[Kit Collins]: 잠시만 말씀드리겠습니다.
[Zac Bears]: 안에.
[Marie Izzo]: 예, 아니요, 아직 모르겠습니다. 나는 사람들이 나에게 말하는 것을 본 적이 없습니다. 동의합니다. 네, 시장의 계획은 모두가 같은 테이블에 앉는 것입니다. 글쎄요, 우리 모두 같은 것을 원해야 합니다. 우리는 모두 한 테이블을 공유한다 테이블에 앉아 있는 두 사람. 무엇?
[Kit Collins]: 아니, 그 사람은 이미 죽었어.
[Marie Izzo]: 예, 그게 다입니다. 이것이 시장의 계획이다.
[Kit Collins]: 알았어, 준비됐어. 죄송합니다. 필요한 기능을 사용 중지하겠습니다. 이상적인. 메드퍼드 시의회 계획 및 허가 위원회는 2025년 12월 16일에 회의를 가질 예정입니다. 회의는 18:00에 개최됩니다. 주소: 시청, 2층, Medford 시청, 85 George B. Hassett Drive, Medford, MA 및 Via Zoom. 비서님, 전화주세요.
[Marie Izzo]: 칼라한 부관님. Callahan 상담사는 부재 중입니다. 르 민 상담사. 스카르펠리 상담사. Scarpelli 상원의원은 부재중입니다. 곰 머리. 선물 콜린스 부통령.
[Kit Collins]: Present. Three present, two absent. The meeting is called to order. Thank you all for being here. People were clamoring for one final planning and permitting committee meeting before we closed out this term, so I had to oblige. The action and discussion item, thank you for laughing, Simon. The action discussion item for tonight's meeting is paper 22-321, a condominium conversion ordinance. This is something that we have not talked about in a little while. It's been on the council's radar for a couple of terms now. This was brought up in the context, initially this was brought up as an idea before the council in the context of one of the mass displacement events in Medford in recent years when a couple dozen tenants were evicted, no fault, from the Bradley Road rental building. In 2022, this is brought up as one possible strategy that Medford could look into as a strategy that many municipalities have pursued as a way of protecting the stock of rental units within a city. There are many strategies that have to work together to preserve affordable housing and to preserve rental housing stock within a municipality. This is one that actually many of our neighbors here in Massachusetts have used and have adapted and have adapted to fit their unique needs. And so in 2022, we had a couple of initial meetings on this idea. We gathered and looked at together some initial research, compared what some of our neighbors do and don't do through their condo conversion ordinances. and put together a framework from which we would make a draft ordinance in those couple preliminary meetings which were in March and September of 2023. Like I said, we looked at kind of a survey of some other municipalities, condo conversion ordinances, compared and contrasted them, and also got some initial reactions and questions on the board from our planning development sustainability department and our building commissioner. So what we have today, and this is in the agenda packet, is a preliminary kind of version one draft of a condo conversion ordinance, which I wrote. The text did not just come out of my head. This came from several, this was adapted from several of the different condo conversion ordinances that are currently on the books in many of our, in some of our neighboring communities, who we looked at, who we looked to as examples at the September 2023 meeting and discussed and it kind of comes out of our conversation from about a year and a half ago about what of these neighboring communities ordinances make sense and seems like it's interesting and seems like it's something that'd be worth looking into here in Medford and which of these things seem like they're less tailored for a community like ours. So I'm happy to run through that draft tonight, but just quickly since it has been a while since we've looked at this, I just want to quickly recenter us on kind of the principles of this ordinance and the why of doing it at all. Why do a condo conversion ordinance? This is, like I said, it's just one strategy, but it's a way of making sure that the city has more control and has a seat at the table when the conversion of rental units to condominiums happens in a city. And we know that in Medford, that's already been happening quite a lot, especially in Hillside and South Medford. A condo conversion provides a really fantastic profit opportunity for for-profit developers and for house flippers. And we've seen this, but especially if corporations and for-profit flippers that aren't rooted here in Medford, that kind of have no business in Medford except for extracting property from these conversions. If they're going to profit from housing in our community, we should make sure that that transaction gives something back to our community as well, to individual tenants who are displaced. and to the public at large and the ordinance provides a structure for doing that. In addition it's important to keep in mind as we're thinking through the levers in this ordinance that the conversion of rentals into condos has an impact on our chances of local racial and class diversity because not everybody can afford to buy a home. It's very important to have homes for the I think over 45% of Medford that does rent at this time. Anyway, this is a way to make sure that the public gets