2015 Medford MA candidates

Excerpts of transcribed videos from the 2015 Medford MA candidates for Mayor, City Council, and School Committee.

City Council Candidates (map)
Excerpts
2014 Words 2015 Words Website ORM endorsed? Medford Happenings Medford Bytes GKM
Patch
MCM
Richard Caraviello*
9,822
37,257
website
Mark Crowley
0
0
Christopher D'Aveta
0
0
Fred Dello Russo*
4,293
96,446
Leonore Eforo
0
0
John Falco
0
4,839
website
2011 Link
Adam Knight*
17,243
77,740
Breanna Lungo-Koehn*
12,070
54,997
website
Michael Marks*
28,929
87,405
Neal McSweeney
0
0
William O'Keefe
0
0
Neil Osborne
0
0
Michael Ruggiero
0
9,014
George Scarpelli
0
4,204
website

School Committee Candidates (map)
Excerpts
2014 Words 2015 Words Website ORM endorsed? Medford Happenings Medford Bytes GKM
Patch
MCM
John Amirault
0
0
Erin DiBenedetto*
0
11,212
Kathy Kreatz
0
0
website
Ann Marie Cugno*
0
9,070
David McKillop Jr.
0
0
Christopher Murphy
0
0
Mea Quinn Mustone
0
87
Robert Skerry*
0
2,390
Paulette Van der Kloot*
0
4,349
Jane Wright
0
0

Mayoral Candidates (map)
Excerpts
2014 Words 2015 Words Website ORM endorsed? Medford Happenings Medford Bytes GKM
Patch
MCM
Stephanie Muccini Burke
3,835
1,246

*=Incumbent

These links go to a dedicated page for each candidate containing a compilation of all their excerpts extracted from the transcribed videos and include timestamped links to the original source video. Similar pages exist for candidates and a handful of important public employees here. Word counts for each candidate are also included, intended as a very rough proxy for who's active. A challenger having few appearances/words in these excerpts doesn't necessarily say much about them. Many successful candidates in the past did not appear in any videos prior to their election.

A great use of these pages is to use your browser's search function to find where candidates mention topics that are important to you, then you can watch the corresponding video in its full context.

One may also wish to upload these pages to ChatGPT then ask for help synthesizing the results more globally. However, be warned it heavily weights the beginning of the file (the most recent excerpts), and will happily fill in missing information with convincing -- but totally ficticious -- misinformation. It's significantly better when asked to compare two things ("rank the candidates on XX"), but in general, treat the results from ChatGPT as a you would something written by a mid-level high school student.

The videos are transcriptions of (nearly) all videos at the YouTube channels listed here, which are predominantly city council and school committee meetings, but also include campaign channels, news sources, and other channels dedicated to local politics, including partisans on both sides (I can only include YouTube channels, but if I'm missing any, please let me know).