[George Scarpelli]: Thanks, John. How are you my friend?
[George Scarpelli]: Sure. Well, I'm George Scarpelli. I'm a father of two amazing kids, John and Gianna. John's a senior at Merrimack in college. finance and my beautiful daughter Gianna is a junior at Bridgewater State College and she's going to school to work with special needs students and I'm married to an amazing amazing woman Dina and we live up in the heights we live on Butler Street and I work for the City of St. Louis Parks and Recreation Department. I'm the assistant director. I've been there for 18 years. Prior to that, I was a school teacher here in Medford for 15 years. I coached girls' softball and girls' soccer and boys' soccer and girls' basketball. And on the side, I fell in love with the solar world and have a solar company, which I have as a passion. So yeah, I've been very busy.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate that. It's been a great ride and I know that when I left Medford I taught for 15 years and I was given an amazing opportunity to work for Mayor Joe Curtatone in the City of Somerville in administration and I took that opportunity and It gave me another opportunity to come back and make sure I gave back to Medford and I think that's one of the reasons why I ran for office as a former teacher. I wanted to make a difference in the school committee. So in 2009 I ran for the school committee and since then I've been an elected official either in the council now for 10 years and before that as a school committee member.
[George Scarpelli]: what what do you can what's the reason what what do you consider the uh... important reasons for you to be uh... running again meanwhile well i think that most important peace john is that you know when you run you really want to get back to the community you feel you have something to offer and uh... that's why we do we do and i think that night i i commend all of all the candidates are running in my is city council is in school kid members because it's a it's not easy position but i will tell you In the last few years, the meeting has been a lot stronger, and it's given me a lot more energy and drive, and that's making sure that our residents in the City of Medford, every single one of them, not the ones that vote for George Scarpelli, but everybody that calls or emails, that they have a voice. That's something we've seen that has been lacking with this council over the last few years, and part of the school committee. I feel like I'm obligated to stand there and fight and make sure that there's a voice for every member of the community.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I think some of the big things, there's a lot of little things that I think that are more important than the big things. really picking up that phone when someone calls when they're in need, or helping someone that's homeless, or reaching out to a family that's in crisis because of immigration or other outside factors that they need someone they can trust. And I think that's important. But, you know, I hang my hat on some very important initiatives that we started a long time ago. For instance, the creation of the full-time method parks and recreation department. I think that's something that we could see our families and residents of Method really taken advantage of, and it's something that was needed for years, and we've done that. So, but, you know, there are so many others that, you know, as a team that we've done, you know, with Council Falco at the time and Councilor Caraviello and Councilor Marks and Councilor Knight that, you know, a few years back we've seen a lot of Unbelievable, you know the the library, you know, Councilor Caraviello really started that and we supported him and Councilor Markswell the Arts Council moving that forward So yeah, there's so much to be done. I mean this previous council started the reclassification of the zoning. I think that's important, right? I think that we're in a crisis right now with our zoning process today that I'm sure everybody's heard about and a little nervous about, but, you know, that's something that needs to be revisited and needs to be redone, and we're here to do that, so.
[George Scarpelli]: First let me say it's it was I'm honored that I received 4,000 votes and that's a lot for primary right but also Realizing that as soon as I woke up Wednesday morning. I had zero votes again and I think that's important for people to understand because November 4th is when it really counts right and Where we are and why I'm feeling so excited about this process this time around is that? people have traditionally run independent on their own and working on their own and asking for the bullet vote means that instead of voting for seven, four, five, that you vote for one person. And that was the old traditional style of voting. And we realized that my colleagues have woken the community up and realize what happens when you run on a slate. And that's what we've seen the last few years. And when you have an elected body that has one vision, one purpose, and one ownership of one word, and that's it, and that's by contract, that whatever is put forth, that they have to work together and vote six to zero on that. And we've seen the negative impacts that you see in a community when you don't have an opportunity to have open discourse, to have an opportunity to agree and disagree. And what I find really exciting is that we have now seven candidates left on the ballot that can agree to disagree. I've talked to every single candidate, and I've met with them, and they're amazing people, and they're hardworking people, they're intelligent people, they're passionate people. not to say that my colleagues aren't, but the one big difference is that the people that are running as independent voices are people that are going to listen follow through with what people are saying and make the best decision for what they think. Their individual thought, their neighbors, their community thinks is the best option for the city of Manfred. Not what a national agenda tells you to. So I think that's what I'm more excited about. And I tell people, I've told people across the board as we started this process, there are seven candidates. And if you appreciate George Scarpelli and you appreciate the work that I've done, I implore that all of you, stepping to that box in November, that you vote for seven independent voice candidates, because I think that's important. We have to go back to the times when you could sit across someone in the rail, look them in the eye, agree to disagree, and move forward. And I think that's a healthy engagement. What we're seeing right now is total divide in our community. You can feel it. You can hear it. You know, you're already hearing it already, the discourse of what this seven group is and who they are. No, I'll be honest with you, all seven candidates, I don't agree in some of the things they believe in and vice versa, but that's okay. That's where we are and that's where we should be.
[George Scarpelli]: I mean... Well, I've been... I'm glad you brought this question up, John, because from the beginning, I was part of the process with the former council where we recodified the zoning rules. Then as we sat together and decided, how do we craft an RFP to find a partner that can help us move to the next level of rezoning? Because the truth of the point is that we need the rezoning. We haven't touched this in many, many years. It needs to be done. And the process is really the number one piece that we had back with the previous council when we started the RFP process. We asked for a company that would partner with us, there's a city council in the city, that would put a comprehensive plan, outreach plan, that would go into the neighborhoods and meet with the neighborhoods that are being zoned, rezoned, and get their input and understand what they want their neighborhood to look like. Unfortunately, we didn't get that. Unfortunately, the first meeting with the new council, we explained this is the process, this is who we're hiring, and I brought it up in the meeting, and I was told that, well, that's not what we decided on, and the director and the city council president at the time decided they would write the RFP the way they did, and this is where we are today. And it's been difficult to watch because if you look at all the votes, I don't support I don't support any of the zoning initiatives as we see today for the fact that it's changing the fabric of our community. You're hurting what makes this city so great. We have great corridors that should be, that we need to rezone, that we need the mixed use, we need the increased density, we need to bring vibrancy back into some of the corridors. But when you talk about encroaching into the neighborhoods, the neighborhoods that made Medford what it is today, why people are moving to Medford, and you want to change those rules to open it up to densification that will then harm everything that built the city for what it is, it's dangerous. And, you know, I look at my colleagues and we've asked to please slow the process down. and I was mocked and disrespected. Yes, you were. I've asked them to have the partners to put together a zoning plan that would be broken down in layman's terms so everybody can read it and understand what it means, because it's very difficult. I've been doing this for many, many years, and I find it very difficult. I'm not lying. I'm not a zoning expert. So I find it very difficult, and I'm in this day-to-day. So it's been very difficult, and when I see my colleagues all of a sudden backpedal, I realize the reasoning is so obvious, and I hope people can see that, that My colleagues decided to support the halt of the rezoning until we have different pieces in place. Blaming themselves for not asking for more money and blaming the mayor that she didn't give them what they wanted. That's not true. No, it's not. This is what they wanted. This is what they got. When I would say that we haven't had enough meetings, our council vice president would respond by saying we've had x amount of meetings twenty thirty meetings just because you call it a meeting doesn't mean it's a meeting if it's not getting to the residents of the city of medford it's not being effective when we see what we're hearing now and i appreciate the mayor for slowing the process down because i think it's needed i think the community development board works very hard and they've overwhelmed i think that uh... trying to push things through so there's something that you could put in an election flyer is wrong. And optimistically, I'm seeing a lot of positive reaction from our neighbors because they're standing up and they're saying, you know what, enough is enough. This is hurting the fabric of our community. This will change Medford forever. If you want to live in Somerville and Cambridge, go live in Somerville and Cambridge. This is Medford. We have pockets that are just like those communities, and we should increase that vibrancy and focus on those areas. But when you're talking about single-family neighborhoods, you're going to really devastate a lot of people, a lot of neighborhoods, and it would really change what Medford is, and that's not why people came to this community.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I'll give you an example, John. I appreciate that you're saying that, but I hate to cut you off, but I'm so fired up about this for the fact that when Council President backpedaled and said that we are now going to go to the neighborhoods and talk to residents, let residents get involved, they had that opportunity. They had that opportunity with Salem Street. When the mayor gave us that opportunity. We had over 200 people at the Roberts School talking about what that neighborhood wanted to see there. And they said they listened. And everything that they put together went off to the Community Development Board. And the Community Development Board looked at all these requests from the neighbors, and they've taken pieces and said yes, and they've taken pieces and said no. And it went to the City Council. And the City Council listened at one evening to all of these residents standing up for their community. and it was going to move forward. As those people left, Councilor Leming turned around and made the motion to bring back one of the most important pieces, the strongest piece of that change, that would destroy the neighborhood of salem street right and the council agreed to move back when everybody left that just gives you an example what you said you're right they had that opportunity so just to say that now because they're getting this fear and it's an election year and now people are looking for wait a second i want people that know that know that want that haven't followed this follow the city council go to youtube in previous meetings understand that this council had that opportunity with the Salem Street families and their neighbors. And they had that opportunity to stand up and listen and say we'll move forward and we'll understand what the neighbors want. And instead of doing that, they turned around And they brought it back to a place where leave the families and the residents of Sound Street and fear of what their neighborhood is going to look like. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I think that people that have been following this know that I was opposed to this from the beginning. And it's funny because I know the other side wants to tell you, see, he doesn't want to help the schools. He doesn't want to help teachers. He doesn't want to help kids. He doesn't want to help families. And that's totally wrong. What I've said from the beginning with this override, was let's slow the process down. Let's put together a team of financial experts that'll guide us in making sure we're making the right decision whether we need an override or not. And if you look back and you watch the process and you see who's in that process, that process consisted of the city council president, school committee members that are all our revolution, the mayor's chief of staff, And no one from the financial department in Method City Hall, no one from the assessors, nobody from the business community, nobody from the banking community, nobody from the education community. It was put out there to say that this is what they needed. And as the process went on, and the override passed, very minimally, by the way.
[George Scarpelli]: The understanding of what the impact meant to people that are vulnerable, our seniors, our veterans, our neighbors that are disabled, and what that means to them. Well, you're hearing it resoundingly now that we have people that are hurting. Our senior citizens are hurting. Our neighbors are hurting. It's not their fault they were blessed 50 years ago to purchase a home in Medford for $50,000, $20,000. It's not their fault that the property value is now, you know, the house is now appraised at a million. And the only way they can live in that home that they built and they created is that they focus on day-to-day cost and how they can survive. not preparing our senior citizens, not preparing our community of what that impact would make. You know, we heard it back then there would be only $40, only $40. I had phone call after phone call, email after email from vulnerable residents of this community that saw $1,800, $2,400, $3,000 increases that needed to be paid now. And we saw that because you see the people moving, you see people having to leave. Not because they want to, because they have to. And that's not fair. No, it isn't. And again, I know that you're hearing dialogue now because you spin the truth to make something happen. So, we didn't want to help the schools. Total opposite. At the time, we had $23 million in free cash. And free cash, again, is our taxpayers' money. That's money that hasn't been used throughout that budget year for some reason, one or the other. So, we had funds. We had $4.5 million we could have put to the school, level-funded everything, and then gone to the process. I only bring this up because Back in 2008-2009, I was working for the City of Somerville, and I worked with Mayor Curt Atoni. And they were investigating to figure out whether they needed an override in the City of Somerville. What he did was... He compiled experts, his team of financial experts in City Hall. Assessor, finance director. He had two bank presidents, a Sloan family and another bank president. He had financial geniuses from Tufts, MIT, Harvard. He also brought in the business community and educated neighbors that work in this field. And they came to a conclusion after meetings, transparent meetings, that everybody knew what was being said, how it was being done. And they figured out that they had to make a few changes. They showed the changes. and they showed how they can bring in some revenue, and they didn't need that override. With that then came Assembly Row, and then with Assembly Row brought a whole new neighborhood, another tax bracket, more new growth, and the city flourished from there. So we didn't see that. And as we're talking about that override and where we stand, I didn't believe in it, not because we didn't need it, But because how we got there.
[George Scarpelli]: I mean, what do you do? It's difficult, because if someone's going to say that, you know, George Scarpelli and the seven independent candidates, they don't want rezoning, they're wrong. You need rezoning. And rezoning is important because of new growth. When you look at corridors like Mystic Ave, when you look at corridors like Medford Square, that's vital space that we can use to bring in new growth to help fund this community.
[George Scarpelli]: When you look at the rezoning, you look at densification, how dangerous can be. When you see the tax bracket that could be increased, let's look at some of the projects that are about to kick off. You're talking about over 400 units on the Fouls Way. You're talking about, oh, maybe two to three, 400 units at the Cappy site. They're fenced around the Gold's Gym site on Mystic Valley Parkway. You're talking about the GE site. There are so many sites. There's so many areas. But the key is this, John. to create revenue, to increase our finances, it has to be done thoughtfully. It's smart growth and development. It's not, you know, affordable housing, densification, and throw it out there. It has to be a process where we're meeting with the school department, you're meeting with the police, the fire department, you're meeting with the DPW, making sure that our infrastructure is strong. These are the key issues that we need to know before moving forward. Right. And it's funny, because part of that is, well, we're going to be asking, you know, two questions that were brought up, and you look in the future, well, we're going to need a new high school. And we do. No one's arguing about that. No one is arguing. And you're hearing the scuttlebutt from the other side saying, well, you don't want these seven, because they don't want a new high school. Not one of us have said that. I will tell you personally, we need to do something about Medford High School.
[George Scarpelli]: Listen, if we're lucky enough for the state to come back and give us, you know, the old percentages, let's do it. Right. But let's look at refurbishing. Yeah. We might have to look at the whole process again, John, for the fact that if we're looking in to bring 2,000 new units in the city, And we're looking at now, we're looking at a huge increase in the school population. We might have to look at making maybe part of the high school, maybe a middle school and a shared high school now. You don't know, but until everything is on the table, until you educate yourselves, educate the community and understand what the impacts are, bring all the people to the table, you don't know what that'll bring. But you look at a site like the Budweiser site, You want to talk about new growth and how we could have really captured a lot of new growth, but at the same time really given the community something great? I looked at that and said about a year and a half ago, why isn't our community development director, why aren't we working with that owner? Why aren't we looking at that land and saying, hey, wouldn't you like to see a Linfield Marketplace there? mix-use would have been great businesses apartments community space recreational space it would have been a great opportunity instead what we have right now We're going to be losing about $500,000 in tax bracket with the MBTA. And then even worse, not even understanding the implications of the increased fees that we're going to have to pay to the MBTA because those buses will be housed in Medford. So, you know, it's been difficult. It's been difficult to watch because I've talked to my former colleagues that are education leaders in Medford and teachers. I've talked to family members that their kids are in the Medford public schools. And if you ask them, not the school committee, not the people that are afraid to say the truth, but if you ask them, have you seen a huge impact with this override money? And the answer is resoundingly no.
[George Scarpelli]: We talk about the $500,000 for sidewalk and hot tub. We haven't seen it. No. One thing I find disturbing is that our community stood up and said, let's listen to our firefighters, because that's the only organization that stood up in strength and did what was right. They didn't sit there and take something. They said, stop. This fire station is an inferior product, and all it is, it will cause Medford harm, financial harm, as early as two to three years once it's built.
[George Scarpelli]: So they supported the city and educated the city says do not support this and we didn't. Right. You know what's sad, John, we haven't talked once about what we're going to do for our firefighters. That Main Street fire station is deplorable.
[George Scarpelli]: It should be condemned.
[George Scarpelli]: I know that our new facilities manager is doing his best. But you look at that override, and if you did it the right way, and you sat at the table with people, and you said, instead of 6.5, we really need 8 million. Let's ask the residents. Would you commit to that extra 1.5? I would guarantee you most people would have gone with that. As a debt exclusion, that money would come back to you after that loan is over. But when you look at the override, It really wasn't needed at the time for the fact of what we had. Because what do we have this year in free cash at the end of the year? Over $25 million again. Now, I said it over and over again. I'm not blaming anybody or accusing anybody that they're doing something funny or illegal. What I've been saying for years is that this is blatant mismanagement of city funds. And I've asked my colleagues on the City Council. I asked them for an audit. And they threw it back at my face and they said, we do an audit. Now the audit that gets done for the city, people don't know, every year our city gets audited. But the audit is very simple. The audit just looks at how many apples you have. How did you spend, did you spend those apples? And that's it. The audit, I'm requesting, and I've reached out to DeZoglio's office to help with the state auditor, and asked for some guidance, and they said, you need the support first of the council, and then the mayor's approval, and they would come in with an audit, and look at the city's method, and you could see, where is the money going, how are we spending it, why didn't we spend it? And I think that's the key. It needs to be done. It's important, George.
[George Scarpelli]: I have to ask it because... John, when this came forth that we would cut our meetings instead of weekly to go bi-weekly... I made a recommendation that we wouldn't do that. I then made the recommendation that if we're only going to work half of the month, we should only get paid for that. Right. Some of the council members said that we can't do that because they've got to pay their rent.
[George Scarpelli]: This isn't about money. To work in a city council, if you're working for money, you're doing it for the wrong reasons. Now, when you look at the situation we are, think about it. You have one day every two weeks. You have a podium that my former colleagues educated me that made sure that I knew that that podium was the people's podium where people could speak. I've seen the most disrespectful, disgusting actions by my council team, the way they treat people at that podium. People can't express themselves freely. People are afraid to come up. Or what they do is you'll have a very, very important initiative. We've had a lot lately. And what happens, it gets pushed off and pushed off. And then all of a sudden at 11 o'clock, 11.30, 12 o'clock at night, it's put in front of the people. John, I'll be honest with you. I said this in the past, that anything after 11 o'clock should be shut down. Some people even mention 10 o'clock. But when you're talking, the other night, 1.30 in the morning I got home. We weren't talking about, you know, we weren't talking about simple issues. We were talking about major, major concerns in our community. So we need to go back to that. And I hope we have four Councilors that are elected that we can look back and change the process back to where it was.
[George Scarpelli]: very important.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, there's a lot. I mean, first, I'll be honest with you. I was one of those city councilors that didn't support the charter. I didn't want the charter. I didn't believe in ward representation. I was totally against it. But then when you started doing your homework and getting more involved in understanding the process, you realize how important that is, especially in government. When you look at a charter to make sure that every quarter represented, and especially as you change, right? We have a lot of new residents in the city of Medford, and they've come from communities where they've always had that representative that lived in their backyard.
[George Scarpelli]: And a lot of new residents don't feel comfortable because they don't know who that person is. They don't know they can reach out to everybody. Right. But more importantly, I realized how it supports the diversity of our community. It really looks at those people that really want to get involved in their neighborhood, that don't have the finances, that don't have the time, that don't have the ability to reach citywide. right and i think that's why slates work that's why the revolution works yeah because when you're talking citywide you're working as a team you're funded you have a lot of money and it's easy for you right yeah but when you look at ward representation you don't have to raise fifteen thousand dollars no you raise a couple thousand dollars you're knocking on people's doors you're talking to neighbors right Now, if you've seen the makeup of our council, that's true. It's been a lot of times it was mostly white men. And that's where it was. As we're moving forward, you want to see that diversity. You want to see more people of color. I think everyone agrees with you. We want people that truly represent our community. And with the charter, my colleagues, I found myself I called it that night, it was bizarro world. I said, I couldn't believe that we had people like Milva McDonald and her team, and that was the Charter Review Committee, who did hundreds of meetings. I'd say over a hundred meetings. I know she laughs because it gets bigger and bigger every time we talk the story, but we've had over a hundred meetings. Milva and her team have gone out and interviewed everybody, the sitting city councilors as well. And they've all supported one major point, and that's ward and precinct representation. That means eight representatives in each ward, and then three at-large members. And that, you realized, that's an exciting new change. We need that. Absolutely. So the council, I remember when Milva came out, and we had representatives from U.S. Boston that were experts in this field, and they shared all their information. I thought this was going to be a great night. And my council colleagues stopped it because they now wanted to go to district representation. And that's wrong. And it was funny because I was getting emails from people that normally don't email me. They seem to think they follow that dialogue because it's easy when you're on one side, they have to villainize you on the other side. So they said, George, I know that we haven't seen eye to eye in years, but maybe we might not align politically, but I'm so disappointed with our members of this council that ran on the mission of eight representations, three at large. And then when they came to that night, they changed it to district. And I found myself as a member, a former member now of the Our Revolution family, sent me my colleagues' breakdown of their mission. And their number one mission, one of their number one missions, last election term, was the charter review and ward precinct representation. And I'm telling you, even today, We need it. People voted for them because of that reason. Melvin McDonald and her team worked her tail off to make sure that we got all the information we needed. The homework was done. It was vetted properly. It was put forth properly. And I know they've made some changes and the mayor had to make some concessions that that my colleagues wanted, that I don't agree with, but you look forward to where we are right now, and I think it's something that people have to realize. Not only just voting the seven independent candidates on November 4th, but also, if it's on the back of the page, wherever it is, find the question on the ballot for charter change, and please support the charter change. It's just as vital. Trust me, believe me, I think it's very important and I think people have to stand up. I'm going to challenge all of my colleagues and future colleagues that we should come out publicly whether you'll support the charter and really spread the word because you have 14 candidates. That's a great platform. What a way to 14 people reaching out to all their neighbors and saying, hey listen, you might not agree in a candidate or two, but one thing we can all agree on is this charter change. It needs to be done. It needs to be done.
[George Scarpelli]: And I think what you see right now is you see our firefighters, you see our police, we see our DPW workers, you see our teachers, you see the most vital members of our community. making sure that they're treated fairly. Our working men and women of our community, our union members, making sure they're taken care of, because those people, if we're taking care of those people, then that group of people are taking care of us every single day, no matter what. They're the first one running in a fire, the first one when someone's pulling a gun, they're the first ones when someone's passed out, they're doing the right thing. They're taking care of our children every day, And I love doing that. Now, it's funny, for fun, I'm a very simple person. I love being home. I love my neighbors. I love my neighborhood. I love my dog, walking my dog.
[George Scarpelli]: I love watching games, you know, watching the Little League game at Carr Park or going, you know, at Gillis Park or going up to the high school and catching a high school game. You know, I miss it since the kids have graduated. I know my daughter Gianna still plays lacrosse at Bridgewater State. I just love doing that because that truly gives you the true feeling of community. You know, you're a Mustang, you're blue and white, and it means a lot.
[George Scarpelli]: And I'll tell you with that, I'll give you a good example. You might, if you're looking at wins and losses for teams, you can criticize any team, but what I love what the football team does, I don't know if people see what they do, but they have implemented a part that I think is invaluable. They go out and perform community service all over this community, whether you're a senior citizen, whether they're helping the hunger, whether they're supporting the Kiwanians, I think that's what community's about and I'm so proud of them and I'm proud about schools and teachers and coaches, so I can go on and on.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, we have a great community.
[George Scarpelli]: We just have to find a way to come together.
[George Scarpelli]: Listen, if that's with or without George Scapelli, we have to find a way to heal and get together, because right now, there are so many questionable initiatives that are out there that are really hurting and dividing our community, and we need to find a way to come together.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll be, you know, a lot of people said, geez, George, you've been a little stagnant. And, you know, unfortunately, a couple of the candidates' nights, I I'm now acting as one of the managers that are overseeing the recreation department at Somerville. Our director has moved on, so I find myself very busy at work, especially in the evening, so I find it very difficult to get out to some of these events, and I appreciate you doing this for me. I want to thank you. And your team, you've been amazing. This is a great platform. And I hope my colleagues really take you up on coming down and sharing their input, because I think it's important. So it's that dialogue that we need. But I will tell you, I'm putting together a fundraiser soon, and we'll start meeting some people. But my phone number, it's public everywhere, 781-858-0240. Anybody can call me. And they do. Okay, and they do. You can ask my wife and kids.
[George Scarpelli]: But in my email, I use my personal email because it's easy to get me, and that's scarpg at comcast.net, or just send me a message on Facebook, and I'll be there. I mean, I listen sometimes. It's not what people want to hear, but a lot of times all our residents want to do is talk to somebody that's listening. Right, yeah, yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Marco and Paul, I appreciate, in the background, doing all the hard work, but I appreciate you doing this. This is important, and I beg everybody, if I can, one last thing is, please come out November 4th. We need everybody to be heard. We need you to look at the seven independent candidates that are not running on a slate, that are working independently with their own voices to bring what each neighborhood needs to see what's best for the city of Medford. So, I thank you for having me, my friend.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll take this again because I love the city of Medford and I want to be there for the residents, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Records, Council President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I see everything's in order. The only thing I don't see is the special line for city councilors.
[George Scarpelli]: That's the back door. Is that against the law? That's against the law. I see everything in order. I move forward for approval, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you very much. And first of all, great opportunity, I'm sure. You're seeing some great events, and I appreciate you taking the opportunity to choose Medford. But the truth of the matter is, there are a bunch of people behind you that are very, very upset. And the complaints that I've gotten from the noise, the conversations of moving speakers, eliminating speakers, It really fell on deaf ears. It sounds like I mean I have video after video people send me after after night saying they stand on their on their porch and you can hear the music and You know, I've talked to our team here at Metro City Hall, and they've said that they've reached out to you and you've making some moves. But to be honest with you, I'm a person that really has to prove it. And as much as we don't want to see you lose any business to Somerville, I think that for one Councilor, I'm a little, little leery to push anything forward when The hours that you have now are really affecting the quality of life and neighbors. And I know you said that quite, you just said, quote unquote, can't make everybody happy. These people you want to make happy, they're your neighbors. So I think that's very important. I think it's very important. So, you know, I'm, I appreciate you wanted to move forward with the business, but I'm going to be very honest with one Councilor until I see the proof. I can't support this because I have talked to the neighbors. I've been there. I've seen the videos. I've watched them multiple, multiple times. And, um, and I think I mean, maybe a year and a year ago I came in, I think I spoke to you and I said something we can do. And I know you said you were trying, but, um, we still haven't seen enough. And to move forward to two o'clock in the morning now, every night, you're asking for every night at two in the morning. That's something that this council really has to look at. I understand the entertainment world. Well, you put in for every night, so I'm reading it. And I know for the entertainment, we know Thursday, Friday, Saturday is very important. But when you talk to a resident and they see this and they're like, hold on, they wanna do this on nights that we have to go to work. And what we have to endure in that neighborhood. And we have just so you know this I'm just telling you know what people approach me about, you know, and you can be, you can be defensive I understand that because it is your business your livelihood, but I just want you to understand this is what I've been hearing as a city council this is what I've been seeing from what they've sent me. What you're hearing is the quality of life is really been an impact. And listen, I've talked to residents said, listen, I understand, but there are some nights we have to, it is a business. It is a business district. It's zoned that way. We have to understand that, you know, even, even the situation with the parking, people taking my parking spot in front of my house. I understand that that's nothing you have control of. Cause I know if you wanted it, you'd want more parking spots too in your location. But unfortunately, um, there are some gives and takes. And for right now, and I know that until the residents behind you come up and say, you know what, it's fine. We've met with them. Have you met with the neighbors? Have you recently met with the neighbors?
[George Scarpelli]: So you have, so that's what I'm saying. So you hear asking for something, but the biggest concerns were that the neighbors that are really affected, I mean, whether they go to sleep at night, whether they have to put sound machines in the house because of the base. I mean, these are things that I'm just sharing what they're saying. So out of full transparency, I have been working with those neighbors. I've listened to them and out of all due respect until I see something different, I can't support this. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Because I just want to dispel some rumors or whatever was said a lot of people saying people leaving your establishment with alcohol that we know that doesn't happen I know that that's not your style, I know that you're very, so I think that we, you know, I know that this. If you could just elaborate a little bit that because I think people might be getting a little more concerned now that hold on one second, they're letting them leave without call. I know that doesn't happen. So if you can just help with that.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't know if my colleagues have any questions. I know 6 to 11 is the time and this is something that's needed and we appreciate your trust in moving here to the City of Medford. extending all these opportunities, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: No, thank you, Council President because I think that I see everything is in order. I know the Inspire Cafe as inspirational as it is important to our community and so many people visit the library just to visit our friends and inspire. So I would, I know they're not here right now, Council President, but I seldom approve anything without the petitioner here, but I would hate to hold anything back, something, somebody who's tied up for any reason, but because I see everything is in order, Mr. President, so I would move forward with this.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know there was one hiccup, and I'm so happy to hear this morning that it was corrected. And I know in my full-time position, I know how important that that position that you hold is for the families in Medford. I think that a lot of times people are running from one area to the other, and probably their only mail sometimes is just that at the concession stand. And to hear that you're having some healthy, healthy choices is very important. So I know that some most ranks now just they've reverted to candy machines and pre-made sandwiches, which is pretty sad, but I appreciate you taking the opportunity and the challenge to work out of our rank and hopefully you'll see us there as well. So I would, I see everything is in order now, Mr. President, I move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I know that we have our leadership team from the police department. I'm trying to find the resolution that
[George Scarpelli]: Can we hear that please if we if that's yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thanks Kevin for bringing this forward because this has been so frustrating. This has been going on so long, and I know that this resident endured some health. And this was approved through KP Law, and then it went through the main office where they didn't know who was doing what, and then it faded away. And I know that there's someone in your office that works her tail off, that tried everything she could to make sure this resident was taken care of. But I appreciate bringing this forward and finally getting it resolved. This is a long time coming. So again, thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Knuckle Bones is a for-profit recreation program that comes out and provides games and activities for residents. So. Amazing.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Council president is the petitioner here this evening. Are they on, on zoom?
[George Scarpelli]: Can we table until later in the meeting if they show up, Council President?
[George Scarpelli]: I know I've spoken with the director and, and I know that they're typical metric rumors that, what is it we only have like 12 people registered to vote, and that was dispelled. So, I think that the office did a very good job for people that didn't complete their census. Something came postcard came in the mail, and that would remind everybody to please send that in so they can be added to the role again so I think it's very simple. It's nothing that's groundbreaking but I know that we talked I want to make sure that if people did get that postcard. that they fill that in and send that in as soon as possible. So to avoid any issues so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you Mr. President again I appreciate the presentation but I'm just a little confused we're not are we moving to this for this project to move move forward tonight or or is this just the presentation I think it's important that I'm hearing that the construction team will be sending out notices but one thing we've heard you know pretty resoundingly throughout the community is anytime we're doing something our community is really not understanding and knowing the issues and concerns so when it comes time to it it's too late because they haven't been involved so I would if that's the case, I'd like to slow things down again. We're talking about, um, 1st of August meeting in the summer. Not too many people are paying attention. And then, uh, and then we don't meet again until September. So I think that it's important that that we look at any initiative that we're putting forth that we slow things down and present it to the residents, especially in that neighborhood, that they're informed properly so they can ask the proper questions that usually arise after construction work is being done and residents are then left in limbo without any recourse. So I would make that as a motion, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Vice President. Again, it's To set the presentation of my share of this, my input at least, I had a great phone call with a good friend of mine before I came into the building and he wanted to express as a Palestinian resident of Medford, we had a great discussion and we realized sometimes it's easier to have one side against another side, because that makes it the battle, right? It makes it a fight. And the idea of why George Scarpelli feels the way he is, many different levels. Councilman Villes brought up some great points that we see eye to eye on, whether you want to believe it or not. We also look at different questions that he brings upon to this evening that I don't disagree with him at all. But I think what's important for this council is to remember when you take your oath, you have to make your decisions for what's best in this community and above and beyond what your personal feelings are. And I think that from the beginning I've talked about the reason why Councilor Scarpelli has been against this ordinance is because of the vagueness, the questions of its legalities, or what the impact will play for our community. And if I can, I'm going to read what the hard work that the city, the city administration has been putting together. And this is a letter that was sent out to the council. And it says dear President Bears and city council, I reviewed the divestment ordinance in the current red line version, which was made available on Friday, August 1st. While there has not been sufficient time to conduct a full review, we would like to share with you the following initial comments, which are in addition to our below email of the July 15th. In summary, in the ordinance current form, there are significant legal and policy issues with compliance with state law, treasury's fiduciary responsibilities and significant implications that warrant further and diligent vetting with respect to impacts the city's municipal finances and a closed consultation with financial advisors of bond council and our legal counsel in dor so these are the the professionals in our field of of what we do uh fiduciary here in this community and it's very important that we understand there are some points that need to be cleared before we can move forward with any sort of ordinance at this level and they make some key points one prudent investment act is to our knowledge there is no concrete information to whether the city has adopted the prudent investment act and legal recommends that this be confirmed given the language in the proposed ordinance and it would be premature to consider an ordinance prior to confirming Two significant concerns with the city's financial advisor. We request initial feedback from the city's financial advisor, Hilltop Securities. On the original version, the ordinance that was presented to the council and they have advised us to the following. KPLR is in agreement with the initial legal issues raised by Hilltop Securities. Further reviews is necessary given the financial advisor's initial feedback. On two, I won't bore you with the ordinances and how they must comply with different laws and the concerns that the city has. But three, the bond rating call. The call has just confirmed a mandatory bond rating call this month, which standard and pours for the school HVAC project. The bond rating agencies always ask if there has been any change to the city's ordinance policies, et cetera, as it relates to financial matters. As such, This is a poor time to have such a dramatic change in policy being considered for adoption relative to municipal finance in light of comments raised by Hilltop. defined financial instruments. The use of the word financial instruments as it presented is vague. It will need to be defined in consultation with the treasurer, financial director, legal counsel, bond counsel to ensure that this does not conflict with the city's legal and financial documents. Furthermore, I question whether the term financial instruments will be used to restrict the contracts that the city enters into with vendors. there would be a significant implication there as well. That should be the case. All the more reasons that the term should be defined after further diligent review by all necessary stakeholders. Five, timeline on this ordinance and adoption. It is my understanding that the city bond adopted divestment ordinance, not as broad as this one, as method is proposed to be broadest of the few that are out there. And they did so in 2021 with a 2025 implementation date. They allowed it four years to be able to be implemented this process. The current proposal ordinance in Medford seeks this adoption implementation less than five months. It is my understanding that the other communities had reasoned and well-vetted processes to adopt the narrower ordinances that is currently proposed given the significant legal and financial consideration and adoptions continues to feel rushed in Medford. Six, the full legal review. Given the significant changes currently proposed, legal, we need to conduct a full review for legalities and compliance with state law, including, but not limited to, general laws, section 44, 55B, as also raised the city's financial advisor, given the statutory requirements of the treasury relative the investments pursuant to statutory requirements. Finally, based on meetings held on Friday between Commissioner of the Trust Fund Chairwoman Judy Beatrice, Council President Bears, and Treasurer-Collector Judy Johnson that our Chief of Staff listened in on, Chair Beatrice requested the following language be added, and I'm sure she'll share that later, so I won't repeat it now, and that is signed sincerely our Chief of Staff. So again, We've had a very difficult time in Medford in the last year, where a lot of process and policies have been implemented without true vetting, without the true input of our community. And this is just another factor. We have to remember, as elected officials, when we were sworn in, it's our fiduciary responsibilities to make sure that we are upholding what's best for the city of Medford. and looking at these documents, looking at the response from our city administration and having questions legally from the legal team, our financial team and our bond council, I think it's enough that we should really slow things down. and really try to vet this properly, because I know it's in theory. I don't disagree with you, Council President. I understand where you're going with this, but I also think, again, we're seeing what's happening with zoning. We're seeing what's happening with our charter review. We witnessed what happened with the override process. It seems like everything is rushed. And I think this is enough information that this council takes a second and realize that this is our responsibility not to rush into these with these factors that we know. So thank you, Mr. President, Madam Vice President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So I know my fellow Councilors mentioned how I love doing this now, so I'll share another one. This was from the Mayor. Today, hello President Bears of Medford City Council. I want to provide an update on a few things zoning related. First, in my opinion, the meeting between President Baez and I yesterday went well. It was a good start to work we all want to see accomplished. We will be working through the Ennis extension over the next few weeks in hopes to have an agreement so we can continue the work sometime after Labor Day. This will allow the city staff, community, CDB board a few weeks to breathe, catch and decompress from this stressful process. Considering there is not an active contract with Ennis, and my hope is that we create a new timeline for Ennis, and considering the fact that we have no, we have two members of the CD board whose terms expired on June 30, 2025, and are not seeking reappointment, I respectfully ask that you do not refer to the corridors out this evening, which you did. If I understood correctly, President Bears would like the CD board direction on residential discussions on 8-6 as well as to have them vote to extend the hearing. I'm okay with that approach. I just respectfully ask that your next meeting on September 9th to refer the residential and ADU discussions back to the City Council Committee for further study. We discussed and I hope you all agree that we should take the corridors first one at a time after the move on to residential parking. We also discussed my request to take CD board's final recommendation on Salem Street corridor. If so, I agree not to revisit Mr. Gav now, but to wait until after this included in a poll we discussed doing in the fall. If the poll shows we should revisit it, then we will. I appreciate your consideration. If you want to discuss this anytime, let me know. If we do this thoughtfully, without rushing, and with good communication at the forefront, I truly feel we'll accomplish the rezoning process. I just wanted to share that. And then I wanted to just share something that I know Councilor Bears said that, you know, the process in this whole zoning, I revert back to one of the first meetings that I mentioned, that part of the RFP that the former council wrote was a really in-depth process that we asked for the RFP to be written for the consultants to really put together a comprehensive plan that goes into the community to help and include those residents so they feel like they're part of the process. And what we're seeing with this council is that we're rushing through the process. And you know what? We didn't listen at Salem Street. You didn't listen to other corridors of this community. You didn't listen to the residents. But what happened was you went into the area and you started talking about single family homes. And then all of a sudden Medford woke up. Medford woke up to the point that we see yellow and black signs all over the city because they're upset about this administration, this team, this leadership team, and the lack of communication. President Villes went to the public the other day without this council knowing anything about it, presented a plan blaming whatever the path was, and I'm not a very big fan, we all know that, of this administration. But this is, make it clear, this is not this administration's fault. What we're seeing right now, the other day, it was political backpedaling. All we missed there was a little Michael Jackson, you guys doing backpedal. Because what we see is, we're getting nervous now. Because all of a sudden the residents are getting in your ears. It's coming to re-election time. And we're hearing. that, geez, you know what? We didn't listen to the override, but it passed, but it's hurting people. We didn't listen. The charter review, we have councilors members sitting here right here saying, we're not gonna support it, but we're not gonna go against it. But we've moved it through, and people are upset about it. Now it comes to the zoning. It's starting to affect, this process is now affecting what the fabric of this community is all about. And now people are getting nervous behind the rail. So let it be said, this is political backpedaling at its best. To say that we're doing this because the mayor didn't give you the tools, you didn't want the tools. You didn't want the tools. For months, we've talked and heard this council chair talk over and over again how we've had many, many community meetings when you didn't. But when you did have that one community meeting, because it was forced, and 220 people showed up at the Roberts Elementary School. 200 people showed up, excuse me. And they presented a plan to share what they felt were issues. And then it went to the Community Development Board, correct? And the Community Development Board listened to them. They didn't agree to everything they wanted, but they listened. So what the residents of Salem Street did is they came to this meeting one night. And at that meeting, they expressed their concerns. They expressed what the Community Development Board listened. And then they presented the changes the Community Development Board requested. And they felt confident. They felt, finally, someone listened. And we don't like everything, but at least we were part of the problem, we were part of the solution, and we were part of zoning our method. And they walked out of this room. And then roughly around this time, one of the Councilors decided to stand up and say, I want to eliminate what was just presented and go back to the original plan. And what happened then was this council voted 6-0 in favor of that Councilor to look at the residents that finally had a voice, that finally had a voice, and you just turned around and spit in their face and threw it away. So now here we are months later, looking at the same situation. But this time, the largest voting block in this community is upset. The largest voting block is standing up and saying, you're not listening to these residents. You're not listening to us. This city council isn't listening. So now we're going to put this plan in place, ask for more money. We're going to backpedal. We're going to say we need more resources. But all this is, say what it is. Once you get elected again, you're going to go back to doing whatever you want to do because your people voted for you to make this happen. Not for the whole community, not for what's best for the 60,000, but what's best for the 7,500 that voted for you. So if I sat idly by and just let this go through, then I would be void of my job responsibility as city councilor to enlighten everybody to see exactly what this is. This is exactly political backpedaling. Because you had that opportunity to prove to the city. When Salem Street came here, and they met with the Community Development Board, and they had serious concerns, and the Community Development Board, who were the professionals here, said, you know what, let's do that. And you listen to, look, late at night again, because no one's listening now, it's only a few people. But when everybody was gone, when everybody was gone, the voice came out to revert back. People went to bed that night thinking that this city council listened and you didn't. So this process, this dog and pony show that I watched the other day, all this is, is just the delay to get reelected and then go through again because you've already proven you're not listening to the residents of this community. You're simply not listening. And it's funny, God forbid anybody speaks against you behind the reel, what do they make? Things were delayed because a Councilor made a motion to table it. That's my right. That's the right, because these residents, the residents you're not listening to, they have to call somebody. And they have to want to make it so that people are listening to them. So we don't know what November brings. I might not be here. You might not be here. But what you should learn from this is that listen to your constituents, not the constituents that just voted you, but the people that live in this community, because you're not listening. So we could say whatever we want, we can play back any tape we want, but I brought this up from the first meeting when I said, We need a more comprehensive plan. And the answer to me that day was, that was with the last council. This council, along with the community development board director, put the RFP together that gave us what we had, and that's trash. And from what I read from the mayor, you better buckle up, because she's not going to bend. Because you know what? Unless this council, and I'll make the motion right now, that I make a motion that this council reverts back and opens up the Salem Street process again. Because if you truly want to be true to your words and want the process to work correctly and why we want to move forward in the right, in this path, whatever we're calling it, then let's make the motion and support it to revisit Salem Street and bring back what they asked for and what the Community Development Board supported. Let's do that. Let's show them just a sliver that we are listening. And maybe we could salvage this. Because right now, there's no faith in this. There's no faith in our community development leader, Alicia Hunt, and there's no faith in this council. Maybe you have people who are whispering in your ear that that's all not true, but guess what? It's true. So thank you and have a good night.
[George Scarpelli]: Is anybody from the development board, the development team on Zoom? Everybody must be in bed, right?
[George Scarpelli]: So my question is simple. When we look at where we are right now, it's easy to say 20 years, 30 years of, I don't disagree with you. But it's also easy to say that if we don't do anything, then we're not doing what we're supposed to. They can both be wrong. And that's where we are right now. They're both wrong. Now, the override was an example that I bring up because, again, no matter how people want to frame how Councilor Scarpelli felt about the override, I never said I was against it. I never said I was for it. What I said was, again, Let's slow the process down and do this right. Let's get the community involved. Let's make sure we bring the team involved that can help us make the decision. And yes, the community spoke. A very close, close vote. And then you move forward to the next big issue, which is the charter. Same situation. People just aren't listening. You have this council saying over and over again that the mayor didn't do this. Well, what team met with the mayor's representative that she speaks with every single day about zoning? Who is it? Who do we meet with every single day when we brought issues forward? The director, Alicia Hunt that we met every single day here. So somebody's void. There's a problem here. So if the director of the department that's supposed to inform the mayor, that's a go between this council, didn't get the information, because that's exactly what we said. That's exactly what we're saying. You're saying the mayor didn't do this, the mayor didn't do that. Well, there's a disconnect. And the disconnect is this. Even though you've identified it, there were issues. There were serious issues about this process. You've all said it, today you've all said it. But you still pushed it forward for what end? To what end? To say we did something? Well, this is where we are right now. We just paid a lot of money to a consultant that really didn't get us anywhere. No matter what you think, because now the community is really divided because there's no faith here. And I'm going to go back to the original motion that no one's responded to. Don't second it again, but let's do it publicly. I ask for a motion that this council goes back to the Salem Street Corridor. Show the good faith that this isn't a dog and pony show, this isn't a political show, that this isn't backpedaling. Let's go revisit again. Because until we have a meeting and understand that 11 out of 12, I disagree with you. I disagree. Well, that's why I was asking for someone from the development board to be here. Because that evening, that evening, one councilor asked to revert back to the original plan. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. So this is where the laxity, this is the problem. It's a lack of information. It's a lack of sharing the knowledge that you think you have and you think everybody else has. But the bottom line is the community doesn't know what's going on because we're not telling them. That's why we are where we are right now. Whether it's the charter, whether it's the override, or now whether it's the zoning. So we can all be angry, but you know what? The bottom line is this. Listen to the constituents, because you know what? I might not be here next year. Zach, you might not be here next year, but someone's going to be back. And all you could do is listen to the people, not to say not to do anything. I'm not saying, there was a comment that was said that, well, we want to say things or do things so we don't get things done. That's wrong. As a matter of fact, this council's voted many times with your initiatives to move things along, even though I didn't agree with them. Not lately, because you could see the relationship we have here. It's disjointed, dysfunctional. We're putting things out. We're making announcements that this council knows nothing about. So I'll make a motion for the September meeting that we ask the Community Development Board members to come up and explain the Salem Street corridor and what happened there. Because myself included, the residents of Salem Street, Everybody's under the assumption that all the changes that the Community Development Board put forth in support of the Salem Street residents were denied and it went back to the original plan of hurting that neighborhood. So again, maybe you're right. Or maybe I'm right. Both sides doesn't win here. Because you're still not looking at the big picture. No matter what you think you've done for public meetings and this, that, and the other thing, understand something. Put a feather in your cap and say, yeah, you had 30 public meetings. OK, that was good. And you reached the demographic. But you didn't reach everybody. And that's the issue. And this council voted no on a lot of that stuff. So this council voted that I brought that forward, Zach. We brought it forward. And my relationship with the mayor wasn't very good. And all of a sudden, everybody's seeing the light now, but the bottom line is this, where she is right now, she's right. Because the residents have spoken. I don't know what the residents you're talking to, but the residents I'm talking to, a lot of them usually don't talk to George Scarpelli. But a lot of them are coming up to me and asking me, how do we make these changes? Well, you know what? When you see people that are running for office, that are running for office, it kind of wakes you up and says, well, that's a mix of a lot of different people that are going after one common denominator. They want to run for office because they want to, they're going to listen to people guys. They're going to listen to everybody. That's what they're running on. All 10 people.
[George Scarpelli]: That's not what I'm saying.
[George Scarpelli]: Whatever was made.
[George Scarpelli]: For the communication, if you can, because this is what I'm saying. We need to know that the communication that's going out there, that it's presented correctly. right? So if we can ask the Community Development Board to restructure what those changes were, so those statements are false, so we can move forward. That's all. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: First, Daniel, thank you for being up this late. And again, in this hour, I made any comment to call out or blame the director. That's not my intent. My intent was to ask these questions where only people that were directly involved. Was this going fast, in your opinion? I mean, everybody's saying it, but was this going too fast, in your opinion?
[George Scarpelli]: And if I could stop you there, Danielle, I want to apologize because you know what, I shouldn't even ask you any questions. I think that we made a motion that maybe we should all sit together and when we're all lucid, I think that We have had a long, it's almost one o'clock in the morning, so I apologize. I shouldn't have even asked you any questions and I'm gonna leave it at that. I'd like to, I know we made a motion to maybe meet with the team again and try to understand so we can get a path to move forward so that there isn't contention with the mayor's office and we do find a way to keep this going, but also looking at the issues and concerns that we brought up and the confusion that is out there that's causing the yanks. So again, I'm going to reframe for any more questions and thank you for being up this late. I apologize.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I thank a fellow clerk that also was instrumental in getting this, putting this resolution forward. When you hear passing of members of our community and when they get to a certain age, you realize that you wish they lived a good life and they're moving on. But when you heard that Mr. Hilliard passed, it hit you right in the gut. I've known him as a dad and as a resident, and everybody knew him as a giving musician, and everybody talks about his trumpet playing and the impact he's left in the music community. But more importantly, it's what he left back as a husband and a dad. Very close to my children's age, and Owen and Duncan, and it's something that We want to thank Brian for his commitment and love of Medford and his commitment to his family, his wife, Stacey. This is something that we've said it often when we lose some community members, but Brian Hillard's passing will definitely be forever missed. So I send the deepest condolences to Owen, Duncan, and Stacey. We, if we ever, if they ever need anything, we should be there for them. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Tufts University seems to be a lightning rod, and it was funny, for one resident that called and said, George, they're building a monstrosity. I tend to agree with them, but this is for recognition for a team of professionals that, as for one Councilor and one school kid member for many, many years, whether it be Barbara or Rocco and his team that have always been there, whether they were going to get their butts kicked for an issue that Tufts didn't follow through with or something we think that they should have done more. And I just wanted to send congratulations for their hard work. And again, thank them for always picking up the phone and at least giving us the information we need so we can serve our constituents better. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: on some of these issues. And if we can at the end, there'll be public participation. They still be allowed to speak.
[George Scarpelli]: So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: For our professional at the, to give us a brief synopsis, I know that we've been working on this.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. So I see everything in order. I think one of the biggest questions that was brought up maybe by one neighbor is that with the cars there, as you're doing the body work, that the overflow would then go on the streets and the side streets and affect neighborhood parking. So, I mean, I would, this business has never had an issue, Mr. President. I don't know if we can add just a 30 day, 60 day, 90 day review, just to make sure that there's not overflow. I don't see any other issue here, so.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, we move to suspend the rules to take a public participation.
[George Scarpelli]: I yield to you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: you know, if that answer isn't efficient or it doesn't, then I'll gladly reach out to you tomorrow. I'll call the city solicitor myself and see if there's a way we can help, so.
[George Scarpelli]: If not, most of all of our employees that work for the city and our active custodians are all members of the union. And I think having organized labor, you can see what's happening across the country right now and making sure that our community is supported through labor and making sure that initiatives that come up, it's for the benefit of our community. And that's why we support our union. So I find this very disturbing. So I think that this is, You know, everything talks about cost cutting, but having union employees and having our employees represented and protected, I think, speaks volumes. So, for one, Councilor, if there's something I can do, I will definitely reach out and, you know, see what we can do to support your organization in moving forward. If I gather, I know that we've been reaching out to see even with to this non-union company to be hired, they're not even coming, getting back to you.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, and again, that's what happens now. There's a greedy person at the top. He's benefiting from the people that are getting their butts kicked every day doing the work. And I think that's why unions balance that situation. So thank you, Mr. President, but I look forward to working with you to make sure that it's rectified. Thanks.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I think we've exhausted so many avenues, and I know that our health department has worked on this, but I think we need to hold a community meeting because it wasn't just the neighborhood from Walter Glenwood reached out because they feel like they haven't been supported, but as that happened, I received phone calls from every other corner of the city of Medford, and I think that we owe it to our residents that we hold a community meeting to really share the concerns and issues that is now turned in to a pretty substantial crisis in the city. And that's the rat infestation. So I would appreciate the council to allow me to make the motion that we call for a community meeting with the health department and the pest company and the city administration to really get a hold of these concerns and issues. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry. I know that Councils brought up the same issues over and over again. So I haven't done this recently since this, the messages I've received the residents, but I would call for a meeting with all parties involved. I think we have to now try to move to the next level if we can, Council President.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry. I know you do so much work. I know I brought this up in the past and your comment was that community preservation, the, I won't bring up what that location was, but you said it was part of the community and it was historical. So, but again, I think that Ms. Fiora brings up a good point. that as we move forward, I think that, meaning that it's an emergency, and I feel that this is, as a person who supported the Community Preservation Act and understanding that saving these locations are very important, especially in the city of Medford, which is the key, I think that legally If it starts getting into a slippery slope, I think that as we move forward, I just let you know that I'll be reaching out more in depth because I think that Mr. Fiora brings up a good point. If today is one thing, it could be another location with another home and a person can buy a historical home and say, well, I can't afford the windows, let me apply to the CPA and just assume you're gonna pay for the windows. And I know that that's not the intent. So again, I think that that's something that you've been working, you have your due diligence and you're doing your due diligence with that. And I appreciate that. share that with you. So I think the component was the community piece. So yes, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So it's not some thorough. It wasn't so the public knows not taken out of thin air. You didn't just make something arbitrarily. It's in the bylaws and discussion aligns with that. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: First, thank you, Councilor Kalani, for all your hard work. I think this is important. I think that, again, it keeps coming back and I don't see, is the, would this committee be in place for private trees in people's neighborhoods? Okay, so that was a question I had from one resident.
[George Scarpelli]: And I think we've seen, you know, with the limitations of forestry department, having a committee to assist, and especially Medford's so passionate about the tree canopy, I think it's important that this is a well-driven initiative. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I know that we'll probably get to it, but it just I think that part of the charter review. We also mentioned that looking into having residents. I think we have multitude of residents that are passionate. So I hope it would recommend that this would be method residents only as part of this commission. So again, I champion this as well. So I appreciate your input. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I appreciate the reading and joining me in this remembrance. Mr. Caraviello, again, when we talk about legacies here in Medford and what families have done to build Medford to the city that we all love. And Mr. Caraviello was one of those founders. And you could see that in the man he raised in our former city council, President Richard Caraviello. And if you know Richard, if you know Rick, you know what type of work ethic he has. And even as a retired city councilor, how hard he works for the residents of Medford to this day. And every time we talked, Rick would talk about the work ethic instilled in him by his dad. And you see that throughout his family. And most importantly, you really see the true dedication of family love and passion and really someone that we know that Mr. Caraviello fought very hard. He spent many years in assisted living, and it was very difficult at the end, but he's in a better place today, and we send the Caraviello family our condolences. So thank you for allowing this motion to be put forth, Mr. President. Thank you. Vice President Collins.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, Karen's a former colleague of mine when I was when I was teaching at the McGlynn, she was an amazing individual, I think that what you realize right away is the importance of a school nurse. I think people forget nurses in general are so important. And I think that, you know, I've seen it firsthand where nurses meant more than the doctors in our health issues that we've had in our family. So we saw firsthand Karen's compassion and her ability to calm so many youngsters down with so many different health issues, and she was just an amazing person. I will tell you the scariest day of my life is when I ran downstairs to her office because I thought I was having a stroke, and my lip was drooling, and I said, Karen, I think I'm having a stroke. She slapped me in the top of the head and told me to leave. She thought I was joking. Stop being a joker, George. And thank God it was Bell's palsy. I had a Bell's palsy attack, but Karen was the person you went to. made you feel comfortable, and she did so much. And I know that she was a nurse for a long time in different facilities, but she decided to become a school nurse to be closer to her family. And now that she'll be a grandma soon, I know she'll have plenty of time to take care of that amazing grandchild. So wishing her much luck and happiness in retirement. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I've seen all the documentation seems to be in order with all the departments. Everybody has seemed to line up. It looks like it just is a simple transfer, just out of name. It's still the same owners, but if you can just explain a little bit more in depth.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, Mr. President, I see everything in order. I yield to my colleagues for any questions they have.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I see everything is in order. Move to approve.
[George Scarpelli]: This breaks my heart to see Rob is leaving us. I know that they've been a long standing company that has done so much for our community. So it's sad to see them go, but I also noticed that the McGovern group is pretty well known and pretty respected as well. So again, I see everything in order, Mr. President. All the documents are, everything is, All the I's are dotted, T's are crossed, so I yell to my colleagues if they have any questions before moving approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I say everything's in order. I know that we've have been there are neighboring restaurants that we've now extended their evenings to, uh, different times. So to be consistent, I would be in favor of what your recommendations would be. I think that if I can, Mr. President, the only amendment I would make is that we do, at least for the 1st 30 days and 60 days, we get a response back to as as I know that you're very close to some neighbors and having that early morning delivery. I would just wanna make sure that it's not affecting the neighborhood. So I would move to that when we get there, Mr. President, but I would put it on a 30 and 60 day review just to make sure that we're not affecting the residents in that neighborhood. But other than that, again, we see everything in order. So I yield to the podium.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I'm just the most important person.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh Kathy.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Today, Madam Chief of Staff, was $22 million in free cash? Is that $20 million? $20 million, yes. And then we're asking for eight to be distributed?
[George Scarpelli]: So we'll use the $12 million. So that falls in line to keep our bond rating where it needs to be and enough free cash in case of any emergency that's needed, right?
[George Scarpelli]: We're asking for a regular washing machines for the stations, correct? It's not, it's not for the turnout gear. I think you're confusing us chief.
[George Scarpelli]: to the constituents that spoke or anybody else that's here, your time is respected. So if any time you come to that podium, the time isn't wasted. We understand there's other things on the agenda, but what you say is just as important as anybody else here. So whether we have to say it 30 times or under times, that's your podium. So feel free to do that. And I think that the question keeps coming about because of the confusion, Mr. President, that we had. And I don't want to make this any longer than it has to be. But if we can ask the chief of staff, really, for the clarity with what happened during the budget meeting. Just so you know, the mayor did speak, but before the mayor, Tim McGibbon mentioned that the DPW directed mentioned that we are not looking at a specific identified sidewalk and road repair team. What we're doing is we're spreading that that money from the override to 20% for different departments to maintain the street services. So I think the confusion comes in if we can have a report that the override in that question said $500,000 for street repair and sidewalk. I think the mayor made mention of it that evening as well, that we were creating a team, we were training them, making sure they have the right equipment. And that's what people thought we were doing. We thought we were having a separate sidewalk and pothole crew. So I think that's where the confusion comes in. So if my colleague is offended, I think that might clarify some issues if we can have a report maybe at our next meeting in a few weeks, just to understand where that is. Because that's why it keeps coming back up. I think people are confused that you know, myself included. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: like I thank you just very simple just for the next meeting if we could just get a breakdown with I know the spreader with the spreader was was purchased that we were training we're hiring three new people they were that's what the that's what the impression that a lot of people had so if we could just get a breakdown that we have that crew in the next meeting when that crew will start when they'll be trained and have we use that spreader to make to do that thank you
[George Scarpelli]: I think that this goes hands in hands with the Chief of Staff. I think that one question that I had related to free cash, but Then with the transfer, I know that last year we used excess funds from 2025 budget. We replenished free cash, I believe it was $9 million. Are we using any monies to replenish to go back into free cash this time around?
[George Scarpelli]: And just a follow-up with that. I know my colleagues like to say that using free cash for operating costs is a no-go, and we understand that. It's true that free cash comes from unfilled positions as well, correct? That comes from operation costs as well. So I think that's where another time that people get really confused when some councils start banging their head and start saying that you can't use operating costs to pay free cash to pay operating costs. But for that one time at the time, the objective was since we're putting free cash from unfunded salaries or unfilled positions that that was that's being used I think that was that's a clarifying point not nothing to answer but that's just a clarifying point that as we see now and you're looking at different salary pieces being being shifted um you could see when that happens and I appreciate the answer that we won't know the 25 until some time but at least we know that that we because I know that people get nervous even at $12 million, you know where I stand with that. I think that's plenty, especially with those two factors, which is the bond rating. But I also want to make sure that if there is some more free cash coming to fill that need, that we can be able to spend it on capital needs as well. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam Chair. Thank you, Council President, for bringing this forward. I think that anytime we talk about our residents that feel that there's fear and unjust and any feeling of not being supported, I think it's important, especially when we talk about our transgender community. I've had many conversations with my transgender friends and understanding the fears that they they fail every day and I think that bringing any resolution through that we can support as a council to make our residents feel that this council can support their initiatives and making sure that they feel safe I think is important. So I would concur with my colleagues and move forward in your support. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If we could sever if we can. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I appreciate that. I haven't read that. I know when you put this forth and I have a chance to read it through, I thought it was very important. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Did the Chief of Staff leave? Because I wanted to get some information. Is she on Zoom? Because I appreciate Councilor Villes. I know we talked today. I think that When we move forward with an ordinance, I made sure that I've talked to both our city solicitor. I've spoken with the director of retirement, Judy Johnson, who's not here. She's at a conference. Who's our city treasurer. I did reach out to the mayor's office. I think that to put an ordinance through, I think we have to be careful to make sure that we're making sure that we're doing what's right for our community. in the sense where we've done our due diligence and sitting at the table and crafting an ordinance that everybody feels comfortable about. And I understand where you're coming from. I think we talked about that today, but I think that as not having a sit down yet with the retirement board and the retirement director. I know they're having a conversation with him. Although it said that we want to stay away from the pension, the comments that he used was that it'll definitely, no matter what we put in, the pension will definitely be affected indirectly with what we're asking the treasurer to do. And the treasurer, at another point, is cannot affect what's happening in the retirement section, so in the pension section. So there's some strife there that when I talked to the city solicitor that I know KP Law has mentioned that there was some redline changes to your first request for their input. I haven't heard or seen anything to understand that, neither has any other department. I also, the chairperson from the trust fund, our trust fund here in Medford, they haven't been part of any conversation. And that too plays a big deal in what we're doing here. And this resolution or this ordinance will definitely affect their situation. So I think we have so many issues. I think it would be prudent that we would just take a step back call for a committee of the whole meeting with everybody involved and then put forth a plan that will work if so sees fit. I think that right now, I know that'll be important to see what the city side says with the administration and what we can do to craft that. But I don't think as a council, I know you've done a lot of work, but I haven't been involved in a true discussion of what this is to be. Honestly, I didn't realize we had a gentleman come up today and said, I'm here to stand with Palestine. Now, geez, I didn't really understand that this was a Palestinian-Israel issue until we're setting up tents outside. So I think that we understand But this has now turned into something bigger than it is and understanding it more in depth will help at least this Councilor who speaks for many different people that reached out to me that are a little confused about this ordinance and how it truly will affect us. I know your intent and your intent is well adjusted, I'm sure it is, but I do think we haven't done a due diligence to even move forward with any sort of a vote because Again, just like we've talked about in other situations that we've talked about. I don't think we've put all the stakeholders in a room so we can discuss and understand the consequences, or even if we have the bandwidth to ask our city treasurer to look at this and see if they can even manage this process. It might be something that we look at, you know, bringing in an outside party that can look at this process where we're asking to pick that we can. You know, bring different, um, entities out of our, um. Uh you know our investments and say we can we do this? Can we do that? So I think it will be important to see what the city says. Councilor Bears a. I know we talked early today, but I think it's important that for this Councilor for the questions I received. I think it's important that we slow this down. We have a meeting is more structured with more understanding what's being asked. So I appreciate it, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I know people have been standing here all evening, but I think that, I know that you want to get that clock started, President Villes, but I think we need to move, we need to move slower. So I'm going to invoke my right for, chapter uh mass general law chapter 43 section 22 to delay any further discussions for uh till our next meeting i think it's important that um after listening to the chief of staff talking to the the um the um parties involved that might have contradicted what you just said. So I'd rather not move forward until we have our questions answered before we listen to anybody and waste anybody else's time this evening. So I invoke that right of section 22 and end all debate.
[George Scarpelli]: Um first of all, the the situation with Marcelo Gomez Silver, I think that for me personally, it it it hits me It reminds me of all of my boys that I've coached in Somerville and a lot of those young men and young ladies that were part of the DACA process and were in process to be legalized really disappeared. And I think that's what hit me, the fact that it's something that has to stop when it comes to members of our community that don't deserve it. And that's what I think is important. And I appreciate Councilor Zaho bringing this forward, but I know I talked to the Chief when he was here, and I know that the leadership team was here the other day, and I did have a brief conversation with Captain Covino, or Acting Chief Covino, and he expressed how difficult that is, and having, I mean, I think it's It's all meant for the right reasons, but I think it's very difficult, as he put it, that a lot of times they're not mandated to report to the city of Mentored either. So to get a complete report to the city council, especially weekly, it's gonna be, I mean, if it's just for what they know, I can understand that, but I don't think we're gonna get a true understanding of what's really happening with ICE involvement in the community, just for the fact that they don't know a lot of times. And to Councilor Collins' point that, you know, being more involved in it, I think in the conversation we had, they really can't in the sense that they're mandated as law offices to support any agency that comes in the city. And, you know, and I think that's not realistic and unfortunate, but I think that finding some sort of avenue that would be more realistic. I know that today I've had many phone calls from a few former players that worked in the neighborhood that ICE was in today and they didn't, they were calling me for guidance. And the idea that they're legal now, they're documented, but still afraid. And the fact that when I did some homework, it wasn't actually an ICE movement in that area today, it was state police. And that brings up another point. It's not just ICE that doesn't talk to our or work with our or mandated to tell our police department anything, it's also the state police. So it's a slippery slope. And to ask them to have them report to something they can't do, I think it's very difficult. So that's my reservation, whether I can support this or not. I support the measure in its spirit, 1,000%, but I think that right now we're in flux with understanding what the process is legally. with our police department, what they can and can't do. So just wanted to share that with my fellow Councilors and the conversations I've had. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry, is it me, Councilman? Yeah, thanks. And again, I understand what my fellow councilors are saying, but again, as much as I respect my fellow councilors and their ability with the perception of the law with this, the discussion I had with our leadership team in the police department is very, it was very black and white and what they can and can't do. And I, even with the question with the welcoming city, why I couldn't support the welcoming city ordinance because the input of the chief at the time wasn't involved by crafting that because when I spoke with him, he made it, he made it clear that it really, it's really divided line when it comes to what we can ask him to do as an ordinance and what their position and their responsibilities and oaths are as police officers. So believe me, I don't, I should, you know, I just want to make sure that people clear because I had discussions today with a few of my friends that are going through this process and understanding the limitations. So we also have to be true and that the community has to understand that our police department is limited. So I would err to their judgment and understand follow their lead with this process, whether I believe in it or not, they are our professionals in this field, and I've been educated by their situations and what they're mandated to do with this process. So it's not easy, it's very difficult, but I just wanted to share that process, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Villes. I know that some of my colleagues get really offended and angry when people don't align with their beliefs. And even though there might be other sides, it's shocking to see their behavior and how angry they can get because there's other viewpoints. And that's sad. So it's really disappointing. But again, I stand with both the video surveillance ordinance and with the welcoming ordinance that I had discussions with the police and the police were involved in crafting both the original welcoming city process and then also being involved with the surveillance process because a lot had to do with the body cameras. But as they move forward to make changes, the police weren't involved in those discussions. That's why I didn't support it. Whether it's, it angers some Councilors, I could care less. But to understand the process, I think it's transparent and open. So it's, to say words like, you know, to just say things, like they're empty. Obviously, some Councilors don't know their fellow Councilors. Because I can assure, I can tell you this, I'm sure no one in this room right now stood in a young man's home with eyes staring down at their four family members. So I understand exactly what it is, but I also understand what the limitations were for their local police department. Now, that's not to say that I'm not gonna support this, but it's also an understanding that it's difficult. And I want people to understand that the discussions I had with the police department, it's very difficult to ask them what you're asking them tonight because they're mandated for other mandates through the state or by what they're sworn in for. So just to share that side of it and being angry about it is so immature and disrespectful. This is the rhetoric that people are alarmed with in this community right now. This is where the divide is, because this council didn't stand. I'm not standing for any sympathy. I'm understand. I'm sharing this from personal experience, but it's also another side that has to be mentioned, because I did talk to the police department. I did talk to Captain of Acting Chief Covino. I did talk to Chief Buckley at the time with these concerns and issues. So you know, if I hurt your feelings, too bad. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for this resolution. I know I had some questions because I received the email and the question that I'm glad that it's going to the subcommittee so we can get some answers. I know that Councilor Caraviello used to work so hard with the 18 whalers that were left overnight with the engine still running and affecting our air quality in different areas of the community, especially I believe on commercial streets. So that might be something if we could add to that. But I think that with this process, I think that one of the questions brought up that a resident asked that, what would this entail that they have a business on a secondary street and usually a heavy truck does traverse that area. So it'll be interesting to see how that could be explained to those residents or those businesses. So I appreciate that and I would appreciate that and move with my colleagues. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. And thank you for presentation. Just a few questions in the school department budget. Is this with the, hopefully with the built-in increase for the paraprofessionals? I know that they're in negotiations right now. So is it, do we have enough in there to sustain what they deserve?
[George Scarpelli]: And that's what the director and the superintendent mentioned.
[George Scarpelli]: That's great news. Unfortunately, I don't see an increase in the fire line. I know that we cut two firefighters right now, but there's no movement there still.
[George Scarpelli]: And I know that, do we get a figure yet on fixing the fire truck that we purchased from Lynn that's out of service? Is that something that's in this budget or?
[George Scarpelli]: OK, thank you. And I'd be remiss to keep asking, but is there anywhere in here that would, for transparency purposes, give us a note that we can't have the figures of all of the settlements with suits or anything, lawsuits? that the city had to pay out, but is there, where would there be a line item for that? Is that separate accounts? Is it a private account that we don't see that we just talk in executive session?
[George Scarpelli]: All right. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Riggi, thank you for being here today. That was my question. The catch-22 is how much are we gonna spend to see how much we have to spend? And I think, obviously we need that to get done, but I think it'll be interesting to see how much before we move forward to do that. I think that we all know that a lot of our buildings are in tough shape and they need some work. So it'll be interesting to see what that cost analysis would look like. Um, you know, if you're saying that it costs that much money just to look at bathrooms and we're looking at looking at fire stations, city hall, I'm assuming not the schools, but I know we talked, look already in the process right now with the Heckner Center that hopefully will be a part of that process and then many other buildings. So it's, I know that's a daunting task task for one man, so one person to try to do that. I think that just to give people an understanding in neighboring community, their team that we have here, facilities team over at Summerville. They have, I believe, two city facility managers plus assistant managers and supervisors, and then a team that work under them, which are mechanical teams, electricians, painters, plumbers, and carpenters. They even have a locksmith. So this is something that, you know, obviously this has been an historical weakness in Medford that we didn't have a team together. And I know this is a great start, but it'll be, for one council, be interesting to see what that analysis looks like to weigh it to, you know, whether we spend it actually doing it or we spend it actually looking to see how much it should take to get done. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Thank you very much. Thank you. First of all, I want to thank the team And what method police has done the city of Medford I know it's been very contentious. And there's been a lot of not a lot of unsettled thoughts, and the chief has always been attentive, and his team has always been there to answer any questions at least. from what I hear everybody on this council. And so I want to really thank you guys for everybody. The team has done such an amazing job because it is difficult what's happening and your professionalism stands out. And I think that that's admirable. you've seen the different issues that have come about, right? Internal issues. I remember the contentiousness between the dispatchers and who's doing this and who's doing that. And it's been so settled now and you hear such a strength now. And you see the different concerns when you talk about race issues and you talk about other issues that are happening throughout the country. And what I love to see is that our department has stood above it all. and really with their arms open, welcomed everybody in and saying, hey, listen, let's have a cup of coffee with a cop, right? Let's hold special events and programs for kids with autism. Let's go into the community. Let's have an open dialogue with anybody that comes to the chief's office. That's why I think the chief is so special because he'll say it all the time, but he talks, he walks the walk. When he says, I'm always here to speak, just let me know. I'll come up. He doesn't hide from anybody. He stands right there. And I take it the same from his whole team. And I want to just commend you for that, because I think it's important that where there's good, there's some bad. And I'm proud to say that our Methodist Police Department has done nothing but made a great example on how we should act. You're content that the issues that we're seeing right now then, you know, working in Somerville, we just saw their four year contract, just catch up for three years, they got a three year contract. And I think it was 14% with some concessions and they got some hikes and some other side, some other little things but they they understood the whole they they talked about the you know flag men and making sure that our officers and our retirees come first and then open it up for the flag people and I I see that's happening and I I I'm just a little concerned that as we're moving forward what happened over there they're down now no more community policing officers are leaving to neighborhood neighboring communities because they don't feel like they're being supported, not by their team in-house, but the administration. And money talks, unfortunately, right? when you're working four years without a contract, three years without a contract, you still got to support your family and inflation and cost of living now. So I think that's my, how is the team handling so far? You know, not, not having a contract for a few years. Is it, do we hear any, um, is the morale still, still as expected or everyone's professional, right?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, listen, that's another one too. When you first heard you're going to have a civilian interact with our police officers and you hear how nervous that could be. And I heard it's been nothing but flawless and it's been such a positive.
[George Scarpelli]: I commend you all on that. And then again, I think the last piece is my most important piece is, you know, the staffing level. And I didn't realize we're down, we're gonna be down to 90 police officers. And then I know that you put forth a plan that looks like we're gonna be up there, but how are we with our, I'm okay with that. I'm gonna live with that and say, okay, The famous voice of Barry Clemente has said that we're gonna be, we're still working on that. How's our fleet? Our cruisers, we're turning those over?
[George Scarpelli]: But we're doing okay. It's nothing to be alarmed. And again, the last piece I have is when we talked about the library when our librarian was here, but when you're talking about the fight at the police station, new police station, are we maintaining its integrity?
[George Scarpelli]: So we've gone a long way where it took a tour one year of the old station, and we had three detectives change the light bulbs.
[George Scarpelli]: Like I said, I commend you. I know that we have some contentious issues that are happening throughout the world but especially in our country right now and so many questions of ice and I know, give chief a lot of credit, how he stands up and explains what the duty of a law enforcement officer is and what the limitations are and what they can and what they can't do and I appreciate that. you, uh, you and the team and chief and the team stay professional and stay above it all. So I appreciate that he does. So, um, I, I, I think that, you know, I, I, there's been times when you guys have been here and I've kind of had to call things out and, but I will tell you, I'm, I'm, I'm proud of our method police department and, uh, all the men and women that serve and, and just keep making us proud. And like I said, I think that I'll still be advocating. I know that we'll be having resolutions coming up and looking at non-union raises. And I, again, will stand against it until every union officer and union position in the city gets their contract caught up to date before we give anybody else their due. So thank you. I appreciate you guys. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So I think I'll be a little more critical. I think that what we're seeing right now is my first question is staffing. I know we glossed over it, and I know that the mayor presents the budget and you have to live with it, correct? But how drastically understaffed are we?
[George Scarpelli]: I can directly feel what you're saying because I work in that community that you mentioned, but that community also has an infrastructure of 10 people. We have Mr. Baker who's by himself. I mean, the other day I saw him walk in the street checking a water leak. And I said, what is our number one person walking the streets? And that's what I find amazing. I said, this is like counterproductive. We have to look at really putting together a plan in place that's a little bit more robust. And I'm not saying you, I'm saying as a partnership, the council, the department, the mayor's office, to see what we can do. I mean, I look at the parks department and Somerville has one baseball field, they have four soccer fields, they have two softball fields. We have a crew of three that just lined fields in Molons, three.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. And neighboring communities, they have like 12 to 15 with, with quarter of what we have in Medford. Sure. So I think that it's, it's, it's something that has to be said and identified, not just glossed over. I think that we have to understand what we're seeing right now is a serious issue and concern of, you know, the override, you brought it up, you know, we had $500,000 and mocked back from the beginning of July one. So, Did we hire those three people? Are they new people? Are we just moving people in? Did we purchase the equipment? Because the mayor said that's gonna fix no more potholes, no more sidewalks. The sidewalk problems are all set.
[George Scarpelli]: So back to the override question with your crew that was presented. It was a hot top sidewalk crew of three people plus, plus the equipment that's needed the truck. Yep. Where are we with those three people in the truck that was presented as an override fix all for us for hot top potholes inside?
[George Scarpelli]: So again, to that point, yes, the perception that We have the equipment, the grinder per se, is a staff finally is it are they trained the staff that you need staff like council business, they're trained and ready to go we have that equipment.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. Okay, so, but this is this, how long we have that equipment. When do we.
[George Scarpelli]: This is what the confusion is where perceptions, not the reality, because what was said and what was led, this is what I'm trying to, people want questions. They're saying potholes are still not being filled. Sidewalks is still a mess. There's still questions, right? But the override, this is a story, and I'm not blaming you, I'm just sharing what has been presented to me when it comes to this budget. This $500,000 is gonna fix this. That was quote unquote, she said, it's gonna fix it. Now what we're saying is, the structure of understanding that, oh, this is just gonna be internal taking 20% of what we have and moving people to right positions.
[George Scarpelli]: I didn't say you
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so just so you share with where we're getting at. Sure. The perception of residents that said when you go through Somerville, you go through Cambridge, There's a hot top truck, right, there's a there's a crew out there. Yes, we have to that they're they're doing that on a regular basis. They're not doing the hot top three to four days, they're replacing the sidewalks that so and these are the questions that people want to know where that's going. So that's that that's where it comes from.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate that. Because again, Your team, you guys are doing a great job yeoman's where you can set into consideration what we're seeing here right yeah so I mean what we have in comparison with other communities and what we have to fix is a lot so I appreciate that that's not the question I think that just understanding as we go through the budget so we can answer some questions the other piece that you brought up earlier. was now the confusion where it's coming in. I know we talked about it ourselves is the private public way. So now I know we talked about what we can and what we can't do. I think we need to really have a true outline. So our residents understand, because I think there's a lot, there's a lot of confusion when I'm getting phone calls saying, George, I have an, I have an issue on my street, but I was told I cannot, they cannot touch it because I'm a private way. So I'll give you an example. We're talking about one neighborhood who hot top this street on their own, this, the private way, The community on that street paid for the hot tub. There's been some issues where the streets have been dug up, plows have gone through, taken up potholes. But then the question is, why isn't that being fixed? So these are the confusion things. And listen, Tim, you've been very reactive. I appreciate how creative you tried to be, and I know it's difficult. But when we have residents calling and they're saying, the confusion comes in, and I'm a city councilor, and I'm confused. Because when you look at it, it does sound reasonable when it says, well, we did pay for that private way. the city did come in and somehow it was a main issue. So the water department came in and fix something there. So they dug up that road. Sure. Whatever happened after that, when the plow started coming in, started tearing up that road. So they've already fixed it. So now where do we stand as a city when it comes to private ways to correct issues that we're part of?
[George Scarpelli]: So, so I know that and I appreciate that I think that I know people don't understand that the funding we get. that we don't get because a lot of our roads are private hurt us. So that's something maybe we should, as a council, as an administration, work together, try to find a way, how can we make more of our private ways, public ways to help us fund these concerns? I think it's a big issue. Because I know we're spending a lot of time on these private ways because of situations like we've talked about. And I appreciate you picking up that phone because I know sometimes you see my phone ring.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, last is something that I think that We've all talked about, we've had the President of the Union here, I mean the representatives from Teamstiz, it seems like it's DPW is seeing a lot of grievances and then appeals and arbitrations and How's that working with the morale of the team? I know it's not, it must be difficult. My biggest thing is morale, first of all, second of all, is most important that we're seeing for the community is the money that we're spending with, let's say there's a situation where someone bids for a job. They don't think, the city doesn't think they get the job, so now you go through the whole process, right? It goes to arbitration, the arbitrator says, okay, we support this employee. Now, normally that would stop and we move forward. Now we're seeing situations where, what, we're going to appeal it now. How does that, how does the morale there hurt? And then how is it affecting the whole budget process when we're A, leaving positions open, and then B, keep fighting these issues when it comes to arbitration cases, which cost money. So is that coming out of your budget when it's when it's coming a legal issue when it comes arbitrations and stuff.
[George Scarpelli]: I hope it does. So again, I had some tough questions and I appreciate it. And here's the thing, Tim, you've always, you've always picked up the phone. You've always guided us. I think the team that you do have are doing a great job for the numbers that we do have. So I know there are issues with potholes and sidewalks on and so forth, but I think for what we have right now, and I think that, you know, that it's important that I appreciate you recognize that with your staff and you support them and, And I appreciate you sitting there and answering these questions. I know they're not, they weren't easy, but I know that, you know, for one Councilor, if there's anything that DPW needs and be a champion for, we're here. So I'm here for you. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm going to shift in a different direction. I think that there's still a lot of pain in this community. And a lot has to go back from the beginning of the process of the override and how we got to this process and how people didn't feel like they were being listened to or being part of the solution to get involved. When you talk to the rank and file across the community, across all of our departments, You hear concerns that maybe what was mentioned in the schools, really, it's not hitting the schools they don't see much of a difference. When you see the streets and sidewalks. You don't see what was said I believe you said $500,000 would really um fix the pothole and sidewalk solutions and and it would help it would help it's not so as we're moving forward you're seeing these these issues that um have come up and we talk about funding issues and concerns something i've i've been bringing forward for years now the the cost of legal fees and seeing what's happening with our unions and the battles that are happening with lawsuits and arbitrations and hearings and not truly understanding and seeing the funding where our city's funds are being spent when you look at those situations. But I think the biggest piece is that I find alarming and it's great to hear that glowing reports, but when you see and hear Our residents really feel like they're not being listened to. I think it's important, whether it's the seniors talking about parking, I know you mentioned at the senior center and not feeling heard when it's with the new development that's coming in, or whether it's the override questions. that our residents were concerned about preparing them to take on such a hit when it came for increased taxes or with the charter questions that this council put forth and made some drastic changes to get it just put forth to the state. Or even now, I'm sure you're hearing with the concerns with the process and how we're working with the zoning and how people are scared that we're changing what Method looks like. So I think that there's a lot going on that I don't like. I've asked this council to vote on on a state audit to come in that this council will vote just to look at the processes of free cash and see what we were last year. And then meeting with the state auditors association and understanding the process through these professionals and understanding that a nine to $11 million free cash safety net for the city of Medford to maintain your bond rating and have enough money with the size and the budget that we have of our community that will be sustainable. And then you see $28 million of free cash. And now we're talking about all these different pockets that we're gonna be pooling, taking money out of, where free cash is budgeted money that this council voted on your request to move initiatives forward. And we see time after time, this huge surplus in free cash. And maybe it'll end, But we look at what's going on now. You're seeing under undermanned fire department. You're seeing undermanned funded DPW. You still have questions in the school department. You still have questions with streets and sidewalks. There are so many concerns that are happening. I know I'm the odd duck here bringing these concerns up. But these are concerns that we should look at and really re-evaluate and understand that someone needs to be listening to the residents of the city because this council is not doing it. And it falls on our mayor and our leader to do that. So I'm not too happy. There's too many gaps and too many concerns that haven't been answered to me when it comes to the budget. And I won't be supporting the budget, shockingly, I'm sure. But I just think that there are way too many people that aren't being listened to and I know the override is a is was a was a huge success for some but it was a very close vote and it really divided the community more than you think and a lot of people mostly our most vulnerable people in our community are feeling that pain today and they don't hear any resolutions, they don't see any resolve, they don't see an assistance to support them as they're making very difficult decisions in their lives today. So, again, I apologize that I, like my fellow colleagues, I'm not throwing roses at your feet and saying how wonderful this is, but, you know, my colleagues find it very difficult when you don't line up with what their philosophy or their views are. To me, I think sometimes things need to be said, even though it doesn't fit the narrative of seven. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Again, I think that it's uncomfortable because it doesn't fit the dialogue for some of my colleagues. So it's easy to say the narrative that suits them. But again, they can go back and revisit all their Reddit sites and the comments they've made that said that $500,000 would fix their roads. So we can go on in that. So the other piece that I appreciate. The assessment says we need $200 million.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, the assessor and finance director. No, the assessment.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, I know. No, I know that, but what I'm saying is the assessor and finance director that weren't involved in the original override process. were they involved in assessing the roads and sidewalks and stuff? Was that private? Because that's what I'm a little confused. So I don't know, maybe it's late. I just, I look at the different dialogue that's being said with the requests to the audit. Maybe my colleagues, they tune me out, they don't listen, but the audit that's requested, the ones that we pay for every year as a city because it's mandated, That lines up as the audit, when I spoke with the auditors, state audits department, they explained that the lineup of what we do here is the audit of the money we spend, $10, we spend $10. The audit that we're requesting is saying, why are we not spending that money correctly? Why is it that every year we have an abundance in free cash? So it doesn't fit their dialogue, so I understand that it's an issue. But when you talk about the free cash and the capital needs that we need, that's usually done through capital improvement plan. That's usually done as a process where we work together in finding out these big projects. When you talk about Freedom Way, that shouldn't be done as an emergency basis. This didn't happen overnight. That's a capital project. That's a capital plan put in place by our office. We've been working on it. No, I understand that. But when you respond by saying, well, we're using that free cash to pay for that bond, Well, that's not used correctly. That money isn't used correctly. So again, we could keep beating this up, but this is my opinion that I'm sharing with you, that residents are sharing with me, because they seem that no one is listening. So thank you again.
[George Scarpelli]: Great, I'll go to Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I think it's, we know the answer, but question, when you say shared, it's not a double pole, it's one pole shared by multiple entities, correct? Yes. Okay, and how long is the project gonna last? That I don't know.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate that. My only question is that the residents that will be impacted by the construction, you know, just making sure I know we have 72 hours of notification and is that just done by, you know, just the butters or could we get something more extensive?
[George Scarpelli]: So the sidewalks won't be closed, driveways won't be impacted?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Yep.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. It's come to my attention from multiple residents I know that reaching out and very concerned about some of the, the processes and how the ADU proposal has been. presented. One question was that the proposal went out in 430 and it wasn't written until 521. That's that was a concern that was brought to my attention by a resident and then multiple residents who feel again that this process is being rushed and and really that this council isn't hearing us hearing our residents and and when it is being heard and we do have meetings and zoning is put forth with some changes that this council will revert back and eliminate those requests from residents. So I can't support this moving forward. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I think that without having a conversation with the Chief, I will not support these initiatives. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, just to reiterate what I said earlier today. I will not support increasing non-union raises until our union contracts are ratified. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. First, I'll start off by humbly letting you know a little story today. Today, we reviewed our survey that we sent out to our community. And number two on the list was, why don't we have as many programs as Medford? So I'm really mad at you, Kev. Thank you. You made me look. You have a lot to know we do, but I just wanted to let where we are and where you are as a, you know, a team of three is very different. And I think that I see you working first firsthand you and I work collaboratively. You've been very helpful when we have concerns, not just me, but other recreation departments across the state that need help with aquatics. I think your expertise is make sure that all of our programs are safe and under following all the guidelines. So I appreciate that. As of your goals, I appreciate what you're doing. I think that the discussions we had both in subcommittee and we've been talking with on a regular basis with parents, Increasing the, the programs for children with disabilities I think that's, we're seeing something that's going to be really celebrated I think in a year where we're looking at what you're doing with aquatics and taking over what we're doing for teen center and now you're taking your turn and some of all doing the adaptive recreation program in the summer. Maldon doing basketball, then us again, we're taking on the bicycle, I like the bike program. So you're seeing, we're taking an initiative as a partnership. And I think that that's a lot because of your leadership. So I appreciate that. I know that there are some limitations. I know that what we wanted is really another full-time recreation employee. And We also, we like, I settle on the fact that understanding that we have a part-time office manager, which I think will help with at least filling the gap with increasing your involvement and your team's involvement away from the duties behind a desk and in the field. So I appreciate that. I know that, as you see, the question that I had was really, I know we have 243. We've increased it to 280,000. And then for part-time, 273. For FY 26, I know a lot that you do is we need the part-time assistance. Is that still enough money in that account to maintain that? The program as we're growing with part time staffing Kevin that that's my biggest concern right now is making sure that I know that we're not top heavy but we're not very bottom heavy so.
[George Scarpelli]: But you'll be okay. And I'll just say before I go, Mr. President, if I can, I didn't disclose that my daughter did work part time with, with the recreation department, but we don't know if she's coming back. Just to make that known. I just, I will I will look, I will share that we, is there a way working with HR to bring in a, use a volunteer-based program? Because I know we have a lot of people that, former teachers, former educators, former coaches that are retired that might be a good way to even talk with the assessor. Maybe there's some sort of an abatement program, a work abatement program for recreation. No pressure. No.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I'll leave you off with this. I've asked this both many moons ago. And you brought it up because it is important because probably the most expensive line that falls with the Parks and Recreation Department will be your electric bill from the rink. Yes. I would recommend through the chair that we make a motion that we ask our environmental director to look into looking into making Dillboy, excuse me, Hormel parking lot to a solar parking lot to fund the needs of the electric cost for the rink, which will then eliminate a big number toward our cost to the city. I think it's something that's prudent. It's very, you're seeing it across the Commonwealth now that you're seeing a lot of, it doesn't affect parking spots. It looks appealing and it, could be a very, very cost effective way to run the compressors. So if we can, that'd be something that I know I asked, but that was years ago and we haven't heard anything back, but I think it's time where it's so maybe 15 years ago, it wasn't 10 years ago, it wasn't so prevalent, but now you're looking at a lot of municipalities using solar parking lots as a way to fund some huge initiatives. So I will end by thanking you, Kevin, you do a great job. And I know I'll be talking to you probably tomorrow. So thank you. You're welcome.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. First, Jared, I want to commend you. Because I know you came in at a very difficult time as the acting. when I know the city threw an override at you and assessments and reassessments and it must have been chaos. And I know I came by the office a few times and I've witnessed it myself. I also wanna thank you for a lot of the senior citizens that were in dire need of support for the fact that their taxes skyrocketed to the fact that they needed, they were making decisions, whether it was healthcare or they were going to have to pay their taxes. And I think that your team, the one-man team that you have, did an amazing job. So I want to make sure that I'm public. I know that your department, as I talked to the previous assessor, was not involved in the override process or the prep of the override process. So that had nothing to do with you. And I tell people that every day that are having issues because I'm still getting phone calls from people that are really struggling with their taxes. But I think that my questioning is that I know that we're looking at the homeowner exemption, and I think that as I talked to the state assessor, who's been a good friend of mine, an ally in understanding these processes as we go, and he said a lot of cities and towns are seeing the homeowner exemption being enacted he said but what he did say is making sure the infrastructure of the team is in place to make that happen. And the other piece that he mentioned was that also understanding that when you hear homeowner exemption anybody that thinks they own a home, whether it's worth 500,000 or hundred 1.2 million. They're like, oh, great, my taxes are gonna go down. And that's not true. And I just, I know that that has to be vetted. I think that people really have to understand that there is a consequence, because I have residents that are saying, George, my tax will go down, we'll finally get home more exemption. And I said, well, your home is praised probably around 1.1 to two family. They're like, yeah, it doesn't equate that way. And I think that if you could share a little bit about that just so we know and the other piece is the ramifications to our renters because when you look at big buildings like the building across from Wegmans, you're talking 600 renters and that assessment that homeowner that would affect their rates, which would then increase renters, correct? I mean, help me understand that if I can. I know that a lot of people are hoping that we are going to ask for hundreds of thousands of dollars to have in place so we can expect this and hire new people, but I know there are some limitations, so.
[George Scarpelli]: We have to be cognizant with that so I appreciate the understanding I think that I think even if there's a way to put it on our site, where it's. put forth so the average person can understand what the ramifications are, because all they hear is exemption, homeowner, and that's it. So I think that understanding the whole calculation might be helpful if there's a way to do that. So if there's a way to do that, that's also important. And I know that one of the biggest things I've said, especially over the override concerns is the lack of new growth. I know my fellow councilors have stated that we were top of the state and obviously they don't understand what I was saying. And as I go through the assessor's line and I've talked to the building department, some members of the building department, we're seeing that they're really, other than two jobs that are in process right now. But one of the biggest factors, we haven't had shovel in the ground and big jobs in many, many years. And that's hurting our base for an increase in what we're seeing for accruing fees for permitting, which is a lot of money that could help our tax base also increasing more of a tax base from housing. So I don't see anything here, but what did we do last year? Did we have many jobs or many, you know, the assessor's office see much of an increase or anything to support the community for big jobs with shovels in the ground that would help with that.
[George Scarpelli]: So I know you don't have a crystal ball, with Fells Way and Mystic Valley Parkway, two big sites. Next year, hopefully we'll be talking and seeing something different that could assist us with that tax base.
[George Scarpelli]: We love election season, don't we? So I appreciate it, Jared. Thank you. And I know we've taken enough of your time, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, I can I don't want to be rude but I know I have to get to work after I speak I try to hold on as long as I can, but chief I appreciate your thorough breakdown, and, but I do have some, some questions, and as we look at the budget breakdown. One thing's alarming to me, you mentioned that the staffing is a concern, but we see two positions that will not be filled this year. How is that gonna affect us?
[George Scarpelli]: All right. So I know that I appreciate that. I'm looking at the report that was sent up with the gentleman that the city hired the GIS report. So right now we're not meeting safe staff staffing numbers on our companies and trucks at the national regulations, right?
[George Scarpelli]: And I know you mentioned you talked about grants, but I know that we we lucked out in the FEMA grant because of numbers and then because they won't, they won't fund the department that are not willing to invest in itself, right? Correct. I mean, that's what I know that the union president was here and I know Danielle did a great job applying for all these grants, but we had a great opportunity to save our community a lot of money with FEMA, I believe, taking the lead in paying for 10 firefighters for three years, I believe it was. And then as long as you get the commitment of staffing, and then we would take over the responsibility that we should and staffing a minimal by department, right?
[George Scarpelli]: Right. That's why I bring this up because we're gonna put down to not even level so that we won't even be able to apply for the FEMA. We won't even do it. So it's kind of a waste. So I see I see the cutting of the budget and staffing and severely hurts method chances, right, for winning these grants. I think that's definitely, it's important that we see this as a community and our leadership team here in Medford. I revert to, because I know that an article went out, an article went out from Tufts and they asked the mayor some questions. And the mayor's question was that, that the fire is resisting change and accountability. How is the morale? Because I know that there's a lot going on there with accusations of fraudulent sick time and possible investigators following your firefighters. I mean, how is the staff? How is the morale of your staff?
[George Scarpelli]: So I mean, you make a good point, because I think that was a topic of discussion. And I actually asked to have you, the leadership team for your union, and the administration, come to a meeting and then go to executive session so we can actually ask some issues that we've heard so we can, this could be some corrective actions. And what I'm seeing is that, you know, you said it yourself, understaffing, people are tired, people are run down. So those are the same people that are taking days off. and then being accused of. So this is what this is. I think I'm more concerned with our budget with the lack of staffing and how it's trickling down effect and then being categorized as resisting. So as you keep, I just want to stay on the topic that, you know, Again, I've said it a few times in different departments, and I look at the legal costs that we're seeing at DPW, we're seeing with fire, we're seeing with different unions that we're seeing, paying representative legal representation for for grievances, then arbitrations, then losing arbitrations, then appealing arbitrations, and then losing again. And we're seeing in the biggest thing we're talking about is money. But these are the reasons, part of the reasons why it's I would love to see our administration try to find a way not to look at it as resistance, but try to work as a partnership to fix these issues so we can then save these these funds that are going out, you know, useless, just useless use of funding. So a piece that I'm nervous about, because I have family and, and elderly friends that where I grew up, and engine three, we can't even call it engine three, because we don't have an engine three. So that means we have no water, correct in the Salem Street area.
[George Scarpelli]: So you also brought up that engine four and engine one's taking all this heat. They're taking it because we don't have staffing for engine three. Right, engine three would lighten the load. And from what I gather, that was a necessity. I know that you don't want that, but I know it's a necessity for the fact that to take some of the pressure away from overtime, because it's a lot of money, that we have to shut down an engine and use that team to fill in gaps for overtime. Is that, that's what I've been told, is that?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: So, um, so why aren't we, why aren't we, You're our leader, right? You came up and gave us a breakdown, but why aren't you telling us this is what we need, City Council? I know we can't give it to you, but I think the public has to understand that sure, there are faults in the school departments. Sure, there are some problems with DPW. Sure, this is public safety. And from what I'm hearing is that it's gonna get to a point where I'm nervous because We've done an amazing job with some pretty big fires and your team has done an amazing job. And I just, I don't want to get to a point to say, geez, we knew this, but we didn't do what needed to be done as a city. So I think that's important.
[George Scarpelli]: So these are the resistant union members. So again, then we, this, the community listened to your firefighters, the rank and file. I believe they listened to Chief Friedman when he came out and spoke. And I think when I talked to a lot of people, when it came to the debt exclusion for the fire station, I think the non-involvement and the final stage and the limitations of that new station really spoke volumes that the community voted it down. And I haven't heard anything. We're both with a new fire station and a training tower. Do you have any updates or anything with that?
[George Scarpelli]: And I just you have to take the brunt of it. But you know, in your presentation, you didn't, you didn't say anything about the headquarters chief, but you had to wait for, I had to say something so we could talk about what's a huge issue.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. So what is the leadership team doing to move our city forward to make sure that we're going to a next step? Maybe it's looking at a debt exclusion in the future for what's truly needed, right?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, well. Deservedly so, but I look at and, you know, I know that you mentioned the peer support team because I've talked to some young firefighters. And again, that's spearheaded by a union, correct? I mean, I know the union takes their brothers and sisters, the new brothers and sisters say, hey, listen, they might not be here, this, that and the other thing, but we're going to take that peer peer leadership and we're going to take control of it to make sure that we're teaching our fellow brothers and sisters firefighters.
[George Scarpelli]: I, for one, City Councilor, I think this is one of the biggest pieces that I find very disturbing. It's not a secret that I haven't been supporting what's been happening with the firefighters, the union, and the fire headquarters, the tower. And I know we're just glossing over things, but there are some serious, serious concerns here. And it's something that as we meet with the mayor as we move forward, that there has to be something that has to be earmarked to our fire stations.
[George Scarpelli]: I agree with that trickle down effect. I talked to members of the state board, fire board, and I get some numbers from them. and to get these wishes, if you're not showing that we're maintaining minimal safe levels of force, then we're not gonna get these grants. Because again, common sense says if your own city isn't gonna commit to it, why should an outside agency give you money to do it? And at least that's what my homework has shown me. And I'm frustrated because since the debt exclusion failure, We haven't heard much. We haven't heard much. And then today you have retirees contacting me that saw this Facebook post about the mayor's article in the Tufts Daily and, you know, making a point that say that the firefighters with this whole process, that again, that they're resistant. to change in accountability. I haven't seen that article. Yeah, I just I'll let you know, I'll forward it to you. But that's so that's what the question was about the unions. And she said, well, the union, the fire and teams is just don't want change in accountability. Well, how do you want change in accountability when you're struggling as hard as they are? I mean, you know, I don't even think residents know because my my neighbors didn't know that we don't have water on on Salem Street. You know, we call it engine three, we have no engine. Yeah, so I mean, these are things that if people hear what it is cheap as a leader, and they see these things, people are going to stand up and say, Okay, well, maybe we do need a debt exclusion. Maybe we do show us. And I think that since it failed, everybody's moving on. They're not talking about something we definitely need down the line, which is looking at a new high school, refurbished high school. I can never say you're looking at a new one. I don't think it's gonna happen, but at least try to stop moving things forward when we talk about our fire department, because I don't wanna be the one, God forbid, that says, I told you so, when one of our firefighters or one of our residents lost their lives because we didn't have enough staffing. So again, I appreciate you listening. I'm very passionate about this because I've gone, I've stood up for our firefighters for a long time now. And again, I hate to be rude. I know that I was supposed to be gone 45 minutes ago, but I just, if you have any response or anything that you want me to ask, I'll stick around for that. But I know Zach doesn't want to hear me anymore, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you so much for your presentation. I know they just clarify, you know, it's like one of my big sticking points is. ratifying contracts. And I know that it's good to see that we're moving forward. So I appreciate the hard work, but I know that. So it's Medford, patrolmen, supervisors, library, dispatch, and building, correct? Are those the last ones that we ratified? Are these the ones that are still open?
[George Scarpelli]: Are we getting close?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Other ones still have some time.
[George Scarpelli]: So I know that, you know, I work in a municipality next door, and I just saw what What neighbor community just offered their police department and with four year retro, and it's a lot of money.
[George Scarpelli]: be interesting to see how we can fund that.
[George Scarpelli]: Not easy.
[George Scarpelli]: I think the other issue and concern that I've had for a long time is, and it might not fall with your department, but it'd be interesting to know, as we've had so many concerned issues with legal issues with grievances through our employees, not particularly anyone in personnel to keep it confidential. Is there a line here that does it come out of your department for arbitration costs, for attorney's fees?
[George Scarpelli]: seems pretty substantial. So from what I've gotten for legal documents from union representation, and it's a lot of money.
[George Scarpelli]: And it's a I would hope we could find a way to tighten up these legalities in these, these battles that go back and forth with, I think losing and then appealing and then so it's something that you know, when we look at good money leaving the city, I think that a lot of it has to do with fair labor practice and making sure that we're doing the right thing with our employees. So I appreciate your input, and I think that's important. It's something that I'll keep asking as we move forward, because I think that if we look at many of the lines, and if we look to the actuals and month to month, and we see where monies are going, there's a lot of legal departments that are getting. chunks of chunks of money throughout the community. And even though we did get a $7.5 million increase in an override and still have money in free cash, and even though that's supposedly not a lot of money, I guess we're still in fiscal constraints and supposedly in some dire funding needs. So be interesting to see where we can, as we move forward, where we can recover and what we can do better to make sure we're not using funds that don't need to be spent.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Barbara. I was gonna say if you have another year maybe you can work on your Sunday disposition. It's just terrible. So angry. Seriously, don't you just want to get up and hug you I just I I so appreciate you. I think that, like Councilor Lazzaro said, have a book from 1982, The Outsiders.
[George Scarpelli]: I have a few, just one question. I know that one of the biggest things we always, we were nervous about as we built this new library and how we're going to maintain it. And it sounds like, you're doing an amazing job, and the team's doing an amazing job. Do you see anything that, especially, I appreciate Mr. Riggi now, and him being active and involved. Do we see that that's being up at the library, the plant itself is being kept to its standards?
[George Scarpelli]: And solar, that's still up there?
[George Scarpelli]: Excellent. That's a great sign.
[George Scarpelli]: Solar's amazing. So on a serious note, though, On a more serious note, we often sit up here at city councils and thank people that have left us and we can't celebrate them while they're here. I would hope that this council would work with the mayor and administration that the day you leave your position, you know, you're not leaving our Method Public Library, that we have something named after you. I would hope through as we move forward and that there is something that the name Barbara Kerr is never forgotten when people look up and say hey who's Barbara Kerr, because I remember the real thin times and you kept things going when things are really bad. You hear horror stories now and, you know, we stick our chests out when you hear what's going on in Stoneham and you feel so bad. But even through the toughest times, you've always kept us above ground. So I think we can never forget that because no matter what, I mean, my kids, if it wasn't for the method public library, and they're 22 and 19 now, and they spent every single week in the library from their most precious years. And personally, as a father, I can't thank you enough and for fathers and mothers all over the city than what you've done for them. So I can't thank you enough. And, and I will hope that my colleagues join me when it's time and that we do find something that speaks to what you've done for us here in Medford and the Medford Public Library. So thank you for everything.
[George Scarpelli]: But I do have some to the chair. Representative Donato did call me about the funding. And he wanted to let us know just an update that they found $25,000. They reported to Bob Dickinson. And then there is $75,000 that they'll be reaching out tomorrow to make sure that the city of Medford receives that 75,000. So we have that 100,000. He is also asking, the state to follow back to all of the money that was required was to be sent to Medford over the last five years. So he's doing even a deeper dive and hoping that if there was something that they missed that the city missed or the state missed that we can recover and hopefully help us as we move forward. So I wanted to share that with you. That would be great, George. Thank you. And I know that with the lighting situation, quick question, if I can through the chair. Yes. Have we, has anyone on the, I know that you do a lot, Cindy, I know your team does so much, but has anybody applied for community preservation money to help assist in funding?
[George Scarpelli]: So so I think what I would ask if we could motion that we could ask the city administration to see if someone from the city can assist us in writing a proposal or a wish to CPA for any funding. Did they have a number for the lighting? Did they get a number by any chance? Did Mr. Riggi get a number to?
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Regan, I appreciate all the hard work. I know it's very difficult to do what you're doing as a one-person army. I would still recommend moving forward. It wouldn't hurt to start the process. for possibly $100,000 CPA funding to support the historical site of Chevalier, because I think it's a public safety issue right now. If we're saying that people are suing us right now, we're losing money more than we're bringing in, so.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. I'll follow up with Mr. Dickinson as well, Mr. Riggi, just to make sure we're all on the same page that you have my number, don't you? I do. I'll call you. I'll let you know. And I think that if, you know, I want to be present also at the meeting, so I know I missed the last couple, but it's important that we get more involved, because we all believe that what you said, it's the engine that keeps Medford Square going right now. Without the Chevalier right now, I would hate to see where Medford Square is. So, and we should be championing it a lot more. And like I said, the refurbishing, redevelopment of Medford Square, Has anyone talked to the Chevalier about what the plans are and how they're going to incorporate the Chevalier with that process? Has the city talked to the commission at all?
[George Scarpelli]: OK. Thank you, Council President. Who's on the RFP committee? Mr. Mather, I believe he said. Andrew Mather, yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Yep. That's perfect. I didn't, I didn't realize that so it's good to see that there's someone that's actively working to make sure that you know the Chevalier is a focal point of the redevelopment so but thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Motion to adjourn.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate tabling this in my absence. Last week I was there two weeks ago I was very sick and trying to get over right now so I appreciate tabling it so I could share some kind words to the family. Shane was a remarkable individual, someone that worked hard for the city of Medford and saved many lives as a firefighter. He worked to support his amazing family. I was a former colleague of mine. His his amazing wife, Mary, and his daughter, Kelly. And I know that leaves a huge void in that family. The Hortys were mainstays in our community for many, many years as custodians and teachers and firefighters. And he'll be missed and we send our condolences to the Horty family. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Council President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Just for clarifications with the clerk, through you, through the chair, Mr. President. The hour is now still coming through the council. It's for approval.
[George Scarpelli]: I know there's some big, some confusion, but it's no longer a special permit. Right. Right. So it has to come back. Okay. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I mean, to be honest with you, I think that, I mean, we could wait for them next week, but I think that's just preliminary. I think that you're seeing one o'clock as a, as a norm where the establishment is located. It's, uh, it falls outside the range of the neighborhood. So in a sense, traditional neighborhood. Um, so I know that we've extended permits to one o'clock, but for multiple locations. Now this council is taking a stance on open up different establishments till one o'clock all over the community. So I think we, as I said in the past about keeping things consistent, I would recommend to award these hours with a 30, 60, 90 day review. Right.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I appreciate the hard work and I know this is a long time coming but I think that I have just a few questions as we go through the process and I know this is so important because this is one bite at the apple and I'm so glad that we're doing it. So, so kudos to taking the bite, we should think it's very important but I, you know, I know that there was there was questions that we looked into the drip different talking about those discussions and maybe looking into traffic flow with the rest of the square and how that would impact. You know this this development we if we talked about is ring road still available because I'm sure in your field you realize that it's a laughingstock across the Commonwealth that. The joke is, what is the only city that has an access road that leads away from the center of your town? And I think that that's what we're doing. So I'd like, you know, it'd be something nice to use the water and develop that area. Have we, you know, the other questions I would have is if we talk to... I'm gonna forget all your... Yeah, no, no, I appreciate it. You know that looking at the... We met with the other owners of the other buildings in Medford Square and worked with them about maybe finding a way to look at the totality of the square and working Riverside Mall and using and talking and working their vision to try to you know, uplift the rest of that area and try to truly make it a truly redeveloped area. The other question is probably the biggest one and you said you, you talked a little bit about it because you, you know, you're going to get the biggest complaints and concerns and issues from our seniors right now. I think that the biggest fear right now is the parking. I don't think the parking is enough that's there. I know that we've had in different municipalities that I've been involved in We've worked on some creative ways and maybe possibly talking about meeting with the seniors and implementing a plan that makes sure that maybe setting up a shuttle service from even though it's just right down the street, it's a huge difference when you're a senior citizen and you're disabled in any way to try to make it from right across the street to behind the hotel. Maybe I think and I think that'd be important is really reaching out because I've been contacted by a bunch of the seniors from the senior center and they're in an uproar and you know, they, you know, they have we talked about for instance, one young lady came tonight and asked, have we talked about maybe making sure that the parking goes up first. yeah sorry yeah talking about the parking first so and I'm glad to see that we're being creative with the parking garage something that we talked about in the past if this is something that's willing to do how about have we entertained possibly doing a bubble on the top floor of the parking garage where it's a recreational space to bring in more revenue both as a recreational space and and a revenue generating source, if we're given the freedom to do that. So, you know, on the highway side, I wouldn't mind going up an extra story to put something like that in for the fact that it's creating revenue, it's creating a recreational space for our youth, especially, and a vital space that we know that we need here. So, I mean, these are some questions I think that, you know, You know, everybody who looks at me like I'm going to be the negative person and I'm going to talk negative about everything I think we need to move. And this is a good step, but I think that being cautious that this is one bite of the apple and making sure that we've exhausted everything possible and the community is really part of it. I know I've said that from the beginning of the rezoning you know that. And I think that being more proactive, especially with the seniors and getting your butt kicked a little bit, it's part of the job we all know that, but really making our senior citizens feel like they're part of this process, not alienating because the room is, again, keeps coming to Council Scarpelli, the rumors that I'm hearing what people think that there's rumors out there saying that maybe possibly we're going to lose the senior center completely, which is a farce, but it's something that I think having the meeting there and bringing it to that backyard and trying to find avenues to just to calm everybody down and say listen we're thinking of you these are options and our number one priority should be our seniors in their, their safety in their comfort in their, you know, state of mind. So, I know that's a lot, but I appreciate it's the first time I could speak on it so I'm really excited about, you know, the designs I was. I was I was fortunate enough to have said it 1000 times that when may occur to Tony back in 2008 started this little little project that he brought me to this little despicable piece of land and he opened up a trailer and showed this amazing plan that went from one end to the other and that's still growing. So, and I think that's why I bring up the fact that I'd love to see what what options are moving throughout the whole square. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. This is a great question. One thing that as we talked about, you know, mainstays and the, you know, the, uh, you know, the, um, gateways, uh, is the money been exhausted? I know there was money years ago for the parking garage that failed behind Colleen's. Cause I think that that might be having two types of two types of anchor parking. I mean, we would hate, honestly, to waste spot, people tell you in your field, you know that putting a parking garage is frowned upon because it's valuable space in a sense, but where we already have parking
[George Scarpelli]: Can you share that with us?
[George Scarpelli]: It was very helpful to share with people.
[George Scarpelli]: prison council. Yeah, that's the biggest thing people things when calls hang out was this means we're taking public parking wafer. We're not. No, so just so that's all this. It's pretty self explanatory.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor, our President. I appreciate you. I think first, let me start off by saying, because I've listened to my colleagues and the Chief of Staff speak this evening, and I've heard the comment being used that one person's view toward another person's view is political. And I think that's wrong to look at what we do as elected officials who are political in opening different sides of different issues. When we look at what I just heard, let's look at what the truths are. The truths are that we've had professionals as close as the State Assessors Association that came out and spoke and eloquently discussed the process of free cash and what would be needed. And we talked about why it's so important in Medford and bond rating. And we've also understood that a city of Medford size with our budget, a number of seven to $11 million would not hurt our bond rating. And the number that we're seeing year after year of 26, 24, $28 million in free cash is a problem. To say that we're in fiscal times and that this is crisis, we are. It's crisis of mismanagement. where other communities, neighboring communities, are thriving. We used it again, the pandemic. We have communities that are thriving off of the proper use of ARPA money. And you wanna talk about using money correctly, this is the reason why we're in this situation. You're seeing neighboring communities now, they're in the same situations because they used ARPA money in the wrong format. So when you look at the disingenuine discussions of the use of ARPA money, the use of free cash and understanding the issues that we've had here historically, historically, we haven't had shovel in the ground for new growth and development and the scale that brings in revenue that would support and assist our taxpayers in almost six years now. I believe there are two projects going on now that we would hope that would stop bringing in some real revenue, whether it's the Fellsway site or the Mystic Valley Parkway site. But these are projects that should have been put forth years ago, no different than what we're doing right now with the zoning and looking at the Method Square Corridor and looking what we're doing there. Because that's the vision that changes what we will be looking at for financial distress. And as you move forward, and we look at our future, there's undertones that the $7.5 million, although huge and although very, very painful to a lot of at-risk Medford residents, that that simply isn't enough. Well, I've heard from different department heads about asked to be cut that we need a million dollars being cut through the city's budget, and we're in dire straits again. When we, when we, when we, when we year after year. find ourselves with millions and millions of dollars in free cash. The comments that you made, Madam Chief of Staff, is just total, total disingenuine. When $28 million isn't a bad number, of course it is. Of course it is. State professionals, assessors have already stated that $7 to $11 million is what we're looking at in the city of Medford size. When you're looking at $28 million in free cash, that means we've done something wrong when it comes to managing our finances in this community. So although it's a different view of my colleagues, if you wanna spin it to make it sound as if it's political, go at it, go at it. But there's a group of citizens in this community that are really hurting for some serious changes that have happened in this last fiscal year. that they're probably leaving the city or doing some drastic, drastic cuts in their own personal lives and their personal health because of the moves that we've been making. And I just, I'm just a little leery and a little nervous that this council is starting to plan maybe another future override for the fact that what we're hearing on 2027, things are going to get worse. It's easy to say, sit around a table and say, yep, we're all right. This is great. Let's all pat ourselves on the back. But it's disingenuous to say that $28 million again in free cash isn't a factor of mismanagement. You're wrong. We've already had professionals express that over and over again, but some people just don't want to listen. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of clarification, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I appreciate my fellow colleague for the words, but obviously he wasn't listening to me during the override discussions, because what my battle with the override was that over and over again, and it's a public comment, and I could share it with him again with the videos, but again, it was stated over and over again. It's not the fact that this council didn't think we needed an override, but through the process, and how we got to the override, how it was pushed through, how it was rushed, and how we weren't prepared, in my view. So what I said at the time was, looking at the shortfall with the school department, that one-time funding, to correct those issues. Because by the way, some of the money that's in free cash are salaries that were not used year after year for positions that were left open. So to use those funds to fix the school's budget concerns and issues without dividing the community, that's what I said over and over again. And then we can sit together with time and look at the process to see if we truly needed an override, and if we did, to prepare our community, especially our most needy community members that needed the assistance to prepare themselves for this, That's the process that I was looking for. I never said to use free cash over and over again. That never came out of my mouth. So again, it's easy to spin the dialogue to make it sound what's good on the other side, but it's very simply put, what we needed for the city, in my view, opposite from my colleagues, and I understand that that's the political process, that's the democratic process. But my battle wasn't about not needing an override and not understanding if we need an override. The battle was, or the understanding was, to slow the process down and use one-time funds of the 24, $26 million we had at the time to support the school department and then prepare our community if that was the need. But here we are again, $28 million in free cash, and one of our leaders of City Hall has just told us that's okay, that's not a big deal to have $28 million in free cash. That's absurd. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I'll send the video, I'll send the video Mr. President, just to remind my fellow council that well that's, yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: I would second that. I think that as one member of this council that the only member of this council that served many years on the school committee, I think the focus has to be that this isn't about this mayor. This isn't all about this school committee. This is about what we think are important changes. Now, I felt it was very important that the mayor was the chair. of the school committee and that that person held that seat because it brought that committee a certain amount of knowledge and institutional knowledge that could really support the school department. Now I understand in the negotiations back and forth there was the acceptance of the mayor coming back and saying okay I can step down as the chair but keeping that position on as a school voting school member is vital. And I think that's true. I think that the people that made these decisions that brought it to our attention again, sometimes I think we don't look and give people like Melvin McDonald enough credit because one regret I have was last week. We had all these questions, we have all these problems and issues and we didn't ask Melvin to come up once to give her input because she was the person that shared all those meetings, put everything in place and made sure that every what everybody wanted wasn't exactly what she wanted, but was fair. And that it went to it got us to a point where we can vote together as a council, send this off to the mayor's office where she'll prove and then send this off to the state house. So it was exciting to see that. Now what we hear is the call and center the residents of our community, and I'm sure you've all received emails and phone calls and text messages supporting at least the fact having the mayor at least being voting member of the school committee is a vital piece of this of this charter change in this charter review. And what I'm hearing back from people in the public is the ego sometimes getting in the way and the back and forth that, you know, sometimes elected officials want to make themselves feel stronger or play the gotcha game to beat you. And it's funny as you, as I got sent a lot of information of different Councilors that wrote blogs and wrote disparagingly about people that work so hard for this process. It's disheartening because it's not just about us either. It's about the community and what the community wants. And this has been a challenge. Like I said, I've been against charter review. When I first ran for office, I was supporting it. And then as I leaned away from ward representation, I voted against it. And then I did my due diligence and really did some homework and met with a lot of different communities about ward representation. And we realized that One of the biggest factors we see the issues we have in Medford is the lack of participation by new candidates, people getting involved. And what's happening is you're seeing what we are today. We have, um, candidates that run on a slate and work together to get themselves elected, and it's working. You can't begrudge them. This is the way this is the way you win the seat. They win the seat. But we've also seen how that affects government and how people truly feel. They don't have a voice. And I've been saying this for a long time now. There's a lot of issues that come to this council and we talk about what's best for your voting block. But when we're sworn in in January, we swear that we're representing 60,000 members of this community. And there isn't a document or a scenario more visible and more involved than the charter review process. An independent group of people that were brought in that did their due diligence and had hundreds of meetings, talked to everybody in every corner of this community, then met with the Collins Center that were the ultimate professionals. I believe 80 years of experience between the two people that were working with us. And they came back and gave us a document that really looked really, really good that could work for our community. As government works, we go back and forth and you see tweaks here and there. And to be honest with you, if I was the mayor, I wouldn't give into half of what you're asking for. But she did, and I respect that. The eight and three, it's good to see that we made moves with that. But I agree that this can't move forward without the mayor's process, the mayor's ability staying on the school committee. Not this mayor per se. It could be three mayors from now that we've done this. And it's important that that person is there. So when I hear my colleagues talk about, school committee members talk about A, B and C and how they feel this, how they feel that, it's really not about them. It's about this community. It's about their document. And again, I implore my colleagues, because as we went through last week's meeting, in the 12th hour, we keep hearing it's 6-0 vote, the meeting hours in here. It would have been 6-1, but you're hearing in the 12th hour that now never heard it before, but now we want the mayor off of the school committee completely. We talked about that the process of the charter committee was put together fraudulently, it was wrong. It wasn't thought out. Then it was this process went too fast. What it sounds like to the community, and this is both many different sides of our community where they stand and reached out to me and said, wow, it sounds like I'm taking my ball and going home. And so all I'm asking my colleagues to do is, we might not see eye at eye in many things, but this is something that could really move our community forward, that in a seven nothing vote, we can move this to the mayor's office, we can get this sent off to the state. And it seems like there's really one piece left and that's the mayor staying on the school committee. And being a former member of the school committee, I know how important it was under Mayor McGlynn. Now maybe under the new mayor with the new school committee, you'll see that importance. But don't hold the weight just because this school committee says that they feel a B and C because it's just not about them. So I would second Councilor Lazzaro's motion to leave the mayor in as not the chair, but a voting member. And I would ask this council to move favorably on a seven zero vote to move this to the mayor's office in the state, because I will tell you if this, they're watching and our delegates are watching and they're listening to their residents because their residents are reaching out to the state delegates and We want something that's going to go to the state house and pass. So it's on the, on the ballot. So I appreciate, uh, the efforts from Milva and her team. Um, again, I, I publicly apologize that I've had questions last week. I should have asked you to come up to that podium. One regret. I realized when I went home, um, that some of the questions I did have, I didn't ask the person directly. Um, but, um, Again, thank you, Mr. President, for my winded dialogue.
[George Scarpelli]: I've been reminded for the council to maybe read some of the blogs from members of this council, because I believe the word right wing was thrown around as part of that committee. So just so you know, just an FYI, just an FYI. But I think that, let's say everything my fellow colleagues are saying, that it wasn't enough time. Let's say that all these issues we had were true. But the document that we've had has gone back and forth to the mayor and we're all very bright, smart, involved Councilors that have made some changes that the mayor has come back and said, fine, make those changes. And we've done that. We've done a lot of movement and we've had things that, to be honest with you, the mayor and I, that's public, I don't see eye to eye with many things the mayor has done. But for this situation, I think she has looked for the greater good, what's right for our community, and what was put forth by the residents of this community. We seem not to be mentioning this. The residents of the community have spoken. And it's a resounding support of this document even before the changes. We've seen some changes. We've seen some movements. We've seen the mayor step away. big piece of the eight and three. I appreciate everybody seeing that and sticking with it. But imagine from what I'm hearing tonight, the piece that's going to hold this up is the process. If the mayor is a voting member of the school committee, imagine that being the only piece that doesn't allow this document through to the state that will give put this on the ballot so our residents can vote on it. It just doesn't look good. It doesn't show you or the community, the average person in this community that wants to know why this isn't happening. It's very simple. It looks like there's alternative reasons behind it. You could say no, but it looks like you're gonna hang your hat on this one issue But it's so minimal and so minuscule to say that the importance of the mayor not being on the council for power. Come on, guys. Listen, I was on the council. I understand when the mayor had total control of that council and that committee. And this school committee is definitely not that anymore. The mayor takes the back seat, and we've seen it. We've seen it good in my eyes, and we've seen it bad in my eyes. But to say that this is the reason why we're not gonna vote for this favorably is a sad description of what this council truly feels about what the residents want, what the residents have been asking for. And it's not me against you. You've been getting emails and phone calls. So have I. I've gotten more than two. And I've got a lot of people that never supported George Scarpelli in the last eight years that are reaching out to me to try to be their voice because they feel they don't have a voice anymore. So I'm actually employed. And again, I believe the Collins Center didn't say that. I believe they said we don't have to wait 10 years. If that's the case, I know this council said the representation of the committee, the charter review committee, switching the power around, right? Giving more, more, put more councils, more school committee members. No one questioned it. They said, okay, that's what you want. Let's do it. So it's, it's put forth. It's in front of you. Everything you're at, we're asking for every change that you've asked for, they've made. But there are two very important pieces, the eight and three, that I believe my fellow councilors, correct me if I'm wrong. Okay, let's do the eight, they've listened, eight and three. So the last piece, the sticking piece, is going to be the mayor on the school committee. And again, it's not this mayor, it's not this school committee alone. It's the mayor and the school committee in two years, in four years, in eight years, in 10 years. So I please, open your minds and please, Let's put this forward. Let's take that off the table. Let's put forth Councilor Lazzaro's motion. Let's send this to the Mayor 7-0. Let's get this to the Statehouse. Let's vote on this in November. Because you know it as well as I do. I agree with the Mayor. if those changes, I feel strongly enough that I wouldn't want her to send this to the state house. If you're taking the mayor out of that, because the truth of the matter is you're drastically changing the power of this, that committee away from the community and to individual people. And that's not right. It's actually, I feel the opposite. So Thank you again, Mr. President, for hearing me out. But I really think that we're at a very vulnerable crossroads, and it's we have an opportunity to do the right thing. I don't think that we're far, far away, and I think it's it's it's time that we maybe put some personal or political beliefs aside and say what's best for this community and listen to our residents. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I would say let's move that to five years. If that would help this council to say, you know, I think there's been concessions. I would make that motion if that would help.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, move forward with this, we move forward with the vote but this issue was defined with you and the mayor and clarify I don't think it's a big issue I think just, you know, clerical, maybe some punctuation or whatnot could just be handled between you and the mayor.
[George Scarpelli]: I agree. So I think that talking with just to make sure that I don't want to go in that room later and say, oh, that's not what
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. I know that it's not not you two but Mr. Dickinson's here. Did we entertain by any chance using any of the 28 million dollars in free cash now that we see is that that number came out a few weeks ago that we have in excess of 28 million and in the past we've shown that we've actively actively worked by moving that money into capital projects to possibly speed things up and then take some future costs to our citizens away, if that helps. I'm not qualified to speak to that.
[George Scarpelli]: So that's good to know. Like I said, I didn't expect to use all $28 million and get this project done. But I know that since we have $20 million and we need to move quickly with this project, I appreciate the fact that we're looking into it. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. And is the petitioner here?
[George Scarpelli]: I think it's important that we can hear from him, but I know that there are some questions we have that we might have legally that we can't answer tonight, but I'd like to hear from the petitioner if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: If I could, Mr. President, I think that, uh, the first issue with changing of the signs, I understand it gets The systems are antiquated we need to move forward as long as there aren't any huge changes that would disrupt our residents, I don't think it's a problem but again. both with this and with the adjusting the fee. I think if we could probably table this to the next meeting and get some updates, and then I don't see that the changeover will be a big issue. And if we can look into seeing what the qualifications or the protocol for the fee structure, and then maybe you can go from there. But right now, I don't think we're equipped to vote on that this evening, Mr. President. I appreciate the petitioner being here, petitioner speaking on behalf, but if we could table this to the next meeting, that'd be super important, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I would feel comfortable. I just like I said, I don't see the any of the particulars in front of me.
[George Scarpelli]: All I'm hearing is a petitioner saying that just changing it. Okay. And I, we, unfortunately, I don't have anything in front that might cause some problems legally for us.
[George Scarpelli]: Out of all due respect, this is the fourth time I've asked something that I feel important that might put our committee in question legally. to go to legal and this councilor has refused a question to every single one and i find this to be a problem this is very easy if we had a city solicitor i'm the i'm the eldest uh i'm i've sat in a seat longer than anybody here i've been here when we've had an active city solicitor that i could call any time to answer any questions so we can move an issue forward unfortunately this is year four without a city solicitor So if one member of this council, out of due respect, if it was my fellow council, the same question, I wouldn't stop that. So this is an issue that if we move something forward and legally comes back on us, I'd rather not pay the consequences with a higher fee or a lawsuit. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: many, many years and a lot of effort. I will not say what they said because they're going to get really tired soon, but they asked if we could please hear Resolution 24468 submitted by the Mayor, draft City Charter, returned to City Council.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I owe the respect to my fellow councilor. We've started resolutions that thought would be quick and lasted 45 to one hour. As I said, residents that are on the charter committee that said that, unfortunately, they can't stay later. These are people that have worked in this community on this project for many, many years. I would hope we give them the respect to move them to the front so we could hear them, so they could be off and whatever the resolution ends up to be, that they can be heard and then move on to their evening. And from what I hear, most of them to sleep. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: That's my motion. Don't vote for it.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. I so appreciate everybody in the last few weeks, especially speaking on behalf of listening to our residents. We heard so many topics that came up. after the initial change of the 5-4, which wasn't what the residents of Medford were asking for. As other issues came about, we heard this council speak over and over again, how we should have our community involved. We should have the community make sure that we educate, we inform, we listen to our residents. And we've seen some things I know when I was away, my fellow Councilor waited till 11 o'clock to revert back to a vote and zoning that that was readjusted for what the residents of that neighborhood wanted, and they waited till 11 o'clock that was my fear about tonight. and waiting longer because people find this to be probably one of the most important initiatives. And we talked about some very important things tonight, not to belittle anything that was said tonight, because they're very important. But this is initiative, and I'll say it again, that was put forth by this council, that this council ran as part of their agendas, that we look at charter review, We are on the verge of making a decision and making a vote, as the mayor said, that probably needs a vote tonight unless we have an emergency meeting. Because after tonight, if we wait until the last meeting of April, it'll be too late for our state delegates to move this forward. Our state delegates that I've talked to have understand. They listen to the residents. They know the residents want an A3 vote. I give the mayor a lot of credit. I'm the first person to attack the mayor when I think she's not listening to the residents, but she has. She's listened to the residents. She's listened to the Charter Review Committee that have worked tirelessly to go from corner to corner, neighborhood to neighborhood, home to home, to make sure everybody was heard. They've done that. They partnered with the Collins Center, the professionals, over 80 years of experience that came back and guided us with what is the best practice for our community. We sent something off to the mayor and the mayor came back and said what? I will concede and understand that if the council wants the mayor to step down as the chairperson of the school committee, That is something she'll support. But the 8-3 Ward representation is what our community is screaming for. And I remind my colleagues, and I won't read it again because I don't want Zach getting mad at me, their platform that was forwarded by my friends from Our Revolution that read specifically that this is what they ran on. This is why they supported my colleagues. So we hear over and over again that You know, the decisions you make today will affect you in November. Well, there are so many things that we've done in the past couple of weeks, last couple of months, that we've tried very hard to make changes here. But in some of the biggest changes, some of the biggest concerns in this community, there is one common denominator that we've heard. No matter what side you're on, why are my local elected officials not listening. So I hope my colleagues see the olive branch that the mayor has put forth, understand that we are in a very, very tight timeline right now, and we put forth a favorable vote of 7-0 to move the charter forward so our state delegation can vote to put this on the ballot. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Is this with taking the mayor's changes to move back to eight to three? Is that what my fellow councilors would support with these changes? Just to be clear.
[George Scarpelli]: To move to 8-3, I will say yes to this.
[George Scarpelli]: Clarification, I think that what we've been told is the latest is mid-May, I mean mid-April, which is next week. So if we go to Committee of the Whole, then we'd have to schedule a meeting, a regular meeting, correct, to then move this forward. So if we call this an emergency meeting, next week to be the latest that we can vote on then it could be moved forward to the legislature. I think, would that be the more prudent decision if this is what we're doing, we could.
[George Scarpelli]: If this is the case, and this is, I'd rather not, I'd rather not lose this because, you know, semantics, you know, I'm ready to bend to make sure that we move something forward, Mr. President, but if we need to call it what we need to call it today, so we can vote on it Tuesday night, which is I believe the 12th, the 15th, excuse me. So that's right in the middle. If that's, then go off to the legislature on the 16th. That hopefully that gives us enough time. And I, I know my colleagues have said that being rushed, but holy cow, you know, you can't, you can't say that about one huge initiative in the community and then look what we're doing with zoning and not saying that we're not doing it there. So please let's, let's figure out a way to make this work tonight so we can get this, we can get this way too much work done and we're right there. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, although both those departments didn't respond the residents that reached out and had some concerns. did email me saying that he did speak with with a representative from the city and they explained the reasoning I believe is because of the construction work being done at Cape and Park basketball court that they had to take up those the existing trees which were full healthy trees I was told and then and there will be new trees planted there as part of the project in completion. So I just wanted to share that with everybody. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, and again this is, this was something that I'd rather not be talking about 12 o'clock at night because it is important but I think it's important that this was, this was an initiative that was put forth by. not just one, but many Jewish residents that reached out and I've talked to, and this was crafted with their support and understanding that this obviously isn't an easy topic, but this has come about with especially neighboring communities that have been holding different movements and directly witnessing The removal of swastika is another anti semitic propaganda that is really it's spewing hate and it's something that. we don't want here in Medford. And I wanted to make sure that the key piece of this whole resolution is made sure that people understood that to encourage peace and unity and understanding. I think that's what the key phrase in when I've talked, when I've met with my Jewish residents and friends that said, George, this is important because they feel that at a time where we're seeing concerns and issues with the, the, the, the dialogue that's being spread out, we're forgetting what people feel here and what people are feeling here is fair and. Not to say that I've had some great dialogue with residents that are Jewish and have mentioned that this is I should take this resolution and dissolve it and get rid of it and, and I can understand and respect their input, but at the same time. Um, as we said, as we became the welcoming city and we look at what we said many times today, even this afternoon, uh, it felt like, but as we talked about making sure that every member of our community feels welcome and feel safe and, um, and they feel like they've been heard, I think it was important that I followed through with this resolution and, uh, not everybody's going to, uh, going to agree with that, but that's fine. Um, um, I, you know, I, I think again, the motive at the end of this is making sure that, uh, looking at this resolution and having an open dialogue of peace and unity and understanding, uh, what our opportunities are here to have a dialogue, to not have Medford be, um, be, uh, dragged into something, um, something negative, something that's even worse that's going on around the world. So I appreciate my colleagues for letting me put this on the agenda and sharing this. And I hope that our members of our Jewish community that have felt this pain and feel the fear that They know that this Council and the city are behind them and know that we support their endeavors. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: that there was an incident in a neighboring community where there was swastikas. I did say that.
[George Scarpelli]: The request that I had for the parking department as well. We had some concerns and I think that I put it in a resolution weeks ago. Were they not in the proper format or because we had some questions. I know it's not
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I know we talked about the G parking, which is on there, but we also talked about policies and procedures that were in question that I wanted to ask the new director, meaning the especially the fact that I've received so many phone calls in regards to the appeals process. Um, so I think that's probably I know there's more, but I think those are the two that I've had a lot of calls and emails about that, get some clarification. Gotcha.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Madam Vice President. Thank you for being here and welcome. I think that prior to you, I think maybe hopefully your colleagues or City Hall informed you the relationship with the former department and the residents were very, very difficult. So complaints weren't going to your office because when other complaints went to that office, they just weren't heard. There was no faith there. And I hope that changes. So the calls that we received, I think the biggest concern and the biggest issue right now is a lack of information. And I'll give you one. The phone calls I received from people saying that we're selling parking spots, so people from outside the city of Medford can buy parking in Medford and take a method residents parking spot so they can take the green line. These are the things that have been floating out there, right? Um, the report that this is still a pilot program, correct? And no one really knows that this was changed, right? This is a full time program now, and I think maybe just if we can, I would recommend just a report or a press release or anything you could share with me with the council that to enlighten us how many people have taken advantage of this program and how it's benefiting people and where they're using these parking spots. Because I think that the calls that I got really did affect some residents that when they came home, there were cars that were parked there. They're not their neighbors, they're not their cars. And they understand that there's this new parking, but don't understand it. And I think that not having an avenue where there was someone on the other line, because the feeling was, and believe me, I understand traffic and parking, I work very closely in municipality, I work with that traffic and parking department. We understand how difficult it is. And it's a very volatile situation at times. But what we were hearing at times that even when the person on, the residents and would call in, you would get negativity right off the bat, and it would become so, so combative that it really wasn't productive at all. So that's when the cause that's some of the calls we that I received. And I think that's why I brought that up back some months ago about getting some information prior to it becoming a full-time program. So I think if there's any way that, you know, you could give us just a brief report, just give us an update on how many people have taken advantage of it, how many people purchased the parking, what are our benefits financially, how we benefit from it, you know, are people taking advantage of it, and and then just informing them just the basic guidelines that this isn't free parking for people outside the city of Medford. I mean, like again, these are the things that unfortunately people didn't have the warm and fuzzies calling the former office because they just, it got right off the bat combative and it just got turned off very, very quickly. So, and don't get me wrong. I know nine out of 10 times the person calling is gonna have an attitude. Why? Because they're angry. And, um, it shouldn't shouldn't be on the person that's answering the phone. That's not fair. But again, at the same time, we are a service customer service based industry here and listening to those constituents, even when they are 1000% wrong. I think it's very important. I think that And as we turn the corner and we meet a new director I'm pretty excited about starting off fresh and making sure that there's an avenue where residents have someone they can call and, in essence, get set straight. So, if you can. through the chair if we can offer that as an amendment to to just share something with our residents that something's very simple that you know that maybe will alleviate phone calls to you where they council scott pelley a b and c said well here's the truth and send that off i think would be beneficial
[George Scarpelli]: So that's- I appreciate that. Sure. I think that'll go a long way. And like I said, you know, I think you hit the nail on the head when you said a lot of times people just want to be listened to and then told, you know, thank you, but you're wrong and move on. So I think that again, I think that that's important, but that's, I think for the G zone, I think you, you know, answering that question and publicly and although no one's really here and no one's on zoom but it'll be nice to get something that we can share with our constituents if they ask because again um people don't like to search people don't like to do their homework they just rather call and complain and have someone else do the homework so um so if that's possible that'd be a great assistance to at least myself. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Go ahead. One other topic I know that I want to address this evening, maybe just as a starting point I know that the process we have and correct me if I'm wrong for appealing a ticket that the resident that would get the ticket would appeal in a certain amount of time. And then it would be ruled on. And then if it's ruled not in their favor, then there's an option for them to go to the next level. Correct. And that would go to a state level where there's a higher fee. Is that okay? Yeah, correct.
[George Scarpelli]: So why don't we do that?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, because I think it'll be maybe just a discussion with the two of us. I think that because the, just so you know, and FDA, so the conversation I've been getting from residents is they feel like it's a trap that There really isn't anybody listening when it comes time to appeal a ticket that, um, if they peel a ticket at noon at 1215, they're getting denied right away. And it seems like, you know, not knowing who's doing the appeals process and stuff like that. So I think it's, it's something that that's, I'm getting a lot of phone calls with that saying. I got a ticket. This is why the reasoning when you know, is it true what they said? Probably not.
[George Scarpelli]: So if I can, obviously I've asked for this months ago, it wasn't on the agenda. So like I said, maybe I'll set something up for a 15 minute phone call or 10 minute phone call, just to touch base so I can give you specifics so you can understand what I'm saying.
[George Scarpelli]: No, thank you council vice president. I appreciate everybody's work and I think this is such a vital, vital piece of where the direction of method is going when you talk about method square. It's something that we've all been waiting for when it talks about zoning and redevelopment and I know. You know, I would caution our group to maybe. Maybe really take a step back and I know we've done comprehensive plans. I know we've done. Um, you know, uh, we've looked back to other other plans that were put together in a place, but I think it's very important that we possibly should be looking at. We've heard so many amazing. Amazing things from different professionals tonight that when you look at what we're trying to do in method square and zoning being the piece, but I think that. Where, where we're handcuffed and what we can do when you talk about development, I think it's important that we maybe. Start working a little bit closer, especially with this quarter and looking at this area and looking at what we're trying to do zoning. and development and working with the state. I was very fortunate to work with one of the most innovative mayors in the Commonwealth, Joe Curtatone, when he redeveloped Assembly Row, and looking at the gateway communities and understanding how we brought that together. He gave me the opportunity to sit on so many amazing meetings and watched how he grew certain parts of that community. And something simple as lower Broadway where he eliminated two lanes on each side and made it one lane and took me down for a ride because my uncle was upset that traffic was building up on low Broadway and understanding. Slowing that roadway down increased the visibility for the storefronts and expanding sidewalks and bringing neighbors and businesses out together and bringing the community out. And it was so important to watch that. And he would often call me and he would say, George, guess where I am? And he would laugh because he would say, what community would build an access road around the center of your town to avoid the center of your town? And we have that. And we have so many aspects of Medford Square where we're looking at the Mystic River. We're looking at possibly the opportunity that we saw when we closed an exit, an off-ramp. and saw what that made, what kind of an impact that would make to our walkable, bikeable, and community-driven development in that area. You see the excitement, and I appreciate all the work we're doing with the zoning and looking at the different benefits we have, but maybe this is a time that we can You know, take a deep breath and slow this process down so we can bring together. All of our stakeholders, our business communities, I, I understand that the hand how we handcuffed with the mandates of, you know, we don't allow banks. We need banks. I understand that. Um, but. We're talking about parking. We've talked to so many residents and business owners that have talked about revisiting the parking garage behind Colleen's and looking at the other side of the city and providing another anchor parking area where you're making Medford Square more vibrant. It'd be interesting to see if there's possibility of working with the Riverside Mall and redeveloping that area together with the three parcels that we put out to bid with our zoning changes. So I'm sure that our team has been doing that, but I don't think that it's been public enough. I don't think that our community has shared the vision that when we talk about two ways, a two-way lane on Salem Street, or changing the traffic flow, or understanding the traffic studies with the state, so i think we're at a critical time but exciting time that as we're looking at our zoning we should be really stepping back and looking what neighboring communities have done and growing certain areas of their community and and use it as a model it doesn't have to be assembly row it doesn't have to be linfield it doesn't have to be malden center but we can Look at what we're doing with our zoning and the opportunities we have for redeveloping that area with the business community housing. And mix use that I think is very exciting. So, I mean, that that that's what I'm hearing from this meeting. Although we heard a lot of great. Understanding of what the zoning is in these these quarters, but at the same time. Really looking at the bigger piece. I think that's the what I'm hearing from residents that. What are we doing with method square and as we're doing this zoning, it shouldn't be 3 prong traffic study. Development zoning, I think that, you know, it'd be a, it'd be a great way to capture a way that we can bring it all together, bring in housing. And bring in bringing it all together for for this area because I. Again, I don't see it as a comprehensive plan with all the entities together. I see it as bits and pieces. And I think that it might be beneficial that we use that community-based meeting that we're trying to implement in a better fashion. I appreciate what you're doing. Council Vice President with that and getting the community more involved. And I think that this is vital. So again, I know I'm a little winded, but I think this is a huge opportunity for us. So thank you for allowing me to speak. Thanks.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I just wanted to, uh, I've known the Monte Cavo family for a long time and, um, And when you hear the news of such a wonderful anniversary of 50 years of marriage, I think it's something we should celebrate. They've been lifelong Method residents that have been a huge part of our community. And I felt that it would be fitting that we recognize them tonight. So thank you and happy anniversary.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Billy Organowski, when we talk about a marriage for 51 years, but you look at what he gave our community, 50 years of service working for the city of Medford. I know Paula, Tiffany, and Jerry, this was a shock, a very unexpected passing. Hardworking man, worked up until the day he passed. So I think that our community lost a very good man and hardworking individual that did his job every single day and left a mark with so many people that he encountered. send the family of the Ogonowski family condolences and that we thank Billy for his services and he should never be forgotten. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: It would be. It would be nice to ask the mayor of the process of, um, that 51 years never had another job. One interview he's ever had for a full time job, and he drove. He made that ride for 51 years, and, uh, I think would be fitting, uh, for his service that we find some sort of, um, respectful honor, and especially in that area. And if we can ask the mayor and if that could be possible, I appreciate that. Council President apologize.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate Councilor Collins bringing this forward. I know we talked before the meeting. I had a resolution similar in similar fashion to have a meeting with the traffic, the new traffic commissioner, and discuss a few other important topics like the South Method G parking, get an update on that situation, the policies and procedures of appealing a ticket and understanding the nuances for some community questions that members that have gone through a very difficult time with that. So if we could simultaneously move those meetings together to hear both resolutions if we can, Mr. President, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I wasn't here for the meeting, but follow the meeting when I got back. It seems like everything is in order. So move approval and I also motion to join.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I thank Ms. Desmond for being here tonight. You make a compelling case, but unfortunately, like I told you, I've reached out to the building department and I'm trying to get some legal support. Unfortunately, this Council, none of us have a legal background yet. Unless Justin can hurry up and get over with it. But that school's very difficult. Can I scare him straight? Yeah, so I think that ultimately, you know, tabling this motion until we get some legal contact from the mayor's legal teams to assist us with any questions we have, because right now, I'd have to support building departments as the professionals in this entity, but I don't want to rule on something without the proper knowledge or understanding. So my recommendation that we table this, Mr. President, until we have legal legal response. Um, what Mrs. with Miss Desmond has, uh, shared with us. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: That's my confusion, building department ruled on it. That's in their brief. So I'm not saying that I don't agree with, I don't agree or disagree with them, Unfortunately, we don't have a city solicitor, and unfortunately, we do have to pay an outside legal team to answer some of our questions. If my fellow Councilors would move on that, that's their purview, but I really think that it's still strong that we need legal, not that I don't trust or respect you, Ms. Desmond. I work for the city of Medford and that's great. Department works for us for the city. So I think it's important that we do get a legal response. Um, we've spent a lot of money on frivolous, uh, law questions for many, many years here. And, uh, I, I feel council president bears his philosophy on, um, giving KP law any more money than we don't have to. I think that it leaves us with, without a city solicitor, it leaves us with the only option, which is to have our legal team to make sure that what was provided with our building department and what you provided us gives us a better understanding so we can make the proper decision. So, like I said, if it's two weeks, we wait for our next city council meeting. Hopefully we have an answer and we move on this as quickly as possible. scrub-a-dub can start working. So I know Councilor Beza's car is filthy and he's been waiting for it to open.
[George Scarpelli]: So I understand his frustration. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Vice President Collins, for bringing this forward. I think that we know the support of this Council supports all of our unions, and bringing this forward is so important, but I would recommend or I would I would request that we amend this resolution. I received a bunch of phone calls today after members of our workforce here in method read this resolution. And if we could amend it to also read that that the City Council support the city administration priorities, municipal unions that have been working without a contract for some over three years. I think that as we're talking with one breath, a city entity that we're going to support and making sure that there's fair wages, which I totally support a thousand percent, but I would also in the same breath, keep our municipal workers that are working without a contract in the forefront along with this resolution. If you could, Mr. President, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for explaining that, Mr. Hickson. I know that, so these plans, they've already done the work. We owe them the money. So instead of paying it off, and with an interest moving forward, we pay it off up front now. And these plans are ours to keep, so they're already done, right?
[George Scarpelli]: No, there were total plans. there was a final plan that was presented. And then one of the reasons why I think it failed was the rank and file and the fire department realized that, and the former chief who was part of the planning team mentioned that it was inadequate. But we still have all of the plans, even the original plans that had the footprint that worked with the former chief, with the team that put that together, that's everything?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, all right. And I know as we move forward, just understanding people are very confused with the free cash. So we've certified free cash last year, and we spent down some of that money to be put into different pots, correct? Yes. Now, this is the new number, we're back up to $28 million, just for clarity sakes? Yes. Okay. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Appreciate my colleagues thoughts on this. I think that as we look at the parcels being small, I think that they are important. I think they are valuable for the fact that you might not see a four story development, but you'll see a butters that would take up that land relatively quickly. then move that money into the Affordable Housing Trust. So I concur with my fellow colleague, Councilor Leming, in understanding that we finally have a revenue source that we can start feeding into that. And the fact that we've heard tonight that the use of free cash to be used for anything is pretty frightening, considering this Council spoke a year ago on a number that was relatively the same number to keep us out of an override that really is affecting so many of our homeowners and affecting now a lot of our renters because of the increase in taxing that fall back onto our renters. So I think that I made a motion and I'll bring it back up soon because I think maybe my council colleagues understand the importance of maybe an audit and putting that back out to a vote. Because again, I know that one of my council colleagues mentioned that it's nobody's fault, but it is somebody's fault. When you continually have millions and millions and millions of dollars Again $28 million in free cash. There's something going wrong. Again, repeat this so people don't take this out of context. I'm not saying that someone's doing something illegal in the city, but there's a blatant misuse of our funds that we keep we keep increasing this free cash amount to a number that's astronomical. What was put forth during the override is the understanding the process of free cash is seeing most communities that are trying to eliminate free cash or keeping it at that level for the bond rating, which I believe at the time for metric was close to, I believe, seven and $11 million, keeping it there that keeps us at the bond rating that we have today and using that money appropriately. So I appreciate the, the, the highlight of the misuse of free cash, excuse me, the highlight of the free cash. And I highlight the fact that that again, something has to be done. We have to look at the way we're spending our money in our community because we see and hear over and over again that we can't do A, B, and C because we don't have the funding. But we obviously have the funding when we have $28 million in free cash. Again, free cash is money that is voted by this council for the previous budget season to move our projects forward, to move our city forward. And if that money is not being spent properly, this is where we are. $28 million in free cash. So again, even if it's not spent, putting it into a high-interest account that brings us money so it's not sitting in account for the whole year, maybe there's another way that we can look at creating revenue for our community just out of interest, out of $28 million. There are so many avenues to look at this process, but I'm going to vote in favor of this paper, because I think this is something we've talked about in supporting our affordable housing trust, something that the previous council, before this council started, Council Falco's wishes and his resolution, and I believe Council Bears and I were on that council, that again, these are parcels that we're looking at purchasing and then building, dropping in a development, There are small parcels that could be hopefully taken by the abutters and then used to add some housing and then build the affordable trust account. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I have a question. Thank you. I apologize. I just didn't really know if you knew my standards. I just have to, just for clarification purposes and move forward, just to say again, Bob, we're at $28 million again in free cash?
[George Scarpelli]: That's what we have today, $28 million again.
[George Scarpelli]: Go ahead. I would before we before we adjourn. I think that if Chair Graham and President Bears would sing happy birthday to school can remember john and topper, I think would be a fitting way to end. Um, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Zach, will you please explain to this kid? Please explain to him. They need emergency foot surgery, but not, you know.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Please forgive me. It's been a long week and I appreciate taking my email today. And I know that before I had a few questions that as I go through, I think the administrative assistant for the Recreation Department, I think it would be cost efficient considering we're using members of that department that are making upwards close to $100,000 to spend probably a third of their time doing clerical work that could be done with maybe even a part-time employee or a full-time administrative assistant. I think that would be a huge plus for that department in the city. I think the The role of the, um, the therapeutic position for the recreation department. As the director mentioned, we have a person that's already working for the department that's trained and licensed. But having that person freed up to do those positions, I think would be a huge. add to our community, especially as we focus on adding so many of our new programs for children with disabilities. And I think that really stretching or adding a role as another program supervisor in that department to free that person up would be a huge success for us. Um, I think the other piece that was has been mentioned, I know that tomorrow will be another meeting at five o'clock with the parents that have came and talked with us to this council and subcommittee. I think that having an inclusion specialist within the city, whether we look at it as a part time role to start and then as a full time role, I think that the if we listen to the parents they really talked about adding that position that we need something similar to that in recreation but having that position city-wide where it's not looked at just as programming but for our students with disability as they age out and become adults and we look into offering assistance and whether it comes to job assistance or housing. I think that's the position that's really that I've heard that talking to the residents is something that's super important. I think that something that I'm a little perplexed why my colleagues didn't bring any, at least all of them we shouldn't but haven't, but I think we should all really focus on bringing a city solicitor assistant city solicitor and I think having the assistant city solicitor like we asked for that's working with the with the the city council directly I think is important I think that when you put that position out with such a low number we're not going to get qualified or even any applicants as we can see that we're on we're working close to four years now but So I think increasing that line to bring in a qualified city solicitor, assistant city solicitor, especially when you see the money that we're wasting and using on outside council. And the other piece that, you know, where residents have questions legality wise and they don't have an access to anybody at city hall to help them navigate. And as you can see, it's caused some disturbance within our community because A simple attorney talking to a resident, um, could have stopped a lot of negativity and, um, and what was going on with been going on and dividing this community. Um, I had just got off the phone a little while ago with a representative from the fire department. I think that not understanding or knowing what the, um, hiring processes we're hearing that there's going to be a huge class going out soon for the fire department. So that's something that I'll bring up. But I know that they're in the works with that. Um, I know that put in funding our police department and looking at the avenues that we wanted that we were looking forward to make it the police department that everybody's proud of. I think that they've done such a great job, but. From what I'm hearing, it's not the fact that we're not hiring, the fact that there aren't enough people to hire. So I think all of us have talked about the increase in the past for DPW because of, you know, I know the mayor's, the override was put in and it'll be interesting to see what this $500,000 for this that's going to save our streets and sidewalks. So I think that that's something that we hear calls about every single day. I'm sure all of you do, but making sure that we work with our commissioner to fill the needs and the DPW department. And then lastly, I know that I believe in last year's budget, we cut the line substantially for the abatement process and especially after the override and our most vulnerable members of the community that reached out to me looking for support with tax relief and looking at different abatement. I think we need to look at that line and make sure that we give the assessor enough support that if people are applying that our homes are assessed correctly and our, especially our most vulnerable members of this community, which mostly are seniors, homeowners, that aren't being pushed out of their homes because we're not giving them enough avenue to support them. So I know that my list is long, and I appreciate you listening, Mr. President, and to my fellow councilors, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President for bringing this forward. I think that this was an initiative that we looked at our most vulnerable. We looked at that as being one of the avenues that we can use to support our seniors. So again, I would second that as one of our very important issues that we all supported. So thank you. Thank you for bringing that forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, Mr. President, if I can just, I know that tomorrow I don't know what Councilors were invited, but I know that there's a five o'clock zoom with the parent organization dealing with the, um, next steps for the inclusionary specialist. And then, uh, I believe our meetings at six now. I was first, I thought it was when I was away. I thought it was Thursday, but it's tomorrow at six o'clock, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. To be transparent for both, I'm gonna be on Zoom. I'll be at the five o'clock meeting with the parent group, and then I'll jump on to ours at six. So thank you for clarification.
[George Scarpelli]: Excellent. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Council President. First, I thank Councilor Tseng to bring this forward, the changes forward, but I appreciate that he has the avenue to reach probably the smartest legal minds in the country at Harvard, but it'd be interesting to see the changes that are made to the call-in center or our legal team to look at what changes are made. I know that You did say a lot, so I'm lost in translation right now because I haven't seen anything. So I think that it's a little premature to bring all these changes that were presented by legal support at Harvard when we had the Collins Center, who are attorneys, that we vetted all of these processes through with them. So I- I love the point of information. I did also work with the Collins Center on this. OK, good. some, right? So I think that, you know, it'd be interesting once we get those, I think that, um, vetted properly again through the call and center to make sure that, uh, the ones that weren't, if they were, um, you know, like I said, I don't, I trust them, but again, that Harvard's not our legal representative to, um, to lead us. And I think that it's important that we make sure we do that. Um, now with the process, the two big changes, I think that, uh, you know, the lesser of, uh, is the mayor, the mayor's position as the president of the other chair of the city of the school committee. Um, I feel strongly that I think she or the mayor's position should be the leader of that, uh, that body and, um, and for many different reasons, but I leave it, I leave that at the will of the voters. Um, but I think what's more important, I think that this council has been in, uh, has been questioned over and over again, that are we making the right decisions for the whole community? Or are we doing this for one base? And when we hear time after time, because I'm sure you got the emails, I'm sure you got the phone calls, I'm sure you got the communication with the community that are very, very perplexed that this council would run on a platform of eight ward representations and then three at large candidates. It's bothersome that the question of equity comes around and gets thrown around easily. And this format clearly is not equitable. To think that this council is going to make a decision, possibly vote for this format, and possibly leave wards and leave parts of our community unrepresented would be a travesty because it's not about this council. As been said before, this is about the council today, the council in five years, the council in 10 years, and the council in 20 years. And being uniformed and giving people the opportunity to run for office. And we talked about all the pluses. I remember because I fought against those pluses, remember? I was against charter review for a long, long time. And it took a lot of talking to different communities, talking to colleagues in different communities and understanding from members of the charter review team and surveys and really understanding the importance of equity and what that meant. And this format that you're proposing and you're changing is an absolute shame to the community that has worked for two years, over 200 meetings, and all identified an eight and three format. We talk about why are people coming out? Why are people not connected to this process? And we identified the fact that we don't have board representation, and the fact that maybe there might be someone in that community that hasn't come out to vote, that re-energizes that community to be part of this process. What an opportunity. Then we talk about running in as an at-large member and how expensive that would be. And how many people, if you look around this reel, we all look the same, most of us. And most of us work together to get funding one way or the other. But to run for an office, you know what it takes? 20, 25,000 possibly. And looking at ward representation opens up the avenues for so many of the underprivileged that would never, ever, ever have the opportunity. So it's befuddling to me that I have openly read the platform of the Our Revolution Method that talked openly about ward representation. Now, I know we could say that no district representation is ward representation. Misleading and not true. Because as members of that organization that have reached out to me to speak on their behalf, they were clearly under the assumption it was eight representatives, every ward representative, big or small, elected population or not. To sit here and think that this process, this change is good, it's good for six people. It's good for their future in the business of politics. You could say it isn't, but if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, I've said it, it's a duck. This is self-serving. It's not what the community is asking for. And again and again, someone that might run for re-election and maybe not, you're giving a lot of people a lot of ammunition for one key factor for my colleagues here. You're just not listening to all of our residents. You're not. You had a body that was presented to you that you supported 1,000%, that had over 200 meetings and worked for two years, then sat with professionals with 80 years of experience that presented what this community is crying for. And to sit up here tonight and say, This is so exciting. This seven-member board, six are probably gonna vote for something the rest of the community is drastically against. And you can't say they're not because I'm getting the emails, I'm getting the phone calls. And so are our members that are on the Charter Review Committee. So I beg my fellow councilors. I know we don't see eye to eye. and a lot of things. But I know for sure the base that voted you in, that have reaching out to me, they want the eight ward representation. They want the 11 members. So I'm actually begging for you to please consider voting this down and going back to the original format. And if not, As I've said to many people, I implore that you reach out to the mayor because that is the next step to veto this because what's going to happen is that there's enough negativity out there that when this does go to the people and it does go to the vote, all their hard work is going to go for naught because the intentions of this council seems to be self-serving. And I know that might hurt. You might think it's inflammatory. You might think this is politics and you can cry whatever you want. but it's exactly what it says. What you're doing, it's exactly what it is. They put a lot of work, this committee put a lot of work into this process. And it was clear. And for someone that was so negative about it, and I turned full force around, and I'm sitting here advocating for it to other members of our community, so they can understand. And it's so clear. It is so clear. Eight leaves nobody behind. Think about that. Eight leaves nobody behind. The other option possibly will. When you talk about combining wards, that's still a big area. That still doesn't entice the equity that we've so many times cried for here. We wanna see a more diverse council. This is what you all said. We only have one person of color. I've heard that over and over again. If you look at neighboring communities, you see a group of elected officials that represent their communities because they're giving the opportunity to run for that office without limitations. So again, To be a politician, please vote 6 to 1 and give the people that are running for office against you, give them more ammunition that you're just simply not listening to the residents of the city. You're seeing it over and over and over again. Whether you win a vote or whether you don't, it's still very close. So I'll end with this. This will get voted and moved through. If this goes the way it usually does, it'll be six to one. It'll go to the council meeting, then it'll be voted against six to one, and then it'll go to the mayor. And then again, people will have to gather, people have to rally, right? Then they'll say, Councilor Scarpelli is being negative again. He's starting a group to go against what? To go against what we're doing here and not listening to the residents. Because in every platform that I've been involved in, in this community and helping residents, there's one common denominator. We're not listening. This administration is not listening. Whether it's zoning issues, whether it's override issues, whether it's charter review issues, it's the same cry You're not listening to all 60,000 residents. You're making your decisions on your special interest, and that's it. So, I know what it takes to be a bigger person and say, you know what, look yourself in the mirror and say, not what best for me, George Scapelli, because that's what I was doing when I was sitting back and saying, no, Mr. McDonald, I don't believe in this process. I don't believe in ward representation. When you look yourself in the mirror and say, well, you know what? Look at the variables and how positively it affects the pros and cons. And how could you not want eight representatives? How could you not want all wards represented? So if I offended anybody, I apologize. But again, this is coming from people that have openly said they voted for members of this council and feel like they're not even being heard.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. One thing I concur with my colleague is that this process doesn't stop with this process for equity. but I can guarantee you an eight ward council moves us forward a lot quicker in equity. And as we move forward, the equity builds off of that eight. By not going with the eight, you're limiting that equity. Now it's great when you could take numbers, and my colleague is a brilliant individual, we know that. But I revert back to a very important comment I've made. The residents feel strongly with the 8-3 format, period. What works, what doesn't work, what communities it works in, we can mold whatever we want to fit your narrative. But understand very simply, we've heard from the call-in center, the professionals, for all due respect to my colleague, 80 years of experience between the two of them. We've heard that I believe there's only a handful of councils throughout the commonwealth that aren't based the way of an A3 council. And doing my research and reaching out to those councils that do have that ward representation, it works. The voices are heard. The neighborhoods come out. People are rejuvenated. There's more energy. And to say that this process might hurt my colleague, that's not true at all. You're an incumbent. That's now controlling a base, where now this opens the process of eight wards, depending where we all live. Because it could be that a few of you might be running against each other in a few years. And we can't have that because it's true. So it's a very simple format. It's easy to speak and spin dialogue and understand, but I want you to go back to the most important piece that I brought up and that I implore all of you to listen to. The community has worked very, very hard with the leadership of our Charter Review Committee. They have done years of data. They've done years of door knocking. They've done years of meetings. They've done the work. Not a few weeks in between talking to friends at Harvard. They've done the work. They pulled up the information. They came to us for what their view was with the residents, all of the residents that they queried. They met with an organization that had nothing to gain, just experience, and they shared their opinions. So we can talk as much as we want and spin it as much as we want. The bottom line is this. If you go against the 8-3 representation, if we go against it, you are truly going against what the majority of this community is asking for through the Charter Review Committee. And you are definitely not accelerating the process of equity, period. You could say whatever you wanna say, whatever daddy you wanna say, but I will guarantee you, if we have a member in our community that feels like they need to run and they might be marginalized, it's not gonna work when you have to do it with two wards, that's even difficult. And at large, we know how hard that is. So again, the vote will be the vote. I just hope that my colleagues reconsider and actually go back to November past and remember what you promised your people. Because again, I'm only bringing this up because they're calling me and they're sharing it with me to share this council publicly. So I'll leave you with that. I think it's important that we could spin anything we want, and we can say whatever we want to make it fit whatever narrative we want. But if it's right in front of you, and I won't say duck anymore, if it's right in front of you, and if it's black and white, it's black and white. I think that's been said and heard. I'm sure you've gotten a bunch of emails yourselves, phone calls yourselves, people from the podium, people that were on Zoom in the last couple of meetings, they've shared this. because I haven't heard one person come back and say, hey, Councilor Scarpelli, what a great format, five and four.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. So we've heard this over and over again with this council is we were voted for. We were voted to make these decisions. We were, what we did was support a body that would go out to the public to do all the work for us, to do everything that we're looking for. They're just saying that's not happening. They did that. The charter review committee, was given the ability to go out all over the community and get what this community as a whole thought was best for this community, our community. To say that we can't go out and survey the whole community, let's do that. But even to that point, we have a charter review committee that this council voted for, that we pushed through, that we, excuse me, excuse me, I take that back, you're right, we didn't vote for it, but we support it.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, so we support it, that we support and we applaud it every time you came up. And I'm sorry, because I'm getting testimony from people on the committee that feel a little slighted from my colleagues' comments. that felt some of the charter members feel that while they're insulted right now for the way that things were presented just now, just to share with you that the idea that that work wasn't done, the work was done. We applauded these members. We applauded the two years. We applauded the over 200 meetings. They went out, went to corner to corner. They got the information that you are saying that we don't have. We have it. We have it. That's what they came back with. They came back with the report that favorably said, unanimously from the people that I've talked to, that it was eight and three. Then you say, you know, well, we were elected to make these decisions. We're minimizing the fact that this elected body understood that there was a charter review committee that went out and did the work. And we sat through maybe four or five meetings, and all of a sudden came back with an idea or a process that you think, six of you think, that that might be the best way to go. Five and four. So it's disingenuous to say that the work wasn't done, that people didn't do their homework, that they didn't listen to people. You're not listening to people. They said it over and over again. that the Charter Review Committee did their homework, they talked to people, they came back. And I'll guarantee you this, maybe we didn't hit 100 out of 100 people, but if you asked 100 people, hey, would you like a city council representative in your neighborhood or Would you want to share with another ward and minimize how important your ward is? Because that's what the questioning is, because that's what I'm hearing. That's what people have said to me. So wait, so saying that possibly my ward won't be represented, that's saying what? That the council doesn't feel that my neighborhood is that important? These are the questions that were asked to me. And what we're hearing tonight is truly a lot of talk, but you haven't answered the questions that's being asked by, when I say 20 out of 20 people that reached out to me, are you doing what the residents are asking for? And you don't need a survey to say that. The people did their homework. Again, if anybody in the Charter Review Committee feels slighted, I hope it's not for me, it's not intended. We appreciate the work that you've done. That's why I unanimously supported your 8-3 format. We went through the process, the exercise with the call-in center. They supported the 8-3, it was very clear. So, excuse me, they didn't support that, but understanding they've shown me enough information that the 8-3 format is what I would support. So again, I just don't think that you're making a decision for what's best for this community and the future of this community when it comes to the elected body. And when you talk about equity, you're looking to see what fits this dialogue for this council. And no matter what you say after this comment that I just made, I'm just telling you, that's the perception that's out to the public. not not the George Scarpelli public, but the public that have reached out to me that normally wouldn't talk to me. So and, you know, I'm just imploring you that I'm sharing this with people that support the six of you have called me and said, Thank you, Council Scarpelli. I'm really taken back with the people that I supported because I was under the impression that it was 83. So
[George Scarpelli]: I bring this to light because it has been an issue for this council for almost four years now, maybe more now, is that I appreciate that Councilor Tseng did his due diligence in reaching out to legal minds that he is directly involved with, but as one councilor, not having a city solicitor and not having that opportunity or running these changes through a city solicitor is something this council should be really upset about and hopefully do something about it because this is a huge concern. But I think that what we're hearing is just common sense where I think we're saying things to be too smart. where instead it's right in front of you. And what's in front of you is there is no doubt that an eight ward representation, that there is no concern, there is no question that anybody has brought up or anybody has talked about, even tonight, that how the eight representatives will negatively affect us. But we've also heard how the eight is really the will of the people. So again, I know we don't want to talk about politicizing anything, but this is what it comes down to. At least that's what it seems like to my colleagues. And it's very simple. You could deny it all you want. You can question it or run numbers or state legal genre, whatever it is. But the bottom line is very simple. Remember where we were two years ago in a day. We had residents over and over again, door knocking, trying to get signatures, and it just wasn't happening. So we turned to a child review committee and give them the energy to go out and do the will of the people, bring us back the information of the people. And that's what they did. And even in all these committees, all these governance committees, we didn't hear out of that 5-4, and I haven't even looked into it for the fact that I think it's wrong in every sense of the way, how that satisfies everybody. But the truth of the matter is even the people that supported the 5-4 didn't have an issue with 8. And then again, we talk about the lack of turnout. I know one resident said the lack of turnout and the same people come here, the same people do this. Yes, this is one of the intents of an eight person ward. It's to generate, to rejuvenate that base, to get people out. Whether there's 10 people that vote in the ward or 10,000 people that vote in the ward. And I know it hurts people's feelings when people call them on things, but that's too bad. This is our job. My job is to make sure that people wanna spin it as much as they want and saying this is, he's polarizing, he's making this into something it isn't. All I've done from the beginning of this process is share the information and questions that residents have sent to me. And I've shared my personal opinion where I was and where I am today with the charter review. So you could sit back and when I get off and defend it and say, he's bad, he's trying to rattle the tree again. The bottom line is this, you haven't shown your constituency that for some reason this eight ward representation brings a negative light to the city of Medford in any way. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry. Can you hear me, Madam Chair?
[George Scarpelli]: I apologize. Um, I think what Judith is bringing up and what some residents have reached out to me and, um, and the understanding of, um, this type of change zoning change in the one family neighborhoods. I think the realistic The answer has to be that this is a realistic outcome, that it's not going to be 10, 20, 30 years. After last week's meeting, I had developers calling me that shared that, George, just so you know, as a developer, that we won't wait 10, 20 years, and they'll do it as soon as possible. knocking on those doors for those one family homes and offering some pretty substantial monies to purchase those homes. And I think that to share the information, the questions that residents have been reaching out to me that the reason why they brought it to my attention because we talked about this at the meeting a few weeks ago is that the fear of losing their close-knit neighborhood and then turning it into a very dense, transient community. And that's something that, you know, it's not what I believe. I think that, you know, you can have neighborhoods of three-family homes and still have a community failing that a one-family neighborhood has, but it's a realistic fear that the residents in these neighborhoods have shared the concern. Again, I don't want to minimize or I don't want to be on the council in two or three, four years. And we see drastic changes in one family neighborhoods in that district. And all of a sudden saying, wait a second, this wasn't supposed to happen this quick. So I think that it sure, I mean, it could move forward. with the 30-year process as people age out, but this could also happen within a year of these zoning changes that developers are knocking on doors. I think people have to understand that. I think this is one reason why I wouldn't support this venture because I think that We still haven't informed our neighbors enough of these changes. I know we've tried and we're, we're making strides and getting more information out. But again, these are the same issues that, you know, we have a resident like miss Briggs that just came to the podium, very educated, very involved. She came to the city council meeting, but we have multiple other members of our community that are very confused. who don't want to come to a meeting that don't understand this process, and we're not going into their neighborhood. Again, I just needed to share that. I've been saying it since we started the meetings, when we started our rezoning meetings, and that we do have to do a better job so residents can understand this. I know Councilor Bears did a great job. you know, answering the question about the one family and people not being able to build their one families if it comes down or it has to redo an existing one family, that was something that was very confusing to a lot of people, including myself, and I appreciate that description, but I do think that we have to be realistic and we have to be, make sure that both sides of their concerns are heard because uh yes it is we do need rezoning yes and we need some we need more housing but at the same time it is true that within a relatively possibly when within a relatively short period of this rezoning that these neighborhoods can be and will be drastically different the one family you know, neighborhood feeling will be gone. I think that that's a realistic outlook. It's not trying to be divisive. I think it's people want to know that, is that a possibility? So I just want to be fair that yes, we could see the possibility of attrition and the process go through so we can see the changes that might be needed, but also could also be something very drastic and very fast. and uh could be very it could be changed very very quickly so i appreciate the time madam chair but i think that i had to share what conversations i have had with members of that community and i think that as we move forward um Ms. Briggs brought up another very important question that, is it just this neighborhood? I think that with our consultants and our community development board, we really have to put a list together. So those neighbors that aren't being talked about, people that aren't at the table right now, that they know that this type of situation is coming to their neighborhood. So I'd appreciate that. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: You want to turn your... You can hear me? Yeah. Zach, now I know exactly how you feel. So powerful.
[George Scarpelli]: I won't. Well, good evening, everyone. Thank you for joining us this evening for our subcommittee on education and cultural committee today, February 25th, 2025. Will our clerk call the roll, please?
[George Scarpelli]: Present. Okay, four present, one showing up soon. Let's move forward if we can. So this is, we're here to discuss Resolution 25-027, Resolution to Discuss Recreation Department Programs for Youth with Disabilities. Be it resolved that the committee on education and culture schedule a meeting on February 25 at six o'clock city council chambers, the committee will discuss the needs of the recreation department for the upcoming budget season, and the committee will also discuss the recreational programs involving our disabled community if I can, if you can all allow me. I would like if my fellow Councilors, because the parents are the reason why we're here, I think that it would behoove us to have them speak and just share with us because part of this discussion is starting a new slate here at Medford with recreation, our leadership team, and looking into making sure that we have a partnership with our parents, the recreation department, and the city leadership to make sure that we can follow through for our wishes for our families, disabled families here in Medford. So would anybody like to kick it off? Come on up. Hi. Name and... Nice to see you, my friend. We sure do.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: All right, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So I, I, I think that I appreciate, um, I appreciate the discussions we've had. Patricia, I appreciate what my fellow colleagues, I know that Councilor Callahan and Councilor Leming really took the leadership role with this and moving it forward. So, and then coming out that evening to bring this forward. Now, as I will speak as a City Councilor for the City of Medford, who is the chairperson that brought a full-time recreation department to the City of Medford. When we started that program under Mayor Burke at the time, we really wanted to focus that when we started, it was really a very thin program when it talked about staffing, funding. It was really supposed to be a self-sustaining program. And as we move forward, we were supposed to have been growing with our community and enhancing programs like we're talking about tonight. We're in a position I think that where we met the city council and all of our council members felt that we felt strong so strong about this that looking at that position is very important in our community. But the, the recreation department is that department. Like I said, we might not have been happy with how things have gone in the past, but I think that I can speak of what I've seen as a resident of Medford is that we've had some hurdles because of limitations. And this is why starting this meeting off right and saying, OK, having our programs, having a leader like Kevin, working with a parent organization that we can craft together, and then work for zero to 99. Because that's what the recreation department's for. The recreation department isn't about sports. I know, unfortunately, it seems like it's been the Saturday three o'clock to four o'clock program, but I think tonight you'll hear some pretty exciting stories and plans that we have to move forward with, not just sports programs, but other programs that we're looking to enhance our programs for our families. But being a city program, a city department, we're that conduit to the library. We're the conduit to the schools. We're going to bring all that together. So at least that's how I feel. I'll call on my colleagues, but if we can, I think you have something to add. Sure, yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, right now this is still a position that we have to petition to the mayor and go through the process, and hopefully that's going to be part of the discussion as we move forward where the mayor is the ultimate authority in the city deems to be. So I think that's going to be important. But I think tonight is really just have that discussion to get all that information out that then we can report back to the mayor and the council and we can move forward.
[George Scarpelli]: We appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: So again, I'll say it again like we started, that's yesterday. The hope is as we're here tonight, the hope is that we, I'm a program developer for a city that gives me the opportunity to do a lot of great things. But we know we can't, I don't make the decisions, because I don't know what different demographics need in our community. So this is where we are today. This is where the start, it's going to be the start, at least how I feel, is the start of something amazing where parents will work with the recreation department, the leadership team there, and whatever piece we do get, and move that forward together because we can make, we're not, at least I, as a city councilor, I'm not going to do a program just to check a box. That's not, that's not the way I do things. We're not checking boxes. That's why we're doing this. That's why we're having this meeting.
[George Scarpelli]: All right. Thank you. So I know that Councilor Callahan, uh, and then Councilor
[George Scarpelli]: If you can.
[George Scarpelli]: All set? Yeah, thanks. Thank you. Council Beas.
[George Scarpelli]: That's the concern. You're bringing up great questions. That's what we hear. These are the things we want to hear. And Adam takes great, great notes, and we're going to break it down. Thanks, Adam.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Collins.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Um, if I can't, uh, We call on Councilor Leming, who's from Zoom.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council. I know I know everyone needs to talk but I know that we have councils that I We only have about 15 minutes left, but I know that we wanted the director also to share some information. So if you have, if you have anything time.
[George Scarpelli]: I agree. Councilor Tseng, you had your hand up.
[George Scarpelli]: OK, so I know we have one more person before Kevin, but you have three minutes to name and address the record.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can.
[George Scarpelli]: Thanks. Thank you, Kevin, if you can. And before Kevin starts I think that this is this is good what we're doing is good, because I, from what I see. I'm saying this is two positions. I'm seeing what we originally thought we're coming in for is really putting together programs for our disabled community through the recreation department. But as Tanya started the program and looking at a totality of what we need, this is something that I, this is great to hear where we are. Cause they really think it's two different, two different positions because they think we need that person, but then we need that person with the boots on the ground.
[George Scarpelli]: Council President, I had that, as one of my closing comments is gonna be that maybe we need to start two groups. One is a working group that we talk about the greater position and then the more parent group that's working recreation where we are today. So Kev, I know that you've been waiting. I appreciate it. So go ahead.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, and to to share with that, Kevin, I think that as a professional, when we started this process years ago to make method a full-time program, I think we dropped the ball like we've done with a lot of things in the last five and a half years but II to give people an understanding what neighboring recreation departments have, I'll use ours. We have a director. I'm the program developer. We have a recreation manager. Then we have eight program coordinators. I have a marketing specialist. We have a financial director. We have administrative assistant. We have a facilities director. And we also have a pool, an aquatics director and an assistant aquatics director. And we're bringing in now, what we're looking now is to bring in a recreation therapeutic specialist. So, and that's the person that started helping us start this program. So I can see the limitations and I think this is two separate issues. I think what we have right now, really as what we discussed earlier, two very different and specific wants and needs. One is really having that inclusion specialist that is overlooking the whole city where it's just not recreation, but everything. right, getting our families and our 0-99 involved in our community. And then having that recreation person that's looking at recreation programming, partnering with the parents, not coming from what Kevin's going to say, or from what I'm going to say, or what Joe Levine will say in Malden, but really work with parents to say, these are the programs that would could run out of recreation, that would be successful. Now, what you have in front of you is one of the programs that talking to parents and getting an idea as just a rough draft that we can kick to get it started. But yeah, yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: And I think that came from- It can be done.
[George Scarpelli]: And miss Sherry, this came from you. So this came from the parents. And I think that's why when Kevin said we're going to start fresh is really do that.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. So I know that, um, I, we are coming close. We do have, it looks like one person from the community who has a question. And then if I can just tie some things in and if any other councils want to just add that in, just really tie this day up and get some action step for the, as we move, move to tomorrow. So if we can. Gaston, if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Gaston. Council Bias.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. So I do think that that's, that's a great motion, but if we can, if someone can make a motion that, that through this, through this subcommittee meeting that we have, we call on Kevin Bailey is the recreation director to work with our parents to start a parent working group for recreation programming. So we get that piece tied in so we can continue with that growth if we can. And then we could, that piece, we can get that running right now. If we can do that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: With a parent organization to continue with programs for families with disabilities.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I think that if we, from what I've heard, right, I think that if we look at Councilor Callahan had a great point and volunteers are great, but in my experience, volunteers aren't sustainable, but bringing that volunteer in as part of a working group with that volunteer, we have some great people in the audience. I won't call her name out because I know she's probably the smartest recreation mind dealing with this community. And I think it's so important that we involve that person. Kevin's good friend. But we look at starting a working group with someone from the diversity team, the school department, the recreation department, our parent volunteers, our community volunteers, a city council member in community affairs and someone from the mayor's office. I think that as we start the budget process, I think that's the team we need to bring together to express what you said, Tanya, when we first started is something bigger than I thought when you first came up. Boy, that was a kick in the pants to say, okay, this is something bigger than just recreation programs and not making it to sports. This is something that our community needs for growth and development, not just through their birth, but as we know, my little friend who's now 21 is now moving on and is gonna need that support as well to grow and get involved. So I think that's important. So Kevin, sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: It could be a volunteer recreation assistant director in a neighboring community that lives in Medford that might volunteer his time to help with that process as well. So I think maybe we have a sidebar at the end of the meeting and we just talk and get put something concrete together because I know you up there Kevin. What people don't understand, when your director, when your team has to spend 10 to 15 hours a week returning emails, returning phone calls, doing menial, you know, positions that really weren't meant for them. I mean, I know that, you know, Kevin's dealing with getting the pond and pool. Like I said, I have two people that are doing one pool right now and, you know, Granted, it's beneficial.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. It's facilitating, right. It's getting it, painting, whatever needs to be done, right? All the safety protocols in place. And so we understand that. I hope everybody understands that there has been so many limitations because it hasn't been funded correctly and staffed correctly. And I think I've talked to parents to nauseam about that. But as we're moving forward, I think that we have a path for programming. because of the Tri-City partnership that you can use different resources to really bring some great programming for our families. So with that piece, I think that that's what we can talk about. that's something we'll talk about the site because I know we're running out of time but I know that as we move forward that bigger picture like council bear said I think that's something that as we get into the budget season we really start talking as a greater picture to craft that that job description of really what we want that person to do that's going to
[George Scarpelli]: I don't I don't want to call them out there, but you've done such great work.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll get and then we have, you know, Council Kelly and Council lemon. It's already been working with the parents with that bigger picture. I think I think that'd be great that maybe if they could take that leadership and Then work with that working group with that volunteer and getting everybody together. And I think that bringing it all together, especially a budget time when we all bring this to the table. We're all going to have some pretty interesting requests and ask and I'm not going to say no to you. You're scamming. Alright, so does anybody else have any questions or We have a motion on the tables. Anybody second? Council, please motion. Second, Councilor Tseng. Can you please call the roll? Doesn't need a roll call. All in favor? Aye. All opposed? Motion passes. Thank you. Any other questions before we wrap up? I know that we do have a meeting that started 20 minutes ago, but- 12, 12. 12 minutes ago, but I'll make sure that this happens in a separate evening where we have more time dedicated to this. So again, thank you everybody for coming. We appreciate this is a beginning and we'll talk at the end. Motion to adjourn by Councilor Bears. All in favor. Second by Councilor Tseng. Ayes have it. Meeting adjourned. Thank you everyone.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you Councilor Bears. Again, great words from Councilor Tseng. I think that Ruthie was what Medford was all about. Her heart is open to everybody. She was so sweet. And when it came to election time, if you ever drove by Ruthie's home, she had everyone sign. I don't think she could ever say no to anyone. And her allegiance was to anybody that ran for office here in Medford. So I think that You know, she told you like it was, there were times that she's pulled me aside and then brought me over to her Cod table at some fairs. And we negotiated some issues in the community, but she's definitely someone this community will miss. Her family is a very strong family in Medford that have faith and love of the city. So we send out our deepest condolences. She will definitely be missed. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry for the long solution but I think that that's minimal what Bob scary deserves. Bob was very special. I think that he was a true passionate lover of the city of Medford and its people. Whenever anybody needed anything, Bob Skerry was there. Whether it was his time on the school committee or if somebody was having an issue as a senior citizen and they were having an issue at the state house, Bob would find a way to make it his mission to support uh, anyone that crosses path. Um, I was very fortunate that I served in the school committee with Bob scary. And I still remember my first day and, um, being elected and Bob came to the house and, um, with the cigar in his hand and pulled me aside and said, all right, son, this is how it goes. And this is what you'll do and make sure that you have respect for this position because it deserves that respect. everything from the clothes that I was supposed to wear to the way I address constituents and the way that we respected our office. Bob was truly a man that always gave back to Medford. And when we heard, when Bob came up and whispered in my ear and said, it's got me, buddy. And he talked about the cancer and He fought and I know that he had a tough last couple of weeks, but he's in a better place today and Bob's family will miss him. The city of Medford will miss him and I'll miss him. So may he rest in peace and condolences to his family. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. I know that this is something that first I've seen of it, so 10 to 20 Red Beach Parkway. What are the abutters? Have the abutters been notified? Are there abutters next, residents next to this? Because I think that before we move this forward, were the neighbors informed and how do they feel about the situation?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for the clarification, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I do see everything is in order. I think that there was one clarification. I think the clerk, just publicly, I know that the hours of operations, is that something we're changing now, Mr. Clerk? Or does the petition have to come back for those extended hours?
[George Scarpelli]: OK, so they do have to come back. So your hours are till 11 o'clock right now. OK, and then I know usually Kelly's was a great location for a little time after for people that work late, or Justin, who is at Harvard until 2 in the morning. Or when that Councilor Scarpella has a few items on the agenda. My wife won't allow me to go there anymore.
[George Scarpelli]: I was one of the last people with the punch card, the three-way punch card. You guys don't know that. I know. I see everything is in order, Mr. President. I know that already the feedback I've heard from people that super professional and that they're excited about this new venture with our new organization. And after my fellow colleagues have any comments, I would move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you to the both of you. I know that this is a daunting task. That's one thing we talked about earlier, how we have so many department heads doing so much with so little. So we really appreciate it. I know that, is this the same, Mr. Hotel, we talked about the federal program and we talked about the lead. Is this in the same vein with that funding or is it separate?
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, we didn't get it, okay.
[George Scarpelli]: We appreciate that. Fred Lasky's, I'm sure his line is, hope that's that's copper so I know that again I think that the biggest thing again is when you talk about this I know we'll get phone calls from neighbors if they come and start doing this in the on the streets when it's time we'll have a plan in place with I know you've been super aggressive with the curb to curb or making sure that whatever we cut
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. So there'll be a plan. So people understand when it comes out to their end. Okay. So again, I thank you for all your hard work. This is something that we need and it's something, especially as you're hearing throughout the, you know, throughout the country, when you hear about lead, uh, you know, let in the water and people getting nervous. I think that it's a step in the right direction. So we appreciate that and how it works. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Possibly waive the three readings with this, because I think that the units that have been waiting a while, if we could move forward and waive the readings, I'd appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Again, I appreciate the hard work of the chatter review committee and And again, I disagree with my colleagues as a former school committee member for many years. The importance to have the leader of your community, if this committee saw fit that she would still represent a voting member of the school committee is that it's very important and vital piece that that person is the chairperson leading that meeting. It just doesn't make sense that the leader of your community is a side chair to a committee that really doesn't move forward without the power of the mayor. So again, I've read my colleagues on the school committee's requests and what their, what the concerns were for the members that I've talked to in the charter committee that this is something that people supported. And if we were going that way, this is what we needed. And I'll say this probably 10 more times until after the vote, whenever that may be, but the more that this council dips in and changes to fit a narrative, the less likely that this will move forward. And I think that has to be a realistic concern. I've already talked to state delegates that have said that residents have already approached them with the disdain that they've heard already from just the ward representation question. So it's, this is hard work from people that, many people on this council put instead of this process. And a long time with professionals sitting at the table, and it seems like as you read these answers, these questions and these changes, they seem one-sided and set to be, to fit a certain dialogue. I know I've been, in the past, mentioned that everything I turn into is political. You can say it, or you can read it. Because this is exactly what councils in the past have asked for, and many people have tried to change the charter, and we move forward with a group of people that work very hard to bring out this initiative that was supported by the call-in center or vetted out by the call-in center. And already, this should have been something that I read through when I had colleagues in neighboring communities read through and see the process. And again, like I said, I made sure I invested my time to make sure that I looked at what my faults were with what I didn't like about the charter, which is ward representation. And I realized I'm wrong for the fact that having that representation opens up having everybody in this community have a voice. So again, just bits and pieces that as my experience in the city school can remember, I think if we're going to move forward with the mayor being a voted member, it's imperative that whoever that man may be that they're in that leadership role. So again, for whatever it's worth, one out of seven people on a voting council that have seen just the rubber stamp that's moved forward, I hope the community understands as we move forward with the changes that my fellow colleagues keep bringing up, is just damaging what this group has done so hard to bring to fruition. So again, thank you for your hard work. I know that many of you out there spent a lot of time to get the proper information out and vetted with the proper channels, but thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Again, I bring to the fact that it's contradictory to the fact that we support a strong mayor form of government, but at the same time, you want to cut their legs off and in a position where that holds the biggest budget in this community. In essence, what you're doing is putting the mayor to the side and saying, We're going to work with what we think is right and plow through it. And the checks and balances are gone. I think that's what happens. I've sat with three different mayors. I've seen it happen. And having a strong council with a strong mayor that's leading the city will pay dividends. Unfortunately, as I read a lot of what my colleagues on the school committee have said and what I've heard tonight is very simple that it seems like it's more ego driven. It seems like it's a little more power driven and I don't think it's really driven behind what's best for the school and the city because ultimately having the mayor chairing that committee It's that checks and balance, that person at the top that's saying, we know what the school committee needs, but at the same time, we have those balances from the city side, right? So what we have now by eliminating that process is truly eliminating a big piece of the process. So again, it's just, It's going to be interesting where the vote falls tonight, and it'll be interesting where the vote falls, the community as a whole, and then in the final vote. It's going to be interesting because, my mother used to say, if it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, it's a duck. So if you see the votes changing and you have six members all in tow, because that's what I've read so far from my colleagues across the board, it seems like everything is in tow. And it reflects back to the ward representation piece that even from their platform, they've diverted. it's gone totally against what was originally created for a community group to do its due diligence and to see what they've done and brought forward. I'm not saying that we shouldn't make changes if we see changes, but so far what I've heard are really damaging changes for one demographic. So I'll be interesting to see how the vote goes. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Chairperson Sang. I think that when it fits a dialogue, the speech can follow. What to defend it when I have members of the revolution Medford responding that a platform that they ran on that my colleagues ran on clearly stated ward representation. And one of the big things that as I started researching to change my mind, that helped me change my mind to what I needed to learn about ward representation, I thought was the piece that I think it's disingenuous to say that's not true, but to have a more diverse population and giving people an opportunity that normally wouldn't have the opportunity to run in a system we have today. So having every ward represented and my colleagues can say I'm wrong and say a lie to put words in their mouths, but it was said in the past that there are some wards that are so small that shouldn't be represented. And that I wanted to make sure when I went back and looked at that video, that that was said and understanding that what I believe Mr. Gimeno said is creating more life. Those wards that have been underrepresented are those wards that haven't come out to vote because they don't feel like they're part of the process. They don't feel like they're part of the community. So there's a huge divide. So I just think that the key piece that keeps coming back in so many issues in our community is our, it's very simple that the question that keeps coming back are the people that we elected, are the people that are sitting on the council floor, the people that are sitting in the school committee floor, are they really listening to us, the community, not 7500 people, not people like minded, but are they listening to the whole community? And this isn't divisive. This is just Like I said, like Lily Scarpelli said, quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, it's a duck. You could follow the votes as we move forward. And it seems like it's ego driven and made to keep one group in place. because when you're flopping on what you promised and then you come back and belittle people in the sense that not understanding, using excuses or words, that that's what divides the community, not listening to the people that were put instead of this group and have worked so hard to do that, have listened to the professionals that sat with our leadership and our volunteers. So It is what it is. People aren't listening that are voting, that vote that represent you. They're just not listening. So I would stand against what my colleagues say. You can have as many years of education on this topic as you want, but the bottom common sense failing of community and disengagement is evident with this vote and this, what we're hearing so far with all these changes that we've seen. So listen, there's one Councilor that Ms. McDonald, I've spoken to you directly and I can honestly look you in the eye and apologize because I let my ego get in the way when I was against charter review for the fact of the ward representation. But for one Councilor, I sat back and you realize when you talk to different groups and different people and you know, notwithstanding the respect the council that's of color on this council, but I've spoken to many people of color in our community that feel that they don't have a platform to run. And the way, and the ward representation is the avenue to run on the council side. I think the format that was in place for the school committee as a former school member, like Mr. Gervino said, I think that's moving in the right direction. I think that really opens up and entices people to run. And that's why it's important not to have all that lodge. So I see the benefit. So again, if I can implore anything to my colleagues and the voters is that very simple, please listen to all residents, listen to everybody, have an open mind. because it's clear that that's not what we're getting.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Again, I feel that by any any motions to eliminate any avenue to have residents bring forth an issue of concern, I think is irresponsible. I think my fellow council just mentioned that the reason that some of the former members of members of the Chatter Review Committee so that maybe it was at a time when Councilors weren't listening, so they needed that platform. That still holds true. So I think that, like Councilor Bears said, there's gonna be sides, right? And having the opportunity for residents to petition and follow through the process the correct way, as written in the charter, I think that it doesn't limit the participation or the involvement of our residents. I would leave this alone, or again, it would be another example of what we've been seeing moving forward in the lack of really listening to our residents. So that's what I'm seeing and what I'm hearing. So thank you, Mr. Chair.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Capello. Thank you to the point that we have public participation, but I'm hearing when it comes to a petition. Then it has to be heard on the floor, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: So there's there's discussion. Our public participation can't can't be discussion. It's just Listened and then walk away. So I see this as as as one of the reasons why I agree with this. I also agree with 25. I would agree 50, maybe 50 people. would be a more truer number. I think that gives you a new. Yeah, I think I would do that. But to eliminate this, I think would be a huge disservice.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I believe the comments that have been used, I want to make sure that with this process, it's made to have an issue that's been put forth by, let's say, 50 signatures that they would be heard by this council. Now, at that time, when it comes to this point, this wouldn't be something that if the chair didn't feel comfortable with it, they would question the motion and move forward. This would be something that had to be heard, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so I think that's the difference with what my colleagues are saying.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. So that again, so again, what I'm hearing is that eliminate this because we don't we do it. No, it's not true. This is a this is a an avenue that if residents don't feel that they being heard, that they get the 50 somewhat signatures, they they present it to the clerk, they bring it to the podium, and then they have to be heard with a discussion. And then they don't have to agree with it. But then it has to be It has to be heard. So again, like I said, I think it's important that this is an avenue that needs to be left in this process. I think that's why all other communities have this in place. It's because, again, it's an avenue for our residents to be heard when they think they're not being listened to. So again, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, I know. I know it's coming in and out with different people but you didn't hear the motion. The motion is to strike.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that we're having issues with the Zoom.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Listened to my colleagues and colleagues in the school committee and we're elected officials. people are gonna come to that podium, they're not gonna be happy with us. That's what we ran for. We have to understand that. Not everybody's gonna come up and say what you wanna hear or they're gonna believe in what you have to say. I've dealt with it. I've been sitting and doing what we've been doing here for the last few months and putting what my thoughts and processes are and then being thrown back and spit back in my face, but you have to take it. That's part of the job. That's not limiting what we're trying to do. It's an open forum. This is what government's about. We talk about democracy and eliminating this for the sake of democracy. I don't get it. So this, we keep saying we have public participation, we have public participation, but the experts with 40 years experience have expressed and shown us the difference. that this doesn't happen often, but when it does, it's an avenue for our residents to come forward and have that ability to come forward through democracy. We talk about, you know, we haven't made these changes. We made no changes. This council voted to have that open forum open four times a month to two. This council changed the process that we have public participation at the end of the agenda and people really can't talk. Whatever my fellow council say, it's not supposed to be debatable. Then we talk about a time limit on when people can speak. So don't give me the fact that we haven't done anything about limiting the process so we can do our business. We've done that, but that doesn't eliminate to get rid of the situation because you don't want to hear people that have an issue. That's our jobs. And lastly, this isn't about you. and how you feel. This is about the city's charter for today, tomorrow, 10 years. This is the information that was gathered by a group of people that spent a lot of time figuring this out and then went through to the experts and then vetted that through the experts. Now, again, when we talk about, yeah, we have the right to sit here and talk about it and have an open discussion, this is probably the only question that I feel that there's an open discussion when it comes to the amount of people. So the representative from the Collins Senate said maybe 25 is a little low. 500 I think is too high. But let's entertain changing that to 50 people and then vet it through our legal team to move forward. I don't think that's monumental. I think that still leaves a reasonable option for our residents to be heard. But at the same time, It doesn't eliminate democracy and silence people. Because I've heard undertones of, you know, people dictating fear and threats and what? Come on. This is a form of the people. Michael Marx said it over and over again. That's the people's form right there. That's their podium. And to limit it would be a total disrespect to this community. So again. I would make the motion that we keep section eight in place. We move forward by increasing the number to 50, and we put a stipulation that the petition has to be vetted through our legal team, because we don't know, because today we don't have a legal team, but in the charter review, maybe in 15 years we will. But this process is set in place that the mayor has KP law that they have to answer to us. So that wouldn't be an issue. So right now that would be my form of emotion on this paper to move, to continue with moving forward but with the stipulations of increasing the numbers for the petition 50 and having it vetted by our legal team.
[George Scarpelli]: Yep. Councilor Cavalli. Thank you. Just one quick comment. Again, I think it's important with the school committee piece to keep in as well as because the school committee has actually eliminated the public participation. They don't even have that option. They have a format in place where I believe you have to send the question to be approved through the council and then be allowed to speak. They first have to pass that. So what you want to say, they have to read it and then approve it. So they're limited completely. So eliminating this with a school committee is even worse. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, as we're going through this, maybe my friends from the call center, I know we talked about in previous meetings that when we're talking about boards and commissions that we wanted to see that they had to be method residents. Is that in the section or?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, so if we can make that a formal motion to make sure we add.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: First of all, I think that looking at 20% to 25% of $160,000, that would increase the city council pay to, what, $40,000, $45,000 a year? No. Council would be basically regret right now. I would not support this for the fact that I think that the council, I would rather see that the council make the motion of increasing a COLA raise after all city bargaining units are compensated before they move forward to ask for, that we would ask for a raise, and then it would be implemented into the next election cycle. So I think that, again, we're seeing a lot of good, bad faith in the last couple of years here, where we've seen union members not getting paid I think the police now we're up to the rank and file I believe they're close to 900 days over 900 days, then the administration's over 1100 days or something so I mean you're looking at compensation and what we're looking for here is I think it's something to put this in effect. I think there could be language that could be added with this and that the compensation would read that the council would vote for the upcoming an increase of COLA increase after their bodies have been compensated or their their contracts have been ratified. So I think that I would be more amended to something like that. I just don't, um, and I don't think that when we're not seeing, we're not seeing most bodies, uh, union employees here from the city getting regular cold payments, every increases every year. I think that this council shouldn't, shouldn't even entertain that right now. Like I said, and I think that To be honest with you, I think that as we move forward, my motion would be to decrease our salaries for the fact that if we, when we go to ward representation, our jobs would drastically be different. So I think that looking at your ward representation, it's a smaller area. I mean, I personally, especially in the last couple of months, I've reached out and talked to maybe hundreds of people from all over the city. So I think that the compensation piece I think should reflect what we're doing. If our job title is now decreased for the amount of residents we're reaching out to, I think that our pay should reflect that. So my recommendation would be a form of motion that we would cut our pay at least a third to to reflect the job duties that would be changed in the, hopefully, in the, with the ward representation. So I think that would have to come probably closer to the community as a whole once we vet out the process, so I think that I just want that to be known. I won't make it as a motion tonight, but we can add it in the night of the Committee of the Whole. I'll make that a motion with the proper language to make sure that both the members, the union members in this community, and the residents realize that this council gets paid for the work they perform, and that's it. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Just to that, I think that's a great idea. If we can, before the Committee of the Whole, maybe if I can request something to that point of what the wording would look like or if that's ever been done before when that type of a standard and chatter. Thank you. And I apologize. I know it's like being in a hockey rink. So I know you probably think you're at one of your children's hockey games about 44 degrees in here. Sorry about that.
[George Scarpelli]: It's been a long time, but to our team, I think that in the Collins team, I think that I appreciate, you know, sitting through and bearing with the weather and everything you've done. I know that going through this process and seeing what, especially what you've done, Mr. McDonald, so many people tried to do before and the efforts you put into it. I know that one thing I do talk about a lot is transparency and communication and making sure that everybody knows what's going on. And even as stuck as I was in my way, I think I had five to 10 phone calls from the child review committee just to get my viewpoint so they can understand it. and then weigh it differently. I think that says a lot about what you're doing. And I think that this community needs a lot more of a McDonald's. So I appreciate your hard work. Thank you. And thanks. Just to think you'll be moving on to another community soon.
[George Scarpelli]: Um, thank you, Madam Chair. I think My question is just general. As we're seeing this, some questions about one, I know that it looks like I think Councilor Leming shared the information to the public on the page so they can share that, because I'm getting texts that people couldn't find this. And then the other question I have is, is it possible, Madam Chair, to work with NSF With with the residents trying to understand the process, I know we talked about this yesterday and making things a little bit streamlined. So people can understand it better. I think 1 of the concerns right now is that the color of the, the, the. distinctions between the different urban, uh, residential urban, um, you know, the, to separate them, it's yellow on yellow and orange. So is there a way to help that later as we move forward? Just for, just for clarification purpose, so people can understand this a little bit better. Um, that's all I have, but thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: And- I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry. Could we, I just had a resident just text me, Madam Chair. I believe if Councilor Leming can share the ones that were sent today, because I think that, I don't know, I haven't looked at it, but some of the questions that might be, The ones shared from an older slides. So, if we can just look at that, that'd be helpful. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Just wanted to share what we're hearing so I appreciate you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam Chair. The simple answer is no. Um, unfortunately, what we just heard tonight is very simple that when we're looking at single family homes, we're now enticing developers to come in to buy single family homes at a market rate and then come in and put in high priced three family homes that will have no legal impact to make any of that affordable. So right now is what we're seeing it in some quarters like Mr. Gav will have some leeway. But I think it's simple answer is this zoning, especially we talked about tonight, will not support affordable housing. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So I could appreciate the on the hand insult. That's ignorant. But to move forward very simple. The question from the gentleman was what we discussed tonight about zoning in our neighborhoods and what we heard with what was taught was spoken tonight and what we're looking at tonight was the quarters of the areas that focused on single two-family, three-family. We're talking about conversions of possible areas where the one-families will not be implemented anymore, and that's where we lend to developers to come in to purchase those long-time one-family homes, to develop three-family homes, and not having any right of making any of those affordable. I think I haven't said anything out of turn. What I've shared with the council yesterday, Councilor Leming, was very simple. Residents don't understand the process because they haven't been informed, hence again this evening. As we move forward this evening, we were given documents an hour before And residents didn't know anything about this. I'm getting text messages now because the area of Tufts University in the train station, no one in that neighborhood has heard of the impact now that that's going to affect their area. So you can use your underhanded little sly insults as much as you want. because it hurts because you think you know it all but nothing what you said is true what you all said was very simple you said there are other avenues that we can use for affordable housing i didn't deny that but the question was what we talked about this evening is there anything in there that supports affordable housing and the answer is simple it's no whether i'm a zoning expert or not Councilor because seamlessly you think you are So I appreciate it, Madam Chairperson, but the insults, that's irresponsible.