something back when what is often a mechanism of gentrification takes place. So with this ordinance, it's up to us to, you know, kind of pull the different levers to make this do what we want it to do in my mind and based on the conversations that we've had about this so far in council. The outcomes that we intend to get out of this ordinance are to target for-profit developers, while protecting homeowners and while protecting the retirement incomes of seniors in our community, to increase tenant protections, to increase the city's ability to connect displaced tenants with new comparable affordable housing, to make sure that relocation payments, compensation to displaced tenants aligns with the true cost of moving within our community, and to increase the incentives and the assistance to owners or condo developers to help with finding new housing for their tenants. And so as we go through the ordinance, I think the key questions for us to be considering and, you know, happy to add to this list are how do we make sure that we're targeting for-profit developers and flippers as opposed to owner-occupants? How what does that relate to a certain type or size of building that we should make sure to target or be sure to exempt? And what are the key enforcement related issues that we should make sure to get feedback from city staff on? So with that, if there are no pressing comments or questions from my fellow Councilors at this time, I'd happily run us quickly through the draft of the ordinance and then we can go forward. Proceed? I'll share my screen. All right, I'm going to try to go through this pretty quickly because it is quite long. This draft, including the comments, is on the city council's public portal for if anybody watching would like to follow along or read it in greater detail that I'm going to go into. So like I said, prior to the writing of this draft, the council reviewed several condo conversion ordinances from other communities in Massachusetts. This included Somerville, Boston, New Bedford, Lexington, and Marlborough. Based on my notes from our conversations in 2023, it seemed like our most instructive examples, the things that were closely aligned with the mechanisms that we might want to pursue. And most comparable and useful for us here in Medford would be Somerville's ordinance and Marlborough's ordinance. And there are some sections that are kind of adapted from those other communities as well. Boston tends to be pretty unique. It interacts pretty uniquely with state law in a lot of cases, but still really interesting to look at. So we start, I'm just going to run through this quickly. We start with the statement of purpose, which is kind of what I spoke to in terms of the housing context for this project in general. It's followed by a definitions section. These definitions align with the other ordinance, the other condo conversion ordinances that are held by our neighbors. Then we get to section three, condominium conversion requirements. Actually, let me just switch my navigation here. This is where we get into the meat of the ordinance this is speaking to. Okay, so we've gotten to the point where a condo conversion, a developer or an owner wants that to happen. Now what? So this is, This is where we start to get into that flowchart of what a developer might want to do with their property and what the city is saying must happen to increase fairness for tenants and the community in that case. Provisions for vacant units or owner-occupied units. These are treated a little bit differently. In this case, we don't have a tenant unrelated to the owner that might be displaced by the conversion. occupied units, this sets forth, sorry I'm losing my place here. So largely this is about how much notice is an owner required to give to a tenant when they intend to take a rental unit and convert it into a condominium. This was one major point of comparison among the other ordinances. Most of the other communities that we looked at give protected tenants a five year notice period and an either one or three year notice period for all other tenants. If you are a protected tenant, so for example, if you have a disability, if you are a senior, if you are low income, your notice period is five years. All other tenants, three years of notice. That's how long the owner has to give you a warning when they're about to take that rental off the market because they're going to perform a conversion. Renting units during a conversion, this is, this section is speaking to tenants' rights while they are kind of going through a current lease when an owner is preparing for conversion. And it speaks to essentially protecting tenants from the conditions of their lease changing while they're still in that same current lease. The intent of this is to prevent owners from doing things that would essentially try to force their tenants out early by, say, increasing the