they'd let you into the school. Just recently I was up there and now they are asking for ID. They've changed their policy. So the policy before was just sign a sheet. You could sign a John Lennon and walk in because really there's no check and balance. The second point I'd like to make too is that high school is open constantly Saturday and Sunday. Hundreds of people going in there. I go out myself, Saturday night, and watch my son play basketball. Every door up in the gymnasium is open. It's a free for all. There's not one security person up there. There's not one security person going on. So the public schools really have to take, you know, I'm not sure who's looking at 18 hours of videotape. But first of all, the back of the school, it's pitch dark out there. So I'm not sure what you're going to see with those cameras in the back. And secondly, the whole school's open. We have the Japanese program that's been up there for a number of years. And the city of Medford makes a fair amount of money for renting out almost the entire high school. But there's thousands of people that literally have been up and watched the program. They take over all the classrooms in the high school. They have other classrooms that are under lock and key. They come in with wheelers. And we don't know what they're bringing into the building. And these are the things. And I'm not saying that this program's a bad program. I'm just saying, how do you keep a sense of security when the building is open to everyone? There's really no security up there, especially after hours and on weekends, which is a real concern of mine. And I hope it's addressed tomorrow. But I think the issue that I've been hearing from parents is not whether or not they wanted to pull their children out was the lack of communication. Be open and upfront with people. And it shouldn't take eight days to figure out what's going on. And if there was a breach in policy or the policy wasn't followed, let us know. That's how we improve. This is how you improve upon policy and regulations when something like this happens. And to just brush it under the rug and then come up with a meeting. You know, I've been calling for two years. for a public safety summit, Mr. President, in this community. And it's not just on the city side, it's in general. It's to bring the police department, the fire chief in, the mayor, the council, and anyone else that wants to be part of it, Mr. President. And for two years, I just called for another one recently, that this council voted unanimously. We have got no response at all regarding a public safety summit. It's almost like people in this community don't want to discuss what's happening in the community. They don't want to discuss the robberies that are happening in our local drug stores almost daily, the bank robberies, an incident like this at the high school. And the list goes on and on and on, drug activity on our streets. And we've been asking, Mr. President, to get together, like any good community would, and discuss some of our shortfalls and maybe why we're seeing an increase in this particular activity in our community, and what we can do better to provide security. You know, so I'm glad that this was discussed tonight. We're not talking out of school now. We're not letting any secrets out about safety at the high school, you know, ways someone could breach the high school. We're saying that we believe there's a concern, and the concern has to be addressed in a much quicker fashion, so speculation doesn't get out there, and people start thinking, oh, my God, what's happening? So we hired a $90,000 PR person. I didn't see one communication from that PR person. Not one communication. If you can't address an issue of this nature, what are they addressing? Honestly, I don't know what's going on, Mr. President. This is a concern that parents should be upset about. And maybe this is not the best forum, but guess what? We're an open forum. People can come up to the podium and speak. And the day we start censoring what can be said at that podium, you might as well close the light and lock the door here at City Hall, Mr. President. I just want to thank Councilor Longo for bringing this important issue up.