[George Scarpelli]: That'll never happen.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm not hiding from that. I'm not hiding from that. You're hurting homeowners with those. Two wrongs don't make a right, Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: Just a point of clarification. I appreciate it, Madam Chair. I appreciate Councilor Leming bringing that forward because I was one of the Councilors that supported Councilor Falco's original initial push for the Affordable Trust Act. So we appreciate that. And we try to, so we understand sometimes that the people in other offices slow the process down. So that's one process. We feel very proud that we can move forward to supporting our efforts in affordable housing. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Hurting more people, Zach. more people than you think.
[George Scarpelli]: So keep building zoning to help those developers.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Is the petitioner here this evening or on Zoom?
[George Scarpelli]: We have a representative from Boba Tea, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Welcome. I'm sorry. Thank you. We see everything in order, but before we move forward, do you have anything to say? I know that it seems like it's just a simple transfer. You're keeping the business the same, but just turning over the ownership? Is that what I see?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, you'll be changing the name? Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: All right, but it seems like the hours of operations don't change. You have everything in place. I see everything in order, Mr. President. Move forward approval and wish him good luck.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you so much. Mr. President, if I can, just a quick update.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, sorry. I know the council had some suggestions a few weeks ago with our process when it comes to licensing. We had a great discussion with council being with some opportunities that other communities use in moving that forward. So I think that we have a few ideas that I know that council president's working to that we can. Look into the legalities and possibly streamline the processes so we can that the hope is that if maybe going to subcommittee and then talk about the process where it's either biweekly or is needed that we meet half hour before. City Council meetings in the side the resident would have to stay, the business owner would have to stay, but as we could see most of the time, we could streamline things and move them forward. So they're not paying attorney's fees and people staying here for an extra four hours. So I appreciate the council bringing the question forward and pushing this along with Councilor Beguin for his support and his guidance with this and look for something coming down the line. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. And thank you for Councilors Leming and Callahan, who actually started this process with some residents that were looking to increase programs for our disabled community and we had discussions with the parents. I've met with both directors from Medford and Malden, Somerville together starting a collaborative and a pilot program with the three communities, enhancing our programming for our disabled youth and adults. And as we went forward and looking what the needs are for the, as we move forward with this process, we realized that having a subcommittee for Education and Cultural Committee to focus on the true needs of what the Recreation Department needs coming to budget season and calling for that meeting hopefully on February 25th before our regular scheduled meeting and then meeting with the parents who I spoke with yesterday making sure that they understand the process and then possibly working to create a committee with the parents and gathering information to see what our community really needs and what they're looking for and working collaboratively with them. So hopefully we get to a resolution in February and we hope to have programs up and running by April 1st. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I know that yesterday there was a community meeting for the Salem Street neighbors in the community at the Roberts and people that were there really got to share some of their I don't wanna use, you can use frustration would be a good word. I think that I don't wanna beat a dead horse and I don't want to keep bringing this up, but I think we have to. I think that one thing that's been coming back and forth is that understanding the zoning when it comes to posting information and what is coming up in future meetings. And I know that for a Councilor or zoning specialists, it's easy because it's in your pipeline and you are accustomed to the language and you can really understand it. But I asked a while back if we could, you really work with our consultant to try to find a way that we can, I don't wanna say, probably just a layman's terms, so people can understand the zoning and with better verbiage. So it's not so complicated. I know that yesterday's frustration, as I talked to neighbors this morning, as I talked to neighbors last night, residents last night, I think the biggest concern is really the speed and the process where last night was impressive in the fact that at least they saw what was going on in person. They got to touch things see things, and then they got to go to those boards and post what they wanted to see. And I think this is something again that I brought up for years now, and I can revert back to previous council. When we looked into doing the RFP process, working with the RFP process is really as it was written back in the day. And I think I showed the council that the minutes that those meetings. that the RFP asked for the consultant that we were bringing in, the partners were bringing in to really have a detailed plan that would go into the neighborhood for communication and having the neighbors feel as part of the process and share the input as you get started. Now, last night's efforts were great, but that's what we were talking about that we do at the beginning. and as we're moving forward the process I and believe me I understand what my council has been saying we've had over 20 some odd meetings and and and the word is we've tried to get the word out but unfortunately when we have the issues that have come about on Salem Street and the lack of what our residents feel like they're not being listened to. I think it's important that we listen. And so I would make a motion that we would ask to, you know, I know that we halted the meeting for March, but I would actually ask to suspend that for another month and maybe go back to that court or go back to the Roberts bring meetings in and just reset the clock with that. Not where it's coming in and people telling me how wrong it is or how bad this is, but just resetting and understanding and having that open process before we go to the next step and say, hey, this is more in depth and this is what we've been asking for, to really understand what we want in the corridor, as they should say. I know some neighbors say it's not a corridor, it's in their neighborhood. I think it's important if we can do that because I, again, because as I follow it up, I don't see a timeline. I don't think there is a timeline. I know that we've been waiting a long time and I know that this council and people have worked really hard and I don't want to discredit that. Please believe me. But I think, especially when we talk about the Salem Street Corridor, it seems like it's a lightning rod right now. And it's created such a negative buzz that if there's a way that this council can lead in working with Ennis and working with Ms. Hunt's office and try to find a more robust way to go back into that neighborhood and sit down and listen and post. I think because that's what we did yesterday, a lot of people did feel comfortable with posting and seeing that, you know, they could put something on a board and understand what that's about. So I think that Resetting that giving a little bit more time I think it'll be, it will be so important for healing, and it'll be very important to moving forward in this community as we go through this process because I This isn't a meeting to say I told you so. I don't want to say that but I just think that it's important that we listen because this hasn't been touched in many, many years and we know that. And there was comment yesterday that was made by Ms. Hunt that she said that during this meeting she thought that everybody was there that was against zoning. And the truth of the matter is the people that I've talked to, they weren't against zoning. they were against the process of the zoning hearings and how it's gone through and how they feel like they weren't heard. Because something simple, and you were there, Council President, the simple piece of the biggest, one of the biggest fear we heard was that the methanol clinics and trying to avoid putting medical buildings in that corridor to avoid the concerns that neighborhood had. And that's something we can revisit if it was started from the beginning. And it wasn't, you know, there were some people that were upset that, you know, the size of the buildings, but I think the messaging was a lot clearer that people understand where, what's gonna go where and where, some stories going to go six stories. There was clarification on some map changes that we saw that really clarified and help people. But I think that if we could, if we can, if there's one thing that I would ask as form of motion is if we can see if we can just delay the process and hold a a meeting at the Roberts with the neighbors that would be a listening session and more of a partnership to see what do the neighbors want, not a negative or antagonistic battle with their side, our side, but sit there and present it the way that, and has presented it in the sense that allowed the people to get up talk to people in person to sit there and tangible and put a sticky on the on the note on the board and say, this is what I want. So I think it's important because I think that no matter how much work and people have done a lot of work I'm not going to, I'm not going to deny that that there are a lot of people doing a lot of work and spend a lot of time But I think that it's important that we understand as a council that the residents don't feel like they're being listened to. And it's not meant to be a disrespectful comment. It's really made to enlighten us to say, hey, nothing's happened yet. We don't have to rush for anything. Let's reset this. Let's go into that corridor and let's become partners with the neighbors of Salem Street and put everything on the table and understand as we move forward, there was nothing that we pushed through or you leave all the negativity behind and say, we did this the way we should have done it. And I think it's important because I, again, I've done that and I've talked to a lot of professionals that have talked about this process and other communities as professionals, whether they're zoning consultants, attorneys, or worked for different municipalities. this is the difference with what we've done so far and where the gaps are and where the cries are from the community. So again, I appreciate the time to listen. I know that in totality, I think that's probably the biggest thing that I've heard. I know that last night's meeting kind of answered some things, but I think the two biggest things that if we can come out of it is if there's a way that we could possibly work with our consultants to try to find a way to simplify. what those changes are and what we're really doing in those corridors. So it's not these maps that are real tiny so people can understand them a little bit better and just bullets where I hate to say it. Someone said to me, yes, this is Georgia. I'm 78 years old, and I just don't understand all this. This is so confusing to me. What does this mean for my house and my future here in Metroton? I couldn't answer them because it's specific to the area. between that and the speed of the process, and maybe asking to do a little bit more teamwork with the neighbors, I think would go a long way for both this council and our vision together. Because again, it's not that people in the room were against everything. They weren't. It was the pace and not understanding the fear, I think, that was something we need to correct if we could. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for that. And again, I reiterate what residents have said, they understand that they're all in, they understand that we need some changes, things haven't been looked at. I think that's a common cry, you hear that. But I think that again, I appreciate the effort, but again, I think the biggest piece that we're missing is truly listening to what they're saying. Our residents using Salem Street an example, because this is the area that we're working on right now. That's the hotbed that they want to be part of the process. They want to go into the community. They want to do what we were forced to do last night, but come back full circle and do it the correct way. To say that, you know, I know that Councilor Collins said that it's breaking a contract. No, it isn't. It is not that the consultants work for us. They've already changed the timeline for four other different reasons. So that's not a true statement. If there was legalities in that, then we should ask for a change order in that contract because it will be easily done if we truly want to fulfill what the residents are asking for. And I think it's very simple. I have a motion in place and I hope my council support it. that we delayed the process of the Salem Street zoning until we hold neighborhood partner involved meetings with our partners in Ennis and our development board and working together to move that corridor forward in a positive light. I appreciate that we're now finally moving into more streamlined, more transparent and understandable process so people understand zoning as a fifth grader. But I think it's important that we're missing the biggest piece here. We need to go into these communities, we need to go into these corridors, we need to go into that community and have them feel like they're part of it. Even though the questions were answered, there's still a lot of animosity and there's still a lot of confusion. And there's a lot of great ideas. I'm sure that all of you have talked to some very, very brilliant people, as I have. I've talked with people that are in the field that have worked at the highest universities in the country. And they've worked on huge projects and small projects. And they live in our community. And they've shared some great ideas. And I think that Those are the people that live in those areas. And I think that it would be important. So I would make the motion that we ask for the delay, we go through the process correctly, and we ask to bring a meeting to work together with the residents of each quarter. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: With that being said, oh, Councilor Strunk. The biggest discussions that are still left out there is this won't be discussed tonight just for clarification would be the. The composition 2-1.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh yeah. I'm sorry. Yeah. I just, I just have clarification because I, I think that was the confusion, Matt, Mr. Chair, that, so again, you just confused me right there. So did we vote on anything?
[George Scarpelli]: Are we doing the seven that Zach said? Are we, have we eliminated the option of, of at lodge for all eight? That's the question that people were very confused when they left the other day.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, just to share with the Council. the conversation I've had with multiple community members and community groups with that. The question was, if this is voted, then moved on to the mayor's office, the mayor has the option to deny that and request the original format, correct? Or will that stop the process? because again, we're trying to work this so we can get this to the legislation, right? So our legislators that I've talked to aren't very happy that we're moving against what their constituents are reaching out to them about what we're doing here, what was done at that vote, and what was done with the review committee. So I think that that's going to be something we can talk to at that next meeting, but I want to be clear that residents feel like they're not informed enough to understand the process as we're rushing through this. And they want to know, is there a stop? So if they feel like they're not being listened to us, the question is, can the mayor, maybe the calling center can help us, can the mayor stop the process? If she doesn't feel that this is what is best for the city, she can not allow this to move forward to the legislation, right?
[George Scarpelli]: that we invite all of our state legislators here because I think it's important because their constituents are reaching out to them because I know that one state representative sat down with me and wanted to miss the meeting. So he wanted to know what was going on. So he's a little confused. So if we can have that as a form of emotion, but if we could just put that as a, just a bookmark, just so that we understand that for the residents that are listening, what this council votes on and then moves forward, the mayor then has the option to say, uh, nope, we're not going to send this to the legislation legislators. We're not going to send this to the state for vote to get this on the ballot, or she can veto and pick what she feels is the best choice.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you, Council Vice President. Um, I I don't, I find it a little disturbing and I appreciate the movement. I know that as I've been stating from the beginning of this process is that we're seeing what people have said years ago in bringing these meetings into the neighborhoods and we see the situation with the Salem Street corridor and what's happened there and I appreciate the extra meetings but I really think we need to take a more proactive approach moving on with other zoning areas. I mean, even just to share because unfortunately, sometimes people seem to think on the council that I'm trying to stir apart or be negative all the time, but I'm receiving emails and the residents have questions, questions that I think that like Salem Street could have been answered at meetings that I requested at the beginning and being glad to see that we're finally moving to the Roberts into the neighborhoods because people aren't, although these are public meetings, people aren't getting the information. We can see that by the mayor's letter that she sent out stating that she's now going to involve her communications team. And I think that should be hand in hand moving forward. I only say this for the fact that as we move forward to the neighborhood, the residential neighborhood zoning where people have already started calling saying, George, is it true that the Lawrence estates is now going to have 2 or 3 families and it's going to change the look of our community? And these are questions that are so simple to answer, but. the access to these meetings or even understanding these meetings or, um, understanding what, um, information that people in, uh, in the community can access. I know it's easy for us because we do this every day. But, um, again, um, you know, like I said, the biggest, uh, The most unified comments we had when we first started the recodification of the zoning was as we bring it to the next step is really having that RFP beefed up to make sure that we have a robust. uh, communication avenue into the areas that we are looking to rezone. So residents can be part of the process, not reactionary, like we're seeing across the neighborhood, um, across the community. So I just implore to my colleagues and, um, and, um, our director and Ennis that We start thinking a little proactive and start moving into the neighborhoods as we move these meetings. You know, we've, we've had meetings in the past where we've gone to the high school. We've gone to both the middle schools. We've gone to many different locations to make sure that we're bringing the message to the neighbors and. Again, the neighbors and what I'm hearing already that there's coalitions, neighborhood coalitions that are starting that already starting to talk about how they're going to go in and and battle the city because of lack of information going into our next next phases. So, um, I don't want to, I just want to inform you this. I don't. I know some consoles would think that this is a, you know, Council Scarpelli being negative again but again, as one Councilor like I mentioned the last few meetings. I'm getting those emails from the residents that feel like they're not being heard by by our. Council and by our city administration. So, again, I'm glad the mayor stepped up and started. And putting some processes with her communication team for sale, I implore you all. to contact the mayor, bring her communication team in as we move forward with these processes, because again, we all know this hasn't been looked at in many, many years. And from what we're hearing with what people feel in Salem Street, again, like I said, when you talk about residents from Lawrence Road and the Lawrence Estates, and they're frightened that the their quaint neighborhoods are not going to be changed to have the possibility of jamming in three family homes. I don't know where they're getting this information, but this is the, um, this is because of lack of notification and lack of, um, community participation. Now, again, I've said this 1000 times. I know Council vice president has done Yeoman's work in putting the uh council meetings in order organizing them all but unfortunately it's just not uh it's just not getting to the community and i'm afraid we're going to be stalled uh zone after zone as we keep moving forward until we really put a comprehensive plan in place so thank you
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry. My hands been up. I apologize. Just so you know. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I apologize. I know it's difficult being on zoom. I just want, I don't want to get too far away from what, what I represented for minutes said. I think that I just wanted to share a text message that I appreciate, uh, her clearing that up that right away, the residents saying, hold it. We're so confused because what we're looking at right now on, um, on the shared, uh, videos that really can't even see what these areas and neighborhoods look like. So just rest assured, I believe that we're not going to take anything of a vote or anything that's going to be moving anything in any direction. I think what we're asking for is to revisit and look at some options. So if we could just clarify that, Council Vice President, that'd be important for the viewing public. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. Thank you. Councilor Bears. I didn't mean to disrespect and cut you off. I just wanted to make sure I didn't get too far so we could clarify. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. You know, sometimes time heals all wounds, and I think having these two weeks really allowed our residents to reach out to our assessor and then really grasp the understanding of what's been happening. So I know that, Councilor Bealz, you've done a great job really educating a lot of people that have contacted me in the breakdown of what the what the tax implication looked like and making sure they understand the numbers are correct. I think the biggest concern was the knowledge of not understanding the impact of the, you don't want to say, you know, retro, you don't want to use the word retro, but it started back as of July 1. So when people saw their taxes in such a huge increase, they saw the quarters that started from July 1 and then their updated assessments. So I think that's what really played a huge impact. And I think that, unfortunately, it's I see a lot of very dejected residents, especially senior citizens and homeowners and renters that I've talked to because they've had great relationships with their homeowners and their landlords, and they realize this implication now is going to come down, and everybody's going to feel some pain with this. And like I've said from the get-go, I wasn't against the process if we need an override. I think it was educating and informing our residents to Let them know, have them be prepared for this. And when you're talking about a senior citizen on Lawrence Road, a young lady who called me and said that, George, my tax bill this month is $2,800, and living on a fixed income, she doesn't know how. she's going to be able to pay $2,800. Doesn't, when I tell you fair, and that's just been a common, common cry. And I think that, you know, I, I appreciate the assessor's office cause they've been super attentive to anybody who's we've shared and they've called, but I think we need to find other avenues as a council to really, um, really educate our residents, especially the most vulnerable and understanding where maybe it's not one offs, but maybe the man's communication team with the finance director with the city assessor that they can truly understand the different options and what's coming down the line in their next tax bill. Something simple as understanding what an abatement is. And I had a great conversation with the former president of the Massachusetts Association. He was great in understanding the process with the abatement and making sure our residents understand that there is an application process But understanding it's not an automatic free savings or support. It has to I think our residents have to understand that. You have to go prepared when you go to the assessor, making sure that you bring comparable numbers that you see in homes that are sold in your area, and making sure they're apples to apples, meaning they are relatively the same age of a home, making sure that they're aligned with, when you say three bedrooms, two baths. So it's a true balance. preparation for that assessment. So I know that, uh, talk to the city assessor that's on the assessor's page for the abatement. But I think that we have, especially with our senior homeowners and disabled and our veterans, I think that what I would request is really, um, with this whole process and is, is really put together as for a, uh, subcommittee and planning permitted. I know it's super busy, but trying to find a way that we have a meeting to bring people in and maybe work with the mayor to set up a listening session that residents can come here maybe Wednesday night or Friday mornings and just have someone explain to them so they can understand and prepare. I think that, I know we've already talked, I've talked to many residents and said that this council is going to be proactive starting in the budget season looking at homeowner exemption this year, something we've never done in the past. And something that the former president of the cess association says, you know, that was in the past, that was voodoo. You just didn't do it. And he said, where you are right now, especially in the situation, he thinks that it's something that we should be looking at very strongly. And as he broke down a lot of the numbers for me, I would concur. I think that looking at other exemptions and asking our state delegation to see how we can maybe look at any other forms of exemptions for our seniors, whether it be through the state or other supports federally that can help with this, I think it's important. And then again, We're seeing so much with our business community. I know that they've been getting their butts kicked, something that I'll talk about with the next resolution I put forth with parking. You're seeing so many things put on now. The business community, there has to be something so they're prepared as well. I've talked to one business owner who has been committed to the city of Medford for over 40 years, and he's been a very good landlord to many businesses in the city of Medford. he finds himself prepared for the fact that he has six years left on a lease for six of his businesses. And he's seen an increase of over $20,000 to $40,000. And these are the things that he's He's wealthy in the sense compared to you or I probably, but someone who stayed in the city and just didn't sell these buildings to big developers and didn't move away, but stayed true to the small businesses in Medford. Those are the businesses that we really want to try to protect. It's not the Starbucks of the world. It's not the Coca-Cola's or the Budweiser's of the world. These are our mom and pop stores that we wanna talk about really supporting and keeping those businesses open in Medford. So again, so with all these, I think it would be beneficial for us as a council to really call for a subcommittee for planning permitting committee that could talk with, maybe bring in the mayor's team with administration, the city assessor, the finance director and ask how we can at least find a path that we can educate and help us in sharing any way we can support our most vulnerable in any avenue we can take financially, whether it be, like I said, a more robust exemption for our seniors or you know, understanding and completing the abatement process to help save some money there. And again, the abatement process, because I've talked to some seniors, and like, if I get it, then they don't have to pay taxes. And it's like, no, no, that's not it. It's understanding the abatement. And I tried to explain to them, if your home is valued, is assessed at $1 million, possibly with the abatement, it might be assessed at $800,000 if it's accepted. depending on what you see with neighboring comps. So that was something that was very interesting. And, you know, like I said, for me, one of the Councilors stood strong against the override for these facts alone. I think this is where now you're seeing the impact, just like we're seeing the impact on our federal government, we're seeing in most major communities in this country that people aren't prepared. And I think that we weren't prepared for the solar ride. We really didn't prepare our most vulnerable. And if we can do something to recover that, I would hope this council would support me in that. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Whatever you feel. Great. Yeah, whatever you feel more.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, President Villescaz. It's sad that it seems like everything Councilor Scarpelli is gonna put forth has a negative connotation. So I'm a little disappointed in my colleague that, again, this has nothing, this is what it is. And by Councilor Tseng bringing forth the process of this being some sort of political, whatever, whatever comment you made. This is the biggest issue you want to talk about. You want to talk about unifying. You're just not listening to the community. This resolution was put forth because the community feels that the city administration didn't do enough work to educate our most vulnerable. And it's funny how you just want to spin it back. So that's dividing just, just so you know, this is what the community keeps calling me. and saying, why does it always have to be opposite? Why can't you just understand that what I put out here is very simple. It's very precise in understanding that this is what the community has called, this is what they wanted me to express, that they weren't informed. And to sit there that this is a divide, of course it's a divide. We haven't done anything lately that hasn't had an issue with communication, lack of communication, lack of transparency. That's been across the board. Have you been involved in the last five meetings? Everything that we've gotten with the mayor sitting here talking to us and trying to throw smoke screens at us. to last week's meeting with charter review to tonight to the to the override, like I said, and not again, the override questions biggest thing was transparency and educating our community. So to turn this around again to be you know let's let's make a political again we just made a political Justin and tell you what. keep doing what you're doing because that's what's dividing this community because it's a lack of communication. People feel that this council just isn't listening and all if all you did tonight was just went through the vote and we took two votes and we voted yes we would have had something positive going on tonight but instead we got to come back to this and say that that this was meant in some sort of political negative way. Listen to what the city is saying, not your city, the complete community. They're saying we're not listening to them. Thank you, President Pierce.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, Mr. President, where, as we have received, I have received multiple phone calls, emails with misunderstanding and confusion from fear of the tax increase from recent tax bills. So some of those people were parents as well with kids in school. Some of those people were senior citizens. Some of those people were renters that were gonna be affected. So what I stated in my resolution is exactly what the residents shared with me to share as a resolution on the council floor. If this council wants to go through again and not listen to what they're saying, because of course this override is gonna help financially help the schools? Of course it would. Nobody said it wouldn't. The question we were saying throughout this process is slow the process down so we can educate people on the outcome and how it affects everybody. So sure, $7.5 million is going to help. Of course it's going to help. And just a little tidbit, in the Melrose situation, they were promised support for the school department, the first two overrides they had, and the first two overrides that were passed, the Melrose public school systems failed miserably. So the third time, the citizens finally rose up and said, no way, not again, because they just didn't prove it. So every side has a story. But again, Mr. President, we'll go through the vote again. By the will of the people, by the will of this council, we'll vote yay and nay, and we'll move on. That's all. But again, just another example by the comments of my fellow councilors, that they're just not listening to the other side that feel like they're being heard here. Because you're talking out of both sides of your mouth. You're saying, yes, they need support. Yes, we didn't educate them. But yes, but you're too harsh on this resolution. This is their resolution. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you Mr. President again this is uh that was brought up by the residents of South Medford. I think that they're seeing such a negative impact in their day-to-day living conditions because of some of these processes. And I know that we have a new director of parking, and it would behoove this council, I think, to maybe sit with them move this to a planning and permitting committee that has the traffic protocol under there so we can maybe talk and look at and understand the G-Zone parking program, the pilot program. I think that with that process and the appeals process that's in place right now here in Medford, we're finding that residents are very, very frustrated. And I think that We need to have an avenue for our residents to express themselves. And what we're seeing right now is the mayor is using traffic and parking as another revenue source. And again, that's on the back of our residents. And it's just not fair. You're seeing time and time again, Mr. President, that with increased fees, increased fines, no appeals process. I've talked to a few neighboring communities, talked to their commissioners, their traffic and parking directors, and I gave them scenarios. One scenario was a senior citizen who parked behind Colleen's and unfortunately, she left her handicapped placard on her dashboard. She didn't hang it on the rear view mirror. When she came out, she received a ticket, I believe it was 1201. She got in her car, she drove to the parking department at 1210 and said, this is the situation. I'm handicapped, this is my placard. Unfortunately, I didn't hang it. And they said, you can appeal it. So they were generous enough to help her appeal it out front, to walk through the appeal. By the time she got home, she was notified that the appeal didn't go through, and she'd have to pay the ticket. She called City Hall, and I believe at the time, the Chief of Staff was overseeing the process, and her words directly were, there's no gray area here. It's either yes or no, and that's it. neighboring communities, you've talked to their commissioners. Unfortunately, there are gray areas and there are options. So the next option on the appeal would have to go to the courts and on $150 ticket, this resident would then have to pay $250 to then appeal this at the next level so someone can listen to her. And again, one of the most vulnerable members of our community not being heard. And, um, That followed up with many residents of South Medford calling me and saying, George, listen, I drive my car on the weekends. And sometimes I have to take it out if I need it for work. But then when I come home, I realize that the G-Zone is now permitted to people that aren't residents of Medford because they bought a pass. And they're seeing the anger and the frustration. We're talking about situations with the business community. residents we're talking about supporting our businesses right our local businesses well now let's say you own a real estate company you in medford square you now pay for that pass which is 150 or 125 you pay for that in the past that was good throughout the city now you have to now buy another pass fee to get permitted and then if you have to show a house let's say in west medford so there's so many inequities here and it seems like We want to save small businesses. We want to support our business community. But in the same breath, we're putting in these hurdles and roadblocks and hurting what we're looking for. We have to remember, when the Traffic and Parking Department was implemented, it was made to really support the business community and keeping non-residents from parking, especially on the one-on-one route or the bus route that goes to the express bus, and parking there all day in front of a business, and then these outsiders take a spot for the whole entire day. Now in South Metro, from what I'm being told from the neighbors, there are cars that people don't live in the city. They get parking, they walk to the green line, they're gone all day, their car's in front of their house, and then they come home, they don't have parking. because we've then, you know, we've sold their spot, we've rented their spot in front of their home. So there's a lot of concerns, you know, there are so many others that come to mind that I think that we really need to sit down with the traffic department and the new director and get some clarity so we can help these residents. I think that, like, again, I think the G zone, it has to be some clarity in where the pilot program's going from here. The appeals process that there has to be something in place that someone in-house walks through, at least looks at an appeal, that it's something that's blatant that could support our resident, especially most vulnerable, that we have that in place. We look at our business community and even invite Chamber of Commerce to that to the meeting if we can, Mr. President, to a subcommittee meeting and get their input to see where we're going. I think that these are very important issues and I hope this council will support me, at least with this one, that we ask to go to a subcommittee meeting in planning and permitting to see what we can do to educate ourselves, help educate the community, and then at the same time add any input that we can that at least the homework that I've done from neighboring communities that were very, very simple, simple ads that really, really could change a lot and really support our community. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, maybe instead of everybody seems to be interested, maybe we do do it. regular scheduled meetings from six to seven. Maybe we ask the traffic commission, any member that would like to join, because I think maybe that might be an option to revisit and update those processes as well. Because I know that Somerville does have one of the councils on the commission, so they're sharing what they're hearing directly. So that'd be important. So that'd be my recommendation if you so see it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that, uh, I know that, uh, Councilor Began, um, sent you a message and you forwarded it to me. Yes. And, um, he mentioned that, uh, the town of Beverly has an option that maybe, um, that we could maybe enhance or help streamline the process. So I'm going to meet with him hopefully tomorrow or Thursday to see what suggestions he might have. Because I don't disagree that sometimes the business owners that come here for an approval and they're there with an attorney that they're paying by the hour. I could see that as an issue, but unfortunately with, and I think this is a question for another day of discussion and battling, but sitting in meetings, long meetings until everybody's heard at that podium, that's our job. Whether we like it or not, we're elected, that's part of our job. So even if you don't like to hear what people are saying, because I, too, don't like sometimes what people are saying, but you have to respect the process. And if it's taking us to 1130, so be it. I think that's important that people understand that. I, too, agree that this process is already in place that we have. And I think that having this meeting tomorrow, maybe shed some light. Maybe there's something I can bring back to the council. I'll email you with some suggestions. If we see anything that's fruitful, that would maybe streamline our process that they do in other communities. We'd love to see that if we can help. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: You have to pay, basically. They use it as a rental. Right, goes to the rec department, which then adds so we can provide programming for the youth.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll turn it on. I think it's first that the council gives up custody to the mayor. I think that's the first thing. OK, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli, go ahead. I apologize. I just, because I'm really confused. I think the way that it's read that the council has the authority right now. So we are the ones that allow that, correct? But we're now getting the authority to do that, right? So I think this is a good, you know, it's a good step, I think, especially when you're looking for funding the Affordable Housing Trust and looking at avenues that we're looking to support, you know, the unhoused and looking for different avenues and then also looking at a housing shortage. If I can, can we amend this, I think, Council Vice President, that it's important that I know that when this started discussions some time ago, one of the biggest concerns, and I've got some phone calls from people on Laforma Gap, mentioned that, is there a way that we can add, the Council can add, giving the mayor the authority, but also making sure that the residents that abut these properties have right of first refusal, because I think that that's what their biggest fear is, is that if a resident that abuts this land right now, if they can take, if they can benefit from that and have control of what goes on next door to them for the house they bought, when this wasn't in effect, I think it's important that this council protects those residents that abut these opportunities that they have the right of first refusal. Does that make sense, Vice President? I think that if council ever can assist us with that, I think it'd be important that For one, I would make that a formal motion that moving forward, I think that this is something I would support, but I think that what was said and what was mentioned in the past, and again, what was reiterated from the residents of McCormick Gap is that they have the right of first refusal, the abutters of that land.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. So, so to reiterate legally, we can't ask for that motion obviously now that, uh, and I think this is the biggest fear. I think that what we're seeing is developers are going to jump on that and they're going to, they're going to come in, they're going to swoop in and all of a sudden they're going to change the face of that neighborhood. So unfortunately I, I, without that support, I don't think I can, I can support doing this because again, We're now allowing something that's so good, that can be so beneficial, that I don't think, I don't know if I can support that. So thank you, Council Vice President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Tseng. I first want to acknowledge the fact that as one councilor, I was, when I first started my journey as a city councilor, I was firmly behind the charter change charter review. And as we started moving forward and we started seeing some of the changes and what it can impact, my biggest The piece that really turned me around to vote against the charter review at the time was really looking at ward representation. And I think it's because of working in a community that has ward representation and really having some situations where you saw the input of ward representation being looked at in some cases as special interests from section of the city to section of the city, but not what's best for the whole community. So I found myself being very stubborn and stuck on my beliefs. And what I think I needed to do was take a step back. And I know that reading all the information that Mr. McDonald's team has done with the charter review and talking to Mr. Jovino and different members of the committee and then reaching out to different colleagues from neighboring communities that have ward representation and truly understanding the positive impacts. And I think that I was so narrow-minded, my thinking at the time was so narrow-minded that I really need to expand and really look at the greater picture. And as I see this presentation, I realized that You know, if I could turn the clock back and if I could have helped by moving this forward back a few years ago when the commitment for the council was needed, I think I would do that today. But what I see in place is so impressive in the fact that we have people that were committed that reached out to probably one of the greatest support teams with the Collins Center and someone who I respect in the world of municipalities, former alderman in Melrose and former city solicitor Frank Wright and listening and answering, listening to how he's answering the questions and his team and I think that this is a great great situation right now. I love what we have, what we've crafted. I have some reservations as well, but I know my colleagues have shared some, and I think that the biggest takeaway from this is I'm a huge advocate now for 11 councils. I'm a huge advocate for ward representation for all eight wards. You realize as I talk to as I talk to people, even in the city of Medford, and we talk about getting people involved in the election process. And as I sit with marginalized people and they say, George, you know what? It's easy for you. You have a base. So when you run at large, it's easy for you to raise $20,000. It's easy for you to say you represent everybody, because I think I've done that. I wouldn't ever take away that I represented everybody in the city. And if I ever ran, if it was the time that I ran, I probably would run at large just for the fact that I enjoy the whole community, that whole battle. But talking to my fellow colleagues in neighboring communities, you understand how important it is for mostly marginalized people that have been underrepresented. And right now there's a battle going on in another room talking about zoning reform at Salem Street. And as a person who grew up off of Salem Street, my former neighbors have called me and said, George, why wouldn't you want ward representation with every ward considering Shame on you, because we didn't hear from you at Salem Street when it came to the ward. We felt like we weren't listened to. And this is why now it's a battle with the Salem Street zoning situation. And we're seeing that in pockets all over the community. What we're seeing at Tufts University with the 10-story building, how it's affecting that community. And I've talked to friends and neighbors there at St. George. Here we go again. The charter review is important because if we had a representative that we can go into in our own backyard that we see every day at the coffee shop, then it wouldn't, the information wouldn't have been getting out there. And one of the biggest things I've had, the negative pieces I've had is a lack of information that's going out to the community because the lack of a written newspaper, the lack of true communication across the board. And one piece that I found that made me feel secure in my process as I go forward with this is the thought process saying, you know what, we might not have a newspaper. but everybody in every small pocket of our community now will have someone that they feel like they can call. And so there are so many things I've learned, and like, again, I'm a big boy now, and I've learned a lot, good and bad, and I wish I could turn back the clock on some of the decisions I made, but when I see the information that's in front of us, I'm really excited. I'm really excited and I commend all of you for all the hard work that you've done. And again, if you've ever felt that I was an enemy to the cause, I don't think I was educated. I didn't educate myself to the cost because I was stubborn. So what I see in front of me right now, I can't wait to get this through. I can't wait to get this to the legislature. I can't wait to come back so we can get this on the ballot and see all these great changes. And I think we see a lot of things that aren't working in Medford and the divide in Medford. A lot of it's because we haven't done this, right? you're seeing how important word representation is across the Commonwealth. And it's time to, like I said to, my wife and I were talking, I said, Jesus, Dina, she says, it's time for me to grow up and put my big boy pants on and say, hey, listen, this is a great proposal and let's do everything we can to move it forward. So again, I commend your charter review team and our friends from the Collins Center, they've done so much work. are the actual experts in this field. And I think guided this platform to a very robust discussion. And again, so I could talk a buzzard off a meat wagon. So I just thank you. All right.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Council Bears. I know that as I went through my notes, I did have a note. And correct me if we'll go back to this again. I was a little preoccupied. As we started looking into composition of terms of office and eligibility, I wanted to ask the Collins Center, I think that one of the constituents, people that have read this and called and asked opinions, with the mayor's four-year term, and the council too, and school committee too, the question they brought up, I said, well, let me ask if it's common, you see that two years really sometimes prohibits true government because you see that it's so short that you're finding that you're always politicking instead of doing what's right. And the question is, has that been entertained? Have you seen other communities do a three-year term where it's a two-year for school committee, three-year term for the council, and then four-year term for the mayor? It's just something that was asked of me, and I just wanted to get your opinion on that.
[George Scarpelli]: That's great input. I appreciate that. I see what they mean. I understand what the two-year term is difficult, because it seems like you really, once you get going, as an elected official, then all of a sudden you have people that you've promised so much to and they've come to you and said, now it feels like you truly are looking at times at the greater picture of an elected official. That's what's the greater good of the community. So I appreciate the input and that's something I'll share with them if they're not watching tonight. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you. Before I move on, if anybody wants any information about my glasses, it's a new, very expensive company that I can share with you. It's called Broke. It's called Half Glass. It's called Broke Cheats. So I apologize for that, because I know my wife's watching right now. And when I come home tonight, she's going to smash me with one of the the 15 pairs I have at home. But the question I had was, I know that as we talked about this, I had a question that a resident asked, and I know it's by ordinance, but when we have boards and commissions, have you ever seen a charter, a part of the charter be put in more, anything that would recommend the concerns of residency requirements for different boards and commissions? Is that something that, we would put in our charter or something.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. So I, if I could, that'd be something that I don't see it in front of me. So I think that where we can fit that, I think that that's been a concern where we've had commissions or boards of commissions in the city that residents might've been living here and we can understand if they moved out that they finished the term, but we're seeing a lot of people that, that we see people that have been on boards of commissions that don't even live in the city. So I think that, you know, finding that language and seeing if that's something we should visit, if that, we could see anything pertaining to that would be helpful. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, just make a motion to request friends from the Collins Senate to see if they can draft any, information that might be prudent for us to look at and maybe vote on for the possibility of resident requirements for boards and commissions.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you and appreciate constantly has bringing us forward. I know that, um and the spirit of what I've seen with this administration. I think having that majority vote in my opinion is isn't robust enough. I some authority and more openness and transparency when it comes to positions. I know that one of the biggest things we've seen over the last couple of years is that the positions that are created that this council doesn't even vote for. And that's happened multiple times, not just with this council, but previous councils. So I think lessening that and giving the mayor's office more of autonomy to make these decisions without a more weighted process that really makes it accountable for the position that she's presenting. I think I would rather see the two-thirds vote for the fact that That meat is needed.
[George Scarpelli]: I just wanted to note that we... I'm reading the red line as I'm reading the original, so... Yes. I appreciate that. I withdraw. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I think that with the professionals from the Collins Center, 40% sounds like a lot. What would you recommend? What have you seen that really works and where that middle ground where the, you know, extra one-on-one elections that might cost the city money.
[George Scarpelli]: Right.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. And that's my fear. We're seeing what's coming out in local elections recently in Medford, you know, with 60,000 residents and 40,000, 35,000, 40,000 voters and only 13,000, 14,000, 15,000 coming out. I think that would pose a problem for the process, you know, going any higher.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. As I, like I said, I really focused on really looking into this process because it was one of the pieces that really limited me from moving forward with the chattel review. And now as we're seeing the The body that has worked on this, the professionals that have worked on this, and the committee that's gone out to the city and the community and worked diligently with the community have drafted a proposal that I think is what the community is asking for, the residents are asking for. I think I mentioned the key pieces that I think understanding the representation for all of our wards is so important. I think when we talked about the ability for someone that's marginalized that might not have the opportunity to run at large. having a better chance running an award, even running in the district. So having a better representation, maybe seeing a council that looks a little different than we see today. And I think that's what I've heard from council, from community members. And I think that when we look at this and I looked across the state, I believe there's only three out of the whole state. I believe there's only three, correct me if I'm wrong, but there's only three that have a seven body council when you look at this format. I think what you see is a council of ward representation and at-large members. And I think that's a huge involvement and openness and form of transparency, communication, and reachability to every corner of our community. So I think what the Charter Review Committee has put forth with the 11 members, I think it's important. I think that that's something that I think the, tell me if I'm wrong, but the majority of the community has said to me, and this is why I know so much about it, because I was against it. I was against ward representation completely. So now when you sit and talk and the understanding of every single ward, imagine telling one ward they're not represented. Okay, but no, no, the district, but it's not the ward. And this is what we're seeing right now because we're the divide in this community. We do have a huge divide in this community. And one of those divides is people feeling that they don't, they're not listened to. They're not, they don't have anybody that they feel they can go to. And especially when you see the demographic method now, we have a lot of new method residents coming in that have grown up in communities that have ward representation. So that comfort level is gone. So they've eliminated themselves of being part of that process. So I think we're seeing so many pieces that this fits. And changing what is put forth I think would be a frightening thought because here's the piece. We saw with the override question that this community was divided. What we're seeing right now, what I'm hearing from both sides saying that this is something they like, it fits. It's something that you meet, you can really go and I think this would be something that they could support and move forward. I will tell you the comments that I've heard from residents saying if we go to seven, doesn't that sound like and against conspiracy theory but unfortunately this community runs on. Doesn't this sound like it's just an organization wanting to keep the numbers down so they can control this council? And I'm not saying that it is. I'm saying that this is the perception that goes out. And this is where, when it comes down to a vote of charter change, charter review, and a vote, this is where we won't get the support. Now, again, I say this publicly. I don't believe in that. But these are the questions that have been brought up that said, when we go to the vote, let's give the city what they've been asking for, what the professionals have brought forward, what the committee that has worked so hard to go to every corner of the city and draft this. And I think that that's very important. When we look at the different compensation piece, I know we've held that off and we're gonna revisit that again, but I've listened to some community members that had said, you know what? We're in fiscal crisis, we're having financial difficulties in Medford, even with 11 people, how would you correct it and say, well, you know what? By moving toward representation, your schedule isn't as busy. I'm not reaching out to every corner of the city. So maybe the compensation could be lowered because it would be less work in theory. So I mean, there's so many pieces that you look at this and say, well, this is, it fits. because ultimately what we want is we want this community to vote for it and support it and move forward to change what we need in our community. This is just a piece that I think is very important. You know, we've said it a thousand times, and every member here, I've heard it and I've seen it on the campaign trail, that really having a representation of a more diverse council, right? What could support a more diverse council but getting people that are marginalized, giving them the opportunity to really control the opportunity to win a seat. Not a bigger district, not a bigger community at large, but looking at a ward. That's achievable for everybody. And I know I joked with Councilor Beaz earlier, but we're hearing it, you know, you wouldn't really have in our revolutions text Councilor Scarpelli. I did get an email that they asked if I can read it. And this is something that our revolution members put forth that many people voted for them because of this and that's what was said was our revolution metric advocates for transitions methods current at large electoral system. to award-based representation model. This change aims to ensure that each neighborhood has direct representation and the city government promoting equitable participation and addressing the unique needs of diverse communities. And their 2023-24 method people platform, ORM, our revolution method, emphasizes the importance of the city charter reform to implement ward representation, therefore enhancing the inclusivity, inclusivity and responsiveness of local governance. So I remind my colleagues that this is what you ran on. This is your platform that you ran on. And to come in today, this is what leaves the city divided. This is what then comes in and says, you know what, then I know this committee did great. We want to see some change, but you know what? It seems disingenuous, to be honest with you. So they sit back and say, what? I'm not gonna vote for it. And I'm gonna tell my families that are saying, well, instead of voting for the change of charter, why jeopardize this with something that works? And maybe the call in Senate can prove me wrong, but there's a reason why we do 11, right? There's eight members, every ward is represented, and then the three at large. And correct me if I'm wrong, the majority, if not, most of the state that has the ward representation has this form, correct? I mean, like I said, I thought there's only three that have such a limited district process. So, and again, I urge my colleagues to follow the advice of the professionals, follow the advice of the people that have been in the streets in Medford, not nationally, not different parts of the country, but in Medford, what they've done for their work to reach every corner of Medford that came out and said, let's do this. This is something that I feel strongly about, and I think that we should support this and leave it as it is. So thank you, Mr. President, I mean, Mr. Chairperson.
[George Scarpelli]: It's not Councilor Collins.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. And again, I look at this presentation as something very important for the goal of this initiative being strong enough that the voters will pass and support what we bring forth. What we've done is we've had the opportunity for a group of people to go out and get the information from the people. Then we brought in the professionals from the Collins Center to support and guide. And this is what's come out. I've heard some of my colleagues look at this, and I've got to be very honest with you. We say it's not political, but I hear a lot of double talk. I'm actually sitting back shocked that I'm saying, I can't believe that I'm saying what I'm saying. And I'm hearing this from the people on your own platform that you've said, quote unquote, like directly, that the importance of a city charter reform is implementing award representation. I'm just confused because it seems like a lot of you are backpedaling for the platform that you were elected to. And at the same time, when it fit that dialogue, you've also said, well, these are the people that I knocked on their doors. And those people, I have to support them. So I have to push that agenda through, even though sometimes it's not best for the whole community, but these are the people that helped you. You've said it and elected you. Now, maybe you could say it's not true, but I'll say it over and over again. The power of video is amazing. These are things you've said and done. I didn't pull this up. I had a member of the revolution send this to me who didn't want to jeopardize their name or their friendship with some of you that said that they're very difficult to see this. I have some counsel saying that the difficult about this is really running the meeting and being organized. Well, that's not the charter. That's our city council rules. That's our policies we can change. I'll tell you one, and I can go to the meeting video as well, that when the council voted five to two to eliminate meetings every Tuesday night, and Councilor Caraviello and myself voted against it, the councilor that's here tonight mentioned that if we see it's not working, then we'll go back to the every Tuesday meeting. Because I hear that as a problem, because the meetings are running longer. And it seems like the message is being muddied, or it's taking too long. Well, that's a city council rule. That's not a charter rule. I've heard a councilor tonight talk about, well, imagine this, some of the wards are too small, so they don't need representation. Wow. Well, a fellow councilor said that there are some of the wards, we could play it back, but some of the wards are so small, that we maybe might not need ward representation in such small wards. I wrote it by word. And then you hear, we're looking from the improvement, it's better than what we have. I'm hearing council say it's better what we have. Is that what we're here to do? Just to get better or fix what's been wrong here. And again, this is coming from a place where I was against it. Now I feel like I'm standing on an island saying, am I hearing myself? We've been praising Mrs. McDonald and her group and how hard they've been. And they've gone, they went out and talked to Medford residents. They want to see Medford results. They want to see this. The professionals at Collins Center said, this is what works. And then we have Councilors bringing up numbers from Wyoming and California showing us numbers. Who cares? We don't know their breakdown. I'm worried about Medford, Massachusetts. And from what I gather, there are only three communities in the state of Massachusetts with this form of government that only look at district representation or such a small representation. And then the biggest piece that we've said over and over again, and it sounds like because it doesn't fit the narrative, we're avoiding it. This will give us a more diverse community council. Of course it will. Well, we have a slow turnout. Well, imagine if we have an award representation. Have we seen, maybe the Collins Center can help us. When you see organizations go from at large to award representations, I'm assuming that voter turnout will be larger because now, you have people that are identifying certain groups and certain people that will then run. With the ward representation being that you don't have to encompass yourself throughout the whole community, time-wise, or raise enough money to run at large, we're giving our, or even a district, we're giving our residents an opportunity to be part of this great option and be a voice. So I know it sounds critical and maybe I'm attacking, but This isn't anything that my fellow councils haven't said in meetings. And here I am coming back and saying, am I in a bizarro world? And I'll say this again. We're trying to pass a piece of legislation here that will go out that the city is gonna vote on. This is something that's popular. This is something that everybody I talked to on both sides, it didn't matter. They appreciate the ward representation. They appreciate that all eight wards will be represented. That's something they can go to the election booth in November and vote in support. Why would we now finally get to the finish line and try to honestly look like you're trying to control it? Because that's what it sounds like. Look, this is what it sounds like. It sounds like you want seven people so you can control it. because when you open it to 11 people, maybe you don't, you lose the majority. So that's the disrespect that happens time and time with this council. Listen, there are things that I don't, I don't like my fellow council say, but I would never disrespect and openly laugh like that. This is what we have. This is what we have at this council day after evening after evening when, when my fellow council is the chair of this meeting. So again, This isn't anything that I made up. I just explained what my fellow Councilors just said. I just reiterated what my fellow Councilors have said in the past. I just read a passage from the people's platform of our revolution that this council all ran on a slate, that they preached and ran on ward representation. I didn't make this up. So I know you're angry because it doesn't fit what you just presented. and it might not go your way, but let's look at the big picture. We want this passed now. And as one council that understands, and you look at the full picture now and do your homework and understand it and really not be angry at what I've lived through and say, have an open mind and look at it. And I've had that open mind. It's allowed me to talk to a lot of people. And the eight wards being represented with the three out loud members is something that I would support. It's something that the professionals from the call center support. And it's what the people that have gone meeting after meeting throughout the whole community. And I know because they've called me a thousand times getting input from neighbors. When we talk about let the people speak, I think the people, it was clear, it's right here. Now this is being put forth by a Councilor for truly, I'll be honest with you, I don't see the weight in your presentation of why seven or district representation has been more beneficial than a true ward representation of all of our whole community.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Chair, to my colleague that referenced the Council that got up and walked out while she was speaking, I want to apologize. I've been sick, so I ran out of water and I felt a little faint, so I had to go get water. So I apologize if I disrespected any member of the council to get water. So I apologize for that. For my colleagues that seem to be offended that I'm bringing politics into politics, sorry. But I don't align with you. You are a slate of six that vote in tow. You usually vote in tow, but you all vote together. on your agendas. And that's known. That's nothing that's a secret. I'm trying to attack anybody. But my position as a city councilor is to be the voice that people call or express a concern or the way they feel or they want to be represented. So when I bring a topic forward, if it hurts your feelings, I'll do respect. I don't care. My goal is to make sure that everybody's view is represented. So I know my council colleagues are upset or feel hurt or the reason that I disrespected them. I'm just sharing what has been brought to my attention by constituents that I'm expressing it night after night, because it seems like I'm the only one because some people just aren't listening. And this is why our community is in flux right now. So when we look at this situation right now, where we are right now, the council brought up some changes and supported it, some with facts, some with his own beliefs, his belief system, which I respect. That's his belief system. That's his due diligence looking forward in his decision. Myself, I looked at it totally opposite, but I will not, I will not apologize to share what has been asked of me by constituents, maybe constituents that don't even vote for me. So my personal opinion and my motion is we stay with the original presentation by the Charter Review Committee with the 11 representatives, eight board, three at large, and again, we can look back at this tape and listen to what everybody has said and what I expressed from what they said. This isn't made up. This isn't a dialogue to make this like some kind of a clown show. This is an expression of one council's view in comparison to six others. And I will not apologize for that. And unfortunately, my friends, This is politics. This isn't, hey, kumbaya, let's all sit together and say, let's all do this, let's run together and let's have one vision and make Medford what we believe in. No, because that's not how it works. It's a very different complex world we live in in Medford. And the thing that people come back for over and over again is they feel that this council isn't listening. And all I'm saying is, We have a committee that's worked their tails off months after months, night after night, getting the information that presented to the professionals and that presented to us. And all I'm saying is the belief of a council making a change and my beliefs from what I've heard from constituents or my personal belief and understanding is that the ward representation of all eight wards are represented. and to throw in pieces like, well, you know what? They'll be there forever, or not enough people will come out in that ward, 2,500 people. That's the way of the world. This is how we work through things. To say that we won't have enough people, not enough people come out and vote. Well, maybe these are the changes that will bring our constituents out to vote. Make them feel like they're part of the solution. Have them feel vested. Make them feel part of the community. So again, thank you for allowing me to speak.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I urge this council to listen to the comments from the Collins Center that delaying this because Councilor Callahan and Councilor Leming haven't been heard, I think they've been heard. I mean, they were here, they were part of the discussion. It's not like they haven't been here, they weren't here. To now move this to another meeting and then to a meeting to vote, let's make a decision, let's move forward so we're not stalling. This has to go to a vote, to the legislation, this has to go to the state. I just think that we keep kicking this can down the road and we're gonna be exactly where we are. So again, I think we entrusted a group of citizens to do the work for this community. And I think that it's been loud and clear what they've shared. And I would be I would disagree with what motions of forward and put forth my motion to move forward with this vote with the ward representation of eight and then the three at large. And let's get this process moving so we can move method forward. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, President Villes. Um, I know that, um, when you look at the financial impacts to resurface, um, um, place that I know that our high school team uses that, uh, those courts and if those courts are not playable like in my profession where we've lost our courts for our high school team. We then have to bus our high school teams off site to support their practices. So I think that I know the high school uses it during the spring season. I know that Kevin does use it a lot with with outside groups or with recreation groups that bring in funding. So I think it's important that, especially as we're seeing pickleball grow, keeping tennis-only courts, especially when you're looking for a facility that is what placed it is, having, I believe, four courts, three or four courts. you know, the programming to be dedicated to tennis and it doesn't, it's not interrupted like what you see at over at Duggar Park, which is a huge benefit, but it also has to, has to be shared. So I think that's a huge piece to take in consideration, the money that's that's saved in the trickle down effect back to our budget when it comes down time to vote every little penny counts. So I know that that's a huge benefit for our high school athletic program. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I'm so happy to see this on the agenda that we're going to entertain this because I think that safety is the biggest concern, especially what we're seeing for activities at the Shell, not just for shows or entertainment, but for our farmers market and the ability to light that area, I think is so important. I think when you look at that, the other piece that you see is As a recreation employee, as soon as we went to to Moscow lighting, we realized the cost savings that directly came back to our city and our department because of the fact that with the old system of lighting. 1, it was archaic and to the. understanding of someone sending somebody down to flick a switch and then come back later to flick the switch again would cost you four hours in overtime and that adds up believe it or not so musco lighting has been a godsend to municipalities so i think that it really saves when you look at finances and a hidden cost that really pays off at the end. So I'm glad to see this and I would support it as well. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I apologize, Mr. President, it's left up, sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I'm sorry, my hand was up. Councilor Scarpelli. no i apologize i put it up and down so many times i just wanted to make sure that miss dupont just uh just share with the public i know that we've had some questions in the past and i had an email today just that people were questioning whether um how does this fit as if it's not a city facility this is something that i support as a historical building in our community and trying to enhance that and make sure we we provide assistance any way we can to to make sure the Shallow Baptist and I believe the Unitarian Church as well that people understand that there are criteria that we follow that but legally we can use our CPA funds to assist in projects like this. I know that the question that I had today was they weren't against any of these uh the the churches personally but the question was if the tax money is uh is it going to a city owned facility that's what they were confused in so i know that i know if miss dupont can expand expand on that a little bit i know that there are some legalities that show that it absolutely fits into this um this criteria and we're not violating any legal issues, but I just wanted to make sure we had clarification on that because I want to make sure that there's no negativity behind any of these projects. I think they're all worthwhile and in my mind fit the scope of historical and I would support it a thousand percent. But just for that fact, if we can share any information that would help clear some questions some residents that have asked. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I appreciate it. I know that there really weren't. It wasn't about just the facility that it was. It was a church. It was that focus. The question was that if it's not a city facility, but I appreciate that answer being that defining that a community exactly what the title title is about. So thank you for clarifying that. And I hope that residents. feel that that's adequate because I think it sure fits the purpose that I believe. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Vice President Collins. And again, my question was from the beginning of the presentation, but Paul, thank you very much. Um, you could see the hard work in the presentation, and there is a lot of excitement with some of these opportunities. But I think that I'd be remiss to say that, you know, we're seeing some we're seeing the impacts of, um, the lack of communication again to really get the word out to the neighborhoods and Um, I know that in the last few weeks we've done, we've tried to do the best we can and we're doing more than we can. But I think we were seeing it now with so many questions. And as we're getting to the end of the Salem Street district and the neighborhoods rallying um, and really not feeling like they've been part of the part of the process or have been given the questions answered. Um, and there's a lot of fear and a lot of questions going on. So, um, as tonight started, I received a few emails from, um, residents from Lawrence Estates, uh, letting me know that they just found out that there's some sort of a meeting. Uh, and I think we I know that I've shown you the date from when the last council really focused on implementing a more robust process and communications and bringing these meetings to the neighborhoods. And I know it's not it wasn't written in the R. F. P. I know Councilor President Bears informed us. But I think As we move forward, we really need to find a better way, even if it's a reverse 911, letting the neighborhoods know that these meetings are happening. Because I know we've had up to almost 20 meetings now discussing this process, but I implore all of us to understand that there is groundswell starting in a negative undertone when it doesn't have to be for the fact that even the Salem Street situation, a lot of these, the questions that the fair, a lot of them could be answered in the meeting with the simple sentence or two. And, um, And I think again, uh, if we when we move forward, I see our schedule. The schedule looks great. We're at the beginning phases of this process, this new process. And, um, I just don't want to be in the same place we are with the Salem Street uh quarter and what we're hearing now and the displeasure and the the anger and the discourse and this divide now and it's it's it's something that I think we need to find a way that this council this uh city administration needs to really we we have so many avenues a communications director we have um we have different avenues that we can tap into I mean it's we really need to find a way if we can to please set the schedule, alert people when we're going to be talking about their neighborhoods so they can be present or at least to be told that we've done A, B and C. I just don't think people have heard us and they truly don't know the impacts that are being created in their neighborhoods until it's time to to the end product, which we're seeing Salem Street getting really close. And, um, and I'm sure everybody there is heard the negative undertone. So again, I hate to be the Debbie Downer every time. Um, you come to come to us for for meeting because of all the hard work you've done. But I just had to share that with you as we move forward with this next process. So thank you. Thank you, Vice President, for allowing me to speak.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I know one of the key pieces I was asking for is the mayor's plan for capital plans and projects that are slated. I know that from what I hear and from the state, Metro wasn't on the list of 10 so far for the MSBA for the new high school. But it'd be interesting to see before we vote on such a large money order and understanding what the MSBA has already shared and what's coming down the line. So I know that's not pressing, but again, I requested a report And I haven't seen anything, if you can enlighten me, but I haven't seen anything.
[George Scarpelli]: We talked about adding this project, the scope of this project, in front of this council. I think it's important that we know what's ahead of us and how we're planning on funding all of these projects. And it's a little disheartening as well, Mr. President, I know that we talked last week and when I conferred with an attorney, it's nothing illegal to ask for a financial breakdown of the process with the superintendent. So it's a little disingenuine when you come here in front of this council and it's a $5 million, but when you ask for a simple question, for a breakdown of financial matters that happen in the school department and we hear nothing. So those are the two big things that I'm a little curious about before we move on. I move on to thinking about influence. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you so much for the presentation. This is very thorough, and I think that this is something that's needed, no doubt about it. You know, the so-called new schools, I was on what was called the 18 when we first started in elementary school. I must have slipped in by accident as a teacher back in the day. So it was definitely needed. I know I've talked to a lot of parents and teachers, former colleagues. I know it's very important, but for one Councilor, like I said, I think that my apprehension is really and the structure of the way that our administration is informing us and where we are, at least this one Councilor, where we are financially. Now, if I, Ms. Cushing, forgive me if I'm wrong, but this first five million, this is something that we'll be bonding as well, correct? Yes. Okay. And then the bigger number is the one that comes later and obviously it's going to follow if we approve it. And that's something I totally want to support. But unfortunately, I'm not getting the information back. I'm not gonna halt it by rule 21 or section 22 of this project tonight, because I hear what you're saying. I think there is a timeline, but I think to the president and to the mayor to understand as we move forward with these bigger projects, I think having more robust discussion of what our financial outlook is in the whole community and what's coming down the line, which I think is very important. I think it's something that I will be using. I won't hold this up. I know how the timeline is important. I'm not going to hold it up. I can't support it because it's against what I feel is my position here as a city councilor, and that is being the steward of our finances and understanding what the big picture is. And it could be something very simple. It's just that I haven't had any communication. I've asked that. I know you were here last meeting. It's something I asked for from the administration that we, part of this meeting, we talk about what the implications are as we move forward. We look at different projects. Like I know that the override was failed with the fire station, but there are still needs there. We're also talking about what's happening for the new high school. It's something that I wanna support a thousand percent, but we still don't know what the impact will be. If we try to, you know, reach out and try to either bond or ask for an override in or debt exclusion for that project so there are so many pieces you know we're also talking about so many new. zoning implications that are hitting us pretty soon and and wanted to see what what kind of growth the city will use these new zoning rules and how that can grow help us grow so there's so much involved and I think that uh again for one council who understands and wants to support this because of the need and I won't I won't hold it back but that's the reason why I can't I can't support it fundamentally I can't I have a For some odd reason, the communication with this councilor and the city administration is zero. I think something simple as asking for a breakdown of the superintendent's buyout, which is not fraudulent. I'm not saying anything that was illegal. I'm not saying it was wrong or bad. That's what it's called in the terms when you settle on a mutual buyout and just asking for that financial implication so we can understand the process and getting answers back saying that it's a school committee purview. We know that's wrong. I spoke to my attorney that will speak to me that is very well versed. And this is, it's a basic request from a city councilor, especially when it's funding that's ultimately signed off by, for one of the votes by this councilor. So I hope you understand why. But again, I appreciate the thorough breakdown. This is obviously something you've done so so much work on and it's great to hear. I'm sure we have plans for moving all the summer programs because they know how important they are out of those two buildings and I know that's going to be daunting so but I also I love the fact that we're already planning for that so these are a lot of great you hear a lot of great things and I appreciate the hard work that you've done so and thank you for hearing me.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President for allowing me the opportunity to speak on uh, true legend here in Medford. Um, when we know that Mr. Granada has been fighting a good fight for some time now. Um, but when, uh, we sure when God came calling this past week, um, we knew he now has one of the best people Medford ever had to offer to sit by his side. Um, Mr. Granada was so entrenched in our community and had so much love and passion for the city that I remember the time when I first started the option of running for school committee, I had to go sit with Mr. Granara to get his blessing. Not for the fact that he was the God, but it was so important to get his blessing so he can talk to you and explain to you what it truly meant to be an elected official in Medford. He made me understand that the reason why we become elected officials is the work that you are doing for the community, for the residents of the city, not for yourself, not for yourself, anything to gain any self-worth or for you personally, but what's best for the community. I think that when you first hear some of the things, I know that people don't know this, but Mr. Granara was a major factor in the Middlesex Sheriff's Offices and Trevor Katushin wrote this past week. It is with a heavy heart that I must inform you all the former Special Sheriff John Granara Esquire has passed away. Our thoughts and prayers are with his entire Granara family during this difficult time. A graduate of Matanon High School, Boston College, Suffolk University Law School, John Granara served the MSO with distinction in the highest levels. He began as the MSO's Chief Legal Counsel in March 1997, serving until 2009 of August. when he was appointed as Special Sheriff. Following the passing of the Sheriff Jimmy DePaulo in November of 2010, Special Sheriff Granara ably ran this agency until the appointment of Sheriff Katushin. Providing leadership at the pivotal time for the Middlesex Sheriff's Office, he was an invaluable source of knowledge, leadership, and friendship to me and many others throughout his tenure. It was our great privilege to have him remain as a Special Sheriff until August of 2011. John's legacy is public service included his time in the method school committee from 74 to 77 and his election to the Massachusetts House of Representatives in 76 representing his beloved hometown of Medford. In his memory, the half the flags in Middlesex jails were all lowered to half staff. Um, I know I read council bears read a few things that Mr. Granada did, but he did every He did more than people even knew. There was a lot of things, whether it's a celebration parade in Medford, whether it's supporting different programs that no one knew about, it was Mr. Granauer that did the work behind the scenes. And he kept a tradition that I thought was so valuable and so needed for our veterans that I believe it was, I said Memorial Day, but I believe it's Memorial Day, not Veterans Day, I believe. that working together with the members of the American Legion and the Elks, they would have our presentation and he would set a day of remembrance that you had to be there, you couldn't miss. So he was a special individual and someone that this city will miss, but if you've known John Granara, please share a story. Don't let his, his work fade away. Let that name stick with you, because this is what the city is lacking today. The reason why you see such divide is because people like John Granara aren't here to bring these groups together. So to the Granara family, we send our deepest condolences, and I'd love to, if we can, leave this meeting in his honor, Mr. President, and thank you for the time.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Another long time battle. Mr. Evangelista fought hard to be there for his loving wife and his two daughters, like he's always been. And unfortunately, He was taken from us and hopefully is resting in peace now. I know that the Evangelista family worked so hard, especially Julianne and Lisa. We all know Lisa, who's worked for the city for many, many years. I'd like to say she ran the city while Mike McGlynn was the mayor for those many, many years, and then moved over to the school department for many years. and I know that he will be missed and we just share our condolences with Evangelista family, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I found them in the ordering.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you for this initiative I so excited to see this. And I can't wait for the involvement of our parents and, and, and really pick your brain and then as a program developer for parks and recreation department, and a neighboring community that is focusing on the enhancement and the growth of our adaptive programming for after school, before school, and during the summers. I think that during the vacation weeks, I'm so excited that, you know, that we have a group of parents that can kickstart something here in Medford. I know I've worked very closely with Kevin and also the directors in Belmont and also in Malden because we find it very difficult to get programs that were bringing enough enough participants to make it sustainable in the sense not that it's, you know, we've offered to do special programming with, you know, with as free programs. We've looked into providing free transportation. So we're really excited and looking into trying to do things collaboratively. That's why I'm so excited tonight to see this, that our parents can share some information that I would love to work with Kevin directly with Somerville and saying, hey, this is a great collaboration where there'll be no boundaries, there'll be no limitations. I remember we worked closely with, at one time, the only thing that was offered for our special needs and adaptive families back in the day when I first started as a developer was the top soccer program and it was such an important program and I remember talking to parents as we ran that program through and it was so important for the parents to feel that they want to be soccer moms and dads as well. It was just important for the whole family to have these programs and I'm so excited. I've worked with Adaptive Sports New England in trying to bring programs to Somerville. One program we're looking to start this coming year is looking to use Dillboy Stadium for our wheelchair accessible track program. One thing that I'm working closely with the Special Needs Department and Somerville in trying to find a true partnership that we can really sustain it. I think that when we've had a program during the summer, and it's an adaptive parks and recreation program. And we would offer that after our students would leave the summer program. So it was very accessible, and we made sure we supported in every which way with transportation. we found it at times that the numbers weren't there. And I think that really having a group that can advocate that we can turn to both Kevin and I personally, because I think it'll be a huge success if we collaborate and work together with neighboring communities so we can really help it grow it together. So I'm excited for the fact I've given, I've been given that that permission from our director in Somerville, that we can really enhance our, our adaptive programming. And so I, again, I could talk a buzz it off me wagon because I'm really excited about this, but I'd love to hear what our parents have to say. And, and if there's a way that we can meet after to try to set something up together, that'd be great. So thank you. Hey, Councilor Scarpelli, Councilor Lazzaro.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I'm so passionate about this because what we're seeing, what I see in a day-to-day situation in my profession I hear it from our parents today and what we're hearing is the the difficult of having something in your own town and I know it's difficult I'd love to do more in the town that I work in the city working but it's sometimes you don't get the numbers that you need. So that's why the conversation with Director Levine in Malden and Director Bailey here in Medford, we've been talking about trying to find a collaboration between the triangle, the three of us, and trying to find a way to pool all the assets that we have together so we can have something that parents don't have to drive to Watertown or Burlington or Brookline but they stay right in this room and we can offer something and that that's that's something that our kids and families would love. I know that we have someone here right now that i'll come to the carpet we we've been very fortunate to have the teamsters as part of our family. And I'll be honest with you, whenever I need anything, I would go to the Teamsters organization who works so hard for artistic community, right? And they run the artistic gala to help us support programs and they've always done that. So Steve, I'll be calling. And I think that looking as a collaboration, maybe having Mayor Lungo-Koehn and working with Mayor Christensen and working with Mayor Ballantyne and saying, hey, maybe there's somewhere we can go. It wouldn't be great, something like the Heckner Center. having a central site for our adaptive programming. Park right next door that's enclosed and safe. You know, we can even across the street, we have St. Francis has a gymnasium. So we have access. We have great people that have worked with our most vulnerable for many, many years. Ron Giovino has done an amazing job with the Challenger program. And imagine using that to enhance that. I know that we have an adaptive physical education teacher at Method High School, and Kala Andre, and she's doing amazing things with the Challenger program. And imagine bringing that to an after school program, bringing that in a Saturday program. So I think there's so much we can do as a city. And the avenues that we already have and the partners that we already have, I don't think this is a reach. I think that what you hear, everybody loves to hear inclusionary. Oh, we're inclusionary. When I was fortunate enough to start the summer program at the former Columbus, now the Mr. Tuck School, one of the issues is making sure that our special needs community had an avenue for a summer program. And we really, at the time, Superintendent Belson made it a priority that it was open for everybody. But I also understand that all inclusionary sometimes in some communities mean that all you're doing is saying we're covering you, but really not doing anything for you. So I'm excited just from what I hear and maybe if I could be added to any of the future meetings and maybe bring in Kevin Bailey, we can reach out to Joe Levine over in Malden and see if there's a true collaboration that we can use that, you know, maybe we're doing the basketball program here at the recreation center, but maybe we're doing our soccer program over at Dillboy Stadium, or maybe we're doing our track program over at McDonald Stadium. So it's not that far of a drive, but it's sustainable enough that we can bring families together and have a true program that we can really be proud of. I find it so difficult to try to run the program in Somerville because it's our number one initiative. And we just not getting the numbers because we have, we have, we have hundreds of parents have hundreds of kids but unfortunately, some can only do some after school here, some can don't have transportation there. Some don't have this will maybe if there's a vibrant program that we have multiple offerings. that maybe we can do something great and I'm excited about moving forward and helping this community and I and I, you know, Medford high did something that's very different. Most communities don't have an adaptive physical education teacher. What they do is is a physical education teacher who studied the adaptive program you can cover some because of your experience. But Medford has a teacher that does that. And I'll be honest with you, Carla ran our summer program for a few years and she was amazing for our recreation program. But there's opportunities there. So like, again, I'm excited about the process and I agree with you. I don't think this is, no one's gonna walk away from this. I think this is important. So thank you so much for bringing this forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, as I said earlier, I thought the presentation was amazing. I understand the need as a former teacher, my colleagues, relatives of teaching, family members that are in the schools, we understand that this is a definite need. I will be voting no for the simple fact that part of the first reading I asked for a breakdown of our capital plan this is going to be a 20 possibly 27 million dollar project and what I asked for the meeting from the mayor's office was a meeting to discuss our capital capital projects that are in in line also talked about what the future looks like and how this looking to see how it would affect the renovation or the new high school project moving forward when you're looking for 20 bonding $27 million. And, you know, the other pieces, the whole, we still need a main street fire station. So there was so many pieces involved with this. I asked to have that. We didn't get it. No council beers has tried. I know that he's still having, we will be hopefully having a meeting soon, but, um, I appreciate the hard work that everybody has done, but I'll be voting no because I have not gotten the information to make sure that our community understands the financial impact in totality once we vote this through. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, as I stated in the first meeting, I think it's very important when we started this project, as Councilor Collins mentioned years ago, the police chief and the police department were very involved in helping us craft this ordinance. For the fact that the police chief was not involved in this process, I will not be supporting this endeavor. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Any further discussion?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that I was the friends from Method People Power. I appreciate the conversation and the respect given in the conversation that we did have. Again, in discussions with the chief of police and our police department, some of these initiatives can hamper our police department to do their jobs and contradicts some of the the ordinances that are being put in place. So again, without the police chief's involvement in this directly, I could not support this for the fact that it might hurt the community more than people think. So it's something that's already in place in Medford. When I've talked to the chief, I believe in the years that he's been here, he's always been proactive and involved. I think he's had interaction with ICE once in the many years, but he thinks, he shared that he wasn't involved in this craft. So it might leave us into some questionable findings later. So I will not be supporting this initiative. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I know this is so people realize Ms. Lerner has called me a racist for many, many years. I'm a first-generation American. My parents are immigrants from Italy. They came across legally and did exactly what had to be done. They love this country, and they raised a proud American. I worked in a community that's very diverse, Mr. President. Unlike Ms. Lerner, I've sat in a living room with an ICE agent. and a family of illegal members. And I understand the situation. But we just had two human rights members just say what? They've worked with the chief. We've had the existing plan in place for five and a half years. It's worked amazingly. This is what was mentioned last time where people are missing, when Mr. Lerner's talking about money. My fear at the time was understanding with the city of Medford and where we are financially, is what are the financial ramifications if there is negative feedback from the federal government? And if they take money away from Medford? Well, in Cambridge, in Boston, in Somerville, they can survive. In Medford, I question if we can. And that's our basic necessities, police, fire, school. That was my concern. So to sit there and publicly embarrass me, she's already called me racist many times. And that's uncalled for. So I will share with you the process as I met with many members of these organizations. I would never ever, in the spirit of any of these ordinances, they're very good. But as a city councilor, we have to weigh many different factors. And because I've done that, I'm labeled a racist. So shame on you, Ms. Lerner. I've given my life to this community and the people of this community. No matter what color, what race, it doesn't matter. But it's about time people stand up to the ignorance we just heard. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: responses over the last year as we continually struggle to effectively fund our priorities, especially our school priorities due to the cost of inflation. Our administration has continued the process of reviewing department overtime budgets and procedures. Since February 2024 especially, I've been focusing on OT even more and working with all department heads that have OT line items in their budget to make sure all public funds are being used the best way possible and to make sure there is not misuse or overuse of such funds. The city's obligation to fund overtime is necessary to ensure the general public's safety, fulfill contractual obligations, and for the efficient operations of our community. However, we must be strategic in how the staffing is deployed as the funding resources are extremely limited and there are critical needs throughout our school district and city. Overtime is a crucial component of every municipality's budget and operations. We need DPW crews out on the streets plowing snow, removing trees that block roadways, and other critical tasks to keep our roadways accessible and safe. Police and fire OT for several reasons. In some circumstances, we need building inspectors to be able to visit homes and make determinations on living conditions. But we need to manage how overtime is allocated so we don't create a situation where we're spending taxpayers' money unnecessarily. That's why we're working with the department heads to develop a policy that enables them to manage their time to their team effectively and implement the overtime procedures that meets the needs of our constituency. The police department has done a much better job curbing overtime and has lowered the police overtime budget from about $2 million in 2018 to an average number of 1.2 million for the past four years, a reduction of over 35%. The fire chief and mayor's office, the human resources director, are working diligently on accountability as it relates to OT. As one example, 28 letters have been issued to staff putting them on notice that their sick time use, which causes the need for overtime, seems excessive. Within the DPW, we hired DPW commissioners to help manage the department, specifically the OT budget. The topic on the agenda is how overtime is managed in our building department. We cannot have a union member fielding calls and assigning overtime shifts to themselves and their fellow employees. That presents a conflict that we made this change over the years. This did find to be necessary change, especially when almost $50,000 was paid out to overtime during the period my chief of staff was out on maternity leave. Our current building commissioner fields the calls from dispatch as part of department responses hierarchy and works within the written protocol to determine the immediate life safety status situations in an effort to determine the need for an inspector on scene. If the situation does not present an urgent need to respond, the commissioner will decline to send an inspector. The address is tracked and scheduled for follow-up by an inspector the next day. In instances where our commissioner is unavailable, our former commissioner is contacted and makes a determination. The former commission has received less than a handful of calls over the last year and has paid $60 per call. The building department continues to develop protocol and the training to fine tune the best possible responses of the concerns and staff welcome construction feedback. Mayor Kern. Thank you. Now, what I've been hearing is nothing what was just read. What we're seeing right now is practice that we've seen that I believe that our building department, by law, if you indulge me, Mr. President, by law, Mass Amendments Building Codes, Section 116.1 Unsafe Structures, I'm hearing that we have concerns with protocol that's now been lifted because of said overtime, as the mayor has stated. What we're seeing right now, I don't believe is true. What I'm seeing right now is that our building inspectors who historically have gone out and not used the overtime that's been stated for overuse or misuse, but because it's standard and it's practice and it's making sure our constituents are safe. When a structure is put in crisis, whether it's be fire or water or some kind of accident that maybe a car hits a home and it's after hours, our inspectors are called and they're the governing body that comes in to deem that facility safe. What we're being told now is that we have a protocol in place where, because of financial reasons, we have, that's another question, we have the former director, the former commissioner of the building department still on staff being paid. It says that he's paid $60 when he's called, but I would like to know what he is paid by still being on the books. Because if we're hurting for money, there's a question there. What I've been told is that if the building department isn't called, then the fire department, the deputy on call, will make that decision. That is dangerous. They're not the governing body or the body that deems a structure safe. And that is a huge liability and huge safety issue and concern for our residents and our homeowners and our constituents. So we're seeing some very, very questionable practices. I find it very difficult that this mayor is putting this into place with other questionable reasons as we're moving forward, and I'll get to those later. But we have our fire department that is thin as it is, that if no building department is called for an overtime, which is minimal, by the way, to come in and clear that, there is a trickle down effect financially that harms our community even more than any overtime. You're asking for our firefighters to come down. You're asking for possible detail from the fire department to sit there possibly for four, eight hours in overtime. And then you're possibly leaving our community in crisis by the ability not to have an engine back to where it should be, where it's needed. Instead, it could be possibly at that site. This is something that I don't understand why it's happening. This is something that I find it very difficult to understand. This isn't an organization, a group of people that have worked very hard for this community for many, many years and done so much for us and really just do their job. And we're seeing some tactics by this mayor that it's very glaring against the working men and women of our community. It seems like it's very petty, and it seems like it's very vindictive. I've been told that our building department now has had practice on Wednesday nights, the late evening, that they would have a working dinner as a group with the commissioner for many years, this commissioner, the past commissioners, that they would come in and they would have dinner together. And that practice has stopped. What reason? We don't know. But for the ability to have your commissioners there, when a constituent comes in and has the ability to talk to any one of the building inspectors that they're working with on site, that's a relief. Now you're told that these people have to now maybe, they can leave, they can go out for the half hour. Now you have constituents that are accustomed to have someone there no matter what. Now that's gone. And why? Could it be that the evening before that this rule was put in place, that the union member was called into the commissioner's office to tell them that this practice will stop, that they can't have dinner in a common area together, that this practice stop the day after the mayor opened the door and informed these members that if they do not stop a lawsuit that we've been given and we've seen from the Teamsters, that she's gonna go public. This to me doesn't seem anything to do with overtime and our mayor taking care of this community financially, because that's a joke. What we're seeing over and over again is the working men and women in this community being treated unfairly and disrespected by this mayor. Whether it's the DPW being drug tested, whether it's our DPW members of firefighters being followed by private investigators, or what we hear today. This is a disgrace. This is why our community is a mess because our mayor is childish and our mayor is putting her feelings in front of what's right in our community. So, excuse me, but this is enough is enough. We need to stop this practice. It's causing the city to lose thousands and thousands of valuable dollars. I know we have building inspectors here this evening. We have other members that are directly affected in this community that have expressed concerns, because there are some serious concerns here. Because what I'm told, if no one else in the building department or the commissioners don't come out, and again, a commissioner that I don't understand why we're still paying, considering he's the assistant commissioner in Brockton. Why we have a sitting commissioner that's in his office today. Why are we paying that? We're so worried about financial issues. Why is it a problem? But regardless, let's move forward. Let's say nobody comes out. Do you know who makes that call? The deputy chief. Now, I know we have one deputy chief here tonight that will tell you, I hope, that he shares that this is a huge liability. This is something they're not legally authorized to do. So you're gonna see a practice of what? Sorry, structure inhabitable. Shut it down overtime. Not because what was said that we're giving people overtime because her rules, her ridiculous rules are forcing our members to waste our city's finances. So again, Mr. President, this has to stop. This petty, vindictive, ego-driven negativity has to stop. It has to stop. The morale in this community from our workers are a mess. Go up and down, go through the hallways, talk to the rank and file. Now, all of you, all of us have been endorsed by unions. All of us have said that we support union labor workers. That's what we said. When is enough enough? When do we all stand together and say this is enough? Because we've heard it over and over again from the Teamsters. We've seen it over and over again. We've been in meetings that we've been informed that we're paying out thousands and thousands of dollars because she is being sued and the city's being sued and they're losing case after case. When are we gonna wake up and realize, hey, maybe we didn't need an override. Maybe we just need a leader that manages our finances correctly.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. So I think that I have a bunch of questions. So I think that starting with, I believe, Mr. Brinch, is he still on, Mr. President?
[George Scarpelli]: So I have talked to the rank and file, and I've talked to many, many members of our union, and I've talked to these members, and the understanding that the fear that they have to speak because of retaliation is evident. The mayor has spoken over and over again how she has come to the City Hall to clean up City Hall as if this is the Wild West. And it's said we've seen good people hurt. And we can go all the way back because we were part of those meetings where we see how much money that have been settled on many, many occasions. So we understand that we are losing money. So there's a reason why these union members that have the right to file grievances because they feel that they're being treated unfairly. And when it goes through the process, the reason why we're losing so much money is because this administration has over and over again gone after our union workers without true facts, and true understanding. And this is why we're losing thousands of dollars, both in legal fees for lawyers to represent the mayor and for settlements. So when we talk about this letter that was read by the assistant commissioner, the deputy commissioner, my question to him real quick, he started saying things that this was done, this action was taken, with lining up our employees and going into a drug truck, testing truck, like a herd of animals. Because they got calls from their wives, not them, how disgusted they were that they were treated that way. There's protocols in place. There are laws in place when you talk about drug use in the community. Now, you hit the great buzzwords and how you're there to protect and make sure that our city's safe. Or are we? It says in your own letter that it was put forth to the HR department and yourself months ahead of time that there was some concerns about drug use and drug issues. What was done? And then when it came to this syringe, when it came to this one syringe, you're talking about a public bathroom that's used by everyone. And I believe the protocol that's in place by law and by statute and by union rules, is that the two administrators in that department have to identify employees that might be under the influence. And then that gives them the course to go to get drug tested. That's not what we saw. Instead, we saw, we heard and witnessed that our employees vindictively were taken out of the streets that were working, lined up and given drug tests and alcohol tests. So these are interesting questions. But more importantly, we have members that that are here tonight that aren't afraid to come here and shed the truth of why this resolution came up and why I had to share this. Because the mayor talks about public safety. Public safety is in the changes you've just made. And I'll have other questions too, why Mr. Foti is even still working for the city of Medford. So if I can, I'd rather yield to the podium, Mr. President, because we have union members that can answer a lot of these questions, because what the mayor said isn't true. It's not true. These members have told me over and over again, different members, some afraid to come to this podium, some are here right now that can answer those questions. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: They said that months before they were identified.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So that one person that was identified then with past, was it similar and was that employee the same person? Because it would be interesting to see that that one person that was, it could have been carried over because what we hear is, what I've been told by the union members themselves, something they weren't afraid to tell me, that not one person that were drug tested that day tested positive. Everybody was negative. So that's something they told me that I can openly disclose. Not one person tested positive.
[George Scarpelli]: So with that being said, I think it's important that we understand this policies and protocol, correct? That the DPW director and his deputy, if it's found that there's drug or alcohol use, they are trained to first observe those people and then move forward. So that day when we had 35 members in a line to get drug tested, in your professional opinion, did you identify them to be under the influence?
[George Scarpelli]: on this issue, and I don't wanna be the dead horse, but again, we have a bathroom that's used not just with employees, but as said by the commissioner, that is also open for contractors. We also realize that there are other avenues why people use syringes, whether it be diabetics, whether it be any other medical issues that were legitimate. And that's the reason why protocols are put in place that the leadership of that department, are trained to identify any drug use or alcohol use and then have right and course to move forward and what I've heard and what I've seen it's not didn't happen didn't happen that way and instead we put ourselves out there for another lawsuit and the attorneys that I've talked to because I can't talk to attorneys because we don't have a city solicitor the attorneys that I've talked to and when when the the the the um the legal document that I showed them to see where we're going to be later in life with this issue, we're in trouble. So again, that's just one issue, again, of the way we're treating our union members. So I appreciate that, Mr. President, but I do know that the issue in hand that was brought forth in this resolution was really about the overtime and the fear of public safety with the building inspectors not being able to do their job as the governing body that's by law that should be doing this. So if I can, Mr. President, if my colleagues don't have any questions, I know that deputy chief has been waiting patiently.
[George Scarpelli]: It would be interesting to see if there is a common trend with the person that has identified as having been caught with being tested positive and the prior incidents. That'll be interesting to know because if our HR department didn't do that due diligence when it was identified months ahead of time, I think that's a bigger problem. So that's for that. But again, the issue at hand is about the overtime. And the question that you bring forth over and over again is the overtime funding. and not spending the money wisely. Again, you haven't answered the question, why the former commissioner? Because I'm sure he's not doing it for $60. I'm sure he's still being paid just to be still on call for the city of Medford. Because no one in all my years, that'll be interesting to know the truth, because it's just not $60 when he's called.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so he's not getting a stipend. Not getting a stipend for being on call or being part of the city workforce still? No, he's not. Okay, careful.
[George Scarpelli]: So it's not something that's locked, I know for sure, because I went the other day, it's an open bathroom. So there's a lot of questions here, but more importantly, back to the original issue. We're paying the assistant director commissioner of buildings from another community to come in and pay him even a dollar while we have union employees that have done this over and over again for years, but haven't gotten a contract for over three years. So I find this very, very difficult to take when it's something so simple as you're projecting that this is just me trying to save the city money. Because I'd like to ask you the question, The evening when you walked in and you saw your employees sitting around a working table where they were working while they were eating. And they were told to please stop the lawsuit or else you'll go public. Was that made up too, Madam Mayor? I need to know this.
[George Scarpelli]: In response, Madam Mayor. You make it sound so simple. But if it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, it's a duck. We have seen the way the firefighters have been treated. We have seen the way the DPW members have been treated. And now the building inspectors that have been treated. All of them with legitimate issues, because your administration has done a poor job in following the rules and the guidelines of the union contracts that was set forth as the law of this community and our employees. So you can say you didn't know anything. You could say that it's one person being vindictive, but there's a common denominator with all of these unions. There's a common denominator with all of these concerns. There's a common denominator with all of this money being spent for attorneys and fees and settlements. And that's you, Madam Mayor. And the quicker the city realizes it, the better the city will be. Because you are dividing this community and you're pointing at the hottest working people that make this city run, not you, Madam Mayor. So shame on you.
[George Scarpelli]: This is about truth and understanding public safety, Mr. President, so I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: So, so again, this is concerning because, again, if the protocol is the commissioner, and then the former commissioner, and then somebody doesn't, they don't both don't answer, then our deputy chiefs are told that's their purview. So moving forward to that if it is their purview, and we are concerned about finances, the understanding if we have a fire firefighter, a deputy chief that doesn't have the bandwidth to call a structure habitable and has to leave it inhabitable, then they have to then do what? They have to bring in someone, a firefighter for overtime, and then possibly leave an engine at that site. So from what I gather, I'd like to know the information, how many times so far that our building inspector didn't pick up the phone, and then our former building inspector, who by the way, doesn't live in Medford. So it'll be interesting to see what that path leads when Mr. Young comes back up, because that's going to be interesting. Because I like to know the financial impact, and I like to know how many times both people were called and nobody responded back to our deputies when they've reached out, because I think that's more concerning, Mr. President. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So the question is, haven't we had issues with the corporate commission, the private commission, the task commission, that we've had issues that no one did not make? Then who's left to make that decision?
[George Scarpelli]: And are you qualified? Not at all.
[George Scarpelli]: Is that alone, for one time, is enough to stop this movement?
[George Scarpelli]: I would make a recommendation if we can as a form of a motion that we meet with the mayor and her administration to figure out the protocol. So public safety is paramount in this situation. But in the meantime, we reinstate the policy that the building inspectors that have been on call for years dealing with what their charged to do by mass law, that we go back to that practice. That would be my recommendation, Mr. President, if we can. Is that an amendment to the resolution? An amendment to the resolution, please. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I would not yield my paper. If my councilors want to vote no on that, so be it. But I think right now, public safety is imminent right now, waiting for a report to later we might be regretting that, and I don't want that ever to happen. So thank you for putting that forth, but I would not take place of my amendment.
[George Scarpelli]: We understand, but I think where I'm asking for a vote is that this council asked the mayor to please implement what has been done in past practice to assure public safety immediately until we hear what Councilor Collins just mentioned as a very viable second option or follow-up option. So that would be my recommendation, but we'll leave it to the vote. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: With the presentation of the mayor and her staff to answer all these questions, that would be fair. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I'm sorry, Mr. President. of our community have been clear and precise. I think we definitely have some issues. I believe that Councilor Collins has put together a great format that we need to follow. But as a council, now that we've heard this from the professionals, that right now there is serious issues and people are watching this, that God forbid if anything happens and this council didn't follow through with the correct motion for liability and safety of our citizens. It's a slippery slope, my friends. I implore you to please, let's collectively as a group, let the mayor figure this out, but in the meantime, put the qualified people in place to make these decisions. Because from what we've heard, if there was a fire tonight, and we have the two authorities, both the commissioner and the former commissioner not answering, We don't have a professional that's going to deem a home habitable or safe, which then would lead to something very dangerous and very serious. So please, Mr. President, I implore my colleagues that this is so important that what we've heard already, we're not professionals at this. We heard from the professionals how serious it is. So again, I implore you to please listen and then vote to tell the mayor unanimously that we support, we bring them back to whole right now until we figure out the proper protocol. That's all. This isn't us against you. This is common sense right in front of us.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, what I said was, when the commissioner and the former commissioner are not available, the fire department members are not qualified to say that a structure is safe. That's what I said to correct what you said. And the other piece that I want to follow up real quick with what was said is that I'd like to know, and part of this may be added on, as a C paper, that I think people might be misunderstanding that this might be hundreds of thousands of dollars. It's not. It's not. The overtime that our building inspectors are getting for overtime isn't a lot of money. So we're not talking about saving a teacher's job. You're talking about minimal money to make sure that public safety is paramount. That's all. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I understand, I thought that was my thing. So it's not, can you just hold it?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I met with the building department. We had in depth conversation the two biggest things with size and illumination if it would affect any residents in the area, and the second would be that if the sign, the special permit would be a hindrance for public safety in that corner area, and I was informed that both are fine, so I would move approval for the sign change.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. I apologize for the delay that we should have moved you forward. So if I could take it back, I would, but we see everything is in order for the, the change of business. And I believe it's the former porch is now the, the establishment. So, and I believe that everything is in order. I did see that the times that you're requesting fall in the parameters that do not need a special vote yet. If you extend those hours, we'd welcome a motion through the clerk's office to help in any way we can to make sure that we can help your business thrive. I know it's the fear that the community heard was that an establishment being left open and I'm so glad that that the establishment is now moving in and I see nothing to hold back Mr. President. I would move approval after my colleagues have any questions or concerns.
[George Scarpelli]: No, we'll be here.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Tseng. Yes. Councilor Tseng. Yes. drop the, delay the papers 25-011, 25-012 till our next meeting, or if I have to dispose of it, I will bring it back up at a later date.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: Present
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Bears. And when you talk about, imagine doing anything for 40 years, how impressive that is. And what Barbara has endured for 40 years at The beginning is a library, it's running a library and then a subpar library, then a failing library with ceilings caving in and then going through the process of a new library and maintaining an opportunity in pilot libraries across the city and working together with former City Council President Caraviello to bring to fruition a new library in Medford. a cornerstone now, a great piece of our Medford Square entrance, and to see what Barbara has given to our community, something needs to be commended. If I can, if I could, I would recommend, Council President, that We have Barbara here at one of our upcoming meetings so we can present her with a citation with appreciation for all of our hard work for the citizens and the residents of Medford and working at our Medford Public Library for 40 years. Very impressive. So thank you, Barbara, for all your hard work.
[George Scarpelli]: I found them in the order of approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you. I'm glad that I would welcome that we go, we revert this to a committee of the whole meeting. I think that when you're talking something about in the process of a $25 million project, I think this is where we need to sit down before we vote on anything and just look into the finances and what where we're going in our community and where we are since the override. I know that there are big questions out there. What are we still doing with the fire department? What are we doing with the new high school if that comes down the line? How much money will we be able to bond? So it'll be interesting to get those questions answered. And to approve $5 million not knowing, with some clarity for the other $20 million, I think that would that would be irresponsible for us to move that forward. So I would recommend that we move this completely to a committee of the whole meeting so we can look at the different options. I know there's been some talk that there's been some money freed up from ARPA due to the override success. So it'd be interesting to see if we can use other avenues to look into possible ways to fund. So I know it's needed, not saying that I wouldn't support it, but I think that for one council, and we're talking about being stewards of our budgetary process, I think it's important that we sit down and evaluate the whole financial process. It's nice that the school committee voted 7-0 because they should. They want everything fixed, but they don't control the budgetary process, and I think it's important that this council really understands our whole, because I believe we talked about this too, Council President, is understanding our capital plan and understanding where we're going with that capital plan. So I would recommend, I appreciate your thoughts and your leadership, but I would recommend we go directly to community to the whole with this process from beginning to end. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, thank you. Can you hear me? Yes. I can just see social media today saying, quote, Councilor Scarpelli doesn't want to keep the kids warm and the teachers cool in the summer. So let's be realistic. That's number one priority. We all know that. But we also want to make sure that when I taught there 15 years ago, we had the same issues. So we understand that have to get done. But what I'm saying is I don't see a few weeks to track back and really understand the total process. Now, all due respect, Tom, thank you for your presentation. I don't even know who you are. Are we paying you? Like we don't, there's processes like, you know, how is the procurement process look? How are we going to, has issues with the MSBA been approved yet for 25 million? Have we have we looked at other avenues do we look at the trajectory of our city's finances when we're looking to how we're going to bomb this so i think that this is this isn't something that we're saying at least this council saying that i don't want this this is council wants to just bring it back and look at this in totality not because the city school committee voted seven nothing because we have issues like the air condition is not going to work in august This is a few weeks that we slow things down and go through the process the correct way. And that's to see the full health of our financial future here in the city of Medford because I'd like to know, there might be more. There might be more that we don't know about because this is coming up that we have to look at. We have to look at what's relatively new and how quick this is and how much it's going to be. Where as we look forward, there might be more that the mayor has has planned, but we don't know about that says, Well, there's another five million that we have to look at. So the kids can go into a safe school. Maybe something's wrong with the doors. We don't know yet because we haven't been discussing this. All we received is this this motion for a loan order and to my council vice president bring that forward and was seconded, but I won't be supporting it for the fact that I'd rather have the meeting before we put five, move $5 million that we can start the process before we know truly what our fiscal overview looks like in this community. Cause that's something that's been questioned multiple times in the last few months. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Can we hear papers 24-518, 24-519 please.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. I didn't say just it's been on the agenda.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Thanks for allowing this to go forward. I think that as we've spoken about in the past, I think that with the passing of the override, I think every dollar that is going to come through the city coffers I'm going to bring forward because of the lack of transparency. You'll see that there's a trend tonight as we look at different resolutions that lack of transparency or lack of information for our residents to understand the process as we move forward have been a big issue. So I think that understanding phone calls I received as soon as we get the news that the superintendent's contract has just been bought out, and mutually, by the way, I don't know what that means, but when you have someone for a contract, so especially someone that's worked so hard for the community you'd want to see that to the end and i think that not knowing what that that number is that dollar number is and how much these ramifications are going to hit our community i think it's important when you have all these questions about the override and where the money's going where it's truly going and as the mayor said she would have a transparent process i'm just moving this forward to ask that we get a detailed report from the mayor's office And, uh, describing the cost. Um impact that's going to hit this city by paying off a superintendent, um, to go home now and, um. collective paycheck to do nothing while we're now moving an assistant superintendent forward an interim role and what that cost will be in the trickle down effect to costs that are going to have to now pick up her slack financially in the city. So, um, This isn't a secret. I hope no one here is offended. I told everybody here I will question every single penny moving forward, especially after the override vote and anything that would be a little questionable when it comes to processes that as soon as the override is passed, we settle a buyout for a superintendent to move her out. So I think that is going to be super important that we have that, Mr. President. So I request that from our administration. The second is I'm glad to hear that Mia did respond back to us about our bond rating for Moody's that people didn't know that we were taken off the bond rating by Moody's, one of our investment companies that give us our bond rating because of some technical issues with filing. I believe I was told, I'm not sure, but I think that we're here that that is back on, we're back on top and our bond rating has been restored. It's also good to know that we truly don't use Moody's too often or if any, when we look at our bonds, but I think it's important that when something goes out, especially when we're talking about what? financial mismanagement, right? And what do we hear? All of a sudden, Moody's has dropped Medford because of A, B and C. So I appreciate the mayor's response today, letting us know that that has been restored. But I would amend this paper, if we could, to ask a report to be presented to the City Council on the reasoning why we would lose a bond rating, because I think that's more alarming in totality to not just getting the bond back. I think, yay, we got it back. But I think what's important, we talk about the issues we had, especially during the time of the override. We talked about mismanagement of our city's finances. So I think that we need to see if we can, Mr. President, to amend the paper to ask for that report. I would appreciate that. Next is to be resolved. The city administration cease and desist the use of private investigators. I was told that we have had multiple employees that under contract are being followed by private investigators, and this is getting to be a real problem because what's happening in our community, whether you want to see it or not, Our community is being divided in so many different levels, and the administration is the catalyst behind this. And we're seeing practices of following hard-working members of our community off of rumors to follow them around the Commonwealth to see if they're doing something wrong during their contractual sick days, and that's wrong. I'm sure everybody here has said and they fight for unions. But if you truly fight for unions, I hope you stand with me to get a true indication of where our tax dollars are going. Because if these rumors again, the reason why we hear the mayor is sent out private investigators because of rumors. And I as one Councilor, if we're going to play that game, I am now responding to rumors. that I want to report back. If this is a practice, I need an update and understand the cost that's attributed to these these, um, these private investigators and where what line item they're coming from and want a full report, what this practice, how much it's cost us from the beginning to the end, and if they have found anything dealing with any private investigators. I know that, you know, we have one DPW member that's now gone, that has settled for a big number, that's, he's home now, counting his money. And I think that was one of the instances that, looking back, I'd love to see what it's cost us. Again, I'm gonna bring it forward. We had an override, $500,000 to fix all of our streets and sidewalks. Well, let's see where this money is going. So I think this is important that we see that. And last but not least, what I heard the other day, I find it appalling. And I think that this is, again, another example of the division of this community. Everybody wants that. What do we have the other day? We have DPW members. We were commending DPW members because of their hard work and their commitment to Medford. But in the same breath, we're gonna hear that in this resolution that just the other day, I was informed that I believe 45 DPW members, staff members were brought in to do drug testing. And that's a blatant blatant problem. So my question that I can ask right now is how much did it cost us? And what do we find with these these these processes? Because I think it's important that we need to know because these members that are here are the people that get up every day and go to work without any question. Now they're understaffed. They're underpaid. These are the people that, remember, we plotted because, what, while everybody was sleeping and doors were shut and everything was buckled down during the pandemic? Well, they were fired, there were police, and there were DPW workers that were killing themselves every single day for this city. So I know the mayor talks about the pandemic, and we want to talk about it when it sounds good, but these men and women, what happened last week, that's a serious problem. And for one member of this leadership team in this city, I think that we have to have emotion. We have to have information that stops this from happening. Enough is enough. Our city is damaged. Our state is damaged. Our nation is damaged as it is. We don't need any more. So I know that there is a representative here from the Teamsters that's represented the union that could explain some important information. And I welcome that when it's time, Council President. But again, I think it's important for this council right now to understand this process. And we all know that, you know, we can't come from the city because of personnel issues. But I will tell you what I can ask for is what the funding what it costs this this community by I believe it was drug testing and alcohol testing, I believe, for all of the city employees that were, by the way, working on our streets, in our schools, in our parks, on our sidewalks, that were called back to the yard, that had to sit in a room and then be embarrassed and disgraced to get drug tested for no reason. So again, Mr. President, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So, Clarity, you're saying the mayor says that so to ask for a a report from the school department, is she is she saying that Are we going to get a report financially so we can understand the ramifications financially for buying out the superintendent? I know that you have nothing to do with it, but did she give you any indication? Because to me it sounds like, you know, go pound sand. We're moving on.
[George Scarpelli]: As the budgetary stewards of this community that vote on that budget, I'm demanding a report, Council President, if you may, to the mayor to break down the financial ramifications of the buyout to the superintendent and what that means to the city. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I don't want to get the tip of tap, but as the mayor just said in her response, when you hear a rumor, she takes up full responsibility to make sure we know what's going on. As fiscal stewards of this community, when the city council, when the school committee mutually ends a contract, and yes, there is a bio with it, there is a financial a financial responsibility to the city by the superintendent leaving early. This is why I'm asking for the resolution. This is why I'm asking the report. I'm not asking for anything bad. I'm not saying anybody did anything wrong. All I'm asking for is a report so we can see what the financial ramifications are by having this buyout, not just with the superintendent, whatever it costs us, if it costs us anything. They come back and say it costs us nothing. But what is it going to cost us for an interim? What's that increase? What is the trickle-down effect? Who's going to take up those responsibilities? Who's going to pay those people? Are they going to get paid? So I don't think this is something that's very confusing. This, believe me, this is pretty clear. So when I asked for a resolution, the resolution doesn't seem to be too dumbfounding, I believe. I think it's pretty self-explanatory. All this council is asking for, ladies and gentlemen, is just a report on the breakdown of the mutual buyout or the mutual dismissal of the superintendent. That's all. I'm not trying to make this more than it is.
[George Scarpelli]: I just think that, I think I'll say it again. And I, and I, for what this community has just gone through in November, I think it's important that we do question everything because everybody's asking. So either it's on the city side, school side, it comes, it's coming out of our city's budget and there are questions that aren't being asked. So when residents come to me and say, what are the implications financially, especially after an override, it just doesn't smell right. That's why I'm saying these are the, these are the important things that all that is, is just, showing the information, understanding the information moving forward. So when we talk about accountability, don't you think it's about time that the mayor is held accountable? I mean, don't we think that this administration is held accountable? This is the problem. So she's getting a free pass by hiding behind different levels. And the bottom line is enough is enough. We need to fix this community. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President, I think that if I can have the representative from local 25 And I think that part of this process, I think that there was a clear trend in meaning behind my resolutions. And I know it was something that's horrible and it's something that would be vetted out properly in the courts. But I think that what was clear is making sure that our community understood a few things. is one, we get a report that breaks down the funding mechanism and how money's being spent. That's the first thing. The second thing is that understanding the process that our leadership in this community in the mayor's office is lacking and it's causing a huge divide in our community. I mean, we've talked about the police today, 900 days without a contract. We're talking about the firefighters having some serious issues right now. Um, and then right. And what we're talking about right now is what I need to know is how much just this one is an issue cost. And then you brought up a good point, Mr. Hatch. You said that, you know, how many communities do you work with? If you can, can you, what, what are they? If you can, do you know what, what communities...
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I think that the question I need to ask you, you've obviously represented those communities and you've had leaders in those communities. Is it an anomaly? Is this a trend that we're seeing just because we're in Medford, we're isolated? I know by working in a municipality for the last 18 years, I see the difference, but most people don't understand that some people actually come to the city of Medford say, this is the norm. This is what a mayor is supposed to do. can you just shed just a little light on your experience and your other communities? Do you see the same trends and do you see the same financial impact to their communities that we're seeing here in Medford?
[George Scarpelli]: OK, so that's my final question is this, because this is what the point is. The amount of money we spent on drug testing and breathalyzers for these employees is important. I wanna see that. But I would love to see the cost that to the Teamsters, because we're not getting the true indication of what the city is paying for our attorneys, because we don't have a city solicitor. So I would like, if you can, if you could report back to the council and just give us an idea of what the Teamsters pay, their council, and fighting method issues, because that will at least give us a true indication that in the last five and a half years, we've seen that the teams have paid X amount of dollars. And from what I gather, it should be pretty equivalent to see where our money is going. Again, I'm bringing this forward to the community so we can understand a major impact to our community. And I bring up the override every time because we talk about mismanagement of funds. And when we have the representatives of 14 other communities, and we hear that this doesn't happen anywhere else, that's a red flag. So again, I know what was happening. We don't like it. We stand against it 1,000% as human beings. But truly, the intent for this resolution is really to understand, A, the financial impact that we're seeing in all of my other resolutions I put in place, and then B, again, the lack of true transparency and true leadership with the mayor of this community. So again, I thank you so much. Again, I apologize that things are getting heated again, but I know it's something that's very emotional. I talked to at least 10 DPW workers that call me directly that I've grown up with, I've been friends with, that were absolutely appalled and embarrassed. Their wives called me and said, this is a disgrace. What my husband had to endure today was a disgrace. And I can't speak to that more than I can, or I wish I could because I would have called the city solicitor and asked him how far I can go with this. But I know that you have put forth the civil rights lawsuit, I believe against the mayor and against the city, correct? So that's going to be interesting to see. And again, another financial impact to our community. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: That'll be interesting, because I know that this administration, what they love to do is they like to come back and say, oh, in Everett, they pay this much, and in Malden, they pay this much. What I'd like to see is what you pay out to fight issues legally with Everett, with Melrose, Chelsea with Cambridge, just to get a true indication how poorly mismanaged this community is when it comes to fiscal transparency.
[George Scarpelli]: It's talking about when we talk about when you're voting on funding. This isn't a financial paper voting on funding. This is a resolution asking for financial documents that are spent by the city. We're not asking for spending money. That's a negative way to get out of this. And I tell you, I'm embarrassed that that just happened.
[George Scarpelli]: This isn't a finance paper, Mr. President. This is a resolution asking for not to fund a finance paper. It's to ask, inquire of how much was funded. That has nothing to do with financial intent for the rule. And you know what it is, Mr. President. So I don't know why we're doing this on a phone show. You're smarter than this. Don't embarrass this council like this. This is nothing to do about calling for rule 21. They're talking about moving money forward in a financial resolution. This is not the intent of it. Please don't do this again.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: It seems like it's kind of a no-win scenario for the chair.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Villes isn't wrong that the line item for the legal department is correct. But the warrant articles that we have, I'll give you an example. I have them all right here because I have them ready. And from month to month, I could break it down with you. I'm coming with you tomorrow, Mr. Jones, and I'll show you, I'll give you an example right off the bat, which was alarming. In June of 2023, the city of method paid KP law through the warrant articles, not in the law, not in the law item in different, different departments over $230,000 just for that one month. So I will come and I'll share this information with you just to see council bears isn't wrong. The line item for the legal department isn't, they take exactly what they're supposed to. It's correct. But the Warren articles that we get month to month, you could see the breakdown. You could see the expenditures to KP law for different departments for hundreds of thousands of dollars.
[George Scarpelli]: But he said rule 21. Right. And I'm glad you figured out what you made a mistake by when I invoked rule 21.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: If that would help to get the information that we're looking for, I would be amenable to changing the language so we can get some information through the administration to see if these are the practices and if they are where we stand as a council. So I would be willing to make those amendments.
[George Scarpelli]: If you want to look at this process and make sure that the wording is correct, just to get some information, the truth of the matter is just understanding the cost impact on drug tests for DPW employees.
[George Scarpelli]: and report back what our drug policies are for all city employees. It's a good idea.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I think the union representative was very clear in the process and the policies when to be drug tested. So, um, regardless what the federal laws are, but there are agreements and laws that were made, uh, in, in negotiation to make sure that these weren't violated. So I think that the mayor has that, uh, to be honest with you, that would be very clear and understandable for everybody here. Cause she definitely violated that.
[George Scarpelli]: Council asked for when we had the the chief chief Evans here when we talked about the And the report then was presented to the deputies and the chief. And we were waiting on a meeting to inform the council of what their findings were with that meeting.
[George Scarpelli]: The administration.
[George Scarpelli]: they would be included in that executive session because you're bringing them in to discuss personal. They have to be there for talking about that. So that's the intent of executive session.
[George Scarpelli]: Correct. And the second piece, Council President, if you want to leave it open-ended, after consulting the legal team, that we then have the ability to go to executive sessions so they see fit, or they deem it approved.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that the process that this council's totality voted to fund this report and having an open forum, having the report presented to the public and then go to executive session through open meeting
[George Scarpelli]: So, but as a committee, a committee, a meeting with all the, all the members of this council, because they think that committee of the whole versus the public health and safety committee, I'd rather, I'd rather that if that was the option.
[George Scarpelli]: Perfect. Thank you. All right.
[George Scarpelli]: that I know that had a great discussion with our director, that there were some questions with the process of notification in our processes through the city council, whether they were done legally, and they are. Unfortunately, the software that we have When the resolution is opened and moves forward, it's not written out in totality. So people didn't see that tonight's would be the final vote for Mystic Ave rezoning. We're informed that the process was done correctly and that if there is a way that we can look in the future to try to share that information to make sure that there aren't any questions moving forward, I think that'll be helpful.
[George Scarpelli]: It's in height, not stories.
[George Scarpelli]: So the recommended is height though, and best practice is height?
[George Scarpelli]: So it shows both?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I just, I know that we've been, I'm going to be redundant and I know that this is my, my cry from the beginning. Um, and I know the director has tried and we've, we've talked about this and informing the public. I know we've done, um, you know, what you feel is due diligence, but I'm going to stick with what, what this council prior really wanted to see was really bringing these meetings to the neighborhoods. When I did talk to residents of the corridor and business owners, and I know that you've corrected me a few times and said, George, we put it in the water bill, we've gone directly to the businesses, but the members that have reached out to me, the neighbors that I've talked to, truly don't understand the process still. And I think that there are some restrictions. I mean, when you look at our zoning process, we still, we're only Zoom. So that really hurts. So people really can't get involved. And I think, again, I think this is my biggest battle is that As we're moving forward, I really would like to see us go into the neighborhoods. I know Innes said they would look to see if it's possible to do that. I know that that was part of the RFP that I read that we looked at back in the day when we first started this process. So again, I just think that's important, especially when you're making these changes that we haven't done in 100 years, that residents feel like they've been listened to. I know that we've done a lot of listening sessions. We've had a lot of meetings. But again, I think that that last piece, I feel, is a big void. I think that we need to go to the neighborhood, and I'm gonna stand on my soapbox to the end with that. So thank you for listening.
[George Scarpelli]: You're gonna be sick of hearing me tonight, but we see everything in its order, Mr. Rafferty, and I really drove by today. The front door looks amazing. It's really inviting. And I'm so happy that you're gonna have Saria A games there. It's so funny that- Yes, sir. I appreciate that. Yes, sir. But I see everything, so I move approval as long as my fellow colleagues have no other questions.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. First, I want to thank Barry and Marie. having a conversation and really having an open dialogue. I think that we expressed a lot of information about this ordinance and having my support. And I think that my biggest concern are two basic issues. And one thing I'll ask is, as I get started is I'd like to see this to be tabled so we can sit with the chief because I don't think that we've had a conversation with the chief and understand the impacts with the police department when we make an ordinance and how it could conflict with the city ordinance and what his job requires him to do. So I think that he, you know, I think that that's, you know, the understanding that the ACLU, the support and the involvement of the ACLU has left some residents questioning, you know, their beliefs in what policing is and what this means with this ordinance. So I think that the understanding the slippery slopes when we talk about, we talk about this, this ordinance. And when I've talked to the chief and I've talked to city officials, when chief Sacco put together the federal immigration enforcement plan and really put this in place, you know, they shared that, you know, the number one priority is our community safety and comfort of this community. And I think it's important because I think this is very important. I don't think I can sit here and attest that as a city councilor, I've sat in a house, I've stood in a house with six ICE agents and a family of undocumented members of a community and, um, I know the fear. I understand it. But I also think that when we move something toward an ordinance, I think we need to do our due diligence and make sure that we really have the information and we're all coming into this as a plan. And I talked to the chief and the chief has been part of this. This is a very important piece. I think that having the chief of police sit down with our body and say, what are some limitations? What are some concerns? How do we fix that? How do we express it? How do we bring it forward so we can move forward? That hasn't been done yet. So I think that's important. I think before we move forward, I think that table moving into a meeting to sit with the chief and understand that this is a process so we can all understand what the ramification is as a law enforcement officer. Because we don't. We're doing something that means well, and we want to do something to protect people, which is good. But I think we're talking about an ordinance. I think we need all the information. I don't think we have done that. And the other piece, and I would also like to invite the administration, the financial director, for the other impact. it is gonna be a different time in a few weeks. And we've seen it openly discussed how communities that put ordinances or rules in place like this, that the national agenda is to harm us financially with federal funding. So I think we need to also understand that platform. So again, it's not something that, this council is not supporting for the good reasons, but I think it's important that we get all the information out there. I know it's goodwill. It feels good. People have done some great work and really put a lot of passion into this, and I commend them. But again, I can't support this unless we do our due diligence and sit down with the probably the most important person in this community, the person that actually does our policing. And he's always been involved. He's always been welcoming to come sit down with us and share his opinion and see what our police department and what those impacts means when you talk about changing an ordinance to what they do every day by law and how that might be intertwined in a negative fashion. So I think that's something that I'm going to stand with and I hope my colleagues can understand that. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I would request that at least you not waive the three readings. I would hate.
[George Scarpelli]: I just, I, again, I think that I talked to the chief. I think that it'd be something that it would be fruitful for us to understand the process. That's all. And again, with the last administration, both the house and the Senate now fall with one party. So, there's going to be a that's something that when I've talked to my my contacts at the higher level, this is what the fair is now is understanding that there isn't an option to stop the process.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. If you recall, this process was very well vetted by the chief. And there were so many concerns that he talked about with public safety. And I know this was in subcommittee, and we're coming right to the floor with this and understanding that this is clearly politics over public safety. This is frightening. This is a process without having the chief involved. I think it's where you're stepping overbound, because I remember those days, he was heavily involved, Councilor. to hear that he wasn't part of this because these are some of the things he definitely talked about that helped him keep our residents safe and our community safe. I remember that specifically. And him not being here and us just pushing these through, I just think it's wrong right now. Again, I wish that you would table this to sit with the chief and have him review this to see the impacts. I mean, we're seeing what's going on. I, you know, I've talked to neighboring communities and understanding that, you know, I understand the process and the understanding where, um, how it can affect people in a negative way, but the pros outweigh the cons in so many ways. I mean, look how they look, look how they found the murder, the gentleman who killed the, uh, in New York City. It was all by surveillance camera, by following him around. They took a murder off the street that way. You're looking to put into action policies that take away that ability for our police and our community. I just think this is stepping over a line. This is something that, you know, we just don't do this at 12 o'clock at night. I know, but to do it at 12 o'clock at night and not have the process over just a subcommittee meeting where everybody wasn't privy to it and then come to here today and start moving these ordinances.
[George Scarpelli]: I too talked to Rocco DiRico. First, I think we're very fortunate both between Barbara and Rocco and having liaisons from Tufts University that pick up the phone the minute we call them. So I think that's a huge benefit. But I truly believe what our neighbors are saying when you talk about, you know, these different corridors and you look at you know, 12 stories, and how frightening that is, and Tufts even conceding to 10 stories. And I've seen all the concessions that Tufts made, and I've been fortunate enough to be involved with a mayor that was directly involved with Tufts University. And he allowed me to watch him be a partner, but make sure that his community was present and getting the best with that community needed. And what's frightening to me is what we see, and I'm gonna be critical and I could care less if anybody cares or not. It's 1215, so who cares? But when we are talking about this mayor and the process that's been happening since August, and all of a sudden she comes out now, well, she should have been present from the beginning when you talk about our neighbors. and their impact of the quality of life. You're seeing it all over the community, by the way. That's why the community is now focused on creating groups and paying attorneys and fighting because they don't believe that this administration can fight for their rights and their beliefs. So, um, I too disagree with the size of this dormitory. I appreciate the fact that everybody is focused on housing and how important it is, but I truly don't think it's going to impact the housing like people think. I have two kids in college, and the first thing they wanted to do is get out of a dorm. I wish that it's gonna open up some housing around that area. I just don't see it happening, but I also see the impact that this is gonna make for residents. So, but again, I did see and had discussions with Mr. DeRico and understanding the information that was put out there. and how many people they touched to make sure that everybody knew about it. One thing you knew in that neighborhood, people knew that Tufts was putting forth this development. And people were talking about it, but it seemed like nobody was listening until the 12th hour. Now all of a sudden, we're scrambling. Because I think the truth of the matter is, if you talk to Tufts University and you said, as much as we love our environmental plan, Maybe some concessions would have been made to alleviate some of those big ticket items that could have supported maybe dropping it down to eight stories. And it wouldn't affected a quarter of the shading for the neighbors. But there were no discussions. We're coming in right now and hoping that people do the right thing. So again, when it comes time, I think this community should really wake up and understand what has this administration done in the last five and a half years? And are you willing to give these people another two years? Because it's not working. That office is not working for this community. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, as we start this process, you know, we're now seeing that we're now delving into more residential neighborhoods. So my request and recommendation would be to hold our next public meeting at the Roberts Elementary School, where it could be a process for all the people that feel that they haven't been heard, or they feel that they haven't been able to come to these meetings, that we put this meeting into their backyard as requested back when we wrote the RFP. Again, I know we've been trying our best to be more transparent and give more people an opportunity to share and be part of the process, but I would truly recommend as a motion that we ask to move one of the final meetings to the neighborhood directly so we can hear from the neighbors in their backyard. So I would make that as a form of motion if I can.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can.
[George Scarpelli]: Whichever, I know that we have, when is that next? Right after CD, if we can, after that, if we can come back and get some input from the neighbors that we can present that the CB, their ideas and their input, and then really get the neighbors' involvement and at least be part of that final solution and the changes that are gonna be made there.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam Chair. I appreciate all the hard work and a lot of the questions that I really have is really based on just the information that I'm getting from residents and there are some that are very easy for me to uh explained to to eliminate some fear and and and and rumors that were going around and I appreciate that. I was wondering if if our friends from Ennis can just have you ever been given a request because a resident asked and I said I I would reach out uh for for city councilors and for uh people that have been educated when it talks about zoning and it's it's easy to follow but have have you ever been requested from a community that you've worked with to try to maybe simplify some of these definitions and maybe a bullet point type of report where where this meeting when they we talk about parking and understanding the offsets when it you know the biggest fear i'm here i give you a good example is the situation that we're dealing with and with tufts university and a 10-story building and how it affects residential homes and it's it's it's clearly defined in this process when we see the the the changes that we're looking at and how the residential area, we won't see those types of drastic changes where some residents are fearful for. So have you ever been requested, and this would be my request, that after a report is given like we've put together tonight, very thorough, but to without embarrassing or disrespecting anyone, have you ever been asked to put together a bullet point that really simplifies what was discussed today so just the average person can read and understand the basic points that We have gone through because I, I think this is where it's overwhelming and this is where people I know council beers and council vice president and our director have put together an extensive plan to make sure that we're reaching our communities. I know that I've been standing on my soapbox and really saying. You know, bringing our meetings to the neighborhoods where people can ask these simplified questions, because I think a lot of people that have reached out to me are a little intimidated by the language and this format, which I believe we can all agree to that. So, again, if there's any way that we can do. some sort of a format that can be simplified so people can understand what the major changes are and what the processes are, I think would be super helpful if you can help with that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: And I think the diagrams have been super helpful that because that's one thing that is really simplified that I hate to say it, but to show people pictures with what the changes will be made it very simple to explain to some people. But I appreciate that council vice president.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for that.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you, uh, uh, gentlemen chair. I appreciate first your assistance and these endeavors. I think that, uh, to be clear, I think that not to confuse everybody, but this is, this is what the conjunction with the, um, the charter committee that's been working so hard throughout the community. I don't, I know that I had a question with, uh, just a text that the message text message saying, is this different? And I said, no, it's, uh, This is all conjunction, so this is a big team effort and making sure that we're putting the best product out and making sure that we have the best information moving forward. So we send this off to the state house that we're all in 1 breath. So, um, I just wanted to clarify that. Um, and then, uh, if I can having the gentleman at the podium this evening. Frank Wright, one of the most well-respected city auditors that I've ever worked with. I really appreciate his presence. And then Frank, if you need a job, Method's looking for a city solicitor and we could do anything you want. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. And thank you for my fellow colleagues to add me to this resolution. I think it speaks volumes for me as a school team member. I was part of that group that was first initiated with the thought of, hey, there's a program that we really want to start here in Medford. It's called Crew. And we didn't have a slip. We didn't have any docks. We didn't have a boathouse. We didn't have anything. And we were borrowing skulls from different different colleges and they were donating them to us. And it really started so and you know, it's just a fad. What I what you realize is that committed young people really drove this when we first started it to where we are today. And I think it's so amazing that we have state champions in front of us right now with committed coaches and kids looking to go to the next level, colleges, universities, and participate in crew at that level. I think it's just amazing feet and see where we've gone. And you know what, I'll say it here. I've talked to a bunch of parents that I work in recreation and one of the, the most attractive pieces of our puzzle in Somerville is our boathouse. And what we can do, we have summer programs using rowing crew and the different avenues of community that crew really brings to Medford. And I'll say it publicly, I would love to see the mayor use our CPA money to look down the line to building us a true boathouse over at home else stadium I think that, to me, would be full circle and look at something that you know we have an avenue, we have a funding mechanism in place. Now all we need is a reason for it. And you've given us this reason tenfold. So I want to congratulate all of you coaches. I know that Mr. Maloney was in the forefront years ago when people told him that this wasn't going to happen. And I believe if maybe some people remember, when we first started, they put a couple of rowing machines in what's now the boys locker basketball locker room in the gym. Is it still there do you guys still use that area. It was like that's all we had. We had four, and people were just taking turns, jumping in so we've gone a long way so I commend all of you for pushing this forward. And it's amazing when you listen to other people from different communities, when they talk about What Medford crew is doing at the regard is and what they're doing at different events, and how you're seeing sportsmanship and and pride in community and this is what it's all about, you know, in. Traditionally, it was what hockey, football, baseball, right? Now you're seeing lifetime sports where you're seeing people using crew to go to the next level in academia, and then taking that to the next level and really promoting something that's really healthy and positive in our community. So I know I'm winded, but I just wanted to I had the vision when this came forth of when this started, when I was on the school committee and seeing where it is today, just amazing. I like so much pride with all the medals on our athletes and coaches standing there stoically and I appreciate all this hard work. So thank you and congratulations.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Cullohan.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. It truly was the victory, the first time greater Boston League champion since the early 90s. First time announced tonight, first time we've had a greater Boston League MVP and Justin Marino. So many kids now coach Curley and his coaching staff ascending off to play at the next level that you have, and you're talking about a group of kids that without football wouldn't have an opportunity to get to the next level. That's what's amazing. What I really want to stress is how impressed I am with the football program for what they do for the community. If you see the wins and Thanksgiving, that's great, touchdowns, and everybody's happy about that. What I find more amazing is what they did the week before when they went to the shelter and they They prepared a couple of the, what am I thinking, Zach? The food, it wasn't the meals, they were doing the different community centers. Yeah, so they really, the pantry, excuse me, thank you for helping me with that. But they were setting up the food pantries and helping with stock and share and present that to the community members. You'll see them this winter, delivering, shoveling seniors out. So what you're seeing right now is a true champion in the sense that, forget about the wins and losses. Coach for 32 years, you seldom remember those truly what they're going to remember is what they did as a team and as a family as being part of a community and really giving back to the community so I congratulate coach curly. Chris Murphy, who's the President of the Mustang. football program and what they do for our community and give them back. And I would love to invite them to our next meeting, if we can, Mr. President, to them and our next guests and the band and really celebrate what they've done, both on the field and off. I think it's equally important. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll share, I'll share, I'll share with everybody.
[George Scarpelli]: I had some phone calls after and I think that the biggest concern was the private process of tree removal. Residents were really concerned with their freedoms and what they have control on their properties. And I think that at the time KP law did say that that could be viewed as taking. So I know that that's something that will be reviewed. And I think that as people ask me, this is the process, it's gonna be vetted through the process and we'll get a clearer understanding as we move forward. So thank you for that, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I see, is Mr. Silva here? Yes. Okay. Okay. I believe this is just a carry over from the previous owner who his family had owned it. The Calais family owned the donut shop for many, many years, a fixture in the Mefford community. And I'm so happy that Mr. Silva stepped up and kept this location alive because it is something that I remember when I was a kid. After church, dad would go over to Demet's and pick up the healthy donuts. They weren't the bad ones at the time. But I appreciate the information. Looks like everything, Mr. President, is in order. If I can, I think the only questions we have is, you know, the number of employees, the hours are staying the same, and that would be it on my end, but I don't see anything that would prohibit us to move this forward after my colleagues share any thoughts, so.
[George Scarpelli]: I think we just, honestly, if we have any other questions, this is a pretty straightforward petition. Everything is in order, Mr. President. I would move approval. If Mr. Silva can add anything, maybe reach out to the clerk for a next meeting, but I don't want to hold this up any longer if it's something that's just technical.
[George Scarpelli]: It is a change of ownership. Seems like just a change of ownership.
[George Scarpelli]: Should ask for an override.
[George Scarpelli]: Just one question to the attorney while we have the hours of operations. Do you continue those with us?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, perfect. I know that sometimes when they go outside that I just would like to remind the petitioner that if it's later that that had to go through the process as well. So again, Mr. President, I see everything in order. I'm excited that we don't have an empty storefront and we see a responsible owner coming in and taking over and And like I said, everything's in order. I would move for approval. My colleagues have any comments?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam Chair. I appreciate all your hard work. I think that presentation was great. I think that I'm going to be the person that people call because they're nervous about what they hear. And what's good is that we're having meetings so we can express the rumors. So the fact that they're being permitted, we're going to look at zoning for 12 stories. It's nice to see that's not going to happen on Salem Street. We appreciate all your hard work with that and making sure that that message is out. I think that when we talk to residents from that corridor, the biggest concern they have, not just the people on the main drag, but on the budding streets, is making sure that we have parking, making sure that they're seeing different different processes that are happening that are taking parking away from a business district. And that's one of the things there, you know, the business owners that I've talked to this weekend, they were really concerned about that because they're all small businesses and it's very important that, although we can hope that it's just gonna be a walkable transit, public transit corridor, the truth of the matter is that's not necessarily true. So having an open mind when we look at what the total community looks for, I appreciate my colleagues doing a better job, I think, and getting the word out, but I will share with you that there is still the need to put that comprehensive plan that we asked for in the RFP to go into the Salem Street neighborhood and have those neighbors that can't come here or join us on Zoom that want to really get involved and understand what happens in that quarter. And I think that you're seeing this, you're seeing fractions of the community right now where neighborhoods are rallying and creating neighborhood groups and getting attorneys and fighting zoning everywhere because the truth of the matter is there isn't enough, there is enough information that's out there. It's nice to say that there are people getting it, there are a lot of people that aren't getting information on what's happening. So, I mean, I try to do my best and I'll share this information for the people that have reached out to me and said, George, we're concerned 12 stories on Salem Street. You know, this is easy. There's no such thing as 12 stories on Salem Street. So, but you know, it's nice to see that looking at pieces like the MBTA area where maybe redeveloping that area where it made Salem Street look like such an eyesore as a, you know, gateway to our community. Because I think that that's when you see successful zoning changes. You see neighbor communities really using the gateway. So the communities is really enhancing that. And I know that we have some limitations for businesses that are there, but I'm glad to see that we're looking at, you know, being responsible to our neighbors and our residents. And I'm excited to see a change on Salem Street where we have mixed-use areas and we're seeing more storefronts. We're seeing more families walking that corridor and looking at, you know, having little pockets of, you know, sitting areas with fountains and, you know, but I think that And now that we've seen it, and we know all the hard work that we put forward with this, is that really getting the true message out. And that's all I'm saying, because I'm saying that, you know, in other situations that we're seeing in the community, where there is concerns that they're going to an extreme, you're seeing some pretty extreme things happening. And this is so good and so new that I think we really have to find other avenues to reach more of our residents in that area. Whatever we have to do, I know that, you know, I know Ms. Hunt you've explained and it's tough that other communities have big, big departments and we have a small department. I understand that. That's why when we talked with the last council, we really stressed the fact that no matter what it took in the mayor's office for the city to put that into the RFP where our zoning partners can come in and bring teams in just like neighboring communities have done. Like I said, as we're moving forward, I love the clarity. I see it, but I think that there are a lot of people that don't see it. And I think that's the biggest concern right now. Because it's great if everybody rallies around this. It makes everything a lot smoother, believe me. So I appreciate your work, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Ted, for you and your team. I know you guys have been super busy. But again, I think that questions people ask, usually this is later in the year. So I would assume that this is tied into what's gonna happen in January. which is the increase of the override to people's taxes. So the phone calls I received, should we come to these meetings, can we stop it? And I tried to explain to residents that, you know, so they can understand in layman terms that this is a tax rate that we are not going to put forth and whatever this council decides, plus what the override is. So someone that's a million dollar home, you'll see, you know, that 7,800, 7,500 a year tax now then increased another, I know one resident was quoted about $800 for their home for an addition on top of that. So I think this is why people are asking, why are we doing this meeting? I think it's, you know, I want to make sure it's clear that we're doing this so we can, that we give your team enough time to set this rate, then we can move forward. So in January, everything will be in place. So just to let everybody know, it is happening in January that the override increase will be added in top of this, which the rates were, the new assessment, like was said, was assessed from the 2023 sales home sales, right? So, okay. So that's one thing I wanted to make sure that everybody knows. And that, again, to be clear, this is year after year that the override tax doesn't disappear. This just increases plus two and a half percent, if that so be it, every year to follow. I think that's what the questions were. And then the other thing that's confusing people when you talk about new growth, when you hear new growth in communities that have a booming commercial base or you're seeing a new tax revenue coming from new development, That's the new growth we haven't seen much in Medford. So I want people to understand the new growth that we've been talking about during the override, it's new growth coming from increasing taxes that we see as the levy increases. So I want people to understand that. So I think that was very important. That was a question that's been brought up saying that, oh no, they've heard from some councils that said that Medford was number one in Massachusetts in new growth, which isn't true. So I just wanted to make sure that those points were just brought up tonight. So it's a different new growth we talk about new growth and development is very different than what you talked about tonight, and new growth and tax assessment. So am I correct with that? I don't want to speak for you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. And then I think that the last piece is what everybody's asking for now is what Mr. Castagnetti has been saying for years is the owner occupied. I know it's a slippery slope because it sounds so easy. So my neighbor who's 86 years old said, George, if this, if you vote in the tax exemption, I'm living a single family home. If I'm if the exemption goes through for homeowners and I get my taxes would be lower than what they were in the previous years. I said that's true, but when you look at the way we look at the big picture. It affects. majority of our residents in a negative way, correct? Their tax will increase even higher.
[George Scarpelli]: Because the word is out that Somerville does it, Cambridge does it. Why is it beneficial for their communities? What do they have that we don't that allows them to do that?
[George Scarpelli]: So typically, communities like that will adopt it. OK. I appreciate you. appreciate all the hard work you guys, your team has done. It's been, uh, I know it's been trying. I know that you were on the hot seat a month ago and I apologize for any, any, um, you know, um, uncomfortable questions that were asked, but I know it was, you stood there and did a wonderful job and, and, uh, we, you know, appreciate getting that out the Friday, the week before, so people can get a better understanding of what it looked like. So, um, And I think that's why we had such a close vote. It was very close because of that fact that people started realizing the true numbers and the effects that we're gonna have on the homeowners. So thank you so much. Absolutely.
[George Scarpelli]: We're seeing things that, unfortunately, your department I've been tasked to do things way too late, right? And I'm glad to see my fellow colleagues are now realizing after they supported the override that how the vulnerable community is really gonna hurt now. They're hurting. So it's something that I welcome the conversation starting earlier now to look at that homeowner exemption because of that demographic that I was screaming about that bought their homes for $50,000, but now they're worth a million, and they're being priced out with additional override taxes. So I'm glad to hear that we're at least understanding it now, and that there's pain. So I think that's going to be something that we should do. I don't know if you'll be here in June to do that with us, but we really need to look at that. But again, We also have to be alarmed, as some residents have said when we talked about this issue, is that the burden falls on who? It falls on the homeowners that have rental properties. Those are the ones that are going to pick up the burden if the exemption comes into play. So the fear now is the talk that was started last year was rent control. So I think that this is something that this community should really pay close attention to because there's a machine that's going. there's a system in place and people have to see what's happening with our council in the direction they've been moving to, whether it was, you know, transfer tax, whether it's fees for a registry, whether it's an override, whether it's a homeowner exemption now and looking at rent control possibly in the future. There's a lot that this city is gonna be moving to if people don't realize and get more involved. This administration, like my colleague said has done a, at least from what I gather, she was saying she was saying that they've done a terrible job, really preparing this community, and what avenues we can take to give us the best choices possible, both in a, a a speedy override discussion without the input and without the proper timing during the budget season. And now here we go with the assessment and the levy that we have to look at, look at homeowner exemption as we move forward. So again, I appreciate what my colleagues have said. It's something that we can't do anything today, but it's something that we, I think, have to look at early. earlier in the season now, when we get to the budget season to make sure we have enough money in the overlay to make sure that if we have that 49.9% of homeowners that apply for the exemption, that we can cover that cost. So again, thank you for everything.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Motion to not.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Bears. And I think that I appreciate all the hard work everybody's done. I know this has been a long time coming, and there's just a couple of concerns that residents have reached out to me about that couldn't make it to this meeting. And I think that Commissioner McGiven helped with a lot of those questions. I think that as honorable and as lucky as we are to have a committee of dedicated members of our community, I think that really that there is some fear that having a community group making decisions that affect homeowners left some questions with our residents, but I appreciate the clear questions and definitions from Commissioner McGiven. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilors, thank you so much. And please forgive me, I was hoping, I know that we might, I guess we had a glitch early in the meeting, so I have to pop out again in a few minutes to shut down a program. I just wanted to, if I can jump in a little bit early, just to give some comments, if that's okay, President Bez. Go ahead.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate Commissioner McGiven. I think that's kind of the questions that I had. Also with former Commissioner Forte, we really had some in-depth conversation with him and his vision with what he saw as the enforcement piece as we moved, especially to the private protection piece. And I think that in my situation, I do think that this is a lot of work and there's a lot of work that was done. There were so many changes that I hope that we do move on to another meeting with our city department heads because I think it's important that we do do a cost analysis and especially moving into the next budget season. with all the new money we have looking into bringing qualified professionals into departments that can handle such a task. I think what I'm hearing is, and I won't speak for Commissioner McGiven, but it sounds like this will really overwhelm our existing team in comparison to what they're already doing today. And then I know that I had a brief discussion with the building commission today was great and he's ready to do everything and anything possible. But as you look at the private tree protection, I think 1 of the biggest concerns that we had starting a few years ago is really. um, having government come in and tell residents what they can do on their own property. Now, and this isn't this, this doesn't affect thousands of trees. I don't think this affects many trees, but I think it does affect the quality of life and the expectations of homeowners that might want to, um, you know, you know, We have some I have to be very careful with my ethics when we talk about solar. So I'm going to leave that to the side. But there's some questions the other residents had. But I think that I think Attorney Stein did put in uh, some legal pieces when it came into the opinion of subject of challenge. Um, if we wrote in an ordinance and making some of these changes to the private, uh, tree protection plan, I think that, uh, that that might be again, that's something we talked about in the past and many, many meetings about being a slippery slope. I know that the former commissioner, um, uh, uh, Forte really had a plan in place that he was willing to share with us that is used in neighboring communities that really didn't affect most members of our community. I fully support when we talk about new development. Uh, I fully support when we have people coming in and flipping houses and taking down trees to, to, uh, find a way to mitigate that with the tree fund. I think that's a superb idea. And I think that's something that will really benefit moving forward with, um, taking care of our tree canopy. I think that's so important. But, um, again, I think there are still so many questions when it comes to the price, especially the private piece and the implementation pieces with either the DPW and their tree service team and, um, the building commissioner and his team when it comes to, um, moving forward with any of these added duties with the tree process. So again, I apologize for leaving early. I appreciate you allowing me, Council President, to share the concerns that was offered to me from some residents and historically what we've been talking about for many, many years. I do wanna see this move forward. Um, in any way, try to hold this back. I think that we have so many great ideas, and I think that, uh, our volunteers did a great job to help design and and craft an ordinance that really has some meat on it. But I think with a lot of these red line changes, um, A lot of people were confused as well in what was happening and we're a little nervous about there'll be a vote tonight, but I do think this is a good piece to, you know, my recommendation, move this to another meeting and bring all the city staff with some, after they've revisited all of these changes and put together a plan on how we could really make this work. So again, I thank everybody and I apologize for my dismissal, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I thank you and I now leave the meeting so you can speed up your half and not waiting on roll calls, Mr. President. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Thank you for the presentation. I think this is such a welcoming addition. I think that especially when you hear some of the bantering of the negativity of the pop-up park and the parking lot where there's no shade, there's nothing that really attracts families to that area in the concept that we're seeing here. So I think this really fills a gap in Medford Square. I think this is something I'll support 1,000%. The question I had is I know that we've had residents that made that the chess hub of the world, it seemed, right? So I know one resident worked very hard I know that the tables there, the chest tables and those coverings going to be able to shade those areas.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, if you can, just if you can reach out to the resident, I'll share his information. I'm sure you know it. Yeah. But if you can just, you know, even maybe get him involved in saying, okay, as you kind of built this area and really made it when people didn't know what it was going to be used for, he kind of made it a home for families and kids that really needed an area to meet. So I think that it was, it was a great vision and great opportunity for us. So I appreciate all your hard work and I I think this is going to be great. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: But I know, you know, this is such a great gesture. It's exactly your heart. And we appreciate that because you know what it does. I don't think we'll ever forget Larry, but just a little symbol to keep Larry's light alive. I think this is a great fitting tribute. So thank you for that idea. And I think that if there is something that if we need to make sure that happens and look for some other alternative funding, I think that we as a council should try to find some other avenues to make sure that that happens. I think that'd be a great gesture.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Leming, I believe there's a resident that has their hand up.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Chair Leming. I appreciate all the hard work we're doing, and I know that I sound like a broken record, but I know as we move forward with, I know Director Hunt's on as well, Um, I know I read what we tried to. We originally, when we first started this process with the RFP for, um, zoning consultants and making sure that we brought these, um, these steps to the neighborhoods and to the communities that were rezoning step-by-step. That's something I thought the former council really stressed. And I think that it would help with, we can see lately a lot of misinformation going out and making sure that the right information goes out and going into those neighborhoods. I know that one of the biggest concerns that I keep hearing is that, you know, Salem Street, is being rezoned for 12 stories. Now I know we're, um, you know, we're saying no, but you have people out there that are spinning a dialogue. So we have to make sure that, um, you know, I know that one thing that we asked for in the RFP when, and it's, um, applied for it was a comprehensive plan for, um, meeting with the community. And I know that we've said that we've had multiple meetings with in this setting, and I don't disagree, but again, I really would recommend that we look at that process and bring it to the neighborhoods where the neighborhoods can really share what they want their neighborhood to look like. I think like we've talked about when we rezoned many as a as a department head in Somerville I was directly involved in the rezoning of different areas in the community where we use this example back a few years ago why we thought it was so important um chair Leming that we had um different city departments like recreation police fire um dpw where as you put these plans out and these zoning reforms out, that people really felt that they were part of the process and they were helping design what their neighborhoods wanted to look like. So you can tell me I'm wrong, but I really would stress that we could follow through with that in the future. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, that, that's, that's, uh, that's if I can, Mr. No, no.
[George Scarpelli]: I apologize that I missed the beginning of the meeting, but as a fitting city council play again. You know, my import is is. is, uh, a piece that's coming from our community. And I appreciate council beers, uh, for, uh, expanding on those efforts. I think that's a, that's a great effort. And that's something that going back to those residents that have reached out to me and let them know that that's coming down the line. I think that's going to be super helpful as we move forward to make sure everybody feels like that's part of the process. So thank you very much for your leadership on that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you so much. That's great information to share. And I think that's where my problem comes in, Commissioner Hunt. Um, when we did the RFP, we we knew our limitations in your office. And I think that's why we asked to put that in the RFP to bring in the capable staff of and it's to come in and work with those communities. So I find it disheartening that we knew that this isn't a secret that we don't have enough staff in your office, but this is why we asked to be put in, and this is why it's written in the RFP as a comprehensive comprehensive plan for outreach for the community. So I appreciate everything you've done way more than what we talked about the last couple of weeks. And it's so important. But again, I'm going to implore that we find a way to go into the neighborhoods. I just don't, you know, everybody has to have an opportunity to get involved. And like I said, I appreciate what Councilor Beaz is doing. I appreciate what your response was and how we're trying to get the information out. But believe it or not, there's still a big gap between the people that that would make it that would make an effort to come into their community and to their neighborhoods to talk about what their visions are to share those. So again I know our limitations but again I revert back to our RFP where it's it says that it was and we were pretty clear when we started talking about the RFP as a council that this is the vision why and to all due respect um We all agreed. I didn't think one person didn't agree that this is the type of format that we need to go into the neighborhood. So I apologize to be a Debbie Downer, especially with some of the good information that we've heard tonight to get the information out, but I'm sorry, I still think that's not, it's not what we asked for. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: resolution stated that it go to governance committee to discuss COLA raises. So now it's that, so in essence, this is saying that the city council shouldn't be voting for their own raises and that's it. I'm confused. I'm just.
[George Scarpelli]: if I can, because I received numerous calls, as you can imagine, because the way it read really alarmed a lot of people. This has been a very trying week, both on the national level and also in the local level. And part of the discussions and making sure that the residents know is that you know, after such a close vote and half of the community split over the override and so much contention still left in the community to divide the fact that we had elected officials, especially the mayor dancing in celebration that half of the community is going to be in pain. Um, to add this, the next day was so, you know, for the next meeting was very, very touching. Um, I just I don't know where this is. We have our own ordinance. We have our own rules. It seems like the way I read it is someone maybe talked to you. Your friends might have talked to you and told you don't do this the day after an override vote because this community needs a lot to heal. And in the process that we went through and the questions we had with the original raise, I don't even understand why this is on there. I would imagine you should rule it out of order, Mr. President, just for the fact that, as you already stated, these are things that we've already had in place. And again, as as the senior member of this council and understanding you know historically why people join this council in the past is really being part of the community and looking at this position as a full-time position should never be looked at a full-time not Medford maybe in a major city but in the city of Medford to even look at a salary adjustment in any way to move forward I think it's totally disingenuine especially the week that we had last week so I would um My I will know anyway, but I would hope that this would be ruled out of order and disperse because this doesn't say anything. It said something early that really riled the whole community up and then looking for a cola when we have we have departments that haven't gotten a raise in years. We have We have city departments that go three years without raises or colds. So that was something that just to let you know, this is what I'm saying this out loud. So the people that are watching because they were very interested in what was being said tonight that to to review this isn't, hopefully this isn't asking for any sort of Kohler adjustment like other communities or anything like that. Until we take care of our own here, I think that we should stay away from this completely. Stay away from any money paper when it's talking about funding this council a penny more after fiscal crisis and what we went through on Tuesday. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Why would you say that? I'm not part of any group, I'm a member of many groups, but to say that you use my name in that? I can use the best metrics in so many different ways that this person did, and just embarrass my community.
[George Scarpelli]: I didn't send anything out. So don't use my name.
[George Scarpelli]: Use my name.
[George Scarpelli]: It's a meeting, tell them.
[George Scarpelli]: The comments that have been said around this oval that we're talking about, these are conversations I've had with people that have reached out to me. And what was said, what was written in the original may be changed after someone woke up. But whereas the Medford School Committee recently went 24 years without a cost of living adjustment, COLA. So now this starts to think, well, what does it say? They're looking for COLA. These are the questions they asked. be it resolved that the governance committee take up the ordinance to disallow the city council from passing salary change to affected city officials, and to encourage the city council to consider regular color adjustments for elected officials. That's exactly what it says. I didn't say it wasn't for next year, but what I'm saying is the phone calls I received and the understanding that I'm trying to explain to my people, and if those people are my people, the ones that that the 60,000 that live in this community, those are those people that had those questions after a very contentious election cycle on Tuesday night, and then put this forward the way it was written. You could spin it any way you want today, but that's how it was written, and that's why there were questions. So any organization to put on email that spun anything anyway, take it for what it's worth. Because this councilor over and over again, whenever I brought anything forward, have backed it up with video or specific instances that all of you have witnessed. So these are makeup things that have been going on here. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, to follow up with Councilor Collins, these are the initiatives that really show the community that we're really looking out for the best interest to our most vulnerable and our veterans sure are vulnerable. So thank you for putting this forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, George Scarpelli 27 Butler Street so not only city council but also a neighbor. I've received multiple phone calls from many, many residents and, and again, the, the, the cause is noble, and I don't think anybody's going to deny that. but to the call that was on earlier of this being something positive for the quality of life of those people that will be attending that property. The quality of life of our residents I think are more important right now because again I think that The, the lack of communication from the butters and not understanding what's been happening. And then the speed of this after an election, I think, is really taking people off. And I think the biggest question that residents that have shared with me that they want to be to ask is. that the traffic study really hasn't been a thorough traffic study. I think this is where the city has to get involved, and we have to ask our traffic engineer to put a plan in place not coming from the people that are trying to develop the area, but something that is looking out for our residents. I think that'll be important. I think it's also important that that we understand what has tried to go in here in the past, and why it was denied in the past, because I believe that in the past, parking issues were a problem. And then again, I did lose the link, so I'm a little late if anybody mentioned it, but we're also talking about what the archdiocese is going to do with the rectory, with the cafeteria, the gymnasium, what happens if that's then sold off to another company. So I don't think the plan has really been vetted properly to the residents and understand the impact. Now, granted, like I said, it's a noble cause, but I think that is it truly beneficial for families that will be going in there when you're abutting the door into a street, into a parking lot that has masses, has funerals all times of the week. So I think there are things that we have to look at as a community, and I would, if we can, Emily, if we can ask the CD board if we can try to maybe table this to another meeting to really just for the transparency sake that all the residents that haven't been able to be part of this because they just found out about this just recently, I think would be important. I think that in fairness to everybody that's involved in the impact that is going to play, I think there are a lot of answers, especially with the traffic impact and the, you know, I listened to the attorney earlier and he spoke about that it's not going to be any people driving. It's not true. We know that. We know that and we need to get a better understanding of what the impact is going to be, especially around the neighbors that are above that, the location because there truly is no parking. I mean, we see it, and especially if there is a mass going on. So again, It is a noble cause. I, you know, if it was just like the methadone distribution center, it's a noble cause if it's in the right place. But again, I think this is we really have to look at our traffic to make a to make a feasible and smart decision and then making sure that everybody's involved in this decision when we talk about everybody, I mean, the neighbors. So again, I appreciate all the hard work you guys do. You're amazing. There's a lot going on. We're hoping that with our new zoning reform coming through, that's going to make everybody's life a lot easier. I thank you for your time, everyone.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I don't want to take long enough. Listen, I know we've had a tough 24 hours, whether you were for or against an override, especially what's happened nationally. It's been a tough, tough last 24 hours. So I just want to make sure that I clear something that a caller mentioned, that if I said anything that meant that I believe the caller said that the I said that the church wouldn't be good neighbors. I just want to make sure that I never said that I would never say that I think the church. I've been a person at St. Francis my whole life. And they've been accommodating to everybody and anybody. So I think they'd be great neighbors with anybody. So, again, just want to clear that up. I don't You know, it's it's it's too tough of a time right now to keep bringing up negativity. And if anybody took anything I said and something in a negative manner, I just want to make sure that I corrected that to make sure that we're all trying to stay positive and moving forward. So thank you, Emily. Appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Test one, two, two tests.
[George Scarpelli]: I've talked to the election commissioners and they said that these rules are all posted at City Hall and the election in the elections office. So if anybody does need some clarity that the election office does have all this information. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Would you like to read that first, Mr. President?
[George Scarpelli]: And thank you for Mrs. Tomaszczuk bringing forward. I know I've talked to a few of our friends in the audience and I think there was some confusion first that people seem to thought it was about the pop-up park, but it's not about the pop-up park. The issues and concerns are something that we'll hear again later on tonight is that the way we're doing business in Medford is that we're really not getting the community involved. I know they wanna say the community gets involved, but the truth of the matter is Let me ask our seniors if we know that we have valuable land here. And unfortunately, I think there has to be an understanding that we need some growth. But if there was a partnership where we brought the process to the seniors and said, this is how we're going to look at the project. We wanna make sure that all of your concerns are taken care of and get your input so you can share what you're afraid of. and making sure that we fill those gaps. I'm sure none of you have had that conversation with anybody from the city, correct? Correct me if I'm wrong. Okay, so this is what we're seeing right now in Medford, is that as we're going through our zoning changes, one thing we talked about was really going into the communities. We put that in the RFP actually, about when we rezone, when we look at projects like this, we go into those communities, just like neighbor communities do when they do big projects like Assembly Row, and they do big projects like Union Square in Somerville, they actually bring city staff to the neighborhood where people come out and talk to you and you can share your concerns. So I'm hoping moving forward by coming to this podium, there is an issue, there is a concern, right? I'm not gonna say that we don't need new growth and development. I'm not gonna say that, I won't lie to you and tell you that I don't think that we need to use these parcels to make a change to really invest in Medford. But at the same time, what we need is an understanding and a form of partnership where our seniors can say, okay, if you're going to take this lot, what lot are we going to build and to make sure that it's similar vicinity that our seniors can park and walk across the street or walk next door so we can accommodate all of the programs that you said are so important to you. So I think moving forward, I think that we have a, you know, I hear you loud and clear. I think that I'm going to advocate to make sure that as we move forward, especially with this RFP and these five parcels I heard that I think it's three, but I also told there was maybe five that are coming down the line that it's going to encompass the whole square. So we're going to see drastic changes here. And it seems like we're forgetting the most vulnerable people in our community, mostly our seniors, and saying, well, let's just move forward. So I'm welcoming. I'll share my information, my phone number. If you feel fear in any way, give me a call. Let me at least try to be a voice as we go through this process, because unfortunately, it's happening. Okay. But I think that it could happen with a partnership. So everybody's involved to make sure that all the concerns that you have are addressed. So you're not going to sleep thinking, are we going to lose the grieving program? We're going to lose the knitting program. We're going to lose this program because there's nowhere to park. So I think that's going to be important. So I just want to share that with you, Mr. President. I think that from what I've talked to a few of the seniors offline, and I think after this conversation I shared with them, they felt a little bit better. But I think that we really need a buy-in from the city administration to work with our seniors, not just bring you cookies and pizza on election week, but really sit down with you and say, hey, what do you really need? And making sure that your needs are met. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I just just a point of information maybe some clarity for the planning department. I know that the question that was reported back to me that part of the RP that the mentioned the mayor mentioned was that it was a looking at 40 spots. for the new developers. So that doesn't even come close. So I think this is why having this conversation is a beginning. And I think it's before it gets too late because we're down the line with other projects in the city that our community hasn't been involved. And when I say community, it's having those meetings at the senior center. when you set a vision of what you want this to look like, what you want Medford Square to look like. So this is where you bring in the business community, because some business members that were at that chamber meeting, really, they weren't very excited. So there's some question. But that's why you have these meetings open to everybody. And you sit there with all the department heads, your planning department, your recreation department, your fire department, your police department, because there's so many things that when you look at development that have to be considered, right? Do we, if we build this many we bring in this many people, are we going to have the infrastructure DPW can carry? If we build it, bring in this many people, are we going to have enough police? Are we going to have fire? So there's so many, so many, and I only speak on this on as, as, as person who does this as a department head in the past, I worked for municipality. And what we do is before, before the city came out and just started giving out RFPs and getting the idea of the developers, because that's the problem with Medford. we bring the developers in to get their idea first. Isn't that, that's a shame. So the issue is in other communities what happens is you bring your stakeholders in first with the plans that were were derived that Medford has spent millions of dollars on that dust some of those off and say well these plans say this. So where do you feel and what do you fit? So the first thing we see is our senior citizens have already come out and said what? We're scared that we're going to be overlooked and bypassed because one of the basic necessities we have is parking. So that could be something that you look at at a meeting like that. So I'm hoping that the mayor really, really readjust and understand the process when it comes to the December proposals that come in, that we reassess again and look at the true process of true development and true input from our community, where we bring the meeting to you Not somewhere that you have to find one, you have to find where this meeting is and then go out and look for it and then not have the proper people in that can answer the questions. But neighboring communities, what they do is they bring everybody in. So every question is answered right there. So then we could set up a comprehensive plan that involves all the stakeholders. Now, that means that not everybody's gonna be happy with some of the decisions. but at least they can look at outcomes. I know one of the things we talked about in my neighboring community was it was affecting the process for one of our senior areas in Union Square. So part of the deal was that we would have a shuttle system in place that would be built in with the developers that we don't need senior citizens who didn't need the parking in that area for it was identified for a small group, I think it was 50 people. So they looked at how they would shuttle the seniors in, and that was part of the contract. So that's being creative. And again, that's at least giving you an option to give you calm and understand that people are looking out for you. Because a friend that came up to the podium said that our seniors are afraid that we're being forgotten. Yeah, I hear you. I've heard that in the last, especially three months in the process, we're seeing what's happening on election day. We hear you, at least I hear you. So I think we need to really put our money where our mouth is and really start opening up the dialogue with the most vulnerable members of our community, unfortunately, which are our seniors. So thank you, Councilor Bearsley.
[George Scarpelli]: I think the concern with that response was that not everybody is getting informed. That's what I'm hearing from everybody. You might just check a box and say, we're having a meeting. Now, I understand the comprehensive plans that have been going on for years. We spend millions of dollars on it, Council President. But what we're seeing, what I'm hearing, especially firsthand from our seniors, is people are getting surveyed that then they say there's a survey of people say they've been spoken to people said there were meetings, but no one really knows when it seems like just a certain group understands against this message, because the average person, and you can look at what we have here in the auditorium today. they're not getting the message. So if that's the case, Council President, we need to do a better job as a community and a leadership in the city is to educate all of our members of our community so they can get involved with these processes. So again, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, President Council, let me bring this forward. Because this is the outside the box thinking that we need to protect that most vulnerable, especially when you talk about the times we're in today so I and I think that Council saying is correct I think that what might help some people that you know, there are some people out there that'll question everything. So I think the city assessor could really support us by showing how the tax levy is, how many, if we looked at how many veterans needed the support and what that would look like and who would carry the brunt. And I think if you asked nine out of 10 residents that we can support our seniors, I mean, our veterans, and helping them through this process, I think that it would be supported wholeheartedly, but I think it would be good just to see that number, because I don't think it'd be drastic. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: All right.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I was informed that our, um, the consultant that this body approved its funding, um, has finished their assessment and has presented to the chief and his leadership team. And one thing that I found, um, that really struck me is that back in September, um, maybe the fire, um, our partners from the method fight apartment can help us. But We had, I know the mayor spoke on a podcast that mentioned the consultant directly and stating some pretty damaging wordage. So I would imagine that that letter is public and is part of this body's purview to overview and use that input to help our residents, especially when they come up to Tuesday's meeting. I know the Chief's here, and I know that President Marcellino's here from the Firefighters Union, and I know that, I believe the mayor used the consultant's words, she said, If she didn't fix the culture dysfunction with the fire department that someone could get hurt. So that's something she used to support her efforts, moving against anything to deal with the fire department but I think that that's something that is alarming to me when I heard it. And now that the consultant is completed. One of the biggest issues that we're hearing right now and discrepancies that we're hearing from both the fire, um, firefighters themselves, the fire union who have come out publicly and chief Freeman, who was here the other day that spoke openly about the design of the fire station. Now, I don't know how people want to look at the situation. If it's one side or the other, I don't. I think that there should be only one side, and that's what we need in our community for our fire station, the best design possible. But I think that I would imagine that, and correct me if I'm wrong, maybe Chief Evans can come up, that the pot of that discussion must have been around a new design of a headquarters and getting some information out to the public, whether it's a, I know we're very popular with press releases, but really sharing any information that's given through a third party per se. It's not the yes group, it's not the no group, it's a third party that's come into the city and done an evaluation that the mayor has requested that this council has paid for. So I would hope that we can get that information out before the election on Tuesday. I know a lot of people have already gone out and voted, but I think that understanding what a consultant might think of that design might play a huge factor. Now again, if it's the fact that there isn't any information in those documents about the design, then I stand corrected and we move forward. But I think it would be interesting to see if that was part of that consultant's purview to share their opinion when it comes to our main street fire department and it's designed for a new station because I know that a lot of people right now are in flux whether they're going to support it or not and if it's something that comes out and says no there are some design that he does support what the administration is saying that this is All perfect and it's ready to go. I know the chief supported it through the letter that the mayor read in her blog or her report that it's definitely that he supports the design. But I think that having a party that is an outside specialist, I'd like to see if maybe the chief or anybody from the union has heard anything that can help us get that word out to the public. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, it could be released, especially with the election coming up in November about support or not supporting the fire design of the project, that if the consultant had information that we can share before the election day.
[George Scarpelli]: So there's nothing in the design that consultants about their thought of the design?
[George Scarpelli]: No, I don't know what I'm just saying. If it's not, it's not. I'm just saying that. So what I would do if we can, um, as well as, uh, appreciate that, that eliminates any, um, any, any thought process of trying to answer some questions. But I think that if we can, Mr. President, that we do motion that we have, um, if the consultant can come out later on after this as soon as we can to really review all of the findings with this council and if it needs to be to go to executive session that we go to an executive session because I know we as a council had some questions about having the fire department and talking with them about some concerns and maybe opening up executive session for them as well so I would put that in a form of a motion and hopefully we can do that before before the new year if we can do that. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Now that the chief has answered that, that there's nothing in the report that, you know, I thought that that might be interesting to see if a third party had some initial thoughts on that in the report, but if they don't, that's fine. So that's now we know if they don't, if we could just rephrase that, Mr. President, that we call for a um a meeting uh before the new year it doesn't have to be right away now with the fire department and um the consultant to review their findings thank you got it so i would amend the resolution to um remove the question about the fire headquarters and then change it to requesting to attend a future council meeting to explain the findings perfect thank you mr president got it do you have that amendment mr clerk
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council Collins for leading our zoning team. I think that this is agreed 1000%. We need to move it forward. I think that we've been looking, looking into this for so many years but I just again, I bring forth the understanding that of course we've had a lot of meetings, we can see that there's been plenty of meetings but one of the things that we made sure with the past council that we really made sure that we tried to incorporate the community. Now you could say that we've had these meetings been open up to everybody and this is great. That's not what we talked about when we started the RFP process back back many many years ago the conversation really was and I hope there's still time to do this is bringing the meetings to those neighborhoods and getting the input from our citizenry and with a comprehensive plan together with all the departments together and getting the vision of what everybody wants to do and making sure that all of the needs are going to be met in that neighborhood And again, I revert to the RFP that was written and the scope of work that it says. public outreach the consultant will develop a public outreach strategy designed to inform the community stakeholders and the general public. The strategy and design was brought up into the fact that what we were doing in Somerville as a department leader that really shined the light and made everybody feel like stakeholders I remember these meetings specifically that we all understood and agreed that going into these meetings, sitting down as a team, looking to see what everybody wants in the community. And we talked about my process. We talked about how recreation played a process when we wanted to look at Union Square and how that process was derived and how it was built together with stakeholders at those meetings in their backyard. I know we've had a thousand meetings. I know that people have been informed. but it's not what we asked for as a council a few years ago. This is what part of the RFP was. And again, I'll state the comment that was made in a meeting when we were deciding this and we were talking about this in March. Councilor Scarpelli said, he thinks the most important thing in the community's input is community-based meetings, meaning in that zoning community. So again, this is something that I'm making up because I wanna be negative or I don't wanna do this. I'm gonna move forward with it, because I think we need to move forward with it. But in the same vein, we have the whole community. I've been talking with the people from Salem Street, and they feel the same way. No one's talked to them, no one sat with them in their backyard at the Roberts, like we did in Somerville. We go right in their yard, go to the Roberts Elementary School. You bring the neighbors there and say, okay, this is a proposal. We're looking to redevelop part of Salem Street to 12 stories. Now, if you ask the people on Salem Street today, no one was really informed. No one really understood the process and no different what we're hearing on Mr. Cav. So again, We know we need this. We know we need the reform. We've supported this from the get-go. What we do need is the truth of what hasn't been done, and that's what was written in the RFP, to have community-based meetings to involve the areas that are being rezoned to get their input and make them feel like they're part of the process. Not all of a sudden they come in and say, well, there's 12 stories coming up and we really weren't part of the process. Well, no, we've had 36 meetings. We know we've had 36 meetings. But I'm telling you again, when we talk about surveys, and I'll use Carr Park as an example, when they did Carr Park over, we talked to Alicia saying that everybody was surveyed in the community. I live a few streets away. No, I wasn't. If I asked my neighbors, no, they weren't. And we're seeing the same thing as we go. Now, this is the beginning. So we could still catch this. But all I implore to my council colleagues to do what was asked in the RFP and I'll make a motion to revisit or ask for the plan that associates must have because it's part of the scope of work of what they viewed envisioned of what the the community outreaches because to me, we're not reaching them. So again, like I said, I'm going to support this because I think it needs to move forward. But in the same vein, before it gets too into the process, we really need to start having these community meetings. We really need to start informing our residents more about being part of this process. So they're not shocked two years down the line when all of a sudden their neighborhood has changed so drastically that they can't live there anymore. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: for myself so I can share this with the community is what that breakdown really means for the community input one on ones. Um, I think that that would be important to Mr. President. I think that, um, I don't think it will be a concern or an issue or a violation to bring the meetings into neighborhoods. We've done this in the past many, many times. So, um, I think that that that that wouldn't be a hindrance at all. But I appreciate the words, but again, I do think that we should do more, like you said, and maybe outreaching and doing something in their communities, in those neighborhoods. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Hello? Is it me you're looking for? Can you hear that? Chief, I know that recently I saw, I think it was a Stoneham truck.
[George Scarpelli]: And I think that's what's great with the fire department in your world that we can reach out to our brothers and sisters from neighboring communities to help. I think that my thing is that I know that as we look forward to the capital plan that the mayor put out, we know we have two trucks coming, right? And I know that there were questions last year that we wanted to order two more, but if we didn't do it a certain time, it would be, drastic, right? So what is I know the two are coming in 20 is it 2026?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so it looks like we need some band aids to get us through these first two. And then I know that do you know when the plan is for the other two was part of our 14 plan? No, no. All right, that if we can, Mr. President, as part of them. We just get an update on the mayor's capital plan about the I know that we wanted to but waiting for two more fire trucks. I think because if we keep we keep band aiding and keep it'll be no different than what we're seeing with the streets.
[George Scarpelli]: There's only so much bubble gum and duct tape that we can purchase. So I know that these are serious issues and making sure our firefighters have, you know, it'd be funny if everybody jumps into Bobby's oil truck to go fight a fire because we don't have a truck. So again, I think that I completely understand where we're going with this and it's if it's needed. I understand but I have other questions but I yield to my colleagues.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, okay, darn.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm good.
[George Scarpelli]: Due to the situation with the override on November 5th, I would invoke rule 21 to move this to the next meeting after the override for the fact that without understanding the true emergency. So I would invoke rule 21 and move this to the next meeting. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: One quick question. Can you define paper way so people can understand what that means, because a lot of people like where's paper way in Medford. I think that we can just explain that a little bit that'd be great.
[George Scarpelli]: And again, that's out of necessity, correct? Because of some structural issues to Joseph's way, is that what I'm?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I'm looking at it right now.
[George Scarpelli]: It looks pretty dangerous. Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I appreciate the I appreciate the hard work, but I think that one of the questions that I've been, um, that I've, I've received from the constituents is that when we wrote this RFP, we're getting to the point where, um, the question is down to a rise that is, is that we need to be answered is that when we wrote the RFP and we asked for uh, in this to be the that were awarded. We were talking about the process of going into the neighborhoods that our zoning changes would be affected so we can have our citizenry be part of that discussion. Um, are we planning on doing that before we go to a city council final vote as we move forward because that's something that was um stressed pretty pretty strongly when we discussed it with the prior city council so uh again i appreciate the hard work but i've been waiting uh to ask this question for the simple fact that it's what was intended when we first started the process so thank you thank you so much Councilor i really appreciate that question um
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor as a city council, I have a question and for you to deny that question for city staff is a serious issue, Madam Vice President, because I have a follow up to the question that you asked because I asked a specific question. The specific question I asked was when we asked to write the RFP and if I'll bring up the minutes, we will that we asked that we were going to take this directly to the neighborhoods and have an open discussion in those neighborhoods with open dialogue and meetings to get everybody's input. Not what you just said. Again, this council is working on the transparency factor of what you think is correct, not what we decided on as a council. So don't disrespect me. I wouldn't do that to you. You've done it three times tonight. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Look at the video.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam Vice President.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I appreciate it. So I think that it's important as as make it make it to be clear that I've I've gone to listen to every meeting, gone to every meeting, and this is under the meeting preference that we're waiting on the process that was originally planned and the RFP that this will be taking to the communities. You haven't answered that question yet. We haven't talked about that. You said that we've had open dialogue that we've done this. We've done that. But again, I want to make it clear. This Councilor hasn't brought this forward because I've been waiting for the process to walk through to see when is the plan and to go into the neighborhoods because that was the original discussion, Madam Vice President. That's all. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Larry Lepore, someone we should all celebrate to know and be honored that he was our friend. It's been a while since you take that ride down Main Street and you notice his car's gone. At Alexander's, one of his favorite spots. Or the knock on your door and just so he can pat my dog. Or sometimes he would sneak away because he knew Dina was coming with Biscotti. And he would always be so kind. And I think that's what we hear over and over about Larry. He never let politics get in the way of anything. He was just such a good person. And even if you had a bad day, he'd tell you, he'd lend you that word that you're doing the job that people elected you to do and made you feel that whatever you felt in yourself that it was the right thing to do. And I'm going to miss him. I'm going to miss him so much because I think a lot of us, even though if you didn't know Larry long, it's amazing how you captured his spirit. Even a night like tonight. You know, he'd look at me and we'd make eye contact with some stupid comment I'd make and I'd feel, oh, I owe him something later. Or when someone would come up and they'd say something silly and he'd look at me with this like, are you kidding me type of face. But he never did it with disrespect or without honor. He was such a good person. And I know the cancer that he fought at the end was very tough, very painful. And my condolences to his family. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: I have one councilor. I know you said that if this job, from what I gather, if this, if we don't find a resolution, National Grid walks away and there is ramifications, like you said, could you explain that? If there is a power outage with this piece being, you know, non-functioning that, that What part of the community is going to be affected if that's the case?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so hypothetically, if we don't move forward with this, there's a power outage. Parts of South Medford are
[George Scarpelli]: So with that situation, does that then facilitate an emergency service? Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: So, and then, if, Mr. O'Connor.
[George Scarpelli]: What do we pay then?
[George Scarpelli]: and then the rule is still up for interpretation, still have to hop the car. That's my question.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: Before we go on, can I just address my original question? resolution.
[George Scarpelli]: Pete, there are questions, um, that I know that, um, there were some questions about council rules, about limitations when it comes to, to, uh, meetings minutes and how long we could speak. And if there are follow up questions, and if there's one question, I believe council bears explain the process that we're using. And, uh, as council president, I think he wants to move this meeting along, but I just, there were some senior citizens that mentioned, if there's some confusion, I hope we have a little leeway when it comes to maybe asking the same question twice because of maybe not understanding it. So I hope we would do that. The other question that Councilor Bears did read, did speak about is that we all asked for information to be sent out to the community. The mayor's response, I believe, The chief of staff did respond that legally the city couldn't inform or given, I'll just read if I can just so people understand, cause it's a little confusing to people. Sending this information request, so it's, we sent this email to legal on today to guide us on what we can do, should avoid doing before we can assist given the OCPF guidelines. One specific question in mind is whether we can intentionally direct notification advertisement to subset of residents. So the following is up on my email below, per council, we can't send unsolicited information to all voters or a portion of voters of the city, whether by mail or by email. We got that, that response was today, correct, Councilor Bears? It was 10 a.m. today. If we knew that and we needed to change wording, I think sending out an all call that we were having a meeting that would, it's open to the public, that just read the resolution, I think that that wouldn't have been an issue. So I just wanted to share that with you. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, you are.
[George Scarpelli]: Council Adam, did you forward this to everybody?
[George Scarpelli]: So I know that the word transparent gets thrown around, Ted, and I hate for you to get dragged into this, but you weren't part of any financial task force for the override, correct? No, I was not. Thank you. Normally, when communities put this into place, I'm told from different communities, different assessors, finance directors, that they usually line this up prior to any budget meetings, so we can help our most vulnerable people in our community understand what any impact it would make. So having this calculation that you're doing for us, and thank you so much for doing it, because I know there were so many questions with the calculations that have been public on the side that you had nothing to do with. I know it came out of a state website, but it didn't truly calculate the newer assessment. So that's correct, right? Yep, right. So when we look at this and now we're doing it on the 11th hour, the question was normally in your experience, other professionals in your field, this is done usually during budget season. So we can prepare our residents that if there was an increase of 373 median price, They're prepared. I know it sounds minimal to some people because it's only, that's all we keep hearing, it's only, but is it odd that we're doing this so late?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. Appreciate that. Any other questions?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. With just a couple more questions, I know that you mentioned that this doesn't have any impact on question six, correct? It's not in fiscal year 25. Because it's not enough time to put everything in, correct? We don't know the actual numbers, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, but we still don't know how much for question six. It's an open-ended, as it said in the question, there's nothing there.
[George Scarpelli]: All right. And I realize the exemptions are great. but I know that there are options when you do this ahead of time is to really prepare your seniors. I know the exemptions sound good, but when you read them and you talk to actual people, there are a lot of senior citizens that really don't fit in that category. So there are no other options. So I know the buzzwords easy to say, we do have exemptions, but when you put it apples to apples and you sit with the senior citizen and you go through their situation, I'm sure you know, Mrs. Jones bought her house with her husband 55 years ago for 50,000. Now the house is appraised at a million dollars. You know, it really doesn't help what we're offering. So it's a funny number and there could be something done more if we had time for an exemption. That's all I'm saying. I know that if we had time, this is something we could petition to see if we can really truly support our senior citizens. I think that must be said. And I think the, the last piece to this, I think that when they look at this and because one question I have Ted is that a lot of people have asked, not just seniors, um, that the, this is like a one time tax. This isn't. So when you see that 4% above your two and a half percent increase, that's going to be compounded year after year after year. This isn't something that's going to go away like debt exclusion, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Right, so that'll grow forever. And I think the other piece that people have to understand too, and it's a tough office. So I just, when you hear the misconceptions, I just need your input to educate our residents and understanding that, again, I believe the mayor said her house is only $13. Some others here said their house is $40 a month or whatever, and we can handle that. That might be the first year, but again, we were told, I think someone from your office emailed us and said that we'll be reassessing again in 2025 for 2026 using the data for 2023, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: So that's good. So it happened. Thank you for helping with that. So it increases. So Again, when this tax goes in, it's now assessed again, the homes will be assessed again.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, but we're seeing that most assessments, because I could tell you, I'm dealing with my own family members that are looking at a $400 increase per month for his new assessment. It's real. So I think that what people also have to understand is that it's not just the home tax. You've seen their cars. Motor vehicle excise. Vehicle excise tax is going to go up. You're going to see the CPA tax because your homes are going to be assessed higher now, right? So now the CPA tax will also be taxed higher. You're going to see that a little bit higher, correct? Okay, that's yeah, that's generally correct.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so thank you. So what you're seeing is, it's not just it's not just an override tax. It's an override tax. It's compounded year after year. It's a tax that increases in the CPA as well. It's the excise tax that increases as well. It's so much more than just 13. That's my point I'm trying to say. I know it's easy to look at a site that wasn't put forth by our office because we know that although it's correct, the numbers that my colleagues did put out there on a page, it does give the numbers that are true and factual, but That didn't include the assessments that residents had, and I'll use my brother's example, because his house was appraised at, on the calculations, at $800,000. His house is now appraised at $1.2 million. So that's why we're seeing that. And that's not odd. This is family-owned homes that that we passed on to generation to generation, just like most people in this room. So, but thank you. I know I'm monopolizing the time because I think it's important, because these are the questions the people that are sitting in this in this room right now and their friends have contacted me and said, we're very confused, Mr. Scappelli. Because even something simple as, Mr. Scarpelli, why are we fighting for $7.5 million for a new high school? And I'm like, no, no, this has nothing to do with the new high school. That's down the line. And people understanding that, well, this is a fight between schools and kids and senior citizens. That's not true at all. We just want to make sure all the information's out so every resident understands the impact. that, and we could talk about solutions as we go, because there are solutions. There were solutions back in April, but thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Is the microphone on? Andrew, is the mic, turn the mic down.
[George Scarpelli]: Let me start off by first saying that unfortunately this administration has divided this community for the children in the schools and the seniors or the homeowners or renters. And I say shame on this administration, shame on this council, shame on the financial task force, because the bottom line is this. This group knew that we were heading in some tough waters back in June 20th of 2023. And you could see that in a city council budget meeting when council beers met with the mayor behind closed doors to set up some sort of deal. We didn't know what that deal was, but they created a financial task force and that financial task force put together a plan of an override without anybody's knowledge, anybody's input or any, or any community participation. There are no issues with our school department. This is a fair tactic and fair tactic only for the fact that we should remember this. Back in April, back in May, back in June, when the city had $25 million in free cash, it was my responsibility to bring forth that we take that $5 million levy that budget, make sure there were no cuts, understand the process, and then move forward to see if we truly need an override, which I never said that should never be an option. But to hear parents and teachers and friends and family say, George, explain this to me. Councilor Villes knew that this was gonna be a devastating situation, but it could have been solved and still could be solved with free cash. We have plenty of free cash in the system not to turn the city upside down or divide the city. Now, remember, I'll leave you with this. What we're asking for in the budget in this override doesn't mean you'll get exactly what you think you're gonna get. Because all these cuts were made to set up this override as a fair tactic. So please. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli. Councilor Scarpelli is not against the children. We just hope that people understand that this could be soft.
[George Scarpelli]: Appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: I think if I can. I think I heard some similar situations with, I know what the assessor came up and gave us medium price homes, but we're seeing real people have told me that this is what we're seeing. We're seeing the increase close to $60,000, most homes that you're seeing an increase at a higher percentage rate. And again, on top of all of what we talked about, with this, so it's not the $13 a month, the $40 a month. It's the pieces that this gentleman just said is the understanding that I never thought that our home insurance now will now increase. So again, this isn't them against us. This is understanding that we have viable options right now to fix this. with free cash and then work together to see how we can have an open process to really include all the stakeholders to make sure that, uh, that no one is hurt. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So, I think my council is not understanding the free cash should be used now to fix a problem now, which we have, and I appreciate the clarification it's only $3 million accounts accounting and just said to fix the school budget, but the key issue isn't. isn't the process of getting this fixed now. The problem that we've had, and we could use the pandemic and use the pandemic over and over again, but what neighboring communities are doing during the pandemic with the infrastructure money that was given through ARPA, that wasn't intended for, for the roads and sidewalks that you're asking for right now. Our mayor didn't do that. Our mayor had to balance our budget through ESSER and ARPA funding. That's the easy way out. That's like paying your mortgage with a credit card. And I'll tell you why. This is the difference. Everybody hasn't said it, but the difference between why we're here and we're in trouble is because of new growth. New growth is what pushes our value, our income up. It gives us more tax base. It brings more money so we can do all the things we're talking about. This mayor has done nothing. We haven't had shovel in the ground in five and a half years. We're talking about, I know my council friends have gone out and told people that Massachusetts is the number one, Medford is the number one community new growth in permitting. Wrong, I sat with the commissioner. Permitting their fine, the biggest concerns we're having, look at the process that she lost fighting 40B projects. One project alone was $3 to $5 million in permits. And then an additional $7 to $9 million that would have come in as new growth. And one job that she fought in court, lost and appealed it, and this group had to leave. The problem isn't our tax base, because our assessments are up. And we're paying more than anybody else in neighboring communities because our assessments are so high. I will share my last point. Neighbor communities per child, Malden, Arlington, Winchester, between 15 and 17,000. Medford, we pay $22,000 per student. Is it a management issue or is it really we don't have enough money? Think about it because it's public. $22,000.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I can, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So again, this financial task force was put together without any individual involved in that comment that a young lady put forth. This was done in a bubble. This was done behind closed doors. It wasn't planned to educate our seniors, educate our residents, educate our renters, educate our landlords, so they could prepare themselves for what's being asked for. within a vote that was presented, a discussion was presented on a Thursday, voted on a Tuesday. not one community meeting. And as a matter of fact, I will share this with everybody. There was a FOIA request put out by a resident that asked a simple question. They asked for all of the information, minutes for the meetings, any information, letters, any emails, any text messages, with this financial task force, with any building or any entity within the city to figure out if this is needed or how it will be used and how it can work. 150 pages later, all the information that was in that FOIA request were information about when we can meet. Nothing that's solid. I would also share with these parents that are so concerned about what's happening, we were saw the information back from the school department. The school department communications director answered by saying, thank you for the FOIA request. We apologize for the tardy response. But after investigating, there was no school department employee or member of the school department involved in any financial task force dealing with these overrides. So what again, what we're saying is we don't know if an override is needed. We know one thing, we know we could fix this issue right now with free cash. So our students and teachers and families are fine. And then we go back to the drawing board as a community together to see what we really need. If the mayor isn't gonna put new growth out there, she's not gonna work to bring in creatively, bring in funding for the city, then maybe we can look at it.
[George Scarpelli]: Financial director.
[George Scarpelli]: Sure, let me help you, Mr. Jones. This financial task force was a farce. There was a lack of transparency throughout. When you speak on, I speak to this in where I worked in 2009. When we met in a possible override in a neighboring community, we talked about three things. It was how do we get here? What do we do to fix it? And how does this happen again? And those people brought in mines from Tufts, Harvard, MIT, Medford, not one person. They brought in their financial team, Medford, not one person. They had their assessor set the rate so people can understand, assessor was never involved. When you look at how this was done, this was done in a bubble, this was presented on a Thursday, and then voted for in the budget meetings. If you look at the budget meetings, when I brought up the way to fix it, which is free cash, and I'll disagree with my fellow Councilor, because she's wrong 1,000%. Free cash for divisional local services, it's not recommended, but not against the law to use free cash. 3 to 5% annual budget, FY24 method generated $9 million to add to a $25 million estimate, which means the city had around 16% of free cash. But again, the solution was very simple. Let's have this financial task force present this to the community, because that's what I asked for. I asked my colleagues, when are we going to present what the findings were? There were no findings. It was just given, we're going to do an override. People came up, shared, the mayor was happy, and it was done. The truth of the matter is, you're right. There was no one involved. This was done in a bubble to scare people, to come out and say, the schools, the kids. And I'll say it again. I said this in April. I said it in May. I'll say it today again. We might need an override, but if we do it right, with open and transparent government, we could do something great. Now remember, with one override in every other community, there's two, three to follow, and don't forget, this council's gonna ask for a 200 to $400 million debt exclusion from New High School, which we need. So this is fear. Please don't be confused. We're not telling you the truth. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Another fair tactic. So people should understand the mayor came out just the other day. We had 34 million, 34.5 million as of July 1st. The mayor, just so you know, what free cash is, it's your money. So when we say we're going to fund 50 teachers and we don't pay those 50 teachers because they don't hire them, that money goes into free cash. That's our money, that's your tax money. and then it could be used for what it needs to be. So it's truly mismanagement of funds from our leadership team. It's taking what we sign off on our budget and not use correctly. So what we have right now, I believe I've said this, Councilor Leming said it over and over again, I'm not saying use free cash every year. We have a deficit right now, correct? that we can correct right now and not put the schools and kids and teachers in fear and say let's level fund that budget using one time free cash one time and then look into what options we have later but let's listen to the mayor what she said 34.5 million Now she knows the override's gonna be a fight. What does she do? Boom, she starts putting all these different monies in different accounts. So from her words exactly in her video the other day, we have 18.5 million. With that said, we can still take funding to level the school budget and still have 14, $15 million, which still leaves enough in there that would appease any bond rating. So again, let's not get scared because that's a scare tactic. Let's see the bond rating so we can move forward. Now, when we look at this situation, council, different communities, free cash, Arlington is 18 million, Framingham 14 million, bigger budget, Quincy 1.2 million, bigger budget, Andover 14 million, Newton, these communities are bigger than ours. We have this budget, they function with lower funding and free cash. So understand this, everyone. We can do this one-time cost to save the fare from our schools, take care of our seniors, our renters, our homeowners, so we can stop the fare in this community. So please, vote no on these overrides.
[George Scarpelli]: It was done in a bubble. It wasn't transparent.
[George Scarpelli]: There's 18.5 left.
[George Scarpelli]: It's called scare tactics.
[George Scarpelli]: So again, Mr. Giglio, these are all scare tactics. Again, the financial task force didn't have the FOIA requests that shows that there were no documentations, no minutes, no information given. We heard the assessor, we know all the major parties, the school department, the assessor, the finance director, weren't involved in these issues. This is, it's not a lie. We just said it, you heard it. Put 30 seconds back on for interrupting me. We have the understanding that the sky is falling. All of these projects that we need to fix, we need to fund. In normal communities, what we do is we bond these projects. When we look at situations that we talked about earlier, when it's, What we're trying, what we're seeing here right now, Mr. Joyo, it's the underfunding of local revenues. One second, I'll just, it's the focus of what we're seeing that our community has done for years here. And that's show lower meals tax and hotel tax and excise tax. So then when it comes higher, you can put that and use it for whatever you want. Let that be known, the understanding what you're asking for, there are no numbers. The problem we hear right now, why the city's divided, why our seniors are scared, why our landlords are scared, why our homeowners and renters are afraid right now, Why our students and parents and teachers are afraid is because this group did something. They put it out there without any true information. So we don't know what's going on. We haven't been educated. That's why there's so much fear. The firefighters aren't supporting a $30 million fire station, because again, there was no transparency there when it came to the final decision that had to be made for 30. And they've decided to go public. They decided to go public to say, let's not hurt our taxpayers with whatever, how many it's going to be, because we don't know. It could be a $50 million fire station. But the design was never put forth to the firefighters. So when you say totality, six, seven, and eight, we haven't been involved, Mr. Gileo. There are no numbers. There is no information. Because this group did it in the financial task force that presented it on a Thursday, voted on it on a Tuesday, and then We find $9 million in free cash after that, that the man knew was certified.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, can I say one more thing?
[George Scarpelli]: We wouldn't know that because it's literally in the budget.
[George Scarpelli]: With the fair tactics, right? It's the schools, right? It's Councilor Leming said it over and over again. Well, we haven't done it, so let's do it, right? Just because we haven't done it, let's do it. Now the roads, now we hear the schools were built bad. So it's all fair, this is all fair. But here's the thing, we're not saying that, let's not look at this properly and do it together. This is the problem. We're doing it in a bubble. We're doing it so privately. We're doing it where it's gonna hurt so many people. You know, the finger-pointing between teachers and finger-pointing between seniors and kids, and it's a shame what you're doing. We can correct this right now with the free cash. No matter what they say, the truth of the matter is we have free cash to make sure that seven and eight are correctable. We know question six is correctable by listening to our firefighters, who will tell you straightforward that the mayor's not telling the truth. What they're building there is insufficient, and it's going to put us 30 years behind in five years. So please understand this, Mr. Gervino, when you say all this information and how it gets out, we haven't done that. Even though councils want to say we did, we haven't. We haven't prepared our seniors for what's going to happen on January 1st of 2025. Once the new assessment, once the new tax bills come out, we haven't done that. We haven't prepared up our, our, our landlords to how they're going to handle single parent, uh, renters in their home. We haven't prepared our renters when increase goes up. And here's another one. Somebody called me when I put a post out about a woman that called me. She has two children, and the landlord said, I'm not going to hit you with the assessment raise, but I'm going to be honest with you. I got to tell you, I'm going to have to raise your rent. And someone asked me, well, are you going to support rent control? Well, there's another wrong that doesn't make a right. Again, there's a system in place with this group that's telling you what you should do out of fear. So please, again, we have the funds to fix it. No matter what they're saying, it's absolutely above board to do that. I understand it was done with mismanagement throughout the process. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: It goes into general fund. That's the answer. It goes into general fund. And by law, you're supposed to take the letter of what the questions are and use those funding as closely as you can to that. But the questions as they're read are very vague. So it really doesn't mean it's gonna go directly to that. It could be portions of that or not. Again, I'll bring us back to the budget meeting when school committee member Jenny Graham was asked a question, if we were given $5 million, would everybody go back to those positions? And the answer was yes. The next evening, the school's financial director and the school superintendent, when I asked that question from the evening before, she said, absolutely not. The money would go back into their fund and they would distribute it to what they think is best for them. So it's a little, it's not true. And I'll give you an example. We talk about all these different cuts. We haven't filled, I believe now 29 teachers in the Medford public schools. That's funding we haven't, we paid for. We have so many dire issues, so many, the fiscal crisis we've been hearing. But at the same breath, we're asking to bring in shiny new programs that are new, that are costing the school department $200,000. We're talking about a city council that during this financial crisis talked about, did what? We found $9 million of free cash when they looked at the override. And then what happened? They voted themselves a raise. So the SIKU committee now goes from $10,000 to $12,000 up to $22,000, $24,000. The mayor gets an increase three times, three different ways. So again, I implore all of you who are open-minded thinkers, are you sure we're in a fiscal crisis or are we in a problem with this fiscal mismanagement?
[George Scarpelli]: That's what happened.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Councilor Bielsa, in question six, I think we have a firefighters union here that have been involved in the negotiation because there is no limit on question six, truly is no limit. That's not true. No, there isn't. It's wide open. So I know that if we can maybe have a fire fighters that have been working on this, just to give us an idea of what the process was, the beginning, what we were looking at for a number and how, how much it's dropped. So we can understand truly.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, okay. So I'm sorry, hopefully the firefighters can have an opportunity to express why they want to vote no on this debt exclusion because I think what you asked, there is such fluctuation and what's true, what they needed and what was agreed upon before the mayor became very angry with the firefighters and then started cutting and cutting. And now we're left with an inferior product that our firemen and women, firefighter men and women said over and over again, that please do not hurt the residents of this community with an inferior station. Don't do it. Wait, maybe down the line, we could rethink this and refocus on what we could do. But for now, we're saying, let's not hurt. So here we go. We have teachers that are saying, let's not hurt our community. You have firefighters saying, let's not hurt the community. The questions you're asking should have been out there for you, Joan, months and months ago, so you could truly understand the impact that you're going to feel. And again, this is where we talk about the lack of transparency and why this should be taken off the table and people should vote no, because the bottom line is, The fear of children, that should be fixed with the $3 million from free cash. The mayor said it, we have 18.5. We could still take 3 million out and do that. We'll still have enough to keep our bond rating up and look to bond other projects. Or maybe we sit together again as a true financial working group, a task force, and say, how do we do this together as a community? So we're not gonna look later because there's no guarantees that there won't be another override next year, I promise you that. because every other community that's gone that way have asked for two and three.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Isn't this a total microcosm of what we're saying? This is what 678 is about. There's so much confusion. First of all, we have to understand the feasibility study that was done is what gets us the funding for through procurement. So we know the numbers. When my fellow council said that this is a city building and firefighters, I don't know what the comment was, that is so irresponsible. To understand that this fire department's gonna stand up and say, no, we don't want a new headquarters because it's insufficient and it will hurt our community funding-wise. When we say the needs of the community, we mean proper safe staffing and department and ability to add technical rescue specialist services to our emergency response, which will bring better services to the citizens in every call. That's wrong what they're asking for. They're asking for a fire stations adequate to help our community grow. The proposed design does not adequately address the health and safety issues of the fire service regarding cancer exposure mitigations, the privacy concerns which have never been addressed properly by our department. Adults deserve privacy regardless of the gender. This isn't an issue which is female and men. Do you understand the design that was presented has firefighters after a fire showering downstairs walking upstairs in a towel or a bathrobe, walking down a community hallway to get to their quarters. By the way, their quarters did not consist of a locker room. This is what we're saying. These are issues that I can't even believe that we would entertain this with so many questions. This is how six, seven, and eight were all done. They were all done in a bubble that we're supposedly battled over on social media by a leader of our community. We have the former fire chief here, we have the leaders of our fire department that have openly said, we don't want to hurt our citizenry and putting $30 million, let alone $3 into this because we don't know what we need.
[George Scarpelli]: So I appreciate my fellow Councilor being in my mind to understand what my plan was, was to get the superintendent to say something she didn't wanna say. Again, I appreciate the resident who put all of the meetings out on social media because you could say whatever you want about George Scarpelli. You could say that he's a liar, but when there are video and documentations with it, simple question to the superintendent was, Will this money, will it be made whole like Councilor, School Committee Woman Graham mentioned? Her simple answer was no. I wasn't trying to have her say anything any different. And as a matter of fact, what we're seeing in the school system after that vote, there were many teachers and many programs that were dismissed and cut. We had the band leader who left right away because there were promised things. We had, we had to believe a $200,000 line put in place for City Year, which is a great program, It's a great program, but when you have so many fiscal crises in the city, why are we funding something that's just a shiny nickel right now? There are so many issues with this, my friends. I implore you just to listen to the common sense. Listen to the understanding that you can use free cash. As a former teacher, and a parent of public school kids, and a coach, I understand, I lived it. I lived the process. but I also understand and how to move forward without hurting our whole community or without dividing our whole community, because this is what we're doing. These override questions are hurting our community. We don't have the information that's out there. It's not spelled out correctly. We don't truly know, although like Councilor Kelly had said, yeah, it goes to the general fund. We don't know where that money's going. So we have teachers positions open with money in there. Remember, there's a lot of money that hasn't been used to date that we can still use, but thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, we went over this again, just to reiterate to people that are new to the room, $37, that's all it is. Coming from people that truly don't understand the impact, because a lot of people here, imagine just $37 a month, what that would do to people sitting in here. Imagine the impact, because that's been overlooked. but it's not 37. We talked about the CPA increase. We talked about the assessment. We talked about the excise tax. It's everything. It's not 37. The dialogue of fear spins it easily. Now, again, I'm gonna say this. The dialogue of fear, we talked about busing now, lead in the water, teacher cuts, roads and sidewalks, because $500,000 is gonna fix road and sidewalks. But the most important thing I wanna talk about is what's happening in our community. Because if you watch what's happening in social media, the teachers union, the MTA, has never ever, as one person that was on the negotiating team and a former member, has never ever ruled on or endorsed a candidate or a question, because we knew as union members that our impact's not gonna hurt just, it's not gonna help us, but it's gonna hurt other unions. So they did the right thing by staying neutral. And maybe they believe in it, maybe they don't, but they said, let's be, let's stay neutral. And shame on this community that have turned their backs on teachers saying, the comments I've been seeing, like this is the teacher's fault? This isn't the teacher's fault, this is the administration's fault to set up this fear tactic and set up this negativity to divide us. It's dividing our community. Listen, I want everything we can get for our children. I want everything we need for our students and parents. I want everything we need for our firefighters. And there's options with new growth as we come down the line, but we can correct it right now without hurting renters, landlords, senior citizens, our people that are most vulnerable. We can use that free cash, make it whole and move forward. So I implore you, please, think about what you've been hearing. It's concrete, common sense information. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that, Councilor, to clarify a little something, I think that what I've heard from residents is the chronic misrepresentation and the lack of true transparency is what causes the community to distrust. That's what we're seeing right now. That's truly what we're seeing right now. When you hear and see how we got to this point, this is what caused it. The misinformation, the confusion, the uncertainty for the people that are most vulnerable, our children, our seniors. That's the issue that we should be focusing on. and thinking that an override is the answer, or, ready for this one, $500,000 are gonna fix our streets. Come on.
[George Scarpelli]: So let's look at, now I've heard that 20 times tonight, that $500,000 is gonna fix our streets. Let's look at the big picture of what's happening. DPW, the mayor is firing DPW workers hand over fist. We have equipment at DPW that we have members that haven't been trained because they don't know how to be trained on new equipment. We have a mayor that's spending so much money on legal fees and legal settlements. We're using, the mismanagement of funds in this community has hurt us to the point that here we are, that some council is saying, hey, since we haven't done it ever, let's do it, which is wrong. So again, I'd love to see us do this the right way from the schools with free cash. Let's go to the table and see what we truly need with a true financial team open to the public that it's shared with everybody's input. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I didn't understand her. I didn't hear her question.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, it's very simple. I'll say it again. I think that when we sat and talked at the meeting in April, May, and June, I came forth with the proposal of a resolution of using free cash of the $25 million that we had. And I believe it was Councilor, when I brought it forth, it was Councilor Leming that used Rule 21, which froze the future discussions of that proposal. And then as it went through and you could see in the videos, as we went through that process, they kept using tactics where we couldn't speak or have open forums before we went to a vote in the budget. So again, these are issues that when I say That's what we need to eliminate. We need to sit together as a community and say, okay, what do we work with the state and work with our assessor and say, hey, let's understand the impact at an early enough stage so we can be prepared for that. Let's see if we can look at true exemptions that would help our landlords or senior citizens or our most vulnerable community members, then let's look at it and say, what do we really need and make sure that our children in our schools have everything that they're asking for? So I think that with that process being open, I don't think we wouldn't be able to deny anything, but the way the process has come out and the way that's been spun saying, Councilor Scarpelling wants no because he doesn't want that, that's not true. The truth of the matter is the way this process has gone about from 2023 in June till today has been a total farce. It's been a nightmare. It's been disingenuine. And this council can say what they want. These fair tactics are out there. You've heard them. I'm not making it up. You've heard them all say it. whether it's whether it's whether it's streets falling in. I mean, even the mayor said the other day was sitting on a 200 million dollar time bomb called our water system. Yeah. Well, if we did our job with ARPA, that's what that money was made for. Not to save your key, sir, because you had no new growth. This is why we're here.
[George Scarpelli]: Let me say it again. Two minutes. This councilor has not said once that we should use free cash year after year. What I said right now is eliminate the fear for our senior citizens, our children, our teachers for one time to level fund this and look at other options. That's what I said. I don't know where this keeps coming back and forth and understand an override It was said by another financial director in another community, he said to me, George, remember, using an override to do what you're trying to do in Medford, it's like using your credit card to pay for your mortgage or pay for your rent. It's just not feasible. It's not a right way to go through the process. We look at the different situations that we talk about and we said, okay, you know, Medford has drastically underfunded so many processes when you look at our receipts. We're seeing that right now. We see that our circuit breaker has increased. We've seen that we use the Fair Amendment Act for Chapter 70, our increase of $4 million. There is a lot that's out there. There's a lot of money in the city that we're not using correctly. We have seen it over and over again. We've talked about, just to have the fact that you have $9 million of free cash at the end of the year, your budget season, to get certified, that just speaks volumes of mismanagement of fiscal funds. Remember, when you sit there and you set that budget, that budget is set, let's say 100 million, and then you only spend 90 million, that means you didn't do something right. That means you didn't use that money appropriately. It's the city's taxpayers' money. So when I say free cash, of course it's not free. It's our money that we've already paid the year before to balance our budget, to make our city run.
[George Scarpelli]: Simon, thank you for coming up tonight. I'm so impressed with you coming to this podium, because there are so many scaredy cat adults, but you have the guts to come up. So I applaud you for that, okay? So I have family members that might be your teachers. I have children that went through the schools just like you did. And I know it's scary right now, because you're listening to grownups talk about, we're gonna cut positions, we're gonna hurt teachers. That's not the intent, my friend. We have a solution that's easy. We can use money that the city has saved, that can fix it right now, instead of going to a vote. That's something that Mr. Scarpelli asked for years, months and months ago. And when you come to this point, my friend, you have to understand, we wanna make sure that every single one of your teachers are back next year, because you know why? You deserve it. So thank you for coming up.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. To your point, Mr. Rodriguez, I think that this is why question eight, again, this is why these questions are so vague, right? That people are confused. because the determination of this $4 million is so we can align the vocational school building with the high school building so we can increase the day, so we can provide programming for both levels, right? So here's something. It hasn't been negotiated. It hasn't been discussed. So where is the money gonna go when it's not even entertained? These are the questions people have. The question that's $4 million, the state expert and former superintendent of Medford, Roy Belson, stated, if during negotiations, that's what we're looking for is to line those bells, then it's negotiations for the high school and vocational school teachers to increase their rate. Realistically, you're looking at $600,000 when you're looking to do that group, right? $4 million for what? Like we've said, more arts programs. We have art programs. The issue is aligning the bell. In programming, we have it. We just gotta line the bell. So again, it's so wide open to say $4 million to do arts and to align this process with the vocational school and the high school. is so vague, how can we even entertain voting on it when we know the ramifications to the rest of the community? Again, please. hear what was being said tonight. There are so many open-ended questions. There are so many issues that people don't know how we got here. We have FOIA requests that show that there was no proper discussions with school department members. When the school department isn't part of this financial task force for an override, and then a question like question eight comes up, it's so vague. Are we sure? Are we sure that we need an override?
[George Scarpelli]: Where does it say that though? Because that's eloquent. You would have to look at it if it was presented that way. Again, it wasn't. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President. Thank you. I missed most of the question, Bill, but again, like we're saying, we're hearing a systemic issue that's been happening for years, but the way the process, and I'll say again, the way the process has come forth, the way the process has come full circle right now, it's putting so many people, so many residents in flux and fear, right? And I think that's the biggest concern. I think the way that we've moved forward, that this group has moved forward to present an out, that really isn't an out like they've said. It's not gonna really help, right? We don't know where the money's going. Things are still questioned for each question. It's not certainties, right? We've already heard from everybody that hasn't been part of the process. So again, why continue this? Why keep moving forward and understanding that we're hurting real people? We're hurting real residents. And when I said, I like, again, I'm talking about the children. I'm talking about the seniors. I'm talking about our renters. I'm talking about our homeowners. We're hurting a lot of people right now for something that quote unquote is so minimal. Because the truth of the matter is, this is so minimal and such cause such divide. What we're now seeing is, are we truly gonna look at the next question when we really need it properly? Or are we gonna look at it with caution and saying, I'm definitely gonna stand against it. I'll use a $200 million, $400 million high school down the line. Imagine if that process was done, how it would destroy homeowners right now, senior citizens, people on fixed incomes, it would destroy us. This is why this process has to be done in a better way. It shouldn't be done in a vacuum. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I think if I can, Mr. President, I think when we've heard parents of the fear, right, that we're going to cut, I believe one school can remember saying it was 55 to 65 teachers. Then it was now 35 and the pain, the fear is going to be spread all over, right? Everybody's going to feel the pain. That was the comment that's gone out publicly by that school committee remember. Right. And I think what you're saying to this is saying that, you know, Are we gonna cut, a teacher's gonna be cut in January, January 2025, if the override fails in November? That's a question, I believe. I don't know. I don't know because in these questions, these override questions, you didn't say to cover the cost of 55 to 65 teachers that will be cut, not a question seven or question eight. I didn't see that. So that again leads to another example of Are we sure we know what we're voting on? And are we sure we need to move forward? And was this transparent enough?