rent drastically or increasing demands on the tenant during their current lease so that they could make the conversion earlier. So this prevents that from happening. It also prevents evictions before the notice period, as specified earlier in this section, would be up. Tenant right to purchase was another stipulation that we saw in many other condominium conversion ordinances. This puts forward that when a owner wants to convert a unit that is currently occupied by a tenant, before they put it on the market, they must extend to the tenant like first right of refusal. Before they put it out to the general public, they have to offer it first to the tenant. on equal or comparable terms to that which they would be offering it on the free market. Most of the other examples that we looked at gave that first right of refusal period as 120 days to average tenants and 180 days refusal period in the case of protected tenants. We also have a section in here and this is interesting, something that I think the council should talk about further at some point is if a tenant should pass on this opportunity to purchase the unit once it is converted, that first, that's actually a second right of refusal would then go to the city of Medford or its designee which might include our affordable housing trust to maintain the property as affordable housing in perpetuity. And then it would be up to the city or its designee to waive that right to purchase and then it could go on to the market. I do want to note and make really clear. that this does not obligate any owner to sell the unit for less than it would be offering in good faith to third parties on the market. It's more about the sequence here, giving the tenant the first right to say no thank you, and after that, giving the municipality or its designee the right to say no thank you before it goes on the market. There are exceptions to the first right of refusal. including if they intend to transfer the condo to a close relative instead of offering it on the market. That would be an instance where first right of refusal to the tenant or to the city would be exempted. The intent of the ordinance is not to prevent people from converting units and then selling or giving it to a family member. going down to the next section underneath requirements if a condo conversion is going to take place. The other major piece of, or I would say one of the main pillars of the ordinance, of course, is increasing tenants' rights in the event of a condo conversion of a unit where they're living and also making sure that they are fairly compensated for the disruptions to their life as a result of that conversion. One of the ways that cities can do that is by making sure that tenants are financially compensated when they're displaced by a conversion. And so all of the condo conversion ordinances that we looked at from those other municipalities included some level of relocation payment. This is a way of making the tenant whole because they're being forced to move because of the conversion, whereas they otherwise wouldn't have had to. So in terms of the actual payment, the financial compensation, we looked at a bunch of different numbers from these other communities. The relocation benefit of $10,000 per unit for protected tenants and $6,000 per unit for all other tenants aligns us with the city of Somerville and how they are structuring their relocation payments. They're much higher in Boston. That makes sense. The cost of living is much higher in most parts of Boston. Boston's relocation payments are more like $15,000 for protected tenants and $10,000 for all other tenants. New Bedford and Marlboros are far lower. But again, I think that one of our north stars here is trying to make sure that it does what it's intended to do, and that's to make tenants whole based on the actual cost of moving and finding comparable housing after displacement. There's also an annual adjustment mechanism in here to make sure that we don't codify one relocation payment that in 10 or 20 years is vastly out of step with how much it actually does cost to move and resettle. So this draft includes language that is similar to what's found in other ordinances, that it shall be adjusted annually by an amount equal to the increase in the CPI for the preceding calendar year, just to make sure that this increases with inflation. Another way that this ordinance seeks to assist tenants with that displacement caused by the conversion is with actual housing and relocation assistance by the owner. The owner under this is entitled to assist the tenant with finding housing within the city of Medford that is comparable, that is not far more expensive or radically different that would essentially satisfy the needs that the current unit was satisfying for them. There's an interesting exemption in here essentially for owners who have gone above and beyond in terms of affordability. keeping their rent levels in line with MHA Section 8 payment standards, or limiting rent increases to no more than 5% per year. They are kind of given deference during this housing relocation assistance process, knowing that the rest of the housing market has been escalating far more rapidly than they allowed their unit to escalate, and this takes that into account. Essentially, we want to set homeowners up for, or owners and sellers up for success, not for failure. And this next section is kind of an extension of saying during the notice period when tenants are continuing to live at the unit during that notice period, the rental unit, the rental agreement is extended and it has to be comparable to the rental agreement that was signed prior to the beginning of the notice period. Again, not giving owners the ability to do any sort of bait and switch scheme to try to force tenants out early to speed up the conversion process. Subsection 8 goes over the administration and the regulation of conversions. Permits will be required for conversions and a sitting board within the city of Medford will do that process, administer those permits and make the necessary documentations. One second. I'm going to come back to permitting in a minute. Just to continue with the rest of the tenant rights and protections under this ordinance, it speaks to renovations to units during the notice period, again, protecting tenants from or super noisy or inconveniences due to renovations that the owner may be making to prepare for the conversion. Tenants still have to be able to enjoy a safe, quiet and peaceful home like anybody else. And the tenant does have the right to vacate their unit early before their lease period would expire, the notice period would expire should they choose to once the notice period has been given. So, excuse me. The next section sets up a condominium and cooperative review board in the city of Medford that will be the administrator of this ordinance and oversee the permitting process. And this is, I think, another interesting section for the city council and staff to review together. It was interesting looking at other ordinances, breakdown of who should sit on this board. My recommendation, based on that research in this draft, is for it to have seven full members and one alternate, which matches with a lot of our comparable communities. Staggered terms of three years each, and that the review board should include two homeowners. Nope, sorry, actually my total number I didn't update. Two homeowners, two tenants, at least one person that would fall into that protected class that might be a homeowner or a tenant, an elderly, disabled, or lower moderate income person. A representative from the CDB, a representative from the Affordable Housing Trust or Medford Housing Authority, and an alternate who may be either a homeowner or a tenant. And I think that actually does add up to seven people. If I can count and talk at the same time. This provides for an appointment process and an annual stipend, which is similar to that of the CDB. And it enumerates the board's duties and powers largely to enforce this ordinance. to create and make available the conversion permit applications to issue them to owners who want to do a conversion and who are compliant with the prerequisites found in this ordinance, to hear complaints from people who are alleging that this ordinance has been violated, to assist in a public awareness program about this ordinance, to establish fees for the issuing of permits, review the documentation of everything associated with this ordinance and condo conversions in Medford and to kind of keep a running list of those numbers, analyze the number of conversions in the city where they're taking place for the edification of the city and the city council. And then finally, the board retains the power to not issue a permit to any owner who has taken any action to circumvent mass general law chapter. 527, which also deals with condo conversions or of this ordinance, including but not limited to unreasonable rent increases, reduction or elimination of services, termination of any tenancy without cause or the imposition of new conditions of the tenancy. Essentially, if a owner of a rental unit is being a really bad landlord, if they're doing shady things to try to vacate tenants in ways that are illegal, the board then has the discretion to not issue a conversion. if a pattern of that behavior is documented. And I just want to, speaking of powers and discretion granted to the board, this is a little bit earlier in section three. But just while we're on that topic, broadly owners in order to retain a conversion permit are required to comply with Chapter, Master and Rule of Chapter 527 of the Acts of 1983. And, sorry for pausing, I'm looking for something specific. Right, my apologies. In subsection seven. The board is permitted to make the conversion permit