[George Scarpelli]: So clarity, thank you. So clarity, everyone, where's Simon? Your teachers aren't going to be cut this year, because that's the word going out. The word was at these meetings now, right? They will not be cut. There'll be no cuts until next fiscal year, next school year. But next fiscal year, we'll have more money. Next school year. Exactly. It'll give us time, because we had an opportunity, Gaston. We had an opportunity back in 2023, when we realized that we were using ARPA and ESSER funding to balance a budget of operations which you shouldn't that we know that but this council voted on a backroom deal that that's what happened and then they've moved forward with this financial task force so here we are right now
[George Scarpelli]: 1.7 so all right so this is where we are right now
[George Scarpelli]: Oh I apologize... so this is... Thank you, I apologize
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. First, let's start off by the teachers and compensation. A good way to make sure they go is scare them with layoffs when you have an avenue to save them. But with this question, the truth of the matter is, in most communities, it's growth. Growth, growth, growth. New growth, smart development. That's what happens. That's what happened in neighboring communities like Somerville. During the pandemic, what happened in Everett, what happened in Malden, you saw new growth. I've heard my council colleagues say that it'll take us five to seven years to see that wrong. We had three 40B projects that not only would bring in valuable funding through permits and fees, and then the new tax base, but also open up an opportunity for what we lack here is affordable housing. And this mayor has voided that. So like I said, just one project, and I'll say it over and over again, because we've talked to the owner of the building. He put in a place for 40B projects, 400 units at the old gold gym site. $3 to $5 million just in permits would have come right to us, right away, $3 to $5 million for one project. And then you would see an increase. Once that's built, you would then have a tax base of more to $6 to $9 million coming in. Now what you saw is the mayor fight that. which is a 40B project, which you can't fight and win in court. We know that by law. She takes it to court, they lost. Then she brings it back and she appeals it. While we're paying lawyers, we lose the appeal, but at the same time, we now have these developers that have walked away to Medford because now they're in Watertown. Now they're in other neighborhoods. And this gentleman just lost $5 million by sitting on a property, hoping he could develop Medford the right way. The other piece we have right now, the mayor is, did everybody hear this? There's an RFP for five spots in Method Square. What's the plan? We don't know. This is again, lack of transparency and openness in this community. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, if I can, I think there's more involved here. I think that it's very clear and cut. I think the communities can see that our firemen and women do not want this override or this debt exclusion because it hurts our citizenry because the design and the building that they're looking to build is not adequate for any of them. We also have a firefighter standing in front of us that, so we all understand why we're in fiscal crisis, why we're in fiscal issues, right? Firefighter Masolino wrote a grant for 11 firefighters through FEMA, so the FEMA would pay these 11 firefighters for three years, as long as you didn't vary from those 11 firefighters. The mayor came in and said, at the end, the only caveat is you have to sustain those 11 firefighters to be at minimal level. The mayor came in and said, no, we'll only fund five or seven. Just by doing that, guess what happened? It voided the 11 firefighters that would have been paid for FEMA for three years. Again, this council, the mayor had a outside member doing evaluation to come in, and we spent $10,000 to start with this firefighter evaluator to come in and look at the fire station. We have yet to hear anything. From what I hear, that person's been gone now. No report, no nothing. This is the problem we see, the mismanagement of our community. It's not that we don't have, in certain cases, enough funding. It's how you manage those funds. So again, I thank you for everything you do, and we should not vote support this override, because our firefighters are saying, let's not hurt our residents, especially if it's an inferior product. We'll stay where we are, even though it's disgusting. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, and I appreciate the question because I too have a stance on this and it's difficult when your kids are reading posts and saying, hey dad, why are they using you for supporting constituents and residents that feel like they're being not listened to, to racist or a member of KKK? It's pretty sad, right? So when you see these situations of division, It's because people feel they haven't been heard. And I welcome you to look at the videos from our meetings. I had viable questions in our meetings, and this is where the division started. When you try to bring these questions forward and this council actively shut you down, as a member of this community and a city councilor, to be disrespected like that, opened up so many people's eyes to say, is this something that's been, is it needed? Because there's a group of people, my friend, that aren't being heard. They're afraid that no one's listening to them. Something that could be corrected, I've said this a thousand times, I never said I didn't want a debt exclusion, or the side, even the All-Method group saying that they didn't want a debt exclusion, all they're saying is, let's have a more open and transparent process. You've heard so many questionable issues tonight, from the firefighters' designs, to question seven and eight, there's so many. So I think the problem right now is you have six councils that really look at something and an issue and they band together, but they leave a whole demographic out. They can say the fluffy words to say that, well, it's divisive. They're saying it's divisive. Words that some people use is divisive. The bottom line is if it's smell, if it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, it's a duck. and people just watch and see it. I don't want division either. There's too much division in this whole country, in this whole world. I would love for us to sit together, but as a councilor, when you're trying to share an opinion for a group of constituents that feel that they're not being listened to, that they feel like they're not being listened to, then you bring that forward, and then they actively shut you down. They use council rules against you. They suspend council rules so you can't speak. That's what happened. And this is why the division started. Because people didn't feel like they were properly listened to. They didn't feel like this financial task force was actually transparent and open. Because if they were, and the mayor presented all the facts, maybe we'd be in a different place right now, but we're not. So we made a lot of mistakes on many sides.
[George Scarpelli]: that when you left, no one could say this publicly, but we wanna thank you because we know how difficult your job is anyway. We understand becoming a chief is very difficult because you have been thrown into the realm of politics. And that's sad because I know who you are as a man and I know how much you love being a firefighter. So I'll be honest with you, I was sad to hear that you did step away because Medford is worse as a fire department because you're gone. So I wanna make sure publicly somebody said that to you. And I know Danielle doesn't want to say it, but I've heard it over and over again through public, through social media, our leader of the community, through social media, bashing on you, bashing on other fire chiefs, saying it's all them, that they've been part of the design. So I need to know, when you left, were our firefighters involved in that design that we have today?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Chief. Again, if I can, Council President.
[George Scarpelli]: Clarification, thank you with that. I also know that from what I've heard, it's 1,000 square feet smaller. I think you want to talk about unity. You want to talk about doing something correct as a team. When you're talking about firefighters, that their safety with carcinogens aren't being met, I think in unity, we should all say that we do not support this debt exclusion for a fire station. That's inadequate for our men and women in the fire station. That's what I think we should say. You want to start in that process? That would be great. But Chief, thank you so much for the clarity. And I apologize that our firefighters aren't being heard.
[George Scarpelli]: So if I can, Mr. President. So very simply put is, I've been saying this for months now, is that it's a one-time correction with the free cash to eliminate any fear and disruption to our whole community. I've been saying for years that in the last five years, we've had zero new growth. When you talk about new growth, that is the solution. The solution to any community's investment in finances is their new growth. We've done nothing in the city of Medford to hang our hats on other than a beer hall. We haven't seen anything bring in true funding other than a beer haul. So, I mean, I've been pretty consistent with what I've been saying, but although you don't wanna look at transparency, I think that's the major issue right now is because the word, the information is not getting out there. We're voting on something that we've shown so many different reasons why we shouldn't. There are so many open questions. There are so many people, actual people that are gonna get hurt. that to have a solution is very simple. That's using free cash once. People keep saying that I'm saying that we do this all the time. We do this once because this community had over $35 million, over $34 million of free cash that we could have used and then sat together in an open process to see what we can do together as a total community to see what we needed. We didn't do that. So again, new growth and development is so important. We look at the way that our budget was underfunded in certain aspects, but underappreciated. I think we have to look at so many different options in the future, but what we lacked and the reason why we're here is because our mayor and our administration use one-time funding to carry her water for the last five and a half years. This is why we are where we are.
[George Scarpelli]: Right now, for the November 5th ballot, we'll have question six, question seven, question eight. Question six is a debt exclusion, like I explained, is a tax that you'll be taxed until the project or the bond is complete, and then it comes off the tax. And that reads, That exclusion on fire stations shall the city of Medford be allowed to exempt from the provisions of proposition two and a half, so-called the amounts required to pay for the bonds issued in order to pay for costs of construction, a new fire station headquarters to be located at 120 Main Street in Medford, including the payment of all costs related design, the project equipping and furnishing, the project site improvements and all other costs incidental to related there too. So you'll vote no, because that's been a lot of people's questions. George, I thought you supported the firefighters. Well, when you hear it straight from the people that I think Danielle put it perfectly when she said, we don't want to sound like the angry people. Instead, look to see what our firefighters have gone through, what our men and women have gone through in the last year. and how they've been treated. And yet again, they're gonna stand up and say what? What you're offering was not transparent, was not inclusive, was a decision made in a box, and the funding is gonna hurt our residents. And they're willing to stand up and say what? We'd rather not have our residents of Medford hurt financially for an inferior product. So please do not vote for question six. Thank you, Danielle. Question seven is funding schools and street repairs. Shall the city of Medford be allowed to assess an additional 3.5 million in real estate and personal property taxes for FY25 general operations of the Medford Public Schools. $3 million includes but not limited to funding costs for teachers, literacy coaches, behavior specialists, administrative assistants, nurses, and for regular facility maintenance, and for FY25 general operations DPW, including but not limited to additional staff for road and sidewalk infrastructure repair for fiscal year beginning July 1, 2024. Okay, this question seven. $500,000, come on, for the roads and sidewalks. ARPA, when it was originally put forth, was directly supposed to go to infrastructure needs, roads and sidewalks. Not at all. So now we sit here and say we're going to give them $500. Thanks. This is an initiative that I put forth years ago. We try to put a sidewalk and hot tub crew together to save the city money because the mayor kept coming to us for $2.5 million bonds for sidewalks. And we never saw sidewalks being done. We could never catch up. And I know my colleagues say, see? See? We're right. We have no money. Not right. Wrong. And again, I love the dialogue. Public schools, teachers, literacy coaches, behavior specialists, nurses. The superintendent has already, the expert in the state has shared some amazing information. Have we been resourceful? Has the school committee and the school department been resourceful in creating revenue? No. I know my colleagues will say, again, he's not telling the truth because their social media sites tell you that. But I have shown everyone, very simple, meeting after meeting, and if you want to look up, watch them on YouTube, From step to step, we showed an avenue to come out of this without hurting kids or teachers or schools. We showed them that avenue through free cash. And what did they do? They imposed a rule to shut me up. So now we move forward. One of our members got a phone call from a school kid member. And that school kid member said, How dare you put a no sign on your lawn? Are you going to be happy when we lay off 40 teachers? Shame on that person. Because that's the same exact question I posed in the open meeting in front of everybody and said, why put the schools, the children, the teachers through this? Take the $5 million out of free cash. put the fear away, and then let's all get to the table and make the right decision for our community with an open and transparent process. So that, ladies and gentlemen, question seven, no. I like the drama behind this. Question 8 is intense. Question 8. This override will expand vocational programs and increase student access to the arts by giving us the funding to pay for new programming, staff to help students succeed, level and increase educator and paraprofessional compensation to ensure living in competitive wages. Doesn't that sound expensive? Vocational. I believe what it is, Roy you can help me if I'm wrong, is expanding the day, the school day, and the vocational day would kind of merge together. That's what we're asking for, right? What, I believe it's maybe through negotiations will be the biggest cost? Well, what we're looking at is nothing close to $4 million. Not even close. Not even close. Understand the trend here. Six, we heard. Seven and eight, education. Understand every single community that has fought for an override and their communities has used what? The children in the schools. Don't hurt our children, don't hurt our schools. Well, I asked my colleagues, and the people on the other side that's supporting this, where were you the meeting that you shut me up when we asked for free cash that we had? And you were there, and you still have it. So let's understand this. Now that you know the questions, let's go all the way back now. And let's make sure we get this and people can hear it, you can share with your friends. All Medford, at no time have we ever said, we're against an override. We do not want it, never. That was never said. What we said, was let's fix what's wrong now with that $5 million. Let's bring everybody together to the table. Let's have an open and transparent process. And let's work together to make sure we, if the need is there, that we fulfill it together. And don't divide the community. But this is what has happened now. Now we're dividing. Now it's yes or no. And I'll be honest with you. As a responsible member of this community, if I didn't think now that we're here, there's nothing we can do, we'd have to step away, I'd step away. But we have $34 million in free cash. $34 million in free cash that has not been used that can recover this funding and make sure that we do this process correctly. This is what we're talking about. And for those who don't know, Just a quick step-by-step so you understand, it's never quick with me. We had our budget meeting last year, the year before last. And my colleagues were in unison, Councilor Caraviello was there, Council President Beas was there. And we were all together in the process that we cannot support this budget. It's too dangerous. So we were all for it. Until the night of the meeting, Councilor Caraviello and I stood there, and our council leadership team came out and said, hey, we just met with the mayor behind closed doors, and we're going to vote for the budget. They've come to an agreement. What agreement? I didn't know what agreement it was. Councilor Caraviello, Councilor Mike didn't know what agreement it was, but there was some sort of agreement. Well, as this grew, we kind of realized what the agreement was. A financial task force was created. A school kid member, two city Councilors, the chief of staff, and the mayor. Five people with no background in financial battles. Nothing. At least not enough to lead us to the spot we need to be. So we move forward, this financial task force is meeting, we don't hear anything. There are no minutes, there's no information. We're told we're gonna get a meeting before we do anything. Well, you hear rumblings, so we call for a meeting. So we have our city council meeting, and I believe it was a week before we had a subcommittee meeting, and a very smart resident, very important, powerful question. They said, so if you ask for an override and it doesn't pass, what does that mean? That means devastation for the school department and our children. Imagine. So I came back the following week and I presented a plan that said what? Use our free cash. Let's come to the table and do the right thing for our community. and let's not leverage our kids in our schools. But guess what happened? It's called Rule 21. Counsel Scarpelli shut down, can't speak. And this is how we're getting messages. The Financial Task Force's plan was an override plan. That was what they came out with. We asked for the minutes, we asked for more information, how do we get there, who was involved? No answer. Now maybe the other side, because my friends are telling me, George, they're beating you up, they're beating you up. That's fine. But this is all true. This is all on tape. So, typical fashion, Friday we get emails from the mayor's office with $7.5 million. Tuesday we come to a meeting, we're gonna vote on it. As a responsible city councilor, I will now invoke our Rule 21, close the meeting, and ask for an open meeting with everybody to talk about this in more depth. Something that's unheard of, has never been heard of, never been done before, but council leadership suspends the rules of the meeting and imposes a vote to not invoke Rule 21. Done, you can't talk about it. But I will tell you, the council had five subcommittee meetings to talk about a city council newsletter. Five. And guess what that, that's free, nothing. But, the paper's adding up to $7.5 million and possibly more. They don't wanna talk about it. So, what do we do? We move on to the next meeting, and they said okay. I reach out to my state representative and I asked him, what is the plan? What can I do? And they said, okay, legal from the state said you can now invoke Mass General Law 43, section 22. That supersedes any method rule, shuts the meeting down. Well, we get to the next meeting. Our leadership team does the same exact thing. Suspends the rules. Says they cannot impose rule 21. I then invoke. Section 22, council leadership says, no, you can't do that. Against the rule, against the law. Because what was going to be said is this. And listen closely, because this is how real communities do it. In 2009, working in the city of Somerville, Mayor Joe Hurtatone was at a crossroads with his community. Big cuts looming. He convenes a group, a working group, a financial working group that consisted of financial minds from Tufts, MIT, Harvard, banking leaders. You had the Sloans from Century Bank. You had his financial team present. You had community leaders and business leaders all in a row. And they worked on a plan because they said you needed to figure out three things before you wanted to go to Novartis. One, how do we get there? We still don't know how we got here, at least publicly, there's nothing been mentioned. Two, how do we fix it? Three, how does this never happen again? That's what we were taught. Well, they came out and they said, okay, this is what we're going to do. We're going to look at traffic and parking fees. Not going to make people happy, but they're going to take that money. They're going to increase those fees. They're going to take that money, and that's going to be dedicated solely to the school department. Boom. Need taken away. Next. We need streets and sidewalks. How do we figure that out? The focus is fees and fines for trash and building. And boom. Developers paid for that. And then the third piece, the most important piece, they sat together and they said, well, what can we do so this never happens again? How do we bring Somerville out of this? Well, they started this little project called Assembly Row. And now, whether you like it or not, there's a lot of money coming into the city. Now, maybe you might question the growth, maybe question how they got there. That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is, that was an open process with financial minds that sat together to find a solution. What has happened here, both in the fire department and the school department, it's been done in a vacuum. Nobody knows. I know that a member of the community did file a FOIA request asking information for, we're waiting on that, hopefully we get that soon, that we can share with the community of what was shared, minutes, any notes, anything taken with this financial group? Who were the professionals they might have brought in that we don't know that could have helped them? Nobody. And here we are today, middle of September, people still don't know that there's an override vote. Like Councilor Caraviello said, he had explained to a person yesterday, why are we fighting it? $7.5 million for a new high school? That's great. But this is the problem. This is the problem. So people are saying, you know, but, you know, Councilor Scarpelli shouldn't be doing this. He's a city councilor. I don't give a shit. I'm gonna fight for what I think is right and so every citizen is heard. Because I will tell you, it's not that I'm new to this or I wouldn't do this or I wouldn't have the guts to do something like this because There were three former Councilors in this room, and only one of them, sorry Rick, only one of them put forth a debt exclusion that was probably put together by the best financial mind in Medford, an Aleesha Nunley, and we looked at the process of creating funding for a new main fire station on Main Street. And it was so simple. We would exclude senior citizens because you know what? You're hurting. Senior citizens are hurting. The vulnerable community, our disabled, our veterans, eliminate that group, those groups, and see what we can do. And I believe at the time it was $17 a month. We could swallow that, couldn't we? But that was with the process that gets started. Even with this process right now, nobody knows what's going on. We still don't know what's happening. Nothing's been posted. I know there's rumblings that money's already being spent from free cash out of the $34 million. Nothing's been done yet. So having this meeting tonight is so important. This fundraiser's so important. Because I tell you, I gotta thank so many people. The restaurants that donated. LaCasha's, Ronnie's Place, Richie Razzo's from Razzo's and Avellino's, always donate. Thank you so much. The thousands of dollars that were donated just the other day was amazing. And guess where that money's coming from? You. hard-working, method residents that want to do anything they can and fight. My neighbor, who's 84 years old, came to my house today and said, George, I can't come. He has $8. And I said, God, no, no, no. Because I tell you, what we do know is Kelly has done a great job with the real estate side and understanding the assessing side. We have Nate Merritt's been doing his deep dive into the calculator that they have on their site that says all you do is poke in these numbers, bam, it's always this much money, you can handle that. Bullshit. Because I'm gonna tell you straight up, $380 for a person might sound not a lot of money. But some of the people I've talked to, I keep saying it, I won't use her last name, but I love her dearly. I see Mrs. Jones. She said, George, help me understand this. I bought my house 50, 60 years ago. So $48,000, I believe she said. I think I tell people $50,000. But now my house is worth a million dollars. My husband died 15 years ago. I was a seamstress. My social security doesn't cover my taxes. So should I move? Some people want them to do that. Because I haven't heard one thing supporting our senior citizens. I haven't heard one thing how we're gonna help those homeowners that are struggling to stay in their homes. Cuz one of my council colleagues actually said to me is, if your house is worth a million dollars, just take a hundred out. That simple. The understanding of not understanding what a home equity line is, that's devastating. Devastating for residents. So we're not candy coating anything. I'm not hiding anything. Everything you see has been public. I have told my council colleagues what they're doing is dangerous to our community. We still don't see the information how we got here. The way they want to get out of it is by taxing. Here's the other piece. Hey, it's only this much money. If I hear that again from people, I'm going to lose my mind. Because understand this, and I'll end with this. What did we talk about one of our first meetings subcommittee? Rent control. Then we talked about a transfer tax. Then we talked about a registry fee. And then we talked about overrides. But it stops there, right? Oh no. Because my brother, I'll use my brother for example, just got his house assessed. An additional $400 a month. Now, he's a young man, works very hard, hopefully he can recover. But then, Kelly did some homework, and we found out his assessment in 20 to 24 that's starting now, he thinks it's over with the assessment side. But Kelly, what did we say, what are we hearing?
[George Scarpelli]: It's going up again. So have we heard any of that in their homework? No. But it's only $400. But let's go a step further. A minimum $200 million renovated high school. Who fits that bill? You. We want a new high school. A new one. Take it down to one new high school. Looking at $400 million. You people don't understand what that number equates to. It's dangerous. It's scary and it's dangerous. So I didn't want to bring you out to scare you, but I brought you out to wake you up. This group never wanted to say no to an override. But we heard it from the smartest educational mind that I've been around. that we haven't seen enough creativity, we haven't seen enough information, and there has been no transparency to show that we need this. We've talked to our fire department, our firefighters are saying, don't hurt our residents. Don't build something just to check a box. We don't want the fire station. Done. So if they're saying it, And I've spelt it out for everybody. It's a very simple process right now. Fix the budget with the $5 million in free cash. Let's move forward and think of different ways to be creative. Let's be shocking and look at new growth and development. Something we haven't seen. Am I lying, Ricky? How many 40B jobs did we lose? Three, how much money just in permits with those three projects? Millions of dollars. And then tax revenue. You've done the homework on it. How much? $16 million. So that's one building. So again, these aren't lies. These are true numbers. And again, you wish you had a platform But I've been shut up way too easy. Well, in this forum, I'm not. And you're my voice. You're helping us spread the message now. So this is what we need. We have a list right now of over 600 volunteers. 600 volunteers. We have captains that are gonna be doing standouts that we have about, what, 60 to 80 people? 60 to 80 people already signed up to do standouts. I'm asking all of you, October 15th, Zach, if you wanna come on out, we're gonna meet at Hormel Stadium. Everybody's gonna come out and we're gonna take our message and we're gonna go to the neighborhoods and we're gonna knock on doors and we're gonna give people the information that no one in the city has given them to help them understand. Understand the rest of everybody else, don't be afraid. If a school kid member knocks on your door and says shame on you, be armed that you have the information right now. beyond that you know the truth. So tomorrow, when you go to the coffee shop, or tomorrow when you go next door and you talk to Dave and have a cold drink, sit down with him and say, hey, do you know about the overrides? Because the fire don't want it, the educational minds think it's absurd, and it's gonna hurt people. And here's the other piece that I seem to forget, and I don't ever want to forget this. I have lived in a, grew up in a home with tenants. My dad made sure that we treated our tenants with pride and with respect. And we made sure we kept our rent reasonable. So the fact that my brother took that, and we still have the same family there that have been there for 10 years. That family pays for a four bedroom in Medford. They pay $2,400. Pretty cheap. We all know that. He will not raise that rate. What people have to understand, if these taxes come about, taxpayers cannot handle this on their own. It's going to be passed down to the tenants. And renters are going to go through the roof. So I want to thank all of you for coming out tonight. Did I miss anything, Rick? Are you sure? He's my captain. Rick's going to tell me. You know, again, I will tell you, we've got great people working on this. I'm so excited for the energy. Right now, we have 260 signs already on the street. Steve's gone. We have 260 signs on the street, and we have another 200 here tonight. Make sure you take your sign, but make sure you leave your name and your address so we know you've taken it. And show your neighbors and just give us a call. override, when you vote for an override and we give the mayor six million dollars, even though they say that the money is going to go to the vocational school or art programs, that's not necessarily true. The money goes into the general fund to be used to the mayor's discretion. Okay, so again, There's a reason why we're here. $9 million in free cash. Those people that wanna know real simple what free cash is, free cash is the money that we approve for the prior year in the budget that the mayor does not use, does not spend, and then it gets certified and carried over. And then it goes into an account that she can do anything she wants with it. It's very simple. So I hope tonight what we really wanted to do is educate some people, bring them out, have them know what's going on. Understand that we'll be having, if you please sign up for the standouts, we'll be doing door knocking. But the big one is gonna be October 15th, Saturday, nine o'clock at Cornell Stadium. We're gonna be meeting there and we're all gonna be hitting the streets. We're gonna be going into the neighborhoods. We're gonna be knocking on the doors, talking to your neighbors, and letting them know that if this is voted through, it's not gonna hurt the children. The mayor's just gonna have to put the money that she's playing with back to where it's supposed to be and help our children and help our schools and help our seniors and our residents so they don't get killed with these taxes. So again, thank you all for coming. Have a safe ride home, and we'll talk to you soon.
[George Scarpelli]: We have to thank my team, there's so many of them, but I want to thank everybody that's here. If you're from All-Method, if you could just raise your hand. Just thanking you for being here tonight and helping. Thank you so much. We've had a few events. I know tonight's a tough, tough night. I know that we had about three different events tonight, but we said we need to do something because things are happening really quick. And the reason that we're here is because we wanted to talk about the Proposition 2.5 override and the debt exclusion. So there are three questions that will be on the ballot. I'll give you some more information later on after a few people speak. But one is the debt exclusion, which is for a new fire headquarters. I'm very fortunate that we have one of our union leaders from the fire department. Danielle Masolino is going to be here. She's going to speak in a little while. And proud to say someone that I called and asked his opinion because I think he is probably the the smartest educational mind, at least in Massachusetts. He's someone that I respect. And sad to say, I don't think people respect him enough until that person's gone. But I called this gentleman and I asked him some questions. And within five minutes, you just feel better because he just educates you with his knowledge. And I asked him if he can come out and spend a Friday night to come out and speak and give his opinion and what, you know, his perspective as an educational leader, someone that ran our school system for many, many years, still works at the state level, high level at the state, and he's gonna share some of his knowledge, and then we'll fill in some gaps that people had that had some questions, and we can help educate everybody so they understand what this means on November 7th. So right now, I'd like to introduce my friend Roy Belson.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm honored that a friend of ours who's worked so hard for firefighters to capture grants and take the pressure off our citizens in our tax base, Secretary for our union, Danielle Masolino is here. Welcome, Danielle.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Quick question. Is there anybody from the administration available to speak? The chief of staff or someone else from the mayor's office?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I have one question that I was informed by another city department that they were told that they needed to stop their negotiations because of fear of the outcome of the override so they didn't want to commit, I believe, to move forward with any issues with funding moving forward until they know what happens in November. So I'm a little curious if that's the case. Maybe we should look at, I know there are some issues that we see that are on here now that I wouldn't object to because I know it's time sensitive. If it's something that's really needed, I think we should move forward. But if there are concerns with the override vote and funding moving forward, that they're holding off negotiations, then I think it's something we need to talk about, Council President. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you, Mr. President. Uh, Mr. Randazzo again. Thank you for everything you do. I think that, uh, you are your, um, history and saving money for our community is second to none. And I think that everyone should realize that. But my question is, along with this, I've I've gotten many phone calls from the business district, and I know what some of the changes in parking in Medford Square that the discussion has been that there's going to be you know, the parking for the business community, um, on, um, on Salem Street next to that parking lot next to the I believe it's a national grid building their substation building. One of the concerns that the businesses has that there is no lighting in that lot. Is that been discussed by any chance? Um, we are office.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. All right. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, if I can.
[George Scarpelli]: A question on that topic. Is the elevator still currently out?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I bring this up because last night we had a very important meeting and I think everybody unanimously decided that having a community meeting with our senior citizens that we're having some confusion on what the debt exclusion and the override questions were. And I get had a few phone calls today. uh from uh representing people that are representing that uh our senior citizens and they were very concerned that uh will the elevators be functioning on october 15th and if not i think we need to seriously consider moving that committee to the whole meeting to a location where senior citizens can attend that meeting. I think it defeats the purpose of what we agreed on yesterday. If we have people that can't climb stairs. Is the 15th something that can work?
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, if we can, if we just have the clerk, if we can, as soon as Mr. Riggi gets us an update, if we can update the council with that, that'd be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Forgive me, that's a late hand Council President.
[George Scarpelli]: No, thank you, Council President. No, it's not the fire. I was, uh, was talking to someone from the negotiating team from our method police department and they were told during negotiations, I believe that negotiations will be delayed, um, for the fact that the override, um, might be in question. So because of that fact that we need to, um, hold off until we get more understanding or, or see what the vote would be. And, um, in November to move forward with their negotiations. Uh, the second part of that question is that if that is an issue, um, I'm under the impression that, uh, there's a negotiating line item. And if if that's not the case, could you educate me? And if there is a case that that it is, um, if you can let us know what we are with that as well because in my in my capacity when there's negotiations there's understanding that most municipalities have a negotiated line item that has funding already set aside and if we're holding that out because of fear that the override will not move forward and needing that funding. It could be construed of maybe as a fair tactic if the administration is moving in a for yes vote or it then leaves me a little befuddled if we don't have a line item when we negotiate with our union members. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, just with that, though, I just, I think it is a direct correlation of what we're asking for. I think that. If that is, and we do find that until until we get to our next regular meeting, where we will vote on these, these initiatives, I think that. the understanding that if we're looking at, and this is the case, if you do find research and they do come back and says, no, we did mention that. And if that's the case, then it's relevant for tonight's meeting. And the fact that if we do have questions about our financial question marks after the override and where, we're talking we're we're discussing this with a negotiating team then i think that everything has to be on the table when the mayor presents any sort of funding for anything right now um like i said there are things that are presented today that when it comes to a vote i i don't think i can hesitate because i think it's needed but there are some other things that we can look at and say hey i would like i would motion to sever and then look at the different options because of uh the need of funding if that's the case moving forward so i think there's a direct correlation of what i was told and what is on the agenda tonight so thank you mr president and thank you chief of staff nazarian thank you and thank you for being here councillor Leming um
[George Scarpelli]: yeah i apologize i just want to make sure if it's if i'm confusing councillor uh Leming i can clarify if he wants um the confusion is if there is an issue that's dealing with our city financial concerns and and one group or one situation is being um frozen for uh the the fear of lack of funding later on in November, then this would be a concern moving any money doctor to the next level, considering if there is some fear and I appreciate the chief of staff looking into it and hoping it's just a rumor, but I got it from a credible source. That's actually part of the negotiating team that said that that did happen. So I'd like to see maybe, maybe there's some misunderstanding there and get some corrections. But if you're confused with that, I can clear it up if you have any questions for me.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, if I can.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I understand that we have, we have, we, we can, we can respect, excuse me, we can, we can agree to disagree. But again, I think it's important that, um, if it does come to a climate when we need to petition to move funding around from different accounts, there are mechanisms that we could do that depending on what accounts. So I would say everything would be open until we understand the true financial picture on November 5th. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I think you have, I just got a text message, Mr. Clerk, that maybe I'm out of line, but there's people trying to get on the Zoom that had questions with that response. But like I said, I will move this forward and with a yes vote until we get more information. Thank you, Mr. President. Okay, thank you. Yeah, oh yeah, thanks. Yeah, no, it's Harold McGilvrey, the negotiating from the police department wanted to get on.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, okay. Yeah. Okay. Sorry. So it would be yes.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry, Mr. Clerk, did you call my name? Oh, I'd say no, I wanna hear more of what Council President is saying. I can't worry about his percentages.
[George Scarpelli]: Medford Happenings, I think, is a very vital asset to our community, as well as our Medford community cable. Access channel, I think that without a a Newspaper in Medford to get information out to our residents. It's so important that you're doing this So I thank you very much for doing this.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, it's a pretty in-depth opinion, I think. You know, we, as a city councilor, it's my responsibility and our responsibility to make sure that we are the financial stewards of our residents' budgets and making sure that our tax money is being spent appropriately. One thing we realized in our communities without, like I said, without a newspaper, we found it very difficult to get information out, and this being a good example. So a few months back a group was organized called All Medford and the All Medford group started to really educate and communicate and really bring pride back to Medford and it's been super successful. We've had hundreds if not thousands of people join our group, and when I say our group, I as a member, as our group. And we're now jumping right into a very serious, you know, situation and big step here in Medford, which is an override, Proposition 2 and F overrides and a debt exclusion. So what I'd like to do, if you don't mind, John, I'd like to start with explaining to our constituents and our viewers that there are three votes that they'll be taking. They'll be question six, question seven, and question eight. Question six is a debt exclusion for a rebuild of a new fire station headquarters on Main Street. That's a 30 million dollar project that I will share with you. The firefighters have come out publicly and they are not supporting the override for the fact that, you'll see a trend as I go through my speech today, but you'll see that there weren't really, the firefighters weren't involved in the final decision making of that fire station. And they're, In the conversations with the union leaders, one of the major issues is that there was really no, there was no partnership involved. No one, no firefighters were really involved in the final decisions. And what we were heard from firefighter Marcelino, Danielle Marcelino, who's the secretary for the union, she explained that they would not support the debt exclusion for the fire station because It was an inferior product and it's not set up for success as they move forward in the lives of future Medford firefighters. So with that, they said, you know, let's be responsible enough to share with the community that they would rather not let the citizens of Medford suffer with the tax just to check a box. So they responded back and they're not going to support it. So question six is about a new fire headquarters on Main Street. And question seven was presented from the mayor. for an override in question seven is $3.5 million of our property, our real estate taxes for our community for 2025 and from the general operations of Medford public school, $3 million for the Medford public schools, which includes but not limited for teachers, literacy coaches, behavior specialists, and administrative assistants and so on. Question 8 was put forth asking for a $4 million override tax from our real estate and personal properties for 2025 as well. And they're looking for increasing access to the arts and vocational programs and expanding classroom instructional opportunities. These are simple taxes and they were put forth, and I'll publicly say, as scare tactics from the administration. We can see that the overrides, and let me just educate everybody a little bit because some people don't really understand what a debt exclusion is in comparison to a Proposition 2.5 override. A debt exclusion is a tax to the community, to the residents, that will be put on their taxes every year until the project that it's funding is complete. So if it's $30 million for a new fire station, you would then start the clock with paying off that bond of $30 million. When that $30 million is paid, that tax will come off the resident's tax roll. So they won't see that tax anymore once it's paid. The misconception is the Proposition 2.5 override is very simple. You will get taxed a certain percentage from your home's assessed value, your real estate tax. Which is going up, by the way, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: And I'll explain more with that. And with that process, that's a tax that's being misled in the public by people that are saying that if it's just $400 for the year, it's not just $400 for a year. Okay, let's start off by saying that when that tax is starting is January of 2025. So it's voted in November Wow, it'll go into place starting in January of 2025 which our residents most of our residents Won't be prepared for that We'll now start that tax and at the end of every year There is some understanding that some taxpayers have reached out to me and said oh, yeah, then then it's done I said no It doesn't what ends up happening is that tax bump that you're going to see for this override will then compound every year Every year at least two and a half percent every year. It'll stay with you forever never goes away never goes away now in clear up a few other misconceptions The comment that we're hearing is, it's just this, it's just that, it's not true. We know that this council has put forth in the past rent control, transfer tax, a renter's and owner's registry fee, and what we're looking at down the line is a new high school. Something that has already been taken out of free cash to start that process. And we're looking at a close to a, if it's a refurbished, maybe $200 million. And if for a new high school, it's $400 million. Just for an example, neighboring community just did their high school. Debt exclusion was put in for over $240 million. It's $1,000 more a year in taxes for each household. $1,000 more for each household, okay. So it's not just what people are saying. Now, I know the other side, the Yes Group, has a calculator in place. They do. They do. And the calculator is misleading because we've had phone calls from different organizations, different people that have questioned that, saying that I put my address in and the number that's coming out is wrong because my assessed value and what they're saying my house is assessed at is totally wrong. So we've done our homework, and we reached out to the assessor, and the assessor has informed us that no one in his office has been involved in setting up any calculator for any organization to educate our community. So they know nothing about that. As a matter of fact, they also shared that the assessment team, our assessors, don't even understand how they can even conceivably work in an override if it was voted in in November because it's such a daunting task. So we asked, well, could you possibly put in place a calculator so residents can see what kind of an impact a true calculator through the assessor's office. He said no one's asked him to do that and he doesn't plan on doing it right now because they are so busy. And this is from the city's assessor. This is the city assessor. This is from the city assessor. So the understanding that it's just this much money, it's not. It's not. And I think that what I see as a trend that's bothering me is that our most vulnerable members of our community are threatened right now, and they should be. So if you're a senior citizen, you're living on a fixed income, if you are a veteran, if you are disabled, and you find it very difficult even just to survive right now, This could destroy them. Destroy them.
[George Scarpelli]: And that's a realistic option.
[George Scarpelli]: The misconception of some of my colleagues on the city council that Well, if the house is worth a million dollars, they could just take $100,000 out. And I share a story, and I won't give my neighbor's name because I love her.
[George Scarpelli]: Let's call her Mrs. Jones. Mrs. Jones bought her house for $50,000 years ago with her and her husband, raised her family, lives there today. She was a seamstress. Well, Mrs. Jones' husband passed away 15 years ago, but the home is now appraised at a million dollars. With her social security and her husband's retirement, it's very difficult for Mrs. Jones to survive in her home because her home is being assessed. And just for taxes alone makes it very difficult for the choices she can make, whether it's eating something special during the week or paying for her medication. So people don't realize the impact, and it's true impact. uh... so i i think that's important as hundreds people hundreds of people in the city just like in a right there is i mean let's be honest that's a big part of it i mean so this is really going to affect everybody what i mean what if you rent well and i think that people don't realize that unfortunately you look at you look at some people like mrs jones same situation right that on the two or three family met for it uh... you would see that the trickle-down effect, where they can't afford to pick up the total cost that's being added to them, that they would have to put it onto their renters. And they don't want to. I will tell you, my dad was a homeowner of a two-family, and we took a lot of pride in making sure that our tenants were secure enough in the rent that they can maybe move forward and purchase a house. And we were lucky that we had five great tenants and four have moved on to own homes, and the fifth, my dad's moved on to heaven for a few years now, but my brother now owns the home and he still keeps that tenant's rent reasonable for them. Unfortunately, the renters and, you know, you look at our tough students, they're going to be put in a bad situation as well. Because a lot of our tough students do rent, and that's going to impact them. Our small businesses, maybe you don't realize it, but when a family has to make a decision of just $400 or just X amount of dollars, they have to make cuts somewhere. And unfortunately, it's going to trickle down to our small businesses as well.
[George Scarpelli]: And I think what people have to realize, too, because we've done some homework. I know that there are people on the other side that would like to say that there are organizations, like All Medford, who really have taken the leadership in this fight against the override because they see how it hurts most of the Medford residents. that they've done the homework, and we have communications back and forth. I know that one member has talked with the assessor again, and just so people understand that own homes, your homes have recently been assessed. So you can see that hike. Then you see taxes that might possibly be added on. Then you look at an override for a new high school that's going to be added on. What people don't realize next year in 2025, Holmes and Medford will be reassessed again, but they'll be using the numbers from 2023. And why is that important? Our homes were assessed a lot higher in 2023 than they are today. So you're going to see a bump again in people's taxes. And it's funny that people that, you know, might not understand this because they don't own a home yet, but what they need to understand is that When the homes, they say in Medford, we're taxed low, and we are. We're very fortunate that our homes are taxed low. What they don't realize, the neighboring communities they want to compare us to. don't have the assessments that we do. So apples to apples, our numbers are pretty complimentary to our neighbors next door that might think that they have lower taxes. So it will play a huge factor in people's lives.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, if I can, John, I think people have to understand where this all started from. Yes, please. And what's important is they understand that we're hearing it too, people from all Medford are calling me and saying, George, I can't believe what they're saying about the people that are involved with all Medford. And again, people have to understand this publicly. The All Method group and the city council, George Scarpelli, has never, ever said, we are fighting. We never wanted an override. All we actually said was, where is the transparency? Explain to us the three most important things that I think that I've heard over and over again. That's important when you look at an override. One, how did we get here? Two, how do we correct it? And three, how do we never get here again? And what we did is starting the process of city council, and the people that want to say that George Scarpelli is not telling the truth, he's a liar, because that's out there too, and that's okay. But the difference between what they can say and what's proof, it's the magic of television. You can go to YouTube and watch every single meeting, and I'll tell everybody, if you're interested, start back from June 20th of 2023. That was our budget meeting, and it started there, John. We had our meeting, and prior to that meeting, all seven Councilors were pretty strong and pretty unified in the fact that what we were seeing financially was frightening, and we were not going to support the budget. The mayor's budget really lacked a lot of very, very important factors, and we said we're going to stand against it. Well, I believe it was Councilor Caraviello and I who walked into the chambers ready for our Tuesday night meeting, and Councilor Bears at the time came out of a meeting and said to Councilor Caraviello and I, he said, I just want to let you guys know that Council President Morell and I met with the mayor behind closed doors, and we came to an agreement. So we're going to vote for the budget. And I then said, well, what was the agreement? Because we heard nothing of an agreement. the people that we represent, their words and their wishes weren't expressed, and then we went on to that meeting. That meeting was true and it did happen, and we didn't know what the agreement was. I know that Councilor Bears said something about setting up a budget team and working better with our budget, and okay, very vague. Then we move forward to what we're seeing, and we hear that there was a financial task force that was created right after that agreement. And that financial task force consisted of the mayor, the chief of staff, Council President Bears, Council Vice President Kit Collins, and I believe leadership team from the school committee member Jenny Graham. So we didn't know what was going on. We never had any public meetings. We didn't see any minutes. We didn't see any notes. We didn't get any updates of any financial team working together and what direction we're going into. So we fast forward to the meetings roughly around in May, and we can look at the meetings in May and June. We had discussions with Council President Bears, and I said, when are we hearing this information? When is a community going to get involved and be part of this financial task force results? And the question was, we came to results, and we'll be notified, and everybody will be informed in a meeting. I said, okay. Well, in typical fashion, on Thursday or Friday, we get an email from the mayor's office and her communications team, and they come out with an announcement that the financial task force has worked diligently to find the alternative solution for our gap in our financial crisis. At the time, it was $5 million coming from the school side. And what the financial team expressed on a Friday presented on a Tuesday was an override and dead exclusions to bring us whole. Now why is that frightening? that meeting I had put in place an option that Medford had over 24 million dollars of free cash. And for those people who don't know what free cash is, free cash is the money that is certified through the state that the city is approved for the budget that year. So Let's say, just for discussion's sake, let's say the budget was $10 million and you only spend $8 million. Well, that $2 million gets carried over into an account, what's called free cash, which is the taxpayer's money that was supposed to be used for the citizens and the community that fiscal year. Normally you see communities, but I think you'll see between 3 and 5 percent of an overage that carries over and then goes into that free cash account. Okay. Well, in Medford you saw an astronomical number that brought us for the last few years up to $24 million. So I came forth with an option. a pretty logical option that said, well, let's take that $5 million out of free cash, let's create a rainy day account, take $5 million out, let's level fund the school department so we eliminate any fear and confusion to our teachers, our students, and our educational process. And as I was presenting that, one of my council colleagues decided that they were going to call what we call in our rules is Rule 21. Rule 21 stops any discussions for that Councilor for that week, and you can follow it up the next week. Well, the reason why that was important, we knew that the next week the mayor was going to come in and present the budget. So they halted me from doing that, and then as we moved on, we moved on to the next meeting, but the next meeting, there was a meeting between the next meeting, I was going to come in as we were presenting this and I was going to stop the meeting and use rule 21 so we can ask can we have public meetings, a public participation, be more transparent about what the financial task force did, what are the numbers, who did you work with, what financial minds did you work with. went to the meeting, the city council leadership decided to suspend the rules and impose the freezing of the option to use rule 21. That means I couldn't stop the meeting. That means everything was pushed through.
[George Scarpelli]: We had a free cash $5 million solution.
[George Scarpelli]: They didn't want to hear it because the so-called financial task force came up with a $7.5 million override.
[George Scarpelli]: No. As a matter of fact, it was the total opposite. I know that this administration used the words transparency. It's a very important word that got the mayor elected years ago.
[George Scarpelli]: And it's been totally opposite. So if you allow me, we can go to the next meeting, John, when we had this next meeting and I reached out to our state delegate and asked him what happens if they impose and suspend the rules again. Well, I went to the meeting, and they said, you know, so they said, George, you can impose general law, mass general law 43, section 22. That supersedes the Methodist City Council rules. It would end the meeting so you can have more transparency and ask for more meetings. So as I did that, they suspended the rules again, eliminated the vote for rule 21. I invoked section 22. They then said, no, you cannot use it. against the rules, but they did that. And in that meeting, you realize we couldn't move forward because, again, we have a message coming out on a Thursday or Friday, and on Tuesday, we're going to vote on millions of dollars in the budget. So we're going to push the budget through without having money. So I'll revert back to a few weeks, a week prior when a constituent called and said to Councilor Bears, what if the override fails? And his words were very strict and direct. And he said, it'll be devastating to our schools and our children and our teachers. And my words exactly were, we have a solution. Why would we not take that five million out of free cash, put everybody at ease, and then work together and find a solution with those three important things? How do we get there? How do we correct it? How do we never get there again? And so I'll give an example. I've had the honor of working with one of the best mayors in the Commonwealth for years, Joseph Curtatone. And we talked, and I said, Mr. Mayor, I'm at a crossroads. What would you do with this situation? He says, well, I don't have to make it up. I'll show you. And he sent me a bunch of information. And in 2009, some of them were in the same situation. They needed an override. But before he did that, he opened up a forum financial minds from Tufts University, financial minds from Harvard University, MIT, his own financial team that works with his budget every day. He brought in community leaders. He brought in bank leaders. He brought in free support from the state that have gone through this process. And they had open, transparent meetings to say, how do we get there? So they focused on fees and fines for traffic and parking, which those fees came in and then supported the school department. They had trash and builder's permits and fees there that went to the roads and sidewalks and streets. And that finished that. And then for the future, there's a little job called assembly row that they started. And assembly row stopped any future issues of fear into any overrides because it was a new revenue stream. Something that in Medford, when you look at our issues and concerns, when you talk about our budget, I know our council wants to talk about new growth being the best it's ever been. That's not true. We haven't had one shovel in the ground for one project since the mayor has been in business.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I'll give you a couple for example. We had at the time three projects a few years back that were ready to go. They were called 40B projects. And the 40B projects, they're special projects that you're giving more of a freedom to have that opportunity to build and develop without any question because you're really focused on affordable housing, something I think we drastically need here in Medford. The mayor fought these projects to the fact that not only knowing that you were going to lose these in court, and she did, then she appealed them and she lost, she did, and unfortunately she stretched this out so long that these developers just turned and took their business to other communities. So I know that Councilor Caraviello was very involved in these situations, and he talked about, you know, even for one job, you looked at $3 million in permits and fees. That would have come to the city and nothing. That would have come to the city, yep. And then a new tax base of maybe even more, like $4 to $6 million, I believe, for our tax base. You want to see where the gaps are. That's where they are. And that could be corrected if the mayor really puts her actions to her words, because nothing's being done except the beer hall, which is very good, by the way.
[George Scarpelli]: But that's not going to bring the revenue we need. So when you see the issues that we have, and we see our going back to this financial task force, we're seeing that there really isn't much information. For instance, If it's not for you right now to bring this forward, most of our residents don't even know what's going on. I'll give you a couple. I had a constituent say, George, $7 million for a new high school. Why wouldn't we do it? And I had to explain to them, $7 million is for a new high school. And that's what people are spinning as the truth. And it's not. This is very, these are very dangerous times. Now, I will tell you, as we lead forward to this, when these meetings are going on in May and June, the fear came out. The students, the kids, the teachers, our educational process. If this doesn't happen, they will be hurt. It'll be devastating. And then I said, geez, I tell you what, as a city councilor, when we started talking about a newsletter, city council newsletter, we met five times in subcommittee. It's an open process to talk about a newsletter. But when you talk about $7.5 million, not one public meeting, not one explanation of what the process was as they went through. I believe that, I don't even think that they had a person from the finance team, you know, directly involved at every single meeting, because, and the reason why we don't know, this so-called transparent mayor had put this in as a task force so they didn't have to follow rules. So there were no minutes, there were no public participation, and we truly don't know really how we even got here. All we hear is from the side that wants it is that this is why it's going to affect our schools. We don't ever, we never give enough money to the schools, we don't give enough money to the city, and we're very, very undertaxed. You don't fix issues financially through taxation. You fix it with new growth and being creative. And we aren't doing that. And this is what's frightening to me.
[George Scarpelli]: And I appreciate that. And I think that when we talk about bringing me on tonight and why I jumped at the opportunity, because people don't really know what's going on, especially our senior citizens. When I bring it up to them, it's funny because people say, George Scarpelli is A, B, and C, whatever fits their dialogue, and he's totally against it. I never said it was against an override. What I said was, let's bring everything forward, let's sit down at the table with all the stakeholders and people that are involved in finance and find a solution together. And we didn't do that. And here we are right now. We're being told that we're pushing this, we're fighting this because we're angry. I'm not angry. I was one of the Councilors way back in the day. I think I was the last Councilor to do this, and I think in the history of Medford. But I came forth years back. offering a debt exclusion for a new fire station. And at the time, I believe it was $17 million. I met with the financial director because she had an open-door policy and she was amazing, Aleesha Nunley. And we sat together and I said, Alicia, how do we do this without hurting our seniors and our most vulnerable, our handicapped community and our, excuse me, our disabled community and our veterans? And she eliminated that demographic and came back, and I believe it was $17 a month for a new fire station. It was voted down. As a matter of fact, I believe Councilor Bears was on that committee that voted it down. And so to say that George Scarpelli's city councilor has this agenda just to be negative, it's not true. Not one time has anybody discussed how this affects all of our homeowners, and most importantly, our seniors.
[George Scarpelli]: So if I can, I know that we talked about this so-called crisis. And I want everybody to understand this. We had a so-called crisis, financial crisis, that was presented. Now, if you watch the video from June 2020, June 20th of 2023. This is a city council meeting. That's a city council budget meeting where I said, don't do this. You're going to destroy and devastate our community financially this year. And I felt like Nostradamus. I hated it, but it came true. So we all have to understand something though. This financial crisis where we had an opportunity to look at free cash and the city knowing what was coming down the line, and I'll get to that, silencing me and moving forward to the vote to put this on the ballot. Then we find out a few weeks after that vote that Medford was now receiving nine million more dollars that were certified by the state that the city administration did not use during the fiscal year. So the reason why we're in financial crisis is because the city administration didn't use the money accordingly that we the citizens and the taxpayers put forth that we voted on for our budget season. So now let's move forward now, this financial crisis. As a city councilor, I took what happened at those meetings pretty serious. I reached out to the state auditor's office and the attorney general's office and how this was handled. The auditor's office, Mr. Zaglia's office representative said, George, they said, their office said, we can't get involved unless the city council votes on it, and then the mayor approves it, and then we would come in and do an audit for you. And what's important, people saying, no, no, the audit, we already do an audit. Why should we pay anybody else to do an audit? Not true. The audit that comes in that we do every year is very simple. The person, the group that comes in and does the audit, they look at apples to apples. They say you start with 10 million, you spent 10 million, done. With the state audit, it comes in and it looks at the processes. So they could tell us, as you look at the process, if the council voted on it and the mayor approved it, you could then see how did we get here and what mistakes we've been making over the last few years because we consistently have millions of dollars of free cash. So that's voted down. It's voted down, city council votes it down, so we can't move forward. Then you move on to the next step, the next week, right before our summer break. And my fellow Councilors vote in during this financial crisis now. They vote in a raise for themselves, they vote in a raise for the school committee, and they vote a raise in for the mayor. And again, John, if you're in financial crisis, if in your home you were having financial issues and concerns, would you then carelessly, let me say, spend the tax mayor's money on something you truly didn't need? And this is what we're seeing right now. What we're seeing right now with these overrides, and I think it's very important. We had a great evening the other night with Al Medford. We brought in financial minds. We brought in great speakers. We brought in, like I said, we brought in the fire secretary, the union secretary. They came in, gave a pretty extensive response on why they will not support the debt exclusion, how the city should not support a $30 million fire station. Roy Bellson, probably one of the smartest educational minds in the state, our former superintendent, broke everything down for our citizens to see where the gaps are. And he has shown us that we do not need an override. We just need to manage our funds better. And with that being said, you'll be looking out. I think that those speeches will be public very soon. So pretty excited about that.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate I'm sorry, but I'm very I'm very passionate about this because it's gonna hurt a lot of people and Unless we know how we got here and how we're going to fix it and how this never happens again, I beg our constituents, I beg our residents, do not vote for this override. We have an option that we still have, I believe, $23 million of free cash that we can stop the mayor from spending anymore, taking that $5 million so our schools, our children, our teachers are safe. We're not gambling on an override vote. And please remember our seniors and our residents that the so-called just 300 or just whatever isn't looked at as whatever. This is people's lives and whether they can stay in their homes forever. And if their tenants, their renters can afford a rent hike that might be coming down the line. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: And again, if people still want to question that, jump on any of the YouTube meetings from City Council and you could see firsthand how it came about. This isn't something we made up. These are all truths. And I question everybody out there. How many people that are for or against it have actually seen what the options are or had any interaction with our city leadership talking, discussing, or teaching them what that vote really means. So that's a wide eye-opening example, John, that people can't look at George Scarpelli or Al Medford and say they're liars and they're evil because they don't approve or believe in one organization's vote and have that open mind to really think about it, because it will impact a lot of people.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: what we're looking for, so you can explain, yes, Dance, what you were asking for tonight. Yeah, I'd like to help the gentleman, but if we can't ask, I think we should table this until we get further information. I know that we hate to move forward if we don't, he doesn't understand what we're asking as well. So sure. Is your partner coming tonight?
[George Scarpelli]: Um, we can put it, can I step aside and maybe call him and does he, does he speak English? Maybe I step aside. Is that okay?
[George Scarpelli]: If we can just move it aside so I can talk to him.
[George Scarpelli]: Cause I know what we push this aside a few times and we want to get it forward if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: Um,
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you for bringing this forward Councilor Lazzaro. I did talk to, uh, to, uh, Mr. DiRico and they are in full support of finding other mechanisms to make, to bring this program, uh, and make it whole again in the future. I think that being that it isn't part of our agreement, it is a Tufts University policy that they're trying to really move forward. I know that what he did mention that it is one person from Medford. And one thing that I was happy about that those people that are enrolled right now will still have the full scholarship, and we'll finish the program in whole. So that's a piece that I thought was very important. But again, some of the people that were enrolled are, I think New Bedford, he mentioned some people out of the country, out of state. So it's a very diverse group that Tufts offers this program, but you do come across, as he said, Tufts University would love to do everything, but with the process and understanding paid tuition, free tuition, and finding that balance. I think that's what Tufts is really trying to find to make sure that this moves forward. So, again, I don't, what I, the message I received from Morocco is that they are, they will look high and low to make sure that this will continue, but it definitely needs a pause right now. so they can come back on stronger footing. So, um, and like again, I said, I know that there is one person from Medford and my biggest fear was if we're cutting this program with that person, not be able to fill what they started. And he said, absolutely not there. Everybody that's in the program right now. I think he said it was five that are all going to move forward and all going to finish with the, uh, what they promised with Tufts promise. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: We can, yep.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, President Pierce. We talked with our partners from the market and answered all the questions we needed. There were some questions that needed to be completed today during one of the process that was brought forward with the health department. All the documents and everything was signed off today. So everything is in order. So I'll move forward for approval, Mr. President. Well, you know, sooner than later, right?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Now again, everybody has a platform. I'm sure that everybody knows that I am for voting no on the override. My fellow Councilors are supporting it. So, uh, that's not a secret. I think the, the biggest fear as we're going through, uh, respecting to disagree, to disagree for both of our, our, uh, our viewpoints, I think what's important is that we have to hear what senior citizens are bringing forth. I've heard everything from, I think I've talked to maybe 30 senior citizens in the last probably six days, because now the word's starting to get out. And there's so many views that are so confusing. One person said to me that, her and her friends that were together at the table said, Councilor Scarpelli, why would you oppose a $7.5 million new high school? That's a great fee. That's a great price, right? and the understanding that truly, the residents of the city don't know what is even on these ballots, these ballot questions, because we haven't informed anybody. The process stated on both the state site and if you visit other sites that have either passed or failed their overrides, you've seen a robust response process where there were informative sessions within their community so people were educated. So when they made that choice, they understood the impact in their lives, in their neighbors' lives. And I think that we've done a major disservice. We're actually two weeks away from the start of early voting. And the questions from the most vulnerable people in our community, And I can publicly have said it a thousand times, this group, the financial task force that was put together, came back, we haven't seen minutes, there was no public participation, there was no information session. So it's now regulated to people going to the elections office and they're giving them a form that just reads what the override questions are, six, seven, and eight, and that's it. So, and again, I reached out to the director at the Council of Aging, and I asked if there's a possibility. Now, it doesn't have to be my view. It could be Councilor Bears in the yes team and Councilor Scarpelli in the no team, but can we have an information center at the senior center so we can inform our seniors and we have the director that can reach out to all of our senior citizens in the city whether they own a rent because when you hear the stories of some of these seniors saying geez yeah we i did the calculator but it wasn't right because my house is appraised at 880 000 shame on you i can't believe that you did that but But when I did the calculations, it said 600,000. And so they had questions with the city assessor. And so they came to me about questions about the assessor, about their homes being assessed. And they're not wrong. The city assessor doesn't have the true numbers because he's not prepared for this and he wasn't involved in this process. So when you talk about the ramifications in taxes, we have, It goes both ways, because we had someone say, George, is it true I'm going to pay $5,000 more in taxes? And I said, unless you want a $10 million home in Medford, I don't see that happening. But that's the fear that's true. It's really happening. And we do have people that, whether we want to believe it or not, They have to make decisions whether $400 a year could impact what medications they're gonna purchase, or if they can travel to see a child, or if they can figure out if they can go out to dinner. That's how scared they are. And the question was, how do they get there? And I said, I don't know, because we don't know. Because like I said in the past, I've tried to put through a debt exclusion. But what I did when I worked with the financial team and the city assessor at the time, they showed us the breakdown with eliminating our most vulnerable residents. That's our seniors, our residents with special needs and our military. And they broke it down for us so you could see it. And that was a question I had with the city assessor. I said, when will you have that? And he said, unfortunately, you probably won't see that till the end of October, the true breakdown. And again, he, to, to, to, move forward with that, the fear that people don't understand that in 2025, these senior citizens homes are going to be assessed again, but not at the 2025 rate of housing, but at 2023, which was a very good year. So that means the homes are going to be a price higher than it really should be. So there are so many fear factors in there. And to go back to what I I talked to the director of the Council of Aging, and she said, unfortunately, I have to run it by the mayor's office. Anytime, as a city councilor, I wanted to go to the senior center, I would call and say, I'd like to come down and introduce myself and buy ice cream. We've probably all done it, and it was never an issue. When I called the next day and I said, can you please let me know if we can do this? And her words were, unfortunately, the mayor responded and said that we need to get legal representation, whether we can go and sit with our seniors to help them understand what this process is. Now, don't get me wrong, there's probably some that are for it, there'll be for it, there's some against it. The problem is, If I hear the word transparency come out of this office and this team, I might vomit because this is totally the opposite of what transparency is. It's the total opposite. It's like bizarro world. What's transparent? Whatever the opposite is, this is what we've done. And again, social media loves it. Councilor Scarpelli never, ever once has said, I don't want an override. What I'm saying is, first, let's see if we need the override. Let's publicly work together to figure it out and stakeholders throughout the whole community figure it out. Figure it out, because if you go on these different websites and you look at what override means, so let's say the MTA, they have a great blueprint. And they said, before you go out to do an override, you make sure you get the buy-in from stakeholders. And those stakeholders would be your superintendent, your senior citizens, your business community, your students. We did nothing of that. So what I'm begging this council to do join me in asking the mayor to hold a session, hopefully next week together in this chamber as a form of a motion that we hold an information session that seniors can come into this chamber and we can explain what the override is, how we got here. Like again, I'm gonna say it again, in every community that I've researched, and I've done a lot of research on this now, the three most important pieces when you talk about overrides, how did we get there? How are we going to correct it? And what are we going to do so we never have to go there again? We don't know how we got here. Although we want to say that, you know, the administration for years past, I don't disagree. I don't disagree. We've done a terrible job in former leaderships to really keep things up to par. That's not disagreeable at all. But where we are today, think about this now. And I tried to explain this to seniors. This is what's scary to them. If on November 5th it's voted in, the process that the mayor has called for, that their taxes will be, you'll see those taxes starting in January of 2025, right away. No time to plan, no time to understand, even that, and I'd love to hear it, it's only $37 a month, it's only $40 a month. That's farce. Because as homes are being assessed, they're getting taxes higher. As homes are being assessed, CPA taxes are rising. As homes are being assessed, you're adding these $40 a month. That, in their new tax bill, it's not $40 a month. To some people, they're looking at four, five, $600 a month. I know because I've seen it. And it's disingenuous to sit back as a council to say, we're all about affordable housing. We're all about making sure that we want to keep residents in their homes and we're going to fight for them. Remember all those buildings that developers are coming in and we had all those people that are wearing buttons and we're all rah-rah-ing? Well, we have thousands of those people. that we represent every day that are telling us, stop, because the only outcome for them is going to be selling their home and finding an alternative place to live. So again, in a form of emotion, Mr. President, I make the motion that the city council, as a team, ask for an open meeting for all of our senior citizens to have an opportunity before the start of early voting, because as they said, the voting starts, I believe, Tuesday the 16th. So it's important that they come and they hear, they get the answers that we need. Now, again, it might be yes. And I'll have to respect that. And it might be no, and you'll have to respect that, but at least give the seniors an opportunity to understand the impact, to understand the process, because that's the other piece that really bothers a lot of people. I can keep going, but I don't want to make it more of a platform than it sounds. But I beg my colleagues to vote yes to ask the mayor to open the city council chambers maybe next Wednesday night for the senior citizens to come in and inform them of what's happening. Thank you so much.
[George Scarpelli]: That's great. And if we can, uh, council bears, if you can ask the mayor to, to allow the director of a council of aging to reach out, to give the opportunity to reach out to all the senior citizens. So they're informed, um, because a lot of people don't have this platform and don't follow social media and without a newspaper, it's very difficult that they don't know what's going on. So if we could do that, I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, then that's great. So what I'll do is I think the Freedom of Information Act that was presented for information that was gathered through that task force and the emails from the assessor, we could bring it that night so everybody can see it. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: No, no, it's just an open forum. It could be any member that has a background that can sit and meet with them. It could be a override professional from the city or the state that would go in and talk with them. But unfortunately, the mayor mentioned that we need legal representation.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Just so I'm clear, so what you brought up earlier, just to be clear, because I want to make sure that I'm not speaking out of turn. So you met with the assessor, but the calculation wasn't part of the assessor's team, correct? Just so I'm clear with that.
[George Scarpelli]: The calculation that's being put out by the group that's, the four method group, the four yes group.
[George Scarpelli]: It's not the assessor.
[George Scarpelli]: That's wonderful, Matt. But the question I had was, because I want to make sure, because the emails that we have, when I speak with the assessors, I don't wanna talk out of turn, because I hate to be called a liar, because that happens a lot lately, that what the assessor's words were, and an email, we'll get it for us, that they had no part of any calculations, and they do not have any of the calculations that normal communities, when they go through an override, they show a breakdown, and the breakdown says, override ramifications or impact. It would be single family homes, two family homes, three family homes. Cause I have the email that states that it will not be ready. Those type of calculations that we're seeing didn't come from his office. So I just want to make sure when we meet, I don't want anybody to go around saying that this is contentious because I know the calculations and you're correct. It's from the state and we understand that, but there's a lot of, right. So there's a lot of variables that aren't factored because I know firsthand because I sat with a resident. that the calculations that are out there that state that his house is appraised at X, but is truly Y, it's not true. It's not apples to apples. So when I talked to the assessor, they said, of course not, because that's not tied in yet. So I just want you to know that we wanna make sure when we come to the 15th that we're not spending too much time looking at or talking about, oh yeah, I'll tell him the truth, I'm not telling the truth. I just wanna make sure. The assessor was not part of any calculations with any financial group of task force here in the city. That's their exact words. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I mean, that's not minutiae.
[George Scarpelli]: So not the newest ones.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. Next we have item 24-476, resolution to support question two, replacing the high stakes MCAS test graduation requirements for high school students. Council President Baez.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I think this is, it's very powerful when you read it.
[George Scarpelli]: See, I'm already voting with you. So powerful. So thanks.
[George Scarpelli]: Um, anyone else I just, as I think accounts of as they can scale and hope people sitting down out there is that but I'll be. I'm behind you 1000% with this initiative, I think as a former teacher, until you're sitting in a classroom, and you're working with a dedicated teacher who's bawling her eyes out. because you have a new ESL student that just moved to the city, to this country weeks ago, and that you have to try to explain to them what snow is. And knowing that impact, that it'll never succeed, and watching the pain, and realize that these are the questions that are leading decisions to what we're looking at as educators. I love the fact that I was a strong advocate for the portfolio format, where you really saw the growth of a student from beginning to end. And it made teachers, what we saw, it happened right in front of us, you took away the creativity away from teachers. And you took away so much talent because instead of them being creative to this individual student, individual classes, they had to focus on what this test forced you to do. It's been a long time coming, like you said, the graduation. My daughter Gianna, she is a Dean's List student, 4.0 student in college, 3.5 in high school, had the most difficult time passing the MCAS. So I saw it firsthand. A young lady that had to fight a speech impediment and understanding what the limitations that you have as a teacher to help a student with a disability is another most painful process to watch. So I agree with you. I hope we can go a step further and moving forward this initiative further to look at maybe using testing as one mechanism. but also followed up with some sort of portfolio process where you can really see our kids shine and our teachers shine. So I would, I appreciate that. So do we have any questions on Zoom? It looks like Julie, oops, Julie Roberto.
[George Scarpelli]: Yep. Name and address for the record
[George Scarpelli]: Next we have at the podium name and address of the record. You have 33 minutes and three days.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. We do have Mr. Cassinetti. You have name and address. We have your... Go ahead. You have to unmute, Mr. Cassinetti.
[George Scarpelli]: Yep, you're good.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. And again, to follow up with that council president bears, I think that when MCAS started the biggest issue with the teachers, where the teachers weren't really involved, it was politicians and bureaucrats was it, and there was a huge gap. Um, so I think now you're seeing, um, hopefully waking up and, you know, look at different options when we're assessing our children. So on the motion council bears second by council Callahan, uh, Mr. Clerk, call the roll. Thank you. How's that?
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, seven, the affirmative zero and the negative motion passes. Can I take this home for my wife? I can Dina, please. It's so powerful.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, President Beas. So I did take some time. I contacted our code enforcement officer and like we thought, Panda Express is has done a great job with everything they do and above board. So we really appreciate that. But as I went through and talked to some neighbors, I think there's gotta be some consistency with our decision. We voted to keep the permit, the hours of operations for Raising Cane, Dave's Hot Chicken, Then we have the wings wing stop. I think all of those restaurants and those establishments have a schedule from 11 o'clock to 11 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. and I think that we've heard for some neighbors that live directly across the street and and that there are some residents in that area, unfortunately, directly across the street. So I wouldn't be able to support a special permit at this time. I think that under the umbrella of being consistent, respecting our neighbors and the past outcomes and decisions that we made for local establishments that are in that vicinity, I would recommend that we do not support a special permit at this time. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you Councilor Bears, Councilor President Bears, and thanks Councilor. It's time to bring this forward. For someone who does manage this type of facility in neighboring communities, I think it's going to be important to get the cost analysis because Uh, community in financial crisis, as we are right now, looking at Porter parties at a lot of our facilities could be very, very, very expensive. Um, what would be what would be, uh, what we've done in, uh, in, in to. hold the burden off our constituents. We kind of maybe want to look into neighboring city facilities that we can use in different areas instead of the port-a-potties in different locations. So that might be something interesting to see if we could set up a map or a partnership with city facilities that residents that are using a certain park or location that they can use those sanitation facilities. Um, I will tell you it is a a huge expense. Um, it's a lot of money. And like I said, um, when we look at apples to apples that are coming up pretty soon, it's something that's gonna be interesting to see where we're going to tighten our belts as a city. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, Councilor Bears. Thank you so much. And I very well put Councilor Callahan, but to further to expound on the free cash is the essential, the amount of money communities have over-budgeted. And according to the Mass General Department of Revenue, free cash represents the amount of community funds that are unrestricted and avail of appropriation. For example, the city of Medford has not had a city solicitor for many years. So that money would carry over year after year. Every year a salary from the city solicitor includes annual budget, because no one is receiving the salary. The amounts of that, if we put aside, city solicitor's salary goes into the city's free cash reserve for the city administration, the mayor, to use as they please if they need so. So how does the community use its free cash? Cities and towns in Massachusetts use free cash after it's certified. The Mass Department of Revenue is responsible for certifying free cash. After a city or town submits its financial information to the Department of Revenue, a community will receive its notification, the total amount of free cash, which is certified, therefore available for appropriation. Well, does Medford have free cash? Yeah, we do. Medford has free cash. As of September 10th, we were looking at a total of about $34 million. This is certified free cash, which means it's available to use. And especially in crises when you talk about underfunding a $5 million deficit in the school department, that's what that money could be used for. And then with the vision of financial minds working together to see if there are other avenues that we should use other than overrides, I feel it would be prudent for our community. So most communities, the four and 5% that's been mentioned, most communities, you see a two to maybe $3 million of free cash after every budget year. Now, you've consistently seen with this administration an absurd amount of money going into free cash because revenues were under projected. And maybe that's done for a reason, or maybe not. It's something that we would love to know with more transparency. Unfortunately, this community, our community, our leadership team, haven't done that. So it leads us down a very, very slippery slope and it's dividing this community. So while we have the free cash and have the opportunity to not put the fear mongering into the community about teacher cuts or school issues or our children, why not use the free cash and eliminate those fears and then sit down like we talked about in the past where I was shut down by this council to look at a more, um, transparent, open form of participation to see where we need to do these three things. One understanding how the city got to this financial situation to How are we going to fix it? And three, what are we doing never to see this ever again? And this council and this mayor and this administration haven't done that. So to ask for an override right now is just absolutely frightening, especially to the homeowners that are living on a fixed income that we're looking at possibly losing their homes. So in the same vein as my fellow councilor asked to vote for the override, I'm going to implore to our residents that This is two different cases, two different stories, and it's going to be important so people can understand the truth. And the truth is, the city has mismanaged its budgets and mismanaged its organization in the city for years. And we see this with a $9 million certified free cash. That is unheard of, my friends. So yes, it is true. When you do take money out of free cash, it could possibly hurt your bond rating. But when you have $34 million, taking $5 million out to make sure our schools and our children have no fear of what might happen down the line, why wouldn't we do that? So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, if I can, I'm sorry. I couldn't get my hand up fast enough. Can we sever this, please? Because I think with the financial questions we have in our community, I would support the traffic motion, but I think that we would have to look at this separate piece as something we can hold off until after the override vote is taken because If we are in fiscal crisis and this vote is taken in November and it's voted down, this could be crucial money to assist for the fraudulent process that was put forth to us where we hear all these cuts going to be made in the school department. So I would request we would sever this. in a motion and then uh and really think twice before we vote on any money paper right now um dealing with um dealing with uh with any any project that doesn't have to do with safety or our children seniors so thank you that's a formal motion thank you sever is there a second on the motion to sever
[George Scarpelli]: No.
[George Scarpelli]: Right now, for the November 5th ballot, we'll have question six, question seven, question eight. Question six is a debt exclusion, like I explained, is a tax that you'll be taxed until the project or the bond is complete, and then it comes off the tax. And that reads, That exclusion on fire station shall the city of Medford be allowed to exempt from the provisions of proposition two and a half, so-called the amounts required to pay for the bonds issued in order to pay for costs of construction, a new fire station headquarters to be located at 120 Main Street in Medford, including the payment of all costs related design, the project equipping and furnishing, the project site improvements and all other costs incidental to related there too. So you'll vote no, because that's been a lot of people's questions. George, I thought you supported the firefighters. Well, when you hear it straight from the people that I think Danielle put it perfectly when she said, we don't want to sound like the angry people. Instead, look to see what our firefighters have gone through, what our men and women have gone through in the last year. and how they've been treated. And yet again, they're gonna stand up and say what? What you're offering was not transparent, was not inclusive, was a decision made in a box, and the funding is gonna hurt our residents. And they're willing to stand up and say what? We'd rather not have our residents of Medford hurt financially for an inferior product. So please do not vote for question six. Thank you, Danielle. Question seven is funding schools and street repairs. Shall the city of Medford be allowed to assess an additional 3.5 million in real estate and personal property taxes for FY25 general operations of the Medford Public Schools. $3 million includes but not limited to funding costs for teachers, literacy coaches, behavior specialists, administrative assistants, nurses, and for regular facility maintenance and for FY25 general operations DPW, including but not limited to additional staff for road and sidewalk infrastructure repair for fiscal year beginning July 1, 2024. Okay, this question seven. $500,000, come on, for the roads and sidewalks. ARPA, when it was originally put forth, was directly supposed to go to infrastructure needs, roads and sidewalks. Not at all. So now we sit here and say we're going to give them $500. Thanks. This is an issue that I put forth years ago. We tried to put a sidewalk and hot tub crew together to save the city money because the mayor kept coming to us for $2.5 million bonds for sidewalks. And we never saw sidewalks being done. We could never catch up. And I know my colleagues say, see? See? We're right. We have no money. Not right. Wrong. And again, I love the dialogue. Public schools, teachers, literacy coaches, behavior specialists, nurses. The superintendent has already, the expert in the state has shared some amazing information. Have we been resourceful? Has the school committee and the school department been resourceful in creating revenue? No. I know my colleagues will say, again, he's not telling the truth because their social media sites tell you that. But I have shown everyone, very simple, meeting after meeting, and if you want to look up, watch them on YouTube, From step to step, we showed an avenue to come out of this without hurting kids or teachers or schools. We showed them that avenue through free cash. And what did they do? They imposed a rule to shut me up. So now we move forward. One of our members got a phone call from a school kid member. And that school kid member said, How dare you put a no sign on your lawn? Are you going to be happy when we lay off 40 teachers? Shame on that person. Because that's the same exact question I posed in the open meeting in front of everybody and said, why put the schools, the children, the teachers through this? Take the $5 million out of free cash, put the fear away, and then let's all get to the table and make the right decision for our community with an open and transparent process. So that, ladies and gentlemen, question seven, no. I like the drama behind this. Question eight's intense. Thank you. So question eight. This override will expand vocational programs and increase student access to the arts by giving us the funding to pay for new programming, staff to help students succeed, fix the school schedule at the level and increase educator and paraprofessional compensation to ensure living in competitive wages. Doesn't that sound expensive? Vocational. I believe what it is, Roy, you can help me if I'm wrong, is expanding the day, the school day, and the vocational day would kind of merge together. That's what we're asking for, right? I believe it's maybe through negotiations will be the biggest cost. Well, what we're looking at is nothing close to $4 million. Not even close. Not even close. Understand the trend here. Six, we heard. Seven and eight, education. Understand every single community that has fought for an override in their communities has used what? the children, and the schools. Don't hurt our children, don't hurt our schools. Well, I asked my colleagues, and we've heard people on the other side that's supporting this, where were you the meeting that you shut me up when we asked for free cash that we had? And you were there, and you still have it. So let's understand this. Now that you know the questions, let's go all the way back now. And let's make sure we get this and people can hear it, you can share it with your friends. All Medford, at no time have we ever said, we're against an override. We do not want it, never. That was never said. What we said, was let's fix what's wrong now with that $5 million. Let's bring everybody together to the table. Let's have an open and transparent process. And let's work together to make sure we, if the need is there, that we fulfill it together. And don't divide the community. But this is what has happened now. Now we're dividing. Now it's yes or no. And I'll be honest with you. As a responsible member of this community, if I didn't think now that we're here, there's nothing we can do, we'd have to step away, I'd step away. But we have $34 million in free cash. $34 million in free cash that has not been used that can recover this funding and make sure that we do this process correctly. This is what we're talking about. And for those who don't know, Just a quick step-by-step so you understand it's never quick with me. We had our budget meeting last year, the year before last. And my colleagues were in unison, Councilor Caraviello was there, Council President Beas was there, and we were all together in the process that we cannot support this budget. It's too dangerous. So we were all for it. Until the night of the meeting, Councilor Caraviello and I stood there, and our council leadership team came out and said, hey, we just met with the mayor behind closed doors, and we're gonna vote for the budget. They've come to an agreement. What agreement? I didn't know what agreement it was. Councilor Caraviello and Councilor Knight didn't know what agreement it was, but there was some sort of agreement. Well, as this grew, we kind of realized what the agreement was. A financial task force was created. A school kid member, two city Councilors, the chief of staff, and the mayor. Five people with no background in financial battles. Nothing. At least not enough to lead us to the spot we need to be. So we move forward. This financial task force is meeting. We don't hear anything. There are no minutes. There's no information. We're told we're going to get in a meeting before we do anything. Well, you hear rumblings, so we call for a meeting. So we have our city council meeting. And I believe it was the week before we had a subcommittee meeting, and a very smart red They said, so if you ask for an override and it doesn't pass, what does that mean? That means devastation for the school department and our children. Imagine. So I came back the following week and I presented a plan that said what? Use our free cash, let's come to the table and do the right thing for our community. and let's not leverage our kids in our schools. But guess what happened? It's called Rule 21. Council Scarpelli shut down, can't speak. And this is how we're getting messages. The Financial Task Force's plan was an override plan. That was what they came out with. We asked for the minutes, we asked for more information. How did we get there? Who was involved? No answer. Now maybe the other side, because my friends are telling me, George, they're beating you up, they're beating you up. That's fine. But this is all true. This is all on tape. So, typical fashion, Friday we get emails from the mayor's office with $7.5 million. Tuesday we come to a meeting, we're gonna vote on it. As a responsible city councilor, I will now invoke our Rule 21, close the meeting, and ask for an open meeting with everybody to talk about this in more depth. Something that's unheard of, has never been heard of, never been done before, but our council leadership suspends the rules of the meeting and imposes a vote to not invoke Rule 21. Done, you can't talk about it. But I will tell you, the council had five subcommittee meetings to talk about a city council newsletter. Five. And guess what that, that's free, nothing. But, the paper's adding up to $7.5 million and possibly more. They don't wanna talk about it. So, what do we do? We move on to the next meeting and I said, okay. I reach out to my state representative and I asked him, what is the plan? What can I do? And they said, okay. Legal from the state said you can now invoke Mass General Law 43, section 22. That supersedes any method rule, shuts the meeting down. Well, we get to the next meeting. Our leadership team does the same exact thing. Suspends the rules. Imposed, says they cannot impose rule 21. I then invoke section 22. Council leadership says, no, you can't do that. Against the rule, against the law. Because what was gonna be said is this. And listen closely, because this is how real communities do it. In 2009, working in the city of Somerville, Mayor Joe Curtatone was at a crossroads with his community. Big cuts looming. He convenes a group, a working group, a financial working group that consisted of financial minds from Tufts, MIT, Harvard, banking leaders. You had the Sloans from Century Bank. You had his financial team present. You had community leaders and business leaders all in a row. And they worked on a plan because they said you needed to figure out three things before you wanted to go to an override. One, how do we get there? We still don't know how we got here. At least publicly, there's nothing been mentioned. Two, how do we fix it? Three, how does this never happen again? That's what we were taught. Well, they came out and they said, okay, this is what we're going to do. We're going to look at traffic and parking fees. Not going to make people happy, but they're going to take that money. They're going to increase those fees. They're going to take that money, and that's going to be dedicated solely to the school department. Boom. Need taken away. Next. We need streets and sidewalks. How do we figure that out? The focus is fees and fines for trash and building. And boom. Developers pay for that. And then the third piece, the most important piece, they sat together and they said, well, what can we do so this never happens again? How do we bring Somerville out of this? Well, they started this little project called Assembly Row. And now, whether you like it or not, there's a lot of money coming into the city. Now, maybe you might question the growth, maybe question how they got there. That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is, that was an open process with financial minds that sat together to find a solution. What has happened here, both in the fire department and the school department, it's been done in a vacuum. Nobody knows. I know that a member of the community did file a FOIA request asking information for, we're waiting on that, hopefully we get that soon, that we can share with the community of what was shared, minutes, any notes, anything taken with this financial group? Who were the professionals they might have brought in that we don't know that could have helped them? Nobody. And here we are today, middle of September, people still don't know that there's an override vote. Like Councilor Caraviello said, he had explained to a person yesterday, why are we fighting it? $7.5 million for a new high school? That's great. But this is the problem. This is the problem. So people are saying, you know, but, you know, Councilor Scarpelli shouldn't be doing this. He's a city councilor. I don't give a shit. I'm going to fight for what I think is right so every citizen is heard. Because I will tell you, it's not that I'm new to this, or I wouldn't do this, or I wouldn't have the guts to do something like this, because There were three former Councilors in this room, and only one of them, sorry Rick, only one of them put forth a debt exclusion that was probably put together by the best financial mind in Medford, an Aleesha Nunley, and we looked at the process of creating funding for a new main fire station on Main Street. And it was so simple. We would exclude senior citizens because you know what? You're hurting. Senior citizens are hurting. The vulnerable community, our disabled, our veterans, eliminate that group, those groups, and see what we can do. And I believe at the time it was $17 a month. We could swallow that, couldn't we? But that was with the process that gets started. Even with this process right now, nobody knows what's going on. We still don't know what's happening. Nothing's been posted. I know there's rumblings that money's already being spent from free cash out of $34 million. Nothing's been done yet. So having this meeting tonight is so important, this fundraiser's so important. Because I tell you, I gotta thank so many people. The restaurants that donated, LaCasha's, Ronnie's Place, Richie Razzo's from Razzo's and Avellino's always donate. Thank you so much. The thousands of dollars that were donated just the other day was amazing. And guess where that money's coming from? You. hard-working, method residents that want to do anything they can and fight. My neighbor, who's 84 years old, came to my house today and said, George, I can't come. He has $8. And I said, God, no, no, no. Because I tell you, what we do know is Kelly has done a great job with the real estate side and understanding the assessing side. We have Nate Merritt's been doing his deep dive into the calculator that they have on their site that says all you do is poke in these numbers, bam, it's always this much money, you can handle that. Bullshit. Because I'm gonna tell you straight up, $380 for a person might sound not a lot of money, but some of the people I've talked to, And I keep saying it, I won't use her last name, but I love her dearly. I see Mrs. Jones. She said, George, help me understand this. I bought my house 50, 60 years ago. So $48,000, I believe she said. I think I tell people $50,000. But now my house is worth a million dollars. My husband died 15 years ago. I was a seamstress. My social security doesn't cover my taxes. So should I move? Some people want them to do that. Because I haven't heard one thing supporting our senior citizens. I haven't heard one thing how we're gonna help those homeowners that are struggling to stay in their homes. Cuz one of my council colleagues actually said to me is, if your house is worth a million dollars, just take a hundred out. That simple. The understanding of not understanding what a home equity line is, that's devastating. Devastating for a resident. So we're not candy coating anything. I'm not hiding anything. Everything you see has been public. I have told my council colleagues what they're doing is dangerous to our community. We still don't see the information how we got here. The way they want to get out of it is by taxing. Here's the other piece. Hey, it's only this much money. If I hear that again from people, I'm going to lose my mind. Because understand this, and I'll end with this. What did we talk about one of our first meetings subcommittee? Rent control. Then we talked about a transfer tax. Then we talked about a registry fee. And then we talked about overrides. But it stops there, right? Oh no. Because my brother, I'll use my brother for example, just got his house assessed. An additional $400 a month. Now, he's a young man, works very hard. Hopefully, he can recover. But then, Kelly did some homework, and we found out his assessment in 20 to 24 that's starting now, he thinks it's over with the assessment side. But Kelly, what are we hearing? In 2025, you're gonna get the sales data for 2023, because the peak of the real estate market will pass your home. It's going up again. So have we heard any of that in their homework? No. But it's only $400. But let's go a step further. A minimum $200 million renovated high school. Who fits that bill? You. We want a new high school. A new one. Take it down to one new high school. Looking at $400 million. You people don't understand what that number equates to. It's dangerous. It's scary and it's dangerous. So I didn't want to bring you out to scare you, but I brought you out to wake you up. This group never wanted to say no to an override. But we heard it from the smartest educational mind that I've been around. that we haven't seen enough creativity, we haven't seen enough information, and there has been no transparency to show that we need this. We've talked to our fire department, our firefighters are saying, don't hurt our residents. Don't build something just to check a box. We don't want the fire station. Done. So if they're saying it, And I've spelt it out for everybody. It's a very simple process right now. Fix the budget with $5 million in free cash. Let's move forward and think of different ways to be creative. Let's be shocking and look at new growth and development. Something we haven't seen. Am I lying, Ricky? How many 40B jobs did we lose? Three, how much money just in permits with those three projects? Millions of dollars. And then tax revenue. You've done the homework on it. How much? $16 million. So that's one building. So again, these aren't lies. These are true numbers. And again, you wish you had a platform But I've been shut up way too easy. Well, in this forum, I'm not. And you're my voice. You're helping us spread the message now. So this is what we need. We have a list right now of over 600 volunteers. 600 volunteers. We have captains that are going to be doing standouts that we have about, what, 60 to 80 people? 60 to 80 people already signed up to do standouts. I'm asking all of you, October 15th, Zach, if you wanna come on out, we're gonna meet at Hormel Stadium. Everybody's gonna come out and we're gonna take our message and we're gonna go to the neighborhoods and we're gonna knock on doors and we're gonna give people the information that no one in the city has given them to help them understand. Understand the rest of everybody else, don't be afraid. If a school kid member knocks on your door, it's a shame on you beyond that you have the information right now. beyond that you know the truth. So tomorrow, when you go to the coffee shop, or tomorrow when you go next door and you talk to Dave and have a cold drink, sit down with him and say, hey, do you know about the overrides? Because the fire don't want it, the educational minds think it's absurd, and it's going to hurt people. And here's the other piece that I seem to forget, and I don't ever want to forget this. I have lived in a, grew up in a home with tenants. My dad made sure that we treated our tenants with pride and with respect, and we made sure we kept our rent reasonable. So the fact that my brother took that, and we still have the same family there that have been there for 10 years. That family pays for a four bedroom in Medford. They pay $2,400. Pretty cheap. We all know that. He will not raise that rate. What people have to understand, if these taxes come about, taxpayers cannot handle this on their own. It's going to be passed down to the tenants, and renters are going to go through the roof. So I want to thank all of you for coming out tonight. Did I miss anything, Rick? Are you sure? He's my captain. Rick's going to tell me. You know, again, I will tell you, We've got great people working on this. I'm so excited for the energy. Right now, we have 260 signs already on the street. Steve's gone. We have 260 signs on the street, and we have another 200 here tonight. Make sure you take your sign, but make sure you leave your name and your address so we know you've taken it. And show your neighbors and just give us a call, just so people know. An override. When you vote for an override and we give the mayor $6 million, even though they say that the money is going to go to the vocational school or art programs, that's not necessarily true. The money goes into the general fund to be used to the mayor's discretion. Okay, so again, there's a reason why we're here. $9 million in free cash. Those people that want to know real simple what free cash is, free cash is the money that we approve for the prior year in the budget that the mayor does not use, does not spend, and then it gets certified and carried over. And then it goes into an account that she can do anything she wants with it. It's very simple. So I hope tonight what we really wanted to do is educate some people. bring them out, have them know what's going on. Understand that we'll be having, if you please sign up for the standouts, we'll be doing door knocking. But the big one is gonna be October 15th, Saturday, nine o'clock at Formell Stadium. We're gonna be meeting there and we're all gonna be hitting the streets. We're gonna be going into the neighborhoods. We're gonna be knocking on the doors, talking to your neighbors and letting them know that if this is voted through, it's not gonna hurt the children. The mayor's just gonna have to put the money that she's playing with back to where it's supposed to be and help our children and help our schools and help our seniors and our residents so they don't get killed with these taxes. So again, thank you all for coming. Have a safe ride home and we'll talk to you soon.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm honored that a friend of ours who's worked so hard for firefighters to capture grants and take the pressure off our citizens and our tax base, Secretary for our union, Danielle Marcelino is here. Welcome, Danielle.
[George Scarpelli]: Um,
[George Scarpelli]: Tonight, we have to thank my team. There's so many of them, but I want to thank everybody that's here. If you're from all Medford, if you could just raise your hand. Just thanking you for being here tonight and helping. Thank you so much. We've had a few events. I know tonight's a tough, tough night. I know that we had about three different events tonight, but we said we need to do something because things are happening really quick. And the reason that we're here is because we wanted to talk about the Proposition 2.5 override and the debt exclusion. So there are three questions that will be on the ballot. I'll give you some more information later on after a few people speak. But one is the debt exclusion, which is for a new fire headquarters. I'm very fortunate that we have one of our union leaders from the fire department. Danielle Masolino is going to be here. She's going to speak in a little while. And proud to say someone that I called and asked his opinion because I think he is probably the smartest educational mind, at least in Massachusetts. He's someone that I respect. And sad to say, I don't think people respect him enough until that person's gone. But I called this gentleman and I asked him some questions. And within five minutes, you just feel better because he just educates you with his knowledge. And I asked him if he can come out and spend a Friday night to come out and speak and give his opinion and what, you know, his perspective as an educational leader, someone that ran our school system for many, many years, still works at the state level, high level at the state, and he's gonna share some of his knowledge, and then we'll fill in some gaps that people had that had some questions, and we can help educate everybody so they understand what this means on November 7th. So right now, I'd like to introduce my friend Roy Belson.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, we are.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, it seems like I do this way too often when we talk about Medford residents that leave an impact. Medford lost one of their favorite sons, Frank Zizzo, Frank leaves behind his amazing wife, Dorothy, and his children, Frankie Jr., Kerry, and son, Tyler. I think that a great family man, loves his grandchildren. If you watch, follow him on Facebook, you realize what kind of an amazing person he is. Grandfather, father, and Method Mustang. He dedicated his life to make sure that kids in our community got what they needed, especially at the hockey rink when it came to Medford Youth Hockey, and especially when it wasn't that popular, our female youth, our female girls program. He really helped build that program and Medford is sad, for his loss and really would like to send our deepest condolences to the Zizo family. And he's the type of person that has left a legacy that not too many people will forget if you knew him. And those who didn't should ask about him because it's someone that you want to, you want to remember or at least know his name because he's that, he was that much of an impactful person. So again, Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Bears. I know that with so much, so much devastation happening across the world, we seem to sometimes forget the pain and suffering that we felt here in our country. back in 2001. I think it's a day that everybody will remember where they were and left such an impact in everybody's lives that we should never forget September 11, 2001. And what that did to society and what it did to our world. And remember all those people that perished that day and beyond because of the cleanup and you see the frontline workers that are passing now that worked on the rubble. It's an impact that we still feel today. And I think that we should never forget that day. Uh, and, uh, it's something that I'd make the motion for a moment of silence for this council. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: We can open it and then I could fill in the blanks.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you. Three o'clock in the morning. Yes, that's not happening. So I will, I will tell you, I think that when you look at the neighbors, unfortunately you do a butt neighbors, correct? Across the street, you have, you have families and homes across the street. I mean, I think we can be very fair to look at what we've done historically for neighboring businesses with the idea of competition and fairness. But I will, Council President, I did ask for a report. I haven't heard back from the building office for inspections. So I'm actually gonna ask to move this to a date certain, but I wanted to make sure we spoke tonight because I wanted to get a report back to see if we've had any concerns or issues in the past. But I think that it's important that we understand that, um, Three o'clock in the morning is a little excessive and I think that that's when you're looking at what neighboring restaurants. I think we've given some permits or some options till I believe one o'clock in the morning. But after that, I don't as one counts I would never entertain if people want that late late hours for anything. For consumption, I think they can go into a business district and outside the city of Medford. I don't think any resident, to be honest with you, this councilor, the three o'clock is just unreasonable. This is why we have the special permit in place. I think we have a week to revisit it, to be honest with you. I think the latest we have is one o'clock in the morning for some restaurants. But again, even that to me is a little questionable because you are across the street from some homes. So it's something I'll have to really think of before I make my vote. But I think that before we do anything this evening, I'm going to ask to, after everybody adds any information or questions they have, but I'll be looking to move this to get a report back from the, the building department to see with any complaints or issuances that have happened in that area. Not just your location, I'm not saying your location did anything wrong, I'm asking to see what's happening in that area. And they haven't, unfortunately, they're a little undermanned, and so no one got back to me in time. So hopefully we get an answer, and then next meeting we'll have a clearer vision of what I can vote on. But I thank you for being here tonight.
[George Scarpelli]: that the biggest issues we have is that when they do open the streets, not just, not your company, but we're seeing too many, too many jobs that are left half done, and it's creating more havoc when people leave. And I think the biggest piece is having a curb-to-curb process. That's something that, to me, as one councilor, is a non-negotiable. But from what I, just for clarification, Are we saying that the roads that we're requesting, they will be paved curb to curb, but we're asking for other streets that are impacted to be repaved? I just need some clarification on that.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I too am a little leery of, of the impact that this will make not only for the increased costs that would be then put on our ratepayers within the community. I know that because National Grid's not going to We're not going to take it on the chin, right? I mean, it's going to be passed off somewhere. But as I'm looking at it online, where we're looking at South Street and traversing down Main Street, I know exactly what you're saying. That median was already developed. That was in front of the police station. Is that where?
[George Scarpelli]: So that's already been done. Yeah, I could see your apprehension with that going across the street of the medium, because if I can ask the city engineer in this map and taking this route, even today, I didn't see, it didn't seem to be uneven or really damaged in that area on the other side of the medium anyway. where we're seeing the work being done down South Street and all the way down Main Street, that is a no brainer of curb to curb, but that's something that I'd have to consider now. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank Councilor Leming to look into this, but I think we need to be very careful. Neighborhood communities have looked at the vision of development without a full comprehensive plan, and it's a good idea. I think it has to be looked at, but I think we better be careful in what, in totality, what we're doing in this community when you're looking for development and what we're asking for developers. We're seeing impacts in neighboring communities where they had some similar issues and they thought would be great ideas, and instead what they did is they further pushed developers further away from the communities. And It really hurt neighboring communities with the fact that neighboring communities lost millions of dollars because of their processes. So I think this is something that, you know, when Mayor McGlynn put this in place, he had the foresight to look at this and say, this is what we want. This is why they set up a trust for each, how do they put it, that each, each stakeholder that within the city that would be impacted, the impacted departments, which would have been, I believe the school department, parks and recreation, DPW, water and sewer.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, right. I stand to say it was road and traffic, road and traffic linkage, parks and recreation linkage, police and fire linkage, water and sewer linkage. So I think that the other question people had was this, are we going to be looking at small development of someone who was refurbishing their home or adding an addition? And I said, no, it would be for... This wouldn't change what linkage currently applies to. Right. It would be with the special... Is it special... site plan review correct okay all right so i just like i said i think that uh understanding the history was important and i think that it does need to be looked at but i think that we should be very careful and you know without a real comprehensive plan that at least i haven't seen in what direction this city's going and when it's growth and development, I think it's a little dangerous. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Thank you very much for all your work. I think these are the revenue generating projects that we're talking about and that the city can really use. And like we said, we're starting with one. And as we see it starting to increase, I think it'll be important that we stay ahead of the kilowatt rate for the fact that we're seeing national grid never saw us They're climbing at an outrageous rate. So in making sure that we're competitive, but at the same time, we're offering something for convenience for our residents and To be honest with you, I'm sure the gaps that people that are driving down 93 that need a charge, the nearest site comes right into Medford, right off the highway, and they use our station. So I wouldn't mind that someone from a different community, a different state that needs to be charged, they come into Medford and help us with our bills. So thank you so much.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Director Dickinson. Thank you, Mr. President. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you. This is common practice, by the way. Every municipality does this. I think it's good practice.
[George Scarpelli]: I think we have.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, I think that's a great idea. For people to understand, I think that someone asked me a question, what does that mean, George? I think that, simply put, you had your mortgage and it extended so long, you can revisit it with a better rate and rewrite that. And I think that's that simple. And we're talking about bonds, it's a lot of money if we could save a percentage point. So yeah, I think this is good work.
[George Scarpelli]: That's a teacher for the next 10 years or a police officer or a firefighter. So I think that's great. I appreciate you had worked with that and I would support this, Mr. President. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, just we change the ownership, everything is same.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you very much. I know that you've worked very hard on this, but a lot of people have still reached out saying they just don't know, since we've moved some places around, they were curious how they can really know where they're supposed to vote. Is there a number or an office that I can direct them to and that we can maybe send something out publicly?
[George Scarpelli]: That's a great idea if we can get like a robocall to those residents to say, don't forget your new location or there's a lot of people it's funny because conversations that we have a big state state representative Donato has a big. big race coming up in September, September 3rd. And a lot of people are really coming back out that haven't voted since the last presidential race. So that's where the questions arose. And I appreciate that, if we can get that word out. And I think the other thing was, that with that race, is it district, Middlesex District? 35, what is it? We really, I think the other question is that people don't know that September is the election. There is no November with this race, because there isn't a Republican, correct? There will be.
[George Scarpelli]: So the two will go in November. OK, that's confusing, because now we were told that
[George Scarpelli]: Right, right. No, I understand that, but I think people, people think that let's, let's skip the primary and we'll vote in November. In November, there'll be no race. It'll just be the, there'll be the candidate that came out of the primary.
[George Scarpelli]: And that's why I think that this is something that educating our voters and getting something out part of that 3-1-1 is making them understand that there is no Republican party running in this race. So in essence, the winner that comes out of the Democratic primary will be our representative. So we have to, it is very confusing as you just saw. So it would be imperative that maybe we, as a form of a motion, we ask the election department and the mayor and the city administration share a robocall throughout that district, those districts that are affected, that they understand that November is really just ceremonial. It's not the actual election for that race is the third of September. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President, this is what's terrible about not having a city solicitor, because I think this is a message that truly needs to be detailed.
[George Scarpelli]: And I think, well, it's for all three candidates. It's not political. It's to make sure that everybody knows for all three candidates that you have a constituent that's going to vote for one of the three candidates. And they assume that they're in the assumption that we'll just vote in November. But the truth of the matter is not understanding the processes we just saw. that letting them know that September is truly the election for this seat. And I don't think it's, I'm not saying one party or the other. I'm saying for all three parties that are running for that seat should be given the respect and the effort by this body to ask if we can do that. Now, again, like I said, if we had a city solicitor, be very simple and say, let's make weapons city solicitor let's let's do that let's send it off as a b paper and we'll we'll get to that when we can but having it stop right now i think it's it's it's not it's not right it's not right all right uh that's fine i'm just what's the text of the b paper We would like the elections department in the mayor's office to work with a robocall and other messaging, whatever other messaging possible to reach that district that is voting in the, once again, I'm sorry, District 30. The 35th Middlesex. the state representative. We have three candidates to educate those voters on the importance of that race being the final representation of that position. Does that make sense, Mr. Clerk? I know that you're very good at fixing my mistakes.
[George Scarpelli]: the September 3rd race, the September primary being the, right, yes, good, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. If I can, Mr. President, another point with that, if I'm right, if I'm correct or wrong, I know that if there isn't a Republican candidate that I, a registered Republican can't, what is it, they report to the elections office to ask to, is it unenrolled so they can vote in that election?
[George Scarpelli]: You say, well, I want to vote as a Democrat. So that's important that people that don't have a candidate in this district that are registered Republicans can come to the elections office and ask to be unenrolled so they can vote as a Democrat? That's a technical question. Yeah, so that's something if we can ask you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, that's good.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that I appreciate Council President bringing his resolution forward, but in the past week and a half, we've been getting multiple phone calls from the residents in the Fulton Heights area, which is odd for road infestation, considering we live in a ledge, and you don't have, you know, you know, too many business districts in that area that promote rodents. But we're seeing that over the last few years, we've tried, we've talked, I know the director of the health department has made efforts to try to stymie the rodent infestation issues. We've even moved to put in ordinances that allow allow us to go on to private property. If we see nesting and try to do, we have to do more. I know that I've had a few phone calls. I know that the curbside composting is a great initiative, but you're seeing the fear that even though they can't open the lid, they're eating through the bottom. So, um, So there are questions that I think as we move forward that we need to now get more in depth. You see neighbor communities put together subcommittees and special task force that work directly with professionals from local colleges and local pest control companies and try to find different avenues to stop or or slow this process down. I know that my motion would be, Mr. President, is that we would convene a meeting with the health department, the mayor's office, the inspectional services, and the DPW to try to craft a task force. I know Boston's calling it the rodent czar. I think that Metro has to do something more to figure out the process in stopping this huge health scare that's growing across the community. And I think that what we're seeing is the different different forms of control. I think that some of them at one time worked to feed the catch basins to make sure that the rodents couldn't reproduce. It wasn't the fact that they were horribly destroying rats all over the community, but they were making sure that they were stopping so they couldn't reproduce. So there's gotta be something more being done other than calling the health department, which, by the way, we don't have enough staff to service the needs that we have right now, to then call the exterminator, come out to put bait boxes down and leave. It's not working. So my recommendation is that we move forward. I know that It's the work that we've done, the Council President's done with a few members of the community with Tufts Medical in that area, but it's just not that area. I think it's time that now that we have Tufts involved in this area, well, let's come together, let's pull everybody together, and let's find a solution for the whole community and how we can attack this problem, because it's only gonna get worse. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. If you'll allow me, over the past few years, I've heard many people talk about the legal claims or settlements or court judgments that have been paid by the city or school department for claims made against the city. the school department or employees of the city or the schools. Yet many of these claims and settlements that have been mentioned have never come before this council, either for an appropriation of money for payment or just to inform us about the claims. Going back to a time even before I was on the council, I know that the council had to approve the expenditures of any amount that was over $2,500. The purpose of this resolution is for the council to be made aware of the expenditures to settle or pay for various claims made against the city, the school, or any of our employees of the city or our schools. My motivation to bring this resolution forward is based on a very simple principle that I'm sure my colleagues can agree with. That is, expenditures of the city revenue is always a matter of accountability, transparency, and good government. People deserve to know where municipal dollars are being spent. With this in mind, I ask for the support of my colleagues on this resolution. Now, as we said tonight, I know that we mentioned just tonight, right? We said we need more funding, right? We need more funding. And we've seen over the last couple of months, we've seen a blatant financial mismanagement of our city's finances, as witnessed with the $9 million of free cash that was recently certified. The lack of new growth in our community over the past four years. Payments to outside councils that we still have yet to find what the true numbers are. And lastly, the settlements that mostly are unfunded by the city leadership. So this is very important because it's another aspect that week after week we're coming forward and that we're seeing mismanagement of our city funds. Now, I get it, there are things that we can't talk about legally, and there are things that might go in an executive session to protect certain laws, and I get that. But there is a lot of money, from what I've heard, from different department heads. Like we mentioned the other day, that you just go and speak to the department heads. Well, the department heads aren't gonna tell you the truth, because they work for the mayor. So like I've said in the past, I've talked to rank and file members that have really shared with me some insight, and it's horrifying. It's frightening where we're looking at maybe five or $10,000 hit here or there with a legal issue, and we never hear anything about it. So, you know, I'm glad we have a representative here tonight because I have some questions that I was gonna leave as a resolution, but maybe you can help with, Mr. Salt. I know that as a representative of the teamsters and our employees here at the city, you know, even the most simple things, an arbitration. If an arbitration is heard, I'd like to know who pays for those arbitrations. I'd like to know how the attorneys are paid, both sides. not just the outcome, right? Because we still haven't heard the outcome of many things, which we know to avoid the rumor mill, just to get this information from the mayor would be so important, just so we can understand and we could share this with our public and saying, you know, hey, In the last couple of months, especially last month, we've seen some pretty disgusting processes in how we've run the finances in the city. Okay, we've seen that. It's public knowledge, but this is another aspect that I think needs to be opened so the community can see why we don't have the funding needed for extra help in the health department. So thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate the time. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. So this, I agree with my councils. This is a simple request that, again, do transparency, accountability, have the mayor present to us what I've requested. And I think it's a simple, it eliminates that outside talk, but then again, it shows if it's something that the community, the taxpayers in this community need to identify that this could be an issue, then it's their right. So I welcome your support. I think that, I know Councilor Bears said whatever we budget is appropriate and whatever that is, but when you look at the numbers, just as Mr. Seltz just presented, there's some numbers in there that I don't remember going in that room and approving. So, again, this is why we asked, I put this motion forward to ask the mayor for detailed answers in, you know, redacting names or whatnot, but actually showing us that these are real stories. These are real lawsuits. what's already been settled are real. Those, a lot of those aren't private anymore, they're public record. So I would ask the mayor to present to us that fact. And when I say mismanagement, when you hear these stories and whether they're fact or not, let's see if they're fact. If they're fact, then we could discuss something else that's very important. And that's what we're paying for our our insurance, our premiums for our settlements, right? What does that increase? What have we paid? You know, when we say mismanaging $9 million, it's a matter of opinion. My opinion and the people that I've spoke with, when you are in crisis, fiscal crisis, and you're calling with a financial task force to come out to call for an override, but then just a week later ask, expressed that we just we just certified $9 million. That's $9 million of taxpayers money that wasn't used properly. So in definition to myself, whether you want to take it or not, it's fiscal mismanagement. You do not manage that money responsibly, and that's the taxpayers' money. So, yeah, there are a lot of things that have come up in the last couple of weeks that we need clarity as we move forward with the agenda presented by my colleagues in the mayor to see where we're going, what direction this community is going, how we got there, and how we don't get there ever again. There's a lot of questions. This is just a piece. That's all I'm asking, is to support the resolution, let the mayor present the information that's needed, and we can move forward. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I truly understand what he's saying. What I'm thinking, My take and the comment, the question is that, why wouldn't someone put a foyer in? If that's the case, they can do that.
[George Scarpelli]: maybe, but as the governing body, is a governing body that it's my responsibility that if I have a question, why would I have someone else put a FOIA request in? We would ask the city, we would ask the mayor for, as I've done with the resolution, with hopefully with the support of the council, that the mayor gets us the information that I requested just to, just to show the answer to the questions under transparency and accountability.
[George Scarpelli]: We're seeing settlements, but we're not appropriating, we're not voting on it. Anything over $2,500, we should be voting on. When we're talking about the settlements, we're talking about insurance, we talk about attorney fees. These are the things that I want to show. I didn't say monopoly money. What I'm saying is real money. I didn't say you did, sir. Yeah, no, I'm saying it's real money. And it's taxpayers' money. So that's why this resolution's come about. Whether Council Beals was strayed off of what the bigger picture is, maybe I should have stayed focused on this issue. But I really think common sense, eyes wide open, we can see that there's, There's, and again, I'm not saying fraudulent, I'm not saying illegal, I'm saying mismanagement. We're seeing the way the city is spending our money, it's fraudulent, it's non-transparent, and there's no accountability. So thank you, sir.
[George Scarpelli]: Glad you can see it. There's a huge gaps in what's going on in this community. So we could just see what spreadsheet, you know, the ones that our chief of staff council president mentioned, let's let's talk about it. Because we talked about KP law, and they came here during the budget season, and openly said we only spend $50,000 on KP law. But But using that example, when I counted up those months, it came up almost $500,000. And that's not totally what was in other departments. So there are questions that this isn't a conspiracy theory. These are questions that I brought up. These are concrete issues that we have that we want answers from the city. We've asked for an audit to do this for us. We've asked for transparency and accountability. This is the form that we're asking. move to the question. Let's get the answers from the mayor's office. Hopefully she does what she's supposed to. And like Councilor Leming said, that's a great idea. If she doesn't do it, I hope someone in the audience files a form. So that's it.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, if I can. I just wanted to thank Mr. Bader, this morning I talked to, we had some questions that residents had and the reason why In the past, I voted no. I think that the questions that were asked by those residents and were clear in those answers, and I shared those answers to those residents that reached out, and I'm in full support with the process as we speak, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Callahan. Present. Vice President Collins. Present. Councilor Lazzaro. Present. Councilor Leming.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Present. Councilor Tseng.
[George Scarpelli]: President Ferris.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. It's a sad day. when we heard the passing of probably one of the finest teachers to ever grace the hallways in the Medford Public Schools. Robin Irving was a very special person. She made it her life's mission to take care of our children. I think it's over 40 years of service, and Robin fought the fight against cancer and lost her battle. It's ironic that today's her 70th birthday, and I know that the family has put together a GoFundMe page to make sure her name carries on. in her name to scholarships for deserving children. So I wanted to mention that. She was an amazing person. I had many friends that had Ms. Irving, and when they talked about Ms. Irving, as if they had a mother out of their home, someone that took care of them. And then when I was, awarded the position to be a McGlynn Elementary Phys Ed teacher, I was honored to work on the other side of the door of Ms. Irving's. And if you ever went by Ms. Irving's room, you know that she was a teacher. She had everything she needed for every kid with every single lesson. And she was tough, there was times she was tough, but everybody respected her. And when we heard the sad news, I'm not less of a man to say, but I cried in my truck because she was one of the good ones. And just wanted to reach out to her family, especially her nieces and nephews. I know how much she loved them. And send our deepest condolences. This is a person that, you wanna name a library after, or you wanna name, leave someone's name to show their legacy, Robin Irving's the teacher that deserves that. So goodbye, my friend, happy birthday, my friend, and thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli. Councilor Saint.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Callahan? Yes. Vice President Collins? Yes. Councilor Lazzaro? Yes. Councilor Leming is absent. Councilor Scarpelli? Yes. Councilor Tseng?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Cowdery? Yes. Vice President Collins? Yes. Councilor Lazzaro? Yes. Councilor Flamenco-Zarazaga? Yes. Councilor Scarpelli? Yes. Councilor Tseng? President Bears??
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Callahan? Yes. Vice President Collins? Yes. Councilor Lazzaro? Yes. Councilor Nunziata? Yes. Councilor Schell?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Tseng? Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Calderon? Yes. Vice-president Collins? Yes. Councilor Lazzaro? Yes. Councilor Sagan? Yes. Thank you. President Bears?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. The point of my resolution is very simple. This Councilman and I use the words transparency and accountability very often, and I do too. These words count. at the count only if we not only talk the talk, but we walk the walk. As this City Council is well aware, I submitted a letter to the Attorney General and the State Auditor's Office expressing my concerns over the way the City Council has used Rule 21 in Mass General Law, C-43, Section 22, unfairly and in a self-serving way to eliminate the discussion of resolutions that call for the expenditure of millions upon millions of dollars. When papers from the mayor were before the city council on June 7th, the council suspended the rules and approved the motion that the council rule 21 not be allowed to be invoked. Then on June 25th, my request to invoke Mass General Law C-43, section 22, which allows any one council to postpone consideration of a paper for one week was ruled out of order. At both of those meetings, my hope was that we could have an appropriate amount of time to discuss these significant issues and also receive input from our residents. When the council leadership ruled my request out of order, I had no choice but to bring this to the attention of the proper state offices to receive their input. The state auditor's office responded to me quickly. and reviewed my requests and explained first the requirements of the majority of the city council and the agreement of the mayor to move forward. So here's the simple part. If this council feels confident that its actions of those two meetings were correct, then your confidence in your actions can be reflected in your yes vote to allow this review. That would be true transparency and accountability. If however, you're not confident that the council's action were correct, you should still vote yes for this review because then we will have guidance from the state as opposed to an opinion bought and paid for by attorneys hired by the mayor. That would be true transparency and accountability. However, if you vote no on this resolution, it will show the residents of our city that this council uses the words transparency and accountability as a punchline that is empty and deceptive. Now is the time to stand up for what you say you believe in. let everyone know the only thing greater than your hollow words is your cowardice. So I will tell you, I will ask as a form of a motion that we vote to send this to be reviewed by the auditor, state auditor's office to look at our finances. Now, again, I'll say it publicly again. I have not one time mentioned that there is someone doing something illegal with the city's funds. My questions have been and stymied for one factor, one factor only, financial mismanagement. So I move that question, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Let me make it very clear then. In both the letter and in the resolution, I asked for examination on everything possible, period. So, I want the examination of our city finances, and I'll be meeting tomorrow with the Attorney General's office and talking about the legalities of the processes we have here. So, it's funny, Mr. President, that my fellow Councilors mentioned some pretty outrageous comments, like as this was something that wouldn't happen. This happened. The last four meetings, Maybe you don't have YouTube, but Councilor Lennon made sure everybody knows. Our meetings are on YouTube now. Watch those meetings. It's funny, Councilor Collins. You tell me about working together and council rules. And it's funny that you talk about disagreements. Of course we've had disagreements. And of course we sat across an issue and one lost and one won. Of course they did. But never, ever, ever has a sitting council been silenced the way this council has silenced me. no different than Councilor Callahan speaking about, it seems to fit the narrative whenever it suits your mission. But I remember when we had an issue concerning a legality dealing with a newsletter, and I said something very simple in regards also to the letter that was sent out to the state regarding the transfer tax. We don't have a city solicitor. I made a motion that we ask for an opinion from our legal team here. And I believe you voted no. And I believe all of you voted no. And that stymied the talk. That stymied the process that you yourself just said. So when you sit back and you start talking and you're spewing to the public that this is divisive, that this isn't true, oh, these are all true. These aren't made up. You suspended the rules so rule 21 could not be invoked. We were talking about millions and millions of dollars that this council got on a Friday and voted on a Tuesday. Is that what you talk about transparency and accountability? No. And instead of walking it through with this open, deliberate conversation, as you just well stated, we did it. We shut it down. We disrespected this councilor and my ability to work for not the 7,000 people, Not for the 7,000 people that elected you when you knocked on their doors, but when I put my hand up and I swore to uphold the rules and regulations and laws of this city, I represent all 60,000 members of this community. So to sit back and spew this disingenuine dialogue that these are lies, that what I'm saying is mistruths, these are situations risen on the fact that you, as the leadership team of this council, you stymied the process of open discussion. You did. You forced me to go out and ask. In regards to my fellow Councilor reaching out to the art of his office, great job. I forwarded our city clerk the email that was sent, so I could share that with everybody. When did you forward that? Oh, just now. I just got it, so I just forwarded it. Good morning, Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you for your correspondence. In order for our office to examine these issues, we would need the request for the city of Medford itself, and then it broke down, which Councilor Callahan so eloquently said, it's the vote of the council, Then it's the vote of the mayor. And yes, the city would have to pay for that. And oh, by the way, yes, the city does do an audit every year. The questions that I would have brought up that evening and the previous meetings before that, that I was silenced. We looked at situations where we had millions of dollars in other avenues that we can make our school system whole to protect our students, our teachers, and our community. But I was stunned. Then the following week, we got the email, right, that we just found another $9 million, $9 million in free cash. $34 million in free cash. And there's an opportunity to openly discuss, transparently, with accountability, discuss this process and say, where did it come from? How did this happen? Why can't we use this to support the education process now? Because what has happened, maybe you stick with your 7,000 people you knock on their doors, but you've woken up this community to the fact that whether you believed in an override or you didn't, people are questioning this community's process of fiscal mismanagement. Period.
[George Scarpelli]: So to call this, sorry, not Council President, to call these allegations, I think it's just disingenuine. These aren't allegations. What you're saying in actuality, what I put out there, what I've tried to say for the last four meetings were lies and I made them up. And that's simply not true, Councilor. And I'm ashamed that you even brought that up. You could go to every single meeting and watch it yourself. And all I had were questions that my constituents, our constituents in the city of Medford, were asking me for answers. And all it could have been, even that evening, when we questioned yours and Council President Bezos' signatures with your titles on that letter that supported a transfer tax. All that could have been done was a simple yes vote, voted to legal, them telling me this is what it is, Councilor Scarpelli, and we moved forward. And I have an answer for multiple constituents that called me about that. No different than this situation or what we did. You made it a mockery. The night of the budget was a mockery. You want to talk about a disgrace in a Zoom, in a show? That was a show. The mail with the snide comments and the linking back and forth, disgusting. Disgusting. Look at the video. You guys look perplexed like this never happened. Go back to YouTube and watch it. Go ahead and watch it because it's disgusting and it's appalling. So to sit back and call this, these allegations, I protested that vehemently. These are truths. And you forced me.
[George Scarpelli]: I made the motion. We sent the letter to the attorney general and the auditor's office. The attorney general hasn't gotten back to me yet. We'll meet him tomorrow, we hope. The auditor's office responded. The response that I got that I shared explained the hows and the what to dos with this process. This is why this motion has come up that we vote on passing this over to the mayor, having the mayor make a decision, sending it to the auditor's office, and then having them come in to look and see, not what the audit that we're seeing done when everything is prepared, but at the end of the year, when we find $9 million of mismanagement funds. That's unheard of, because as most people in this administration love to do, they contact neighborhood communities. They love to put these charts up. Well, I did that. The average increase in free cash in neighboring communities are no more than $4 to $5 million, and that's excessive. We're looking at $34 million. And you people stifled me. You shut me down that we couldn't talk about it. Those aren't allegations. Those are truths. I know hate. I know they hurt. I know when this comes out, I know that it hurts me, Council President. It hurts me because I was voted just like all of you. And I was voted, but when I took the seat, I made sure whether a person agreed with me or not, that I made a decision what I think was best for the whole community, all 60,000. But from what we hear from my fellow councilors, that's not true. So I will tell you this. This will move forward. We'll go to a vote. I think I'm very clear on the vote now. It's examination. That's the motion to have the auditor, this council, to vote to allow the state to come in and put through an audit through the state to see where we are and what's been happening with our funds. period. Now, moving forward with the Attorney General's office, we'll see what they say about the management and the style that this Council President used over the last few weeks. That has been an absolute atrocious display of leadership. So that'll come out in the next meeting, and I'll make sure I'm a little clearer for everybody when the Attorney General answers those questions. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: You got the letter the morning I sent it through the clerk. So you saw that. So you saw that. And the response from the, the response from The auditor, I had it this week, and I forwarded tonight. You forwarded at what time? Oh, just now. During the meeting. Yeah, just now. You got it.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, so that's what you're going to win on. If that's how you're going to play the gutter ball, you've got me. I'm just asking. You've got me, bud. All right. You got me.
[George Scarpelli]: Don't use my name. Point of personal privilege. That's the law between the doors. Point of personal privilege. You use my name. You use my name.
[George Scarpelli]: You said that evening. It's a point of personal privilege. You obviously don't know who you are. I'm the chair. Thank you. Please recognize the law that indicates that I'm the chair. Number one.
[George Scarpelli]: When not, I'm going to Councilor Tseng.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Sen. Vice President Collins.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Just to address a couple of the comments that people use my name directly. On that first meeting, when we started the discussion talking about possibly using the free cash and being stymied, and then stopping that conversation because we all knew the process the following week would be the process. The next meeting would be to talk about the budget and possibly vote. When we attended the next following meeting, which allows me to then discuss that resolution that I put forth, I took it off the table. I took it off the table to eliminate the nonsense that was already passed. The idea to send a resolution through and explain the resolution, the option of thought process of one Councilor, who by the way, understands that sometimes it's inconvenient for people that come to a vote to 100 people. But when you have the responsibility of thousands of people and making sure that we're doing our due diligence with all of the finances and all the financial questions we have, that I took it off the table because it was too late. My motion that was presented the week before was to discuss the process so we can sit with the mayor and understand the process and get some answers so we can move it forward one way or the other. But that was stymied, that was stopped. So it wasn't that I stopped that meeting because of lack of transparency or didn't want to openly discuss something. It was a moot point, we moved on. Anything I said there eliminated anything we could do because the mayor was ready to move on her votes. So understand that, that's very important. I know, let me share some shocking, sometimes the administration doesn't tell us the truth. So you realize that even though you rushed the vote, even though we realized we got information about finances no more than a few days prior to that, that there were still multiple layoffs and we lost many, many teachers. So that was a lie. It was not an option. We could have waited and move this out a week after and got the information that all of our citizens wanted. not the 200 people that were here that found babysitters, but everybody, that's our responsibility. But we didn't do that. You made a choice to service the people that service you. And that's blatant. You talk about, Councilor Tseng talks about just picking up the phone, call the departments. I don't trust the departments. They work for the mayor. And when I say I don't trust the departments, I speak with the rank and file. And they privately talk to me. And we can't use their names because they're afraid of what goes up here. That's not throwing fuel on a fire. You asked the question. You brought up the question why I simply didn't go to these department heads and talk to them. Because again, The key words in my resolution are transparency and accountability. So if I want something to be transparent, I'm going to bring it up here in front of all of these people so they all understand the process, not sit in a director's office that they can appease your agenda. Because that's what we're seeing. Because you said it yourself, You said it yourself, that was a very important meeting for the override. That was a very important meeting during the budget to get that approved because there was fear that teachers were gonna be laid off. Simply not the truth. So, this is a simple, simple resolution as I said. This is just to send this off to the auditor and get, a true indication of what the financial mismanagement that I see and others see, that we get the answers that are needed and required as we move forward, especially when you're talking about what you were asking for in November, when you talk about overrides. Because it's very important that we get the message out so everybody doesn't make a decision out of anger or lack of knowledge or lack of what was done during the budget season, because that's what it lends to. That's what it lends to. Say whatever you want, but that's what it lends to. And this is why this community is so divided. This isn't, this is just one council standing up to make sure that the whole community is listened to. Not the 200 people that showed up for meeting and they were gonna be inconvenienced. Because honestly, I know all of you. And I know you're very bright people and we've talked a lot And if I talked to you privately and I said, realistically, y'all given information about $9 million on a Friday, without talking to anybody, even okay, we talked to the directors, but then we go to move on a vote on a Tuesday. Truly, that is definitely not enough time. I've been doing this long enough. That's not enough time to get the answers that this community deserves. So, This is what was said tonight. Sure, this is the process of the council, and the process of the council, you went through with the letter of the law. You motioned it, you voted it, absolutely. But I will tell you, say what you want, Council Vance, we worked together, and the council's working together in the room right now, broke a rule that we can use against transparency and open dialogue. Never would have done that to you. You might have lost the vote, You might have lost the vote, but it was understood. And same here, hey, when I sit and I lose a vote, I take it and move on. But to be stymied, that's not acceptable.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Any further discussion by members of the council? Mr. President, I just have one comment. Thank you, Mr. President. Just to expand on what Councilor Callahan mentioned about the process and how everybody was here that night and they were so excited about the override and giving the voice to the people first time voting on it. If you remember the conversation and if you remember the dialogue that was set forth in my motions, was the fact that we had a financial task force that we didn't see or understand how they got to that situation. We didn't see how they showed us why we need an override, what got us to that override, and what are we gonna do in the next steps to make sure that we don't need another override the following year. These are the questions. This is a transparent process that we were asking for that evening. And of course people came up and voted for it. And of course they want to be told that we should go on to vote. Sure. But you're not listening to the people that are right in front of you. As many of those people that came up and said, we're for it, thank you so much. You have the same amount of people that are telling you right now. You're not listening to them. But you're not hearing them. So I find it a little disturbing that the process of silencing or discussing or transparency or accountability would have come out in those meetings and discussions when we had the opportunity before the votes came out and understood, okay, the financial task force met. no minutes, no understanding how they got to where they did, but we're gonna come out with a $7.5 million override, a $30 million debt exclusion, which by the way, you're gonna be shocked when the firefighters come knocking pretty soon, and the understanding that not just a week later, we find $9 million more in free cash. That alone, if that doesn't open your eyes and say, well, geez, Councilor Scarpelli, eliminate all the negative banter, eliminate one side or the other, geez, that's exactly what happened. And yeah, maybe we should look at that. Even though, Councilor Tseng said it, you just said it, people came to that podium. Of course they were in favor of it. But the problem was the people that had questions weren't listened to. That's a lack of transparency and accountability, my friend. This is the problem we have. This is why we're here. So you might be confused in the verbiage that I'm sending the auditor, but let me simplify it. I'm asking the auditor, with our vote, to look at our city's finances, period. We'll move forward with the Attorney General after I speak with them tomorrow. Maybe they have something to share. But this isn't a very difficult, you can make this a convoluted resolution and be very confusing just because you wanna sign it, but it's a very, to everybody, it's a very simple process. My resolution states that we ask the state auditor by a city council vote and then the mayor's approval to come in and look at the city's finances because I question the process of millions of dollars in free cash and the process of how we got to certain votes when it comes to a financial task force that didn't have minutes to explain to the public what's happened to this community financially, period. Thank you. Vice President Collins.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, one more last comment. And I bring this point up so we can all understand this, that one of my number one motives of moving to free cash and not leaving it up to a vote, is that during subcommittee, a resident asked a very poignant, moving question. What happens if the override fails? Council Bear stated, it'll be absolutely devastating. There'll be massive layoffs in our education process, not word for word, Council President, but it'll be a mess. My process was saying, why gamble right now with a total future and not using the free cash that we had in front of us, and then work together as a community to look at other options, but we didn't.
[George Scarpelli]: Donna, are you there?
[George Scarpelli]: Eileen? Eileen, I'm requesting to unmute you.
[George Scarpelli]: Council President, if I can, just to clarify. If I can. Thank you. I know that we've talked about the audit that's done every year. The process that, the piece that we really would benefit from, from the state audit, isn't just, the audit that we get every year is the figure, the money line. And it comes out, like I said, I don't question whether it's being used fraudulently in the sense that it's illegal. My questions I have, and something that the state auditor's office will do, is audit the process. Not only the figure, but the process. And that's what we're seeing with being the biggest issue right now. Because the audit comes in and they say, yep, all the numbers add up when you add up the numbers. But when the year is over, when the year is over and the mayor presents $9 million, The process has to be investigated. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: This council might've known, but the financial team, they definitely knew there was $9 million.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Callahan. No.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Lazzaro.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Lemke is absent. Councilor Scarpelli. Councilor Tseng.
[George Scarpelli]: President Bears.
[George Scarpelli]: Motion to approve.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Vice President Collins. Yes. Councilor Lazzaro. Yes. Councilor Fleming is absent.
[George Scarpelli]: President Pierce.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Callahan? Yes. Vice President Collins? Yes. Councilor Lazzaro? Yes. Councilor Flanagan is absent. Councilor Scarpelli? Yes. Councilor Tseng? Councilor Tseng on the vote to adjourn?
[George Scarpelli]: President Peers?
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam Vice Chair. Thank you so much. I'm really excited about the direction we're going into because we hear a lot of, you know, why can't Medford move forward and going through the reclassification, I think that the zoning and understanding the changes we haven't had in so long. And I think what we're seeing, especially in the last couple of weeks with one of the zoning issues, one of the, one of the placements of a very volatile issue we talk about what we've seen is we've seen neighborhoods now get more involved and I'm so happy that one of the biggest things we talked about setting up those teams that are going to go right into the neighborhoods that are really going to talk to those neighbors and get their input to see what we're looking for as a community, what they want in their front door and their backyard. So my only thing is, as we get started, I know that, you know, is how we're gonna get the word out to, you know, when that time comes. I think it's not for now, but I just wanted to share how excited I am that we're moving through this. And I know it's a lot of work with a lot of good people, and I'm really excited about it. But as we move forward, I think that The piece that we're seeing now is that community really getting involved. I was part of the, I was working in Somerville at the time when Somerville did their rezoning. And the mayor at the time really had every department deeply involved. So when we went from, you know, from square to square and neighborhood to neighborhood, we had everybody represented, every department there. So when the community members had an input, we were taking our fluorescent orange dots and putting it to where they thought was relevant. And that really helped us. put together and zone their neighborhoods and be part of that. So I'm very excited about that. I just wanna thank you for all your hard work and I'm gonna need bigger glasses for those bigger bullets. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Just a small question. When do you think these maps are going to be available online in PDF format?
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Every community should have a Tom Lincoln. I admire Tom for his conviction of what he believes in, and Tom was the person that fought for what he believed in. And if anybody wants to know why the Brooks Estates is still standing and why it's still a great piece of our community, it's because of Tom Lincoln. So I can't wait to see him and shake his hand and thank him because he put a lot of time and effort. There are many, many nights that we would butt heads and not agree, but we would always respect each other. And I admire what he did for our community. And hopefully someone's ready to pick up that torch. So thank you, Tom.
[George Scarpelli]: Let's say some nice things So we have known your family a long time and I just want to commend you and thank you and It's people like Sylvia that kept Medford moving. I know people think today's times might be a little difficult, but I remember some really tough times in Medford, and it's the people that made this building what it was and what it is. And it's people like yourself that I personally am gonna miss, and it's like, I think that it's a piece of history that'll be walking out the door, but at the same time, you left a legacy here that I hope everybody would follow because you've done an amazing job for our citizens. And I know that this is going to sound bad, but I know you get paid every week and not a lot, but what you gave to us is priceless and we thank you so much. So thank you for everything you've done for the city and enjoy retirement.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Janice DePace, I've known Janice for a long time. I remember her children participating in sports, and I remember teaching with Janice while she was at Medford High School, and now she's... on to bigger and better things. I'm so excited for her. She's just a great person. If you know Janice DePace, she has a smile on her face and a special word for you just to keep, just to make sure you have a great day. And she was like that with her students. And I think that everybody that crossed her path. So she'll be missing the clerk's office, but she's earned an amazing retirement. So congratulations, my friend.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. To the Babe Ruth and Willie Mays of the teaching profession. I wanna thank Mrs. Lasky because I had the honor not only to be a parent of a child in her class, but also a colleague. And you were the pinnacle. You were what everybody wanted to aspire to as colleagues. And you never, you never wavered in your emotions. You were just a great teacher You were there for every single child. And I know the impact you made in my child's life. You know, dad's an elected official, but my son could care less about politics until he ran for fourth grade president. And he woke up one morning with a suit on and he says, dad, can you hold this behind me? I said, what is it? He said, it's American flag. And I said, what are you going to do? He says, I'm going to give my speech with someone holding the American flag behind me. And I said, how come you didn't carry it with what dad's doing? He says, you weren't in Miss Lasky's class. And to Justin's point, I remember when he came home one day, he met Mr. Lasky and he says, I know what I want to do for my future, dad. I said, why, what do you want to do? He says, I met Mr. Lasky, and I want to be the reason why we clean Mystic the lake so we can all swim. And just those impacts that we made, the growth and respect to our environment, the little lessons that became huge lessons today. I thank you from the bottom of my heart because it takes a village to raise your children. And we were very fortunate, the Scarpelli household, to have you as one of our children's teachers and teaching them from right and wrong. So we thank you so much. You earned the retirement. I know there's a huge void at the McGlynn. I remember when we started, that was the A-Team, remember? And to be in the same breath as you know, I think was by default with my position, but to be in the same breath as when they called the 18 and talk and stand side by side with Don Alaska gave me a sense of pride. So thank you so much. Thank you for all your work and enjoy the retirement. So thanks.
[George Scarpelli]: I would like, if we can, Mr. President, is bring Ms. Lasky back, and we send her off with one of those wonderful citations that you draw up. Sure. That'd be great if we can. You got it. Maybe invite the whole Lasky family, because I know we haven't seen them for a while. But thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. We recently lost an amazing person from an amazing Medford family. We had Lauren Kane passed away. Those people that didn't know Lauren, Lauren was an unassuming but very powerful figure in our community for the fact when being a police officer, a female police officer, wasn't the norm. she took that job with such pride and such vigor that she started as a young person, as a teacher, and then moved on to be a police officer, and then moved on to hold to hold huge positions with the drug enforcement team and making sure that she played a huge impact in making sure that drugs weren't being distributed to our youth. And she worked for the DEA. She worked for the city of Cambridge. And most of all, she worked here for the city of Medford. Um, it's a sad day for, uh, the method police department that they lost one of their own and, uh, she will definitely be missed. So I would ask that we send our condolences to the cane family for, um, for a person who really gave her life for our community. And, um, we may she rest in peace. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Callahan.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. So first I want to commend the neighbors and the residents that really pulled together. And what you see in front of you is what happens when you see that something might affect our neighborhood in a negative way. What I found amazing is I went to an organization, a group of neighbors put together a meeting at the Fireman's Club, and I think probably about 130 people showed up. And what we heard from everybody there with respect and honor to every individual involved was that nobody was against the process of helping people. But what everybody was looking for is making sure that this facility or a facility like this would be put in a location where it didn't affect residential neighborhoods. It's amazing to see the community rally around this and really start a grassroots quick organization to really rally around and just educate people. And I think that's what's important. I think that we have, what I realized in those conversations, there were some people very angry at George Scapelli. and deservedly so. I think this is something that we talked about with our leadership team here that when we did the recodification of our zoning and we implemented these type of facilities in the medical field, in the zoning process, that it was then going to go to a special permit. We realized the impact it could have now legally with the facility like a methadone, and people keep saying clinic. And what really brought a lot of people to their feet was it's not a clinic. There weren't people there to assist people that were addicted, but it was just a distribution site. And We had people that were involved that were both former recovering addicts, and we talked to administrators in the field, and they really shared an input that really educated a lot of people. And again, at the end of the discussion, it wasn't that, let's keep these people out of Medford. No, it was, if it's needed in Medford, let's find a location where they can get their help and the support, but at the same time not affect a residential area that's. Feeds away from a dance studio, a school, the lack of parking in that area affecting small businesses. So there were a lot of little intricacies that played a huge part in what that neighborhood, the effects it would have had in the Salem Street neighborhood. I commend the mayor. I think that I had some issues because we wanted to make sure that without a city solicitor, I reached out to the mayor this weekend. She had an attorney that's well-versed in these topics to call me to make sure that we didn't say something that would get us in trouble later. And I think that with this motion, And as this process started moving forward, you saw that everybody was listening. You saw that every department in the city was listening. The mayor was listening, right? The Board of Appeals said, one of the biggest questions was, well, how do we make this a hybrid meeting? Because there are people that couldn't make a Zoom meeting. So making it, opening it up to everybody in the community so everybody had an input in this decision. My motion tonight would still be for a moratorium moving forward, but working directly with Mrs. Hunt and the mayor's office and making sure that we look at our zoning to make sure that any Any facilities under this criteria are moved into non-residential areas where it won't affect our residents. So again, there's still a process, but that would be my recommendation and my resolution if we can, Mr. President. I know that the meetings are hybrid, so everybody can still attend those meetings. That was very important. And again, I can't thank This sometimes is elected official, you look back and you say, geez, with this process, sometimes being a politician, you get, you know, your colleagues have one way of thinking, you have another way of thinking, and kind of get a little discouraged. But one thing you do know is that you all love the city of Medford, and we're all fighting for the right reasons. And what I saw this past week with community members rallying together to make sure everybody was heard. What I loved, there was, you know, I'm getting phone calls from young people that have young children in the schools that just moved to Method a few years ago, but in the same breath, they were introducing me to their 88-year-old neighbor that they were making sure that they felt comfortable. And that's what's amazing. We really took care of our neighbors with this situation. And again, I'm going to say this again because we talked about this issue too. This wasn't to divide at all. I know that people are looking at social media and saying, this part of the city is saying, suck it up. This part of the city is saying this. These people are saying that, you know, shame on you for not wanting to take care of people that need support. That was never the case. With everybody I talked to, it was an open mind, but with the goal of making sure that These types of facilities are located in the community that doesn't affect our residential neighborhood. So I give them all the respect and pats on the back that they deserve. And I appreciate this company that realized that maybe this isn't the way to go and didn't want to continue with the fight. For now, Salem Street is in a better place right now because there were a lot of issues. And it wasn't just what people would think that with the methadone distribution site coming. People were concerned about the parking. People were concerned about the small businesses. And people were concerned about that whole corridor. And I think that it was really expressed in a mature, responsible, diplomatic and not divisional conversation. So I appreciate that. And I will tell you, I am so impressed with, and as I move forward, I'll put a motion through Mr. President later on, that we convene a community engagement committee that brings in the talent we have in our community, You know, there are some amazing people that are in the field of addiction. There are amazing people that are engineers, and there's amazing people that work with traffic studies, and there are doctors, and there are legal minds that really came out and shared their expertise for the greater good. Not to be negative, not to go one way or the other, but really to share an opinion. I commend everybody here for being here and following through with something that they knew that was going to impact their neighborhood and this community. So I'm glad to see that a wrong is righted and we'll be working hopefully after we pass this resolution that we work with the mayor's office and the community development team and really try to change that zoning so we're not in this position again that we're making sure that if it's needed then we'll have a location where it's not gonna impact the community like it has in last week. So thank you, Mr. President. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I'd like to clear clarity with the Council, if I can, Council President. I know we have the Council, we have a representative that the city had hired to work directly. I just want to make sure that I, what I put in as a motion is legally, um, you know, acceptable. I don't want to put something in that's going to negatively affect that.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, if we could just move forward and send this to the subcommittee in zoning and we stop the process as soon as we can.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I think we eliminate the moratorium. I've taken that out. I think that we restructure the motion to ask to refer this to the zoning, our subcommittee in zoning to draw up the legal and proper terminology to move this forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry, can you give us some guidance? I know that we have residents that have worked very hard on this issue that want to be heard tonight. If there's a possibility that they can express their input and their time and effort they put into this, I would recommend or ask that you would allow them to.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so if you want to speak on this, you'll have to wait at the end now to public participation, and you can speak on this.
[George Scarpelli]: I think we're in a good place. I don't think this is productive. So we're in a recess. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: You have three minutes.
[George Scarpelli]: I just wanted to make that a point that was mentioned, questioned by a few residents via phone calls. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I make the motion that we approve the special permit and with the 30, 60, 90 day review.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, and I appreciate all your hard work. I think that when we are committed to support the CPA, I think that there's some clarity maybe you can help with. I know that when we first voted for this, it was a matching number by the state, correct, at the time?
[George Scarpelli]: It still is. Have we seen that? Are we getting that money? We receive it every year. Every year? And how much is that?
[George Scarpelli]: So it's 14% this year.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scrivner? Thank you for all your work, Tom. I appreciate it. But the questions that residents called me and they're just concerned that yes. Yeah, and I appreciate the developers and having that control, but the conversations I had with a few neighbors that here are a few homes that aren't in the historical realm, and they would need approval to change the color of their house or a window frame. That's what they've told me. So maybe we can dispel those rumors.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so that's, with developers, listen, I support this and I understand what you're saying. I think that what I'm hearing is just the neighbors that are saying, what's recommended for materials if they had to make a change in their home and they're living on a fixed income. and how that could relate to their processes if they needed something to be remodeled. I think that's the biggest concern and where it falls in. I think that really hasn't been delineated for, okay, this home was built in 1974 and they want to replace some windows and the windows might not fit in the criteria that we might be looking at with the commission, but it's affordable for the family. sure so i think that that's my biggest concern with this i don't think that i've heard that it we've been saying that it's been recommended but if they say no what are the ramifications um well i was gonna put this on the slide but but but um we've actually never said no okay But how long are you going to be there?
[George Scarpelli]: I know that.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate that. I like I said, I think that what you're doing and what we're doing that in that neighborhood for years, I mean, and I know that, you know, for my friend sharing music, who is a strong proponent and former former school commember with myself and you know, I know the passion she had. So it's not like I said, it's not, this isn't something that I would talk against because of that. But I think that the biggest piece is that everyone has the neighbors that are concerned that many people have.
[George Scarpelli]: And I appreciate you and I appreciate who's here right now. My fear is if we're putting the disordinates in, it's the next group that comes in. If they come in and they have a hard line and they're like, no, we're not gonna do it. Well, you get to control who.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, no, we don't.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Last week, I know we had a very informative meeting on the budget a few weeks ago when we talked about the processes and where this money is coming from. And we voted for an override. and an override that put forth the onus on the children in the schools. And I put forth a recommendation to look at free cash. We then noticed that, We were informed that in this packet that we've now have $9 million added to that free cash to roughly $34 million. And I'm curious, when you went through this process, did the financial task force identify, did they know about that $9 million as it's going forward?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so I know that my fellow councils, we have five money papers in front of us, and they, I believe, what was it you implemented? the rules to avoid Rule 21. I will do this with all the papers tonight, but as my right, I'm invoking state law under Chapter 43, Section 22, which reads, Section 22, any ordinance or order or resolution may be passed through all stages of legislation at one session, provided that no member of the Council objects thereto. If any member of the council objects, the measure shall be postponed for that meeting. So I'm going to vote that right for the fact that we're pushing things through and we're not getting the information, at least this council is not getting the information they want. And it's a tactic that's very silly that we're going to try to get information that was passed, that was information that was given to me. And I made sure that we reached out to the state legal department and they said, any budget paper, If this is invoked, our ordinance is invoked, then I can supersede that with the state ordinance until I, as one city council, who finds this process so faulty, and so smelling with the lack of transparency, that we're so confused of where this money is coming from, and I've used this many, many times. You're all very bright people. I'm not saying anybody's doing anything illegal. I'm telling you this is financial mismanagement. We asked for a $7.5 million override on the fare of our families and children. I wanted to propose a $5 million free cash proposal that eliminate that fare, then the community can look to see whether we need an override or not, which I wouldn't oppose. But instead, we required it. I was stifled. And then we moved to the next meeting, which was the budget meeting, and we had similar questions. Now we move to the next meeting, we come up with $9 million. We have $34 million in free cash, with an override still hanging out there. Are we still nervous about the kids in the schools? Well, I have the right to invoke this rule, and I do so, and I will do with all money papers tonight. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I've been instructed by legal industry that this is a money paper that I can implement at my disposal, in my discretion, and I do so. So I question the chair, if you wanna stretch this out even longer,
[George Scarpelli]: I am opposing rule 22.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, I have it in front of me. Thank you so much. I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: You want to play the game, so I'm playing the game with you guys. I know, I'm saying. Because it's kind of funny that when you want to talk about information, I've implemented my right.
[George Scarpelli]: And if you want, I've questioned the chair, I've put in the rule moving forward.
[George Scarpelli]: It's not debatable.
[George Scarpelli]: The rule is not debatable. It doesn't apply. Okay, remember. When you pulled this last week, I did my due diligence to make sure that the information is getting out there. It's funny, we can have five meetings in subcommittee about a newsletter, but you wanna take these motions on money papers and force it down people's throat without giving it its due diligence. Shame on all of you.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll text you, Ken. We'll talk about it. But that's a disgrace.
[George Scarpelli]: Have any of you talked to the administration for $9 million? The 20, the July. You agree to call on Bob anytime.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Nobody was against the process of helping people. But what everybody was looking for was making sure that this facility or a facility like this would be put in a location where it didn't affect residential inhabitants.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. I was informed of this wonderful news that we have two amazing Method residents that are sharing their 70th wedding anniversary, and I wanted just to express our deepest happiness for them. We know that they have three very proud children, Josie, Janet, and Paul. They wanted to make sure that their parents were recognized and just an amazing accomplishment. And 70 years cheesy, that is something to really to applaud. So I just wanted to share that. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you, Councilor Bears. This is, again, a very popular location and it looks like everything is in order. I will move approval after we hear from any questions from my colleagues.
[George Scarpelli]: I question the chair on the ruling.
[George Scarpelli]: I vote no.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you councilor Bears. I think that I will share the probably the only comment that I agree with the mayor is that an override should go to the community, but if it's done right. Last meeting, I posed a question about using free cash and showing the process so everybody could see what it does. And just for the fact that the possibility, now maybe the mayor can answer this, in November, Madam Mayor, if the override happens to fail, what happens to our school department?
[George Scarpelli]: You usually are, but.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. So we would take that gamble. So that's what we did. I'll revert back to June 20th of last year during the budget meeting, when I'm sure you remember the meeting that you had with both Councilor Bears and President Morell. And as Councilor Bears stated before, it's in the minutes, it's in the video that Councilor Bears met with behind closed doors. And you came to an agreement and he's going to vote for the budget. And what we did was you sold your soul because what you did is I felt like Nostradamus because as I said that night, what you're doing is going to put our city and financial ruins. And here we are. And here we are. So the fact that when we look at where we are today, and what we talked about back a year ago, we've had one year knowing that this was gonna happen and what was created to make this less harsh for our community. Let's think about it. You started a financial task force of you, the chief of staff, Council President Bears, Councilor Collins, I believe vice chair Graham and the chief of staff. That is our financial team. When I talked to neighbor communities as they lunged into these proposition two and a half, I talked to Mayor Curtatone, who informed me back in 2009 when they faced the same situation. And this is what neighbor communities do for, I believe the word's been thrown out there, transparent, which I think is an absolute farce being used that way. What they did back in 2009 to that community, they set up a financial advisory committee provided with expert advice from both savings and revenue production measures designed to help the city maintain its financial strength and face this deepening economics recession. They looked at a committee which had Samuel Tyler, president of the Boston Municipal Research Bureau of Free Assistance, Jonathan Sloan, the president and co-CEO of Century Bank, Jeffrey Hartigan, senior vice president investments of UBS Financial Services, the Chamber of Commerce and leadership team from their financial team, and Daniel Richards, Professor Daniel Richards at Tufts University and in the economics department. That's what I've been saying, that we might need an override. We might need it. But why divide the community? Why gamble our future, our kids' future, by not doing it properly? And what do we do? We met behind closed doors. You sat in the meeting since I believe Councilor Bears said September. You've had meetings that we've had no updates, no minutes, no notes, nothing. Councilor Bears stated that when we get closer, he will give us all the information possible. And what we've got, we got a message from yourself that we are now going to just jump into an override, jump into debt exclusions, and jump into very, very scary times for a lot of very vulnerable residents in our community. Of course, when I asked for debt exclusion, I worked with the best financial mind in Aleesha Nunley. You remember her. Aleesha Nunley, who was an award-winning budget creator, she was, and when she broke it down for us, we eliminated senior citizens, and we eliminated veterans to see what that exclusion looked like for new fire stations. And the numbers were drastically different, but we were making sure we were taking care of the most vulnerable members of our community. What I asked for the other day was, when I was unceremoniously ruled 21, and made quiet again, because what I was saying made sense. Taking that money, five to $7 million out of free cash, and balancing the budget, and then working together by being more transparent and open in the process of an override. You mentioned that the process, that looking at the process, it's only $440 a year. Now, that's minimal. Sure, that sounds great. But what's scaring our residents, maybe you're not listening to them or even hearing them, especially our most vulnerable, when you're looking at a transfer tax that was mentioned, rent control that was mentioned, a registry fee that was mentioned. We talked about a debt exclusion for a fire station. That's probably $250 million debt exclusion for a new high school. Who does that fall on? Our homeowners, and a lot of these homeowners that some of my colleagues think that are rich because they own a home of a million dollars. Well, I'll give you an example of a person I talked to today, and when she said, George, I'm gonna be honest, this scares me, because her and her husband bought their home in Medford 60 years ago for minimal money. Now their home's worth a million dollars. And that million dollars now, because of the tax rate, now these little add-ons, as you called it, they're just small, as they keep adding on, these most vulnerable members of our community are petrified. They fear where we're going with this community. What I would have asked you, Madam Mayor, is looking at the process. and where we've been in the last five years. What have we done to create new growth? What have we truly done to create revenue to support our streets, our sidewalks, our schools, our fire, our police? What have we done? You've had 340B projects that you turned your nose to that they've all walked away. Millions of dollars, millions of dollars in revenue through tax and through permits and fees. Millions. Just that alone in three projects that we know of. So when we look at this process, this is a total farce when you look at what we're doing. We look at the different processes And like I mentioned, here we are. This was mentioned on Friday. This is probably the biggest, biggest motion, resolution to come in front of this council ever. Ever. And we have no meetings. We haven't talked about this as a council, community, and not once. But we've had five meetings on a newsletter. But when you're talking about affecting thousands of people, thousands of homeowners, we haven't had any discussions, except for you and your financial task force. That doesn't seem like a financial task force at all. Because what it reads is what it reads. Because if it walks like a duck, it smells like a duck, it's a duck. You guys went in the back room, and you found the easiest way so you could be let off the hook. And that is by debt exclusion to override. And that's a shame. That is a shame. I showed you what other communities do, what they've done in the past, and how it works. We talked to the superintendent who came up and talked to us about making it whole, and her saying that, no, it's not going to make it whole for what we talked about. Because I believe Vice Chair Graham mentioned to one of the city council, I believe Intoppa, When he asked the question, if we get to 79 million, will everything be put whole? She said, absolutely. The superintendent sat in front of us and said, absolutely not. She's gonna take more money, just like you will, and put it into a black hole that we don't know where it's going. And the proof is in the pudding. Our numbers aren't very good, Madam Mayor. If we look at our education numbers, we don't look good. We're not doing well. And we provided more funding to the school department above all other departments. That's not to say we don't need more, absolutely. But it's how it's managed right now. That's a weak question. So I appreciate the dog and pony show. I appreciate everybody patting each other on the back. But this was a complete joke. Lack of transparency, lack of communication with all members of this community. And again, I'll say it again, I don't disagree that we might need an override. I say that from the get-go. But what we haven't done is we haven't done this together. What you've done tonight, if you caused enough divide in our community, Madam Mayor, we are now divided. And I will tell you, I've had hundreds of people call me on both ends, 100 people saying, George, we need an override, and having great discussions. But I've also had hundreds of phone calls from people that are saying, no, this isn't good, and we're gonna fight on this. So instead of sitting there together as a group, and putting it together and figure out the best course transparently, what we can do for our community, we didn't do that. On June 20th, you sold your soul. This task force was put together. You sat here doing nothing, because you knew this was going to be nothing. I'm glad you could smile, miss, because you're really affecting hundreds of people's lives here. And then you come out and come out out of all this work, not knowing what you did, for overrides, debt exclusions. So with that being said, Mr. President, I will invoke Rule 21, which states dispositions of all items appearing on the city council agenda. All items of business appearing upon council agenda shall be taken up in the order their parents and fully openly debates the disposal of by vote of council previous to the consideration of any other item of business. No item of business shall be referred to committee except for the following reasons. for the study and the report of subsequent meeting, for the purpose of drafting an ordinance, and the event that open discussions may prove damaging to the character and reputation of a person or persons, all matters referred to the committee shall reappear on the council agenda for the meeting for four weeks following the referral, unless sooner presented by the committee chair or a majority not exceeding two weeks is voted by the council upon request of the committee chair. majority committee memberships. Any financial paper appearing on the council agenda for the first time shall be automatically laid on the table for one week when such action is requested by any member. Now you might've suspended the rules, but I want the community to realize you stifled me last time disrespectfully shutting down rule 21 because I made sense. and it was a viable way for us to slow things down and do it the right way. And then tonight, you suspend the motion for this process. Well I invoke rule 21 this evening. And if I have to, I would look into contacting our attorney and looking for an injunction to see where this goes, because I think this is a fraudulent process by the president. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. So I appreciate the dialogue back and forth. Just a quick note to the mayor. The presentation you just gave was the same presentation we heard at the debate. Again, no shovel in the ground, no money in our accounts. We've done nothing at Mystic Ave. We've done nothing in Medford Square. And councilor Tseng, immediate funding is available when you start these projects and permits and fees. But my biggest issue I'm having here is not the fact that, because people are gonna leave tonight saying councilor Scarpelli is against an override. No, that's not what I, I've said this a thousand times. And councilor Callahan said, democracy is so important, getting the vote out. And I agree with you. But why behind closed doors? Why weren't we involved? Why would you announce it on a Friday and then bring it to the floor on a Tuesday and then vote? Especially when there are viable options that we know of. Free cash is there. You can use the five to seven to do everything you said to pull in the hot strings of all the parents and kids and teachers who, by the way, are my friends, my relatives, my family. So I understand completely, but there's an option there. And then maybe step back and say, well, instead of dividing this, instead of making this a contentious situation, let's sit together and say, well, did we look at the process of eliminating seniors to this process and how much would it cost us? Did we look at eliminating veterans from the process and see how much would it cost? That's democracy. Democracy isn't saying that six people in one room say it's all right and that's the way we should do it. So that's democracy, no that isn't. Democracy is being open and honest and being truly transparent. We talked about looking at where the funding was and where the funding's gonna go because when I say the black hole, I say we were given millions and millions of dollars from ARPA. And what do we do with it? Nothing to show for it. Infrastructure needs, it was the airport, nothing. You could get angry all you want, Madam Mayor, and turn your head, but you made some pretty snide comments tonight, and it's pretty embarrassing. But I will tell you, I will tell you. You put on this paper, excuse me, Mr. President. We've talked about, Madam, I believe you said it was that we needed to, the people that were getting jobs illegally or questionable, and you were cleaning up City Hall, you've used that comment a lot. But I tell you what, I'd like to sit down at these meetings and say, well, look what they've done in other communities. Where did the funding go? Why are we here? And how do we fix it moving forward? What have we used in consultants, Madam Mayor? What have we used for investigators, Madam Mayor? What have we spent on for legal fees in the hundreds of thousands? What have we used in settlements? There are millions of dollars that we wasted because you put a cape on and thought that was your job, and that wasn't. And the courts, obviously now we're hearing it and we're seeing it. So I will be honest with you, again, it would have been nice to have some time to sit with the community and figure out, or at least all the council, because it seems like six people know what they're doing in the council, but there's one person sitting back saying, well, I had questions. I had things to offer. And when I came out and started sharing that on the council floor, I was pushed by asking me to put the amendment first, then I was asked to verify comments, and then when it started getting heavy and it started making sense, we sectioned 21-me. And now we get to tonight where I think we do need breathing room. We need another week to look at this, to look at this and ask some questions and make sure people, through the democracy, the process of democracy, that people ask these questions. And you can pat yourselves on the back all you want of this task force, and you came to this agreement. But to present all the information from this hardworking task force that was presented to the public on a Thursday or Friday, and then brought out for a vote tonight, is a disgrace. It's really, this isn't the way democracy works. And I know if you, deep down inside, I think all of you know it. So, Mr. President, I know that a lot of people do want to speak, and again, I'm just going to leave off with this. We had a mechanism in place that could have taken care of our children, our teachers, our parents, all these coaches and teachers that you're looking for. through free cash, which we had millions because of the process that was mismanagement of finances in our community for the last five years. And an abundance of that much money is just bringing it back to who deserves it, and that's the taxpayers. Remember, that's the taxpayers' money that weren't spent correctly. So now we have an option now to do that. And instead of doing that, we're gonna rush through a vote tonight, which it's sad to say I will vote no, not for the fact that Councilor Scarpelli doesn't think that we possibly could use an override, but we didn't do it the correct way. We did it behind closed doors. Whether you wanna say it was a great process, whether you wanna say it was transparent, it wasn't. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: We still have no city solicitor, Madam Mayor.
[George Scarpelli]: Whatever puts you to sleep, Madam Mayor, every night, that's a shame. Because I sat next to you for four years.
[George Scarpelli]: Who you are. I respect you, then.
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I just want to remember. I want the mayor to remember that I remember that person that sat next to me. And she wouldn't deal with what's going on right now. So shame on you. Whatever puts you to sleep.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, if I can point a personal privilege.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. And I'll say this to all due respect, whatever Mr. President makes my colleague feel good, but what he did was stifle the process. I was very clear. You asked questions as the chair of the council. I answered your questions. You did not rule it out of order. We move forward with the process. And when it started getting uncomfortable, my colleague ruled to shut me down. It's very simple. Why I shut it down tonight is because it just doesn't matter because the process is already through. What you're asking for, and what I was asking for, was never entertained. It couldn't have been entertained, Mr. Leming. Because if I said what I needed to say tonight, it would have needed time for the administration to look into that. For instance, looking at an override and taking senior citizens out of the process. And I know Councilor Collins has mentioned over and over again, that's transparent and there were notes and all due respect for the vice president, Mr. President, those not the questions that we had, or I had, or the people that I represent had out of those meetings. Because what we had was the options of doing A, B, or C. But with those options comes processes. For instance, we need an override. Okay, were there any other options? Okay, if we did do an override, what would it look like? That's what my questions were going to be driven through. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President, uh, Councilor Scarpelli. So when I asked for debt exclusion, the finance director at the time, Aleesha Nunley did a study that excluded our seniors. And my comment tonight would have been through the process. It would have been interesting to see before we got to this point, if seniors could have been excluded. So, uh, but I, I believe there's council bears says it's, it's a mass law. I believe there is a process that you can work with the state to get that exempt by the way. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Can you repeat that again, Council President? I apologize.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: No.
[George Scarpelli]: No.
[George Scarpelli]: No.
[George Scarpelli]: No.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam Vice Chair. I also appreciate the resolution because it definitely is something that we should understand and with a little compassion, but to what relates to the proposed site, I think it's also conversations I've had with former addicts and, um, and people that were once on methadone that really stressed to me that, uh, the location is, um, is something that should be looked at. I think that, um, to help the city find a location, um, that would be suitable, but, um, in the area that's being requested where it's. a few blocks from the school, across the street from the dance studio, a park right down the block. So there are some concerns there for the residents and the parents of the Roberts school. So I think that has to come into play. And I think that Um, like again, this isn't coming arbitrarily. This is coming from discussions that I've had with, uh, with addicts themselves and who've, who've told me that it should be in a place because, uh, there are some serious concerns there. So, although I appreciate my fellow council bringing this forward and I feel for, uh, and respect, um, a resolution at the same time. uh, in the same breath is understanding that, um, having the location in part of the community that could negatively affect so many, um, we have to look at their well being as well. So, um, I thank you for that.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: So I apologize. Thank you, Council President. This is a long time coming. I think that it's funny. I don't know if people know Councilor Caraviello and what kind of a person he is. Councilor Caraviello ran for mayor, unfortunately. In my view, he was a couple votes behind. But you would think that someone who's spent so much time in this chamber working for the Citizens of Medford, you'd think he'd be tired. But last week, I think he spent over 60 hours helping an 88-year-old young lady that was being displaced from her apartment who was battling cancer, and he drove her all over the city to make sure that she was safe and her rights were protected. So this is the type of person Rick Caraviello is. I've had the honor of working with Councilor Caraviello as an elected official and as our past patriarch and someone that I mentored myself against, um. To receive this award from the city. I think it's perfectly fitting. And I miss you back here, but I know you're still working hard for the citizens of Medford. We should all take a great look and understand how Rick Caraviello lives his life, because if we had more Rick Caraviellos in this world, I think Medford would be just a supreme place to live. So congratulations, my friend, well earned.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Bears. I think that I have to put this forward for one simple reason, that the acknowledgment. I know that yesterday was a very special day, and I know that some of my fellow Councilors were there and showing their support to our veterans. Unfortunately, my wife ran another half a marathon. I was there supporting her, but I wanted to make sure that this body recognized all of the sacrifices made for our military men and women, and really showed that respect yesterday, and understand where we are today is because of our veterans. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: parks, open spaces, historical sites, and affordable housing?
[George Scarpelli]: Right. So I think that this falls, just it falls in with the process and it's something that's so needed. I know that it's been working, the process has been working, I think, in the cemetery and other places around the city to make sure that we take care of our tree canopy. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, thank you so much. A quick update. I think everybody's waiting. So how's everything look?
[George Scarpelli]: That's great news. really exciting. So I think that, uh, Mr. President, I see that I know that we're waiting. Everything right now is pending. But as you said, this is provisional right now. So we move forward. I would move forward what we have in place right now.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So I, I too feel, um, that we, we owe a certain amount of protection to our, our, our, uh, our residents. And I think that we have tools in place that we're just not taking advantage of here in Medford. Um, this council really can't do much for you, but what we can do, we can work with the CPA like the city of Cambridge and put CPA funding to keep a mediation company on retainer. So when these issues happen, you're not scrambling. There's an avenue that you can come right here to City Hall to make sure that you're protected. And I think that that's the beginning of it. I know that my fellow councilor feels that what we're talking about right now, we have a group of people that are in dire need, that are afraid. And I feel sympathy and I understand that. But with, now, say no different, no different than Brooks family feels than the residents that reach out to me saying, George, I'm 78 years old. I lived in a fixed income. I own my home. And the process that this, that society has given us has, by success, has driven the cost of my home up. Now they live in a fixed income. So now what you hear, you hear a council that says, let's have rent control. Let's do a tenure. Let's do a transfer tax. Let's do a registration fee. Let's do an override. Let's do... that's frightening. So I think we're on the same boat. I think you have homeowners, and this is the problem. It's very, it's difficult when you have some Councilors trying to divide the community by calling things fear tactics. They're not. People are scared because it's the truth. If you own that home and you live there, and you didn't expect your $18,000 home you bought 35 years ago, that is now a million dollars, because some people behind this real feel like, because that house is worth a million dollars, that person that owns that house and that has to live there every day, that that's a wealthy person. No, it's the same person that's sitting back here. It's the same person with the same fears. So let's not divide. Let's try to find options like the CPA. Let's look at the CPA for mediation. Let's look at our CPA tax. We had Councilor Marks has been preaching for years. Look at the space that we have, that Medford owns, that we can sell. We can allow building use on those small parcels that you could take that money and put it in to the affordable trust fund that, by the way, we haven't even established yet. It's not even up. But imagine that funding coming in, that the Brooks family comes to us and says, what? We're being pushed out. Yeah, we could plant the seed. But listen, I can also go get an oak and bring it right here and plop it right down the middle of this forum. So there are avenues. So don't don't let's let's be honest. I fear and I will work as hard as I can for this organization because I hate to see people leaving. It's not fair. But at the same time, you can't look at the other side and say, it's all your fault. So we're gonna move you out so everybody's in that boat. We need to find the common ground that we can all work together to make sure that we all want affordable housing, that people aren't scared to leave. Sure, listen, I think that one thing we should focus on is look at the developers that are coming into the community. find a way that we have legislation behind us that would protect owners that or renters that live in their home that are being pushed out for for total gain. So I agree, I'm going to support you 1000%. But I'm going to make the motion that we ask us a CPA organization to fund a mediation retainer right away. Because again, as much as we all have good intentions back here, we don't have the power to do what needs to be done. You know, we had Councilor Caraviello come here today. He worked all last week on an 88-year-old woman that was being displaced, who has cancer. And he came up to City Hall to ask for help. And do you know what happened? Nothing, because nobody answered the call. It's a City Councilor that's worked his tail off to make sure he's protecting a resident of the city. So we all understand. But this is where the unity comes in instead of saying that, oh, this is this and this is that. We need to figure out a way to make sure affordable housing is done correctly. And we use the avenues that we already have in place here. We just haven't tapped into it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So point of information.
[George Scarpelli]: I have the right to point of information.
[George Scarpelli]: When you're ready, when you're ready, point of information.
[George Scarpelli]: With the gavel today, I see where it's coming. But a point of information, I will tell you, the misinformation that's going out there was a letter signed by two of the leaders in this body.
[George Scarpelli]: That's exactly what's scaring people.
[George Scarpelli]: Because it's actually actions not it's not words. It's actions and your actions were something totally opposite
[George Scarpelli]: Well, then why haven't we had the meeting on the tenure on the transfer tax then? Why haven't we have committee on the transfer tax so we can point out and pick out what you just said, Councilor Bears? Because if you came out and we sat as a community and said this is what we need. Let's not let's not hurt the homeowners like you said in that in that context. I'm for you a thousand percent.
[George Scarpelli]: But we haven't done that, have you?
[George Scarpelli]: It's one project. It's one project.
[George Scarpelli]: Speak the truth. You want to talk about not speaking the truth? That's affordable. The CPA is not phasing that out for one project.
[George Scarpelli]: They are.
[George Scarpelli]: Are people getting evicted? Yes, they are.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, just to be clear, I'll give you an example. Today, I talked to a homeowner. I talked to a homeowner today that has about 18 feet that the city owns. They're willing to come in and pay that 18 feet to build an addition for the senior citizen parent to move in with them. So I know it sounds nice and it sounds powerful to say developers. It's not all developers. You have small parcels of land that homeowners that are bought these properties that will gladly pay, that would feed our trust to help communities like we have here at the Brooks. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can, just if we can, what is the reasoning for that? So I can understand that. Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I would follow up that the mayor and it would be great if we had a city solicitor. I would really focus on the city solicitor really paving a way for this organization so they can have a point person in the city they could talk, not a city council that really we can't do much. So if we can just also request that the mayor, um. Get involved and use her, um, executive power to see what we can do to assist this organization. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Please.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, please. I'd like to at least investigate, maybe send the subcommittee that we can look at, you know, a request.
[George Scarpelli]: OK, so maybe we change that just that we look to send this to subcommittee, that we invite the CPA in to see what that would entail, to make that a piece of the puzzle that one of our residents did say that put another tool in the toolbox with that.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Sure, my amendment would be that, now again, this would be the whole presentation, so this is a little odd and a little bothersome to me as a city council, but I will tell you what we can. The amendment will be that I would look for the, the city council to ask the mayor make sure we get it right. I would like to make sure that we make a motion for the mayor to appropriate $5 to $7 million needed to level the school budget through the free cash through free cash and by the process that we first take that, make that as an appropriation before free cash is certified and we announce for what that is used for. And now if I can, Mr. President, is that efficient?
[George Scarpelli]: I'll tell you what, Mr. President, don't appreciate it, but I will tell you, the question that we had was the, Mia's process and how she brought this forward and the irresponsible process that she moved forward on social media and then in city council and school committee meetings, where she talked about, the option of free cash being used. $2 million is committed to fire trucks. $2.3 million is committed to an OPM design for the new high school. $1.2 million for OPM for the HVAC system issues at the schools. We have to rebuild Freedom Way for $10 million. We have to fix HVAC systems in the schools for $15 million. Estimates for middle school alone. We have to put more money on water and soil infrastructure. Is that good, Mr. President? So can I proceed?
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I would present something and explain it to you and that'll get that. That'll explain it, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: So not if it's time sensitive to ask a motion to entertain this before the certified, the free cash is certified.
[George Scarpelli]: It's called, shutting it down. It's used,
[George Scarpelli]: it's an episode used to do that. Shame on you.
[George Scarpelli]: No.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So again, this is, I appreciate for my fellow colleagues to help me express what I've been hearing. And I'm not going to get into what was said earlier, because I think that that's why we're here. Because the communications that I received from residents with the you know, the discussions of rent control and the, you know, the 2% tax. They're talking about, you know, the registry. Then we're talking about what the mayor has presented. What she said was a 2.5% override, which by the way, publicly, I will tell you, I'm not opposed to that. She talked about debt exclusions. I'm not opposed to that. I publicly say that. I was one of the only Councilors that brought a debt exclusion to this body that they've never done it before. And it was voted down. So I understand this process we need to follow. But what comes to mind is I've said it over and over again. And we heard it tonight. Until we exhaust until we exhaust everything in our pockets that we can show that we're not making mistakes and just being reactionary on taxation. because I've identified many, many different options that the mayor hasn't. I've met with the building department. There are no permits out there for any sort of development. And when I say development, I speak of the development that everybody talks about. We just had a conversation about it, about affordable housing. The mayor lost 600 affordable housing units. But more importantly, she lost a huge tax bracket. She lost a huge, between 3 to 5 million, just in one building. for permits and fees, one building, and look who we are. Look at the problems we're having right now. So this tactic by the mayor, by putting this out there, is something quick and easy for us. She's done nothing for five years, honestly. The Beer Hall is her claim to fame. We really haven't moved the city forward at all. And we're not bringing new revenue at all. Okay, so now what I'm getting to my point very simply is this, I didn't, I wouldn't support a rainy day account. But as I look at the options now, and the options I see have to be really expressed and understood. Because a lot of people that have come to me, they're not against working together for an override. They're not against working together for a debt exclusion. but they want the data to prove it. They wanna see, are we doing it right? You don't just put out a tax, just a tax, just to cover your keister, because that's what she's doing. And I know that's your agenda, because you've told us this, but the bottom line is, let's listen to what that last caller said, Councilor Bears, the other night, because I think that's what brought this forward in my mind. She asked you, She asked you, Mr. President, what if the override doesn't pass? What if it doesn't? And you said, right, it's going to devastate our school department. The vote is in November. If it feels, it affects our kids. It affects our teachers. It affects our community. And even if it's a 1% chance that that override would fail, are we willing to gamble our students' educational process for this? Like I said, we can look at, as a council, bringing forth the rainy day account that the mayor asked for, we appropriate it correctly, we earmark that money, and everything goes level funding to schools, and maybe she can't do the Freedom Way for another year. But at least that now brings two groups, and that's what it is right now, the people that don't want Proposition 2.5 override, and people that do want the Proposition override. But what we can do is take that time to sit together and probably, because I know Councilor Bears said it, there's a finance group that's been working since last April, I believe he said. with the mayor, I'm sorry, September, the mayor, the chief of staff, Councilor Bears, Council President Bears, Council Vice President Collins, and school committee member, Jenny Graham, excuse me, Vice Chair Graham. So the five of them have been working on this. And the question that everybody's been saying is, well, What have they worked on? And I know Councilor Bears said, when it's time, they'll put everything out. But for right now, we don't have that time to wait and put it out there. Because right now, are we willing to gamble our students' future next year on a possibility of this divide not making it happen? Because I know I got people emailing me saying that something went out on a social media site and shame on you, George Scarpelli. I'm one person. I'm one person. But as I read it, the question was, is this a fair tactic by the school committee and the mayor? Of course it is. Of course it is. Because there were no other avenue presented. There was only one avenue. We did nothing for five years. On June 20th of 2023, the budget meeting, I sat here and said, you're going to destroy our community. We are going to be in financial ruins if you pass this budget just because you want to get elected. You're going to use ARPA money, which by the way, which by the way, I use ARPA money. And we're told specifically, do not use ARPA money unless it's sustainable. Well, our mayor took that money and the ESSA money, and the school committee did, and they've level funded a budget just to get elected because she didn't want a black eye. Let's say what it is. But here we are today now, here we are today ready to gamble on our children's future. So that's not a scare tactic, that's legitimate. If the override does not pass, then quote unquote, our schools will be devastated with layoffs. And we're gonna hurt teachers, we're gonna hurt children, and we're gonna destroy this community. So I implore my fellow Councilors to please. follow. Let's put the motion through that we ask the mayor to bring through a rainy day account that we appropriate the funds needed to level fund the school budget and make sure that everybody is whole because that was another question. I got a phone call from school committees where they were astonished the other day that that the chair, I think, was astonished because her answer was, no, everything goes back to the same. And the superintendent sat in front of us the other day, and I've got calls from teachers, I've got calls, that's not true, they said. So again, it's manipulating for what they should do. They're not being transparent enough. So I please, I implore you to let's, let's Let's focus on free cash, level fund this budget, let's build on our children's future, and then work on if we really need an override and debt exclusions, and then work together as a community to make sure it passes. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Shame on you. Shame on you. You're just a bully with a gavel. You're a bully with a gavel. You're out of line.
[George Scarpelli]: You let me answer. I have the right to point of information.
[George Scarpelli]: You're willing to gamble on kids' future on an override instead of looking at real money that our residents, that the mayor mismanaged and left out.
[George Scarpelli]: Bottom line.
[George Scarpelli]: So we can't, we can't move forward and discuss it and the mayor can't move forward to look at the process.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: President Piazza, my question might not be for you, Mr. O'Connor, but I'm looking for. I know that I might have missed it, but I know that we lost a valuable member of our team here to a new position, but our outreach manager for prevention and outreach, Do you know if we're filling that position or if it's been filled? Oh, that's great, okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Now, will it be under your department? Oh, perfect. Okay, great. Obviously, big shoes to fill. He was amazing, so. Yes, yes. Okay, that's all I had. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: All right, any questions, Councilor Scarpelli? Thank you. So, Connor, thanks. Just one question. I know I mentioned it to the chief of staff on Saturday, we did the tour of the fire station. Have we connected with the auxiliary group and told them that we're moving on?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so still might proceed.
[George Scarpelli]: So they wouldn't need the trucks and all the apparatus. I know that I know the chief was also reaching out to let them know that they're trying to find there was some equipment that they said that. Okay. All right. That's all. Thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. First let me disclose that I do have a family member that is a teacher. I've contacted the Ethics Commission and the protocol is that I can be present because we're not discussing any votes, so I will not hide in a side chair or anything like that. I'll stand in front, and you can ask any questions if you, you know, and I'll respond. The way the process goes, I was told to inform the public, because it was a little confusing yesterday, that the night of the budget meeting, that when we go to vote, I will ask when we get to the school department budget that we sever elementary education piece to be voted separately. I'll exclude myself, the council will vote on that part, and then I can come back in to be part of the procedure. So I think that there was some confusion of what the process is when you have a family member that's in the system. So again, I appreciate, your presence. I know that Councilor Bears made a presentation about where we are right now. I will share the conversation on June 20th of last year. I felt like Nostradamus, Mr. McHugh, because I sat in front of this body and I explained how tragic and how devastating, if we funded the budget the way that we were going last year, where would we be today? And it's happening. It's happening, and there's nothing we can do. My fellow councilors, like Councilor Behr said, did meet behind closed doors with the mayor and came up with a plan with another member of the council to set up this financial group. This financial group, I guess, has been meeting since April. Are you part of that financial group?
[George Scarpelli]: So is Mr. Dickinson part of that group? Our city financial director?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so on a day to day basis during these meetings, I don't I don't I don't see any minutes. I wouldn't know what's going on those meetings. What I do know is that they've been meeting. And we've come to a conclusion over after knowing for a year over a year now, because it was publicly stated, we're gonna be in drastic, drastic financial need. But we've known in a year, and I'm gonna ask some questions about that later, but we've known for years that we are in a devastating situation. We knew we were gonna be here. And what we've heard back was the mayor announced that we're gonna look at debt exclusion and overrides. which is very, very irresponsible for the fact that when other communities present overrides or debt exclusions, it's part of a transparent process. where it's discussed, it's presented so the community and as a whole understands what this process looks like. What happened that evening when the mayor pronounced after you said, I believe that you were talking that we were gonna have a $5.5 million shortfall and the man jumped back and said, it's the first time I heard of that. I only thought it was $500,000. Really, they've had a working groups in September and that's the first time they've heard that. So as we move forward with this process, We're seeing the mayor present that evening that we're now going to focus on this working group that is going to look into an override and debt exclusions to get us to where we need to be. Irresponsible. I've been saying this for over a year now, more than a year. The lack of transparency and the mismanagement of finances in this community is pitiful. It's the reason why we're here today. We can look at zero new growth. We can look at confusing payments to law firms that when I did my numbers from the actuals, over $470,000 paid to KP Law. You're seeing lawsuits. You're hearing all these different issues and why we are where we are. And I'm going to be honest with you, I don't disagree with my fellow colleagues. My number one priority is to fund the school system where it needs to be so we can do the best we can for the most important people in our community, that's our children. I support it a thousand percent, but it's how we get there. And that's what's frightening to me. Because right now, I don't see a transparent process. You have a few Councilors and a school kid member working together with the mayor and the chief of staff without any financial professional with them on a day-to-day basis, and the mayor comes out and says, after these cuts, I'm gonna look for a debt exclusion, and I'm gonna look for looking at an override to balance our budget. Oh, absolutely not. There's a way to do it, and I'll get to that when I speak, when she comes to this body. But what I understand, so I can understand this transparent process, if you can allow me to expand on this, is that Where are these questions coming from? I bring up the point that I have some bullets that parents, teachers, administrators, myself come up with. The process that why do we not have faith? Well, there was a Monday we got an email saying that there was a shortfall in the FY 24 budget of 2.5 million. And then on Friday, hey, we found 2.2 million or so, right? Where did that come from? So we still, I asked for a report much back in understanding that. So if you can allude to that, that'd be great for the first question.
[George Scarpelli]: And if it can't to that point of information, Mr. President, I think we agree that I think that we've talked not getting the information that you need, but what that evening on June 20th of last year, I think the biggest problem was the lack of information given to the the complete council. And to be honest with you, even with this financial group, you keep saying the leadership, we talked about this last year, the leadership. Well, did you think maybe that getting us just monthly reports on what that leadership was working on? Because we didn't. And these are the things that I'm saying when I say, well, lack of transparency, that brings me to the first question that we talked about. So if you can speak to I appreciate I can give a quick recap on that.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so with that being said, You have to understand, I'm not blaming you, I think just understanding it, I think understanding you coming in in August wasn't the best, it's not the best fit, so I understand that. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, you don't work five days a week, right? You're a consultant that works.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I just think that this is working three days with this type of budget and what you had to recover from, it's not fair to you. It wasn't fair to you at all.
[George Scarpelli]: So you were well aware, Mr. McHugh, that we were in financial disaster ahead of us, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: No, I'm saying when you got here, I'm only saying this because I We have a school department that knew and a city mayor that knew last year that we were going to get to this point. And I can speak firsthand being on the school committee when we had some huge cuts and you had to stand up and be a big boy and big girl and stand in front of everybody and tell them what they don't want to hear. Okay. But we're looking at a situation where What we did this year, Madam Superintendent, I think we did a terrible job in making sure that we tightened that belt and made sure that we did everything possible. When we get to this point, we wouldn't be this bad. you know, to that point, you know, usually we get a budget. I was accustomed to always get the school committee budget, even as a city councilor. So I love the point, but I'd love an actual budget if you can get that to me, because I like to look into the pieces that you don't hear about. How much money do we spend on consultants? How much money do we spend on people that we could have moved over to other positions and people could have picked up other spots? I work with, Superintendent Belson, I realize he's probably the cream of the crop, but when we had drastic cuts in 08, the first group he went after was his leadership team. And he said, well, I'm gonna feel the pain first. And I'm glad to see that we're gonna move forward with getting to this budget of 79 million, which by the way, does that bring everybody back on? Everybody that's cut, all the directors, would that $79 million bring all those people back to their positions?
[George Scarpelli]: So that's what the misleading point of last evening and tonight is. So what I got when I got the phone call this morning from parents and people saying, this is great. So Hannah's coming back to the bench, you know, right back to her position. That's a big one, right? Yeah, our head of physical education is going to come back, right?
[George Scarpelli]: state mandated position, right? You're talking about secretaries, where I worked at the McGlynn School, knowing how two secretaries are important, vital to that process. So what I'm getting back is saying, this is great. Everybody's coming back. So that's not true.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so in full transparency, the reason why I say this, and I don't want to put you on the spot, I wish the superintendent can help with me, but as we talk about these positions, we have to make sure that the community understands this doesn't make everybody whole again. Okay, so this is what we may have to make sure that, because people left last evening thinking, oh, this is great, we're going to get everything back. Okay, so we gotta make sure that's not true. We still, that's still left up until to the school committee and the administration.
[George Scarpelli]: I completely, completely understand. But what the school committee said last night is go level funded a $79 million, not for what the mayor's presenting, not as of last night, people left that meeting saying we're whole again. We just don't want to be careful, Mr. President, because I don't want to come back to the city council that the city council didn't want wasn't transparent because the questions they asked me and is that We don't know. That's not true. So even though we get $79 million, hey, I support it. Like I said, I want to make sure that we're whole with the school department. But I just want to make sure that when this happens, and let's say the mayor comes back and says, hey, we're going to go for an override. And that override is going to be passed. And you're going to get that $79 million. but understand to the community that this city council made sure that everybody's aware that doesn't mean everybody's whole again. I just wanted to make sure that piece was clear.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam Secretary. Thank you. And that's exactly what I was asking, because I think that understanding and make sure we're transparent enough to say what you just said was perfect. Hopefully, the community is listening. So when they come back and say, we're confused, so that that's a huge piece that I wanted to clarify. And I appreciate you. you pointing that out for us, okay. So thank you. So I appreciate the budget book, if you can get that for us. I know that we talked about last year and some things that were talked about were, you know, where were we losing money? Have we looked at what are these shortfalls? How do we really capture, bring those numbers back? One being, you know, we're seeing that we're losing a lot of kids to charter school, or our kids are leaving to private school, and why? Especially at the middle school, high school level, mostly the high school level. So I think that, you know, people realize that we do lose a lot of money when we, and then the reimbursement. Can you enlighten us on what we paid the charter schools in reimbursement this year?
[George Scarpelli]: All right, so we'll ask the mayor. I think that's important. I think that the reason why I bring this up is Back in 2008, we looked at how do we find a way to even try to figure out, because pennies start turning into quarters, quarters into dollars, dollars into hundreds, right? So we looked at something like the summer programming. And we did, I'm proud to say that I was one of the people that brought the summer program to the MISA Tech and brought in hundreds of thousands of dollars to make sure we did that. And what we didn't see is one of the biggest, biggest needs was after-school care, before-school care. And we've done the best we can without the space. But these are things that I'm looking for to say, how do we bring more revenue back into the city? And at the same time, providing a need for our students. I think that's going to be important as we move forward. I think that's just a comment. I know, like again, I think that some of the biggest questions are rumors. I wanted to make sure we spelled a few rumors. So if you can just enlighten me. Because I didn't hear this, so that's why I'm trying to just figure this out, to answer this for a constituent. Are we cutting foreign language at the high school? Or is that a process, is that something that's on the table?
[George Scarpelli]: All right, and I think specifically just so you, just to be, just to, be up front is I think that the commitment with CASIC and bringing Italian to the elementary schools, and the rumor is that maybe Italian might be the language that's being dismissed. So that was one of the questions.
[George Scarpelli]: And I think that's important because I think that, I don't know if the funds have now dried up, that Miss Petrangelo, former Italian teacher, left the school district. I believe she left a million dollars at the time to make sure that foreign language, but mostly Italian, was something that she would leave her legacy. I think that's what's important. That's one of the questions, one of my former teachers, so I think that, I'd like to, if we can, maybe not tonight, but just get some information on that, Madam Superintendent, because I think it's important to see if we still have that in the budget, which you donated. I know that.
[George Scarpelli]: And that was at the high school?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. So like I said, I think that it's important that, you know, as I'm, the questions that I'm reading up, not just from me, they're from former teachers. And when they hear these things, they want to make sure that the legacy of one of their former colleagues is still carried on. And I think that, you know, I, you know, I see so many students, my children included, that the Italian language part of their culture is very deep here in Medford, and I know that I think maybe Italian families really don't feel So they feel a little bit slighted. And that's something that just for transparency purposes, just to bring forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so I just want, just so you know, just with Miss Petrangelo's funding, with what she donated, just to make sure that plays a big factor, because I think that as we move forward with this, when you have a teacher leaving a vote load of money, which is a million dollars, a lot of money, and that was some years ago, so I don't know if there's anything left in that line, but understanding that with her legacy, her former colleagues that I've talked to, making sure her legacy is carried on, that we give her the respect, whether there's only 12 kids for Italian, we find a way to fund that class with what she left. That's my point. So I appreciate that. I completely understand that there's a need base and we can all agree with that. I promised Councilor President Baez that I wouldn't go line by line. I think that I've taken enough time tonight. I think the biggest question that will be during the budget presentation with the mayor, and I think that I'll be more vocal when it comes to how I think this budget should be funded, because I think that What we're seeing right now is something the mayor ran on in transparency. This community has yet to see in five years. And we've lost a lot of revenue because of, for what she has decided what's important to this community. We've lost millions of dollars. We wouldn't be in this bar right now if the mayor was more transparent in the process. Just no different than this process we're in right now. We found out I was watching the meeting, the five o'clock meeting, and the mayor was stunned when you expressed the number, and she came back right away and said, this working group has been working on a override, Proposition 2 1⁄2. And I only bring this up because Councilor Villes and I talked. A lot of people I've talked to that you would think that don't want an override have blatantly told me, if we can see the financial picture, and is it true? Does the data prove that? If we had new revenue, if we went with one 40B project, and if that 40B project brought in $3 million in permits, right? And then the new revenue, that's another $3 million. out of that project. This $606 million in new growth, that's one project that we fought, which by the way, would be hundreds, hundreds of affordable housing units. This is the narrow minded thinking and the mismanagement of finances that we're seeing today in this community that is hurting the bottom line. The bottom line is scary to say it's going to be our children and our seniors. So again, Mr. McHugh, listen, I appreciate all your hard work. You have the toughest job in this whole city. You were given a pile of junk, and they said, OK, go to work.
[George Scarpelli]: And to that point, do you see what I'm saying? To that point, Mr. McHugh, We're a community that's looking at a $79 million budget line, and we truly don't understand it yet. That's what's frightening to me. We left here a year ago at this time knowing we were going to be here. You know, another comment people ask, is the school committee still going to accept their raises? Well, sure. I would recommend still that we cut our pay to support that so we don't hurt the budget in any way possible. But that's my opinion. But when you as the director of finance or the acting finance guru here see how drastic and how difficult this process is, Imagine what we're thinking. Imagine what the residents are thinking. Imagine the homeowner that's a senior citizen sitting back and someone's whispering in the area saying that if an override goes through and debt exclusions go through and transfer tax goes through, that homeowner is possibly looking at thousands of dollars that are going to change their lives. So that's the fear right now. And so, and I appreciate that, I hate to put you on the hot seat because you don't deserve it, but this is exactly how everybody's failing. And this is when I say mismanagement of finances in our community, it's not your fault, but it is, we can see it.
[George Scarpelli]: No, no, I think the biggest piece, I think, Councilor, is that the understanding of is in trying to recover funding in any way we can is finding a reason why we're losing.
[George Scarpelli]: Just to reiterate, I think that maybe some things are getting confused, some councils in translation, but the understanding, I appreciate you bringing this point up, that understanding to sit here and blame anybody right now doesn't get us anywhere, but to understand the process to make sure the, the bleeding stops when the same thing's being done over and over again. We have to identify that and being the fact that this council is in charge of making sure that financially, we're doing the best for every citizen. It's important to ask us the most important questions. So when I bring up the fact of five years of stagnant growth, of course, that's a huge factor where we are today. Of course it is. I identified one development that would have brought our community millions of dollars, and that's one. So the key factor and the key process that I'm bringing up right now, and especially that everybody understands this, is not only with the mayor, and I brought up the council respectively, the council president from June 20th, and then even with this financial process that we're talking about with this working group. When you're doing it in a bubble and we don't know what's going on, it's alarming. We're in big trouble. And now sure, could we have looked at a debt exclusion or overrides in the past? Sure. This council, by the way, unlike anyone here, presented the debt exclusion for a new fire station years ago. And maybe one person was here that voted no on that that evening, but it didn't go anywhere. But what I did was, I met with the financial director, who by the way, as award winning financial director, and Aleesha Nunley, and she presented a breakdown of that debt exclusion to educate everybody to understand where it fell, where it fell. And at the time it was $17 per household a month. with excluding senior citizens and veterans. So I understand completely what this council is looking to do, but it's how are we doing it? And understanding that maybe pointing the finger has to be done. Maybe people understanding because you know what? To get this passed, if we really need it, we need everybody involved. We need everybody to see the light. Because all this is doing right now is further dividing this community, this process. Not that we don't need it, because I've already addressed that. I think that if it's done properly and the data proves it, and we can say, well, let's say we have four developments ready to go in the next year and a half. And we're ready to pull the trigger instead of fighting and going to court and denying and denying. Well, maybe that's revenue that we wouldn't be sitting here right now. So to my colleagues, we have to identify that. And we do have to look at pointing because that's our job. We have to figure out where the mistakes have happened. So they don't happen again, like Councilman said. So this isn't sour grapes. I grew up in this community. I taught in this community. I coach in this community. I own a home in this community. I raised two kids in this community. I was in the school committee for eight years. I've been the council now for many years. I've seen the ups and downs. I understand that things are underfunded. But if we do it correctly, everybody can get involved in this, and everybody can support it. But when it's coming the way it's coming out right now, and it's irresponsible, the process was irresponsible to date. And Council Bears and I have talked about this. He doesn't disagree in the sense that he wished things came out differently, too. We've talked about this. So that's the process that constituents Maybe not some people's, but constituents that reach out to me, make sure I express that. So we look at every avenue possible. Maybe talking to mayor and saying, okay, let's look at this. Let's look at this right now. What we can do today to fund our schools, to get them level funded, so they're not hurting. But at the same time, pause, get the information that we need, the proper information that we need, the data that we need, that everybody can marry and understand. Well, you know what? We do need a debt exclusion for this. We do need an override for this amount of money. I'm not saying not to do it. I would firmly believe if the data shows and everybody's part of the process, because I said this at the beginning, the difference that you're seeing in communities that have passed overrides, Communities were informed, they were part of the process. I'm good friends with a former mayor that is probably someone that I put on the top of the mountain when it comes to mayors. And when I explained this to him, he says, well, explain the breakdown. How was it presented? And when I said, well, it wasn't presented, it was just mentioned. How irresponsible? So fellow consulate might not take what I'm saying as that they take respect toward it or they feel that it's not needed. Oh, it is needed. Because that's what people put us in for. So I would never tell anybody here not to express your thoughts. But these are the thoughts that we can bring everybody together and find a way to get where we need to go. And like I said, if it's a debt exclusions, if it's overrides, I think there's a way to get there. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I'm glad to see that our Chief of Staff has like commender. She's coming here as she usually does and stands up and defends the mayor because that seems like that's been common practice with our chief of staff. I will tell you the numbers that I shared a numbers that were given to us by her office and I believe there was a comment a few weeks ago that the law line item was $50,000. That wasn't true. When you do the actuals and you count it up at the time for that one year that we did have, which we expressed is a question because we're seeing the mismanagement of financial process here in the city. You can blame COVID again, but that's getting old because as Medford's fighting about COVID, I could talk about communities too. And I won't talk about, I won't give you numbers from Athol, Massachusetts. I'm gonna talk about our neighboring communities. Malden, flourishing. Everett, flourishing. Somerville, flourishing. New growth everywhere. We're touting a beer hall on Mystic Ave. So when we talk about transparency, there has been huge lack of transparency from that office. Even the fact that what I heard the other night, looking back at the meeting, that a city solicitor is not important. It's a disgrace. The city solicitor works for the community. He's that check and balance, that person's that checks and balance for the city, for this body. So there's a lot to be said in what's going on, because when it's time, everything will come out when the mayor is here, because I think that that's one thing people are missing, is that when things are tough, I believe she said that to Councilor Caraviello when he ran against her for mayor, saying that Mr. Caraviello doesn't want to make tough decisions, he wants to say yes. Well, guess what? It's been tough for the last five years. And we haven't seen much happening. So you can blame the pandemic, you can blame whatever you want to say, you can look at whatever numbers you want to look at. But the truth is in what we live in every single day. You might not understand that because you don't live in metric. So, but no, no, no, no, no. That's a valid point. You're touting something that and not understanding what the community has expressed to us. So don't be a little bad, to me at least. So, you know, the understanding that when the mayor gets here at budget evening, we'll go over it, we'll discuss it, we'll debate it. Because we're here for, we're here, like we said, in a more mutual understanding process, is that we understand that there's a process that we might need a form of overrides or debt exclusions. But I don't think it's done in a transparent manner, I've mentioned it, I'll say it over again, and I'll stand by that. I sat with this mayor. and what she worked with sitting next to me for years isn't the person that's trying to run the city right now. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll do respect to that. I appreciate the hard work people are doing, and I understand keeping them on right now, but I think as we move forward, I think it's important that we give the opportunities for Medford residents to take those positions, so I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: They're advisory committees. Yes. Take it all back then. I apologize. I think that's great.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm good for now, Council President. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you very much for all your hard work. You can see the impact because of, I think that, oh boy, when you first started, we were calling the office on a daily basis and now we don't have many calls and that says a lot about department that, you know, unfortunately, people look at like, it's evil. So but we know, we get it.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I appreciate it. So I think that the only question I had is I remember that we had talked in the past that for your comfort, I know that your office was a little. How can I say it was underwhelming? Have we done any anything to support you? And in your comfort level in your department? Is that have we done anything to help with that?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, well, I think whatever, whatever we're doing, there's got to be there's got to be a solution where we can find you know, hopefully find a more suitable location for you, especially as we're growing and as you're taking on pretty important pieces. I mean, I know that it doesn't sound like a lot, but just doing the passes for projects or for moving, that's going to be a very busy office. And, you know, and if you look at neighboring communities, Boy, they're standalone buildings. And from what I recall, yours is possibly a cubicle. So I would hope that we a little bit more proactive and finding you a better location or another space in the building where you have that space that you and your staff deserve. So I just wanted to share.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. Yes. Facetiously, maybe we should maybe make an office move from city solicitor's office and the traffic and parking. Maybe that might work.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I apologize. I should have brought this up. And director reminded me that on the on the appeals process, I know that is it? I haven't really had a chance to look through it. And someone just mentioned it this afternoon, and wanted me to ask a question. Is it? Is it just people that the talk the talk around Medford again with the appeal process being something to the tune of $250?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Tonight is a great example of what Method truly is about, right? We have, tonight was just, we haven't had many of these in a long time, but this was a love fest. And I, you know, this is what Method's all about. So a group that was started a few years back, the CCSR, we have one of our leaders here, Mr. Richard Trotter is here tonight. And I know that when we heard about this story, and then we saw it on TV, and then you see it in action, because, you know, it sounds, well, that's cute, right? And then all of a sudden, our postal worker walked down the street with the whistle. And I said, and you see what's going on. And there are some dangers. Sadly, there are dangers. And we had two fifth graders that decided that they wanted to do something about it. And it's easy just to sit back and do nothing. But this is what's exciting when you have a fifth grade. to fifth graders that can reach out to this school, that can reach out to an organization like CCSR, and then provide an avenue that they can do something really, really, really moving, and something that really shows the city and shows their friends and shows everybody that you take an initiative, because you care, because you see something and you want to fix something. So I give them our friends a lot of credit for what they've done. I'm so happy they're here tonight with their families. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Come on up, Savannah.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli. No, thank you. So I think this is the process that... No, you... Sorry, this is the... So I think that the process we're seeing is on point. I think that... you know, I personally didn't see any violations myself. And I think that this is just an example for our newer Councilors that voted against legal response for my question from last couple of weeks. What that triggers now is the public asking for their opinion okay so what happens is so I did reach out to legal opinion just just point of information that it's because we have absence of a city solicitor I it shouldn't be a motion it's just a request the administration so it doesn't need it doesn't need um a passing of the council if a sitting member of this council asks for a legal opinion. So that'll be brought up again and I'll just ask the questions that I had at our previous meeting with any legal questions. I think that's the process that works. Unfortunately, what we're seeing is the lack of a city solicitor really hinders a lot of issues. I think that, again, This situation will be handled by a city solicitor, and we probably wouldn't have to pay more money to a outside law firm to rule on this, which is pretty self-explanatory. So I'm glad it worked out. And again, just a point of information that's gonna be down the line. I think that's important that we know as a council, if you have a question legally, you could just refer it to the city administration to get legal opinion. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Petition is here tonight.
[George Scarpelli]: Good evening. Thank you for waiting. Yeah, we appreciate that. So now, taking over the existing business that's there, are you changing ownership or?
[George Scarpelli]: So, so this is your existing business?
[George Scarpelli]: And you just want to?
[George Scarpelli]: Do you want to sell cars? Yes. This wasn't clear. So I think that that is there a lot there? Is there? I don't see that there's a lot. at that location where you can just you can, you can show the cars, is it?
[George Scarpelli]: where are you gonna store these? You have to help me understand that your auto body shop doesn't have any exterior parking for display of used cars.
[George Scarpelli]: Where?
[George Scarpelli]: That's not clear, Mr. President. That's, you know, I think your petition's a little misleading. That's why it's a little, when I looked, I looked at the address of 26 R Mystic.
[George Scarpelli]: That's an auto body shop.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, but it's a side street.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, so I don't, there isn't, what I'm saying is, you're saying now there's another address that you bring your used cars?
[George Scarpelli]: So. As I did my research and what I saw is that I didn't see that, so I would have to see what I could do here. I looked at Google Maps and I drew by, so I'm trying to figure out where.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, if you can, because I don't see parking there. I don't see a lot. And the biggest issue we have in those areas are parking. And whenever, you know, just to the fact that overflow from auto body shops park their cars temporarily on the street. I can understand that. I don't want to affect that business, but if you're putting in placing used car there and just sitting there, you know, and on the street, I can't, I couldn't support that.
[George Scarpelli]: Inside this building?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. So what do you do in the building? That's an auto body building inside.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, if I can, I think instead of wasting time, what I do is I'd like to maybe send the code enforcement officer and ask them to go visit that, because I don't see it. I think if you're doing business for auto body, you need the indoor space for auto body. That means if you're gonna take spots inside, where are you gonna move the cars that you're working on? Outside, right?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I just don't want to deny it, if we don't know enough. So if we can table it till May 28 meeting or enough time for everybody to do their due diligence.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I did have one of the other pieces that we wanted to have a meeting with the code enforcement officer. He reported back to us that there has been no issues or concerns in that neighborhood surrounding Pinky's for any of their business issues that have been fine. So that was one of the concerns. I did talk to the owner and I made some recommendations after talking with the neighbors, and again, this is their decision. So I leave it to the owner to give us an idea of what they might be looking at, and then we can move from there, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I think I know that we've been talking with the neighbors. I don't know if they're on right now.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I would know that the neighbors we talked about either two or three days appreciate the petitioner working with us. What we did decide is that We'll do a 30-day, 60-day review. And then what the neighbors did ask, because Tufts might be their number one, that we just ask the code enforcement office, when school's back in session, to maybe take a closer look at that area and making sure that the process is fine. But I'd like to hear from the neighbors. I think this is a good compromise.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, October 1 to get a quick, after the Tufts opens up, we say October 1 for another report.
[George Scarpelli]: I think Mr. DiRico is just an amazing individual, and anything he says is like diamonds flowing from my heart. from his tongue.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. And this resolution comes up because of a conversation with a very educated constituent, and he's here tonight. Guest on is, we had a discussion, we talked about I did some reading, and you realize that the negative effect that this puts on, especially, I looked at the fact of a senior citizen that was having issues with their taxes, and then finding a way to get out of it by selling their home, and then coming back and taking, the whole property instead of what is owed to them. So I think that this is something this council should support and send some ascended to state legislators for their understanding. So I know that we had, after our council speak, I know that I'd like for a community member to come up and really give his professional opinion.