subject to reasonable conditions for the protection of tenants and the public interest of the city of Medford, including but not limited to these following factors. And this part is really important because this is the section of the ordinance that essentially says what is that kind of What's the word I'm looking for? How is the city allowed to make that decision of whether to issue a conversion permit or not? And different cities handle this differently and handle discretion of this differently. Some other cities that we looked at have a hard cap, like for example, in Marlborough. And per their ordinance, no more than 25% of units in a building per year may be converted from rental to conversion in other cities. Whether conversion permits are approved or not depends on the vacancy rate of units community wide, which I do think is a very interesting way to handle it. To essentially let the housing market and the vacancy rate be a guide on how many units are allowed to be taken out of the rental market. These are things for the city council to consider as we move forward. I did not include those hard caps in this draft. I don't know that that would be my recommendation. But some of the other factors and pieces of context from some of our neighbors I thought were useful. For example, when deciding whether to approve a permit or not, to consider the hardships imposed on the tenants residing in the accommodations proposed to be converted. The aggravation of the shortage of rental housing accommodations in the city. particularly for lower income people. What reasonable arrangements may have been made or will be made to alleviate the hardship on the tenants that might be affected by the conversion, and an intent by the owner to offer a reasonable percentage of the new conversions to sell to the Medford Housing Authority, Affordable Housing Trust, or another entity that will serve a similar function. So a lot of the same principles are at play here, but this leaves a little bit more discretion in the hands of the board to interpret hardship, to interpret the market, and to approve or deny permits based on those important pieces of context. So I will jump down again to, I think we're at section five now. Permitting process, this is the, lays out the steps that an owner with an intent to convert might go through. I'm not going to go through this in great detail. This provides details for if you want a permit to convert, here's how you do it. Here's the steps that you would take. The granting process, which would include, again, some administrative steps and some hearings before the board. And then if a permit were to expire before it is approved, steps that the owner must take to get a new one and restart the process. Effective date, I propose that the ordinance would take effect six months after passage. Give the city time to prepare, create the board, empower the board, and start that administrative process. Standard severability clause, annual reporting. The review board should submit to the city council building department and office of planning development and sustainability an annual report kind of summarizing what we have learned about conversions, their rate, where they're happening in the city because of this ordinance and penalties for violation. This was also adapted from other communities with condo conversion ordinances putting forth or actually this one was pulled directly from mass general law I believe. that any property owner who violates or knowingly permits a violation will be punished with a fine of not less than $1,000. With the final disclaimer that a violation of this ordinance by an owner will not affect or negatively impact its sale to a purchaser who is not involved in the violation and had no knowledge of it. I'm going to pause there. for a second, so I can pull up my other notes document. Are there any initial reactions, questions, or sections that we should go back to? All right, I'll go to Councilor Leming and then Councilor Bears. Oh, wait. I went to you first, go ahead.
[Zac Bears]: 알았어, 서둘러볼게. 이것은 정확합니다. 결정 지점을 포함하는 일종의 기본 문서인 결정 지점으로 식별한 의견을 사용하여 우리를 앞으로 안내하십시오. 정말 대단해요. 감사합니다 그래서 제 유일한 질문은 우리가 시나 시의회 및 위원회에 연락하여 이에 대해 만나야 한다고 생각하시나요?
[Kit Collins]: 물론 이전 회의에서 PDS와 헌터 이사, 기획자 에반스가 이 문제에 대해 논의했다고 생각합니다. 매우 유용합니다. 포함되어야 한다고 생각합니다 의심할 여지없이 위원회 건물입니다. 40호 전 위원은 몇 년 전 재임 당시 많은 도움을 줬다. 그렇지 않으면 나는 그렇다고 생각한다 중국개발은행 총재와 안전주택기금 대표가 몇 가지 논평을 했습니다. 이것이 나의 상위 4~5개 사항이 될 것이며, 제가 주요 결정 사항으로 간주하는 사항을 식별하고 이를 다음 그룹 토론을 위한 제안으로 메모에 포함할 것입니다.
[Zac Bears]: 아주 좋아요, 감사합니다.
[Kit Collins]: 감사합니다 다음.
[Matt Leming]: 이번 일을 겪으면서 두 가지가 생각났습니다. 처음에는 그것이 거기에 있다는 것을 깨달았습니다. Bill, 하지만 저는 별로 신경쓰지 않았습니다. 국회 의사당의 세입자 우선순위와 관련하여 최근 몇 년간 제가 한 일에 주의를 기울이지 않았습니다. 그래서 나의 첫 번째 질문은 이 요소가 주법과 어떻게 상호 작용하는가입니다. 두 번째로 생각해 볼 점은 다음과 같습니다. 다른 지역 사회에 대한 조사를 바탕으로 아파트의 가치를 알고 계십니까? 매년 접수되는 신청서 수가 몇 배로 증가합니다. 특별위원회를 설치한다면 4조에 언급된 사람들을 위한 것인가? 그들은 1년에 한 번 만날까요? 아니면 매달 열리는 행사인가요?
[Kit Collins]: 예, 좋은 질문입니다. 잠시 시간을 내어 이전 변환에 대한 몇 가지 설명을 적어 보겠습니다. 1초. 문서에는 없는 것 같아요. 아, 좋은 질문인 것 같아요. 다른 사람들이 얼마나 바쁜지 나는 말할 수 없습니다. 아파트 자치단체 관리위원회는 그렇게 하지 않지만 연간 협약 대신 월별 회의가 있는 CBD 모델이 되어야 한다고 생각합니다. 그렇게 될 것이라고 생각해서도 아니고, 허가가 더 많아질 것이라고 생각해서가 아니라, 게다가 사업 허가가 위원회에 도착하자마자 처리되기를 원합니다. 우리는 이기고 싶지 않습니다. 판매자나 소유자는 청중으로부터 높은 기대치를 갖고 있습니다. 전직 PDS 인턴은 2018년부터 2022년까지 메드퍼드에서 아파트 개조 공사에 참여했으며, 그런 다음 저는 중요한 경고를 했습니다. 이 데이터는 추적하지 않았기 때문에 얻기가 매우 어렵습니다. 그래서 제가 원하는 것만큼 맵지 않고 약간 순한 편이에요. 그런데 우리 기사에 나온 녹음에 따르면 이적 건수는 2018년 24건, 내년 30건, 2020년 29건, 2021년 37건, 2022년 33건 정도다. 홍수가 아니란 말이야. 이는 도시 전체에 있어서도, 적어도 지금 이사회에게는 큰 금액이 아닙니다. 물론, 다르게 포착될 수도 있고 그렇지 않을 수도 있고, 데이터에 나타나지 않을 수도 있는 차이가 많이 있을 수 있다고 생각합니다. 하지만 제 생각에는 CBD 수준의 워크로드이거나 적어도 2년 전과 동일한 CBD 수준의 워크로드라고 생각합니다.
[Matt Leming]: 당신은 주법을 알고 있습니까?
[Kit Collins]: 응, 미안해. 법률을 구매할 수 있는 주 세입자의 권리에 대해 말씀하시는 건가요?
[Matt Leming]: 이것은 정확합니다. 이것은 정확합니다. 우선 사항. 어렴풋이 기억나네요. 나는 당신이 언급한 1983년 법률을 읽지 않아서 자세한 내용을 모릅니다. 그러나 저는 이것이 저렴한 주택법(Affordable Housing Act)이 논의 중이었을 때 시가 임차인 선호 사항을 시행할 수 있는 능력을 인정했을 때 그들이 제시한 급진적인 요점 중 하나였다는 것을 기억합니다. 혼란스럽네요. 이 논의가 어디로 향하고 있나요?
[Kit Collins]: 틀림없이. 저는 풀뿌리 수준의 진짜 문제는 시가 먼저 거부할 권리라고 생각합니다. 하지만 이에 대해 제안하실 사항이 있으시면 Chief Bills라고 생각합니다.
[Zac Bears]: 예, 주택 요금은 입주 날짜에 관계없이 세입자에게 적용됩니다. 1983년 법은 아파트의 전환을 구체적으로 허용했고, 이것이 바로 차이를 만드는 것입니다. 이상적인. 이것은 정확합니다. 이것은 정확합니다.