[George Scarpelli]: Present
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Tseng, thank you very much for all your hard work. This is well done. I think that this is needed. I think that we need to really If I can, I think that I'll be making the recommendation for all of our future commissions to make sure that part of the membership appointment removal organization, there's a section in there that says that the members have to be residents of the city of Medford to make sure that that is spelt out. And then the other piece is the independent resources. I think it's a slippery slope when we say that we provide adequate funding to retain its own council. This just, it just leads away from something that I'm fearing is that we're still not really going all in with the city solicitor. I think if we put a city with, you know, the council with partnership with the city solicitor or their designee, I think providing funding differently opens up another concern that we hear over and over again is in the community is where are where is all of our legal money going and what we're seeing even with our Our warrants, it's more than, for what I've counted so far, it's over $400,000. So I just want to make sure we keep a tight leash on that if we can. But thank you for all your hard work.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor. Councilor Scarpelli. So the previous resolution that I voted no on, and I'll probably vote no on this. We're making decisions where usually in the past, I know that this council here today, I'm the only one that's actually been part of a council with the city solicitor, sees the importance of that answer. And I know my fellow councilors don't believe in spending money with KP Law, so requesting any questions to go their way, I think I feel reluctant to vote on anything without understanding legal ramifications or what we should be directed by legal counsel. I mean, we can talk all we want until we find ourselves in a tricky situation where we're then called on the carpet. And then because of those situations, we're then brought to court for legal issues, and then it's blown up 30 fold, like the BJ situation a few years back. So again, I would in the past have recommended to get legal counsel, but that's not the privy of this council anymore. So just wanted to share my two cents with this. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I appreciate your... description. The question I have is something that comes up every year. With the Action Boston Community Development, the ABCD program, I think we had a problem, if you remember, that focused on making sure that this money was spent in Medford. And again, if you could just make sure that that happens, to approve this money. I know in the past, they weren't very clear that if it was going to Boston, if it was going to other communities, but Boston and other communities have different avenues, and I think this is, you know, when we talk about Medford, we just want to be clear that this money is earmarked for Medford residents and Medford concerns. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you so much, Director. I think that this is so exciting, hearing so many positive moves from our HR department. Maybe this might have been for the Executive Council President, but I just might have forgotten, but any movement or any thoughts of I know one of our strong initiatives is the City Solicitor and the Assistant City Solicitor's position. Have we talked about maybe increasing that CAF to bring in candidates who will actually look at that as an appealing position? I know it's really low and from the people that I've talked to they won't even consider even applying in Bedford. So this might not be for this conversation, but I did want to put it on our to-do list if we can, whether it's a form of a motion. But again, I didn't want to leave this out. I know it's an important agenda piece that we focus on.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that may be- Yeah, sorry about that. It was up before, I apologize.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I'm sorry, Councilor. I put my hand up and direct your answer to the question. Thank you so much.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. I think my biggest thing, as we've talked over the years, is the staffing and what, you know, it seems to be that every time we have an initiative, it's always, well, we'll put the building department on it, or we'll put the health department on it. So I know something that came about in conversations of a possibility, and, you know, especially looking into this year's budget, It's a little concerning to me. If we, if we, the council did move forward with a registry for our landlords and renters, do we have the capacity for staffing in your department to oversee that?
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate the walking the line on the answer, but I think that it's concerning to me that, and probably not to be answered today, but I probably will ask when we come to the final budget, when we look at the building department's budget and asking and realizing the responsibilities with this type of rollout. I know you kind of skimmed over it, but I don't want to disrespect you in any way, but it's a monumental, um, process to be, uh, policing, um, all these properties and making sure, especially when you're talking about the fines that you see that might be implemented. So, um, because I think then that leaves us into some liabilities, some equity issues that, um, are we covering, are we doing our job? Do we have the staffing to do our job? So I, but like, again, I, I appreciate, um, the answer, but I will let you know that I'll probably ask a little bit more in-depth questioning with some more guidance as we move forward because it looks like it might be an initiative that this council might bring down the line. If we don't have the staffing, I can't see it. I believe in the meeting that we had that Your department supported it. That's why it was little. We were told by a correct me if I'm wrong, Council President, that it was stated at the meeting that the building department is actually that you actually initiated that. the process of looking into this and implementing this. So I'd like to get a little more depth later on to see how we can manage this with the staffing that we have. And again, I appreciate it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, President Biz. And to follow up with Vice President Collins was saying, I just want to just echo what was just said. I think that what you're doing as a one man team, one person team, I think is just phenomenal. And I just want to highlight something that we've heard yesterday and again today. And the initiatives that we're seeing that your office and recreation and what we're trying to do with disability acts and what we're trying to do for programming for disabilities and and our adaptive programming, I think is as a super surprise and excitement. So I just wanted to share that. And thank you for all your hard work.
[George Scarpelli]: Make the motion to join both resolutions.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, this is, um, this is another, um, another process where you see the CCSR program assisting young people with innovative ideas that give back to our community. We had two fifth graders that saw the need after witnessing the holdup of one of the mail carriers on TV, and I believe they took it upon themselves, both Savannah and Adam, two Brooks students, to find a way to assist our mail carriers for their safety and providing them with whistles for, and this is so, it sounds so simple, but it's the minds of great, two great individuals that were raised the right way, that saw a need and they stepped up. In typical Medford fashion, this is what makes Medford Medford, that we have young people seeing the need for something, reaching out to their school and the CCSR to really put something together. And we should all celebrate that. I'd make the motion that we invite them to our next meeting and hopefully give them a citation and really applaud their effort for what they've done. So thank you, Mr. President. I'm sure you have much to say as well.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. This is an amazing resolution. I thought that, you know, if you all leadership, and we brought it up, I just thought that a resolution for a great person, even before Rick Caraviello put his name out there to run for mayor. Rick, as a Medford Mustang and a committed member of this community, with no fanfare. And I think no one really would have known what Rick has done if he didn't run for mayor. And they use it as platforms. And I know Rick, he was very taken back. He didn't want to talk about the things he did, because Rick Caraviello was the person that did everything when nobody was looking. and he didn't want anybody to know. So that's what's amazing about the person. And being named the citizen of the year, I think is an amazing award for an amazing person. So the fact that if I had the opportunity to go to the banquet, listen to him speak, and you see the names on that list of the former, the former, you know, honorees of that award, and you see the greatness. And when I say the greatness, it's just people giving back. It's just people loving Medford, and people giving back to the community, and especially those people that give back when no one's looking. I know we have a few people here, I think Rick Orlando's here, one person is a former award winner. And This is, this is for someone I'm glad Zach brought this up that I'd like Rick to come out and I think we should really honor him, even if I know he's going to be a little bit quicker. He had knee replacement, so he'll get to the, he'll get to the podium a little quicker, but, um, You know, I'm honored to call him my friend. I'm honored that I got to serve with him on this council. And I'm honored that I got to watch him help so many and teach me that selflessness to just give back when no one's watching and see the impacts it made in people's lives. I know that he read a few stories that people wanted to read because of his award. And you realize the impact that that he never intended to make and how moving it was. So to my friend, congratulations. And again, I would love to invite him, Council President, to our next meeting and him and his lovely wife, Carol, because I know that if it wasn't for Carol, he wouldn't be able to do all those selfless things that he's done for this community. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So I appreciate that. I believe that if I can, Mr. President. I apologize, because I couldn't get on. I was listening and I couldn't get on to the last second and I apologize for that. But I know that engineer Olin said that we're looking at substantial figures, correct? What, $6 million a year to catch up?
[George Scarpelli]: Could we just have a 24.015 and 24.073? I won't be supporting that paper, so I apologize.
[George Scarpelli]: So I think that we see that for our Snappy Patty petition, Uh, they're looking for the extended hours just for Thursday, Friday and Saturday, 11 to 1. Um, we have, I have talked to, uh, the, uh, building inspector's office and, um, um, talk to them, uh, getting some feedback. on any issues and concerns of the establishment, their well-respected establishment, and being that one of the questions we did hear from both people that were for or I didn't have anybody against that reached out, but that they've been great businesses and the fact that it doesn't abut a neighborhood, which makes it very important, I think was something we see. I know that if there is a petitioner here,
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, Snappy Pats. Yes, sir.
[George Scarpelli]: So again, this is something that we come about many times. I think that the petitioner comes with respect, background, no issues. I think that Um, I would support this. I know that whenever we've done this, we do put a 30 day and then a 60 day, um, uh, just to review with, uh, the building inspector just to give us any updates if they hear anything different. Um, and like, like I said, I think that, uh, I don't see anything. I see everything else in order, Mr. President. And again, people have to know the approvals tonight go with the, the, the, the owner. And if it's changed in any way to a different owner, then the process would have to be reassessed with the new owner of the business. That was one of the questions that someone asked. So if anybody else has any questions, I don't see any concerns or issues with this petition.
[George Scarpelli]: I make the motion to approval with the stipulation of a 30- and 60-day review.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Is a petitioner here?
[George Scarpelli]: I am waiting for, just for clarification, I am waiting for the building department I tried to call today just to get an update with any reports. So I'm probably going to ask the table this, or extend it to our next meeting. But I did have questions. I know that when we've had concerns of neighbors, I think that we see you've done everything that you need to do, and we want to support you in any way we can. But you're going from one extreme to the next, and being to the point that it's in a residential neighborhood. And the biggest fear, we've received multiple emails with residents that love you guys, that think that you're great, hardworking people, but at the same time, it really affects their quality of life with not people that you have control of, it's with your customers or with the shared drivers that come in. parking in front of people's homes, engines revving, music on, they run in and grab an order. So they find it that it's gonna be a huge disservice for that neighborhood. So I would tend to just offer that the timing to two o'clock in the morning, I wouldn't personally as one Councilor, especially in a residential area, I wouldn't really support that. I think it's just too late. But I will, like I said, Mr. President, If we continue the meeting, then I'll make the motion that I'm still waiting to see if there's a way that we could figure something out with our building department, with our inspectors and our neighbors, to see if we can extend some hours to help you with your business, but at the same time, not affect the quality of life of that neighborhood.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can. I just that I wear a body that really wants to try to support local businesses. So if we could find a way, maybe we can talk after the meeting that maybe we could, you know, reach out to a couple of those neighbors and maybe or if you can do some outreach, those neighbors that surround your your the reports that the emails that I received had nothing to do with how hard you work and how much they love your establishment. The question is, they're just afraid of the outside people or activities that you have no control over. And that's what they were questioning. So that's why I don't wanna deny anything this evening. If we can just, I'd like to motion that we move this to our next meeting, just extend it. for two weeks and maybe... Given the time frame, I have to open the public hearing and then we can continue. We can do that, right. But I just want to give a petition, just what we're looking to do. So maybe there's a way that we can talk to our neighbors and see if we can find something. I think there's something here that we can work with the neighborhood, but I know what scared everybody was one o'clock and two o'clock every night.
[George Scarpelli]: There's an old nurse, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpello? Thank you, Council President. Thank you, Councilor Cohn-Springsteen. Now, this is creative. This is raising money to support our housing issues. through the people in our community. Isn't that great? And I'm gonna support this 1000% because this is what we're saying. Because when we're talking with the last few weeks, last few months, the scary talk has really moved a lot of people in a negative way here. So when you hear resolutions like this, you see what Cambridge has to do for, what Harvard has to do for Cambridge when it comes to housing. You can see what Boston asked for housing with all their universities. So this is something that I agree with my colleagues. I think we need to really, and especially as we see, I mean, they've, Tufts has just grown and growing and growing and And all we keep doing is losing revenue, losing tax revenue, providing more services, costing our community more money. So I support this wholeheartedly. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: To the chair, if I can. Sure. If we can have a legal opinion on backgrounds that have political undertone and making sure that we're following, uh, the process of our rules and regulations. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. First of all, the council president and I did speak. Moving forward, I think that coming to professional opinions that putting in vague resolutions where it comes to discussion, we're going to try to make them more substantive. I think that whenever we do a subcommittee meeting or a regular meeting and we put resolutions in that are open-ended, I can understand that it's a little confusing, and I think that we can work on that. with this process, I think that understanding, it first started with the process with subcommittee that Councilor Leming proposed that with the newsletter. I think that understanding the process where it starts here and to a subcommittee and the subcommittee is the process is then sent to the council floor that we vote on something as a council to support or not support or share openly to the public of any concerns that we have. Has something changed since then?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so, and this is so people understand. I've gotten phone calls and they said, we don't see your names represented on this newsletter. And the issues I said that, well, I'm not, because I think that I had some concerns. And the concerns I had was not the fact that we're getting more information out to the community, but making sure that everybody, that there's equity involved. And we asked for some answers to the communications director, and he gave us some responses that really didn't equate to much, but still we have still yet vetted how we're getting the have-nots, the people that don't have an avenue to get our information. And where is our information going? it's going to the same people, the haves in our community, and they're getting the information that's designed by six members of this council, that I would question whether there is some violations. And I would ask legal counsel to report back to us if this is in violation of, you know, campaigning. And I think because we have six members that are on a slate that are putting out a newsletter that's going directly to an identified group of people that really isn't hitting the whole community.
[George Scarpelli]: Sure, and I appreciate your opinion, but I think there's some issues that I really want a legal opinion on.
[George Scarpelli]: So we should ask that too. So the key is really just asking these questions and having a set of solicitor, this wouldn't even have been a resolution, just a phone call and say, hey, I have a question. But because we don't do that, I have to bring this forth on the council floor. So I mean, that would be one. The second, which is more, that's really affected this community more than I think my colleagues even thought they could. Because over this past week, there was communication that was signed by my president and my vice president to state delegates about the transfer tax. And it's gone rampant that my fellow colleagues used their titles on a topic that we wanted to send to subcommittee that we have yet to talk about. The communication, the lack of communication, and the lack of putting forth this process of going towards subcommittee, it's something that we found so important to this community that hundreds of people were involved. And the feedback we got back from real people that have been here for years, that actually put this community on the map. I want you to understand, I get phone calls from people that told me, George, if no one's gonna listen to us, and there isn't gonna be the option that Councilor Callahan, they stress, put forth saying, this is just an opportunity to bring this to subcommittee to see what works and what doesn't, to see if we needed, if this is going to, and how we can focus and who we look at. Are we looking at developers? Are we looking at homeowners? Are we looking at seniors? Are we looking at so on and so forth? But we didn't do that. So these members of the community legitimately called me, and this isn't a political ploy or anything, I'm just sharing something. Good Medford people, backbone to this community, that said they decided that something what you think is sort of a political victory has now forced them to move on. And that to me is damaging to our community. It's still dividing our community. Now, don't get me wrong. Everybody knows this is the political process. Six members of this community, this body, ran on a slate, were elected, and they have the decision in the final vote. Everybody has to understand that. So if people come up and wanna be angry and disrespectful and talk negatively and be angry, that's too bad, right? They didn't do what they had to do in November. But what I want you to understand, that these are real issues. These are real issues. And this is what, it's only a 2% tax. I hear that too. It's only this, but we heard it today. We heard it this week. Between the $3 to $6 million focus on getting our roads back to snuff, $3 to $6 million. We're talking about a $250 million new high school. right? We're talking about a rent control. We talked about a 2% transfer tax. We're talking about an override. We're talking about a CPA that the state isn't matching. And from what we see is really, they're not doing their share for affordable housing. So with all this, it's not just 2%. And what that letter says, it's pretty damaging. I don't know if you really thought it out when you signed this on.
[George Scarpelli]: That'll bring me to the point where I'll ask for, through the clerk, I'll ask for a legal opinion that using city council titles and the correspondence to the state or other entities that gives the impression the information is offered as an official act of the city council. It specifically didn't, if you read the letter- Well, if that's something that, I'm cliche for you, but you're not my attorney.
[George Scarpelli]: So let me ask the question that we can, Mr. Clerk, through the chair, to ask legal representation if, by using it, no matter what line you put it in, but using your title By using your title, does that constitute what I asked? And if you'd like me to send that to you, I will. But I, Council President, I respect you, but you're not the legal entity of this body. So I want that.
[George Scarpelli]: I wouldn't, if we could, I'd like to make that as a motion that we ask for the legal opinion on that.
[George Scarpelli]: So city council titles using correspondence to state or other entities, it gives the impression that the information is offered as an official act of the City Council.
[George Scarpelli]: No. Okay. But what I'm saying is you whatever line you put it in individually or not, It's it just doesn't it's it's it doesn't pass the smell test when you sit here and talk to hundreds of people and you express that this is a process that we want to vet it is right. And then we put out and what they what was what was said in that letter. was so damaging that it truly affected neighbors and residents that it's going to affect more than just the 2%, more than what was said, maybe 1% here, 1% there. The talk was 5%, and who would pay for it, and then so on and so forth. So there's a magnitude of issues on that letter that I think that as a body to even sign that, individually or not, it just gives out the look that this body truly doesn't want to listen to the residents. I just want to clarify, what did the letter say? We can read it if you like. I'll send you a copy of it.
[George Scarpelli]: So I'm not done yet, I haven't stopped, I'm still continuing to speak.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, no, I'm not done. Okay. No, thank you. So the other issue is that we're talking about, you know, the these communities that are involved in this tenure and this in this transfer tax. And it's surprising to see that these communities and I've reached out to local members of of council and elected bodies in these communities. And I find it amazing that for the most part, most of these communities that have that have signed on to this are vacation communities, communities that have housing for summer rentals. You have a few that you have conquered, possibly Somerville, Arlington, Cambridge, but then the rest are West Tinsbury, Wellfleet, Truro, Tisbury, Provincetown, Oaks Bluff, Nantucket, Edgartown, Amherst, Boston, Brookline, that's Chatham, Chilmark, These are towns that, for the most part, when you say that these towns, there are 17 cities and towns that are supporting this, you're sending out the wrong message. Because the reason those communities are out there is because of the development that goes on. Now, if this council truly said, let's focus on a transfer tax on developers for these properties, it'd be important to discuss it. But with that letter that was just signed on, whether it was two years ago, it was done again this week, that it sends the wrong message. So again, and I'll finish with this. When you look at what is being asked for and what has been discussed by this council over the last two months, and the monies that you're asking for, you're scaring homeowners, homeowners that I think that I don't think you truly understand. A million dollars isn't a lot of money. You raise your eyebrows, but a million dollars for a homeowner in this community isn't isn't a lot of money. And for the people that built these homes to a million dollars, they're hard working blue collar workers. Can you take that off the camera, please? You're talking about homeowners that built for nothing and using their homes for retirement for the most part, at least for the 300 phone calls and emails that I've received. Now, again, this is my opinion as a city councilor moving forward when we get it to subcommittees that we really spell things out so we understand the processes And we're not misleading community members that we're going to wait for the subcommittee that was so intense that we haven't had a meeting. We haven't had a meeting, but then my two fellow leaders, my council leadership here can sign off. And what I think is a violation using the title, but we'll wait for legal opinion. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: You have a lot to say really not from the chair, my friend.
[George Scarpelli]: You don't say facts.
[George Scarpelli]: You're not following your rules.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, if I can.
[George Scarpelli]: Directly, he used my name, so I would point of personal privilege.
[George Scarpelli]: So I thank Councilor Callahan. Point taken. Thank you for answering my question. The question I had was the process subcommittee for the newsletter. It got its number. It was vetted. It comes to then the body that we vote on it. And then once it's agreed with the community, a newsletter is then released, correct? That's the process. Was the process followed, Councilor?
[George Scarpelli]: So I appreciate that. And this is what the conversation was. And for what I left, I think I've been very vocal in understanding I do the best I can on Wednesday nights. I've expressed that to the president. I do have another job. As a matter of fact, I have two other jobs. And I do the best I can to stay to every meet at Council Leming. But on Wednesday nights, as Councilor Bears can attest, I do the best I can to stay as long as I can. And to point me out that I left at a certain time, I gave my opinion, and then I had to go close the program. So to that point, I've asked the council president to please look for other evenings other than Wednesday nights, so I can stay at all the meetings. Also, I don't have to miss a meeting, because I missed one. I missed the one prior to this. And then I stayed as long as I could. And I appreciate the discussion that happened after that, but that's common practice. That happens. You've missed meetings. We've missed meetings. We've left meetings. The process I bring this forward on your situation and your resolution is that what Councilor Callahan said is what is an issue. A subcommittee gets a number, we discuss it. Long as it takes, we make a vote to send this to the council. To the council, we then vote and then we act. You didn't do that. You didn't do that, Councilor Bears, through the Chair, to Councilor Leming. You didn't do that. So I appreciate that bringing forward, because it's true, that's what happened. And then to Councilor Collins, through the Chair, to be vague and to be deceiving, not my intention, didn't know how to bring this forward, no different than her first meeting, Councilor Bears, through the Chair, when we talked about, quote unquote, The description of our subcommittee was on what? Home rule petitions, very vague.
[George Scarpelli]: Very vague home rule petition.
[George Scarpelli]: So when we talk about these concerns and issues, when we talk about subcommittees, and we talk about subcommittees that are in session that we're not talking about, and they're not being they're not being brought forth yet. When the community sees a concern, and they bring it forth to me, and that they're nervous for the fact that the process that they thought was mentioned that evening wasn't followed through. I looked at this as a process to speak on it so they understood the process as we move forward. So as we move forward with the subcommittee process on the transfer tax, understand what phone calls I got, the emails I got, the people that talked to me on the street, So this is done. I said, what is done? No, it's not done. Well, this letter says everything that we fear about, everything that we were nervous about that evening. So to one councilor's point of view, as this being dividing and this is being hurtful, you have hundreds of people that felt that night that they weren't listened to. And then with the delay and not talking about an issue that was a pretty hot topic, and then not being brought forth and then this letter going out publicly, it put people in a different way. So it's my responsibility as a council to try to put this forward so we can discuss it, so we can move forward with it. So if at any time that you say something to me that's hurtful, and I say something to you that's hurtful, we know each other personally to understand that I know you have a job to do, and you're representing people that have come to you directly. That's all I'm doing. And I'm telling you, it is scary to people. It's scary to people that when I, it's not that it is scary people to the point that they are. And that's what I just, you need to share that as part of this lack of subcommittee process. So again, appreciate our talk earlier. I'll make sure moving forward as we move forward with these, our resolutions that I will eliminate discussion and I'll be more detailed for the body. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: That's just so wrong. It's semantics. In what way, Mr. President? in the way that I just described it. Well, it's pretty embarrassing, because for this council, I deserve the respect that when I bring something forward, that it's given back that same respect. And to call it that is out of line. OK.
[George Scarpelli]: We can have that discussion whether it's a letter or not. Please, please explain. That's sending a wrong message. We can have a discussion without sending anything to the state. That's not true. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: No, we have people that want to speak.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, the question is for the legal department to ask if a newsletter that's being put forth could be construed as campaigning. But the question the first question is legal opinion using City Council titles and correspondence to the state or other entities that give the impression that the information is offered as an official act of the City Council.
[George Scarpelli]: the legal standard. Mr. President, if I can, I did forward the edification for Council Leming on the 23rd of that evening at 8.23. I didn't have your number readily available, Councilor Leming, so I know that Councilor Villes wasn't in-house that evening.
[George Scarpelli]: So I thought I was on the assumption you were, so, because I was also sick, so.
[George Scarpelli]: No, what I said was, on that text was, hey, Zach, I'm out if you could just, so you could just move the questions quicker, because I have to leave. And that's when I asked about, seeing if we can have any meetings outside of Wednesdays. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: No.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Pente, you could speak at public participation, that's all.
[George Scarpelli]: where our leadership moving forward, where the mayor stands on this and getting her more involved as we discuss the processes. So the process for a home rule petition is this council would discuss it, any issue, then it would be voted. If it's voted through, it would then go to the mayor's office and the mayor would then have the option to veto it or move it through. And then it would go to the state house, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, is that true?
[George Scarpelli]: Because the other question was that if it came back to the council, we could do vote on overruling her decision.
[George Scarpelli]: And this is the process just sort of to be to be informed. Maybe I'll explain a little bit better. So as this process goes on, we start talking about different home petitions. The question also falls in not just in the council, but what the process is with the mayor's office and then with the state delegates and then moving forward. So I appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: That's what this process is. The questions that the constituents that reached out to me were with the process, because I believe this council There is an issue with affordable housing. But it's how we're getting there. It's just a philosophical difference. I think that our administration has done a terrible job using their responsibilities and their powers to bring affordable housing. I think they've done a terrible job over the last five years. Terrible. colleagues. So as the Councilors that want to pay for it, they have to look at what you've got right here.
[George Scarpelli]: Sure, Councilor Scrivella. Thank you. You don't care.
[George Scarpelli]: Kevin, thanks so much. Thank you. It's one of my initiatives when I first started to bring forth the vision of a full-time recreation department, and you've taken that vision that we had years ago and done Yeoman's work. It's been amazing to see what you've done for not a lot. Thank you. I can honestly say that because I'm reviewing my budget this year, and I'm embarrassed to see what we have and how you're functioning. So I give you, you and your team, pat on the back. You and Mr. Folsom really done a great job, and I think that people should identify that. One of the constants we've seen in the last few years is how amazing the recreation department's been. You know, we could talk about the little things, but that would have been bigger things in a negative way. You know, the lives we've, your life got saved at the pool and the pond and understanding what, how you prepared for that and making sure that we did what we had to do to fund that. So, you know, I didn't hear any, the good part is this, I didn't hear anything negative here. that you look like you're going to be okay. One thing that I did see in one of my initiatives that we met to talk about what we were looking for, I looked at something close to my heart, which is recreation. And we have probably the most expensive administrative assistants in the country. Between your salary and the salary of your assistant, it's kind of... It's kind of we're losing money and what we can be doing. And I brought forth the idea that we had when this came about last year with the Elections Commission and talking about the elections office and not having enough work throughout the year. and how great would that be to find maybe if the chief of staff can forward this to the mayor's office and look at a part-time position, even if you have someone working in your office, I know because I understand it, someone there at 8.30 in the morning till 12.30, just to prepare your signatures for what you need for payroll, returning emails, returning text, phone calls, that I would imagine would open up so much of your day and so much of your week. and I could see the benefit. I see a lot in addition to an addition, and it's a minimal addition, especially when we're talking about what we're seeing in the elections office. And granted, some months might be slower, some years might be slower, but what a way to take the opportunity of, you know, cross-training someone to work in that role. I think that I would love to see maybe a little bit more work done before we sign off on the budget. And hopefully that can come to fruition because it'll pay off. And that's one thing that I fear is that working in recreation, always having someone on the other end of the phone when kids are out at programs, or parents have questions, it's imperative that there's someone there. It's a safety, it's a reassuring factor, and it's a more legitimate factor, knowing that there's someone that's going to be answering the phone, and it's not going to be your director, your assistant director. Especially when, like you said, we do the, if I don't want to step on your toes, but we do a robust babysitting program, 25 students at $50 a time. And we do it every other every other season. And what we're seeing is it pays for itself. Especially if you're already trained to do it, it cuts eliminates the middleman. So I don't really have any other questions except for you know, a pat on your back and for your staff, I think that you guys are doing some amazing things. I hear a track meet, I see middle school programming, I see adult programming, I see drop-in programs, I see week vacation programs, I see programs that other communities don't do that we're doing here, so I give you a lot of credit, and something that I don't think everybody here knows, but Our Director of Recreation is also the leader in the state, the field of recreation and aquatics, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Right. So waterfront trainings and stuff. So that's another, you know, feather in our cap in the fact that, you know, I was taking advantage of Kevin for a few years calling him. uh helping with my aquatics questions that you know you're always willing to help as a as a brother recreation employee so um I think the other piece too I'd like to I brought this up years ago and uh I'm not sure if it's a violation or an ethics issue but I don't care because I think it's important because I think looking at years ago, I asked for the city to look into making Cornell Stadium's parking lot into a solar parking lot and see the benefits financially, what it can do. And I hear that they're talking about maybe the schools coming forward, and that's such a great idea. But imagine if we could put the fourth cab, if we can look at that parking lot and how we would fund the hockey rink. Because I can only imagine. I would assume the electricity costs would be over almost $200,000 maybe for the year.
[George Scarpelli]: it just benefits. And then if we use some of that money to bring it back into the recreation department for what you're trying to do, I think that's an added benefit without costing us anything right now. So, you know, if we can, for the record, Mr. President, if we can ask, maybe do an energy assessment over at the formal parking lot, and then, again, requests the administration to see if we can do a dual position with another department, which we've heard with the elections department for administrative assistant that would support the recreation department. So thank you very much and thank you for your hard work. I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, overhead, it's pockets. They can, if you want, the Lincoln Sudbury High School, if they want something to... to see what it looks like. Even Stone Zoo has it now too. So it doesn't touch the trees. It doesn't affect parking spots. All it does is puts a covering over that we can capture that energy that could feed the hockey rink and save us a lot of money. And that would be super if we could see if we can do that.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: The press box has been pretty dangerous. And I guess we've had visitors there. Squirrels. Squirrels, they have their own, their address there now. Do we have any talk? I know that there was some talk that we were supposed to do some renovations, but that hasn't happened, right?
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I know that the only reason why I bring this up is that former alumni that done very well for themselves, reached out and asked if there's anything they can do financially, or they also are in the business that possibly they would like to commit and help. So if there's any way that if you want to leave that charge and see what that would entail, and I could put everybody together, I think that'd be great. I think the other issue too, that they brought up was the audio system. Yeah, I was gonna bring that up.
[George Scarpelli]: And as we can see, I mean, Homel is now, it's not just the high school's field. I mean, we're hosting professional teams, our marching band and color guards, we're doing multiple rentals now there. So I think it's beneficial that we, you know, are cost effective, that we make sure we do that. Are they still bringing out that 1902 speaker? before games you know that gigantic it looked like a megaphone they're not that i know
[George Scarpelli]: I can. Thank you. Thank you for being here this evening. Again, I applaud the eight double plus rating for the bond. I think that's important. I think a lot has to do with the amount of money we have in our free cash. So kudos to the community for investing their money into that part. So that's a feather in the city's cap. I think that's very important. I just hope it doesn't affect us negatively when we look to balance our budget coming. FY 25. When we see the mayor, I think there's a lot of questions I have, especially with the new growth as we're going through. giving understanding, so if you want to prepare for that when we get here, the understanding of the lack of projects that we're seeing, the lack of new tax revenue, and I think the lack of movement in Method Square. I think that, I believe it was her, at the mayoral debate she talked about these jobs that were already shovels in the ground, I believe I can bring that up. I think it's going to be important to see where the mayor stands when she gets here, but. Knowing where that is, especially when we're looking to our fiscal future is going to be very important. I think that if we can as well, uh, the home rule petitions that are out. I don't hear much from the mayor and where she stands with those, so it will be nice when she comes as that presentation as we look at our fiscal future. I think it'll be important to see where the I'm just a little curious that we have, if you can just educate me in the Director of Communications, looks like 94.5, Director of Community Affairs? That's correct. Okay, 94.5. Then we have Special Projects Coordinator, it's a small $13,000, looks like a stipend. And then does that look like we're hiring another communications specialist at 75.3? Is that what the increase says, is that someone moved?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so that's great. So that's funding sources. That's, that's good to know. Just that when you when you look at the budget, and when you're hearing it, I know that I got phone calls today that there are going to be massive cuts in the secretarial staffing at the high school I'm hearing. huge cuts that that emergency meeting today and I just want to make sure that as we're looking at and I'll say this to all the the department heads moving forward and especially at the school department here with the executive department is making sure that we're looking at our executive offices and making sure that they've tightened their belts as much as they could because it looks like we're losing frontline employees again throughout the city and we've seen level funded here at this office. So I could appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: Great. Any questions? I'll be asking for all these commissions of these all method residents managing the staff to the chair.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, if I can, I think that if you would have that ready for us with next meeting is the big much meeting, because that's one thing that I look forward to making sure that all of our commissions, our method residents, to have people that live in different communities and sit on commissions that are making big decisions for our community, I think is kind of, you know, it doesn't pass the test to me. So if we can have that prepared, that'd be appreciated. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I make the motion to refer that to the administration and adjourn.
[George Scarpelli]: I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Bears. I appreciate the reading and joining me in this remembrance. Mr. Caraviello, again, we talk about legacies here in Medford and what families have done to build method to the city that we all love. And Mr. Caraviello was one of those founders. And you could see that in the man he raised in our former city council, President Richard Caraviello. And I If you know Richard, if you know Rick, you know that he has, and even as a retired city councilor, how hard he works for the residents of Medford to this day. And every time we talked, Rick would talk about the work ethic instilled in him by his dad. And you see that throughout his family. And, um, Most importantly, you really see the true dedication of family, love and passion, and really someone that we know that Mr. Caraviello fought very hard. He spent many years in assisted living, and it was very difficult at the end, but he's in a better place today, and we send the Caraviello family our condolences. So thank you for allowing this motion to be put forth, Mr. President. Thank you. President Collins.
[George Scarpelli]: Council, thank you so much. Again, I've been I've been getting phone calls and people asking that they don't see my name. I think that I still haven't got my answers. And this process as a subcommittee, as you've already moved forward with this, but we still haven't answered. How are we going to get this information to the community? And I know there was bantering back and forth about, well, at least getting it started. But it's exactly the message that I didn't want to send that I've been answering questions on. It's who is getting this information? It's not, there's nothing set up. We've still yet to hear anything from the communication director to see how we can get it out to undisturbing communities, parts of a community that's underserved. How do we get them the messages? Because the truth of the matter is what I'm hearing so far and the understanding of what we're sending out is something that our city clerk does at a pretty high level in our meeting minutes. So I just want to make sure that people understand, for the record, I'm not being included in this for a few reasons, and one being that we have still found out, we have still not vetted out the process of where this information is going. It's a newsletter to do what? To go where? Now again, if it's hitting, if it's, if we put a plan in place to get everybody, especially the underserved in our community, to make sure they're getting the information, because that's who's not getting the information. But again, I just want you to know optics are a lot, are pretty big here. And if we're bulldozing this with six Councilors and one left on the outside, I want it to be noted. So we still have, I put a motion in to ask where these are going. I asked for communication from the communications department that didn't send anything of any substance. And we have still yet to know where we're handing these out because that's all I've heard. We're going to hand them out. To who? To your Lister? to your groups? Well, that's that we're using city funds to to send a message out to one organization. And I just think that's wrong. So I just wanted to share my not like it'll go anywhere. But I just wanted to make sure that I was heard. And it's on the record that I've stated that if I can Mr. Mr. Mr. Clerk, that I'm not a part of this process because I don't feel that this process is serving the whole community. It's serving people that can be reached and nothing is being done or designed to reach that underserved part of our community. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I read the minutes, still no answers.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can. Councilor Scarpelli. Again, I appreciate that, but it was discussed. It was discussed. But what we're doing is we're putting something out there before we even came to a resolution. You've come to a resolution, but everything is being discussed. This is what the subcommittees are for. Now we're putting out a product that's actually going out to print. we haven't even we at least that's what I'm hearing right now. With everything was being discussed in subcommittee, nothing's gone out to the regular floor, nothing's been voted. And then nothing has been approved to move this this paper to go out to the public and making sure that did we look at we can just we can say that we're serving we're looking into serving the the underserved in our community. But just by saying it, just because you check a box doesn't mean we're doing it. So again, my recommendation is let's slow this down and make sure that we get the answers that we want, or else you're gonna leave a group of people in this community, again, feeling like they're not being listened to. Because there's things that are coming out in the city in the next couple of weeks that is directly showing that this council is saying things but doing something totally different. So I, believe me, I don't want to be the negative. It's not, it's usually in the last couple of years, it's never been my nature, but it's right in front of us. It's black and white what we're seeing. So please, to my fellow council, understand, you saying things and just putting them through, that doesn't mean that it was vetted properly. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Present
[George Scarpelli]: Apologize, I switched over to my laptop so I can see the presentation a little bit better. Going back, I know that for transparency's sake, if we could, Council President, can we please make it a motion to ask for the Projections of new growth for the last 3 years through the chair through the. Assessor and the budget director's office. I, you know, that just eliminates any questions that if I come up. And I bring something up and it's something that won't be questioned because it's coming from the department that's supposed to give us that information. I would really appreciate that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, please the projections and projections and what we were what we end up getting if we could just for just so we can have an understanding of what we looked at in the past and what we actually had in the past. So we can at least estimate what we're really looking at because 2.5 is pretty pretty dismal.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President to the chair. Bob, thank you for giving us this information. But what what what I'm a little, I'm a little nervous about. I know we just want to get through and get something on that will work. But we saw it for a minute at the school with the school department with the, you know, the 2.5 million dollars that they couldn't find and then they found and then there were a lot of budgets that were frozen and that really put the teachers in some difficult positions. Now, just curiously on the city side, do we have any departments right now that we're looking to hold positions or cut positions or freeze their budgets for FY24? um before we can get into 25 because there are rumblings out there that you know there might be some key positions even maybe an overnight position at dpw that we're looking to probably eliminate for the rest of the year and that's these are these are um These are these are questions that I think we need to know, especially if you're looking at the budget moving forward and seeing that. You know, having every department trend, just for the sake of numbers in a budget, where do we, where do we look. In 2024 with our departments on the city side.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't know. So real quick, it's a simple question. As our budget director, do we have any departments right now that look like they're in jeopardy of freezing their budget or not having enough for them to finish their FY 24?
[George Scarpelli]: So for clarification through the chair, so we might have some freezes in some departments. Because I think that when I asked the question, just to move forward as we move forward on this, and I'm hoping that our budget director understands that when we're asking questions that also has to do with the ARPA money, I find it a little befuddling to me that Our budget director says he doesn't see anything right now, but the chief of staff comes up and says well with our blah blah blah That we there are no there's no Definitives on that. So if we can as we're trying to vet out next year's budget and understanding how we got getting through this budget You know, I think we got the quarterlies. I think today we got one two and three. I saw them again today I really appreciate that but um, you know, um I'm hearing some trends and some concerns moving forward. So if we could just get an update as a form of a motion for our next meeting, Mr. President, that if we do have any departments that are looking at some budget shortfalls in FY24, that we're prepared for that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So Mr. Mr. President, if I can, this is this is so. So, Bob, if you've taken that, that my comment and anything to be disrespectful to you, please don't think of that at all. I'm looking at when we're asking questions to our budget director in the past, Bob. in the past or in my other roles, when we have a question with the budget director, I would assume that they would have all the information in front of you. If you weren't prepared or worked with the other people that are working on this budget together and you didn't have those numbers, that's not your fault. If anybody there took that as an insult, I apologize, but I'm just stating the fact, in the past when we've had budget meetings, and we've had other budget directors, and we've had other administrations, or working in other city municipalities and understanding the budget, when you're asking a simple question as, do we feel that any of our departments in the FY24 budget look like it's going to be funded, I would assume that we would know. You answered it by saying, well, from what I know, it looks like we're not going to have a problem. I understood that. The chief of staff then came up and said, oh, maybe the I believe it was the ARPA. So we're not we can't be definitive on that because of ARPA money. So I I tend to I tend to really get really disappointed when leaders of our administration come to that podium and accuse members of this council just because they're asking questions because they haven't been informed at all when it comes to information on the budget and they ask a question that wasn't clarified and then turn it around and make it sound like I insulted someone. I've been accused of this over and over again by this person and I find it offensive and that Mr. President and I hope you can take point to that because that is highly highly unprofessional. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Two quick questions. One, can we get a copy of this presentation emailed to us, Mr. President? I know that I've been held hostage from a virus, so if there's any way that we can get that emailed, I'd appreciate it. And next, just for Just for us to prepare us, Bob, and I know, like, again, I appreciate your hard work, but when we're doing our projections, our department heads looking at going through an analysis with, let's say, a 10% cut, an 8% cut, a 5% cut in their budget. just so they're prepared for next year. Because I know that Councilor Beall said I missed, as we're talking to each department head instead of me asking them one by one, I know that Councilor Beall is correct from wrong when I missed the meeting last week that the conversation was that these were pure numbers that department heads gave us. But I'd be interested to know if they were given that exercise to prepare us for any sort of cuts moving forward for FY25.
[George Scarpelli]: All right, so but they're given to us as a wish list, correct, Councilman?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, but they weren't asked to do a cut proposal so that we can we can see that to prepare ourselves.
[George Scarpelli]: That's my question. Thank you. Yes, correct. Thank you, everyone.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm in agreement with that, Council President. I would move forward with that as a motion, if that's what you need.
[George Scarpelli]: Is that a yes?
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Madam Clerk, there was a question, was it last week's meeting, there was a question on a resolution that Councilor Cownie put forth about the registry. I'm not sure it was last week's.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm going to say no, because I want to check that, and then I can get back to you on that. We got an email about that. There was some wording changing for what was originally put into the resolution, and then what was written in the resolution.
[George Scarpelli]: Paul, do you want to talk?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I appreciate bringing this forward to Council. Let him indulge me with this resolution. I know that I spoke to Mr. Stone King, supervisor who has now moved on to new community. And he passed along a letter that he asked if I, you know, could read he shared it with everybody here. But for this is reading for Mr. Stone King says, dear Mayor Brianna Longo Cone, I'm writing to formally resign from the position as superintendent
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, can we have the therapy dog back in? Round two? Can we have round two of the therapy dog, please?
[George Scarpelli]: There we go. All right, so I apologize. He writes, I'm writing to formally resign from my position as Superintendent of Water and Sewer for the City of Medford effective April 5th, 2024. It is with heavy heart that I submit resignation as I've greatly appreciated the opportunities and experience I've gained in my time serving the City of Medford during my tenure. I have had the privilege of working under the leadership of DPW Commissioner Tim McGiven. I must commend Commissioner McGiven for his professionalism, dedication, and unwavering commitment to the betterment of Medford. His leadership has been a source of inspiration and guidance to me, and I am truly grateful for the support and mentorship he has provided. I will strive to emulate his exemption leadership as I move forward. Despite the admirable qualities Commissioner McGiven have found myself increasingly frustrated with the administration's lack of action addressing critical issues within the department. The recent handling supervisor of water and sewer job posting, coupled with the And something offers 0% costs of living increase for FY 24 has underscored and concerning absence of values you place in my position as well as the lack of priority place in the central matters, such as water main replacements, aging utility infrastructure staffing shortages and overall neglect. of the needs of the DPW. I have worked tirelessly to address compliances issues, modernize departmental operations to highlight the pressing concerns surrounding the water distribution system. Regrettably, my pleas for assistance recognition of regulatory concerns and urgent calls for action seemingly fallen on deaf ears. It is disheartening to feel ignored and undervalued in the position where the welfare of the community is at stake. I believe that my efforts have made this positive impact, but there is still so much work to be done. I have reached a point where I feel I have exhausted all avenues and effected meaningless change within the covered environment. It is essential that the City refocuses its attention on critical infrastructure projects, staffing needs, and operational improvements to ensure the continued well-being of Medford and its residents. I'm deeply concerned the residents are unaware of the alarming conditions of the water system and its critical need for substantial improvement. Immediate focus and drastic change are essential to ensure the integrity of Medford water infrastructure as time is running out. I'm grateful for the opportunity to have served the city of Medford and valuable lessons I've learned along the way. I extend my deepest appreciation to all those who have supported and collaborated with me during my time here as those contributions have been instrumental in shaping my professional growth. I wish the city of residence the best in the future and hope necessary steps will be taken to address the challenging challenges facing DPW. Thank you once again the opportunity to have been part of this community Sincerely, Dan Stone King. So thank you, Mr. Stone King. I had an opportunity to talk to Mr. Stone King and I had a great conversation with Tim McGibbon. What I find appalling and what's frightening is that whenever lately, I don't know if we've followed along with my resolutions, we've always had something come back from the administration. Do you guys notice that? Every day after I bring something up, like even tonight, we have something about the water department. Why does it take? Why does it take a negative resolution to make city administration move on something this important? Mr. Stone King actually told me, we're not there yet. But he says he wants us to think in Medford as Flint, Michigan. Now we know how bad Flint, Michigan is right? Now I said, Is it that bad? When I talked to Tim, he says we're getting there. He was very excited when ARPA came out. And the first phase of ARPA was meant for what? Infrastructure needs. So they had a plan in place to really start moving things along. What he told me is that we're moving at a pace of about, what is it, a quarter or half a mile? We need three miles a year to catch up in Medford for what the aging infrastructure that we have in our water department. What I found amazing to me is, I don't know if people realize this, his position holds a license that you have to have to run the water department in Medford. If you don't have the certain license, you're at serious risk of serious danger when it comes to your water quality. So he's there having that license, which aren't many people that have that. As a matter of fact, As we speak right now, I believe Medford has hired Weston and Sampson, an outside agency, another outside company, paying them $200 an hour, an hour to sit in that office just to make sure that we have someone in place to qualify that our water is safe. Now, all this had to be done is a conversation and fair negotiation process to say, hey, what do we need to keep you? But I talked more about that. It wasn't about the money system. It was about the value. He was in the position for two years, two years of vital, vital position. So do you know how many times he spoke to the mayor twice? Twice. So we could say whatever we want and what's going on. And like I said, I'm gonna say it again, because there's a bunch of issues that I'll bring up. I want everybody to follow this along. Because as I bring things up, all of a sudden we have resolutions from the mayor. It's funny. But these are all too late. Not for Weston and Sampson, they're making a killing. $1,600 for today, right? Eight hour days, $200 a day, $1,600 a day. Now, I'm gonna be honest with you. I've reached out to neighboring communities, asked them about this person with this license. I've reached out to representatives MWRA that I know, from Medford, that hold that license. Quote unquote, A, I would never come to Medford because the administration's a mess. And B, why would they leave? They're making way more money where they are. So this is the problem that we're having. And if you're watching, every week, it keeps piling on. It's the same thing. It's a lack of leadership. So Mr. Stonekin wanted to send that along. I know I had a great discussion with Tim McGibbon. Tim did send over a letter. Everybody received the letter. And I shared that with Mr. Stoneking. And I said, well, he said, in typical fashion, nothing against Tim McGibbon and the DPW, because he works for the mayor. But all this does is just delay everything. What do they say? They're starting the process now to start looking into it. And they've been working on it for a couple of weeks. His words were, quote unquote, it's just talk. That's what he's felt for two years. It's just talk. And I appreciate Tim. Listen, I know it's not Tim McGibbon. I talked to Tim. His hands are tied. We had a great discussion. And I understand his frustration. But we are where we are. So I thought I'd share another happy Medford story with everybody. And I know that council bears. I know that he sent you have some administration, they sent some some messages to the city council. Do you have that? Do you want me to read it? I can read it. All right. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate Director McGiven. But to my fellow councillors, is this not a theme that we see? City Hall needs to be done, we're gonna set up a committee, we're gonna look at development, we're gonna set a consultant, we're gonna look into things. Everything is, just like Ms. Stoneking said to me, it's all talk. This is a director of DPW speaking for his boss, who's over and over again shown that nothing's getting done, zero. We're not getting anything done. We talk about multi-million dollar issues, that we had it right in our hand. We had millions of dollars. When ARPA came out, that we could still use for infrastructure needs, that we did nothing, zero. But again, Mr. Stonekirk writes this letter, I put it on as a resolution, what happens? The position that hasn't gotten any movement for months comes to us tonight for a change in CAF so we can raise it, so we can get better, we can entice people to come out now, right? So this is exactly what we're seeing. What's that saying? It's a dog wagging its tail. What's that state? The tail wagging its dog. Tail wagging its dog, exactly. And this is what I feel. Honestly, sometimes it's like watching a dog chase its tail with this administration. So we've known since the mayor's been in 2020 that we've had a huge issue here and that it was compiling. But now all of a sudden, in her 50 years, we're gonna now go into this, right? I wish you put together a pilot program or a committee like she did with the finance, with the water department that April as well, and maybe we can get something going, but we still have seen nothing. We're still seeing nothing. This still doesn't do us any, it doesn't do anybody any good. So again, I appreciate The answer, but it just only leads to the same old lack of leadership and the same old destructing, destroyed Medford that has nothing moving forward. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Name and address for the record, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, if I can, Judge Kavanaugh, if you can, if you honor me just for a moment, it takes a great man to know a great man. So I think that it's important that Medford knows that. You know, talk about a legend. He's uh Judge Kavanaugh is is uh someone we should all be proud of. So, sometimes what he just said, sometimes I get offended now. Some of my behavior sometimes when you have honorable people like that approach the bench and um I remember as a young man, to speak on behalf of another great man. We're losing our heroes, and the gentleman who's leaving the chamber right now is one of those people, so we should give him what he deserves. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: And again, I think that there's a dialogue that's being that's that's created now. And I hope everybody's really watching and listening because we're hearing a lot lately about lack of funding, lack of management, saying it's not mismanagement. But what we're seeing in what the dialogue that I'm trying to show everyone is that We have rules in this council that any awards over $5,000 have to be approved by this council. We know of many, multiple, multiple hundreds of thousands of settlements that have been put out there that I've talked to different representatives that we know nothing about. So anytime we have these issues and we have these issues that come up and questions that come up, It seems like they're hidden agendas. We've been asking, for instance, what we paid KP Law since they've been here. Now we voted on what? $5,000 for a retainer so they can be on staff for the mayor. Well, now that's blown up. Now we don't know what it is. I know that if it goes by the trend of December, which is close to $80,000 for the month of December, that's pretty frightening. And that's not including other things we know nothing about. So I bring this up to ask the mayor, especially before the budget season and before my colleagues asked him that what we're seeing a trend of possibly asking for taxpayers to be penalized for the lack of mismanagement and what we're seeing. When I say lack of mismanagement, we see a mayor speaking for years at debates talking about new growth and development. At the debate with Councilor Caraviello, she spoke and saying that we have three projects ready to go that raise millions of dollars. Those projects are gone. That's why I asked, I asked for the Office of Community Development to come out because we had 40B jobs. Remember we talked about the mismanagement of the 40B jobs and losing over 600 housing units for affordable housing. Right? We lost millions and millions and millions of dollars for fees, fines and new taxes. It's called new growth. We haven't had that. We had the mayor talk about Method Square, starting Method Square, shovels in the ground, bringing millions of dollars of revenue, nothing. We've seen nothing. So when I say mismanagement, it's mismanagement of understanding of where we're going in the direction we're going in the city of Medford. We can say we didn't fund anything. We can say that we're putting money into the general account. And the reason why we have to put in general account is because our management isn't following through with the promises that they've made of transparency and follow through for new growth. We haven't seen any of it. This is why we're going to general fund. This is why the money that was earmarked for one thing has to go to another thing, because we're losing that money because we're not the mismanagement of our finances in the city hall. I'm gonna give you some examples that I want. I'm asking the mayor for a report, meeting executive sessions, not to know anybody's names, but to understand that, where is this going? We're looking for mismanagement of finance for City of Method. So I would like to see the dismissals of city staff, and then the lawsuits filed by that city staff. The cost of investigating these city staff members, the cost for hiring private investigators, this I'm even hearing, and this is what the problem is when you have lack of transparency and lack of openness, central administration, that I believe the firefighters were told to be careful because people are watching them now. And this is this is what happens. This is what happens because it's been done before. There's a city, there's a DPW employee that was followed for months, months by a private investigator. He was let go. He's right now in active, it's in an active process right now, but they've already told him, the courts have already ruled, there was nothing wrong. We wasted thousands and thousands of dollars on investigators. We're looking at the cost of legal representation for all these cases. Forget about the 40 B cases that you know, they could have won. It's an automatic, you can't fight a 40 B and lose. All you can do is string it along a long enough time so the developers can back out because they're losing so much in funding. Well, that's what happened. One project we had, A development company went bankrupt after four years, they're gone. The 40B projects, they waited. We know the world's the gold gym site. The owner spent over $12 million to keep that going. Well, the investors in that job had done what now? They've said, you know what, enough is enough, we're moving forward. The project on Boston Ave that I believe they're talking about possibly putting in a mosque now, five acres putting to a mosque, lack of taxpayer money, lack of new growth. Think about that. Understand the mismanagement and what's happening. That's where where's the money? Why is there money there? Why are we looking now to look at a pretty pretty outrageous and intense movements to try to bring new money in through the tax payers? We can't do that until we see where the mismanagement is coming at City Hall. We see the city, the staffing that has to be paid. I would ask for the record that the mayor please inform us the cost of any consultants or per diem staff that she has in place right now, she has in the last few years. And I say, let's say four years since you've been in office, and what we're paying out the staff that she hasn't filled. And it's not because it's not because people are leaving because they want to. They're being pushed out. You're talking about good people. We haven't even heard the case haven't heard about about Aleesha Nunley, the best finance director in the Commonwealth, I would say. Mike Durham, the best veterans affairs director that method has ever seen the state has ever seen gone. You're talking about settlements that I know that we know. Did you did you know the custodians settled on their their legal issues that they were they were given back $500,000 that the city reimbursed them. They were rewarded that did we vote on that? No. So the cost of settlements, the cities in the schools, I want to know what that what those numbers are not the people, but what the numbers are. And the cost of the law firms because I know it's just not KP law, you can see that when we say KP law, everybody picks on them, because they're in front of us every day. Right. We have multiple, multiple law offices that are working for the city of Medford, multiple. And it hurts me because I see new Councilors giving reports that they met with KP Law. It's funny because some of our Councilors, Justin and I laughed the other day when Matt talked about, Councilor Leming talked about he met with KP Law. I was never given, no one's ever told me we could talk to KP Law. But I would love to know what that costs, because an in-house city solicitor is part of their salary. It makes it so easy. So when we look at this resolution, this is really to get a report before the budget comes out, before we look at some drastic changes, because I don't know if people heard, but I believe the school department has $7.5 million to get leveled. Is that what we're hearing? 7.5 million. Now, now I'm going to guarantee you everybody, the rainy day account. Why does somebody want to bring the rainy day account in? She's got to put the money from somewhere. So she wants to take it from free cash. I'm going to let everybody know this is what it is because I've been here a long time. She's going to go to free cash, call it a rainy day account and pull out. Is it truly $7.5 million? No. Everybody nervous about that? Absolutely. You should be. That's a scary number. It's still going to be a scary number. But the mismanagement of this city, the mismanagement of the school department, the mismanagement of the finances and that office in this city has been devastating to this community. Not only lack of new growth, but also in fraudulent and misleading and legal fees. And again, we don't know what they are, we can only speculate. This is why I asked the mayor to bring us a report in the executive session so my fellow councils can look at this when it comes down to understanding some of the comments that my fellow councils have made in the past about looking at different funding mechanisms. going back to the taxpayers and saying, hey, we need we need X amount of money $250 million for new high school. And I believe it was I've talked to new school committee. I know we have some people in the audience right now that worked on this new school projects before I've talked to people in Somerville just did a new school people in Arlington to think in this climate of $7.5 million in the hole. that the school committee is going to come to us and ask us for $2.5 million so they can start the project. And we don't even know. I think it starts at 30% reimbursement of a new high school. We don't even know what it's going to be. the feasibility study $2.5 million when we don't even know if we're going to come close to this. And from what I'm gathering from my friends that I have in the state, it's not very positive. So the reason why I bring this up in this, this is, this is hopefully we can go to do I think it's going to happen? Probably not. We're never going to see this. But the hope is to go on executive session with the administration with her legal team, with the HR director, with the chief of staff with the mayor with us sit there and say, Okay, this is what we spent the last four years. These are lawsuits that are pending, because I know there are lawsuits out there right now that they're trying to settle out of court. I know that. So there's hundreds of 1000s of millions of dollars out there that still have to be spent. And in the meantime, we have nothing new going. Oh, I take it back. We have a music venue going on in Mystic Ave. You know, Mystic Ave, we're supposed to change the zoning, the gateway community is gonna come in. What's the talk now? We have one building being talked about, one building and nothing else. So I ask again, my fellow councilors, as we go through this process of looking to where the needs are in our city, we all know We're fiscally strapped. We all know we're in crisis financially. And possibly, if it came down and we could sit together with the administration and they can show us, they can show me that, you know what, George, this is the data. You know, you're right. We didn't lose millions of dollars in new tax. We didn't lose millions of dollars in new fees and fees in permitting. We didn't. We didn't lose millions of dollars on on settlements. We didn't lose millions of dollars on on legal services. If they can show me that I will be the first one to vote yes on anything that you ask for an increase in taxes. But until they can show us that they're not mismanaging our funds, because this is what we do. The city council, we're in charge with a fiscal stewards of our our city's finances, with the last line of defense. So unless we can prove that they can prove that all we'll be doing moving forward, and any sort of tax, any sort of override any sort of debt exclusion, it's putting more money into a hole that'll disappear. Period. I think we're all smart enough to understand that. So this is why I bring this resolution up, Mr. President. I ask the mayor to please bring this forward, that she meets with us in executive session to give us a breakdown, to prove me wrong. I hope she can. Come prove me wrong. Tell me we're not spending millions and millions of dollars. And then we could see a way that we can find a way to fund the city the way it needs to be funded. But until then, these are huge questions that they need to answer. This is mismanagement. This isn't hundreds of years of neglect. This is mismanagement from someone that's been in office now for years. She's done nothing. When neighborhood communities were in the same spot we were, talk to the mayor in Malden, talk to the mayor in Somerville, talk to the mayor in Everett. They had the same issues we had. They used those funds to make sure they did what was right for their community first, before she started covering general accounts because she mismanaged the business of the city. She's done a terrible job in the city bringing finances in the system. Remember, the last meeting we had was new growth was what? our new growth that we talked about. I know Councilor Bears says that the city assessor is going to give us a great report. I can't wait to see it. But here we are, year five now. Year five, she's the mayor. The most we've seen that was presented to us was a million dollars, new growth from fees and fines from traffic and parking. That was amazing to me. That was amazing to me. So I asked for this report, because I don't know, I'm sure you're all smart enough that you see what I'm trying to do here. I'm trying to show my colleagues that listen, I understand what you're saying. And you we need we need the finances. But understanding taxation isn't always the best resolution. First, let's find out what's causing this. Why aren't we bringing in new money? Why are we spending so much money on things we shouldn't be? And then if we shows that that's not true at all, Councilor Scarpelli, then I walk away in peace voting for whatever the city needs. But right now, this right now shows poor, poor mismanagement of the finances of this community and the leadership of this community. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: through the chair. Are you referring to the chair?
[George Scarpelli]: First, this was reached out by a few neighbors and they didn't realize, and I explained to them that Council President and a few of other my colleagues have been working tirelessly on this issue. When I went out to visit and talk with them, you can blatantly smell the creosote that is, I can't see how it's not harmful. And I know that you've done your due diligence, Council President, I really appreciate that. I know how hard you work with the MBTA, our state delegation to make sure something moves on this. So I'm just gonna step away and just give you the kudos you deserve because you've worked tirelessly on this. And again, we're seeing the true ignorance of our MBTA work its magic. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: A few piles. I mean, it's hundreds. I know I live across the street.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. So we're trying. I just want everybody to know the reach out to myself. Yeah. I mean, the council bears in this in and of itself. I believe. Yeah. Staying right. That's scary.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that there are a few representatives from the fire department here. I'm again when we're talking about mismanagement of city funds. The reason why I brought this up is during the school committee meeting when they were talking about the you know what the devastating news in that financial front was. And then I believe there was some conversation about possible layoffs and we talked about, you know, we're talking about, you know, police, fire teachers, most important people in our community. And Then the mayor sent this email saying that they were bringing in, I believe it's municipal solutions that were coming in, and they were going to, at a startup cost to start, almost $10,000 to bring this organization in to do a study of procedures and policies that were 60 years old. I emailed the mayor, I expressed my displeasure again of wasting taxpayers' money because In the normal situation, and I've talked to police officers, I've talked to directors and assistant superintendents, I've talked to other department leaders in our community, in our city structure. And when they're making fundamental policy changes and procedures, it starts with the people we already pay, the professionals that are there. They work on those policies, and then they review it together with the administration, making sure it falls in all the criteria that's needed, and they make those necessary changes. So again, I bring up 60 years. So the mayor responded, said, if you have any questions, contact Chief Evans. Chief Evans picked up the phone right away. I really appreciate that. We had a great conversation, and I respect Chief Evans. I know the difficulties in, and we had a, We had an agreed to disagree moment because he said, George, I'm trying to do a lot here. And we do have some policies that are 60 years old. And I can't do everything at once. And I said, Chief, first of all, in the normal situation, would you have done this with your team? He said he's inundated because he started this position. So simple question is this chief, If it's 60 years old, if there truly is policies and procedures that are 60 years old there, you can't wait another six months? to save the city taxpayers money, especially when you're talking about possibly laying off firefighters. But I did hear some great news that I'll also ask. I'll ask our our friends from the fire department that I hopefully they give us some good news tonight because I heard some things about this possible grant that would absolutely save our community and I'm actually giddy about it. So, but that's it. That'll be that'll be something that I'm going to add on. But right now, I know that today, today, municipal solutions were on site meeting with I believe the deputy chiefs and starting the process already. We don't know what the final number is. It could be 50,000. It could be the cost of another firefighter. We don't know because what we did get we got a start of almost 10,000 the beginning of a study again, another year, I'm going to say it because we don't normally do this in our community and other departments. When it's in the police, with the police department, they start the process with the police department and their leadership team. When it's in the school department, they start with their direct as a curriculum, they work it out. And then if they need more clarity and more backing, then they go out to an organization and bring someone to tie that in together for maybe a minimum amount of money. What we're seeing right now, shockingly, the fire department, the firefighters aren't even being looked at to do that. People that we've trusted, all of a sudden now, everything is under a microscope. So now the mayor is bringing in municipal solutions to meet with the fire department to look at how to make these six-year-old changes and change the policies and procedures in their association, which I don't disagree with. but to spend, again, mismanagement financial funding in this community is just waving its ugly face again at wasting money again. So I know that you're on the forefront, Mr. Jones, and you guys have been, so if you have anything to add, I know that I wanna know how that was going, if you can, what's the practice usually with the fire department, with past chiefs? What is it? Oh, no, that's good. That hasn't passed yet, right?
[George Scarpelli]: Now the six if I can, Mr. President, yes, the 60 year old policies that they're talking about is it's I know we have six year old policies here. Like, for instance, we don't I'm milking cows can't roam free. Is that the type of stuff that we're seeing in these policies that they're just useless policies that they're old, but they're still there that we just need to take out what some of the Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Financial mismanagement, everyone. or retaliation. I don't know. It's one or the other. It seems like every week the firefighters are here and we're bringing up something that the mayor is keeps piling on. So I'm a little disappointed with that, but thank you. And I'm sorry to interrupt.
[George Scarpelli]: Because I know that it's time of the year right now that the firefighters can apply for a grant that they would, I don't know what the agency is, FEMA, that FEMA would allow the city to incorporate a grant for as many members to get you to even to where your staff needs to be, and they would pick up the total cost, correct me if I'm wrong, for three years. for three years. This will make our firefighters whole. And we don't have to wait, we don't have to use a penny of this, this community's funding to make that happen. When I heard I heard that I was so excited. And I just I, you know, it's something it's good that we're hearing some good news. Can you give us an update with that?
[George Scarpelli]: And that would mean with overtime, what would that do to be fully staffed?
[George Scarpelli]: Think about that.
[George Scarpelli]: So if I can't through the chair, I'm a little confused. So where we put in- We put in for 11.
[George Scarpelli]: So if we're not asking for the 15, we're asking for 11. So those four can avoid us from getting this grant.
[George Scarpelli]: My last question, if you can, Mr. President. Yeah. So that would mean that the fight, my hope would be that the fight upon will be exempt for any cuts then, because they would have to maintain that number, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: That's good to know. But again, we've heard so many negative things in the last, it's good to hear something positive. I know, Danielle, you've been instrumental with being the union secretary. I know that you've been the busiest person. I know that Bobby and Eddie want to say that they are, but I appreciate all your hard work. Because, because what we're doing with this is we're actually finding alternative ways to fund our firefighters and our fire department for the safety of our community and creative ways and not coming out of the tax base. But so I applaud you guys that that was such that's great news. And
[George Scarpelli]: So this is our staff doing all this. We're paying someone over $10,000 to see what's right for you. Just just throwing it out. Yes, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: See what else you can do.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So if I can, Mr. President, if I can. Councilor Scarpelli. I apologize. And this is what I was trying to get to. So, because I want to make this as a motion, if it's true, especially coming to budget season. So our chances, if we went to those other four firefighters and we went full board with this, because this is what I was told, is that we would have a substantially better opportunity by doing that. Correct. Okay, so in a form of a motion, I'd like to ask the mayor, why wouldn't we look at four more firefighters to make us whole? If we can do that, Mr. President, because as we get into the budget season, and we lose a huge opportunity because we didn't go all the way. We went with We went with what 11 we said, and we needed 15 to make get us to that point. And we would eliminate all that money for overtime. We would we would have it paid for for three years. Okay, I thought that's what I thought. And that's why I'm a little perplexed right now.
[George Scarpelli]: So through the chair, as a council, if we can have our president send a message to the mayor, can we adjust those numbers? Unfortunately, it's too late.
[George Scarpelli]: Danielle Masolino, you should be credited for what you're doing and put on a pedestal because this is exactly what, no matter what the junk you guys have been dealing with, no matter how angry everybody's getting, you're sitting down at a desk and doing real work to make a difference. And sometimes I feel like I sit here and I yell and we get mad at each other and then you go home and you say, what did I just accomplish? We didn't do anything. But I want to make sure that I acknowledge for one, I know I feel that my Councilors feel the same thing that you're doing. they're doing what we should all be doing, and that's putting your nose down and going to work and getting it done. And I just hope that in the end, we're sitting here and we name the new Marcelino Fire Station after you, because the whole staff is going to be staffed by your grants. That's my hope. So, but thank you. She was hired on the same program.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, wow. That's awesome. Okay. Well, again, so thank you. The chief didn't want to put in for them. appreciate that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Is there a motion to send the question to the mayor, if I can, on the reasoning for that, why we didn't move forward with those four other firefighters to give us a better opportunity to achieve this FEMA grant?
[George Scarpelli]: The I just wanted to We're hearing some issues with the Crystal Campbell fountain. I know that there have been some movement. I guess they tested the computer to get the fountain moving. And we're hoping to get it going for yesterday's marathon. Unfortunately, it didn't it didn't come to fruition. There is talking to Mr. McGiven talking to former Councilors, there is a concern. And I hope to be a mediation immediate for that for this process that When Mayor McGlynn did the fundraising for the Crystal Campbell Peace Garden, he made sure that no matter what his existence would be in Medford, he would leave it into a trust with an organization that would oversee the funding. because I think the fear was it would raise all this money, and then when the city needed in bad times, it will be forgotten. And there's some confusion. I've talked to Mr. McGiven that there was words that, there was word going back and forth that the reason why they couldn't do it is because they weren't releasing the funding. I talked to former Councilors that said the funding would have been released, but they wanted more of a detailed itemized breakdown for what that funding is, because that's what the trust asked for. Um, and unfortunately, that didn't happen. So I believe the city move forward to make the changes needed to fix it on their own. The other piece of that is what people are really upset about when you've been around, you saw the original garden with the fountain on the lights on, and then all of the sunflowers and crystals name. She loves sunflowers. and they planted flowers. I mean, it was an amazing area and it was so peaceful and a lot of people really took ownership of that. So there's been some, there's something going on between the people running the trust and the relationship with the mayor and trying to have trust there. So I talked to Mr. McGiven to reach out that if they want me or any of the council to be involved to try to mediate this, to try to make sure that ultimately the trust is there to fix the garden and keep the garden, the planting of the plants funded through the trust and the city also understanding that just do your due diligence, presents what they're asking for if it's three quotes, they know what they're paying for. So legally, they can lease that money. And I think that's what that's where we are. So we are close. I know that I did talk to a few dbw members that were there when they were testing the computer for the fountain. But I I think we're still a ways away before seeing what that garden deserves to be with the lights, the fountain, the colorful water that changes colors, and then the garden that goes around. I think that's important. So thank you for your time, Mr. President. I would ask for meeting with Mr. McGiven, myself in the trust, or anybody else in the council would like to join us to try to find a resolution to do what this trust was intended to do, and that's keep the garden in Crystal's honor, because we can't forget that. She was a special person. Her family was great people. My wife ran the Boston Marathon for five years in her name with her friends from UMass Boston. And that garden did mean a lot to their family. In the worst time of their lives, the city of Medford gave them something that they could always go to and feel that crystal spirit was still there. So there's gotta be something done and we have to figure it out. Let's figure that out. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that's what we're asking for. We're asking for a sit down with it, whether it's mediation, where we're setting, because I think there's a lack of trust on the trust side because of the lack of support from central administration. It's not Tim, I think Tim's doing the best he can. But I think maybe another elective fit body that comes into place says, hey, let's support this trust and make sure the funding and the processes used the way it was intended to. So I think, like I said, I think Mayor McGlynn did this for the sole purpose of the money not disappearing and being used somewhere else. And people forget that people actually donated thousands of dollars to go directly to that. So, you know, and it's important to see that last year was the 10th year anniversary. And I know that family members and friends from UMass and the running team, they really wanted to be here to do the celebration to kick off the marathon, and they couldn't do it last year. So it was super disappointing. So, and there's a lot of people put a lot of hard work to make sure that happened in a short period of time. If you remember, I mean, at the time, as soon as this happened, me and McGlynn really started moving quickly and getting funding for, you know, third parties to come in and donate a lot of money to make this happen. So thank you. Thank you. Tell her say.
[George Scarpelli]: In my discussions with everyone, the trust is in place. There's a person in charge of the trust that is in charge of all the money, that has criteria set in place that when the funding needs to be addressed for the planting of the flowers, any upkeep of the fountain, that the city who's in charge of the site presents the trust with a breakdown, a financial breakdown, that's reasonable to what the trust rules were, so they can then cut them the check. The problem is, I think there's, I think the person you gotta talk to is go across the hall, talk to the mayor's office, and ask what their role is with this, Mr. Castagnetti. So I'm gonna give you 30 more seconds, but if you can, So I think that that's what I was told. So working with Mr. McGiven, he's been working his tail off on his own trying to find funding and city funds. There are funds though there. So I'm hoping that we can get I'm not going to stop until this is done. So I now that I've been invested in it, I'm hoping to meet with the trust and sit down with them. I know that Councilor Caraviello has worked his tail off you know, probably he has to try to make this happen, but for some reason, you know, you have money there and you have people that are willing to spend it, but it has to be spent in a certain way. There's some non-transparent people, I should say, that maybe don't want to go that route. So, but that's the issue right now. It's putting people in a room. And if it's me and Tim and the trust people and saying, okay, how do we make this work? Bring in, you know, a mediator to say, how do we make this work? Because ultimately, they don't want to release the funds because this is their funds. And this is the rules that they were entrusted with when they were given control of these funds. So and I can't blame them. This is this is what they signed on for. So I'm hoping to get it done, Mr. Kessler. I promise I want it. I want it done myself.
[George Scarpelli]: I was informed by the union representatives representation that I don't know if we without legal representation here to guide us. position is an arbitration. And it's being heard in arbitration because the position was a union position. And it's posted as a non union position. So I don't as much as I wanted, and I was going to follow up with, you know, also asking for an increase in the calf, if this is where we're doing it for the city solicitor, so we can get to a rate that it's going to be appealing for someone because it's obviously not working and this is the mayor controlling the dialogue everyone again so she sees the need here but as city solicitor she controls the dialogue kp law so she's not going to raise the cap we we did request that as part of the budget right no i i know that was the mayor replied to me in an email that she will get us a paper to increase that cap Right, I know, but what I'm saying is we asked for that, we still haven't seen it. This is an issue with the water department, but again, I think the biggest question right now is if we can wait till the next meeting to move this forward, get some legal representation on this, because I don't, if it's an arbitration, that's going against my beliefs as a union supporter, and I can't, if we vote on this, I couldn't support it. and then we'd have to wait. Instead, I'd ask the table for one week until we get some clarity from legal about voting on something that's in arbitration that is non-union, but was once in union position. It's haven't been negotiated out. I think it's a slippery slope for us. So I know that the vote is in place, but I would maybe think of holding it off for the next meeting and getting some clarity. That would be my recommendation. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you. Is that a motion or an amendment? The motion's already in. I would just, my, if... We can amend the motion. Yeah, I would motion to table it to the next meeting to get clarity for legal representation about voting on an arbitration. There's, Vice President Collins.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor CASSIDY. Councilor CASSIDY.
[George Scarpelli]: You do that to Sylvia?
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, if I can?
[George Scarpelli]: I wasn't gonna say anything. And I think that I read those two letters and I can understand the behavior of some members of the community that act so inappropriate that they cross that line. And I don't stand for that myself, but I don't want to lump in the members that come to this podium that have passion for a topic. and make it seem like, I think like what was said earlier, that they get lumped in together. I think that personally, I've talked to some people and people have reached out to me and for one, I want to apologize because somebody reached out to me and said, Councilor Scarpelli, you're so abrasive and so aggressive that you actually scare me. It's my personality but I can also see that so I would apologize, but I also think that we have Councilors here tonight that need to publicly apologize the constituents, because of their behavior. And I think that, you know, what's good for one should be good for all because I think some of our fellow Councilors maybe not understanding or feeling nervous and maybe showing, you know, a giggling or disrespectful manner to people at the at the podium. And to be honest with you, it's not to those ignorant people that do come up and cross that line. A lot of times you're seeing this behavior to people that just express themselves openly and have that right there. So I said to myself, if this is going to be brought up, I'm going to apologize that if I offend anybody, because at the times that I speak, with what they put as abrasive manner. It's who I am as a person, I'm a loud person. But if you're offended, I apologize that you're offended by the way I present. But at the same time, I would hope that my fellow colleagues that were praised tonight in these letters that also behaved in a manner that isn't isn't truly what should be expressed by a city councilor. I would hope they apologize openly to the public like they've done privately, just so everybody's on the same page and everybody is expressing that type of behavior and acknowledging and saying, okay, let's move forward from here and understand that, you know, nodding your head, not paying attention. Because one thing I really tried to be totally honest with everybody, since I started as elected official, We've had some pretty colorful people at that podium. And I've seen some behaviors from some of my fellow Councilors that they would stand up and walk out. No matter how much you disrespect that person, getting up and walking out and disrespecting that person is a total disgrace for the seat. And I would never do that. Whether I believe in what you're saying or don't believe what you're saying, I'm gonna sit here and I'm gonna listen to that person. Now, there has been, you know, I've seen it myself that Councilors make motions that could be represented as disrespectful. So, like the person who wrote the letters, I don't disagree with them. I think that there are people that do cross the line, but that podium's there for everybody. I know that was said the other night in subcommittee. That podium's set up for everybody to speak their mind. Now, when they cross that line, they got to be held accountable. I think that's something we need to talk about. But in the same breath, we should all take ownership of some pretty tough couple of weeks. I mean, we've had some pretty intense weeks. And there were things that we can all agree to disagree with, but still have the mature and responses and to give the respect to the people that are at the podium. So again, that's what I feel. I appreciate the letter, even though they didn't put my name in it. So I'm very hurt right now. But it's okay. I'm going to have Dean to write me a letter next week.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, if I can, I apologize. I'd be remiss if I didn't do this. I just want to congratulate all the residents of Method that ran the Boston Marathon yesterday. Oh, yes. I think, especially my hero, my wife, after being sick for eight straight days on antibiotics, she woke up Sunday and said she's perfectly healthy. and she ran the Boston Marathon yesterday. A little disappointed. She did an hour. It was the worst time. We're going to talk about that. We're going to get her training tomorrow, get her back at it. But I just wanted to tell her how proud we were of her as a husband and as a mom. She ran her seventh Boston Marathon yesterday, and she killed it.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, President Beasley. Again, a great man, a great family. And these are the things when you know someone's a true hero, when you realize when no one's watching. And Jack McGlynn did this for 100 years. He tried to stay under the radar. And it's about time that He could be recognized. Unfortunately, he wasn't here, but his family was. I know that his children went out to Washington to receive the honor. And I think that we as a city should really praise and honor people like Jack McGlynn, not for just the service here in the city, in the state, but for also what he did when nobody was watching. And that's a true sign of a true hero. So this is where, hopefully, there are history books written where Medford students can learn about how important Jack McGlynn was to our community and to our country. So I think that I'd like to dedicate this meeting to Mr. Jack McGlynn. And hopefully, I would recommend that this city finds it within themselves to erect a statue in my eyes for that person who did so much for this country. So he's what Medford's all about. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President, and I thank Raising Canes and their representatives I think that. We're going through the due diligence of making sure that our neighborhood is, um, is involved in all of the signage concerns, and I think that we had a subcommittee that that broke it down, and I think that we made some concessions and. I think that We're pretty happy with decisions we made and removing a few signs and then keeping signs that are vital to their operations. And I think the biggest ones were the signs that had the menus on it that were hidden by bushes. So that was a big piece that would question, but the landscaping that's set up it's really going to assist with that. And I think all the lighting that you'll see on the building is really reflecting on the building. It's really nothing that's illuminating the neighborhood. So I think we can listen to the petitioner and then we can move on.
[George Scarpelli]: I would, if I can. Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I'm just gonna move forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so I think that with the concessions for the neighbors and for the business that's moving in, I think that we've been pretty thorough with our meetings and informing the neighbors, so I would move forward with the changes as instructed and approve.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Um. If I can't do the chair to Council Kalyan or any other councils that can what documents were we asking for? What? What? This is an intrusive. Um process and what we're asking for for renters information. Landlords information. Can anybody share what we
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. And I think that's what the big concern is. I think that we're doing something that sounds like it doesn't need to be done. We've been we've been Based on interrupt speakers, I'm gonna ask the room to be silent, thank you. I'm hearing dialogue back and forth from fellow councils that we're here to do people's business and we should do some things later on that we'll talk about that we need to do business. We keep doing business and keep throwing more work onto people that we already know don't have the capability to do what you're asking for. You're asking for something that's already done through the city in every way possible. If the biggest thing is just to get the information out to people, there's other ways to do this. But to be intrusive and then really take all these unnecessary documents, it makes people very uneasy. And I'll be honest with you, for a council that's very, very astute in understanding about people that I probably most difficult people that are going through a very difficult time. I was getting phone calls from landlords saying, George, what do we do hypothetically? Hypothetically? What do you do? Because the conversation scares our residents, that our landlords allow to give them a place to live, but are afraid to give documentation, because maybe they're undocumented. And they're petrified. This is a fear that you should wait when we get to this point, but also understand we're trying to do something over and over again with different issues on this council lately that's redundant. And it's putting more work to departments that need to do their work, not to do this additional stuff that we want to get people to know that there is some sort of rebate. There are so many other ways we can do that. There are so many other ways we can do that. But to keep bringing resolutions through. I think it's hurting this community and it's driving more wedges through this community. So I would request that we deny this process and not put more work on more departments that don't need it right now.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. What I'm thinking, some of the things my fellow councils aren't understanding is The dialogue that started in January and the presentations that we've been putting forward is dividing our community. And what you're not listening, what you're not understanding is you have to win the trust of people for them to talk to you. Let me give you some hints. When my fellow Councilors mentioned that There's 7,500 people voted for them. So that's what they're gonna support. That's wrong message. The 7,500 people, they got you elected, but you have to work for 60,000 people. And so the dialogue that has been going on since we started here, and it's gonna continue with the next resolution, is that we're hurting our community. We're dividing our community. Our city isn't good. Our city is a mess. And the dialogue that we're spending is attacking who? Homeowners. Everything we've done so far, nothing of substance. We could talk about having subcommittees. We could talk about all these meetings we're having. We've got nothing. We've had nothing done. So I think what we're not understanding is what people are saying, maybe because they can't talk to me, maybe because people are reaching. And here's the thing, it's now by the hundreds, and it's people that normally don't come to this podium, you see them tonight. Whatever you're trying to do, whatever agenda you're trying to pull out, you're hurting people, you're dividing the community. And it's gonna go on, with everything else that we have tonight, we're gonna see that. You're trying to justify, I respect you more than anything in the world, all of you, but you're trying to justify things, but you're not looking at the human factor here. People aren't talking to you, because people don't trust you, Councilor Lemmie. You haven't earned it yet. What I'm hearing is, what I'm hearing from a lot of people, I'm hearing a lot of hurt. People are hurting because you're attacking them. So what have we been talking about? What is it we've been working on? What is the lesson so far? We've talked about rent control. We've talked about a tax. We've talked about a registry. We've talked about how the firefighters are hurting. We've done nothing yet for what the city needs, and the mayor's loving it. The mayor has done nothing for this community. We're five years into this. And no matter what happens, this council, I've been around the council 18 years now, whether it's school committee, city council, we've made sure we've at least been the voice so people can, they can come and talk to us because no one's listening. That's what they're saying. That's what everybody's saying. The undertone here, is it really about a registry? No. Please, it gets out of control. Listen, I don't like the fact that people yell out. I think it's just a poor way to get things through. But here's the thing. Right now, that's how they feel. They're angry. And maybe some of you don't know, because I don't want to bring this up. It doesn't matter if you lived here a day or 50 years. I hate to hear that. Because everybody, everybody's a method Mustang. Everybody's a family in this community. But right now we're doing nothing but dividing, trying to find a way to deceive and divide. You don't even see it, but it's happening. She's usually as a marionette. She's like with puppets. With everything's going on in the city, the city's a mess and people aren't happy. And we're talking about registries. This is what we're saying, people are hurting. This Mia doesn't care. And she's using us as pawns. So believe me, publicly, I'm going to tell you this. I despise the fact that it's George Scarpelli against the rest of the world. I hate that. I don't want that. I want the seven of us to do great things together. I really do. And we have. No, people can talk negatively about you, Zach. We have done some great things. We have done some great things together. But it's all being overshadowed now by dividing, picking and choosing my group and your group. And things are going to come out tonight that's going to prove to that it's going to show to it. Look what she's done to the fighting department. Look what she's done to this council with that. So again, this is just another piece that's dividing this community. And Councilor Leming, you're an educated person, you're involved, appreciate that you ran, but you have to understand, people here are hurting. This city is hurting. This city, whether you wanna believe it or not, is divided more than I've ever seen in my life. And we could put a dog and pony show and put lipstick on a pig, and we could do little parades and think that's great. It's not hitting everybody. We represent everybody. whether you like me or not, I'm still gonna fight for people that don't like me.
[George Scarpelli]: You know, you can put a lipstick on a pig. It's still a pig. You just heard what this council, what people just were upset about and what we just spun. I'm embarrassed. What goes on in different studies, what goes on in different communities, This council, this is the people's forum. This is where people come and speak. The school community did this a few years back and what happened? You've eliminated people, they've walked away. Parents have left the school district. There's no voice there. You're saying this isn't limiting? The more people are gonna talk? You just saw what happened. Whether they liked it or not, they expressed themselves and people left. At least they left fulfilled that they had a place to speak. but now we're gonna implement the three minute time limit and the 90 minute hired stop. Come on, it's embarrassing. We were elected for them. We're like for the people of city of Medford, just cause it's inconvenient. You can make, you can say anything you want. A listening group, this is a listening group. We don't have to invent it. This is a listening group. So you wanna talk about different, You want to talk about different, we have so many other meetings. You've been to these subcommittees. It's packed, right? People are really joining in. No one's coming. No one. So that's a farce. So this is disingenuine. This is not about democracy, Councilor. Someone accused me of not being democratic, not being good for the democracy and the newspaper and this election fight. This isn't democracy. You just listen to people tell you what they felt. They're telling you they're hurting. And the next resolution is, let's shut them up. But no, it's not. No, it's not about that. We want them. We want to hear them. What? I don't care if one person has to come up here and say things three times the same thing. But you know what? Let them. This is their forum. They didn't make the choice to only go once a week. once, twice a month, that was this council's choice, not mine. So when you put things up there, be honest, because those communities, they meet every week. They have a forum every week. All we did tonight, after you vote this in tonight, all you've done again is devalue what people want and what people are about in this community. So people reached out, told you three minutes, I get 1,000 phone calls, people are disgusted about this, and they're not coming in here. You're forcing them not to come in. Maybe that's what you want. You say that's not what you want. But that's exactly what's going to happen. I'm disgusted. It's the first time I feel ashamed of being part of this council. You're shutting people up. You're dismissing them. You're going to keep coming back and forth with resolutions that you're putting forth. And that's not business. That's your business. That's your agenda business. Our city is a mess. And I'll say it again. We've done nothing to conquer anything in this community right now. We're going to go to budget season with the mayor that's dictated what's going on and what we're going to do with our money. And we don't even know what we're doing with our money. But I'm glad you put this working group together that was hidden. I didn't know about it. This is disgusting. Every single resolution's coming forward now is hurting people and dividing the city. I can only sit back and talk to people and say, hey, listen, these are good people, which you are. They're my colleagues. So don't tell me you all haven't talked about it because you have, not illegally, but you have. I haven't talked to the mayor about any issue. It's the first time I've heard every resolution you people are putting forward. And it's doing nothing but dividing this community. So like I said, you can spin it any way you want. The bottom line is people are gonna speak less time. People can only talk for 90 minutes instead of when they feel like they're content and they can walk away and go to sleep at night. And for what, I don't know. All you're doing is hurting the city. Keep following the mayor, you're hurting the city.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. And I apologize for you. Just give me a minute. I appreciate that teaches waiting because I know tomorrow is a very big meeting with the superintendent, but, um. I just want my council members to understand a few things. One, for my friend Maria, though, you don't have to apologize for anybody that came out tonight to speak. They have their right to. And to sit there at 12.30 to mention something like that is disingenuine. So I think that's a shame. But on this situation, we're talking about with, I want us all to take a minute to think back. I want you to take a minute to think back to last year's budget meeting, where this council stood strong against what the mayor was pushing for. And I don't bring this up to hurt anybody, I just want the timeline to understand something. We're all in favor of the budget being pitiful, and the idea that we had no support from the mayor. Our council leadership met with the mayor behind closed doors, came out, and told us they're going to vote for the budget. We stressed, please understand what? You're going to balance the budget on ESSER or ARPA money. Please don't do this. It's gonna put us in dire straits in the future, especially next year. It fell on deaf ears. It fell on deaf ears. And budget gets passed, we move forward. We move forward without any knowledge of what's going on financially in the city, even though we've asked. We've asked, right before the budget, we got three reports for three separate months, and then they stopped. I started talking about it again, because it's budget time, right? Why we haven't seen these actuals, or why we haven't seen any financial documentation. What did we get the other day? We got Decembers. Council Bears' leadership is asking for quarterlies. I appreciate that. But here we are. on the verge of starting probably the worst budget we'll ever see here. We talk about trust. We talk about gaining trust. And what do we see? We see the mayor come out of nowhere and put forth a task force to develop a plan, a plan to investments in the city and the school budget operations. I'll just do no disrespect, Mayor Lungo-Koehn, Nina Nazarian, Council President Bears, Vice Chair Jenny Graham, Vice President Kit Collins. No disrespect to any of you, but you're not financial wizards. You don't know anything about a budget.
[George Scarpelli]: There's no finance director on this committee.
[George Scarpelli]: Do you have minutes of these meetings? We don't take minutes of the meetings. No minutes of the meetings. So here we are, this comes out now, a few weeks before we start our budget. Let's go back a couple of weeks, and what did the mayor ask for? A rainy day account. Because we have 20 some odd million dollars in free cash. So we all see what's coming, we all see what happened, we're not stupid, right? This is how she's gonna save the budget. So now, let's follow up the next week, the school committee put a resolution in supporting the City Council's resolution on the rainy day account. Why? Because that's how we're going to bail her out. Now I want you to look at the bigger picture. Because I asked and no one showed up tonight, but I asked. New growth. Zero. If the mayor was here, I would ask her. At the debate she had with Councilor Caraviello, she talked about new growth and these developers that are starting to bring money in. I know for sure we had 340B projects. We had development in the city that was bringing in real tax dollars, permit fees to bring us to a level that it's the least we can fight for our schools. 340B projects. One, the Gold's Gym site. They've lost their funding. The Bertucci site that she fought in court. which you shouldn't fight 40 Bs, but she did. By the way, what'd we talk about? 600 possible units of affordable housing for my friends that are looking for affordable housing. Bertucci's was a science lab. Okay, so I apologize, but it was the RISE building. The RISE development, they went out of business. We lost them. We have groups that wanted to come into GE, but saw what happened. So what did they do? They didn't even ask. You have Boston Ave that I'm hearing maybe, possibly, they're talking about maybe another church going there. We lose total revenue. We have Medford Square that she said we're on the verge of presenting something to us. Nothing, zero. Mystic Ave, the hottest spot in the country right now. The last land close to Boston, that's it. shovels in the ground, permit fees pulled, zero. Hundreds of millions of dollars on permits, on fees, and in tax revenue. So I bring this up for a point because the teachers are gonna come up and talk about a dire situation. And this council's number one initiative, mine as well, is making sure we fund our school system. At what cost though? At what cost? When we have a school committee issue that they lose $2.5 million were in their deficit, then all of a sudden they find it. And what I heard doesn't appease me. That's not good. In the real world, someone goes down. In the real world, someone's going to hurt. That's bad. That's bad business. This is tax dollars that they lost. Then they found on a Friday. So we talked about I know she talked about we talked about over proposition to an F override, we're talking about probably $250 million new high school, which we all want. But careful what you wish for. Because all she's using you all she's using us as as scapegoats. So I believe the words she told a friend of mine that's told somebody that, you have to give a little to get a little. So maybe they'll get the proposition due in a half, she'll support it. Maybe she wouldn't fight it. Maybe she wouldn't veto it. This is where truth comes in. This is where trust comes in. So this is gonna be very difficult, because I know the story the teachers are gonna tell us. And what that letter went out, that letter went out to the community. She, superintendent sent me an email today, it was only sent to the leadership team. That went out like wildfire. I had parents call me tell me they should they leave the school system. I had teachers call me tell me they're applying elsewhere. And I'm saying no, no, you're tenured. No, I'm gone. So I want us to prepare and understand this. Make sure When it comes to the budget season, and we're gonna have to vote on it, make sure you understand what you're gonna vote on this time, because last year, she suckered you. We got nothing that we asked for, zero. And in the meantime, all of a sudden they put this committee, she announces this committee, maybe even working since the fall, she announces this committee, when? Right after this letter comes out. big press release. We're finally looking at the schools. Are you kidding me? She's been in office four and a half years now, four and a half years. Do you know the only new growth we have in our community of substance was off of traffic and parking, by taxing and fees to our residents for parking. Imagine in five years, our new growth is to Cuba and a beer hall on Mystic Ave. So I'm going to tell you this is going to be shocking. But guess what, everyone, we're going to be in some serious crap in a few weeks. What we're going to hear is going to be terrible. I'm going to tell you something. She's going to sit in her office and she's going to tell us to make the decisions. So I apologize. I wish the Alicia Hunt was here because we don't see true growth at all. We don't see any movement. We don't see any new growth coming in with development. And the development that we lost, they weren't in neighborhoods. They weren't changing neighborhoods. They weren't commercial areas. And we still have heard nothing. So I apologize for you for waiting. I know you have a big tomorrow, MCAS, I guess, tomorrow. You have a big meeting tomorrow with the superintendent. She told me, by the way, everybody's invited. It's a Zoom meeting. Very important meeting. Probably the biggest meeting they'll have in the school department. The biggest meeting of the year. And they won't even sit face to face. They're having a Zoom meeting tomorrow. But everybody's welcome, she said. So at five o'clock, by the way, I'll be getting out of work running to awake and I'll jump on as quickly as I can. But I apologize for waiting, but I know this is important and I appreciate your patience. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information. Point of information with that. This is exactly what I'm saying. This leads exactly to the dialogue that you presented, Council President, for years. What I'm saying to you is, understand, she's run the city for five years. We don't see the financial picture at all. So until we know the financial picture of what she's done, because maybe 2025 looks great, but she had four years and she's done nothing. That's why we are where we are. And to give her more money, so she can throw more away?
[George Scarpelli]: We keep funding her, keep saving her with money, right? There's no guarantees that she'll do anything that you think she'll do. Remember, we wanted what? A city solicitor?
[George Scarpelli]: It's not there.
[George Scarpelli]: We're still talking about a huge shortfall.
[George Scarpelli]: We have exactly done enough actually. There's a law show me there's a lot of money. There is no money. Show me. You're right. And there's nothing. Nothing. This council that mayor has done nothing. Nothing to grow the school department and the teachers. But you can go along. Trust Councilor Scarpelli trust. Remember we talked about collaboration. Nothing. I've been telling you that I've been collaborate with you in her. the revolution or her. Right? And where's that? And where's the need? Where's the divide coming? You keep having meetings? Please, please.
[George Scarpelli]: We were hoping that someone would be here tonight before the big meeting tomorrow. So a representative, so she emailed us, let us know she couldn't come. So I wanted to make sure that the teachers had a voice tonight before tomorrow's meeting. That was the hope. So the superintendent, we would have rather had the superintendent here and her financial team to answer some of these questions that I think are a huge burden, but obviously that's not, about what we have.
[George Scarpelli]: Sometimes emotions get the better of me, but I will tell you that the problem we're seeing, and I think that this is what's frustrating, is that although we all identify that the schools are not one priority, we're still the financial stewards of this whole community, the whole city. You know, we talked about, we talked about our what's going on with the custodians. We haven't talked about the police that don't have contracts, the 911 operators that don't have contracts, that the COLA, I think the COLA, I don't know what the COLA is right now, but that's not looking good. So, I mean, there's so much, but I think my frustration with Councilor Bears now, we joke about his initiatives and we, you know, and I understand that this is where, maybe it is, maybe you'll get a vote from me one day for that. Maybe it will be, but again, in a more calming fashion, understanding the waste that we're seeing and hearing. the investigations, the lawsuits, the settlements, the consultants, on and on. This is dead empty money that we could have used this year. So when you say you've done your work, I apologize for disrespecting you because I'm sure you did some work, but the questions that need to be answered aren't being asked for some reason. So if you're, as our leadership team, you're with there, find out what we paid KP Law. Find out what we paid out for all these lawsuits that we lost. Find out what it costs to take all these 40 Bs to task in court and then appeal it. This is money that we lost, money that we should, so were there shortfalls? I guarantee there was shortfalls, I'm sure there's shortfalls. But as the stewards of our financial budget here in this city, all of it, because when we're talking about, listen, we're gonna, I hope we don't lose teachers, but we're gonna lose firefighters. We're gonna lose police officers. We're gonna lose 911 operators. We're gonna lose custodians. We're gonna be in a mess. At least that's what I was told from what I'm hearing. But I haven't, I know you've had talks with them, but you haven't shared anything with this Councilor about the outlook or the financial outlook that you're hearing from these meetings, or if you're even giving those meetings. That's where my frustration comes in. So you might be meeting with them. And when you say you've talked to your, I haven't heard one thing. The only thing I've heard is what I've asked for, for the city, for the administration to pass on. So we got December, what did December tell us? You saw them, right? What did December tell us? $78,000 between the schools in the city for KP law. And that's December. That's a holiday month. So just imagine, this is what I'm saying about, before, listen, if we could show data that shows, listen, that, hey, everything's on the up and up, and it's not mismanaged, and all this money that we've lost, that if it's funneled in the correct way and managed the correct way, then maybe we just need an override, or maybe we need something different, a debt exclusion to help some things, or maybe we can take some free cash. But we don't know the true financial picture, because no one's telling us. And I believe they're not telling you either. I would assume they haven't. And I think this is where my frustration comes in, everyone. And I think that this is why I'm at a loss because I was part of the negotiating team when I was a teacher. And then as a school kid member, we sat there and listen, I sat there with John Falco and Billy O'Keefe and we told the mayor, this is what we want. Mike McGlynn didn't give you a thing. But he came back the next meeting, an emergency meeting, found $600,000 to make sure we can get what we needed for our kids. So as we're moving forward to this week, and these, especially tomorrow. The way that it was all presented, it was a scared tactic for our teachers. And what got me more fired up is I talked to parents are taking their kids. How many times we had tonight? How many times did we hear tonight the parents are taking kids out of the public schools? By the way, that hurts us. Because we get reimbursed, it goes by number of pupils. So we lose them. So There's a lot of frustration. Thank you for listening.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I hate to be a stickler, but if you can, if we can sever that piece with the, uh, KP law, um, anything dealing with KP law, I won't be, um, in favor of, okay. So just, uh, if that could be done, I'd appreciate it. I appreciate everybody's hard work on this. So thanks.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Hotly pursued, love it.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Mr. Chair, I think this, You know, first, I think the Election Commission does the best they can. I think that, you know, Henry and his team try to stand above it all, but there are some huge deficiencies that were realized in November and then magnified again for the federal elections past March, which I think that brings me to my conclusion that, you know, appreciate the reports, but reports mean nothing when the same thing keeps happening over and over again. I feel that this council should ask the administration or demand that the administration call for an outside audit to come in and audit and educate our election department and commission and support. the, you know, the counting of the ballots, the process of that, the counting of the ballots, the voting process that's in place and the lack of education for our poll workers and the lack of guidance of understanding what their jobs and roles are done on a person to person basis and polling location, polling location basis is very different and it opens up an avenue for distrust and for confusion. Again, let me repeat, most importantly, it's not the poll workers' fault. The poll workers' fault are doing exactly what they know what to do. They haven't been trained, they haven't been vetted properly to make sure that they're given the tools to succeed, and I think that's been a huge problem. I think that we, as a council, asked, oh God, years ago, to look at our voting list and to eliminate all of the people that are in the election list and clean that up. And we can't do that. And you're having households receiving ballots when they don't even live there anymore. We have people that, are on the voter registration list when you go into vote and you're seeing people that moved out of your own neighborhood when you look down 10, 15 years ago. You see voters, Medford voters that have passed on that are off in heaven and still are on a voting list. There's a lot that can be done to help our poll workers. And one thing we need to do, unless we try to get ahead of it right now, I think we'll never catch up. I think we need to put some funding and some support to this venture right now, before the federal election, to make sure that we have crossed our T's and dotted our I's in this community. whatever we saw in November, whatever we saw in November, in our elections in November, we saw some we witnessed some similar issues that happened in March. And I said this before the November elections, I said, please, perception is reality. Whatever we need to do, whatever this council needs to do, let's help the administration give them what they need to make sure that this doesn't happen again. And they're happening again. So I'm sure you've heard all the rumors about, you know, who's come into the city, the investigations that are going on in the city, you know, different different federal departments talking to people interviewing people. It's, it's, it's, it's scary. for the fact that one of these days something's gonna happen and we're gonna be left holding the bag. Because listen, we know what's going on. We know there are issues. We know that there are serious issues as a council, we know. So I think we need to give the commission the tools that they need in the election department, the staffing and the tools they need to properly educate to properly inform to properly hold an election and making sure we're giving them all the tools possible. And I think one of the biggest things you start with first is looking at our role looking at our people that are on the on the election roll. See, see if they're even living here. See if they passed away. Because what is it they're saying is 45 registered 45,000 registered voters 42,000. I don't see that. I don't see that at all. I think there's a big piece that, you know, you have election workers going through numbers. You have, you know, poll workers going through numbers that aren't even there. And then that causes more issues because, you know, you heard what happened in November. You had more line, you had a bigger line of people waiting in a separate line because they were told that they weren't registered voters when you had former city councilors that were told that. So it's not, this isn't good. So I think that we need to, as the reports, we appreciate the report that came back, we understand and we see some of the inequities, but what I don't see is a clear path to fixing this. If tonight's tonight's meeting was to hear what they were going to say, and see what the administration is going to say, see what happened. And then I hope at the end of this, that we have a clear vision of what we need to do. So this doesn't happen at the presidential election. It's very simple. You know, I would ask the chief of staff, how often do you see a chief of staff running an election? That doesn't look good. that just doesn't look good. Whether whether there's nothing there or something there, it just doesn't look good. Not having a chief of staff running your elections. It's it's it's it speaks volumes and where we are and we need to we need to figure this out before the next election. So I appreciate Mr. Chair for letting me share my opinions. But as for one, I'll be one council that will support any endeavor that will lend support to the commission and the election department to make sure they have all the tools possible that the same issues don't happen again. Ballots going out when they shouldn't. Too many ballots going to people's homes. Election numbers not being tabulated in the proper timeline. Numbers that not not being released in a proper timeline, poll workers that don't understand the protocol from one polling station to another. It's it's that. Like I said, it leads to. Perception being reality, and that's it. I don't want that to happen. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, sure. Councilor Caraviello? We wouldn't know, to my fellow councilors that I've mentioned, but we wouldn't know, but that will, from what I hear is when I've talked to different elections commissions and other communities, this is just a basic fundamental process that could be done with a consultant that can come in and do that. And that would eliminate that question. Again, like I said, perception's reality. We all see it. That's something that might not be a priority, but it's a piece that needs to be cleaned up. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Tseng.
[George Scarpelli]: We have a Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Council President. I appreciate Councilor Collins going through these different scenarios, but for the newer members, I think the biggest piece that was really frightening for the business, especially coming out of the pandemic when we first started this discussion, if we all remember, was the protection of the brick and mortar businesses and, you know, different out of city vendors coming in and not having the same requirements, but just coming in and taking business away from our brick and mortar who pay in and committed to our community for forever. Well, as long as they're there. So I do agree with Councilor Bears though. you know, you wish that there's a more, more, just an easier answer to this, because the whole idea that the premise that we've been working on is really, you know, when the mayor has a program that, that a school might have a function and they want to bring in a food truck, that it's, it's, it's easier just to go to the, go to a separate department and have that permit. So I, You know, I this can this can get very convoluted as we hear. But, you know, my hope is was that with this, we'd get to a point where it would be streamlined and not so cumbersome that if there was an emergency situation, if there was an issue with with, you know, different organizations within our city, whether it's school or a fundraising organization that wanted a food truck for a special day is just that it streamlines to the health department that the biggest issue was that all the health codes were really covered. the where the bollards are and where the placement and all that stuff I think that it you know it could we could we find a way to streamline it and say that permits that are on that are in safe areas and in on city grounds because if you if you look at most of them that come before us, they're at the schools, they're at the shell, they're at the different parks. So there's a way that we can just put some language in that ordinance that we don't have to bring in 16 different parties just to make sure that we can accommodate these vendors for special events without keep picking at this and making it more than it really is. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: And so again, that's not if I'm sorry, sorry to interrupt point of information, Mr. President. Councilor Scarpelli, do you have a point of information? Yeah, just, I think the biggest, our biggest, you know, the understanding is that the food truck, the food truck ordinance, even if it was on school grounds, it still comes to us because our protection of brick and mortar, the school department doesn't, you know, we've already gone over this with the solicitor years ago, that that they don't have the right we have as the city council this is why we we had it in the first place is to make sure we protected our brick and mortar buildings and school department that's like saying the school department can offer uh free um have every every saturday have um food truck alley at at uh at uh the brooks and um and that leaves our brick and mortar and West Medford Square left without any business for that week. So I respectfully disagree with our council just to make sure I don't wanna lose the most important piece here, which is protecting our brick and mortar businesses.
[George Scarpelli]: So be careful, because this is going to bring us all the way back.
[George Scarpelli]: So, point of information with that, Mr. President?
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry that I'm not there, but this is gonna bring us all the way back to the beginning because this was what we explained to our business community. And the reason why we went this way is because of that safeguard that they knew that this council would make sure we were protecting our brick and mortar. If we now leave this open to other entities to come in and do special permits every Saturday, and it's allowed in separate departments, whether it's the parks department saying that we'll use Placestead Park to do something, you know, and it just leaves it to a slippery slope, and it's going to open up that, you know, it's going to open up that can of worms again that we started years ago. And I just think that we should be very careful as we move forward with this now. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President, I think, thank you. I think having the authority to issue the special permit under the city council gave us that safety and that sense of understanding and acceptance with our brick and mortar businesses. But now as we're trying to find a more streamlined way to help our help our citizens that programs that want that one day permit. If we take the special permit out of the city council and leave it to the board of health, then we lose that. We lose that sense of control where our business and our business districts and have entrusted us when we first started this process. That makes sense.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. With all due respect to the representative council from KP Law, I think we're talking right now two separate issues. And for the sake of public finance, I say that we stop and reevaluate as a council and put this in order so it can be presented with all of the information. I'm a little shocked that that how we presented it maybe this was our fault by not presenting all the documentations from the beginning of this process but this isn't something that started in 2022 or 23 with with the brooks school this started years before that and making sure that that the understanding that the council is the authority that distributes the or votes on the special permit. And again, I'm going to say this again to make sure all our new councils understand. This was a gigantic issue with our business community, a brick and mortar community that was very, very controversial, very intense. And I just don't want to continue this dialogue because we're, I think we're talking two totally different, different things. I believe the council is focused on one piece of this, this, um, this request that we asked for, but we're missing the whole beginning of the race. What we're doing right now is finishing the race. We just missed the first 23 miles of the Boston Marathon. So I don't want to continue this for the sake of funding reasons. It's not you know, attorneys are a lot of money and we can sit there for another two hours talking about this. So, uh, I'll do requests that would motion that we, we, um, table this and until we regroup as a council and get all of the information that the attorney on record is, is, um, is given so we can make a, a decision without, without stirring up the, uh, the business community again. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Great, so motion of Vice President Collins to- Great, on the motion of Vice President Collins, seconded by?
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: If this is the way we're going, I think that in all reality, to put a paper out like this, I don't want it to be presented as the other departments in the community like DPW, fire, police are being left off that. So I would motion that either we add those city departments to that list, if that's how we're going to break it down. Because, you know, the optics of something that reads as Vice President Collins wants to move forward, which I don't disagree, but we're going to be getting to some nitty gritty budget issues when it comes time. I don't want the perception to go out to say, well, we want to maintain these budgets, but it's okay for cuts that the city council wouldn't support the cuts of police or cuts the fire or cuts the DPW. So I think in other city departments, whether it's a secretarial staff, whether it's the veteran services. So I just think by wording it that way, it opens it up for a slippery slope for what the message should be. And that's, we wanna be level funded with all city entities and school entities.
[George Scarpelli]: The court of public opinion would throw out and say, well, here we go again. The council doesn't want to do X, Y, and Z. So I think if it's phrased that way, I think that speaks volumes because we don't want to lose any of these positions. the fear of losing Penny's position. I know we lost Penny, but losing Penny's position, I think, would be a huge, huge loss to our community, especially in what she's done for drug prevention and awareness. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So if I can, Mr. President, I can see this, the hard work you've done, but are we meeting, are we still going to have the department meetings and are they going to be open and honest discussions, you think, with department heads?
[George Scarpelli]: But that is my hope. And I think having in the past, not the last few years, but going back four or five years, we would get an update from my finance director of the state of the state and see what kind of, what the climate looks like and what our funding would look like from the state. So I don't know if the mayor has discussed anything with you about giving us some clarity as we get closer. Because like I said, all you hear is, you know, different communities. they've already been given some sort of understanding of what's happening in the state and what their community is going to be looking at for funding. And it doesn't look too promising. So I wonder if we'll be getting some information that can help us prepare our constituents as we move forward.
[George Scarpelli]: I would support that. Thank you. I'm sorry about that. I would support that. I think that's been our biggest cry for the last three years. And I think that we've all been pushing together for that because that helps us do our jobs better. And having someone here, I think even somebody neutral with contentious issues in the city where it's not coming from the administration. I think it helps having a city solicitor come up and say, hey, this is what other communities have done for a transfer tax. And this is the reason, legally, why X, Y, and Z. We don't have that. It seems like we have a divide. KP Law has already mentioned that they don't work for this council. that brings up another contentious issue that everybody keeps harping on. Whether we are or whether we're not, we just don't know because we haven't seen the actuals that break down KP laws, what they've been paid the last few years. But I think that stuff would help with really helping us grow and get together. So I think that's important. I think if we can too, Mr. President, if we can, number nine, for the DPW cement and hot top, I appreciate you putting that up there. But I mean, even if we can reach out in a form of a motion to ask the DPW director, just to do an analysis of what it would cost for a three team and equipment. It's something that when I did it, it took me maybe three days with the director of DPW in Somerville and the director of DPW in Wakefield at the time that helped me get those numbers. And then just show us, give us an idea of what we spent in bonding and how it's these issues that we've had the data and it's presented and they say, George, what we're spending for this staff plus the benefits in the equipment is definitely less more than what it would cost to bond the $2 million a year. And that's an easy look at something to say, okay, that's just not efficient. But that can also come back the other way and say, while a crew of three can do X, Y, and Z, but I think it would help us moving forward to make some big decisions moving forward. I don't see it happening in this budget, from what I hear, where we're gonna be, but maybe down the line, we'll have things in place that would help us make better fiscal decisions. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Either out of here or out of there. Just to get it before the budget season, I think that just an understanding so we know.
[George Scarpelli]: I can, Mr. President. Councilor Scarpelli. And this is where I get a little confused because it's the functions When you hear some of the issues with the finance department, the software, is it truly that? I think that truly hasn't been defined yet. Because some of the information we're getting from the previous finance director, the information was the same software that's being used. I would recommend that maybe getting more staffing and moving that forward, because I'd like to see a cost analysis to that to see what it would take if it's a $80,000 software system that we have to pay year after year, purchase once and then pay year after year, in comparison to hiring an assistant in the finance department. It'd be interesting to see what that would look like. I just, you know, a lot of it, a lot of the financial questions we have, I think revert back to not being communicated, not being transparent. Um, I don't, I don't really trust the administration when they say it's the software system that's antiquated because the finance department that worked at the beginning of your tenure, Mr. Mr. President, At the beginning of my time at the council, we were updated and we were informed. And those pieces were in place to make sure that, for instance, the retro pay. That system was in place when contracts were ratified years ago that did the work to make sure that our employees were given their retro pay and reasonable time. So I, again, I just, I, I don't want to be the pessimist. I don't want to be the, the, the, this, the, you know, the, the, the siren every time, but I, I don't want us to throw good money after bad when it could be something that it's just management, not system.
[George Scarpelli]: Motion report paper to the mayor. The mayor, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. public should know too. I think that this council, I think way back a few years ago, when we started with Mr. Borbowski and changing our zoning codification and moving this forward, I think this is a big piece that we haven't seen in Medford in a long time. So what I like is that this process really allows the community to get involved and neighborhood to neighborhood to make sure that everybody is part of the solution of what you want your method to look like. So I know that council bears did a lot of hard work. I know that we made sure that was in the budget to make sure that that funding was there. It's not going to be cheap, but I think it's something that we haven't seen in how many years now?
[George Scarpelli]: 60 years, right. So that's a good message to the community. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I think that I had some opposition. I think the idea is sound. I think that we still, I haven't heard at least that we have put together a plan on how we're going to get this letter out to everyone. I think drafting a newsletter that can only be reached by a few and not all, I think it's, I just think it's a slippery slope like I told you. I just think that if it's not reaching our most needy community members and without having a plan in place because I don't think we've invited anybody from communications to work with us. So I think we're moving things forward and we still haven't got any answers, at least for me, as we're going forward with this and how we're going to move this newsletter forward, where is it going to go to? It's going to go to people that are already in the know for the most part.
[George Scarpelli]: No, no, it's okay. When they're done, I think.
[George Scarpelli]: Great. Thank you. Councilor Scarpellilli. Thank you. First, working in Somerville, I think that our community, especially when I was coaching, we saw the benefits that CHA provided for our students. And being there and having an on-site office at Somerville High School paid huge dividends for our kids, especially our kids with need. The biggest question that we'll hear whenever you hear of an ambulatory center or hospital setting that's coming into your community, what are people thinking? Loss, tax base, right? So what is, you said a lot of great things that you do in Somerville, Revere, Cambridge, right? Everett. What is CHA going to come for Medford? What are we going to see from Medford? You're coming over the line, right over the line. So I think that with public transportation, you're still going to get the sum of residents is still going to benefit. Your residents coming from that are still going to benefit from that area. My question is, what is CHA? What are we going to do to really become part of our community? Are they actively trying to pursue some sort of outreach, maybe to set up a site at Medford High School, like we have at Summerville High or Cambridge High School, where we can benefit? from having CHA in our community. I think being on the outskirts sounds great because Somerville still benefits from it, but they now have another area where they can now have a huge tax base where the facility is. So if you could share anything that can help constituents that have been reaching out to me and saying, Well, here we go. Another loss of tax base, and it's still in some of it.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, that was a great asset.
[George Scarpelli]: That's great. Mr. President, I think that I know it's a public meeting, so we have to open it, but I think it's, especially if we have the access to tap into a CHA to help our neediest members of our community, I think this would be a win-win, especially if the naysayers that are afraid of taxes won't be affected. So I would support it once we move through the process.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you so much. We'll be in for our physicals next week. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you so much. If I can, can I suspend the rules to move paper 24053 to the head of the line there, Mr. President, if we can?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. This was something that was put forth weeks ago. I know that President Buckley was here patiently, and I appreciate you allowing us to move this to the front. I think that to go back a little bit We had, at the time, something that I have a resolution later that we could bring up, but I know that the mayor asked to make some drastic changes for our leadership team in the fire department, which caused a lot of uneasiness. Part of that stemmed from accusations of sick leave, sick time taken. And while this was going on, Medford had one huge fire, I believe a three alarm here in Medford, and then assisted and I believe a five alarm in Chelsea. Along with that, I know that I've talked to many firefighters and, and they to their words, feeling very unstable and very nervous, in a sense, in their working conditions. And I wanted Mr. Buckley, if you could, come up and just give us just a quick update on how our men and women are doing and how the process is so far with Chief Evans. So if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: That's one of the questions that came about. I talked to a few firefighters that that are afraid to come up and mention that they were, I believe. I believe one of them told me one of the stations had a terrible case of the stomach virus. And there were a lot of identified dehydrated firefighters at one time. And I said, I just don't understand. Just take your time off. And I think that this is what this is where the dialogues that's the plan when you bring politics and why you need to bring politics into the situation. Because of discussion from the beginning of these issues we've had here is that we want to keep politics out of the firefighters purview and, you know, stop being there. You know, one member told me that not being that being their voice, you know, having being part of that process. But I think that what I'm hearing from them and the reason why I asked you to come up is the fact that we have firefighters that are sick. And they're afraid to come to this podium, and they're afraid to who they can speak to for the fact of retaliation. And that's a huge problem for public safety. So I think that, I don't know, I don't know if there's an answer. I don't know if there's an avenue that I can propose that whether I know that the mayor was contemplating some sort of investigation, I think it was- As far as I know, we're still under investigation, so. Still under investigation, okay. So I think these are the questions that will go to my, I don't wanna bring this up now, but go to my resolution later that You know, we want to get to a resolve as quickly as possible and have our method firefighters move forward to do the job that they've been paid to do and what they've been doing honorably even through this this fiasco. So, um. I mean, other than that, I know that there are still issues with some facilities and what I'm going to ask is, we've done this a few years, we did this a few years ago. I'd like to, with the clerk, I know we did like a walking tour. We did a Saturday morning and we just visited, we picked maybe three houses and, you know, it could be random, you guys could tell us where to go, but we visit the actual fire houses. So we can all see what's been said. And until you see it, and that's why I think I have a little more fire because I walked that walk and I saw some of the conditions that our fire men and women have to live through. And they never bring this up, but I think that it would behoove us that we actually, you know, maybe set up a walking tour on a Saturday to some of our stations and visit.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, if we can do that through the clerk as a motion that we can just maybe go visit. It doesn't have to be all of us. Maybe, you know, if we can't make it, maybe two or three of us just go and just report back.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. But I think especially as we go into the budget season, we look at the capital plan and follow the mayor's capital plan to see if we can go with that, I think is important. So again, I don't want to take your night, Mr. Buckley. I know maybe my fellow council have something to say, but I just, I really wanted you to come up and really just, these are the issues that I heard. I know the other thing was that was being spun as part of the dialogue of wasted money. You know, we talked about the chief now being in place and, Did we rectify that cost that was going around that she promoted two deputies, correct, or two lieutenants?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so the big question we had was, We were losing money up to about close to $60,000 for overtime.
[George Scarpelli]: Has that been rectified? Are we still backfilling any positions?
[George Scarpelli]: I remember it's 125, the number that's at least workable. I think we're budgeted for 124.
[George Scarpelli]: This was really made just to get the how everybody's doing. But I think that all plays into it. So I think that, again, I really wanted to hear what happened. And at the time was really about what was going on with the chief's issue. And those two fires and that just lend our support to the to the men and women on the fire department that especially that week, that the city of method appreciates, you know, everything you guys have done, because mom, that the fire was streamed everywhere, the one on Riverside Ave. And I, what was great to see is everybody worked. It was just, even though there was no acting chief at the time, the team looked amazing. And I just, that's why I wanted to bring it up the next week, just to, sometimes people just need a pat on the back. And I know that, you know, if I'm gonna, as many times I've called and we went at it over some disagreements, but at the same time, when you deserve a pat on the back, you should get it. So, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: No, that's not for this paper. If we can just I think that we could set up a working group. It doesn't have to be all of us. Like I said, just work with the secretary.
[George Scarpelli]: this is an amendment, right? If we can't with the member just to see if we can put together just a walking meeting to the sites just to walk to the fire stations and so we can actually see what, you know, what we hear and, you know, put, once we put the sight on, eyes on it, I think it'll make a difference for everybody. I know it made a huge difference for me. And people ask me, George, did they save your life? Are you really, really going overboard sometimes at the fight? And they say, you must have saved me during my first heart attack. I said, not yet. So, you know, but I'm staying in good grace a sec. But what the question was that, Once you go through that tour and you see, you know, there was one station that you had the fitness apparatus right next to the exhaust and it was like- Still there. It's still, that hasn't been fixed. Okay, so I mean, these are the things when you look at, you're gonna be like, you know, with the carcinogens and you're hearing about all these serious issues, health issues. And I think these are the things that once, I think once people go and you actually walk a fire station, not to get one of those funny little helmets, but actually see what's going on and see where our female firefighters have to change and where their bathrooms are and understand the windows that can't open. And I hope those have been corrected, but these are the things once you see it, I think what you see it, I think that it'll, it'll put everybody's, it'll put things in a different light for everybody here. I think that, I think that's why I'm a little, a little more motivated when it comes to our firefighters. Um, you know, nothing against our police, but you guys live the life. You guys have a spot at the police. You have massage in the new, new stage. Yeah. But all right, if we can, that's, you know, I appreciate it. I know that the civil service, I know that there was also brought to my attention that even this process right now, that the mayor is going forward looking for either the deputies or lieutenants moving forward. There's a civil service process. That is it true that the mayor isn't following that either?
[George Scarpelli]: We did that, I think, six years ago.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I think, I don't know, while we're in here, do we want to just go through the 240541, just to, it's in the same breath.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that I think that a lot of people are here because of this situation. So just to move the night along, I think it's important that that this was a resolution that was brought forward with the concerns and the issues of the fact that the mayor had asked the city council to vote on eliminating the position of chief process through civil service. And that morning of our meeting, she already had somebody in the office. She was interviewing someone already in the office. without this council even approving that. So this council heard questions from the firefighters and the administration, and we asked to try to come to a vote. The council needed another meeting with the mayor, and you would think for the sense of morale, I think right now, and something I think we've all identified, that one thing has nothing to do with the other thing. civil service doesn't have anything to do with this so-called investigation. So to hold this off for two more months, to leave these firefighters in a certain feeling of being unsure of what's going on and leaving this, it really puts it back on us. So what I would recommend, Mr. President, if you allow me to make a motion that we do. few things is that this situation with the mayor is a mess. The mayor created a through this on the city council's lap, and it was irresponsible. It caused outrage among our community and has put us all at risk. The mayor was gung ho when she filed this paper, but now she needs more time. It's clear that this matter was not properly vetted, and it was retaliatory in nature. It's nothing more than a knee jerk reaction to an unrelated and substantial allegation. The record of this body reflects the agreement. This action was both irresponsible and not well thought out. There is no place for politics when it comes to public safety. So the mayor can refile this paper. I would make the motion that the mayor can refile this paper when she gets her ducks in a row. And this issue is a mess. that she's created, and the council should not be left holding the bag while concerned residents lay in wait. I move that this paper be received and placed on file, and the mayor can come back in future time and put this through. And I ask my council to vote in favor of this for one big reason. is to really calm the community down and say, listen, we understand after time, we've all had time to think about it. We've had a lot of questions. The questions that I've talked to some of my fellow councils about, maybe you could tell me if I'm wrong, really stems from understanding the policy of the sick time. It had nothing really to do with the civil service issue. Well, the civil service issue isn't that important to the mayor because she doesn't want to meet for two months. She's already responded to us. So my my hope is that we can see that let's put everybody at ease that's been directly affected and put this to rest if we can. And then she could bring this up when she's ready and take it off our plate, Mr. President. I make that a formal motion if we can. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I think like, I think that it's a clarification. So everybody, everybody knows out there. So our, our city council rules state that if we move this, we cannot dispose of it until it's heard in the committee. Right. And so I think that we should revisit the mayor and ask her to really move up that timeline. And I recommend that the constituents that have reached out to me about this issue, that there's only one person that we can reach out to, send the mayor an email. send them email saying, dispose of this or meet right away to get this off the plate of our of our fighter fighters minds and let them be at ease. Okay, because this is something that whatever might be minuscule to most people, but if any, just an ounce of negativity, that our firefighters can take off their shoulders, why would we do that? So I would make that recommendation to all that's listening to send the mayor a message. I know I'll try, it'll fall on deaf ears, but I would recommend that as our leadership, if we can revisit that and send a message to the mayor to have an immediate meeting and not wait two months, because the optics doesn't look good either. People have asked me, he's like, why two months? Well, we have no control of that. The council president has no control of that. The mayor has said she wants to wait two months, so.
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry, revert back to regular business.
[George Scarpelli]: That's no joke.
[George Scarpelli]: I think whenever we look at something that hasn't been touched since 1990, right, there's two things that can happen. Either it's either fraudulently overlooked or It's working. So I think it'll be interesting if we can get a report. I'd like to see where what we've done with that linkage, even doesn't have to go back 30 years, but even just the last four years, while the mayor has been in office, what have we done with our with the linkage? that has been coming in. That'd be interesting to see, because that'll also help us with the data as we're moving forward, because I know that Councilor Bears mentioned a few times of the city not being funded properly, right? We all know that. But these are the avenues that we could possibly look at to say, well, there's a way that we can fund this, or there's a way we can fund that, other than a proposition to an F override. So if I can, as part of this resolution, just to maybe getting a report back from the mayor's office, to see what we've done. It doesn't have to be extensive, but what we've used the linkage money for over the last four years, that'd be interesting.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I appreciate that. I think that now being the new president, Mr, uh, Mr. Beard, uh, Council President Beards, I think ultimately the council president, I think every year don't. Isn't that part of your duty? Uh, to approve the linkage?
[George Scarpelli]: No, I'm sure. But I but I'm saying maybe that that'll help to to understand, because here's the thing, even though we say one office does it, the truth of the matter is, at least when I've been directly involved with linkage, in discussions with prior mayors, the mayor really does it. I think we all know that, but I think that just getting an understanding of where we are and where we can go with this as another revenue source, I think is very important. So I appreciate you bringing this forward. I think it's a good study to see and just to investigate and then move things forward. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. Because it's still broken.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll make a resolution just because I get an update because I know they said the piece was in just to see when that is. So to help Mr. Mr. Cassinetti, that's something I'll do for the next meeting.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Again, I support going to committee so we can vet this a little bit better, but we're already listening for the parts that we've already identified. we're already lacking support. And I think spreading that a little bit thinner, when we've already looked at other avenues that we can try to find a pool to help with the affordable housing, I think it's important. So but I think until we, I think the reason why I want to see this go to the committee, so we can understand how that pot has been distributed and what an impact would be if we subtracted it or what kind of impact that would be if we subtracted, you know, certain percentages and how much that percentage would cost and how that would affect, you know, those other pools that already are drastically in need. I would support it going to committee, but that would be my reservation in that meeting, making sure we have that data. I think it's important, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: One information on that. Yes. Those those projects were in land court. were stalled for two years. Now remember 99% of those projects go to go to court, the city loses, right. So what in essence, what happened was, they might have gone, but they left because they were losing a lot of money. And think about it 600 units, having 60 affordable housing units, that would have done a huge
[George Scarpelli]: Instead, the big planters now.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate the input, but again, this is where This is the piece that scares me when we're talking about all these different funds that we're looking into and understanding when somebody has a shortfall on a Monday of $2.5 million, and then Friday they find it. In the real world, somebody gets fired. So I know that that's what our colleague mentioned, but I've talked to other school members that said, when she asked for more clarity, they couldn't give clarity to exactly where the mistakes came from. They said there were mistakes and they were corrected. Now, Are they, that was the question, are they corrected? How can you show the public, and I love this word, because I hate it if he is, but it keeps ringing true, is transparency. How do we honestly look at our constituents, and when, especially during budget time, when the biggest department that we fund in the city lose $2.5 million and then find it in a week? So that to me is bothersome. I was hoping someone from the school committee would come, the superintendent would be here, but obviously that doesn't happen. And again, You know, even bringing up last evening, bringing up the dialogue that on the agenda last night in the school committee meeting was the rainy day account. And this is why I was fighting it so hard the other night. The rainy day account that the school committee has brought to the attention for the support to the city council. The rainy day account that we mentioned here, if a roof falls in, right? Or if there's some kind of natural disaster, we have that funding for us. No, no, no, no. By putting this resolution out there through the school committee, and from what I gathered in the meeting last night was, a million dollar shortfall, would that constitute an emergency that the mayor could then tap into that fund to bail her out? That's not where that funds in there. What we're seeing is a gross mismanagement of our finances in this community. And that's why I've talked to council bears about this. I'll say it till I'm blue in the face. all of these taxes, all of these overrides, everything we're talking about, until we truly get a control of our fiscal responsibilities and management until we understand that we can trust that person, or the organization, all we keep doing is keep pumping more money to a black hole. Now, this isn't the other side of rhetoric. This is it's black and white. It's right in front of you. Monday, 2.5. Today, 216,000. Why? There were some errors. Define those errors. Because a report just spoken by this council president, it's not good enough for me. For the sake of transparency, for the sake of moving forward with some initiatives that we might need. Hey, I've told people a thousand times, Maybe we do have to look at process of taxing. If you could show the data and you could show the people that are overseeing our finances are responsible and shown that to us, then we could visit it. But until we see that, how can we even entertain it? This is what I keep saying to my colleagues. A lot of it is very simple common sense. Think about it, in all of your businesses, where you work today, you go in tomorrow and you sit with your team and they say, okay, everybody, we have a $2.5 million deficit. We have to start looking into cuts, we have to figure things out. And then we come in Friday morning, everybody come sit down, we get donuts and coffee, guess what? We're all set, we found the mistake. Okay, everybody go back to work. That's great. That doesn't give me the warm and fuzzies. That doesn't give me the confidence that says, hey, let's put in multimillion dollar override and say, hey, go ahead, run with that now. until we see that until until we actually have control, or we have an office that gives us the confidence that we say, okay, the numbers now show after everything is calculated, after it's done responsibly, and then transparently put out there and say, well, okay, then this gives us an action that would say this is what we need. But why we're not more offended as a council that has to approve a budget. Our number one priority was what tonight? For the budget, we had a meeting. Making sure our schools are level funded. What is level funded? We don't know. The school system and the mayor, the president of the school committee has already shown us. There are issues, serious funding issues of checks and balances. So I just asked my council colleagues, in the good faith of common sense, sit back tonight and think about what I said realistically. It's very simple. I didn't make it up. This isn't one side over the other. This is right in front of you. This is a deficit of 2.5 million. And all of a sudden some words came out and saying, this is where it happened. That's not true. That's not true because here's the best thing about Medford, people like to talk. They don't know where it came from yet. It's not defined yet. It's just that it's found. That's irresponsible. So I don't appreciate the representatives of the school department not being here when a councilor asks, especially when this council is one vote for that budget, that's either gonna support or deny what's going on there, because here's what I want everybody to understand. When it comes to the budget time, If we're gonna come together and say, hey, we're gonna find a way, we're gonna cut all this, but we're gonna raise the school budget by 10%, and I don't vote for it, I don't want it to be the dialogue to go around that George Scarpelli, the teacher of 15 years, whose family teaches, who dedicated his life for children in education, doesn't want to balance the budget because he doesn't like schools. No, what I don't like is irresponsibility. I don't like the lack of transparency, and I don't like the lack of respect for this council, for the person across the hall that chairs their committee, and the people that run that department. So I know it's a rant, but it makes me feel good because it's out there. Okay, thank you, thank you, I love my claps. That's why I'm here. Truly, that's, I'm being facetious, but this is how I feel, and I think that, really, sit back and think about it as we move forward to the, probably the most, I do feel for the sympathy for my fellow council that are new to this, it's not gonna be easy. Y'all gonna be torn 15 different ways. Because no matter where you stand on it, Telling you right now, the common sense of this right now is we're not being respected or educated in their shortfalls, and we're gonna be blindsided, and guess who they're gonna turn to? Because the school committee has done in the past. Ask Mr. Rousseau. They publicly blame this council, publicly. So be careful, because this council's gonna be the one that's gonna have to make these decisions. So let's not celebrate what we're hearing. Let's get to the bottom, bottom of it. So we have, we can make responsible decisions come budget time. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: No, Councilor, thank you very much. I just made a smart comment with Councilor Bears about our Medford Square plans. But I do want to, I think that as we're moving through this process, now that I have the floor for a minute, I think what was important as we've seen, when you see these successful community impacts and sharing, I think that are we going to be putting forward uh, community based meetings where we're going from each area of the community to ask, ask for their input. I know that's something we talked about at the meetings. I think that that's something that when I talked to constituents and we talked about what they would like to see their, their, uh, community look like, I think it was important that we, um, we really tried to reach out and have more interactive meetings in their backyards. So I think that would be important as well.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, President Bears. Excuse me. Let me get my notes if I can. This past week, City of Method lost a great friend, Joe Rosetti. If people that neighbors that know Joe, Joe's family grew up with Ashley's daughter, Ashley, and son, AJ, over in the Wellington area. Um, Joe has been a lifelong dedicated coach to so many of our youth football players and just recently came back to our method high school football staff. And, uh, Joe battled some, uh, some health issues over the last couple of years. And whether he was, uh, rolled up to the field or home, listen to it, uh, through online watching games, he was so dedicated to our kids and he'd be a great, he's a great loss to our community and just wanted to send condolences to the Rossetti family. I know his wife, Sherry, has always been by his side. I remember them when I taught at the Osgoode School and they were a pillar of the community and he will surely be missed.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Mr. President. James Jimmy Burns. Another another loss for our community. Mr. Burns was a lifelong Method resident before moving to the Cape after his retirement, and he leaves a family behind that really leaves a hole. Mr. Burns is a member of the Bedford High School Hall of Fame. He was a legend basketball coach here at Method High School, coached a lot of our kids or now adults in CYO, and he passed suddenly last week. and we just wanted to share our sympathy and our condolences with the Burns family.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: We've had some trouble even getting the updates from our actuals from this administration. I believe we were doing pretty well up until right before the election. I believe June, July, August, we were getting redacted information for our city's budget, but we haven't seen anything. and to establish another fund or give this administration control of more money without the checks and balances that I think we're surely lacking here in this community. I wouldn't support this. I think that, you know, the... I think what frightens me, Mr. President, is the Chief of Staff said herself, she mentioned with the ARPA funding, if we're gonna use this type of funding, the way we manage the ARPA monies or the ESSA monies, we're gonna be in serious trouble. It's like, until we know. I'm sorry, I think until we know that we have a legitimate, transparent financial department that's going to keep this city abreast on all of our financial doings. I think it would be a huge error for this council to support it for the fact that We've seen what happened during the budget season. We had a financial director that can't tell us what's going on with an actual budget that they gave us last year, saying the numbers weren't correct. We have different organizations that are still waiting for their retro funding, saying the software is antiquated, so they can't get that. And to think that we want to give more money somehow to this administration, I think it would be it be responsible for this, this, this, this committee do that. So I would recommend that we table this until we get a further understanding of where we are when it comes to updating this council on our fiscal day to day or our fiscal needs and responsibilities. This is another pool of money that if we approve, We're going to, you know, it's going to come back to us and we're going to be made the scapegoats for the lack of true transparency in that office. So I would move that we table this, Mr. President, that be form of a motion. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, Mr. President, Mr. President, if I can. Do what you want. Excuse me, excuse me, excuse me. Excuse me. Hey, hey. Hey, listen, listen, this isn't the way, this isn't the way to behave. We have a forum. We have a forum. You have every right to come to this podium, but please give us the respect that this office deserves. We want to get to resolutions, but yelling out like that, that's not going to get anything done. If you want to speak, this forum's here for you. Come up and speak. I listened, come up and speak. Yelling out doesn't help. It really doesn't. So please, it's only going to make this a longer, more miserable, disrespectful process. We're all here for a reason. We want Medford to be as best as it can. So this forum's there. So just take advantage of it.
[George Scarpelli]: Did Ellie take the batteries?
[George Scarpelli]: Well, we'll make a motion and we'll do that tonight, but at the end of the evening, but again, we can recommend that the mayor come. I know that the chief of staff is here in her stead if we have questions for her. That was the business area and the person who presented this on the budget that the issues are right now is, we don't know like most communities have a working budget, you, you understand where the money is being spent.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm just saying it's everybody else isn't it something to you know I'm just letting everybody know the issue is this council doesn't see that we don't know either. So I actually put the school, I put the superintendent on the, on the docket tonight as a resolution because we're hearing rumors because right now they're just rumors to us that the school budget is in the whole 2.5 million for this year so we don't know. So these are the issues why I wouldn't vote for this because I think that without understanding we can't move forward. I also think that we have we have a few new Councilors that weren't here when this process started. So I think it would be it would be beneficial for them to sit in a meeting to start this whole process over and understanding what a rainy day account is and what it's used for and how they're There are other ways if there are emergencies to help with different scenarios, but I'm not going to get into that tonight. What I'm saying is I don't support this because we don't know what our fiscal future looks like. There is no last year we didn't get we we didn't even know. I don't even think we got a written budget after it was passed. Correct. We got a budget. So right. So we got it right after we passed the budget. We had nothing to work from.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I think that that's probably one of the questions that people are fearing, is what's going to constitute an emergency? Is the fact that there is a shortfall in the budget, that that would constitute an emergency, something that should have been handled through our general funds, that now can come to us to say we can build to bail the city administration out. We say it's a roof, but what is going to constitute an emergency that this fund can be used for? So I think that that could be a little enlightening for everybody, too.
[George Scarpelli]: So again, this is where this council, we fell in this gap with being put on the spot by the firefighters piece, the civil service. She's making us to be the scapegoat. So we're gonna say, let's do this. And then there's gonna be a huge shortfall because they're gonna cut teachers. Now think about it. Then they're gonna come to the podium, look at us and say, now you voted down. or something that's an emergency in the city because they didn't fund it correctly, they're gonna come to this council and say, okay, you voted for the stabilization fund, now you're gonna have to vote on this. Don't let it get to that point, that's what I'm telling you. I don't know if you see this, but we're being made to be the scapegoat for her mistakes. So just be careful.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, let her do it, but not from this council.
[George Scarpelli]: I just, thank you, Mr. President. I just want to come full circle, just to understand. The comments that I made earlier, I think that it's out of frustration and understanding. As we're moving forward with initiatives that are coming forward through this council, and there are people that are questioning those initiatives, I think the biggest issue why this has blown up so much is the understanding that the questions that we all have, Is it that we don't have enough money? Is that we're not funding it? Or is it that it's just being mismanaged? Because that that is the ultimate question. I've been part of this council. I've been part of this council for years now. With the former mayor and the former financial director, we saw everything we watched things happen live right in front of us. So we knew to prepare as we went forward. with, with this administration, we haven't had that luxury. So these are the issues that I feel to go full circle, like I said, this isn't to attack anybody, this isn't to say that this, this fund wouldn't be good, it wouldn't be good. The fact that it's not transparent, and we don't truly know what the fiscal climate is, and where we stand, we just heard a school committee member Has anyone talked to you about a $2.5 million deficit in the schools? Because no one has. No one's told me. But where does it have to come from? It has to come back to us. So the mayor is going to come back to us and ask us, where are we going to approve this money, everyone? Where last year at the budget, we warned her, we begged her, please do not use these funds this way. The ARPA funding, we looked about why is our infrastructure so bad? Do you realize that neighbor communities use millions and millions of dollars for what that was intended for? And that was for infrastructure needs. What we're seeing in our community, it's need to fill the gap in the ordinary budget. And now it's left us in big trouble. So all I'm saying is, as we're moving forward, Whether this is good or whether it's bad, whether we're voting for one thing, whether we're voting for another thing, understand something. We don't have an accurate picture to make a sound decision. It's common sense. That's all the full circle I wanted to make. Nothing against anybody. This isn't personal, but this is very simple. We don't know what's going on in the budget. No one's seen anything. We don't know. No one's talked to us. What was the last? Have you met the financial director? Have they come up to give us a report? Has anybody said anything? We don't know anything. We don't know, but we know we're gonna be meeting and we know what's gonna be said. We're gonna be in fiscal crisis in a few months. And if someone says to me, it's because we don't tax enough or we don't give enough money, we don't know that because our administration isn't transparent enough for educate us in the community to say, this is why we have a shortfall and this is why we need a tax or this is why we need that.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, careful with that window.
[George Scarpelli]: So I don't wanna beat a dead horse, but I'm just saying, these are just common sense issues that I'm bringing up to understand. We don't truly know if this is a structural issue, if this is a mismanagement issue, or this is a lack of collecting issue. We don't know because we're not educated and we're not given the tools to succeed. So that's why I think it's a slippery slope for this council to keep moving forward initiatives and truly not understanding our fiscal picture. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I appreciate the dialogue, but I think that what my fellow Councilors have to understand, even though it was a few weeks, I think you have to understand the concerns that homeowners have in Medford. We've talked about the CPA and the 1.5% of our tax money going to affordable housing. We've identified that we're really not using that properly. We've talked about issues that I want you aware of so we can understand that this just isn't about a 2% tax. In the last few weeks, we've heard the CPA tax. We've talked about this 2% tax. We've talked about rent control. There's rumblings about a proposition to an app override. Talks about a $2.250 million new high school. These are identified initiatives that my colleagues have brought forward one time or another. So it's not just one little issue. You're not talking about one issue that's riling up the city of Medford. This is a combination of a bunch of different issues that are affecting who? Homeowners. We mentioned, again, I revert back to the administration. We talk about not having enough affordable housing. Well, this administration themselves stopped three 40B projects that would assist us in creating more housing. We keep mentioning the highest, only the highest earners, only the highest homes Well, I'm going to give you an example because I don't think anybody else in this council has this perspective. I own a home. I have a father. just to put it in perspective, I have I have I have a home that I purchased. I have my dad who came to this country, worked very hard to purchase his home, a two family home on Paris Street. He killed himself that home. He built that home and now that home is worth $1.2 million. And what's offensive and what's bothering the community is to think that why should a penny of those people's hard-earned money go to any tax? I'm just putting this all in context because this is being, this is being portrayed as, this isn't, this is just something to just touch base on and go after and just talk about. This is something that's dividing this community. Another piece dividing our community. We keep talking about affordable housing. We talk about a few different issues that I agree with. I know we need these, these homes need help, right? These homeowners, excuse me, these renters that live in these condos that are being moved out. We understand that, but unfortunately, that's what happens when things prosper. This is what happens when you live near Boston. And now taking it and throwing away the baby with the baby water, it's just hurting our community. And I think that there are ways that we can do it. But again, I'm gonna revert back to this. We're talking about an affordable trust fund, right? A trust that we talked about. Affordable housing trust. Housing trust, correct. Is it? Is it even in place yet? No, we voted for it. Is it in place yet? It's not a place. There's no committee. They haven't done anything yet.
[George Scarpelli]: Is it in place yet? No, to even talk about it again. It's premature. And it's disrespectful, this community, to say, okay, this is what they need. So it's not just 2%. This is a dialogue that's spinning around the community. And the community, you know, it's funny, I appreciate people coming out. And I appreciate, I'm gonna say this again, but where were you in November? Because this didn't just sneak up on you. So I am gonna tell you, I respect all my colleagues. I respect everybody behind the reel. To run for an office is very difficult. But again, as you can see, our politics don't align with some of my colleagues. So that's why when it comes to November, you have to understand these are the impacts. So I understand we have residents that wanna rush things through, I understand that. But there's more involved in our community, just this one issue. This is just the tip of the iceberg. So when we talk about a 2% tax, we still haven't defined the 1.5% of tax that goes to the CPA and how it hasn't been used. We also haven't talked about the 40B projects that the mayor has stalled to help with that affordable housing issue. So we have a trust that's not actually in play yet. So we've heard comments over and over again talking about how we're pricing out the working class. Who do you think owns these homes? It's the working class. I'm lucky, I'm lucky that when I said to my dad, I said, I want to move to Medford. And I've heard this from some of my colleagues. And he said, and I said, this isn't fair. I have a degree. I went to college, I should be able to afford a house, but I can't afford it. You know what he told me to do? He looked me straight in the eye and says, well, one job doesn't do it, go get three. So that's what I did. So my home, my home that was purchased at 220,000 is probably appraised at 800,000. I'm not ashamed to say it. I'm proud to say that. But everybody has this opportunity to do that. You just have to go to work and do it. So the dialogue, the dialogue that's being spun that we can we can mold this to whatever we want. I think it's it's really, really disingenuous, because it's exactly who you're hurting. It's the homeowners or hardworking people. I've heard more from renters that have called me says please, with all these initiatives, don't do this. I love my landlord. Most landlords are great. I know we have bad landlords. But you're lumping everybody into this issue. And you're going to destroy this community, whether it's rent control, whether it's taxing, whether it's whether it's an override, whether it's whatever it is, we're killing our homeowners. So And I know this is terrible, because now what's going to be spent tomorrow on social media? Scarpelli hates renters. I hate, I'll be honest with you. I've been fortunate enough to have in my father's home on Paris Street, to have five renters since we bought the house back in 1972. And out of those five renters, because of a good landlord, like my brother and my father, Four of those people have gone on to purchase homes in Medford because they work with them. The other thing is, I've heard this tonight too, that of course the real estate associations are pushing this all because the real estate has nothing to do with the true homeowners. But if you look out in the audience and we do have real estate, a bunch of real estate agents, but the common denominator with those real estate agents are, they all live in Medford. and at least for the most part have lived in Medford and that I've talked to. So the whole idea is, the whole understanding that they're getting 7% on purchasing, that's why they're doing this. No, really, the homeowners are getting nervous. They're saying, holy cow, I'm gonna sell my house now, or I'm gonna raise my rent to $5,000, because if it does go to rent control, I wanna be ahead of it. This is the fear that we're causing here. I don't know if you guys understand this, because maybe you haven't lived in a home or run a home in Medford and understand the true impact, but it's dangerous. So like I said, there's a lot of movement. I'll read some comments from residents that have reached out to me to ask me to read things that couldn't be here. And I'll do that later, because I know there are a lot of people that wanna talk, but we have to understand something. This isn't just an issue that's gonna go to subcommittee. or go to a committee or where we can maneuver. You have to understand there's a huge fear in this community from renters and homeowners that what we're trying to do, what we're proposing to do is going to change their lives dramatically. So I just want you aware of that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: and how to fund that. Whether it's taxing homeowners, whether it's a $250 $250 million school and how to fund that, whether it's rent control, whether it's this tax, whether it's whether it's a proposition to an app override. That was my comments of why this issue has been so electrifying in this community. So I would appreciate that. But obviously, I also want to say two things. This is a this isn't a method is in a town. It's a city. I want everybody got to fix that. Because we hear that too much. And method is great. So we appreciate that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Alex. Excuse me. If we can, you're doing a great job. I'm so proud of you. Let's get through it. All right. Next, name and address the record at the podium.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information that counts as a Councilor Scarborough brought up some good points and I appreciate that I think that I think this council also has to understand this dialogue being said that someone threw out bad information. I'm gonna be honest with you, the feedback that I got back from people was the fact that we had a meeting with one of our subcommittees that's also been put forth to me that's very confusing to people to what they were used to. Because the document that you have in place is very, it could be very cumbersome for just the average person. Not everybody is involved in government and understands this process. So I think I mentioned that to have something where it really highlights what the old subcommittees were and how we're tying them in, we didn't do that.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, but not from what I was told, but I'll go over that with you. But the other concerning is that What started this off was the whole rent control issue. The meeting was called for home rule petition. That's what it was called for. Two hours before the meeting, information went out about a litany of rent control issues. So this is compounded with that the comment was put out there for 2%. So there was a dialogue out there said 2%. So what happened was you had people that are invested that wanted to get the word out because they don't feel like they're being heard. So I think we have to be realistic that we do a terrible job in really informing our community, terrible job. Even the conversation that we had in subcommittee talking about having a newsletter with our Councilors writing it and saying we could start it, but where does it go to? It goes to the same has, but the have-nots don't get it. But I said, it's the same thing. We have to find a mechanism that hits everybody. We don't have a newspaper, so we don't have that. But that's why these issues get brought into this atmosphere and why so many people are so contentious because they're hearing it as something attacking.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. And I know I know that just so just like you said, I know that there is a group that they're having a kickoff event on May 2, and it's for all method is a group of residents organizing to keep Medford informed about important issues that affect your housing as well as the issues that affect your quality of life here in Medford. And I applaud that grassroots organization because I think that's what it is. It's welcome to everybody from what I've told, and just come on in. And even if you get your name on an email, maybe that's how we start that conversation that we talked about at subcommittee.
[George Scarpelli]: I just love saying no to me by the way that's a no time. I'm counting, I get a radio. Go ahead.
[George Scarpelli]: So this is from, This is from residences dear method city council, I'm unable to make tonight's meeting live or on zoom due to conflict, I want to express my thoughts. on tonight's real estate tax proposal. I understand the issue of affordable housing and the need to address this issue. Maybe tonight's meeting will raise more awareness to our affordable housing needs in Medford. I for one will certainly pay more attention to this issue. I'm a lifetime resident of Medford. I raised my family here and went to Medford public schools and have contributed to the community in many ways. In fact, that's what I'm doing tonight. I think what's missing in this whole issue is the fact that there are thousands of different scenarios that homeowners have been planning for sales of their homes. Many people I know are thinking of their home as an asset for retirement. As we all know the cost of living and the cost of health care in this area are tremendously expensive. Some have leveraged their homes values to offset the college education of the children. Others were hit with illness and sent them in a different direction in life and thus the need for this asset is paramount to living a normal life in the city. I know this from experience. Most of us are not real estate moguls looking to make a fast buck. We're citizens who have worked hard our whole lives in this community. We deserve the right to use the sale of our home to make the right decisions for our families and our future in the city. So please do not derail the thousands of plans citizens have laid out for themselves by now blindsiding them with another tax. That's Jim McCarthy, 37 Blakely Road in Medford. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. Again, I think that this is a very a hot topic. I think that one thing that I would recommend is as we move forward with our committee meetings, I know that we have in the past been a little free and adding information before the meeting. I think it'd be important that we try to figure out what the president and our leadership team, that as we move forward, when we send out these topics, when you talk like use the rent control issue, that the information gets out there so residents can see that, because I think that's one of the things that played into this evening was the fact that that issue was so big, and that information wasn't really put out that way. It was put out as home rule petition. Now legally that's the way they've done, but in all sincerity, it's, it's that starts the divide. So I think that whether we change our way of business, Mr. President, and how we allow ourselves to present information for certain meetings, I think that's something we should revisit. But a question that I had was, we keep skipping over a step. Everybody keeps saying here, right? And then we go to the state. There's one person we're not talking about. What is the mayor saying about these issues? Has anyone talked to the mayor? Because this is funny, what I see that it's a problem. This is the most important person suppose in our community, our leader. And we have yet to hear from her. She's very busy fighting right fights, right? I mean, postponing meetings for two months, we'll get into that another day. But the mayor hasn't been transparent in anything we're talking about. One of the issues we hear right now is, Why so late was because something might have been very simple, really turned into a snowball effect to the fact that we truly don't know what our budget looks like. So I know you have the resolution coming up this evening, and I had, I would have motions going forward. I don't know if we're going to get to it, truly don't know. But the truth of the matter is, We need to know where the mayor stands with this. So whether it's passed or not, I'd like to, as an addition or a separate motion, that the mayor is involved in these meetings and her administration to help us if this moves forward to craft something that's reasonable.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: really tried to focus on for our many years and going through this process is understanding. First things first is looking at what I would request and what it really meant to our budget. and I think that there's a tone to it. City Solicitor, Assistant City Solicitor, I was going to talk about, I'm glad Councilor Collins brought up the fact, Vice President Collins brought up the fact that the reason that we're not filling that position is, you know, the dialogue out there is when you're offering a position that important, it should be given that respect when it comes to pay. And, when you keep it at that price, and like I've told you in the past, everybody here, that I've talked to city solicitors that I've worked with in the past, and this is, you know, their observation is that you only can apply for a job and be a city solicitor if the mayor truly wants a city solicitor. I think she's very comfortable, KP Law, I think she controls the dialogue, and as KP Law says, they don't work for us. A city solicitor now works for us. And the reason why I think that's so important, I'll say it over and over again. We did a huge disservice for the residents of the BJ's neighborhood because we answered questions without having legal representation. And it cost us by putting in a gas station that we could say now they're doing it that we don't need there. It's for a huge company that has a lot of money that has done nothing to prosper relationship with the neighborhood. we've done. Even even after they've come in and talk to us. It's still a mess. They still have not fulfilled what they've wanted. They should have done so. Having the funded positions to what it deserves to be, and I'm glad Council Collins shared those numbers because I had the similar numbers from, um. That city And you could see that, and I think that that's a huge cost savings, both with not bringing KP law for hourly rate and something that they really don't assist us with, and the fact that having someone that heads off huge issues, like I mentioned earlier. The DPW cement and hot top crew. This is something, I think it's now, it's sort of, comedic now when I bring it up because I've been doing this since we started I when I first when it was my first year as a Councilor was gung ho about this and I got a report and I did a I did a study and I came to I brought I brought the paperwork into the to the administration and it was a crew of three with their salaries and their benefits and their one time cost for the truck. And it came out to maybe like $250,000. And it was voted down, it wasn't even obtained. But since then, every year, we are asked to pull a bond for cement sidewalks for 2.5 million to 500,000 per million dollars. And I can guarantee you we're going to get that again this year, the mayor will come to us and ask us for a bond for sidewalk repaving. And where you can have your own crew come in and do that. And when times are slow, which they wouldn't be because we have so many issues, you can also use that crew to backfill, whether it's a spring to help the fields crew get that facility ready, whether it's highway, if we need something with highway. It's probably one of the most underfunded, under positioned departments in our city, both DPW, and as you all know, with the fire department being down 25 firefighters, you're looking at under funding and undermining our most vital positions, and that's hurting us. So that's why I bring that up. I think the other, the administration for recreation department, so I would get a few phone calls, because I don't know, some of you might know, I chaired and spearheaded the full time recreation department here in Medford a few years back. And Mayor Burke gave me the opportunity to chair it and really be the voice and share my professional opinion and we really watch it grow. And I think Kevin Bailey and his team, they do an amazing job. But now we're at the point where there's growth, we have to keep moving forward now. I think we're starting to get stagnant and we're starting to waste money. And I'll give you an example. When you have a director that's making, you know, maybe 90s, and he's spending 15 hours, 20 hours a week, answering phones, making phone calls, replying to emails, because they don't have a even a part time administrative assistant. These are the things that you see that are hurting us, and they're cost effective, and no by no means. So, you look at the situation where we when we talk about elections they say well funding the elections department is difficult because it's only really during election season we really need those people so. I want the administration if they can is to be a little creative and looking at a position where you have someone that's working in the recreation office, maybe 20 hours a week, or maybe 30 hours and 10 hours in the slow times in elections. And then that flips during election time, they work 30 hours in elections and work 10 hours at recreation. And I think that that would be more cost effective when you're talking about your director or your assistant director answering phone calls that that you really should have someone that's, you know, there all the time. The other pieces of people saying that we don't have someone that's answering the phone. So parents would call even during the program. You know, as a recreation department, you want somebody at that phone. You might have an issue with, a parent might've forgot that, they forgot to tell us their child is allergic to bananas. And when you don't have a person you can talk to, and you can't get ahold of that person that's in the field, it's a scary time. And I know it's dramatic, but these are the things that we think of when we work with children. So that's why I look at that position, seeing how important that is. The other position is looking at increasing program, another program coordinator that focuses on after school care. And I can tell you as, as my profession, we see the benefits financially and for our community, when you can offer a robust program through your recreation department, where parents aren't afraid to spend money to make sure their kids are in a highly developed program like the recreation respected program like recreation. And that also supports the issues we're having in the school department, that you've all heard it, you've all gotten phone calls that there's no after school care. one school's full, so there's a waiting list, they'll never get in, and then as they try to get on the next season, they can't do it, so it's just a revolving issue that, for the most part, who it really affects is the most needy in our community. It's not the more affluent members of our community that understand on April 1st, registration's gonna open, they're gonna be there right on their computer, boom, boom, boom, they're gonna sign up with their credit cards, and what happens, You have families that don't have that access, maybe not to a computer, not to even have a credit card. So it makes it difficult to make sure there's equity there. So I think that having that position would really help when it comes to the overflow and looking at what we're doing. And I know that we work closely with the YMCA with their afterschool care, and they take a lot of the voucher kids in our city. but there's still a huge need. And you love the fact that our parents that have a voice are being heard and the Brooks and the Roberts and the McGlynn and they're being heard and they're figuring out ways like being creative and starting bringing in Mr. Karate and paying Mr. Karate $150 for an after school program. That sounds great for the parent that has the means. But when we talk about kids that don't that when they're locked out of the YMCA program, because the numbers, these are things that I feel that are important in our budget. Next is staffing and education for the elections. I'm hearing some pretty disturbing things in the streets. Not only from this, you know, last election, still things are lingering. And a lot has to do with probably the greatest people in our community. And those are the people that are working the polls. And when you're talking about, I know most of them, and they're the sweetest people in the world, but unfortunately, I don't think we spend enough money and time in making sure they're trained properly. And then that does what? Because perception is reality, that then puts them in a bad position because they weren't taught the right way. And a resident that is educated when it comes to this, they blow things totally through the roof and who gets affected and then who walks away. are those people that come in and do that work for us. So I know a little winded, but I wanted to make sure that there was a dialogue and there was a reasoning for my choices. So we're also, you know, I know that Councilor Villes, we all want the schools at least level funded. From what I heard today that the teachers, union representatives reached out to me today and they were told that The school system is at a spending freeze right now, and they're still trying to make up. I know that Councilor Bears heard something different, which is better news, but from what I heard last time, it was still $2.5 million that the mayor actually replied and said that's true. So this is scary because a lot of it's coming down to the sustainability. When we purchased or we put any money from ARPA or ESSER into any of our programs, The reasoning in other communities having that person that oversaw the ARPA money, the first thing that when we met with them as a professional, when you meet with that director, they say, okay, what is the sustainability after that money is done? That was the key. If we couldn't show sustainability, we couldn't move forward. Medford just used it as a stopgap. Now we're gonna be in dire straits. And I think that's why having this meeting is great, but we all should realize I'm trying to, educate everybody I talk to, you know, and you, my fellow colleagues are just starting off, you're going to see, you're going to get phone calls, emails, people going to stop you in the street, and they're going to blame you. and people don't understand the budget process. We can ask what we're doing right now, but when it comes down to the budget, all we can do is cut, we can't add. And I'm just trying to educate people with that, just so they know, because it is going to be, I hope I'm wrong, I pray to God I'm wrong, but it doesn't look good. But thank you very much, Mr. President. And I owe you 66 minutes for talking, so. No, you're good.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scrivilli. Thank you. So, I appreciate Council Bears and our new Council at least starting this process, but, you know, for my newer colleagues, it's nice that there was a time when we used to get We used to get updates on a pretty regular basis, making sure that we were all caught up and understood what was going on in the day-to-day budgets here in the city. So even the actuals that we're getting from our Chief of Staff, it's kind of sparse. I mean, we were receiving them until last one we received was August. and they're redacted, so you really can't see much, but at least we got something from the administration. The fact that I think that I might disagree with Council Vice President Collins, the software that former financial director Aleesha Nunley had is the same software that we have today. she would give us a robust breakdown of our finances and preparing us for the upcoming budget, especially for the last few years. This has been horrific. And I think that we're celebrating starting in March because the truth of the matter is, I believe two years ago, we didn't even actually get a actual budget book, we didn't even receive one. And neighboring communities this process, working in municipality, I see things a little differently, because I'm part of that process. We started, we started six weeks ago with our process in our department. And we're already starting the pre budget meetings. And we're actually getting updates from our finance office that gives us our budgets updated on a monthly basis. So we know where we are. And It's pretty impressive. What we don't see here is there is a lack of transparency. The mayor ran on transparency, but we're seeing a drastic opposite of that. There is really no transparency. The software is there at least to keep us apprised of what's going on, but it's sparse at best. Like I told you, this is something we've asked for for years. I mean, we're two years behind and we started getting redacted actuals in June, July, then August, and we haven't seen anything since, unless my colleagues can say otherwise. The last one I got was August. What is it? The Warren articles, the redacted Warren articles. So we haven't seen anything. So I think that, you know, Councilor Bears brings up a great point that, you know, not having, funds really paying a huge impact and the issues we're seeing today. What are we talking about? What has been the biggest news lately? The biggest news lately is what's going on with the firefighters. And it's funny, so what I did is I didn't just go to our fire department, I went to neighboring fire departments in the greater Boston area and I talked to they talked to the fire. I talked to deputy chief in Boston, and he broke down their process. I talked to a deputy chief from Cambridge and in Somerville. And I've asked them, the biggest thing I see right here that's glaring, and you know, the overtime issue or the absentee issue wouldn't be an issue. If our fire department is funded with 125 people that's supposed to, because they built in for absences. And I asked questions that looked into some opportunities that hopefully we'll know soon that we'll see that our firefighters don't take sick days fraudulently. They earn those days and they take those days. I don't think we'll see one firefighter in the red. I don't think other departments in the city or other neighboring fire departments will have the same news. But we're seeing the impact of our budget causing some serious divide in our community. I mean, you've all seen it, that everybody's pointing fingers at us and everybody's pointing fingers at this person, everybody's pointing fingers at that person. But if it's funded properly, we wouldn't be in this mess. if we had a team in the finance department that can bring all the information forward that's needed, like neighboring communities, because I'll give you, I can only speak for myself, but I'm in a municipality where we were in the rez for three years in our contracts, and we finally settled up. It took two weeks to get the retro updated and then paid out to all the employees, and that was hundreds of employees. We have the same software here, but for some reason, it's causing a huge, huge issue why the fire department hasn't gone near retro because I personally think either we don't have the money or we don't have the staffing that can do the job that's needed. So this is why it's important to understand the processes as we're moving forward. And we're gonna be, I'll say it a thousand times, I think the lack of growth and the lack of new money in the last four years, we're reaping the negative ramifications today. There hasn't been a shovel in the ground. We have major areas in our community that could be redeveloped into mixed use smart growth and development processes that will bring in millions and millions just in permit fees. know, we talked about one of the projects that was that walked away from the city on Boston Ave, that just the permit fees alone was $6 million. That would help any deficit. Um, You know, so there is so much that I see that wasted, wasted funds, wasted money. And, you know, I pray like Councilor Callahan says that we realized how important those ARPA positions were, both on the school side and the city side. And we're seeing what's happening because, you know, I we love Penelope, and she's changed that department. One person she came in, she was a one person army here, when method was going through a huge drug issue, suicide issue. And she did amazing things. And I don't think we celebrate that enough. And if you talk to recovering addicts that live in our community, young people that I know, and I taught, they tell me that that office saved their lives and actually gave them a purpose. Then our advocates for that. And because that's what I was told, that's an ARPA position. And I think the fear of losing her job now that she's a young mom and have a family, she, she needs that sustainability and, and now she's gone. And, um, so I think that we're in a position right now that, um, looking at creative way of funds funding is something that's needed. So I appreciate everybody sharing their their goals and I think that someone that's the senior member now, is that the first time I said that Kit? I'm the senior member now and I've sat through a lot of these both on the 16 years now on the school side of the school committee member now a city council I've never seen anything like we've seen in the last couple of years. Last year was a very contentious budget. you know, we were angry with our colleagues and it kind of divided us in a sense because of the process. I'm happy that Councilor Biaz has gone early with our vice president and talked with the mayor and started this process openly so it's not something that's being done on the 12th hour. You know, just so we can get something through so we can move on with our lives here in the city of Medford. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Can I just chime in, Madam President, if I can? Absolutely. Thank you, and I understand why we're doing this, but I think that some of the confusion's coming in. If you could shed some light, I know that that Section 31, Chapter 186 of Mass General Law, that all landlords must deliver an accompanying form when issuing a notice of quit for nonpayment of rent and residential tenants. I think, so the confusion is that I believe, are we saying in context that we're not seeing that happen and we want to make sure that we're doing our part as a city? Or because there's already, what I've been told is that the state law is already in place. So there's a required notice to quit an accompanying form that the landlords must provide a form of notice to quit as of April 1, 2023. That's when it was implemented. The landlords that issue notice to quit for non-payment of rent to a residential tenant must also give a tenant a completed accompaniment form that details information on rental assistance programs, applicable trial court rules, standing orders, emergencies, so on and so forth. I could just keep on going, but as the questions that I received were that if this is already in place in the state, You know, what I don't see is it is these forms in multi language languages that we're offering. So I think it's important to hear that is, are we doing this in conjunction with the state law to make sure that we're going above and beyond as a council? I think that's the question that landlords are asking. We're already doing this by state law. Are we doing something we're not supposed to? Or is this something now we can do the metric ordinance instead of the state ordinance? So I think just getting that clarification would be good.
[George Scarpelli]: When a state law is in place, and we have, I understand the fact that we're putting in an ordinance to beef that up, but when it goes to a judge, would they look, they wouldn't look at what we're implementing. Does it hold muster if it goes to a court? like with the state ruling or what the state's asking and then what we're asking.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, if it goes to court, is it a binding law that it would be using it as either defense or, you know, you're battling it goes to a court for eviction? You know, what a judge, right? Look at that as a binding bind? Is it binding in the eyes of the court?
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, thank you. Thank you. Similar similar questions my colleagues brought up. I think that it's funny when we see some of the biggest issues we have is the policing and the notification and who's doing it. And, you know, it falls back in an office that's undermanned and overworked. But I think that that's that's I think that's the, the, the concern is making sure the word gets out so. thinking, you know, I know that landlords don't always oversee their properties. So you look at real estate agents, and we have, we have a lot of great real estate agents that are responsible, and maybe finding a way to marry them to also share that information to share to their tenants if that's their will, or is it just something that goes right to the homeowner, and it leaves it up to them? So I think right now the, the biggest issue is that I see it's the intent is awesome, getting it out there, making sure that people are informed in this, you know, so one of the questions what is, is a redundant? No, it isn't redundant, because the state law looks at one thing, but we're looking at multiple factors that pay into a landlord. tenant agreement. So, you know, I, I was fortunate that I had, we had the best landlord in my life. And that was my dad. And he had, we had landlord, we were, we had renters that lived with us for 15 years, and bought their home, another 15 years, bought a home. And now my dad's been gone seven years, the tenants that are still there. they've been there for about 12 years now. So there's a lot to say about a good landlord tenant relationship. And, but I think that the biggest thing is really going to be that I want to focus on as we move forward. And this is really now bringing in the building department saying, how are we going to do this? You know, it's, it's, like you said, Alicia had it all right here, you know, the tax bill, you know, I, the water bill is right because I don't pay the water anymore I go right online and do it so I wouldn't get that information so I think that these are the these are the big issues as we're vetting that's what we have in these meetings that people have to understand because I know that the the intent that people thought this meeting was for is we're going to do rent control again and uh I said so this is once again not that meeting I appreciate Vice President Collins clarifying that and and everybody understanding that This is a journey that we still have to vet out some very important pieces. But again, I think we look at the situation we had last year, it gives us an avenue to support our renters and our landlords. So they're prepared. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that we're moving in the right direction, but I think that we keep this in the committee and actually call for a meeting with the building department and try to see once we gather more information with what our office of planning is doing, and we can, like we said, these meetings are great, and what they're intended for is to vet these processes out where, you know, you get phone calls as a Councilor Tseng, we're doing something today. It's like, no, understand there's a process, and these small processes hopefully get us to a resolution where everybody looks at the final product and say, this is how it benefits everybody. no one's out to get anyone this isn't a conspiracy theory this is something that's hopefully going to work so i think that the biggest question right now is how we how we get the information out and then um in the building department how we're going to oversee that uh this that's that piece of it so so i would recommend we move with that as a as a motion thank you councillor scarpelli
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Bears. I hope everybody rested up. I got to bed at five in the morning this morning, so thank you. I just wanted to share some comments from some of the residents and the negative impacts that they're gonna be feeling with their landscape companies. Most of the people that have reached out did stress that they are senior citizens that do have homes that need to be taken care of and at the same time are on a fixed budget. So this will affect people. I know that there are some benefits that when you look at implementing this type of an ordinance, when you look at environmental measures. But again, I still haven't. I've been researching this and I still haven't. received something that I feel comfortable about is what will happen to the batteries after use because from what we're what I'm what I'm investigating in neighboring communities that are doing this the biggest question is the effect in the environment when we have to destroy or bury these batteries and what impact it'll make on our environment. So there are still a lot of questions. You know, the other piece that, you know, everybody, some people make comments tonight that, geez, I'm glad to hear that the municipal side, we're going to be fading into something. I don't know, do you understand that The average cost is between two to four million dollars for a municipality to retrofit DPW trucks for charging stations and then replacement of these batteries. These are studies that were done just in our neighboring community that they pushed it through anyway, but Our neighboring community has a lot of money to, I believe I was told it was $3 million to retrofit their vehicles and phase in all of these new leaf blowers. And I know we have until 2028, but I tell you what, I don't see a very good outlook for our future finances in Medford with still no development and no actual uh, responsible fiscal responsibility that's being maintained by administration. So these are things that I find still, um, a little concerning. Another piece that I, I received was that, you know, I, I, I'm not there right now, but I'm assuming there's at least one landscaper that's been in the city for a long time. I would assume he's there. Uh, but for the most part, our landscapers aren't really coming out and, um, you know, they're disgusted in the fact that they're just going to move away from Medford and the impact that this is playing on their part because, you know, they use they use leaf blowers. I mean, that's that's how they get through power through and make sure that they can keep homes affordable when you use a landscaper. So. I have a home, I'm going to use my electric blower, but I do it for what's needed and move on. But I just think there's a lot of variables. I know it sounds easy, and it's great to check off a box that we want to put in this ordinance, that it supports the environment, that it's really going you know, prepare our community later and moving in slowly into the phase out. But these are, these are difficult times and they're going to be worse in the future. And there's a lot of variables here that I can't support without, without more, um, more work being done to prove to me that this isn't going to be, this is going to be safer for the environment. So, um, I appreciate your time and thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I just, I've done a little research on lithium batteries and, you know, uh, There is, you know, a huge, you know, question about them. When you're talking about lithium batteries and what they contain, the metals and cobalts and nickels and the contaminants, they contaminate water supplies and the ecosystem if they leach out of landfills, because that's how they're truly disposed. We could drop them off at Home Depot, but then they go to a landfill. And the biggest thing that we're hearing right now is what Officer McGover did say, is that they do cause a lot of fires. You're seeing that more and more as they're demanded more and more in our communities. I did do a little, I did do some homework on the lithium battery. I think it's something that as I get more involved with understanding, you know, our environmental needs and footprints, I think that, you know, The comparison that studies have shown is that we'll see more damage to our environment in the future, in the long run. The measurements can't be apples to apples, because this is something that's at its infancy. And you'll see it later in life. And I think that's what is keeping me from moving forward with this. And the particulates in the air, You could, you know, you could, you could debate that as well. So how it's, how it's blown and how it's managed. You look at, you know, putting in some standards in place, people like the cast family, they make sure they are respectful to the community and they're respectful in how they're disposing and using these products. I know some aren't, some companies don't do that, but you know, that's more of, um, you know, the piece of enforcement, which, um, I know we have, we have our, um, we have our, um, building inspectors and our, our code enforcement inspectors going through their, um, going through their contract. And I would recommend that our new director re commissioner reaches out to their, his team and in negotiations, they should really, um, enlighten their enforcement officers that this is coming down the line because this isn't going to be easy this to add this to their plate again there's another reason that i find it you know um listen i know i know it's inconvenient for people because some people do take advantage of it and they could be loud but for the most part Um, you know, the conversations that I've had with residents, it really, you know, it's, it's, it's, it really doesn't make a difference. I haven't, I haven't heard a groundswell of changing an ordinance or implementing an ordinance for this. So, but again, I, I, I respect my colleagues and, and the, the, the evolution of this process, but, um, um, just wanted to share what, what I've learned. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Sure.
[George Scarpelli]: No.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, I'm sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: I've got 28 people.
[George Scarpelli]: that will really help us understand this is the portion that goes to true form of power. right?
[George Scarpelli]: That's a good answer. So the question is, if it wasn't set up, could there be a certain amount of money expected that this is already an issue, this is already a problem, that we can start feeding this money? Is there a figure that we can hold to make sure that, with the question we have right now, the question I'm trying to receive, is the funding that's going off to legal services, It's truly, you know, there's other avenues for legal services or issues when it comes to housing, but when it comes to helping out homeless or accessibility, it's really just, you know, this would be a great way to bring it out.
[George Scarpelli]: those are the three categories a minimum of 10% a year has to go to each of those three and then the remaining is can go to any of those three when we can now have an identified system that's already been set up that we know can get action. we know that we can actually go and that there's always gonna be at least 10% or maybe more that will support the housing concerns we have in the community. So I appreciate some of these questions.
[George Scarpelli]: That's, thank you for the clarity, I think that's important, so appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli, if I can, thank you for that. This is great. This is what you see the excitement with, when people can see the tangible changes, the upgrades to important pieces like parks and playgrounds, I think it's important. But do you know a part of this is for accessibility apparatus, so our kids with special needs can have an opportunity to play in all these playgrounds, just the one at the McGlynn, I think the one at Carr Park maybe too, is it?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. That brings up a good point. Miss Cameron, I think that especially this evening, as we vet other issues out the affordable housing give us give us some ideas of some some of the projects that were denied for affordable housing this round.
[George Scarpelli]: So I only bring this up because what the tone we're seeing lately, rent control, the tax question this evening, and Community Preservation Act has funded all of our affordable housing issues so far today. I think that's amazing. So that that speaks a lot. I think that speaks volumes of what direction we should really be considering when you talk about affordable housing needs and in how it affects the rest of this community. So thank you. I don't think.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Any further comments?
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Bowen.
[George Scarpelli]: Because
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: We had a special permit meeting with Council Member Nygaard there and we discussed the signage for the restaurant that is being built in the Felswick Plaza.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, just for, um, just for edification tonight, uh, Wednesdays have been a very difficult night for me because I also work on Wednesday, some Wednesday nights. So I'm going to stay in this meeting as long as I can. And unfortunately won't be able to attend the seven o'clock meeting. So I just wanted that, um, that to be no night, not, I'm not disrespecting anyone. I just, uh, unfortunately every other Wednesday, it looks like I've been, uh, had to work my regular job. So thank you. All right.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information if I can, Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I appreciate this. I just wanted to share just a couple of questions before we get going that people have reached out and I wanted to share that with this topic being very important, it is also a hot topic button that that we had some questions on whether the information that we received today from you was enough time for any legal ramification with the open meeting law, what the information is. And then the other one that I needed to share with you, Councilor Collins, that I had residents calling me asking if we can table this portion for the fact that tonight is a holy night and we have a lot of people that couldn't make this meeting at such a short notice once they understood what was involved. So although I feel some of these points are very important in what we saw with the issue that you talked about, I think as a whole this is something that really has to have more of an open dialogue with from beginning to end with all the stakeholders in the community. So I think that I just wanted to share that with you. I hope you can consider that because I think that with such a hot topic issue right now, making sure that we don't alienate or try to divide with this topic. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, to the Chair,
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So I appreciate that Councilor, but I also wanted to make sure it was addressed that we did have, being that even if it is a kicking off point, we do have residents that, you know, looked at what we had, but then the information that was sent out that that was shared that it was it's pretty intense and it's pretty like we know it's it's a volatile hot topic button so I think that you know the the understanding that a lot of There are a lot of homeowners that are at 6 o'clock mass tonight for a holy night. So I just want to make sure that we address that. That's something that, again, when we talk about this new process, because this is a new process, and how we're doing our subcommittees and different committees, this is new. So I think even with me, I was a little confused with the process. And getting the information now that will be outlining something that I think that people need to know from the jump. That's my input. I respect what you're trying to do. You know that, but I just wanted to make sure that I was heard. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry, point of information. Mr. Chair? Go ahead. Again, I hate to interrupt, please forgive me, but as we're going down this road, I think we need to be very careful that we're not without any legal representation, as we're looking to go further with this, we're not looking at what we say and then coming back to bite us because there are financial ramifications that do affect the community and individuals in this community. So I, you know, I, you know, I know that I've asked, I just don't, I don't want to, you know, go down this hole and then find us in that BJ situation that we, we made a big faux pas and we're, uh, then backpedaling. So I would, I would caution to move forward with this. I, you know, I, I, I would second 22 it, but, um, I right now that, that, that, that's coming close. I just don't, this is too much in play with this, this, um, I know that if we're talking about pieces of this that talked about this issue that's brought apart apart, but as we're looking at rent control, that's a whole different, different animal. This is this is something that's going to change this community drastically. And that will affect every homeowner and also what it would look like financially tax purposes as we move forward in in revenue. So I I think we need to really understand as we're going forward. It's like I said, if I received this information, Madam Vice President, early, you know, with some time, I could have vetted this, but I honestly got this, the whole breakdown of what your resolution reads. about an hour and a half ago. So I would ask that we would table this to another date and move on to something else, because I think that this is something that might come back to us. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information to the clerk, please, Mr. Chairperson. Go ahead. If it wasn't in, what is the ruling on open meeting law regulations with material that wasn't in place just a few hours ago? Clerk.
[George Scarpelli]: So that's the question, because I'm getting phone calls and emails from that talk about home repetitions on stabilization. But what I got today was pretty in-depth and pretty lengthy and pretty intense. And I think that's where the slippery slope comes in. But thank you for the clarification.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you. I'm still a little, I'm still a little confused. Justin, if a council saying, as we're looking at this, we're looking to. To an essence, sending out a press release that the city has a whole department that does this. Um, you know, for one Councilor, I'm not afraid to work, but I have two kids in college. I'm working three jobs. Um, you know, to, uh, it just, to me, it's, it's, uh, you know, and adding another meeting and I, you know, I, I completely, you know, understand what you're looking at, but I still, I'm still a little confused of what, what, you know, the goals of the city council that, um, we're sending out separately now do we have all the the other question I would have is the accessibility issue that who is it getting to is it getting just to the people that you know that that have access to to what we have or you know the mayor does Her monthly video, we have a city communications department that we fund. My question is, Are we doing, is this too redundant? Because I think that, um, I don't want to water down messages that it's coming from where, I mean, it's, you know, that's, I have, I have a few concerns with this because I think that, you know, sometimes, sometimes more isn't better. Um, the city sometimes doesn't do a great job. or really a good job or actually even a decent job getting out information. But this is something where local communities work hand in hand with their communications department. You know, you don't, you know, we get We get communications from the city council on a weekly basis through the communications director and the mayor's liaison in Somerville, and that goes out to everybody. So I don't want to be redundant, and we don't want to put... Listen, if we put too much out there, sometimes we kind of... we kind of bury things that we need, messages we need to send out, and it makes it more difficult for the common citizen, not the person that's there at our meeting every day, not the person that's watching our meetings and chiming in or emailing us all the time, but I think this is something that, you know, If I'm having a difficult time understanding it, I can't imagine our residents. So that's my concern. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. And this, this is why these meetings are great, I think, because we can. We can vet some some issues and concerns of my 2 with those comments. I too share those, those concerns, but I think that we have to look at a, trying to find out what that mechanism is going to be. Um, this council is very limited in what we, what, what we control when it, when it comes to, uh, what outlets we can use through the city, unless we have buy-in with the city. Um, because I, um, Even our page, it's not really understood to most constituents, I think, and where to find information. So I think that poses one problem that I think we have to vet out. And then I think the other piece is, again, we can use what Councilor Lazzaro mentioned with the newsletter that she mentioned. it's who gets those newsletters. When we have engaged constituents that are involved in the planning and development, or there's an issue in their neighborhood, they're involved. But like you said, there isn't a main newspaper or or identified uh link that we can use that's going to get out to every resident that's what i'm that's what i'm trying to say when i said that it's is it who who can we reach um you know the the engaged resident they're they're going to see that but what we're seeing is that people that that unfortunately aren't engaged, but when they need to be and they can't, they're not tied in with any group or any, um, um, site that, that we're seeing. So I think we need to find, you know, work with the city and maybe work with the clerk and our president to see what can we do to start or have that type of messaging that's going to go out throughout the community, not, not specific, um, already engaged constituents. So I think, you know, as we're vetting it, this is great, but I think that these are two concerns that I'm hearing from people that don't know anything until it's already passed because they're not tied into a specific group or newsletter. So just sharing.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry. I think when we're thinking of being accessible, I think, sure, you start at, we need a starting point. I agree with you. But again, don't we want the mechanisms in place that we are going to reach everyone, everyone that we can and making sure that we're getting it to the families and the residents that don't have access. So I, I don't, when we try, we want to do this because it's something that's very important, it's needed. We know that. But I think that we need a partner in the city that's going to sit with us and hold our hands and walk us through the processes so we can make sure that we're making sure we're reaching everybody. I think it'll be a disservice, truthfully, because of what we're hearing and how divided our community is right now, and the haves and the have-nots that they say the city council has now a newsletter. And who is it reaching? Well, it's reaching to the haves. Well, why isn't it reaching the have-nots? Because we haven't vetted out properly how to get it to those avenues. Now, it could be a simple, it could be a simple resolution, but everybody in this meeting doesn't have, we don't have control of that. This is what I'm saying. I think that, you know, I appreciate a chairperson reaching out to Mr. Smerdy, but, and I understand that the mayor has their own message, but We're the city council for the city in Medford. That is the department that has to work for us to make sure that our message gets out. I'm not saying put our message in with the mayor's, but having the avenues in place that it's reaching everybody that we can conceivably reach so there aren't concerns or questions or people that are divided against saying, here we go again. How many times have we heard this? People in West Medford know about it. How come the people at Middlesex Ave don't know about it? We hear this every day. Well, at least I have for the last 16 years. So I just don't want to add another layer until we vet the process out. Sounds great, and I appreciate it just for the fact that I can't tell you, I'm sure we all have heard, the lack of a local newspaper has absolutely crippled our community for getting information and really sharing and celebrating some really big news in our community. But again, I think that, you know, as we move forward with these meetings, I think it's imperative that we meet with the city representatives that are going to sit with us and say, hey, We might not hit every group, but we did everything we possibly could to reach these the the underprivileged groups. And the message is getting out to everybody, at least with an effort that was that was put forth by this council. Not at least that's how I feel. So again, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll make a default on you tonight, Matt.
[George Scarpelli]: That brings a good point. I know that community channels, it's a little bit different, but I believe we can, to this point where we have a big issue or a big meeting coming up or needing to send a message, that we can add it to the loop. You know, if we wrote something up and sent it to communications, could that be added to the loop on the public access that because in the past we used to do that.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, that, that's, that's great. So that might help. I mean, we, we can chip away at this, uh, council chair, uh, lemon. Let me see what we can do.
[George Scarpelli]: Um. Thank you. I think this is something that I found when I first started having our first meeting with the school committee, the Massachusetts School Committee Association, and giving us like a tutorial. I thought it was great. I know that when you know, when, uh, when Mark Rumley was our city solicitor, he would often bring us in individually and give us a, uh, you know, checks and balances the way of the world and legal and, um, and, uh, common, common practices of city Councilors, little course, but I don't know, maybe the clerk can help me with this. So we can ask, um, legal about this. If we had a, um, What's the word I'm looking for that we had, um, you know, uh, I'm, I'm, I'm drawing a blank, but it's, we would get together and have a, um, like a meeting together, like a learning, um, seminar where it really didn't affect the open meeting law because we called it, um, a certain gathering. I'm having a brain freeze, Adam.
[George Scarpelli]: And then we can share, you know, we can, um, you know, separate the two groups with them and then even share some issues, but then not discuss them until, you know, maybe, uh, a committee of the whole meeting to describe, um, diversity inclusion subcommittee or committee of the whole. I mean, there's gotta be a way that we can do this, that, that. that I know when we were in the school committee, we used to have training together and it wouldn't affect us. So, because I think this is a good idea. I think that anything will help and make sure that we stay on track of what we're trying to deliver here in Medford, so.
[George Scarpelli]: It was supposed to be That's what I I'm under the same Understanding if we if we we dispose this paper if we do that that that's been practiced I believe adam for for a while if you receive in place on file. It's we have to re um re-enter it Then I think, yeah, sorry. We just continue it. What can we do?
[George Scarpelli]: That's it. I agree. That's all we have to do is leave it alone because I think this is a working document because we could bring it up at our next meeting and that could be modified by asking for the certain guests that we want to come and help us uh, get to some sort of resolution.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, it seems that we've lost another legend here in Medford. He didn't have to have a first name. He didn't have to have a last name. He was just known as Bruni and an individual that. grew up with Down syndrome and was a family who had an amazing family. His sister Carol Caraviello, Rick Caraviello's former council president, council Rick Caraviello's brother-in-law, great nieces and nephews that loved him. Bruni was a fixture, whether it was on the music site here in Medford, because he loved to dance and he loved to sing. But most people know Bruni and remember Bruni as one of the most committed Medford Mustang supporters in our athletic fields. I remember a story. You don't really make it until Bruno, until Bruni recognizes you. We were coaching, I was coaching probably my 14th year at Medford High School, and our boys had just finished their sixth straight season without losing a GBL game, and we're going into the state finals. And I wasn't nervous as a coach, I was ready to go, our boys were ready to go. And I remember someone beside me, and I turned to the right, and here's this posing gentleman wearing a Medford jacket. And I said, Bruni, he says, coach, And I said, that minute, I said, boy, two things. I said, I made it. As a team and as a coach, we made it. Bruni was there. And two, that now I'm nervous. because Bruni was here. So he left that mark and everybody that crossed his path, he always had a smile on his face. He loved being around him, but individuals with Down syndrome, he lived a full and happy life. He just has had an amazing family that supported him and Mefford will miss him and send his condolences to his family. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Now, Council President, you normally don't put a retiree from UPS on your agenda, but someone like Pat O'Brien, I get more phone calls from residents and owners of small businesses that talked about losing a fixture here in Medford. You all have, if you live in Medford, if you've been around Medford, you know, Pat O'Brien. Pat's the hardest working individual I've ever seen in your life. Yes, he's in a big brown truck and yes, he's always wearing brown, but he is always running. He's never stopping. He's always giving back to the community, whether it was in his position as a UPS driver and, um, But I remember Pat as someone that volunteered at the ice rink, that drove the Zamboni to make sure the ice hockey team had the best surface, whether it be coaching baseball or coaching basketball for his children. He was someone that was always a fixture in Metro. And I just want to congratulate him. He's a great role model for any Method resident that lives with the motto of working hard, to the community. So we wish Pat, uh, happy retirement. I don't know what he's going to do with all that energy he has, but, um, maybe he can come here and, you know, maybe work with the city council. You know, help you with cleaning out the back room again. Council president. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So I know that, first of all, I care very deeply for a lot of our members. I respect you. And I will tell you that having deep conversations with my fellow Councilors, that's not the intent of this Council. we'll do everything that needs to be done to make sure that event comes through every single year. It's too important for our community. In today's society, where we lack a true sense of community at times, that event brings everybody together. So I don't know where where that might have come from. But I will tell you, we will work hard together as a board to make sure that that's not something that's going to ever be forgotten. And and we understand how hard you work. And I think that comes that evening that happens a lot of miscommunication and a lot of misunderstanding what was coming from the administration, the council, and your organization. So I think all it says is really having an open line of communication. I know that Judy's working really hard with the mayor's office to set up a meeting with different clergy and different churches. I know that the council president would probably love to be involved. to make sure that we're all together to make sure that this is an all-inclusive and a true celebration the way that you intended for. I think that you know I brought my kids to the event when they were babies and it's something that to this day they still remember the Christmas trees and not for what what what the symbol of it but what it meant for the city and that was really unifying us. So I think that we so appreciate everything you do and I appreciate that you even had to come up here and share what you had to because there might have been some negative I'm glad you were here. I'm glad that we got it. We had a chance to speak, get the word out. And really, I think most importantly, is rally around as a council as an organization as a city to do more of these type of functions, because they're so important to what we're doing here. I mean, you want to talk about we have a room full of people that want to that are looking for true inclusion and peace and happiness. And I think that you're you're You're the originators. You've been doing this before people were looking for where to look, where there's peace and love and happiness. So you are, in my eyes, the cornerstone of what we all should fight for. So again, I'm sorry that there was any negative words that came out in discussions, but rest assured, I've talked to Council President We're gonna work very hard to make sure this doesn't change. And now, I think that it's out there now. I would love to see so many other of our churches and our synagogues and our different affiliations and partners throughout the community really rally around this event so we can use this as a true teaching moment for everybody and really celebrate that amazing event. I know that still hundreds of kids show up every year And you didn't mention how much money goes out, Mrs. Lonergan, but I know you're talking to the hundreds of thousands that were raised and that were distributed to so many families that needed it and so many organizations that need it. And I think it's to the point now, we don't have enough room for the people that want to donate Christmas trees so they can. And what's the intent of the tree? People don't realize you can hold what? more prizes on it. So you get more money and more donations that can come in. So that's one of the intents for it. I think that people didn't realize how important that is. It's really just a mechanism to really stress the importance of gathering funds to support different initiatives throughout the community. So, um, You know how I feel about all of you personally. I've known all of you probably my whole life, and I think that I'm proud to call you my friend, but I will tell you, as a council, I didn't hear, I haven't heard one negative thing moving forward with anything we're trying to do. I think we're all one team, making sure that we're gonna spread this love. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Callahan. Councilor Scarpelli? Thank you, Councilor Villescaz. I think any time that we present a resolution or an ordinance that has a level of detail that we talk about law enforcement, I think it'd be prudent for us to maybe send this to subcommittee, invite the chief or someone in his stead to give us their input as our, um, the city of Medford to make sure that what we're voting on has the best interests of our police department and our safety of our citizens. I think that it would be, um, it would be, um. a prudent solution to move this forward to get a little bit more information. What I read is, you know, it's information that's gathered, but I'd like to get more information before I would vote on this and really get the input of the chief where it's mentioned a few times that the ramifications through the police department and getting their input. So I would recommend that we would move this to one of the subcommittees, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: That'd be perfect. And with that ask a representative from the police department there to share their input.
[George Scarpelli]: I need to correct something, because I embarrassedly, I just got text with a couple of threats. Mr. O'Brien did not retire. We received information from a colleague of his saying that he retired. But the truth of the matter is, Mrs. O'Brien sent me a message and said, no, George, Pat was given a circle of honor award for his safe driving in the city of Medford. So please, Pat, I won't come home tonight. He is not retiring. If someone could reach out to his bosses, he'll be in work tomorrow. So please forgive me. I make one mistake a year and that was it. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Councilor Villescaz and thank you, Vice President Collins. I think that I'm going to bring us back to a few sessions ago, and I made a commitment that for one councilor, I would stand with the policy that I will not vote on any national or international vote that comes to this council. I think we have so many issues right now within our community that I think our focus really needs to be on the measures of Medford right now. I know that, you know, the information will go out there that Councilor Scott Peli doesn't believe in this, or Councilor Scott Peli's belief is X or Y. The truth of the matter is, everybody is in favor of peace. And I've had the opportunity to talk to so many great residents of method both from Palestine that are in support of this resolution, that are from that are Jewish that are supporting this resolution, and a Jewish residents that are totally against this resolution. So I found that this one resolution gave me the opportunity to listen to some amazing people that she had some amazing thoughts. And what I find it more important is that we have an avenue to bring some very, very educated people that have their own thought process to come together and unite them, and then come back with a message that I will personally work with, that we can contact the people that have contacted me, bring my friends together, and then send a message together. Because one thing that I've realized and something Medford doesn't need, This is another piece dividing our community. So no matter what anybody votes or how they vote tonight, there's going to be a half that's really separated. And that's not from my opinion, my own opinion, my beliefs, but this is my opinion from the multiple phone calls I got. I did receive messages from people that asked me that if they could, if I could read something into the record or a statement to the record, and I on both sides, I, I recommend a recommended my Palestinian friends to send any messages they wanted me to read on the record. I've asked my friends on who feel that this isn't a resolution that they feel safe on that I would share the information show. So if, if you would allow me I have
[George Scarpelli]: This is a public participation. This is the council speaking as part of the record.
[George Scarpelli]: I am. All right, I am. Okay. So if you'd like to do that, I'll... If that's all right. I'll yield to you and then come back.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I completely understand. This is a topic that I respect from all my fellow councilors. I think that anything that you've said, I don't think any of us disagree. I think it's very important that everybody understand this. We have a council that is very cordial and respectful, and this isn't an easy and a simple issue that has a simple outcome. But I will tell you, as Councilor Sagan mentioned, the communication I received from our constituents that felt the need that were scared to come out tonight, that really wanted to understand that what is being said so far, they're feeling the opposite. They feel that with this motion moving forward, that it hurts what we have in our community of bringing people together. So again, not my view, I'm explaining what residents have reached out to me and asked that I share. One person that I respect, A former teacher of mine, who has been living in Israel for many, many years now, reached out with a comment. He said, while nobody here wants to see any more death, people must remember that on October 6, there was a ceasefire agreement in effect that was holding well. However, on October 7, Hamas terrorists violated the ceasefire and attacked kibbutzim, villages, and a music festival murdering 1,200 Israeli, including not only Jews, but Muslims, Christians, Jews, Americans, Thais, Russians, British, among others. While mutilating many bodies, burning some alive in ovens, and raping countless women, there were people ranging in ages eight to 87 years old. There was among over 230 kidnapped people that were brought back to Gaza, of which 136 are still being held. If they are alive, we still have questions. Since Hamas has not allowed the IRC to visit the hostages, we have no idea how any of them are doing. A ceasefire resolution only gives confidence to Hamas that they are winning the war in the West and makes it harder to get the hostages, the bodies, back. Plus, Israel will not accept a ceasefire unless includes a return of all hostages and bodies as well as leadership of Hamas being sent into exile to a country that will accept them. Unless those conditions happen, it doesn't matter how many cities or states or countries vote for a ceasefire. Israel will not accept it. So I think that whether you believe in it or not, these are messages that come from families of Medford. We have another that was sent that wanted to reach out in the statement. Forgive me that they're longer, but to members of the council and those in attendance, thank you for listening to this statement. The months since 10-7 have been extremely tight trying for the Jewish community. We experienced a predominantly attack on the brothers and sisters solely because they are Jewish. It brings back haunting memories of when this was commonplace not more than a century ago. We are slaughtered not for the military advantage, not for political maneuvering, but because we're Jewish. The only thing different today is that there is a country and an army that will push back and defend us. In the World War Two during the programs in Russia, and the inquisitions across Liberia and in ups or uprisings like Farhoud in Middle East, we were defenseless. But today in the first time in 2000 years, we have the ability to stand up and push back against the Jew haters that are attempting to alienate us. In the latest, we have experienced rapidly rising anti-Semitism, including here at home, with genocide chants down the street at Harvard, and anti-Zionists who, by definition, call the destruction of the Jewish homeland in Israel. We hear louder and louder every day the warning signals that Jews are no longer safe, coupled with the thousands upon thousands who celebrated our deaths on 10-7. We are scared. We cannot trust our local officials to stand against anti-Semitism, and we cannot trust our fellow citizens when we see them marching in the streets calling for more Jewish deaths. Our concerns are not heard. Our safety is ignored. And this ceasefire resolution before you is a symbol that you are telling Jews to once again not push back, not fight for the survival, but lay down and take it. That is what we hear when there are calls for Israel to call off the war against those who started this in the Battle of 10-7. During World War II, we did not have a ceasefire for Nazis or Imperial Japan, despite the horrific amount of civilian death in the war and aggression the Axis started. There was no ceasefire against Al Qaeda 9-11, and the worldwide Jewish community will not abide the ceasefire with the Hamas. The common thread here is that there cannot be a ceasefire with groups whose entire reason for existence is ideological mass murder. The only type of viable, long-term, and durable ceasefire is one where Hamas' war-making ability is destroyed. Only then can Israeli lives and security of the Palestinians can be free from an Islamic dictatorship. A ceasefire that leaves Hamas in place is a banned band-aid upon a cancer. It may save some lives in the short term, but guarantees more war, death, and destruction down the road. Hamas officials have promised to repeat the genocide of 10-7 again and again. Israel will be forced to continue to defend their citizens. Hamas will continue to try to kill Jews and hide behind their own Gaza subjects. Jews, Arabs, Israelis, Palestinians, all will suffer until Hamas is no longer poses a threat. And even after this, there is those who are still not swayed by the existential fear of Jewish constituents face. I leave you with this. Why is the council taking such a stand? What is it about this war that is exceptionally different from all the other conflicts raging in the world, that makes it worth splitting a community further alienated, an already fearful minority, just to issue a statement about a handful of these beliefs. How does this serve the interests of Medford residents? And what message do you think will be heard for your actions today? Thank you for listening to these concerns. So I will tell you, I've shared some amazing conversations from my Palestinian friends that it was a great understanding, something that I will never understand the, the feelings that you have. I could never, no one here, unless you're Palestinian or Jewish in Israel and understand the situation we're going through. So to minimize that, to minimize that, to minimize that would be disrespectful. But I will tell you that there is a ground movement moving forward that I will gladly move forward with, with my friends that I've now worked with, that bringing our Palestinian people and our Jewish residents to find a clear message that we can work together, that could present to this community, that it's more of a unified front. And I think that that's what's important here in Medford today. So again, whether it's popular or not, that's not my intent here. I have a strong belief in what I believe in when it comes to issues dealing with national, international issues. I'm gonna abstain from any votes. I will not vote for anything on any agenda that comes forth in this council. I've done this in the past, and I'll do this moving forward. That doesn't mean George Scarpelli doesn't believe in peace. That doesn't mean that George Scarpelli doesn't believe that there isn't a way to unify our community. But this is who I am, who my residents have requested their information be spread. And I thank you for the time, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Excuse me. Personal privilege. My comments that were, like I stated, these were residents that asked me to read things on the record. Okay, this is, don't divert what was said. That's what I wanted to just make sure that that was stated. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm not for every Palestinian that I talked to would have great discussion. I offered the same advice. And I offered the same chance to read. It just wasn't sent. Thank you. Thank you, Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I just, and I think that I understand where the motion's, the resolution's coming from. I think that we just need to be cognizant in the fact that anything that we put forth that companies can look into and say, hey, well, let's take a chance in Medford, but remember if, it doesn't work, we're going to, you know, it's going to penalize us in a sense that, you know, being taxed and when then that would lead to what we're talking about and seeing unsavory or other entities entering or being just admitted into each community that would affect us in a negative way. So I understand the frustration because we have three master plans that we spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on for Method Square and nothing's been done. We haven't seen anything. So I know that, as we said, moving forward, I think that the helping with some of the zoning changes and the understanding of what we're doing moving forward with the planning department to really see what works in Medford. I would tend to hold off on some resolution like this until we see a more of a robust plan that the city is hopefully unveiling relatively soon from what I hear. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: For our newer members, this is a very contentious situation with the neighbors of the BJ's neighborhood, with the implementation of the new, the building of the new gas station at the corner of Middlesex Street and BJ's entrance. One thing that we wanted to make sure we cognizant with the neighbors being informed with everything that's happening so they are not left in the dark like they felt the last 25 years. And what's been happening, I guess, is the construction work they were setting pylons. And as a gym, they were hitting the pylons to set the footings. They shook houses and neighbors were scared to death. Nobody was informed. They let everybody know. I give a lot of credit to our court enforcement officers. They ran to the site at 630 that morning and talked to the project manager and he showed him some of the seismology equipment that they've had and said that it's not affecting them, but the neighbors want to have would like to call for meeting with the representative what we did agree with. I believe Council President was that there would be a representative from BJS that would be at our beck and call for our neighbors so if we can reach out to them I don't know where it fell it that it was with the building of the building department, or it was with the mayor's office I don't know who has the. if we can ask who that connection is and ask him to come to the next meeting, because I think some of the community members really want their voice heard, and especially the fact that they did tell the code enforcement officer they'll be doing this again. in a few weeks when they set the gas tanks underground. So there'll be more shaking and some other people had some questions with the gas lines that are there. How is that affecting it? And then we had a call that evening a water main burst in front of one of the residents' homes, and they wanted to see if it's attributed to that type of work that was being done. So I think we need to be super, super delicate with these neighbors, because as one of the members that failed them that night in voting, in an irresponsible manner, not knowing the laws and the rules of that night, and not having a city solicitor to protect us, it put us in a really, really bad situation. And whatever we can do for those neighbors, we need to follow through with. So thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Scrivina. Two questions.
[George Scarpelli]: Even if by chance we can get at them, reach out to the neighbors in the immediate vicinity of 4th Street, Middlesex, just letting them know that this is what's happening. One resident said that
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Madam Chair. It's also important as we start in this new format that we're not redundant. So if we have, it's how we're rolling this out, something with the zonal reform. I think that's something so important that, you know, having one Councilor do the legwork, then three other Councilors do the same legwork. And then again, to the community process, then again, I think we, I don't wanna make this more than it has to be in the sense that let's not suffocate. the common resident and the fact that what we're trying to do is great and really highlight and stress certain aspects of what we're doing and certain agenda items. But at the same time, I think zoning could be a little different because it is so important and it is citywide. I think that that's one of the reasons why we spent so much time making sure that we secure the funding for the consultants, making sure that we have the right team in place with the office of community development and making sure that we create something that we're encompassing everybody's efforts. And I think that we, something similar that we use, for example, the way Somerville, when they started their projects, as they started looking at their gateway communities, whether it was lower Broadway, whether it was Assembly Row, it was always done. It wasn't done in a vacuum. It was something very open and transparent where I think that could be I just don't want to have the same thing said over and over again because the redundancy might pull people away from being part of it. And if that makes sense, I'd rather see us work more as a team and show the unity together with the community, especially with what our ultimate agenda is when we push any of our subcommittees through. At least that's my opinion. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Good to know.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council Chair. So something that I've talked to, I know that it's been bantered around the state, but I think it's something that as we look at this topic and looking for how to fund it, I think that one of the things we might want to consider is bringing a state delegation in. and working on a statewide mandate of cyclists registering their bicycles. And with that fee, supporting any safety recommendations and upgrades. So to assist with what our goals are for cycle safety. And I think, as we know, we have probably the most Um, if everybody had the respect of a bicyclist, I think it could make the world a lot better, but we also have, um, those rogue cyclists that tend to cross the line. And, and, and I think that's what makes at times a site cycling world, a little difficult for some people to, to, um, engage with because they think that, you know, uh, the content of, bicyclists don't follow the rules, or if a car was taking a right turn, I heard this through the, this bicycle lanes is confusing because something simple as a person taking a right turn and a bicyclist cutting in behind traffic and ramming into the side of your car and then you have damage to your automobile and the person rides away. and not having an identification piece for a police report or anything to that nature. No different than how the license plates started with automobiles, but I think it's something that putting a fee to that and having an identification number, it could be beneficial for what the greater plan is, and that's more safety, more bike lanes, and where it's, you know, when we started raising fees in the community I work in, the city was in, they were an uproar for the fact that the fees were all was they were all increased. But then when you understood that all traffic and parking fees go directly to youth programming and schools, then people don't mind. And, you know, for street sweeping, weekly street sweeping, people see the streets being swept us. Okay, we understand now, if you're going to break the law, that's what it is. So when you look at identified fee structure, and you're looking for something like bicycle registration, and putting that money directly into our roads and for safety purposes, I think it's hugely beneficial. So my thoughts.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that probably first, maybe on its own paper, I think that's something that was relevant years ago. And we're seeing the fact that our roads, especially our sidewalks, seeing the negative impact, especially after all the bonding that we've provided. And then the feedback that we've heard back was that a lot of the lack of functioning of the projects is due to lack of license contractors that can do the job. And then see because the season, something I put out a few years ago, I'd like to bring it back and maybe put it as a motion or with this or a separate motion that we asked the commissioner to do a cost analysis of starting again, our own sidewalk and hot top crew. When we presented this, I think my first term, I had a the ability to take the DPW director in the neighboring community who actually broke down the equipment that's needed, the type of vehicle that would be needed, the three staff members plus their benefits, and what it came down to is having a crew that worked through the warmer weather and working at our pace to do that, the sidewalk repairs and sidewalk management plan, it really benefited neighboring communities where Medford, what my bone of contention is, I'm sure Councilor Bears remembers that when we keep when the administration keeps coming to us with $2.5 million bonds to redo sidewalks and stump removal. And to this day, another piece to this is having that list updated and reporting back to us. I think that it'll be good for the new council to see what we've done with that $2.5 million and how little gets done with that in a certain amount of time. So I don't know if we can add that or maybe as a second motion, ask follow up with the director of DPW commissioner to maybe put together a budget request for a hot top and sidewalk crew. with the staffing and materials needed. And that doesn't have to be done by next month, but it might be something we could look at for the budget season and saying, well, look at this impact. Let's do the math. If it's 2.5 million and we've only done 400 panels, sidewalk panels, and what's equivalent to neighbor communities, what does it take to do 400 panels, and we see that there's a drastic financial difference, I think that we should really entertain that. I think that we've offered it, and I know some DPW directors in the past have wanted to do it, but it's always been frozen at the administration level. The other piece to that is the benefit of having a sidewalk and hot top crew with potholes all year round, if there are down times that those three staff members could also be used in the parks department if needed, could be used in different departments when needed, you know, when you do see a lag. So if that's okay with.
[George Scarpelli]: the time for our new members is that weather got in the way. Lack of I believe at one point we're hiring landscape contractors to do sidewalks because there were so limited for for licensed contractors that typically do this with having some time to do it. So yeah, we got that desperate. So I would hate to do that. You know, because I think we might see the ramifications a few years down the line when you bring in people that didn't do things the proper way if that's the case.
[George Scarpelli]: As part of their equipment.
[George Scarpelli]: All right, this is something for budget season, my request. So it still gets some time, so. Awesome.
[George Scarpelli]: I love listening to Adam get cramps in his fingers, so I think it's great.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye.
[George Scarpelli]: Would you like me to repeat that motion?
[George Scarpelli]: Right. And to add Council business comment that other look at the cost for a Luke sidewalker. to also add as one of their duties. So I think that rounds off a whole team. When you look at sidewalk, hop-top crew, slash snow removal on main sidewalks, that's a pretty complete position. And I did Google it. He is right.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, if you want to use Chewbacca shovel, is that in there too?
[George Scarpelli]: And if I can, Madam Chair, I think that what's important is I don't know if you can effectively do that job unless you have a true understanding of what, like you said. the facilities, what's needed, how to have a working document, because as we said, it could be windows one day, but as the windows need repair, it might be flooring, and then understanding how that breaks down. So I think that, I know that we've in the past had a comprehensive study done for all the buildings, but I think if we invite the, I've yet to meet the facilities director, maybe inviting him to one of our next meetings and asking them if they do have a comprehensive plan, you know, with what Councilor Bears was saying, so we can see. you know, what a working document looks like to maintain or bring these buildings back up to par and making sure that we stay ahead of things. I think that the other piece of that, there are so many things that we need, and there are so many avenues that we can use, but there truly isn't a point person that, at least I haven't heard yet, that can look at different grants and different avenues that we can use to fund these projects. So, I know it's a good start to have a facilities manager, but I would love to see what other communities have. I mean, most communities have a facilities manager that has an assistant manager that also has a facilities crew that does electrical. They have an electrician, a plumber, and a carpenter that's on staff that you're not wasting time or money bringing outside contractors to do things we need. in most cases at a minute's notice. So I think that that's how most facilities teams work in most communities. You know, I remember when Medford, the school department, used to have its own maintenance team. They had a locksmith, an electrician, we had a plumber, we had a carpenter, we had a painter, that they worked. And again, this is with the old schools, the neighborhood schools, that they kept them up as much as they could. But we're looking at what's so-called the new schools now that are now outdated and in desperate need of upgrades. So I think that having the new facilities manager come to us, and believe me, I don't expect the person to come up and say, yeah, this is what we need. I think we might have to look at asking the mayor to bring in a consultant that goes through the whole building, like Weston and Sampson, that other communities use, that go through all of our buildings and come through with the honest assessment of what we need in our priorities, starting high priority first. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that we've seen, Madam President, through the chair, I believe it's a I think that we're seeing our city engineer being more proactive when we're opening our streets to private entities, let's say a resident wanting to change from a lead pipe to copper water pipe. I believe the new policies in place now that the homeowner now has to pay the contractor to go curb to curb, which if what bothers me with that is that I don't know. There's still question, I think, to ask the city engineer that when the utilities come in, are they mandated for the same type of restoration? If they open the street from what I've been told, they're not. They open up the area that needs to be open that they can get to, they resurface it, they let it sit one cycle, and they come back and resurface it. But I think that's not fair. I think the basic resident, the homeowner, or, you know, The landlord that has to pay for the safer, you know, transfer of lead to copper has now bringing up the rate that's falling back on the consumer because now the contract is not saying, okay, let's keep it the same price. They're boosting the price to an unimaginable fee. And I'd like to know if we're seeing the same with utilities. Our biggest issue right now that we've seen and heard from time and time again, using Winthrop Street as a good example, That street has been opened up, I think, maybe 10 times in the last 10 years. And you're looking at the same. The same areas being opened up, but there isn't collaboration with. national grid gas work to Medford's infrastructure, water pipes that I think that if there could be a better way to communicate that to minimize any of the resurfacing of the roads. But I think that the biggest thing with I believe this is the having the utilities coming in and going curb to curb as well. So I, I believe that's something that we need a better understanding, maybe through a motion, is just asking some clarity with the city engineer just to give us a report of what the utility standards are when opening streets and for private residents that want to make, you know, change their water lines. Just so we have an understanding and then because I, you know, we've heard it for years now, the biggest concerns and issues we have in our roads and sidewalks are the fraudulent work done by the utilities when they come in and not being held accountable. The biggest part of that is also that most communities have what's called a clerk of the works, that when they are doing a job, permitted a job, you have a clerk of the works for the DPW that watches and oversees the opening of the area, the closing, then the cleaning of the area. So that's something we asked for in the past. I believe we asked for that if we could ask for a fee to be added to any road work that would pay for Clerk of the Works and we were told that can't happen. So that they told us that that's, something that we can't request. But if we can get that motion to the city engineer to give us a better understanding of the utility side of the roads, and hopefully we can police that a little bit better.
[George Scarpelli]: There is, I believe it's five years, a new road.
[George Scarpelli]: So we do have and if they can update us with that, because they have in the past where they tell us what level we have. So that might be helpful to that. And then we could see, you know, sorry. Sorry, Adam.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, good.
[George Scarpelli]: We don't have to. allow permits. I mean, it's very simple, like, what's good for the goose?
[George Scarpelli]: To that, I believe Councilor Marks spearheaded that process, and I don't believe we have many double polls left.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that with that announcement, I think Councilor Marks was very proactive with making sure, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that all of the double polls have been converted back to the single pole. So let's get an idea, maybe ask, I think, I think, Mr. Randazzo might be the person to ask, you know, I'd be happy to.
[George Scarpelli]: That's funny because when we asked the gas company, I think the, uh, was it Harvard street? We had the issues with some serious, uh, high level, uh, gas leaks. They were pretty forthcoming with the report of how many we had. And I don't think it was really meant to poke the bear, but it was really made for just, uh, information gathering. So we stay at the top of things with the neighbors that called. So, That's a little alarming that the utilities would say that, though. That's pretty disheartening. Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: I think we can pull old papers back You know, I think maybe bringing in the representatives that we work with, with especially National Grid, was super, super helpful when we had the Harvard Street issue. So maybe just having an open conversation with one of their leaders to say that might have been policy sent from a letter, but more of a personal level, maybe there's a way that we can get some information that we need.
[George Scarpelli]: for the engineer, motion for the engineer.
[George Scarpelli]: Just understanding the policy. I think that's the first thing. Once we understand the policy, then I think we can move on something to this committee. All right. And then Councilor Lazzaro had maybe something that.
[George Scarpelli]: I have a second. I want to second that too. Second.
[George Scarpelli]: just I know that just probably having the union president involved and making sure that that's the biggest issue we talk about any sort of volunteer work, especially when it comes to DPW. And I remember that. And most of the time, it's not a big deal. But I think that even cleaning up behind the high school, remember the hill? And we came in with about three teams full of kids that wanted to clean that area, and just making sure that DPW gets paid overtime to do that, just we're informed and they understand. I don't think that it's ever been a problem, but I think it's something that just they want to be part of the information. So whenever we do anything with volunteering, I think making sure we have that as a priority just to make sure that they're in the loop.
[George Scarpelli]: It's funny if you go down the road further to more affluent communities, they have the soundproof barriers all the way down 128 supporting their city. So it's a little disheartening. I know, and that's not Councilor Donato, I mean, Representative Donato, he worked his tail off to get what we have right now. And when we first did 93, when they first did the 93 project, They, for some reason, they asked for it on that side of the highway. But for some reason, we didn't ask for it on this side of the highway. So that was the biggest issue.
[George Scarpelli]: He called everyone.
[George Scarpelli]: So, yeah, it might be something we can ask the state representative just to get us an update. But yeah, I don't think it's. Yeah, I think he's pulled every rabbit out of every hat to try to make it work. So, yeah. Just so you know, if I won the megabucks, that was one of the things on my list. Wow. Just, you know, $500 million gets you a lot. I'm going to buy me a house first. I already bought that. Oh, already? Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, and I appreciate all the hard work. I know that City Clerk has put into making sure that we have the proper people at the table to answer any questions that the community has reached out. I first want to thank Representative DiNardo for being here tonight. We realize that He really doesn't have much information either, but he's here just to really listen to people. And I really appreciate you doing that. And especially when you're talking about an issue that really concerns a lot of people and a lot of people looking for answers and really not getting many responses back from other parties. So we appreciate you being here tonight, Representative Donato. I know that both Representative Garbally and Representative Barber We're invited, but they know that it's the same message that Representative Donato would share, and as their colleagues, I think that he's representing everyone, but this really falls into his district, which is key. So I brought this forth because we did have some neighbors that had some concerns. And the concerns really, you know, it goes from one extreme to another extreme. One extreme is simple is that we understand and we want to be supportive. to the people that need this type of shelter at the time, but we want to make sure we're educated and everybody knows the process, especially the neighbors, the direct abutters, that they're informed. I've received calls from people that are in the health fields that find it a little alarming that What they're seeing in different neighborhoods in different states is the lack of vaccinations for the support that we're giving for the people that are in need. So I think that there are a lot of questions that have to be asked. There are a lot of questions that have to be answered. Unfortunately, I think the key, what we'll hear tonight is really just people sharing what the how they feel. I think that's very important. But I also understand that truly, from what we've heard, both from the communications from the mayor's office and outside is that we really need the the landlord We need someone from the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities, and someone from the Mayor's Office, and most importantly, someone from the Governor's Office that's going to come in and really set up a meeting that really can answer some questions. We're hearing that it's a done deal. but at the same time, we're not seeing it. We're hearing that the mayor has put out an MOU, but it hasn't been followed through yet from the state. So there's a lot of different variables that are still left wide open. And I appreciate, I think that the phone calls I got from a lot of teachers and parents from especially the McGlynn and the Roberts where they're at extended capacity right now and making sure that having to the public schools right now would be totally devastating in some of our schools. So I think that, you know, the questions we have is infrastructure, George. Do we have enough police? Do we have enough fire? Does the health department have enough support to make sure that everything is on the up and up at this facility? So there are a lot of questions. So like I said, Mr. President, this is really, I put this out for the residents that had some questions that can share it publicly so we can get it on the record and hopefully the governor's office can follow through with a meeting so people are notified properly and for one person mentioned that for her and her family, it's scary, not in a disrespectful thought process to the people that are going through this, but it's scary because of the organizational piece. I think that that's where they're not understanding and not knowing. So I know that other people want to talk, so I yield to them now. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: First time here?
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate you bringing this forward because this was started by a community member like yourself that had an issue. So I think we all feel the same pain of the lack of lack of information. And I think that that And we'll relay this to the mayor. I think we'll put it in a form of motion that when we do have this meeting, that the information is put out the robocall for all the residents in that neighborhood for at least to get those questions answered. Because I think that one thing we all share are these same questions. You know, we understand the situation that we're in that we're put in, but I think the biggest biggest concerns right now is getting the answers to the questions that we have so we can move forward. And this is the big problem with what you see in most communities. When there isn't transparency, there isn't lack of there is a huge lack of. communication. But this is truly coming from, you know, the state level, where I think that, you know, looking at the governor's office and making sure that they hear us and they that that meeting when that meeting does come, come to fruition, that the message is sent loud and clear. It's, it's, it's, you know, this is this is an issue immigrations of It's a big issue. It's a bigger issue than we have right now. That's why I know Mr. Pagliarulo brings up good points in the sense that this is a federal issue. We're a mess. And it's not fair to the families that are brought here either. I've had the fortune of coaching a lot of these young people that are forced to come into our country because they don't have anything else, and they thrive in our country, and they try to make it make it through as legal as possible to make sure they want to be American citizens. So it's a hurdle. We understand on every level. But with this situation that we're talking about right now with the Riverside issue, there are a lot of issues. And something that I'm going to stand strong on, we don't have the infrastructure. That has to be stressed to the governor through the MOU. This be stressed that the mayor, we don't have the infrastructure in place to house number of families and people for more than what they're saying. I appreciate Councilor Lazzaro bringing that question up. And there is a state law that says that truly, I've talked to teachers today, talked to teachers from both the McGlynn and the Roberts that called me about this issue. St. George, we truly don't have it's we're filled to capacity. And with the lack of support that they have in the special needs department, it's it would magnify things to a degree that we could never recover from our kids will not recover from, you know, so you bring a lot of good points, you know, trash health department being involved, the police making sure how do we how do we police that area that a friend on on zoom talking about health concerns and vaccinations and making sure that people that are coming into our country, listen, we can't come into the schools, our kids can't enter schools without being vaccinated. So if they're coming into this, into the housing, we're the United States of America, we should be able to vaccinate these young people that are coming in and make sure they're as healthy as possible if they're going to be in our community. So there's a lot of pieces that we all share. I think that, you know, it's not something that this council is for or against. We just provided, we wanted to provide an avenue so people can come up and talk. It's not, this isn't you against us, it's not. I think that we've got to find the middle ground. We got to find the process to make sure the communication and the answers are met from everybody. We feel the same way. We all have the same questions. I mean, you know, just because we're city councils don't mean that, doesn't mean that we have the answers. You've seen it a thousand times in different formats. So, you know, I appreciate you bringing this forward because I think that that's what this, that's what a good community is about. There's an issue, community member steps up, city council step in when they're not being heard and we share, we give that avenue. So I appreciate that and understand that. We feel the same way you do in the sense of getting the word out. Whether you're for it or against it doesn't matter. The truth of the matter is we need a line of communication so everybody feels safe. Whether you live in the hills or whether you live right on Riverside Ave, these are big concerns. Because like you said, It's not just people that are, you know, the same people that are moving in with these health issues, vaccine issues. They're going to be shopping at Wegmans. They're going to be playing in the parks. They're going to be, you know, in our libraries. We, that possibly, so it's making sure that we have everything in place to make sure that we're giving them the best opportunity to thrive while they're here. So I appreciate it. I just want to let you know that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So think of what people want, you know, of me, but this is why I'm Bruce America, far from a bigot, you've come up here and spoken in favor of many different issues, and it didn't matter what the issue was. So I think that if that's, if that's the Facebook army that's out there, that's that you don't have to we got just to just erase it, because, you know, you've come in, you've come 1000 times to this podium, and support of many different people didn't matter what whatever color they are, race they are, whatever gender they are, you're always there to support people. So, I think that that should be mentioned. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: It's a vacant office building, it's not a hotel.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that again, I think we're missing the point here. I think that what the biggest concern is communication. I think the biggest concern and what people are saying are valid valid points. If it's offensive, I can understand that too. I can understand how some people might feel that way. But they're legitimately valid points when you're talking about, you know, Are we communicating enough? Is it transparent enough to understand that if we're allowing this to happen, are we giving the support to help these families thrive? So I think some of these questions like, are they being vaccinated? That's not just for protection for the people that are in our community, but for the people that are gonna be in the same area with them. So it is a legitimate question that when I reached out to different communities like Cambridge, like Revere, these are the same questions. Again, I don't want to cloud this as being something that was really racist or this should be failed, it's not. I'm a first-generation American. My father and mother came through Ellis Island. I understand the situation. I work with kids that are from Lynn, same type of children. And I understand what they go through every day. And I feel their pain and I work for them every day. But at the same time, with this situation, Let's not muddy the water and understand something very simple. This is just about communication, making sure that not only our citizens have the answers they want to be protected, but also let's not forget the people that are coming into these houses and understand to make sure that we're doing the right thing for them. So I think it goes both ways. I don't think it's just this shouldn't be pitted again. Like I said earlier, this isn't something that one against the other. This is something that we need more information to be distributed to all parties. To make sure that we're making sure we're taking care of not only the visitors that are here, but also the residents that are here. And I think that like, from what I heard from the most part, from the phone calls, the emails, and people that are coming to this podium, it's really not understanding why they're not being heard or why the messages are being sent. So I thank Representative Donato for being here. I understand the mayor has sent multiple messages about not truly knowing or getting the answers that they need, but that's why having that meeting with them. Is it a done deal? I've heard it was to and then I heard it wasn't because nothing signed yet. But again, the council bear said this is an issue that it's coming directly from a landlord and the state. And What we're hearing is our political leaders don't have the power to get that information out that we need yet. So like I said, I'm hoping that with getting this meeting out and all the parties are understanding, because I'm sure Representative Donato is going to go back to the state level and they're going to hear what Medford's saying and forward against it. And I think that we need to have that meeting that really answers these big questions. And again, it's not just, you know, for the last caller, it's the last person on zoom, it's, it's not just to protect our citizens. The truth of the matter is, it's really protecting those young, especially the children that are in that in that location. Because no one's giving them any answers. And listen, for someone that's worked in this field, and worked with this demographic for the last 1520 years, 30 years, I understand how difficult it is for these families, and what they're going to be going through. But I would hate to say that we're rushing this process through just to say we house them. That doesn't do people any good either. We have to make sure we're protecting their safeties as well. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for being here tonight. I know it took some time, but this is obviously a very bothersome situation. The way the process was handled in many different levels was very alarming to us. Like the lack of communication was alarming to us, but I see some of the protocol in place that I'm reading. I find it a little alarming where the biggest thing as we went through this process and how difficult it was and the concerning issues that we saw, probably the biggest thing that affected me personally is how many people mentioned to me long time voters said they would never ever vote. in a local election again, by the way, the optics looks now, there was nothing wrong, I guess that everything came out that you did the refill, there was a recall or recount for for numbers, everything. It wouldn't nothing would change. It wasn't this this conspiracy theory that was out there. But what I do know is what I saw firsthand and what I heard firsthand election day. And what I do want to make sure that we do moving forward is making sure that people that are involved in the election process, whether it be your office, our commissioners, whether it's our poll workers, or whether it's people that are working the polls, and that's where I'm going to come from. You have people that exercise their rights to go and work polls, and I'm reading the criteria, and I've been doing this since I was a little kid, neighboring communities, and understand that this is a process that's legally in place. And there's something even here that says that what people don't understand, what I'm speaking is poll workers, people that don't know that are watching. candidates have an opportunity to build a team to make sure they're working their team to most efficient process to make sure they get their voters out on election day. So people work very hard to set up these teams that at each polling location, they had what's called the poll watcher. And a poll watcher would sit in an approved area by law, they would, I know that it said that they're not to provide a chair or table, we understand that. We have here that this is the process. This is where we wanna help people feel comfortable and understand the process. And there's this part here that says they're not to sit down, even if they bring their own chairs. That's something I would question. Okay, I think that's terrible for the fact that it's exactly why we're here tonight for these little things. The understanding of educating our workers, the process of the new pads. Now, what we trained, because I was part of one of these teams, they were trained, the poll workers were trained to understand this. As a person comes in, they're asked for their ID or not. They were then asked for their name and address. Then they would say their name and they would repeat back their name and address. What we saw firsthand though, because I was there, what I saw was it would say, they would show their ID and then they'd go right through. It wasn't repeated in some cases. In some other cases, their names were given but they weren't repeated back. So the whole format was a mess. The way that poll workers that volunteered to come out, the way they were treated was horrible. So as we're moving forward to this process, now, whatever the process is, if it's just putting out the markers, where to stand on election day, because we didn't do that this year. Why? I don't know, but we didn't do that. So we had people at different locations moving anywhere they wanted. And you had some areas with some aggressive poll managers that are coming out. I forgot what we call them, but, and then we had other areas that we didn't have it. So it was inconsistencies. So the process in total, I'm reading this, and I'll be honest with you, I'm not truly satisfied because when some of these issues occurred with the ballots and who got what ballots and the misprinting of the ballots, we as a council found it to be a problem. We said, quote unquote, that perception is reality. And if we need to do anything, please, let's work as a team to figure out a way, whether it's approving money, whether it's hiring people, whether it's getting people educated, we didn't do that. Instead, we just ran with it. And it was exactly what we were afraid of. It was a mess. It was completely a mess. Then the process moves forward with people getting ballots that they shouldn't have. Then we have, we've corrected that. Then there was some ballots that, you know, that had the wrong dates and we corrected that. And then, then we go to the election day and there were multiple issues with people not understanding the process and how people were treated. Then you move after the election process and understanding that there were legal documents that were sent out saying, for instance, The mail-in ballots will be tabulated here at City Hall and posted at eight o'clock at City Hall. That was never done. Questions that people have asked. We talked about when it stopped, polling stops at eight, the voting stops at eight, and 8.30 things will be posted. Well, we didn't get posts, we didn't realize the final numbers until one o'clock in the morning. So these are all legitimate issues. And I read through this report, and it sounds great, but I think it needs more substance. I think it needs more, I think the biggest part right now, especially when we talk about the election day, is the education and the fact that the poll workers are valued. And if we have to find that if value is by by expense, for those important dates, then we should find whatever we need to make sure financially they're valued. So we get more people interested in this council talk about, you know, what we're going to talk about in a minute about a rate pay raise for school committee and saying we'll get better candidates if we pay. But let's find a way to make sure that we're putting everything in place so the March elections, we don't have the issues we have. Because like I said, I hate the fact that we had to feed into the narrative of what we saw. And some of these issues are concerning to me. I still, I don't like the fact, this is part of the election process. And poll watchers, and I know for sure, because I'm married to one of them, that some of these people are angels, and the way they were treated, and the way that when we were then presented to explain to them the laws of Massachusetts. that we had and then being treated the way they were was appalling to me. And what we did was not only did we let questions and let perception become reality, the biggest concern I had right now was we lost good people that dedicated their voting rights to this community every time we had. And we have to find a way as a team to do is to. Commission your office in this council, the mayor's office to make people feel confident that they should come out to vote that their vote does count that if they're part of the process of a they're given every right that they're supposed to be given to the law. And at the same time, educate the people so they understand the process. So again, I hate to be harsh because I tell you what, when I say love, I love some of your commissioners. I go way back with the commission. There's no way to blame here. But I think my frustration came, especially right after the election, was the lack of communication. and the lack of understanding. And so, you know, here we are, January. the 20th and we're talking about the report that was passed in and I think that this is a good start. But for this councilor, I would recommend that we start a subcommittee, Mr. President, with this process that we meet with both commissioners and the elections office to make sure that this council is working, working step by step to make sure you're getting everything you need. So we don't have the lack of the lack of employees downstairs. We saw it firsthand. We know it's not easy. We know that it's a it's an undermanned process. But we're saying if this is the council, we our our strength is making sure that we vote on a budget. And we're working hand in hand with the commission and the elections office that we're working through this all the way through the budget season to make sure that we're staffing a staff that's gonna give it the respect it deserves moving forward. Because I think this was, there were a lot of concerning issues. And again, it's someone that's built up a lot of sadness and anger for the simple fact that people that were there, people that dedicated themselves to the election process, and people that just came out to vote have now found themselves not wanting to do that anymore. And to me, that is a disgrace and it's sad. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: It's the commission's fault. It's the election, the election department's fault. This is something that if we really want ownership of this, we all have to have ownership in this. And I think that, you know, we don't, I take blame in it myself because, you know, we let that happen. We let that office go down to one person. We saw the mistakes, so is that okay, Mr. President?
[George Scarpelli]: Just one more. Thank you. I think Councilor Leming brought something up that I had as a concern. I think that we have two commission members that have done yeoman's work and gone above and beyond, and we see you two everywhere. You're everywhere. And that brings me to the question that I had that we talked about even during the process with the school committee and looking at commissions and boards that we feel that are that important that we have to look at it in different ways. So, one question I brought up was everybody knows who the two of you are. But I asked for a report to say, what is the attendance record for the other members on the commission? Because I think that's important also, just for the fact that if two people are doing the job that realistically a commission of five or seven, we really need dedicated people that, hey, we heard so many people say this so many issues. Well, then put up a shut up. And these are the opportunities that we have in our community that come and help the commission and be part of that commission and be part of the commission all in. It's a volunteer position, you guys. And for the most part, I've seen the commission, these two members of the commission, very active everywhere. But for the most part, most other people don't know who the other commissioners are, unless it's election day or they have to be in a certain spot. And I think that's a problem as well. And I think that's something that I'll be bringing forward myself because I think that in the totality of commissions and boards that we have in our community, and who's responsible for putting them into place or what they their weight, their responsibilities of weight, whether it's financial or whether it's weight other ways, maybe, maybe it's, we look at our assessor and say, maybe there's a tax break for residents that have these backgrounds, that we can bring people that are qualified to really support that. You know, it's no different than, you know, we have commissions right now that we have nothing in place right now that we have commissions and other boards that don't even live in the city anymore. And that's something I'll look forward to meeting with and try to change those. But I think that's another concern that I have that in totality, this isn't, this is something that we need more, more effort and more support to in every level. So I wanted to share that as well. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, to Ms. Miller. I will provide, the commissioner with the letter that was sent to the candidate that that morning, what there was said that the votes will be tallied here and posted at eight o'clock.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. I just want to say thank you, because I think that this is uncomfortable. I mean, I think we all mean, we all have the same intention. I think everybody here loves Medford, and there was nothing done with any ill will or intent. So I think that you coming here tonight is a huge step that starts that healing in this, in the fact of those people that I told you about that really affect that. No one's hiding anything. You're in front of us as a commission and the commissioner and say, hey, this is what we need to do in this council. Look ourselves in the mirror, like my father taught us in his Jesuit schooling, that you always look at the person that you're looking at and put yourself in their shoes and say, what do you, how would you do that? And make sure you understand the process. So I think that that's why I'm stressing the subcommittees and sitting down and truly being part of it because, you know, even just to hear the fact that, you know, while we're going through the process of recount, we still don't have enough staff to still even try to do something to assist them by moving forward. So I really do appreciate you coming out tonight and giving us these answers.
[George Scarpelli]: You know what, I would like to bounce here, Justin Singh, for the presidential election. I thank you. No, not that one. Oh, no, not that one. Not the presidential. No, that's not going to be contentious at all.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, so just, I know that some information that, first I want to share, I think that one of the questions was the fees of the structure for the 2024 paraprofessional wage scale pursuant to Method Public Schools from their records of proposal. So it's given the, just for a point of information that the kindergarten aids right now. One of the questions was if there was one, one group that one paraprofessional group that was making less than what was going to be asked that this would be this would be a question. I think that they paraprofessionals stand at $20,500 with their contract ending. this year, so they'll be negotiating again as we move forward. So I, for one, I will applaud the effort by Councilor Tseng of finding common ground. I think you've done your due diligence, I will tell you. I applaud that immensely for the fact that you listened and you tried to get to a resolution. I will tell you I will not support it for the fact that I really think that until we really know. I think if this resolution and this compromise came after understanding what our budget looks like, even for a dollar, I think that I would support it wholeheartedly. I will be honest with you with that. I think that this is the sense of compromise that I wish that the teachers and paraprofessionals were there moving forward. And I think that this gives, like you said, I think that this gives our school committee and administration the same, hopefully the same type of attitude and mentality when it comes to supporting and rewarding our teachers that need it the most and that's mostly our paraprofessionals that are getting the short end of the stick right now. So I think that Again, like I said, I want to applaud that. But at the same time, I think that not knowing our fiscal situation right now is the reason why I can't move forward with this. So I thank you. And like, again, I'll say it again, that's a very, very well thought compromise. And I'm sure that the teachers will feel that as well. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Just for point of information, I think that receiving emails and people understanding that just so they're not misplaced or forgotten. But again, school custodians have been without a contract for years. Our parking department still hasn't had a contract. Our inspectorate services have no contract. DPW superintendents and recreation department have no contract. So again, these are all Teamster positions and other Other positions in the city that it's that dollar figure that's got to come from somewhere, whether we increase it $35,000 or $75,000. it's going to trickle down. So I just wanted to make sure that I mentioned that because I did receive emails and support of not forgetting that these very important positions are left without a contract for years. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I think I was pretty clear at our last meeting that where I stood on this topic, I think that there are so many factors to look at this, but looking at this is more prudent and realistic. process, when we look in the basic sense of the perfect world, this would be easy. If we had unlimited funds, then we would do what we need to do. But unfortunately, we're talking about a school system that right now Today is drastically underfunded. And when it comes to next year's fiscal budget, we're gonna be talking about some pretty difficult decisions to make. And those decisions are gonna be, gee, can we afford a language teacher, a foreign language teacher in the middle schools? Where could we find 45, $55,000? I know we could find it right here. Let's look at the conversations. Well, how do we fund these clubs? All these great clubs that we started, these small stipend clubs that teachers do it for service for their children in the schools. How do we fund those? Because they're gonna be on the chopping block. They're gonna be cut. And the question is gonna be, where do we find $36,000? Right here. If you listen to my council colleagues, I appreciate the hard work you did, but where was this math when paraprofessionals and teachers are negotiating? This is, this perception's reality. And I think that it was brought up at the meeting when, I've had a thousand phone calls. I think I've shared it with you people. And I want you guys to understand that I will share what they've said to me. The perception of reality that when you have an organization running for office in the city, and they run in a slate, and that slate goes on a gigantic picture all over the city. And then as soon as the election is completed, then the word goes out that that organization is now going to support each other to raising funds. So that's a glaring question. Whether it's true or not, that's not what I'm saying. It's the perception of what we're trying to do here. Now, I've gotten a message from different members of past school committees. I've gotten messages from present school committee members. And the idea of saying, this is equitable, what we do is no different. Absolutely, it's different. Absolutely, it's different. And no one can tell me otherwise, because I'm the only one here that has done both. And I will tell you that this position has way more pressures. We have way more work to do. Every single day. Now, when you think about it, what is the school committee? The school committee is a policy making authority. They set policy. They set policy. They have a superintendent that does all the work, that sets everything in motion to what the vision of this school is. Is it working? I don't know. That's still out for debate. But the question that I have is understanding this process today and what they're asking for today. And I shared it with my colleagues today, tonight. It's very simple. If the community didn't want this, well, you should have come out to vote. Because there are six people from one side and one from another. And the philosophy is very simple. This is just common sense philosophy of doing the right thing today. Until we have a better understanding of what our fiscal responsibilities are when it comes to the budget, we should not look at any increases like this at all. It's borderline dangerous because what's next? When I joined the school committee, it was a service-based opportunity. It was for me to work and give back to my community. And to hear the responses, but we'll get better candidates if we get paid more. Here's a here's a lightning rod to everybody. We make $28,000. I'm not I'm not I'm not getting rich over $28,000. So if the fantasy is a school kid member sending me messages saying that Well, it'll bring in better candidates. I've worked on a school committee with great candidates. I've worked for school committee members that we couldn't shine their shoes and how dedicated they were. And they weren't getting a penny. It was a volunteer basic process. Neighborhood communities, because I did some homework too. What we're asking for here is an absolute disgrace to what neighboring communities just around us get. Some of those are the highest, and I think that they're bordering between $16,000 and $18,000. That's it. Everybody else. There are some communities that, when I brought it up, they were like, what? Are you crazy? To equate it as the same responsibility as what we do here is different. It's not the same. It isn't. It just looks and it feels funny. I look at the situation that we're in tonight, when we're bringing this up, and we understand the voting process now. And I know some of the council wanna know where we're gonna go next with this. And I think that, you know, is there something that we can do? Yeah, you hear that the equity piece is being thrown around. If that's the biggest issue, then let's correct it. If we make 28 and they make 12, well then why don't we all pull together, not jeopardize the funding mechanism, what we don't have at the high school right now and drop our pay. And I don't. I don't do it for applause or social media comments. I'm dead serious. When I started in 2008, when I ran for office, I did it because I wanted to give back to the community. And you know what? I've stood in there, I've stuck in there pretty long. I've learned a lot and I've done a lot. I'm pretty satisfied that my legacy, that what I put forth to this community is something strong that my kids will look at and say, well, my dad was part of that. And that's what it's all about. If you're doing this, we're doing this for the money, we're in big trouble. Because if that's a reality of what this body thinks of what is a successful financial situation in your homes, this isn't it. So I truly, I would make the motion that we look at all of our salaries and become equitable by dropping our salaries. Because if the city council school committee, if that's the biggest issue, then let's do that. This isn't something I'm not listen, it's not going to make or break me. And I tell people it's just 8000 less than I'd have to donate. And I'm sure all of you feel the same way. I don't think anybody here if you've been here for a while, have seen where your money goes. Your money doesn't go to fancy cars, doesn't go to fancy houses. It usually goes back to the people that helped you. And that's what we're all about. So when we sit here and talk about 100 and whatever percent raise increase, I think it's disingenuine. And to be honest with you, I think it's a slap in the face for the people that are really having a very difficult time right now. The morale in the school department is still terrible. It's still terrible. Our scores are very low. You know, we're in flux in many different areas. Our school facilities look terrible. Our custodians still don't have, if they've settled a contract, it's gonna be lower than ever, or they haven't either. So you still have unions out there that work every single day, that are doing the dirtiest, most disgusting work in the city, and with a smile on their face, picking up kids and hugging them after they vomit all over them. But at the same time, oh, people are gonna offend that I said that, but by the way, kids vomit. So we shouldn't be offended by that. Because, and this is funny, because the other piece of this is, I've heard from teachers, I've heard from teachers, qualified, respected, long-term educators in our system, that have been absolutely torn down by administrators and school kid members because they've come to that podium and raised an issue. That's a disgrace. This is their podium. They're taking care of our children, whether they live in Medford or not. They're more of this community than most people. So listen, we realize, and I think everybody has to realize this, the vote's gonna be the vote, and we have to move on. But I think, in good faith, this council can work together to show the community, can we be responsible? Can we send the right message? And is the right message to give an increase at this amount? No. Do I think that that and in reality of life that we haven't touched there. They haven't, the school committee hasn't gotten an increase since I believe, yeah, I was there in 2008 and eight, six years before that, we didn't get that. But I tell you what, George Scarpelli didn't care. Ann Marie Cuno didn't care. Paulette Van der Kloot didn't care. Billy O'Keefe didn't care. John Falco didn't care. Mayor Michael J. McGlynn didn't care. We went to work every day for our city and we did a lot of great things. So be careful what we do, because once we open this can, guess what's going to happen? Do you know how many committees, commissions we have in this city? What's to say we can't look at what they're doing and saying, well, we've got to compensate them now. So careful of what we do. If we, like I said, if we had an abundance of funds, then maybe we can look at and working it together and try to build it up slowly. When we're talking about, and we all heard it, everybody heard it, let's all be realist here. The next year's budget, when we sit together, when we lose ESSER money, and we look at what the ARPA money we've lost, and we look at the positions that those funds hold for us, we're gonna be in deep, deep trouble. And I'm gonna tell you, I'm like, listen, I've only, I know I could speak, but I've told you guys, I've really pushed in things that I've seen just by being part of this community for so long. You saw how it worked with the city solicitors. You saw how it worked with the budget. It's just not equitable. Be smart, be prudent, and use common sense with these issues when I say, Maybe it's not fair, but they ran. They ran for office at $12,000 as a payee. That's what they ran for. So that's what they should have until we make sure we know what our fiscal future looks like. Please. That's all I ask this committee to do. Councilor Callan asked a question that, where do we go from here? What's the process? I would hope this is still a feeling of process, because the truth of the matter is, when you have an employee, because that's what it seems like to me, when you have an employee that's come to you for a raise, right? I'm assistant director of a program, and I've had employees come to me and say, George, I think I deserve a raise. I said, you know what? Let's sit down and talk about it. Let's sit down at your body of work and let's sit down and talk about it. Have any of you talked to any of the school kid members? No, you've talked to all the school kid members. Don't say it, careful, because you don't talk to all the school kid members. Because if you really want to do some homework, you've talked to all the school kid members. So my recommendation would be to have the school kid members here. and let's talk with them. Because I think when you put it together and you understand, and maybe you sit and look at people eye to eye and you say, well, this is how it hurts. Here's the reality of it. The school committee knows how bad the budget is gonna be. Let's be serious, they know. So when you look in the school committee's eyes and say, okay, your child goes to the Brooks, your child has kindergarten AIDS. With this increase, this could be the increase that avoids kindergarten AIDS next year. That's what I'm trying to say because listen, I taught for 15 years. I was on the school committee for eight years. I've been on this committee for six years. I understand how all the balls are being juggled right now. So please don't make something that looks good on paper. Have you make a decision because ultimately, the decisions we make tonight will affect what we do in June, in July, in August, and in September, more importantly, in such a negative manner that it will hurt us. It will. That's just the reality of it. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: To the personal privilege, just to Councilor Lazzaro, when you use a person's name, and understanding what I did when I ran for office, and I was a school kid member, We worked our tail off. We changed policies. We put in bullying policies. We made sure we had new science labs, new fields, new gymnasium, new curriculum. So we worked our tails off. And by the way, while this council was doing that, he owned a fence company. He owned a painting company. He worked as a coach. and he worked as a full-time recreation assistant director. So I completely understand how hard it is to want to be part of a position, but when you use the name like you did and understand, I don't know what you did or what school department you work for, but I made reference to the school committee, the teaching and the city council work that I've done in this community, in the city of Medford. So I appreciate that you have an overview of what happens in another- It was Medford, actually. Well, in Medford, but I truly didn't even know you worked in the city. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, first, I think the point of information is for clarity purposes, Council President. We're not, as we move forward, we're not tying in the increase if this passes with the school committee, correct? It's not, it's not, it wouldn't be voted by the school committee because in essence that would be a conflict of interest, correct? It would be something that if we do, if we do vote yes to this, that the increase would have to come from the council every year after that or put into place now. at that time, because I think it's a conflict of interest if we're having the school committee voting on something that's going to be on the same line as the teacher's contract. That's a confusion. That's all I want to clarify.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for that, Claire. Yes, absolutely. My motion would be that the City Council lower their rate of pay the school board. To uh, equitable rate for the school committee and then follow Council sayings or, uh, process of compensation moving forward. I think that. With the. With the, uh. The fiscal our concerns and issues from all sides to be on level playing field. And that's not a political ploy. This is something that I feel strongly about, that if this is a wrong and we wanna make it right, let's make it right. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: No, it would be taking our salaries, pulling together an all-stop level playing field, roughly 20,000, whatever the math comes up and then go up and then go up with what the process would be.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, point of information, Councilor Villescaz. I hate to interrupt, If this is true, have anybody filed? Because this is serious.
[George Scarpelli]: I was spoken to by the head of the paraprofessionals union. Again, this is one of the issues that I heard myself, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Council President Washington is searching, can I just make a comment?
[George Scarpelli]: There was something that was passed by. And I think that as a, as a former coach of 32 years, I didn't realize that coaches haven't been paid, haven't got an increase in 20 years as well. So that might be something that, um, we should remember just for the budget process, because I think all of us realize the importance that they, they play in our lives. So I know it's great. A lot of those coaches have been there for 20 years, you know, a coach like Louis Jerry.
[George Scarpelli]: Isaac B. Zachary.
[George Scarpelli]: Kit Collins.
[George Scarpelli]: Could we suspend the rules to take papers 2-4-0-1-2, 0-1-3, 0-1-4, please?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. It's sad to add a few resolutions and for passing some pretty important people here in the city of Medford. James Jack McDevitt was an amazing person, an amazing teacher, and someone who really loved the law and loved the city of Medford. Mr. McDevitt, I remember in high school, Mr. McDevitt started, I believe it was the Method Co-op Bank inside Medford High School. So we had a work program where we actually ran a bank out of the school that was run by students at Medford High School. And he was He was so involved in making sure that he taught the most important classes, and his view were law. And he was, I believe, a Triple Eagle. He loved his BC. I had the honor of being at his wake tonight, and he would be laid to rest with his BC hat right next to him. and he leaves behind, he joins his wife in heaven, but he leaves three great sons and Michael, Mark, and Chris to leave and share his legacy. So may you rest in peace and we bless him and wish the family well, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you again, Mr. President. Judith Granara, was a very special person here in Medford, a lifelong resident here in Medford, a former school teacher in the Method Public Schools. Her husband, John, has done so much for our city, and the Granara family has given so much to the city of Medford, and her passing will daily be missed. I know that she leaves her son, John Jr., and her daughter, Kelly, and I wish their family and we pray for their family. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Ernie's a little more personal. Ernie Artelino passed away After a brief illness, Ernie was a Mustang Hall of Famer. Ernie wasn't the biggest person in stature, but he went off to University of Miami, played football and baseball for the Hurricanes, and came back and started a teaching and coaching career that's helped so many young men and women achieve their dreams. I had the privilege of coaching with Ernie, and I learned as a young coach the importance of making sure you never, ever, ever treat a female athlete as a nefarious ex. He made sure that we elevated every single athlete that he coached. And he used to tell me, he says, coach, look at your athletes, not your female and male athletes, look at your athletes and treat them accordingly. They're no different. As a matter of fact, he used to say they were stronger, our female athletes. And, you know, it was a different time back then. And the legacy that he's left behind, I remember walking through his wake and former athletes, former basketball players, and some of the girls were there. And to that evening, they would visit Ernie in the hospital and they would tell me the stories that Ernie still, the impacts that Ernie made in their lives. And he really understood what we're fighting for today and equality for gender. He was, he saw something that most coaches didn't back then. And I, I, I attribute my successes as a coach because I was around Ernie Adelino. Um, Ernie had his own language. When he wanted to talk bad about someone, he made up a language. And it wasn't that he was talking bad about someone, it's because he forgot their names. So we'd call him, hey, Frappeterra. And we didn't know, we said, what is he saying when I first started coaching? He says, George, Ernie forgets his keys and people's names. And because he had so many kids now, he taught it out to Catholic for many, many years. But I think his biggest joy is that he leaves his daughter, Diane and Laurie, his pride, Ernie Jr. and his daughter, Elena. And we wish the family the best because we talk, I hate to be the one that keeps saying this, but when we lose legends, it really, it really affects our community. And Ernie was a true legend. So these are three people that played a big part in the framework of what Medford is today. And There are three people that will surely be missed, so I thank you, Mr. President, for allowing me to speak and wish their families the best.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Miss Lee. Um, we did have mailings come in for a change. They've been They've been unbelievable owners so far. I don't see any changes. I think that there was never an issue with the hours of operations with the former owner. So I would move forward with the request that is offered by the Mailings Corporation. Then if we can just have a 30 and 60 day review, just to make sure that we have no No issues within that two-month time frame, midnight move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: appreciate the movement. This is someone that's been around for 16 years now. It seems that it's more streamlined, and I think it keeps us on task. And I think that, you know, as transparent as can be. I think what's important, though, I think what Councilor Tseng brought up, I think it's important that the shared goals and visions. I think that was probably one of our most important meetings whenever we start our new terms. And that's sitting together as a group, because we're going to all understand that we're going to agree to disagree on, if not some, but many issues. But I think having the respect of each other and understanding each other's each other's goals, and I think it sends that understanding for each other that I didn't realize how important I'll use Councilor Bears' initiatives with traffic and why that's so important to him. And when you understand why traffic issues are so important for a personal reason for Councilor Bears, you realize as a human being why you need to really understand and take those initiatives in for more of a personal level. I think that, you know, as someone who's always been involved in youth services in the city of Medford and bringing the recreation department as a full-time, I take a lot of pride and passion. That's something that Councilor Tseng and I have been talking about is starting, introducing a youth summit to really get our youth involved and really helping them mold what they want to see the city of Medford. And so I think that having that meeting, I think it's probably the most important meeting we'll have. I appreciate my new Councilors that reached out after they were elected. You know, it's the banter goes back and forth. I think that it was an interesting election season. But at the same time, we all realize that it's an election. So you're going to get down and dirty sometimes. But at the same time, now that we're here behind this real, we're going to work together to do some great things. I know I joke a lot. I think that, you know, when I first came in, I joked at the fact that I got so many people calling me wishing me luck, but I truly, truly can say everybody that's behind this rail are very good people and we all have the same mission and that's to make Medford the best city we have. So I appreciate. the changes already Council presidents put into place. I will tell you, there'll be some kickback a little in some things, but I enjoy doing that. And for that next meeting that I think that we sit together as a team and vet those, I think it's gonna be very important. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President, if I can. Unfortunately, I don't have a PhD in organization, so this, if you could just do, if we can, if I could just ask for one favor, I think that as we're going public with this and people start looking, I think that one of the easier formats that we see on our website are our subcommittees and how that was formatted. If we can add, and ask Council President, if we can add where, especially with the first document, as we're starting this process, that we can add maybe a little section that shows this would, in the past, fall under this committee. So people can truly understand. Because if you look at this, I understand it. And as we're going through the process, saying, OK, now I understand where it falls. But I think as we're talking about having that transparent form of government, where the common person is going to look on, they have an issue, and they have to speak where the the language has been for years a subcommittee on science where there isn't a subcommittee on science but there is a committee that is under rules and permits if that's the way so be it so if there could be maybe a little disclaimer that says in the past this was these were the subcommittees that fell into this category. If we can do that just to, especially as we get started, I think that this document will be no different in a year or two, the people just understand it better. But I think if we can have a little disclaimer there that shows the common person what they're looking at, so they can, that have revert back looking at, you know, the subcommittees that we've had in the past. So at least they understand where it's going, okay? If we can do that, that'd be great. I'd appreciate that, Council President, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: And I think the structure is no different, but I think what I'm seeing is you're welcoming everybody in where the former subcommittees were. It was in the point where, in the past, I can't show up because I don't want to disrespect that chairperson because I'm actually not on it. I think what we're seeing is a more open, inviting subcommittee process. But at the same time, it's not so, and for the newer members, I think that to be stated, We all have families. If everybody's going to show up to five different meetings a week, that's a little overwhelming. But at the same time, I like the idea that it's open for everybody. Because in the past, it didn't lend to that congeniality. We were just like, I don't want to show up because. I don't want to disrespect the chairperson because it's not my committee, thinking that I want to interject my thought process. But the way that Council Biaz has structured this, I think it's appreciated, because I think it shows that it's a welcoming committee, but at the same time, it's understood that we still have to have the groundwork as subcommittees and chairs and voices. But thank you. Sorry to interrupt, but I think that little history that we've seen in the past. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Um, they bring this forward and explaining it. I think that the phone calls I was getting was joy. Okay, so George. If I wave hi to my neighbor, am I good? And I said, please, I said just, but I think that it's important that we understand where it's coming from. But I think that I appreciate that it's going to the assessor just to understand the ramifications because although the best laid plans sound great, but I think we all have to, when we make decisions is also understand that if there are, what does it look like if we have 10 landlords that are going to do this? How does this affect, you know, the other balance with our tax bracket and see how that affects us? I know that, you know, love the idea, especially when we see, you know, as a former, you know, resident of a home that was owned by a resident of Medford, and that being my dad and making sure that he never took advantage of his tenants. And we know in his passing, he promised my brothers he took over the home to make sure that the families are there, we'll always have a place to live. So I think that that's a reward that people like to have that open mind to see because I think like, as Councilor Cowen said, we have, you know, the homes and the landlords that really take advantage, railing out those people that live here. And, but I think it's something that I think needs to be vetted, and I appreciate that going to the subcommittee so we can see where this goes. So, I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: People don't know, but I was Justin's favorite teacher. It was crazy.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I know Mr. Merritt's been actively, I know the neighbors have reached out. I think that the question that has been put out there, the mayor did address it. I could share the email with everybody. I was hoping to get some clarification. what I would like to do is call for a meeting with that state representative because in this email the mayor clearly states that it's really that she doesn't believe I think that it falls in her privy to hold this meeting. She thinks really it needs our state delegates to really explain what's going on so if I can read it so you absolutely that'd be great thank you if you can so it's uh it's an update for temporary shelter update from the mayor Hello, everyone. I wanted to provide an update in the last email. The humanitarian crisis unfolding in our region. We believe the state is moving forward with the facility at 400 Riverside to serve as a temporary overnight shelter for families. My office, along with our Acting Building Commissioner, Fire Chief and Board of Health, Emergency Response Director, have outlined our concerns as well as our code requirements to ensure that the governor's administration ensures a safe and secure environment for families currently in the state's wait list for emergency assistance. I'm working toward reaching an MOU to set a clear limit on the number of people housed at the facility as well as capping the duration of each family's stay. The reasons being the facility is very large and could fit thousands because three of our elementary schools are already at capacity. My ask of that Schools are already capacity that this be for no more than 75 families, 250 people, which is what was the original plan for the state. The shelter is active until April or June, and the latest based on legislators, recent legislation, that the families rotate into permanent shelter within three to four days. Again, these are just my asks, and there are no specifics for report out of the public yet. To date there is no lease agreement in place with the owner of 400 Riverside, no contract with the health and services provider, and as I said, no MOU. in place with the city, so there are a few details that can be shared. As you may have read, the state is moving forward and has already opened the Cambridge site, which took priority. As soon as I am fully briefed by the state in specifics and operations terms upon Riverside, I will relay Excuse me, that info to you all as well as the public. Ultimately, this is a state-run endeavor in the relationship with a private entity, and we ultimately have very little say and have no oversight on the day-to-day operations. My only hope is that the MOU can be reached and signed. If there is any community meetings, it would have to be done by the state officials running the system and the building owner and provider as we don't have much involvement or insight into how this process unfolds. So that's from the mayor's office. It's from the mayor. So I think that I think the mayor also understands the impact of our infrastructure, that making sure that we don't overburden our system right now. I think that I've heard a lot from the teachers and the fear from parents, especially in that neighborhood between the Roberts and the McGlynn and the Andrews. It's very, very, very, very tight. And although we understand that we you know, the governor wants to look at options, but again, I think my hope is that I get an update from the mayor again. The mayor's been responsive, but I think at the same time, I think we need to have our state delegates here and all of them. I think that we need to have an understanding that if this is going to happen, which it looks like it's going to happen, that we're prepared in every which way possible. Because you can understand if it was three to four days, and then we're moving to it. But I don't see many guarantees. When I heard from friends in Cambridge, It's really not being used as a three or four day Passover. It's really being used for families that are being housed. And to be honest with you, from what I gather, it's not a conducive environment for families either. I mean, granted, it's safer maybe, it's warmer maybe, but I think that if this is the governor's wish, we have to look at a long-term commitment to housing the families. You know, we've heard a lot. I've talked to a lot of different communities. And what we don't see a lot of the more affluent communities that have a lot of money that they're asking to move these families, communities that have access, that have space in their schools, that have infrastructure that can support that. But it seems like they're really coming into more of the urban rim and urban communities. over exhausting their infrastructure. So I think the mayor and all her department that see that for the fact that this is, you know, whether you're for it or against it, that's not the question. The biggest issue right now is making sure that we can handle that. we can, Mr. Merritt, I know that you've been on the forefront. I wanted to make sure I read that on on the record, but then at the same time for our next meeting, we should call for a meeting because we don't know what two weeks will come. If this is going to happen, at least let's hear it from the state representatives and see where we're going from there.
[George Scarpelli]: Inviting all of us state representatives and city administration to give us an understanding of what the process I know the mayor has given us some information, but at the same time, I think if we can have someone from her her department. and the state delegates that can come in and support us in understanding what's going on. So we're not going back and forth, and we hear it directly from them.
[George Scarpelli]: that's the common word I've heard from the residents. I don't think anybody's opposing anything, but I think understanding the process, so there's preparation and understanding to it.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate you coming up. I think that you've been the lone wolf for many years. We've had many discussions about this, and even in Somerville, I know that this is something that I truly thought of the process that that was done, that the track was a new track. My daughter played basketball, so it looked like the surface was done, but I didn't realize it was the same type of issues that we've had in the past. I know that the big call right now is getting the approval to be on the list now for the new high school. I just don't, there might, you know, if there's something that you brought up an alarming situation when you talk about safety, it's something that you have to look at. I mean, it's, when even, this is the catch 22 that you came to our forum because you can speak in our forum. And I think that, We appreciate you doing that. I think there's got to be, unfortunately, the way that's come up, we can't deliberate or send anything out. But I think this is again, that this is something that I personally make a call tomorrow. Brown, I'll talk, I'll talk to the superintendent tomorrow. I'll try to make a phone call tomorrow. and then find a way to maybe put it on their agenda on the school side. Because if there is something that is something we have to look at for next year and Medford and the track really isn't safe, then we have to look at alternative sites to support the student athletes that maybe you look at a Reggie Lewis Center to book practice space and time. you know, until you figure out a plan. So I think that that's something that we need to get more information from. I think I do. I'm going to call the superintendent tomorrow. I'll call the athletic director tomorrow and get some better understanding of what their process is and what's happening. So maybe we can help move you along and give you some insight to help you with this, because it pains me to see you back up here for the same situations over and over again. sad because I think with the loss of Mr. Maskell, I think he was probably the last advocate for track and field, really, true advocate of track and field at Medford High. you know, whatever I can do, I'll lend my support. But I know that Somerville does have a new floor, but they're having their own issues as well. So they have to close it at the end of the school year because of the way that it was put down. So throughout the summer, they have to close it to put in industrial humidifiers in there so it doesn't pop up. So there's issues everywhere. But I think that You know, for this situation, you brought up safety. For me, that's something that can't be overlooked. So for one person, I'll look at how's the president. I'll reach out to the superintendent. And if there's something I'll request for her to do, if she can, is put it on the next agenda so you can go and speak to the authorities that need to push that along. And that's the school department. And if it's something that we need assistance from this body that can ask the mayor for some funding if there is, that has to support our kids that are in a situation like that, because it'd be interesting to see what the athletic trainer has for documentation and data that says how many kids have been ACLs, MCLs, you know, different injuries that happen on different type of surfaces.
[George Scarpelli]: That's the thing, data drives.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, well, like I said, I think that we're looking at, you know, a few years back, a grassroot organization came to me and said, would you be willing to help in a little project called the Field of Dreams? And they said, no, there's no way you want to put turf fields behind Bedford High School. And that's all it needs sometimes, just discussion. And like you said, there are avenues out there that we can tap into if that's the case. I appreciate you coming out. I think the right now it's the first thing you had. We have to do tonight is understand that there's an issue so we can move forward on that. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Dasch, I know that one of the questions that was brought forth was the turnaround for the fire truck. That was a big issue, but that was resolved. Yes. So again, I think the biggest issue is really moving this forward. Something that I believe what the family had mentioned at the beginning, that it was a hardship due to a family member. And that's the reason. And I think that I know my fellow counsel is going to table it, so he allowed me to speak. I would move it on the vote, but obviously I don't think it will have the vote, so I just think that we have a new council coming in. I think that if we can bring them up to speed and hope for the first meeting in January we get this passed, because this is, I still don't, I don't see why it's an issue that we can't move this forward. Because it seems like in good faith, we're, we're, we're going above and beyond. You know, I look at this in a sense that we're kind of holding the Alps hostage here, in a sense that we're, you know, what we're asking them to do, we're going above and beyond right now. And it seems like the city has really, really just waste a lot of people's time not getting the answers to the right people. To hear the fact the mayor hasn't even seen this yet is a little bothersome to me. That to me is just, you know, no disrespect in any way, but attorneys are expensive, correct? And everybody has to make a living. But we're talking about amount of time that's being spent by the Alice family to try to get this push forward for a good reason. And in even having the open dialogue and doing something that I know I wouldn't do, I wouldn't, you know, allow myself to sort of be bullied to try to make this happen. This should be something our community should be looking to assist each other. And so, um, know, I just I'm a little confused why we can't move this forward in the sense of a time sensitive situation. So, but I'll leave it at that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. If Council Vice President would entertain, could we add something to the motion? I'd like to get the attendance record for all of the members on the Election Commission. I think that's important. Because I think that's important. Um, from what I gather, we don't have too many members that are actually committed to that commission. And I don't think we're taking it as serious as we should. My biggest piece with this situation is accountability. We've seen very, very good people be marched out that door. But not even a quarter of the concerns that we've we've or understand any process that has gone on is a disgrace. I haven't heard from one commissioner. I haven't heard from anybody except for the coordinator who sent us a message saying that the election is now certified. And like Councilor Caraviello said, my biggest problem is when I was a young man, when I was in high school, everybody had a mandatory class called civics. And you learned about our government. You learned about the respect you should give this process. I still remember my son just left a minute ago. We talked about how Mrs. Lasky ran the fourth grade presidential election in her classroom and how important everything was and how organized everything should be. I wish Mrs. Lasky ran this last election because Councilor Caraviello again is right. When people don't want to vote, good people, good hardworking people that took pride in coming to that ballot box every municipal election. They've looked me in the eye and said, they'll never vote again. They have no faith. And I truly thought that maybe coming out ahead of this could have helped that. But instead, we just fed into the rhetoric. And I said it the day that we had the first issue. I said, what? I said, be careful. because perception is reality and it's exactly what happened. So moving forward, I know that we'll have a new council, but I think as this council looks to move people forward and look at our budgetary processes, we have to start looking for people. If the city administration is not going to hold people accountable, then we're going to have to make sure that they that they know that this council is going to be strong enough to make sure they hold their people to the feet of the fire. Because this has been an absolute laughingstock across the commonwealth. And the fact, I'll be honest with you, I'm disgusted with the Secretary of State's office. Reached out to them, haven't heard anything. This is what they're all about. If this is what the Secretary of State and our governor sees that that's appropriate, look what's happening. It's a trickle-down effect. Now, who knows how many people aren't going to come out for the next elections. And why? No one's told us anything. No one's even talked to me. I got a bunch of fluffy, I'm getting a lot of emails, fluffy emails, you know, wishing me luck, a happy birthday, a congratulations, but no one is still from that commission's talked to me about, George, this is what's going on. And they're good people. And then for the recount, I know I wasn't there, but I, I talked to a few people that came here, gave their time to help with the process. And I heard our coordinator, our elections coordinator was verbally getting in people's faces and disrespecting people to the point where the attorney from the from the candidate side had to step in and say, Please do not address any of our people. Talk to me. That's a disgrace. So there's a lot more that's going to go on in that meeting when they come back. But my biggest thing right now is, and a lot of people that have talked to him on every side, every side, this isn't just, you know, the George Scarpelli side, this is every side. Everybody's watching to see where the accountability pieces. That's what everybody's waiting to see. And if you want to give them benefit of the doubt until the January 29. So be it. But if you're gonna come up to that podium on January 29th and give us fluff, be prepared, because this one Councilor is gonna ask some serious questions, and I'm gonna be calling people out directly. So thank you, Madam President, and I rest my case.
[George Scarpelli]: It says, temporary shelter. Hello, representatives, senators, members of Medford City Council, Medford School Committee. I wanted to give you all a heads up on an ever-evolving matter. At the end of last week, I was informed that 400 Riverside Ave was being explored. as a possible temporary winter emergency shelter for migrant families on the wait list. The state was only going to pick one site from my recollection on a phone call. The families would only each stay a few nights before they would be transitioned. The shelter was going to run through April and start with those families currently staying at 10 Park Plaza and may build up to no more than 75 families. The state, excuse me, 75, the state asked for a walkthrough today, and at the time, the Commissioner Rice relayed different terms to us, all regarding capacity and length of stay through June. He also said that this was the site they plan to try to move forward with. I have another call with the state tomorrow to try to get more clarity. This is 110,000 square foot site that meets the needs of the state. And I'm worried about the burden it will cause with city staff, the school department, and et cetera. It reaches the capacity that we are unable to handle. I will follow up with you when we have more information. That was on 12-5. So this is, I thought this was public record. I didn't realize that. I didn't know that no one else knew it. It's the first time that I heard that no one. I mean, I'm sorry, I don't have Facebook, but yeah, this isn't Facebook, but I would assume diagonally across. Yeah, I would assume we should have a. We should call for a community meeting immediately, maybe somewhere in that area that we can let our neighbors know. Because from what I gather, it doesn't sound like the mayor's supporting this either. So if this is something on the state level, I think it's very important. That's the biggest thing. When I heard this, I talked to a couple of teachers. And they were confused because they the increase in numbers in the elementary school, especially kindergarten level, I guess they've added an extra kindergarten to every single school already. And there was some thought that we've already let families in, and that's the issue. But if that isn't the issue, the fear from our educators that any influx, now remember, anybody that moves into our community as a child, they have every right to go to school in our city. And this is gonna put a huge burden, a burden that I don't think that can meet the capacity that we offer right now, both at the McGlynn and the Roberts for sure. I don't know if the other schools have space from what I was told that there aren't many places. Now, the other issue we heard was with the closure of the Salem Street Fire Station back in our area. I say our area because we grew up in North Medford. The idea of any more an influx of this magnitude with only one true station that's on that side, really, other than coming from the main station and then the heights. It's really going to play an impact with public safety. So there's a lot of issues here that I appreciate you bringing this forward today because I think that it's scary at many different levels. And again, like I said, But when I gather the mayor is really confused with this whole situation as well. So not to support her in any way and understanding it, but this is something that one thing we should do is have community meeting or something should go out saying what she just said in this email that I personally thought because this is a public record, I thought it was already out there. So I didn't know that. So I apologize. I wish I knew.
[George Scarpelli]: And this is why it's an issue, because I took that as that they changed that. The original phone call was for temporary, and then it was extended. So I'm looking at it totally different. So I think that's why, I think having some clarity, I think that's why really just having some clarity from the main office I think would be important.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. It's difficult for me because when you spend so much time in people, it's not just every other Tuesday now, or it was every Tuesday, but my first two phone calls on the way to work every morning was to Councilor Caraviello, then to Councilor Knight. What I want to applaud you, Rick, is for teaching all of us to understand why we do what we do. And I think people have forgotten that. And I think last meeting was a pretty good indication of where we were. Rick Caraviello, the Rick Caraviello I know, no one understands how much you've done for the city. What's great about a person that does things, hey, listen, it's great when the camera's in your face, people taking pictures of people talking about you, and you're standing up and shaking hands and cutting ribbon, because I know a lot of people that do that and love it. It's all ego-driven. But the Rick Caraviello I know, that I'm honored to call my friend, has always done things behind the scenes. And I've always admired that about you, Rick. I've tried to emulate it. It's very difficult to do. while running a family and running a business and taking care of dad that's in a home and understanding everything that goes on in a person's life, you still have time to feed the hungry. You still have time to build a deck for a person that can't afford a handicap ramp. When a veteran needs something, it's Rick Caraviello they call. And I used to be, to be honest, I was so jealous of how you did that. And, but it also made me proud that I've learned from the best. I've sat behind this rail with some amazing people, some amazing people that when I sit and talk about all these different people than our lifetimes that have lost, we've lost, and they've moved on to the, the big Mustang land in the sky, I look at it and I say, who's going to take that place? And I was fortunate because I see people like Councilor Marks and Councilor Falco and Councilor Knight and you being the Mount Rushmore of that group. I don't want to get emotional because I think that this is more than just you've given enough. Zach is right. When it came, when you saw the city falling, no one else had the guts to stand up and you stood up. You stood up taller than any man I've ever seen in my life other than my dad. You didn't hide from anything. You fought every single day to make things right. And I'm honored to be your friend. So I hope I can make those phone calls in the morning still. And sometimes I think Dina gets jealous because I don't pick up her call. And I'd say, I'm on the phone with Carvey. But she knows. So for your family, people that I love, Carol, you've been amazing. to make sure Rick is here with us, and I don't think he's ever missed a meeting. And if I missed a meeting, I'd always get an email, a text message right away saying, where are you? And I felt guilty to say, my God, Rick, I'm stuck at work. Because no matter what, even after the election, he was still here. Even after the election, people are still calling him. He was at the door the other day, and I was like, after the election, and I said, what are you doing? He had a truck full of turkeys. He says, do you know anybody who needs a turkey, any family that needs a turkey? And that's what I'm talking about. That's what we're going to miss in the city. People don't realize that. And it's something that when I see your grandchildren, I make sure they know how proud they should be of their papa. And Rick, you've done an amazing job to set a standard for the Caraviello family. So my friend, all I can say to you is I wish one day George Scarpelli leaves a legacy like Rick Caraviello, because it's not Armin anymore. All Armin did was win a few football games. Rick Caraviello is what we should all aspire to. So I will miss you. I appreciate everything you've taught me. I've appreciated you, the phone calls that you've, you've called me and set me straight. When I was going to go stray, you pulled me back. And I hope I still get those phone calls because we know it's not going to be easy. President Zach Beers. Imagine Ricky. Joking, of course, but I love you, my friend. I'm proud that this journey in our lives made us brothers and I thank you and I apologize. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I think that it's tough when it's one person that leaves, but when it's two, it's really tough. Three. Well, I apologize. Someone that I've worked with, I mean, for a long time now, so I apologize, Councilor. Believe me, I have your speech ready, so I hope you have tissues. I love listening to kid laugh. Do you ever notice that? It's my mission in life. Yeah, it's my mission in life. But I just want everybody to realize, I think that, You might not agree with him a thousand percent of the time you might get irritated with him Sometimes he does it with a subtle rule or a law, but sometimes he does it with a kick in the face but he does it all for a reason and something that I admire and His passion and love for the city. I think that that's a common denominator tonight. I think that Councilor Caraviello touched on it. He is probably the smartest person I've ever been around. I would call him so giddy about something. I found something. I'd say, Adam, how about this rule? Or how about this? And he'd say, no, that's good, George. But how about this? And I'm like, I was wrong. But he wouldn't tell you. Or it would be like, I have to do this, Adam, could you, I sent over a speech. And 15 minutes later, I'd get something back and say, wow, that's great, but that's nothing of what I sent you. You know, it's, when I first started running for school committee, one of the first phone calls I made was to a young man named Adam Knight. And he was amazing. And he helped, mold that team that started my journey as an elected official more than 16 years ago. And I admire your passion. I admire your, what people don't realize is your strong integrity and for what's right. And it's something that we laugh about. I'm not going to lie to you, Adam. The last couple of months, we've had a few jokes behind your back. And I tell you, people don't realize, when he first got angry because somebody moved all of his paperwork, people don't realize that's years, years of organizing. And if Adam needed anything, if I said something, and I'm like, geez, I don't know where to look for it. I'd look at Adam, and he would know exactly out of a mound of pile of paperwork that he knew exactly where to go to help. And he probably still has it right now. Right. So I think that knowing the Knight family, and I was fortunate to know his dad and know his beautiful wife and his kids, Um, I think this is good for Adam. I think that the last year that he had has been very difficult. He's been true to what you're supposed to be and what we should all admire too as a family man that supported his brother through probably his most difficult time. And, um, you know, I wish people would know what you've gone through. Um, but as a friend, like I said, my first phone call, then my second phone call to get whether your approval or your understanding or you correcting me. I appreciate that, my friend. And like I said, there's a common denominator tonight. I'm sad because I'm not going to see you on a regular basis, that we're going to be mandated to see each other at least every other Tuesday. But I'm proud that we're friends and I'm proud that my kids get to be around Adam Knight because he's a great role model. I know my daughter Gianna loves him and his family and I know John is at Merrimack and he's following Adam's footsteps out of Merrimack and I know how much Dina loves both you and Rick and what you guys have done for our community. I'm gonna miss you my friend and But I thank this opportunity because I have a good friend that I feel I can count on for the rest of my life. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: No, all right, kid.
[George Scarpelli]: Buy the coffee, okay.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I, uh, Councilor Morelle, I just, Council President, um, I'm honored to call you president. I think I've reached out to you some tough meetings and I wanted to, you know, publicly say that you've handled yourself with grace and honor, and I think you've been a true leader to this council. Like Councilor Caraviello said, it's not easy when your community is viewed as divided, you know, the new metric, the old metric. And I would get phone calls, imagine this Morell, I said, imagine this Morell, imagine Nicole Morell would take an opportunity to stand up and run for an office that's not traditionally for an independent, strong woman, and come in and do what you've done. I thank you because you give my daughter the understanding that you can reach for anything you want. And we haven't seen eye to eye to everything, but it was always out of respect. And what people don't understand is that it's for a reason. And Nicole Morell doesn't go home at night. They tell people, yeah, but Nicole definitely goes home at night. How can I destroy that? It became comical at times. And I think you've stood up and you have taken the leadership with honor, with grace, with distinction. And I'm proud that I've served with you. I think that the most honorable thing in life, I think I've, in my life that I've ever seen, is watch my wife raise our two amazing kids. And tonight, it like kicked me like a mule watching you with your baby and understand the huge sacrifices. And I remember the nights that you'd have to run out of here for 20 minutes and run back and people didn't know why, but your mom first. And you taking this hiatus, I know that when everything moves forward like we expect and have a positive growth with your beautiful son, that you'll be back. And I think that we appreciate the four years that you've given us, and I appreciate you being our leader and I think that I hope that we do see you around still and I'm sure that if you see me go the wrong way that One thing people don't realize, I don't think, is how tough you are. And George Scott Pell likes to speak. People think I yell. I'm yelling at people. I don't yell at people. This is how I speak. Ask my wife. I just talk loud. And it's great because you give it right back. And there was some things me and you would talk about right here, and you'd say, oh yeah? Did you forget two years ago? And I'm like, oh wow. And I'm like, ooh, ooh. But it's out of respect, and I appreciate that, because I think that's what this council is so great about. We've done some great things, and we've respected each other enough to agree to disagree, but not cross the line. And so I thank you, and I wish you much luck and happiness at home, and enjoying your beautiful son. and I'm sure we'll see you around, so I appreciate it. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I would make the motion that we bring the city council pay down so we don't have restrictions.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I talked to the petitioner. I think that what we'll do to speed things along is we'll call for a subcommittee on a state-specific. We're looking at January 19th at 6 o'clock prior to our 7 o'clock meeting, and we'll ask for legal representation to be present. the building department that could assist us in making sure we make the right decisions for both the neighborhood and the business. So I motion to move this to subcommittee.
[George Scarpelli]: Motion approved. Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Council Vice President. I'm gonna speak as someone who no one else in this council had the opportunity to do. That's someone that both sat on the school committee seat and in the city council seat. And understanding, I'll give you my opinion, then I'm gonna share a lot of emails, phone calls, conversations I've had in the last few days. And I think they're very telling. When you decide to take the chance and the responsibility of becoming an elected official, it's being elected official. It's truly a position of service. You're doing it for a reason other than the paycheck. I've never looked at it. Now, as I grew up in this city, I took it upon myself to watch people that led the way for us. And they gave back in service, whether it's coaching little league teams, whether it's volunteering at the food bank, whether it's joining a school committee that didn't make any money, or whether it's taking the leap to the city council, because you think you could make more of a difference. So I generally, personally feel that understanding the process of a pay structure being a major issue, I think it's sad. I think it's sad to look at it that way. To think that I had one phone call that said that understanding that we can get better candidates if we pay, that's sad even to think of. Imagine, imagine voting in people that are there for the money. That's horrifically frightening to me. As we move forward, what I found very, very glaring in this situation, the issue of gender equity in pay. And we received a dialogue from three female school kid members that knew nothing about this, that didn't want anything to do with this vote and think that they're totally against it on the record. There were two members that didn't reach out to me. two members that didn't reach out. And there were two members that I find it, it's very frightening that these two members are the catalyst behind this motion. So let me share a few things. As a member of the council, we had an opportunity to stand up at budget time, didn't we? Didn't we? We did. And three of us stood up and said no. But some others didn't. I'll revert to most important thing that bothers me more than anything are the phone calls that I got from the people that work the hardest in our school district. By the way, majority of them are women. they're getting their butts kicked. And what's glaring to this, it's something that we need to turn to our school committee members that's more important than a pay structure. From what I've heard, and I'm sure we'll hear it tonight, that the possible legalities of lack of coverage in special needs classrooms, lack of coverage with teachers absences, lack of coverage in severely disabled classrooms, that's a problem. So I'm glad this came up in the sense that this brings something forward. I think the city council does more, and I think its responsibilities are far more succeeding. Doesn't mean I'm better than a school kid member at all. But our responsibilities, our charter, give us the responsibility far greater than our colleagues on the school committee. And to be honest with you, I'll make a motion later on, whether it's tonight or another night, that since we've cut our time, I'll make the motion if equity, financial equity is serious to the issue, then I would make the motion that we bring the city council pay down so we don't have to. because Mr. President, Mr. President, again, this city councilor didn't join or didn't ask their constituents to hire, to vote for me so I can make a paycheck. We're not rich, we're not gonna get rich. And when everybody ran for their office, when our school committee ran for their office, you're gonna have some candidates that are gonna be stepping in seats that are in the audience tonight. I'm sure if you ask them, if this was a big concern in their eyes, they would absolutely flat say, no way, that was not the intention at all. So I just think that this seems like there's fingerprints with only two spooky members that are pushing an agenda, and I think that this is a sad, sad day when we have unions that don't have contracts, when we have teachers that don't have coverage, and more importantly, please, more importantly, that I find frightening as a former teacher, that I've talked to a few paraprofessionals, I have two teachers that told me straight out that we have classes, high level, low leveling functioning classes, with special need classrooms, with lack of aids, with lack of certified teachers, and they're just covering them just to have a body in the room, and that's against the law, and that our kids, they don't deserve that. So that's the biggest issue. So I know this is going to be left on the next council in January. But I think it's important that this happens. These phone calls, these conversations, I think it's great, because I think that's the dialogue we need to move the needle where we need to move it to. And I'm not going to be critical, but I will to all of you. Get involved. Don't come out just when it involves your issue, because that's what we're seeing. And we can't do that anymore. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: So when you clap, it stops it. Silence is the whole thing. That's not a Zach against George thing.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. D'Antonio. Mr. President. Mr. President, if I can. Just one second. Mr. Sharpell. Just a point of information. There's a comment that's out that there's $25 million we can spend. That's not true. It's not. There isn't $25 million. I'm not trying to debate. It was something that was in our free cash. It's not like it's still there and that we have to use it. It's not. That's not. Just a point of clarification.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Councilor Tseng. Councilor Scarpelli, then Councilor Knight. Thank you, Council Vice President. And again, this isn't easy. I think that this is what we agree to disagree. But I think this is what this council is about. not similar to what we're hearing that happens on the school side. So I appreciate that, that we have this here. So, but again, my intention was to listen to everybody, understanding, weighing the pros and the cons. And as much as I respect former council, my motion was going to be received in place on file. So that would be my motion. to receive and place on file. Thank you, because I feel strongly enough that I've heard enough that we need to move forward without this as an issue. Remember, we're going into this with a new council. Why would we have them give them that responsibility? That's what I feel that it's just not fair. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor GRIFFITHS. Councilor GRIFFITHS. Madam President, if you can, I think that—we really can't debate it, but what we can do Unfortunately, when you come, developers are smart, so they're not stupid. They're trying to circumvent the system. But what we can do, if we can, if we can share your information with the clerk to get the information to the code enforcement officer. Because what you're saying, what they're doing, we have everything in place for that because we do have some developers out there that take total advantage of this in our community.
[George Scarpelli]: You know, we can be pretty hard on some developers and I think that and making sure that they told the line. So if we can make sure that our code enforcement officer has that, that address, and they get out there tomorrow, I'll make a phone call tomorrow as well to the code enforcement office to make sure they come out and set up a regular, you know, visit where they check in periodically throughout the day. Yeah, because if it's that bad,
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, so we change the title to the Council of King Kong's resolution. Solid waste resolution.
[George Scarpelli]: I disagree with everything. I just want to honestly, I think you've done a great job with this. As I'm following through, it's very thorough. I feel secure that you've done your due diligence and feathering your cap. This is a big, big contract. And to see the work that you put into it, I have so much faith in it. So I appreciate your hard work, Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. This is a problem that's going on for years. So I know we've heard from the state delegates that said that there are issues that are going on. I know that Rick's worked on it. I know that And what I'm hearing from all these sides is that there's different entities, there's the state, there's the electrical utility company, there's the private entity, there's the city. We need to get everybody in a room and realize before somebody gets killed and then everybody's gonna be pointing their fingers at everybody else, we need to get everybody in a room for this meeting and find a resolution. Because they say the simplest thing is meeting with the neighbors and taking up the pavers so they can make the changes. Well, if the neighbor doesn't want that because they're afraid it's not going to be replaced the proper way, let's find a resolution to make this happen so we're not sitting here and talking about a horrific accident or a jogger or a bike rider that's going down South Border Road that gets killed. So I think it's important that through public safety we call for this emergency meeting to make sure all the parties are in a room because I think everybody's working their tail off, but They're all doing their own thing. No one's sitting together and saying, let's do that. So that's why I bring this forward tonight, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: And if I can, I think that that's important. I wouldn't want anybody to touch our pavers unless we have a commitment by the the public entities that are all involved to say, hey, listen, this is what we'll do to make sure at your discretion with your contractor, making sure that everything gets put back the right way. I think that's the only thing that's fair, because I think what's happening is, it's dogs chasing his tail until somebody gets seriously hurt, and then all of a sudden we're sitting there saying, all it was is just moving some pavers. So I think having everybody in the room is important. I think that if Mr. Vita's, we should invite him too. Yes, we should get him involved as well, so he's familiar with that, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Appreciate that. Thank you so much for that.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm listening and I appreciate that, you know, understanding this with clarity and making sure like we talked about, making sure that the information is out there. And I think this meeting is perfect because it is the information that will help us guide us for our next meeting. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mike Noville from National Grid.
[George Scarpelli]: Cam Hansel from National Grid.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. What time of day will this work be? You can determine that. okay so we can do something at night because right now that area is a mess traffic wise so and the last piece I know maybe the city engineer the paving was that going to be curb to curb?
[George Scarpelli]: So we'll be done curb to curb.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, but are we now in the practice, because it's great news if it is, but that now our public utilities that come in to open up our streets, it'll be curb to curb like we do with the private entities as well?
[George Scarpelli]: Great.
[George Scarpelli]: Now, if I can, while the engine is here. How long, again, will the process take for this project?
[George Scarpelli]: All right. So I think that two reasons for the question, that area is a mess. I think we all know that. Now that it's all right turns there, I mean, that area's just flooded in the morning now. This could be something done at night with the city's request. Is there a better time to do it?
[George Scarpelli]: Police, okay.
[George Scarpelli]: For safety reasons, we would defer to the traffic sergeants. And that's something that if we can, as part of the record, we'll reach out as part of a motion to reach out to the chief of police to request their thoughts. And if it's not that we have a detailed informational plan that goes out to our residents. And just because that, I take that, I think everybody knows that trip. We've heard phone calls and emails from multiple residents about that right turn only being a major change. And then if you drive through Medford Square, now you see why, but I think that making sure that everybody's informed of what happens if it does happen during the day. But thank you, ma'am.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Councilor Bears and Councilor Caraviello. I think that my frustration is what's felt throughout the community. You said something very important because what bothered me more than anything in this time in our country, you want people to get involved. And I had five to six people call me and say, you know what? I'll never, ever vote. in an election for the city ever again. I'll leave my vote just the national agenda and that's it. Because that's how disgusted they are. And I can see why, being part of it. This is, and I'll give you an example. Councilor Caraviello did, in running his election. He was honest, he was fair, he worked hard, and he asked volunteers to come out. And those volunteers came out to assist, like any candidate could. Any candidate could have done what Councilor Caraviello did. Now, it didn't come out in his favor, and that's life. But to hear the horrific issues that poll workers were put in, and the poll watchers, so people don't know, you're allowed to have poll watchers, and it's a machine. So the poll watchers go out. It's a calculated strategy where they're allowed to have poll watchers sit in a relatively close area that you can hear and see the process. The process is very simple, that the poll watchers There was talk that they were told they can't sit down. Then they were told they can't sit down if they bring their own seats. And if that's the case, OK, bring your own seat. Pole watchers sat in their seats. And then they were told to move 25 feet away. And then the process was very simple. The process that by law states, in the general laws that we had attorneys pass out to each polling station, each warden, and it said straight out, the process is such, when the person approaches to vote, if they have a license or not, because we had the new scanning system. And believe me, I do not blame the poll, the workers that are at the poll, I don't blame them, because a lot of them are great people and they just weren't prepared, but they had the licenses. They have the license, you're supposed to sweep their name and address. They're supposed to say, George Scarpelli, 27 Butler Street, and the poll worker responds back, George Scarpelli, correct. for the purpose of clarity and transparency. And then what they do is that person has a book, same as the workers do, and they check off who comes in and votes. And then if you have a machine that works for you, volunteers that want to work for you, you then have people pick up those books every two to four hours. And then you have people in offices or at homes calling people and saying, hey, we see you haven't voted today. Do you need a ride? It's a machine. It's done all over the country. What we saw this past Tuesday, I'm not even gonna bring up a formal, maybe I will, because I said what happened before, I said, please, this is why this country is such a mess. Conspiracy theories through the roof, and I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I hate it. And what happened this past week and the weeks before this and understanding how this process went was a disgrace. How much money did we lose? When you don't open up the boxes of the ballots to a few days before you have to mail out the mailing ballots, and you realize you have someone's name spelt wrong, so they have to be thrown away. Now you have to get ballots reprinted and rushed in, which is thousands of dollars. And then they go out and then we realize that we're getting phone calls from Ward 6 saying everybody that ordered, that requested four ballots got eight. Everybody that got asked for two got four. Everybody asked for three got six. And then we had to reassure the public that even though it looks bad, they cannot vote three to six times. And we said that day, that meeting before the election, please. If it's because you're understaffed, ask for help. If we have to approve anything from this council to assist, bring in a thousand people from the state, whoever you need to assist. Now, Councilor Caballero's team was very proactive. I know for sure, because my wife was one of the poll watchers, that at her location, she showed up at seven where polls open, correct? Well, at 7.30, they still weren't ready to go. Then we heard some places that we had machines that weren't working. By law, when you test a machine, the notice has to go out to the public and it has to be done in an open process. Before the election, that process has to be open to the public. They come in and you can watch the Elections Commission test the machines. That didn't happen. That didn't happen. And then as you went through the whole process, we will tell you that we were given a notice from the election director that said, the votes that were taken, the votes that were taken from early voting and absentee voting will be put through the voting machine here at City Hall at 8.30 in the morning and then posted at eight o'clock here at City Hall. That's a memo that's public that went out to the election officials, elected officials. And then you realize, now you go through the numbers. You sit there and you go through the numbers, you have people getting their numbers, and it's a mess. There was talks that people coming back saying that the police were being yelled at by wardens, that ballots were being counted, they didn't understand where the ballots were. We had people here counting ballots without being in public. Now that's, that's, it's, it's not to, it's, it's, it's, is it, does it affect the election? No, I don't think it affects the election, but the perception of it is terrible. And if this happens in any other, any other department, things have to be taken swiftly and quickly and making sure this doesn't happen again. So I'm gonna ask for, if we can, as a resolution, I would amend the existing paper to ask for our election commissioner, our election director, our commission, to come before this council to explain in detail what happened. And one of the biggest questions I have from a lot of people that were waiting that night at 835, we had probably between, I believe it was 10,500 votes. And they said, that's it. And we said, wait a second, Medford has never, never been that low. What happened to the ballots that were counted in the morning? We don't know what you're talking about. So then all of a sudden at one o'clock in the morning, they posted something that said they found the ballots and it was 4,000 more ballots and this is what it was. Regardless who won, who lost, That just doesn't look good. Perception is reality. And this is what, this is the type of situation that brings the fire to the ignorance of our country sometimes. And that's what's sad about this. So the reason for this, the reason why I want to move forward and, and get a detailed report, and then ask for, you know, the Secretary of State's office to get involved to them do an audit, because we need answers. So people can understand that your elected officials are holding people accountable when they're not doing their job. So we can squash and move forward for our next elections without any other issues or concerns. Because like Councilor Behr said, perception is reality. I said it the night, the week before the election. Perception is reality. And what happened is exactly what we would hope, we were scared would happen. Now you have a room full of people that are just as upset because the process was terrible. It was terrible and somebody has to be held accountable, period. Because in my position, if I left a little kid in the park by himself unattended, guess what? The next morning, I wouldn't be working. So in the elections department, when you make these many mistakes, something has to be done. So Madam President, that's my resolution. I appreciate it and thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I think we are at the point where everybody really expressed the same thing. So I think the governing body in the state needs to get involved, and I think that this council should send a letter to the Secretary of State's office, to Galvin's office, so I'd make that a formal motion that we craft a letter, send it to the Secretary of State's office, and ask them to look into this process. Please. And just if I can, Madam President, I don't want people to understand that when we heard all these issues, the poll workers that are there are maybe mostly the sweetest people in the world. They're doing something that's thankless, truly is thankless. But one thing that was resounding throughout that day is how they weren't trained properly. They didn't know what was right. And the sweetest woman that I love dearly, when I went to vote, she looked at me and she said, the first three letters of your name. And I said, no, that's not how it goes. But these are the issues that went on everywhere. We had one poll watcher that was put 25 feet away in the corner, was presented the law. She was then moved by the warden behind eight feet away in compliance. And then our elections commissioner came in and said, get out, go back to where you were. That's not the rule. So it was the arrogance as well, because you have people that volunteered. and as part of this process, which this is what we want in our country. We want fair and open involved processes. So, and again, I think that letter that we draft helps with the healing and the understand that we can move on and understand that we have something in place, Madam President, for especially November, that we feel safe and confident in our processes. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I think the biggest concern that I have is, as we're talking, as we're seeing some of the new changes we're seeing and some of the development that we're seeing, one constant comes back to me from neighbors and residents that they shared what I felt was an issue was that As we're moving forward with these zoning changes, we see that they're important. We see that they can be successful. What we don't have, though, is proper notification when we do certain jobs in our community. I don't think we do a very good job informing our constituents of projects that are coming about. I'll use Mystic Ave as an example. That evening, we talked about a building that sounds great, but I posed it for the fact that it right now, it's a unicorn, and I didn't get any answer from the administration of what the vision is for that area. No different than what's happening over at the old KISS 108 site at the T building in Wellington, that the building's being razed and we still have no vision. Now, that's very close to having two gateways of our community. And I think that moving forward with any more zoning is, to me, is a slippery slope to the fact that we're not letting our constituents know. There are some projects that organizations, I'll give you an example with our housing. There have been multiple meetings, multiple neighbors, opportunities for people to speak on different projects. I don't think we see that too often. when it comes to some of these positions and some of these projects. And I tell you, I think when we talked about putting together the zoning study and having that bring that team in that will go neighborhood to neighborhood, remember we talked about that and getting the idea of the residents of what people want Medford to look like. It seems like we forgot that. We're not doing that anymore. That's been put in the back burner. Well, we haven't done anything. We're coming up with new zoning changes and we're saying, well, we could do this now because this might work. But in totality, we still don't have a plan and we still aren't including all of our residents. So, and I think that's a concern. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I think for any projects. I mean, for anything that's going on in the city. I've been getting phone calls, I get 45 phone calls, it's something we're gonna talk about later.
[George Scarpelli]: And what I'll do is I'll ask, what I'll do is I'll ask a request because I think what's getting out, because if you ask, there's a demographic that if you look at all the surveys and there's a demographic that gets the information and it seems to be one demographic, there's a lot of people, if you ask the common person in this room that's not involved with this, they've never heard anything about this because the message is getting out to the people that it seems like that are pinpointed to direct mailers or groups. So that's the problem. When I say this project, I'm saying as a whole. I'm having calls from as a whole when we're talking about different surveys and things being done around the community and your office getting back to people and saying, oh no, we sent it out. And there are times that I'm in those same neighborhoods. I didn't get anything. I'm a city councilor. So that I can't, I can't not listen or bring forth what my constituents are bringing to me.
[George Scarpelli]: So let's talk about what we talked about. Something that we were very excited about is hiring that zoning team and then bringing our vision of our development, our growth in our community. Remember, going neighborhood to neighborhood, involving everyone. Right? Having community meetings.
[George Scarpelli]: This council requested it. It's not us. This council has requested it.
[George Scarpelli]: Just a quick question. What do the residents in Wilmington say?
[George Scarpelli]: So will the residents of Wilmington know about this?
[George Scarpelli]: Again, it's the same situation. It's really the same situation. You're in front of us today to hold something through that has to be accepted tonight.
[George Scarpelli]: When a zoning amendment comes to this council from anybody whatsoever, you have to- I know that, but the way you presented it, it seems like even after this process, it seems like it's going to go pretty quick. It has to be done right away.
[George Scarpelli]: One public meeting on it? Yeah. So when did we find out about it? When did your office find out about it?
[George Scarpelli]: Again, these are things that, some things that just out of your control, but in the totality of these processes, it just doesn't look good. It's no different than the voting situation. It just doesn't look good. I consistently get, constituents that reach out and say, we knew nothing about this. We didn't hear this. And so I think, you know, as a council, we need to figure out a way whenever we put these projects out, that there's gotta be some assistance that if they don't have the funding or anything that has to be done, because the biggest issues we have to come back to us are the constituents that they knew nothing about this. I, you know, I, we, we had, we were fortunate enough with the last speaker, the last project that the housing authority did a lot of the legwork. on their dime or the way they processed it. But this is something that I'm hearing over and over again, especially the last week. So I appreciate it, and I understand that the situation's a little different. And it's just not fair, because I know what's going to happen. We're going to get phone calls tomorrow. The people who watch this will all have to say, you don't care about us. The answer is easy. At least we know now we can say this is state mandated, and this is a situation, and it's out of our hands. But it just doesn't. just doesn't look good. That's all. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, Councilor Scarpelli. This is unbelievable. We're so excited about it, it's our neighborhood, and the only thing, I told my 20-year-old, John, I'll take you to the park. So I mean, everything about it is amazing. I think that, I'm sure, Ms. Hunt, this is one of the reasons, I got about 15 phone calls from the Butters that it's a really big dog-friendly neighborhood. And they're confused that they didn't know about the process fully. So this is what, and they wanted to come here tonight. And I said, well, this isn't about, that process. So I don't know if there's something we can do to talk with them, set up a separate meeting with these folks that so they can understand the process that you, it was, I believe that the question was, could you do separate areas and construction? I don't see that happening. So from what I've been told, so I don't, but I think if that, other than that, I don't think anybody in this country is looking at that, what we're doing up there. It's, it's really bringing people back up the hill. I mean, it, you know, when you talk about, you know, it's, it's re re re energizing so many different groups, you know, you have the baseball people that are saying, wow, you have, you know, you have new ball fields, we have multi purpose, we have, you know, you know, special needs, you have adults saying that looking for that apparatus park, I mean, this is something that You know, I'm excited to say we're far ahead of Somerville. You know, because this is what I do in Somerville. The people are begging for this in Somerville. So this is in planning stage. So I'm so excited that we're seeing this. So I, you know, and I understand the process we have to go through, the funding mechanism. It's nice to see ARPA money being used this way. It's exactly what, you know, you want it to be used for. So I would move approval. Mr. President, you're gonna get a lot of that. The next two years, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: We lost zero. This past week we lost a member of our teaching community at Bedford High School. We lost John Lazzaro, a former colleague and friend. John's had a tough last couple of years, but no matter what he went through physically, he still found his way to his classroom and to support his chemistry students and his science students from high school. Great demeanor, he always had a sense of responsibility you know, confidence that only John had. And, you know, we went through a lot of beginnings when we first started together as teachers. So I know his wife, Kay, is one of the best people in the world. And they raised two amazing children, John and Elizabeth. I know my son, John, went to school with Elizabeth and It's definitely, you can feel the void in our community. He also had a brother, Phillip, and his brother, Mike, who's also a custodian at the high school. So I know that he'll be laid to rest tomorrow. I hope that we can get word to the school department. I hope that they'll be lowering the flag at half-mast in his honor, because he deserves that. You know, to John's family, we feel your loss. We'll never feel the pain that they do, but he'll be missed for sure. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Because I own a solar company now.
[George Scarpelli]: Why don't you say something?
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Madam President, I know that one thing that I need to mention again is the commitment of the football program to the community. I think that shines brighter than any win we've ever had. And I think that's what's important. Their commitment to the community and volunteering. I think it's it They don't have to win a game for what they do with the community. So I applaud you guys for doing that. But I think that coach Curley has to take a lot of credit. But I also have done this. People have to understand if you didn't live in Medford, if you didn't go to Medford High School, if you didn't play a sport. If you didn't have the luck of having Steve Miller as your equipment manager at Medford High or live in that era, you truly don't understand what it means to be a true Mustang. I mean, you know, Bud Kelly, he coined the term blue and white flowing through your veins and legitimately, I, my freshman year, I wanted to cut myself just to see if I was, is it true? Because that's how much it would convince you. But I will tell you.
[George Scarpelli]: Don't do that. If you come to the game next Thursday, you can buy. And I believe blue and white t-shirt. I do believe blue and white, but I will tell you my point to saying this is that it's very different because when you hear some people say it, you know, Mustang pride, you know, there's some clowns that do do it. And that's just a word for them. But we appreciate you, Chris, because I think you keep that alive. And and I think that's what you're seeing the change with these kids. It's not just John Curley. It's Chris Murphy's energy to say, hey, listen, being a Method Mustang is part of life. And you know what? We're Method Mustangs behind this reel. It's like, you feel like part of the team. And that's what I think our whole community is lacking right now. We're forgetting that we're all Mustangs. And maybe if people lived like that a little bit more and understood that to be true, I think that it would stop a lot of animosity in our community.
[George Scarpelli]: We're all together as Mustangs supporting our team. So, Nicole, I'll even buy a baby a nice little outfit, a little Mustang outfit. Chris, if you can.
[George Scarpelli]: There was nothing better than listening to a group of Brazilian kids screaming defense while the offense was on the field. There was nothing better than that. We have other things we should celebrate, but we should be celebrating The fact that our marching band won the championship and came in this community, I love the fact that they had the police escorts come in. These are things we should be celebrating. We have so many great things. This is what elevates us. Thanksgiving is a good start.
[George Scarpelli]: I have it right here for everybody.
[George Scarpelli]: I see Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Council. I think that's what my sentiments were. I think that the biggest concern we had when this came in front of this body is that, especially at the time during the pandemic, we were seeing the effects, the negative effects with what was happening in our country affecting our brick and mortar businesses. And as we continue to work out of the pandemic, and here we are, we're finally safe, hopefully, We're seeing businesses thriving, especially in the square. I think the number one goal is not to allow the food trucks other than what we stipulated in the guidelines that Council Bears expressed that it was for special events. I think that, but the concern was that there are special events that come up and sometimes the council won't meet and it leaves organizations in limbo. So it's giving the right to city administration and the Board of Health to give that permission and take it off the City Council plate for those purposes. We don't want anybody to miss out on an opportunity, but at the same time, my number one goal from the beginning was protecting our brick and mortar businesses, especially in the climate that we're in right now here in Medford, where What we have, we need to keep and what we need to grow on the brick and mortar businesses. If we're bringing in food trucks from outside the city and allowing these organizations to roll up, we're going to really taint what we're looking for, and especially most of our squares and and bringing more solid businesses to the city of Medford. So I agree with Councilor Bears. I think we agreed on a good plan. for their purposes of making sure that no one is left behind, but at the same time, still protecting the brick and mortar businesses and not allowing the full-time or a specialized area that some communities do have that maybe their businesses thrive. Until I see our brick and mortar businesses thriving and people rushing to come to Medford and opening restaurants, I would hate to give a a food truck provision to come and go as they may please and take business away from what we need to grow in this community. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: I mean, I know other communities use, I can understand that too, but so leaving the permitting process with the health department to make sure that we follow those guidelines, but taking it away from the council to make sure that it's a more streamlined process. I know other, communities use the communications department that does all the special events for the city, or even the parks and recreations director, and allowing that purview under the guidelines that we've given them, that's pretty simple. I know that if the Board of Health doesn't want to do that because it's out of their purview. That's one thing. But we have other departments in the city that perform permitting processes that, given the guidelines of our ordinance, I think this shouldn't be a heavy lift. You have multiple departments here that we can delegate that. the permanent process to if that's the only issue, I don't see why we can't just put that on the city administration to appoint. the best practice that they follow, because they run road races, they run special events, they do parades, they do walks around City Hall. We don't perform those permits, someone that does that in the city. So I would recommend, Madam President, that this question be given to the administration to pinpoint the department and allow that department to follow through with the permitting process. I think it's very simple. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Let me finish. If I can this, we're making this very difficult. It's one day special permits for special events. That's very simple. It's not special events four days in a row, unless the city that allows a permit if they had, let's say per se, a carnival in the city that lasted two or three days. We're just protecting the long-term permitting process of a food truck anywhere in the city. We've already decided we're against that. We're protecting our brick and mortar businesses. I don't know, this isn't a heavy lift. To me, it's very simple. The permitting process goes to the administration to assign someone to do that process. Health department assigns that. If it's something that we didn't put in the ordinance that says that it has to be in a private, in a public way, then we can adjust that, correct? Other than that, I think it's that simple. We do not want food trucks in a designated area anywhere, at least for now. at least this council does, I'm speaking for myself, but until we have security and growth in our business community, allowing food trucks is only gonna hurt that process. That's my philosophy, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, if I can. Just as a resolution, I think, can we, I'll be asking this moving forward, that can we also have a report of the billable hours from KP Law to address situations like this to the council? I'm going to be asking that moving forward until we have a city solicitor. This this is a type of ordinance that is done within days in the in city halls all over this Commonwealth with the city solicitor. So, um. nothing personal, I just need to move forward. Moving on, this is gonna be a common cry from Councilor Scarpelli till we see a city solicitor, that we get a report back of how many billable hours it'll take KP Law to address these concerns. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, here's what I've got. Mr. President, the council, the health director, the interim economic development director, any departments, the administration, if necessary, come back.
[George Scarpelli]: Vice President Bears.
[George Scarpelli]: At the end.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I'm gonna speak more of a personal level, I've known Henry a long time. Henry and my dad were very close. And I remember many a night in Boston Ave in West Medford with Henry, my dad, and Mr. Caggiano just hanging out and drinking homemade wine and telling stories. And you just realize, I often talk about when great residents pass on, who steps up. And it's refreshing when you could talk about a resident like Henry Miller and his lovely wife. what they've done for our community. He's not someone that sits back. He sees an issue and he attacks it. And he's always there to lend his word, whether you want to hear it or not, whether you like it or not. So I appreciate his friendship and we should all be honored to have residents like the Miller and family here in Medford. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: I found them in order and will approve, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, I think that we've already, I think coming from Representative Dash, I think that would sum it up for us and give us a brief synopsis. I know we've already gone through this, but I'd appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: So I make a recommendation that we table this until October. until date certain, which would be the date of November 28th or meeting that close to that day, whether it's the 1st of December, if that's okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Councilor Bears, for bringing this forward because, you know, listen to everybody's points. It is a complicated situation, and I think that this brings me to my point. I've talked to a couple of business owners that people aren't realizing some of the traffic calming measures that we've implemented I'll give you an example, one of our local businesses had five delivery drivers that were always on the road. And what they're finding right now is he had to let go of two delivery drivers, but the outside agencies, Grubhub, all the other automobile delivery services, they've increased, he said, over 75%. And what they're doing is they don't care where they're parking. They're still parking in the bike lanes. They're still parking, you know, we've lost control. So the reason why I bring that up is because I think it's important. As we move forward to make these decisions, and I appreciate Councilor Bears bringing this up, because I have neighbors calling me about that whole neighborhood. where it is a cut through. It was no different than what a couple years ago was Fulton Street, right? It was a Fulton Street area, the corridor, and people have just forgotten. Now they're so fed up with it that they're just living with it by now. The issue I'm seeing is that it's good to do initial conversation with that traffic engineer, but I think we need to start involving the community. Because I know that I got a few phone calls the other day with the whole idea of eliminating left-hand turns. Well, people calling me saying, well, where is that going to now lead the people? They're going to lead them right into their right turns into their neighborhoods. So we're, instead of going 50-50, their discussion is now you're flooding that area with 100% of the traffic. And the truth of the matter is, there is no communication with the neighbors in those neighborhoods that are affected. So I appreciate it, but I think we need to move forward with this. I support Councilor Bears' initiative in getting our traffic engineer and working on that corridor, but at the same time, I think that we should do this shockingly. I love the word transparent because it's never used in this community, but bringing the neighborhood into the meetings, bringing the neighborhood into the meetings with the traffic engineer and say, okay, what would one solution that you think, how would that solution affect other situations. And we're not seeing that. And you know, just today to get emails and phone calls from from residents and business owners saying, you know, George, I know the sounds great. And I don't know what it checks a certain box. But the truth of the matter is, his business has increased automobile traffic that are parking, there's no enforcement use, we all see it, lift, whatever they are, whoever they are, they all they pull over wherever they want. they pull into bike lanes, they block driveways, and they do whatever, they are now dictating what happens on our streets. So I'm gonna second Councilor Bears' initiative, but I would really like to see more community participation in these decisions so we can really get a true outlook, outline of what everybody sees, the people that live there every single day, and how one issue one solution can affect another and just at least vet that out. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye.
[George Scarpelli]: Vice President Bears? Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Just to share with I know I've received multiple phone calls, especially Ward 6, that we did get an email from the chief of staff, and I'll read that if that's okay, Madam President. Yes. Dear President Morell and city councilors, we recently learned that some addresses who are requesting early voting ballots have received more than one ballot. A short while ago, Steve Smerti and I met with elections to better understand what happened. Well, the uh... Well, this process is not, it happened, there's still checks and balances that are in the system. I'm sorry, my email is breaking up. In the system that would prevent someone from being able to physically cast multiple ballots. So there are fail-safes to make sure that you cannot vote twice. Specifically, there is a unique identifier assigned to each voter and only allows them to cast a ballot once. As we learn more about how this happened and steps that are going to be taken to avoid this from reoccurring, we will update the council. So I think that what I appreciate going forward with this resolution is the first thing is just to express that multiple phone calls that are very, very concerned with voter fraud, right? And the conspiracy theorists are going crazy. But I think my concern right now is We've seen some pretty drastic issues in the last month dealing with this election. One being that I believe the ballots, there were misspelled names and they had to redo ballots. I believe that's one thing. And now with these ballots, it's not a few people. I guess I got a phone call from one person that said they requested two, they got eight. So this is scary for the sense that There's gotta be some people held accountable for this situation. And this administration is fluffing this over like it's nothing. It's costing the city a lot of money. Let's begin with that. Because if they're giving away ballots, that's a problem. If the misspelling ballots and then the ballots have to redone in a rush order to make sure that we can have a true election, this is a problem. So perception is reality. So I just, I brought this up just to explain it, understand that I've talked to a very knowledgeable former elections coordinator that told me that George is no way that, you know, what people are saying on the streets, that that person is gonna take eight votes and they're gonna go to the ballot box, they're gonna mail eight votes for so-and-so. And rest assured, that's not the way it can happen that way because of the fail safes that are on the ballot. I appreciate that. I want to make sure everybody knows that. But at the same time, I think we have to realize something. We're two weeks away from a very big election. And we've had two major flops with this election process. It doesn't look well. It doesn't look like it's being handled by a leader in this community. So again, we're moving forward for two weeks. I just pray that we're kept in the loop with everything that's happening because again, unfortunately, I was gonna bring this forth. So I'm glad we got the email beforehand because I believe it was only one district, one precinct that really- Yeah. Okay. Oh, good. Okay. So, but again, I think moving forward, we need to, we need to buckle down. I mean, this is, this is, you know, you see what's going on in this country. Every, the issue in this country is in what's inflammatory is voter fraud and everybody's going crazy about it. We're not doing ourselves any favors in this community. So I just had to, I had to share my frustration. I had to calm some people's nerves and understand publicly that there are fail safes in place, even though they're getting 10 ballots. And I'm sure I'm gonna get text message and emails later saying, oh, no way, they'll find a way. But there isn't a way that they can use all eight ballots. So, but again, moving forward, I think we really have to tighten this department up. And it starts with the mayor. And I know that it sounds political, but truly, She's the CEO of this community, and this is happening under her watch. Something has to be done. So I appreciate it, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Bears brings up a great point, not to be insensitive, but we're two weeks away. Who else is supporting? If we have an elections coordinator who's not here two weeks before the election with these issues, who's that? That is true. It's frightening. Who's supporting that department right now? Do we have any information with that?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I didn't want but I appreciate because I think it is so sensitive right now, that it is heightened. And the fact that who's supporting, you know, I don't, you know, we were very fortunate under clerk, he, you know, we had a great team together. So, and Councilor Bears is right, that's something we talked about at budget time, of the reduction of staff, and situations happen. Every employee, they have the right, if they're injured, or sick, or hurt, that they need to take care of what they need to care. I don't wanna be insensitive to that at all, but the truth of the matter is, we're still two weeks away from a very important election, in my eyes, because I'm running. And, you know, I think it's important that I'd like to, if we can, I'd like to make a motion to see, can we ask the administration, are they supporting the staff, even if our director is on remotely, having people in the office is so important. you know, is this somebody that are they working with maybe getting someone in for the next two weeks and three weeks to try to make sure that we're We're, we're filling the gaps.
[George Scarpelli]: So you tell me what we're doing.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't want to say she hasn't been in or I think it was just like, she couldn't attend tonight because I'm just, and I'm just saying, if this is something that's longterm, we really need to find a way that we have assisted, we get assistance to that office.
[George Scarpelli]: Appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, and in a municipality, anytime there is any any pay that was that was distinguished during a certain time when a retiree was on duty, they would It's automatic, this is confusing me. Maybe it's clerical error, but you can't do that. It's not fair labor, I believe. No, it's definitely a fair labor act issue. I mean, you're talking about, again, our working men and women in our community, they're telling you that the money that everybody's getting, while you were there too, by the way, through the through the worst time of our hyperinflation, you were there.
[George Scarpelli]: I know that. I don't know if the President can reach out to the city administration to get an answer by as soon as they can to get us an email that the chief of staff can inform us why this is happening. Do you know if there's anybody else? Is that how you're the only person?
[George Scarpelli]: I believe anything that's negotiated... Right, I was active in negotiations, and I worked. Anything that's negotiated during the time that any retiree was still in place, they would be... I didn't retire, I actually resigned. Excuse me, or resigned, doesn't matter. As long as you're working during that time, you are giving the same amount, same treatment, same incentives that they received.
[George Scarpelli]: Shockingly, we have another issue with our labor question with our working men and women here at City Hall. Shockingly. So if we can, I think we need to get word on this and get get it back to us as soon as possible because if, if we haven't, if we have one that's one too many, it was city employees.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, well, we can see that, but, you know, rumor has it there's a great team somewhere in here. We haven't seen it. So, you know, I think that, I don't know who to ask because I don't know what department's in and out, but- I'll reach out to the chief of staff. If we can go HR, chief of staff.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, and then ask if there's any other employees, because I bet you there's other employees that just washed their hands of Medford and said, what? Typical Medford, they walk away. But if they earned it, they deserve it.
[George Scarpelli]: It's not worth it. It's not fair to you. You deserve it. Thank you. Let's get some answers, Madam President. And then if we can, I'll put it on as a resolution for our next meeting to make sure that we follow up. Thank you very much. Good luck, everyone.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Check, check, okay, good.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. As a first-generation U.S. resident and Method resident, I was born to Italian-born parents who grew up in northern Italy in two little towns in Calabria. And they came to this country, the greatest country in the world, to make something of themselves and for their families and start the legacy that they would be proud of. They came to this community and they loved Medford and appreciate Councilor Knight, excuse me, Councilor Caraviello for speaking earlier, but you have to understand there's still so many Italian Americans in Medford that were raised like me and have parents like mine and the sacrifices they made and to be just part of that that history and that pride of being an American citizen. It's funny, my dad, while my mother raised, well, she parented four children on her own, while my dad worked as a member of Revere Sugar, he worked at a meat packing company and at glass cutting. company while going to Don Bosco High School to learn English because, as he said it, it was his honor to learn the language of the great country he moved to. And I think that stands for a lot of Italian-Americans, proud Italian-Americans that live in Medford today. And just to acknowledge that fact that this is a good time to mention what they've done to make Medford what it is today, whether it's the arts, whether it's education, whether it's, you know, in the, you know, the political field. We have Italian Americans, greatness all over this community. So I appreciate is bringing this forward and acknowledging this this time for the Italian Americans of metric. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Council cover will bring this forward. I know that again a great method family when you talk about, um. Our friends at Alexander's again. Another another small business that is quick to this death does hit South Medford hard, and the family of Alexander's just doesn't, it spreads throughout our community, so condolences to the family. Thank you, Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: Hi, Ms. Ribeiro, how are you? Now, this is a transfer?
[George Scarpelli]: It's going over to, you're taking over?
[George Scarpelli]: From the Catracalla family?
[George Scarpelli]: And this is good news because there was a big question in that community, that neighborhood that we hope it was staying. So this is great news. If you could just tell us a little bit about your concept and what we're doing.
[George Scarpelli]: That's great news. So I see everything is in order. I think that, I know that, are you familiar with the hours of operations?
[George Scarpelli]: And any, you realize that hours of operations that was granted to Bocelli's has to stop with them? Yeah. And then any extended hours, you have to come back for a special permit? Yes. Okay, so I know my fellow colleagues have a question. I see everything in order to move forward, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Hi, how are you? So a new business and on High Street. This is very exciting, especially when you see said to me, what is it? Mr. Maniscalco?
[George Scarpelli]: Rudy. Okay. So why don't you give us a description of what we're going to do?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I can only imagine. So this looks, I mean, everything is in order. Your hours of operations, if you could just share with that.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. All right, Madam President, I also see everything in order. Move approval. My colleagues have any questions?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President, and thanks for presentation. For one, Councilor, I've had a serious issue with how the community, how this community, our leadership team, really puts together the vision of our growth and development plan. We say we have a comprehensive plan, but it is all over the place. To me, there are so many questions with this building. A, you're on probably one of the most busiest intersections, one of the biggest concerns of traffic in this community, huge issue. How many people do you plan on occupying this building on a day-to-day basis?
[George Scarpelli]: Possibly 80, 100 people. And there's only 23 parking spots. It abuts a neighborhood.
[George Scarpelli]: Can appreciate that. As you can see, there's no guarantee for any business. So if you last five to 10 years, the next business comes in and has no philosophy or belief in the same as you do. So again, it affects our community. Please don't take this personal, because I would love to find a location for this type of development. I think it's amazing. I think we've turned a few away that has really hurt us. But I think the biggest issue I see is we don't have a true development plan. You saw how it looks there. It looks out of place. It's a beautiful building, but it's out of place. You have a community of two to three family homes no more than 100 yards away from you. You're talking about an intersection that has been habitually taken advantage of. You're talking about a neighborhood that has felt that they have been they have been treated so unfairly and overlooked so many years. So there's a lot of variables that has nothing to do with you. So I want you to understand that. I think that when we talk about development and you look at the plan of Mystic Ave, man, I would love to see, I mean, the idea can be sold so easily when you're building four, five, six, 10 similar locations, all the way down Mystic Ave, where there's establishments to eat, go for a drink, go for shopping, to live. That's a community, right? That's a community building. And then when you're trying to sell the concept of 100 people in only 23 spots and thinking that now it's not gonna affect it, everybody's gonna drive a bike or a bus. We wish that could be the case, but that's not true. At least that's what the neighbors, the neighbors that we deal with every day in that community, you have to understand, they're scorned. They're part of this community that have been bypassed in many different levels. As I'm sitting here right now, I'm getting text messages of people that live right on that road that are disgusted that we're even talking about this. And it's a shame that, and I'll say it publicly, I think this is the concept, this is beautiful. That building is beautiful. You know, I think the idea of it, you know, when you see neighboring communities, like I'm sure you have, you see the assembly road, you see what's going on in Malden, you see what's happening in Everett, you're seeing this type of development grow together. But we have a unicorn sticking out of an eight-story unicorn sticking out of probably the most densely populated traffic area that we've had so many issues in the past. So I personally, not anything you did, but what this administration has done when we talk about development and growth, not having a true picture. If the city sat next to you, stood next to you, the development department sat with you, and they said, George, this is our plan, and this is what it's gonna look like. Because I sat with a gentleman years ago in a disgusting field in Somerville, and he opened this door, and he showed me this full life-size model of something called Assembly Row. And his vision was talking about gateway communities, talking about how when you enter Somerville, this is what it's gonna look like, this is what's gonna grow to this, this is what's gonna grow to that, and guess what? It's happening. Just this great little shop area now has buildings for health care, buildings for corporate development. It's grown. People, a tea stop right there. So of course you don't need parking there. And you see how crazy it is there now. So this is what we're not having in Metro. I just personally think that, you know, you're a catalyst to say, okay, here is the perfect development team that wants to come back and talk about Lincoln, talking about taking care of the community, talking about parking issues, talking about environmental issues, looking at the sciences, and let's use them as a catalyst to say, okay, this is gonna be here, and this is how we're gonna grow that area. If that was presented today, I would say to the neighbors that, hey, you can't question growth, but all they're seeing, like it was just said, It's just standing out. It just doesn't belong there. And there are too many questions right now. That's why I wouldn't be able to support it. And it's not, believe me, it's not personal. I think that your concept, if it rolled down the street with five other buildings, with the concept of this is what we want from Mystic Ave, we're just not seeing that. We're not seeing that from the administration. And for this Councilor, For the neighbors that have reached out to me that are nervous about these issues of parking, sense of community, sense of traffic, sense of lifestyle change, they think this one building without understanding the concept after this building and what that means to their neighborhood is what's giving them the fear. that has opened my eyes to say, I can't support it. So I hope you can understand that. And again, I just hope the city opens their eyes and says, how do we help our developers get the support of their council by presenting a plan for the city that's gonna show this area, by the way, probably the last of the Mohicans, the last area close to Boston that we can build on. We know how important that corridor is. That corridor is huge. The last corridor leads into Boston. So we know how important that land is. But without a plan from the city and from what I'm hearing with neighbors and their issues with what we talked about, and even before you were here, God, it took us years to put in a crosswalk right at that set of lights because of the dangerous area that it is and the heavy trafficked area that it is. But I hope you can understand that's how I feel and I appreciate you being here. Could I make a couple comments? Sure.
[George Scarpelli]: Just moving forward, I heard some things that my fellow council said. They sound great if there was a plan. One of my fellow councils sounded a little desperate today, and I truly don't think we are. I think this is an opportunity for us as a community to really set the groundwork for what one of my colleagues said, to really rejuvenate a corridor. And from another one of my colleagues said, really set that gateway, correct? You've obviously developed this, you've seen it. Okay, so I'm sure that, I'm not asking for your comment, but I'm sure that you can see my point of view when we're looking at smart growth and development, and what we're seeing is spot growth. We have a comprehensive plan that really is not involved comprehensively. So I know that our director is on the call tonight. Is there a diagram, is there a vision of the Mystic Ave Corridor that Office of Community Development in the city. And I would like to see the city. Uh peers across the Commonwealth set the groundwork the table to show Councilors in their cities. What that would look like. Because I would tell you if this was the beginning of this gateway in the beginning of this, this open corridor of beautiful, uh, open space with with smart the water and electricity, whether we have the traffic and parking concerns answered. These are things that have been concerned. They haven't been answered for me. You know, and I love the idea that you want to vote for it because we put this in place for this purpose. We didn't put it in for this purpose. We put it in for this purpose to start the development process so we could grow an area, not just pop up one building that neighbors are directly affected. And as a matter of fact, what neighbors are they? They're not the neighbors on Lawrence Road. They're not the neighbors on Grove Street. They're the neighbors that we talk about every day that are always impacted negatively. So this building's gonna come right up in front of their homes. Their buildings, this one building is gonna impact an area that traffic-wise has been stressed to us before these gentlemen even came to us. So what I ask our director, is there a plan in place? I know there's a comprehensive plan that's out there and that we reviewed, but is there something that we could see tangibly, hold on and look at and say, wow, look at the beginning of the growth of this corridor.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So the answer is no. So there really isn't something there yet. So why rush? That's all I'm saying. Because I remember in a little community next door, they settled for this company called IKEA to go in the middle of their plan. And then once it blew up, what happened? Once it's really took off, what happened? They had to reach out to this company and say, we have to move you because the vision has changed. No disrespect to anybody here, but we don't have a vision yet. All we have in Wellington is somebody that wants to build there. Let's do it. All we have is this organization that wants to just build on Mystic Ave. Let's do it then. We don't see anything. Again, we have one bite. We're the only, only community left that abuts Boston. This is valuable. This isn't, we're not begging for anything. This is valuable, valuable development space that we should grow with responsibility and make sure we have all the factors in place. We already said it. We don't have all the factors in place. We're gonna prove this without knowing if it's gonna handle the safety of that roadway. if it's gonna handle the traffic of that neighborhood. So again, again, it's nothing personal. This is something I've been saying, whether it's you or any other company, any other development company that's here right now, we need development seriously bad in Metro. We've done nothing in the last four years, nothing, zero. But because of that inability to grow, we've now left ourselves in a pretty valuable situation. So as our director just said, if we can wait 18 months, we're gonna have a better opportunity here. At least that's the way I'm looking at it. Maybe I shouldn't say verbatim, but that's what I just heard, that they were off at 18 months. So imagine if we wait 18 months, what the vision and what answers we can have to make sure that Florida fits everything we want for those neighbors that again, are always the ones that people don't look to support. And I know because I'm getting the information from them on a regular. So again, listen, I don't wanna be the catalyst and stand here and say, follow me, but you have to understand that this isn't personal. This is one Councilor that's fighting for the neighbors of that community that still don't know what that card is gonna look like. All they know is we're putting an eight story building jammed into a little area of the corner with no parking and still have issues with traffic, safety, in infrastructure issues. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: you. Thank you, Madam President. Thank you very much. We just wanted to send congratulations to one of methods. Greatest couples. You could still see them driving down Lawrence Road or Winthrop Street in their Cadillac going really slow. Mr. Mrs. Brady. Um, they're a great example for all of all of us as they're celebrating the 70th wedding anniversary. Uh, two amazing amazing people that have done so much for the city of Medford. Um, the Children all involved in Medford, um, whether it's coaching or, uh, um, giving back to their community. They've done an amazing job and great Medford people and just wanted to wish them a happy and 70 more years on their wedding anniversary.
[George Scarpelli]: And he outlasts you at all the polling locations.
[George Scarpelli]: One question we had, what are the other restaurants doing in that area? And it's very similar. Ours are very similar for what this business is asking for. Everything is in place. We've had no complaints to date. So I wouldn't hold this off. I know that if we can, we usually do some sort of review. maybe a 30 and 60 day review to see if it's had any negative impacts to the community, the neighborhood, but I would move forward with this in favor of that, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you so much.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you for being here. I know that when the request came in for the new ownership, change of ownership, nothing changes. But unfortunately, at the time, that with new management, the prior permit went with the owner, so we requested for you to come in and you've done everything that's needed. I think we had one, as we went through the process, just one thing you should take note of. I know that we have there's we haven't had many complaints at that area we'll ask for another 30 60 day review with the new ownership but at the same time there was one question about some cleanliness around the area especially in the later hours when other businesses come in the next morning there were some things that that were left you just want to make sure that that area is maintained And there's some oversight there. Other than that, with the 30 and 60 day review, I would move approval. Everything is in order. And again, this has been an existing business for many, many years. And the hours of operations, it wouldn't be fair to change those now for what was established for many years in that location with the same business.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And thank you for this new initiative. But I revert back to what we've been talking about for four years now and the lack of a true comprehensive plan of what vision what our city's true vision is, and when we talk about development. We talk about all this, we see all this movement, like the spot development, whether it's looking at Mystic Ave, whether it's looking at the Apostle at Wellington and the air rights, whether it's looking at Medford Square, which we have, I think we already have hundreds of thousands of plans that are already written that we haven't looked at. I think what we're doing right now is we're allowing the city and really one department to make a decision what's greater for our community without the true input of what the community wants and the visions of what they see. We've been screaming this for years. It's funny that we're a few months away from an election and all of a sudden we're being talking about Method Square. truly, I can't support this for the fact that we've been asking for a true comprehensive plan of what we want to do as a community, what direction we want to go in. I know we've been talking to Director Hunt and her department about putting in teams to come in and go to neighborhood by neighborhood and giving some direction of what we see and what we think Medford needs. Because right now, we're a mess. We can't even drive into Medford Square without sitting in 45 minutes of traffic to get from one side of the city to the other. So until, I appreciate the input of the knowledge of acquiring what the DIF is, but I think truly until we have a true comprehensive plan of what we envision Medford to be, I don't think this council should approve any sort of ordinance that approves anything until we understand what one piece will do to the other piece of this community. We still haven't had these talks. We haven't had, have we sat down with the mayor? Has this committee sat down with the mayor and talked about a comprehensive plan of what direction we want the city of Medford to go in? We haven't. We haven't, we're a few months away from election. We wanna talk about redoing Medford Square, cause it looks good on a flyer. I just think that we need to slow down and do this the right way. And I say this again, I remember when this disgusting area, when I started working 15 years ago in a neighboring community that people used to laugh at, it was an armpit. And now it's one of the most popular, most exciting spots in Massachusetts to go to. and that's Assembly Road. And now that's turning from Assembly Road down to Lowell Broadway, into Union Square, around the Highland area. That's a plan that they had in that community with the neighborhoods. I would sit in community meetings and we would look at what impact we would have with fire, police, recreation, what happens with traffic studies, everything. We would sit together and we would create a plan. And that's how we grew that community. And that's why that community is so, so strong today. And why they have so much money they don't know what to do with. And then guess what? A neighbor commuting next to them said, hey, that's a great idea. Let's follow that same idea. They got a little help with the casino, but now you're seeing that grow, that area grow, and it's growing. We don't see that here. Because we don't have a plan. There isn't a plan. Or if there is, it's a secret. So again, I'm not gonna move on to any, I stopped voting on money papers years ago because we still don't have true numbers of what the budget, the budget that was voted for this past year. We were told by the finance director those numbers were not true, but we still voted it. I'm not going to vote on any money papers, and I'm sure not going to vote on any development issues right now until we sit with the mayor and understand what we have for a true comprehensive plan to see what direction Medford is going in. Do we want to be Somerville? Do we want to be Winchester? Do we want to be something in the middle? We don't know. Because right now, Councilor Caraviello has said it for years, we're the last piece of dirt. that developers can use now, closest to Boston. Everybody else is dried up. They can't touch it. So this is valuable. To jump into anything because we got a grant for it, that's not responsible. I don't think that's responsible. I think we need to see the biggest. Councilor Caraviello brings up a great point. Where does this ordinance, how does this play a factor in Wellington area? How does it play a factor on Mystic Ave? How does this play a factor in other areas in our community? And why wouldn't we use it? But this is a conversation that we're not talking about. We're talking about things in little bunches. Let's do this little bit. Let's do this little bit. And nothing is truly getting done. This is why we don't have a true increase in our new growth. We don't see any of that, like neighboring communities have. We don't have a true understanding with whatever growth we have, what it's going to do to our public servants and fire, police, DPW, and our school systems. These are things that should be talked about as you start this process in Medford Square. We haven't done that. I think we're putting the cot way ahead of this horse, saying, hey, let's get this done. without understanding the true direction that we're going in. So that's why I appreciate the presentation, but I couldn't support it. Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Again, this is a lively debate that I think it's interesting and it's informative. But again, it brings us back to the original question. this would be a great opportunity to use a great tool in our toolbox if we knew what the plan is. I love the idea that we want to work on Medford Square right now and use this tool, but understand something, without a true plan about moving one street and moving another street, how that affects the plan just right down the road on Mystic Ave or just down the road on Riverside Ave. or just down the road in West Medford Square, or just down the road in Salem Street. So there are so many, if you look at what we're talking about here, it's a great idea. It's a great tool in the toolbox. The only problem is we don't have a toolbox yet. No one has anyone talked to anybody here because I haven't talked to anybody. I haven't sat with the team and said, this is our vision. This is a true comprehensive plan that the community is involved to sit down and deliberate and share their thoughts and where method's gonna go. The mayor is putting thousands of committees and boards together. and these little bits and pieces like getting bit in the ankle over and over again. It sounds great, okay? And it's a start, but start for what? What is it a start of? Because when you start something, there's a vision, there's a finale. When you have a starting point, your destination, your journey takes you somewhere. With this starting point, we don't know where it's going, everyone. That's all I'm saying. I all agree, we all agree. This is a good tool if you had the opportunity to understand what we're looking at in totality. We don't have that. And I think it's just narrow minded that we're not thinking of the big picture. We're moving and changing things for the sake that you don't know. We keep talking about underserved communities and underserved parts of our community. We don't know the impact. By changing this ordinance, you don't know the impact that's gonna have. You don't know the impact that it's gonna have. And has this plan talked about what happens with our infrastructure? Have we talked about what's surrounded it? Have we talked about the fire, police, teachers, the school department? I got a text this morning. Schools are adding more kindergarten classes. Classes are getting filled. and just keep adding it with no direction. So again, this is a good idea. I agree with my colleagues. I think it's a good idea. If you had a plan that we can say, this is great. This is the plan in Medford Square. This is how it's gonna roll into probably one of the biggest opportunities we have, and that's Mystic Ave, especially along the highway side. You have so many opportunities, but we don't know. Right now, it's just people talking. It's people talking and no one's, but there's no one leading us and saying, this is what we should do. Let's, we talked about it. This council has talked with the development director and we've talked about putting in, you know, getting a zoning consultant in place. We've talked about getting a team in so we could sit down to see what zoning we want from Medford, what growth we want from Medford, what direction we want from Medford. But if we keep changing these little pieces, I use the parcel land we voted for in Wellington. We still have the air rights. Everybody keeps talking about the air rights with the T. Well, I found out the other day that the T wants that land. The T's, and who's gonna get it first? The T of the city of Medford. Who do you think's gonna get that first? These are the things I'm saying until we have focus on this in the back door, the T is coming in to negotiate what they want at Wellington station, where that could be a huge gateway to our community, what we want to do. So again, I appreciate everyone's input. This is a, it's a, it's, it's, it's a respectful debate. I think it's, it's bring some make some great points. All I'm saying is I agree with you. That is a good tool, but I don't agree that we don't have a plan to use this tool. One part of the community that's small minded, that's narrow thinking. We need to understand what we're looking at the city. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, sir. Again, I was appreciate you mentioning that be nice that two years ago, we used to have a city solicitor that we can have here and help us as we go through this process. I had no idea that KP law would be here to help us along. But we're talking about a very Um, different situation. Um, and I think that all we're asking for right now is just the opportunity to go to the next step. And you know, the questions that people have in neighborhoods is, you know, as valiant as your, your, your, your heart and what you need is something that I would support in a second. I don't see that. Um, this is something you took a chance on that land, but as your family grew, to be a strong member of our community. You know, we've had a lot of obstacles and hurdles come in the way and you still want to be a strong member of our community with your family, and, um. I think we should support this this evening and move it along. I know that they'll be hurdles along the way. They'll be neighbors that are going to be mad about breaking ledge. They'll be neighbors questioning parking, and there's going to be questions about affordable If that's the question that we're just trying to move something down the road so we can maybe help a family that's in need right now, I think that we'd be. We'd be speaking for myself. I would be foolish not to support a family that is looking for that support in Medford. Again, we're not giving approval to build the Taj Mahal all we're looking for. Council is asking for the family that we help them move on to the next step and then we go from there. I think it's a no brainer. So I would move, um, if there is a motion that we need that I would move that forward this motion forward to, uh, to the next level. So the house family can see if they can, um, support their family concerns. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: point of information for the ASKP law that if we amend this, that it would go with just the Alves family. If it is transferred over, then that would, that restriction would have to come before the city council again at the time. Yeah, I think that's an easy ask. I think that.
[George Scarpelli]: if we didn't want some developer to come in and put a ton of... Or we allow it to what the Alves family, the existing owner right now only.
[George Scarpelli]: So again, Matt, if we can, for clarity purposes, for the simpletons in the room like myself, to the attorney, is it possible to grant the Owls family only for this purpose and not for the property or future property owners?
[George Scarpelli]: Let's do that.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. No, again, this is just to build the process to go through the next step.
[George Scarpelli]: One information, and again, but this is my, this is dilemma, the chicken, the egg kind of my, my concern would be the Alps families taking all the risks they're paying all the upfront they're doing, they're moving this for their family forward. So again, as they move forward to restrict it and limit them for what they can, they can make on that part of their property. I think it's a slippery slope. I think it's already limited to none. Well, I'm saying as you move forward, you also have a family that they just explained how, you know, as their family's growing with some need to restrict their possibility of greater growth to support their family. I think that's, you know, that's a question that I'd have with that. But again, that's why we're here.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, I know, but you're making this as if these were developers and I can understand that fight, but these aren't developers. These are residents that have lived in this community. And so I think there is a difference. So, and I think the, the situation plays a huge factor in my decision. So I wouldn't, like I said, I would move approval for the deed restriction to be lifted so we can move forward with this and that it stays with the Alves family. That if it's changed after that, that then it has to come back to this council. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I did. Yes, please.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate that. I wish we had that much fire for developers that are destroying our communities. But I will tell you, What I'm hearing right now, this is the process to move it forward. Then we could discuss with the fire department about what's needed or if it's even possible to move forward with this. I think this is a simple ask that would move this family's worries into a better direction and we'd get some answers that way. Moving this to another meeting is just, making this longer than it should considering all the processes that you just talked about can be moved into the next phase as we move forward. I believe I don't think this is anything that that's groundbreaking. if we vote this forward tonight, that can't be adjusted as it moves forward for all of the different hurdles that residents have to go through when they're looking to, I believe it was support a family member, not moving him or them to outside services or into housing, but they want to look to take care of their own on their own property and the property that they're requesting and without the burden to anybody else. I think that's valuable and I would still support it. So I have a motion on the floor, Madam President. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. It's come to my attention that our turf fields are in disarray. And although we appreciate all the hard work going into all of these grant funded parks and playgrounds, I think our city administration has forgotten about the existing fields. And this is something that I've been putting on the agenda for years, hoping someone would listen. Unfortunately, when I'm gathering from some parents, they're a little nervous, especially what's happening in Medford High School. The field is a turf field. The field does have black pellets, but the field hasn't been tested for GMAX. Now what the GMAX study does is it should be tested every year, this is what we do in my profession, on a turf and natural surface fields to make sure the density is safe after a long period of time. The Field of Dreams was started back in early 2010. We're now coming on to 2024, and the life expectancy of a turf field that is maintained properly, that means to come in and groom it on a regular basis, that means on a yearly basis, coming in and doing a deep clean, that means taking the pellets up, re-grooming the surface and then re-entering the pellets, which, from what I gather, we haven't done on a consistent basis here in Medford. What was brought to my attention, the way I brought this up, is that as soon as someone says safety to me, I have to present it in a resolution so the city can get back to us in a timeline that God forbid somebody gets hurt and those tests weren't done, then the liability, and if the attorney's still here, this would be great because I know if the city solicitor were here, I know that that would be something very important to stress the fact that getting that test done. Again, what I request is the city administration to have a licensed turf contractor come in with a GMAC study for turf, not natural surface. They're two different tests. And they do a test at Edgley Fields behind the high school, the fields at Hormel Stadium, and from what I gather, the field at the Brooks School is absolutely deplorable. It's probably one of the most used playgrounds in the community. I know our school age kids at the Brooks love that field considering what they had years ago and the mud bowl that they used to have to and then bring it into the school and it started destroying the floors at the school. The community really put a good effort, but they forgot again. an existing playground and park and Metro completely forgotten. Unless you can cut a ribbon, unless you get a big grant to do it, unless someone does something that does some work to do that stuff, we've completely forgot about our regular fields, our fields that are still existing, that our kids are on every single day. So. I would recommend, I would make the motion that we ask the city administration. I don't know if it falls under the facilities manager. Did we hire a facilities manager? So we have one. Maybe that facilities manager, because at least in my role, we have a facility manager that actually oversees the parks as well as the actual buildings. If that falls under that person or the new, I guess there's a new director of parks that we can get a report back as soon as possible. Kids are on those fields today. I would hate for a kid, a young person to fall tomorrow at a game and smash their head on a on an area that hasn't been tested. And then we are held that first of all the safety of that that that young individual and then what can happen later. As a father of a son who saw a neurologist on a regular basis because of concussion issues, I take this very serious. And one of the things, one of the most important pieces as we've gone through studies and now part of a working program that my son is actually involved in, that realizing the fields that he was playing on caused the concussions, not the head butting, not the physical bump to bump, but the actual falling on the turf as a goalie onto a turf that wasn't tested properly. So I think that we need to, We, I didn't realize until parents said, you know, have you gone up to the soccer field, soccer game, that these fields are terrible. It looks like all the pellets are washed to one side, that, you know, that they're not safe. Again, I was a proud member of that committee that built those fields in 2010. What we asked for is putting a fee aside, an identified fee with every renter, And over that 10 years, we would be able to replace that turf. Obviously, no one followed through with that control. And I think the city management, the administration has to report back to us. I'd like to, it could be done in two weeks. I think it's important that it's done in two weeks. I think that they need to immediately go to all the fields, get the certified turf pro to come out to do those GeoMAX studies, and then go out to, especially from what I'm hearing at the Brooks, that the carpet now is, it's coming up on the scene. Now again, in my profession, a little maintenance, to those fields, it's simple as this. Vacuum in the pellets, adding liquid nail down, patting it back down, and then putting a weight on top of it for 24 hours, and we don't have those dangerous issues anymore. And then re-entering the pellets. It's simple, but no one's doing it. So I think we need, you know, I'd like to get a report back in two weeks if the clerk can make that as part of the motion, because it's brought to my attention. Now that it's brought to my attention, I think that we have to move on this quickly. And believe me, I would hate, I would hate to see what happens if they have to close those fields. because we didn't do the preventative maintenance that we typically haven't done in our facilities so far. So I hope that answers that. I hope that you understand that, Mr. Clerk, and thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Unfortunately, especially in Somerville, because of the growth, and we're seeing that in Medford, natural surface fields have to have a resting period. So to maintain, thank you, to maintain a natural surface field in the East Coast right now, it's impossible. Unless you're an affluent community that has the ability to have six natural surface fields and rotate those fields. But I will tell you, I was directly involved, again, because of my son, the biggest concerns are you know, the toxins that are in the pellets. And we've done, we've had some major strides with looking at more environmentally safe products. We tried coconut husks, then we realized we had kids that were allergic to coconut husks. So what we've done in Somerville is now we use a soft wood pellet that has to be maintained on a daily basis because when it rains or wind blows, it pushes the pellets. But it's safer for the environment. It's needed because we don't have many fields in our community that I work in. And believe us, I think we, I personally, I agree for a son that played Division One soccer and played soccer his whole life, I understand having natural surface fields. what we all want but unfortunately in the east coast especially and being a city like Medford that's community like metric it's very difficult to maintain all of the youth activities and sports and um and do that i know that you know we've been very fortunate that you know that um We've had an athletic director that he's always been on the forefront of making sure that these tests are done. And I appreciate that, but it's the trend that we're seeing, not just at the high school, we're seeing it all over the city and having the tools and understanding. And back in the day, there was always, I don't even know if the battle is over, who has the high school? Is it the city or is it the schools? And I don't know if that's ever been, been, you know, delineated yet. So, but again, like Councilor Bears, I know I could talk or buzz it off a meat wagon, but yeah, I wish we could. My preference is a grass field. Unfortunately, it's very difficult to have a grass field and use it the hours. We have one grass field in Somerville and we kept it at the Argenziano School. And we're ecstatic that we kept the grass field and we've had to condemn it because Um, the dogs, um, dig up holes now. So now there are so many, they call landmines, park landmines all over the city, all over the field. We had to close that field down and, um, And again, it's not, you know, like I said, we want it. We really do. We want one natural surface fields, but it's very difficult.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, we can combine them if we want.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can't, if I, I'm sorry, Councilor, I just, I don't wanna, I just got information that the field was tested and they do it two times a year. So that's good news. So that's great news that I appreciate the information that the information that I received was wrong and I don't wanna spread misinformation. So that's great news and we appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, again, that poses another question. Is it the PACS department that rents those fields, or is it the Brooks School that? But we should police that better. We have two fields in our community that I work in that are only used for U-12 and under. no adults can be on those fields and SPD know that if anybody's on there or the neighbors know they call recreation we send somebody down and we send PD down they just right from the car say please get off the field you have the permit and and that's probably the reason why it is this yeah and I say I you know I've gone there before and said that and I was I won't tell you what was said to me but um if you know that what
[George Scarpelli]: Good.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I think that I appreciate your hard work because I know that that's the reason why I brought it up again, because it seems to fade and it's not fading. It's getting worse with the rats and the rodents. I think that, um, It's now creeping into parts of the community that you wouldn't typically see rodent infestation. You're seeing them, you know, typically saw them around the sewer systems, but now you're seeing them in the ledge areas in different parts of the community. So it's, um, We need to really have the voice of our public health, our city DPW director, and really sit down and share with the community. I know we've made some changes that we asked for our health department to want private property if you see a nest or colony or whatever they call it now, but people don't know that. I had a neighbor call me and they said they can't do this because it's on my neighbor's property. And I said, no, we now have made some changes that we just have to get permission and we could stop those nests that are maybe on your neighbor's property, but they're coming into I was, a neighbor sent a video from a home at Fellsway. And when I tell you, I thought he got it from, I thought it was a video from a movie. And he had a train of rats walking down his garden wall. And he showed, they went right into a hole. And it was, to me, it's just, we need to, something that I know that can't be fixed in one day but we need a plan that involves every corner of this community because it's coming from everywhere you know you're not You know, you're seeing it in West Medford, you're seeing it in Wellington, you're seeing it in North Medford, you're seeing it in South Medford, you know, you're seeing it in the Heights now. I mean, you know, when you see it in God's country, that's a problem.
[George Scarpelli]: That's a great selling point. But thank you, Madam Mayor.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm going to have to, um, if this is, uh, to speak on any changes to solar in, uh, as part of the discussion, um, I'd have to separate myself. I do now own a solar company. Uh, so I'd have to step away. Yes, everyone. It's real. George Scarpelli does care about the environment, but That's why I'm going to separate myself from this. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: First, I'd like to move approval on the donation, but just a little bit on Kevin. Kevin and I are colleagues now in different communities, but we often uh, collaborate. And, um, I don't think people realize how lucky we are to have Kevin here. Um, the adaptive program, I know I've been trying very hard for years to get it off the ground, and Summerville making sure that, uh, we are full inclusionary, making sure that all of our young people and adults have an opportunity to participate in multiple recreation opportunities. And, uh, you know, when you have, uh, a leader like Kevin, who presents these programs. I know he works very closely with partners across the state, and now you're having different organizations donating, and thank you for that organization to donate. That's very kind of them, and I know it's gonna go a long way. I'd be remiss to say I'm a little jealous tonight because this, I believe it's this week, Coming up soon, Kevin was asked to be a representative, I believe, to speak. be the keynote speaker at the Recreation on the Statehouse and Kevin will be speaking on recreation and that's a huge feather in his cap for what he's done in a very short time with very limited basis. To be honest with you, I can't tell you, I won't tell you publicly what our department and I won't tell you that I have 12 full-time employees and 100 part-time employees. and to see what Kevin does with only three full-time employees and only a few part-time employees I think it's a huge feather in his cap and I think it's something has to be acknowledged publicly that when you are asked to speak at the Statehouse and out of all of the recreation departments across the Commonwealth and having our director be that speaker, I think it should be mentioned. I'm not jealous, though. I'm not upset. I'm not, I mean, just because he's probably stolen a thousand different ideas from me doesn't mean that it shouldn't be me. But on that note... Do you have a professional crush on Kevin? I'm joking, I'm joking. I do I do but again I appreciate Kevin's hard work but I had to mention that Kevin I'm sorry I know you get you get a little embarrassed about that but when we call you out on stuff like that but again when you have such limited limited funding and limited staffing but still do what you do I think it's a has to be mentioned when you as celebrated like you are right now. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I apologize, I was talking to Councilor Villes. We talked knows my fault. Uh, is that Mr? I apologize for that. Um, we just recently lost another pillar of our community. A gentleman that, um gave to the youth of Medford as a hockey coach and always happened to go to his services the other days. That's Mr. John Garrity. Mr. Garrity was one of my favorite parents. His son Jay was my captain. His son Chris played for me. He was always willing to help, never a negative word, whether he thought I played his kid too much or too little. He was just a good sounding boy, a Method legend in his own right. Listened to some stories the other day and hearing the stories on the playground and on the ice and playing pond hockey really summed it up what kind of person Mr. Garrity was. He was a tenacious individual who loved life, loved Medford, and loved his family. I know that with the passing of his son, Jay, I know it was very difficult. Jay was a very big piece in a lot of people's lives, but I'm sure when a dad loses his first son, I think it must have played, very big part in who he was after that and I know that he was a rock for his wife and I know that Mrs. Garrity is one of the leaders in our community in making sure that we don't forget the issues of drug addiction and the Garrity family really keeps that on the front page and making sure that they're solid advocates for that. So we did unexpectedly lose Mr. Garrity a few weeks ago and just wanted to send our condolences to the Garrity family and he will be missed. Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Caraviello and Knight for bringing this forward. I think that another great family metric, not just a camera store, but Hunt Drug now, if you wanted lessons, if you wanted to do different trade shows, the farmers are always willing to even come into the community to run programs for the community. I know that you know, with, you know, Gary and I coach, I was fortunate enough to coach a great athlete in Gary Fava. I don't think he's missed a three point shot to this day. I think Larry Bird's the only person that rivals him. So I think that, you know, it is an amazing story of a local family. that have done amazing things, but what I really am impressed about is how they always give back, whether it be the veterans or school programming, and it's something that they never forgot their roots. I just want to congratulate them as well. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: As such, move for approval. I second that.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll present if I can. These are projects that are already in place, and these are just the additions to finishing projects, something that's why we voted for the CPA, the great project, so move forward to approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Madam Mayor, Madam President. I think what you're doing is unbelievable. What you're doing right now is a good example for the rest of the community. We don't have to have a task force, just people caring about the community. We're going to hear that about, you know, Emory Street. It's people that are reaching out to us that unfortunately we don't have the court enforcement department we need. I agree. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: a few different issues when it comes to our handicapped community and the lack of respect, whether they were having a city event and they're blocking handicap ramps or issues like what we're hearing tonight. I think that, I know that the, I know that Neil Osborne used to have the position. is so frank. Has anybody can we actually make a motion to send that to Francis as well? So I think this is an issue to with the Disability Act that it's not just the T issue. It's just not, you know, a situation with with, uh, you know, Todd Blake, but this is also something that legally that the city has to get involved in, and we can send, you know, our enforcement agency to look at that as soon as possible to see if something could be remedied sooner rather than later, because if we wait for the T, they'll be building a blue line going through Metro. So if we could do that, I appreciate that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I don't want to say it, but I'm going to say it, but I told you so. We had an opportunity this budget season to hold the mayor's feet to the fire, and we didn't do that. The answer to Councilor Tseng's resolution is very simple. It's called a city solicitor, an assistant city solicitor. It's unheard of in the state of Massachusetts. the city of this size, not having a team of city solicitors representing the residents, the council, of this community. So we're finally getting some redacted bills. I believe it was last month, maybe you can correct me, I believe it was over $100,000 K.P. Law. I believe this month, last month that we just got, a slow month, I believe it was another $60,000. Correct me if I'm wrong. But this is money we're paying to a law firm that doesn't have to answer to us. And this is what's frustrating. These are basic necessities we need that every city needs to move forward. Even tonight, some of the resolutions we're going through, we're talking about I'm afraid to open my mouth because we have no legal representation. Because one one of our residents came up and said, Well, you're starting to pick on people. I don't disagree with them. And the fact that we don't have legal guidance to say careful how you say this, because you could be sued, because that's happened to us. Did we not forget that? And we're still in court with it with the BJ situation. So again, Thank you for bringing this up. Again, for the neighbors, what's going on in that neighborhood is ridiculous. I think that, again, the fact that we don't have code enforcement officers is another big issue, but we wouldn't know that because we couldn't discuss these issues at the budget hearing. Because the mayor got what she needed. She got her four votes. And now here we are again, bringing up these same things and sounding like a broken record. Well, I will tell you, I, on the school committee, we realized we had the toughest mayor that negotiates in years, and Mike McGlynn. And when we needed things done for our school department, the school committee stood together and would not vote a budget until we got what we needed. And I know people don't like to hear this, but that's politics. That's part of the whole gamut of why we're here. This mayor is doing whatever she wants to do. And I don't see any benefit for our community, whether it's neighbors with Airbnbs, or whether it's a simple question that people, no one's picking up the phone. So I'm frustrated, yes. I'm not as animated, because I think I'm getting tired of being so animated. But again, this is a very simple issue, very simple solution. Hire a city solicitor. Hire an assistant city solicitor. In most communities, that's like saying, breathe. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And I think it's time to maybe make a motion that we become a little creative. I know that working with the building department, the inspectional service department, maybe working with the unions, maybe we ask the city administration and the mayor to sit down with those unions like they do with the police department and bring in retired police officers and maybe pay them to actively to go out and do, you know, assist with the code enforcement. And, you know, especially with our retired police officers, I think that might be an opportunity that we can think outside the box. And, you know, other communities use grant writers, bringing in grant writers and use grants that they would write to bring in money to our community and pay them through that. Maybe there's an avenue there that they, you know, having some incentive that we can, you know, do a few things at once where we're sending more people out, qualified people out, to understand our code enforcement and start, like our neighbor said, is start policing it better and giving them the avenues that we haven't given them at budget time. I'd like to make that form of motion that we ask the mayor administration to look into that process to try to immediately enhance the code enforcement office, both with the health department and the building department.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, I think anybody that can be trained for that, Councilor Knight, that works with the union and the code enforcement department right now that can do something that can assist with these concerns and issues so we get ahead of it.
[George Scarpelli]: If we could amend that too, Councilor Knight brought up a good point. Per diem payments to assist.
[George Scarpelli]: No, if you can add that to that amendment to that B paper that add that or either word it. Okay. Mr. Clerk.
[George Scarpelli]: As she's been doing, as the mayor has been doing multiple times in multiple positions in City Hall. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: President, I appreciate bringing this forward as a strong union supporter. I support anything dealing with unions, but I, I would be remiss if I didn't bring up the fact that we're talking about, we're talking about RAs from Tufts University. And if I recall back, we talked about our own unions being affected. and Councilors that are sitting here talking about the effect that it had, you know, on the process of moving forward on a nonunion contract is because maybe we need to move forward. We need to help things going forward. Remember those conversations? We have a fire department that hasn't had a contract in almost 800 days. We have secretaries that didn't have a contract for six years. We're talking about the RAs at Tufts University, a contact at Tufts University today. And boy, I tell you what, correct me if I'm wrong, free room and board, free meals plan, stipend. So when I talked today with the representative of Tufts University, that's what they told me. Not to say, I'm just sharing to you what they've told me. I'm just, and you know what? So what I'm saying is this, understanding that, I'm gonna stand, I'm gonna vote for this because I think any union, any person that wants to work together as a union and have representation, you can never deny it. But I just want you to realize and understand And it's a good point to bring it forward that we have unions right now in our own backyard. My father always told me, don't worry about your neighbor's backyard till you clean your own backyard. 800 days, 800 days without a contract for a firemen and women. They sat through the pandemic, the first ones they applauded how great they were, how amazing what they've done for our community, going into the homes where people are dying and putting their lives first. So I'm using this, yes, I'm using it as a platform that I hope you understand why. It's for the fact that we have unions in our own community right now in Medford, hardworking men and women residents that live here all year round that haven't been treated fairly. Again, two wrongs don't make a right, right? So I'm going to support this paper. I think it's a very important paper. And that's why I share what the representative from Tufts University told me today, so we can all understand. This is the difficult part about negotiations. You hear what you want to hear, what they want to say, to make it sound good. But who's affected? And that's the employee, the worker. And again, I think we need to look at our firefighters, because I think, listen, unified message next week. What can this mayor do to support our firefighters? Update us right now. I know that the negotiations now are now in arbitration, it's out of our hands, but what else can we do for our firefighters that we're showing them the unity, right? That they're standing together and saying, what are you gonna do for them? But thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you Councilor. You made a great presentation for the city of Somerville. You said Broadway five times. And this is what we've been talking about here in Medford, with the lack of the movement with our zoning. consultant to look at what Medford wants to do. And so I just think that you said some things with the neighborhood, but I know the neighborhood on the Medford side has a real problem with this area right now because of some fears and because of lack of true understanding where we're going in our community. The spot development, we're seeing that happen all over the city. But these are the issues that I find being a problem when the council for the projects has mentioned how it appeals to Broadway, which isn't Medford. So I tend to be a little leery, that's all. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I would really, again, when you're talking about a project like this and what it affects and when we're doing it, where we're not having meetings, I think that's a slippery slope again, councilor. I would recommend that you wouldn't do that.
[George Scarpelli]: What is it?
[George Scarpelli]: So you're taking over the boils?
[George Scarpelli]: OK. So Madam President, I see everything in place. Before I open up, there is one question. You were applying for workman's comp. Is that completed?
[George Scarpelli]: It says that you were going to apply for your insurance.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Madam President to the clerk, if the gentleman could just forward you that. So I would move in favor, as long as you have that document in hand tomorrow. I don't want to hold it up, but if we can do that, if you said you have it, just send a copy, then my recommendation would be to move and approve. And as long as the clerk has that tomorrow. Is that okay? Sure. All right. Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, can we just dismiss 23-386 please.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I'm sure that everybody's heard and everybody's, it's not just in Medford. This is a pretty severe issue, all over the Commonwealth. I mean, you're hearing you're hearing that now that you're seeing this rat infestation, not just in where they traditionally would find them, you know, close to restaurants or close to water. Now you're finding them in areas like the Heights where most of the homes there are ledge. And so it's starting to become even more disturbing. So I know that the Board of Health is super busy, but I think we need to find Um, an avenue where we're putting together a serious team that's devoted to this issue right now. I think that's what we're seeing right now. Um, residents contacting us. And then I know that the Board of Health is responding piece mail, I know that something was sent out, and it was forwarded by one of the residents, one of the residents that reached out to me, and who requested this resolution be brought up that now the what we've been talking about for a while is having the possibility of The Board of Health, as long as the homeowner is willing to allow them on their property, they're willing to do some abatement on private property. In the past, that's been an issue. I know this council moved forward to try to find a solution where we have the Board of Health work together with residents because one of the questions back maybe two years ago was that you could see the nest but unfortunately the exterminating company couldn't go one foot to that nest that had the issue because it was on private property. So I think we need to do a better job communicating with not just people that are complaining, but I think the community as a whole. And then really look at some sort of a plan. I know that, Everybody's saying that, well, some of it's development, the movement of the streets. Here's the thing, we haven't done much development and we haven't really fixed many streets and sidewalks. And when you're seeing projects like tonight that are coming up, we're gonna see some more movement. We're gonna see some more, we're gonna see greater projects and we're gonna see the earth being moved in a greater capacity, which means more of that rat infestation moving from, you know, from one area to the rest of the community. So, you know, we do have a problem. I know that the resident that contacted me, that the Board of Health moved to support that neighborhood, but once we heard that, the feedback I got was this isn't just in one neighborhood. This neighborhood was in the Heights, by the way. But then I got phone calls when I put this resolution up, I had phone calls with, I had phone calls South Medford, I had phone calls West Medford, the Hillside, I had phone calls in the Wellington area. So it was, it really stirred the nest, to say the least. So I think we really need to, really be proactive right now. I mean, when you're talking about the summer, in a few months, rodents are going to leave the exterior of our neighborhoods and now try to find homes and businesses to infiltrate. So I think if we can, I know that we put it out there, I would make a motion that we have a meeting with the Board of Health and any other department that needs to be involved. I think that you know, whether it's DPW or code enforcement that we bring all the parties together to try to find a way to put a program in place. Again, I'm not gonna, I know neighboring communities, I've talked to neighboring communities and they've had remediation plans that don't, that go, they're pretty deep. It doesn't look at just, you know, baiting catch basins and putting in traps, they're really looking with different entities to bring in to help us stop the reproduction of the rats in their nests. So again, I know it was a little winded, but I think this is serious. This is something that it's coming up a lot and we don't hear any solutions. So I would make the motion that we, contact the board of health, the code enforcement, the DPW department, and someone from the mayor's office for communications to try to find a way that we send out a detailed plan and try to at least get the information that's needed to help this process along. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for being here. As I'm going through the, everything looks good. I think that, what are your hours of operations? We're keeping the same operation hours as current. I think that that's my question, my fellow councilors. I believe that when we allow a special permit for extended hours, it goes, is it, do we see any restrictions with that? I, cause I don't.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, so seven o'clock to 11 o'clock, is that? No. Right, so that's the issue, cause we allow a certain, hourly certain hours and then to go to the two o'clock request at 1030 to 10am 1030am to two you have it stretched off and the requested hours that asked you have to come back for a special permit for that. So, as we approve this, the hours have to change so 11 o'clock until the special permit is heard is on the petition. It says requested hours 10 30 a.m. And then it's crossed out. You had two a.m. And then below it is seven a.m. to 11.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. What I'm telling you, you can't do that until The permit that's requested in front of us is a request from 7 a.m. to 11. To extend those hours, you have to come in front of us with a special permit for extended hours use. By changing over, the ownership changes. The vote that was taken in the past is dismissed, and now it starts again.
[George Scarpelli]: Right.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, if we could do that. We don't wanna hurt you. We just wanna make sure this is, you get everything you need in place so there isn't an issue later.
[George Scarpelli]: I would move forward. I would move forward with the petitions request right now in favor and the petitioner contact the clerk in the morning for the extended hours.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, were there any other clauses that aren't in this that any stipends or anything else that was added to this that we're not seeing? COVID money or?
[George Scarpelli]: No, it's okay, I just, I trust you. And then we have the retro, that's involved as well?
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, I would waive any time restraints. I think these employees have waited long enough that we move forward and move this through as fast as we can. So I move approval, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, I looked at both.
[George Scarpelli]: I did, I found them all, I found them in order.
[George Scarpelli]: I'd second the motion.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Again, I apologize. Due to the rain, my schedule was diverted to work. So I'm in and out. So I apologize for my absence in person. But yeah, if I know this is exciting because I know Sushi is one of my family's favorite foods, but we wanted to make sure if the petitioner could give us a little brief description of their business, and then we can move on with my comments.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Madam President, just a couple of questions. We do see everything is in order. The petitioner did everything they needed. Everything is signed off. Are you familiar with our hours or operations?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. So the hours of operations that you're looking for, I know that
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. I do see everything in order, and if my colleagues have any questions, I would move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, you can meet with the clerk. I think that would, that might help you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you again, Madam President and the Chair. I do have all the paperwork, everything is in order, but if the petitioner could give us a brief description. I know that boba tea is very, very popular, but just a description of your process would be important, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. And I see everything in order, Madam President. I would move approval. My colleagues have any questions.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Again, I'm glad to see with such changes. I know we heard some sad news yesterday about a few establishments closing on Middlesex Ave. So the very popular site of Tiki Island, I'm glad that there's someone taking this over and the reputable owner. I think this is all of the paperwork seems in order. I think that just understanding the hours of operations that was an established business for a long time, and understanding the amount of employees. I think that if we just got a brief description of what we're doing, and then just answer those questions, and then open it up to our call my colleagues, that'd be great.
[George Scarpelli]: I have done some little research and she is a reputable owner. So we appreciate the opportunity to keep that business going, the Tiki Island spot going with such an owner. So I think that the hours of operations, I'm trying to find it on the sheets that I have. I know that-
[George Scarpelli]: But that's what I just wanted to make sure we had that because I know a lot of the permits leave with the existing owner and their application. So I do see everything else in order, Madam President, I would move approval after any comments that my colleagues might have.
[George Scarpelli]: I know council because was saying I think the Buddha is very very important that they keep it.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't wanna waste anyone's time. I'm gonna be popping in and out, so instead of going and asking for individual votes to move forward, I'll text Councilor Caraviello when I pop back in, so I don't waste anyone's time, because I have to pop back into a program.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: And again, Madam President, I think that when the students did come up, you could see the excitement. What I'm proud of is really we sent a challenge out there and how everybody rallied financially to support this group so they can go and represent Netrid at that championship level. So I think that, you know, they deserve all the credit they received from us, but it's glad to see that this community really supports our kids. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I can approach the podium. Thank you, Madam President. I see a few friends here tonight and I'm glad they can make it. I think it was a few weeks ago, we had a very scary and horrific situation and dangerous situation occur over at the Tufts pool. And something that would have really put our community, I think, in a real tailspin, and it would have affected so many lives in a negative manner, especially the young person that was drowning. When I heard this situation, I was fortunate that my daughter is a lifeguard and she's trained by the best. And I always thought, as the assistant recreation director, I have 40 lifeguards, I have two pools, and wanted to make sure that our staff is trained the correct way. And it's funny, because when I called Kevin and I said, Kevin, I'm going to put this up, he says, don't put our names on this. It's not about us, it's about the kids. But it wouldn't be fair. if we didn't acknowledge yourself, Kevin, and Danny, folks, for your leadership in what you do for our kids. People don't know, I asked Kevin to come over and train my lifeguards in Somerville a few weeks ago, and I appreciate he did that. And there's a reason for it. He's the best in the state at what he does. And for what happened that day, You know, I had a great conversation with my friend Osman and said, you know, what happened and how graphic the whole situation was. When you hear a kid drown, a kid who's drowning, what do you think? It's like, oh, he was flailing his, no. To hear the whole description of, you know, getting the call and the lifeguards all running into action. And, and Osmond seeing the young person at the bottom of the pool and how, how was it called? It was, uh, he was pinned, I guess, face first on the, on the floor of the pool and everybody went into action. And It's something that needs to be told, and it needs to be elevated, and our lifeguards and our staff need to be congratulated. I know the whole story, it's phenomenal. The buzz went around within 15 minutes around Medford, how Osmond went right in the water. did exactly what he was trained to do, bring him to the top, turn, the backboard was on site, staff was there, they took the person, the young person on the deck, everybody's in action, everybody, I know that the pool manager right away knew her role, the fire department was called, and in typical fashion, Osmond said to me, he says, no, Mr. Scapelli says, the firemen were amazing. And I think that's what the whole team, they all knew what to do. Because when I talked to the fire department, they said, no, no, it's a young person who jumped in and brought, all we had to do was get there and then do what we're trained for. And that's save a life on the deck. So between Armstrong ambulance and the fire department and Kevin's training, What I really wanted to do tonight is just acknowledge you as quickly as we can, because I know a lot of you young people off to college and we won't see you for a few months, but we contacted the clerk and he put together a citation for you that, you know, this is probably, I've given out a thousand citations, champions in sports, academic awards, music awards, right, drama club, this is the most amazing citation that we're giving out tonight. And I'm so I'm so happy for that. Because what you people did, right? So I know chief chief just walked in, I said, I know, you know, give him kudos and his staff for what the fire department chief I know you don't like the accolades and that's your job, but the fact that the firefighters and the lifeguards work together to save a life. And so what we did is we put a citation together. It reads, the Medford City Council takes great pleasure in presenting this council accommodation to, this is our manager at the pool. From what I'm told, she's like, She's like the den mother, and she's taking care of everything at the pool. That's Danielle DelBene. And for your quick and heroic response and saving the life of a drowning youth at Tufts Pool. If you can come on up and take a citation, Danielle.
[George Scarpelli]: And then if you can, everybody knows how Zach likes to be taking pictures with everybody. So we're just going to take a big picture with everybody.
[George Scarpelli]: No, thank you. You don't like this. Thank you. Next, we have Sophia Purifuri.
[George Scarpelli]: We have Ellis Vasquez. Coleman Jones, is Coleman here tonight? Okay. Arias Bravo.
[George Scarpelli]: Is it Aja Bravo, oh, how is that I Tell you what, this is this is Kevin again.
[George Scarpelli]: Osmond McCormack. So if we can, if everybody come right up front, I'd like to take a picture so we could send this off to the newspapers and make sure that everybody realizes what you did and how special people that you are. So come on up.
[George Scarpelli]: Thanks, Chief.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I, you know, to that point, I know that I see it firsthand. So when it's pouring outside, and Gianna asked my wife to get eight beach towels, because they have training and we said it's pouring, and it's 52 degrees out. And we said, What is Kevin thinking? Yeah. And I take that all back, have whatever I was going to publicly tell you. And this is the reason why. And Janet, just like probably the rest of the lifeguards, they go gladly because situations like this because and people don't realize it's just not a it's just not a clean, safe pool all the time. Right. all of our lifeguards also train with your staff and yourself at the pond. And that's a difficult, especially with bad weather. So, you know, and it's two different types of positions. So these kids really commit themselves and your staff. And again, we appreciate what you guys have done and you made us look really, really good in this community. And I know there's one family that's very, very happy today. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, just for clarification. This was just for at the time was for over 300 units. It wasn't mixed use correct. My refresh my memory.
[George Scarpelli]: So I appreciate that you're here, because I think this is the question that I had back then. Yeah, especially with that area and getting a lot of feedback on what's happening there. And what the T's interpretation of what their wishes are, and the rumors that what they want to do with that space and the airspace of that area. So there's a lot of variables that are in place there. miss out they said so I'm, I'm just a little concerned that what question I had back then was, what is our vision. I mean, if you can share something with us because when you look at neighboring communities, and you know look at Linfield look at assembly row, look at station landing when that was done. It was done with a comprehensive plan of what that whole area was going to look like. In essence, we're looking at one piece of what else and I think that's what, you know, people are asking for and personally myself as a gateway entrance to our community exit to our community, you know what, what do we see there what we envision.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so I appreciate the answer. I think the biggest concern that I'm hearing from the neighbors And personally, I think that, you know, I was fortunate being a member of a municipality that was actually directly involved as we talked about with this new zoning consultant coming in plus the team that will be going out to each neighborhood. I think it's important to get, you know, as recreation, I was in all meetings as well. I have to go represent recreation at the different neighborhood meetings to talk about the vision of that area. And I think that it's nice that You, you explained it perfectly and I completely understand, but if we keep doing the spot zoning. It's really not a big comprehensive, you know, master plan that everybody wants to share. And I know that you get the word out as best you can. neighbors from that area, when you're talking about that area, they really, when we talk about this project after we voted the last time and they said 300 some odd units, what are we going to do with that neighborhood? There was nothing to calm them to understand what, you know, you're talking about Rivers Edge, you're talking about what's happening down the street in Everett, and now we're adding 300 more units. I think having the community input, that's why I implore the city, the administration, to really, and I can make this form of motion, to give us an update where we are with the hiring of our consultants as well as partners so we can work together to get this done because, like you said, waiting a year and a half They're not gonna wait. But imagine what we've already lost because we don't have a comprehensive plan, because we don't have the tools in place. So if we can get that going, if we can put that out, we'd appreciate it, Mr. Clerk, Madam President, and thank you for your answers.
[George Scarpelli]: Just to share, I appreciate that, but again. when it's affecting neighbor direct neighborhoods. I understand we post and we do that. That sounds great. But you know, as well as I do, unless people are directly impacted, and they know what's going on, that they really don't know what's going until all of a sudden shovels in the ground, like no one told us. And that's not true, but it's what's then promoted. So I just wanna make sure that it's mentioned, it's not your fault, I know you do what you're supposed to do, but I think having this piece in place, and as we talked about, putting that piece with the zoning and having the team that's gonna go out to the neighborhoods and really get what everybody's input, I think that's what a true partnership is with the community and our zoning. So I appreciate that. Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: I know that looking at the map, it looks like really the only public interruption is going to be on College Ave. And I see that everything's been signed off and everything's approved by the engineer and the city electrical department. So I don't see anything that will prohibit this council from voting, so I'll move to approve.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I received many phone calls about a recreational vehicle that was parked at Medford High School for some days. And I quickly called the superintendent and we had a great discussion. And the understanding was that the word was that it was the registration came back to a school team member and the questions and the concerns of the neighbors saying that you know, there was special treatment, that this isn't right, this is a problem. So instead of... continue with the back and forth. I contacted the superintendent and what she said in her response, she sent this today. I'll read it if I can, Madam President. Just for clarification, the superintendent did say that I am providing the following information in response to the listing of a motion on tonight's city council agenda offered by city council, George Scappelli, regarding the use of parking facilities in the grounds of Medford High School. The owner of the recreational vehicle currently parked in Method High School received permission after making a request to the high school principal who has full and appropriate authority over the use of school grounds, including parking. The vehicle is set to be moved from the school grounds on or about July 14th. In the past, With the explicit permission of the school department and buildings principal, school parking has been made available for use by individual Medford residents, other city departments, including the Department of Public Works and Public Safety Department, public and private contractors for temporary parking of construction machinery and other entities and organizations, including film crews working in the city of Medford. In each case, the school parking space will not in any way impede or interfere with student employee or public access to school facilities. Please feel free to contact me additional information. So this is exactly what the superintendent did say. And, um, that's all it just clarification that. If this is the case, then it's given permission, then I think that's a new point. So I just wanted to make sure that I shared that. People have their own opinions one way or the other. But again, if residents are seeking permission to park a vehicle at the high school, there is an avenue. That's why I was asking for policy. I think that that's probably the biggest I get out of this conversation and this resolution is if we can, just if this is common practice, which I don't disagree, we've seen commercial vehicles, we've seen other vehicles parked there, that the policy be made public because if this is an option, because we do have residents that from time to time have a very difficult time parking their boats or recreational vehicles or you know, and sometimes during, you know, during for months now, this isn't again, this isn't all summer. So again, as long as the policies, it's written, it's it's in, it's transparent, and I have no problem with it. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, if I can, thank you. Again, I was a strong, I was against the budget and anything dealing with funding for the city, especially after our hearing a month ago and the discussions of understanding that the numbers that were in the budget that were given to us weren't correct. And until I see otherwise, I know Councilor Caraviello did his due diligence by reaching out to the company that provided those numbers to the city. They were very clear that the numbers that the financial director mentioned that this company was fraudulent in putting the numbers out, they were wrong. I think Councilor Caraviello can speak to it. They told us that those are the exact numbers that the city of Medford gave to them. And again, I will not support any money paper dealing with this year's budget because we still have many questions and many concerns of where this funding is coming from. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Thank you, Madam President, for allowing me to speak on this because I did talk to the superintendent and I want to read. I know that one of the one of the students, Stevie Rayner, he's who contacted me directly, wanted me to say say hi to him. And he said, you know, and answer these the concerns that You know, it's funny when things go out, and the discussion was that they're opening all the coaching positions for Medford High School. And I know this isn't a privy of the city council, but this is a forum that, unfortunately, as quickly as the word can get out, because this is an important topic, I talked to the superintendent. The word was on the street, and the superintendent and I discussed it in depth, that We are now putting in a policy in the middle of the summer that will now open up all the coaching positions and the athletic director, the big question was the athletic directors were not involved in the hiring, that the process is skewed and this is, you know, witch hunts. talk to the superintendent, the superintendent reassured me that the athletic directors are in full involvement with this process. They will be on top of the situation. This is something that and I shared my own personal opinion as a 32 year coach and athletic director and understanding the process that I shared my concerns that And that's where we've got some phone calls that during the fall season, the fall season starts in a few weeks. And the process is in place right now to have a committee put together. And the rumor was that it was gonna be just parents and kids hiring coaches, not true. The superintendent and I shared what we do in neighbor community where I'm part of that as a former coach, I'm also involved in the hiring team. That's between six to eight individuals. It's not two or three people. It's not people that are on there that don't like a coach that's sitting in the position right now. It's a position where we have the athletic directors, the assistant assistant athletic director, the the athletic trainer, you have two sitting seniors or captains that are coming back that season, and alumni that played that sport. You also have a parent and you have either a teacher in the school or a coach that's in the system. And so it's a whole, it's a whole committee. It's a true committee. And I think that, um, you know, that's, that's what we do. It's, it's very important that every school in the greater Boston league does that. I know that I talked to, uh, athletic director Maloney, he met with the superintendent. They had a great discussion when I was told that the process is exactly what, what I just said, that that's the hope. So again, let's, let's, you know, not jump ahead of it, not, it, you know, because kids are nervous, and I expressed the superintendent in this way, because of the fall season is what I'm a little concerned about. By the time the committee's put together, by the time the interviews are done, you're looking probably the middle of August, the season starts the third week of August. Using football, for example, if the football coach is let go and a new coach comes in, you are giving the student athletes that have been involved with this coach the last three years. This is every sport, girls' soccer, boys' soccer, golf, volleyball. coaches that involved last two months with the student athletes working camps, giving back to the community, kids getting in shape. The other piece that was was brought forth is you have coaches from colleges that are talking to student athletes, and they're discussing the possibility of being recruited and to make a coaching change this quick might be detrimental for their future. So the superintendent understood, we agreed to disagree. But I think that, you know, I think the process in place is a fair and open process. It's just like, like she said, it's an anomaly, because you have to start somehow, you have to start sometime. So my wish was starting for the winter season, if this is a process we move to. But again, I think the answer is very simple. It's not The athletic director is involved. It's a true committee, from what I was told by the superintendent, of a varied amount of people. It's not just two people, a parent that doesn't like a coach, or a kid that doesn't like a coach. So I appreciate letting me discuss. I think publicly it needed to be said, because I don't think there's a forum, as we get closer to the season, that I think the kids wanted me to give an answer. Their parents had reached out. I appreciate it, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Knight. I think what Amy's talking about is these positions were all voted by members of this council, not unanimously, but it was voted by members of this group. That's what she's saying.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Amy Thank you so much. I understand your frustration, and but again this is the fundamental issues we're having and society, right? Everybody wants to talk about supporting the union. It sounds good, it looks good on your paraphernalia you're gonna mail out that you're supported or you're whatever for this, but I want you to realize, and I want my fellow councils to realize, this is something I've been saying from the beginning, any money paper that's come, unless it was urgent, I voted no. Any vote for raises for non-union employees, I voted no. I implored, I expressed that to my fellow Councilors and they passed, unfortunately. I voted no. What I will tell you is the other issue that I see, it's pretty damaging. When you look behind you, I don't see one male. I don't see one male employee that hasn't got when they need it. And I know this council in the past have talked about the rights of women and making sure there's equality here. And I don't see that either. So here's the thing, I'm not afraid either. I lived in this community my whole life. I've been an elected official since I left teaching in 2008. I'm not afraid to say what I have to say. But what I'm sad for you is you're being used as a pawn. Unions are being used as a pawn, whether it's the lieutenant governor, whether it's the governor's office, whether it's state representatives or whether it's this council. So what can I tell you? I can't tell you anything. You're going through horrible negotiations because nobody is standing up for you. This is the time. Right now, I thought today, when I came here, I said, well, this is the time. We've talked about a council that have worked together pretty closely in the past year, making sure good initiatives get passed, even without any of the tools that were promised us last year. So this is the time, when we vote later, you're going to realize where you should focus on, where the city should focus on, where unions should focus on. Because I'll be honest with you, if you keep giving and you keep giving, what is she gonna do? She's gonna keep taking. Until what? You say stop. Last year we said stop. And at least we were heard. At least we were heard. With the presentation later with the budget, I know Councilor Caraviello has worked extensively in putting some numbers together, that when I think that people hear it, and if anybody would vote for this budget after you hear these numbers, it'll be appalling for me. So what I could tell you and your fellow colleagues that are getting the short end of the stick again, is all I could do is apologize from one city councilor to one department in the city that keeps us running every single day. I apologize that you haven't even have to go through this. This is a disgrace. This is sad for me.
[George Scarpelli]: You wouldn't know what compound is because you weren't given a raise for six years. So that actually explained to you later. You wouldn't know that, I'm sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President, I appreciate the time and I would just tell you know, everybody has their own opinions of what they have to do. I too was a member of the negotiating team. As a union members in the school department. I then battled for contracts for teachers as a city school committee member. I'm on the negotiating team municipality, neighbor community. I'm a union member, my parents have been union members their whole lives. One thing we've always learned and we saw it play out right in front of us when the country was going to close. And what happened? Each party stood strong until they figured out what was best for what their needs were. And here we are right now. And we've all agreed behind this rail, that making sure fair labor practices, making sure that there's equitable, equitable pay when it comes to our non union or union employees. I said that every single time a vote came up. And if we stood strong, Amy, my belief, if we stood strong on the no's all the way through, then it comes to the position where we have to do the right thing for everybody or nobody. So right now, this is why the city is so divided. This is why morale, someone told me the other day when I mentioned it after I've talked to many different department heads, believe it or not, that morale here is terrible, and I can see why. So all I can say is this, what my fellow councilors saying, they're not wrong. This is what it is. This is our power. But I will tell you, the power that we have today to vote yes and no for the contract, for the budget, just like we did last year. Just like we did last year. And we thought we won last year, right? We thought we finally got what we needed to make this body work better. And what happened? Not one promise was fulfilled. Not one. No different than what you're going through so this is going to be a very interesting evening tonight. I think the community will see where we stand as a, as a council, where we stand and where we want the city to go, because if it's, if it's going to be, you know, pick and choose, like, it's being done on the city side with non union and dividing us. If we're gonna see that here, then we're in a bad state for the next few years here, if that's gonna be the case, that stays the trend. So I apologize and I told you that, and I appreciate you for coming up, I really do. You know what, they have to see the people that it hurts, because I don't think people see, that's the other piece. We don't have a newspaper, people don't see it every day, what they see is fluff. A lot of people like to see the fluff and the happiness. What they don't like to see is what's happening right now. You standing up there and saying there are people, there are ladies, women behind you that work hard for the city that are hurting. So again, I just want you to know, I know the president has given us more than enough time to talk. So we appreciate that. But there's nothing else we can do. So I apologize. And I appreciate it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President. Thank you. Chris, again, I want to take the time to I know we expressed it as a council. to thank the Football Association and the high school football team. But whenever you think you guys are done, what I saw, what I saw and what I heard with the Kiwanians and feeding the, helping with the food insecurities and working together with Chelsea and making sure that again, Medford stood above it. So again, I want to applaud the members of your team and the coach and staff for really really looking at what being a high school athlete is truly all about. It's not, you know, if we looked at the wins and losses, that's, that's pretty small way of looking at this process. But the way that this football team, our football team brings so much pride to this community. And for me personally, um, I just have to applaud the association coach Curly and his staff. And most importantly, the kids in that team, cause they, they really, um, really standing above and showing what true superstars they are. So again, thank you very much for that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Some tragic news. Again, when Chris brings up people that have given to our community. There's a gentleman who kids grew up in Medford, coached his youngest son, watched Freddy Rita give back to the kids in the community. And when people weren't supposed to give to this much time and effort for certain type of kids, Freddie would go and find the kids that couldn't afford a pair of cleats, or a pair of shin guards. And he would make sure that he would buy those cleats and buy those shin guards, and then he'd put them on a team. And then when at the time there was, you know, this infighting with method you soccer, and some people thought that kids in need really weren't getting the attention they deserve, Freddie and some others, dedicated members of the community, decided to start a new league called Method United. And they did that, not because of ego, but to make sure every kid was represented. And it worked. And what happened after a few years, that group then became, came together again as a true Method youth soccer organization that we see today. A true vision of what the demographic of what Method truly looks like. The canvas that is Medford. And Freddie's love for the game of soccer and Freddie's passion to help kids was evident. Freddie's a great story because I saw him a few weeks ago at a baseball game and we were talking and I didn't realize Freddie was an orphan. And I said, there's no way that an orphan has the ability to raise such an amazing family. And that's what he did. He raised amazing children and His wife, Adele, is just one of the best people that I've ever met. And unfortunately, Freddy lost his life mowing his lawn. And it's something that I know my family, myself, we're gonna miss Freddy. He was very special. And we send our condolences to his family. He was one of the great ones. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I have one. Just one question. I'm sorry. Uh, Daniel, thank you for being a tight. How was the participation with the, uh, in these meetings? Do we have a lot of community input? Uh, is that something that's that was that that was different? Uh, it was not as normal as usual.
[George Scarpelli]: So not a big turnout of negatives.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I just have some questions. Thank you. And I know we can answer these questions, Miss Desmond, but I think that the points that were brought up that I want to bring forth as we move on, I think that we're, I think, any community that has a reputable establishment like raising canes to come into community I think it's a plus. But I also think that the most important pieces is understanding what the neighbors that really about that location, and how that affects them and I think that that's why these are the questions that I have right now. Now, I've gone back and forth with different neighbors, and they've called me back and forth, and the talk of using Dunkin' Donuts as an example, being open, having the drive-through, and so on and so forth. But I think that what's different with this is when they bought their homes, it was always an establishment. There was Mr. Donut, Dunkin' Donuts, there was something always there. So this is an establishment that's coming in with established families and homes that are there. So I just want to just express what neighbors have called me about. One being, you know, the issues are going to have a noise, adding patrons at one in the morning. usually they're not the quietest people in the world. I mean, you know, you look at other takeout locations, you look at, for instance, Wendy's or Burger King, really don't about a neighborhood in that sense. So, but we've also had issues with noise in those locations, but now coming into a neighborhood and understanding that and presenting that. The other piece is the actual air conditioning units and the nerve, I know it's been mentioned before being on the on the subcommittee and chairperson for lighting and signs. I think it's very important. a very tough time and making sure we abide by these certain issues and blinking lights. And it's great that we did these traffic mediations and all this stuff, but all you did now is we've added more lights. We've added more lights. So understanding how that is going to work with the neighbors and the people that have maybe a bedroom that abuts it maybe even 100 feet away. I think that's important. I think that, You know the traffic issues, the way the design shows I, I don't, I don't see a real issue with that with the flow that it shows really directed people away so I think that that isn't a big issue I don't I don't think. But then I don't know if people have told you in that area we have a huge. huge rodent issue. And now they're nervous that holy cow, we've had this rodent issue in this community and no one's responded to us. No one has come back to us. And they looked at different, they looked at stop and shop and different, you know, facilities that have food. Now you're bringing that 100 feet, 100 yards away from their home. an eating establishment so now the nerves are heightened, and I just wanted to bring that up as, as we proceed through this process that these are really the contacts of information I got from from residents in that area so, and I know you know, I'm sure you agree with me. These are very sensitive topics and they're very valuable but it's something as we move forward that I wanted to make sure I made after your presentation I brought that up because the residents that reached out to me, I told him, listen and watch the presentation. That's why I asked previously to Danielle, if there was really public participation, her comments were well, here's today's public participation. So that tells me we really didn't do much to really even though there were a couple of signs and we hit some of butters. The neighbors that I've talked to said they really weren't informed. So again, that's neither here nor there. That's not your fault or the city clerk this other reasons, but I just wanted to share that with you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so I know that we've gone through this before with other facilities and other establishments. It's not, it's really aesthetic, it's not really set to hinder the decimal system, correct? Decimal level, is that correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Right. But we've had some studies in the past that have shown that if it's not made as a deterrent where the the make of it isn't made to hinder the noise. It really, whether it's going up or down, this is, again, this is something new from the neighbors that live across the street on the other side, having, they don't know that until it's done. So that's why it's coming up here. Is there a way that something that's aesthetic that can also be, you know, protected by, you know, with the noise level that they could do both? I mean, Is that something we can look at? I don't know that this is these are things that the neighbors have asked.
[George Scarpelli]: Council night, but the restriction with the trash pickup.
[George Scarpelli]: It's point of information question would be to my fellow councils. At the beginning of that you said the leadership, how and when was this leadership taken, and we're all of this council privy to that discussion.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so the President and the Vice President met with you saying you had you met with the mayor and you had the agenda that you and the president had to present to the mayor without the input of fellow councils, five other fellow councils. Is that true?
[George Scarpelli]: No, no, no. Did this leadership team meet with this council person and say, we're going to the mayor as our leadership team. Did our leadership team come to this councilor that represents the people of the city and say, we have a plan that we want to present to the mayor as a councilor, do you agree? Did you give me that opportunity? No. No. So I think that this agreement you have is fraudulent. It doesn't, it does not encompass what this, you can't put, you can't say, Madam President, that the leadership of this council eliminating some Councilors in that decision and say that this isn't a fraudulent decision that you've made?
[George Scarpelli]: If it smells, if it walks like a duck, and it looks like a duck, it's a duck.
[George Scarpelli]: I call into question for what you just said. Absolutely. Point of information, the Councilor came into this chamber, looked at me and said to me and my fellow Councilor and said, We talk with the mayor and we have an agreement. Who is weak? Because I'm not weak.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I'm not weak. And this council to say that my leadership with YouTube, and you represent me one Councilor, I don't care about anybody else right now. You represent this council, you never you to never talk told me about this presentation, you were going to give the mayor and what what negotiations you were going to have with the mayor. So you're telling me the mayor met with YouTube, and you had an agreement that you think that you were going to work out to give her the votes that she needs to pass this budget.
[George Scarpelli]: So on the record. And because of open meeting, we're not allowed to have a conversation. Excuse me, excuse me. He has the floor originally.
[George Scarpelli]: So, did the leadership talk to counter Caraviello. This is a question I have, did the leadership talk to Councilor Knight? Did the leadership talk to Councilor Collins? Did the leadership talk to Councilor Tseng? And did the leadership talk to Councilor Scarpelli? Did the leadership do those things? Because if you did, and without consulting maybe two or three or four and not all seven, then I'm going to have a problem with that. And I'm going to make sure that we look into this. Because if you did that, if you individually talk to each Councilor and presented a plan that went to the mayor to negotiate something without all of us together, I find it to be a problem.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Villes? You said leadership. What are you asking about? I just asked you the question. Did you talk to Councilor- Did I violate the open meeting law? No, no, did you meet, I never said that. I said, I didn't say that. I said, I said, did you individually, I didn't say violate an open meeting law. Did you individually meet with other councilors to present a plan that you were gonna bring to the mayor? Be careful now, because there are ways to find things out now. That's the question I have.
[George Scarpelli]: Did you meet with other members of this council one on one didn't not saying you violate any open meeting law. Did you meet with other Councilors and present the plan that then went to the mayor.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. Did you talk to Councilman Caraviello?
[George Scarpelli]: Did you count Scott's concept?
[George Scarpelli]: Because why do you have a meeting with us? Why did you put this up in a meeting? These discussions occurred between other meetings. Madam President, it doesn't look good. It doesn't make it that this council, all due respect, this council's worked hard to work together. And this council has been standing side by side with all of these negative initiatives that we will follow through, we'll continue with. Because there's a lot that's gonna be said tonight. to go through that and then make a decision after talking to only three Councilors or two Councilors and then going to the mayor personally and negotiating something for what's best, the leadership for what's best for us in this city? You didn't do that. Nobody consulted me. From what I gather, nobody consulted Councilor Caraviello or Councilor Knight or Councilor Collins, as you said. So I find that a real problem. Thank you. I'm sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: Then I moved to table this meeting for another next meeting. So we can talk.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm not done yet. I'm not done yet. And if you're interested in... It's a question because I'm sure this point of information is simple. The question is this, does this body, the city council, are we not supposed to do what this council just said yes or no, what you just said, are we not supposed to be including what you just said, I'm bringing it to you as the first opportunity to you what I'm saying is, our duties as city Councilors. supposed to be given the respect of what you negotiated with as a normal process as a city councilor and that's what we want but you didn't do that that's exactly what we get we're gonna get that next budget we we get it anyway we don't by law we get it anyway obviously councilor collins was next to be recognized
[George Scarpelli]: That'd be nice if she was that was a question I was going to jump in if I can matter. So information. Can you tell us who's on the call as department heads?
[George Scarpelli]: The superintendent isn't on?
[George Scarpelli]: This is, this council is gonna vote on a budget today. And we talked about, there was some changes that were made that really made you think of, this is what we need. So I asked my fellow councilors to listen to what we just heard. We're gonna take $500,000, $600,000 of ESSER money. We're gonna settle the budget on an election year to make everybody happy. And then next year, the teachers that you talk about, the kids that you talk about that you love, We're gonna be in such dire disrepair. I don't know how we're gonna dig out of it. That's what's frightening. Understand what we're doing right now. Councilor Caraviello presented the numbers that came out of the budget book. And I appreciate the numbers you shared with me, because these are outstanding numbers that when we talk about funding for this community, of funding for a budget, of funding for a prop two and a half, of funding for these different projects, understand this. Planning and development $703,000 budgeted 226,000 was used 32% was the budget was spent 32% we spent police 14.3, we spent 7.4 51% of the budget wasn't spent. DPW 12.9 spent 6.7, 52% of the budget wasn't spent. Fire department, excuse me, after DPW, these are the big five right now that we're bringing up. So the total expenditure is we're looking at, we're talking millions of dollars that have been mismanaged that we could have used that we could have used to fix these gaps in the library, to fix the gaps in the school department, to fix the gaps on the streets and sidewalks. Instead, this council voted for bonds, 2.5 million, 2 million. We voted for bonds to do the work that was already in the budget, sir. These are your numbers. These are the numbers that came from this city. To see that we over-budgeted this much money is a gross, a gross mishandling of our city's funds. Not yours, not mine, this community's funds. This is appalling. We talked about millions and millions of dollars that we didn't use. So listen, I'm looking at apples to apples before we got this information, before we got to finally sit down, because when you get the budget book on the Friday or Father's Day weekend, it's really tough to see. And when we get to this point and we talk about what are we doing, in most communities, as you brought up, Madam Chief of Staff, In most communities, like tomorrow night, I'll be sitting in Somerville, it's called Cut Night. Every department head will be here to support any questions at the council. That's the respect they get. The biggest budget line we have is education, and our superintendent isn't even here to answer a question. Because I had other questions that was brought to my attention after looking at the capital plan. For instance, the neglected fields behind Medford High School. that have been out past this day over five years, that if we end up doing a study, which happens every year, it should, and it shows that that field is unsafe, we have to close two of the most important fields down the city. I don't see anything, which is a huge revenue generator. And that's what I was going to ask the superintendent tonight, but she's not here. These are serious issues that we don't have any department head in front of us that we can ask these questions, because I would love to talk to the department heads, because I'm gonna be honest with you. I've talked to some department heads. I've talked to people that are in the know, because believe it or not, there are still relationships here, and they're petrified. George, don't ever speak my name. I just want you to understand that the confusion they have with the way we run a budget, they're very confused. Because when they do their lines, and they then match up what's presented to them, they're totally confused. And I bet you what, if I do a Freedom of Information Act, and I ask for any communications between department heads to a director of finance, we're gonna see some questions that department heads are very confused. So when we talk about this budget, when we've been talking about this budget as a union, we've been talking about what the mismanagement has been with this council for months, if not a year. For what we've been promised, what we weren't, remember that. Remember, I'm gonna not say the council's name, but remember, I will never let that happen to me again. The mayor lied to me. I will never let it happen to me again. She promises everything last year at one o'clock in the morning. We get nothing. Here we are today to consider that you're going to vote for this budget with these questions befuddling. So these are serious issues. These are issues that this councilor, I'm going to reach out and find out on what avenues we can take to do a deep dive in this. I know we do an audit, but this is something that frightens me. And if Councilor Caraviello said it's a pattern, this is one year. If it's a pattern for three years, what are we doing? That's a gross mismanagement of our city funds. That's a gross mismanagement. And again, Take a deep breath, go sit down with your budget book, because when I asked this question, if this was real or not, it's in your numbers. It's in your book. These are not just a couple of percent, because I've asked a couple of finance directors in neighboring communities. Rarely you look at an overage about two and a half to three and a half percent, correct? That's what they look at, usually. That's the gap that other communities they say that they put into, about two and a half to three and a half percent. 32, 51, 52, 57, 59, that's only five departments that we over budgeted. So if this council wants to vote for this budget, when you hear these facts and say, this is better for our community, think about it. Think about it, no matter what was said or what was negotiated, think about what the numbers in front of you say before you vote. And I tell you, if you support this with this information in front of you, I hope everybody's watching, because remember, you vote, and you represent every member of this community, and you're their fiscal watchdog. That's why I appreciate your hard work. When we talked and you gave me this, I couldn't believe it. I went back and I looked. I'm not a really numbers guy. I went and sat with a few people that I can talk to. And they couldn't believe it.
[George Scarpelli]: If this is gonna be, if tonight's gonna be a gotcha game or you win or we win, we all lose if this budget passes. That's all I have to say. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Just if they have a response.
[George Scarpelli]: So we can, so we have other questions.
[George Scarpelli]: The question was that we have something public that the mayor is agreed with. Did she not publicly give us other issues last year? Do we not have other public issues last year? Is this what you're going to do?
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, that is true. Thank you point of information point of information. So, with this information you just gave us. You just openly told us that the numbers we have aren't true, how can we go to this budget should we vote on this budget.
[George Scarpelli]: Is Councilor Tseng-Wook done?
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry very, very simple. I find it that it's in doubt that we have a software that the finance director has concerns with and would presented a budget that I find that it's on a slippery slope right now to make a decision. I also think that my fellow councils are making a decision because publicly things were promised. As if we weren't remember when we were promised the city solicitor, we didn't get one. last year when we were given a city solicitor, and we were given the other options that we sat here for and waited for and we got, we never came through. I don't want you to forget that I want to make sure it's on the public record that I said that, because the reason why my fellow council said they were in favor of this budget because whatever was whatever was discussed and agreed on. It's discussed in open, and it's been, it's public. And what we've never been lied to before. And again, the reason why I say this, and I know, listen, we still have questions that still haven't been answered. I asked for a copy of the consultant who put the safety of our kids in the high school on the forefront of his report. I've yet to see that report. All we know- The Welsh report? Well, it hasn't been discussed in the budget that even though we haven't, the $900,000 was asked because of the report coming from the school committee, the $900,000 was asked in that report to make Medford High School safe and efficient moving forward, like the addition of principals, like the addition of more paraprofessionals, like the addition of monitors, like the addition of security systems. So now we're gonna vote on something without taking that consultant and not honor what they've said and agree that we'll let ESSER funding fix the deficit that we all so strongly were negatively against because of this factor. Because all we're doing is pushing this down the road. And openly, Madam Mayor, Madam President, this looks like, as long as it gets through this budget season, because November is a very important season, that let's not worry about that now. Let's just get through the season. Let's get through the vote. That's what I see. I just wanted to share that with my fellow Councilors, and I would yield now.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, but the report, we want to see the report, because what I will tell you- I didn't get it. No, but what I will tell you too is when I talked to the teachers that were actually interviewed, they were so impressed by the consultant and they had they they finally felt like they were listened to. But after the meeting that I missed on Wednesday, unfortunately, what I found out from some of these teachers that who, by the way, who are now gone, teachers that have been in the system for years who left, they've had enough, they moved on. So that's speaking freely. So when they tell me that come September, if these things aren't in place, we're going to be in the same situation of fear and safety concerns. And that's what they've shared with me. I just wanna share that with you because I haven't seen anything about increase in principals and assistant principals, and we're talking about whatever, and if it is done the way it's funded right now, right? Madam Chief of Staff, the way it's funded, we're looking at $600,000 right off the top next year. So whatever we're gonna implement, it might be good for a year, but then it's all gone. And I just don't think that's a sound fiscal responsible decision we can make. I just don't think so. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, if you can, I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I thank you. I know that we've been getting messages back and forth. And this is the reason why I asked for the extension. And I appreciate you working with the neighbors. Yeah, we know. I know the neighbors are very happy with the the rules that you're putting in place your employees. I think that's very important. But so let's just so we can move forward. So you're asking for the extended hours until 12 o'clock just for Fridays and Saturdays and Wednesday night and Wednesday night special
[George Scarpelli]: This is exactly what I was hoping for. So if we're looking at the conversation we had back and forth with both everybody talking in favor for you and the respect that you have for the neighbors, the neighbors they have for you, my friend. So I would, I know we still have to move forward, but so to be clear, it's Wednesday, Fridays, and Saturdays until 12 o'clock. Okay, thank you. You're welcome, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, what the question was, if it was going to be, you know, if we were gonna deny it, you know, in what grounds do we have to deny the special permit? So I think that with this resolution, I know we'll hear from the residents, but if we don't see any conflicts, I appreciate the council for being here, but we wouldn't need their involvement because that answer would be new. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: You in favor?
[George Scarpelli]: D'Antonio, if I can, I know I asked for for this meeting specifically because I didn't think that this was just the issue with just with oasis I think the enforcement was big so I recommended that we had legal counsel here, the police chief, the DPW traffic commission, I mean the traffic director as anybody else here. We should, I think we asked for the parking director also. And the parking director.
[George Scarpelli]: I do not see. Not the building, but really is really having.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, well, I'm a little disappointed because we asked him to come tonight. And that was one of the reasons wasn't just, it wasn't just the community members and the business owners to talk and glad you did. But the other reason why we call this because it was concerns of other issues that I think the enforcement was bringing in the negativity of the business owners where we have to make sure that there's a plan in place, whether it's signage, whether we talk to the traffic commission, and do residents only from certain times or set up, you know, patrols in the parking lot area, and around the same time is the closing of the establishment. So this is the these are the questions I wanted to ask the the departments that are relevant to get us. I agree.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so I think that'll be something we'll have to follow through. I think for the neighbors. I think the feedback that I got back from the neighbors was that, you know, really, is is giving South Method the respect that they deserve and the residents there that they deserve, and making sure that there's some sort of a plan that the administration can work with the traffic department, the chief of police, and making sure that they step up dedicated patrols if that's what's needed in the evenings. But I think the piece that bothered me the most, the phone calls that I got, were the elderly neighbors that said that, you know, the blocking of the driveways. And to say that it was Oasis's fault, I didn't believe that. I think that the issue really is having the enforcement. And I think that we need to, you know, I know it's not a popular thing to do. But when you throw a few tickets on a few cars, and somebody gets told because a senior citizen can't back up out of the driveway for an emergency reason. I think that's more important to me than any anybody's uncomfortable situation of going to get their their automobile out of impound because they didn't park and a reasonable area. So I think that's something down the line we need to really call for a meeting, whether it be a committee of the whole or subcommittee on public safety, and really bring the neighbors back out. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: That's part of the discussion. The part of the discussion with the owners, we're going to place signs not only in the facility, but also as they walk around toward the public parking area. And I believe it's going to be in a few different languages, just for our Portuguese speaking patrons. So we appreciate that. And I think that's the, you know, and I appreciate that the general came up and talked about, you know.
[George Scarpelli]: Maybe community development? Yeah. That's a good idea. Yes. To reach out to Bocelli's and I think Mace Cafe stays open a little later. So maybe reaching out to them, form a motion that maybe that the liaison to the businesses can reach out and see what they can do to make sure that they can post some signage or, you know, for their patrons to also respect that neighborhood.
[George Scarpelli]: Could you please? I'm sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: It's not extended, correct, because that goes with the owner. So all this is just changing of ownership from one subway. Yes. Right. The subway and Mystic Ave. Yes. Okay. And this is that you have only five employees that work for you?