[Kit Collins]: ខ្ញុំគិតថាវាគួរអោយកត់សម្គាល់ថានៅ Somerville សិទ្ធិនៃការបដិសេធដំបូងរបស់ទីក្រុងត្រូវបានលុបចោលយ៉ាងមានប្រសិទ្ធភាព។ វានៅតែមាននៅក្នុងសេចក្តីព្រាងនេះ ព្រោះខ្ញុំដឹងថាវានឹងផ្លាស់ប្តូរយ៉ាងណាក៏ដោយ។ ខ្ញុំគិតថាទីក្រុងគួរតែមានសិទ្ធិក្នុងការបដិសេធលើកទីមួយឬទីពីរ។ ប៉ុន្តែប្រសិនបើវានៅតែមាននៅក្នុងសេចក្តីព្រាងនេះ ខ្ញុំប្រាកដថាមេធាវីក្រុងនឹងប្រាប់យើងថា នេះអាចចាត់ទុកថាខុសច្បាប់។ ខ្ញុំឃើញ រឿងមួយទៀតដែលខ្ញុំចង់គូសបញ្ជាក់នៅក្នុងការពិភាក្សាបឋមនេះគឺជាចំណុចសំខាន់មួយទៀតនៃការពិភាក្សា និងការប្រៀបធៀបនៅក្នុងពិធីបរិសុទ្ធសហគមន៍ផ្សេងទៀត៖ ថាតើប្រភេទអគារមួយចំនួនគួរត្រូវបានលើកលែងដែរឬទេ។ ដូចដែលយើងបានពិភាក្សាហើយ បទប្បញ្ញត្តិមានការលើកលែងជាច្រើនទៀតសម្រាប់រឿងផ្សេងៗគ្នា។ វិសាលភាពនៃការបដិសេធប្រភេទទីមួយអាចត្រូវបានលើកលែងសម្រាប់ម្ចាស់ដែលមានបំណងលក់ ឬផ្ទេរទៅសមាជិកគ្រួសារ។ នៅក្នុងសហគមន៍ផ្សេងទៀត អគារតូចៗត្រូវបានលើកលែងពីការរឹតបន្តឹងនេះ។ ចូលចិត្ត រង់ចាំ ខ្ញុំសុំទោស។ សូមអភ័យទោស ខ្ញុំត្រូវចាប់ផ្តើមប្រយោគនេះម្តងទៀត។ នៅក្នុងសហគមន៍មួយចំនួនទៀត អគារ 2 និង 3 យូនីតពិតជាត្រូវបានលើកលែងពីបទបញ្ញត្តិទាំងមូល ពីព្រោះជាក់ស្តែង និងមិនចាំបាច់និយាយ វាជារឿងធម្មតាទេសម្រាប់ម្ចាស់លំនៅដ្ឋានក្នុងការបំប្លែងអគារ 2- ឬ 3- ឱ្យទៅរស់នៅក្បែរ ឬនៅក្នុងនោះ។ ខ្ញុំមិនគិតថានេះជាចំណុចចាប់ផ្ដើមល្អសម្រាប់ Medford ទេ។ យើងឃើញអ្នកមិនមែនជាអ្នករស់នៅជាច្រើនទិញផ្ទះពីរជាន់ និងផ្ទះបីគ្រួសារ។ ខ្ញុំគិតថាមានវិធីផ្សេងទៀតដើម្បីកែសម្រួលបទប្បញ្ញត្តិនៃបទប្បញ្ញត្តិដើម្បីឱ្យពួកគេមានភាពយុត្តិធម៌ចំពោះម្ចាស់ ប៉ុន្តែមិនលើកលែងទាំងស្រុងនូវអគារតូចៗពីបទប្បញ្ញត្តិ និងការការពារភតិកៈនោះទេ។ លើសពីនេះ ខ្ញុំចង់បញ្ចូលវាទៅក្នុងអនុស្សរណៈសម្រាប់ក្រុមប្រឹក្សាដើម្បីពិចារណានៅពេលអនាគត អាស្រ័យលើរបៀបដែលយើងចង់ក្លាយជាការច្នៃប្រឌិត។ សហគមន៍ផ្សេងទៀតបានដោះស្រាយបញ្ហានេះតាមរបៀបគួរឱ្យចាប់អារម្មណ៍។ ជាឧទាហរណ៍ នៅទីក្រុង Malden ជៀសវាងការបំប្លែងអគារពីរ និងបីយូនីត លុះត្រាតែកន្លែងទំនេរលើសពីភាគរយជាក់លាក់។ នេះគឺជាវិធីមួយផ្សេងទៀតដើម្បីធ្វើឱ្យបទប្បញ្ញត្តិស្មុគស្មាញ និងធ្វើឱ្យពួកគេកាន់តែមានភាពរសើបចំពោះអ្វីដែលកំពុងកើតឡើងនៅក្នុងទីផ្សារលំនៅដ្ឋានក្នុងឆ្នាំដែលបានកំណត់។ ប៉ុន្តែសម្រាប់ពេលនេះ វិក័យប័ត្រនេះមិនបានលើកលែងអគារណាមួយឡើយ ដោយសារតែទំហំ ឬចំនួនអាផាតមិន។ ខ្ញុំគិតថាវាសមរម្យដែលយើងរក្សាវា ជាពិសេសដោយសារយើងបានឃើញអគារតូចជាង 2 ឬ 3 យូនីតជាច្រើនត្រូវបានបំប្លែង និងកែលម្អ ជាពិសេសនៅសង្កាត់ដែលយើងបានពិភាក្សាពីមុន។ អ្នកណាក៏មក។ ពិសេស។
[Zac Bears]: 저는 이 문서를 Collins 부의장의 메모가 있을 때까지 위원회에 보관하고 기획, 인력 개발 및 지속 가능성 담당 이사와 건물 위원회를 법안에 관한 다음 위원회 회의에 초대할 것을 권장합니다.