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, I see everything in order, all paperwork's in order, so I would move approval after my colleagues have any comments.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. This came about when the resident came to us who's been on the list, who lives in a private way who who's lived there for a long time in the city. she planted a tree, a rooting tree in front of her establishment, her home, and she sat on the list for three years and was informed by a city engineer, I believe, and I was hoping he was here, but obviously he's not, that the city engineer has now followed through with the hard line, which is a law that the city does not maintain private ways. I will tell you I received many phone calls concerning public safety when it comes to these decisions. We can understand when it comes to doing these bigger projects and understand our rules and regulations when it comes to private ways. We understand that one of the biggest reasons that we don't receive enough funding from the state or the federal government is because Medford has, what people don't realize, an abundance of private ways. And it really hurts our bottom line when it comes to road work in our community. So if you talk to most people that own homes on private ways, they have a lot of pride and they maintain their homes. And this one person who has a very dangerous lip now because of a rooting tree and has been on this list, had now been told that this would not work. And we need to clarify this because The truth of the matter is, if someone does still trip and fall, the burden falls back on who? Not the resident. It comes back to this council and the city and legal action. So if you see those suits that we've had in the past, 3,500, 5,500, these all add up to a pretty good number. But more importantly, I fear that it's going to be that elderly person that walks down that private way, smashes their head and God forbid passes. And I think this is something that to just be passive about changing this rule as a new new city engineer, and And I wish he was here because I'd like to ask him some questions that the residents that did reach out to him from what I've been told was that it was very arrogant in his presentation. And to me as a city employee, municipal employee, that person works for the residents of the city. And I think that's the biggest piece. I think that we need to have guidelines set by this administration, really informing the people in the private ways of these rule changes or not to rule changes, but the the the persistence of following those rules now. Now, I got a phone call from another resident. And he said, Well, George, we live over here near Arthur Winthrop Street. My neighbors and I, three years ago, followed the rule and we brought in a hot top company because the street was deplorable. And they talked to these professionals and said, because this isn't a major way, you should use this type of top, this type of patch. They repaved the whole street on their dime. They did it right. And then they're upset now because during the Winthrop Street project, The city diverted all of the traffic where? Through this private way. Now, because of the hot top that was laid, because of the trucks that drove down that road consistently, their street is now in disarray. So their question that I wanted to ask the city engineer, if this is the case, what fair is fair, is the city now liable for repaving that street? And that's a logical point. But again, when you're not talking, you're not communicating with your residents, this is a huge concern. So these are the things that are open-ended. And I would make the motion that we ask the city administration to please set up guidelines to re-educate our constituents on the follow through now of our new engineer and the policies that they're now following through or not following through. and the fact that what if the city is diverting the public traffic into their private ways and destroying these roadways that have just been paved? So I like to get these answered for these constituents because The next step is they said they would come here and the eight people that I did talk to said, you could use my name. And I said, you know what, let's see what the answers are in the follow through. Because I will tell you, for the residents that are listening, This is very frustrating for us because we ask these questions, not because we want to be rabble rousers because that's because this city administration has come up here and said, well, our, our, our directors, our directors in different departments are actually afraid to come to city council because of backlash or aggressive behavior. And this is what we're putting office we're putting office to be their voice. And that's not an easy place to stand, but when you were elected or you're hired in a municipal field, that's part of your job. That's your, that's part of your job requirements. Come here and answer these questions so residents can understand what the process is.
[George Scarpelli]: I think we need more communication through the administration to really let our constituents know of these processes. When no one comes up to answer these questions, everything's left open-ended. And the frustration gets to a boiling point where we're seeing good people in this community putting for sale signs and moving out. And that I hate to see. And all it is sometimes is just simple conversation. You saw what we did tonight with a very, very, very productive business in our city and neighbors that had an issue. They got to sit down together because we opened the line of communication for them and they found the best avenue for both parties. So these are the things we need in our community and I think the city administration is really failing us. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, I think that the goal for this is really to educate the constituents, and And so I would like to see a community hall with those residents of private ways, get the word out. And I appreciate Councilor Knight and Councilor Bears sending that information, but when you are living to a certain standard here, and you've grown up in a private way or lived in a private way, and all of a sudden snap a finger, the way that you've lived your life, things have changed now, whether it's right, wrong or indifferent. The residents that live in those private ways have to be reeducated and really have to acknowledge what needs to be expected as they move on. If this is the way it goes, like Councilor Knight said, the I don't blame the city engineer in any way. I question his his behavior or his tone with what residents have told me. And you know, I'd like I said, if he was here, I'd love to ask him but but that's the what I question with our our city engineer. Again, my question is really you're making changes, sweeping changes that are really affecting our community. And especially when it comes to public safety, when people are expecting their sidewalks to get done. Because imagine if, like Councilor Knight said, you have a sidewalk that's panels lifted, you have an elderly parent that lives in your home with you. You're expecting the city to make these changes because they've been on this list, so they wait. Now all of a sudden they're told that after three years you're top of that list. They know we're not fixing it because you're a private way. We're changing our policy. So that's the process. I think we need to meet with all of these departments and really set the tone with how to reeducate our private way residents. And then maybe they have to answer some questions about legitimate questions that were brought about on detours and sending heavy trucking that ruined a street that has just been paved. So these are legitimate issues. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. First of all, what I'm hearing is, um, from consensus. I mean, there's a lot of people that say that our friends at Oasis are hardworking people. What I do hear is that there is quality of life issues that deal with someone in the community. I find it hard to believe that it's all Oasis. I find it very difficult to believe that we can say this is all Oasis's fault. But I think again, I think that this is the Antonio brings the point that's very important here is the enforcement I had multiple neighbors call me this week about this issue. And it didn't just start it started with Oasis but then it continued on about the lack of enforcement. in the streets of South Medford. And that's what I see that are issues. But I do think that there are compromises. As I did my study, I looked at the restaurants and the different bars that are open in the area, and there aren't too many that are open that are budding neighborhoods like Razo's or Bocelli's that are open till one o'clock. So that's something we have to wait. But again, I think where we're talking about many people have come up and said that legally we have to really what my recommendation tonight so we table this until we have a committee the whole meeting then maybe we can what that happens we can ask legal representation to me with the council to give us some direction and what we can and what we can't do. And I'll give you some examples we. We didn't approve a gas station from BJ's. And we gave the wrong reasons why. And then what happened was BJ's came back because we didn't have legal representation. They sued us. They won. We had to go back to court. Now guess who's suing us? The residents. The residents are suing us because we're stuck in the middle because we don't have legal representation. We haven't had a city solicitor in a year. So we're not lawyers, we're elected officials that are trying to do best for our residents. So I know that we've got a report from our building department that our code enforcement officers are doing the best they can, unfortunately. the size of the city that we are now and what's going on in the city, only having a few enforcement officers, it's very difficult. We know that. Parking, we know that's a huge issue, huge concern. I have family members that live on Princeton Street that call me all the time. They think because I'm on the city council, I must own a tow truck. So I understand completely. But again, this is a parking lot that is open to the community, and there are no limitations other than making sure commercial vehicles aren't parked in there. So I, you know, is there something that the residents can talk with the owners. If we table this and come back and say well, maybe there's something that you're looking at, maybe Friday, Saturday and Sunday till 12 o'clock if there are church groups that are coming in. Maybe there's some kind of compromise that, you know, we'll can all work together to see what we can do what's best both for the business owner, and for the residents. You know, I've worked directly with a few people that are sitting in this auditorium about Oasis and their lack of cleanliness and they don't put the barrels out and the trash truck comes at this time. And to be honest with you, they've done a great job since we met with them. I haven't heard the same complaints from different people. It's maybe one or two of the same people that are complaining. and maybe they have a right to, but the truth of the matter is they're doing the best they can. You know, the alternative is imagine if they're not there. We're seeing empty storefronts everywhere. So I think that's what we're concerned about as well. So trying to find that compromise, I think might be the way to go. But again, I'm not saying we should or we shouldn't because legally we don't know. So my recommendation truly is going to be to table this until we have a committee of the whole meeting with city administration, with all the parties involved, our code enforcement team, our representation. My motion, table this until we have a better understanding legally of where we can go. We all have our thoughts. We all have our thoughts if Oasis was maybe a couple blocks away where it didn't, but a home, homes, they would say no, they're thriving, we don't want Oasis to leave, we need to have them, give them anything they want. Right, but then you have residents that are saying, listen, I mean, we had issues with, first it was, I remember the first phone call I got was the trucks are revving their engine in front of a window, keeping their engines running while they're running in to get something to eat in front of a resident's baby's bedroom window. And we stopped that completely. We ended up moving with the city and Oasis, we ended up bringing in planters, gigantic planters, so they couldn't park up on the curb. So that's just discussion. Maybe it's just a discussion we can have again, and see what we can do. Because I you know, and I'll do respect. You don't have control of your clientele, but you do have control of your people that work for you. And if you guys if we can all sit together and try to find a way that we can fix that, and help the neighbors and be part of the neighborhood community. And if it's something that we're bringing in the traffic enforcement saying, well, we need resident parking only. the nights that we're going to that we would allow Oasis to have a certain extended hours of operations that we make sure that there those parking spaces are open for residents at 10 o'clock. There's got to be something that we can work with. But again, I'm only saying this as a way to a final answer that can help everybody here. So I that's why Madam President, if I can, I'll make the motion that I feel we need to table this and move this. So we have all the representation at the table, including a legal representation that can guide us. And I hate to do it, by the way, I voted, I voted against everything that had to do with a representative for from KP law. that we're paying them hundreds and hundreds of dollars just by picking up the phone. I hate that we have to ask them, but because we don't have a city attorney in the city for a year, I think with this situation, I think it's warranted because either way, I don't wanna make a decision either favoring or being against without knowing the true ramifications legally. So I hope you can understand that. So that's why I make the motion that we table to a committee of the whole that, you know, we can even make it within the next 10 days if we can, that we asked the city to the mayor to have legal representation, be present to answer our questions and hopefully we can make a reasonable decision. And maybe in that time, maybe the respected owners of Oasis who I feel that every time I've talked to them, they've been very, very good. They've been very, very welcoming and understanding. And we have people that are definitely committed in our South Medford community, that maybe there could be some kind of discussion that we can say, hey, let's find, let's find a common ground. And then let's, let's revisit this when we can a community of the whole.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate the respect Councilor Bears, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I just want to, I think that one of the biggest pieces, I appreciate the owner. I think that's a great compromise, but I also think that there are, bigger issues here that that the city needs to address. So, you know, the traffic, the traffic issues, the, we have our special services department, they're all here and I know they work probably at hours a week, but they've been sitting here for the last three hours and having them understand the process and what their relationship with Oasis, so we know how you've been in the past. I think they're, you know, this isn't beating a dead horse at all in my eyes. I think this is trying to get the best case forward for something that, again, I, as one Councilor, don't feel comfortable making until we have legal support. Like, so again, I, you know, I would, I would still like to go to date certain for our next open meeting to extend it there that we can ask a representative legal representative, I think the owners of Oasis and here's the thing on the people that are against it and the people that are for it. If we don't find a compromise, someone's gonna lose. So I think that we need to maybe find some, some common ground that maybe in two weeks we come back keep this extended for two weeks, and then put it first in the agenda, ask those questions and then vote on it, because I, you know, I, I feel that I can't speak for anybody, but I feel that the majority of the council is in favor of it, but I also think that this is an opportunity for us to meet with the administration, bring in the MPD, bring in the traffic, talk to Inspection Services, ask DPW about the upkeep and what's going on there and about signage for the parking lot. and permits for maybe the drivers that can park there until 12, and then close it and resident only that could park in there then tow. So there's other things we can use this meeting for to find the best avenue for the community and self-medical, including Oasis, because this isn't going away. If we give them the permit three days, guess what? The self-med residents are gonna come back and say, Oasis is doing this again. And is it? I don't know. But let's try to solve this instead of just pushing it through. Let's wait a week. Let's bring everybody in. Let's let's have the parties work together. See what's best. Come back to us. Let's put something thoughtful on the table. So we have to talk about it again. Listen, I'm sure you don't want some of the emails you get from some of the people that email you every single week about issues in South Meffin. We could sit everybody at a table to figure things out right now to get a better understanding. So I would welcome that, Madam President. If it's voted down, it's voted down. But that would be my motion. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Our next regular meeting.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, okay. Ask the people, ask the people, the neighbors at BJ's. Yeah, but the good advice we got there.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Again, moms demand action. I remember a little organization when I was young that started up by their moms was a program called SADD, and it virtually eliminated drunk driving. And it's something that, luckily, it's just second nature for our kids. They just, we don't see that anymore. as much as we used to. So I think that, you know, being Councilor, being Councilor Tseng is one of his teachers, I remember going through those training sessions and bringing kids into the into the lockdown areas and going over this and watching how crazy it is. And then here we are today. You know, my daughter's 18. She's graduating. And the whole process is second nature to her now. And it's sad. It's sad that they have to live this life this way. But I appreciate when moms take take action like you have. And do just a little piece that makes such a big impact, because studies have shown a lot of gun violence death, especially at the youth level, comes from kids taking their parents' guns and playing with them, and self-inflicted, or taking them to school and hurting others. So again, to reiterate what I said, thanks for bringing this forward, but keep the good fight going, and whatever we need, the council's behind you 1,000%, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can, can each of the members that are here, can you come to the podium? If you can, I know that we don't want to, if you, I think everybody should know who they are. And if you just give your name and the year that you are currently in right now.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm Matthew Harrison, I'm a junior. Congratulations, and again, that's great. The reason why I asked you to do this is twofold. When we have our athletes, after they win a championship, we ask them to come up and we recognize them. When we have our leaders in the theater, our arts, we ask them to come up and identify them. So I think it's important that You started now a legacy and now it's a tradition that's going to carry on because I hear we're all into classman so we're all coming back next year. So we have a dynasty at the vocational school so I will share something with you. And I will start it off by the. the trip to, I believe it's Colorado, we're in need of some funding, correct? I think, so I'm not going to say how much, but I'm going to start, I'm going to ask the community if we could find a way to help, just reach out to the high school or or the clerk to see if we can reach out to anybody who'd like to donate to help with their cause. I'm going to donate, I'll be the first one to donate. I'll talk to Mr. Campbell, one of the parents, to help out. I know that, you know, to get the ball rolling, but you deserve to be in Colorado to represent the city of Medford and our schools and such an honor for you to do that. So congratulations.
[George Scarpelli]: I did, I know Mr. Puccio is here. I know that, let him speak, but I think this is an amazing event, so.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor if I can. First of all, Miss Butcher. Thank you so much. I think that, um, there's still a little undertone of disgruntled Italian Americans in the city method for reasons I won't bring forward. But these are the events that bring everybody back and put everybody in the right frame of mind, and we really appreciate you taking the forefront and It's wonderful, you know, with this wonderful event. So I move approval with the food truck and ask my colleagues to support as well. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: development is progressing method, but I'm just a little leery that this type of zone changing for individual parcels is what really affects our community in a negative way in the sense that, unfortunately, we don't have a true understanding of what a whole picture looks like. You know, when you look at neighboring communities and they said, we'll use, we'll use assembly row. That was a whole vision that wrapped around. What I don't feel comfortable doing is approving his zoning change right now for one building right now, and not knowing what the rest of the picture looks like. I was fortunate enough to start with Mayor Curtatone and working with him and seeing what he did when Oh geez, Ikea had the number one spot back in the day in assembly row, then all of a sudden the vision started changing and started conforming and they had to find a way to move Ikea. My whole, my reservation with this is really making these spot changes in zoning to accommodate certain groups without truly understanding, and I know we have a long process to go, but that's probably one of the most dangerous intersections in the country, and the residents in the Wellington area that people seem to forget about, where you're gonna be bringing in, how many units is that right now?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. Now imagine adding that much without understanding the true impact with the whole community there. Yeah. So I think that's where my reservation comes in. So believe me, I love the idea. If I see if there was a comprehensive plan to see what it all would look like together, and that's what I'm sure in your profession, you see that. And that's why you're here right now because we have such an outdated zoning format that you have to come up and ask for this ridiculous format so I just have to be honest with you. I love the idea it looks beautiful. I just right now I. Um, again, that the understanding of what the true impact means the rest of the growth there and what impact it brings to, um, you know, the negative issues it brings to that Middlesex area, the Wilmington area, I couldn't support it unless, you know, we had our Office of Community Development and people sharing, I don't know if Alicia's on the line, just even understanding what the vision is. I mean, again, that's, we call these, you know, what was the big thing back in the day is gateway communities, gateway entrances, right? That's a gateway that's coming in from Everett Rivera. That's a very important piece right there.
[George Scarpelli]: Ms. Hunt, thank you so much. We appreciate all your hard work and we know you're super busy, moving forward, I would love a conversation to share that vision with us so we can all celebrate in what we're trying to do. I think this is what the biggest concern we're having with the administration is understanding that obviously the zoning isn't going as quickly as we want it. I appreciate the representative to your words. I think it meant a lot to me, understanding more what you're saying as our leader in the office of community development. I think that maybe if you could moving forward is, you know, share those ideas with us. I think it would go a long way to at least moving my decisions forward. And because that's the issue is we do need housing. The issue is we do need the development. We need the new money in Medford. That's something we've always been, crying out. But at the same time, I think understanding what the vision is, and understanding that we could be great partners in this, at least all of us, not just individual Councilors, but all of us to make sure that we're all celebrating in this and moving something like this forward, I think will be helpful in the future. So thank you. So I would move, Madam President, that we move this to the next step.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, for one Councilor, I'd rather you be a little premature and reach out to us for the fact that I've worked with other communities and seen what they're doing, and there's a partnership there. I'm sure this was something that the city was working with, must be months now, because this doesn't pop up overnight, and you got it last night. So my hope is only that you share these visions with us so we can help move things forward. I don't think it's negative in any way. I don't try to be. I'm not trying to be. But if you can, just you know, be a little premature. I'd rather you be a little premature because it would help us moving this forward a lot quicker and understanding it, at least a big picture and a better vision to it.
[George Scarpelli]: As a former negotiating member of contract as a teacher and a active member of a negotiating team municipality, that is absolutely appalling what I just heard. That just tells you, and it should be a shot across this community, of where we are in the leadership of this community. Now it's sad because we're gonna get phone calls tomorrow saying, what are you doing? This isn't political. I keep telling people we don't have a newspaper. We don't have an avenue to share what's going on. This is the only forum right now. If you were here earlier that six o'clock meeting. It was it was our council's wish list go over the budget, our hopes and budget for the budget. And I was so demoralized as I got went through that mental process to see what I needed. And It's you're always overlooked. You're saying that you're not getting paid, but I want to ask you a question. You have plenty of staff in your offices, right? Absolutely. No, you don't, right? There's abundance of employees that are DPW and your secretarial team way understaffed. So you're not only are you not getting paid what you deserve, you're doing the job of two to three people. And here's the funny, here's the funny piece cause I can see it. Um, We vote no on the budget. In 45 days, they have to pass it. They have to run on a different budget. Guess who'll have to do all the work to get the new budget prepared? The secretaries. I know. That's what's so moronic. It's scary. But I, for one, as a union member and part of a municipal team, I have not voted for any money paper, let alone increases for the administration. Have they gone back to the administration, taken down salaries? Have they done that to the administration staff? Because they're okay. I mean, for the ones that are there. So I just find this very, very frightening that people have to understand. In a normal negotiation, you have a representative from the city. And a lot of times when you're at a crossroads, then your mayor steps in. A lot of times when I sat in negotiation, you had city solicitor who would come in, the representative from HR or your HR director, department head, who's in administration, working with each individual unit. and you find that common balance. You look and negotiate for trading language for percentage, trading longevity for other options. And this is how you work it. What my frustration that I need to share with all of you is this. We truly don't know the financial outlook of our community in a few weeks. We don't know where we are. We haven't seen any projections. We haven't seen any pre-budget stuff. We haven't seen anything. All we hear are rumors. We hear that the school committee got probably one of the biggest budget pieces in the community, the biggest. We were told that they got a letter, the school committee got a letter saying that we're looking at huge cuts and layoffs. So the teachers called me and says, well, is this why we got what we got for percentage so they can cut everybody? So what I fear, what we don't know, we don't know what the budget's gonna, I'm afraid of as bad as it is in city halls, bad as it is out in the streets and the roads and the parks. We don't know where we are, but I will tell you, in negotiations as a school team member, as in negotiations in a municipal department where I work as a city councilor, Ms. Fagli, I understand exactly what you're talking about. And I'm willing to stand with you and say, hey, Let's start off this budget meeting. Let's start this process off by saying, hey, if part of the budget process with the city council isn't making everybody whole and making sure everybody's on the path to make sure that they're supported and they're shown the respect they deserve, I'm willing to stand with you in any day. I've done that. I'm willing to do that any day of the week with all of you. But I will tell you, Where, what I'm, what I have, my disappointment, my fear is that we don't know where the climate, financial climate is in this community. I know Councilor is saying, we would love to, I agree with you, let's use that 25 million. But we have a resolution out asking, where did this 25 million come from? No one's told us yet. We don't know. And the fact that they have KP Law and everything, issues at the school department, handling personnel issues, school department, handling negotiations here, fighting for taking away 40B projects and development in the city. We're a mess. This isn't a political ploy. This is me venting and talking with you. So the city, how do we move forward? I hate talking like this. I hate being negative. I want solutions, but I'm telling you, your frustration is our frustration. We tried to hold a meeting with the mayor. Council President worked her tail off to make sure that she worked with the school committee so we can sit down before this budget season to talk about what's happening at the high school, security issues, future budget concerns, other issues that we need to talk to so we can sit down in a room and work together. We got word back that the mayor didn't want to meet with us. We got word that the mayor didn't want to meet with us because she was afraid of the dialogue. She's the mayor of the community. And it's funny, know what I'm hearing from people? You know the only way you can reach out, George? Start a Facebook post. Let's start a Facebook newspaper. And that's whatever she puts out, you know, with Run Like Girls or any of the programs or whatever fluff that's going out there, the signings and the ribbon cuttings, let's put it to what's really affecting Medford. Because I'm afraid, July 1, I'm afraid July 1, We're going to be talking to parents about classroom sizes being too big. We're going to be talking about special needs parents of their children that can't have the services they need. We're going to talk about the three DPW workers in the parks that have to cut down to two. We're going to have to talk about the 80 police officers that they have to cut down to 75. That's my fear. Why? No one's dispelled that. No one's told us. The only time we have anybody from the administration here is the chief of staff to call us bullies and tell us that, you know, sticking up from here. You're wrong, she's great. In the meantime, we're falling apart. We're falling apart. You saw just what happened today. We had questions with legalities that should have been taken care of in five minutes. If we had someone, it would have been done. We haven't had a city attorney for a year. And I know what the dialogue is from the main, the administrator's office, is that it's very competitive. Just so I've talked to, I've talked to eight city solicitors sitting at a table at a memorial. And I asked them, jokingly, hey, come to Medford, we'll get your top dollars. And they were like, George, not if you gave us the key to the city, that place is a mess. So it's not just here, it's everywhere. So long story short, I don't care that I'm venting anymore. At least I get some sort of satisfaction. I get yelled at when I get home by my wife, but I'm telling you, we appreciate what you do. And we're gonna support whatever you ask me to do, I'm gonna do. Because I'm at that point, if you're frustrated, I'm frustrated. I grew up in the city. I did everything I can. I got four jobs and bought a house in the city. I did whatever I could do to stay in the city, to make my kids go to the public schools in the city. I've gone through McGlynn and Burke and now Lungo-Koehn. This is a mess. And to hear the dialogue that her mission is to clean up city hall, holy cow, if that's cleaning up, I'm frightened to see what's next. But again, I apologize, Madam President. These are tirades that I'm getting sick and tired of myself. When I say it, my ears hurt. But it has to be said, because you know why? Because the regular person that all they have is this evening to watch us talk, they don't truly understand what's going on in the city. They don't know. Well, that's it.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for being here tonight. I just want you to know for one Councilor, whenever you're standing in front of us, there's a sense of legitimacy and honor when you're here so I appreciate when you're representing any client so appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: So I, you know, you've been here, you were here. I mean, our biggest issues is making sure that we make the right decisions legally. And I think that understanding that this process and what it's intended for is what, you know, getting phone calls from people asking, you know, what is this for another auto body place? And I think that having that clarity, just making that part of the record, if we could, that this would be only an auto repair, and the license will stay with, it won't carry on to any, the new owner, that'll be identified just for this owner, and that if it's, she moves on, that the permit would die with that. So if that's legal, I can't believe I'm gonna ask your opinion as a legal. But I don't want to hold anything up.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, okay. So we want to make sure with that. And then I know that the fire chief did put down that, this is a confusion piece, the legal piece that I have, no obvious violations observed. But then he leaves a note, this is not ready for final inspection yet, 424. Do you know what that is?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so I know that I appreciate that for the information. That was great. But I have been getting phone calls from representatives of National Grid. And I guess there's some sort of is the city engineer on online? Okay, so I know there was there was concerns about, you know, the National Grid what they're putting in for service and approval isn't what's to the acceptance of our new engineer. And I don't know if they're falling into that. So that's a question I was gonna ask.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, so they haven't come to us. Yeah. So that's,
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, right. So it's not coming. It'd have to come in front of his body. I have no, I have no further updates on that one because. That's why I just, thank you. Mr. Clerk, I didn't wanna put you in the spot, but I hate that we're holding businesses up, not just this one, but with national grid that maybe, I mean, it's not gonna help sway me in any way. I'm gonna see everything. So I would move forward approval as stated with those pieces in writing that making sure that it's just a auto mechanic shop. And obviously the, that the permit stays with, that disappears with the... With the petitioner. Thank you so much, Mr. Beaton.
[George Scarpelli]: And again, that's the questions people were asking that. you know, with the private way, physical both ways now. Massive amount of traffic that's rolling in their roads. These are the questions they're asking.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Bill. Thank you for the presentation. I know that there's not much parking in front of Bank of America as it is. I know that the traffic study showed that there's no traffic issues or concerns, but how many automobiles would the lanes allow for the drive through? Because I thought my first impression would be around the back of the building, but being on the side of the building with the lack of, you have handicapped parking in front, I just don't want to hinder any lines that would hinder any parking for handicap accessibility.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I know what the problem is that the printing doesn't show I was I looked at it reverse so I apologize. Okay, I don't see it being a problem. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Do I have a motion from the council, I would motion to approve. The only thing I would ask my colleagues I know that when we do special permits we asked for maybe a 90 day review. I think that it's just protocol that we've to approve and support this paper. I see everything is in order. I don't see the biggest thing in that area is traffic concerns. We don't see any traffic issues. And so I would think to improve and then again, visit any concerns if there's any issues in 90 days for a full review for full approval.
[George Scarpelli]: I'd like to waive it if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: You don't have to be nervous. You don't have to be nervous.
[George Scarpelli]: Welcome. How many employees will be working in the business?
[George Scarpelli]: Is it family only? Yes, I mean- Okay, I see. I see all the paperwork is in order. And before I move approval, I know maybe some other councils have some questions but for one one council we appreciate when families come in and start neighborhood businesses like yours and I think it'll be a huge benefit and a little competition on Salem Street. for the juice, the juice wars. I know as if a bulb had just opened up, so it's exciting. So we welcome that. So I would move approval with any questions of our colleagues.
[George Scarpelli]: I see everything is in order. I do know Jeff. People aren't familiar with Jeff's business. They've been a very reputable and upstanding business in West Medford Square with many people supporting him in that area. We're excited that he's moving to a location that's recently been closed. And as you know, when something closes in Method Square, we often hold our breaths to see how long they're gonna be open storefronts. Jeff and Ian have taken an opportunity to go in and you can see the work they've done already. Very vibrant yellow door out front and welcoming everybody in. We're so excited. But again, how many employees, John, would you be? have any questions or comments? Close to like 10 10. All right, great. And, uh. The hours of operations. Everything goes. You understand the hours operations are and in any extended permitting, just come back to us and get things rolling with that. But, um, again, it's another, um, new business that we should be
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpellillo. Thank you, Madam President. And I know that one of the biggest concerns was making sure any of the outdoor dining areas are accessible for our handicapped and mothers with strollers. And I think that having the inspector in place and being the overseer is going to be the important piece to make sure that all of those areas are protected. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Again, to the public, I know that I've talked to some people in the streets and some residents that want to point fingers at different members of this council for the reason why the budget process isn't moved forward. I will let you know that Council President Morell has worked diligently with the mayor's office to try to get a schedule for our upcoming budget meetings. If anybody's familiar with what happened last year, We actually didn't see a budget. We both came in and may I had to come in at one in the morning. to negotiate an agreement so we can get something passed. And I know that what I find a little nerve wracking right now is that they're having open dialogue with the school department and the school committee about a very dire situation that's been publicly spread that the mayor is looking to cut the education budget and look to let go of teachers. So that to me is frightening. And to the fact that no one from the city administration has even updated this council to let us know what is going on. This has been happening for over two to three weeks now. This issue is happening two to three weeks, and no one from the city administration has told us what's going on, either to calm everybody's nerves that there might be rumors or that what was sent out by the mayor's office to the school committee that we are having serious financial issues. And again, we wouldn't know because we still haven't seen, here we are, middle of May, we still haven't seen financial paperwork of what's going on in a day-to-day role here in the city. So I know that people, it's easy to say when you run to some people to say, oh no, this isn't the administration's fault. This isn't the mayor's fault. This is this group's fault. This is this person's fault. That's not true. Right now we have a president council president that stands independently and works with the administration to try to get a schedule, so we can be informed so we can make the rational decisions needed for our constituents that have fallen on deaf ears, we've called for meeting. over two months ago to talk about budget concerns directly with the school department that's dealing with something very serious, which was security issues that was brought forth that we needed to support our school district. Correct. And the Council President again worked diligently with the school committee, the word came back and said the mayor was looking for a date, and then it fell in the mayor's desk. So again, I know the sounds let's beat up the mayor, what this sounds like is logical information so everybody understands where we are today financially in the city, this council doesn't know. We don't know what's going on financially. All we hear is that there's a letter floating around with the school committee, and they've had multiple meetings to discuss issues and concerns that we're in dire fiscal issues that are gonna lay teachers off, that are going to cut the school budget. But again, here we are, May 9th, I believe, and we know nothing yet, zero. No conversations from financial director, no conversations from the chief of staff, no conversation from the mayor's office, no conversations from the mayor. And I wanna make this public because I'm getting tired of talking to members of this community that just wanna stick up for people that they believe in. Understand something. It's okay to look at an elected official and say they like them as people. I agree, I like a lot of people. But when you look at the positions that we're in, for instance, the mayor's position is the CEO of this community. That means they're in charge, they're the boss, they're the buck stops with them. And when we don't get information back, it's glaring that we don't have leadership that we need right now. Because I'm frustrated, I've said it a thousand times, I'm frustrated. And I'm frustrated for the fact that no one is telling us what's going on, and we don't know what's going to happen. And I'm going to guarantee you, we're going to sit here again on June 30th, and we're going to look at each other like dummies and say, what are we going to do now? And someone's going to come to the podium at one in the morning and say, I found $12 million again. I found it. And I'm going to give you what you need. And we vote on it. Yes, right. We wake up the next morning and what happens here we are 10 months later, we still don't have an attorney for the city. We still don't see a facilities person that's actually working for the city. We still don't have the things that we asked for. the financial documentation from the financial director that was given to us from the previous financial director with the same exact software. We don't, we can't get it from this council, this leadership. So again, Madam President, I apologize for going on, but I'm tired of people on the street blaming fellow city councilors and their party affiliation on why things aren't happening in the city. Things aren't happening in the city because of one person and one body, and that's the mayor's office. And believe me, it has nothing to do about liking the person personally, because I think she's a fabulous person. I've known her a long time. But as a leader of the city, I don't know why we're blinded and what's going on. The frustration is real. I'm a city councilor and I haven't talked to the mayor's office or the chief of staff in over a year. Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. I'm sorry, I'm sorry. Did, did you say that our engineer, did he put that in writing, or did he say that he called me on the phone when I spoke to that way he spoke he spoke to me Yes, those were his words.
[George Scarpelli]: Now the area you're talking about, is it posing a threat or will it pose a threat? for residents?
[George Scarpelli]: Well, of course he has a record for that.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, our problem is we don't have a city solicitor that we could speak to because I find this a bother. I mean, it's dangerous. I mean, and we also talked this council's also talked about the because we have so many roads that are private, we lose a lot of money that that are directly assigned from the state and the federal government. because when they look at Medford, it looks like we have X amount of miles of road because we have so many miles of private ways. So I think that's something I believe we brought up in resolution to look into the process of taking back those roads and those streets for the fact that it would bring in more money to refurbish our communities, you know, dire need for the reconstruction redevelopment of those roads. that's something that you know, we can revisit as a council later on.
[George Scarpelli]: I know it's a law. We know that we know that that's the city's law, but which is that private ways what we can do what we can't do. You know, I have neighbors that live in a private way that pulled their money to resurface their whole street. So I know there are different rules and regulations, but I think when it comes to safety, I think that might supersede any issue or concern. That's why we've been told that. Yeah, we've been told that so I don't know what if it is exactly that.
[George Scarpelli]: What we're saying is this council is supporting the fact to look at changing all our private ways to public ways.
[George Scarpelli]: And I think that for your issue right now, I think that we need to have, you know, somebody from DPW to go down and look at that, that area where you're talking about and to address safety issues. And if it's safety issues, I believe that supersedes any
[George Scarpelli]: So maybe we could do this. Why don't we, why don't I make a motion that, okay, so what I'll do is we'll put a resolution in, I'll talk to the city clerk that will ask the residents to come up, the city engineer and a representative from the city that could come up and speak to safety issues. We can't speak on the law unless we, as a council, put something forth, which that might be something we look at, but I think right now in the urgency of this issue, that if it's a safety concern that we bring the people together in the resolution at an open meeting, so we can get to the bottom of this, because what I don't want to hear is God forbid tomorrow.
[George Scarpelli]: the city, which to the benefit of the city that we're all streets and you get the revenue from the state, and we all get the same services and again there's a catch 22 we asked for this already, but because we don't have a city attorney that works with the council, we can't get the work done. So if we want it done, we have to hire KP law that works for the mayor. and give them thousands of dollars to come back and give us the mayor's response of what the answer is.
[George Scarpelli]: Let's hope so.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I think Councilor I appreciate brings forward it. First of all, what's frightening is we don't have an IT department. That's the first thing. First thing is that we have someone that's working I believe per diem or on a contracted basis, but we don't have an IT department, which is frightening because we can't get the answers we need. And again, appreciate what you're saying, because people have also told me in situations that the city has gone out and asked for different feedback. We have a group of educated method residents that send their feedback And with those numbers, our city officials gather that information, which that's all they have. And they have to make the best decisions from that group. What we realized is that that group doesn't truly identify the true demographics of our community. I think if you would probably look at most of the surveys that go out, and that are replied to are really from one administrator that works her tail off to do the best she can to get the information to the people that are directly involved because they're interested with her. And it's no fault to her. She's doing the best she can. She's doing her position. But I look at the rest of the city saying that when we have issues like bike lanes, for instance, when things go out, who responds? the bicycle commission people in the bicycle world. Right. And that's what the demographic looks like what's being said. And it's no different than when you're trying to put a project in an area of low income. And when the people surveyed are the wealthy homeowners in that area that want that development or they could sell their homes for big money. And it just doesn't get to the people that really live in the community and have no other option but to live in that area. So I applaud this resolution and I think this is a huge problem when you look at a disparaging lack of true community involvement because we don't have the tools in place to get it out in, you know, maybe different languages or reaching different demographics or, again, so again, I rest with that. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: We've been here for 18 years, I didn't realize we had a sign.
[George Scarpelli]: I think Council President, thank you. Councilor and Councilor Bears, but I think that appreciate Councilor Caraviello to bring this, this motion forward, because I think that what he's seeing, because he is a councilor that's been in the forefront of smart development. And I think that's what's key. I think that, you find developers going to Councilor Caraviello and talking to him because he has an open mind and he understands that to move the city forward, we have to look at the smart development. And I think that what scares me is you see businesses, big plans that have been put out for, I mean, we'll use CHA, the process that they were going to build at the site of Century Bank has now fallen through, I heard. And what that would leave us is, boy, wouldn't that be a great new car dealership added on that block? And by right, that's what we're allowing. So I understand Councilor Caraviello's aggression when he talks about a moratorium, and I appreciate the the fear of moratorium and the open-mindedness to say, okay, let's not look at that, but also look at, let's change that word, but also look at the dire need of making sure that, like Councilor Beo said, is understanding getting that process in place and looking at our zoning as we go looking right away I think that's a great idea that Councilor Caraviello can sit with your subcommittee and look at specific areas that we see right now are you know as well as anybody where they're ready to pounce and look at those rules and come back to a community the whole meeting that we all work together and look at those zones that we can we can make some changes right now because I understand what you're saying because I think the residents like Council saying said, they're a little nervous, because they haven't had opinions, the whole idea that we're excited about why it's why what we've talked about in very important meetings we talked about the zoning consultant coming in. The key is bringing in a team that's going to work with the community to set up meetings to get the ideas of every set every community separately, just like I remember working in Somerville 15 years ago, being part of the recreation department, sitting on this community meeting saying, this is what's gonna happen in Union Square. What's recreation gonna look like if we do this development in Union Square? And having the neighbor's input. So I'm excited about this process, but I appreciate Councilor Caraviello. This is, I think, a very important resolution for the fact that if we don't make a move soon or quickly, And obviously, we're not getting the support from the from the from the city and the administration. I'd like that we can put our minds together like Council be as Council saying, and look at some avenues. I applaud that moving over to a subcommittee and moving this forward so we can see some action right away. So we don't see this development that can come in and stick there for the next 100 years without any movement and probably suffocate that area. Because it is, you listen, they tell you about the gateway of your community. That's a gateway. Mystic Gap, for instance, is a gateway. The Century Bank area is the gateway. This is where you come in. That could be a perfect site for mixed-use area that we can really do some great things and bring in some real revenue to the city. But we don't hear anything. We don't see anything. All we see is failures because I get phone calls from people that were involved in that saying, hey, just a heads up, CHA is backing out. So I really appreciate Councilor Capiello bringing this forward, because this is probably one of the most important people pieces that people don't realize of the growth of this community moving forward when you talk about funding mechanisms, when you talk about lack of basic needs that we have. this is the new revenue that can help us fund that. So thank you, council, I appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you. Covell. Mr. Council cover. I'll bring this forward. I know that, uh, it's been a very difficult time for the value family. I know that Steve not only just lost mom this past week, but lost his sister a few weeks ago after brave battle of cancer. Um, Stella was an amazing person. If you knew her, walking the halls here at Medford High, you really, you really know, knew someone who loved the city of Medford. I had the privilege of knowing Stella as a member of our congregation at St. Francis of Assisi and mom and, um, and, uh, and stellar and the rest of the mother's club at ST Francis really made an impact in people's lives. And, uh, it's, uh, she's definitely a person we're gonna miss here in Medford, and we send our condolences to Steve and the rest of the family. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you a little nervous about now the Uber Eats and all these delivery services, the park on front and run in, and what it would cause for that neighborhood. So is there parking there?
[George Scarpelli]: No, that's a great idea. And I understand that if that was 10 years ago, but now with all these delivery services, that's something that when we look for these types of permits, it's something that I have to wait for the fact that they're not gonna park and then walk over. They're gonna put three or four deep and run in. And I would hate to put any limits on anybody in their business, but that's my concern right now. But thank you, Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: How many employees are employed?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. And this is a business that runs successfully in neighboring communities, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: This is a business that also runs in a neighboring community?
[George Scarpelli]: No, I think this is something different and if it brings more people to the square, I think it's important. And I might find myself there one day. Everybody can use some help. So anyway, so I wouldn't seek to move approval, but I know it's public hearing.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I see everything is in order and the petitioners already explained the questions on employees, how it affects with parking, everything is in place and in order.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And Henry, especially in such a volatile time in our country when it comes to voting issues, I think you know, having you and your commissioners involved really put should put everybody at ease. The commitment that all of you put in to such an important aspect of our process really should make everybody in the city proud and feel at ease in your efforts because I've known you many years and there isn't a more thorough person or leader in our community so I thank you and the team behind you and all the supporters and helpers that you do have so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Commissioner Driscoll, thank you so much. I know that this is something that you've been very transparent, and it's always a pleasure when you have the actual commissioner and his team come with concerns or issues. And I think that We've got, we've had a few emails and concerns about lack of lack of community input which I don't see, I didn't see where that that fell into place I think that you've been so transparent in that format and really involve the community. And again, I think that any housing right now in this format is so needed. And anywhere we can find the space to make sure that we can enhance housing for a demographic that has been missed, I think that is a huge win. So we appreciate, I appreciate what you have done as a leader and moving forward to make sure that Medford has options for the people of Medford. So I thank you for your commitment and I applaud your efforts and how you presented this. This isn't something that you hid behind a desk and all of a sudden it came out and you know, the commissioner shows up or send someone there just to approve it. It takes takes questions. You've always been here. And that's what's always been. I tell you sometimes it's not comfortable, but you've always stood at that podium. And I appreciate that. And also bringing your team and them willing to sit there and stand beside you is a huge testament of who you are as a leader. So, um, like I said, we've been talking about affordable housing and housing for seniors and like, and I'll repeat it just because I think it's important. It's not ideal. It's not a penthouse on the water on Mystic Ave on the Mystic River, but it is the step in the right direction and I applaud it. So thank you so much. Thank you very much for the kind words.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Again, thank you, Councilors. I think this is a direct correlation of the lack of partnership with the mayor's office and the situation where we are today with really being left in the dark and so many issues, but most important as this speaks to it, the lack of representation to assist us in making us, giving us the support that we need. And some people might say, well, why is this important? I think the important this piece is bringing back full circle is the meeting that we had that that we had no guidance and then were sued by BJ's and then went to court and now here we are now I believe that it's now the residents are coming after this council and that all stems from one simple issue and that's not having legal representation here so again and that that goes back to not having a working relationship with the mayor's office so I think that Like I said last meeting, we'll belabor the process of the conversation again, but this is something that really, as a unit, I'll support the most part and look forward to putting this back in other elected officials' passwords of true transparency and letting the residents of our community vote to show us that this is the process we need to go in because we really need to move the city in the right direction. And I think this will help. So thank you, Madam President, I would second the motion.
[George Scarpelli]: No one know for me.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President, and on both of these orders, I think that I implore, and have my fellow Councilors understand the temperament that we're in right now the climate we're in. I received phone calls today I don't know if any of you have also from the school department that the mayor has already shared a very dire situation on the school side, that there will be cuts and layoffs on the school department, and believing that the administration's have a meeting here tomorrow. to rethink that and try to focus on how we're going to stop such a drastic move. Well, again, to my fellow Councilors and to the public, I've been imploring all of you, without understanding the budget and without understanding what we're doing with the money in our community, please don't vote anymore. money papers because we don't know where this is going to go when it comes to the presentation of the budget. I beg of you to please consider that I've been saying this and it's coming through fruition. from what teachers have called me, and they're appalled, and they don't know where they're going after what was supposed to be good faith negotiations and understanding the climate financially this community, and what is being told to me by the school department of teachers in the school department that they've been told that there will be cuts and layoffs. So every dollar right now we should really consider whether we're approving anything, dealing with money anything right now, until we have further understanding of what is going to happen in our community, when it comes to budget time because of the lack of information that have been shared to this council. We've been pushing money papers through because quote unquote what you said was, we still need to do the business of the city. But what we're doing is something unknown and what might happen is whatever we voted for is going to cause drastic trickle down effect in other areas in our community. So this is why I've said it, and believe me, I hate the fact that this looks like it's going to happen, that the budget is dire, that there are severe consequences that are happening. And I just, you know, I can only hope it's not true. But since we haven't had any information from anybody administration. I can only go with the people that reach out to me and share information, and that came directly from the school committee. Again, this is where we stand. You have your own conscious to vote on this, but understand, whatever you vote for, for one more dollar, whatever you vote on, when it comes to the budget season, and when it comes to the mayor looking at us and saying, we can't do what you want, and we're going to have to look at other positions, and then cut the assistant in the engineering department, or cut this program at the library, or cut this on our side, it falls on us. So again, I know it's a drastic conversation. But again, believe me, I wish I was wrong. But this is what's happening. Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President, I appreciate my colleagues words, but again I'm going to, I'll say, if there's a reason why the male mayor only allocated a certain amount of money to the school side. You can only equate that there is some shortfalls on the city side. So, this is what we're saying, again, we don't have the information in front of us. The question about a $2 million, a $200 million fire truck order. The reason why we, I've always supported that is simple. It's a process that had time table on it. That's going to take years before we address that financially, but the vote needed to be taken. That's why we supported it. So I, again, it's being a little disingenuine when we have the union heads in front of us, and we tell them that we're supporting them. And their, their, their response to us was, I hope you would not support a non union positions raise when we haven't had people in this building that haven't gotten a raise in four or five years. Those exact words. So these are the three points that were raised in my eyes, but I think three points that it's very, very effective to understand when we keep voting, even for another dollar right now, for what I've heard from the school department is really a glimmer of fear that I'm seeing that's going to come in front of us, hopefully by July 1. So again, And I think, and here's, we supported the charter changes that Council B has brought forward for this purpose. This is why we all mostly stood together with this. The fact that we haven't been part of the discussion, the fact that we have been disrespected and treated like our opinions don't count, and the ordinances that we put in place don't count. So there's many different layers to this, but I'll be honest with you, I've been saying this for a long time now. And like I said, I respect everybody behind this reel, and I respect your opinions, but all I'm saying is, and I hope I'm wrong, when it comes to July 1, and we're looking at different drastic cuts, because even a bond, there's trickle down effect on how that money's being dispersed. That's all I'm saying. It might be a bond, but if we're using money from one area to take away from another area to pay for a bond because it's spread over many years, until we know that climate or that's explained to us in a thoughtful, reasonable, responsible way that I can go back to the constituents that voted me in, that I could look at them and say, this is why I support it, I can't do it. So again, this isn't, anything to banter back and forth and say that I don't respect what you're saying. All I'm saying is that's the view that I feel. So, and I appreciate it. Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Clarification, it's a KP law. Boy, it's so serious.
[George Scarpelli]: and Madam President, I support Council mates. Uh, intense 1000% but anything that goes to K. P law, I will not support. So I appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank Councilor Bears because that was my my my response to make a motion that, um, Obviously, this isn't the only settlement that we're looking at over $1,000 and to get a breakdown of all the settlements that have been forgotten or bypassed or not reported, I think we should ask for a report because this, like Councilor Knight said, for years, That's a long time ago. And to say that because if to say that was the only one is pretty frightening considering in the past years that I've been on the council. I think we've by this time of the year we've all always seen about six to seven close to eight settlements that we've seen with either pothole incidents. city vehicles, hitting different vehicles, or even trip and fall accidents. So, again, Council and I brings up the point that that I find very frightening is that we're not seeing what's really happening. This lack of transparency is frightening. So I'd like to make it a motion that we ask the city, the mayor's office or the chief of staff to get back to us with any information or settlements that we've had, even in a spreadsheet form so we know what's coming. I think that that's important because I, You know, this is, this is frightening the fact that 2018, the sense that it happened and the reporting dates are so off. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Sure. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Settlements are different. I believe they said the judgments. Settlements and judgments are different, but we can ask for executive session to review those, can't we?
[George Scarpelli]: Sure, let's ask. Because if you've seen the KP law, what was given to us, close to half a million dollars, and I still don't believe that that's a true number. Transparency.
[George Scarpelli]: Good evening.
[George Scarpelli]: One moment.
[George Scarpelli]: I can, I can just interject just so I know that sure it's, you're a little fired up I just want to make sure that I know we get the opportunity to talk I think what Mr. Chubbs is talking about is the traffic commission meeting that was held last week, that there was some sort of approval or process that they're looking to take both sides of Winthrop Street, I believe, from the park, all the way to South Street to implement bike lane safe bike lanes but would put in bollards along both sides of the street, and we've got many phone calls from residents that were concerned that it's going going to directly affect their life, their quality of life, the safety and well being to the families and businesses like the American Legion that is located right on that street that that need those parking spaces for their survival. So again, I think I just want to clear just so you're all right. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I appreciate the residents that came up to speak but I think that it'd be something that possibly we asked the traffic, make a motion that we asked the traffic engineer to come to the city council next city council meeting because I think that compromise sounds great but. It's great if you live on the side of the road that still has parking. So I think that the phone calls we received, and I think the biggest one is the American Legion and the fact that they're a veteran service function hall that survives on rentals and having those spaces. Because if you talk about competition and they don't have those parking spots, they're just gonna leave to Arlington or other communities and they lose their business. And that's something that this community needs. And they've been very good to this community. So the other piece of this is unlike high street, when I've talked to some of the residents, Madam President, the discussion was most of those side, most of those driveways are shared driveways. So to access your parking area in your property, you have to go through a shared driveway. So it's beneficial or it's necessary to have the parking on the street so neighbors can easily park in their driveways and then put their cars away at night. So it's a different dimension that we never had to look at with High Street. So I appreciate you hearing, allowing us to present to our neighbors and I just move on that. Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: want to speak during community participation, if we allow them to join us.
[George Scarpelli]: say redacted, could you explain what it looked like?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And to that point, I have a resolution that will be up later that that will speak specifically to that and I'll make some recommendations with that. But what I wanted to do is really just thank you, Mr. South. I know that... The common cry from this council is a lack of communication. And last week was a great example. When we're sitting here and we're asked to provide votes for raises for non union employees and then when Councilor Knight asked, but it's funny because it's not the name it's not the position. It's the calf so what Council night recommended or asked, could you please give us the name of the position for those caps. And what the chief of staff did say first was the mayor and the city council to us as a you know forget about the mayor that's whatever decision but it's a council. We were never even talked about because we would have not even entertained just even bring that up. So, you know, I find it hard to believe that, again, is there a representative from the city.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so that just tells you. So last week, I believe it was comments were made that, you know, the facts sometimes that you are presenting aren't true, but for one person, I appreciate the facts you are sharing, and it's easy to find out if your facts are true or not. with one phone call or one Google of what you're saying and they come to fruition. So not like I had to, but I wanted to make sure because it's easy to come to that podium as administration and defend themselves because it's all they seem to be doing and look at this council and call us bullies because we're asking questions that pertain to serious matters of all of our constituents, all of our city members. And we're in a spot right now that What you're hearing with our union situation, I think, is just a smaller piece of where we are in this community. We're in a sinking ship. We're in a tailspin. And as a resident and a homeowner. I'm petrified, but I do want to thank you and your members again, I, I have not will not vote for money paper until I've been very clear, I will not vote for any money paper until We see financial paperwork that's showing us our direction, and that our union members are taking care of, because this has gone long enough four and a half years. That's a disgrace.
[George Scarpelli]: So we talked about cost of living just last year went up seven and a half percent.
[George Scarpelli]: And we're getting another, we're getting another kick now with healthcare, with the elimination of Tufts, I believe, GAC now is now moving to Harvard. So we're going to see a bigger kick now. So again, thank you, Madam President, allow me to speak, but thank you, Mr. South for sharing that information.
[George Scarpelli]: I know that concert. I think that what was clear with us wasn't ever source. Yeah. It was the police. It was the city administration that didn't inform the neighbors that would have had the option that would have wanted what we see in Winchester and I believe Winchester, they gave you the approval to do one pass and that's the difference between the Winchester side and that side from the line to the high school to the satellites at Lawrence, as far as you're going, I'm sorry. the Victory Park side.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm glad to see that we're doing that, but I just want to be clear because I was going to apologize for that because I was one of the people that was really critical of coming to find out there was a lack of communication again.
[George Scarpelli]: Great. Thank you. A few neighbors did reach out to me, and what's alarming is that there was an option for National Grid customers to add gas lines to their homes down Winthrop Street. What's bothersome to me, and I know that, I don't know if there's communications between two entities, but They were, they were just I was just informed that they were told that they plan to do the connections may 1, and we are looking to plan to hot top that area. April 15. So do you know if it's maybe it's not even with the ever so I speak but with Todd of Todd's on. Can you shed some light on that because if that's the case. Does he know about this project that, it was a petition by neighbors on Winthrop Street to add gas lines, so.
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: So I know that if this will reach out to the engineer, but is that that's a date already certain that something's already been to the to our schedule that we've already issued to the city and they agreed to.
[George Scarpelli]: So we make a decision as a community that this is what I know we're asking the but butters but if they're not getting back to us this is exactly why we are, we're getting the phone calls and what we are in the negative feedback on ever saw us because of the choppy work that was done because of the timeline that was presented by the city administration so this is where you have to take a stand as a city administration and say, hey, you know, this is what's best for the whole community. I know that it's five days rather than 11. It's no seams. It's one task.
[George Scarpelli]: So that's what I'm saying. Well, the milling and the paving I think that so I think that's important that I think that all plays into one as what we're asking. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President, I appreciate all the hard work that a city clerk has has done for us, and I know that this council has worked very, very hard on putting through some initiatives that this community needs. But what I was referring to is the understanding of what the role in KP law has with our ordinances, whether they're legal, whether they are being able to move forward these ordinances. And I've, like I said, I've had the, The opportunity that work with many, many different city solicitors, and one. One ordinance rule 30 ordinance and bonds orders referred to the city solicitor. This is in our charter. Every ordinance and every order for bond issue shall before its passage be referred to the city solicitor, who shall for with examine the same as to its legalities and notify the council in writing of their findings. It shall be standing rule of the city council that no final or definitive action shall be passed by this council in the matter of abatement of betterment assessments until such time as the legalities of a proposed abatement shall be approved by the city solicitor. So what's that saying is that it's simple. We could do the exercise moving forward with the ordinances and what we're trying to do as a council, but in essence, having KP law review them is often not. From what I gather, and I'll ask with a motion that we ask the city administration to forward to us any signed ordinances by KP law, I'm gonna guarantee you that it probably isn't because they know it's against the law because they're not acting city solicitors, because they know this rule in our charter, so in our ordinances. And this is what I was afraid of. I'm hoping I'm wrong, because it is a lot of money we've spent with KP Law. But moving forward, I want to just, again, just stress to my fellow Councilors that the understanding, the idea of what we're doing is I completely understand. We need to do our job the best we can. But when we don't have the tools in place to succeed, and we, keep asking for KP Law's opinions on things. It comes back to this. This ordinance is very, this resolution is very simple. I think it's an eye-opening resolution. I think it'll be interesting on my motion to see what we get back in two weeks with the city administration, where the signed ordinances are that will put so much hard work into passing. And I think that's, you know, I think that's going to be a telling sign of where we are. And I know that I'm going to make a second motion that's Council fears thinking about it since he brought it up and asking that the council asked for city administration for funding. to reach out to former city solicitors, preferably Romley or Scanlon, that everybody else's work in per diem, that we asked them to come in and work on a stipend program where, or a retainer that they can assist us with the city solicitors or get sworn as acting city solicitors so we could pass these passages forward. So these are two motions I'm gonna ask because of this news that was shared with me that we need the update from the city administration with the signed ordinances to see if they are signed or they're not left to be signed. I know that there were questions that As long as the mayor signs off that they are acceptable, no, it's not. the legal opinions that I received and what our ordinance says in rule 30, it clearly states that we can't do anything until the city solicitor signs off on this. So if we can do that and ask for the administration to allow us to bring in and swear in a city solicitor per diem or on a retainer to help us finalize some of these ordinances and other motions that we have that right now are being left off to KP Law and their infinite wisdom for the mayor, not for this council. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I think this is where, again, this council is being bypassed without any legal support. So why do we need a council? Why do we have our ordinances and laws that the mayor put her hand on the Bible and or about to follow the bylaws and the ordinances of this community? That's what we all did when we had the inauguration. When we were sworn in, that's what we're sworn in to do. This is rule 30 of our ordinances, the city councils for our city solicitor. And again, I would like to see those signed documents.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President, I won't belabor this I know you know where I stand on this I think that this discussion is a healthy discussion the banter is healthy. I think this is what people elected us for to think of outside the box and think of, you know, every avenue so I think it's, it's a. It's a positive step, whether you're on the side that wins this argument or loses this argument. But I do think that my point is this, and I'll say this again. My fear is, no matter who is in that position, as we figure out this financial path that we're in, because we still don't know, and I know it's one person's race, but There's a lot of little pieces that have been put into place and given the money that we need without knowing what's going on. So again, that's just another reason why I wouldn't vote against anything with the money paper, like I said, for the fact that we don't know our financial future. We appreciate the finance director presenting what he did, but that's not, You're right, it's not the complete piece, and that's what I'm nervous about. And again, thank you for the time.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President, Councilor Cavillo, thanks for putting this forward. I've known the DiClemente family since I was a baby. Mom and dad worked side by side with them at St. Francis for almost every fundraising event for the church and the community. And Mr. and Mrs. DiClemente took over so many other efforts to help the members of this community, one mostly being the food pantry. he would be there and he's stickler. I mean, he, you know, the stories are well-known that he wanted to make sure every family was serviced. So a gentleman, someone that we'll miss and to his wife, Jerry, I know that when you lose your second, your half like that, it's difficult, but just to let her know that the community supports her and are behind her and we send our condolences. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you again, Madam President, Councilor Caraviello. Joan is a legend. It's funny when you first ran, when I first ran for school committee, someone said, you need to go sit with Joan. I don't think you can get elected if Joan's not supporting you. and that's the type of person she was. And what she'll tell you is the truth, the honest to goodness truth. So she was someone that always, again, always the first business to give, and always willing to help anybody in need. So congratulations to a fine, deserving individual. So congratulations.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you council. Yes, bring this forward. But again, I think this is, this is an exercise for this council to understand what we're seeing. We keep, the mayor keeps putting capital projects in front of us and we keep voting it. At least I haven't, but we keep voting these different agendas, her agenda through. and we still haven't seen anything. Truly haven't seen the finance piece yet. Although the finance director was here, wasn't enough, at least in my opinion. Second, we have papers in front of us today that should be in a capital improvement plan. So if we're gonna vote for firetrucks tonight, is that part of the plan? Or is that outside? Are we just gonna start voting piece by piece by piece? So until this council, stops with giving everything they want, we're gonna keep going down this road. We're gonna keep going down this road because it's acceptable. We're being treated like we don't count. We're being treated with no respect. But at the same time, this initiative is something that was brought up by a department head that talked about this capital improvement plan. that when you're going to present it, we start the budget process when, but when should we start the budget process? So we're going to do a budget process at the same time we're going to see a capital plan. It's just distorted. This isn't how you do business. So again, though, thank you for bringing this forward because I do think it's very important.
[George Scarpelli]: It's in the record.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Councilman Pierce for bringing this forward. But let me start off by saying it's a sad day when elected official, when I became that elected official, we used to watch the council and laugh. They were laughing stock. It was all over YouTube because you had councils that were passionate. And here I am sounding like one of the disgruntled city councilors. But I tell you, it's frustrating. When we have to go to the lengths that Councilor Villes is going through right now and asking this, to go put this forward because we're not getting any information. We're not getting any respect. We're not moving the city forward at all in a partnership. It's disheartening and depressing. A good example. is the effort that our council president has put forth. Months ago, I asked, I recommended, requested a meeting with the council, the school committee, the mayor, and the superintendent. And we talked about And the concerns that I wanted to bring up is really just understanding the budget in a better way in the eyes of the school committee and how we can work together and also get a report of what has happened in the school district that has been absolutely devastating this year. And we haven't, from what Council President, I won't speak for you, but I know that she's done her due diligence, reached out to everybody, but it's falling on one person. And what it's telling me as we proceed with the budget for one Councilor, I'm going to have to assume that the school committee budget, the school budget is fine. I'm going to have to assume that the school committee members that came to us and said, you won't meet with us. I'm to assume now that the budget is all set. The school budget is tight. They've got plenty of money. because that was asked for a couple months ago to sit with that committee. And when I say the committee, it falls on the mayor because she's the president of that committee. She's chairperson of that committee. And not to have that meeting in place and be realistic now, we're not gonna have this meeting. We're coming up into budget season, talking about capital plans, we have enough on our end. So I could only assume, maybe we'll get a response back from one of the school team members in their Facebook posts, that the budget is perfect. because if you're not willing to sit with this council to understand the needs at the most crucial time that we've had in our community and our school department and over a few years since last major incident with the previous administration, it just shows you the lack of disrespect. It just shows you that we have It's comical in the fact that people come to me and ask me questions and I can only say, I don't know. That's embarrassing. And why is it embarrassing? Because when I met with the mayor, and I met with the chief of staff in that office, And we're talking about, I wanted to meet and talk about how I felt and that I felt contentious. And I want to get over that. And I asked them to their faces. I said, please allow the council to be part of the victories and part of the failures.
[George Scarpelli]: The mayor hasn't come to this meeting. The chief of staff is sometimes on Zoom. We wouldn't know that because we don't have it in front of us. I don't know if she's on tonight or not. Not at the moment. It's comical because in neighbor communities, you have representatives sitting in the front row that work directly with their council. That we don't have to try to reach out to department heads to get things done. That shouldn't happen anyway, just doesn't look right. It's a liaison that works for the council and the mayor's office. We know the mayor's busy, but not to have a representative here to talk with us and share these concerns? When you have this much contention and this much anger, because that's what I feel, how do you expect to move the city forward?
[George Scarpelli]: And excuse my frustration, please forgive my frustration because I know you all share it. I know your personality probably doesn't match mine in the sense that sometimes I'm too vocal, but I'll be honest with you. I appreciate Councilor Bears bringing this forward, but I will tell you, I hate it, but I'm gonna bet my son on this. The city can have my son, my 20 year old son, if we have a meeting here, if something comes out with these resolutions. That's how confident I am that nothing happens. But again, I'm gonna reiterate to my colleagues, let's keep giving her everything she wants because this is an election year. Let's make sure they get everything they need, make sure all the fluffy stuff looks good so she can move forward for another two years. Some days you have to say, stop. So we need we get the respect that we need to help move the city forward. Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. So appreciate the chief of staff coming before us. But what in the past was called bullying. My, my passion really derives from the understanding I sat beside the mayor. And we shared different concerns and we shared the lack of transparency for other administrations. And I supported the mayor when she ran for office. And what I saw was totally completely opposite of what we talked about. It was completely opposite of what she ran on. So our first term, I was very contentious, I was angry, and I called for the meeting with yourself, I don't know if you remember, yourself and the mayor, and we sat together. And I asked you, tell me if I'm wrong, if I'm lying, I asked you, I asked the mayor, please allow the council to share in the failures and share in the successes. Absolutely, that's what we'll say. I haven't gotten a text message from you about what's going on in the community. I haven't heard any outreach from the mayor's office or your office. The only contact we had that I appreciate was with the last chief of staff accepting thousands of dollars worth of free furniture from the Furniture Trust Company that refurbished many offices in this building. And then the situation, that same furniture trust company that worked with this yellow office or some office at City Hall to donate more furniture, and then get a phone call from the CEO saying, George, what is this letter that won't be signed? Which we agreed, we needed us to sign. With furniture that was already in the building, already being used. Why is the lack of communication coming from the CEO instead of the chief of staff, knowing that I put my name and my reputation for this organization to come help this community? This is the little things that maybe you don't understand. You seem to think that it's bullying or it's anger. Yeah, it is anger because I am passionate. We are a mess. There is lack of transparency. You just said it yourself. I guess if you're not the president or the vice president, we don't get text messages. So there's the frustration. That's why I support Councilor Bears's initiative. As a charter review, at the beginning I did, I voted for it.
[George Scarpelli]: would put the steps in place for what they wanted and that I didn't believe in because I've lost that communication with the mayor. I lost that professional partnership with the mayor. So absolutely I voted no to the charter review because I have no faith in the mayor's office that's gonna lead that charter review. That's why I didn't vote for charter review. So, Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: You can't, the city can because it was done prior to that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I think, thank Tim, because I know that he's putting forth an initiative that I've been asking for since I joined the council, and that's having our own hot top and sidewalk crew. I think that would save us millions of dollars over years. But again, Tim and I talked, and it's not personal, I think that, the way that we're receiving papers and not understanding the budget, not seeing a capital plan, I think to me would be, is why I won't be voting for any money paper, unless it's time sensitive. And right now this isn't time sensitive. I think that, I think we've been going through the slippery slope without legal representation guiding the council. Attorney General did respond with the phone call. Mr. Clark, is that correct? And in essence, the result was talk to your city solicitor. I believe that's exactly what the Attorney General's office representing the state said, you need to talk to your own city solicitor. And again, these are issues that I think Unless it's not time sensitive, I think this council has to be very cognizant of what we're approving. As a matter of fact, I'm gonna make a motion as well that we ask for copies of all of the signed ordinances from the attorneys making it a legal document that is specific that we've worked on because what Like I said, I've had the ability to talk to former city solicitors and other communities and these are questions I can ask. And they're under the understanding that we should really get notification whether all the work that we've done, and all the money they put into that, that we've asked them to put in that the bottom line is somebody signs that to make that official. If it's not signed, all the work and the money we spent for them and all the work and time we spent in this room was all for naught. So I'm gonna request the administration give us a copy of the signed ordinances that we've sent to KP Law with their signatures making it a legal ordinance. So again, believe me, I despise being that person on this council. I despise it, it's one of the reasons why I ran, because I hated it. But unfortunately, like I said, and I thank Tim for understanding, my dad said, at 14, when you open this checking account, we're gonna put $100 in it. If something costs $101, you can't buy it. Well, if we can't see what's truly coming in front of us, we're making decisions without knowing. This would be great if we all vote for new equipment, and then we come to find out that we don't know if we have enough for staffing to put people in that equipment. So all we're gonna have is hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of planters that grind in one place. So I'm just a little, again, this is why I'll be voting no, but this is what, I'll express until we get the answers we need. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate that, but again, like I said, Tim, and I appreciate your hard work, but again, if we don't know the climate that's ahead of us, the last director stood in front of us at previous budget meetings that said we're devastatingly low or short for what is passable capacity of employees at DPW. So I think that's when we have to look at, without knowing or understanding the budget, like I said, I know the finance director came up, who by the way, I'm a little confused about that too, because it's the same software that's being used under Leish Anomaly, correct? The software that was used under Aleesha Nunley that gave us all the reports that the mayor as a city councilor asked for, that was given in a timely fashion is the same software that our finance director right now is using, I believe. Maybe the chief of staff can answer that too.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, maybe we can ask him that because the previous finance director didn't use a software as an excuse. Everything we asked for is money papers to keep us involved and knowledgeable to make these decisions Tim, we received. So again, this is why, again, maybe it's the seat. Maybe it's the seat that turned you into somebody you don't wanna be, but I can't support it. Yeah, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I completely understand that. I believe the chief of staff mentioned that as a software as part of this problem why this isn't happening. So I just want to make sure that's clear. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, Chief Esteves is here. Would ARPA funding fall into this category with what could that have worked?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, I yield to Councilor Bears for one minute.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. Thank you, Madam President. Chief, first of all, again, thank you. And more importantly, if I fight is that two giant fires in one week, and then not including, I'm sure, we assisted with the Somerville fire right down the street. So you're talking three fires in a matter of a week that were pretty serious. So these are the situations where it's time sensitive that I need to support. But I'm glad my question was really more of the fact that seeing what we went through this week and really needing the trucks that we need to to function, making sure everybody's safe, is that I was, my question was also the third truck. So I'm glad to see that'll be part of that capital plan. And it'll be something that I'll be pushing for because ultimately, this is about safety of our firefighters and safety of our citizens. So, and making sure we have the equipment needed to do the job. So again, I can't Thank you enough, I think that we rest easy knowing that we have a department that, although we lost some property, no one died. And everybody went home safe so yeah, I thought that that's very important so I just wanted to thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I see the issues you're facing.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Um, we're right.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Councilor Collins-Lee. I will tell you, I did receive phone calls from union members that stress the fact that unless the equity and fair negotiations with non-union, with union members and not having their contracts settled with for years, I think it would go totally against what we have been preaching about supporting our union members. So I think that's one of the reasons why I won't and again, not a penny I will vote for until we have a true understanding of what we're doing financially in this community. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, if we could, I'd rather table this to get further understanding because I thought that it was just 2% voting on our raise for us, I believe.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Right off the bat, gentlemen, the sweeper. Does this mean we'll have two street sweepers? Is it functional or no?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, that we have.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I understand. But this is what, again, I'm gonna just, this is my, I'm gonna make this cry every single time. Until we know where we are financially and purchasing these items, it's just, it's irresponsible for us, it is. I'm sorry. I know there are things like the fire trucks at a time sensitive, but this is just irresponsible. Keep voting these papers through. What we just did a minute ago is beyond me. Again, this is money. We don't know where we are. We keep voting for it. So again, I will not vote for this. And I implore my colleagues to think about it. I appreciate it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't want to interrupt you Tim but this is where the frustration comes in. It's like something this big right 10 year contract one of the biggest contracts we have in the community. Now again, we're told that. ideally getting the vote done right now and not truly understanding it. That's a part that I feel very uncomfortable with. And that's why we talked originally tonight about the lack of communication and understanding of respect with this council, because that's how we feel. I mean, that's probably not intended, but it's how we feel.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Just to respond to that, then you weren't clear enough for this council to understand the process. So because I think there are councils here that are very confused. If this was presented to us, Ms. Hunt, then we wouldn't be talking about these other legalities. So maybe there was a flaw in your presentation. So that's where I find it being disingenuine when you've been in front of this council multiple times, obviously. But when we have questions like this, obviously it wasn't clear enough. Thank you. Absolutely.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information with that, you know, daily municipal RFPs myself. I think it's a slippery slope when we start putting in language that is really specific when you talk about procurement and RFPs. So again, I think this is again where it comes in not having legal opinion because this could be, ultimately we can go through this whole process and then come back and say the process was skewed and then we have lawsuits from competing vendors. So I don't, Again, it's just not having that communication and understanding, so.
[George Scarpelli]: Great job.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Councilor Caraviello for bringing this up. Uh, Mr. Howard wasn't just a gentleman who who created an infamous breakfast sandwich. He's someone that fought for our country, that loved Medford, and someone that really cared about his community. Living up in the heights and working on the board of Little League, we'd find ourselves as parents preparing a field at 95 degrees, and without field, Mr. Howard would be walking toward you with two gallons of water just to make sure that we're hydrated. They'll show up one day and drop off a bucket of balls that people didn't collect and make sure the kids got back went back to the kids. I love the story back in the blizzard of 78, when no one can leave their houses, and you had elderly families that couldn't find. a gallon of milk or half a loaf of bread, and Mr. Howard decided to ration off everything in his corner store to make sure everybody lasted through that difficult time in 78. I send deep condolences to the Howard family. I know Mrs. Howard is represented by a name on the corner of Fulton Street. I ask the administration to, with respect, add Mr. Howard's name along with his wife in respect of that historical corner that I think everybody should drive by, walk by, ride your bike by, look up and say, wow, I wonder who that person was. And you can know about what it means to be a true community member and what it really means to be a Medford Mustang. Because again, I've said it too many times here, who's gonna take their place? People like Mr. Howard stepping, passing on, who's gonna take their place to pass on the legacies that great people from Metro made up. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And I blame my passion and my outburst sometimes on Council Maloney because I learned from the best. He would wear his emotions on his sleeve and he wouldn't be afraid to say what he thought he needed to say for what was best for the city of Medford. And maybe from time to time, the rumors that he might have jumped over the rail a couple times. but he had so much passion to make sure that the city of Medford was represented in such a positive light. And he was a person that would take care and work for anyone in this community, whether it was in the Wellington area, West Medford, South Medford, even though he grew up, he was over at Charter Nav. he really fought for everybody. And, um, it's a sad day that Mr. Moody's passed. But I know that he's left a legacy with Gordon and Sean and Bobby. Um, three Children that following his footsteps and giving back to their communities and, um, someone I'm very proud to have known and learn from. So, um, condolences to his family. Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for being here. First, business, everything looks like it's in order. Personally, I'm going to be very upset because I'm going to be spending a lot of money. My daughter loves the establishment, so now that it's in our backyard, I think the family money will be spent at Boba Tea. So just take it easy on us, but- Thank you. No, I look, I see everything in order, Madam President, and I move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I know that I appreciate Chief being here this evening. I know that we just had a few concerns. One that I know that as we're looking at our budget coming forward and understanding that we might have some issues with the fleet and seeing what we need to do, we can do as a council to try to help move things along if we need to need to. to make sure that you get all the apparatus you need for the safety of your men and women. So that'll be the first thing. And then I know that there were some concerns about benefits for new hirees, that we can shed some light.
[George Scarpelli]: Someone's here tonight, so I appreciate that. So if you can shed some light on our fleet, that would be.
[George Scarpelli]: If you have any questions, I'll yeah, so I know that one of some of the residents are asking that why is there a Boston truck and I don't know if we said maybe there was a fire and they were covering and then someone said what happened with the Boston truck was.
[George Scarpelli]: So this, I'll say it, Chief, this seems dire. This should have been something that this administration should have asked for two years ago. And this is something that is, do we have a representative from the administration?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so that's a problem. So I look at that because usually when you present a capital plan like this, it's in the capital projects. We haven't seen, have we got an update? So I know that, you know, I know that the mayor put out that the station, Main Street stations now going under this, that, and the other thing, and that's great, but these are the things that frighten me. This is great if we have a brand new fire station, but, you know, are we gonna be, you know, rent in a U-Haul truck and throwing some ladders on the top, because we don't have fire engines. So that's what I fear right now, because as you're saying, two and a half years away, and we're in discussions about ordering them, I think this council needs to play a bigger role in this, Chief. I think that we need to make a motion that we need to have an emergency meeting, as committee of the whole, with procurement office, with the mayor, And really, let's try to figure out a way to get this audit sooner than later. I mean, I don't, I know it's not It's not a popular thing, it's tough to be up there. I know it is, but from here, I know how dangerous your jobs are, and not to have the proper equipment that you need, whether it's turnout gear, whether it's fire trucks.
[George Scarpelli]: Chief, I appreciate everything you do. I know this is nothing on you. What I'm saying, sitting here, we've ordered fire trucks in the past with Chief Gilberti and this administration, the administration prior to that. So originally this council was involved. That's what I'm trying to say. If we're waiting for the 30 days and you're sitting with the mayor and she's putting something together with other different departments, Guess who they have to come to to ask for the money? They have to come here and we know nothing about it.
[George Scarpelli]: As a city councilor, what I'm saying, this is what I'm telling you. You don't have to. I'm telling you what I see. is that I don't care what other departments don't have paperclips. Our firemen, firewomen don't have the equipment they need to succeed and be safe. So I know it's not it's not popular for you to say it, but I can say it chief and it's okay. But I will tell you we need to have an emergency meeting with the mayor to see where this council falls in to make sure we're in the loop to make sure that we can hold meetings to clear any funding that we have to approve to make sure this happens within 30 days. That's all I'm trying to say. And I'm only saying this because I'm in your corner. I want to support your people. This is something that working here for 16 years, whether on the school committee, city council, we've been directly involved when we talked about the previous fire trucks or different, different, uh, you know, uh, expenditures that we put out, whether it was for police cars or a new station or whatnot, but we were involved. This council has yet to see updated financials. So we're, we're, we're nervous chief. I'm nervous that we're going to get to me and we're going to come here. I'm going to say, forget the fire trucks, George. We might have to cut firemen or firewomen, and I don't want that. This is what I'm saying. We need to get together with the chief, with the mayor's office, and really start, because they've gone publicly to different arenas, and they publicly mentioned how awful the budget's gonna be this year. And listen, I'm publicly saying this. I've said it a thousand times. I'm sounding redundant to everybody, and I sound like a crybaby at times, but I'm frightened. I'm nervous, because I don't know what we're doing here. This council hasn't talked to anybody about what's going on. So thank you for coming. Thank you for the update. My recommendation is that we make motion that we call for an emergency meeting with the mayor's office to get an update on the capital plan dealing specifically with ordering the fire trucks within this 30-day window so the clock can start now. Does 2020 code that, Chief? 2020 trucks? And the possibility is we have to make them last for at least another two and a half years if the clock started today. So that's why we need to get the clock started. We need to do whatever we need to do as a council to jump ahead of anything needed that this council needs. So whatever we can do, that's all I'm asking, Chief, is to get the administration to sit down with us and say, whatever we need, let's get this done. Let's understand if we can use our money. Let's see if we can, you know, what other funding mechanisms we can use. to make sure this happens right away. That's that's all I'm saying. I mean, I'll give you an example. Sounds pretty dire. We're down a few a few trucks. We have a we have a motion later on resolution today for another $1.5 million in sidewalks. What? I don't we haven't even know we don't know where the last 1.5 went last year. So before I these are the issues that we don't know about. That's why I asked you to come up and I know it's I know and I don't make I don't want to make you feel uncomfortable in any way chief. Yeah, you're doing an amazing job. Yeah, you have one of the best departments in the city. I know and I speak firsthand for the way they treated my mom and my dad when they when they were leaving the service. So I can't say enough about them. So but We know, we can see the issues, but we haven't heard anything. That's why having you come up and just shed some light, I appreciate it. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Is Mr. Osborne present?
[George Scarpelli]: He is online.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. I appreciate the response. And I think probably my biggest question is that, I know the fire was first brought up, but since then, I was told that there might be some concerns with new hires at DPW, and new hires with the police department, and the lack of truly, lack of true communication with going back and forth. that you sent us a clarifying email, and I appreciate that, but I have a question on that. It seems that the comment that when open enrollment is closed, there's no way to get anybody on, correct? Is that correct?
[George Scarpelli]: So just so you know, Mr. Osborne, I did contact a couple of neighboring communities and talked with the benefits managers, and I know that they have different systems set up that it's a 60-day waiting period once they are hired, no matter what month of the year it is, that if they were hired in January and February, they would then be, you know, added on to the insurance for GIC on April 1st. That's for example. Another example is February to March. They would then be hired May 1st. They would have the GIC. I've talked to a few people in a few HI departments that have also told me that it's not uncommon for a relationship with the members of GIC and I have a call with them tomorrow to just give them a call and say, hey, listen, be a little persistent. I believe one benefits person told me that all she really needs to do is call them three times in a day and they'll get somebody on if it's really needed. So I think that's that, I'm a little confused with what you sent and then what I've heard from GIC itself. And then the other piece is, are all the firefighters that were hired. I know back in February that wants insurance. Have they been given their insurance or are they still waiting for the insurance? Second question is, do there's still issues with the police that had some concerns and some issues and with DPW? If you can answer that, that'd be great.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so that's alarming to me because I think that when I hire a new person in my position, I work with my HR benefits coordinator in the HR. As they go on to the onboarding process, the, this is part of their process. Are you telling us that when they're going through the onboarding process, when they're hired for the city of Medford, that that's not the job of the HR department to follow through to make sure they're doing that? Because you're making it sound that they have to come to you separately and ask for it.
[George Scarpelli]: And I'm not just putting blame, I know that you seem to be a team of one, Mr. Osborne. You know, we're fortunate that we have teams of six to eight that are working where we're onboarding people, at least that's what it sounds like to me, that you're alone. So that seems to be an issue in itself. So right now, you know, no firemen, that everybody has, I know that I've gotten some calls from firemen that they still haven't had their insurance applied to their benefits, but no one's reached out to you to let you know that.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I know that representatives Buckley and Jones have reached out and mentioned that they would like to come to the meeting and maybe if you can, if there's any way, gentlemen, if you can, just enlighten me. I was told, I was led to believe that there were firemen and women that were hired back in February that have yet to be granted insurance. or offered other avenues to get their own insurance. So I just want to make sure that if this is a wrong that we fix it, that We look at the departments that need to get on board to make sure this happens. And I know that the police reached out as well, and representatives from DPW had some same concerns. And I guess that since they're not specific to this, I'll call for a separate resolution with the police to understand how that's transpired. Uh, if you could shed some light and your members appreciate just name and address for the record.
[George Scarpelli]: So if I can interrupt. So I know it's a two month period. So we figured out in February, they didn't have insurance. So they didn't have that meeting. It's still a year. Have they had that meeting since then?
[George Scarpelli]: So more importantly, so July, everything was handed in. Correct. August, September, he should have been on. Is he on now? No.
[George Scarpelli]: So if I can, Mr. Osborne, if you're still there, I don't. Obviously, is there a way that we can, first of all, correct this by helping these three firefighters get their GIC benefits ASAP? Because I know that talking to, there's an open pipeline when you express these concerns to GIC directly with issues like this. It takes days to get them on. Is there any way, do we have that possible in Medford or no?
[George Scarpelli]: So, so, Mr. Osmond, what I'm trying to figure out is if we If we talk with the firefighters that are in question, and they come to your office tomorrow, do we have someone in place that can assist them to make sure that this is corrected and we don't, nothing happens again? Whether it's one side or the other right now, I don't care. I wanna make sure these firefighters have insurance. Is that possible?
[George Scarpelli]: So my hope is this. My hope is that with the leadership of the fire department, that we can reach out to those three firefighters, that they can go to Mr. Osborne's office tomorrow and see what needs to be done right now so we can get that clock that clock ticking. But I will tell you Mr. Osborne and I can I can have I can share some contacts with you with G. I see that there is a possibility when situations like this arise that you can call them and they can't support you within days that I know we've dealt with it. So what I find more alarming to me is that we don't have a system in our HR department that this isn't a natural onboarding system where they come in, fill out the paperwork, do the GIC stuff together, and that happens. That's more alarming to me than anything because this wouldn't have happened if we didn't have a competent system in place like other communities. This isn't odd. This isn't new. This is, private entities, as they come in, if you work with a private entity and you walked in and you sat down with the HR directors of that company, that's part of the onboarding system of acquiring healthcare. That's probably one of the, after the salary, that's probably the most important thing you're looking at. So I think that that's what I'm more alarmed right now is that we don't have that process in place. Because I heard what you said, and what's alarming to me is that you're saying let the people that we're hiring, who, by the way, we're having a very difficult time finding people to work in Medford, that they have to come and search for you so they can get the benefits that they are required to have. Because every city employee is required to the option of GIC. So I don't know. I don't want to get in between what was said here, what was said there. I really don't. What I want is these three firefighters to get their insurance as quickly as possible. And if you'd like to, I'll share that tomorrow with the information that I can get to you, that there's contacts at GIC that I've worked with directly that can help with onboarding special situations, like seems to be this one. So this is, from what I gather, I'm not confused. From what I was told, Mr. Osborne, is that all three firefighters that are having issues all wanted the GIC and the city's insurance, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so for today, what I would love to do is get these three firefighters there tomorrow with our benefits officer and our HR director, and let's get the clock started tomorrow. Let's get them get their insurance. And moving forward, we need to figure out what we want.
[George Scarpelli]: That tells you the city doesn't care about us, but they only care about money, this, it's a little confused because I know that as as a negotiator on when we were as a teacher, and we negotiate we're one of the first, I believe back in the days, we were on the negotiating team when we were picking the government insurance process. And I know that we, that's one of the things with the teachers onboarding system that's done right away. So I think that that's something this council, I would make an emotion that we ask that we see the onboarding system that's used in practice today. and our HR department and then review to see how we can correct these issues so we don't have people or families without insurance without knowing. So I think that'd be important. I'd make that as a form of motion. And then I'd also make a form of motion that requests that that HR director reach out to these three firefighters directly and call for an emergency meeting with them ASAP so we can get that clock started so they're insured through the city as soon as possible. So again, I don't, I don't, personally, I don't, it's not hearsay. I've worked with the GIC often. This is not a year-long process. This is if you go through different benefits departments, they have charts that are set up that shows you if you're hired, and these dates, these are the dates that you'll be on board. They're given, they're, I'm not going to share with you, but this is one communities that they share with the person that's hired. This is it. This is your date. You're hired in this date. Expect to have your G. I. C. On this date. So that's something we need to correct on the city side to make sure this doesn't happen again. So, um, again, this is this is alarming, but I think it's something we need to correct as soon as possible.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Madam President. I can just just final question. Um, I have those motions in place, but if Mr. Osborne can answer, are we having similar issues with fire and DPW as well, and other departments?
[George Scarpelli]: Police, excuse me, police and DPW, any other departments that, so we can correct that as well.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank you, Madam President. I, too, expressed concern early in the whole meeting. with no outlook. or vision of our finances, I find it very difficult to support any paper. And I know I appreciate all the work that Tim you're doing and your other department heads, but I hope you can understand that as a city councilor that doesn't know the financial climate of our community. And then being given a paper $1.5 million to bond to me is very, very, unacceptable, to say the least. I think that the other piece that I found alarming is that when we're looking at sidewalk repairs, we've also asked for an update to what the last 1.5 million that I balked at, if we all recall, that we all approved that because we needed it. And to be honest with you, I don't see much work going on on sidewalks. and we've asked for a report of an update and we haven't gotten that either unless I missed that but I haven't gotten an update with that so I I would move to table this until both Councilor Knight's feedback is responded, his motion responded, and we get the update on where that money went for the last one and a half million dollars that we bonded for sidewalk repair, replacement, and stump removal, because I'm still getting a lot of phone calls that sidewalks are a mess, and I haven't seen that list that we've asked for. So, I apologize, but that's how I feel.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information if I can.
[George Scarpelli]: Tim, I appreciate that. As one councilor, I stood here in my first budget and asked for a sidewalk hot top crew. We worked with the neighboring DPW commissioner that put everything into place, a whole funding mechanism, which isn't a lot of money. But the most important thing they said was before we get that equipment, make sure you have enough people that are going to run that equipment. Yeah. So I think we're putting the cart in front of the horse because I think you're right. We need our crew. We need this equipment, but we need the crew to do it.
[George Scarpelli]: We have a plan. We have a capital plan. I submitted a request. I know the mayor's office. That's good. So the whole idea is that truck and the equipment needed with three staff members. It wasn't a lot of money considering what we've been putting in for bonds over the last four or five years. It really pays for itself. So I applaud your effort.
[George Scarpelli]: I know the Councilor Knight has a motion, I believe, that I seconded, but I just wanted to make sure that Tim, it's nothing against you. I appreciate the hard work you're doing. But again, I think that to my fellow colleagues that we look at the lack of financial transparency and not understanding who we are right now. I think to vote for any money paper right now would be a huge detriment as we move forward. I'm only going to bring this up a thousand times tonight because I think it's important that we're going to get to May and I don't want to say I told you so because the fact that we don't know where we are financially and it's premature to be bringing money papers to this council and asking for things that might end up having a bond for new equipment but the possibility of hiring isn't even on the radar, looking at possible cuts is what I'm afraid of. This is what, until we get a clear fiscal vision of where we're going and the understanding, I think it would be really, it would be really reckless for this council to be voting for money papers. you know, between the lack of legal support that we have, you know, and I think earlier I was so upset because I just keep reading this KP law stuff and all I keep talking to different city solicitors and understanding that every time that phone rings and they pick it up, it's $700 and the clock starts. with $700 and we don't know where we are financially. So again, I'm going to share this a thousand times and I'm going to sound like a broken record, but I'm going to tell you, I think it's irresponsible for us to vote for money papers until we have the proper legal support and knowledge of our fiscal outlook. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, madam president.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. So I appreciate Mr. Lieberman. He's been very active and involved in our community, and he makes a lot of sense at times. But I think when we're talking about money papers, I think for one, Councilor, KP law is an issue because we've made mistakes because we don't have legal representation supporting this council. So we've been left out in the cold on some serious legal issues that cost us a lot of money. That's one. My respect for Tim and what they're doing, it can't be, it's not questioned. He is amazing, what they're doing there is amazing, but the problem we're having is understanding. I know we had our financial paperwork here the other day, financial director here, and he presented some sort of paperwork. We still don't see where we are financially in our community. So bonding and keep spending money, not understanding where we are. It sounds great today and I think it's out of the box and let's do it. Let's do it. And we do it. And then we come to me and say, guess what? We didn't know the financial outlook, but this is what it is today now. We now have to go to Tim and say, Tim, you have that great equipment we just purchased, but now they're gonna turn into planters, because now we have to lay off 10 DPW employees. This is my fear of where we were last year, last May and June. Don't forget where we were, that at one in the morning, the mayor had to come back from home and try to figure out a way to give us, find us $12 million. So that's all I'm saying. We know the issues we have in the city. We see it every day and we appreciate directors like Tim that are working their tail off and trying to do the best they can. But for one council that represents everybody in the city of Medford financially, if we don't see the paperwork in front of us, we don't see the numbers in front of us, no matter what was presented last week, because that's a great start, but it's March. It's March. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, Madam President, again, I don't, Um, it's not that I don't support, uh, traffic, uh, engineer. I think that he does an amazing job. But again, I think that there's too many questions still haven't been asked or answered. Uh, when we've sent that out, I reiterate what Councilor Knight said. Our city solicitor said that there were some concerns with the process and agreed with this council. And then, again, we get contradictory feedback from KP Law, so I'm left in limbo. I don't think that we can move forward with any of these caps or increases or change of salaries. Although, do I think it deserves it? Absolutely, but it's also, what we're seeing is you have other departments that people are picking up duties and not being compensated. And I'll give you an example of the veteran director who was put into position back in the day when he was the hearing officer and he was waiting to be compensated. And don't forget that day because people that were here remember the injustice there. So here we are now in the same situation. So this isn't how business works in the municipality. Although as much as I like the director. I don't you can't be picking and choosing. I think it's a slippery slope. And again, this is why, you know, not having having a conflicting legal, um, representation is a huge problem. So I won't be able to support this. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you. I just just to be clear, I appreciate these comments and I think that that's what's great about this forum. But again, this is as 23-057 then leads off to 23-058 and that's gonna talk about the differential in the salary. I want us all to look at that and realize that does, because it seems to me that we're going to be losing a union position and all of us here are union supporters, correct? This compensation for what reads in the next resolution, the increase of the funding using salaries would be funded because of a highway salaries account due to temporary vacancies in the senior clerk position. So does that mean that we're losing the senior clerk position to fund this position? No. No. So what does that mean? Just for clarification purposes. So when this person does come back, Tim, we're gonna hire this person back full salary? And then how are we gonna pay this position if that money's being used somewhere else?
[George Scarpelli]: Chief of staff Nazarian here, just because that's something that's important before I vote. If you look for both papers together, this is approving something that is still questionable because of not understanding the true legal separation of two different parties. But then the next page talks about the funding of that position. And that's looks like eliminating a union position. So is Chief of Staff here?
[George Scarpelli]: She did say she was, though, right?
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, just... This is the increase the funding using the salaries of funded curve, the DPW salaries account due to a temporary vacancy and the senior clerk's position. That person is now, they hired the person now? There was a vacancies back? Yes. Okay, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Just clarify that. I don't want to lose that clerical position.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Madam President, the Furniture Trust Company is an amazing organization. They are an organization that goes in, especially during the pandemic, and go into these multi-billion dollar office buildings that haven't even opened, that were built prior to the pandemic, and have furniture that is brand new and untouched. And they're brought in to throw away all this brand new equipment. So what they've done is gone. They reach out to all nonprofits. I will tell you in recreation, they've refurbished our teen center. They've worked with our administrative staff in the school department and multiple other locations. I know that prior to the pandemic, Mr. Zarian, I know that all that furniture that was in here, the movie company, all that was donated. So I appreciate the hard work that the Furniture Trust Company does. It's a former Method resident, Pat Redden, who spearheads that endeavor. And he just called me today. He's helping homeless family and making sure that they're donating furniture for homeless families and different homeless organizations. Framingham State closed the whole dorm and they took all of the furniture bureaus and betting and moved it over to a homeless center in the past. So they do so many great things and I appreciate, I know this is a hard, difficult thing to do. It took a little while to get this signed off, but we appreciate everything you do. Thank you, Councilor Villes for pointing that out. I want to make sure they get their credit too, so.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. May 15th.
[George Scarpelli]: and central administration, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli. I'll bring it forward. A true gentleman. Russ was someone that was a pillar of our community and will be greatly missed. So may he rest in peace. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Next meeting, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I think that I think Councilor Knight bringing those words up, I think that it's important when we're looking at it with the oversight that's needed. Again, it's the only reason why I am voting for it. Anything like I said, that deals with any fiscal responsibility or requests in this body, I would not support for the fact that we still have no idea of our fiscal future here. in the city. We have no, had no discussions with the mayor of the administration and guide us where we are financially. So again, that's a dire situation, but I would support this paper.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for being here. The question I have is, as I know in the past before your entry to this wonderful position, we had a question we had with all the road work that's being managed throughout this community. How have we set it up that since we don't have a clerk of the works, how do we manage the work of one, let's say, National Grid comes in, sets a trench, leaves, who's monitoring that at the end of the project? Because that's typically been the issue, that we just don't have enough people.
[George Scarpelli]: keeps eyes on things and we tend to find out what's so but we don't have anything formal like in place where it says, you know, we have an alert systems is job, you know, job, job, a from National Grid, public street.
[George Scarpelli]: Sure.
[George Scarpelli]: I completely understand what you're asking for as a member of. In our business, in the recreation business, when we're asking for what applies, it sounds great, but because of the pending snow and- And the spring. And the issues.
[George Scarpelli]: That was a confusion, so I think that, yeah. No, I think that anywhere there are parks, I think that I would second that. You know, once we have, you know, during the spring season where we have the traffic that we have now at Doug a park. I think it's important that we do.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank Vice President Bears for bringing this forward, but this is common practice in most municipal budgets. We're further along in our budget where I'm working with municipal government that I work for, and it's very transparent. This is where I find my frustration that what Councilor Bears just asked for is truly a press of a button of spreadsheets and really help everybody involved. And again, that magic word of transparency, we use it, but I think we should follow it. So I think it's important that this initiative moves forward. So I appreciate the efforts Vice President Bears and I move second on this paper, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Councilor Collins, Councilor Villes. I know this took a lot of time, but I've been steadfast in my my view of our business and the lack of legal representation that could guide this council. And without that, that's one of the many reasons why I can't support this this evening. Like Councilor Knight said, there are 12 amendments of an ordinance that needs to be changed and how that affects the technology piece, not just this situation, but moving forward in other situations. Again, I'm gonna say this again, Councilor Knight put it one way, I'll put it the way that I've been saying it. We've been trying to do the city's business without a city attorney that represents this council, that guides us on ordinances. The recommendations from KP Law, I don't even know if they would be valid for the fact that they don't work for this council. So any legal information that we need to back from dealing with the legality of this or any of the questions that we had. I really can't trust or depend on, and to support this right now would be no different than any of the other papers that I've not voted for because of the lack of legal guidance. So I hope you can understand that. I appreciate the hard work. I know that this took a lot of work, and I appreciate that. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information if I can.
[George Scarpelli]: In no time do I question your ability or I'm disrespecting you in any way, madam, my fellow council, but like I said, and the other votes we've taken, we've talked about this and I've been steadfast on this. Even with the knowledge of the city administration or the knowledge of outside parties or your intense work, I still, still doing the city's work and making sure that anything I vote on, I feel secure legally that I've done the right thing. And again, I bring this back all the way back to BJ's. We voted on something that we thought was right because the work of this council, we thought we put in how we felt. It came back and we were sued and we lost. And we lost money tenfold, whether it be attorneys fighting the fight or fighting the appeal or whatnot. And I think that that's my point. Nothing else right now. I think that this is the reason why I know that this is the frustration that Councilor Knight brought up when it came to Councilor Beza's last paper. We talked about the partnership with the mayor's office and this council working together. In other municipalities, there is a liaison that works directly with the mayor's office that works as a partner with us. When we had some issues and concerns and negativity going back from this office, I sat with the chief of staff, I sat with the mayor, and I said, please, allow us to share in the celebrations, but as equal share in the negative issues that are happening, that we can work together. And that's just not happening. And until it starts to hurt, I have not, I haven't voted for a money paper. I will not vote for money paper. I think the city administration has to understand either we start getting along, we start fulfilling the needs that we need as a council that we've asked for for years. I can't support it. It has nothing to do with, I appreciate what you're doing. I appreciate your knowledge and the time you put into it. But again, no disrespect, but you're not an attorney. the people in that office I'm working for this, this, this office, this, this department, and we don't have anybody that's that's guiding us, because I will tell you, I did contact city solicitors that I used to work with, and they, they recommended that George you don't, you shouldn't do anything until you get a representation from your city solicitor because They don't know, they've never heard this before. There's no definition of who is guiding us in signing any ordinance, let alone this ordinance, but any ordinance moving forward. And if it's coming from, you know, support and who's guiding us, who's pushing this forward. So that's why I'm cognizant and a little leery of anything we do. And I know that I've talked to Councilor Biaz, I've talked to Councilor Morell about this. I know we have to do the city's work. But there are some things we just can't, can't push forward without having what I feel comfortable for the constituents that put me here. So I appreciate it and I apologize, but I thank you for respecting both of our opinions. So.
[George Scarpelli]: Just one question. Chief, since your tenure as a chief, have you seen, is there identified issues with what we're talking about that people's civil liberties have been harness harmed.
[George Scarpelli]: So two Sundays ago, I was personally involved in a road rage incident where a person, I had my son and another guest in my car, up and down 93, young person driving crazy, slowing down near an exit, threw a bottle off my car, contacted the state police. As we're traversing, they were taking off the exit. Person was making motion that he was gonna shoot me. As we came closer, and we were really slow because they were slowing up going to the exit. That person then slouched down into a seat, and I heard my son scream, dad, he's got a gun. We talked to the state troopers. They ran the numbers. Unfortunately, it wasn't the plate, the number with the car that we set. Got a phone call yesterday from the state police, thankfully. What I expressed that evening was not even that the gun issue, but the fear for my family that if he has my license plate, What is he gonna do if he's gonna brandish a gun on the highway? State Trooper called me yesterday, told me thankfully for the surveillance cameras on the Cloverleaf, they identified the car to the plate that we gave, and they followed through. He couldn't give us any more information, but to say that, it's safe to say that It's documented, they know it, but there's a history there with that situation. So I can tell you firsthand, I know my son and his friend haven't slept because of that fear. I just want to share that with you. So I appreciate how state troopers do their due diligence using that form of policing in a sense that, and it really wasn't used for policing. It's really used for traffic. And when you talk about a gun, they really triggered something for them to look at that. And there was history there. So I just wanted to share that with you. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: That's not the way I read it. Thank you, Madam President. And again, not to disrespect my fellow councilors that are speaking on this issue, but again, the intent of law and the understanding, we do not have anyone behind this rail that's an attorney. which poses another issue and concern that we have with a lack of this. And like I said, I'll say it again, most communities is there's representation for the council that's present with us that you can call the podium and ask these questions to make sure we're protecting us, the fiscal responsibilities of the community and our laws. And again, it just, I don't think that people, my frustration comes in understanding how serious this is without not having legal representation as we move forward with these ordinances. So again, just something I needed to share. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. South, I appreciate. I appreciate the updates because I don't think people understand, you know, when you see the mayor come up and they do the state of the city address and everything's happy and, you know, skate with the mayor, that's a new one that's coming up. This is what infuriates this community. I remember just a few short years ago, this body, including the mayor, talking about the essential workers and how important they were during the most difficult time in our history. people that got up every single day to make sure the streets are plowed, make sure that the parks are clean, making sure that the pipes that burst are fixed. We made sure that our municipal workers, our DPW, were applauded, and this is a true slap in the face when it comes to what I'm hearing. So I have a dumb question, because I can only imagine. I know what's going on, but I will tell you as a first member of this community, I see each and every member that's sitting behind you in their trucks every single day, working every single day. I haven't seen one iota of change, and that's what I find impressive. So my question truly is, how is the morale of this team? I mean, I know, are we filling openings? I mean, are they still doing the job of our minimal compared to what we were looking for during negotiations when we heard the ridiculous numbers, when we talk about a city the size of Medford and the DPW team that we have and how limited it is, that hasn't changed, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: And I think that this is what bothers us. I mean, you know, I'm hearing from from colleagues and neighbor communities that they they used to say they used to open a bottle of wine on a Tuesday night to watch Council Penter and Council Camuso go after each other. And they thought that was funny. But what you had there, you had two people that they had different views, but they both loved Medford. That was the key. And they wanted Medford to be the greatest city in the Commonwealth. What I'm seeing right now is what I'm hearing, what I'm seeing right now, not getting any financial paperwork. We don't know where the city's finances are. If this is an indication, I think this is pretty scary, that if she's only offering 2% to the most, the hottest working people in our workforce, that They're only offering 2% standing there. I find it scary to where we're going to be in June. So for one, I'll do anything and everything that I'm not afraid to stand on any soapbox if it can carry me and say whatever has to be said for the men and women that work for our city. I think that what we're seeing, what I'm hearing, is that the morale in this community is terrible. The workforce just isn't there. And everybody's being pit against each other. And what keeps coming back to me, the mayor made a comment that it's difficult to clean up city hall. I'm still confused with that comment. I don't know where that's coming from. She's been in office now, it's in her fourth year. I don't know what that means because all I'm seeing right now is a city that has no leadership. I'm seeing a city that has no directors and no leaders in different departments. We have a city council that has no power. We're an absolute laughingstock when I'm talking to colleagues in other communities that they can't believe what we have to do as a council when we're asking for simple documents to do our job. Now, are you just negotiating? Is this the, it's not the chief of staff, it's not the HR director anymore. I know that we gave him a fancy name with more money, but I don't, you know, that's the other piece is when we talk about the higher level. I'd like to see it. You probably have it somewhere. And if you could forward it to us, I'd like to see what the leadership at the school system is making. I'd like to see what the leadership here at City Hall is making that are in that are are negotiating with you because I bet you they're not worrying about how they're gonna pay their sons or daughters tuitions that members behind you have kids going to school as cost of living increases or the price of gasoline. So for one council, I'll do anything, any invitation that's offered to me, I'll gladly join in and share my support. I think what people really have to understand out there is that we're not in very good shape in the city. And this is a great example of it. The teachers settled, but they're not happy either. They're not happy either. We know they're not. but they know they had to go back. One thing we're seeing from our DPW employees, they're not stopping. There is no threat of a strike. They're still doing the job above and beyond. So I applaud them all and I applaud you for sticking with it. And you've named a couple of communities that I know employees that work there and are so pleased the way you negotiated fairly with their negotiating teams in different communities and their outcomes. And that's what's so frustrating with this community Again, it just, it brings a fear to my heart that if she's only offering 2%, how bad are we looking financially? No one's telling us, no one Mr. Selk. And I'm just afraid what's gonna come in a few months because this is a scary time and method. And I think people need to stand up and wake up because When the dust settles, the people behind you are still gonna be the ones standing up. They're still gonna be up at two in the morning plowing our streets to make sure our kids have a safe walk to school. They're gonna be the ones, when your basement's flooding, the first ones in the basement dealing with that junk in your basement. no question about it, and they need to be treated fairly. So for one Councilor, I'm going to stand beside you or in front of you to make sure that someone has to listen. So I appreciate what you're doing, and I appreciate everybody's hard work behind you guys. I'm sick to my stomach because I, you know, I'm, again, I hate to say it, but I work in a community that has hundreds of DPW workers that are making a lot of money, and then The administration, they are looking at readjusting their pay scale for what their wage analysis looks like with cost of living. So I can't imagine what our next negotiation looks like in my community that I work in, because it's fair. They want to keep people happy and in their community. What we're doing here in Medford is scaring people off. and no one's going to want to be here. And that scares me.
[George Scarpelli]: To interject, and I don't want to be rude, but I sat at a fundraiser with eight former city solicitors, and I offered them all as a joke to please come work. I'll try to get them whatever they want to come to Medford. And the answer was, are you kidding me? We see what's going on there. It has nothing to do with what we're hearing, that it's the climate. It's very difficult to get people. No, it's getting very difficult to get people that can work here. That's what we're seeing firsthand.
[George Scarpelli]: And in the community I work in, I hired someone yesterday. That person starts with health insurance the day they start, which is February 18th. So that is, that is completely false. I deal with that every day. To say that they have to wait for an open enrollment is false. It's a disgrace.
[George Scarpelli]: Right.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Madam President, I know before, I'd like to move back to the regular order of business. made a comment. I just want to make sure council president I did talk. I know that we called for a meeting with the school department to work together to see what what the process is with security and how that's going and then looking to see what funding mechanism we need moving forward for support. So I know that the council president has been working hard to try to knocked down a meeting with the superintendent, the mayor, the school committee and the city council. So we can work on that, at least work on that piece and to see where we are, where we need to be. So I just wanted to give you an update with that.
[George Scarpelli]: All right. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for counseling. I bring this up. Mr. Granada is definitely someone that, um, that anyone can go to, especially in the political field, to talk to him and get the true insight of what the energy is in our community. And it's someone that has that type of knowledge and that type of passion and love for the city of Medford is someone that's so vital to our community. I know that we haven't seen him around much, but I know that he's someone that we should be very proud that we can call him our friend. So I wish him a happy birthday and many more. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. So I think the representatives BJ's and of course our neighbors. I think that I received multiple phone calls and and the understanding of the process and where we are today. Um, it's it's a pleasant, um, pleasant response by the BJS team and what was asked for to really support those neighbors. I think that was probably the biggest sticking point of what was in the past I know that it was called the flagship store but it sure wasn't shown that way by our neighbors and the the concessions and the understanding of the commitment from BJ's and what really is being put back into our community into the plant to make it look very appealing and a welcoming site. Everything that we asked for in the council, I think that we found a way to capture that, but I know that there were a couple of questions that I know usually Councilor Knight, since we don't have legal representation here, that anything that's permitted stays with the permit, Councilor Knight, is that with the permitting? Okay, so that was one of the questions I was asked, that if BJs happen to, we don't see it happening, although they'll close, but one of the questions, what happens to that site if BJs does step away? What happens to the tanks in the ground, to the environment? Does this permit go with the permittee or does it go with the land? That's one of the questions. And then the other question that came up and it was just passed over a few weeks ago was that back gate. the gate on the Fellsway side. I know that there was some talk saying that back there was arrangements that that was closed at the end of the evening to stop any traffic coming in from Fellsway as people use it as a cut through to come through. So and as I recall, that was one of my jobs as a former employee. Yeah, that I had to that's when the end of the night if you bring the carts in at the end of the night, the last person would have to go, whoever worked the tire shop, would go and just lock the gate and the first person the next morning would open the gate. So I don't know if that's something that is, no one seems to know if it's true or the intent of it, but I know the residents had a question that it really made, whether we see it or not, they saw a big difference, not having that access after hours. I know that I explained to them that when the delivery trucks come in, And then they responded back by saying but George that question is that there are going to be delivery trucks idling in the parking lot. So that shouldn't be an issue so that might be something that just just to look at I know that we've already asked a lot and you've really come back with a lot of great responses and. And I also had to explain to the residents our situation on the council and why this went to court and why it came back and really give BJs a lot of credit for opening that line of communication again so we can really get the true context back to BJs to say this is what our community really needs to make this work. You know, and again, the last piece was, I'm sorry for being winded, but these are the phone calls I got, was that the idea of the trees on Woodruff, if they die, and PJ's really put in a statement that says if it's anything to do with snow, they'll replace those ones that have died as they move through, but the other piece is, it is up to the city, and this is, you saw our DPW workers here tonight, and it's gonna be tough for them to do, they're gonna be the ones maintaining that area after BJ has planted and implemented that look. And I know that we explained the fencing. We talked about the fencing people asked for and the new slats that are going in. So I know we're gonna see a major change, but what I like and I appreciate is that there is someone identified at BJ's that's going to be working directly for the neighbors. So if I get a phone call from someone on 4th Street and they say, George, this is what's happening, I can directly call to the whether it's the code enforcement officer called directly to the maintenance facilities person to be jays and they can get that response to that resident. So we can get that taken care of something that we haven't seen in the past. So I appreciate that. So again, it's really those three things matter, President. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: But the concert night again, if BJ's would leave in a hundred years, they have to go through the same process, like as we're implementing this process as a restriction. The last piece is, what is the traditional situation when it comes to gas tanks removal? If say BJ's would leave in a hundred years, who for environmental purposes, that was the question I got from someone, are the tanks left abandoned and what harm that would do or Is that something we could implement that if at any time BJ's does close their doors and abandon that site that the tanks have to be taken up? So that was the question.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. That answers most of the questions. Appreciate it. Do you have a question about the gate, they have a gate if you know that. I mean you can get back to us and just I think that was one of those are the three questions that I did get phone calls from neighbors that, and I explained, shared your information so I really appreciate that. you know, the gate for some reason, especially for the older ones that remember when it first opened, that that was part of the negotiations they sat with and keeping that open. But after business hours, they would close that.
[George Scarpelli]: And that was the question they had. And that's what I told them. I shared that with them about the trucks coming in. I also shared that you've already hired a towing company, a contract with a towing company, that any truck that's not supposed to be there is being towed out. So we also appreciate the sweeping trucks after 11 o'clock, that that's been in place. I know that was a point of contention in the past. So we see a lot of movement, but again, I think that's just clarification on the gate, was that if that's the question, if that's the concern, at the end of the night keeping the trucks away. The question there was, well, George, why is that a problem if it's after hours and the trucks out there coming in anyway? So that kind of makes sense in the sense if they can't, if there are no trucks coming there, why not close that for, and what they're seeing is the vehicular traffic that's coming down there and causing the speeding or using the cutthroat to get to Wendy's or You know, so that's their concern that in the middle of the night, those houses that have bought the drive on the side, that's where the hair and the, you know, the engines. You know, so that's, and I think that a lot, it's going to help with those months with the race, the speed bumps that we're putting in for those months. I think that's going to help a lot because I know we hope there's not going to be much speeding in the winter months. So, but if people want to be racing their cars usually during the spring and the summer. And we understand, but I think that's what clarification with the residents and I appreciate your time. Thank you for the attorney of KP Law for answering those, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: We have a direct line to BJ's that as a facilities person going to answer that question for us to take care of that. So the other piece too, is this is something that we'll add as we move forward, but making sure the DPW saw them today, we don't have enough. And they're going to be overseeing that land and that whole, that's going to be maintained by the city. And, you know, on the other side that, you know, that we follow through with the police. I like to hear that we've already started a process with a contract that BJ's has with the tow truck company that anybody's in there idling and they don't move themselves, they're going to be hitched and they're going to go. So that's big, that's big.
[George Scarpelli]: No, no, it's this that the parking lot is big enough that it's the truck had to make a U turn, because I know that, but the parking lots wide open.
[George Scarpelli]: Everything looks like it's in order, and I know that Councilors will have some questions, but just a brief description. Are you changing over management? No, yeah, I just recently bought the store, but we will keep everything the same. Everything's the same? Everything's the same. Okay, so I know that the previous owner, did a very good job in that area. I know that both the liquor store and really kept that area. It's one of the areas that we, that kept a clean out front with the scratch tickets and the nips, that's been a big bone of contention in the area. So I hope you'd maintain that same. We will maintain. All right, we appreciate that. So again, I see everything in order. Madam President, I move approval pending any questions from my council partners.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President, to be just if we can call these representatives from These fields, I think that there's some questions that were brought up tonight that we really need to get some clarification as city councilors. And then the other piece is also the fleet, dealing with the fleet. I know that there's a few trucks down right now, and we do have a Boston City truck. People have been asking me, why do we have a Boston City truck? I've talked to a few firefighters and they explained, so there's reasons for it. But it'd be nice if we get a report dealing with this with all the parties involved, meaning you know, city administration, the HR director and representative for the fight upon but that'd be great. So if I could call for that make a motion for next week, our next meeting to invite all those parties to be present the meeting, city regular city council meeting just to give us a brief update on what's going on to so we have an understanding but I don't see it happening but it's just a thought. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: It's distracting and devastating working in the municipality. What was said tonight, that you have to wait for the open enrollment, not true. I could tell you that working firsthand. But I do want all the parties in place so we can dispel any rumors and move forward to try to help our firefighters who don't have insurance, and at the same time, also ask for the representatives of the fire department here to tell us what we need to know.
[George Scarpelli]: That's what the whole idea is, to approve it and then.
[George Scarpelli]: If we change the wording, say we would like them to report back. Yeah, so if we can't, just... Thanks.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, sorry about that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I just, uh, informed just to share some information. Thank you, Councilor Bears. Um, but the it is it is, uh, to the public that, um, as of January 24th that, um, The 2023 annual census will be arriving in your mailboxes within next week, which means it should be arriving this week or next week. So everybody should look out for that. And again, just to reiterate, the importance of the census plays a lot to do with what funding we get here in the city of Medford. So it's very important that people do their due diligence in making sure they fill out the census. So thank you. Madam President, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Since two weeks ago.
[George Scarpelli]: Take your time out. Zach's a judge. Ask Nicole.
[George Scarpelli]: No, not you.
[George Scarpelli]: That's a resolution for next month. All right. approval.
[George Scarpelli]: No, no, we've got two papers. Safety.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President, I know I got, I got a few phone calls and some pitches I can share with the council tomorrow. of situation Harris Park where dogs are actually inside the basketball courts with the gates closed and people running around dogs running around and residents not being able to use those areas because there are dogs off leash. So, we just got a report back one from. from the mayor's office I know they talked about this pilot program that they wanted to start if that was something that if that they've started that and we just weren't informed, and then if we can, especially in the Harris Park area, if we can have. the health department code enforcement officer, maybe, um, request them to check that area, um, for unleashed dogs, especially with that playground area, right? So being so popular, I think it's important that we just look out for the safety of our Children. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, before we leave, I know that Saturday morning is 30 below zero. If the mayor has any plan, the state administration has any plan for any emergency hotline or anything, if people need emergency care with this dangerous situation, that that be posted somewhere and maybe put on her Facebook site so we can we can know what plans we have in place. So again, everybody take care. Again, the report says it's 30 below with windchill on Saturday morning, so be careful. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, just a motion to approve.
[George Scarpelli]: Before you move the screen and change the screen, I know that some of the neighbors, one of the questions they had were really when the business was closed, maybe there were racing cars. Are we putting in speed bumps as race walks on the premises or in the lanes now?
[George Scarpelli]: We appreciate that. But I know that talking to some of the residents, probably the worst time is during the spring and summer. where I know they have the removable speed bumps. Could that be possibly looked into for spring and summer months that we could put those down? I know that in the city, we've had areas with the temporary raised bumps to try to control the speeding. I think that, and I know we're not looking in this picture, it's not showing much of the back of the building on the Fellsway side. And it's good to see all the work being done at the front, but on the back, I know that in the past, I know when I used to work there, they used to have a gate that at the end of the evening, we used to close access to the back of the building when businesses closed. On the Felsworth side? On the Felsworth side, years ago.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Again, thank you for presentation. I think you have been very thorough and answer our questions. But most importantly, I think you realize most of these questions derived from the most important people. Those are our butters and residents live around the area. Um, we appreciate that you acknowledge that 1986 and being the, you know, the first B. J. That opens. But, um, I'm sure you've heard from the neighbors that it didn't show it. And I think that's what they were concerned with. And, uh, this is good faith and movement. I think that, um, it's important that they have a voice and they have someone they can talk to. Uh, even if it is through the city in the code enforcement officer, let's say that has a contact number. I think that's something that I wanted to make sure we had, and I appreciate that's in there. And going the extra mile and giving that person's personal information I think shows the commitment that we haven't seen from BJ's for a long time with our neighbors. So those pitches are pretty drastic. you know, with the fencing and the garbage that went through onto Bradbury or Woodruff. And I think that those are the concerns where you've addressed. So I think the trucks that what frustrates you frustrates all of us. And I think that's something that we as a council have to have a separate meeting with the traffic enforcement, the chief of police and make sure we do we do our job to make sure that that stops. So again, I appreciate it. I appreciate that. You made not just some half remarks saying that you'll try, but you're committed to a lot of these, even with the speed bumps, something that being creative and looking at seven months out of the year, that we can definitely stop that process of speeding down those lanes. I think that is exactly what I was looking for tonight. So I appreciate the effort. Thank you. You're welcome.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I think that the Council for the neighbors makes a point that I think that we addressed with the representative of BJ's that holds the restrictions to the permits that we have that meeting once a year to make sure that we follow through with these these these concerns in the neighbors. And again, I think that the representative for BJ's weren't there in 1986, I would take. But you would also understand the neighbors that see what they're living in right now. And that's what they were living in before the permit request came before us about building this gas station. So you can understand the frustration. I think all of you can. And I think that it would be disingenuine that if it's not followed through, and I hope you meant your word, and we have the restrictions in place to make sure that if we follow through and vote in favor of this tonight, that our neighbors will have a voice from here on out, and that area, their neighborhood, will be represented by someone from BJ's on a phone call basis, so I appreciate that. Thank you, Madam President. I just want to clarify that with the neighbors, some that are very close to me, that I grew up with, that had the same concerns or proud of us at the same time that we voted no, then understanding the process that we went through that evening that caused this to go to a legal format and this be heard in front of a judge. And I think it's important that people realize The biggest issue for this council was not having legal representation in that room that evening that brought us to this point. I think that it's important that we still hold the administration accountable for this process. We do not claim to be attorneys. We do not claim to have all of our rules and regulations memorized on the tip of our tongues, but at the same time, we didn't have support that we needed to make this council work for the people that we should have. And I want people in the public to realize that, especially our neighbors that live in the Wellington area. This is something I regret and wish we could turn the clock back and have the city solicitor that we asked for for years in that room to support us. So again, I think that does handcuff us in a sense, but at the same time, it also brought us to what I feel is a pretty reasonable and committed relationship with our partners at BJ. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, if you can.
[George Scarpelli]: Before we get started, I think that as we get these these outlets from the mayor. I think that we should set precedent to make sure everybody understands before anybody speaks on it. This is done anyway, whether the council supports it or doesn't. This is just, I think, a platform for the administration just to speak on it. I think that there isn't any discussion. It's really just a platform for the mayor to tell everybody what she feels is important for the opera. I have we gotten a report before we start this and what would where the opera money is. Have we gotten any updates on that?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. So I, you know, I appreciate this coming forward and I'll make a resolution, put a resolution through as we move forward for next week that we get an update on where we are with the offer money. Again, I just want the public to realize this. This is something that we're going to have to vote on. This is something that is just sharing with us and something she's moving forward, not to say it's bad or good, but it has no bearing with this council with any decision. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Caraviello. Thank you, Council. I too understand the concept behind it, because we all get the phone calls from the people that didn't know, and I think a lot has to do with the transparency and the communication from the administration's office. I think that's where we're lacking. I think that I work in a community that the streets get swept every Tuesday, so having those signs up are important. even that, being a member of the community there, you still hear people complain because they got towed or because, you know, one thing or the other. So if we had an infrastructure in place here that had the times and locations all set, and we know, I mean, imagine even getting the notification today, you know, what process they have today for the twice a year, it starts one day, then all of a sudden it's another day. So and then changing those on a sign that would be monumental. So I think that I also agree. I got a phone call from one constituent that reminded me over an issue in their neighborhood when they putting up, um, they're putting up crossing, you know, crossing sides. They were upset because What is Councilor Cabrera assigned pollution? Yeah, it just looks messy when we're trying to clean the streets up. So I personally think, I don't disagree with you. I just think there has to be a process from the administration that really spreads the word. I know that, what is it? I've heard that there's a new website unveiling soon probably 2025, I'm not sure, but as soon as they get an IT department, they're putting together. a new site. I mean, that's the first step. I mean, um, you know, something simple as in the old days, they even coming down the street and putting, you know, notices on telephone poles, letting people know that they're coming the next day, having the police come down a little bit earlier, hitting the sirens. I mean, there's got to be another way. And what I would recommend is honestly calling for a subcommittee that we can actually you know whether it be signs with with myself or traffic that we can meet with all the parties involved and let's let's vet out a process that even right now what we could do immediately before the spring sweep and we so we can look at that process i think i don't disagree with council beers i i hear we get the same phone calls But I think there's so many other variables that would impact that. I think we're just way too early to look at the cost, the aesthetics of it, and the management of it. We don't know when we're going to do one thing or the other. So that that's why I would, I wouldn't support it tonight, but I would support a meeting and bringing this forward to a subcommittee where we could bring all those parties that council is asking for together and say, Hey, this is the extreme in my eyes, but what can we do right now to make it work? So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: neighborhood communities that street sweep every day, their traffic and parking department, their fees and fines go directly to the streets, parks and school department. So that's what that money is used for. And then you see the action, the reaction of their constituents are pretty pleased when they realize, okay, I messed up, I got a parking ticket, but if it's going to go back to the schools and the parks, it's worth it. Not to new growth, but so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If we could, for the record, could we ask the engineer for just a cost breakdown of what that was? Because it'd be interesting to see what that cost.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Again, maybe the wording is a little off, but the intent for this resolution isn't really to discuss what has been unveiled to date. I think it's really too early to see the benefits. I think we hear a lot of great things from the students I've talked to that immediately they felt safer, immediately they appreciated the structure. They still, the administration had assemblies with all the kids so they can explain what the process is and what's happening. So that was very helpful. So we saw a lot of very good movement, but I think that this resolution is really for this council as we move toward the budget season, where the biggest department in this community that takes up most of this budget. Our city budget is a school department and also understanding the shortfalls that are being mentioned in public arenas from our city administration, how bad the budget is going to look this coming year. I think it's important that we meet with the mayor, the superintendent and the school committee as they start to put their budget together and the understanding where the questions that came about during these concerns and these issues, safety issues, that we're making sure that we're in full support funding-wise when it comes to security processes. the implementation or any maintenance that needs to be done on cameras, the understanding of any processes going through. If the SRO is that they hired, I hear great feedback from the kids that they feel safer because of that and understanding that process and making sure that's funded in the police budget or the school budget or the city budget. So a lot of this for this resolution really was meant for setting up that meeting because I believe um someone on the school committee mentioned that this council has never asked for that and and they've never seen us there. So I think that I'm reaching the olive branch to say let's find find a time to all meet and so that we're all on the same page when it comes to this budget for this serious concern and serious issues that we witnessed this past couple of months that we need to make sure that we are on top of that. So if we can, I just hope my fellow councilors, I would make the motion, like I said, that we really, that council president reach out to the mayor's administration and call the superintendency, what we can do to get a meeting You know, relatively soon, I mean, we did get some, we will be getting some paperwork, I believe, financial paperwork. Is it all of it? I think it was just one, one month, I believe. So we still don't know or understand the pattern of our fiscal climate right now. That's still unknown to us, but at least we can sit down and understand the process that I know that when I was on the school committee, the process was very clear and it was very open. We understood what we were looking for as a school committee. And like I talked to a few councils earlier, it was very simple that we looked right away as what we were making sure we're maintaining any legal obligations to any programs that were running in the schools. and making sure that we had coverage with that, with those programs. And then we listened to every principal to make sure that all the needs were met in each school. And I'm sure they do that now, but I think it'll be important for us to understand that process and for us to express support for the budget that they're looking for, the school department's looking for as a partner to make sure that we're all on the same page. This was a very difficult situation that divided our bodies, not everybody, but some people in each body. I can only imagine what's going to happen when the budget comes out and they tell the school department that they have to cut another $2.3 million per se. That's a fictitious number. That's not a real number. I'm saying, fictitiously, if that happened, where would we be? So I don't want, I wanna make sure that we're on the same page and proactive. It's first of January right now, before we really unveil this and we still get into the nitty gritty of the budget, we really need to hold a meeting with those stakeholders to make sure that we're all on the same page. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, that'd be that. But the intent and that encompasses everything we need to talk about will bring up the safety concerns as part of their budget. As long as you know, if you could put if we could put something in there, not only with December, was it December 20th? Yeah, we talked about it. Yeah. Okay, so I take that back. I forgot that date. So no, that would be that would work. That'd be great.
[George Scarpelli]: We can get mine. I gave you mine in three seconds.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And again, Mr. Bradnese passed, I believe, before Christmas, and we haven't had an opportunity to bring this resolution forward, so that's why it's a little late, and I apologize to the Bradnese family. Mr. Bradnese was one of those families that led one of those families in Medford that were stalwarts of our community. a U. S. Navy veteran. Um, a longtime method resident, a method firefighter for over 30 years, and, um, he passed away peacefully before Christmas. And, um, I just wanted to reach out. His son, Mark and I graduated together at Medford High School. Um, he had a wonderful family, wonderful wife, and, uh, he'll be missed in our community and especially the tap street area. Um, You know, you should get special dispensation for living on that hill anyway. Uh, so I know that, um, uh, he's definitely a loss and I would, uh, ask the, um, the clerk to send out, um, um, uh, memo to the family, just letting them know that if we could honor them by, uh, holding this meeting in his name. So, um, and hold the moment of silence from Mr. Brand. He's appreciate it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I caught a little heat after inviting the football team and congratulating them for their community service. We had a few other champions that I'd like to call on for our next meeting, Mr. Clerk, Madam President, so we can give them a citation and congratulate them on a job well done. That was our 2022 Girls Varsity Soccer GBL champions and our champion Anna Casey from our cross country team. So if we can just put out an invite, contact Athletic Director Maloney, and have young ladies come out and acknowledge their accomplishments. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, just to just answer this in my background, what we've done in Somerville, you use this different forms of coconut husks and wood chips. So it's it's environmentally safe and it's a better option. The old Nike black pellets that were poured in. So just to share that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Great, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Janine, thank you very much because I think that when you talk about your position, I work very closely with our department and we're fortunate in my community that I work in that we have a whole planning parks division and engineers and designers that are looking into these processes and moving that step forward. So I think that, you know, you've given your time. That was very impressive and I appreciate that. being the phys ed teacher that started at the McGlynn, this was awful. This site was tough because you couldn't do much other than kids bouncing around when it first came out, then the bounce is gone. So I think that it's great to see what we have and we definitely need it. I think that it's so important. I think that, you know, a couple of, you know, as we went through the processes in the community we work in, just be careful of the lower nets. I know it sounds great, but you can start it today and then tomorrow the high school and neighboring older kids come by and they want to do a dunk contest, right? That's something that we should be aware of. And again, that's going to be the preventive maintenance side. But I think my concern right now is now if this is all from ARPA, if this is all going to be funded through ARPA, this is great because it's the mayor's decision. This council really has no leverage or any word to share with that's all coming from the main office. It's great for the presentation is great. I think it's we appreciate that the information, but I, you know, the, I want you to understand as a parent and a volunteer that We're in a position right now that, I'm sure you've heard it possibly, but we haven't seen a money paper in the city in years, it seems like. So we don't know what's gonna happen. So when we hear the mayor has gone to different library groups or whatnot and said that the budget's gonna be really dire coming up, it frightens me that here we are, you put all this work into this. And you've come to us and we're talking about a $2.6 million project. And in theory, it sounds phenomenal. And if it was going to be funded all from ARPA, there we go. It's got it. We have it. And that's the mayor's decision, the committee that she has on that. I just want to be upfront and understanding that without seeing the budget right now, it's tough for this council that if we get started and the organization comes back to us, it's not the fact that we don't need it. It's not the fact that it's probably going to be one of the best parks that are probably going to be utilized from every neighbor and community. Because I tell you, when we opened up ours at the Lincoln School, people came over from, I'm telling you, from miles away to be part of the parkour park there and everything. So it's definitely something we want and we need in this community. But I think that as we move forward, we need to really have everybody understand the restrictions. We're in this council right now is really not understanding where we fall on the budget because we're talking early. It's why I requested the meeting with the school committee, the mayor and the superintendent. So as we get the process going, I would hate to see something that we get to the point in May and say, Hey, we're moving, moving forward with this great project. Now we're going to have to tail back because we're looking at cutting teachers and we're looking at cutting safety issues at the high school, but we're looking cutting for security. So this is why I'm calling for that meeting. And I hope, you know, spread that word to support that. But because I think this is important. I know that This is where my kids went. This is where I taught. A lot of my colleagues are still there. I know how important it is. And to see that plan, that's amazing. I think that it's so exciting to see it. The whole community is going to use it. I can't imagine what not only the school community is going to use, what the recreation department can use, just with that stage in that area. I mean, talk about a community event. I mean, everybody's just, you know, you talk about the Shell, and that's a great place, but a lot of people are afraid of the road. But now you're putting it into a park. I'm giddy just to think about the possibility. But I just don't want to be the bearer of bad news or the, you know, Debbie Downer, but I just want to make sure that we know that budgetary wise with this breakdown that you showed us, it's a. If it was all ARPA and the mayor supporting that, that's great.
[George Scarpelli]: Like I said, you've done so much work. This is amazing.
[George Scarpelli]: So I appreciate, I just wanted to share that just in case, you know, we're here again in six months, like, my goodness, this didn't work through and how we're going to make it work. So I appreciate it. This is amazing. And thank you again, because especially when you talk about volunteers, this is something we all talked about. When you talk about creative and educated members of our community that want to give back, this is the end result. So I think that's awesome. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Um, it's my privilege tonight. I know we've had, um, we've had a tough week here in Medford, and, um, this is fitting and needed, uh, to address a group of young people that have done our city proud. Um, and before I recognize anyone, if Coach Curley and coach offered, come on up. I just called them up just because next to coach Curly, I looked like a supermodel. So I wanted to make sure he was next to me. But you guys, I wanted to really put a resolution through a few weeks back to acknowledge what the Method Mustang football team has done and their coaching staff. Something that's always overlooked is the impact that young people play in our community. And it's easy when it's something bad, right? When it's something bad, everybody wants to talk about what the kids are doing wrong. But I wanted to make sure that as I look through different messages that I received, I was noticing a trend. I was noticing an amazing trend. that our football team is a special, special group of people. I coached at Medford High School for many years. I was lucky to be part of a great organization and a great team. And one thing I realized, it's very important to have Mustang pride. And I think that's what we're lacking right now in the city, true Mustang pride. And when coach Curley came, came to the program and before that, We had some difficulties. Numbers were low. Kids were getting in trouble. You know, we weren't winning games. Everybody thought that the world was ending. And then you saw the bigger picture. Coach Curley came in. You saw him active in the community. You saw him doing special things with his team. And all of a sudden the football team started becoming, became elevated. And now the numbers have grown. and positive things are in front of us. It's all right. That's my favorite song, by the way. It's okay. So now, what I wanted to address is something very important. What is a Mustang? It's not a word. I know people, it's easy to say Mustang pride. What it means to be a Mustang is truly to love the city you live in, to represent your community with pride and distinction. And what you boys and girls have done have been amazing.
[George Scarpelli]: And that's the key, having a leader you can lean on. A person that wants to be involved in a young person's life, no matter what the circumstance. And it's easy to say when things aren't going well and teams aren't winning and you're losing, it's easy to say, well, they're no good, let's get rid of the coach and let's start all over again. What I find so impressive and I want you to understand, this isn't about winning and losing. You went to Fenway Park and you represented Medford with a lot of respect and pride. Why I put this resolution through is for what you're doing off the field. A few things that this football team has done. You've helped organize the national night out with the whole football team and the police department. Really showing what unity means and how everybody works together. You led that. In September, you helped empty out the senior citizens' basements and helped seniors. In October, you helped with the Unified Basketball League. The day before Thanksgiving, Before Thanksgiving game, we saw you guys over at McDonald Stadium helping with the unified flag football game. Then you saw a bunch of football players in yards raking out people's yards that couldn't do it themselves. And now you're helping with the Medford Family Network for their toy drive.
[George Scarpelli]: And I wanted to have this opportunity tonight to bring Coach Curley up and really commend you for what you have done and really put you on the pedestal that you deserve to be put on. One thing is having the leader to show you the way. And it's an honor that I talked about John Curley tonight because John's a very special person. What I'd love to hear is I got a phone call from a teacher And they said, George, I saw this resolution. I need to share something with you. I had a problem with the football player. He was being a little wise. And I called Coach Curley. And the next day, Coach Curley was sitting in the back of the room, just his presence there. And what we realized is that young man wasn't offended. He was so taken back that Coach Curley was there to do what? To show him he cares. to make sure that he's doing the right thing. And that's the type of leadership we need in our school system. And what you boys have done and girls have done and gone out to the community and put together all of these community service hours. It's something we should as a city applaud. So I want to publicly thank you guys. I want we I know we put together a do we do we have that
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so we have accommodations that we put together the method Mustang City Council, the method City Council award the this combination to and we'll say the young man's name a young lady's name and recognition of your outstanding 2022 season. with the Medford High School football team and your commitment to community service. Congratulations on your accomplishments. Go Mustangs. If we can, I'd love just to recognize you. We're going to call your name up. I know that Coach Curley, Coach Offer are going to help out. If we can, just before we get going, if Coach Curley has anything to say, I know that before we get going, I know we want to I know some of the boys and girls want to get in and out. So I know that, Coach, if you have anything to say, that'd be great.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't want to figure one person. I know that Mr. Mr. Medford's here. Uh, Mr. Chris Murphy, thank you for everything you do with the football association. Um, We really appreciate it. You look fabulous by the way. So thank you. All right, coach, you ready? All right.
[George Scarpelli]: Louise Barbosa. Yeah, come on up if you're called. Sorry about that. So come on all the way around.
[George Scarpelli]: Coach, I know that we have a bunch of coaches that have been committed. I know that they've been great with the program. If you could just acknowledge them. I know, Coach Offit, you're a right-hand man, but anyone else that you need to address, that'd be great.
[George Scarpelli]: So you know when you're a true method program, when coach Joe's leading you boys. So I think that I appreciate coach for being here. I know he's at an appointment, but he's gonna try to make it. If not, I'll come by the house myself and drop off his. So what we did is we put together a certificate that's gonna be in a folder. We're gonna be getting that out to you tomorrow, okay? But I thank you guys for coming out tonight. One more, sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, it's easy to point things out when a young person does something wrong. It seems like that's an easy thing to do. What I'm proud of tonight is that we're really putting you on a pedestal because you deserve it. The opportunity that the time that you give on your own, like coach said that when we talked and said that no one forces you to do anything, but you go out and do it because you love the city of Medford. This is what true community is all about. So I'm proud of you. I thank you. My fellow Councilors, thank you and have a great night. We really appreciate it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, if I can. Is the anybody representing the city to answer any questions on this call?
[George Scarpelli]: This is the first time we've received this type of request.
[George Scarpelli]: All right, so structurally, it's not unsafe or it's not going to jeopardize the area around the well. It's not, it's pretty. Correct. And you're recommending this zone. Is this something you recommend? Yes. Okay, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Is the petitioner here this evening? Hi, how are you? So I've reviewed the paperwork. Everything seems in order, sirs. This is what type of, if you could just give us just a brief synopsis to share with everybody.
[George Scarpelli]: Just me and my wife. That's it. Okay. And I hear great things about this this product and We're excited that you're moving to Medford Square. It's a great location. I know that my daughter loves it. So it's going to be, it's going to be something we'll see in our family. So again, I see everything in order, Madam President, I would move approval after questions from my fellow Councilors, if they have any.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Penny, for all your hard work. You've done so much for our community and I really appreciate everything you do. So I think that One thing I realized as I'm reading through this, this is, it's amazing. This is what we've lacked here for a long time. So I appreciate your effort, but a most vulnerable community right now, have we, I didn't see anything with the housing. Are we partnering anything with the Medford Housing Department to reach those families that I think that
[George Scarpelli]: So obviously, there'll be a big piece. Yeah, definitely.
[George Scarpelli]: What precisely are you looking for?
[George Scarpelli]: I mean, literally, after a year and a half of waiting for this document.
[George Scarpelli]: Warren articles are passed by this body.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I'd like to clear this up. I want to give this body everything that it wants. I really do. You know, I came here I have the budget tactuals for the first quarter. I have revenue projections that unfortunately are locked up in my computer, which died. But I can email all that stuff to you. I really don't wanna sit here and there's no reason for me not to give you stuff that you want. I just, okay, and we're on the same page. We really are. I'm not really sure physically what it is. Warren articles are passed by this body. They're not. We've never voted on them once, ever.
[George Scarpelli]: You know. When you're talking about the AP warrant, that's what you want to see, which all the bills that get paid every week. All right, how many years do you want that for? We can stop there.
[George Scarpelli]: I understand your frustration and I will work with the mayor to get this documentation to you. Because if there's a holdup, My issue with this whole thing is procedural. I need to know exactly what you need to see when you need to see it. And I'm not completely clear.
[George Scarpelli]: That would be great. And part of this is me being new. I'm not coordinating with the mayor's office.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. It would simply be these, these are the vendors who are paid this warrant.
[George Scarpelli]: And I mean, we can also send you an example of what the previous finance or finance director gave us for specific bills would have to be looked up if you wanted to see a specific bill, but it will say, you know, we paid Joe Schmo $600.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: What are one budget to actual with the votes that you took on the 28th for the general fund and water sewer?
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I have first quarter revenue compared to first quarter revenue from fiscal 2022. Okay. It's stuck in my computer. I can email these files to you if you prefer.
[George Scarpelli]: I do have paper copies of this along with the budget stuff along with the vote. to a copy of the vote that was taken.
[George Scarpelli]: All right, well, I apologize that I haven't acted on. I will follow up with that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Bob, again, the other person taking the heat and I apologize for that. It's not fair to you. No, no, and I'm not going to pile on. I think that we should, you know, I think for preparations purposes, I think that maybe calling for a committee of the whole meeting with Bob, once we have all this information. so we can sit down and really sink our teeth into these issues. This is something that, so you understand Bob, something as simplistic as people that are watching understand. When I was 14, I opened up a checking account. My dad said, okay, this is how you balance your checkbook. This is how you spend your money. And if you don't have, if you have $100 in your account and you want to purchase something for $120, it's telling you you can't. and you're responsible to control your own finance. Unfortunately, what we're seeing time after time here, we're getting papers from the mayor, we're getting requests from different Councilors about asking for money papers. And to be honest, I haven't voted for a financial paper and approval in a long time, because I find it very difficult for this body to do their job, not understanding the basic financial breakdowns of our community. You were there when we had the tough budget process. It was horrifying for you being new. And as we're going through this process, but we haven't gotten one, one paper. We haven't gotten any information about where we're spending our money. And here we are, we've got almost January, January one. So I want the public to know this is the hardship we're feeling the council. We don't have a city solicitor. I'm trying to ask questions. about legal matters and we don't have anybody to turn to. And I apologize that you have to be here tonight and really be hung out to dry. I'm curious if the chief of staff is here.
[George Scarpelli]: I think it's a simple question. I know that the chief of staff has been out for legitimate reasons and she hasn't, she just started to ramp back up, but were you familiar that our finance director hasn't received any of this information from this council?
[George Scarpelli]: We have crises that we're dealing with right now that we're looking at financial support and hoping for some financial support. And we don't know where we are financially. So to move forward with any of these dog and pony requests and then ask for funding for deeply needed resolves and not having an understanding of where we are financially, is very difficult for me as a Councilor to make decisions moving the city forward. I hope everybody that's watching and understands realizes how dysfunctional this community looks right now. There are so many issues that we're seeing that coming across from us. And this is so totally embarrassing. I'm disheartened right now. So Bob, again, I apologize for the answer that the chief of staff just gave. The understanding is this, we have been asking for money papers, I think, I believe from the day after we had our budget, and we've been trying to get some information, some valuable information of where we're going, what direction we're in. We're trying to figure out what, tonight's a very important meeting, there's some resolutions tonight, we're talking about some very important issues, and looking to fund some very important issues. But getting the okay from the administration to fund papers, and then not understanding where we are, because I believe you were there when the mayor said, as critical as last year's budget was, next year's is gonna be even worse. And what puts me on edge right now, Bob, is the fact that we haven't seen anything, and we can't move to support our most neediest members of our community and resolutions that are coming forward. So I find this very disheartening. I find this very troubling. And I don't know how my 16, 17 year old daughter has the ability to run her finances better than what we're seeing with this multimillion dollar corporation called Medford. So, and again, I know it's not you Bob, but I have to express my concerns and discuss. So thank you. Councilors at some point it is going to be me. So I'm just to let you know. We have had staffing issues. Tina's been out, Tyler quit. We've got a very, very good person to take over from Tyler. She is already working on the 2024 budget. We've already had meetings on it with all the department heads. So we're working on that right now. We got the recap done. I'm working on the state reporting. So we'll know what pre-cash will be. Hopefully we'll have that wrapped up within the next month. depending on how much availability they have, they have staffing issues too. We were fortunate to get the recap done so quickly because there are people out there too and everybody does their recap at the same time. So that's coming along. By the end of December, I should, I can do the cash recon for the first half of fiscal 2023, which we can send off to CLA and get our revenue replacement number from ARPA for that. You also have a much better projection of how much, you know, how much revenue we are actually going to take in in 2023. So we are working on all these things. I'm doing a lot of cleanup work, especially on all the grant fundings and the CPC, the linkage funds, all of that stuff. I'm just trying to get the books back in order to be in a firm foundation from what I'm being able to say, this is what's actually going on. I'm sorry for the miscommunications or lack of communications, but we are seriously working on this stuff. And I don't wanna be here till two in the morning on June 28th, hashing out a budget, neither do you guys.
[George Scarpelli]: Please, I think until we have all the information in front of us and Bob has time now to get the documentation that we need to move this forward or to understand it. I think we need it immediately. It's something that, you know, we've been asking for forever.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President, appreciate taking this out of order. This has been a very emotional last 24 hours, it's been very intense. And I wanted to make sure that if you allow me to give a small presentation that I prepared, so I don't miss anything. Methods in crisis. It's not a new crisis, but one that has started to spiral out of control and has just caught the attention of the outside world. Sadly, we had many years of warning given to us to prevent the latest incident. But as we see today, those warning signs were ignored by the very people that were entrusted to protect our kids by acting on our behalf. Most of you know my background as a former coach, teacher, and now Assistant Director of Recreation for Neighborhood Community. I want to look at a few fundamentals to see where we missed out, where we made our mistakes. First thing that came to me is, are our kids safe? No, they're not. It's not the data that we need now. We now have the actual proof from our experiences. Are we doing all that we can to keep our kids safe so they can learn and grow successfully? No. The warning signs are there and we ignored it. Are we unified on this issue? Absolutely not. Sadly, some people take their responsibility serious while others do not. I question the personal motives of some to simply protect their income versus protecting people that got them elected or hired. There are outside groups currently bullying elected officials to exercise their views, which do not help to protect our kids. National organizations, national movements, while we're having crisis here in our own backyard. Is our division hurting our kids and the reputation of our city? Yes, that's evident. The division in this great community is tragic If it continues, we'll just see the first of many situations that will bring our amazing city even further down. Now, two heads are better than one, and four heads are better than two. Unified, we will overcome together. Divided, we will continue the sad, turbulent ride to a much worse place.
[George Scarpelli]: My knee-jerk reaction was quickly defended to the categorization of being looked at and politicizing this issue. Then I thought about it. Of course I'm politicizing this issue. Because that's the only way, the only mechanism that we, our kids, and the citizens have to make any changes to our system. We live in a political system that requires checks and balances to protect our citizens. So being attacked with this term makes no sense and showed me exactly how those that are guilty continue to deflect away from their own inaction, neglect, and responsibilities. Well, we've learned that inaction equals action, meaning inaction enabled these outcomes, putting our kids in harm's way and making our parents petrified to send our kids to school. That's the atrocity that we are looking at today, right now. If anyone has been politicizing this issue, it's those that have been both enabling these outcomes and hiding from the consequences of their own inactions. We were elected by the people, for the people. It's time that we get to work for the people, especially our children. See, when We got elected by the people. It should not be measured by winning or losing. It should be measured by the impact that we make and promises that we keep. This is our opportunity that has presented itself to us today. The question was presented, what are we going to do about it? Here's what I propose to get us united, back on track and protect our kids the way that they require from us. First, I'm going to be asking the mayor to put together a team so we can put an implementation of safety that works with our teachers, our principals, our police department, so our kids feel safe when they go back on January 3rd. We want them to feel safe. Meetings, consultants, that's passed. We have true professionals in our building that we can work together over the next two weeks to make sure we have that plan in place. I'm sure of that. I have resolutions in place this evening that would ask the mayor to prepare an RFP to hire and train true security guards, four to five. Make sure that we have full staffing in the video room where our staff can watch a minute to minute action and who's going into the bathrooms, who's loitering in the hallways to make sure our administration can see where these issues are happening and get the support there as soon as possible. Last night, I believe it was Tony Puccio who brought up a very simple resolution. We ask our parents today to do everything, to be involved. And he mentioned that. I thought that was a great idea. When I got home, I got a phone call from a former soccer captain. She went to school in Tulane, worked in Louisiana, and she sent me an article about a program they use in the schools in Louisiana where they were having issues and concerns like we're having today. It's called Dads in the Hall. Maybe, to be correct, we'll call it Dads and Moms in the Hall. If we could put parents on a bus to go to a field trip to Plymouth Rock, then we could put parents in the school that want to assist our teachers to make sure they're just an extra eyes and ears as we walk the halls. So I thank you, Mr. Puccio, for bringing that forward. I'm going to ask the school committee to open up their meetings for public participation, where there's a dialogue like last evening. So if there's an issue with parents, students, or constituents, they have this forum to come and speak with a dialogue back and forth to make sure things are identified. The process that's in place right now, as some parents can tell you tonight, very daunting. to put it through, to ask to get approval, to read something, to write something up and making sure that what is going to be presented is approved is another form of censorship. If not, I'm gonna request this council to go back to the original request that Councilor Knight and I put forth as a ordinance change demanding that we put in place that format for the City School Committee so they have an avenue to have a voice and they can listen.
[George Scarpelli]: The word back was that the police were there and they were present. But we also know that won't happen every single day for the rest of the year. So I implore our school committee to work together with the police department to move forward to making sure that there's a plan in place over the next few weeks. So we have our children feeling safe.
[George Scarpelli]: I know that she's not here right now, But I want, I heard something last night from a very courageous young lady and I want to leave with something that she said that I take it. It was directed to me. It's direct to all of us. It was very simple to, as she said, step up a step down.
[George Scarpelli]: We have a responsibility to make sure that we're giving the tools to our leaders in the school, our principals and assistant principals, to make sure that they can run the schools as efficient as they did when they led the middle schools or before this administration, when they were part of the resolutions. So let's unify this community. Let's unify our schools. and let's make Medford the city that it's always been, an amazing place to live, work, and raise their family. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, if I can, Madam President. the funding was there for the school system. I believe it was probably 80% of the funding that was cut for security over the last four years. So the funding was there and the school system cut that funding. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: trying to be restrained and understanding something very simple that I want to share with my fellow Councilors that gave their opinions.
[George Scarpelli]: to talk about money concerns and money issues should not be even a thought right now. The thought and the discussion of 30 years ago, five years ago, is an embarrassment to me for the fact that this is happening. This is happening right now. When I talk about unifying, I talk about what I said as a national agenda. we see and hear the direction that the school committee has gone on many different levels. And some school committees, members have called me in the past and just didn't understand that they wouldn't fight if they didn't have their own voice, but to follow this national agenda. And as I'm seeing, the people that I looked at and trusted and admired, I'm seeing that they're taking not what's important today in our schools, not what's important, our children, not their safety, but to be in this council chamber yesterday and listen to some of these people that truly are aligned with people in this room.
[George Scarpelli]: that we need to put that away. Open our minds and be unified in the fact that the unification is needed for the safety of our children. Not what happened five years ago. Not what happened 30 years ago. What's happening today. We're not gonna get the funding we need. We know that. And that's not gonna change. So bringing that up right now is really sad to me. That's just a buzzword and a check off. So I will tell you, we need movement now. We need our school committee, our superintendent to move now. I wanna see action now. Let's stop, let's hold school off for the next four days, three days. Let's bring our teachers into a room with our principals and let's find a solution right now. So our kids are safe when it's time to go back to school.
[George Scarpelli]: I want to get solutions from groups that are going to work together to make our kids safe on January 3rd. Safe when they go back to school. So to protect each other because what was said in another forum and how it was presented by this Councilor to people on different committees and try to protect what they're doing on the school committee side, I'm not afraid to speak for it.
[George Scarpelli]: And I understood those legalities. But you know what? When it came to children's safety, George Scarpelli never swayed. I made sure that they were safe. I never had this situation when I was on the school committee. Thank God. But I will tell you, we can bicker back and forth and disagree, but ultimately, that wasn't my intention today. My intention is truly look at everybody and say, let's meet now. Let's bring everybody together now. Let's set a plan that's tangible that we can reach, that we're not gonna get grants from the state. We're not gonna get funding from City Hall, but there's ways to get that done right now to make our children feel safe. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information. There's a difference between bullying and passion. And that's what you lack, ma'am. You lack the passion.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Madam President. Madam Superintendent, yesterday a young man came to the podium and addressed the situation that happened. Did you hear the young man who described a very similar situation just a few weeks prior? I asked the superintendent.
[George Scarpelli]: Was that addressed today? Did you contact the guidance Councilor that he talked to, to express the concern of the same people threatening him to stab him? Did you address that today?
[George Scarpelli]: It's not isolated.
[George Scarpelli]: Would it be shocking, Madam Superintendent, that a few phone calls I did receive from personnel that were there to support that there were still numerous students walking the halls freely? Has that even been addressed?
[George Scarpelli]: As you approach the re-entry and starting the new year off, I would really hope, from what I've heard from the kids, is that your administration, yourself personally, bring the student body together so they can understand what's going on because they're lost. Over the last incident that happened, they were waiting for some sort of acknowledgement of something and to keep them feeling safe, that was not done. I hope moving forward on the third, that the student body is in one area that they can see the leadership of our school system to show them that we're there and we understand what we're trying to say. That hasn't been done yet.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry, maybe you didn't understand what I meant. It was the fact that I wanted to bring it back to today. We need to focus on today. We can't go back to 30 years right now and worry about this today because today is the crisis.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. It's my privilege tonight. I know we've had a tough week here in Medford, and this is fitting and needed to address a group of young people that have done our city proud. And before I recognize anyone, if Coach Curley and Coach Offit come on up. I just called them up just because next to coach curly, I looked like a supermodel. So, um, I wanted, I wanted to make sure he was next to me, but you guys, uh, I wanted to really put a resolution through a few weeks back to acknowledge, um, what the method Mustang football team has done and their coaching staff, something that's always, always overlooked. is the impact that young people play in our community. And it's easy when it's something bad, right? When it's something bad, everybody wants to talk about what the kids are doing wrong. But I wanted to make sure that as I look through different messages that I received, I was noticing a trend. I was noticing an amazing trend. that our football team is a special, special group of people. I coached at Medford High School for many years. I was lucky to be part of a great organization and a great team. And one thing I realized, it's very important to have Mustang pride. And I think that's what we're lacking right now in the city, true Mustang pride. And when coach Curley came, came to the program and before that, We had some difficulties. Numbers were low. Kids were getting in trouble. You know, we weren't winning games. Everybody thought that the world was ending. And then you saw the bigger picture. Coach Curly came in. You saw him active in the community. You saw him doing special things with his, his team. And all of a sudden the football team started becoming, became elevated. And now the numbers have grown and positive things are in front of us. It's all right. That's my favorite song, by the way. It's okay. So now, what I wanted to address is something very important. What is a Mustang? It's not a word. I know people, it's easy to say Mustang pride. What it means to be a Mustang is truly to love the city you live in, to represent your community with pride and distinction. And what you boys and girls have done have been amazing. One thing I will say is that we have Coach Curley as your leader. And that's the key, having a leader you can lean on. A person that wants to be involved in a young person's life, no matter what the circumstance. And it's easy to say when things aren't going well and teams aren't winning and you're losing, it's easy to say, well, they're no good, let's get rid of the coach and let's start all over again. What I find so impressive and I want you to understand, this isn't about winning and losing. You went to Fenway Park and you represented Medford with a lot of respect and pride. Why I put this resolution through is for what you're doing off the field. A few things that this football team has done. You've helped organize the national night out with the whole football team and the police department. Really showing what unity means and how everybody works together. You led that. In September, you helped empty out the senior citizens' basements and helped seniors. In October, you helped with the Unified Basketball League. The day before Thanksgiving, Before Thanksgiving game, we saw you guys over at McDonald Stadium helping with the unified flag football game. Then you saw a bunch of football players in yards raking out people's yards that couldn't do it themselves. And now you're helping with the Medford Family Network for their toy drive. That's amazing. And I wanted to have this opportunity tonight to bring Coach Curley up and really commend you for what you have done and really put you on the pedestal that you deserve to be put on. One thing is having the leader to show you the way. And it's an honor that I talk about John Curley tonight because John's a very special person. What I love to hear is I got a phone call from a teacher And they said, George, I saw this resolution. I need to share something with you. I had a problem with the football player. He was being a little wise. And I called Coach Curley. And the next day, Coach Curley was sitting in the back of the room, just his presence there. And what we realized is that young man wasn't offended. He was so taken back that Coach Curley was there to do what? To show him he cares. to make sure that he's doing the right thing. And that's the type of leadership we need in our school system. And what you boys have done and girls have done and gone out to the community and put together all of these community service hours, it's something we should as a city applaud. So I wanna publicly thank you guys. I know we put together a, do we have that at? Okay, so we have accommodations that we put together. It's the Muffet Mustang City Council. The Muffet City Council award the this combination to and we'll say the young man's name, a young lady's name in with the Medford High School football team and your commitment to community service. Congratulations on your accomplishments. Go Mustangs. If we can, we'd love just to recognize you. We're going to call your name up. I know that Coach Curley, Coach Offit are going to help out. If we can, just before we get going, if Coach Curley has anything to say, I know that before we get going, I know we want to, I know some of the boys and girls want to get in and out. So I know that, Coach, if you have anything to say, that'd be great.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't want to figure one person. I know that Mr. Mr. Medford's here. Uh, Mr. Chris Murphy, thank you for everything you do with the football association. Um, and we really appreciate it. You look fabulous by the way. So thank you. All right, coach. You ready? All right.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, come on up if you're called. Sorry about that. So come on all the way around.
[George Scarpelli]: So, uh, coach, I know that we have a bunch of coaches that have been committed. I know that, uh, they've been great with the program. If you could just acknowledge them, I know Coach Offit is your right hand man, but anyone else that, um, need to address.
[George Scarpelli]: So, you know, when you're a true Medford program, when coach Joe's, uh, leading you boys. So I think that I appreciate coach for being, being here. I know he's at, he's at an appointment, but he's going to try to make it. If not, I'll come by the house myself and drop off his. So, uh, what, what, what we did is we put together a certificate that's going to be, uh, in a folder. We're going to be really, we're going to be getting that out to you tomorrow. Okay. But I thank you guys for coming out tonight. I know that, uh, One more.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Coach. Again, it's easy to point things out when a young person does something wrong. It seems like that's an easy thing to do. What I'm proud of tonight is that we're really putting you on a pedestal because you deserve it. The opportunity, the time that you give on your own, like Coach said, when we talked and said that no one forces you to do anything, but you go out and do it because you love the city of Medford. This is what true community is all about. So I'm proud of you. I thank you. My fellow Councilors, thank you and have a great night. We really appreciate it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, if I can, is the anybody representing the city to answer any questions on this call?
[George Scarpelli]: This is the first time we've received this type of request.
[George Scarpelli]: All right, so structurally, it's not unsafe or it's not gonna jeopardize the area around the well. It's not, it's pretty, correct? And you're recommending this, Owen, is this something you recommend?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Is the petitioner here this evening? Hi, how are you? So I've reviewed the paperwork. Everything seems in order, sirs. This is what type of, if you could just give us just a brief synopsis to share with everybody.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Yeah. Cause I was falling into play. And then, uh, how many employees do you have?
[George Scarpelli]: And that's it? Okay. Um, and I hear great things about this, this product and, um, We're excited that you're moving to Medford Square. It's a great location. I know that my daughter loves it. So it's gonna be something we'll see in our family. So again, I see everything in order, Madam President. I would move approval after questions from my fellow councilors, if they have any.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Congratulations.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Penny, for all your hard work. You've done so much for our community and I really appreciate everything you do. So I think that Um, one thing I realized as I'm reading through this, this is, it's amazing. This is, this is what we've let we've lacked here for a long time. So I appreciate your effort, but, uh, a most vulnerable community right now. Have we, I didn't see anything with the housing. Are we partnering anything with the, with the method housing department to reach, uh, those families that I think that, if you can.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so obviously there'll be a big piece of this. Yeah, definitely.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Bob, again, the other person taking the heat, and I apologize for that. It's not fair to you. No, no, and I'm not going to pile on. I think that we should, you know, I think for preparations purposes, I think that maybe calling for a Committee of the Whole meeting with Bob once we have all this information so we can sit down and really sink our teeth into these issues. This is something that, so you understand, Bob, you know, something as simplistic as people that are watching understand. You know, when I was 14, I opened up a checking account. My dad said, okay, this is how you balance your checkbook. This is how you spend your money. And if you don't, if you don't have, if you have $100 in your account and you want to purchase something for $120, it's telling you you can't. Okay, you're responsible. to control your own finance. Unfortunately, what was saying time after time here, we're getting papers from the mayor, we're getting requests from different Councilors about asking for money papers. And to be honest, I haven't voted for a financial paper and approval in a long time, because I, I find it very difficult for this body to do their job, not understanding the basic financial breakdowns of our community. You were there when we had the tough budget process. It was horrifying for you being new. And as we're going through this process, Bob, we haven't gotten one, one paper. We haven't gotten any information about where we're spending our money. And here we are, God, almost January, January one. So I want the public to know this is the hardship we're feeling in the council. We don't have a city solicitor. I'm trying to ask questions about legal matters and we don't have anybody to turn to. And I apologize that you have to be here tonight and really be hung out to dry. I'm curious if the chief of staff is here.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, can we address the question to her?
[George Scarpelli]: I think it's a simple question. I know that the Chief of Staff has been out for legitimate reasons and she hasn't She just started to ramp back up, but were you familiar that our finance director hasn't received any of this information from this council?
[George Scarpelli]: So again, I heard your answer. I don't appreciate the response. I think that this has been a total lack of disrespect to this council. We have crises that we're dealing with right now that we're looking at financial support and hoping for some financial support. And we don't know where we are financially. Um, so to move forward with any of these dog and pony requests, and then ask for funding for deeply needed, uh, resolves and not having an understanding of where we are financially is very difficult for me as a Councilor to make decisions, moving the city forward. I, I hope everybody that's watching and understands realizes how dysfunctional this community looks right now. There are so many issues that we're seeing that coming across from us. And this is so totally embarrassing. I'm disheartened right now. So Bob, again, I apologize for the answer that the chief of staff just gave. The understanding is this, we have been asking for money papers. the day after we had our budget and we've been trying to get some information, some valuable information of where we're going, what direction we're in. We're trying to figure out what tonight's a very important meeting. There's some resolutions tonight. We're talking about some very important issues and looking to fund some very important issues, but getting the okay from the administration to fund papers and then not understanding where we are, because I believe the mayor, you were there when the mayor said as critical as last year's budget was, next year's is going to be even worse. And what puts me on edge right now, Bob, is the fact that we haven't seen anything and we can't move to support our most neediest members of our community and resolutions that are coming forward. So I find this very disheartening. I find this very troubling and I don't know how my 16, 17 year old daughter has the ability to run her finances better than what we're seeing with this multi-million dollar corporation called Medford. So, and again, I know it's not you Bob, but I had to express my concerns and disgust. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Please, I think until we have all the information in front of us and Bob has time now to get the documentation that we need to move this forward or to understand it, I think we need it immediately. It's something that, you know, we've been asking for forever so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I appreciate taking this out of order. This has been a very emotional last 24 hours. It's been very intense and I wanted to make sure that if you allow me to give a small presentation that I prepared so I don't miss anything. Medford's in crisis. It's not a new crisis, but one that has started to spiral out of control and has just caught the attention of the outside world. Sadly, we had many years of warning given to us to prevent the latest incident. But as we see today, those warning signs were ignored by the very people that were entrusted to protect our kids by acting on our behalf. Most of you know my background as a former coach, teacher, and now Assistant Director of Recreation for Neighborhood Community. I wanna look at a few fundamentals to see where we missed out, where we made our mistakes. First thing that came to me is, are our kids safe? No, they're not. It's not the data that we need now, we now have the actual proof from our experiences. Are we doing all that we can to keep our kids safe so they can learn and grow successfully? No, the warning signs are there and we ignored it. Are we unified on this issue? Absolutely not. Sadly, some people take their responsibility serious while others do not. I question the personal motives of some to simply protect their income versus protecting people that got them elected or hired. There are outside groups currently bullying elected officials to exercise their views, which do not help to protect our kids. National organizations, national movements, while we're having crisis here in our own backyard. Is our division hurting our kids and the reputation of our city? Yes, that's evident. The division in this great community is tragic. If it continues, we'll just see the first of many situations that will bring our amazing city even further down. Now, two heads are better than one, and four heads are better than two. Unified, we will overcome together, divided we will continue the sad, turbulent ride to a much worse place. You know, last night I was accused of politicizing this issue. My knee-jerk reaction was quickly defended to the categorization of being looked at and politicizing this issue. Then I thought about it. Of course I'm politicizing this issue. because that's the only way, the only mechanism that we, our kids and the citizens have to make any changes to our system. We live in a political system that requires checks and balances to protect our citizens. So being attacked with this term makes no sense and showed me exactly how those that are guilty continue to deflect away from their own inaction, neglect and responsibilities. Well, we've learned that inaction equals action, meaning inaction enabled these outcomes, putting our kids in harm's way and making our parents petrified to send our kids to school. That's the atrocity that we are looking at today, right now. If anyone has been politicizing this issue, it's those that have been both enabling these outcomes and hiding from the consequences of their own inactions. We were elected by the people, for the people. It's time that we get to work for the people, especially our children. See, when we got elected by the people, It should not be measured by winning or losing. It should be measured by the impact that we make and promises that we keep. This is our opportunity that has presented itself to us today. The question was presented, what are we going to do about it? Here's what I propose to get us united, back on track and protect our kids the way that they require from us. First, I'm going to be asking the mayor to put together a team so we can put an implementation of safety that works with our teachers, our principals, our police department, so our kids feel safe when they go back on January 3rd. We want them to feel safe. Meetings, consultants, That's passed. We have true professionals in our building that we can work together over the next two weeks to make sure we have that plan in place. I'm sure of that. I have resolutions in place this evening that would ask the mayor to prepare an RFP to hire and train true security guards, four to five. Make sure that we have full staffing in the video room where our staff can watch a minute-to-minute action and who's going into the bathrooms, who's loitering in the hallways, to make sure our administration can see where these issues are happening and get the support there as soon as possible. Last night, I believe it was Tony Puccio who brought up a very simple resolution. We ask our parents today to do everything, to be involved. And he mentioned that. I thought that was a great idea. When I got home, I got a phone call from a former soccer captain. She went to school in Tulane, worked in Louisiana, and she sent me an article about a program they use in the schools in Louisiana where they were having issues and concerns like we're having today. It's called Dads in the Hall. Maybe to be correct, we'll call it Dads and Moms in the Hall. If we could put parents on a bus to go to a field trip to Plymouth Rock, then we could put parents in the school that want to assist our teachers to make sure they're just an extra eyes and ears as you walk the halls. So I thank you, Mr. Puccio, for bringing that forward. I'm going to ask the school committee to open up their meetings for public participation, where there's a dialogue like last evening. So if there's an issue with parents, students, or constituents, they have this forum to come and speak with a dialogue back and forth to make sure things are identified. The process that's in place right now, as some parents can tell you tonight, very daunting. to put it through, to ask to get approval, to read something, to write something up and making sure that what is going to be presented is approved is another form of censorship. If not, I'm gonna request this council to go back to the original request that Councilor Knight and I put forth as a ordinance change demanding that we put in place that format for the City School Committee so they have an avenue to have a voice and they can listen. So this has been a very intense last 24 hours. My daughter didn't go to school, nor did I believe close to 400 other students. The word back was that the police were there and they were present, but we also know that won't happen every single day for the rest of the year. So I implore our school committee to work together with the police department to move forward to making sure that there's a plan in place over the next few weeks so we have our children feeling safe. And that leaves me with one thing. I know that she's not here right now, But I want, I heard something last night from a very courageous young lady and I want to leave with something that she said that I take it. It was directed to me. It's direct to all of us. It was very simple to, as she said, step up a step down. We have a responsibility and I hope we hear it. We have a responsibility to make sure that we're giving the tools to our leaders in the school, our principals and assistant principals, to make sure that they can run the schools as efficient as they did when they led the middle schools or before this administration, when they were part of the resolutions. So let's unify this community. Let's unify our schools. and let's make Medford the city that it's always been, an amazing place to live, work, and raise their family. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information if I can.
[George Scarpelli]: The funding was there for the school system. I believe it was probably 80% of the funding that was cut for security over the last four years. So the funding was there and the school system cut that funding. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. trying to be restrained and understanding something very simple that I want to share with my fellow Councilors that gave their opinions. Agree to disagree. We've done that many times. These are our children. They're unsafe. They're scared. Our teachers are scared. To talk about money concerns and money issues should not be even a thought right now. The thought and the discussion of 30 years ago, five years ago, is an embarrassment to me for the fact that this is happening. This is happening right now. When I talk about unifying, I talk about what I said as a national agenda. We see and hear the direction that the school committee has gone on many different levels. And some school committees members have called me in the past and just didn't understand that they wouldn't fight if they didn't have their own voice, but to follow this national agenda. And as I'm seeing, the people that I looked at and trusted and admired, I'm seeing that they're taking not what's important today in our schools, not what's important, our children, not their safety, but to be in this council chamber yesterday and listen to some of these people that truly are aligned with people in this room. So these issues are concerning to the community to understand that we need to put that away, open our minds and be unified in the fact that the unification is needed for the safety of our children. Not what happened five years ago, not what happened 30 years ago, what's happening today. We're not gonna get the funding we need. We know that, but that's not gonna change. So bringing that up right now is really sad to me. That's just a buzzword and a check off. So I will tell you, we need movement now. We need our school committee, our superintendent to move now. I wanna see action now. Let's stop, let's hold school off for the next four days, three days. Let's bring our teachers into a room with our principals and let's find a solution right now. So our kids are safe when it's time to go back to school. Because the next few days are going to be useless. There's going to be no learning. I want to hear solutions from groups that are going to work together to make our kids safe on January 3rd. Safe when they go back to school. So to protect each other because what was said in another forum and how it was presented by this Councilor to people on different committees and try to protect what they're doing on the school committee side, I'm not afraid to speak for it. Politically, I don't care. Our kids are hurting and what people are seeing and what they're hearing from the school committee are gender items that aren't protecting or looking at their safety. I was questioned that I was part of that school committee and there are legalities. And I understood those legalities, but you know what? When it came to children's safety, George Scarpelli never swayed. I made sure that they were safe. I never had this situation when I was on the school committee, thank God. But I will tell you, we can bicker back and forth and disagree, but ultimately, that wasn't my intention today. My intention is truly look at everybody and say, let's meet now. Let's bring everybody together now. Let's set a plan that's tangible that we can reach, that we're not gonna get grants from the state. We're not gonna get funding from City Hall, but there's ways to get that done right now to make our children feel safe. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information. There's a difference between bullying and passion. And that's what you lack, madam. You lack passion.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Madam president.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam Superintendent, yesterday a young man came to the podium and addressed the situation that happened. Did you hear the young man who described a very similar situation just a few weeks prior?
[George Scarpelli]: I asked the Superintendent
[George Scarpelli]: Was that addressed today? Did you contact the guidance Councilor that he talked to, to express the concern of the same people threatening him to stab him? Did you address that today?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Would it be shocking, Madam Superintendent, that a few phone calls I did receive from personnel that were there to support, that there were still numerous students walking the halls freely. Has that even been addressed?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, that's good to hear. As you approach the re-entry and starting the new year off, I would really hope, and what I've heard from the kids, is that your administration, yourself personally, bring the student body together so they can understand what's going on because they're lost. Over the last incident that happened, they were waiting for some sort of acknowledgement of something and to keep them feeling safe, that was not done. I hope moving forward on the third, that the student body is in one area that they can see the leadership of our school system to show them that we're there and we understand what we're trying to say. That hasn't been done yet.
[George Scarpelli]: That's good to hear, thanks.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry, maybe you didn't understand what I meant. It was the fact that I wanted to bring it back to today. We need to focus on today. We can't go back to 30 years right now and worry about this today because today is the crisis. That's my intent.
[George Scarpelli]: Great idea. Second that.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam Mayor. Thank you, George Scarpelli. 27 Butler Street, Matthew, Massachusetts. Um, what I'm hearing on what we've seen today was horrific. What I hear and see from this committee is just as bad. This isn't something that we're looking at systemic. This is something right now that's happening right now. Our kids are afraid. My daughter doesn't want to go back to school. Where is the urgency? Where is your urgency? A few weeks ago, we had parents up here talking about the fear they had about their daughter being beaten up. And we had a consultant and I've asked teachers, I've asked students, have you seen the change? Nothing, nothing, nothing has been done. And to sit back, I'm gonna speak and then I'm gonna leave because I don't want it back and forth, Madam Mayor. This is what we're seeing with my daughter, her friends. I ran up to the high school just so I could be present for her, just so I could tell her her dad's outside. I see over and over again, I saw Madam Superintendent, this is not an isolated incident. To write that this is an isolated incident and to say publicly this is an isolating incident is false. This is not. This is not. And I'm scared, and I'm disgusted, and I feel bad for my daughter and her friends. And this might be not the best thing a city council should do, coming up in front of a body and expressing themselves with this motion, but I don't care. You have principals and assistant principals that are running around that school with no support. for rules that have been implemented by this body. Give him back the tools, give them back the tools so they can run the school system the way they see fit to keep our kids safe, period. And then look at your studies and then look at your consultants and see what they said.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll be honest with tomorrow. We've asked for an emergency meeting didn't didn't go through only three members voted for an emergency meeting. We have a forum for people don't feel like they've been heard today to be up for the city council tomorrow and express their concerns and I will be honest with you. My daughter will not be going to school and her friends are not going to school.
[George Scarpelli]: Sure. So I will tell you, as a parent, you're asking me to have a back and forth? As a colleague, I haven't heard one word from you. I haven't had one word from anybody. I've publicly put this out there because we haven't heard one word from any of you. Well, one word, yeah. So I will tell you, as a former member of this body, I worked diligently to make sure that we implemented a plan to keep our children safe from bullies, not the opposite, because that's what we're feeling. That's what our kids are feeling. Whether you want to see it or not, our children are telling us that they feel that you're protecting the bullies. You're allowing them to run the show. If you ask any kid, any child up there, they're telling me that they feel unsafe. They're telling me that they don't have the structure that they felt in the past. So to tell me that the tensions, suspensions, well guess what? If you're saying that, And that's not happening, it's not getting to the ones that it's happening to, because the kids are saying that. The kids are telling me that there's no suspensions, that they're not gonna get detention. The kids are saying it. Maybe so, but let me ask you one question. We've had assemblies for everything. After that incident with that young lady, did you bring that student body in? Did you bring that student body in and give them security to let them feel that they would be safe? Have any of you, other than Go Mustangs or emails to people that if they get to them or not, did you sit in front of the student body yourselves? After that incident, look them in the eye in the gymnasium, like you did when you were all there cheering them on for the football game, and look them in the eye and say, you're safe because of this. You're safe because we're going to do this. You did not. Correct? Correct. Thank you. That doesn't have to be a law.
[George Scarpelli]: We understand that, but that doesn't mean the tact and the professionalism that you have from your teachers and administrators up there to bring the rest of the student body in and to let them know that they're in a safe environment. You don't have to disclose anything, any other news about what's legally can be said and what can't be said. You're all educated, very bright people to sit our student body down and look them in the eye and say, you're okay and this is why it's gonna happen. I'm not asking you to disclose any information about the perpetrator, the person who was injured. I'm not saying that. Let the kids know that they're safe, because you haven't done that. You haven't.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. I just want to express that as a city Councilor, you will see resolutions from this Councilor that will ask you Madam Mayor, the resolution that if you came to our, our body for funding for licensed security guides to help our principals and assistant principals to make this happen. That'll be a resolution, there'll be another resolution that the council would like to ask Members of the school committee, the police department, our teachers that we set up a team summit, so we can work with our children so they can tell us what they want, just like the brave young men and women that were here tonight. So that will be the dialogue that needs to be started, there'll be a few others, but As Mr. Puccio said earlier, we allow our parents to monitor lunches. We allow our parents to monitor different various programs throughout the schools. Maybe it's time that we ask those parents, and myself included, that we get more involved on a daily basis at Medford High School so the kids see our faces. Not to be the policemen, not to be express this, the communication that I've gotten back from students and parents over the last 24 hours and before, is the understanding that we are very fortunate to have a headmaster like Paul DeLava. Paul DeLava. And I know Paul DeLava will be very upset because someone's talking kindly about him. But Paul DeLava was part of that group that when I was a school committee member, he was a coach, he was a teacher, he loves Medford. So whatever was implemented after that, whatever stigma that's out there that people are portraying what that administration can do or can't do, let's try to find a way to correct it and make sure we don't lose people like Paul DeLava and his staff. Because if we lost him right now, we would be going back years. So thank you for your attention.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I know that it was a resolution that I put forth that I appreciated all of the you know, talk and discussions around the Thanksgiving Day football game and being Fenway Park and how important that was and how we could, you know, the recognition of a football game. But I think what's more important that had to be addressed. And I think that our young people have to see that committees like this council and more recognize what these young men and women do and coaches do for the community. I would love that we could ask the Medford High School football team and coaching staff to appear to the city council and we make a motion that if we can have citations made and just to recognize what they've done. And what I'm trying to say is you have a program just a few short years ago that almost didn't have enough kids for one team. And now they're close to 60 to 70 kids that are playing on the team. That being so important because you're seeing kids. And from what I gather, it's a lot of kids that are Not the don't have the support that that most kids have in their families so leaning on each other. I think it's something that's so important. It's such a great tool to have a team like the high school football team. But what you realize is what they're doing in our community. and giving back to the community. We forget about wins and losses, forget about all that, throw that all away. But when you have a leader like John Curley, the football coach, who's going out with his team and help organizing and running National Night Out, the whole football team showing up and working with the police department to organize a National Night Out event or in September where they helped the senior citizens clean out their basements or in October, when they helped with this in support of the unified basketball program, where they're, they're, they're boys and girls dressed up and mascots and supported in support of the team in November, again helping with the unified football Thanksgiving Day game, and then What I thought really struck me was a neighbor called and says, well, the football team is coming out to rake our leaves. And I said, yeah, right. No, but that's what they were doing. They went out to neighbors that couldn't rake their leaves and were stuck in the house and the football team came out and rake their leaves. And I know that they're actually going to be they're doing a gift certificate drive to support the Medford family connection. So it's important that people hear this and why? Because you hear so many negative things now, especially what's going on in the last couple of months at Medford High School and everything you hear in TV and how negative things are. But we're lucky because we do have a lot of very good kids at Medford High School. And looking at the football team and the leadership from the coach, John Curley, and what they've done, I don't mind that you're not winning the Super Bowl. It's okay for me. I love the idea that we can read these stories and talk to neighbors and talk to senior citizens, how the football team has come out and helped this community and given back. And it was funny last night, I talked to a teacher and they said, Hey, you, you have something on the agenda for the football team. And the coach said, yeah, I just wanted to thank him. And he said to me, um, I had an issue with one of the players and I just wasn't getting to him. So I contacted coach Curly and Coach Curley, during his lunchtime, went to Medford High School, and when this young man sat down in a seat, his football coach sat behind him. And it was funny because I said, well, that's a scare tactic as a joke. And he said it was total opposite. What that young man felt, because their football coach cared enough that he would take his lunch and sit behind him, and at the end of the class, have a dialogue to make sure that both the teacher and the football coach is in this working together to make sure they achieve their highest capability possible. And to me, I think that speaks volumes. So I really want Coach Curley and the football team to be here and to be recognized and given a citation so they can understand that We see this people see this, and this can be just as contagious as the bad things, the negative talk you hear, but when you see teams like this and you see coaches like this lead lead lead our young people, you know, in the positive light. This is what our community is built on. This is what makes Medford, Medford. And this is what Mustang Pride is all about. If anybody thinks that Mustang Pride is about putting on a football helmet and running through a tornado, that means nothing. To be a Mustang, to have Mustang Pride, this is what it's about. Giving back to the community, understanding that there's something bigger than you. And I want to just make sure that we commend our coaching staff, especially Coach Curley. I know that the football association under Chris Murphy is his leadership. I think that that whole association should be recognized and I would make that a formal motion to invite them next week to the meeting. Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I think if I can. I know that Council night. That's exactly what I heard from our assessor and the understanding that in theory, it sounds great. Uh, where if you want your home, you'll get you'll get tax exempt. That's not the way the way that it's been been, uh, uh, told to us that something that this council, especially some members of the council push for the understanding of keeping people in Medford when you're going to see how higher priced homes, which is a lot of times our three family homes, we want to keep people in Medford. And what I was told that as you're looking at those people that most landlords aren't going to say, you know what? We'll take the hit. My taxes are going to go up, but I'm going to take that hit. That's not going to happen. We want people to still afford to live in Metro. What's going to happen is, again, the landlord's gonna put it back on the renter, and affordable housing even gets deeper and deeper. So these are the reasons why that I'm gonna support the vote that I've taken since we've been here, and what our acting assessor has told us. It's not as simple as the wording of, you're on your home, you're, you're going to be exempt from the taxes. That's not true. So I think that you still have to understand where that money's coming from and who's going to take that. And I think it's just it just hurts our community if we approve that in totality. But thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, to address a question to Mr. Coates, is this the final paving?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so, and yeah, In your professional opinion, what we're seeing on the method side with the patchwork, with the manholes that are sunk in, is that acceptable?
[George Scarpelli]: So we appreciate you being the person that we're addressing this to. But I think you have to understand the horror that these neighbors have gone through and just the idea when they see the work that's not up to par and the idea that maybe in the next six months, that they could have machinery again, going up and down that corridor, fixing a mistake that we'll be talking about tonight. I hope you understand that. I think my last question really is, what's acceptable for standards? but the difference between what we see in Winchester and the difference that we see as soon as you cross the line in Medford, do you recognize that?
[George Scarpelli]: So this is our fault, so our standards are lower?
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, you did say that. What you said was that the standards in that community are different than ours. That's exactly what you said. So my question is, being the professional, the standards that's allowed in Winchester wouldn't be allowed what we have in Medford in that act.
[George Scarpelli]: So if I can ask our engineer while you're on the phone, while you're here in this presentation, if we can. So from what I'm hearing, the reason why we have patchy work and that we feel that it's subpar, it's because, not you per se, but we Medford told Eversource to pave it that way, piecemeal like that, because that's what I'm hearing.
[George Scarpelli]: Just so you know, and just the conversation I had with paving companies that do highways and so on, they did tell us The longevity or the length of that reliability for that roadway, because there are seams, are drastically different.
[George Scarpelli]: So what they came out with, I went out there with them. They looked at it. They said, what I'm saying is seam is what we see. So what we see, no matter what it is, they've told me- I've also been doing this for 20 years.
[George Scarpelli]: And then they'll be able to... So what safeguards do we have in the next season?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so just for entertainment's sake, If you had your choice, would you have rather done what Winchester did? And having no seams?
[George Scarpelli]: I'm saying as a professional that we pay for the city of Medford, who is you, would you recommend that or would you recommend the piece?
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, that's not good right now, my friend. I'm asking you as a as a city. So this is what we don't need on. This is the problem we have. I know that we're going after our smaller businesses and saying we're going to pay curb to curb. And that that fee goes up to our residents. Now. We're asking for one of the richest companies in the Commonwealth to make sure they pave a road the way the standards that those neighbors deserve, right, my friend? So this is what I'm asking. If you don't really see that, this is what we need, because we've been crying for years that we should have a clerk of the works, that we find a way that we have a clerk of the works for these jobs. Because what Councilor Caraviello is saying is the person that ever saw us has promised us that's going to work with us. Maybe they've worked with you, but or department at City Hall, the mayor's office or whatnot, but we haven't been getting any information on what's been going on. And this is what's sad, this is why I have a resolution later about communication with the city. This is the stuff, and I'm sorry, you're just the person that, and I know we've been called bullies, by the way, because I'm not trying to, I'm looking for a professional that's in our community that's gonna say, no, George, This isn't right. The best thing is that, because the professionals that I'm friends with that said, yeah, let's go for a ride. And we went for a ride and they said they do highways, big jobs across the country. They said, no, honestly, the truth of the matter is the best way to do it is no seams. Okay, that's what they've told me. So I know you have 20 years of experience, but- I agree with your assessment. Okay, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: But again, thank you. Thank you for being here. I appreciate it. And I again, I think the frustration is those neighbors that I, you know, your frustrations every day. Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: I, you know, this is, it's tough though. I, you know, whenever source, when they came in, they said there's no benefit to our residents, but they're going to at least leave it better than the way they saw it. I tend to disagree. I would call Ebersole some shame, because if that's what you're leaving and that's what we're going to do and you're blaming, whatever, I'm not going to go there. But thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. First, let me start off by addressing some concerns that my daughter has been reading on social media. We love dogs. We love our dogs. I've had dogs my whole life. I love my dog. But the question that I put this out is to really discuss the survey that is being put out there by the city administration to talk about specific hours in specific areas that we have unleashed dogs. First of all, there is a city ordinance that we as a city council have in our laws here in Medford that you're not supposed to have, you can't have unleashed dogs. That's it. Why we're doing a survey without presenting this to the council or the understanding of what this means or what the repercussions mean, because right now you're having people, especially the kids, different sports organizations saying, hold on one second. We've had issues in the past where my daughter was on the field and a dog was unleashed and oh, but it's okay. It's a good dog. It's a good dog. Until that one time that good dog becomes violent or something scary happens. And for the city administration to put anything out there right now is really disingenuine to this council and understanding our policies and laws here in the city. There was a concern a few months back about Tufts Park and what we said was, well, let's look into fencing the old pool area, because it's still a big area, and they could still have dogs roam in that area, but we put a fence up. And the response was, no, because the people that wanted this movement said, that's still keeping their dogs within an area, and they're not free to roam. Well, I've read what the city has put out, and the process of having a survey, and the survey coming back, and they're gonna pick places in the city, maybe even fence them off, or cordon them off, and we're gonna set times for when people can go. We can't even get information for the most vital issues in our community out. But we're gonna let Nana be, who's gonna walk her three-year-old daughter through a certain park, and she didn't see the postings, and she doesn't understand the hours that there can be unleashed dogs in that area. I don't understand the process and having a survey to go out to talk about a law, an ordinance that we already have in our community, that we have not only in the park side, but also in the city side that says we do not, have unleashed dogs in our community for safety reasons. And there's a reason for the ordinance. It says an animal. It's an animal. I love my dog like a human too, but it's still an animal. There are no guarantees with that animal, especially around children.
[George Scarpelli]: The end result is that people want to have certain hours, from what I've read, in our community in certain areas, but maybe not ballparks, it's said, but certain areas to leave unleashed dogs. I think it's a dangerous, dangerous game to play. There's a reason why Councilor Marks work so hard to implement the dog park. There are reasons why there are areas in the state side where the fells that they can run your unleashed dog. That's why there are areas, but to designate city property and then put hours to it and think that we're going to have the bandwidth in that office to make sure it's communicated to every resident with their child and say, that as long as we post it, we're safe. I said, I think that's very, very dangerous. And I think it's unsafe and it's just, it's a shame that it's put out there to appease people during political times saying that we'll just do a survey. So when that survey says, absolutely, let's do 10 o'clock in the morning to two o'clock in the afternoon at Tufts Park, during the weeks that the kids are in school and to say, hey, that's great, we're gonna post it. But we're gonna have that one day that Nana's gonna walk their child that doesn't have the post and the dog's gonna attack. That's a very slippery slope. That's very dangerous in that sense. And believe me, and I'll say it again, George Scarpelli, what camera are we on, loves dogs. I love dogs. But I also love and respect the people that traverse our community and wanna feel safe. So thank you, Madam President. I think that my reason for putting this forward is really just to vent and then just to spread some of the concerns that residents did have that's saying that, well, if it happens, this survey happens, they open one spot, what's gonna stop it from moving on? And I think that this is, you wanna focus on building a dog park for bigger dogs, you wanna think, well, let's figure that, let's work that out. Let's look at Tufts Park and maybe closing off that area, fencing off a safe area where dogs can run in a bigger area. Maybe that's the solution. But to put it the way that it reads to me is that possibly having hours around the community for unleashed dogs, I think that's wrong. And more importantly, in the form of a motion, is I'd like the city administration to help this councilor understand how we can ask for a motion for a city ordinance that's in place. Are we changing it? Has anybody had talked about changing an ordinance about unleashed dogs? Cause I've never heard anything of that. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, just real quick. I appreciate the caller calling in, but again, I think Councilor Collins brings up the best point. When you identify, this is great that 35 people responded, but guess who those people that did the survey, guess where they're from? They're the dog lovers that walk their dogs off a leash. So of course they're gonna get that information. This is the problem with the process. That was the main question I had with the process. And regardless of that personally, I know I've been contacted by a few people from your committee or your program. I don't care what other communities do in the city that I live in, that we have audiences from the city, public safety is number one. So to allow it is dangerous. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. When I put this forward, I think the frustration came out that as we walked in one day to City Hall, the chambers were used as a storage facility. Probably the most hollowed ground in this building was being used as a closet. Out front, the floors looked dirty. There was They were crates, empty crates in the front. They were floor washers. And I think that, you know, as part of this beautification committee that the mayor has in place, I think that as well with the city council, I'd like to work together. I wouldn't mind getting my hands dirty, but when you come in here, which is supposed to be the most respected room in the community and the way it's being treated. And as I'm writing this, a real happy post went out and residents texted me and said, did you just see this post? And I said, what does it say? During the farmer's market here, we had llamas in the foyer of City Hall, llamas. I'm working about dogs and we have llamas in the foyer. So what I'm asking for is really to work with, ask the beautification committee, I know the mayor has a beautification committee. in place already that we work together with the council to try to find a way to come in. I know that I'm not tooting my own horn, but I have a connection with a very important company, the Furniture Trust Company. They came in and donated so much furniture, new furniture for our office staff here to save our community money. And I thank them for that. No one in the city has thanked them yet. City administration still hasn't thanked them. So I will put a resolution through later to thank the Furniture Trust Company that's been giving furniture and donating furniture throughout this building. But they were, that's what all that furniture was here. That's why this looks like a big closet. But I think that we really need to start taking pride right from the beginning, and that's when you walk through those doors. So I'm willing to work for it. I'd like to get a group of people together and maybe come through the building and help move some things if they need, if we don't have staff enough to do that, but that would be my request. Thank you, Madam President. Can we dress up in costumes on that day?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And I know that to beat a dead horse here, but I understand that we have to do a business, but until we take a hard line and understanding the finances of our community and especially what's going out to KP Law and especially the fact that there really is no urgency to hire a city solicitor or city assistant city solicitor until we truly understand the financial implications of the mayor's legal consultants, which is KP Law. I was reminded by a former Councilor for this resolution, just to remind us, when we voted on KP Law, if we can all remember, do all remember on the monthly costs that we were giving them? Who remembers that? It was $5,000. I know for sure it's definitely gone past that $5,000. And I know that there's been talk that this is the frustrating part of being a city councilor. We're now moving in, excuse me, other communities where I work in the municipality, we are already in the middle of our budget talks for May and June. We're all in it. The directors already met with financial director a few times. We're ready to go. We've already given our predictions, what our staff wants to, what they're looking for as a wishlist. We're already all in. What we're seeing right now is we still haven't seen one financial paper. And I don't know if there's a reason for it because one of the common denominators is that we've asked for the understanding or the amount of money that has been paid out to KP Law. So what I'm requesting from my fellow Councilors to follow my lead in asking you to please refrain from asking for resolutions that ask for legal opinion from KP Law or legal opinion because the legal opinion that asks for KP Law, at least that You know, I appreciate Councilor Knight that followed up on his resolution that he responded with asking for the city solicitor to give us an answer, knowing we don't have a city solicitor. And I will be public and transparent that I've reached out to a few former city solicitors that I've worked with, and I've asked them, if they would apply. And please help us. And and I said, I know we know we've been told by administration that it's difficult because it's a fight throughout the Commonwealth. And the answer I got from city solicitors that I worked with the now in different communities. It's a George has nothing to do with the shortage right now, it's the fear of what they're hearing of what's happening to department heads in this community. So I think that we should start looking at things straight on and figuring things out because things are getting, things have gotten away from us in this community. We're in crisis. We're in crisis. So I think the more that we support The mayor's initiatives, especially with KP Law, the more we're giving evidence, the more we're showing, and I know it's tough. I know that we're trying to do our business, but the truth of the matter is, are they really answering us? Even when we ask, are they really getting back to us? Are they really giving the answers that we need to help us succeed? I say no. I haven't seen, you know, we've done a lot of work, and Council President, I credit you with a lot of meetings. We're doing a lot. but we seem to not to get anything done because where does it fall? It falls for when it gets to legal opinion. So, um, again, everybody has their opinion, but I asked my fellow colleagues to share with my motion.
[George Scarpelli]: I understand that we do need some protection when you talk about BJs, but again, I'd love to support that with bringing in Mr. Dickinson and see where we are. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Very simple. This was when I wrote this, it was a few weeks back, and this was in conjunction with the horrifying situation for that young lady that endured the beating at Bedford High School and the lack of communication we got from the school department. I know that, you know, when I was in the school committee, one thing that we made sure that the superintendent reached out to all the stakeholders. And I know that when I was a school committee, we made sure that our city councils knew when something very important happened in the school department, that we would be getting phone calls, especially something that dire. And, um, we, we didn't get anything. I think we got a, uh, something that was added to a, um, go Mustang page and then something in it. It wasn't, It wasn't anything that we were alerted to because it's something that at that level. Now, don't get me wrong. We have a student that has an accident in the gym class. As a school committee member, I got a phone call saying, George, just so that you know, the ambulance just left from the Glynn School. We had a young person break their wrist in phys ed at basketball. Thank you. I understand it's on the school committee side, just on the city side. we should be informed with issues that, especially dealing with the horrific issue that was brought to that situation, and newspapers and news trucks, and we're getting phone calls from news outlets, and we're getting phone calls from parents, but I don't know what you're talking about. And they said, how do you not know what we're talking about? So again, It's something that I find very disheartening, so I think that's why that was put in. So thank you for hearing my cry, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thanks for my colleagues. I think that I'm looking at this in a different way that we can look at it and showing showing our community how this can work. by going out in the community. I know that, you know, like I'll say it again, I hate to say it, but when you're working in a community, in a municipality, when you want something to change, you want something to happen, you go through the community, you set up round table events where people come out and share what their concerns are, and then the rebuttal or the communication back and forth to make sure this works. Now, traffic and parking fees and fines in our neighbor community, people were outraged after they went through roundtable discussions to each neighborhood. And they came back and they said, okay, so you're saying these fees and fines are going to go directly to our school system, that our roads will be swept on a daily basis and our playgrounds will be safe and clean. Well, let's see. And that's what happened. So the big conundrum, the big issue and concerns, the negativity was put to rest once people really understand where the benefits are and where that can go. Unfortunately, what we're hearing over and over again is the lack of communication to who? The citizens of this community and That's where I agree with Councilor Knight that this cannot work and this won't work unless we have a way that we can turn to each other and say, this is how, why this is happening. Now, granted, when you're sitting in front of someone to tell them you're gonna raise fees and fines, they're gonna look you in the eye and tell you they're wrong. But ultimately, you made the decision to explain it and you move forward. We have yet to do that. in many things. My phone's been blowing up about how people were part of this dog commission, and this is something that, and Brookline, how things change and shame on you, and this is wrong. Fine, fine. I've talked to 30 of my neighbors that asked about this dog situation. They don't live in Brookline, they don't walk their dog off a leash, and there's a huge lack of communication in this community. The last two resolutions speak volumes. I think we saw a huge, huge difference with the relationship with the police and neighborhood policing when council Falco made this motion to move it to neighborhoods. And we actually joked about it because council Falco every week would give a summary and say, don't forget community policing will be held this night in this location. And you want, you want to know the truth? The police loved it, and the neighborhood loved it because that always filled the room. And they sat there, and like Chief used to say, they used to take it. And then when they were left, they were shaking hands saying, oh, now I understand. And boy, does that help. So communication is key for success in anything we do in life. And what we're lacking right now in this city is a true lack of communication. So I think these resolutions help. So thank you to my colleagues to support if they will.
[George Scarpelli]: So to the chair, to council night. So just, just to be clear, I'm on the negotiating team. I work in a municipality. So you're telling me that at first I've heard of it and it's appalling. So if someone's accrued 20 years of service in their community and accrued and earned their sick time, um, Because I do that myself. We have a process with when you're talking about before, you know, looking at FMLA, looking at different processes to make sure you're saying that in the city right now we have, there's an avenue now that employees that have earned that sick time can't use that time accrued. That's what brought to my understanding, yes. That bothers me in so many ways, because when you look at accrued sick time, these are the reasons why you use that time. Why you save it. That's why you save it. That's why you want people to work when they can. And the financial implications of that, if that's what's happening, in the long run, I know that it must be pretty similar in this municipality, like our municipality, When you leave and you have certain vacation days, accrued sick time, you can actually buy those days back. And if you have a member in his 20th year that wants to use that time, deservedly so, that comes out of, financially, you're looking at that one way. But then if you look at the end result, the 30 years, what you're going to be paying out for that employee for those years that you withheld those days, There's so many negative ramifications with that process, I think it's appalling. I know you brought up the piece which I think is the most important piece, the heart, the humanitarian piece, that you've accrued that time. You need to find a way that if you were on workman's comp, there's a reason why that you got hurt on the job, in the city, working for our community. You've accrued those days, you've earned those days, And now you can't use those days. I just want to make sure I'm clear that I'm really hearing that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for the clarification. I think that's a disgusting, disgusting policy. And I stand with you, and I would second that resolve. That's horrible.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Knight for bringing that forward. That speaks volumes. But again, I had the privilege of speaking with Mrs. Branley privately, and what punched me in the face was the reason why I ran for City School Committee back in 2008 when I left the city of Medford. Something that's uncomfortable, But I didn't say anything then, but my son was bullied to horrific, horrific levels where we talked to him every day about it today. And he's a well-rounded young man that I'm proud of every single day. And I made that decision to run for school committee because I wanted to make a change. And the key piece of that was I left the politics behind. When I joined the school committee, I left politics aside. And it's disgusting that this comes back around. And when Mrs. Bramley talks about it, it just brings me back to the reason why I ran originally. I wasn't a true politician. I was a phys ed teacher and the kids loved me. And that's why I was, that's why I topped the ticket because everybody loved Mr. S. And then I realized my role and how important it could be and the changes we can make. And then I said, you know what? I'm going to do more because I realized with that administration, I could do more on the city council. And then I joined the city council and you saw some great things happening.
[George Scarpelli]: Everybody that I've talked to that read this and called me said, thank you. This is amazing because we don't have an avenue to talk to our schools, school department or school administration or school committee. And at least this gives us an opportunity that it's uncomfortable for them. I know what's uncomfortable. I was a school kid member making some huge changes. I'm a city council that has to make huge decisions. But to sit there and look the person in the eye, it's honorable. It's what we do. It's what we should all do. And all I keep hearing over and over again is that we're not being heard. So why did it get to this extreme? Because I waited 24 hours and I called Mrs. Branley. And I couldn't wait for her to say, George, they called me right away. I got the information that I needed. My daughter feels safe. Our kids, everything's moving in the right direction.
[George Scarpelli]: Cause it's not popular. What we were asking for right now isn't popular. And if the people that support my school community members were good people, but it's gonna hurt me politically, I don't care.
[George Scarpelli]: And this ordinance, this ordinance speaks volumes to the people that work for our community, care about our community, every single day, the most important people, our teachers and our students. And yesterday sat in that crowd, we stood in that crowd, Councilor Caraviello and I. And I was proud, I was proud that I was supporting our teachers in this battle. And it's funny, what keeps coming back is the lack of communication, dialogue, because what was said publicly in front of everybody through the Teachers Association, and then what was said in a closed meeting, an open meeting at school committee, and what was said that there was, there's a contract already, there's a ratified contract. No, there isn't. I was part of a negotiating team. No, there isn't. The negotiating team met with the city school administration, city administration. They came to a plan that they can now send to the body and they vote on that. Then the body decides. That's what we do in this country. And from what I hear, because we weren't given, the negotiating team didn't let this information out, but last night a school administrator said that the votes were close. I taught for 15 years, we ratified a contract, at the end of the vote, it was always 80, 90% in favor. Not by 27 votes, that's still failure. Even if it won by a vote, it's still failure. It's still telling you something. Even tonight, what do we talk about? What do we all say tonight? What a disgrace of a lack of communication. And we have the second strongest governing body in our community, a third. Well, I don't know where we are now, but they're a forum where people need to let the information that they know or they feel has to be brought out to the public, understood. And it's not to put anybody out. It's not to make you feel uncomfortable. It's to share the information that's vital.
[George Scarpelli]: It stymies the process of open forum. It stymies the process of sharing information that's important. And I'll tell you, when I left that meeting yesterday, And teachers came up to me, great teachers, teachers we know and love. And I know Councilor Bears wrote an impassionate, and they wanted me to share that they appreciated that, and they know that we're supporting the teachers.
[George Scarpelli]: that teachers and parents and kids can come to a podium, to a body that they elected and say, we need help, or we need justice, or we need support. Or do you know what? I know Councilor Knight hates it, or just to come up and speak because it's their forum, right?
[George Scarpelli]: I'm gonna, again, I say this because you have to hear this to the Branley family. Sometimes in horrible situations, great things come out of it. And I think this is something that if it's supported by this council, that's gonna be resounding for a long time to come because we're gonna have a voice and someone's gonna have to listen. And for a personal level, thank you for showing me why I took this job and why I do what I do. Okay? Again, councilor, I ask my council colleagues that I know it's not comfortable. I know it's very uncomfortable because a lot of those people are our friends, but sometimes you have to make a decision that's bigger than yourself and bigger than a political line. So I ask everybody to support this ordinance. I think it's important.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And again, I understand Councilor Villes and bringing that B paper up, but again, I've said in the past, I can't support anything when it comes to financial, this revert back had nothing to do with this issue. I will not support any initiative that goes to the mayor to ask about spending more money when we don't know what the money looks like. So I wouldn't support that. I think the other piece is very important that as a former school committee member, Yeah, this is a difficult decision to make, and this is a hard line to cross. But over and over again, when you speak to the educators that you all love and respect, and they tell you that there is no forum that they can reach and talk to on the school committee, when you talk to the kids that we all talk about how we want to support, that they don't have an avenue that the parents can go to that forum and speak on an issue. Or, um, You know, again, the parents in situations like this, I know this situation's driving, drove this issue, but we're talking about asking a school committee that, by the way, voted to eliminate security guards, who voted to implement a suspension process because it affected an uneven balance and not looking at what's in front of you. We're seeing what's happening right now. I'm sure the Bramleys, or the kids that are being bullied, or the parents that can't speak, or the parents that don't have a voice, truly don't care about any systemic issue right now. They wanna know to make sure that their child is safe. And if this is the extreme that we need to move on, I think this is where this body can, if it against mass general law, like Councilor Knight said it, let it come out. Are some of these things that we can work on to change as an ordinance? Yeah, maybe. But the bottom line is, teachers last evening, teachers that you support, children that you support, parents that support you, came to me there. and reiterated the fact that this is an unbelievable stock. This is something that we are now finally having an opportunity to hold the school committee accountable for what the citizens see as a severe concern and issue. And this is just an avenue that they can just go to a forum and speak because they don't have that process. And to say that they do, no, they don't. There's a system in place that you can petition it, then you can come up and you can speak, and then that's it. No dialogue.
[George Scarpelli]: And it's a serious motion last night. They voted zero confidence. the people we trust, my former colleagues, our teachers, our children's teachers, you know them. If they voted for that purpose, it should hold some weight enough that this council should move this forward to show the school committee that this process needs to be adjusted on their end. So I, again, I understand that it's not comfortable and I understand as a former school committee member, I'd be appalled, but as a former school committee member, I would never have let my body get in this way and do this. I want us all to understand, all we're asking for is a forum where people can come up and talk to our elected officials. They're telling us they can't. That's that simple. So a vote tonight, symbolic or not, a vote tonight is to show the school committee that we need to move this forward to the next step. And if the next step says, Massachusetts General Law says we can't do it, okay. This council put the most important piece forward first, and that's the teachers and the students and the line of communication. Thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Do you feel what you've seen and what we've gone through for the last few months, do you feel that the school committee is given an avenue for our constituents to go and speak on concerns and issues that we think is vital to our community.
[George Scarpelli]: But Anne Avenue, yes. So with that, I would say, I'm not asking the school committee to change any policy or procedure dealing with how to run the school. I'm asking them, I'm asking us to support an ordinance that brings the school committee, bring the constituents, our constituents, our parents, our teachers, a forum that they can go to and speak on concerns and issues. That's all. It has nothing to do with the policies that they have.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, if I can, I, again, the reason why it was brought forward, The reason why we're here is, you know, the reason why this was something that was important is because we have that opportunity for you to talk to that microphone. And I know that you would rather be doing it to the people that have to make the decisions, because like we said, we can't make a decision, but when they're not being heard, When you're not being heard, like I said, two days later when we talked, no one's reached out to you yet, trying to figure out a resolution, or at least bring your daughter's mind at ease, or your family's mind at ease, you have to come to this forum. So I think it's something that I don't want to see die, and I think that, like, Council and I said to let it rest. I would support that would go to the committee of the whole if our colleagues will indulge us and then maybe we could sit down and see what legally we can and can't do. And then see if there's an option that maybe the school committee sits back and sees this and says, well, maybe we need to readjust and what our policies are. And maybe we need to have our forum open. So because it's got to this point, everyone, it's not, this isn't, This is uncomfortable. I know it is, but it's gone to this point. And I know that uncomfortably, it's your position and it's your family that's paid the price, but it also opened a lot of people's eyes. And like I said, personally, I'll never, I readjusted who I am as a person because of it. So, and I know it's not easy. I know it's not easy, but thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm going to be calm. If I can't just say, because I agree, Council Bears. These are initiatives that we need to focus on. I think that funding these initiatives are great. But what we're asking for is free. We're asking us to have a forum that our constituents can meet with our school committee. That's all. That's the point where this word is brought up. That's what the issue is. I agree with you a thousand percent. I won't vote on it. I won't support it because of financial, my background with financial issues until we see our numbers. But we also have a school committee that voted in policies that hinder the situation from being resolved. So again, we wouldn't know that because the parents can't speak to that point. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. I know that I talked to conversations, uh, clerk. I know there was some outstanding paperwork that we're waiting on that has now been approved. Everything is in order and in place. Um, I know that is that is the petitioner online? Yes. Okay. I know that that's basic questions. I know that other councils Alaska know that how many employees will be working, uh, for the for this company. Are they free to speak?
[George Scarpelli]: for the approval, I think that we need to, do you have all the paperwork in order? Are they all workman's comp paperwork in order?
[George Scarpelli]: The hours of operation, I know that. Yep, 7 a.m.
[George Scarpelli]: perfect that falls and it needs to be changed, you know, that has to, um, if it goes past the ordinance hours, it needs to be, um, that needs to be addressed. But, um, I see everything else in order, Madam President, uh, Mr. President, so I would move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Um, thank you, madam president. And, uh, I know that Casa Caraviello has said it all, but, um, I know that the, uh, what, what buddy Clayton did, um, uh, what he's done for our community and the way he's raised his children to give back to our community and his grandchildren is something that, uh, is a great example for all of us to follow. He was a true gentleman. I know. I don't think I've ever. ever recalled Mr. Clayton ever having a sour puss in his face or an angry look. He was always smiling, always pleasant. And if you look at his children, they have the same demeanor. So, um, he was a great man. He, he leaves, uh, uh, an unbelievable legacy and, uh, he's truly going to be missed. And again, um, especially in the West, West Medford neighborhood. So, uh, condolences to his family, madam president. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Can we just let Councilor Cabell know that I know he's got his earplugs in, but we can hear Carol's conversations, Ricky, just so you know. Tell her I said hi, I love that recipe.
[George Scarpelli]: No, no, I'll step, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I found them all in order, Madam President, move approval. Second.
[George Scarpelli]: I mean, it seems like it's pretty simple, Madam President. Can the petition just let us know what this process is? Is it leaving ownership? Is it just staying within the ownership of different people within the system?
[George Scarpelli]: Same employees, everything's the same. Well, I'd be honest with you, Madam President, Eddie's place has been... I've never heard a complaint. I know that I'm a little biased. My daughter's favorite... So, she... Grilled chicken salad. Yeah, all the order, everything is in order. I would move approval with any questions from my fellow council. Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, buddy. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: No, go ahead, I'm sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I appreciate it. No, I think that Ellen. I know that Ellen has just always explained where people have asked for that. the exemption for residential and how that impacts our community if we went that way. I think that you always had a statement that really just summarized it and really helped people understand why it's not really a good fit right now. So can you just elaborate on that?
[George Scarpelli]: That's exactly what I wanted to hear. I want to make sure that that's a brief understanding. So thank you again for all your hard work. And we really thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President, Councilor Caraviello. Thank you so much because I had to set some phone calls. The phone calls I got were very very evident when I went out and witnessed it myself. One thing the neighbors in that area wanted me to focus on were the sore covers and how they are already dipping. um, in those areas around every store covered either in the middle of the street of the side. So, um, and councilor councilor Caraviello is correct. I took that ride specifically because I brought this issue up and how they treat a method in comparison to Winchester, where they left the roads impeccable. When they left every evening, they moved all the apparatus into the, uh, T parking lot. There was nothing on the streets and. And like Councilor Caraviello said, took that ride. As soon as you entered into Winchester, you don't see seams, you don't see the manholes that are below level that are already causing a divot. So I appreciate you bringing this forward and I'd like to know what what the DPW director shared with Councilor Caraviello because I had questions for him. I'm glad he called Ricky, but this is an important issue. I know that, you know, we've already talked at city engineers already talked about, you know, people that are pulling permits and going curb to curb on on residential questions. So now, if we're gonna hold residential pavers accountable, where do we stand right now with, you know, the big three, you know, Eversource, National Grid, and our city paving. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, madam president, if I can point of information. Councilor Scarpelli. I suggest we contact the contact people that came out for us in the summer and ask for their presence at our next meeting for next Tuesday. Thank you. I make that as a form of motion if we can. Thank you. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli. I'll second that.
[George Scarpelli]: I would have to see to that that'd be great. Thanks.
[George Scarpelli]: These students- Madam President, if I can, Nicole, I hate to, we're having trouble hearing you. Is there any way we can raise the volume? Yeah, you're a little soft.
[George Scarpelli]: I know it's an important message, so I don't want anybody to miss it.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And again, thank you, Mr. Brownlee. It takes a lot of courage to do what you're doing. It's easy just to keep your mouth shut and walk away and hope things are going to be okay. But I know I've talked to you personally. I think we all share situations about children being bullied, mine as well. As a city councilor, we have a school committee. and the mayor who's the president of that committee that are in charge of making sure that they follow through these issues. So as a city councilor, it's very difficult to cross over. So I'll leave that with that. I know that you had some, without getting that information, you had some interest to talk to the city solicitor. I know we talked about that. Unfortunately, I informed you that we don't have a city solicitor because you were asking who you can speak to. So that I apologize for on our end, But I'm going to speak right now as a parent of a Medford High School student, someone that has had their kids go through the system from preschool all the way through high school. As a member of a teacher in the system and a member of the school committee that did everything in my power to make sure that We put in strongholds to make sure that our kids are protected, putting in bullying protection programs, setting up mentoring programs, making sure the kids that don't want to be in the school and that are harming our children every single day, that they're the ones that are being looked at and those are the ones that are being taken to task. And unfortunately, what we hear over and over again, especially with this story with the Bramley family, it seems like that's not the priority right now. I told you in a meeting months ago when this happened, We're still seeing the uh, the the children that that that can't go to the bathroom because the the bad kids or the kids that don't care are using those bathrooms and And going kids not eating in cafeterias And finding little nooks and crannies to eat throughout the building. That's despicable That's horrifying to me and why and why the kids are telling me. They're telling me that the administration's in the buildings afraid to punish kids because of rules that are put into place. Well, I think we need to revisit these rules and make sure that we hold a school committee and our mayor and the school administration, the superintendent, to task, that this is their job. And I'm not talking as a city councilor, because I'm out of line if I was. I'm talking as a parent of a senior at Medford High School. And when I hear ridiculous comments like, geez, maybe this child should go to a private school. Maybe she should just leave. Are you kidding me? The Branleys did nothing wrong. The kids that are bullied do nothing wrong. We should take a stance against the kids that don't want to be there, that are harmful to our kids. We need to take a stand. So as a parent, I'll do everything I can to make sure that my voice is heard as well, Nicole. This is horrific. I saw the video, it's disgusting. That is the parent. As a city council, I will tell you, we have no grounds. We truly have no grounds that this is, you know, unless when it comes to the budget meeting, we talked to the superintendent, because it seems like that's the only time we seem to get any information. Because unfortunately, we found out as a council through the newspaper, through the TVs. I wasn't notified, and I'm sure most of my fellow councils weren't notified. So it's very difficult when we don't get information. We have to hear from newspapers and stuff. That's frustrating in itself. But that's what I'm frustrated as a city councilor. As a parent of a child at Medford High School, I'm appalled that this is still going on. My daughter was there and watched the situation occur right in front of her. And she was horrified for this family. Horrified. And so were all their classmates. But you know what they're told to do? Keep their mouth shut, sit on their hands, because they're afraid that they're the next people to be bullied. Well, that's not the way to live. I remember one person stood up and looked me right in the eye and said, say something, see something, say something. Well, we're seeing plenty, and we're doing nothing. So please, if there's anything that the school committee that's on tonight or the city administration that's going to hear this, please, work with the school administration, work with those great teachers, because that's the other thing. We went out and got us... We heard that there was a study done. That's great that we did a study, but we wasted money, the city's money, on bringing someone in from the outside when we could have just asked the teachers, great teachers that know exactly what's going on and what we need to fix. No one's asked them that. Instead, I'm getting phone calls from teachers that they're afraid to stand up because they're wiping blood off their clothes, off their bodies, because they just broke up another fight. So, Nicole, again, I don't want to revert and take this away from your points that you made, but I tell you, as a parent, I'm standing with you, and I'll do whatever needs to be done as a parent to make sure that your child is safe. There's absolutely no reason why your daughter has to fear and put her head down at night knowing that she has to get up in the morning to go to Medford High School. In no way in the world should you and your family think of trying to figure out how you can break the bank to try to figure out to move your daughter to a different school system just because this is happening. I condemn that. So I thank you, Madam President. And if what we can do is we can ask the city administration, I will tell you, Nicole, I do not support AP law. We don't know what we're paying for this community and paying them. And I don't know what it would be a charge to this community. But right now, I'm at the point where No charge right now would be too small, too large. We need to get assistance for this family. If she's not getting the information she needs by law of the timetable, then someone needs to assist her. And obviously when I talk to Nicole, She wanted to come here to see if anybody and I explained to her that we don't have a city solicitor No one really can answer you. So I know this is going to get back to the superintendent I know that there's commitments on this on this call, please Somebody get mrs. Branley the information that she needs so sure and her daughter and her family could rest every day, please. Thank you Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: I just, I know I'm breaking in and out. So we really, this doesn't matter on what we, we don't have a vote on this. Is that what I just heard? Is it?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. No, I think that this is important because I know when this first came out and there were departments that were left out and chief Friedman fire or one of the departments. I'm glad to see that we're moving forward. This isn't something I would, I would vote against, but, uh, there are some concerns. I know that, um, uh, I know there's some it issues that are coming up and we don't have an it department. So I don't know what, what we're doing to get that into place, and then some other concerns that I have with the recommendation. So if I take it again, it really doesn't matter. But hey, thanks for the input. I appreciate that. Thanks, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And thank you, Mr. Sullivan. I didn't realize that was your capacity to work with it. I'm glad to see that we're using your expertise. But again, this is what I was I was asking to same thing that the same grounds as Council beers. I know that you said that we can add this to our budget, Mr. Silva. This is the problem, my friend, we don't know what the budget is. So I understand that we have this ARPA money right now for these jobs. And when you look at what we're looking with the fire department, and as much as I don't like the traffic and parking, you're talking about something tangible that's going to be fixed. When we're looking at our IT department, this will support something right now. But if we don't have enough staff, we don't have a budget that'll um, withstand, um, the concerns that I'm saying are what the mayor had mentioned last year during the budget season that, um, you know, that we're going to, we're going to be looking at some dire situations again. Is this right now putting money into something that as much as we need it, and I agree with you, we do need it. But again, is it going to be putting it to something that then we can't man. that don't have the funding to staff and not having someone at the other end to answer at that IT desk for that support. I mean, and we just haven't seen anything. I've been saying this at every meeting until we have an understanding of what our budget looks like. This is what I'm afraid of. You know we weren't I was I was the same same type of situation. We talked about the 3 1 1 you know unveiling years ago that we said. And I said it myself. I said how how do we have a 3 1 1 system. We don't have the infrastructure in place to support that. So this is what I'm afraid that this is not 3 1 1 system all over again because we're starting to put money into situations and different processes that We don't know budgetarily if we can even support that in the next budget cycle. So this is what I'm fearful of. So just thank you for listening to my concerns, but that's what it is. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I understand. I thank you for the, for the, uh, the knowledge that you're sharing. I just, like I said, I'm just, you know, what was left in, in June was the comment that was resonating that it's going to be so bad. Um, is it going to be so bad that the mayor says we need to take this money out of the communication line to support fire police? That's, that's what I'm fearful of. So, but thank you for your input. I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Thank you. I would recommend the table if she's not, if there isn't a representative, not a president, her point.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, I just want to clarify that. I appreciate Jim, you know, giving us the information that we needed with that but I just wanted to directors to chief Friedman. I, I, it's not that I don't think that this is an important endeavor that Jim has presented. I understand that data. What I'm concerned in is not understanding our budget and how the longevity of the sustainability for whatever we're using our ARPA funding for can be sustained. I would hate to be uh during sitting in budget season you sitting across from us and saying we're talking about closing you know a fire station god forbid or or losing firemen and women because we don't have in our budget we don't know what the ramifications are in our budget so It's not that I don't think that this isn't a great idea, because I think this is an amazing idea. I think this is exactly where you should be in a community that can handle the sustainability. We don't know where we are financially. So I just want the chief to know that. I know that he jumped in and wanted to defend this amazing process. I agree with him. But again, without us seeing the budget numbers, without seeing our finances right now, without understanding where we're going, anything that's not sustainable, that has to be sustained, excuse me, through our general budget, I think it lends to fear in my eyes. Because if, you know, God, if this was the case, why aren't we funding, you know, the teachers' raises with it then? Why are we securing, you know, these are the concerns that we have, that everybody has, that we don't have the funding to sustain this after the ARPA is gone. So that it's just the same question, just in a different area. So I just want people to understand that this, I agree with Mr. Silver. I think it's something that it sounds great. And most functioning communities have unbelievable ID departments like he's talking about that have a high have helped us that all we have to do is send it, send a request to. So it's, it's beneficial. Absolutely. But again, My fear, again, I'm going to say this all the way until the budget season, because we still have yet to see anything dealing with our finances. And in my own home, my father taught me, you can't spend what you don't have. That's why we have a checkbook, that we follow the guidance. In today's world, we have online banking, so we can follow that every single day. I'm not going to cut a check for $2,000 if I only have $1,500 in the account, everybody. This is what we don't have. These are the basic understandings of finances that we don't have right now. We can't see. So again, I know I'm winded, but I just wanted Chief Friedman to understand that that's where I was coming with that comment. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Chief, that's exactly what I'm saying, though. You're saying that you can see savings. We can't, because we don't have a budget. We don't have finance paper. That's all I'm saying. I'm not saying you can see that in your budget. As a city councilor, we don't know. We don't have any information budget-wise, financial-wise. That's all I'm saying. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: if I can shut off some of these other bills, which again, I've, I've supported everything that when it comes to fight upon, especially communication, because we realize how, how we're in the dinosaur age and I completely understand that. And I agree with you. I support this a thousand percent. All I'm saying is my fear is without knowing the finances, guys, that's, that's all really I'm saying. I don't, I don't disagree with you. I think it's, it's something I find women need for their safety. I agree with you a thousand percent. Understood.
[George Scarpelli]: Reaching out, touching me.
[George Scarpelli]: Hi Madam President, thank you. Again, I'm gonna stand with my previous stance that anything we do with any money papers have to be halted until we get definition of questions we've asked that clearly affect our decisions moving forward financially in hopes that we understand what the forecast looks like moving into the next budget season. don't know what's going on financially. I believe our finance director has already stressed that. There's too much going on right now to get a hold of it, a hold on it. And then again, we have our union representation in the audience again. And again, when this room is full with all of our union members, everybody stands tall about these money papers, making sure we're showing the true support. Every penny that goes out, making sure that you handle the people that have been working without a contract and are at a stalemate right now. And until that's done, I will not vote on any money paper moving forward. So this is something I will not support. And I believe anything dealing with salaries, especially when we have questions out there that haven't been answered, that we've been waiting for a legal response from that gave us guidance, whether that, you know, what we've done and what the mayor has done in the past and city administration's done in the past with upgrades and not getting a true understanding if it was done, when it was done without our knowledge, was it against our own city ordinances, which we believe they were. So, This is a trend, unless we figure out a way to stop it. I also understand the other side of this, saying that we can't move forward unless we have these positions in place. But you know what? There aren't too many offices full anyway in the city. And it seems like we're just piecemealing things and nothing is really truly happening to support our union brothers and sisters. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I can't imagine. Thank you. While you're here, Chris and talk about the football team. Um, what I find amazing is we're talking method. Maldon football game and its history and how much pride that we have is former Mustangs and what it means to everybody in Medford that that whether new or old, understanding how old this game is and what it means to us. So it is important. But I also wanted I've noticed something that I haven't seen in a long time here. Um, the football team were raking leaves this past weekend. Yep.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, that's my point. I think that what we're saying is, I know you brought up the record, but eliminate the record. huge number of kids now, I think it's 60, 70 kids that are playing football. We have, we have, if you see them, it's volunteering at all the recreation events. You see them volunteering at raking, raking people's yards and needs assistance. You see them when, uh, push pulling on the pushing for their, their, um, pro other programs, whether it's a, whether it's a show in the school or whether it's another athletic event. So I give our Medford Mustangs a lot of credit. I think it's truly what it's really meant to be. The old days of, you know, the jocks having some sort of persona. I commend our, that stigma has now disappeared, at least in my eyes. I think that we are one big family at Medford High School and And I think what keeps them together right now, especially through tough times, are the kids. I mean, the kids have really stood strong with each other and got them through some tough times. So I commend Coach Curley and your organization.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, God, I just remember that. Actually, we traded right before Thanksgiving. Yes, we did. Coach Pierre took a penalty shot on the soccer field, and I took a hand off. And I think Chris lit me up.
[George Scarpelli]: Chris doesn't have much passion for this.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, if I can, I know that Justin and I already decided. I'm gonna paint an M, Justin's gonna be the E. If anybody'd like to join us to fill in the rest of the Metro. We'll see, Justin, we'll see, we're fine.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, thanks, Chris.
[George Scarpelli]: No, sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I know that I talked to City Clerk this evening, and the fire was put out by our meeting, and I thank you, Council President, for putting that through. This business will not be what is feared to be a pawn shop, so with that part of the record, We would have special conditions to this special permit that this this will be allowed only to sell used and new phones and uses a repair shop for only phones, tablets and computers. With those stipulations that would go with the with the permit and, um, stay with the person that, um, that has petitions. Perfect. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I appreciate Councilor Villes. comments, I think they are important. But again, it brings us back to where are we going to be once we see these numbers? My fear is once we start to see these numbers and we see the dire fiscal emergency we'll be in, you're talking about a position that will probably be gone in three months anyway. Because the first thing you're going to do is start letting go of people. And that's all that I can think of because of the lack of information. We were bleeding last year, and we pushed through in the final minute. for our budget last year, and I don't see any new growth, I don't see anything that shows us financially that we'll be stable. And again, it's putting in a position that's going to get somebody ready to go, in a position to support what we need, which in turn We've been waiting, and we've started a dialogue with bringing in a representative, legal representative, hopefully Attorney Hrabowski to help us with the zoning, continue with our zoning information. We're gonna be in the same situation that this person's gonna work for a few months and then they're gonna be let go because we can't sustain their position. That's my fear. And this is why I can't vote for any money paper because I don't know. So what we're going to do is we're gonna vote for a position that right now is pretty, it's not secure. I know it's open, I know the money's there, but What's gonna happen in a few months when we finally get paperwork that shows that we're in dire straits and we're looking at teachers, we're looking at fire, we're looking at policemen, we're looking at custodians, you're looking at paraprofessionals, you're looking at city hall staff. That's the only thing that I fear, putting the next few months into someone's position and then letting them go. There isn't a clear dialogue, that's what I'm trying to get at right now. We don't have a clear vision of what our budget's going to look like. So when we keep putting money and putting these caps through and putting these upgrades, trying to keep putting these upgrades in, the uncertainty is so clear that all we're going to be doing is hiring people right now and approving positions that are gonna serve as time cost and time wasted because it'll be time to move forward past these people. And that's what I fear. So with that, like again, I said, I cannot support any money position right now without a clear understanding what our financial and fiscal weaknesses and strengths are moving forward. Again, we have teachers, you saw what happened in Malden yesterday, work to rule, I believe our teachers already started work to rule. Melrose, excuse me, I think our teachers already did that without the fanfare. But, and we haven't heard anything. There's been no movement. You know, we haven't heard. So it's, it's, you know, firemen as well. So it's, it's been, you know, a lot more. So until we get a true understanding what's happening financial in this community, I can't support any money paper. So I, I believe me, I, I, I understand my fellow Councilors and their vision. I think it makes a lot of sense. But I think that on the other side, this is where I stand. And I just appreciate the conversation. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for being here. Sure. Just a question on that. I know that some companies have reached out and residents reached out that just wanted to replace their water mains. And I know that Councilor Knight brought this forward with this project. That's why I'm bringing it up. Are we now having the companies now go curb to curb whenever they open the street?
[George Scarpelli]: I'll disagree with you there, just for the fact that what I did prior to your arrival, I had asked for a list back at least, I believe, two or three years on openings, approvals for openings, and who did those and who did the paving and did they do, a just partial or complete or just a block. And it was comical because when I got back, I got list of the addresses for the small businesses in the residential homes. So I use one example, Tufts is one of the biggest companies we use for residential. So you have Tufts paving or construction, whatever it's called, and then it says the address. And then, so you can understand when we wanted that to see if the paving was done to specs of what we were told was gonna be acceptable. But anything that had to do with our utilities, it was just basic. We didn't know the address, we didn't know, it was actually useless for us. And I think I'll ask that again down the line, because I think I'm gonna call for a special meeting for this for the fact that You know, personally, on my end, the reason why I brought this up, High Street, at 10 o'clock at night, we had a utility job that the public utility hired an outside company to come in and repave. Well, they came in at 10 o'clock at night on a school night and, you know, it was, they said they had permission from the entity. So I think that- Are you on a public way or a private way? I'm in a public way.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate that. The answer you gave is just a little alarming that our utilities have gone above and beyond. I believe that's what you said. I don't think they've done that. As I said, it's a public utility company and they kind of have their own guidelines. I know, and what I'm saying is, those guidelines we have to find a way to change them because if you look at our roads a lot of it has to do with i'm not saying it's your fault this is not your fault this is years of of mismanagement of our roadway roadways that you know this is why these questions are coming up from council night that's why we appreciate you being here so thank you understand thank you very much any further questions for the council at this time
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Merle?
[George Scarpelli]: If I can. Thank you. I propose a table this motion for the fact that in the past, just so the constituents know that especially people here in the chambers, when we have a question or concerns with legal background, city council usually has a city solicitor or assistant city solicitor that works with us to answer any questions that legally that we need to make sure that wherever we vote, we vote either as for or against that we are doing it with the proper form and not holding the city liable. I'll give you an example. This council voted on a gas station to exclude a gas station for BJ's about a year ago, and we didn't have council here. So the reason for it was illegal. So BJ's took us to court. and we were found to be in fault and it would have been a serious, it could have been if our acting solicitor at the time worked with BJ's to make sure that we had some language and understanding what the protocol was. So I tabled these, anything that you're gonna see with legal, I'll be honest with the city administration to all my constituents that anything with legal notification I don't feel comfortable. I'm not, I don't have a legal background. I want to make sure that I cross my T's and dot my I's when it comes to certain entities that we're not putting our decisions on putting a financial burden on our committee or community to fight a legal battle that we're going to lose because we weren't informed properly. So that's the reason that I asked because it's, you know, we asked a certain a few questions, one being that if there are 50 to 60 cars that are going to be housed in Medford, Who is going to, where are they going to be housed? Are they going to pay excise tax? At least will we get the tax revenue from that excise tax? I believe the answer was that we will from Lyft. I just want to make sure from our legal team, I wanted to ask that. There's some other questions, but I know that there was KP Law was supposed to be, is supposed to be here online tonight. I'd like to just, we can ask them some questions. I think that making sure that, you know, opening this up, I want to get some examples in the city that where this is similar to, so we can all understand on its basis, what it entails. So we don't put ourselves by allowing this and then later opening up an issue that because of past practice, we might be doing something that's going to harm our community later. If that's the question for our legal representation here.
[George Scarpelli]: You would, yes. Point of information.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And this is, like I said, this is our concern as a council. In the past, I appreciate the council from KP Law coming in and stating our ordinance that We read also what our city solicitor used to do is work with us. and help us understand past practice, what we've done with past businesses and how that negatively affected our community with our decision or the impact on how we can present it that is legal. So again, I tabled it for the fact that we don't have a city solicitor that's working with us because I asked what I really wanted to know is to give us some examples that we as a council can, can see tangible comparisons that we've done in the past that have both helped and then crippled us in a sense. So when you look at this situation, I personally have a concern with traffic. You're talking about 50, 60 cars. If anybody's in that area, I know what the comment was from the company that we spoke with last week that said, oh no, they won't use the satellite program next to in the Fellsway Plaza, they're going to park over at a parking lot in a parking garage across the street. I don't know what the proper answer is and what the safe answer is as a city councilor that doesn't have a background in legal jargon. So again, I can't vote for this or support it for the fact that, leaving it to table, not to the fact that right now I don't have an answer for it, whether it's a yes or no for this permit. I don't have an answer because I don't have any support from a city solicitor that I have in the past worked with to help me make these decisions. So I apologize. I hope I'm making sense. I don't know where I'm going to go I'd like to hear from my fellow Councilors before we make some motions, but I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, if I wanted or not, these are great questions debate, sitting with a city solicitor. no offense to Attorney Blake, but this is what I'm saying. We're having an open debate about something that we should be talking about with our solicitor, making sure we get the questions answered correctly for the councils that have the opportunity to sit with former city solicitors. I do not forget what we've done. This is what I implore you to understand. This is not about you know, whether I want to hinder a business to prosper in our community. We definitely have questions, and I appreciate Attorney Blake coming and answering questions, but the questions are our ordinance that we know. Okay, so this isn't a strategy to understand for or against it. It's where we could understand with a city solicitor sitting in our community, working with us as a partner, figuring this out. Again, I'm going to say no disrespect to KP law, but I don't see them as a partner. They are an employee for administration. So again, thank you for time, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: So I appreciate Councilor Bears bringing it forward because, you know, with my hesitation, I would have tabled it, but if moving it toward a Committee of the Whole meeting where we have legal representation that if we had to adjourn in a confidential know, manner of like we have in the past with our city solicitor that I would feel more comfortable to understanding our process and that format. So, um, I know you have questions before me. Anybody else might have questions before I motion. I think that that's a good idea to send this community holds.
[George Scarpelli]: Turning, turning over new ownership and the business is going to stay the same. I was saying the same, same employees. Everybody's great. This is great because I know that we might, we found out that when we were closed, it, It was around Christmas time, I think, and it was devastating for us, because it's easy for a lazy husband to buy his jewelry at once, and the quality's phenomenal. So I appreciate your business, your respect to our community, and I see everything in order, Madam President, so I will move forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, thank you, Madam President. Thank you for being here this evening. Again, this is similar to the conversation I'm having with Lyft. This is a new business, correct? Yes. I do have some questions that I really needed to be answered by a city solicitor. So I think that this would fall in the same category if you, you know, if you persuade me differently but I just want you to be aware it's not personal. It's not I have questions but I don't have the person to answer them just yet so maybe we can add this to the, the, the.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, well, Mr. Costas did a lot with audio.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Got it.
[George Scarpelli]: So I, again, so the questions I would have is, you know, moving forward, what can be sold as, you know, what's titled the, where is it? secondhand articles. I think that's, that's what the question that I need answered, then what is second. So if we grant this petition, and the business falls through, it would start with cell phones, then all of a sudden, no disrespect to you, then we have chainsaws and, and power tools. And so these are the questions that I have with our city solicitor, making sure that You know that it fits the neighborhood. And so I think that's important so I would, I would ask the table this and reference this again at the committee the whole meeting if that's okay. Okay. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, please. I don't want to make this. I don't want to drag this out. I just want to make sure that we have answered the questions. And if those questions are acceptable, that we move forward and have you open and prosper here in Medford. So I just want to make sure we do our due diligence. So please forgive me that I'm delaying this a little bit, but I want to make sure we have the right questions answered.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so maybe we could, you know, set a separate one maybe before the meeting next week. I know you have a busy schedule, Madam President, but I don't think this, it's just a few questions that we really need to solicit. That's why adding it there, it wouldn't take long. But if we can have a committee of the whole meeting just to answer some of these questions and give us some guidance as we move forward, maybe a separate meeting for that, that'd be great. Legal please, I think legal is important.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I see that Icon Motors is actually still, if we can, if Mr. Marciano can tell us that it's, the business is still staying the same. Yes. But it's just the ownership is, you're now gonna be the sole owner, I know it was Partners, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Right new corporation in order to have that I need to apply for the new license under the icon name Okay, and so just changing the icon to icon and I know that um, I know that hope the practices stay the same and your support to our community. I know you've been very active with our youth organizations and donating and being active as a member of our community. I know that a lot of people from Medford work for you and we appreciate that. But I know that there was one concern I think that I mentioned to you that the parking off street, I know that you have a big lot, but I think the concerns whenever, you know, that especially not as much on Mystic Ave, but as the parking of, vehicles on the street. Does that happen too often? Is it something that we're gonna make sure that we can keep an eye on that and make sure that it's under control and we're not taking advantage of that? So, all right. I think I see everything in order. It's another well-run, respectable entity here in this community and I would support to move forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: So this is 55,032 weeks. So what would be the full full salary for full year?
[George Scarpelli]: She will not go from the 13 to a 12. What is the salary of that position for a full year?
[George Scarpelli]: And then we still have that position that if that person moves up, they deserve that money, obviously, but I opposed and I tabled for the fact that This council has openly talked about what we've been saying, what have we been asking for, and we haven't getting it. So unfortunately, until we see some movement where we have our unions that are coming to us that haven't had a contract, and we have some caps that were approved that we're still waiting on answers that we never approved, and then asking for money papers that we've asked for, for, I don't know, Councilor, Councilor Mejia years. I'll get to that in my speech. So I'm waiting to see with this situation, I'm gonna stand strong. I understand, I respect Councilor Beaz's conversation with how important this is. And I agree, I think we need it. I don't think we don't need it, but right now, I don't think that, We keep saying yes to all what's asked for. We are just a rubber stamp. We need answers, questions answered for us, for this question, to give us strength. We keep voting yes, until they understand that no, we're not gonna vote on anything until we have a city solicitor. No, that we can't vote on money papers till there's respect for other unions or positions that haven't been filled yet. We have positions in the city hall that haven't been filled that are vital positions. This is adding another position that we already have a director and we have an assistant. So at least it's stable right now. We're voting on something and moving more money to an entity that at least is stable in our stable definition. So this is why I can't support it. Nothing personal, I know how you work and I know how your team is working. But again, this is fundamentally wrong to ask this until we have the entities in place that we can get answers, because we're not getting answers.
[George Scarpelli]: So Madam President, I appreciate that, but not just city solicitor, but I'm talking about other empty directors positions that we've had in a long time here. That is some serious concerns. So I understand, I appreciate you sharing that with us with city solicitor, because I understand that as well. But like I said, there are other major needs that if we had to move, you know, CAF money around, I would rather move CAF money around to make sure we can bring in a qualified, you know, experienced city assessor or a qualified IT director. This is what I'm saying to my colleagues. If you need, if this is where we need to move some money to make sure we have it, this is where it should be needed. Right now, I don't think we have the stability. in other locations to be approving capital, approving $88,000. And we, you know, you want to talk about hurting, let's talk to those teachers that haven't gotten a contract. Let's talk about the fire and they're hurting. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thanks, Councilor Knight. I think you hit the nail on the head. Steve is just all I can say is that anytime you talk to Steve, even if you just pass Steve and walk past Steve and passing and driving by him, he had the most calming, peaceful, welcoming face that you can ever have. And he's someone that is definitely missed. He's truly one of the good guys in this community. condolences to his family, he will be missed.
[George Scarpelli]: Obviously it's affected people, so I think going to that body, the traffic commission, and then you obviously have support that, like Councilor Behr said, is now This, unfortunately, it was done right, embedded, everybody has a voice now, it has to be turned and divide the community and say, hey, now it's us versus you because we weren't notified. So, unfortunately, and I apologize for that, but that's terrible. Sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And again, I do not want to at any time disrespect our colleagues on the school committee side. But I think everybody has watched the news about the horrific attack on that young lady, a sophomore at Medford High School and the phone calls I've been getting and the conversation I've been having with Medford High School students. and not having the knowledge of what happened or how we can direct our young people for support. Uh, we have kids that we have students that have come to me and said that they're afraid. I mean, they're legitimately afraid. We're talking about going to school. I've I've talked to teachers that have involved in fights that are horrified and frightened to go to work. And when you see that, it's just another slap in the face and disrespect of this community that you have. You have a marine recruiter breaking up a fight. And, uh, which leads to, um, questions we had with the superintendent about security. They said they had security from now what I was told, you know, that the questions that is not being communicated correctly, and that's where the communication comes in place. I think that they're more like door monitors and, um, and something has to be done. I mean, this is you know, not only because I have a child here, but I talked to, I was at a recent school event that when I tell you former students and athletes that I've coached have come up to me and said, coach, we're scared, it's scary up here. And Smithford High School, that's a place to go where you're gonna be safe. And not having the understanding of what I could tell them, because in normal cases, situations when there is an issue this big. We're informed that anybody here was anybody else, maybe I missed it.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, the situation is, and the resolution is, you know, How do we find a ground with this communication that when we get the phone calls from parents and students that are asking for assistance and help, where do we direct them to? Because they don't feel comfortable in what they're seeing and what paths that have happened so far and who they can reach out to. They feel alone and they're scared. And if anybody, if you didn't see the video, I wish you not look at the video because it's gonna change your life. It's disgusting. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Madam President, just I think more importantly, I know that the intent is really to have the understanding that the students are so custom to situations that have happened in the past, whether it was the issue last year. And now what happened with this situation. I think they're a little bit lost. So I'd like to know what the what this school administration is going to do to make the rest of the school feel like they're safe. You know, I know that I think that the communication to us, the most important pieces is from the school department to say, you know, this is what's going on, but asking, having an avenue that we can have the kids talk to the guidance councils or, you know, their, you know, teachers they feel comfortable with, because whenever they're, especially when I was on the school committee, the understanding that something big happened, the first thing we did is rallied around the students that were impacted. And this, for instance, is all of our students. And I asked if there was assemblies, how were the students notified? How are they feeling safe? They haven't been addressed. from what I've been told. Maybe it's different, but from what I've been told, they haven't been addressed. So I think we need to stop listening to our children, listen to our students, because they were frightened. So again, I don't wanna be a dead horse, but thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you for my fellow counsel putting this forward as a first generation American who has a very deep and proud tradition of our Italian culture. I appreciate bringing this forward, but I will tell you to say that the Italian American community isn't is still a little unhappy in our community, not because of a name change of a school, but because of the discussions of not following through with really celebrating an Italian American and making sure that our community wasn't forgotten. It's something that I appreciate my colleagues bringing this resolution forward so we can mention it again. I appreciate Councilor Knight and Councilor Caraviello for that initiative they did put through a year and a half ago. But again, I guess if it's not forefront in the news, it's really not a true issue in this community. So it's disheartening for Councilor Caraviello person like myself that parents came to this country from Italy to make make their their roots to settle their roots and look at follow the American dream. And and Medford has done that for sure for my family. We're very fortunate that my mom and dad have now passed on but left us. We leave them at the thanks of everything they've done for us and how they taught us to work hard and really have pride in who we are. And I think that, I just hope this community and this administration follows through what they're saying and what we talked about just a few short years ago, because it seems like it's a culture that is easily forgotten where one time the Italian culture and the Irish culture in this community built it for what it is today. Why so many people love this great city. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, and thank you, Mr. Pierre, for coming out and let us know. Again, my recommendation, if we can have our code enforcement officer there on a daily basis, because money talks. So every time we see a violation, we should be taking these violations. And if it happens three, four times a day, then they should be taken three, four times a day. Like Councilor Knight said, it's getting frustrating for us that when you talk, try to have a conversation or work together with these bigger companies, falls on deaf ears and it's frustrating. So I think if we can make a recommendation that we ask a code enforcement officer to make, you know, two trips a day and, you know, really have a pipeline that Mr. Purifori can call them directly, and when you see and hear a violation, that we call them right away and they come right over. I've had issues with something as simple as a construction project going on in Fulton Street that we had neighbors, trucks were parking on the sidewalk, kids were trying to walk to school, so we set it up that The constituents that saw something, they called me, I called the code enforcement. After the fourth ticket, there hasn't been a truck parked on Fulton Street on the sidewalk. So I think that if this is how you have to do it, this is how we have to do it. It's frustrating, but it's the only way that I see it. We've asked him to come in to talk to him, his partners. And between BJ's and Budweiser, there really hasn't been much of a partnership. So if we can do that, that'd be something that I would recommend. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, correct me if I'm wrong, I believe the conversation we had with the administration was a new growth was 1.8 million and 1.2 was directly from fees and fines of, so I think it's public. I think that from what we were told back in those meetings that this is a process to raise revenue for our community, which is disheartening to me, right?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you for coming out. But I sense your frustration. since our last meeting, talking about traffic and parking since we had the director on for a half hour to answer questions. We've had about 30 phone calls and emails. People have called me. One thing we've recommended that maybe we stop, we reset, we educate both the enforcement officers and the community. I think that that's what a responsible community does when you're unveiling such a huge, impactful scenario like traffic enforcement. Um, to say that we don't need the sticker anymore. These are questions we had to ask, too, and we were cut short, too. We didn't realize I know that Councilor Morell did. President Morell did a great job even getting the director here just for, you know, a half hour. And we were told what before the meeting that she was leaving at seven. And after her 30-minute presentation of a presentation she sent us, and then listening to just a few people, there's so many questions still need to be answered. This is frustrating for everyone, yourself, us, because we don't know what to tell you. That's what the sad piece is. And I don't blame the traffic enforcement officers that they hired, because it's not their fault either. You know, when you have three people on the road in the city that met with size and they added all of these residential streets and sidewalks and streets and roadways and said, okay, now let's police those areas. It's impossible to get to Marion street in a daily basis, let alone a weekly basis. So maybe it is wrong. Maybe they don't have it. We had a resident come up and tell us that they ticketed 40 tickets on one street. And when they asked the question of what problem was, They gave them the wrong street. They weren't even on their street. They named a street that has a car wash on it and that's it. So that just tells you the frustration. And I know I get a phone call from a resident said that they were actually, they were enlightened that the enforcement officer came down the street and gave warnings. We asked, instead of giving the ticket, why don't you just give a warning so they can, the residents can be proactive and correct the situation. And the director, I believe the director said what, that the dogs would attack them if they get out of the car and gave a warning. I guess that dogs are very scared of tickets, just like us. So they won't attack with the tickets, but with the warning, they won't. The resident called me, said he had a conversation with the gentleman that came out and said, well, the director said that she was not going to give warnings. And they said, that's not true. And we were all in the meeting saying, I'm a little confused because the dog doesn't know how to wag the tail. So it's getting frustrating. So, and again, I will call, I would love to call another meeting, a Committee of the Whole meeting where we bring city administration, a traffic enforcement director back out in front of us to answer some of these questions that still have yet to be answered. And, you know, the situation at St. Joe's, if it wasn't for Ricky's phone call and reaching out and getting everybody involved, they'd be meters there. and people be getting ticket and towed. So there's a lot of questions still have to be answered. There's a lot of concerns in this community about a traffic program. So I apologize. I wish I had an answer for you. My recommendation again would be to, review, do an audit of all of these concerns that we have with our residents, with the director and her team, to see what we can do to mitigate any future concerns. Because I can't imagine how bad this is going to be once we have to park on one side of the street or the other. And how are they going to enforce this? It's going to be a real scary winter. You know, this is just a prelude to what we're seeing. So again, I wish we could do more. We feel your frustration. But again, all we can do is, you know, maybe ask for another meeting with the director, because it seems to be that that's the only person that can answer our questions.
[George Scarpelli]: No, it wasn't. I agree. And we told them that. And Council President worked her tail off just to make sure that she was here. So it floored us when we heard that we have a half hour and there were 30 people waiting to talk about some, you know, just to get an answer, just like you did. So. And unfortunately, you're here today to express that question. And we can't really give you the answer that good or bad, because at least we can have closure if there was someone that could give us something. And I don't have much faith you get that phone call, by the way. I apologize for that.
[George Scarpelli]: But I would really try to call the communications department, the mayor's office, chief of staff, and ask their guidance on who you should call, because you've obviously tried the numbers that were there. So that would be my recommendation. All right. Thank you. I'm sorry. Thank you for listening.
[George Scarpelli]: could we do it as a resolution next week? We'll do it on the ice cream truck. We'll do it on the ice cream truck. There are other items on parking.
[George Scarpelli]: We do have community participation. I have a source. I know we have a resident that wants to come up and speak.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I think that that's whenever we're doing, we made sure, especially with the problems we've had with the rodents, that there should be some mitigation in the agreement. So unfortunately, we can't do it because of public participation, but we could do is file a resolution next week to have all the city departments, the health commissioner and our city engineer that oversees the project to look into making sure that there's some whatever's in place needs to be in place and then and shared with the council so we can get back to you and your neighbors so they they can know something's being done. So I again especially when you do we talked about this whenever the roads are being open we know that we're going to have uh a manifestation of rodents and that's why we made sure we put those uh those those uh plans in place to mitigate that so hopefully we can remedy that for you but thanks for coming up and sharing that Mr. Chubbs. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Larry? Well, wait a second. Maybe something will come out of the sky.
[George Scarpelli]: We're still under suspension.
[George Scarpelli]: I know I still have one on the on the suspension. Yeah, I know that we have our director here that under unfinished business 22-466 our loan order for water meters. I know it's up for its third reading. So if we can move that along.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: We could motion that we have the petitioner give a brief synopsis.
[George Scarpelli]: Sure, obviously this is why it's a special permit request, but I, being that you're from San Francisco, you haven't seen or understand where 616 Fellsway is, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so it is an absolute nightmare of a location. And to add more traffic, this is why I get a little disappointed in the traffic impact reports, there's no traffic impact anticipated. Now we're looking to add 50 vehicles to this process?
[George Scarpelli]: Right, so this is why I'm a little confused on why put 616. If that's the case, you said that the drivers have an opportunity to go to the 616 location for That is correct.
[George Scarpelli]: So, and then the other location, it's a hub where they're going to be parked in the parking lot or in the garage?
[George Scarpelli]: So all those automobiles that'll be parked in Medford are registered through Medford in Medford?
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I mean, if we're parking 50 automobiles in our city, Medford accepts excise tax for automobiles that are parked and based in our community. Are those 50 cars based in going to pay excise tax in our community?
[George Scarpelli]: Do you have any more assurances than I believe so?
[George Scarpelli]: So for many different reasons, one being that we don't have a city solicitor that if I had questions that I can call to ask the legal questions dealing with this and the fact that this is something first time I've heard of this, you're looking at two locations and 50 more automobiles that will be parked in. Is there a negotiation between you and the lift and the garage companies. Is there is there an agreement between them?
[George Scarpelli]: but we have an entity that's used for public parking now being used as a business entity. That's now going to be over, it's gonna be, because I'm a little confused. It's gonna be, they're gonna be there. So there'll be housed there. So you'll have drivers coming in and out, taking those vehicles out of that location. And, then we don't know if they're going to be registered in Medford where there'd be tax in Medford and truly don't understand the impact or I know the traffic engineer isn't online, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: We did get- Off of vehicles?
[George Scarpelli]: And then, you know, the traffic impact, I know that is one of the most densely populated areas that I know I traverse there every day. And to see that adding another 50 more vehicles at a time is something that I have questions with. So my personal opinion right now, until we get legal, I have, I get some legal questions that I need to ask, you know, an entity in the city that I can ask, which I don't, we don't have a solicitor. We don't have a city solicitor. So I guess I'll have to call the mayor's office to see who can answer some of these questions legally. I would recommend that we table this until we get further understanding of what this process is. So that would be my recommendation, Mr. President. That would be a motion to table.
[George Scarpelli]: I think the important piece right now is very is twofold. The understanding of getting some questions answered and making sure this council at one point wasn't represented when there was a special permit requested by a legal team, and when we denied it for a reason that we couldn't, we were then sued. So the reason why I want to make sure that we don't do anything until we get the word from legal that one way or the other. So I know I appreciate the representative from Lyft. It's a lot of great questions. Councilor Caraviello brings up some great points. I understand the benefit for taxable revenue through the excise tax, but I just want to make sure there are some questions that I have legally on our end before.
[George Scarpelli]: So my recommendation would be that now that I have these questions that I can, I would table for two weeks. And hopefully the city administration can have someone through the legal team just answer a question. I'll reach out to them tomorrow. So my recommendation right now I don't feel comfortable to go to a vote with this. So it has to table for two weeks.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Vice President. I appreciate my colleagues. I don't The intent for this format is to come through us to give a permit for a special event. And so far, special events for, for instance, the Harvest Fest, which we would support, the fundraiser for a school, And the biggest thing we talked about over and over again, and I think everybody, everybody, including, including the mayor who sat right here when I said a thousand times, if it affects brick and mortar businesses, we shouldn't support them. Okay. And there is, I don't, I still don't understand Okay, let's say the META program is a huge success. The city has rallied around it. Everybody is super excited. We're gonna celebrate this. There are gonna be hundreds of people here. Is there anybody here to tell us, is Zach's ice cream truck going to charge the individual? Is the city picking up the fee? Does anybody know that?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I know we're making light of this, but I'm gonna be honest with you. In all seriousness, this is disappointing. I know we're joking and laughing about it, but are you kidding me? I had teachers call me today because they're working to rule. Now that's not good for both ends. You have kids that are not gonna be given the services they need because teachers are that frustrated that they're not working to rule, so when 230 hits, they're home. And I understand that this is funny, but this is funny disgusting. Let's have an ice cream truck unveil, celebrate something we just talked about that's turning the city upside down. We've had nothing but complaints and anger. You know what, if the director will come here for four hours to discuss issues, I will vote on an ice cream truck to be parked right out here. As long as someone's right there answering the questions that I have to answer every night. I'm disgusted.
[George Scarpelli]: This is something, I love this city. I love the city, but this is becoming a laughing stock. This is a joke asking for ice cream. So my vote to be no, I would deny this permit.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli, if you could, I'm gonna waive the rest of the reading and go to Councilor Scarpelli. So thank you, Mr. Vice President. I think that this is what it's entitled for. This is what we do. It's a special event to bring the whole community together, to push an event or process that we need to really spread the word. And I would support this wholeheartedly, Mr. President. a method companies, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: represent members of the City Council. My name is Richard Batten. I'm from Batten Brothers Sign Company and 893 Main Street in Wakefield, Massachusetts. And I'm representing Needham Bank Uh Needham Bank is in the process of moving from 400 Mystic Ave to a new building that well existing building, but a new office for them at 270 Mystic Ave, which is the intersection of Mystic Valley Parkway, Mystic Ave and Harvard Street. What we're requesting, well, what they're doing there is essentially building a new branch and renovating the building and giving it a much more modern, nicer appearance. They're gonna be doing a lot of renovations there. And they really feel like this is a very high profile location for them and very important to their business and hopefully to the city. Because of the... the nature of that intersection, what we're requesting is to have a primary, to have signs on four sides of the building. The signs that we're requesting are comprised of white individual letters with a maroon and white logo, which is their standard logo. The relative scope of the sign in relationship to the building is not overbearing or intrusive. The goal of the signs is to service, identification for people that are traveling. because the entrance to that branch, as you probably well know, is either from Mystic Ave or from the Parkway, and it's difficult for people coming from different directions to know what the branch is. In effect, if we only had one sign on that branch, or one primary sign and a small secondary sign, it would be somewhat invisible. The signs we're requesting are similar to their signs that have been previously approved for Rockland Trust and for Central Bank before. And as a matter of fact, I think Rockland Trust actually had two signs on one side of the building. Central Bank, prior to them, had signs on each side of the building. So we humbly request approval of our sign package.
[George Scarpelli]: There are no moving signs. We initially had thought of putting a pylon sign on the corner there, but we've decided against that. And the pylon sign had a message there, but we opted to go this direction instead of that direction, so no moving signs.
[George Scarpelli]: say they'll probably be turned off somewhere around 11 p.m. usually we run them. Usually we run it on a time clock with a photo cell. So it would say that any time after like, let's say 7 a.m. that it gets dark out, it would turn on. But in every case at 11 p.m. it would be shut off. Great.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sure you had a few laughs, but this is what's difficult for me as the chairperson for signs on the subcommittee. I think that when I see something like this, I always made my first phone call to guess who? Paul Moki, our building I'm not with Paul retiring, and I know we were supposed to have a new director in place, but I haven't heard yet to ask some questions. Now, I would normally listen to Paul, and he would say, George, this is X, Y, and Z, and answer those questions, and it would be finished. So I'm battling right now because I don't see any... I don't see any digital signs that are moving. I don't see, you know, I know that so that the request is that we're adding more signs that are recommended and that the signs will be off at 11 o'clock. I think that's important now. Outside, do we have like, will you have around the parking lot enter signs or will there be anything that would distinguish people can understand that? I'm sure that there'll be directional signs, small directional signs. Okay, but it won't be anything that's illuminated or anything? No. Okay. And this is what's difficult. This is obviously a business that we want to support here in Medford. a very professional sign company that has done their due diligence, read through everything. It looks good to me. I would tend to support it, but again, this is my inner battle, is that not having a building commissioner where I can get any answer questions that I had and feel comfortable with my decision tonight. I don't know if I could vote for it. So this is why I yield to my council colleagues before I hear any other recommendations, but right now just I yield.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor say any further comments point information kind of concepts, if you can explain this a little bit more detailed at that. So this would be. This would be $30 household per month for internet and bills. Yeah, this is coming through what what program is that it's a federal program. What is it, it's a federal program. Okay, okay. That's amazing, I didn't realize that.
[George Scarpelli]: This should be something that, again, this is where you should be standing on top of mountains. Imagine parents understanding the difficulties they're having with Wi-Fi connections, because affordability, there's a process that we can do that on the federal side. It's disheartening but appreciate your hard work and finding that that's a, I would second your resolution.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, if we challenge it.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I can. my colleague bringing this forward, I think that this, I believe, was a huge issue in the local school department that then left that school department in financial resolve because of that situation. So it's good to see if we bring that forward, making sure that our school superintendent and school department and the governing body there that makes decisions also are informed of this, this very important situation because we don't want to be viable. So, thank you. And we said I would second that.
[George Scarpelli]: Motion to adjourn please.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I know that when I saw this, I got a phone call from Bill Jr. that Mr. Carr has passed. And I know how the family had worked to bless him with the wishes that he live and die like he lived. And he was just an amazing person. He battled. He taught his family how to live and how to live for their community. From South Medford where the Carr family started, to West Medford and Hillside coaching Little League, to the classrooms at Medford High School and the guidance Councilor office at Medford High, Mr. Carr touched a lot of people's lives in a very positive way. And again, I've been saying this for the years that I've been on the city council. We're seeing too many Method legends pass on, and not enough people picking up the torch where people like Mr. Carr have left off. What he did do is he did teach his children to give back to the community. And we know both Bill and Doug have given their lives to Medford, and they're always behind the scenes. You never see them a lot like Mr. Carr. you know, a true Mustang, a true legend, a BC, a love of Boston College, and a person that would be missed. I know that tomorrow's his wake and Thursday's his send off, and I'm sure we'll see a lot of grateful people for knowing Mr. Carr and his family, and someone that will be missed. So my condolences to the family, and If you have a minute, read his obituary, and it speaks volumes. And maybe, maybe if a constituent reads that and says, geez, let me pick up just a little bit of what Mr. Carr has done for our community, you can make such impacts. And that's what he's done. So bless him. And thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Councilor Cabrera for bringing this forward. If you remember, the reason why years ago, when I was just a young man watching this council on TV, the biggest issues with parking in Medford is that you saw that people were using the streets, the side streets and main streets of Medford to park so they can hop on commuter buses and take parking for residents all day. And that was the biggest issue. Now it's turned into something that I believe, during the budget hearings, we talked about new growth. And I believe the majority of the new growth that is projected is coming from traffic and parking, if maybe someone correct me if I'm wrong, but from fines. And that's a terrible way to run your community, on the backs and the pocketbooks and the wallets of your constituents. We're seeing major issues with this parking plan, and it seems like, and we'll talk about this tomorrow with the department head, but it seems like this has turned into just a moneymaker for this community, and it's for the wrong reasons. My recommendation is gonna be the same as Councilor Caraviello. I have constituents call me about this issue in Wellington, where the whole street was tagged, and when people came up to fight it, they said, we'll fix it, you just have to bring up your registration. the constituents said to them, well, if you could see it in your computer and everybody on this street has gotten tickets because it says it's another street, why can't you change that? Because we have residents that are elderly, that find it difficult to get their way to city hall. They want them to come up with their registrations, sit in an office that isn't very friendly from what I gather, and ask them to change this because they made a mistake. I just don't understand the lack of preparation and the lack of transparency shared by this department and the lack of education that they haven't given our constituents. And again, I hate to harp on the communities that do it right, but whenever they implement any sort of change, it's something done 10 times. It's put out to the community so everybody in the community understands why these plans and these parking enforcement penalties are in place. So they're educated. I saw one of the biggest increases in fees and fines in a community where I work in that would have made you sick in this community. But the way they unveiled it and the way they educated their constituents, explained to them, do you enjoy your streets getting swept twice a week? Do you enjoy that we don't ask for any money for our school department, that we can give our teachers full benefits, that we can give them high salaries, that we can look at our paraprofessionals and pay $40,000? Where do you think that's coming from? It's coming from fees and fines, but it's understood by the constituents saying, well, if I made a mistake, and at least I know where that money's going. In our community, we don't know why we're getting ticketed, who's giving the tickets, do they understand how they're giving tickets, And then when someone has an issue, no one is actually talking to a person like a human being. I've had very calm residents come to me and say, Councilor Scarpelli, I've gone to the office, I've tried to peacefully just ask a question. I know it wasn't the wrong, but I just wanted to be educated. And the lack of professionalism in that office, where it was smug people, people looking you right in the eye, raising their arms over their heads and yawning in your face. I mean, this is customer service at its worst. And this is gonna be something that's gonna be shared tomorrow, but I've welcomed all those people that have contacted me, come to this meeting, share your thoughts. Because I think we need to put a, sometimes you need to stop everything and reassess so we can educate our constituents, educate the staff that's there. Because from what I gather, I'm looking at complaints through the union that they're not being treated right either. It's a mess. And it's disheartening that I know that, you know, constantly very somberly put where we are right now. And this is disheartening. This is disheartening. Now I'm glad we can celebrate a road race and I'm glad we can celebrate trick or treating around the square and that's all fine. And our constituents deserve that. We deserve it. Don't get me wrong, we deserve it. But that's not what runs the city. Right now, I'm afraid what the next year's budget's gonna be. We see the financial climate of this country right now. I'm petrified to see what we... We saw what we went through last year. And I think we need to reassess starting tomorrow evening with the Parking Enforcement Office and see where this council's going. I see, and I'll jump ahead and I apologize, Madam President, but I see resolutions that are coming in front of us tonight that changing of ordinance for great people that have done a lot of work for our community. But out of all due respect, I was one councilor. How can I vote on something tonight where we don't have any guidance from a city solicitor? We don't have any legal support from anybody in this community. whether the intentions of anything that's brought to us. is good or bad. We can't do anything about it. So this is very frustrating. I apologize, I digress, but it's been a very frustrating last few days, and I hope people show up tomorrow night and share their concerns, because I tell you what, the phone calls and the emails I've gotten, it's not even anything about just people being kind to each other, just showing respect to each other at a desk, and we can't even do that. So thank you, and thank you. I support Councilor Caraviello's resolution. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. One thing I find problematic today I don't have it in front of me. Do we have someone from the city administration here representing the city anymore? Do we have someone? Is there someone on zoom that just just just to relay these messages to the mayor? Is it on that note?
[George Scarpelli]: So we so okay. So in essence, right now, we don't have any, any representation to discuss any concerns and issues from our community from from the mayor's office.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can, just because this is our second meeting now after the summer break and we have issues and concerns. it could be something that could be answered quickly through someone from the mayor's office and not having someone, I know that the chief of staff isn't here, but there should be someone here. They have a lot of people in that office, if I'm not mistaken, that could represent that office. So I'd actually put that in the form of a motion that if we can, that we request that someone from the city administration staff represents the city hall in our meetings to answer constituent services concerns or issues in a media basis. So I really appreciate it. I mean, considering only meet twice a month now, that I think it's important that we have someone here that it's, you know, I don't think we're scary anymore. I think we've all toned it down. I don't think we're bullying anybody anymore. I think we're in a good place. So if we can do that, Madam President, I appreciate it. And it's also chocolate milk. today is uh if you look at the it's uh it's a very important day forget about not only hispanic heritage month and it's also we have very it's we went over that this morning that's why i know that director said today's a very important day for chocolate milk believe it or not do you want to make that a beat paper please please that'd be great thank you i'm just sorry a point of information as well on that point um
[George Scarpelli]: Is it similar? It's expensive, but it's pretty well. I mean, they run their program, if you have a parking sticker, I believe it's increased now to $180 per car, but it's citywide and it's run pretty well.
[George Scarpelli]: We're not going to succeed.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information if I can. Another avenue would be to contact our city solicitor.
[George Scarpelli]: Our city solicitor?
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you, Madam President. And, uh, Council nights, uh, you know, comments, uh, I think, uh, hit it right on target. I think that, uh, what we see is over and over again, the most important people in our community, the people that make our community run are the ones that are being neglected. And, um, When you're talking to our brothers and sisters that are teachers or brother and sister firefighters or our secretarial staff or other departments that that are crying out and saying how do we, how do we survive. hasn't met with administration, hasn't tried to figure out strategic processes and try to figure out a way that we can get to a reasonable percentage raise. When we're told we talk to people and try to get more invested, it's a personnel matter, which we know, but when it's phone call after phone call and person after person and family after family that are being affected, It's alarming and it's alarming to the point where we're seeing good people walk out the door, whether on their own or with assistance or whether it's teachers that are qualified and our kids love and making impacts and moving to different communities or whether it's firefighters or police officers leaving to go to different communities or our secretarial staff leaving because it's just not worth working. It's better just to stay home. And it's just not fair for you. And it's not fair for the people that need you in your seats. So I was raised as a strong union member and understanding that that we're stronger in force and understanding that as long as we all work together, something positive has to come out of that. So from one union member to others, we're standing with you and hoping someone listens and tries to put something forward in a positive way because I talked to a lot of teachers last night and I feel the frustration and I could feel, when you walk through this door, you can feel the dreariness, you can feel the negative aura. And it's sad. I'm sad because I love this community, I love this building. And I apologize that you have to feel that way. So again, as a council, as one council, and I think most of us, if not all, we stand with you. So we need to find a way to create something to make sure that all of our employees are happy and they're not leaving. Because I think that you've already, like you said, we've already, we've already proven all of the unions behind you. We've already proven that no matter what, we're still going to come in, you're still going to work your tail off for this community, and you're still going to do what's best for the city. And, and I know it's getting frustrating, and it's going to be a time when people are just going to say enough is enough. And then when someone needs a permit there's nobody there, or when someone needs a return phone call there's going to be no one there, or the children to walk into a classroom, and they're going to nobody there, or there's going to be a fire somewhere, and we're not going to have enough firefighters. So these are the fears that I feel, and it's it's frightening so again, I appreciate what you did tonight for coming up, because I know it's not easy, but we're standing with you, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you for coming out because I know it's not easy. And we appreciate that and believe us. I know for one concert, and I'm sure my fellow Councilors, we've all received emails and phone calls with very similar frustrations. So just to be clear, you gave us a picture that it shows for automobiles that has a ticket, a permit that's updated. or a permit that's updated with a handicap placket, and you were all still ticketed.
[George Scarpelli]: And you went to the, and what was the answer from that department?
[George Scarpelli]: So did they, did they fix these?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so that's good. Yes. Because what we've heard is there are some that they haven't, they've asked to file, go through the appeal, they lose the appeal, and then the repercussions with that is to go to the state, which is a $250 fee anyway. Right. So it's frustrating.
[George Scarpelli]: Unfortunately, I know I'm just asking questions we can't put anything for amendments or recommendations but maybe we'll do this next week because I think that, again, working in a community that has a very viable and transparent and involve traffic and parking department in that community. We've had multiple meetings when it comes to any types of fee or fines or different changes to the rules. And when it happens in different neighborhoods, those neighborhoods are in meetings with their department head to discuss that as community meetings. So I'll make a recommendation next week when we can as a resolution that we recommend that our new parking department Traffic and parking department, and their director, take major steps with our communications department to start meeting with neighborhoods, even if we go from southwest hillside, the Fulton Heights North met and break it up that way. that they can come out and have community meetings that to discuss some of these rules because there's a lot of confusion going on. And I think that I know they said they've done something online to enlighten people, but it's just not enough. And, and like you said as we move on to July, January 1, when this really hits. I think before then we have a few months that we can still reach out to our constituents and really educate people. And I think that might help with that piece. I think transparency is very important. So I think that that'll be helpful. So again, I just want to make those comments. I appreciate you for coming up tonight. And thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: looking to change that policy now because of the lack of federal funding, because we have so many private ways in this community that we're looking to eliminate the private way, and that would eliminate any of those concerns, Mr. Sacco.
[George Scarpelli]: It does, but this is the reason the community should know as well. This is why we should, you know, there's so many different factors to this. this situation to help our community, whether it's more funding from the government to repave streets or having issues like this where, you know, DPW's hands are tied because these, this rules that need to be changed that say that we can't trim a tree that has public safety concerns. So, because we do have, we do have students still walking down that street to go to school when it's walk Metro day. And if it's under a tree that's that safe, I hope that Mr. McGiven can help us with that.
[George Scarpelli]: I know that we're doing farmers markets, public library, no disrespect, but that's really, That's one demographic, if you really look at it. Have we looked at doing the PTOs at the high school, where we have hundreds of parents going through? Are we doing like the Mephiti football games? We have hundreds of parents going through. Are we looking at different events? I mean, I understand whenever we do these surveys, I don't know if it's as visible to everybody else, but we keep doing it at the same places. We keep doing these at the libraries, the farmers market. There are other people in the community that are represented, but we're not going to them at all. And I think that we should really take a hard look because this impacts our community, the whole community, not just this demographic, because it seems like that's all we're doing right here. It's with tagging one part of the community we have to start looking at our when other communities do these outreach and I think it's very important this is this is a great step because we're seeing this is where I would like to see more public participation, more involvement but Why aren't we doing this more into the largest scheme scheme of it that the public schools when they're doing different meetings that, that, that, you know, the, the big athletic events in the city, you know, the, the, the big road race this weekend we're having hundreds of people this weekend. Why wouldn't we be doing things like that I mean the mystic rest of the river festival September. Yeah, that's the same people that go to library and say people that will see at the farmers market. So we have broadened, you know, our outreach here. Let's look at Sunday we're gonna have hundreds of people running a city wide road race. Well let's look. I'd like to see that if we can. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: It's not a lot of residents in the city of Mexico, right? 500 is not a lot.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't disagree, but I guarantee it's the 550 people that do all the surveys. We need to start reaching out to a greater scheme, a greater number, because this is a lot of money. And you can see it, this is a big, people don't realize how huge this negotiation is exactly what it entails. So I appreciate it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So again, before the table, I wish I had the opportunity to speak before but again, these are situations that has nothing personal to do with the position, but the clarification of what we haven't had yet. And then again, to my, to my fellow Councilors that remember the days that we were told one thing and then not not given the proper answers what we needed and here we are again. We just spoke to 500 people. and told them that we support them, no matter what, that this administration is not following through with our union employees and what do we just do? We just voted four to three not to table it. So I'm waiting to see what the next vote's going to be. Point of information.
[George Scarpelli]: So my, what I just said to end that was, I can't wait to see the next motion. That's all I want to say.
[George Scarpelli]: So I- It's amusing because it's frustrating. So don't make this a joke because it's not amusing because I'm happy.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Well, there were 550 people that weren't happy.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. John, thank you very much for your hard work in answering some of these questions. I think this is an easy question for me. Fundamentally, if this doesn't happen, how difficult would this make our system?
[George Scarpelli]: Right. So to me, I think this is a slam dunk in the fact that you're talking about 0% loan, you're talking about possibly eliminating concerns to our residents, whether their meters are read wrong or read incorrectly, then have to adjust later, that could be crippling. So I think that this is something that for myself, I think that it's not even thinking ahead, it's catching up and making sure that we are on the same page and working together as we move forward in the future. So I would look to support this paper.
[George Scarpelli]: Just to approve in general. So we'll just go with the others. No, no, you take it. No, I think that I should jump in. I'll give you a sack.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate Councilor Collins, Councilor Tseng bringing this forward. I think that, you know, until it happens, until you know someone, it really doesn't hit you. And just recently we had a young man that grew up on Almond Street, a prestigious athlete, going off to play football in college, everything going right in his life, and felt something on his face at an all-star football game, and told his brother, that's a teacher at Medford High School, and said, let's feel some pain. And we quickly, the family had quick resources that they took him over to the doctors. Right away, they sent him to Dana-Farber. Unfortunately, he found that it was lymphoma. with the grace of God and the process that his family went through and having Dana Faber in the backyard, they got to it right away and the diagnosis and the surgery went well and everything looks positive in this young man's life. So until you see it, but you have to realize it, it's happening to the person right next door. And to see the movement that, we can make here in Medford. It's exciting and it's a way that we can have just a little piece that we can support and move this horrible disease out of here. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. First, I apologize for my parents and my tightness. I came from emergency work and either late for another 45 minutes to get here as fast as I can. I apologize for that. So on the note of our parking garage, I know I missed the beginning of it, but being creative, I think, is what's so important that we reach out. And you would think that looking at the different entities, bigger developments that are going on in the city, partnering with them, but even thinking outside the box, I brought this up years ago, that one thing Medford lacks is, facilities for youth for outside activities. And neighboring communities have used parking garages, the top floors, as indoor facilities and recreation facilities, where you would not only get the the partnership to help build such a structure, but at the same time, also have the opportunity to create funding through fees through parking from the participants from those programs during the evenings. If you look at Boston, right next to the Boston Garden, you have a good example that there's an indoor athletic facility, excuse me, basketball city that's right above. So they have five five stories of parking. Top layer is a recreational facility that's utilized by its city, its recreation department throughout the day, and still leaves enough parking for businesses, merchants, for for multiple uses, but at the same time, creating revenue with a partner and trickling down those funds to make that happen. So there's different ways to be creative here. And it's something that's drastically needed. I know that we've talked to many people and these are, what is it? 22 years of master planning for city I would love to find a way that you now encompass both sides of our square as we start looking toward development, putting in, bringing in parking. I think it's needed. I think that it's one of the reasons why we can't further development in Medford Square. So I think it's, you know, where do you put the cart in front of the horse? We have to make a move. I think that this is probably a very important step to move Medford Square forward. And I thank you, my fellow Mustangs, that they keep fighting the fight. So thank you for that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Um, documentation. Everything is in order. Um, this is something that we've all been waiting for. I know that Mr. Heineck is a cornerstone of our community, and, um, This is something we've been preaching about for years, bringing in small businesses that keep business out of Winchester and out of Somerville and right here in our own backyard. And why not support one of our own? So, as I said, everything's in order. After my colleagues' comments, I move approval. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I believe we're all supported Councilor Caraviello with that motion, so.
[George Scarpelli]: I just reiterate what my fellow councils have been saying. It seems like lately, the city of Medford has been getting a tail kick by the state. You see some of these concerns we've had with DCR, the public transportation, what's happening with removal of buses. And then something we'll have to discuss because something very dangerous is going on. And I'll be making a recommendation soon to close off the on-ramp for 93 at the rotary. They put barriers that now jet into the highway and leaving people in the most dangerous, dangerous situations without any notice to anyone. So if you're taking that exit and you're a Method resident for the last 30 years, and you hop up on the highway and all of a sudden you look up, there is a fixed Jersey barrier right in front of you, pushing you right into traffic. So we're having a serious problem. And I think that what we need to do, to be honest with you, is have a meeting with all of our state delegates and sit with them and ask them for some guidance on where we're going with what we're seeing here in Method. Because to me, it's nothing but a lack of respect. And I think we need some movement. So my recommendation is that not only with what Councilor Caraviello said, Our neighbors on the Fellsway are just appalled. I mean, just appalled, but if you, like Councilor says, you move up and down two miles to a different community, and their streets are paved with granite and cement, it's beautiful. So I think there's a major discrepancy going on here, and I don't know why, but it seems like when you start adding it up, Method's getting the short end of the stick in many different state entities, whether it be DCR, DOT, or public transit. So my recommendation, if Councilor Caraviello allows me, that part of this discussion, that we invite our state delegates to come down and really ask them what's going on at the Statehouse. What did we do wrong? Did someone break up with someone's significant other or something that comes from Medford? I don't know, but we need to figure this out because this is terrible. It's frustrating that we're hearing more issues coming from the straight state side. We have enough to worry about here in Medford right now to be piled on with what's going on on our state roads and highways. and public transit, and now our sidewalks the DCR, and our path issues or lack of grass issues or cleanliness issues or more on issues, we go on and on. But I think we need to sit down with people and look them in the eye so I'll make that as a form of emotion. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Just a point of information. I know that Representative Donato just informed me that he is working extremely hard. He's talked with the state this morning for any questions about the on-ramp. They're coming out with new signs and information for the community as soon as possible. So we thank for his commitment. And that's that's a benefit of having someone like Mr. Donato in place that he's sitting home watching these meetings, and he's already ahead of the game so I really appreciate that so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry, I have to mention, I know that unfortunately I couldn't make it the other evening, but my daughter did go and the kudos to the Method Police Department on the National Night Out. What an event to really showcase what our Method Police Department does for our community and the discussions I've had with neighbors and friends that really never looked at the police in that light. It was such a refreshing conversation we had. So I just want to give them congratulations. And this is what really, these are the type of events that really enhance what NEPA's really about. So it's exciting to see. I think we should do more of those. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so you just, this is your new location, correct? Yes. So what was there before that, before?
[George Scarpelli]: It was a Grava?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, because is that what Grava used to do, their auto body, but they don't do it anymore, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: All right, so you're just taking that location. Again, I understand Councilor Caraviello's concerns, but I'm not going to penalize a new, a new business owner that wants to come into the city for the bills of, of other business owners in that area. I think that if you look at the permit and everything that's been requested of them, traffic issues and concerns. Chief Buckley signed off on that. I know in the past, I can ask my, my Councilor genius Council night. If we could we put a review on that Council night.
[George Scarpelli]: I think if I could recommend that with Councilor Knight, if we could recommend that and just move forward with the six day review and ask for the code enforcement and Chief Buckley to visit that before we vote on any movement moving forward. I think I want to continue with the process, but again, I don't want to penalize a future business owner for something he hasn't done wrong yet. or intends to. So right now, all the paperwork seems to be in order. I understand the frustration of the merchants in that area. But at the same time, I think that has something to do with oversight and not with, um, the petitioner that's in front of us. So I would move approval and ask for some feedback from the court enforcement officer and the chief regarding our concerns.
[George Scarpelli]: I wouldn't mind because it gives us a little more time once it's in there. So I would support that as well.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Um, if those people aren't familiar with the national night, I would is, um, we have been supporter in my capacity, my professional capacity in the city of Somerville, and it's a great opportunity to bring our neighbors together and as a unified front and and the best people, the best profession to lead that are our men and women in the police department. So if I know that Um, we have Lieutenant Harden it here. If he's, um, you know, just fill us in with all the particulars and I think we should all spread the word and I'll be part of such a great event. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, if I can.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for your time. If I can, Madam President, this is important, but we need to get the word out. Maybe one of those mystery surprises should be a robocall from someone.
[George Scarpelli]: But I will tell you, what's amazing is this is what our officers do on a day out anyway. It's amazing that, again, you brought this out and everybody's volunteering to get involved. And because I know the four people standing in front of me and the officers you mentioned all have a love and a tie to Medford and all want to continue with its greatness that it is. I appreciate men and women in blue, I really, I think this is, you know, you guys do everybody does such a good job and making so many people feel welcome but when you bring all those groups together for an event like that, it just reaffirms how great your department is, and how great our community is, and I can't thank you enough for doing that so I'll be there, I will not be in the dunk tank.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can amend the motion, just make sure that we send out a roll call so everyone in the community knows about this amazing event. So I appreciate that. Second.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can. This is a no brainer in my eyes. I think you're talking about the recommendation to appoint Erin DiBenedetto to the election commission. See, this is a person that who I know personally and I can vouch for her that her commitment to this community and through volunteerism while her children were in the method public schools, and then her energy and efforts to then pick up the mantle around the school committee and hold that office gives her an opportunity to really give that office a different viewpoint and a sense of history. So I think it's, I think, It's someone I respect someone that I think is very honorable and would be a perfect fit for this position. So, um, all I can say is I appreciate you even putting your name down there and, and continuing your, your, um, uh, pursuit and giving back to our community. So, uh, and, and another facet informed. So, um, and again, you have to thank you. the husband, Joe, who's always been there and he just keeps smiling. I don't know what it is. Just keeps dragging. You keep dragging him out and he keeps smiling. So I, um, I would, I would support this nomination. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpellilli. Thank you, Council President. Thank you, my colleagues, for bringing this forward because it is something that we can discuss and discuss we should. But I'm looking at this in three different processes. One, the presentation and the process. I think that the budget season was difficult, but I've heard from so many constituents that something serious as this, probably something This is probably a topic that's probably. one of the most intense, serious questions that we should visit in our community in years, that we haven't visited in years. So I think understanding the process and looking how it was presented that we're presenting this in the middle of the summer and a lot of people that aren't around to really share the concerns. I personally received over a hundred emails, phone calls, people expressing concerns, questions that we have. So, to reiterate the process, not having the city assessor here tonight to answer some questions I think it's very important to not have the questions that we have to get answered for us is very important. For one, the senior exemption, I think it sounds great. I think we should give every senior exemption. Unfortunately, it falls back on the taxpayers. It'll be an additional money. So when we're talking about $12 million, if we have a tax break and understand the ramifications of who's gonna pick up that break. it's gonna be taxpayers, the general taxpayer. And that number that Councilor Villes mentioned of 500 some odd dollars a year, that's a question. The other question people asking is, okay, so this is for one year. And then what do we do after that? Do we apply for others? So these are just simple questions that can't be answered. The other piece of this is truly the infrastructure within City Hall right now. I don't think we have the manpower or the person power to really function or present an override in its totality that could be put forth in a thoughtful and professional way. I just don't think we have that capacity today. So I think that's another concern. And then when it comes down to the concerns of the constituents and I'll share with everybody, the biggest issue is that This is going to affect so many different people. We had a, we had a budget season that was very contentious, and a lot of people called us extortionists and, but it was something that we needed to move forward to make sure that we, the city gets gets the basic necessities that we think we need to move forward. And then I had a discussion with the mayor and talking about Some of the concerns we've had for years, I was a councilor that put forth a debt exclusion for a new fire station. The mayor assured me that it's going out to architectural design this week and we're moving forward with the new fire station. So that's in a positive light. What we've gone through, what Councilor Behr so eloquently put, and the pains that we've seen the last couple of years, think had a direct reflection on the COVID outbreak and the lack of growth here in the community. We talked about the 40B projects that we haven't been able to get off the ground and creating revenue that way. The Mystic Ave corridor and increasing revenue by opening up new zoning for clean energy or biotech or whatever is talked about. I know Councilor Caraviello talked about everyone else being landlocked and Metro being a unique community right now, that we can really do some great things and create revenue that way. So our first license went out to our marijuana distributor that will bring in some funding. So we're finally seeing some light at the end of the tunnel. And believe me, I'm not calling this a knee jerk reaction, because it isn't, because we've lived through some tough times. but I think ultimately who this affects in the community, the people we're trying to support. I mean, all of us have talked about, you know, affordable housing, people not being able to live in Medford, people not even be able to afford rents. Well, the homes that aren't single family or the homes that are rented, what happens because the taxpayer is not going to fit the bill for this. All they're going to do is turn and increase rents for their renters. And that's not going to help one of the biggest groups we've all worked for to make sure that we can make sure that methods affordable for all. So I think there's a lot of questions that if We had a team here, and we can sit together and figure out what's the best course of action with the true blueprint of what true new growth looks like. And understanding where we can, where we need to move. Listen, if $3 million is what it is and we need to move forward with that. after it's a thorough plan and how we don't hurt our taxpayers as much as we can. I think it's something we visit, but it's something we visit and explore. I think it's very dangerous tonight. The other point that I'll bring up is that, and I, you know, I talked to my colleague about this, that, you know, George, you know, people, this is another mis-attack. It's another mis-attack. In the middle of the summer, you're coming in, you're blindsiding the public and then, bam. We don't want to divide. I think, We've done a good job working together, and I just don't want to divide the city any more than it has to be. These are important issues. It's something that we've all looked at. But I think it's it's also important that we truly don't know what's down the line. We've we've asked the mayor and I think the mayor is going to present us with the capital improvement plan. And one of those plans is going to be a new high school. And if that's the case, you know, if you're talking about looking at the parents and And what they'll be asking for for something like that and what we're asking for today, it's not just $550. This is something that's gonna be impacted many different levels. So a household's not just gonna see an increase of $550, it's gonna be much greater. And that's what I fear. And I think that not having, you know, people in this room that can answer our questions and us not vetting that out properly as a team, I think, you know, even with any money people, we do how many readings? We do three readings. So I think it'd behoove us, I know I wanna hear everybody before I make any motions, but it would be really beneficial for all of us to really sit down and look at the plan of totality before we put this out there. And it's knee jerk reaction because the truth of the matter is, I've gotten the emails too that said, hey, we need that override, support the override. Well, okay, in theory, it sounds great. With $12 million, we get to do all these great things. We don't know that. So, and that's and that's the other underlying situation that is is bothersome to me so I just caution I know that everybody wants other people want to talk but I just, you know, I appreciate bringing this forward because the dialogue has to come out. We are, we are in some constraints. But I think this is another situation. We worked together with the administration say, let's look at true new growth instead of looking for a proposition to an app override. I think that looking at that and exhausting that before we do something this drastic, because this hurts the person that lives in our neighborhoods and in every single home and apartment in the city of Medford. So we just have to be careful because as good as it sounds out front, You did your homework, no one's ever going to question that it's very thorough, but there are other questions that what is this with the two and a half, is this added with the two and a half, or without the two and a half the original two and a half. Is it with the. How much would it be if we had to incur the cost of the senior exemption. I understand where that went because we did our assessment. We got a report back when I tried to do the debt exclusion for the fire station. And I believe it was with every single senior citizen to be excluded, it was $17 a quarter, I believe, for our taxpayers to build a new fire station. So I know the process. I know it's not easy. That failed, I believe, six to one back in the day. And, and again, even at that point I presented it, knowing that we haven't vetted it out properly so, and this is, this is a big deal here in the city so like I said, I really think we should. take a deep breath, look at all the information that was presented, and really move on to another meeting so we can understand this with all our stakeholders in the room. That means the mayor's office, a city assessor, and looking at all of the different angles and all the different possibilities that we can benefit from and we can also hurt from. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: I think Councilor Knight makes a lot of sense, and I think Councilor Bears brings up a lot of concerns that we all feel, but I think that there is a better solution. I think that I'd make the motion that we table this and we move forward with the administration that we put a team together with this council to focus on new growth and put a plan in place. Because I think where we are right now, we're at 12 o'clock where we were during budget season, during budget night. I think that we're at a point right now that either side, if this goes one way or the other, it's gonna impact a lot of this community in a negative way. where instead, I think it's a push that we need to get everybody at the table with our leadership here and move forward quickly and looking at and moving forward with new growth. I think that that's, it's out there. We talked about, we talked about the fees. We talked about the permitting. We talked about the new growth in taxes. We talked about all these avenues that we have possibilities to build that number and, Maybe at the end of it, we see that there is still a deficit of some odd million dollars that we need to look and focus and bring it to the voters. But right now, like Councilor Knight said, and like I said previously, I think it's the process right now that this council has done great things together and we've listened to each other. And I think we respected a lot of what we needed. And I think this council today needs to look at this, but really not to be that quick and moving forward with this. I think that, you know, I hear council saying, you know, put it to the voters, but I think first the voters put us here to do our job. And I don't think we've done enough right now to get the most from the administration and ways we can work as a unit to create the revenue we need that we don't have to go for Proposition 2.5 override. So I'm hoping my, My fellow councils can see that. I would love to see a date certain for a meeting with the administration, the city assessor, and looking at a list of new growth that we together, that we already know. I mean, we've already talked about the 40B project. We have already talked about Mr. Gabb. We've already talked about Medford Square. I think it's time we need to do that. I mean, it's, And I think we're ready to do that. I think the mayor and administration, hopefully they're ready to come to the table and let's get this done. I think that moving forward with the proposition two and a half override in this process, I think is a little, is a slippery slope in many different ways. So again, like I said, I appreciate the banter, I appreciate the information, but I think it's something that we need to This is our job to find a way to bring everybody together so we can find a solution other than the most drastic. And I know some of us feel like we're ready for the most drastic, but I think it should be revisited in a different light. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. So gentlemen, thank you for being here so late. And we appreciate it. I, you know, I can honestly say 10 years ago, one of my first initiatives was making sure Method brought charging stations to our community. And people said, you're crazy. So this is, this is nice. I can now retire. So if you guys are looking for another consultant, just call me, you know, but we're doing is what you're doing is great. I think that, you know, the biggest concerns we had when neighbors heard, you know, we had that, We've had some serious issues in that that Plaza that, you know, one was a dumpster that was taking in free clothing that turned out to be a disgrace but what what we saw what I saw, and, you know, doing my research. It's so far away. I think it's exactly what we're asking for. I like the concept. I think that probably the only thing that I'd ask, and I'm sure you have the answer, that any of the materials that are gonna be advertised are tasteful and are in good nature with our family atmosphere. I think that's the biggest question I had. Other than that, I love the idea that you're giving back to the community. anywhere we can spread the word, something simple as an election coming up here in September and adding something like that is very important. So anywhere we can add that, where it's not an eyesore, where people love to put those signs in the middle of violence, I think this is a tasteful and respectful way to kill two birds with one stone. So I think it's a great idea. I would support this and we'll approve it.
[George Scarpelli]: What happened? Shut off the microphone.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Councilor Caraviello brings up a good point. If it's 137 for one, and we've always been under the impression that anything over $2,500 comes to this council. And were there any others other than in the past year, other than that 137? Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Just one question. I don't know if it was the KP law attorney or yourself mentioned that, Mr. South, is it true that part of the KP law budget that we're paying for legal representation, that's what pays for the private investigator? Is that coming out of the same line?
[George Scarpelli]: Emotions are high because we have so many gaps and so many needs in this community. And what we're seeing as concerning is that one of the biggest line items is a law department that we've been asking for an understanding where this money is going and no one's told us a thing. Again, I revert back to the first budget meeting we had where I was very concerned That was very intense and understanding these are the questions that are so frustrating. When I teach us on afforded reasonable raise pox and shambles our streets and sidewalks are a mess. And then we present a money paper that counts a caveat was correct. This council voted $5,000. legal fees for representations a month. So we looked at that as $60,000. And we then came in at the beginning of the season, the new term, and we talked with our new Councilors. And unfortunately, we were screaming for a representative that could represent the council legal representation. And that hasn't happened, which has left us in pretty vulnerable situations that actually afforded us few negative situations that came out legally, because we didn't have the representation. And we've asked over and over again. And I believe the council was promised legal representation of this council if that paper was voted on, I believe. And as we look at the budget, we don't have that. So correct that that hasn't been added.
[George Scarpelli]: And I'll say this again, like I said the other evening, normal and other communities, Councilors and the CEO of their communities work together to find solutions to make our city succeed. So it's not, this is the problem. This is a blaring problem. It's just not the mayor who's running the CEO of this community. We understand that. If there was give and taken, we understood, but there isn't. This body has been disrespected time after time. You're coming to us with information that we've been asking for for months, if not years. And then we have to, we have to, under pressure, vote it through so we can run the business of our administration. So it falls on deaf ears when it's a plea that the mayor needs this for all this work. So do we. We're hired to follow the ordinance and laws of this community. And we need that assistance to make sure that we can help this community grow. So again, like I said, if we work together, like was promised, and if we shared our failures and shared our successes together, we could have a lot of great things happen in this community, but instead we're here. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll just leave it at that, but I and I'm gonna, I'll end with this, and I, we understand. We're not naive not to understand that we're a public body and understanding that the confidentiality rules, but that still doesn't allow the administration not to meet with us on understanding what the monies, how much money and where it's going. It doesn't have to be the person's name. It doesn't have to be the situation, but understanding the process, that's all we're asking for. So we could understand that because when we hear things and we sit here like nights like tonight, we're given things, it would be nice to understand that what Mr. South presented They're names all over this, and maybe that's right or wrong, but if we sat with our administration in executive session and explained to us where our money was going and what situation without the person's name, that doesn't affect any kind of privacy issues. So that's all I'm saying. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I do have a question. Councilor Scarpelli. I know that she, we, this is, I know that, We had some difficult times in the budget and presentations. I know that we just received the official budget just the other day, but I was under the impression that there wasn't anything in the budget for the cruisers and then the groundwater remediation. I don't, is that something that just happened recently? Chief, is that?
[George Scarpelli]: Because we're also talking about hybrid vehicles and would we be capable of having the hybrid vehicle with the docking stations and everything like that?
[George Scarpelli]: Right, right. Sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: That's on now. No, I just, you're good. During the regular budget meeting, was this known? Because I thought we asked, when we asked the fleet if we're adding more police cruisers.
[George Scarpelli]: All right. I know that. Thank you, Chief. That's all. That's a great question. And then I know that the recreation, Mr. Bailey could just give us a description of the 50,000 for because I, this is this is the only piece that with the recreation quick question. Recreation is a revolving account. The only way that it survives is a revolving account. So when you take $50,000, it's going to hurt us. So if you just explain just real quick with that, just elaborate what that means with DCRA. I understand, but I think that as we In my capacity, we pay DCR for our ranks too, so if you just elaborate so people can understand what happened here.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so the rink is an enterprise account for revolving. Sorry enterprise enterprise account Okay, so, so this was this what this this isn't wasn't your, you didn't know about this until you took it over. Correct. So, if anybody can anybody tell us what the city. How was, how did we lag and paying this for the last five years, prior to recreation taking it over.
[George Scarpelli]: So moving forward, this payment will not come straight out of the
[George Scarpelli]: All right, but that 50 $50,000 is you're going to be, you're going to be able to recover that 50,000 because I know If we're taking that, you're okay with your programming and... So on a new contract each year, we should be paying it.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, but this came out of this year's account, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: But it came out of the recreation revolving. Correct. So my question is, are you okay financially by taking $50,000 out of your account?
[George Scarpelli]: So without that- I gotta tell you, you're doing a lot with little, and I appreciate it. I mean, the pond and the pool is great. I see the partnerships all over the city. What you're doing together with different entities in the community, I think exactly what makes the recreation department so successful. And I commend you and your team of, I believe, three. By the way, I have 12. just so everybody knows my department. So, but thank you. He's in another city. I'm in another city, correct. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: eliminate security guys at the high school correct that's not true. Because I think that said and I just want to clarify for the public that's
[George Scarpelli]: So again, just the question, because of the the word that was said there was no security. We still have that statement is false. We have the monitors.
[George Scarpelli]: We still have a resource student resource officer too. Correct. And now that I know that opposite. Mosaic was the point person, I believe, maybe I'm wrong, with the monitors. Who does that fall onto now? Was that fall to Chief Buckley's?
[George Scarpelli]: And I agree this when you're talking about security, in a public forum, it's very, very tricky. So I think this is something that maybe the school committee, the city council and the administration should sit down in a committee of the whole with an executive session to really bring up some, making sure that we've, what's going on, especially lately, that we're making sure that everybody's comfortable and that's reiterated together as a team. So again, I thank you and that answers my question. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Molly. Thank you so much, because I know this isn't, This isn't a job that's been in place for many years. This is something that you're thrown into a fire and saying, okay, now you're in charge. And it's very difficult because I'm directly involved in how the money is distributed as a department head and getting involved. The question that I have, and I don't want to put you on the spot, when we're talking about opera recovery, and you're talking about the people that were mostly affected, that was the teachers. Was that weighted to look at what the teachers have gone through and to support whatever money could be used to then work with their administration on what they deserve, which is a reasonable wage increase? Is that something that could have been done?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so again, I know this is a difficult job and there's so many moving pieces, what you can use it for, what you can't use it for. And I know there are some communities that try to manipulate the system to try to get ahead. But like I said, I've seen ARPA move other communities in the most important avenues like libraries and recreation and mental health and education and teachers and seeing where that goes. So I know that it's not apples to apples because our deficiencies are very different than neighbor communities, but you answered that's a glaring question that's a little bothersome to me. So thank you so much. I appreciate your honesty.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I should have made that clear that you're just the person putting the numbers down and handing it off. So it's not the person that's making decisions. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, like I said, though, I think that it's an understanding, just different deficiencies that we had to maintain. But was there ever an opportunity to look at that piece when it comes to funding the teachers and how, I mean, that must have been difficult.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so we know that we said that there were 30 people that. were given- I did not say that. That was an incorrect statement. No, no, I apologize. I'm not sure who said that, but it was inaccurate. No, I apologize. Okay, so I know we had teachers that were pink slipped. I don't know how many there were. Were they all retained now? Are they all back?
[George Scarpelli]: I just wanna take this time to just disclose that I do have a family member who works in the school system. It will not preclude me from voting on the total budget, but I just wanted to make that disclosure.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. So first, thank you very much, Madam FBNA. This isn't easy. I know it isn't easy, but I'm gonna, My fellow Councilors have identified different areas that have been bothersome or questionable that they brought forward. I'm not gonna do that. The first meeting I talked about passionately, talked about the lack of your office and this body to work together to share in the failures and the successes. I was lucky enough to sit next to you for many years and learn a lot from you. And I watched your passion. And my passion was by your chief of staff was promoted that it was bullying. And I found a fence to that because she's one of your leaders. And when you look at the situation that we're in, I find it difficult that That you're coming here tonight, and you're expressing a deep passionate expression of what is important what's happened and that would have been great six months ago, as each situation came about, as we will talk as we wanted. When we were colleagues, we talked about that, having that line of communication, working together. where we can sit and talk about this and understand that, hey, we need these legal fees because of X, Y, and Z. And I know what personal matters, but it's also understanding in executive session, what the city, why we're moving forward. I had non-negotiables. I had non-negotiables and I apologize, I didn't get back to you today. I got into a little fender bender, thank God everything's okay, but I couldn't get back to you. Tonight, you couldn't give me the answers for what I want, my non-negotiables. My number one non-negotiable is having legal representation here. And we talked about that. We expressed that need. It was $50,000 that we looked into that because I give you the example, the BJ situation. We answered a question illegally. So held this city, this council, and a negative light to the courts. So there's no way we're gonna win because we presented it wrong. Where if we had council, those are little things, that's just little things that could lead us where we need to be led. There were times we wanna go to executive session because this council looked unprepared. And we didn't have that guidance. And we didn't have that partnership. My other non-negotiables are educators. Can I speak to that?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so, so with that. We have questions because we're not meeting with you, or we're not getting the answers we need that we've requested. So, normally we would call a city solicitor city so sister city solicitor that would return our calls and answer our calls, or that there weren't overwhelmed. I think Councilman he's not, he's telling the truth when it says when we. when the council from KP Law stated that they don't work for us, they work for you. So what hurts us is, okay, so we have a question that deals with our body and we're not getting the answers because KP Law, sure they were there for X, Y, and Z, but I will tell you, the most impactful attorney that's moved this city forward in many years, was zoning consultant, Mr. Bobowski. And as we move forward to the next step of that we asked for funding, a lot of funding $50,000 I don't think it's a lot of funding we talked about the big scope of of new growth. It was bypassed. So when we're talking about legal representation for the council, they haven't seen that. Like I said, the other piece of this is our teachers. You know my background. I was a former teacher for 15 years. I was lucky enough to coach you. I was involved in the schools as a school committee member for many years. I know what it takes. It's a backbone of our community. And when you talk about your staff here feeling underappreciated, Have you heard what they're saying behind you? The morale is very low. My daughter goes to school there. I'm sure your kids go to school there. They see it. I hear horror stories from neighbors about paraprofessionals being treated like trash, being beaten up by students, and it's difficult to hear. And it's difficult to look at my fellow colleagues in the eye when they're telling me, George, you know what? I'm just leaving. I'm retiring. I trust and I know that helping our community move forward. So I don't, I know, I'm not gonna beat up the school administration, I'm not gonna beat up the school committee. They're doing a very, they're doing what they have, what they're given. I'm just telling you, I just think, especially for what we went through in the last few years, and the people that are on the front line every single day aren't being, aren't being given the respect they deserve. And that's why, and that's not a political ploy. I'm telling you, this is what I feel as a former teacher. I saw what my family members do as teachers. I saw what colleagues have done during the pandemic. It's difficult. And you thought that, everybody thought we'd find a way to support them. And we haven't done that. So I'll be honest with you. I don't feel I know.
[George Scarpelli]: Like I said, and this isn't a slight, I know it's because it's a totally different job than where you were when you're sitting there. But you wouldn't accept what's going on here today. I know that I know that the person I sat with couldn't wouldn't deal with the budget being given such a late time that staff members coming up and disrespecting this body, shutting us down. belittling us, that's unacceptable. So this is how we feel. I know that comments have been made. I know comments have been made that, you know, your department heads feel that we are very aggressive and they don't want to come to us. You know what, it feels both ways when we ask the simplest questions and the simplest requests and we get nothing back. So, and I don't know why that's happening. So, you know, there's a lot of, there's a lot of healing that has to get done, but in the case of the budget itself, There are things that I just haven't seen that are going to give me the ability to move this in a positive light in my eyes. So I just want to let you know that face-to-face. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. And I appreciate all the department heads running around scaring and getting nervous. So you know exactly how I feel. That's exactly how we feel sitting behind this rail. And it's sad that it has to be that, that brings to this point. Because if we would listen to, and that's a sad part of this, because I know that it puts everybody in a bad spot, but that's exactly how we feel. When we get attacked, and we don't have the answer, and no one's answering the question for us legally.
[George Scarpelli]: moving forward. I think just when I just caution the council, I can understand we're looking at a line that doesn't reflect people that are in this building right now. And I know we're looking at a supplemental budget, but no one knows what direction the administration going. So I would caution us moving forward. the real people that work in the building. We really, I just want to think a little bit deeper with that. I should have said something earlier, but the question was moved, but there is, I will support movement when it doesn't have to affect a person that's working in our building every day.
[George Scarpelli]: So again, I'm going to reiterate the same thing I said earlier, and this isn't a gotcha game or anything like that. I just want you to realize As nervous as everybody seems to come to this podium right now, this is how we've been feeling. Do you people understand that when we ask for revenue, we ask for reports, when we ask for something and we don't get it, do you realize that we go and we have to answer to people? And this is difficult, this is very difficult. And maybe two wrongs don't make a right, but I'm gonna tell you, I had non-negotiables. And I was voted by my constituents that said, this is what I put George in there for. And I'm telling you, the way that I feel I've been treated on behalf of the people that put me into this position, I can't vote on the budget. I asked for simple $50,000 so we have representation here for us, because I don't wanna be put in a position that we have. And I can respect our directors coming up and saying how difficult that is. I understand that. I feel exactly how you feel, because I'm in that seat. But as an elected official, we really have one purpose that we have any power on when we don't feel that we've been respected or we're not getting what we need for our constituents. You can call it political theater, whatever you want, but the truth of the matter is, this is the only bargaining chip we have. This vote. And it pains me that we have to go through this. But I cannot support this budget. This whole process has been a mess. It's been a mess. And you can blame every other angle, whatever you want, But not to have a dialogue with us has to pay a dividend, it has to pay a price. And that's why I feel comfortable in understanding that, well, I'm willing to roll the dice and vote no on this budget. Because I'm not happy.
[George Scarpelli]: and set up to make sure that the neighbors all are informed. I know that one of the biggest things that we're seeing, especially with the Eversource project, is a lack of communication with the neighbors. Is there someone that's going to be the person that's going to be meeting with the neighbors and giving them the updates? And then if it affects any I know we always have issues with neighbors that see citizens that need access to the driveways and, you know, access to getting out for dogs appointments, whatnot. But, uh, I want to make sure that's there. So, right.
[George Scarpelli]: Just to notify them that there is going to be some restrictions and travel flow, I think that'll be very helpful. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Who's still awake by now watching.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam Mayor. I think that this is a step in the right direction. I think that, you know, again, this is a process that I'd like for us to sit together. And like I said, and I'll say it over and over again, is share the successes and work on our failures. And I think that's the only way that we can be successful. I made a statement from the beginning that my non-negotiables, I'll take you for your word that that's gonna be adjusted and I think that's my biggest fear was making sure that we have the representation that puts us in a position where we could make the best decisions possible for our community and having that person in place I think is gonna pay dividends. I know this is very, very odd because it was a difficult process, I think. We all stated that. I'm not gonna keep beating that up, but at the same time, I appreciate you coming together and figuring out a way to make this happen in the last hour or so. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate Mr. Rafferty. I know I'll support the second Councilor Knight's motion to waive and move forward. I hope you'll be in front of the council asking for a special time permit for the World Cup in Dubai. So if we can open up at two in the morning, and close at 10 in the morning. I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. If you can, thanks. We won't be watching Italy, but.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that is important that we're very delicate when it comes to. I know some people want specifics and that's very dangerous to do. I know Mr. Murphy, which are saying so it's not, we have to understand that. We can't get into details of our security protocol because all we're doing is announcing possibly to the people with bad intentions. So we have to be very careful. It's a fine line that we have to walk. So I just wanna share that with all the viewers and the people that are here, just be understanding with that. I know what we're saying. We are looking, we ask questions about security. It is a priority both I think for the city council and the school committee. So I just wanted to share my view with that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President?
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate the gentleman coming forward. I appreciate that some of the funding is going to nonprofits, and I appreciate that. But I think that my reservation to all the food trucks right now, especially with the pandemic just passing, is the commitment to a brick and mortar and what would happen with you taking a certain percentage away from a brick and mortar. I think that's something that, before I make my vote, I'd like to hear more of the questions that are coming out. I'm committed to our brick and mortar businesses that have committed to this community, especially during the most difficult times, and bringing an outside entity into a neighborhood that's going to directly compete with a brick and mortar, and their sustainability throughout this process and, and their bounce back, I think that That's my hesitation with all the food truck industry and these pop up events because I think it, you know, if we look at neighboring neighboring coffee houses, and you take 20% of their business from seven to 11, it really is going to hurt their it's going to hurt their bottom line and their bottom line has a lot to do with the fees and fees and permits requests and the limits that they have to live with while being a brick and mortar, as you well know. So, you know, I'd like to, what y'all thought, as both a brick and mortar and a pop-up vendor, like, how would you, how would that impact your event if next door, a coffee establishment popped up a cart, maybe half a mile from your location?
[George Scarpelli]: that's yet to be seen until, how do we find out? We find out when Donuts of the Difference calls us and says, George, we have people just coming in buying donuts, but they're not buying their coffee because they're going to the coffee cart down the street. So that's my reservation. So I appreciate your honesty. I just wanted to be upfront and honest with you. These are my reservations, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: You have Mike's pastry.
[George Scarpelli]: In the Lighthouse Cafe, so.
[George Scarpelli]: But I agree with council, Mr. Schrader, if you talk to neighboring, if this, if there isn't an issue with the push cap, if that, if the neighboring businesses, allow the 21 to 24 days, I wouldn't, I wouldn't, you know, I would recommend that maybe we table this until they petition those other businesses. And if those other businesses approve, I would gladly vote for them. You know, if it's, again, it's only for, I believe it's 21 to 24 days.
[George Scarpelli]: All right. So, I mean, if they did that and they come back and said, to see if we can bring another brick and mortar business, I like the concept because it's a, because what the petition is asking for is a trial to bring in, uh, hopefully a full-time brick and mortar. Am I correct with that? Correct. Right. So I, I agree with Councilor Knight. I think that maybe if we can table this, ask, um, ask our, uh, city administration to reach out to the neighboring, I believe there's four locations that, that directly affect, uh, know, that timeline. I don't, I don't think they'll agree with you. I don't think they'll disagree with me. I just think that we need that. We've been pretty stuck, at least I've been, I've been pretty strict on my decisions and I don't want to and throw anybody away, I say, I don't, I'm not interested, especially with some of the, you know, the downtown empty businesses. I would love to see another business. If we can do that, I appreciate council and I bringing that open mind.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. Letting them know it's only 21 to 24 days, probably less now, but. You know, I really want to support this. So I think that, but again, we have to be fair. Again, this is where we don't have legal representation to help us. And I don't want us to be in a point where we agree for something that it goes back to say, past practice, we've done this and then it hurts us. So I apologize. Procedural has nothing to do with you. Unfortunately, we're a bit of a mess when it comes to legal representation when it comes to our council. So it's kind of a little trouble.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: She was here for public participation but it's paper to dash x x x, if we can, if she can come up and it's a public. We can't take action, right? She can speak, correct.
[George Scarpelli]: So just so you understand what it is, we can hear you because where it falls is unfinished business. We can hear the situation, but we can't rule on anything, just so you know that, publicly.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, Mr. President, if we can just have the petitioner, if she can reach out to the, um, Clark, maybe put on next week's agenda so we can lead her to make sure the engineers here also. You don't have to be here in person if you're we saw the pitches. If you want to come and call in from zoom. We can do that.
[George Scarpelli]: We also have, you know, we can have, that's an issue of handicapped accessibility, if we're saying that a resident is legally handicapped.
[George Scarpelli]: Disabled, excuse me, and we have an issue in front of their residence. This is something that we can, we'll make a resolution and we'll bring it forth next week with inviting all the parties. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Nothing.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, appreciate this reading this. This resolution, I know that Mr. Fitzpatrick, a longtime Method resident, well-known Medford family, loved Medford, and I'm very proud of his Korean War, being a veteran and supporting our country. And sad day in our neighborhood that Mr. Fitzpatrick has now passed on, and we send his family deepest condolences. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. So again, thank you for the presentation. What's glaring right now is that what we have there, what's existing there, and prior to the past location, it was a huge public safety issue because as Mystic Ave backed up, people would fly through the Bank of America parking lot, just cut over onto the sidewalk right in front. It looks like you're putting a landscape, and is that a fence right to the corner?
[George Scarpelli]: Right, we know that. So that's why I would support. I think that the update looks beautiful. I think that, like Councilor Caraviello says, this should be a gateway to our, probably one of our most intriguing neighborhoods for growth and development. And it looks like it's very thorough. I appreciate your hard work on this.
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry, thank you for being here this evening. My question is, are we, has there been issues about working on Saturdays here in Medford?
[George Scarpelli]: Alright, so this job will be done mostly when then, you know,
[George Scarpelli]: How long is estimated time? Do you know?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President Knight for bringing this forward. It's been a very trying year, not only the congratulations for the students, but also our teachers. I think that if you heard them last night, you know how they've worked and how much time and effort they've put in and getting to this point with this class. So the Method High School students, our Method vocational students, and our Curtis tough students. Congratulations on the job well done. And definitely a class that's going to have some great memories, some trying time so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And thank you for Ms. Nigro being here this evening. For my colleagues, I see everything in order. I know that I'll move approval after you give us a brief description. I know we're excited about this business venture and can't wait to get it started, but if you can.
[George Scarpelli]: Excuse me. all the hard work. This is a great venture that you put forth and we're so lucky to have have you here in Medford, and I think it'll be a great example and a shining star to, to really push off into other communities and show them what a great opportunity this can be. So I, I see everything in order, Madam President, after my colleagues speak, I move approve.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. This is a concern that I know we had. We talked, um, yeah, a few years back about some concerns about, um. not having a dog park in the South Method area. And I think that there were some concerns and there were some questions asked if we could possibly use the small park area where the old South Method pool was and we could erect a fence. where we could have it's a wide open space and we talked about possibly putting in a fence there and having dogs run off the leash in that area and there was some banter back and forth and we really didn't get get far with that and we really haven't heard much because of the pandemic and and to be honest the lack of activity down there for from different youth organizations. Well, I know that this past season, they've been some concerns with dogs off their leash, while kids are playing, especially girls softball. That's the phone call I a few phone calls I received. And I did call the mayor's office. And I know that they They talked to the animal control officer. They supposedly sent someone out, but nothing has been resolved. The parents of the youth softball program had some concerns and I wanted to bring this forward so we can shed some light. I understand I'm a dog lover, but I think that the safety of our residents, especially in a park, especially children, I think have to be first and foremost. And I know if there's, there could be a way that we can meet with, you know, I know there's, they're very organized organization for the dog walkers and group in South Medford at Tufts Park, maybe that we can work with meeting with them and the city administration to see if we can find a way that maybe putting in even if it's a temporary fence and the gate that that people really want to leave, take the dogs off the leash that there is an area there that's enclosed. I know that they're very respectful dog owners and they clean up after the dogs and that's not an issue there and but it is a concern that even though the dogs are playful, it's left some negative marks in a few children's eyes and dogs are off leash that, you know, see a child that's playing with the ball and the dog runs up and thinks that it's playtime and they take the glove away from the child, it leaves a negative mark and it's frightening. So these are things that are concerning. I know, you know, it might have been one or a few issues, but as this happened and the word cut out, I got a few phone calls from parents that the children play in the playground area and they They, they shared some concerns about the dogs around the other side of the fence and, you know, having the child run outside of the playground area onto the into the park they had some concerns so there are some valid issues there and I think that this is something we need to revisit as a council before. something serious happens. And again, if it's an isolated incident, that's fine, but still, now that we know this is happening, I don't want the next isolated issue being something where a child gets bit and we could have done something about it. So I know that, I know the police, we've tried to, I've asked for patrol, I've asked for the animal patrol officer to go out patrol the area, but from what I've gathered from the parents, there hasn't been enough visibility from the city's departments that are protecting the children in that area. So if we could just maybe make a motion to ask the report from the city administration and what they've done and that we can share with the community and then to see if the city can reach out. I know that the city administration told me that there's actually a person that organizes a lot of the dog activity there that we can maybe work together and try to see if there's something we can do that can accommodate all the parties and make sure that we can put maybe even if it's a temporary safe, at least during the sports seasons, that they have that area on the side that we can fence in that would separate them.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Madam President, I recall that strictly I know there were a couple issues that they, I think it's a big enough area that that dogs can run free and I think that another question that was brought up by that organization is that there wasn't enough separation from small dogs and big dogs so I don't. To be honest with you, I think my first priority is the safety of the children in that playground. So let's see if we can move forward, see if we can find some sort of even just, even make it a pilot program for the rest of the summer, just to see how that works and then go from there. But right now, I think that's something that has to be imminent. I don't want to be sitting here in a week and there was no action and a child was bit by a dog. I just, I feel terrible. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you. Council bus brings forward. This is a happy day for a great person but a sad day for this community. Mr. Mulkey, I don't think I've ever met somebody so well-versed in their position in this building in a long time. He is prepared, educated, calm, cool, collective. And even under the most strenuous circumstances, I've never seen the man in a negative light ever in my life. He was someone that you would call and hope that he would give you the answer that you wanted. But when you hung up the phone, you were confident. And even though you didn't get the answer that you needed or you were looking for, you felt confident because you were educated enough to answer our constituents with a lesson and anything that we needed in our community, dealing with a code enforcement issue or a building issue or, I mean, the simplest things, the most intriguing items. So it's gonna be sad because we seldom work with many department heads, especially lately, that will call you back in a timely fashion, listen to your concerns and find a solution for you, whether it's what you're looking for or not within minutes. And to say that he wasn't one of the busiest department heads in this community for a long time would be an understatement. So I wanna thank him for his service. I wanna thank him for his commitment to the city, his ability to probably lead, I think, one of the best departments in the city. I think his whole staff is a true reflection of his personality and his educated background. I think he has made his staff multi-talented. I don't think we have one, inspector downstairs one officer downstairs that that isn't well versed in many different building topics. And I think it's because of his leadership. And when you talk to those people, not one ever have a bad thing to say a negative word to say. And They're always working as a team, always supporting each other. And it's comical. If you look at that department, and if you can only clone that throughout the community and society, boy, we'd be a better place today. And a lot has to do with Paul Mulkey. So, you know, we're going to miss him. I hope that one of his staff will be the next to succeed him, because I think he has groomed them in his fashion. So, again, thank you Council yes bringing this forward. I'm sorry Mr. celebration, but publicly I want to say thank you and if we can ask them to come up and make a motion to have them come to our next meeting and present him with a citation of service and something that we could publicly thank him I think would be important and I think that'd be well deserved. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: point of information I know we did have I know I had a few calls about the South Street intersection and the work that was being done by EvoSauce overnight because the I believe the chief had decided that due to safety concerns of that intersection they needed to do it overnight so I don't, they haven't stopped the process. I think they're sort of working backwards now. That's what it seems like to me. So, but again, it'd be nice. And this is, again, this is where, when we first sat down with Eversource, when they came to talk to us, one of the biggest things I kept saying, and I think all of us have said, having a representative paid for by Eversource or by the utility companies to be the clerk of the works. We can't expect our city engineer to be the person that is sitting there making sure that they're held accountable because it's not feasible. But at the same time, this is something we're lacking in our community. Other communities have the clerks of the works that make sure that all these jobs are being, you know, you know, all the neighbors in the areas are being informed, making sure that, you know, the preparation isn't hindering traffic, that the cleanup is done satisfactory, so constituents aren't left with concerns and issues after they leave. Again, we're gonna keep coming across this until we have someone with boots on the ground there that's making sure that they're responding back to the city engineer or DPW director in some communities or the mayor's office. So this is definitely an issue. I think we've lost communication again with Eversource. They get to a certain point and then they forget that they have to report keep people informed. And that's, that's not good business. So again, utilities shine again. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you. Councilor Tseng for bringing this forward. I think that as the former chair of the transportation subcommittee, it was daunting to get their assistance. But one thing I realized that I would if we can add is maybe using some influence with someone in this room that maybe could bring someone from the transportation department to our meeting and actually have a voice there that can answer some questions. So I think that maybe adding an invitation for someone from transportation to come in and help with that. So I don't know who that person can be, but maybe if we can, um, ask, uh, uh, clerk her to be, so if he can reach out to maybe any of his, uh, former colleagues, if we know of any to really just to push, I know you've been, you work very closely with me, uh, uh, Mr. Her to be seen clerk her to be used to, to get some initiatives pushed forward in the last few years because of your, your, um, knowledge of some people in the DOT and hopefully that might help to get someone to our meeting. So if we, I would second the motion to make this into a committee of the whole meeting. And then I would also add to add someone from the MBTA to be there as a representative.
[George Scarpelli]: You have vast experience, I think. You may be adding your guidance. I think that in the past, you've led me to bring in all the stakeholders. So, you know, the stakeholders that are really in charge of making these decisions, I think I leave that to you. If you can guide us a bit, I'd appreciate it. Done. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thermoplastic, I got four words for you. Thermoplastic sidewalks. Yeah, thermoplastic. So whatever we can.
[George Scarpelli]: So the is a date, daytime hours.
[George Scarpelli]: How long would that take? Oh, it would be just one day. All right. And would it impact impact any neighbors driveways or anything? I don't believe so. No. All right. That's a case.
[George Scarpelli]: So first, thank you for coming out tonight. I know that first I want to thank Chief of Staff Nazarian. I had some questions last week and I've been championing a sidewalk hot top crew for, I think, since the year I started. I think that until we do that, and it's good to hear that we're trying to find some equipment and have some onsite with our staff, but until we do that, even if we catch up, if we don't have, this isn't ongoing, year round as soon as the week that the cement is is mixed and we can stop pouring cement. This is going to, it's just going to continue no you know as well as I do. So I'm glad to see that we're trying something I, I, you know, I did talk to the mayor and I know we have some budget concerns coming up and I know it's difficult hiring a whole new crew, but it's something that when keep coming to us and the city keeps coming to us and asking for $250,000 million. It's frustrating, and I'm sure you can understand that. It's frustrating because this isn't an issue that just happened this year. This isn't this is something that's been going on for years. So, you know, I've always been taught to think ahead and try to find a way, not only to try to fix the solution, but make sure we stay ahead of that, that that's that problem as we move forward. So, those are my concerns and my questions I think that with that. The other concerns I had were the fact that unfortunately the procurement system is that has to go out to bed. And what I fear, and working municipality I get a different advantage by talking to colleagues that I work with and understanding the lack of true contractors that are out there. that aren't busy that aren't working that can do masonry work that that's a piece that I'm hoping we have licensed masons or people that work with cement I hear in some communities that they're bidding out to landscapers, and they're making big bucks because they can bid for an easy, an easy buck because no one else is bidding for them. So, I just, we just want to make sure that we're, we're handling that the correct way and making sure that we're staying on top of that. Because again, We have a crew that comes out there and uses the wrong mix or pours it the wrong way or whatnot and slopes it the wrong way. And now it's turned into a rain issue in someone's neighborhood or someone's property. So these are concerns that it's comical that people just listen to your concerns that you want to express as a council that constituents have asked for and said, shame on you for not wanting to fix sidewalks. you'd be a fool not to want to fix sidewalks, okay? I think everybody here wants that done. I think making sure that all of our questions are answered and we're putting the best foot forward, which I think the assessment's a great, great step. I know that I've talked to the mayor and people, from what I gather, we're looking at the most needy sidewalks where most dangerous sidewalks correct it's not going to be people aren't going to jump because somebody calls from one side of the city or not and everything wants to get done in front of this person's house of that we're going to we're going to track we're going to go after the number one sidewalks.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I appreciate that. And this is why this meeting is so important. I appreciate you coming out tonight. I think that the last piece is, in the past, we've asked for lists. We've asked, just tell us. The proof is in the pudding people want to see so when they when we would ask in the past can we have a list. It was daunting so I'm glad to see that we have this assessment that we can, we can actually now chart and follow the data as we're taking them off. So I know I talked to the mayor and she said that that's not going to be a difficult task now we can now be informed. of you know maybe monthly updates saying this is what we did and this is where we're going so it gives us a good understanding what what's getting done so we can actually see it and you know we you know the question a lot of times in the past um is we just bonded 250 000 and it doesn't seem like we've done anything well it was tough for us to say well look at this area this year because we didn't know so i think that it's important that we get that data as well
[George Scarpelli]: you know, to ask for the DPW commissioner for once this project had started, even for a monthly update, that would be great. And I'll end on a personal note. I kid you not, as I'm walking in here, fellow Councilors heard my wife call me crying. Avid runner, marathon runner, going for a nightly run, raised sidewalk, hit their foot, hit the top of the race sidewalk, and now my daughter's taking her to the doctor. So this is stuff that, this is what you wish, as we're going through, it's that important. And I'm sure I'm just one case. And so it's imperative that we need to get these sidewalks fixed. We need to focus on our infrastructure. It's a vital piece of our community. We all know that. So, and again, the questions I brought up in last week's meeting where I think very valid and appreciate the answers. I think that between the chief of staff, the mayor, and two fine gentlemen in front of us, I think that I'm satisfied with what direction we're moving into, and I hope we see some real movement, and I appreciate that. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, sorry. Qualified bidders though, Tim, are we getting qualified construction companies?
[George Scarpelli]: It's understandable to the- Yes, I agree to that. Okay, thank you. That'll be nice, that'll be helpful. All right, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I couldn't review it, so I apologize.
[George Scarpelli]: It sounds like it's going to be a great Italian restaurant.
[George Scarpelli]: Me neither.
[George Scarpelli]: I mean, if we, if like, again, we've done this in the past with petitions that we could ask any questions that we normally ask and then revert back to if the clerk could send us so we could table it for one week and then vote. You don't have to be in next week, but we can vote on it.
[George Scarpelli]: It's on the agenda, but it's not. It's on the agenda.
[George Scarpelli]: It's 22-348, petition convict to license for Barry Rafferty, 51 Crocker Road.
[George Scarpelli]: Page five. Yeah, so it's been advertised, but yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: you know, the, the, uh, the proper paperwork be reviewed. Um, the next week's meeting, I know that, um, again, I, I can't approve anything. I don't have in front of me. So I don't know nothing. It's Mr. Raft. I want to move forward myself, but, um, common practices. We reviewed the paper, the documents, make sure that all the departments have signed off on it. And if, you know, if we can look back on, there was a a tequila restaurant that was supposed to open that didn't have paperwork that was signed. Hence, now we have a delay. So I just want to make sure that we have that paperwork documented. So I would move forward with it. And if you could send us the copy of the documents with all department heads clearing this, I would move forward with it.
[George Scarpelli]: needed. We've looked at all the documentation. Everything is in order. Again, just the only thing is that the extended hours of operation is through special permit. So other than that, I find everything in order. And after my colleagues' questions, I would move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can.
[George Scarpelli]: I know that as we looked at other, the only question that I had that was brought to my attention was the voting record for municipal elections. Is that something that's weighed as we, as the mayor processes? Cause I know that that wasn't a concern with other applicants. So that's, I know that they shared her voting history and obviously she's a strong supporter of the four year elections, but in the two year elections, and this is, a very important piece of our process here at Medford. So if we can get some.
[George Scarpelli]: I only say that because it was shared, so.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you again. Again, I want to reiterate, I appreciate that somebody new to our community wants to get involved. I appreciate that. There are multiple. positions that are open right now that would probably be a better fit considering she does have a stellar resume. I think she's a very talented individual and someone that could really provide a benefit to the city. But like I said earlier, we were given the, to be honest with you, I wouldn't, I saw her voting record and Councilor Knight hit the nail on the head. We're actually voting for a commissioner and it's nice that people want to do it, but it's a commissioner that's never voted in a two year election. So I can't see how we can support it legitimately. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: President, maybe we lost the petitioner, but I just find it, I find it bothersome that again, utilities, we seem to have the biggest issues with utilities. And they're not here to represent on this petition. So I do understand Council nights. Support of Mr. Randazzo is probably one of the best in the city. I think that I would say I trust him wholeheartedly. But there are questions that I would like to ask the petitioner that is that would be very important for the residents of that area to make sure they're going to follow through what is asked for in this petition. I know this is what was asked by the by the director, but until I have a representative from National Grid that I can talk to, I wouldn't support this tonight. Apologize, but no further discussion.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: I would, hope that my fellow Councilors would reconsider their vote for making these changes. I've heard from numerous residents of the community and the negative impact it will have for the members of our community to have an opportunity for a voice publicly is something that would be detrimental to the growth of our community. And I think that, again, I reiterate the council's made some great points of our subcommittees and our subcommittees have done some great work. And I think that you are correct with that. But I still think that we haven't done our due diligence to see what our lives would look like by adding subcommittees on the other days, other than Tuesdays and Wednesdays, to see if we can still maintain the Tuesday night regular meetings. for the sake of the public and having that voice as an open forum to share any concerns or discussions they might want to have shared to this council and for any issues that represent our residents. So I hope we can reconsider. I know that we've had dialogue, we've had open dialogue, we've shared our concerns, We've agreed to disagree, but I would just hope that we can reconsider and realize how important these Tuesday nights are to our whole community. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, you could still have subcommittees on those other days, Madam President, thank you in the subcommittee check and call them whenever they want.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information. Councilor Knight had mentioned that it started here and then it moved to subcommittee. So yes, that's here. So now we're eliminating that for two weeks. So that's what, and believe me, this is not personal. I still love Councilor Knight. I'll always love Councilor Knight. But this is just, again, we agree to disagree. And I guess the vote will show and we move on. This is why we love our country. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Last thing, because I don't know if I missed something because we are all highly educated people behind this rail. And I don't know if I missed this along the way. Maybe one of you can answer this. Are we at any time hindering the process of properly having subcommittees by not allowing a four-meeting month. Is there something that I'm missing? Because everybody keeps saying that we're getting so much done in subcommittees. We're getting so much done in subcommittees, and I totally agree, but I'm just a little confused. Everybody keeps saying this. I just need clarification. Did I miss something in a document that said that we cannot have subcommittees any other day to perform this great work we're all doing? Did I miss that? Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I just want to thank you too I think this is a difficult position. And I know when there's ever a question. You're always there to help so we appreciate all your hard work. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Like I said, she's probably a wonderful person. I just, if I didn't see a resume or have anyone talking on behalf, I don't know who she is. So if I can, I don't know if we go to committee of the whole, but just to get her information, if there's any way that maybe for next week, if we can, you know, just table to next week. Yeah, just to, I'd like to get the background if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, at least I saw it. Well, I'd be happy to hear from you. Yeah, no, if that's the case. I just wanted some information.
[George Scarpelli]: So I think what I was saying before it was kind of, it's just, I, it's either we know an applicant or we would read their resumes. So we have an idea. I don't think I don't need a committee the whole meeting I think that if you read someone's resume I get to see who they were what what their background was I think that would be enough for me so to me to table this until we get just the resume this week to vote on it next week. I don't think it will hold us up that much, but I just think that. It, to me, that's, you know, we've gone through, like last week, we voted, like I said, I knew a few when I saw our resumes. So to me, that gave me enough confidence with the, you know, the background check that was done by our city administration. So that would be my motion.
[George Scarpelli]: First of all, we've done in the past. We've done in the past is we've seen, like I said, giving you example, Mr. Miller and I've known him. Personally, I know his background, and I'm confident with what I know. I also, I, other, other, other. other participants resumes that to me, that's fine. I think just the resume, plus the added vetting of Sandy and her staff and the administration, I think that all I just wanna see is what their background is. I think that to me, that's all I need. So that's all I would ask for if someone wants to add to that, you're more than welcome. But right now, I think a simple, their resume just to get a better idea of what we think personally, I think it's important.
[George Scarpelli]: So for minutes archive isn't that important, don't you think, is there a way that we can that could be capable of all these meetings that our public should be stored and as part of record correct.
[George Scarpelli]: can I make sure that I'll record that with that information that we have this administration just get back to us to make sure we do have that information that that's part of our mission going forward with the new technology. I think it's very important. Is that something that people get back to us to say, I'd like to see the minutes of the meeting or rerun of the meeting for individual purposes. So if we can, that'd be something I'd like the administration to follow up with, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Any further discussion sounds like political theater and the council president.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you again. Thanks Rick for bringing that up. I know Kenga, you've dealt with a lot of reporters in our days and I think that you have by far been the most fair and we appreciate that. There are times when you don't agree You disagree, you might disagree what you you right but you are always fair, there's always two sides, and at least you've tried you can see that you made an effort to look at both sides and I think that that's that says a lot. I know that it makes me angry and sad for the fact that I talked to one of the one of the editors just a few years ago when she told me that the commitment of this newspaper was really to go back to the roots of community. And here we are looking at the total opposite. So I will express my displeasure to her personally tomorrow again. And I won't hesitate to call them a liar because they lied. I mean, They came to me for two reasons. One, as a city councilor and two, covering my position in the neighboring community, where they wanted to maybe push the community aspect and really get really community based. And instead of doing that, they've turned it all around. And now what I've heard from a lot of people, from all sides, it's just, they're all disappointed that there is no, there is no message to be sent or they can read online or get that paper and share the information that a lot of people still like to get. That newspaper is something that's very important to people's lives. And maybe not to the younger generation, but to the older generation, it's a huge part of what they do every day. And I'm sad that we're seeing that go. But again, I'm sure you'll do great things at the Statehouse, but I'm not happy about that. So, but thank you for everything you've done.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. We recently know that we just received information from the mayor's office that they're putting together a task force to look into contract trash removal contract that's up and coming. This resolution was driven for the fact that conversations with people that really aren't truly in tune with the recycling format and, and this came about and having conversation my neighbors is, we were looking at what we were, what people were throwing away and how many people don't really use as much trash, and the recycling bin being being overflowing with talking to maybe asking the city to do it twice. You know, doing it every week with the recycling, and the basic. understanding of opening, it sounds bad, but we went through one of my neighbor's recycle bins and it was comical. They said, I'm a very good recycler. I know exactly what I'm doing. And then you notice that what the rules are and what people don't know in the city of Medford, at least people that really aren't in tune to it, that I gave them an example that they had a pizza box and the pizza box has said, yeah, it's empty. And I said, we'll see this grease spot on the pizza box. Recycling, if you enter that into the recycling in Redemption Center, they take that and they void that whole barrel. because that grease on that carton voids it. So it's really trying to make sure that we have a way to educate all of our constituents. It's nice to think that everybody's in tune to recycling, but not understanding the true rules and what takes and what they don't take and understanding that if they go through something and they see a jar of peanut butter that hasn't been cleaned out, that voids the whole barrel. From what I've been told, it's not apples to apples as we look to true data when we go to the contract. So the hope is, I saw the contact from the mayor's office and that we're starting, did anybody else get that? Yeah, so they're starting a task force. And I think one of the biggest pieces we need is just, Part of this is to make a resolution and put it out there that we ask for a process that we find a way to educate our constituents on the do's and don'ts of recycling. Something simple, bullet points, even a one-page tutorial which shows the basic concepts, because I don't think people understand for the fact that what the contract will look like moving into our next contract negotiations because it's going to be expensive. It's going to come back to the taxpayers. So I just want to make sure that I brought that up this evening. I'm excited to see that the mayor is already moving forward with this and putting together a task force that's going to be addressing this. I just ask that, you know, really an education piece has to be in the forefront. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: And it would be nice is to share this site this is this is perfect that it realizes that as part of the education piece I think that once, and it's not the people like I said it's not, it's not the person that's really invested in recycling, it's the common person that really doesn't understand, and, you know, when you look at the numbers when it comes down to it. we're losing a lot in trash where people think they're doing the right thing. So education, I think is key.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam Superintendent, I know that this is something that I think we would be foolish not to support this evening. I think my biggest, my first question is, when would we know if we would be accepted or what we would be awarded if that's the case? Do we have a timeline with that?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. And the reason why I bring that up is because of what cuts have is did say that it's definitely will be substantial. And what we need to look at is not just the high school, but as we're moving forward other capital projects are other new schools that are new anymore that following disrepair themselves. we can go on and on fire station, we could talk about, uh, different city buildings and, you know, other wishes and hopes. So I think that, um, not, I don't know how I don't want to put this, just I think to put, put the administration on notice that when it comes to money and that vote, we're all would hope we'd all vote unanimously to see where this goes tonight. But as we move forward, I think it would be travesties that we don't have true numbers. When you look at what else we have to do in the city. Because the worst thing I want to see is, you know, pitting one group against the other what we need, we don't need this in our community. So I think that having that capital plan in place so we can look at actual figures. So we can make educated decisions when the time comes because I, I certainly don't want to deny it when it comes time for talking about money. And I don't want to deny it because I don't know what the rest of the needs of the community going to be. So that's all I would ask. Um, not that it's a warning, but it's just a just to get the word out there. I don't want to be. The council says no on a money paper dealing with improvement of schools when we don't know what's happening with the rest of the community. So I would hope that, um, the administration really pays attention to that as we move forward because I, you know, I walked to the school the other day and my daughter goes there and my son graduated there and I coached there for years and it's just can't keep ahead of it, it's just a, it's, it's nobody's fault but times, and it's it's a mess so we know it has to be done there's a lot of Um, I think we're losing our kids now. I think unfortunately we're losing a lot of kids to different school systems, whether it be Matt and on, you know, we will, we all thought just a few years ago, Matt and on was a school of the past. Now, all of a sudden it's revitalized and we see droves of method kids leaving. And that's one of the reasons why parents tell me they're leaving is because of you've seen Medford high school. And that's just. not the way to be. I think, you know, we're very fortunate that we have great teachers, administrators at the high school that, uh, make me feel comfortable knowing that my daughter is getting a great education and she's gonna move forward for the next step chapter in her life on a solid footing. But, um, you can't defend some of the things we see with some of the parents that lead for that reason. So, um, I hope my colleagues all support this and, like I said, when it comes down to the real thing and we start talking about real money that we need to find a way to make sure we fund these, these important issues, so thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I know Mr. Miller is here this evening, but speaking on, for one, Councilor, he's Anything you see with the name Henry Miller and associated has to be something that's upright and and for the best of our communities always been someone that's taken the lead. There have been times that I've gotten phone calls from the gentleman and he didn't like what you heard in the other line but it was the truth and it made you open your eyes. You wish the city had 1000 Henry Miller and and to see that he steps up again to volunteer to be part of one of the most important commissions that we have in our community is speaks volumes for the gentleman so. This is a no-brainer to support Mr. Miller on this commission, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: No, thank you, Council President. Thank you, Council. Vice President Baez, you summarized that in depth and appreciate it. I know that again, just to reiterate, unlike what has happened on the school committee side, that the word that keeps coming back out there is that We're changing the rules to stifle our constituents. That's not the case. Reiterate what Councilor Beall said. This will always have a forum here in this chambers for this council that any participant, any resident of the city can come to that podium and speak on any issue that they think is prudent or they need that to get off their chest. I think that was important. The policy is still in place where it's not debatable, but there's a process where if a community member does want something on the agenda to speak and discuss on that agenda we can do that so this is definitely a venue that is still for the people and have options for the people to speak. So other than that, to reiterate the other piece that was out there that has some debate is the amount of meetings per month. I know that there is some debate, whether it's two meetings or bi-weekly meetings, excuse me, bi-weekly meetings or weekly meetings, I still think, and that's still on the agenda. So other than that, I see everything is in place and I would move for approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. Thank you, Madam President, and thank you, Nina, for being here tonight. Um, I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna be consistent with my vote with this process. I think that when, uh, Madam Mayor was part of this committee, we both agreed and looked at the process of bonding every year of 250 now $1 million for something that, um, I actively at the time years ago, went out and secured a breakdown financial breakdown of, uh, a truck, three employees, what it would cost to have three more DPW employees, as other communities have, a sidewalk and hot top crew that work for you year round. And I believe at that time it was $250,000. And that was a one-time cost. Then all that was left was the payment of the three employees for the year. I kept bringing up the same piece if we're going to figure out a way to spend $250,000 and only getting a few sidewalks done, or having no crew for doing hot, hot patch or hot top. pothole remediation that we look into at budget season. I put forth the recommendation every year that we input a hot top and sidewalk crew for this reason. And so I'll reiterate this. I know it needs to be done. I won't support it because I have historically said over and over again the redundancy of this this ask could be gone and we could be now looking at a crew of three extra employees in the city that could then assist other departments when needed. There are so many benefits to adding a sidewalk hot top groove that I just think that this is fundamentally fiscally wrong coming up and asking for bonds every year for 250, 500,000 this year is a million dollars. So I can't support it. And that's the only reason why I think that it's the studies that we brought forth, the numbers we brought forth in the past shows that this doesn't have to be a bonded item. It doesn't have to be a loan. this could be a department in our city that would help us throughout the year and fulfilling the need of our community as we go. So, um, just wanted to make sure that you knew wasn't nothing personal. This is something that I've been preaching for since I came on this council years ago that it's, uh, I did my due diligence. I did my homework. I put a few local DPW commissioners put plans for it that I submitted to the, to the council at the time, the mayors at the time. And I just think this is, again, it's another, another year that I'll be saying this, a million dollars. I know it doesn't come from the same pool, but a million dollars spent, $250,000 spent one way would save us a million dollar discussion today. So I just think it's a redundancy that we don't need anymore in this community with this. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Historically, I've done the homework. We've mentioned this both as former Councilors and former, like Councilor Caraviello says, this isn't just this administration. It's been every administration before that, that we've sat and talked about this and we keep bonding so much money. And then the question comes back at the end of the year, we sit with the DPW director, we say, what do we get done? Well, unfortunately the contractors couldn't do this or couldn't do that. And then unfortunately came into the season when we couldn't pour cement anymore. And then we lose our window because we help hold everything out to outside agencies where if we have our own department three person department with our own equipment. As soon as the weather breaks and as soon as the cement can cure. and other communities, boom, they're out there and they're working, they're putting sidewalks in, they're replacing sidewalks and then when cement can't be cured, now it breaks right into the winter season and potholes have to be filled. Those crews that were doing cement sidewalks, they're now filling potholes all over their cities, making sure that that's kept up. So, again, it's, I understand you don't know the history of it and That's something maybe I should I should touch base the earlier so but I think this is something that I've said over and over again for years that this is something that we really need a dedicated crew. And if I supported this tonight, that would come on budget season and say, well, why would why would we need to look into into hiring our own cruise if we're going to accept the million dollar bonds every time it comes forth. So that's why I have to stay away from this and not support it. So that's the only reason why. It's because it's something that I feel strongly about for many years, not just today, but in many different administrations. I mean, it goes all the way back to the McGlynn era. So it's not that expensive. if we could do a cost analysis. I know it's a little bit more than it was back in the day, but it was one truck and the equipment that was needed. And, you know, the only reoccurring cost is the three staff members that could definitely be used in different sections in our DPW when needed. So when we weren't in season for sidewalks. So again, thank you for understanding.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Councilor Caraviello for bringing this forward. One thing you haven't seen here in a while is Mr. Eller, and unfortunately, you know why now, and I know he He was a strong man and felt very, very confident in his convictions. And he wasn't afraid to tell you either. He'd look you right in the eye and tell you, you don't know what you're talking about. And you can't begrudge a person that loves Medford that much in its budget system and the way he wanted to see it run. And he made you what I liked about Mr. He told you right to your face. He didn't, he didn't hide behind anybody. He challenged you. And, um, you know, he made my knees quiver a few times and some of the questions he's asked me because he was a very intelligent person and, uh, something that, um, one thing you, you can't deny is that he loved metric. Um, and you could tell. by how many meetings he came and expressed his concerns about this city's fiscal responsibilities and where they were going. So he will be missed. So he is right. He's did say a lot of it's like Nostradamus of the financial world here in Medford. So, but he will be missed. So it's condolences to his family.
[George Scarpelli]: So we did ask, did you, I guess, I mean, I guess what we heard is that Verizon is working, but there is something going on with Comcast and a piece of equipment at the station that needs to be replaced. And I believe they're looking into it right now. So I guess Verizon, you can't see everything's fine, but it's the Comcast connection that they're trying to fix.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Councilor Knight, for bringing this forward. True words couldn't be spoken. Mr. Mosaic is a true gentleman. When you're talking about the last of The old guard that I remember in high school where there was a team of maybe six security guards that roam the vast hallways of Medford High School keeping the peace. As time went on, Mr. Mosaica became the total opposite of what you think a security guard was. He was a person that kids could speak to, a person that when you needed a strong arm, he was there. When you needed an ear to talk to, he gave it to you. And I think every kid that walks the halls at Medford High School, love and respect Mr. Mosaica. He is truly a gentleman. It was, I don't think I've ever heard a negative word said about Mr. Mosaic. And it is a contentious job, you know, at times you have to be the heavy in the school, where it's a suspension or removal of a student or, you know, or a faculty member, Mr. Mosaic was the person that had to be that heavy. And he was always there with respect and kindness. And I'm glad that he's retiring and I wish him well and his family well. So thank you, Madam President, for giving me the moment.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Thank you, Councilor Biazzi. This is, I know that you do your due diligence, but again, I've represented myself in the same fashion Councilor Knight has spoken, so it would not be legal to point, but I will not support this paper for those facts as well, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. This is off topic, but I've just received about eight to 10 text messages and emails that again, the system is breaking down. Um, people can't watch it's coming in and out. So I just wanted to make you aware of that, Madam President, that if we can let the administration know that if we could figure this out, because I tried to watch the rest of the meetings last night and a few other meetings, and it was coming in and out. Not to say that it's our professional that's working here tonight's fault, but there's obviously some technical issues going on. And it's a mess, and this is what's, you know, we need to correct that. I know that on this topic, Madam President, I agree with you, but I'm going to stand firm on what I have been voting on for the last few months. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Knight brings up some good points, and I won't reiterate them, but I think that there's two very important issues that I received some feedback from. One being the restaurant owners coming off the pandemic right now, even waiting until 2023 to kick this off, it's still something that they're little setback and still under the pandemic effects of their financial restraints and that's one. Second, I know that Ms. Hunt did a wonderful job presenting and doing the best she could, but after the meeting, I got feedback that I note that she mentioned that only a handful of restaurants returned the surveys. I was notified by about four that were watching the meeting that said they would never even were approached or had any knowledge of a survey that would help us make a decision. as well as what Councilor Knight brings forth, I think it's enough for me to just slow down and try to revisit this. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: The concerns of lack of afterschool programming in our Medford public schools and asking us for some assistance. I've, um, this is my, my, my profession. And I think there's some viable solutions that we can discuss working as a partnership with the, uh, public and, uh, the municipal and the school department as a partnership and working together and creating a revolving account that would put a safe and prosperous program for any of our students that are in need of after-school programming. I've heard a lot of phone calls, talked to a lot of people, and we have some locations that take care of our students. excuse me, low income through vouchers. And we have the residents that can pay high fees to that can pay for an after school program, but they're still not reaching all of those groups, and then there's a group in the middle that's being left out because they do fall in the middle. So there is a process that I'm hoping that if we can amend this, that we would invite all the parents that have reached out to our I'd like to call for, I know we've asked for a subcommittee meeting, but in the near future to set up a subcommittee meeting for the recreation youth. And if we can meet with the recreation department, someone from the mayor's office, a representative from the school department, if we can, and maybe sit down and put a plan together that we can put a program that would house the needs of our community until, which is the big issue, until we find a recreation facility that other communities have that are fulfilling these needs. So if you would indulge me, I appreciate that, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. And thank you for bringing this forward. I know it's important, yes, living with an avid marathon runner. The people that are taking on this massive endeavor is something that I look in amazement and awe. Unfortunately, Dina took the year off this year and should be back next year. But to all those brave souls that are going to give it a whirl on Monday, wish them good weather and Godspeed. So thank you and good luck.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. This Subcommittee on Science had tried to do our due diligence. Unfortunately, both the petitioner, the petitioner hasn't fulfilled his requirements, so I believe they're trying to set up a meeting with the building department to properly put the paperwork in order and proceed in the correct process that is asked upon them. So we hope to, I believe we tabled that, and we're waiting for future contact with the petitioner. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, if I can. Please. Excuse me. Quick question. I apologize, did you say you were handicapped? Did you?
[George Scarpelli]: Do you have a placard?
[George Scarpelli]: And did they put a handicapped spot on that street for you?
[George Scarpelli]: I hope we get to find a resolution for what Our neighbors are going through on Bradley Road, but this is something that as we move forward, I think it's something that we should talk with the traffic commission, maybe hold a meeting with the residents of Bradley Road, because this is something that's been going on for years and no one has listened.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, maybe there's other solutions that we could talk to the traffic commission when the time comes. So let's hope we can find the resolution for the biggest issue and then revert back and circle back to the traffic commission, because that's important. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Councilman. for expressing those concerns. I echo all of them. I think it's important that as we as we hear so often, even this evening, that a lot of the issues we're having with parking has nothing to do with method residents. It has people that come outside of method that want to use our recreational spaces or our restaurants or our theaters and, um, and it really displaces the quality of life of our residents. So if we can, like Councilor Knight said, you know, in the case that we've had in other locations and it's worked, I think we need to follow up on this stretch of road as well. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Maybe, you know, and I'm just saying, and I'm not saying you know maybe we can maybe we can maybe we can ask, I'm assigned to, I know they're thin but with this being such a dire situation having a assigned member for office. They're working directly with the families and the homeowners of Bradley will be an advocate even for the state because you know this is really this is this is getting out of control, but I think with this is such a dire situation I think that. And one of the biggest things is having someone on the other line I think that's important. I think the least we can do is recommend that, uh, Miss Hunts puts a identified representative from their office that's going to work directly with the people of Bradley Road because of because of this die situation. I don't think they'll block at that. I think that they'll they'll really work hard to do that. But I think that's very important. That, you know, where we were handcuffed, at least you should have an avenue within our city hall that are going to at least point you in the right direction and make sure that someone's going to be on the other line because I can't, I can't even imagine what you're going through right now. And the stress level, at least we can do is ask the city. to take that stress level out, so they can help you move forward those chores so no thank you if I could recommend that that'd be something that no I appreciate that because you know I did make a call this week and the woman says where you can go live in a shelter.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I think if we can do that, because there are avenues and I know that it's easy for us to sit on this side. And it's easy because we have, you know, we have homes right now but the idea of what you're going through. We don't, we can't say we understand because we don't, but we can also understand that if we can do this and we could follow from what I've, I've talked to a few different attorneys I can't. By law, I can't tell you I get it. I get it. I know that like Councilmate says, this isn't an easy process. No, and you have to go to even as you as residents there if you take advantage of what we have in the city to finance legal representation that that building can stay the same for a long time. And you just what you're doing is banded together that's very important. have someone direct you from the city to the right avenues and make sure that someone's on the other line and follow through with the resources we can offer you. And I think that at least gives us some time to find out other ways that we can get to the state and have the state representatives look at different options, whether it's finding ways to, uh, you know, work directly with housing within different state housing, um, processes or whatnot. So there's got to be something out there that, like you said, this is the worst case scenario, and I know what's happening today, and like Councilor Behr says, this is probably the beginning of something more drastic moving forward.
[George Scarpelli]: No, no, you have every right to. That's the reason why we're here. We wish we could do more, but we're here to listen and help in any way we can.
[George Scarpelli]: If this is little that we can do, and at least let you know that you have seven people that understand, excuse me, can be there for you just to listen. That's the best we can do. I hope that can help. But listen, I wish I could do more.
[George Scarpelli]: I wish we could do more.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. I wanted to take this time because I was getting some feedback from a bunch of teens that know, I was with my daughter and their friends and we were talking about recreation. And what I found amazing is that when you hear the bad things in Medford, it resonates. But when you hear good things, kind of falls in deaf ears. So when you hear what our recreation department's doing, probably our most neediest, most vulnerable community members, you're looking at teens that really don't have a place to go here in Medford, where other communities have bowling alleys or rec centers or boys and girls clubs where they can always have a safe place to just pop in the The recreation department at the old high school at the recreation facility, um, has been housing a free team night where kids could just come in and drop, drop in, and they were consistently housing between 70 and 100 teens. We never heard of an issue. We never heard the police say that the teens are out of control. We have seldom heard of any issues of teens walking the streets of Medford and hanging in places they shouldn't because we gave them an opportunity, something as simple as the gymnasium and the classrooms at the Chevalier and the gymnasium. It's paying such great dividends. And to think that something that small has made such a huge impact. Looking and sending this to subcommittee, which I chair and sitting down with the director and right away, I heard from the library staff that wants to get involved, knowing that we have a state of the art library and there's possibilities to do programming for teens with the library and looking at future facilities. The HECMA Center has come back up and talked of discussions now that there's hope that there's an arts center in our community elsewhere that we can focus on a facility that abuts a playground and it's on a bus route that our kids can find a safe haven to go any day of the week. But again, having a location in the middle of Medford Square that our kids and what we've seen is our most neediest kids. Um, our Children that have either single parent or both parents have to work to survive and have nowhere to go and having that location in the middle of method square and giving them that that safe area to traverse to. I think it's so important. So I'm so excited that this is the some of the vision that we looked at years ago when We had our committee to put this together to see if it was viable. And one of the things we talked about is sustainability. And we talked about recreation funding itself. And what you're seeing with the new, we've hired now a new recreation coordinator, and that person is focused on adult programming. And what you're seeing is, no wavering in adult program fees, the numbers are through the roof, the money is coming in and it's offsetting other youth programs that really need it. So this is exactly the vision that started years ago. And I think it's time that we look into the possibilities of moving it forward and having another location, a standalone location, would be an amazing opportunity for our youth and all of us here in Medford. So I appreciate you listening to me. And again, I congratulate our recreation director, Kevin Bailey, and his staff who are doing an amazing, amazing job. I'm fortunate to be the program developer in a recreation department where I have eight full time program coordinators, a facilities director, a full time administrative assistant and a director. And we have over when during the summer is over 100 part time staff and about 70 of those staff members that are funded by a mass summer jobs program money that's allocated directly to help our teams work through the summer that would allow us to do great things for the kids in the community that I work in. Well, this is the path that method deserves. And I think that we have the means we have the ability to do some great things in the next year. And I'm hoping with the subcommittee, the input from our neighbors and our, um, our, our teams, especially because when you listen to your children, the truth is the truth comes out and then you can't, you can't hide from it. So it's so important to hear and see the results of what the team night has met on a Friday and Saturday night and the number of kids that have participated. So, um, Thank you for the time and I motion that we have a subcommittee to discuss possible future growth dealing with the recreation program and facilities and hope to have someone from the city administration there, also our director and any of his staff that would like to come and any other city entity that we feel that could really work in collaboration with this group. So, the library being one that we've already reached out to. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President, thank you, Councilor Collins and Councilor Tseng for bringing this forward. I think that this is something we've been talking about, right? It's, you know, put our money where our mouth is. And now that we have a new diversity director in place and meeting with that individual, I know that especially when we talk about education, and you see the diverse student body we have now and making sure that we are focusing on making sure that we have a diverse teacher population. So such a diverse community has representation. I think that's so important and making sure that we have qualified diverse candidates involved. I think it's it's something that we need to see that ball get started. And these are the dialogues that start that.
[George Scarpelli]: So again, I had concerns with the first vote, and I don't believe I supported it. And I think that a lot of questions came about and still have. I know you're saying it's been up and running for a few months, but I'm getting copies of residents that come and get permits, and they're getting permits handwritten.
[George Scarpelli]: So the visitors permits as well.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, when they come to the office, we take a hint we take a document with our seal, traffic parking seal, and we handwrite.
[George Scarpelli]: So again, this is my problem. Without seeing a plan, without understanding or vetting that plan and not understanding it and getting it started and now asking for more money, I can't support that. I still don't understand. There hasn't been a community discussion. The community hasn't understood what's going on with our traffic and parking. Maybe the people that are invested, they're involved, but this is everyone in our community, and we have questions, and the questions haven't been answered. I know that Councilor Caraviello is getting the same phone calls I got. Um, we're not being in a point to answer. Look, ask those questions. I don't know how we can approve, um, money's going forward if we can't ask questions. So, um, I'm gonna decide here to answer your questions.
[George Scarpelli]: point of information. Point of information. The animosity is you have the director of the parking traffic and parking the other representative here to answer our questions. Okay, so the question isn't being nasty to say that this isn't this should ask the treasure. This is this is your city council asking the director to get word back from the treasurer what the common practices is so we can make a better decision for traffic and parking.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate the comments you just made because this is what we're trying to get at, but instead you could feel tension as if we were against you or you were against us. You made some very clear concerned issues that we don't know about. So when we ask for a plan, the plan is so we can help disseminate the word to the people that call us. So when I get an email that shows me a handwritten is this is where our money is going with that traffic and parking, I wouldn't know, because we don't know the plan of what's going forward in our own city departments that you're here asking for money. So these are the concerns we have nothing negative I know, I know how hard you work, and I know how difficult it is. Believe me, I work in a city that has 30 PCOs and have eight clerks at the window. So I understand exactly how monumental this is. But unless we all understand where we're going and what plan we have or where we are today, these are the concerns we have from the people that call us. And listen, we know you're getting phone calls. It's inevitable because people say, I just try to call Faye. Well, really? So, and I understand that there's only one person but at the same time, there has to be a plan that we could follow that we're all in the same dialogue, and separate from that, do we have just to achieve a step. So we don't collect credit cards from any other department recreation permitting, we don't. We don't have that in place.
[George Scarpelli]: So yeah, do it online. Yeah, but you can't come to window. Okay, that's
[George Scarpelli]: If I can. So the $45,000 would staff these remaining positions for the rest of this fiscal year is that we're looking for.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, and then the addition for these positions, do we have a figure for what that would look like. If that's in the budget for next year and additional.
[George Scarpelli]: I'd be remiss to say the direct correlation with the addition of Councilor Tseng and myself in the passing of the movement of this. So I want to know all joking aside, this obviously was a very planned out and. long process by former Councilors and Councilor bears vice president bears to put a product that we can all look at and move forward with. I think that having all of the department heads involved that are directly involved in the constituents that shared their input I think was also amazing to watch for our first meeting. So I just wanted to pat on the back to Council Biaz and Councilor Falco and Marks that were part of that committee that started this. So thank you. Move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you, Madam President again. I echo the sentiments from my colleagues. But again, Council Falco, former Council Falco president and Council marks. I know spent a lot of time with this, uh, this, uh, initiative. And, um, I'm also very proud of it. And I think that When the administration allows this body to look at representation, like attorney burrows key and having his leadership. I don't think. We've been, we've been in forums of other attorneys, but to work with Mr. Brabowski and his wealth of knowledge and the pieces that he shares from other communities that he has, he has fought with and, and changed so many, so many guidelines. And I think that, uh, you know, without him, um, I don't know if it would have been, um, can't say easy because it's been two years, but he really made it very educational and we appreciate his leadership with this process and we look forward to moving this forward. So thank you, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: approval pending commission.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, thank you. I reiterate what my colleagues have already said but again, when we talk about. the members of our community that have given so much and now have left us. And for one, Mrs. Carroll has handed those traits off to her children and Omari is always the first one to step up when the city's in need. I remember the process when the food truck at the fundraiser for the Andrew School backed out, Omari quickly jumped in and offered fundraiser for the Children of the Andrews right away. And that's typical for what the Carroll family has done for years, and she will definitely be missed. And we send our condolences. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you again, Madam President. Thank you for Councilor Caraviello for bringing this forward. Mr. Casey, another strong member of our community. I know that he raised a great son in Joey that now gives his life and his profession as the Medford police officer, and he will be missed in our community. So send his deepest condolences.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you, Mr. Brennan, for being here. I do see your paperwork is all in order and it's acceptable in my eyes. I know we have a few questions. The location being one, I know there's some confusion. It says 177 College Ave, Mr. Brennan. Is that located inside? facility.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, and it obviously will be open for the public.
[George Scarpelli]: And not students that was a question. What are the what are the hours of operations you're planning on having.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, and there's, I see everything's in order. I know that one of the biggest issues in that area is traffic and that has been approved with no hindrances. So I move approval. I open the floor to my colleagues. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for tonight to bring this forward I think that what a fitting couple to make sure that we acknowledge such a momentous occasion, and especially for Maureen, I think to be married to a gentleman like Jim for for 30 years that that's just amazing. That's just, just an amazing feat and she should be commended and, and obviously I joke Jim's a great guy, and does a lot for our community. And this is, these are the type of people that make Medford the great city that we live in today. Just great members, great neighbors, great community, great community members. So congratulations. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, thank you, Councilman for bringing this forward. I think between the Heath's and the Finnegan's, I think that there's a common bond here. Two couples have been married 20 plus years and also members of our community that are great examples of what a backbone of family people are all about. a good example of how to give back to the community and still maintain such a strong marriage and families. So I congratulate them and wish them happy 20. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you again. Thanks, Councilor Caraviello. This is something that shouldn't have gone unnoticed. But when you have someone like Larry, he's been the the common denominator for politics in this hallowed hall, and we appreciate everything he does. I know that I know he had a long street going. before that ice storm left a few Fridays ago. I was pretty disappointed that he didn't make the trek out in two inches of ice and had to deliver on Saturday. If I could just ask if he could maybe bring a treat for now on so Gabby doesn't rip the couch apart when he drops off our papers. But again, I second the motion. Thank you, Larry and move approval. Council Scarpelli, would that be something that he could put in his expense report that you know what, forget it. I'm sorry. I just, you know, as a new Councilor I wanted to.
[George Scarpelli]: always giving back and definitely be missed and send our condolences to the Bolden family. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. If the petition to come on up. Welcome, thank you for being here. It looks like, Madam President, all of Mr. Pham's paperwork is in order. And the hours of operation, Mr. Pham, do you? Yeah, from 10.30 to 10 every day. 10.30 to 10 Monday through Sunday?
[George Scarpelli]: All right, they do delivery as well, is it? We don't do it now. Okay, good. All right, how many employees will be working there? Right now it's four. Four, okay. I see everything in order. I know my fellow councilors might have a few questions, but I move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: See you in a few days.
[George Scarpelli]: Reviewed all the paperwork. I know that we have, it looks like everything is in order. Mr. Menon, is it?
[George Scarpelli]: Good evening. I know we talked a little bit before the meeting.
[George Scarpelli]: He, you know, unfortunately, the only sad part about this is it's crumbled cookie. So, but again, we, again, we see everything in order. What are the hours of operations?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I know that it's a very popular place and it will be a well addition, an added addition to our community so if my colleagues don't have any questions I move approval tonight.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. So what would I have to do? I would do is see the clerk tomorrow, file for that. And then you come back in front of the body. Usually we approve it and maybe a 30 day review, 90 day review. And if there are no issues, we continue. I don't see it being a problem. Okay. Okay. All right. So I move approval to 10 o'clock, 11 o'clock, excuse me, 11 o'clock.
[George Scarpelli]: He didn't mean that.
[George Scarpelli]: A sad day, Mr. Boyd was a true hero, a veteran, someone who loved Medford. Mr. and Mrs. Boyd had two children and they raised them to love the city of Medford and love their country. And that's one thing, if you know Buzzer and you know Billy, that's what they're all about. Billy and I were classmates at Medford High School in class of 87 and nobody could, Nobody could. Nobody could tell Billy he could bring his trumpet to any event and play the fight song. And that's something that Mr. Boyd instilled in his children. And he'll be sadly missed. I know that he's gone through a tough time the last couple of years, but he was definitely a fighter and appreciate everything he's done for our community and our country. And we send our condolences to the Boyd brothers. wish them well, it's difficult times.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President and thank you for being here tonight. Now, the question I have is, I work in municipality, and I work as the acting director of recreation. And one thing we're seeing is we're seeing a huge gap with parents going back to work and being home that had young children that had coverage. Now that moving out and you have both parents with two family house that children left without assistance after school and something that we're working on in my community that I'm working in, but something that I know that the Director of Recreation, Kevin, is working right now with one of the phone calls, a bunch of phone calls we've received about the same issue, which is the voucher, the families that have voucher programs are being accepted into afterschool programs. And then you have the families that have funding to pay the expensive fees for an afterschool program. And what's left now is a huge gap of families that really never needed after school care. And we're seeing a huge disparity now. And I'll be working closely with with the director and working with him and sharing some of our ideas. I know that in in my community where I'm working, we're actually taking over an afterschool program for low-income middle school boys and girls, and we're hoping to use the ARPA money to assist us with those gaps. So the question I have, would that be something that the parents and the director could come to the body and ask for assistance? Does that fall into the category here in Medford? Is that something that we're looking at as you see these concerns that we're seeing and these gaps now?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, that's great. That's great to you so it's going to be this I appreciate the presentation because you really shared a lot here and it's something that I think as we move on to the community. It's something they can they can use in different departments can use to assist to fill in those gaps. And I know I'll be bothering the chief of staff in the mayor's office and asking to assist in any way I can to help with that gap. So I appreciate all your hard work. And I think this is I know that Council B has brought up a very, very good point where it's the hidden, you know, everybody thinks that we're getting every penny is going to go to everything we need is going to fix everything. But we should really understand where that money's coming from where it's already earmarked. So But thank you again for all your hard work. This is great.
[George Scarpelli]: And I'm sure that's easy to do. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I know that I unfortunately missed it, and I appreciate the understanding from my fellow Councilors. Unfortunately, my son was injured while at school in Maine, and I was on call to pick him up. They wanted him off campus. He's fine, thank God. There's no issues, but it was something that was unexpected. And again, You love Netflix social media but we got beaten up pretty good about it but I appreciate your comments, Madam President, and just so everybody knows family does come first and this council's view in life so if I heard anybody's feelings. for the situation that I went through with my child. I truly feel for those people that didn't understand the situation. So, and pretty disgusted in that. So thank you very much. And thank you for my colleagues for understanding.
[George Scarpelli]: I would second that but thank you Madam President again for our committee on the CPC. I think that they do an amazing job. I know that when the, the judgment that comes through the community that's a little bit before the gun. They're always willing to listen and calm the community down about different petitions that are in front of them and give great examples why we move forward, why we not, we don't. And I see that all these initiatives that we all voted favorably for are something that's really gonna enhance our community in a great way. So I would second that motion for Councilor Knight.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you Madam President to indulge me just for a quick moment. A few weeks ago we had a horrible car accident on Harvard Street, and the young lady. Brooke Roselli was injured and is going to go through a very difficult time forward and I know that the community has really supported the Roselli family and helped in every way possible and I know that very appreciative, but I know the community is putting together a night for Brooke to help with any of the facilities that might be needed as she comes home, hopefully soon. But on April 7th, they're doing an evening for Brooke from 5 to 10 at Premier on Broadway in the Somerville Method line. So it'll be a nice event to support a young lady who did the right thing and took an Uber out on a Saturday night and and responsibly came home and unfortunately was was struck and has gone through some serious medical issues and. Again, kudos to Medford police that they really went forward and hunted this culprit down enough that he came out of the woodwork and turned himself in. So, but Brooke is a fighter and she's a survivor and she's gonna need our community's help. And this would be a great event for everybody to turn out and support her. So thank you for indulging my two minutes. I appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President, and I've gone through all of the paperwork. We find everything in order. Um, I know that I've talked to a few, and it's my neighborhood. I've talked to a few of Mr. Mel guys neighbors, and they are very pleased of how he's running the business. I haven't heard him negative. Um, any negative banter in any way from his business location. I think that what he's asking for, I would support and just put a 90 day review on this process as we normally have done with most of these requests that we give Mr. Malgar the opportunity to open from 11 to two. And after the 90 days, we revisit to see if we've had any concerns or issues from the neighbors or police or anything like so. I would move to approve with the 90 day review.
[George Scarpelli]: Did you understand the question? Just, I mean, I would do a delivery only the late night after 11.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so the question was, are you planning on mostly having like Grubhub combined take food, or is it gonna be mostly people coming in? What do you envision? People walking in at two in the morning?
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry, can you say that again? So the question he said, would you be amenable to, if his request is that you do delivery only from Monday, Monday through Friday, Monday through Thursday, and then from 10 to 11 to two, just do delivery. And then on Friday and Saturdays, open till two o'clock. Correct, correct. Would you do that? Yeah, I will do that. Is that correct, Councilor?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you to review for the Mr. Mel guy, what counsel nights asking if it's okay that we do a 90 day review that you on Friday and Saturday say open till two, but Sunday through Thursday, you do only delivery from 11 to two. Yeah. Okay. And then as that goes, then we can revisit in 90 days. He's saying if we, if that, if it shows that there's a need, is that okay? I'm amenable to that.
[George Scarpelli]: As conditions and so I yield to Council night's motion. I think the petitioner will accept that. So I think it's it could be something we can work on, then revisit again as you need to. Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Council President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you again, just to be redundant because you deserve it. I think that Lasky family in general, what you always give back to the community, not only that in your professional life, you've always looked out for Mr. Lasky and it's something that we're grateful for and having, um, you know, you're a better half working with our children, and you'll always see Mrs. Lasky in the garden. I always remember seeing Mrs. Lasky at the McGlynn Garden, and the pride and joy of that area. So I think that having you reappointed would just keep this moving forward in a positive way, and I support Councilor Caraviello's motion as well, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: and Mr. Huckings raised Debbie, John, Bobby, and Laura, and just wanted to reach out and give a moment of silence for Mr. Huckings' passing and wish their family deepest and sincere condolences. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. Thank you for all of you. I think that's important. I can completely understand why Councilor Tseng would like to see this. I know that, I think that in totality, what this resolution says is that, let's ask the chief to gather data on Medford so we can educate and look into this. Because I've also, after reading this, I've contacted a few other colleagues in neighboring communities that had similar concerns and what was the outcome of those concerns were totally against what everybody was saying that it was really race related in the sense that how those numbers were attributed, how they were counted, how it was looked at that Medford looks at this as racial disparity. But I think the numbers will show With what we're asking for that the chief, sit down and look into this process and look at the true data for Medford, not the state because the state's going to show a drastic agreeance what what we're saying because it's, this is definitely an issue in the state, but when you're talking about more method I think that I welcome. the process that our chief looks into the data a little bit with the magnifying glass to give us the true numbers. Because I also understand that what Councilor Caraviello was saying in the sense that I was getting the same phone call saying, why is Councilor Tseng saying that, you know, our police are racist or they're being stopped and that the presumption of, you know, how you interpret the resolution is how people are gonna read it. Be a further result of the Method Police Department consider holding a community forum on traffic stop issues in order to deepen community trust and public safety as recommended by the report. So I think that you're on the right track, but I think before we leap to anything negative connotations, I think that we asked the chief to come in and do a data driven report that states what's going on in Medford, because I don't disagree. The numbers are gonna show statewide where you're getting, what these traffic stops. There is a concern, but I also will think that we'll have a better understanding when the police department, the traffic department does a deeper study in the data in Medford. So I just, like I said, no one's questioning the, I think that, unfortunately, there's racism everywhere, and there are good and there are bad everywhere. And this is the problem. And I wanna make sure that we look at this in totality, that I think we really ask the chief to come in to find these numbers before we can all jump and leap to conclusions that, yes, our police force is racist, which isn't what you're saying. And I know that. So, but at the same time, it's also give us a true indication of what, what our method stops have been, not just for this year, because you could look at one year and get an understanding, but I think we have to look at method stops over three to five year period. I think that'll help. And listen, if that unearths something that's alarming to this council, I think we move forward in a more aggressive manner. But until that time, I think, you know, let's, let's ask the chief to do his due diligence. I would recommend that. I know it's part of the motion, but I just reiterate that motion that we asked the chief to give us more data on traffic stops, not just for this year, maybe going back two or three years. Because I know that what was said in different communities, the numbers were a little skewed because last year during the pandemic year, you had comparison to 800 stops in one community that, previous years that 3200 stops. So it'd be interesting to see that. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: And I, I shared the sentiments of Council beers because like I said I reached out to colleagues in different communities are going through a similar resolution and concerns and issues and, and what, what was brought back to me were the concerns the state numbers and how it was represented. So I think that's why having the chief come in and giving us true data what's happening in Medford, with what we're looking at, which is what you're asking the resolution. I think it's important to get that data and numbers, the data doesn't lie. That's one thing about working in a community like Somerville and having summer stats tell you what you're doing right and wrong every day. The data drives a lot of what is the true definition of what's happening. So like I said, all I'm saying is having the chief, giving him the information, asking him to compile that information for what we want, we're looking for in Medford, not for what's been questionable in other communities, but the numbers that came from the state that are a little skewed. So we're both saying the same thing.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. does do a data dive with these concerns, I think we'll be pleasantly surprised with what our officers are doing. And so, you know, and I understand that these are the questions that were also put forth with different communities that numbers might've been skewed in the state level. So that's why it's important that we get the numbers from the chief. That's why I'll support this because again, the chief will look at methods numbers and get back to us and educate us. Now, if we find something that with method numbers that we have to be, we have to now be cognizant and look forward to directing the chief where we need some support or assistance that we change something that might be hurting our community, then we need to fix it. But I think that welcoming the data is gonna be what we're looking for. I mean, I think we're all looking at the same thing. We all wanna see the data and it's, And it's not for the gotcha game, it's just to get the numbers and let's go from there. And I think the chief will welcome it. If we know the chief, he loves these type of issues where he'll answer these questions. He's never, from what I recall, the chief has never shied away of questions like this. So I pose that in support, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank Council, it's thanks for bringing this forward, but again, I'm going to stay with my vote. I appreciate, I support my Haitian community. I've done a lot for my Haitian community, but at the same time, I'll be voting no on this resolution for the fact that I'd like to see this council work closer with our Haitian community in Medford. And as I talked to a few of our Haitian leaders, it's ceremonial, but I'm done doing ceremonial. votes, and I appreciate that, and I hope you can respect that. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Madam President.
[George Scarpelli]: Just to be clear, symbolism is important, but when we present symbolic gestures on a weekly basis, more than once, more than twice, all they are is symbols and empty words. To say that a council that maybe tonight will vote no on the symbolic resolution, but doesn't want to see movement is a total farce. I think that we have tried to see, waited for action in so many ways in the last eight months, and truly have seen nothing but more round table discussions and actual lack of hands on, feet on the ground, getting things done for our community members that have struggled so vitally in the past. So again, I'm gonna say this, I support my Haitian community, I support the the movement and anything we can do to help. But again, when we keep sending out symbolic resolutions, they fall on deaf ears. And when it comes time that this council really needs the state delegates or our federal delegates to really understand that we support something that we truly need, this community truly needs, because there's something truly glaringly wrong we just fall back on another symbolic resolution. So again, that's why, again, why I'm voting. Not that I don't wanna see movement, because that's an absolute farce. I've lived our lives doing this for people. So I just think that, careful with the comments, because it's, moving on. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: No, respectfully.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I see that the information that we requested over the last two weeks was answered by our building department, Mr. Moki. We find everything in order, I move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate residents that have reached out to me that had some concerns and wanted me to put this have gone by that property probably every day over the last three months. I've talked to the building commissioner this morning and the squatter situation has been taken care of. They make sure that they have regular police presence to make sure that doesn't happen again. That was happening, but now has been resolved. The project, as you can see, has now started back up prior to this being written. So they're now back to work. I believe what I was told was the historical commission froze the permit because of some clerical or some changes that were made that weren't approved by their office that has since been approved and they've moved forward with that. But I think the biggest piece that we see as much as we don't, we might not agree or like the the look of the building where it's higher and it's longer and it really takes away the look of the neighborhood for what was there prior. There's nothing we can do with the zoning that was in place that was approved. But what we can do is find a way to hold developers accountable for what's being done in our neighborhoods. Granted, they have the position to go in and build as long as they follow the proper protocol and zoning requirements. But there's still requirements that have to be maintained when it's dealing with neighbors and trash and possible dangerous situations with open areas, where there's construction equipment, where there are ladders, where there's a development that's not enclosed. So what we're doing is for this developer, and they're not here today, so I won't bring up their name, but they've also done a few other jobs, developments in the community, where I've had complaints with what this company and this developer has done with the lack of neighborhood cohesiveness and understanding what the neighbors should be notified. And they haven't done that and they've been very rude and disrespectful and that's not the way we should do business. So unfortunately, some of the concerns have been answered with no apparent punishment or halt of this project, but at the same time, we can ask for them to come to the city council and a committee, the whole meeting with the building department and this council that we start to look at drafting either policies or ordinances that would protect our neighbors when developers come into those neighborhoods and affect them in such a negative way. I know we have a few neighbors that are here tonight that would like to speak. If my colleagues don't have any other questions right now, I think that the neighbors words speak volumes. So thank you, Mr. President. Mr. President. Yes, President Morell.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, I think it's twofold. I think we can ask them, but they don't have to show up. From what I've gathered, that we can request for them to come, but the likelihood of them showing up will be, would not happen, but I wouldn't mind getting this developer that's working in our community there to answer the questions for those neighbors. But moving forward, I think we should look down the line to put a committee together or a community whole meeting together to look at with the city solicitor and see what kind of, in the building department, to see what kind of rules or policies we can put in place that that really haven't been followed by these developers as they're moving through metrics. So does that make sense?
[George Scarpelli]: I know, Mr. President, if I can. I mean, there are rats. Yeah, and I did talk to the building inspector that what we can do is we can request and amend this resolution that we have the building inspector go out and visit the site and give us even a weekly update so we can make sure that they're being held accountable.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I know, but that's not their job, but we can't we can't do is we can have them go by even on a. You know, surprise visits. Yeah, throughout the week. You know, just even if it's just a pop in so we can ask them if they can do that if we can amend that Mr. Clark, and I have their workers climbing around the roof, no safety. There's a lot of questions about safety and OSHA and they fall on the rules. So we did talk to the building inspector and he's you know, with this motion, hopefully he can come out there and if he sees that, he can stop that, you know, due to unsafe practices and stop that project. So I appreciate bringing this forward and I'm sorry you're going through that. We talked about the sightline and unfortunately, the zoning in the area, he explained that it It definitely it looks like a monstrosity. It doesn't belong. It does. It looks more like a like an apartment building.
[George Scarpelli]: And I apologize for that. But unfortunately, this legally, there's nothing we can do that I know as they move forward. So I this is this disheartening, disheartening piece of government when There's nothing else we can do. He doesn't, the developer doesn't care about, he cares about the bottom line. He wants to get in and get out. So, but we can hold them accountable for the cleanliness, making sure that, you know, that they're providing safe conditions for employees and making sure that it's the cleanliness. And if there are rats there, that they're making sure that we can look at putting in some sort of policy that they have to put an abatement process in for roads. Downsized the building. Yeah, we asked this. Nothing we can do. I know that's that's that's tough. And I apologize for that. But we will get to the city city building inspector and hopefully they get out there tomorrow. Thank you very much. You'll hear from Mrs. Ryan, I'm sure.
[George Scarpelli]: That's a great idea. Any of the snow in front or on the side of that, of that particular we have an ordinance that that is certainly a violation of the city we're gonna add that to the, to the, to the. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mike. Thank you, Councilor Nai, for bringing this forward. I think we should celebrate this, but if you can help me out, the criteria, Councilor Nai, Is it classified as a hospital anymore? Is it just healthcare? How is it defined?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilman, for bringing this forward. I know we're working as a chair of the Subcommittee on Signs. We're working on setting a meeting right now, but another concern. So I think we could rectify that request and have them in. So I think it's important we do that because it sounds like there's a public safety and public nuisance issue. So thank you for bringing this forward. I second the motion.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you just to beg the mayor and the administration to please find another firm that Medford has a standalone legal team or a city solicitor someone that's going to show that this is a true concern for our community. If we do lose, if they do build this and we lose the most valuable piece in our community right now, especially in our downtown, which is the Chevalier and crippling that facility in any way will be devastating for this community. You know, we've been all talking about the revitalization Method Square, redeveloping Method Square, and the biggest piece of that was surrounding it around the Chevalier and the shows that happened at Chevalier. We're finally getting past the pandemic issues that we can stop bringing in more shows on a regular basis. We need to make sure that Medford, the city of Medford, its own entity, stands up and files suit as its own entity, not as a partner with our vendor. We have to stand alone. I'll support the $2,500 because that is nothing. I don't know what, you know, I think it's more symbolic. And I think that, you know, it's important, but I think more importantly, We as a community we as a city as administration have to stand up and say that we are hiring this law firm to represent the city of Medford in this legal battle that is unjust and as as funny as you can, you can talk about. Because what the neighborhood agreement that everybody agreed upon, they're finding ways to circumvent that. And it's going to hurt many communities. But more importantly, it's going to hurt our community. And if we don't have someone at that table, representing the city of method as its own entity, then we're not really showing We're not showing the Gaming Commission, we're not showing Wynn, we're not showing Encore, we're not showing the city of Everett, that the city of Medford is willing to put a fight. I mean, we spent a lot of money on legal battles that we know we're gonna lose. And this situation, we need to make sure that we beg the mayor to come to us with a paper if she needs to be, that we support any initiative that we have a standalone legal team fighting for this cause. So thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor, for bringing this forward. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh Chair, still in doubt. I think that, you know, is the legal representation, is Ms. Scanlon on or? Mr. Mulkey on tonight? Because unfortunately I hate to hold our petition up again, but it is a valid question that we needed answered for tonight's meeting. I believe we actually put in the resolution that it was date determined. It was, you know, we were pretty strict about that. So we're under the assumption that would the chief of staff know any way to, you know, find a way to contact either the city solicitor or Mr. Mulkey to get on the call later on this evening so we don't have to do another night and just table this for later on in the meeting.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can. I'm in total. Is there a way to reach out to the city solicitor to see if they can answer that question or?
[George Scarpelli]: I'll do that right now. I hate to waste the petitioners another week. And I know that it's a question that's a legitimate question that we need before we move forward.
[George Scarpelli]: We can, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: At the table until we get communication. So if you could just ask the petitioner.
[George Scarpelli]: All right, just so the petitioner knows, we're just waiting for what we're asking for from the legal department to let us know that we're taking the proper course so that doesn't affect you moving forward. So we're just waiting for someone if they can call us before the end of the meeting tonight, okay? All right.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Knight, for bringing this forward. I honestly, I thought that if he doesn't mind me adding my name to this resolution, I thought I did. I'm very close friends, graduated with the sun common. and friends with his daughter, Fran. Mr. Palmisano was bigger than life. He was that type of life of the party that worked for years for the Duck Tours and was a legend there. Always a person to make other people laugh and make other people feel comfortable. Another member of our community that had a battle of devastating illness and unfortunately, passed on that with the major suffering. And it's something that, you know, you wish you could take away, but I know that he's not in pain anymore and he's in a better place. And for his family, you know, Method residents who grew up and loved our community and, you know, raised by his wonderful parents. their wonderful parents and Mr. Parmigiano was definitely the anchor of that family. So some of that will be missed. So I condolences to the Parmigiano family.
[George Scarpelli]: I would second that.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President. Councilor Scarpelli. First, I'd like to thank, I know there's a group of residents that are actively taking a role in making sure that this is presented the right way so it's sent to the state in the most positive light moving forward. When I was first elected, one of my first one of my first initiatives was looking at the charter view and making sure that we could revisit something that we haven't seen in so many years. So I think that had changed with me last time we voted, I voted no. And the reasons were very simple. It was so simple that what was asked for was yes or no and move forward. I think it's important that as you talk about a commission, One of the biggest things I think needs some debate is the understanding of ward and precinct representation. I think that sounds so easy for everybody and there are definitely some pros in that aspect of making sure that each ward are represented. speaking for myself, working in a municipality in a community that has ward and precinct representation, I see a lot of negative affects of that situation where it becomes a special interest option, special interest groups around the city. What I see is a lot of negativity in the sense that you have one community member and one part of the community holding their colleagues hostage in for what they want their initiatives to move forward not what's greater for their community as a whole, but for their small piece of the community and you could, I saw negative effects, a few times that. It didn't, it didn't help the community, and, and that's because of that and you know some other options that when you know you get a phone call from someone from South Medford or get a phone call from someone from West Medford or someone from the Walton Glenwood area. I work just as hard as if it was someone in my own backyard. So it gives people the opportunities to call seven different Councilors to really push an initiative, or a concern that they're not following so I see the benefits there I know that there are benefits to go through with it to look at that but again, when it was first presented as charter change or charter review, it was cut and dry. I had a great discussion with some members of the committee and talking about having a forum where we could discuss these options, where it's more of a thought process that it's discussed, it's understood, and maybe moving forward, it could be something that as you go forward with the initiative, and what you're looking for for charter review, at least. every piece is broken down and discussed and then thought upon. So, but I do think these, as we move forward with this initiative, I think that I would support it now. I would move forward, I think, but it's also a lot of questions that I think that we should really meet together with the administration and the committee members that are looking to form this commission. um meet in the community the whole meeting and iron out any concerns and issues and then bring this forth with the with the solid base so we can move forward with the vote of seven zero to go to um the state house so we have no issues or concerns because i think that was the biggest thing as we move forward in the past it was unanimous support from a council to the State House saying we all support it. And I think that, you know, making sure that we have all of our questions answered and all of our I's dotted and T's crossed. I think moving this to a committee of the whole in a relatively short period of time that we can get all the stakeholders in this room to discuss all the questions and then put this forth to a vote. And later on they next meeting so we can find a way to move forward in a seven zero vote. I would, I would recommend that tonight. So that's an emotion.
[George Scarpelli]: Unfortunately, they're tied up with the family situation right now. So I don't wanna waste, I don't wanna have you sitting here wasting the rest of your evening. If we can ask the clerk to have the answer reported back to the council and have someone from the city solicitor's office on the meeting for next week so we can get this taken care of and the answer that Councilor Knight can move forward. You can come forward if you want. Yep.
[George Scarpelli]: I know, but it's a way that the permit process, the way it goes through, it has to be asked the proper way, and the way that it was asked leaves doubt, and not anything that you did, it was- I mean, I'm just an immigrant from Albania coming to work. No, no, I know, and we wanna- We don't, we don't want...
[George Scarpelli]: Now you're out of line right now. You're way out of line. If that's what you want, you're voting. You won't win. I'll tell you what, you're out of line. I'm trying to be kind to have you understand the process. This has nothing about you or race. For you to say that, you're out of line, sir.
[George Scarpelli]: So I move to continue this until next meeting, have a representative from the law department to answer this question that has something simple to do with the process, has nothing to do with you or the permit. It has the process that leaves it in doubt, the way it was presented. That's all it was, has nothing to do with the existing permit or anything moving forward. To tell you the truth, I don't think anybody in this, including the question from the council who asked that we're not going to support this. We've always supported our business owners, whether you were Italian or Irish or whatnot. But I will tell you, there's a question that if we proceed with this, Mr. Abazi, and later we found out we made a mistake, that could affect your business and stop it then. And we don't want that. So that's the reason why. Please.
[George Scarpelli]: I completely understand, but like I said.
[George Scarpelli]: We know you are. We understand. No, we're saying that, listen, when we put this out for you last week, we asked the administration to have that answer to us so we can just let you move forward today. Unfortunately, we don't know where that where that dropped and we're going to as a council, we'll look into that because these are the issues we have, we've been fighting with this council to have legal representation at every single night for issues like this because this puts us in a bad way Mr. Bosley, and it's not you. So and I apologize for. I will tell you I understand you want to work but I also don't want to approve something then come down the line that we have to then hold your permit and someone comes in from another department the city and say hey wait a second, you can't proceed, and then that affects your business in a way negative in a manner that will hurt you. more than you think you're being hurt right now. So I apologize if you think you're being singled out or attacked in any way, but this is just a policy procedure that we have to correct that someone made a mistake on, not you, not you. It's somebody that should have answered this question and you should have been gone an hour ago. Well, we're gonna we're gonna take care of it. I will tell you, you don't need to be in next week. That's right. Council Council night. You don't have to be in next week.
[George Scarpelli]: Any further discussion. I can Mr. President. Like I said, I worked the storm in Somerville, and I think that I'm one of the first people people talk to when their cars are being towed and ticketed. So as an administrator there, that's one of my duties while the administrators are on the road working. And the signage you're talking about really is put in place after the storms. when they're going to remove the snow mounds up and down the street, the snow emergency. Some of them luckily has the blinking lights at all the all the the storm alerts that are all the blinking lights, all the street lights that are blinking white light that That calls for snow emergency for people to look at what's going on. They do a reverse 911. They do a, an email blast. And then the last thing they do before they get told is actually the police officers actually traverse the streets with the with the tow trucks saying, please move your cars. It's under snow emergency. I think that, but I think having the signs out there, if there's a way to keep it, I think that poses a couple of different concerns. One that we're going to have DPW workers that are going to possibly working, if it's a big storm like that, that are going to be possibly working 24 to 36 hours and having them go out hours early to put up signs or hours after to put up signs. I think that it really takes away from what we really need them to be doing. And I think that, you know, maybe working with the communications department to find a way to reach those citizens that reach out to you, that are not getting the notifications. But, you know, I think the signs might, I don't think they'll work in our community for that fact. I just don't think we have the manpower to actually put those signs out and then if you're talking big snow, they're probably covered within an hour anyway. So I just think that there is a way that, you know, doing reverse 911 letting everybody know that there's a snow emergency, and what the policy is and which side to park on posting it on on public access television on the loop. And then, you know, sending out city wide emails that that people that aren't on that. And I think a lot of people that don't get notifications, it's just because they haven't been. They haven't been put on the list with communications and we've had thousands of people asked me, and all they really need to do is contact communications department and have their names and phone numbers added to that list. So that if there is a snow emergency, they'll get taxpayer. you know, one of the biggest things I have, being that I work in Somerville, I get the same notifications that residents get in Somerville. So I'll get an email, I'll get a robo call, and I'll get a text message, you know, throughout the day before a snow emergency. Once a snow emergency is gonna be declared, letting me know, and I live in Medford. So I don't think this is a difficult ask. I just think that it should be, you know, maybe a little coordinated with the communications director moving forward. So again, a little winded, Thank you. Thank you for bringing it forward, though.
[George Scarpelli]: but maybe looking at the portable digital sign posted in strategic areas that don't really get the information they need. But I think the sign itself, I just don't see that working. And so I agree with you, every which way we can to help to get the word out.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. If the petition is here, you can come to the rail. Welcome. I've reviewed the process, Mr. President. I find everything in order. Do you, your times of opening closing, do you know what they will be?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, but then the hours of operations.
[George Scarpelli]: Everything stays the same.
[George Scarpelli]: And number of employees? Same. So you're just seamless, just a quick turnover.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, Mr. President, I see that Mr. Kumar has put everything in order. It's been approved by all the departments. So I move forward favorably.
[George Scarpelli]: I just spent in 20 to zero three seven.
[George Scarpelli]: That was my question.
[George Scarpelli]: So, Mr. President, I agree with constant I that's my. This didn't come in for the license of petition so I was a little confused with this also, not to say that. you know, the petitioner, Mr. Bazzi that I'm against it. But I think that, like Council night said, I don't know if we should move forward with this until we get again. This is where having legal representation here, um, you know, for the council would help move this along. Now we're looking at And I'm going to recommend that we table this to next week, date certain till we get the answer from either the building commissioner or the city solicitor, making sure that we're voting on on something that we're apprised of, because like Councilor Knight says, I don't see a distinguished item that tells us why we need the special permit. So I would look to table for one week and just to get this answer. This could be just a simple question, simple answer. And again, to the petitioner, Mr. Abbasi, this isn't, Any affirmation of that, I don't wanna support this because if it's just straight what it is, I see it's in order. But again, I don't know what the underlying reason for it hasn't been defined yet to this body. So I would recommend that we table this for one week.
[George Scarpelli]: City solicitor, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Motion to revert back to regular business by- So if we can, Mr. President, just let the petitioner know, I know that before we rush off, I know he's still on, just that we're just asking for the question to be answered, and then we'll bring this up again next week. Okay, thank you. Mr. Abbasi, did you get that?
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, thank you very much. It's a sad, it's a sad day with the passing of Brian. Brian is what Medford Mustang pride and heart is all about. He fought a courageous battle with cancer, and anybody who who came across Brian in the middle of his darkest days, you would never know that he was battling this illness. He had a smile on his face. He always, first person to volunteer, donate whenever, especially when it came to kids, he was always there. I still remember it was maybe 94 degrees. We were having a, a wiffle ball tournament in the name of Jimmy Maturana who passed recently for raising money for his scholarship fund. And then after that, they were going to play the first baseball game at the new Jimmy Maturana Field. And Brian plays in the tournament. It's 97 degrees. He goes through the whole celebration and then he ducks out and comes back wearing about 40 pounds of umpire equipment because he's now going to umpire for the kids so they can play the baseball game. In the middle of all this, he's battling this horrible disease. And that's exactly who Brian was. I mean, when you talk to people tonight at his wake, when I talked to his family, He is what makes Medford a great community. He was there to help anybody who needed help. And he always did it with a smile on his face. And to his children, to his sisters, to his friends, we are going to miss his physical being in our community forever. But I will tell you for one person, Brian's memory will never be forgotten because he left that impression on everybody that crossed his path. So those who didn't know him, talk to me if you see me, we'll talk about a few stories and just a great man. And again, I think in the last couple of years, I've said this too often, But we're saying goodbye to another Mefford icon, someone who left a mark in this community and never asked for anything in return. So to his family, we send our condolences, our prayers, our memories. If we could dedicate this meeting, Mr. Clerk, in his honor, I would love to do that. And thank you for allowing me to speak. Thanks.
[George Scarpelli]: Moment of silence, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Um, thank you, Mr. President. Uh, how's the constant to bring this forward? I think that, um, I've seen how terrible this affects immigrant communities. I think that I've had the privilege of working with a lot of great families and great individuals that, um, just even recently with the elimination of the Dream Act and, um, these young men and women that came to this country when they were infants, and find themselves now without a home. They're not familiar with their parents' home country, and they're being told that they're not citizens of the country they were raised and grew up with and pay taxes in, and they find themselves left in limbo. Anything we can do to support that, I would champion that as well. So I appreciate bringing this forward and I would move, second the resolution.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. And again, I echo the sentiments of my colleagues. I think that we had three dedicated people in a very important office. And I think that when you talk about our senior citizens, the most vulnerable members of our community, they were the ones that really needed this office more than anyone, because they are the ones that were being manipulated. And having this office in place really put someone that they could reach out to at any time to make sure that they're protected. And if I, if I'm not mistaken, I believe the Attorney General has has acknowledged their office many times on the job well done because of their excellence. So again, it's gonna be sad losing them, but thanking them for everything they've done for our community. And when you can do something, when you walk out the door, knowing that you left a positive mark, I think that you should keep your head high and really applaud what you've done for this community. As one Councilor, I applaud them and thank them for everything they've done.
[George Scarpelli]: So, Councilor Scott-Bell. If I can, thank you very much. I had a nice discussion with Councilor Tsengin in support of this resolution, but I will also share some comments that were shared with me from residents that were a little concerned that the understanding of white supremacy in the inference that there are running rampant of white members of our community in white supremacy. And it really paints a picture negative tone of unity in that light. I think that I support totally support the celebrating a black history month. I support that the city is city government, the schools, we combat racism and teach black history. I know that in my conversations with different different educators and as we talk moving this topic forward and not just being just talk like it was mentioned with some members of the community that I had discussions with and putting our money where our mouth is and asking the city to ask the school committee to look at bringing back civics. So everybody understands where we are and a quarter of that civics lesson Bing! the focal point to black history in Medford and black history. I think that's something that I've mentioned in the past in moving steps forward. So it's not just talk, it's not just rhetoric, but I know that I asked council's saying to see if we could find other wording when it came to white supremacy, because unfortunately in some people in this community that it doesn't unify, it's really dividing our community in the sense that people don't look at it the way that it's addressed, because they think that every white person is being dressed as a white supremacist. And I think that's not the message you're trying to send in our conversation. And I like what Councilor Bears, Vice President Beas mentioned that the intent might be more defined so our residents can understand that this isn't something that you put through to divide or made it so that it's one person against another. It's a unified feeling that we want Medford to be exactly what we've been trying to work for, and that's a community of one. again if we could in and changing that I would support it if not unfortunately I would just vote present on this because I do other pieces in this this resolution I support a thousand percent and I would I would also make it uh you know, asked to amend it and to reach out to the school committee and asked to bring back civics and adding a whole block in method black history because we have plenty of it here. And I think that this is how we're going to start the change at the younger level where people understand where the black history method was I mean that I've talked to one of my closest friends who is educated man of color and said that with the with he would love to be. given the opportunity to go to the post office when the concern was with the mural, with our slaves being in shackles. And this is what everybody sees when they go to the post office. And he made it a point to me and said, George, you know what? We would love to see that. Leave it there. Let our kids see what this history was about and how devastating it was. And using that type of philosophy, where you look at the Royal House and the slave wall, and we'll talk about so many benefits and so many educational points we can use in this community, that bringing that class back and use that as a jumping off point to really educate our community, I would support it a thousand percent.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can just if the city clerk can read Councilor Bears's amendment over. I appreciate Councilor Tseng for entertaining that for the other residents that reached out.
[George Scarpelli]: be a quarter that teaches the methods black history and black history. So I think it's important that we see that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you counseling bringing this forward and know that I did, I did have some alarming questions. I had a Asian American family reach out to me later earlier today and asked if if method is dealing with recently increase anti a crimes. as they read the resolution. So I did call, try to reach out to the chiefs and are you familiar, has something happened that we don't know because I think it's important that if it is, we make that public and that's something that we have to reaffirm publicly, so.
[George Scarpelli]: We know that.
[George Scarpelli]: And yes, yeah. I appreciate bringing that clarity because I think that, again, this is an Asian family that I'm very close with and said, George, have you heard something? And I was trying to get the answer to that, but reflecting back to last year's resolution, I appreciate that clarity. So they're not alarmed. And again, I support this a thousand percent. I think it's very important that And again, as we talked to this constituent, that's one of the things they talked about is the Asian community finds it very difficult sometimes to stand up and call someone. And a lot of times it's something that they've taken and we won't take that in this community. So, and that's what I shared with them. So I appreciate it. And again, happy new year.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, what Councilor Morell, Villes, and Knight don't see is the amazing jacket that Justin's wearing right now.
[George Scarpelli]: Motion to accept.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli, if you can just give me a brief, which one is this? Are you taking both? 631 and 023 to take them off the table. Six, but 631, I don't see it.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. I voted no on that. Correct.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you again. Thanks for bringing this forward, Councilor. Council President, this is, this is a family that again you have to celebrate because although they owned a successful business. They were always one of the first businesses get back to the youth of the community so often you go in there, and you'd see a new plaque. express those representing and sponsoring another youth team or activity. So I've had the pleasure to know a lot of this Salvato family, and I know that they've done so much for our community, and I would support and second Councilor Knight's motion. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: poll just to be clarification for for all the residents, you're actually talking about another poll that upright in our community in a city location, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Are you familiar with any double poles that are still left through national grid in the city of Medford?
[George Scarpelli]: We've asked for years to eliminate all the double polls for the fact that one, it's a safety hazard. poses problems for ADA accessibility, and aesthetically, it looks disgusting. This is only gonna be to erect one pole, correct? There's no other pole near that?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, I can I can understand that but at the same time, with all the public utility companies that are doing work in Medford. a lot of either your brother companies have erected these poles and walk away and then point to each other to say whose pole that belongs to to be taken down. So that's my biggest, one of my pet peeves right now is that I still think we still have poles through National Grid that haven't been taken down, whether it was YAR doing or Verizon's doing. And I say this all due respect, Mr. Ortiz, I truly don't care. We need to see action. Sometimes the only way to see action, if we talk to representatives like yourself, that you can go back to your supervisors and say, listen, Medford's really gonna hold back on allowing X, Y, and Z until we fix this these issues. So, um, like again, I'm sorry, you know, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm shooting the messenger per se, but, um, I know this isn't probably all we are doing, but you have to understand where I'm coming from as a Councilor, the, the issues we have when they're at double pole. So, uh, like I said, it's not in this, this, this location, but, um, I'd like to see how my polls by national grid. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Councilor Caraviello, I understand, I appreciate where you're going with this, but at the same time, I didn't realize that this would be followed up with, this is what we're asking for with a lot of what ifs, and that's what I'm a little nervous about. If it's going to the mayor's office, you know, I don't want to go the other way and say, well, let's share, let's send our stuff over to another community. And I hope that doesn't happen.
[George Scarpelli]: But I also think, like you said, the work The workflow, he does a lot right now in the city of Medford for our veterans. And I think I wanna help the veterans in Winchester. If it's raised to work with a partnership with the city of Winchester while they're continuing to find solutions, I would support that. But to do this, I know that it's just a word, but regionalizing means that you know, oh, hey, that's great. So, you know, let's, let's have Maldon jump in. And then, you know, Mr. Durham now, who's phenomenal in his job, is really picking up a heavy load. And not to say that they don't need support. But I think the veterans in Medford are first and foremost. So I think that's my, that's my, my my hesitation with this, but I appreciate bringing forward. I understand where you're coming from and every intention that you have, Mr. Caraviello, is always support the veterans in both our community and across Massachusetts. So it's not a slight to that at all. I just think that, you know, I'd rather, you know, I'd like to see it maybe word a little bit differently, but.
[George Scarpelli]: Is there any way we can maybe bring to him just a quick meeting, a subcommittee meeting, or a committee of the whole? I don't want to vote against it, but maybe to talk to Mike and ask him. I'd like to know what the numbers are. If the numbers are 300, we don't know. But if the numbers are 10, I can't see why.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can do that, I'd rather do that. I don't want to vote against it, because I have questions. For instance, if the mayor is in charge and we're taking in 10, what would we could petition Winchester to say they pick up 10% of Mike's salary, if that's a way to work this partnership with Winchester. But I'd appreciate if you did that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Is Mr. Pierre here? Hi, Ms. Peer, if you can come to the podium. Thank you for coming here this evening. We have all of your documentation. Mr. President, we see everything is accounted for and in order and approved. So I know before we vote in favor of moving this forward, if my colleagues have any questions.
[George Scarpelli]: 9 a.m. to 10, 9 a.m. to 8 on Sundays. Monday through Saturday, 9 a.m. to 10, correct? Yep. And 9 a.m. to 8 on Sundays, Council Member.
[George Scarpelli]: I think my concern is- Everything's in order for approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Is Mr. Massoud here this evening?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I see all the paperwork in order. Just the hours of operations, they're not changing.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, but with the new Councilor Knight, it's 11 to 11, so everything's in order. Again, I find all the paperwork present and in favor of the petitioner, so I move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Mr. President, can we, No. 22-022 communication from the mayor.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. So if we could, I have the same question. I think that if we can table this and call for a Committee of the Whole meeting before our meeting next week, a regular meeting, and ask the city solicitor and maybe the chief of staff, just to clarify, I think that this is important for the fact that what we asked for is a representation. So we, at the time when this all occurred, didn't look like uneducated buffoons and dog chasing his tail when we had legal issues, not to battle against our own administration, but just to guide us on legal terms and legal movements as we had some concerns. So, I don't wanna see this, if this could be rectified in a committee of the whole meeting where, we can iron this out and make sure this is defined a little bit better. So it does appease both parties and we could have someone that represents the council. I think that would be amazing. I just don't want it to fail this evening and then sit again for a few months. So my motion would be to table for committee of the whole meeting next week with the chief of staff in the city solicitor.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, well, I think it wouldn't be, I think it would just be a defining evening for this. I don't think this would take too long, but if we can add that.