[Kit Collins]: 사적인. Bills Council과 Second Laming Council에서 수정되었습니다. 장관님, 준비가 되셨다면.
[Marie Izzo]: 르 민 상담사. 이것은 정확합니다. 곰 머리. 이것은 정확합니다. 콜린스 부통령. 이것은 정확합니다. 켈리 상담사님. Kelly의 변호사는 참석할 수 없습니다. 스카르펠리 상담사. Scarpelli 상원의원은 부재중입니다.
[Kit Collins]: 사적인. 감사합니다 3명이 지원했고 2명이 결석했다. 움직임이 지워졌습니다. 내 이사회에 최종 의견, 질문 또는 제안 사항이 있습니까?
[Zac Bears]: 나는 이미 이것을 했습니다. 거기. 나는 단지 의자가 나를 알아보기를 원할 뿐이다. 감사합니다 Collins 의장은 이 행정 명령을 이행하는 데 있어서 리더십을 발휘했을 뿐만 아니라 지난 2년 동안 이 위원회에서 보여준 능숙한 리더십에 대해서도 감사드립니다. 여러분 모두, 특히 다음 위원이 되실 분들은 이 위원회의 위원장으로서의 자리를 그리워하실 것입니다. 그리고 그것에 대해 우리는 매우 감사하고 있습니다. 나 자신에 대해 이야기하겠습니다. 운영진과 관계자분들께 진심으로 감사드립니다. 귀하가 해당 주의 의장으로서 이사회 및 위원회에 제출하는 모든 것.
[Kit Collins]: 감사합니다
[Matt Leming]: 머물 수 있기를 바랍니다. 당신이 여기 있기를 바랍니다. 위원회의 위원장을 맡지 못한 것은 그에게 큰 손실이었습니다. 내 말은, 당신은 메드포드 시의회에 재직하는 동안 많은 일을 성취했다는 것입니다. 여러분은 도시를 위해 훌륭한 봉사를 해왔고 앞으로도 그렇게 할 것임을 알고 있습니다. 정기모임에서도 정말 감사드립니다. 귀하의 서비스에 진심으로 감사드립니다. 이 위원회에서 과거에 무슨 일이 일어났는지 이야기하는 것은 밀실 회의에서나 인생에서나 어려운 일입니다. 나는 당신에게서 많은 것을 배웠고 당신을 만나서 반가웠습니다. 네, 감사합니다. 정말 감사합니다. 회의를 마치도록 하겠습니다.
[Kit Collins]: 매우 감사합니다. 글쎄, 가면서 좀 쉬어라. 우리가 전화할 수 있다는 거 기억나? 내 말은, 전화를받지 마세요. 예, 저는 오랫동안 이 위원회의 의장직을 맡지 않았습니다. 미안해요, 리치. 지난번에 동료와 문제가 있었던 것 같습니다. 다들 동의하시나요? 이것은 정확합니다. 다들 반대하시나요? 움직임이 지워졌습니다. 회의가 끝났습니다. 매우 감사합니다. 감사합니다 아니요