[George Scarpelli]: No, it's disheartening for my fellow councilor, who's new to the process, who just shared some insight, those fears that we're leaving the city without legal representation for one week, when we wanna make sure, until you're sitting in this council, and I'm shocked with my veteran Councilors that sat here and watched our dogs chase the tail and how embarrassing it was for us to sit here for two meetings because we didn't have representation and how hard we fought during the budget meeting to get a line item that represented what we asked for and then to come back and something disingenuine to say that we're asking for, we're getting money, but it can't be used for what we're asking for. It's just giving the city more money the negative ramifications we've seen with the assistance from KP law and different city functions. So it's a little deciding to me. I understand everybody has a vote and we've spoken. So I will not vote for it because I think we needed a week to get better understanding with the chief of staff and the legal representation from the city to guide us when we have questions. Okay, so if that, it is what it is. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you Councilor Knight for bringing this forward. I think that with the senior abatement program, it works so well for so many residents that need that support. And I know that Councilor Caraviello works so closely with veteran services and realizing how many talented veterans we have in this community and the ability for them to come out and use their expertise to maybe work with our kids at the vocational school or work with the recreation department, programming, or even here at City Hall. So especially what we're seeing in today's society, I think it would be important that we give back to the people that gave us so much. And I would second the motion, Councilor Ioannoni. Thank you for bringing that forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Real quick, thank you for bringing this forward. I think it's important that what Councilor Collins mentioned that people have to realize that this building is for everyone. And having the opportunity for this building to represent everybody and that it gives everybody an opportunity to come here and express how they feel or what they feel what's going on in the city, how they can, how we can make it better. And, you know, this past holiday event where unfortunately, There was some unfortunate misrepresentations. I think that it's good to see that the city moving forward and openly discussing it and sharing it with the community and the plans and how we can correct this so it doesn't happen again. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: There's a baby crying in the background.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank Councilor Bears for bringing this forward. I just think that, just to make it clear, I know that I did get a few phone calls in regards, and I appreciate this going to subcommittee, because I think it is something that's important that's being vetted. So, you know, the fear is that will we get enough business done in two meetings a month? And the biggest question is really, The ability for again, which was said many times to the people's forum that. gives people a chance every week to come to the podium that have to express a concern or an issue that comes before them. So these are the, these are some of the topics we'll talk about during the subcommittee. I think that this is getting the ball rolling and making sure that we have deep dialogue to make sure that residents get involved and attend that subcommittee. And when it's, when we, know, share your concerns. I know that I've received a few phone calls and a few emails in regards to the fear of losing that venue where a resident has a place to speak on a weekly basis. So again, I've I look forward to the subcommittee meeting and welcome all the residents that emailed me and called that had concerns to come out and share your concerns and that, you know, I think are valid. And I also understand, coach, Councilor Bears is, Vice President Beas is, you know, thought process to get that dialogue going. So thank you. Any discussion?
[George Scarpelli]: Hey, I can Mr. President. Also, like, if we can maybe entertain tabling this for committed a whole meeting where we can really get the input of residents and we can really vet this process as we go forward. I know that there are some of these subcommittees that, you know, I'd like to, as we just started, maybe, you know, bring in the school committee and ask their opinions, especially when, as a former member of the school committee, whenever you not that I felt this way, but some council, some committee members felt that when you did a combined subcommittee, a committee that it might overstep a bound and there might be some animosity. Now that not saying that it is or isn't, but this is something that it'd be nice to sit with, you know, sit with the committee members and I get some input. I know that I did get one city school committee member called me to remind me when we tried to do that years ago, which I didn't, I didn't see it being a problem, but it is, it is a change. And I think that it's something that I like to see in, you know, in a process where we could just discuss this as just this being the topic of the conversation. So, you know, making a motion to- Yeah, if I could send this to, I mean, rules or the committee of the whole- Yeah, with this involves all councilors should go to the committee.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, I completely understand. And I agree with, you know, with most of the subcommittee, the new subcommittee, you know, changes, but I think that really it's understanding each one with the vision of the President and what direction we're looking to go with when you're, you're talking and getting the input from, you know, our residents that that elected us to say, for instance, the school and racial balance, I think that's, you know, something that we need.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, right. So we want to change those two.
[George Scarpelli]: what is the change going to be. And if we're allowing the president to do that, and it's presented in a way that might have some animosity toward another city body, I think that's the concern that before doing that is understanding what the president's definition of each new title is. So I think that would be my only... Well, common practice is the president usually asks the members what committees they'd like to be on.
[George Scarpelli]: So Mr. President, if I can, I agree with Councilor Knight saying if it's standing committees, I'd support that. But I said, I think the question that we had were, if we're allowing the president to make some change. I think that has to be a discussion before. I think the standing committees I would support, but as we're moving forward to change or to add different committees, I think it's something that I wasn't privy to Councilor Knight's first few years and Councilor Camuso's, but I know what we've done here has worked in the sense that it's been transparent. I'd say that Councilor, President, I was not transparent and what I'm saying is having that extra meeting to talk about the new committees, I think, if there are, that'd be important. Other than that, I agree with Councilor Knight that we can move forward with the standing committees. I agree with that. Chair, would you like to support that?
[George Scarpelli]: And I think it goes both ways. So it is. That's why there are there are seven votes and there's no animosity behind it. We just move forward in a positive light.
[George Scarpelli]: Don't disagree. I think that Councilor Knight said they'd support all the standing committees, but I'd like to, any new committees is just to have a committee of the whole meeting, just to discuss those few meetings. And again, Councilor Morell's a voted president, and I think it's just having that layer of discussion. So other than that, move forward.
[George Scarpelli]: With the new committees.
[George Scarpelli]: And that would be my motion, that the committee We think it should be passed and we would have a committee of the whole discuss. On the new committees. On the new committees. That's all.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you for, my fellow Councilors, bringing this forward. I think Councilor Knight remembered this very vividly because I'm like my, my, my first year colleagues, which I don't know the background yet but I'm fortunate to work in a municipality that that people don't might not understand is that the sick bank is so important for brothers and sisters that you work with. that fallen ill for some serious health issues and employees that have occurred sick days that can give back to those that are in need for that. So I think it's so important and something that simple, you think that the Family Leave Act is just automatic in different municipalities. And so it's enlightening to a few members in the community thinking that don't we already have this? And it's something that, you know, I appreciate my council's bringing this forward and something I will support and I look forward to the community to hold me. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Now we see this is just a business that is a pizza restaurant, I believe. Is the petitioner online?
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I know my colleagues have some questions. I see all the paperwork is present in order for approval, so.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate, thank you, Council President. I appreciate Councilor and I bringing this forward. I think that it makes some valid points, but I think that talking to a few department heads, they've been accustomed to using that Wednesday evening that they are here when it might be a little bit slower. to really do the business that we we pass on on a Tuesday night for them to to to really get ahead of the game where Fridays they have a half a day they lose a half a day. So it kind of hinders that process so I appreciate that and You know I I think that you know it's something that be interesting to see as we share our thoughts and community that being on that point Mister president.
[George Scarpelli]: I think those people who know Miss Callahan realize how important it was to our community. It was a deep loss when he, when, when he left us, and, but his memory lives on in, in Council night and I applaud that he does this every year. Because you don't know where you go until you know where you came from. And definitely Mike Callahan is a person who led the way here in Medford and supported us. So I second Councilor Knight's motion.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Councilman, I thank you for bringing this forward. I think that you make some valid points. I think even, I think the most important point is we have a new committee, a new council here. I think We'll see that, especially when I first started, having that chart and understanding who to call saved a lot of work for everybody. Something simple as, I'll give you an example. I got a phone call today from a senior citizen who lives in South Medford, whose son is moving into his home to assist him so he doesn't have to move to assisted living. great gentleman lived has lived here for over 70 years. And question was very simple. Now with the changes with the traffic and parking, who is who can he call to, to find to ask for another permit, temporary permit while his son is living there with him without getting towed or ticketed. So it would be as we That being a new department, having that that outline would be so helpful for us to do our job, and more importantly, to help the city administration, assist them and and answering questions I know that. We created a whole new department. I think it was a few years ago with the former mayor that I believe when Mayor Burke came on her biggest problems were the communications, because of the pool and pond permitting system, and really have anything in place to answer the simplest questions, where can I get a, a pond pass and. I think that having that organizational system in place really helped that eliminated that. And if you remember, during those times. There are so many issues in Medford but the biggest talk the biggest concern was, how can people get a permit for the pond. When all it needed was just a simple phone number and someone to answer that question so I think that's a, you know, every point that Council night brings forward when talking about fiscal responsibility is important but to the simplest form. asset is really to help us and the our citizens navigate who they can call when there is a concern or an issue. So I second the motion. Council night. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, thank you. I'll do respect. You have probably one of the wealthiest gentlemen who's asking $2,500 from the city. I apologize. He's not asking for any money. You just said that he's asking the city.
[George Scarpelli]: I can't, I apologize. I just can't even think of doing that. When he, when he bought on listen I agree 1000%. I think encore is, this is a disgrace, but I also think. It's a city's responsibility that if we feel that it's affecting our downtown area if this happens, and they're breaking the agreement that they had with our neighbors, then this is something the city should have our own attorney our own city solicitor at the table. or as well as unfortunately law represents separate. Well, I know, but we do have a city solicitor. So before I vote on any money being handed off to anybody, there's gotta be some clarification that if the city solicitor can represent the city of Medford in these talks, making sure that the city of Medford is represented at this table, because it's definitely a disgrace what they're trying to do. They're trying to manipulate what the agreement was And it's going to hurt like you said, I care about our community but it does hurt all these small, small theaters across Massachusetts, it's going to, it's going to destroy something very very important. And I think instead of. assisting with $2,500 have have the representative from the Chevalier go at them their way. But I think the city should really take an active approach and hire a either have the city solicitor or bring on legal team that's not KP law that's going to share our concerns and move forward with that. I think the more people that are attacking this organization and Encore, whether it's the private entity, whether it's the cities and towns that have the neighbor's agreement, that we should all focus on that. I don't feel that You know all the respect I know you're saying I just I'd rather I'd rather if you ask for money that we asked the city to go out and get a representative that will be will work for the city at the table, I'll agree with that, giving the representative Chevalier $2,500 to. I can't I can't support that we get $1 ticket. I think that we're getting manipulated there too. So I don't agree. So I wouldn't be supporting the B paper, but if it's something that we're asking the city to file and work with and ask for funding from this council to approve, to move some sort of money to the budget so they can get legal representation other than KP law to fight, I'm behind that a thousand percent.
[George Scarpelli]: Through the chair, we heard the mayor speak, and we're so excited that the focus is going to be focusing on Medford Square. And now we're finding out that they're taking away the only piece that brings vibrant life to this community. And we're not going to have a standalone representative that I think it waters down how we truly feel about this issue. Maybe you agree or don't agree with me. I agree that we should have legal representation. My recommendation is that you take that off the table, Councilor, and we ask for the mayor to hire an attorney or a team that's going to fight for this, this issue as a standalone issue as a representative of the city and that did not a $2,500 and we're going to follow the coattails of the gentleman who's making millions off of this community. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So being a partnership, I think it belittles it, to be honest.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President, I think that to reiterate I think it's important that we as a council stand together and strong and asking the mayor to not come back with $2,500 next week, but to come back as a standalone battle against Encore and the gaming commission. So they know that there are two different entities coming out of this community going after what they're trying to do here. I think it's that important. And I think the other piece looking down the line, If this doesn't work in our favor, who's to say the person we're going into partnership with to battle this issue doesn't want to break a contract and then we find ourselves in a legal battle with that group. So I think working together would be a huge, huge disservice to our community. So I think, again, I wasn't as articulate and obviously it's Councilor Council night, but it's imperative that we are a standalone entity as a city of Medford fighting for the agreement that was put together and. And if I were the mayor, I would really love to have a conversation with with Mayor de Maria over and ever and ask him, is this the way we want to do business because I think that. They realize the impact the negative impact their paint these neighbor communities. That's not the way partnership I want to work with the neighboring neighboring administration. So, thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Knight and Councilor Carriel, bringing this forward, I know that another huge loss for the city of Medford. I think that losing my mommy, you realize the perspective you have. And especially when you're an elected official, I think that you realize that your mom is your number one fan. And I know that Mia Burke's mom was definitely her number one fan, and we send our condolences and best wishes.
[George Scarpelli]: And to that point, to that point, and to my fellow councils that are new, I think that the frustrating point was when we were posed questions and we needed guidance, we sat here looking very, very bad because the city solicitor responded back to us and said, I cannot answer your questions. Because of conflict of interest. So that's why the, the importance was that we had our own legal representation and it wasn't wasn't put forth at the time was like us against the mayor, it wasn't, it was to get guidance and how to proceed with an issue. We sat here I believe for two separate days. over a meeting that we did nothing but look at each other because nobody could answer the question because our legal representation, which is our city solicitor, couldn't guide us. And that's what was the frustrating point for me. And I think I appreciate the mayor trying this, but this brings us to the same concern, which is it goes to the city solicitor, which is a conflict when we have concerns dealing with issues that are brought to us with, you know, with the city. So again, that's a winded point of information, but I wanted to make sure that that was, that was my biggest concern. That's that we look like, we look like amateurs, and it looked really bad on us and this governing body in our community, that we didn't have that guidance.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, if I can.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I just think that it's just the common denominator that we've been talking about. And I'm going to stick to what I've been talking about with the proposal for the traffic and parking, not truly having a plan in place for moving forward with funding. We, we did that, when we're looking at what we talked about in the last, the last time we're here about funding for different positions and we talked about not really going through the understanding where we're going with the ARPA money, and why we just spending without having a plan. And I guess Council and I, I've been talking about the situation from the get go. You know, I understand that the, that the chief of staff has comparable salary structures from neighboring communities but just the biggest question that we had here that has still yet to be answered was that the chief people officer at the time that we looked at the salary was overseeing two big departments. And then one of those department was taken away, but yet we're now going up on that salary line. So I don't know where we're going. This is my confusion. It's not, I haven't got an answer. We're going to common sense when we're talking about your own home and your finances and budgeting your own home. You have to have answers to answer these basic questions. If you were hiring a painter to paint the wall and he was doing the carpentry work and you were paying X amount of dollars, perfect. But that carpenter now came in and said, all he's gonna do is paint, but we're still gonna ask you to paint, pay that person that same money. We're gonna question it, aren't we? I think everybody here will. And that's what I've done. And we still have yet to get a true understanding where, well, he's worth it. That doesn't help me answer the questions that constituents have put me here that said, Councilor Scarpelli, again, traffic and parking. We're talking about where this situation is going as we're moving forward traffic and parking. We're not taking it over tomorrow. We've approved vehicles, we've approved positions, people getting paid, car payments are gonna be made. We don't know what the plan is. They could be sitting in the garage for six months. You know plans for the opera money. We talked about who else is at the table, did we have other departments at that table like other communities have. So we said, the person that's higher that person that's going to be in charge of setting the tone that's going to facilitate that that'll have the expertise to do that that's the step we wanted. That's a step that we have to go forward. So we have a plan in place. I just don't see a plan. All I keep seeing right now are piecemeals that keep coming back to a slowly small, not small, but numbers every week with additional 50,000, 250,000, and there is no plan. So I made a comment that the frustration comes in that I have yet to have a true conversation with anybody from the administration with a guidance of where we're going. And I'll be totally honest as a city councilor, I feel belittled in the process because it's gonna get pushed through, it's gonna be moved forward, they're gonna find a way to get it through and nothing is gonna be discussed and we're still gonna be sitting here trying to answer questions to the people that put us in these seats without any answers. So that's my frustration. I'm frustrated. Am I gonna vote for that? No, I'm gonna stick to what I've been doing. I'm not gonna vote for any money paper. I don't know if you realize this. I'm not gonna vote for any money paper until somebody sits with me from the administration and shows me what steps were taken, which direction we're going to as a community. This shouldn't be a secret.
[George Scarpelli]: close to the 20 okay but we do have the federal funds manager hopefully coming on board so yes okay excellent i just wanted to be clear on that one i won't know thank you the point of information too with that because i believe that the conversation we had with this was to have a meeting with the other departments that weren't at the table this is where my confusion comes in that we tabled it for the purpose to go to committee of the whole meeting to bring all the departments that weren't at the table, because I believe what we talked about were the only people that were at the table, the health department and the, what is it? Community development, the only two department heads. And where we said, I think it was council Mark said, that, you know, Is the fire department eligible for ARPA money? Yes. Is the police eligible? Yes. DPW, yes. Seniors, senior center, yes. Then how can we proceed with this until we sit at the table with everybody? And I think that was the concern. Again, I'm gonna bring it up again to my freshman colleagues. Remember, you're approving a lot of money without a plan. So again, this is, This is something I will not support again, because until I get a better understanding of what we're doing in this community with all of our money, I'm not voting for anything to do with money. Make that known.
[George Scarpelli]: That's my fear to my council president.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Councilor Falco. Thank you everyone to, give us this opportunity this evening to honor a very special person in our community and a very special person to me as I started my plan as an elected official. Paulette, you've always been that person that sets us straight. There's been some crazy times in the school committee where my Italian got up and Paula would sit me aside and say, George, you need to take a deep breath. And she was always, you were always the most calm person in the room and someone we always admired and looked to for guidance when it came to your experience. And for everything you've done, for our children, the school system, and the city of Medford. We appreciate everything you've done. So I know that Councilor Falco wants to say something, but we're gonna be presenting a plaque this evening from the Medford City Council to congratulate Paula Van De Koop on her 32 years of dedicated service to the children, the city of Medford, December, 2021.
[George Scarpelli]: So if we can, Paula, can you come on up and accept this plaque on behalf of the city council?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate everybody's hard work on presenting this but, again, I think Council marks brings out some valid points. And the first point that I think that business area and has has expressed the beginning and that our community whole meetings is. is really a plan. I'm finding this bothersome that we talked about this with traffic and parking, that when we're talking about money and different departments and really not having a plan in place yet and still having a focus group, but that was passed. But as this comes through our process here, again, without having these positions, and with the shared vision. I don't know how we can support until we know what this this ARPA money is going to encompass, because one of the things that was very clear last week. that other department heads weren't involved in these discussions, not to say that these positions right now aren't important. And I would tend to maybe agree with Councilor Bears with continuing some of these positions. But I think right now, I think Councilor Marks brought it up last week, that this position, Amendment O, That should have been presented. I think that tonight would probably be the only position that I would even entertain for the fact that we really don't have a plan. And this person for this position is the person to help us with that plan. Other than that, I don't, until we bring everybody to the table and really share a vision, you know, I'm lucky that I work in a community that the city council works with the administration and they share each other's visions to get the product to the community. And I'm not seeing this here and I'm very disappointed, really disheartened actually. So this is a lot of money that can do a lot of great things for our community. And right now, it seems like what we're getting now with traffic and parking now this paper is We're just gonna add things and spend. And then when we come down to some important pieces that we all feel that are important, we're gonna be told what? Unfortunately, we spent all of our ARPA funding. And without a plan, I can't support this. So thank you. Thank you. Councilor Bacow.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. Are we in the process of, I thought we were in the process of reviewing everybody's salary. Is that something we were doing? Isn't that I believe it was something that the mayor brought up that they were going to look at every position and look at each individual salary. Is this still happening or this wasn't part of that?
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Last question, I'm sorry. Right now, how many of our units, are we whole now with every unit right now? Do we have any negotiations for contracts? A teacher's union, I believe is done. Are the other unions, as we move forward through these money papers, is everything complete? Do we have any big outstanding raises coming up or negotiations still out there?
[George Scarpelli]: This is the question I'm presenting is on behalf of a money paper that we're voting on about money that this city has to spend. So as we make our decisions, I think it's important that we know if there are outstanding negotiations. It's not, you could say yes or no. You could say that. I'm not asking for any money. I'm not asking for anything that would interfere with any sort of negotiations, union negotiations. The question I have in front of you is very simple. is that are there any outstanding negotiations still with any major union in the city as you move forward to vote on a money paper? I believe that has nothing to do with the violation of meeting law, because it's a money paper that's in front of us. We're voting on money.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so that would have been my next question. But if you answer the question, the simple question, because it seemed like it was avoidance, just so our chief of staff could understand what it looks like, at least to this council.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, Mr. President, this is not a position that's that's in place, correct? That is correct.
[George Scarpelli]: Any further questions? Mr. President. Councilor Scott Belli. Again, looking at the positions I agree with Council marks wholeheartedly. I believe I said that my first statement that we're doing this. We're doing this piecemeal, and it's not fair, but at the same time, I'm also looking at the positions that are there that are upholding that these positions to the coven. pandemic and looking to make sure that those positions are still moving forward. So as of right now, again, just for clarification, because maybe I'm not that quick, but the data analysis person is in place, but ends in June.
[George Scarpelli]: CARES Act that ends in June.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, I, I think, as we get closer, I think that Councilmarks brings up a great point that we I think it's important that we let all of the people that will traverse that area, know that that's not going to be a little area because it know, especially as we get going, I think that maybe that when we get closer to this project to completion, that we work with the city and the state to make sure that there's signs posted. And citizens all understand because that's pretty scary. I understand that's conservation land, but not having that area lit in many different levels. I know, I know Councilmember Mox brought up the big point of the the members of the community a little bit about this. Um, we've gone to a lot of discussion with this, but now not having a lit area and we can understand being police the right way. And we appreciate state and local authorities working together. But I think that, um, making sure at the time we post, um, throughout that area as it gets dark so people can understand that it will not be lit. I know that if my daughter says, Dad, I'm going to go to one side or the other, and I'm going to be pretty scared as a parent that my daughter is going to make that trek during the evening when it's not lit. That could be a recipe for some pretty serious issues. So I would hope that as we get closer and I bring this forward, that we all agree to at least that point that it's a public notice and we put out some signage so people understand what's happening. So thank you. Thank you. Any further questions?
[George Scarpelli]: Happy birthday Stella.
[George Scarpelli]: a face we miss around here and the godmother of Medford. What a great tribute to acknowledge Stella's 90th birthday. We have to thank her for her number one present to the city of Medford, the birth of her little young son, Steve. And little Stevie and what he's done for the city. So thank you and happy and hopefully many more birthdays, Stella. Mr. President, I just see little Steve actually here in the audience.
[George Scarpelli]: State Representative Donato, can you walk him up? State Representative Donato, can you walk him up? State Representative Donato, can you walk him up? State Representative Donato, can you walk him up?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. To my friend John Falco, it's a sad day. I won't lie to you. I first want to thank his his family, his wife, Jackie. I don't think anyone could say they had a better partner beside them. I think that Jackie has showing that she supports you in every which way and allowing her to represent the city for so many years. I think that you've done an amazing job with your boys, John, Joey, and Jack. I think that it's a great, you show not only how, what kind of a leader you are, but also as a parent. If only one day, you could dress down and make me feel okay. I dress. You just couldn't do it. I thought maybe today you'd show up with that fake tuxedo shirt and but you didn't do it john and I applaud you, but We've gone through a lot. We started this together some time ago and we decided the reason why we wanted to do it is because we love Medford and we wanted to do what's best for Medford. And you stepping up and challenging the mayor for the most important seat here in the city, I think gives you, shows a lot in who you are as a person. And a lot of phone calls, I mean, I think other than Dina and I talking, I think you probably in the top three phone calls that we shared. We didn't see eye to eye in some things, but we always respected each other. And I think that's what we see that we're lacking in society. It's okay to disagree, but always have that respect for each other. And I think that you've done that. You've been a great example of that. called you my friend before we started this journey. And hopefully I call you a friend for a hundred more years. So thank you for everything you've done. It will be sad. I think that a lot of times when I look across the room, I look at my two colleagues to look for, you know, support and something I said or something somebody said, and all you guys have to do is show me your eyes and especially with these wonderful masks. Your friendship and guidance is something that I'm going to miss as a Councilor, but I know we'll be together for a long time. So you've made your mother and father very proud. You've made the Falco name very proud. And, um, and thank you for everything.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. First, again, I think we owe a great gratitude to Mike's wife, Lisa, his daughters, Gianna and Olivia, and son, Evan. I think that when we've talked, we've talked so proudly of your children, and it makes me a better father. As a person, When I got that phone call, when you called me and said Georgia decided to step down, whether you realize it or not, it got choked up. And because I think that what Michael Marx has taught us is to love Medford, be true to who you are and fight for the community members, whether you know them or not. Nobody talks about charter review and wanting to have precinct award representation, Michael Marx is a great example, why that might not help why that might not work, because Michael Marx worked as hard as he could for someone that lived in Wellington Glenwood. or someone who lived in Hillside or someone from West Medford and North Medford or South Medford. You worked hard for every single person. Not only that, you were prepared. And I think I said this probably one of the most impressive evenings. And I remember that night that you came out and talked about an issue and you were so thorough and so prepared that I don't know how we as a council couldn't support you. And I think that's what you've always done because you've believed in what you wanted to say. And again, I'll say it again. I think that if society understood what happens in these chambers and we can all understand to agree to disagree and have the pride and respect for a person across from you that might not look at things the same way, but maybe understand it. Because I tell you a lot of times I didn't agree what you were saying, but I had to take a step back like my dad taught me with his Jesuit upbringing. To put yourself in that person's shoes and I realized a lot of time, boy, you don't wear to eat. And my feet hurt because I stood in your shoes so many times and realized, wow, that man is right. And most of the time is because you love Medford. I'm gonna, it's gonna be tough because one thing you realized is what a good man you are. And a lot of people, you know, when you first got on that, all that Michael Mox, he's something. He just, he's just an angry man and he's just not a good man. And then you sit with the man, you realize what a great individual, what a great father, what a great husband, what a great friend. Because I tell you, Mike, when I might have something down with my family, you were there, the phone call was there, had nothing to do with city council. You know, whether it was a edible arrangement for my daughter when she was going through a tough time. And when I said today is Council Marks' last day, she says, I have basketball. Can I watch it? I said, you can watch it. But she really wanted to be here because you make impacts on people's lives that you don't even know. So I will tell you, I know that what you've given this city, I don't know if people really truly appreciate it until you're gone, but you have made a fighter out of every single one of us and taught us how to do it the right way. So my friend, thank you for all your years of service. You set a path that people should follow, that passion should be in our hearts, no matter if you're here a year or 44 years. And I will carry that on with me until my last day in the seat. And you'll always be my friend. And I think that's what's more important. So thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Councilor Morell.
[George Scarpelli]: It looks like it's a changeover from what was the expresso pizza on Boston Ave. And it looks like our petitioner is Peony's Pizza, a very well-known and reputable business in neighbor communities, correct? And everything I see here, Mr. President, is in order. The reputation of this company is a very positive one, and I move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: I can hear your passion, and I'm excited about that passion, but I tend to disagree with my colleague, which I seldom do, to the fact that we're in a position where, I'm in agreement with Council Marks, that Mrs. Zarian said it herself, that we don't even have the community input yet. So having a plan in place and having vehicles and a software system in place, and spending that money right now, and possibly, possibly setting you up to feel that when we unveil this, it won't be till another five or six months, and we've just purchased something, leased something, or purchased something for five or six months that we're not using. And we still have to pay for that process. We still have to pay for those materials. So I think that, like Council Member Marx says, I tend to agree with him in the sense that why not wait put a plan in place where maybe we're talking to our traffic department and having them assist until we can unveil a true process so we're not running our heads into the wall like we've talked about in the past and what we see coming in the future because what we're going to see is, you know, it's, you know, the lack of cooperation from Republic parking, that's a hindrance. It's hurting us right now. We don't have community participation. We truly haven't seen a plan that we could roll out that spells what we want to do, because ultimately when it comes down to it, I know you're going to hear it, Faye, but we're going to hear it too when it comes to the community members saying, wait a second, just like my dad, when he went to go find a kiosk, that's 70 something years old, and he walked around the neighborhood and couldn't find a kiosk. So something simple as that, just to give people the expectations of what's coming. And I reiterate, I agree with you, Mrs. Ayer, and tomorrow night's an important meeting, but I'm gonna be honest with you. If we really wanna do this right, we're gonna need more than one meeting with the community. So until we know all these factors that we can put all this in, and this is why I disagree with my colleagues to the point I write that, We don't know where this is going yet. At least I don't feel comfortable with it because we haven't even sat down with the Republic yet to understand what the money figures look like, what we're really looking at down the road. Believe me, I'm all in with this. I think it's gonna be a great process. We've got a great leader in place, but at the same time, rushing it to make it happen by January 6th is an unrealistic and unachievable goal. Can I say something? By the time we order a desk from Faye, it's not gonna be till February. So it's something that simple. So, I mean, we've said a lot of contradictory things to each other, but ultimately we want this to succeed, but we also want to make sure we have everything in place that we can present it the correct way so we can vote on it in a more thorough and educated format. Because as the steward of fiscal responsibility of our community, It's great that we talked about a startup of $350,000, but we don't know if we're looking at another $2 million, a million dollars, we don't know that. And that's no one's fault, but the system, so.
[George Scarpelli]: I will work on that. Faye's saying in the contract, there's only two cars in there, 14 and 16. If they're driving new cars, they can. Yeah, well, I'm starting to drive around with other guys.
[George Scarpelli]: Absolutely.
[George Scarpelli]: That clerk is essentially
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, if I can. I don't see this being a long wait. I called for a meeting on maybe Tuesday. just so we can sit down and discuss this a little more.
[George Scarpelli]: And then move forward with it. So it's not something I want to hold it off. I just want us to make sure we have everything in place.
[George Scarpelli]: Can you hear me? Can you hear me?
[George Scarpelli]: It's so crooked. Smash a bank for me.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, no, no. You're so crooked. Go to jail.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. Would you like to wait for the other councilors, Mr. President? The second meeting's going on, and would you like me to?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Mr. President, bring this forward. Chief has been a rock here in the community for so many years and now I can publicly say my dream is to, when I grow up, is to be like Chief Gilberti, hoping to get hair plugs, lose some weight and go to the tanning beds and And we could say this publicly now, can we please get the new chief Friedman. I know, I know, Chief Gilbert he had his, his, his city vehicle, which had the right the side to look really close. It's a fire chief. So I wanna get a nice big sign so everybody knows who our fire chief is. No, but seriously, we appreciate all the hard work he's done. I know it's not easy. You can't make everybody happy 100% of the time. And I think chief had that balance to make sure that his department worked for the best interests of our community. And we appreciate that. So thank you. Chair recognizes Council Member Morell.
[George Scarpelli]: Would you like to?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, who have we invited? I miss that, Mr. President. For the Committee of the Whole meeting, we want, what departments are we asking, requesting again?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, if we can't to go back to that I think that it's important I'm going to hop on this until we find some sort of resolution I think it's important that we have a clerk of the works. That's really reporting back to the city when we talk about these, these huge, huge inconvenience wrote the roadwork that's going on again. If we have someone there on site every day something's going to get done something's going to be reported to the right people because there's definitely a disconnect, and I think that who's paying the price up and down Winthrop Street not the South Street and no council mark said it but You know this, it's no different than the rattling of the plates, you know, it's, I've talked to a few neighbors in Winchester, and I said geez I said do you have the same concerns with the rattle and plates, and they say no that was one of the first initiatives I talked to them about making sure that every time they drop those plates. It was an enough of a buffer to make sure that didn't happen. But you travel and traverse right over the line. And it seems like the slap in the face keeps coming back with these huge companies like Eversource and National Grid. So I appreciate the welcome. I think we need every department there that's possible. And we need to make sure that we have a watchdog moving forward that's representing the city to make sure that Everything that that person will say from Eversource is held accountable, because if you remember the first meeting we had at Eversource, remember everyone? The gentleman came up and he had a plan, and this is great, they're gonna put door signs, and everybody, this is my cell phone number, people call me, remember how great that was? I have yet to hear from that, that man disappeared. It was a figment of our imagination, because there has been no communication, no support from Eversource. And again, We know we had no power control to allow them in. We heard that a thousand times, but we also heard that we would get the support and the people would have, somebody would hear a voice that when something needed to be done. And I'm just so disappointed. I'll say this to the end. This is what we hear every day, roads, sidewalks, and a lot has to do with our, our partnerships with Eversource and National Grid. So I'm pretty disgusted. I appreciate Council President bringing this forward. Thank you. Chair recognizes Councilor Peco.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you for bringing this forward. And I'm gonna go at this a few different ways. Tim, first of all, thank you for listening to us and giving us the answers as a department head the best you can, because we've been accused of being bullies in sense to other department heads, but I think people don't understand. When this isn't a console Scarpelli issue of console Falco show council moral issue. This is an issue that we get from our constituents. I think all of us got calls saying is this crazy. Look at Mr. Gav, what a mess, what are they doing. It's not a reflection to how we feel. We're the voices that people call to ask these questions. So first, I wanna thank you just for doing the best you can to answer these questions. I know they're not ideal answers that we all wanna hear, because we all wanted to hear you say tonight, Tim, is okay, it's all gonna be repaved, everything's gonna be perfect, and we'll do it right. But we know that's not the case, but we do have to figure this out. And maybe not Mr. Cabot as we move forward. I asked year after year of a clerk of work, someone that represents the city of Medford and what the city of Medford requires to their specifications for what this council is going to be asked on and answer these questions. not a consultant and I asked at the budget meetings, the chief of staff responded by saying, we would like to look into I think was a resolution put in place that we'd asked that. Why can't we as we bring all these projects into Medford, ask for part of a fee to go to a clerk of the works that's hired. Through the city of method that knows our specs understands what we expect in this community, because I'm sure I'm sure that the engineer that they hired is a qualified engineer, but at that engineers there to collect a check from ever source. And that person is going to look at that and say hey it looks great. I will tell you in the community I work in. If they know there's rain coming in on a Monday and a Tuesday, like they have, and they've got their trucks out there that night before, I'm gonna tell you straight out, I know these people, they're gonna say, absolutely not, because I'm not sitting there at a city council meeting the next week, like we are today, dealing with this, because now we're talking about ifs and what ifs. And that's the problem now. So, and again, this isn't about you, Tim, you're doing the best job you can, and I appreciate that, but I'd like to make an amendment to this, that we ask the city administration to look into, with the city solicitor, a proper form of funding that with all these projects that are coming in, that we have a clerk of the works that works for the DPW director, that answers to the DBW director, not that the DPW director has to ask the engineer who has to ask the Eversource engineer that they paid for it to see what happened or what's going on. I asked for a resolution was I asked for all the paving projects that was that were put out there for the last two years I got the report back which is great is all of the small jobs that were put out there, the Tufts, the C.J. Daugherty companies, you have the addresses. What I really wanted to see is all of the national grids, the Eversources, and what I got back was national grid, no address. Because when I drive to an area and a constituent has an issue with, oh, they cut this up, who is they? So they give me a time frame, so at least I can refer back as I drive by and say, oh, that looks like a job in front of 17 Butler Street, that that was a gas recut and they had to go back in because now that road is sinking, it's easy to go back and tell National Grid as we move forward, this is the work that you're doing. So again, it's frustrating to the point that we sit up here and people in the city that don't know the process and what happens come up here and the braid us because, and I don't begrudge them for that. This is what we're here for, but they braid us because the streets of this and the streets of that and the sidewalks of this and sidewalks of that. And most of the time, there's nothing to do with this body or the city employees. It has to do with the outside agencies that come into the city. So I implore that the city administration, there are definitely ways to do this, whether it's working directly with the DOT, Eversource, National Grid, these companies have big bucks, and we have to find a way that we can subsidize their funding to make this happen, to bring in a clerk of the works that'll make sure they're doing what's best for the city of Medford, not for what the company that's giving them their paycheck by the end of the day. So again, Tim, again, this is no reflection on you. I know this is a difficult position you're in and that's all we keep hearing. Everybody here has been campaigning and all you keep hearing is infrastructure, streets, roads, sidewalks, curbs, catch basins, you hear it everywhere. But if we don't have the things in place as we move forward, this is only gonna get spiral even more out of control. And this is a huge issue, because I think you're right, Council President, we're gonna be sitting here, whether I'm on the other side of the rail, this side of the rail in six years, we're gonna be talking about how deplorable Mystic Ave looks again, and shame on you, because this came in front of this body back then, and we just threw it away. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Scapelli. Thank you. So I appreciate Councilors bringing this forward. I know that we have many phone calls myself. when you're not getting the information that's needed, because I think that's the biggest frustrating point now. I think the cat's out of the bag. I think everybody knows that they have the right and it's going to happen. But what the problem right now is not understanding when, how the quality of life is being uprooted and the damages that's going to happen. So again, I'm going to request that we call for all of the people involved, a representative from that team and the city administration again. And we go to that site because if we're not getting the answers, if the constituents aren't getting the answers they need when they're contacting different departments or asking for help, we have to take it to the street. So I appreciate, again, we've done it before, it worked out well, I think that It was, people weren't happy at times, but at least they got the answers questioned and they asked the question to the right people. Because again, we're getting, I'm sure all of you are getting the same email from the same people who aren't getting the answers that they need. And again, so I'd like to amend this if we can, to call for a meeting as soon as possible, because we're talking about 20 more days of blasting, that we bring all the parties involved, to the neighborhood, you know, and we have a community meeting at the site. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I think God brings forward I actually am honored to have been on that original committee, and the hard work by grassroot organization with Bill Carr and Jay Sharma that started that program, and they were, they were, they were we tried our best to build in a system that part of that fees 10 years ago, 12 years ago would go to what we're talking about right now. And that's obviously not happened. I wish it, I hope it did. Maybe there is something in that account, but we put out to the state for one of our stadiums two, three years ago, and we are finally now, resurfacing turf at Dillboy Stadium. So this is in that field is probably about a year away. And one of the biggest things you'll hear the geo studies, a concussion test study. So that's going to be, you know, you might get to a point where you don't have any options once that test comes back and it fails. you're not going to have any options. It's going to be closed. So I think that it's important that bringing this forward today, I think it's important that we move on this and it's not cheap. So maybe there's a way to look into the the monies the federal government gave us to, if there's a way to, with infrastructure needs. So it's gonna be daunting, but I appreciate you bringing this forward, and it's something that this administration has to work on yesterday. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for bringing this forward. These are one of the deaths that happen in a community that stop everything. And it's instantly felt across the community. As he was called the unofficial mayor of Medford, I think, and he had the right to hold that because he had a great demeanor about him. I think, I remember back as a young man in high school, first being introduced to Officer Butts, and he really tried to look at situations and really try to use common sense to come to an end result to help, especially kids. And he gave so much, that's one of the things you hear so much as you talk about him throughout the community, how much Billy Butts gave to kids and how much he gave to his community. And it took the wind out of my sails because he was a pretty special person. And our family, St. Francis, I know that my mom really loved him. Dad really loved him. He left that impact on anybody who came across him. So I know I've talked to a few of his brother and sister, police officers, and they were punching the gut. This is something that really threw everybody for a loop. So condolences to his family. Know that Billy Butts leaves a legacy. like no other and a legacy that people should be proud of if you've known him, if you didn't listen to a story, understand the person and try to emulate what he's done because he's a great role model and great example of a human being and a police officer. So rest in peace, my friend, he will definitely be missed.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. First, personally, it's the first time I've been back here for a while. I just want to publicly again thank my colleagues and the Medford community in supporting my family and my mother's battle and then just recently her death and I appreciate everybody for standing beside me and this brings me to this resolution. Last week, I really didn't want to miss another meeting. I jumped on Zoom. I was still with family and I was trying to do the city's work and as I went back and checked my notes, I realized that I listened to the question in reverse. So I made a mistake. I contacted Clark Curtabese the next morning and asked for reconsideration. So I know it was a lot of work, but my preference would be leaving it alone or looking at another section. So right now I'd like to reconsider and change my vote.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate it, but I knew what Ms. Gail said, and unfortunately, I just listened to the question.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. As I reviewed all the paperwork, I know that everything seems in order. I know that this is a Asian taste restaurant on Middlesex Ave. Is this just a family run restaurant? I'm sorry. Are we changing anything that we have right now in the footprint?
[George Scarpelli]: No, I see everything in order, Mr. President. So I request any additional comments from my colleagues.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Knight.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. And thank you, Councilor Marksley, for bringing that up. And I think these are the issues and concerns we have because You know, today it's our friends from Brooks Street. And last month is our friends from Fulton Heights. Another one, we'll get one from South Method. So we're hearing you. But what I'm gonna suggest today, something that we see that works, I think was Council Falco that brought this up in the Fulton Heights area, is that we call for a meeting with all the parties involved, city administration, traffic engineer, traffic department, police chief, and really have a meeting at the site. And I think we did that and was it Fulton Fulton Spring Road. And some of the things we talked about some of the traffic common measures, measures, weren't as extensive or expensive or time consuming like we're talking about because It doesn't sound like it's, it's obviously what it is very unsafe, and especially for neighbors that that can't traverse their own front of the house I think it's it's a disgrace. So, I think that with this council's support that we call for a meeting relatively soon and whether it's getting bad but We do it at the location. And we talk about some of the traffic calming measures. For instance, stop signs, making sure lines are painted. Not the raised sidewalks, but if it's a long direct street that in other parts of the neighborhood, we see them in Lawrence Road. It's the, not a speed bump, but do you recall the name? The speed table? It's where it's raised, where there are lines painted on it, where people can see it as it's coming up. So it's not drastic. uh, bump, but it's, it's, it's risen. So you have to slow down. So then we could talk about, you know, one way the do not enter what the process is for doing a one way. I think that we can do because this council could present it all and what we'll do tonight, I'm sure we'll all send this out to the city administration and then we'll get a little piece of paper next Tuesday and it'll say, you know, from the mayor's office who they sent it to and Unfortunately, once we get to that point, we're left with. a year later, a constituent coming back and saying, thank you for putting on, but we haven't seen anything yet. And I think that that needs to be followed up with a better format. But what I'm trying to say is, I'll make the motion tonight that we call for a meeting at the location with all of the parties that need to be there, whether it's city administration, chief of police, traffic engineer, DPW. DPW, of course, so we can get things, you know, we'll reach out to DPW direct tomorrow and we'll ask them to at least go to where the areas are where there are giant potholes where we have neighbors falling in 12 inches that they can patch those right away. I can't see why that's something that we can reach out quickly for, but- What did I mention? Yeah, sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: So the resolution, Mr. President, the resolution is to have the meeting and get all the parties involved so we can do an on-site visit so you're not running around talking to this body that unfortunately, I wish I made the call that said, let's go do that because there were 30 last year that we asked to fix too. listen, it's not good. We know that. So I believe me, I apologize, but this is getting frustrating for us too. So that's why I asked my colleagues to join me in voting to have an onsite with all the, all the department heads that need to be there.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry about that.
[George Scarpelli]: be a two lane road. Maybe it should be one direction or where it could start going into two directions. So, you know, we could, that's something that, that's why we want everybody there because I can feel your frustration that where is the meeting? Do we go? If we don't can't do it here, where do we go? So we're trying to do now is we're bringing the meeting to you and let's get all your neighbors out. Let's get everybody out and let's let's let them speak because unfortunately some people there's actions when there's a crowd around them. And if that's what we have to do, that's what we have to do. And unfortunately, you know, my wife gets mad because I can't go apple picking again, but it's fine. I hate apples. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: It's such a cozy neighborhood, it looks like. So everybody's all tight and cooped together.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. First of all, I know that mom had her her funeral today and I just want to thank everybody that's on the council that supported my family and and and understand the reason why I'm not there this evening but I just I want to just make sure that as we're This is something I presented a few weeks back that was being held off, and I appreciate to bring this forward this evening, but if we could just get a report from the city administration, the engineer's office, that we can look back at some of the projects that we've done that have been performed by, especially our utility companies, and if the projects were successful, brought back to what we request every time that the openings are at the same or better condition. So if we can get just a simple list and what has been done so I can check. It's not just one. The problem is there's probably about 15 to 16 that people have contacted me on. So if we can get that, that'd be greatly appreciated.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Mr. Thorde was a longtime Methodist resident who lost his life in battles with cancer, and a very important person in my life was one of the first people to volunteer and call and help my run in the school committee years ago. And I graduated with a son, Scott, and a longtime Medford family, and I just wanna send sincere condolences and well wishes to the family. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Mister president again this is something that before weeks ago so I appreciate bringing forward again this evening but I was probably one of them. Most phone calls I've been receiving this from my constituents about the rat problems we're having and I can understand the plan with the city moving forward with the health department, but I think we really need to move forward more aggressive, more detailed plan, and bringing in some professionals that really see this rodent infestation or rat infestation as being what they do best. I think that especially what's going on with the pandemic and what other issues our health department has, I don't think we're really putting enough time to really attack this problem before it even gets worse. So I know just recently Channel 4 and 5 had Melrose's issues and we had so many different other neighboring communities that are going through the same situation, but I just don't want to you know, get so far behind with this, this concern that we're going to be, we're going to be really in trouble. So what I've asked is the city administration, the health department, um, is really work together and try to put together and invite, um, you know, uh, professionals, both the, the academia level and maybe contacting our neighbors and see what we can do as a collaboration, especially when we abut some of these cities that are having such a horrific time with this. So it is an issue. I mean, I went to five different homes prior to my little hiatus and The barrels have been eaten through, you see nests. I know that council's put forth some changes hoping to allow private entities to, public entities to enter private private homes, so we're hoping we can do more. So again, really reach out to the city administrator and put together a working group that will attack this and its necessity as it's been called on. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Councilor Falco? Yes. Vice President Knight? Yes. Councilor Parks?
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Now, I'm fortunate enough to know the gentleman at the podium, it's someone that I idolized growing up across the street, probably hit the farthest half ball home runs I've ever seen in life. So some people looking, what is half ball? But this is what, you know, we talked about the last year and how difficult the last, really the last year has been in really society. And I think that, you know, we talk about, you know, the division in our community and At that time, if you remember back then, Medford's baseball was sort of what the city was about today. And there wasn't anybody really bringing that together. And I think Ronnie and your team really stood up and kind of put baseball back on the map in Medford. I remember as a young man watching this happen and saying, wow, I would love to be part of that. And you could hear the kids that I would teach, they would be so proud to be in that tournament. And then to move it to the next level where you see where it really pays dividends and shows where the kids that needed it the most found something and reaching out to challenge it and having families, the Alaskans and the Butler's for some that have been supporting it for years and doing great things in our community. And it's been a sad, it's been a sad couple of months here. You know, you're hearing these different, all these different changes in Medford. And for someone who grew up with these great changes, I'm excited to see what the next step will be. But when you see the moving on of a Michael Mox or the end of an era and challenger and the MIT and see what you guys have done, I want you to realize there's a reason why people want to move to Medford. And it's people like yourself, Ron, and your team that made Medford the city that everybody loves and wants to be part of. So I'm proud of that. I'm proud to be your friend. And I thank you for everything you've done. And I can't wait for Sunday's event and support you guys again. And those people that don't know the reason why I leave, I have a sweating problem. So I don't know what it is lately. It's like 90 degrees and humid and we have our, and you know, I try to, I've been pawning my kids off now. Hey, we're going to volunteer. And then I try to hide behind a tree. So, but I just got to tell you, again, thank you for everything you do and we're definitely going to miss this.
[George Scarpelli]: Is that a motion? No, congratulations. Yeah, right. So make the motion that under special rules, we have a presentation from Councilor Falco to Eagle Scout. No, we need to vote on this one first.
[George Scarpelli]: He's a little slow today.
[George Scarpelli]: Come on up, Desmond. Thank you very much. Mr. President, if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, Desmond's making his way up there. I think that it's important that I think everybody here really celebrates Desmond's achievements. I think that, you know, first, I've been given the honor in the past to present an Eagle Scout, and I think that was one of my biggest honors, because you realize how amazing and how important and What an honor this is the great people that have done that. So, and I know Chris Murphy comes out every year, every time there's an Eagle Scout presented as a fellow Eagle Scout he's here to present so here to show his respect. So again, with your family and in the whole team behind you. I know the work that has to be done to do that. And I know Desmond understands the greatness that is upon you now. You know, president, vice president, something big is gonna happen, Desmond. Just don't forget Medford. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, and having a mass exodus with our board would be devastating, so I'd support this, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President, but maybe Mr. Chen can... We're asking for your name and address.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so a couple of few questions. I know that now this is just changing over from one. Yes. The other correct. I know the word when it comes. Yes, correct. I think that's just just the term that we use cleaning dying. Yeah. You know, yeah. The biggest, you know, in this area is what's happened in years of water so people may see dying, but just to be sure this is just a legal form a formality for cleaning and laundry.
[George Scarpelli]: How many employees do you have? How many employees we have?
[George Scarpelli]: All right, and your hours of operations?
[George Scarpelli]: Six to 11, okay.
[George Scarpelli]: to 11 p.m., sorry. Great. And so, I know the service is a lot of the college, Tufts University. Exactly. Yes. Okay, I know that the business there was good, respectful and there were no issues. I know that moving forward, we see everything in order. I don't see anything holding this petition up. I just wait for my colleagues if they have any questions.
[George Scarpelli]: We're up to regular order of business, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: We have information Councilor Scapelli. I'm sorry, I'm a little confused. Are you saying that there's a discrepancy that we're not, we're not, it's not, I'm confused. You're saying that there's an issue with the fire escape that has no reflection to citizens, but to the landlord, what does that have to do with, I'm confused with this project.
[George Scarpelli]: So Citizens Bank does not agree with number two, then?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, do you realize this is a hearing that will depend whether this council supports us or not? A city engineer is requesting that this be one of the stipulations. You understand that, right?
[George Scarpelli]: I'm trying, I'm just, I don't know.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, no problem. Unfortunately, the city engineer isn't on the call, and as I'm reading this, our city engineer division recommends that existing encroachments be allowed to remain so situate for as long as they remain in good condition. If they fall into disrepair or poor condition, the city will revoke the license. The existing encroachment includes a metal fire escape building and sign attached to the building. So you're saying that, um, so I just want to make sure we're clear on this. So you're saying that citizens bank does not agree with number two and will not.
[George Scarpelli]: It's existing, and for item number two, the engineer is giving us direction as a council. These are steps that the engineer is giving us that you would abide by, so we would give you this permit. We would allow this to happen. Do you understand what we're saying?
[George Scarpelli]: If I understand that correctly. Right, but I'm understanding that Mr. Salaam said that they do not support what that is because that is... He's saying that that's not part of his scope of work.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm going to yield to my fellow consultants.
[George Scarpelli]: This is not Citizens Bank's concerns, it's the landlord's concerns. So obviously, so they're not taking responsibility for that, if that happens. Am I confused with that?
[George Scarpelli]: What he's saying is- It's not a question, Ricky. This stuff is already there. We know that, but if the petitioner just said, this is what I'm getting at, he said that This is a disagreement with the landlord. That's the landlord's responsibility. Well, the landlord's not here for this permit. Citizens Bank, if they're not gonna take responsibility for this, then they're not gonna support this. Do you understand what I'm saying?
[George Scarpelli]: Why would you bring up the landlord? What would this council need that for?
[George Scarpelli]: Yes How is that so difficult Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scott. I think this is such a big issue because I have also reached. I did talk to a few residents that welcome the ramp because, uh, you know, handicapped accessible. I think it's very important, but I think it's unfinished business between the petitioner and the city engineer. uh I think it might behoove us that both parties that we table this so we get further clarification so this possibly could go to no vote which would then extend this longer than we should so I don't know if um if that might be the course I just put it out to my colleagues to to maybe contemplate that without the engineer being here with the assessor really not gauging, you know, the understanding of this as much as we should right now, because understandable factors. And, you know, I don't, I see the sides on both sides. It's a city sidewalk. It's taking land that not everybody will now traverse because it's being, uh, handicap ramp, which I think it's very important. I think that I want to move this forward, but I just want to make sure that, you know, there seems some discrepancies and some, uh, to be gone, but the negotiations shouldn't be done at this level. This should be done by the city engineer who are the professionals in this situation with our city administration, the council. So I truly think we should table this and until we get this information that Mr. Salam and his team sit together with the engineer and the city administration to clean up these fine issues. So this isn't in jeopardy of failing this evening.
[George Scarpelli]: know exists. Right. So what are we trying to do here?
[George Scarpelli]: We're setting precedent right now. This council setting precedent something we don't know. know that we've never done before. So I think we need guidance and we don't have anyone right now. We don't have the engineer. Our assessor has just told us that there's not enough time right now to get the information that she needs to help us with this. And I understand West Medford, but I also know that Salem Street encompasses a lot more of the sidewalk.
[George Scarpelli]: But it's a longer sidewalk.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President, I know that I'd like to vote on the motion, so it is out. And then I truly think, you know, we Like the gentleman said, I think we get everybody involved. We don't want to go in circles, but we think we bring Tim. We have the city assessor. We have city administration. We bring in, you know, even the ADA compliance officer. I think that it's important that he's here right now. So, you know, we get all these answers, these questions answered because it does, it is important. I think that it's, you know, not the idea is very important, but I think the process has to be done the right way. So this council doesn't set precedent for something that's leading us in a bad path moving forward. So I, you know, if I can. Yeah, I understand. We understand. Thank you. Motion to table?
[George Scarpelli]: I'm going to I'm going to motion the table and, um, have the if we can ask promotion that we have the city engineer, the ADA officer and the city sister and the city administration work together to try to find, um, uh, common ground so we can, uh, not chase the tail all day, so we can get this project moving forward. I know it's a delay, but I don't wanna go to a vote, the vote's no, and then we can't bring this up for a long time. So if we can do that, I vote to table.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Correct.
[George Scarpelli]: And while we're there, I personally, you know, for my edification to get the understanding of point number two. So that's a little bit clearer in my eyes, you know, but my thing is moving past two, six and seven, we need that clarification.
[George Scarpelli]: Yep, exactly.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, a quick question as far as
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scott Belli. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Council, for bringing this forward. I think that Mr. Fusco is someone that I personally would reach out to if we had issues or concerns, and he'd be the first person to call back. Always had a solution to assist you in not leaving people in the lurch or leaving them dumbfounded. I think that Councilor Marks, as his knowledge of what he does, is second to none, and I agree. He would have been a great chief. But more than that, I think the respect And what he gets from his colleagues and the people that work for him, I think is pretty pretty impressive. So I think that it's again, you celebrate and you applaud and you congratulate him on his retirement, but it's definitely, they're definitely gonna be shoes that need to be filled by a few people, I think. So thank you, Mr. Fusco, and again, a great Medford family, and I'm glad he settled in this area to raise his family. So thank you so much. Thank you. Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: I can amend that. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you for Councilor Caravielloo bringing that forward. I know that, you know, with the updates now with the tennis courts and as you see what goes on at Duggar Park and how much of a vital pocket is the community there. I often thought why those guardrails are even there. I think that there's gotta be something more pleasing to the eye. I know that there is the post and reel type of guardrail. So it'd be interesting to see if we could ask the South State delegations to look at maybe converting that old rod iron, which is pretty dangerous on the other side, very dangerous on the other side, that we can look at more traditional, you know, fencing that's used. If there's any even needed. I know that there's a need because I think there's no sidewalk, I believe. But I think we need something there. But I think that there are so many aesthetically pleasing, you know, solutions we can use. I know that they have just the, it has the wood look that has the post and rail look. I think it looks so much classier, more inviting and allows the openings along as you walk. So, and provides the safety that's needed. But I know a few times with kids that are playing basketball and, you know, I know it's further away, but someone's taking a run at that and they run into that guardrail. I'm shocked we haven't, at least we haven't heard. any more serious incidents. So if you allow me to amend that to ask the state delegates to look at replacing that altogether.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, I know Council and I wanted to be a talk on his good friend Mike McDevitt, I think that Mike is a fixture, and his family's method method icons I think that Mike deserves. Congratulations, and a pat on the back because he uses. the post for so many outreach events for community events to bring our community together. And he's a catalyst behind that. So I just want to thank him and congratulate him. And I hope that my colleagues join me with that. Thank you, Councilor Scott Felly. Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I think that once the word came out such an event, I think anytime that we have an opportunity to celebrate and stand hand in hand with our veterans, I think we as a community have to stand up and do so. So I thank Councilor Knight for bringing this initiative forward and giving me the opportunity to spread the word and making sure that we all find our way to supporting our veterans that day and letting them know that the city of Medford truly, truly appreciates everything they've done for us and where we've come, where we are today and where we go tomorrow. I think our veterans are a key part and a cornerstone of that vision. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Maggie Tootin.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry, I jumped the gun table the records and then I have something to share on the motion by Councilor bears seconded by Councilor Scott play the table the records.
[George Scarpelli]: All right. All those opposed motion passes. Mr. President just want to share a date with everyone. Saturday morning, we'll be celebrating the, the life of Jimmy Madonna. uh, method, legend, and, uh, um, unbelievable young man who passed way too soon. They'll be doing a huge fundraiser to support scholarships and other ventures for our kids here in Medford. It'll be a wiffle ball tournament. That's still some openings. I know that the team is working very hard. And then we'll have a I know Mr. Tanaka is working very hard. to prepare the 50 70 field that's in the far corner of car park to be, um, be renamed after Jimmy Maturana. And we're going to have, uh, Billy O'Keefe and Babe Ruth is going to do a two inning ceremonial baseball game with Method Babe Ruth players. And then just like I said, just a great community day. It starts at nine o'clock, and I believe the ceremony is looking to be at two o'clock for the dedication. So it's going to be a long day with a lot of fun and a lot of great stories. for a great young man that's gone way too soon. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Council Scarpelli. Thank you. And thank you, Mr. South for bringing this forward. I think that with the teams is representing, uh, these employees, I think it looks like it's an upgrade that's overdue. And I appreciate your effort and your hard work with this. But the question I can, if we can make an amendment to just send this to the city administration. I got word back that non-union employees, there were a handful of non-union employees that were bypassed their regular step rate during the COVID. So my question is, are we going to make that whole with their upgrade that they deserved? I don't want them to, we approve a step, a new agreement, but they're still missing a big piece of their, what was owed to them. I know that we acquired funds from the federal government and hoping we could, ask that from the administration, Mr. Clark. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: So could we leave this with the, if we move to approve, but also the caveat that maybe the city assessor could give us a cost estimate of what the amount of land that they're going to use and what the rate is square foot for rental. I mean, I'm just throwing ideas out there, Maybe we can ask them for some guidance.
[George Scarpelli]: Then I make the motion that we, I know if we have further questions, but we table this until the next meeting with the the notes sent out to the city assessor to give us a recommendation.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Council B.S. for bringing this up, this resolution. I know that Andy Milton not only was a great teacher and someone that we're going to miss because he's left such an impact on our school community, but also in the sports world. I know that Coach Milne was head coach at Arlington High School soccer and an avid athlete in his own right. And I think that a lot of what he did in his personal life, he really he really was a driving force for a lot of his students. And they talked to some of the students that they really took his drive in all aspects of life. So I think that's a sign of a great teacher and a sign of a great mentor. So I guess we can blame him for council's BSV. So he's right. but uh he's a great someone say thank someone say thank great teacher and uh wish him wish him well in his retirement and um thank you i'm sure you guys had some great battles on the soccer field coach on the motion by councillor bears seconded by councillor scarpelli all those in favor all right opposed the ayes have it the motion passes
[George Scarpelli]: Chair recognizes Councilor Scafelli. Thank you. Councilor Falco, thank you for bringing this forward. Um, for years working in the municipality and also, you know, having, um, worked with Alicia, you realize how amazing she, she is and, uh, how lucky that community is to have her now. Um, I too want to thank her for all of her hard work. One thing about Alicia, we realized, uh, whenever you were confused about something, she brought it down to layman's terms. You understood it. Um, and she always had the answer, even if you didn't like the answer, she would tell you the answer straightforward. with no reservation, with no political bantering. It was straightforward, highly professional and something I'm gonna miss. So I wish her luck in her endeavors and thank you again for council Falco brings forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you for Councilor Councilor Falco will bring this forward. I was fortunate enough to watch Amy play as one of my daughter's teammates. And as a freshman on the varsity, having a leader like Amy Orca to follow and to emulate is a huge, huge benefit. Something that I cherish that my daughter had that opportunity. people what has been written last year. Amy was probably one of the best players on the team and went up for a layup, came down and tore ACL. And if you know Amy Orcutt, I think she wanted to go back in the game. And but she sat on the bench, smiled on her face and just kept pushing her teammates. So I know that West Point is such a such an honor. And I think she's going to make method proud as she already has. So I want to congratulate her and wish her the best of luck. She's a she's a great role model for all of our young female athletes, especially, but all the athletes in Medford High School to follow. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, motion to take.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Knight. Those are great words. Again, I said it too often lately, but another legend lost. I was fortunate to live three houses down from the mythical Ray Buckland. When you were a little kid and you came outside and there was this, I believe when I was a kid, he was 10 feet tall and he'd wear his Chuck Taylor's and he'd have a basketball in his hand. And you actually thought that he, he could never be stopped. And when you approached him, he wasn't this big monster. He was just this greatest person that could be, that could reach, um, reach any kid and it showed when he came back, when he came back from Europe and started coaching basketball for Medford High School. We had a neighbor, I still remember, we had a neighbor that was a great young man, I won't say his name, and he was very tall. And back then to have, I think, size 16 shoes and to be six foot seven and be in middle school was unheard of. And he was a little odd. And at the time, you know, growing up and I'll never forget that we would see him and I'd say, hey, where'd you get those awesome sneakers? And he'd say, Ray brought them over to me. And that's the type of guy he was. I mean, he'd see something and he'd do his little piece, little part, little part. And, you know, I've spent a lot of time in Lynn and Frazier Field with our successful baseball programs, whether it be through Babe Ruth or whether it be through the high school. And I still remember when John started playing, I still remember some, that mythical figure walking down the parking lot and screaming out method Mustangs. And, uh, there was Ray and leaning against the fence with the rest of the Mustangs and rooting on his method Mustangs team. And, um, you know, I was fortunate to see him just to just a month ago and sit with them and watch a few winnings of the ball game with them. But, uh, he was just a, like Adam said, uh, a great dad, great husband, a great friend loved his mom and dad. And again, it's another legend lost and send our condolences to his family. He will be missed. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: The position for recreation is 53 to 64. Correct.
[George Scarpelli]: remove the the facility recreation facilities coordinator, and keep the parking enforcement officer, Mr. Mr. President, if I can, I completely understand what counsel nights going with this but I think that looking at the. the description and talking to the director, I think that this person's role, not only opening the rink full time, full year, but also providing much needed programming with the middle school sites on site and having a dedicated person there to assist with that. You know, sometimes you try to look at the benefits and something that you feel that, I don't know what Councilor Knight's feeling and the reason why, but I think that this is a beneficial position, something that I'll be supporting tonight.
[George Scarpelli]: So there's a motion to keep the clerk and a motion to eliminate the facilities coordinator.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scappelli. Thank you Mr. Oswald for being here. I understand what you're saying, but my confusion comes in as we debated the position, the diversity position, and debated the process of the CAF and how it went, is that you did do the work, and I appreciate the hard work that you've done, and you were compensated for that. But as we're moving forward to creating a new CAF, my hesitancy is that it was, the numbers were created for a position that held something in my eyes that if it was done correctly in the past and it presented to us, whereas the head of diversity, head of human resources to be paid at that level, I can see that's this. the reasoning for that. But as we're moving forward and changing the name of chief people officer, which is same as human resource officer, which now takes away the human diversity, you know, position. It really, to me, that's where the reason why I would want just more clarification, more understanding of the budget process and how that job will work with the committee of the whole meeting. That's why, I know that it's frustrating. I know you've done the work, but you also have to understand that this council is frustrated too in the process and how this was handled. So again, this is no reflection from me personally to you. I think I've said it a thousand times, you do an amazing job. I just think the process and understanding the funding mechanism and how this is, It was presented one way with the same number, and then it was changed with a bigger position that I thought was equally as important. And then, but the numbers stayed the same. So this is why I'm a little hesitant. That's for my vote tonight. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: that we had a question with stopping of a step raised for some non-union employees. I just wanna know if that's been made whole or is that still something they're waiting on? I think it was told to them that it was frozen because of the COVID or I just, you know, is that have been fixed and have been adjusted, so.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, no, okay. For 22, for 22. It was 22, but I know that what, I got a few phone calls from a few non-union members that said that they were due a step raise back in December 21. And they were told that because of the COVID, they would not be given that step raise. And some of those were at the highest point. So it made a big difference on their way of quality of life. So if we could just look into that and see if we get some clarification on that, that'd be great.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, Pat, uh, this is, uh, it's bittersweet because, uh, you know, you went through a tough time with all of us and, uh, it was your leadership that pulled us through. So I don't think people realize how much you did do. Um, I know that when you're talking about a position where it takes you away from your family, you, you know, you, you see some people get bitter and angry. I've never, ever saw that in you at all. Um, I'd see you on a Tuesday after a marathon session, the school committee, and then thinking that we have a marathon session on Tuesday and thinking your week's done, but no, you have to do another committee meeting on a Wednesday and you're a one man team. So No wonder why other communities came in and tried to scoop you up and why you're leaving. So it hurts that you are leaving, but, you know, you took a lot of junk from a lot of ignorant people that you had to deal with and listen to that stuff. But I just warned you, yeah, we had the flyby, it was supposed to start, and then the flyby. So all I want to, let it be saying that, Thank you, congratulations for all your hard work here. It's something that you set Medford on a great track. The award you received, I think, is something we'll never forget. Thanks to you, and have a great time in the neighboring community.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Good luck. Good luck.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Now, this is for a petition for a conflict license at Stacey's Landing for Tower Place Suites, Fairfax. Mr. President, do any of my colleagues have any comments or questions before I recommend approval?
[George Scarpelli]: We while we're on this bench and paper 21432. Regards to College Avenue, Medford, approval of easement to Tufts University.
[George Scarpelli]: 21437. 21437.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Peers.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: President Caraviello. Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, Scott. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Markswell and members of the board. I had the privilege and honor of working with Teresa at the Osgoode School and then the McGlynn School. And one thing you realize as a young teacher, you look for role models to follow. And Teresa was that role model. I think that we focused as young teachers to make sure you look at the intangibles. And what we learned from Teresa is her passion for the children, every single one. So she was a true advocate for all of her kids and for our teachers that were at times going through contract negotiations and the nerves that are felt with non-tenured professionals. And she was a rock that kept a lot of young teachers together. And she was a great role model. So as a friend and a former colleague, I want to congratulate her. I actually thought she would never retire. And but it's, it's it's it's sad because I think she still has another 45 years in it. So I appreciate it and wish her luck. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: We can keep going, but it's not televised. Are we still televised?
[George Scarpelli]: Quick call text back.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, thank you, Councilor Marks for this forward. I know another colleague that I work with, and you know the passion that Cheryl, my uncle had for her kids in this community. It spoke volumes, at least to me that, you know, especially when I first started on the school committee, you know, she wasn't afraid to call us and tell us exactly what her kids needed. And, uh, and she was a strong advocate for that. So, um, I wish her well on her retirement and congratulate her for all the commitment she had for our community and our children. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Motion to be brought back to regular business. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears is correct that this would require a home repetition to be canceled. And the estimate of $50,000 is the number that my predecessor often quoted to me for the cost of a preliminary municipal election. That's a back of the envelope calculation, but it's one that my predecessor used and was very confident in using.
[George Scarpelli]: So there would have to be some sort of, likely some sort of answer before then, because I would be ordering the ballots the next week. If the drawing is Friday, I wouldn't be able to get the ballots ordered on Friday, but I would definitely order them early the following week. Thank you. Mr. President. Scarpelli. Through you to the clerk. With that, again, remind everybody when the last day to accept nomination papers. I think the last day to accept it. August 10th. 10th? No, there's a July. There were July deadlines. There's a July 23rd deadline for the last day to pull the papers and a July 23rd deadline for the last day to return the certificate. It was the last day to pull, so 26th. 23rd is the last day to pull, 27th is the last day to return the certified papers. Okay, so again, I think that I appreciate that, and I appreciate Councilor Bears bringing that forward, because that's one thing I looked at when we first started running. You look at primary, the savings is the number one thing, but I think that it's important that we still don't know what tomorrow brings, and I think it's a little too early, I think, because like Councilor Mark said, you had another candidate for the mayor's race, and you don't run a primary, that can play a huge factor in what happens in this community. So I think that, unfortunately, I think timing is one of the biggest issues, and I feel the same as my fellow colleagues. And I appreciate listening to you, talking about it, because it is a conversation that I think a lot of people in the community ask, because as Council Member Mark said the last time, it was really 50-50, not only with the candidates, but also with the constituents. I can't tell you how many times, if you don't have a primary, we save a teacher and it sounds great in essence, but you know, with the process, I think that the due process that we have in place is there for a reason. And I think that it's something that with the time being so congested and so questionable to move forward with eliminating is a little shaky for me.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Councilor Falco. Yes. Vice president night. Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Marks? Yes. Councilor Morell? Yes. Councilor Scarpelli? Yes. President Caraviello? Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, I think it, and I appreciate the conundrum we're in, but like, Like we said earlier, when we did ask KPLR a question, they specifically said they worked for the administration. So we truly did. And I think from that moment on, that's when we felt that we had no one else, especially when Kim, there was a question, like we said, during the cap question, when the city solicitor and I believe the finance director said that this isn't, they didn't think you could do that, And the chief of staff said, well, he thinks they're wrong. So we were left in limbo. And again, this brings up another question that we have in tonight's budget with the cap issue that's still left out there. So that still needs to be answered. So what we're seeing is an unbalanced process that's really hurting the whole process, I think. So I like, if that's possible, where we have legal representation from KP Law that that's spelled out, that we have a representative that we can reach. And, you know, it's something simple. You know, I try to reach Kim and she's very busy. I don't have anybody else to ask because when we first had the question of, oh, we want to go to executive session, it was easy for us to call Howard and the school committee. and say, Howard, I won't bring this up. How does the process work? And I didn't have that luxury a few months ago when we had that same issue. So it's something that simple because ultimately it makes us sort of look incompetent to our constituents. And I think that that's the biggest concern. I think we need to have that partnership that I don't feel we have right now, which is tough. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So again, the question is going to be as we go forward, the jeopardy of voting positively and negatively for the for the budget. Different councils will look at different concerns. I look at this one as if there is a process for the supplemental budget to look into this. And without denying the budget, that's one of the avenues you're looking for Councilor Knight is that. So by asking for a reduction and then getting guidance from the finance director of a supplemental budget, doesn't in actuality jeopardize no vote or negative vote. So that's-
[George Scarpelli]: I think we only reduce it by 50 keeping 10 giving the mayor some time to see what we can do.
[George Scarpelli]: This is to reduce the amount of 55,000?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli?
[George Scarpelli]: President Caraviello?
[George Scarpelli]: I'll step out. No, I think that the mayor answered the question. I think what we're seeing is the chicken or the egg. And um, if uh, You know, I think you get to the question that there was a fundamental, uh, misunderstanding with the process with chief staff and the solicitor. Um, so like I said, I think you answered my question. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. One person that I can count on to be thorough is Councilor Knight, and I respect his input greatly. But again, I think that Council Marks brings up a great point in where we are timeline-wise. So I think that the commitment from the mayor right now and understanding where we need to go with the timeline and these, these oppositions we wanted. And, um, and I understand what council nights, um, commitment to the fiscal responsibility, but, um, I'm, I'm willing to, uh, move past that as well as Councilor Marks saying, and, um, with the commitment from the mayor that we move forward with these and then come back. I think that, uh, There has been a fundamental issue here and it has been debated. We have worked very hard on this, this council, I think on the whole budget. We spent a lot of time on this and, you know, I just don't want, I wanna give the benefit of the doubt and move forward with making sure that, you know, as we move forward, we're cleaning up the mistakes and the errors that we see in the fundamental disagreements and lack of communication that we see both on the last issue and as we move forward with this. So, uh, thank you. Uh, listen to my input, Mr. President. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Council 9's motion is to reduce the city budget in the dollar amount equivalent to that appropriated in the fiscal year budget in caps that don't exist. And the dollar figure associated with that is $617,390. And so we have a motion on the floor, Vice President.
[George Scarpelli]: Sure. That same resident contacted me right before he came here. The question was that the health department instructed him that they're waiting on the council to allow them to go on the property. So I think we need clarification from the solicitor, because I thought we were waiting for them. The word we got is we're waiting for them to draft something that we would approve. So we're waiting on the city solicitor, I believe, so we can do that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate all my colleagues adding so much input. I think that just a couple of quick questions. Madam Mayor, the parking enforcement, is that an enterprise account? Would that be under an enterprise account or it's going to be through the city budget?
[George Scarpelli]: All right, thank you. Um, and I think that I don't want to be redundant, but, uh, first of all, uh, uh, Alicia, um, I can't thank you for your, uh, professionalism. I know that we've had you up every single day and we leave this council and you go back and have to do all that work that we're, we're giving you. So I appreciate you coming back and making sure that we're given the proper information so we can present a responsible, uh, uh, content to the mayor and the city administration so we can make our city function the way we hope it would. So thank you so much for that. But again, I will echo that every question I had, Madam Mayor, with the budget, I wasn't asking for, in essence, the city to find funding. I think that I gave creative uh, input and in hoping we could get to some resolve as we move forward down the line. And I, you know, you were on the council with us, you sat next to me. And one of the biggest things that I've been pushing for is the DPW, uh, adding three person sidewalk and, uh, hot top crew. I got the information back and I understand that that's not something that, uh, we're going to be looking into. I know the process of adding five more people, which is, which is important, but we all know that you know, each department needs at least three more. So I guess it's a start, but you know, I would really look, look at as the process moves on and really focusing on instead of budgeting or bonding out 250 or $500,000 a year, really look at the cost savings. If we kept this in house and what those other three people can do, uh, with that DPW director and, uh, and movement and movement. So, uh, the second thing I'm glad to, uh, I got a response back from the recreation department. One of the initiatives I brought forward was the reevaluating the process of scheduling and booking field times and looking to see where those monies can be filtered right back to the recreation department, to the parks department to assist in refurbishing some fields, changing fencing. So it's taking the money that we're generating and bringing it back to our our community. And I'm, I'm glad to say I got, I got a, I received an email today that it looks like there's going to be some movement and there'll be, there'll be holding a meeting, uh, that they requested that, uh, that hopefully I can be part of and get, try to help that ball get moving that. But I think the biggest thing we talked about, we had a very trying year this year and, uh, one of the biggest things, and especially for myself, I think that, um, you know, I felt it and I listened and, um, was the, social issues we had in our community. And one of the things we talked about at the round table discussions was making sure we put our money where our mouth is and move forward with some initiatives. And I think that's why this council really stood strong and understand that really having the diversity directors stand alone, so that person can have the freedom to work with, you know, like I said, I'd love to see as we move forward with the school budget, bringing in an assistant on the school side and having those two people work together and start their own office with the administrative assistant and really getting to see what we wanna see for growth and diversity in our community. Because I know that it's not just on the police force, not just in the classroom, but it's also what our kids are talking about every day and what they're hearing every day. And a lot of times you learn from our children and I have two at home and you have to listen to them, you listen to their friends, I think there's a disconnect in the schools where there really isn't a true identity that they can reach. So we have right now this position, I really appreciate this. This is a great, this is one of the reasons why I'm in favor of the budget because I think this was probably my number one wants in my non-negotiable. And I appreciate you and the administration looking into that and making this come to fruition. So like I said, Councils have asked some great questions and we've debated some great issues, but all of my questions were asked and I yield to my fellow colleagues as we proceed, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So I too have, my sister works in the school department as a reading specialist. So just wanted to disclose that. Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears. Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Vice President Knight.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Marks. Yes. Councilor Morell.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: For which one, Councilor?
[George Scarpelli]: That one just got approved. I think you just voted to approve that one.
[George Scarpelli]: Those are separate council records, Councilor. There's council records from last week, and there's council records from last week's emergency meeting. So those aren't ready yet?
[George Scarpelli]: are not on the agenda tonight, but the records from last Tuesday's council meeting and last Wednesday's emergency meeting, I emailed to you.
[George Scarpelli]: So they are not on the agenda tonight. I approve Tuesday's meetings. I believe it was Wednesday.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye. Roll call, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, you know, I don't know how everybody else feels, but I think that with what we're hearing, and what we received and aligned with budget concerns. One glaring is what Council Marcus brought up, that do we continue with the budget considering what jumps to the top of my list now is legal representation for the council, nothing against the city solicitor. I honor and respect her opinion, but the truth of the matter is she still works for, she doesn't work for this department. She doesn't work for the council. So, cause I'm, you know, I trust what she's saying, but I also I'm questioning the validity of the other reasons to me. you know, personnel legal, you know, it just, it just, I, we're in a timeline with the budget, but I don't know if I'm, I, you know, I, I gotta think about whether I want to move forward with this budget. So that's what I'm saying. So if we can't meet Saturday with the city solicitor, with all this information, and without violating any open meeting laws. And this pushes the city business to a point where... Tuesday is the last regular meeting of the council.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, am I missing something? A point of information, if I can. What is the posting? What was the posting that was sent out? For this meeting? What did we send out? Can you read that back? The reason for the purpose of the meeting?
[George Scarpelli]: So if I can. If we were to retire an executive session to discuss the process of concerns of legal personnel matters without the topic, but just the guidance of what the process is.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. I'm not, you know, obviously I'm not an attorney. I'm just, I'm not done yet. I'm just trying to figure out again, if it's not about, if it's just about getting guidance of the legalities of how to proceed, not to discuss what the process is, what the situation is. Am I not making sense? I'm just trying to figure out why we can't move forward with this.
[George Scarpelli]: That would have been one of my questions tonight.
[George Scarpelli]: Legislative budget, or it wouldn't fall under the legal budget, correct? So it wouldn't matter what we're doing next.
[George Scarpelli]: step. I say we move forward to Friday's executive session at six o'clock. I would invite the proper parties and make sure all of our legal responsibilities are in place and we move forward and get some understanding. Because from what I was told is that because this council did get something in that nature is something that we have to, we're obligated to follow through on our end. whether the central administration feels that they see something that they want to have their own investigation, that's theirs. But I think that that's our job as city councils. We have to answer to our constituents and that's why I'm, Steve, is your motion still on the floor?
[George Scarpelli]: on working with the council for this issue to show up on Friday's meeting, is that acceptable? Is that the question?
[George Scarpelli]: I'm waiting for an answer. I don't know if anybody has an answer.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. While we're on the suspension, we take up paper 21-419.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I see, review everything. Everything looks in order. I know we have a couple of questions. Mr. De Oliveira, what are your business hours?
[George Scarpelli]: employees will be working for you? Three. Three? And you'll have a delivery service too? Yes. Okay. I know we had one question that the establishment opened before this was approved. I know we talked and- Yeah, I'm so sorry. There was just a misunderstanding. Yes. I did check with, it wasn't with the clerk's office. I did go through Mr. de Oliveira's paperwork. All of the departments are updated now and in order. I wait for any comments before moving approval from my colleagues.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Scott belly. Thank you, Mr. President, I think Council marks bring this forward and it speaks volumes way. Everybody's talking about it so I all I can add is one thing I realized when I first joined the council and when I was coaching and we had issues and, and Mr. Cronin was involved. He is the fireman's fireman. I don't think I've, I've met a fireman that loves being a fireman more than, uh, deputy chief Cronin. I think that, um, and you could see it with his, with his efforts, you know, uh, not just with the emergency situations, but just the way he carries himself. So, um, he's a great role model for these new, new firefighters that are starting off and, um, he will be missed. So we wish him luck after 40 years of, uh, uh, works in dedication city Medford. and it is time to enjoy retirement and he definitely did his service for the resident city of Medford. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor MUX. Chair recognizes Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you. I just thank you for my fellow Councilors bringing this forward. We all know the Inessa family, and when you talk about a Medford family and keeping their business in the community, and thriving like it has and what they've given back to the community is a blessing and we share those celebrations with them and congratulate them. Two things though, I know that Councilor Knight's wife doesn't watch this, so it's impressive that he used such great compliments even though she's not watching. And last but not least, they still couldn't do anything with my hairdo. So I've tried, if anybody knows a hair salon that can do anything with this, just let me know. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Council President Cavill for bringing this up. I know that I've talked to a few neighbors and they're appalled. And I think that changing this ordinance might help. But I know that we should look into, I know Council Member Marks has brought this up for years, looking at our private ways in general in our community and the lack of funding we're losing because they're not being charged to our roads and streets here for federal reimbursement. So I think that it's important that maybe we call for either a subcommittee, a committee of the whole soon to visit this ordinance in general, and look at the negatives of having that in place and trying to weigh the pros and cons. And I think that that might be the beginning, but I think that this has to be something that we reach out to the director of DCR as well. And if we can't send him, I don't know who it is, they change them every month, but send out communications DCI director that enlightens them on what's going on in that area, because it's obviously it's being used for recreational purposes. And if those, you know, cars that are coming and families that are showing up and those parties that are throwing in our residential neighborhoods, if they're giving different outlets in different areas where they are approved to recreate and we can help them with that, that might be something we can move them along. But I think something has to be done because the neighborhood is failing it. I know that some of the music and the noise and heard gunshots. One person told me, I mean, it sounds like it's like the okay corral down there and it's something that we really have to stand up. I know that Councilor Caraviello has been the active de facto sheriff and going down there, but it shouldn't be a city councilor that's going down to support and help our neighbors in that area. I think that we have to really get our state delegates involved and other state agencies to get involved to make sure that we find some solutions to move these these groups out of there because it's really deteriorating that neighborhood. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scapelli. I appreciate everybody's comments. I think that we had an issue on Equavia Road just recently during the pandemic where cars were parking from the fells and parking in the neighborhood. And the temporary signs that were put out there with the horses made it reasonable for towing. So, and I think they just did it just for the weekends because that's when the traffic air really started, no different than what we're seeing in this area. So I can't see why we asked the chief and the traffic engineer to put out temporary signs in these areas on Friday afternoons through Sunday, so this could be policed properly. I don't think we have to wait for a sign to be erected.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, Mike, we need to demand this from the chief, the traffic engineer and the mayor's office that this is what's being done in other neighborhoods and it's worked. So I'm a little confused with the, so I think that we make a motion that as part of the report that we asked for the temporary signs to be erected by DPW from the traffic department on Friday evenings and then taken down on Sundays. And I believe that would allow the police, the leverage to toe because I know it's not, it's not the officers on the streets. They want to do it. Yeah. You know, they, it's not them. They're getting it from higher up. So I think we need to get really, uh, more clarity right now from the chief and get this taken care because, um, you know, until someone drowns out there and it's one of our firefighters that are going out there and one of our police officer going out there and jumping in the lake, trying to help a family that shouldn't have been out there and they lose their lives. I think that's when we're going to see some movement, and that's not what we all want to see. So I think that's, we need to move on that immediately. So thank you. Chair recognizes Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: my my comments earlier is for a motion that we call for a meeting uh to and bring in the stakeholders so um if we can you know one of the uh upcoming meetings i know we have finalized in the budget but having calling for a meeting with state delegates, a representative from the DCR, even somebody from the sheriff's office to answer these questions directly, as well as the traffic engineer and the police chief for the traffic department. Because again, I appreciate that, that Councilor Caraviello went out to this meeting and when I was told it wasn't a big deal, It was just neighbors that were concerned and they were trying to bring it together. But I think this has to be some answers and they have to be people sitting across the table to answer those questions. So if I can call that as a motion to call for an immediate meeting, not to say that we shouldn't try to do something this weekend, but what I'm saying is get some resolution quickly. and I know that Mr. Donnell brings up a good point, why penalize Medford residents? You know, when I'm gonna, from what I've heard, it's 99% of non-resident people that are just looking in that area because it is a beautiful area. If you want it, spend millions of dollars and buy a huge colonial on the corner and they can have those rights, but I just wanna make sure that's on the record, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Just comment. You know, it's been It's been bothersome to me as a first generation Italian American. I was fortunate enough to be raised by a wonderful Italian family. And I was taught lessons by probably one of the greatest men in the world, my dad, who studied in the Jesuit seminary. And he always told me as I started my journey as a school committee member and a Councilor, that no matter what the issue, put yourself on the other side. And he was, you know, his saint was Padre Pio, and it meant a lot to our family. And I hear the cries and I hear my neighbors that are upset. And the naming of the school, like my father would say, stepping aside, if it truly offended one person, it's something that we should look at. And if it really needed to be changed, we should look at that. I'm disgusted in the process. I thought the process wasn't something that we heard everyone, but why I decided to speak tonight is very important for the fact that I'm very proud of who I am as an Italian American. I wear that with a badge of honor and what I'm hearing from my neighbors, especially my older neighbors that made Medford such a great, great community with, with many other unbelievable nationalities is that they feel like they that they're being talked down to and they they've been thrown away and the heritage isn't what they brought to this community is not important. And that's what that's what bothers me, because I think if my mother and father, my grandparents felt that way, I'm doing a major disservice by sitting in the seat by not saying something. So my comments aren't just to just talk about it and let you know where I stand, but one thing that my father taught me and the Italian culture taught me, especially in Medford, we always found a way to bring everybody together. And I think Medford's screaming that. And to be honest with you, I think that most people on one side or the other, they feel the same way. They really do. And the people on the other side, they're all not animals. Besides that, when you hear side to side, and the people on this side, you're not disgusting animals. So there's gotta be something this community can do. My mother said to me, bring them all to a table, cook for them, let everybody sit at a table. look across the table from each other and talk to each other. And you realize how many things you have in common. We've heard new Medford, old Medford. That statement should be gone. It's Medford. We said this the other day when we lost Buddy Kelly. Buddy Kelly had a way as the athletic director to bring our community together. He made everybody feel like you were a Mustang. and you had one of the prerequisites of being a Mustang is that you had to have pride. And I think everybody that comes to this community, whether you are new or old, you have prides for this community. So I think what we need to do as elected officials and we need to do with the mayor's office is try to find that common ground, find a way we can bring everybody together. It could be something as a community event. that we bring everybody together and say, hey, let's sit down and let's just talk to each other and understand because some of my new neighbors I've talked to, they said, George, I'm just so disgusted with this group that doesn't understand that Columbus was a slave monger and it hurts people. And my discussions with those people and the understanding is that's really not the cry. The cry is that what Columbus meant to the Italian Americans at a very difficult time, they gave them, that symbol gave them an understanding of what America was and made them feel part of America when they didn't have a country. Something very similar that a lot of people in this country are going through right now, whether you're Latino, whether you're Brazilian, whether you're Haitian Creole and you're moving to this country, they want to be in our country. They love our country. This is what makes America great. So I, you know, I know we're not supposed to comment. We're not supposed to make motions. This isn't This isn't anywhere that we can do that, but as we move forward, I think that maybe this council can be creative enough to work together, all seven of us, and look at all of our groups that we work with and try to find a way with the office across the hall and maybe find a community event that brings everybody to the center of our town and celebrate it with cultural music and cultural foods and, and, and open tables. I mean, we have round tables for everything, but I'm almost sure the people in this room haven't really sat down and talked to people on the other side of that social media blog that they're beating up because they, there's just no communication. So someone told me my best quality when I first started as a, as a coach was I I did a great job bringing people together. And I think I'm on account of a great group of people that want to bring people together. And I think that as we move forward, when we can make motions and we can move forward, that we're creative enough to find something that'll help Medford heal. And it's so divided right now. And it's not comfortable for me. It's not comfortable for my children. This isn't what, this is how I wasn't raised. And we love Medford for a reason, just like the people that just came in on Carberry and just bought an $800,000 home because they want to be part of Medford. They want to be part of this community. So I think we have to find a way that we really work together. So, you know, you can't belittle the opinions of Ms. D'Antonio. I think it's how you feel and whether you like it or not, you still have to listen to those words. and vice versa. So I thank you for bringing this topic forward just so I can let my feelings, you know, be told that I haven't really expressed. I think that, um, you know, when I sit back and talk to my dad, these are the stories he tells me is he would have told me is to find a way to bring everybody together and use our culture and our heritage to do what's been done for years. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Um, I'd like to make a motion that we, we, we, uh, convene a meeting, a committee of the whole meeting with our community preservation committee. And, um, really now that we've been working with, uh, these funding, these funds and, and looking at these different pools, be interesting to get a report to see what, what demographic, what groups are really not reaching that? Are we getting enough people in the housing field that are requesting enough funding? Are we getting enough people for the funding for recreation? I know we always talk about the historical sites and this is perfect and it's where it needs to go, but at the same time, are we reaching enough people in our community that have the ability to apply for these funds? And are we doing enough to promote that and communicate with the community? So it really just, if we can, is just having a meeting with the committee and just getting a breakdown and just revisit everything and look at it as a whole again to see as we move forward to the next application process that maybe we should be focusing on one area, not the other, because of, making sure that there's equity with the funding. So if we can do that, that'd be great. Thank you, Mr. President. And thank you, Alicia and Danielle for being here.
[George Scarpelli]: I think this is something that needs a little more teeth. Thank you. I think this needs a little more teeth than just an explanation from the management company. I think this is where our state administration has to take a lead, whether it's with the Board of Health, the building code, the building department, or code enforcement or the city solicitor. So I'd like to make an amendment that I think that not only through, from what I heard is that there are certain a timeline when these certain buildings, and I think that all our assisted living buildings should have some sort of protection with the city administration, whether which department to be, but my amendment would be that they would look at not just the heat, but excessive cold, that there are certain timelines when they, they look to turn these air conditioners or the heating systems on. But as you can see in New England weather and what we're seeing in different, we'll have days of 35 degrees one day, another day we'll have 90 degrees. So I think we have to have a way or we have to have an assistance here in the city of Medford where our city administration involved working with these assisted living homes where we're protecting our residents. And I think that from what I gathered, it was probably the most terrific situation where you're stuck on the fifth floor and there's no heat. I mean, there's no air conditioning that it was oppressive. So, which is dangerous for our residents. So I appreciate Councilor Falco, Councilor Knight bringing this forward, but I think we need to make, I'd like to amend this at the city administration and city solicitor's office, whether it be the code enforcement officer or the health department, that we implement a regulation that when, cases of certain heat or cold, that we make sure that by code or by law, by ordinance, that we're taking steps to make sure we're protecting our residents.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. When I heard this news Friday morning, it was probably one of the toughest days because Buddy Kelly's played such a positive impact in my life and thousands of other residents here in the city of Medford and outside. First to his family, his wife, Judy, who stood beside him through two bouts of cancer. and the most awful fifth stage of Parkinson's disease. And his loving children, Beth, Judy, and Linda, who were there every step of the way for their dad. From what I hear, the last few months spent every single evening with him, making sure mom had the assistance that buddy's independence required. When I say this, I say this too often, maybe it starts to sound a little corny, This is happening too often when legends are leaving us here in Metro. And I thought of Buddy the other day and yesterday when we see our city going through a pretty tough time and it's so divided. And Buddy would be the type of person, no matter what race or gender, sexual orientation, what religion, your height, your color hair, or if you had no hair. He's the type of person that would find that bond to bring everybody together. And that's what I think we miss here right now in this community. And what I'm talking about is if you grew up in Medford and if you didn't grow up in Medford, you should learn about this because Buddy taught me some important lessons in life. I learned them in my home about loyalty and commitment and pride. And that's in your home. That's instilled in you by your mom and dad and your family, you hope. But Buddy taught you outside the home is what it all meant to be in Medford Mustang and be, and as he would say, blue and white, blue and white. And how that blue and white flow through your veins, no matter who you were. And it was funny as I read posts and talked to alumni and, you know, Krista McCormick, a legendary basketball player, captain of UMaine when I played professionally, she called us and she sent the message and said, But he was so amazing that he was the person back in the day that said to the girls' basketball program, to the boys' basketball program, hold on a second. The boys don't get the glass. The girls can shoot on that same glass the day before game day. So he changed the rule. And he made sure that everybody felt comfortable in Medford High School. He had his own way, but his way was the Mustang way. He brought everybody together. And I'm going to miss him greatly because he did instill in me as a young coach and a young man what it was and why we live in the city of Medford. Because truly, whether you're here a day or whether you're here for 35 years, you're here for a reason. You moved here for a reason. You're brought here for a reason because you love the city of Medford. And if we can get back to what Buddy taught us for so many years and taught so many people that let the blue and white overcome everything else. And you could see amazing things happen. Like I said, last couple of nights, I've been thinking about buddy and seeing what our city is going through. And that analogy just came to me because it really meant a lot to me. That's the type of person that brought me into coaching. That's the type of person that when you sit in a locker room with my teams, that it wasn't about the win or the loss. It was about being a Mustang. and loving the blue and white and loving the city. And somewhere along the line, we forgot that. And I'd be remiss to say that if it wasn't for Buddy Kelly, I don't know if my life would ever be the same. He taught me so much and I'm gonna miss him forever.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President, and I congratulate Kaylee. I think this is an unbelievable accomplishment. I've watched Kaylee play as a coach and member of North Medford Board and Medford Little League, and watched the commitment of her mom and her family, and it's amazing to see. This is what Medford's all about. This is why people move to Medford. Coach Vonnegut, Coach Pazzarello, Coach DeSimone, Coach Quinlan, Coach Bell that's not here, I know that. Coach Nesta when he was here, one thing you knew about the baseball team, they always took care of each other. If one of their kids passed away, one of their grandparents or teammates' grandparents passed away, You know this team would always rally around each other. What you're seeing tonight is exactly what Councilmarks brought up. This is what we need, a diverse group of kids that love each other, love Medford, and want to support each other no matter what. As a former softball coach at Medford High School, I'm sure, Kayla, you've gotten the phone calls, right? Jeez, you should be playing softball. it takes a strong person to do what you're doing. You stepped up, you had a dream, you've had coaches that believed in you, teammates that believed in you, parents and grandparents that believed in you, and the biggest, most important piece of this, Kaylee, you believed in yourself, and you went out and did something special. So this is what it's all about. This is what makes Medford great. And I'm proud to be a parent of a baseball player. I'm proud of a lot of these young men and women that are here because I've watched them all grow up, and to be there, is so important. Don't ever forget that because that's that's important. Always support the people around you when they need you. So congratulations and keep up the good work. Method Mustangs. That's amazing. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, yes. Thank you, Ms. Wilk. Maybe you should talk to the mayor. Is that the budget? You're very persuasive. On all serious notes, I think this is a very good resolution. The fact that when you talk about the Mefford history, a lot of people focus on the Brooks estate, the royal house. The focus is really on one side of Mefford. But you realize how important that the north side of Mefford historical sites and landmarks and people that reside in that neighborhood and how important that is. So I appreciate Councilor Marks bringing this forward and I too will support a day named after you.
[George Scarpelli]: So, Durham, I'm going to be honest with you. My children were in the back watching the celebration the other day. And when you typically go to a celebration to honor our veterans, you hear a lot of warm and fluffy stories, and deservedly so. But your speech resignated. And I hope if people can see that, if it's played back, I think it's a true understanding of people like yourself and your colleagues that gave their lives for this country. I think Councilor Falco, myself, when we started in school committee, one of the first things we want to do is bring civics back to our community, back to the city. And what we're seeing is the basic irresponsibility of us as Americans and educators at the time to teach our kids what the flag really means, what the Pledge of Allegiance really means, and why it's so important. and that celebration of the 9000 flags that put that and the work that Mr. Granada has done year after year. I think it's something that has to be honored, cherished and also our Children should be educated because it is important because we don't know where we're going unless we know where we've been. And if people don't understand what our military, what our veterans have done, um, we can't move forward. So I really think that we talked about the separation in our community right now, and I think that's one of the pieces we need to bring together. And I think that your words spoke volumes of why we do what we do here. So I think that I just want to Thank you, and thank you 1,000 times over, not just for your service, but also for the effort that you're putting into making sure that the community and the people of this community understand how important the flag is, what the POW flag means on that pole, and how important it is to this country, and the basic rights that everybody has in this country because of the work that you and your colleagues have done. Thank you so much. We should never forget our veterans. And again, people should really take time to watch a retape of that speech because it speaks volumes. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scalabella. Thank you. Councilor Markswell. but that's gonna be a conduit. I'm gonna make a motion that we ask the director of recreation of the city administration to have the director of recreation reach out to this organization and truly start a partnership because this is what recreation departments do. around the Commonwealth. It's just not the old recreation days where you're doing park league or you're playing games, but it's more now. It's theater driven, it's music driven, it's driven with STEM and chess. So there's so much more we can do. And I think that that's what makes Medford such a great community. There's different avenues. And I think that in Kevin's budget, you're talking about simple pieces that even right now you're looking at a few tents that they probably already have, you know, that they can set up for tournaments all the way down the line, you know, chess tables, chairs that are comfortable. If it gets big, why wouldn't we close off that area of Medford Square and celebrate it? Why don't we do it, you know, in my community, I work and we had a group come in and we were doing tango. We realized tango blew up. So we decided to close off an area of Union Square and we started the biggest tango event in the neighborhood. And that's now triggered another aspect of what our community can do. So this is Medford, and if that's a piece that people love, I think we should celebrate it. And again, I think it's the person that's got to bring that together has to be our director of recreation. I've talked to Kevin multiple times. Kevin's a great resource. We love Medford Square, but why wouldn't we do something at Wright's Pond? Why wouldn't we do something at Tufts pool, let's, if it's something that's, you know, creates revenue and generates, we have different areas that we open up for restaurants, you know, in the street, safety is an issue. We look at certain times that we do something special for chess activity that we can really celebrate in the community. And that brings, like we said, that brings people into the stores. That brings people that play into the restaurants.
[George Scarpelli]: But this is great. This is coming from a resident. We have a communications director who's amazing. She's done great things. She can do great things. Why wouldn't we partner with the communication department, the recreation department, and really start something at Groundswell that we started, you know, we all celebrated, didn't we? We talked about Chris Donovan and starting the chess program. We first opened Riverside Park and this is great. And then, you know, the ink dried and everybody forgot. So this is something that's sustainability wise, we really need to get the recreation department involved. So my recommendation would be to reach out to the administration, that they can. contact Mr. Donovan and the Method Chess Organization so we can really assist in what they really do. I know everybody was talking about budget time, everybody gets nervous, but this is low-hanging fruit.
[George Scarpelli]: So that's not difficult to do. So that's a good recommendation to take that contract.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, without recreation. because they can enforce, if I can, Mr. President, I take point of information with that. The big reason was that they couldn't enforce a public, an open area, but because it's classified as a park now, we can now, they can police that a little bit different. We have a little power with that, so.
[George Scarpelli]: Unless they win.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that resolution, I think the, my absence last week, a lot has been done. It looks like the chambers is open for business and we're moving on to some sort of normalcy. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scappelli. Thank you, Vice President Knight bringing this forward. I think the scope of family, again, fits that mold that we've been talking about this past year. And it's been a tough year. It's the people that unselfishly given themselves to this community, no matter what, no questions asked. I remember there were concerns when I was overseeing the recreation department years ago, when it was just a summer program, that the traffic and the safety of the people going to Tufts pool They were in jeopardy, but unfortunately it was tough times financially. Well, the Scopa family, if you know Mr. and Mrs. Scopa, they made sure that that area was safe for everybody. And they tell you too, that they then took their passion of Medford, they moved out to the high school and started making sure they always saw the high school on the grounds when it's being rented. And I still remember in the school committee talking about security in Medford. I said we don't need security in Medford when you have bulldogs like the Scopus because that passion and love in Medford really shines. So again, I thank Councilor Knight for bringing this forward, Vice President Knight bringing this forward. And again, It's the challenge to our community who picks up that torch from the scope of family and then carries on that tradition of community and unselfishness and pride that the scope of family has shown. So we appreciate everything they've done, and he will be missed for sure. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Scott. So I know I appreciate council and I was going to say the same thing. I think that what we did realize is that through the pandemic, you know, the difficult what was what was difficult for some people was a success for other people. So to get people involved to support it, I, you know how I feel. I'm a strong supporter of making sure that the first priorities in person meetings but having that option, making sure that it's cost efficient. And I think sending that to Patrick and as a professional coming back to us and telling us what it looks like and even and that's a little homework to council bears. And I know that the software that's needed really isn't developed truly yet, but seeing what other avenues we can we can work with to make this happen. So I would support, I appreciate your resolution, but I would support Councilor Knight's motion that we get a report from Mr. Gordon, so we can move forward with some teeth and that's it.
[George Scarpelli]: I know that I like to make a motion that we contact our partners, the MBTA. I didn't get one, I didn't get two, but I got a few more phone calls from residents in the neighboring streets that have brought this issue. They wanted to know why MBTA buses are driving down side streets in that neighborhood. And I didn't believe it. I said, no, maybe there was a detour. Well, this past week I was driving, uh, coming home and it was about six, seven o'clock at night. A little bit later, it was dark. And I realized coming down Lawrence road, there's an MBTA bus in front of me. And he, that, that driver was, they were going pretty quick out of service bus. But I think this, I think it's time that we call, I know that as a chairman of subcommittee transportation, we could do subcommittee, ask for a subcommittee meeting, but there are some issues that we're seeing right now, especially in that area with the MBTA and our community that we need some answers. So I make that form of a motion that we call for a subcommittee or committee of the whole meeting, whatever this council prefers, because before somebody gets hurt with what's going on in that area with the changes, and MBTA buses going down side streets, pretty narrow streets, by the way, before somebody gets injured.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Shakes, could you explain how many cars will be on the lot? How many cars will be on the lot? Yeah. Eight. Okay. Yeah, eight. Is this also a, A service station? No, we're not a service station. We have an automotive body shop. Okay, right. I do see all the paperwork's in order, Mr. President. Any questions for my fellow councilors?
[George Scarpelli]: Move approval, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Socrates, I thank you for being here tonight. The question, you said it's going underneath. So this project is going underneath the sidewalk? Yes. All right. Is it existing sidewalk? It will be replaced with the proper cement forms? Is it hot top there now? Yes, it will. Okay, so do we know if it's cement right now? Is it hot top? I just want to make sure that it's uniformed and that it's left better than what we gave it to. So I just want to make sure of that. You can say yes, no, is it?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. And again, thank you, Council Marks. Again, another issue that when we reviewed this, to be honest with you, I thought with the discussions that this the sidewalk was to go all the way to place it. And again, your due diligence and making sure that we're protecting our residents. I think that we're at a point right now, another concern as you so eloquently stated, it's going nowhere. So let's give an example. You have Mr. Jones taking Mrs. Jones out on her walk and she's in a wheelchair. you traverse that area, when you get to that part of the street, it's a huge concern for public safety. And I think that we need to push Eversource in this project, but if we're not gonna see that happen, and because we've seen them dig their heels in, I think we really also need to get for a backup plan, ask the city administration and the city engineer to maybe look into that. We're going to continue in that and seeing if it could be done either in house or as, um, uh, possible the city because I it's that's that's it's. Inexcusable to keep doing to not have that to the end of place that and that and leaving that that, uh, that opening. It's just it's just not safe at all. And it's where there were no sidewalks. So to hear that it's stopping there is a disgrace. So I appreciate you bringing this up again, Councilor Marks, and I will second that resolution.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, if I could just interrupt you real quick, Mr. says, I think that we need to, um, I think we've we've asked this before that we've called for what has worked as in person meetings, and I asked to do this at Victory Park or and at the high school parking lot with all the neighbors and ever source when we when we requested ever source to come to this meeting. I think that, uh, that we make that initiative right now as an amendment to this resolution, that we call for an immediate meeting with all the neighbors and the community. ever source team and the city administration. So I think the neighbors can look the people in the eye that have the answers for this. We've asked to have ever source pay for clerical works. So we make sure all the project gets done. This is something this council has asked for as well. So we share your frustration. I'm sorry to interrupt you, but I think we have to make that a point and move with that quickly. So thank you, I apologize.
[George Scarpelli]: Maybe to enlighten you, the recreation housing now lifted all the limitations, any participants outdoors for recreation programming, the instructors and the kids do not need to wear a mask. If they're indoor recreational activities, they still have to wear a mask and still keep the social distancing, but they've lifted almost everything dealing with recreation. So I hope, and Mr. Bailey's usually on this, Hopefully you can set increase in those council vice-president.
[George Scarpelli]: I've requested to put through a resolution similar to this, but I was told that it didn't, we had this on the agenda less than 90 days. So I did want to, if I could add to that, just if the Senate administration can also provide us with the, with the tax revenue that is being lost right now with the lack of the 40B projects and follow up with the update on where we stand legally. I've been told there was already a hearing today on one and didn't go too favorably for the administration. So, which from what I've been told, I think it's going to follow suit. So be interested to see. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Marks, for bringing this forward. What a litany of success that the Andre family has put forth, with especially their patriarch, This is why we love Medford. I think people, it's funny that you often get confused in lifelong residents in Medford and people looking negatively at that. And when you look at someone like the Andre family, The reason why Medford is such a great community and such a great city is families like the Andre family. And we can never forget that. I tell my kids all the time, you'll never know where you're going if you never know where you came from. And it's important that people like Mr. Andre are remembered of what they've done. I've known the Andre family for a long time. I was lucky enough to coach Collar and I conducted her into the Hall of Fame. And again, what Mr. Andre passed off to his son and then passed off to their children, you see the commitment to Medford, becoming teachers. working and volunteering for Little League. When I was on the board in Little League, if you needed something, Frank was sitting on his stoop watching every single game like a dedicated Mustang. This is someone that we should find, you know, that we see a lot of names that are deserving this community along the streets, street corners and different plaques and monuments. But when you talk about a person like Councilman Mach said, that really stepped up for his community and could have easily walked away and we didn't know where we'd be today. So again, this is, I wholeheartedly second the motion and congratulate Council Marks for really highlighting a true Method Mustang that should be never forgotten. So thank you. Thank you. Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Peters? Yes. Councilor Condoco. Yes. Vice President Knight. Councilor Marks. Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can, Mr. President, point of information. I concur with Councilor Morell. I think what we'll do tonight is reference to send this to the subcommittee on signs. I know we've already met on this with the number of signs we've already allowed. So I'm really not in favor of really supporting it with all these lights. I don't know if the council would want to vote on it. If you'd rather send it to subcommittee to get more in depth, I'll support that too. But that's normally the course of action. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. And again, I think the extenuating circumstances that we discussed with the sign movement had to do a lot with churches and showing schedules for Christians at different locations. I think other than that, on this I think the Citizens or the Century Bank that's on 93, that really doesn't really hit any of our neighbors. But again, I'm prepared to vote. I don't think that this falls in any need whatsoever. Everybody knows that there is a car wash there. Everybody knows that there's free vacuuming. I know we've already approved the signage and the awnings that go all the way around it. So, you know, as one resident who's also a customer, I can't see what else you want to put there. I think everybody and their cousins know that that location's there and what it's offered. So I'm ready to vote and denial myself. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Thanks, Councilman. It's funny that you bring this up. I think that my mom is going through some medical issues, and for a patient, they don't know who I am. My sister, Lisa, whose last name is Sharae, has been working with the Armstrong Ambulance, and the professionalism and the caring and the effort they provided for my family to make sure my mother is comfortable and has the transportation needed. And one thing we realized, how difficult it is for the common person to try to get in touch with healthcare organizations to make sure you can take care of your family members. And the assistance that was provided by Armstrong and people in their office was amazing. And it's not because of who I am, they don't know who I am. Um, but, and I'm sure that they've done this across the community and, um, you know, I'm glad that council and I brought this up because when you see that type of care and that type of specialism, you know, you want to, you want to scream on the rooftop and say, Hey, you need a pat on the back. So this is, I'm glad he put this forward. So there's a forum that I can say, thank you as, um, you know, as a relative that, uh, that they've taken care of and, I applaud what they've done. And again, it's another organization that during through the whole pandemic, they didn't take a day off, they were first person through the door and making sure that our citizens were taken care of and transported to local hospitals to make sure they they live a healthy life. So I applaud them.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. If I can, Mr. Sutherland, as one councilor that I could tell you that I was privileged to work for her on special occasions. Jean was a very dedicated and loving person to everybody that crossed that doorway at the Columbus School and the Dane. I remember when they first opened the new Columbus and And I was a phys ed teacher at McGlynn, and we had to teach the ever-growing class to the fifth grade. And Jean brought me in, and she says, George, at the time, there was a female phys ed teacher. She says, I need you to work with my young men in my fifth grade. And she gave me strict instructions, and making sure that was very delicate, and making sure that most of these kids came from single-family homes that, obviously, we all know that abuts the housing projects. She wanted to make sure that I spent extra time making sure that we gave the time that they needed if they had any questions, because a lot of those kids didn't have a male role model in their lives, as she felt. And that was her heart. And she was very caring to everybody that came in those doors. I remember when I was given the privilege of running the summertime programs. Principals are very, very territorial when it comes to their schools, even when it's not in session. And I remember Jean, when we went out looking for a school where we could do it, Jean stepped up and said, I would love to have that program, that summer program in our school, because it'll benefit that neighborhood and those kids most of all. And she wasn't shy when it came to tell you how she felt. And I respected that so much. And both her and the whole family, I think all of her, brothers and sisters can say that they really meant something. They really put forth a dedicated effort to the city of Medford. And I know there are other names on the list and that's a process in the school committee, but I want to make sure that this council made sure that someone who worked with her on a daily basis at times really understood the impact she made in that community, that South Medford community. I applaud you for coming up and sharing your stories about one of the greatest women around. And I tell you, I used to duck when I used to drive down Governor Zapp, because she used to fly or walk. I don't know how he kept up with that pace. But I was always embarrassed, because she had bigger biceps than me when I'd walk into the pizzeria. But thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Councilor Falco? Yes. Vice President Knight?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli? Yes. Councilor Caraviello?
[George Scarpelli]: Ms. Blackburn, you know my respect for you is to the moon. So you're welcome at any time during public participation, even next week, if you'd like to come. We can sponsor you to come up and share your remarks. I know that I worked for you and with you. Yes, you did. And I know you know the ins and outs. So I know that at the end of an agenda, having the forum with someone with your background and your knowledge of what goes on and what people have done in our school system. I think it's important that they hear what you have to say. So what I could request or recommend to you is next week during public participation, we reach out to the clerk and add Ms. Gwen Blackburn to the public participation section to speak on behalf of Jean Barry Sutherland. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Blackburn.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Lee. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you Councilor Knight to bring this forward. I know that the Menounos family, strong family, Medford, I coach Maria. My time as a basketball coach in Medford High and her brother Peter grew up on our street, on Parris Street. Very hardworking parents and really good people. And I know Maria's values of family came from her parents. And I know when she, She hit it big and she brought her mom and dad with her every step of the way. And I know this has been a public battle of this sick disease and cancer and reach out to them and send a deep, deep condolences to the family and sending our prayers. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. President. To follow on with that, before I get to my question, I know that Councilor Falco, thanks for bringing those up, but have we done it, we thought about doing a public press release like, you know, with throughout the community so people feel comfortable that the people that that their neighbors that they trust, like, you know, this council and say, Councilor Scarpelli, I had the Pfizer, I feel great, I feel safe, I'm doing my part. The mayor's office, you know, the school committee, the coaches, the teachers, you know, have we done anything that sort of creative and using a valuable asset, which is a communications director that's very talented, and probably the best public access director and Pat Gordon, I think that, you know, putting all that together, that could be something that could really move mountains. And putting that on the loop, I think that this is something that we can use. Maybe if you could share that, Marion, with the mayor, and maybe that'd be something that we can push.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so to follow along with that, it's my other question. I appreciate the openness now to get this process rolling. Great to hear there was zero deaths today, first time in June. The numbers are dropping. but still the responsibility of face coverings and vaccines. You look at this chambers today, we have invested community members that are here to share their opinions or their input in something they would like to share. I think that what I'm hearing from my constituents is maybe looking at the other bodies that aren't opening up a live audience so they can be heard in an open forum. Is that something that the Board of Health is working with, let's say the school committee, other boards and commissions that, believe me, we understand and might be a little in the fact that this is still a pandemic, but we're on the back end. And I think that follows along with people that are feeling, that are a little hesitant that when they see their elected officials in person vaccinated, that they're showing them with the good example that we're moving forward. And this was a horrible time, but I think that is that something that's being discussed with the mayor's office as well as opening city hall for the business that needs to be done in the city, Miriam?
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate it. It just, you know, the concerns that I've been, you know, I heard, you know, the great news, we can now put 50% of the people at amusement parks and we can now have everybody go to baseball games, but the office, these public meetings are still closed off for our community members. They're asking me, so I appreciate you pointing out that this is a state guideline. So this is something they really need to get to Governor Baker and move that along. It's coming to me and they appreciate the work that we've done on the city council helping these chambers. So I think that I've gotten maybe 10 phone calls in the last week and a half with some concerns that they've had in other boards and commissions and committees that they really want a form that they can see in person. at least the answer comes from our director of health and I appreciate that. The last question I have is I know a few weeks back, we hired the COVID director of emergency operations. I truly don't know the actual title, but what is exactly that person doing? Is there any updates on what that person's doing?
[George Scarpelli]: No, I believe we hired, somebody in the field to oversee the COVID response?
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate that clarification as well. So thank you. Councilor Belco.
[George Scarpelli]: That's what the confusion was. I know that this is something that we hired just recently, this position that we just hired recently to deal with the COVID emergency plan. So I, it was a, I believe it was a Mia's appointment.
[George Scarpelli]: Myrtle or something, Stephanie? Myrtle?
[George Scarpelli]: So what I'm asking is, because I don't, I'm confused because you just said someone else's name that was a communication person. So Steve is the person, Marion?
[George Scarpelli]: I didn't hire Steve, so. Okay, so does he work under you, or do you work with him?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. So that's all I was trying to get at. I know that we approved a position for this COVID position that I truly forgot, but I looked through my notes and so the question is probably better off for Jackie, because just to get an update of what, if he's doing communications for COVID, there's some questions. So I'll direct that to Jackie. Thank you. Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, it's better. Scott belly. Is there someone from the city administration just to ask a question just about the as I'm reading this? Is the seal of way to measures its own own position? Or is it now go up somewhere else? Because that's what I believe it was.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Do you know what moving forward in the future budget? Is this going to be a standalone position? Are we looking for somebody or is this going to be absorbed into another position, Felicia?
[George Scarpelli]: You don't believe so that it's still gonna have its own title or it's gonna still be absorbed?
[George Scarpelli]: I believe it's a stipend. I believe that's what it is. If I'm incorrect, I apologize, but I believe it's a stipend. Okay. Thank you. Maybe I'm
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President. Again, I apologize. I know this is very important. I know I mentioned it at the first meeting. I know we've had many, but as we, as we've gone through the round table discussions about race in our community, one of the biggest, biggest initiatives that we're that was said over and over again, is when the words are great, the meetings are great, but when is this community gonna put their money where their mouth is? And one of the things we talked about, I think I said it then, was in those discussions, the round table discussions, is that the glaring problem of not having a diversity specialist that works with the school, And having that person that's in the city side, working with the school department together with the city side would be monumental and moving some huge initiatives forward. So again, I apologize because I have been, I did miss that meeting with dealing with the family issue, but I just can't support this in any way, especially what we've been talking about in this community for the last of teen months. This is exactly what we talked about, putting money where our mouth is, putting the person in that position who's valuable in that position to go out and increase his role, both working with what he did in the private sector and his knowledge in the community. And it would be valuable to have that person go right to the school system yesterday and start working together with the school department, the city side, to get to some resolutions to show our community that yes, we're not just having marches, we're not just talking around tables, but we're actually making things happen. So thank you, Mr. President. Councilor Galco.
[George Scarpelli]: 2021 Mr. Clerk, please call the roll. Councilor Bears. Present. Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. I get into this resolution, I want to thank my colleagues and apologize for my absence in the meeting earlier and for being tidy for a couple of meetings. Sometimes family issues take precedent and my mom was going through a health crisis and my brother and sister and I are trying to do the best we can to make sure that she's in a good place and we're working through some health issues. Again, I appreciate the professionalism and the caring of my fellow Councilors and understanding and giving me some leeway. I apologize to my constituents, our constituents in the city of Medford that I have been a little tardy and a little absent. So be sure that I'm still involved with everything that's going on. It's just that I'm doing it bedside and that's something mom loves to hear Council Mark say, Mr. President, Mr. President. That's when we know she's getting better. So I thank everyone for that. So the resolution is very simple. It's the residents from Mystic Street and High Street are really getting beaten up with their public parking. And for what was intended for that area is to eliminate the illegal parking for non-residents to come in and, you know, and park in front in that neighborhood, we're seeing that park, Metro Republic parking is now going in and writing these outrageous tickets for the most outrageous reasons. And for elderly neighbors in that area, if they're parking what is a supposedly a curb, but is not a curb, somewhere where they parked forever, that's just a level land. they're getting ticketed for something simple as parking on a sidewalk. And so it just seems like they're trying to fill a quota and going out to those areas and really affecting that neighborhood in a negative way. So I'd like to send a resolution to the parking commission, traffic commission, maybe to set up a meeting with the neighbors just so they can share some concerns and maybe invite them to the next traffic commission meeting that they can really, they can understand what's going on to maybe say, put in some changes in that in that area of Mystic Street. So thank you for your time. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate Councilmember Council Vice President, I bring this up. This is the confusion with the neighbors that public parking has now they, everybody should know that they can go into any neighborhood now. And They've been, you know, if you parked outside the driveway that you parked for many years and your back, your end is sticking out a little bit, they're ticketing you overnight for parking on the curb or, you know, even if they're ticketing for police action where a sticker might be expired. So these are the things people don't realize that is still happening with public parking, so. Like I said, if we can at least look at that neighborhood and if we have to go neighborhood to neighborhood, I think this is a going to, it'll be a bigger issue than it is. I think this is just scratching the top and I'm glad that we heard the mayor talk about today in the early meeting that looking to bring in in house traffic and parking which Um, I think it's a great idea. It's something that council max worked on for years to make that come to fruition. So, um, but again, thank you. Council, uh, council night.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I know that you triggered something, Councilor Knight, that I found fascinating. So what we're seeing with the Winthrop Street project with Ebersource, this past week, driving back and forth to see my mom in Woburn, I go through Winchester and often get trapped by the construction workers. What I found that's amazing is, all of the construction trucks that are in Winchester drive all the way down, they pull into the T parking lot, and they park all of the utility trucks and all the apparatus for the construction in that parking lot on a daily basis. But Councilor Knight says in Medford, they just leave all their trucks and their apparatus and their metal plates that we're going to be able to get that. Cones and everything up and down with the tree. So I think that you know that brings up bring us a huge point that you know to mend the paper that we asked again. That ever source looks into cleaning up that area. With eliminating all of the, um, debris. Uh and machinery. That deals with this construction. So again,
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. And what an unbelievable resolution because it's funny because I've been searching and trying to figure out in our subcommittee with recreation youth and what we can do to try to have this city council step forward to give the youth their voice in a way that they can be heard. And with today's social justice issues and the outcry of our students and children in our community, the city truly doesn't allow an avenue where they can come to this forum or have an avenue with this forum in the city side to really express their concerns, their issues and their wishes. Councilor Knight, typical Councilor Knight, studies every day, looks at what every single community does, finds what best fits the city of Medford and how we can help our constituents and our most important constituents, our children. So I wanna applaud you again for finding this topic to push forward a very important agenda. I remember when I first started in Somerville, we had set up a recreation commission. a commission that really focuses on doing some fundraising through the city with the recreation department that would allow kids that couldn't afford different sports or different participation fees for programs and made sure everybody had an opportunity to participate. Not only that, they work together. One of my first years there, I thought was amazing. We were having some serious issues in Somerville with some social justice issues and some suicide issues. And they worked together with the school department and the commission and Tina Palman to have a round table forum for our youth to come out and speak of what they wanted. And to be honest with you, it's one of the reasons why I love my position in Somerville as a program developer where my door's open. I can't tell you how many times a young man, a young lady came to my door and sat down in front of me in my office and said, you know, coach, I really want to do this now. What was important is the typical recreation people think of what's traditionally recreation, sports, you know, games, activities, what came out of that, those conversations and having the ability to have a commission, our kids that needed other outlets, whether it be music, whether it be arts, whether it be band, whether it be, you know, um, different social issues and having different type of clubs arranged through our commission. So this is something our community needs. This is something that Councilor Knight said, did his homework. This is where we can put people that are invested in our youth and want to work together. And I'll tell you what, there's 100,000 fundraisers that go out there, Something simple as having a commission that works together that will hold a golf tournament. This is what we did in Somerville, held a golf tournament. Then they did a road race. And not only did they bring the community out, they raised valuable funds for kids at risk or youth that wanted to do something different. And there was never a no. It was always an avenue to do something positive. In today's climate, where our kids really need a voice, And, you know, I'm so glad that they have the, you know, the teachers to reach out to and the CCSR, because I think, you know, our advisors have done an amazing job. But this is a piece where if we sat in a round table, when we talked about race issues in our community, one of the things that came out of those meetings is really putting our foot forward and really putting things into action. You know, we talked earlier about the diversity director, and I think everybody says we need that as a full-time position, and we all support that. And I'm glad to see my councilors stood strong with that to make sure that's a standalone program. You look at something Councilor Knight just brought up with the commission, these are the types of initiatives that really lend to what people are asking for. So I know I'm a little winded, but I'm really passionate about this. This is what I do in my life. I wanna see kids succeed and find avenues to help them succeed. And Councilor Knight, again, one week it's Councilor Marks, another week it's yourself. And I appreciate your commitment to this community and your professionalism when it comes to this committee. This is spot on and I second the motion and love to see this move forward. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears.
[George Scarpelli]: I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Mr. President. Councilor Scarpelli. I move to suspend the rules to take paper two, I believe, two, one, three, four, zero.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Is Mr. Kafour present this evening?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I see everything is in order. The question I have is hours of operations. Can Ms. Fischel just review that with us?
[George Scarpelli]: That's not the practice at the other Dunkin' Donuts, if I'm correct. We've passed a few of these. recently and 3.30 seems very early for our neighborhoods.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, that's why I'm a little.
[George Scarpelli]: 7 to 11 is the normal business hours and anything other than that requires a special permit. So what was with the previous owner is eliminated as we move forward with our takeovers now. So, Mr. President, other than the hours and making that a restriction for the record, I see everything else is in order, move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, Mr. Mayor, I mean, Mr. President, Councilor Scarpelli, if I can, I really appreciate the hard work this committee has done, and I appreciate Councilor Morell sending us the the report, but I think it would truly do this committee an injustice that if we just hold it to a, just a review and just talking about it in a council session, I would feel really comfortable and do a quick synopsis maybe, but I would really call, you know, make the motion that we call for a committee, the whole meeting with the whole committee and the council, because there are a number of questions I have, And it was only done because of the hard work to this commission that brought up some great concerns and great issues. So, and in resolution. So, like I said, I appreciate them being here tonight. I'd love to hear a brief synopsis. And if that, if my colleagues agree with me, I think this really needs a whole committee, the whole meeting that we could really spend a whole evening on this, really breaking this down because it is important. It's probably like I said, other than the streets and sidewalks, probably the next biggest question we get on the council from constituents is traffic and parking questions. So I make that into a form of motion.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council. Vice President, I bring this forward. First, I, too, wanted to congratulate and thank Annetta Russo. For one person being involved in board representation on Little League, and basketball, and youth soccer. To take that position is a very stressful, tiresome, and daunting position. So, Annetta did a great job. I really want to thank her for holding everything up, Medford Youth Hockey, for her time as the president, and congratulate our own Paul Camuso. And I'm sure he's going to do wonderful things as the president If we know Paul, we'll see the Boston Bruins there soon playing against the Method Rock Midgets. So, thank you. Councilor Marks.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Resolved. Take the motion for the DLT to me we clean section of roadways debris between 16 and 93.
[George Scarpelli]: The door- I believe they've already come to us. Yes, they have come to us in the past, but it's great. The historical door in front.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Marshall and this board. I know that I've known the McGoverns, and again, here's another lifelong Medford resident and family in Medford who found a way to do their part to make Medford the community that it is today. They did that not only with the Super Red, I know that, believe it or not, I spent a few nights after baseball trying that soft serve, and the McGovern family has always been there for the community. I know they taught this community how to deal with loss, with the loss of their first child, and I know that good friends with Patrice, who's been a teacher of the Method Public Schools, and I know the love she had for her dad, and how much their family loved each other and love Medford. So my condolences to the family and he will be missed, that's for sure. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you again, Councilor Marks. Thank you, Mr. President. Tom Cangiano, I've known for a long time. I was fortunate to be friends with his daughter, Andrea, who graduated together from Medford High School, and then coached Michael, a prolific goal scorer with our Medford High School soccer program. And Mr. Cangiano was the perfect parent. Always had a kind word to say, things weren't going the right way, was always there to lend a hand. I remember a young man and his newlywed wife purchasing a home and Medford in going to Stonehenge Co-op, I believe, and sitting with Mr. Cangiano. And like Council Member Mox said, that opposing gentleman standing across from me was probably the best person you could have in your corner because he was also a father figure. I still remember the time when we presented the mortgage, he said, everything looked good. Then the homeowner went up to him and said, I was a mess. I was going to lose this house. He played it off like a true friend and father figure. And I believe he told me, George, your mortgage will go up 55 cents. And to me, I thought it was devastating, but he was such a good person and he knew how to put you at ease and really help you get started with your life. And that's one story. I remember Mr. Canjano and I'll never forget him for that. So thank you, Councilor Marksley for bringing this forward. And this is a terrible loss in our community. And I know he's in a great place right now. with the person he loves and that's his lovely wife. So thank you so much and our condolences to them.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, Ms. Kerr, name and address for the record.
[George Scarpelli]: I can. Chair recognizes Councilor Scarpelli. First, let me thank Councilor Caraviello, because I think that it was your leadership that started this journey and say what you want, it's too big, we don't need this, this, that, the other thing, this is truly gonna be a gem in our community. When you talk about gateways to our most important spots in our city, you're talking about driving it to Method Square and now seeing this unbelievable building that's gonna be open to our residents in so many various ways and truly being a true community community facility. So, um, Barbara, again, it takes a great leader to, to lead the way. And Barbara's, you know, the, the only knock is Barbara doesn't actually live in Medford. So we should actually find her a home, you know, maybe next door, you know, get her in here. And so she's just been amazing. And I think that her team's been amazing. And, uh, you know, like we said, especially during the toughest times during COVID and working for recreation, I know exactly what she's talking about. and how we can still provide a service to our constituents. And she did that. When you're talking about the volume of work that you've done over the most difficult times, I applaud her efforts. And so again, I know that, I know Councilor Caraviello keeps challenging us to pledge and get out there and help raise that money and lessen the burden to the taxpayers, but I appreciate all his work. his efforts, so thank you. Chair recognizes Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Chair recognizes Councilor Bears.
[George Scarpelli]: Chair recognizes Councilor Morell.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Chair recognizes Mr. David Tedisco. Oh, he said he's all set. I'm all set.
[George Scarpelli]: Sure. It's a motion.
[George Scarpelli]: Motion of Councilor Scarpelli to receive in place on file, seconded by Councilor Falco, thirded by Councilor Bears. City Clerk, please call the roll. Councilor Bears. Yes. Councilor Falco. Yes. Councilor Marks. Councilor Morell. Yes. Councilor Scarpelli. Yes. President Caraviello.
[George Scarpelli]: Vice President Knight. Yes. Seven in the affirmative, zero in the negative. The motion passes. Council paper 21326 offered by Councilor Scarpelli being resolved. The Medford City Council congratulate Medford's own Bill Boyd on his recent victory to the New Hampshire State House of Representatives. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. William Boyd III, a close friend of most Medford residents. Bill and I grew up together. Bill was a graduate of Medford High School class of 1987. And then went on, I believe, to Boston College. And he's someone who loved the Mustangs and loved the Eagles just as strong. So it's so proud that he's made this move. And as a Method resident, grown up here, his dad's still here. His brother's still here. that Billy took the leap and did something very difficult, especially in this climate, and representing his constituents in Merrimack, New Hampshire. I just wanted to reach out and share the great news with a leader in the class of 1987, and now a leader in the state of New Hampshire. So I just wanted to wish him luck and congratulations. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Knight. Vice President Knight. Mr. President, thank you very much. Congratulations to Mr. Boyd on his recent election. When you talk about the Boyd family here in Medford, you talk about a family that's really focused on service, whether that's military service or public service, the Boyd family has been willing to step up for the call. As Councilor Mack said, I do believe that the legislature in New Hampshire is a part-time legislature, but I also believe that it's an unpaid position, Mr. President. I want to just show you what type of person Bill Boyd is. It's about service and about helping people. and that's the type of guy he is. So with that being said, Mr. President, I thank Councilor Scott Paley for putting this matter on, and I endorse the proposal a whole lot. Thank you, Mr. Vice President. Clerk Herbies. Thank you, Mr. President. I'll jump in here as well, if anyone does. I never knew Bill Boyd when he lived in Medford, but he and I are fellow Eagles. We were BC classmates. I was a year behind him in college. He was a dear friend of mine in college. He remains a dear friend of mine today, and I congratulate him and wish him very well. I wish him the absolute best.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears. Yes. Councilor Falco. Yes. Vice President Knight. Councilor Marks. Yes. Yes. Councilor Scarpelli? Yes. President Caraviello?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears. Yes. Councilor Falco. Yes. Vice President Knight. Councilor Marks. Yes. Councilor Morell. Yes. Councilor Scarpelli. Yes. President Caraviello.
[George Scarpelli]: On that question, Mr. President, I have done some research on this. Vice President Knight. On the Councilor Marks question, I have done some research on the topic, just for point of information. I think some of the criteria include sharing of living expenses, the individual responsibility for the wellbeing of the other partner's dependents, Um, they'd be capable of entering into a contract. Um, and, uh, they're not within a partnership with somebody else. And what I can tell, uh, has been some of the criteria that I've been able to dig out of these statutes. Thank you, Mr. Vice President.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears? Yes. Councilor Falco? Yes. Vice President Knight? Councilor Marks? Yes. Yes. Councilor Scarpelli?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I suppose tonight, we're going to submit the paper to ask the administration also provide a breakdown as to whether or not there any restrictions as to where these funds can be spent. you.
[George Scarpelli]: I hope the mayor's office goes so they can answer our questions.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears? Yes. Councilor Falco? Yes. Vice President Knight? Yes. Councilor Marks? Yes. Councilor Morell?
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I know if we don't have anybody, I know that I did, I was a constituent did reach out via email asking the city administration a question. There's no one here would like to ask that question. Okay. Councilor Scott has a question on the public participation through a constituent that the constituent is asking that the POW flag that should be flying in front of the City Hall isn't there. I haven't noticed it, but if it isn't, could we get the report live? Thank you. Thank you, Councilor Scapello.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, a resident reached out to me about a pothole, but I'll take care of that. I don't need that in the record.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears. Yes. Councilor Caput. Yes. Vice President Knight. Yes. Councilor Marks. Yes. Councilor Morell. Yes. Councilor Scarpelli. Yes. President Caraviello.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Tocco. Yes. Vice President Knight. Yes. Councilor Marks. Yes. Councilor Morell. Yes. Councilor Kelly. Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. And again, I will not try to match what Councilor Marks has said, because I said this the other night. This is what a Councilor does. Council Marks was ahead of this before anybody else. He did his homework. He was thorough, and when he went to the meeting the other night, I was on that meeting, and I think it would have done a major disservice if I jumped in with what he's already done. I think that we're lucky to have him spearhead this effort because there are concerns. I know that Councilor Knight also has done his homework, and I wanna leave what he's done to be presented by his expertise. All I'm really focused on right now is Um, the understanding that I support Councilor Marks and every syllable he mentioned this evening. I think that there is such confusion out there right now. That's coming from the administration. It's coming from different department heads that who can do what, this is the city council's privy, this is the mayor's privy, so we'll clear that up, I believe, this evening. But I do want to, if I can, there were department heads that were there the other night, Mr. President. Do you know, unfortunately I can't tell, is Tim McGivern or Alicia Hunt on the call right now?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Is that as Dave Rodriguez, the chief of staff, is he eligible to speak? If I asked him a question.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Council Marks already brought this up, but I wanted to make sure that we had someone on the call today that we can implore to them that the biggest call that one of the biggest bothersome issues that came about was something this council has worked hard to do, and that's making sure that everybody is represented, that everybody has a chance to speak. I mean, we can go all the way back to the budget hearings last year that we had enough concerns that we didn't show up to a meeting because we wanted to make sure that there was a forum for everybody to speak. We worked hard, the council president worked hard with the administration to make sure we have people here that I will bet you a dollar for everyone that they wouldn't have had an opportunity to get on Zoom to express their concerns to them. They're in a safe manner, they're socially distancing, they're following through all the rules, And that brings me to the biggest question, the biggest issue I had with this, is that a department head mentioned that this, we've heard enough community participation and no one else can speak. I wanna make sure that the chief of staff and the department heads understand they're running this meeting. Everybody that'll be there on Thursday, I know listen, we've been there. We've been the marathon meetings that lasted to one two o'clock in the morning. This is our job. This is your job. This is this affects everybody's just because it might not follow the telephone pole in front of your house doesn't mean that you can't listen to every concern of every citizen in our community because it matters. Because today it's in front of one person's home. But like we talked about, they're expecting another 40, 50 who knows how many more So this scares a lot of people. There are a lot of questions out there. And I'll tell you, it just tells you how great the city of Medford is. I heard some great dialogue from some brilliant people in our community. Unfortunately, the only people that were answering those questions were scientists, or managers, or people involved with Verizon. Either they work for the construction companies that'll be doing the installation, they weren't directly, one of the questions, do you work with Verizon? And the answer was, no, I work for this company. Well, that's the company that puts in the towers for Verizon. So technically, he's telling the truth. But these are the issues that we have. And why do we know that when communication can either help or hurt, with the lack of? A few years back, a gentleman named Bill Carr Jr. started a committee to build new fields behind Medford High School. And what he did was he went out and secured a cell phone tower of over a million dollars to pay for those fields. And he was given every single hurdle to jump over, every single route to run through. And one of the biggest questions those neighbors had in the area, because everybody knows around the Medford High School area, there's absolutely zero cell space there, that no one can pick up a call. And that's one of the number one cell areas in the country, we were told. And what we did is we brought in Educators and scientists from MIT and Tufts that we didn't pay, they came in on their own, brought in by the community members because they worked at MIT or worked at Tufts, and they brought these professionals in that really helped all the neighbors understand what the scenarios were. And that, to be honest with you, it calmed a lot of people down. What we're seeing right now, what I'm hearing now with hundreds of emails and phone calls is the lack of representation of an independent person, an independent scientist that are gonna give us a little more insight. Instead, we heard some great dialogue from people that have done their homework. I know one gentleman, he had the study from Europe that they don't allow this at all. It's not even a question. So, you know, the Board of Health was a member of that committee who voted no, that should speak volumes. So again, I implore the city administrators that will be running this meeting, whatever department it is, whether it's Alicia Hunt, whether it's Tim McGivern, that they do not stop the process of our residents being able to speak, because this is their forum. This is their community. And I will tell you, if that does happen Thursday night, I will do everything in my power to make sure they are punished in every way possible through the state. So again, Councilor Marks, I will not try to delve into what you've already said. I think that it was stated perfectly, and I appreciate you standing strong, and I agree. We're gonna sue our own entity here in the city. I'm not afraid to stand up and make sure that our citizens are safe. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: for the health director, just give us a brief update on the COVID plan.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Falco. Yes. Vice President Knight. Councilor Marks. Councilor Morell? Yes. Councilor Scarpelli?
[George Scarpelli]: Pat?
[George Scarpelli]: While we're on this, Mr. Fadjen, can we look at number 21094, please? Resolution 21094.
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry, Mr. President, you've lost my vote, but that's okay. First of all, Chief, thanks for coming tonight. I think that one of the biggest questions, what are we asking chiefs and department heads to come out for? And one of the discussions we talked about every time we meet, it's usually about budget and it's, you know, we need this, or can we give you this? But I think that it's important that we spent some time talking about what, you know, the information you gave us today, I had a brief opportunity to look through and it's pretty amazing what numbers can show you and how well our police department works with our community. And, you know, I know that, you know, you talk about so many of your officers doing so many things. I know Councilor Falco really pushed for the community meetings and hopefully they get started again. I know we have Officer Rory Rockowitz, works and method cares about prevention. Officer Rudolph we've had here to talk about 9-1-1 and any issues and concerns and that he put to rest and, you know, talking about Officer Hartnett and Officer Brooks and Sergeant is talking about probably the biggest phone calls we get the most dealing with traffic issues and concerns. It's great to see the Civil Rights Division now with Officer Purifuri having someone there in place and you really see and then, you know, one unbelievable addition and Officer Stanton Hurd and domestic violence and having her on board, I think that there's a common thread here that Method Police really do work well with our community and they hear what our needs are. And if there is something there, you're a chief that's willing to really work together with the community to make sure that if there is something that people need to talk about or that aren't being heard, you're ready to jump in and into action. So again, these are the reasons why that having these meetings, Council Member Mox had some great questions and you gave a great presentation. And I just want to thank you for that. I don't want to continue with the evening. I know some of the others have questions. I just, if I can, I do have one question for Officer Stanton Hurd. Can she tell us who her favorite high school softball coach was?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, are you just saying my name? Is it Coach Scarpelli?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. Thank you, Chief.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Uh, Scott Billy. Uh, thank you, Mr. President again. Thank you, Council marks. Uh, I think this is what we're looking for. Um, Mr. Karen's, you know, we'll like again. We speak during budget times, but, um, it's mostly focused on what the needs are and how we can help or how we can't help. But I think it's important to hear what you just said. And I, you know, my questions I had were see quick fix and how the department was working. The other question I had was, you know, seasonal street sweeping. We talk about, you know, snow removal. We talk about, you know, in every season there's something. The preparation of the ball fields, that was another question I had. I'm glad to see that, is scheduled in place once the equipment can get on the field so our kids can get outside, especially at this time, you know, during the pandemic that they just want to get out and run and just have a good time. So again, I don't want to be related to the issue, but you appreciate what you're doing. I think that, I don't know if Stevie Tenaglia actually sleeps. I see him, at all hours of the day and night. He's driving around in a truck. Sometimes I think he's attached to that seat, so, because he's always working. And again, I think that, you know, yes, staff, whatever department it is, whether it's water, sewer, whether it's parks, whether it's highway, I think the DPW does an amazing job for the number of employees we have there. And, you know, it's what keeps our city going. You answered all my questions. I think that's important that we know what's happening and our residents know what's going on. And this isn't just a one-time meeting that we talk about, you know, the budget. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. As a young teacher, I remember this energetic, exciting teacher that would dress up and run around her classroom and excite her students and excite the school and get everybody going in such a positive way. And that was Marie Cassidy. I remember her as a young teacher and saw the impact that just a smile of being positive and being energetic meant to a whole school district, a whole school system. And what she's done is she's taken that knowledge and that love of children in a small classroom in one school, and she then turned our whole community around. If people talk about new and old Medford, one thing is constant. Marie Cassidy made everybody feel welcome. So there was no new, there was no old Medford. Marie Cassidy to bring everybody together, and that's what this city needs more and more every day, people like Marie Cassidy. She's been here a long time, five decades. I find that impossible myself. I think she's 21 and 21 and 20. She's 21 years old, and she just keeps going and going. And I think that her impact and her way of living is, I think, an unbelievable example of how everybody should live. Has anybody ever seen Marie Cassidy? not smile. I don't think I've ever seen that. You know, Marie's always there when family's in need. Who do you turn to, Marie? When you're new to the city and you need to find your way with different families, Marie's the person that's there for you. So she has been just an amazing person, and I probably know why she's not on this call, because Marie doesn't like, every time you see her, They feed her with the accolades. I think that's the only time you see her turn her head. So she's an amazing person, and I wish her a very happy birthday. And let's pray that she has five more decades with our community, just to move our next generations on in such a positive way. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: We'll place our file, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Is the petitioner here?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Joanne, for joining us this evening. I've reviewed all your records. Everything seems in order. If you can, just if you can give us just before any councilors have any questions, we were on this. Can you give us a brief synopsis? I know this is a new dry cleaning, dying and dry cleaning location on Boston Ave, but could you give us a little brief insight?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. No, that's a clarification. Wanted to make sure that, that everybody understands what it is. I see everything is in order, Joanne, and I know if anybody has any other questions, I move approval. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that received an email from a resident. And as I started looking into this and talking to different people, different departments, I think that this is one of the, um. One of the pieces when it comes to rules and regulations that, um, hurt hurt our residents and not being a permitted total permitted community, uh, people that are residing on major main thoroughways, main streets that share parking spots with businesses. And then, especially during the winter months with snow, finding it very difficult to park on main streets. And you're asking people that are working second shift or nurses and so on that might be coming home late, looking for a parking spot, can't find a spot on the main road. They're residents that are willing to pay for permit parking on the adjacent street. What I'm asking the city administration to do with the traffic department is to find a resolution that we can assist those neighbors that, you know, even if we said people that live on Salem Street that abut the side street of Park Street that have permitted parking, that we find a way that they are permitted to purchase a parking permit for that area or that one street so they have the ability to park in a safe manner. And the other piece is leaving those spots open for some local small businesses that really need that parking, especially as we get to a new normal here and open up our businesses. So again, this is a little issue that maybe is just bypassed because of the simple blanket rule of the permit or no permit, parking on the street. And this is for one resident that turned into about four more that I reached out to and I'm sure there are more that we're looking for a solution. And if city administration fabric the topic can help to find a solution to be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I think Council Marks brought the same issue forward in the Governor Zav Lawrence Estates, Lawrence Road issue. And the traffic department moved quickly, I believe. to rectify the situation. I know that safety is paramount, and I can understand where they're coming from, but with what Ms. Catalo is talking about, it looks like these are put right in front of people's residence, and it does cause a bit of a concern where there wasn't much thought in maybe talking to the neighbors and maybe putting them more strategically location or at least not as flashy or interruptive to a bedroom or not. I'd like to amend this to maybe send this paper, this issue and concern to Todd Blake, our traffic engineer, to see if he can look into this and see if we can find some solutions maybe to move these locations to a more suitable area where it doesn't affect residents' front doors. I think it's very important. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scott Belli.
[George Scarpelli]: That's about it.
[George Scarpelli]: No, thank you. I think this is a discussion that I think that's needed, especially when you're talking about the city by the mystic. I think that my discussion is more with the chief of staff, and I know that Paddle Boston has been a great partner with neighboring communities. And there's often a partnership that you see with Paddle Boston, with different recreation departments that we look to enhance our waterways as we work in partnership with these these for profit organizations. So what I'm asked what I'd like to ask the chief is, is they just paying a permit fee or is there a partner fee? Is there something that we're in partnership with paddle bosses just kind of awesome looking for a permit to use our parking lot.
[George Scarpelli]: It would be great. I think that this would be a great time to capture a need that we have in our community with an excellent organization of Paddle Boston. I know that different organizations like General Giant, Paddle Boston work with different communities. We look at our probably our most growing high school sport right now and activity when you're talking about waterways and rowing and our our dock that's at the Hormel site, and trying to work together. I'd like to see if there can be a partnership with Recreation Paddle Blossom City of Medford that we could set up some kind of a financial assistance where monies that are created could help enhance that docking system to help our residents of Medford. I know it's a great benefit and it's amazing for our community, but I think whenever we offer a permit for a for-profit organization to come into the community and ask for a permit, I think that in good faith, there might be some way that we can work together to try to capture some funding to help our own programs. And again, I know it's a business, but so are we. And a permit is, I'll support a permit tonight, but I think that if there's a good faith discussion with someone say from paddle Boston, that maybe they can work with our athletic director who works amazingly with different organizations to try to enhance what we have and using our waterways to for profit. I think that Just a permit just isn't enough for me. I'd like to see some, maybe some commitment that we're using these areas to not only provide a service, but it's also maybe to grow with it and maybe have another stop down the line closer to Hormel where, you know, they have maybe a few locations, but also use Paddle Boston to help our rowing program recreation program. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so then I'd make a motion. So make a motion that we work with the recreation department with the city administration to work with paddle Boston, and trying to find maybe a common partnership that would help support our rowing organization and Again, if they're going to use our- You want to amend the paper? I'd like to amend the paper. Again, if they're using our waterways and using our land for profit, there should be something more and it's just going to permit. So I'd appreciate that, you know, just something to enhance it, not to take it away, but to enhance it. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I will not try to even come close to talk about the 5g issue. Because Council Max, that is what a city councilor does what you just did right there. because I had phone calls saying, what's wrong with Councilor Marks? Why is he questioning 5G? It's just gonna happen. And what you just talked about right now are the other phone calls I got that, you know, Mr. So-and-so from Cherry Street that says, George, there's a 5G box going right across my daughter's bedroom window. And we're here for her future because there's still not enough information out there. And something simple as, why can't we just move it further down where it doesn't affect anybody's home? Where there's a poll that would work, not even a compromise. So whatever is being said in the public, the idea that the work that you just put into that and making sure that everybody has the answers is exactly what a city council does. And as a community member, and if that was going in front of my house, Councilmax, I appreciate your effort and your work. to make sure that everything that you put out is making sure that we're protecting our residents. So I thank you. I know that what we're hearing is it's a done deal. It's a federal law and they can do X, Y, and Z, but you bring up so many valid questions from so many residents that I think that this meeting has to be so important that Verizon has to at least listen and they have to at least look at some compromises. If we have homes that are 10 feet away from an eight-year-old's window, and that's a fear for that family, why shouldn't Verizon look at moving it down another 50 feet where it doesn't affect any homes, or it's the homes further setback, so there isn't an issue? So that's a thoroughness of what a true city council does. So I appreciate and applaud your hard work, and that's what we should all aspire to, what you just did tonight. So thank you very much for that.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, to reiterate, I think that Councilor Morell said it perfectly that when we stand together, I think that it's a message that Santino DeMille, appreciate her message, but thanks Councilor Bears for bringing this forward and making sure that our community realizes that we have each other's backs. we support our Asian community. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Marks?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Falco?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Caraviello, for bringing this forward. I know that I was planning on making a more detailed tribute to Mr. McKinnon. Mr. McKinnon, again, when we talk about legends, Mr. McKinnon was a legend for sure. He was bigger than life, a hero football player, a hero in this country, and a hero of a father and a husband. I know that His wife, Jean, and his children loved him dearly, and they made a huge impact in our community. I know Mr. McKinnon, as a freshman at Medford High, when you first walk into Medford High School, I think they left Mr. McKinnon right in the front door so he could set the tone. And I think that his tone was with his face, and he could scare you. I tell you that. He was someone that was very stern, but just a great educator. and a great leader at Medford High School and the city of Medford and other communities as well. But he will surely be missed and condolences to his family, the McKinnons, the Bradys. He's definitely leaving a void in this community. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Amen. Thank you very much, Mr. President. The chair recognizes Councilor Scott Felly. If we could dedicate this meeting in Mr. McKenna's name, I would really appreciate it, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: That's all I have. Thank you. Along with that, Miriam, first of all, thank you and for all the volunteers for everything is done through this pandemic. And again, like Council Member Mox said, I know that I was, I know I'd go home and my mother would say, my wife would say, might be a little critical, but I really wanted the opportunity for the residents that wanted to come here and speak in person because it says they're for them and so I appreciate the work that you've done with Council President Caraviello to get the chambers open. And so people can feel like they can be heard and share in what issues are in our community. And I appreciate that. One quick question I do have. If we have seniors or sons or daughters of seniors that haven't receive phone calls? Should they direct calls to the mayor's office your office to get better understanding of how they can get vaccinated or if they had questions?
[George Scarpelli]: Do you know that number off my head right now of course I don't. But then the meeting. Yeah, I'll look for it.
[George Scarpelli]: My last question is the hypothetical. I know we've been very adamant to making sure that our teachers were finding any way possible. Do we have, is there a plan in case of extra dosages that we can work with either the Armstrong or our fire department to maybe work with the school department to get teachers vaccinated. I know that if there's a case that we might, I know you're saying that as we're calling different seniors, they're saying they're already vaccinated. So I don't know if we have a mechanism in place that if we do find that we have extra vaccinations that we can, you know, if there's a plan in place that we can maybe, cause that's where we can We have a captive audience in their schools where if they want to be vaccinated, we could bring it to them. Is there anything like that set up just in case as a hypothetical?
[George Scarpelli]: So again, thank you, Marianne and your staff for providing the leadership that we needed in probably the most difficult time this community has ever seen. So I also to follow along with Council Marks. He said it all, but I think that what I saw during this pandemic is sense of community and the few things that Council Marks mentioned that really impressed me is the seniors, our neighbors that are seniors, when you'd watch neighbors walk next door because they were going to the supermarket and ask them if they needed for them to pick something up just because they didn't want them to be exposed, whether it's Halloween and making sure our neighborhood kids can have a safe and happy time and make sure that we did give them an opportunity to celebrate Halloween, but in a safe manner, whether it's, you know, teachers and, you know, I'm lucky to have my sister as a reading teacher, just listen to her stories and, you know, watch her cry at times because of the frustration at the beginning and what teachers are going through. It's been so, It's been so eye-opening when you look at tragedies, how communities band together. And one thing that I'm very proud of is that one thing we did see is Council Marks, everybody that he mentioned, the leadership team with the Board of Health and Mary Ann, and our fire and police, and they didn't take a day off. Our firemen and police, men and women, and five men and women were first ones through a door and hearing the stories, how they had to wrap up to make sure they were keeping themselves safe and their co-workers safe is just commendable. So we're seeing the light at the end of the tunnel, but we see contentious issues in our community today. And I don't want our community to bypass how great Medford is and how they acted and how they continue to act and making sure they're protecting each other. You know, something simple as wearing a mask. I'll be honest with you, in my travels, I didn't see too many people in the city of Medford not wearing a mask. And something that simple meant so much for our safety and for each other's safety and health and well-being. So again, I appreciate the mayor bringing this forward. I appreciate Councilor Marks bringing his accommodation forward and And this is, like I said, as we get to the end, we pray for the people that we lost. We never forget their struggle that they've gone through, but at the same time, we celebrate how our communities stood together and we're getting through this. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Mr. Lewis, for presenting your business here in Medford. I see everything that you have passed everything in. Everything looks in order. If you can, if you could just, before our councilors ask some questions, can you give us a little synopsis of what we're doing in your business?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so do you have an actual cafe, or is this just in bulk that we just do?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so thank you. I do see everything in order, so I move approval. I know my fellow colleagues may have questions. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. Collins for applying. I know Mr. Collins from a lot of volunteer work. I know the basketball programs at Duggar Park and also with our our fundraising that goes on during the summer. And I appreciate his application. I think he would be a valuable member of this commission and I would support him wholeheartedly. So thank you for reaching out. I think you would really make the Hormel Commission a most successful venture. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: What we're hearing tonight is that we need to see some movement. We need to see some action as we go on. We heard it from the chief of staff a few weeks ago, looking at a five to $8 million budget deficit. We heard it from the mayor, if you watched her interview on public access with the transcript that we're looking at dire times with five to $8 million deficit. And something I would like to recommend to the council, it might, behoove us that we, as a council, look and put in place what neighboring communities do. I know neighboring communities, their auditing, finance, budget, and taxation, or their budget and finance subcommittees meet on a biweekly basis to go over with the city finance director, department heads that are called on when needed, What those organizations do in neighboring communities is they eliminate the process that we're doing right now and continually asking for the administration to put a budget together. So what I would recommend, and I'd like to see this put forth and I'll leave it up to the president, make this as a motion, is really looking at the subcommittee of auditing, finance, budgeting, and taxation to try to meet in bi-weekly meetings and look at budget concerns with the finance director, the city administration, and then bringing in those departments that we just requested. Unfortunately, we heard it for years here, whether it be school committee and getting the budget Friday before Father's Day, and we have to vote on it on Monday, or on this council so far is receiving that budget pretty late. I know that unfortunately Mayor Lungo-Koehn and her administration had a tough year last year with the pandemic and I sat next to her for years and we all had the same concerns that we get the budget issue, we get the budgets too late and it's difficult to really put together a plan or understand the plan. So I agree with Councilor Falco. I believe the mayor said in the meeting that it was the school department had 52% of the budget last year. I might be wrong, but if between the school, like Councilor Falco said, the school department, DPW, police and fire, we're looking at the majority of our budget here in the community. And like everybody said, this is gonna be a scary time coming up you know, we're going to have to try to figure this out. And I'd rather have more information ahead of time, instead of waiting for the last minute and then being told we have to do something. So, because I tell you what, if I have that decision to make at this year's budget, I don't know if I'd support it. So thank you, Mr. President. And thank you, Mr. Vice President. Oh yeah, if we can, if we can request the chairperson of the auditing finance budget and taxation subcommittee, to possibly look into setting up some meetings. I hate to put the work on that chairperson, but is it you now? Oh, I don't think so.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, good, so you're really good with this. So you're a pro at this, so. Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. And thank you for Councilor Knight for bringing this forward. If we can, if we can amend this paper to ask the administration if they've met with the leadership team to see quick fix of implementing the forgiveness program, or maybe if one of my colleagues can help me, what was the program that we talked about? I didn't bring my notes with me. to work with constituents that have a very big parking, right? It was supposed to meet amnesty, correct, right? It was the amnesty. That's what, thank you, Council Member Mock. So if we could just ask if they've spoken with CQX about the amnesty, implementing the amnesty program to possibly, recover some of that $500,000 that is still outstanding. Thank you. Thank you. Councilor Belco.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, please forgive me. I had a brain freeze. That was part of the- That was part of the Republican- I'll bring it up later. Thank you, I apologize. That is withdrawn, I apologize.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli, thank you for my colleagues for bringing this forward. Again, another legend. off to heaven. So I think that Mr. Wells, I remember substitute teaching and Mr. Wells often being the person that puts his arm around you as a young teacher and saying, okay, this is what to watch for. This is what to do and what not to do. And I was fortunate also to know him. His son, Scott and I were classmates in 87. Scott left us way too early. And I know that was a painful ordeal for the Wells family. Um, it's, we, we're definitely going to miss Mr. Walls in our community and we get send our deepest sympathies to the family. So thank you, Mr. President. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I bring this forward because as we just, a few resolutions ago, we talked about how difficult times and how oblique times are looking financially and trying to recover funding anywhere we can in our community. I was lucky enough to traverse a few communities that have solar powered carports in their athletic facilities and their open parking lots. Talking to facility managers and a few communities, the discussion has been the lack that really haven't lost any parking spots, but at the same time, gaining enough electricity and power to run their hockey rinks, some of their high schools, and then having a plan in place that would also bring back some funding back to their communities. So I know that our energy environment director has been busy. I think this might be the first first resolution that we've sent over for a long time. We haven't heard much from that department, but I think it's something that we really need to inquire about. I mean, I know that there are private deals going around with different solar companies for residents. And I'm sure with the competition that's out there right now, looking at different solar carport farms at some of our facilities, to recover some funding, I think is a prudent effort. So I welcome the director to put a plan together and hopefully we can get some news back. Thank you. Councilor Morocco.
[George Scarpelli]: to be able to bring this forward. I think that as a former school committee member, that was my number one initiative is trying to battle this inequity. And right off the bat, we saw the inequities where, and I think most people don't know what the reimbursement looks like. And the easiest way I explain it to the common person is that to the money that's given to, to the city public school student is $5,000, but the money that goes to each pupil in the charter school is $7,500. And when they have money in reserve, they can actually use that money to improve their facilities. I think during the time we're on the school committee, the charter school in Malden built a multimillion dollar sports facility when we were losing reading teachers. And I think that's where we have to realize the inequities, not only just in on the bank account, but also in the classroom. And I know it goes hand in hand and I appreciate bringing this forward. And I think that it's something we need to really push, especially in these dire times when we're looking at a deficit right off the bat because of this inequity. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. About a month ago, we had the Director of the Board of Health, and as we talked about the budget season coming upon us, We mentioned what we needed. I know that we talked prior to that about putting a plan together to open the chambers. Their answer was very simple, concise. As long as it's following proper CDC guidelines and six feet apart and people wearing their masks, we can do what we want to do. I believe that's what you said. So what we're seeing right now, we're hearing right now from the general public, we're coming down to a pretty it's people starting to get tired. I don't want to loosen up on any dangerous situations. I know that we have Councilors and department heads that might have health issues that they need to protect themselves. And I can respect that, but I think we have to have the option to have the people's forum open for the people. We're asking our teachers now, We're asking our teachers to come back to the classroom. We've heard some great news before I left for the meeting that President Biden wants to see all of our teachers vaccinated by at least the end of March. And that's a great step. And we're moving in the right direction. And as long as we have the proper protocol in place, I can't see why we can't move forward to start inviting people and department heads back into this chamber. So again, my request is really to get the room ready. If they need my assistance, I can come here with my tape measure and we could measure out six feet and put enough chairs for the people that are interested to be here in person. And hopefully get back to the people's business. I think we're very fortunate that we now have another form of reaching our constituents and our community via Zoom. And that's something we can continue doing. I know Patrick loves to make sure that happens. But at the same time, as I've been saying since last budget season, there are people that want to come to this chamber and express their support or their issues to this council and this community. And I think we owe them that respect as we're moving to a more positive in what hopes to be some sort of normalcy, Mr. President. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know prior to COVID this project was discussed and a plan was in place to meet with the members of that neighborhood and the community to discuss their project and timeline. And here we are. We're now moving into March, April. We're going to see nicer weather. And the word is that Eversource is going to be revving up to continue this process. And I reached out from a few constituents that are still very concerned. with the lack of communication and lack of notice to especially our senior citizens. One of the things we talked about months ago was making sure that they had a liaison that dealt directly with the constituents, with the neighbors. One very valid point was when an area of Winthrop Street is closed and We have elderly residents that can't traverse in and out of their driveways. And with health issues and concerns of doctor's appointments, and not having that contact person, I think is a very dangerous situation. these are valid concerns. So, you know, as well as making sure that the process is still in place and what was promised. And one of the biggest things we've talked about, and I know Chris Donovan has been pushing this, is the implementation of sidewalks along both sides. of Winthrop Street from beginning to end. So I think that was part of the agreement, but we haven't heard from anyone in a while from Eversource. So my recommendation is actually to call for a representative from the Eversource project to appear at one of our next meetings. And so we can go over the process and hopefully set up what we asked for in the past was a community meeting. I know with nice weather, Councilor Marks and Councilor Falco, I think held a great meeting up in the heights with members of the community, social distancing, wearing masks. And we had close to 50 people there. And I too look at this project and really having the neighbors come out and speak to someone in person and then actually know who they can talk to when it comes time for shovels to break ground. So if we can, I'd like to amend my resolution to ask for a representative from Eversource and our city administration to meet with us to make sure that concerns and issues from the neighbors in the Winthrop Street area are heard and they are listened to and everybody is prepared for this daunting project. I know hopefully we're all getting back to school. The high school's gonna be back open. The weather's gonna be nice. You're talking more traffic, people going back to work. So as we're getting to some sort of normalcy, we're gonna be encountering some serious concerns for those neighbors. So I'd like to have representatives here to discuss that and have them, our neighbors, have a chance to speak. and she had her concerns. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Motion to approve.
[George Scarpelli]: Hold on. The wind issues? No, he's not here.
[George Scarpelli]: I found the records in order move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Scott, I thank you for bringing this up. Uh, Council marks. I, too, prepared to just ask a simple question that had a few phone calls this weekend. I heard the rollout at the Andrews and all the volunteers were amazing. the program was a great turnout, but the confusion that I heard from many constituents after the fact that we're bringing their parents or trying to find appointments, that they saw a lot of, or they talked to a lot of people that weren't from the city of Medford. So that was a confusion. The confusion was they were told that people from Malden and Melrose were. And that should be something we should have someone from the administration or the Board of Health just to explain to our constituents what the benefit what the benefit by having a consolidated effort, like maybe that we can go to Melrose-Wakefield Method residents or vice versa, we don't know that. At least that's what the communications I got back from a few seniors. So if we can ask the Department of Health to have that answer ready for next week, I think to be helpful. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. There's been a lot of movement, especially in the last 24 hours with the governor proclaiming and the head of the board of education that we're going to, at least for the younger grades, to full in-school learning for our elementary school students. And did a little research and just seeing the support of many different medical professionals talking about the, the safety of our children and that they are limited in transmitting the virus. But I think the biggest concern is our teachers. Sometimes it's a more elderly population and Our veteran teachers are afraid to come back, and we can understand why. We do want to get back to school. I'm one of the parents that want to see teachers back in the classroom, but this is a simple fix. If we moved all of our first responders to the front of the line, and we want to reopen our schools, there's no reason why we shouldn't have our teachers moved right to that front of that line. So it's a little disheartening. The good news, I can go get my vaccine shot because I'm a little overweight. I don't know if you noticed that, but that's a positive, but our teachers that are going to be educating our students need to feel comfortable and safe. And I think it's important that we start putting our teachers as a priority and that we reach out to all of our team members and government and really stress the governor that the teachers need to be put to the head of the line. So I ask this for my colleagues to support, and I hope that we can move quickly to try to get this important demographic taken care of. Our teachers need it. Thank you. Councilor Bearsley.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President, and thanks, Councilor Falco, for really putting this issue forward. I think that, you know, in my field, we see, in recreation, we see how important it is, especially today with the pandemic, trying to get especially a demographic that's not being serviced in a sense as our seniors and finding recreational activities that are pretty inexpensive and an easy fix if you allow it. Talking to the director of recreation this past week, Kevin Bailey, I know we have a great and highly successful football program through recreation and an outside organization. And they really started groundswell here in our community like you're seeing in other communities that are giving constituents an opportunity to play. What that has also happened is that recreation organized program is great, but what we're seeing is we're seeing constituents that just want to go down the park and bring their paddles and go over to a tennis court and just have a pickup game. So with that, what Councilor Falco is mentioning, You know, I know that we heard some concerns that if you paint the courts, you know, that it'll affect X, Y, and Z, but just like other sports and other sports facilities, there's a way to do that where you are using temporary paint, using a different color, so you're really not affecting the tennis court itself, but also giving an opportunity for, you know, our participants in pickleball to have an opportunity to play in their neighborhood. So I think that we can end up becoming the Mecca of pickleball here in Medford will be the talk of every town and there'll be pickleball played across the land. So, but I know that, you know, another option that if we can look at too, I know that some communities participate in pickleball on turf fields. It's recommended to play on, from what I was told, on the tennis courts. But if you see that it's really growing to that extent, there's other areas that we can facilitate pickleball courts. But again, this is great. We started off with what we're seeing in our community with a bocce court that needs to be revisited a little bit. maybe take up the sand to put some stone dust, I guess, Mr. President. But I think that when you're adding these type of recreational activities, the people that in the past have been pushing aside, you know, I remember when our seniors only recreational activity was walking around Meadowblend Mall 455 times and then getting a coffee in the food court. But, you know, this is what our constituents are asking for. And I think that, I appreciate Councilor Falco to bring this forward so we can help this move along. And like I said, this isn't a big budget issue. This could be a very easy fix and it should be celebrated. So thank you. Thank you. Councilor Morocco.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I don't play pickleball, so I don't know. No, you don't really, you don't have to. From what we gather, you don't have to, so I don't think it's something that's, it's, you know, it's that dire. Okay. I think it's appropriate. Okay, thank you. I know we have some speakers.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, Councilor Scott. If I can, if we can just amend the paper to, if we can call for a subcommittee meeting for Youth and Recreation Affairs, I think it'll be important that we can follow up with that with our Director of Recreation and also move forward some discussion before the budget and making sure that we have all of our ducks in a row when it comes to recreation in our community. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I would second that, Mr. President. Thank you. I said, I too understand that that was totally against us because of the implications to our brick and mortar businesses. And this is why I've been against the, the food truck initiative until we have an understanding of where and when these outside businesses are coming into our community and not paying permit fees and not paying taxes and not going through the protocol that all of our brick and mortar businesses go through to survive, and especially at this time. I had a great discussion with Vivian Su after the event, after the meeting last few weeks ago. talk to a few of the business owners in our community that they are now touching base and understanding that we have brick and mortar businesses that would love to work as a fundraiser where 10% of the proceeds that go into that restaurant for that day, all the proceeds, that 10% of all people that go in there, not just the people from that school, would go directly to that fundraising organization. I think that's the true meaning of a true fundraiser. So again, that again shows the support of our brick and mortar businesses and what they're willing to give even during these tough times. They're still reaching into their pockets and wanting to help our children and our community. So again, I will support this initiative tonight because I think some of our PTO members were put in a very difficult position not understanding what was the movement with this. But to me, this is just a blatant effort of an end around where they came to us. We did not approve it. The person that was speaking from Watertown was moved with talking to principal and so on and so forth. And then this was born. So in a time where you're talking about probably one of the neediest communities, parts of our community that have got housing projects and where a lot of our kids that have need, their classmates are walking outside and paying 16 to 18% more for a meal and can't be part of that program because of what is a blown up payment system. I think it's truly unjust and not a, not of opportunity for those kids to be involved and do it right in front of them, in front of their faces really, really bothers me, but I will support this tonight and with a lot of questions. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I believe the records we have, ma'am, we have that the prices were increased by 16%. Right. So you're not so. So obviously, so the understanding of a true fundraiser is leaving those prices where you have it, and then giving back to that community.
[George Scarpelli]: I want to wish a very special person a happy 29th birthday. Carol Caraviello, I believe, celebrated her 29th birthday. We want to make sure that, you know, anybody that's been married to you as long as she's been alive has been pretty impressive. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Ross. We appreciate you being here tonight. My question is, whether it's 100 feet or five feet, what is the expectations of the resurfacing of that road as you enter to Medford?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Falco? Yes. Vice President Knight? Yes. Councilor Marks? Yes. Councilor Morell? Yes. Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears. Yes. Councilor Falco. Yes. Vice President Knight. Yes. Councilor Marks.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Morell. Yes. Councilor Scarpelli. Yes. President Caraviello.
[George Scarpelli]: to take on 21063.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Councilor. President Caraviello bringing this forward. We see the movement. It would be nice to hear if there's any discussion with the city administration with any open requests from the Community Preservation Committee that there could be something worked together. If there is any requests from the city to work together, maybe to make that park that I know it's a state run facility, but maybe it might be something that we can work with the DCR and MWRA to maybe take control of that. And one of the issues with the lights that we've had in my profession, when we've had issues with that, Councilor Caraviello, it might behoove us that we request the DCR and our director of DPW look into the possibility of putting in satellite system where it could be controlled via your iPhone. And it's a very easy fix. I know that some lighting systems are outdated, but in my community where I work, there was an outdated system. We thought it wouldn't be compatible, but it was only a $5,000 fix that turned a whole field that lights are being left on. and to a very easy solution. And the money that was saved just on wasted electricity on those lights that were left on over and over again, it saved, that box saved the outgoing funding and they take a few trips. So if we could ask the Director of Lines, Wise Lines and maybe the DPW Director, to work with DCR about seeing if it's compatible to put in the, I'm not, I think athletic director Maloney might have the company that does it through the satellite system. So if they can work together to see if we can do that, that might be a solution.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears. Yes. Councilor Falco. Yes. Vice President Knight. Yes. Councilor Marks. Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Councilor Scarpelli? Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Council paper 21064 offered by President Caraviello.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears. Yes. Council Falco. Yes. We get this right this time. Councilmarks. Yes. Council Morell. Yes. Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: President Caraviello. Vice President. Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Vice President, I bring this forward. I too received a few phone calls as soon as these eyesores were put back into place. And not only what was there, but now I heard that they've doubled. And what we're hearing and what we're seeing is exactly why we will move forward with the ordinance. Public safety being one, the idea of road infestation, and then again, the eyesore for abutters wake up and step on the front porch and see these four donation bins that, from what we were told, even the property owner doesn't know who they belong to. We put the ordinance into place. I've called the building department, the code enforcement officer. I know that Mr. Murky was working on this as soon as possible to make something happen, to get rid of these, remove these donation bins that, question whether they're donation bins or for profit. We truly don't know, but I know that something has to be done. And I know we await the passing of the ordinance that this council worked so hard to put forward to make sure this doesn't happen. But here we are in the middle of the night, someone comes in and just drops four bins right in front of their home with piles of snow and these projecting out. Drivers either entering Fellsway Plaza and cars leaving the plaza are having a difficult time to see and are causing a very dangerous situation for our residents and shoppers in that area. So thank you for bringing this forward Councilor Knight and hope we see some movement quickly.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. there's an open space that they could be utilized. So I don't think it's, you know, for the cause, we're right, it's important, but as long as it's maintained and it's put in the proper place, we would support it. That's what we, you know, some of the issues we put into the, stipulations we put into the ordinance. So it'll be interesting to see, but again, I apologize that you have to go through this again, Mr. Foley, and thank you for coming up here this evening to share your information.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Falco? Yes. Yes. Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears. Yes. Councilor Falco. Yes. Vice President Knight. Councilor Marks. Yes. Councilor Morell. Yes. Councilor Scarpelli? Yes. President Caraviello?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears. Yes. Councilor Falco. Yes. Vice President Knight has accused himself. I got to call you last. Councilor Morell.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Yes. President Caraviello has accused himself. Acting President Marks.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears? Yes. Councilor Falco? Yes. Vice President Knight? Councilor Marks? Yes. Councilor Morell? Yes. Councilor Scarpelli? Yes. President Caraviello?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Peers. Yes. Councilor Falco. Yes. Vice President Knight. Yes. Councilor Marks. Yes. Councilor Morell. Yes. Councilor Scarpelli. Yes. President Caraviello.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears. Yes. Councilor Keohokalole. Vice President Knight. Yes. Councilor Marks. Yes. Councilor Morell. Yes. Councilor Scarpelli. Yes. Vice President Caraviello.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears. Yes. Councilor Falco. Yes. Vice President Knight. Yes. Councilor Marks. Yes. Councilor Morell. Yes. Councilor Scarpelli. Yes. President Caraviello.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears. Yes. Councilor Falco. Yes. Vice President Knight. Yes. Councilor Marks. Yes. Councilor Morell. Yes. Councilor Scarpelli. Yes. President Caraviello.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. As we review these three ordinances, I think it's just a piece of what this council has been able to do. You're talking about a few of these Ordinances were visions that were started years ago, even before the beginning of this term. And the hard work from this council in the midst of a pandemic and making sure that we listen to our constituents. because I think when you talk about the donation bins, when you talk about the rodent issues, when you talk about the mental health issues and It really came to us from our constituents. These issues are brought to our attention from the people that are directly involved. And for this council to take its initiatives and hard work and make sure that we have Ordinance now in place to make sure that we're protecting and moving forward with some great initiatives. I think it's a job well done. So I wanted to wait till all three. I know my fellow Councilors mentioned how much work that we put into these, but I wanted all three to be read before I mentioned and gave my two cents just in appreciation for everybody's hard work. I think that this is what happens when people work together to make sure that we're putting our constituents first and their safety and well-being. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilman, for bringing this forward. I've known the Mosher family for a long time. I started first with interactions on Princeton Street, growing up next to my best friend as a child, and we spent a lot of time together. Then meeting, getting involved and sitting at Victor's and knowing the family. And one thing that's amazing is the type of person she was. She was a great mother to her great children and a great wife to her husband, hardworking husband. But what you realize with Mrs. Mosher, when you walked in that door, she treated everybody like family. I often brought, whenever I had issues with any of my students, The place that I would want to go and they wanted to talk, I would take them to Victor's Deli because there was a nice quaint area. And one thing that Mrs. Mosher always did, and Nancy and Jason after Mr. Mosher's, really made people feel comfortable. And when you bring a young man from El Salvador who's got a lot to worry about and And Mrs. Mosher walks over and they're looking at this elaborate menu of food that's prepared in front of them. Their eyes are stunned. And Mrs. Mosher is the type of person that made kids feel so welcome. And they gave them that opportunity to have a place. that they would feel that they were in their kitchen with their parents. And she was that type of person. I think that she leaves a huge void in our community. I know it's in Somerville, but it's in our hearts. It was a Method restaurant. It was a Method business. And it's someone that we will definitely miss. I know Mike has mentioned A few times already that how proud he is and the honor that he'll give his mother to pass on her traditions. And if you know Mike Mosha, he's got the same heart and she'll be missed. So our condolences to the Mosha family and we wish her the rest of peace. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Marks. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. And again, Councilor Marks, thank you so much because after your issues and questions that you brought to the forefront last week, I too received many phone calls. And if my council colleague would allow me, I would really, I'd like to amend this paper to ask the city administration. a very talented Director of Communications, and Jackie Peeks. I've been fortunate enough to work with Jackie as a partner when she was in a neighboring community, and she is a wealth of knowledge. And I think that what Councilman Mox is saying, our seniors need to be informed of what's going on. Because I know that our Director of Health last week was adamant that that X, Y, and Z was happening, but we were getting, and I'll be honest with you, my own mother got the phone call saying that she was set up to take the vaccine in Medford, and then to hear that that wasn't true. Those are the issues that are true, so we have to find a way through public health announcements and addressing it and head on. So we have a lot of very talented people. I'll point my finger across the hall right now to Pat Gordon, and there's got to be a way that we can send out public health addresses to our constituents on the loop, especially our seniors. with some sort of a message. I know the mayor's done some great announcements in her office with some great initiatives in using the public, the community cable. That's an easy way to reach a whole needy community, which is our seniors. And just to inform them of what's happening, the process of what's going to happen. Like Councilman Mach said, a lot of seniors don't know what's happening. I know we heard in the past was that the city worked, did their due diligence by setting aside a location and getting ready to rent a location to administer the vaccine. And then that fell through because the governor didn't come through with the vaccinations. And we can understand that, but There's got to be a plan in place as we move forward. It could be something that's happening in two weeks. But we should be pairing our seniors right now and what they should be doing. And how this should be informed, because this is, It is serious. I know that before we came to this meeting, I lost a very good friend because of the COVID and a lot had to do with his and his residence. He had a son who's a teacher that came home and didn't know he had it. These are the issues that we're going to hear as we go to opening the schools and making sure our teachers are vaccinated. But right now, the biggest issue I see are our seniors. So we need to be more transparent, to use that word, that it's so easily thrown around this community. We need to be more transparent when it comes to informing our seniors especially, and what needs to be done. with achieving this life-saving vaccine. So please, I implore the mayor and the administration to please find a way, working with our communications director, reaching out to our different avenues, whether it's letter form and tax bills, whether it's Using COVID relief money if it's still there to send information out via letters. Whether it's setting up a loop on channel 15 and 22 and channel 3 to make sure that residents, you could point to a senior to say, hey, turn on channel so and so. Watch that, watch the loop, it'll tell you what's happening. And even if it's the vaccine's not ready to come out yet, we don't have the vaccines, but When it does, this is what's going to happen, A, B, and C. That's what they need. The governor right away, when he's first rolled out this wonderful plan of senior citizens going on to a website and then maneuvering through 66 different sites to then sign up for some place and not be available. And then realize, there's something really simple. You could just dial 211. And you know what, that doesn't make that, hey, we have C-Clicks Fix. Imagine if we could find a way with C-Clicks Fix that seniors can call that number, dial 311, and have a person designated, maybe through the health department, that says, I'm a Method resident, I'm a senior citizen, please guide me. So we have initiatives, we have these tools in place in this community. But we have to be transparent in the sense that forward thinking to move this forward and try to find a way to get the word out that's so desperately needed. So again, I know that we've There's no blame to go around, I don't think, I think this is a crazy time. But even if we don't have the vaccines right now, we should have a plan in place to inform our seniors that this is what's happening, this is when it's going to happen. So thank you, I'm sorry for rambling, but to hear the desperation and some of the seniors that I talked to over the last week. It's frightening and some of the simplest things that they just want to go for a walk. They just want to go to their salon and get their hair done and not think that they're going to come back and die. And one resident I talked to said, George, I just want to hug my grandkids. And that speaks volumes. So if we please, we need to move forward with this in a more sensitive and proactive manner. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. So when I saw this resolution, I, I have the privilege and ability to work with facilities management and I did some homework and I reached out to the neighboring communities and talked to DPW commissioners and assistant commissioners and facilities managers. Unfortunately, if it was that simple, this could be an easy resolution or to find a solution for this issue. Unfortunately, it isn't. Let's talk about the noise first. So what I got back from the information, in using the DPW, our DPW as an example, the leaf blowers they use emit a decimals for noise at 100, 110. The leaf blowers that are electric by this study has shown that it reaches between 90 and 92. What that is equivalent to, as they told me, is the difference of a whisper. The biggest issue is something that concerns me, is when we're trying to talk about the environment and look at the carbon footprint. What we don't have in place yet in this country, we haven't put anything in place about what happens to battery powered blowers for the batteries that are going to be needed. And for what the study that's already done in neighboring communities to show that the amount of battery life would be eight batteries per day per employee. And those batteries then would need to- Point of information, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So in private use, you're asking private landscapers and private businesses now to look and retrofit their vehicles to a charging system that is very expensive, that would then take eight batteries per employee to be used, that would only last for two years. So what I've been told is that the carbon footprint could increase Because the system has not set up a place or a system to eliminate these batteries. It's not like when we talk about car batteries and we talk about electric cars, there are systems in place to eliminate and discard those batteries. They haven't yet figured out what to do with the batteries when it comes to lawn blowers, believe it or not. There are so many variables, and I appreciate and I think that once it goes to subcommittee, these are issues that have to be brought up. And when you talk about just having the private sector being focused on, the word that's come back is that if we allow the public sector to use these leaf blowers, but not the private sector, it leaves us out there for a huge issue of bias. So if that's the case, I know that a neighboring community is looking at $500,000 to retrofit their DPW trucks and purchasing of equipment that's needed to run their communities. So I just want to be cautious that both the noise and the noise level, could be argued, but I think what's most important when you talk about the carbon footprint, and neighboring communities that have been focused on this issue wholeheartedly, and they've been researching this, it's a slippery slope because of the lack of... planning when it comes to disposal of the batteries that will only last for two years. So I just caution everybody, I support sending this to subcommittee, but I also would recommend that We make a few phone calls to neighbor communities that have already put this in place and are trying to put this in place that are sitting. One community has pushed something through, another community is now with their city solicitor trying to understand what's happening. When I spoke to those people in neighboring communities, it seemed like our resolution is very similar to theirs, which is pretty impressive that we're looking at the same issue. So I would second the motion to send this to subcommittee, but I also urge us to be very careful in understanding the impact this is going to make negatively not only through our carbon initiative, but also our financial responsibilities and our legal responsibilities. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I did forget that because gas It's such a difference between gas and electric, you would have to double your time used with electric blowers in comparison to gas blowers. So I just want the residents to realize, you might not like the landscaper to be out there for a half hour, but if we do make this happen, that's going to be buzzing for an hour. And that's how they explained it to me. So I apologize, Mr. Chairman.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Knight, is that a motion or an amendment?
[George Scarpelli]: I would second that motion Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: They have no catalytic converter. Point of information, Councilor Scapelli. Mr. Caplan, I can understand your desire to move this forward, but I think that all we're looking at is this might be the solution. We might look to eliminate the gas blows. We also did our due diligence and realized that this could negatively affect our carbon footprint in other ways. So that's all we're saying. We're not saying that this might not be an option. What we're saying is we just want to look into the process and how it affects in totality. So I know that you seem a little intense that this body is trying to move something that you want to see go forward, that we're not doing that. We just want to do our due diligence to make sure that there are processes in place so we're not hurting our environment at the same time and changing inordinance. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I just want to apologize to Mr. Kaplan because being in the committee meeting, we can't see who's in the meeting or not. So I didn't know if maybe you missed that part because as you're talking about the issues about the environment, that I already said something. So that's the only reason why. It's not intended to be disrespectful in any way, sir. We just, in this forum, I can't see that you're on the call. So I apologize. That's okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, Mr. President, I, again, I appreciate Mr. Kaplan's involvement, but again, this isn't anything but to look at this so we have all the information to either move forward or not move forward with an issue. But this is, I know that it's going to go out on social media, we all know this, that here we go again, the councils are against the environment. So I just warn the community and just again, enlighten them that this isn't anything against anything that's being said. This is something just to look at it and study it a little bit further because it isn't just, it's not cut and dry, first of all. Second of all, I'm offended in any way that an employee's race has to come up to this. I think that's appalling.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I thank my fellow colleague and Vice President Knight. I think, not to be redundant, but you hit that right on the button. I think that this is something that we brought forward, something that we look to address in my number one vision with this is the safety and having the responsibility that we put on other entities that use Medford as a place of business. And I think that it's a very important piece of this puzzle. And as they grow and move forward, I think it's important that we meet with them and make sure they understand where we want them to be and how the city of Medford holds them accountable. And I think that you're seeing this across the Commonwealth, there are other communities that are focusing on you know, the feet to the fire, per se, to Amazon. And as they're growing, it's great. You'd like to see companies grow. But as they come into our community, we want to make sure what cost and making sure that they are licensed correctly, that they are quarried. And as they drive our streets and enter our residents that they're people that are safe and follow our laws. So I appreciate Councilor Knight's thoroughness with this presentation and move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. So we have Mr. McGregor, Mr. Wetzel. Thank you very much for choosing Medford. We see all of your paperwork is in order and all approved. And before we go on for approval, Can you, can we have a little insight in what we're trying to do with Deep Cuts Deli and give us a little preview if you can.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, okay. And we can't hear you. Oh, you guys hear me now? There you go.
[George Scarpelli]: So you come highly recommended. I know it seems to be a very exciting venture. So we're excited to hear that. So how many employees will you be employed at the location? The moment we have about like six to eight. Six to eight in the hours of operations. Have you figured that out yet?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. So I see everything in order. I move approval. Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Mr. Shaheed, that's a great motto. I follow that. Thank you. Work hard. Again, I see all the paperwork is in order. And before we move approval, would you like to give us a little look, see what we're going to be, we're going to be treated for here in Medford soon?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Like I said, I see everything. I know some of my colleagues have questions, but I see everything. I think the concept is innovative. I wish you luck, but before we approve, Mr. President, do you have any questions? Is that your motto, work hard and eat good, Judge? What is it? That's your motto, right? I'm starting my own construction company so they can deliver.
[George Scarpelli]: Question, Mr. President. Councilor Scarpelli. To really Roberta, if we came back and visited this next week, this wouldn't, I wanna move forward with this, but I understand my colleague's reservations. Is it waiting a week would be, would that really hinder anything for this vote, this portion?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor, would Councilor Light be opposed to putting a date certain so we can get the information back from the city?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarborough.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Mr. Carr, for all your hard work. I know that you're involved in so many worthwhile endeavors in our community, so thank you. But my questions were very similar to what my colleagues have said. But to look further into the archeological dig and that request, I know we requested more information. The question's really to Roberta, if we would ask to just separate that $50,000 until we get a little more information. And just approve $250,000 to get the work started and the process started on the walls. One, is that possible? How much would that hinder the archaeological process? But the only reason why I think it's so important, I know Mr. Kyle said that all we're asking is for $50,000 and that's great, but we got to. We could be pretty exciting when you think of we start digging a little bit deeper and we find something really important to our history and we need more to keep moving forward with that. So really my question is to Roberta to see A, if we can just sever the $50,000 until we get more information dictating what that process is when we talk about archeological digs. And second, if there's a process that as we move forward, with the CPC looking into adding more funding if they do find something of value that we need to move forward with. So that's probably my question that needs to be answered tonight for that. Roberta, can you answer that question?
[George Scarpelli]: OK, so I appreciate that. That could be a good recommendation. But it wouldn't hinder the process. One of my points is if we wanted to move forward with the walls, is that something that couldn't be moved forward if we delayed or looked into more in depth the archaeological piece? Or is that all in one? Does that make sense?
[George Scarpelli]: It's not funding, Roberta. What I'm asking is, does one process of the building of the wall, let's say they can't do the wall until the archaeological piece is done, that's what I'm trying to get at. Would one delay the other?
[George Scarpelli]: OK, so if we wanted more information, on the archaeological dig and get more depth about the $50,000 requested for this. Would this, the question is, would it delay the process of the refurbishing of the walls? No.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I would recommend with Roberta's recommendation that we move forward with the other two pieces. And then look into the questions that were brought up by Councilor Falco and Councilor Marks. And then so we could still, that money will still be there once we have those questions answered. We can move approval on those when the time comes. So like I said, it's not, I don't want to not vote against it, but I want to make sure that we have the questions answered that we can't have answered tonight, but we move forward with the other two pieces of this very important project. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I believe that's what we're doing. That's why we're here. We're giving them the recommendations to get that information in order so we can move favorably during our regular session when it comes for voting. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I have to thank my colleagues, Council Marks and Council Knight, especially. I think that Council Knight really spearheaded this in the onset of this project. And again, I won't repeat what they said, but I think my concern is that here we are ready to cross that goal line and the complaints from some of the neighbors that really we're not following through of all the hard work that was put forth from the representatives from LMH and this council and the advisory committee that made sure that all the concerns were addressed and they were listened to. Like Councilman Mark said, It's been difficult, I imagine, with the pandemic and having open meetings and getting everybody more involved like we had in the past. But as things get to somewhat normalcy, and the nursing school reopens, and the parking concerns become an issue again, I think that that's important. the neighbors in that area, especially that immediate area, have someone that's going to listen to them and make sure that this council did their due diligence and really follow through to make sure that it wasn't just an empty promise, but we're ready to follow through as we go through a pretty exciting process at the ambulatory center. So it'd be interesting to hear what what our representatives have to say and hopefully our residents can share some concerns or issues and get them rectified so we get the train back on its rails and make sure everybody's in the same place. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scappelli. Anybody from the administration or from the Andrews PTO?
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President. First of all, thank you, Miss Sue. I think that you've done so much volunteer work, not just for the Andrews, but the McGlynn for many, many years. And I appreciate all your dedication. But just to familiarize this council, when we run other fundraisers with the brick and mortar stores, do they typically also add the percentage onto the fees? Is that common practice?
[George Scarpelli]: Right, so I know, just a question, maybe you know, maybe you don't know. Do you know if like, I know we've done so many others with the brick and mortar stores. Is it typical practice that they would have a set fee and then add a certain percentage on that fee to bring in money for a fundraiser?
[George Scarpelli]: And the reason why I bring it up, because maybe you were familiar with the meeting we had, maybe not. But we had a meeting with the representatives from the food truck. And it's really disingenuous that they came in front of us saying they will do the same thing that our brick and mortar stores will do. And they would commit, and they donate, and they would give so much back to our community. And I'm so disheartened that that's their practice. And again, that doesn't reflect anything on you or the PTOs. I think that you're trying everything you can do, believe me, to try to get anything going in the positive direction to raise funds for our kids. And I know my wife's dealing with it right now with a senior in high school and trying to figure out. what we can raise to help to do something for our students at the end of the year to give them something positive they can fall back on, they can remember such a horrible year and a half that they've gone through. So I think that my message is to those food truck providers that I'm a little disappointed that that's how they do that because, like I said, I think I'm familiar with the brick and mortar stores that run these fundraisers, it's 10% of whatever they bring in at the regular fee. And we talk about the haves and the have nots in the community, and it's sad to think that there are families that want to do this fundraiser, but won't be able to participate because inflated prices from a food truck. But again, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I just want to reiterate it. I agree with Council Marks. I think that being that it's time sensitive, it's not the PTO's fault. And again, it's getting into politics that they shouldn't be punished for. what the food trucks are trying to pull as an end around, in my eyes, that tried to get into our community. And what I see is a negative impact to our brick and mortar. But I wholeheartedly agree with this, Councilor Markson. Hope the PTO and the Andrews raise a whole lot of money for a whole bunch of activities for our kids that really probably need it. So thank you, Mr. President. And good luck, Vivian. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. And again, I thank Councilor Marks for bringing this forward. Officer Kelly for all his dedication. Thank you. Officer Butts, I will tell you that he was a very special officer, I think, in our family. Someone that the old time police officer that made sure he knew the families he was policing. And getting to know them, getting involved in the church that He worked in there in helping them move the city forward, making sure that everybody felt comfortable, where people aren't afraid of their policemen and feel comfortable going to him. And I could tell you stories where I often remember Officer Butts, being called in with family disturbances, not as a representative of the law, but as a friend that can reach out to a troubled kid and understanding the family dynamics and trying to be the mediator and making sure that everybody handle the situation with cool hand and did the right thing. So I really appreciate everything he's done for Medford and our residents. And I thank Councilman Mox again. Again, it's When you talk about community, what happened the other evening with the reverse 911, social media, the police officers and fire department. I mean, people just rallying around trying to find this person in need that was walking around. And I'm going to toot my own daughter's horn that My daughter called me while this was happening, she was out with her friends, and she called to ask permission that dad, they were in the area where they last saw this person. Do I mind if her and her friends would walk the neighborhood to see if they can help? And I think that just wasn't my daughter, but people in general really came out of their homes and instead of walking a daily walk one way, people walked. toward where the missing person was, and I think that, and thank God it turned out to be a happy ending. So, I thank Councilor Marksley for bringing this forward, and I wish our retiring police officers the best as they move forward, and hopefully our young officers can fill their roles. So, thank you. Thank you, Councilor Escapoli. Councilor Knight.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you Councilor Falco for bringing this forward. I think that one thing we saw as school committee members was the difficulty during budget time and that's one thing. is one thing that we changed in the city school committee is having the pre-budget meetings where department heads came to us and it was so informative that each department or at the time principal came in from each school and gave us their wish list to understand what their greatest needs were. And what we realized We were lacking legally in some positions, making sure that we fulfilled our legal requirements as school committee members. And I think that what this does, I think that it's time consuming, but at the same time, it eliminates the fluff that goes on during the regular budget meeting to get right to the point and understand where we are. If Councilor Falco will let me amend this paper, I'd like to amend this paper and asking that when we do the pre-budget meetings, as long as we're out of the red, I'm hoping that the department heads themselves, being that the chamber alone can hold 200 people, that if we call two or three departments, that there's enough room and space that these department heads can come in person and stand at the podium. And without any interruption and go through these very important items that are going to be in front of us. So if we could, I'd like to get that approval. And that is a council wish that that be mandated, that that happens as long as we are out of the red. So thank you, Councilor Falco. I appreciate the time.
[George Scarpelli]: The option?
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I think that it's under their privy, but I'd welcome them in person. I know that if people have some underlying issues that they're afraid of, I can understand that. But truly, I'd like to see everybody here that can make it here in person. I think it'd be important. This is a big budget, and really having that personal touch and the personal involvement. And again, I said, if it's making sure that we're out of the red, that's when I would support that. So I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Councilor Falco, for bringing this forward. And to echo what Councilor Marks was saying, I was probably the only elected official at the time that actually lived as an employee of a municipality, the 311 C-Click-Fix background. And one thing we talked about at the time, it was very clear during my election process that how difficult this will be because we don't have the infrastructure in place to handle the volume that was going to come in. And this is what we're seeing. And we still see it. And until we fix that, I don't think it's going to be possible to have a successful system in place. Now, to share with the community and say that this is a data-driven program so we can make educated decisions when it comes to our fiscal responsibility, when it comes to adding DPW workers, To add more policemen, to add fire, to add teachers, to look at what we need, where we have the most concerns. That was a viable understanding of it. But to think that C-Clicks fixes what other communities use the 311, it's very difficult to come to fruition in this community. It's very difficult. When you're asking for an issue that goes for C-Click fix, and then goes to a person that's in charge of that, then goes to the department head, but then the department head gives it to their employees to make sure that project gets done. It's virtually impossible. Look at the parks department. Issue comes in at three C-Clicks fix for a certain park. Mike Nestor and his two employees, it's in the middle of the summer, is getting all six fields ready for baseball. Four fields ready for baseball, but then they have to answer to a C-Clicks fix call. It's very difficult to do, not to say that it can't be done, but this is something when we get to budget time, we also have to look at making sure that if we understand what we want for our C-Click fix. It could be run in a proper and transparent way that you're going to get the answer back. Listen, like Councilor Falco said, I'd rather, instead of just closing those and putting them aside, having someone from the administration contact them, contact citizens and say, this is the concern. We are, unfortunately, we can't get to it, but at least that's the communication people are looking for. So I thank you for bringing this forward. I actually thought that Council Marks was everybody's C-Clicks fix, because as many resolutions you put on this year with sidewalks and street repairs. And again, I too, as a city councilor and a resident, I'm going to do my due diligence to go right to the department heads to make sure that they can help us because we need to get some issues that especially safety concerns taken care of and going through the process might not be the quickest way right now because it is in such flux. So thank you for bringing this forward, Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: One information, Mr. President. Who's the chairman of that?
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Mr. President. Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. Correct me if I'm wrong, I thought that the commission, when given that question about where we stood with Park-Method, they told us that It didn't fall within the privy with Park Medford there. Their discussions led to that area. Was I mistaken? Or if any of my Councilors can remember that.
[George Scarpelli]: I would second that amendment. That's a great amendment.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President and Councilor, for bringing this forward. Mr. and Mrs. McGillicuddy are definitely a fixture in our community. And when you say how, you know, you look at the backbone of our community and the members that make Medford, the people, the spirit, and the McGillicuddies are those type of people that will be missed. Mr. McGillicuddy will be missed. It's what I question every day is, who is the person that's going to take a Mr. McGillicuddy spot in our community? And those are huge shoes to fill, but that's what makes our community great. People like Mr. McGillicuddy and Mr. McGillicuddy who taught us how to be loving parents and members of our community. And I hung around with Karen for years and got to know them. close and they were very great. They were very good people. And I know Mr. McGillicuddy is going to be missed in our community and we send our deepest condolences. So God bless.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. And again, thank you, Councilor Marks. I think that when you talk about, you've said it all, but I think that while all this was going on, I remember Karen still being a devoted daughter. I mean, I know she went through some difficult times with her dad, and I remember her still working and being the most dedicated employee in this building. And, you know, coming from two cities, I've worked with a lot of department heads in Somerville, a lot of department heads here for a long time, and by far, she will stand out as one of the greatest for the fact that she brought knowledge, she brought dedication, and she brought compassion. I think that's one of the biggest, most important pieces. With everything that she did, every single day, she brought that compassion that really made you feel that Karen was there. Two are probably one of our most neediest communities, because if you look at our seniors, especially, And you see how lonely life can be at times for some. She would always find a way to make sure they were taken care of. And I think that she was a great advocate for our seniors and the position she's in now. I know she'll flourish. I congratulate her and we miss her. And I think that we should all use her. her skills in moving forward in anything we do in our lives, because she was something special here in Medford. So thank you, Councilor Marksley. Appreciate that. And I think that she deserves all our congratulations and kudos. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Vice President Knight.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, before we get to the records, okay? No, no, no, no, please. Hearing and seeing none, Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, I know I got a phone, I had a phone call from a concerned resident that sorry, confusing social media posts that stated that the council voting against the eviction moratorium. I just want to set the record straight, whether it's social media, other city Councilors, that's not the privy of the city council. We've gone to subcommittee. We've, what we've, this is something that has come from the executive order from the mayor. If with that, as I told the citizen, if we can ask the mayor to give us an update where they are on this executive order that's coming for them about the eviction moratorium and make sure the public understands that this is not a city council. This wasn't driven by the city council because they don't care about people that are getting kicked out of their houses and being left homeless. That's the furthest from the case. So if we can, can we just get an update from the mayor, that'd be appreciated. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you. I did, after reading this resolution, I did contact representatives from Somerville, talked to the director of OCD, and it was very enlightening. There is, right now, the only parking that is relegated to these dispensaries are only off on street parking. So there really isn't any designated parking. They don't feel the need that there will be for the fact that they look like they'll be having nine host agreements. Nine. So they're looking at their philosophies. The dispensaries are going to be looked at as a neighborhood package store in the same sense that residents will have the opportunity to visit. It's a small mom and pop type establishments they're looking at that's economically empowered for local residents. Mom and pop storefront, and spread out throughout their community. They really like they like the big piece is that they're looking that you're looking out probably about six months minimal before they start seeing these shops open. So I think we have some time but from what I gather there isn't much There isn't much input on parking lots or anything like that. They expect that it will not be, they do not envision what happened in Brookline with the overcrowding in the neighboring areas being over, over impacted, but it's something that they were very open for future discussions with the council, making sure that they take, the residents of South Medford and keeping them informed if they do see some changes. And I really appreciate them answering a lot of questions for me. I think that, uh, cause it is, it is a worry if you're looking at what happened in Brookline when that first opened and, um, you know, what it, what it brings to that neighborhood. And then again, the biggest, uh, the biggest, um, solution to this is let's open our, um, our recreational shops here in Medford, and our residents will be hopefully going to do their business in our districts and the districts that we relegated for business. So again, I thank them and hope that helps any residents of Medford that has some questions with their concerns. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: If you can wait to the, if you can wait after the 2016 resolution, if you can, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, please. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, thank you, Vice President Knight and Council Marks. I think this is something that the three of us have been getting phone calls. Um, I won't, I won't, uh, I won't repeat what my fellow colleagues have mentioned because these are the same concerns that residents have shared with me, but here we are. We started a little slow and then we rallied around the community and with the leadership team and it really picked up. The transparency was there, the big word, and everybody was involved and here we are on the one foot line and ready to close up and here we go with another, some more concerns and I think this is, Your first impressions are important, but you also want to make sure that that last taste is something that's just as important, because that's the final product that's left in the neighbor's lap. So I think it's important that we follow through with these initiatives and resolutions and these amendments that were put through. And I hope that, and I think they will, they've been very responsible with that. The organization comes back with their team with some good results for next week's meeting. So thank you, Mr. President. Thank you. Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scott Belli. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, thank you, Councilor Marks, bringing this forward. I think this is very important. As we see, when the community gets involved and the council work together, I think a lot of great things happen. And we have seen some changes, but I think that we need to keep rolling and making sure that There are some serious safety issues that follow through and completed in the very near future. If we can, if Council Marks has a mind, if we can amend that, I know I brought it up many a times and I'm seeing it in neighboring communities and we talked about it there at the site visit that looking at the raised bumps, and striping that area to see if what that cost analysis would be. If we can have the city administration get back to us, the traffic engineer, to see what that would look like and how that would look like going up. through that Fulton area. So I think it's important that could really help the traffic calming measures. I know that we discussed raised crosswalks there, but cost is an issue and different construction and ADA issues that are questionable. But we can add from what we were told that day that putting those the not speed bumps or raised raised roads per se that would help mitigate some of that, the speeding issue. So if we can amend that to the paper, I appreciate that. And again, thank you for bringing this forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thanks for reading that in the record. Again, thank you, Councilor Marks. I won't be redundant, but again, these are the phone calls we were getting. I believe there was some feedback to the constituents that this is something that the council voted for. The council requested these signs to be put in. That was the furthest from the truth. And I think that once we talked to the city administration, once our traffic engineers and everybody got involved, I think you saw some drastic changes. The biggest concern is you're taking the look of a very quaint, historical neighborhood and really changing it to the point where it looked more urban with all these signs. And I think that was one of the concerns and Councilor Marks hits a nail on the head when it look like Route 1 in a sense. The raised speed bumps or the raised streets, I think that whether people like them or not, I think they're important because especially when you're talking about people that aren't residents, but people that are cutting through Medford are increasing their speed in that area. That's going to bring the speed down. But at the same time, what we're seeing in neighboring communities, especially more in the suburban communities that have these, you see the painting on the roadways, not signage on the sidewalks. So, and that does the job. And I think that Council Member Mox is right. When there's too many signs, it's redundant and becomes more of a distraction to people. So, I think that You know, as soon as this came forward, we did have a conversation with the mayor. She did direct her staff to make sure that these were corrected. And the Meadows Wakefield site and the Lawrence Memorial representatives worked quickly to make sure those are rectified. But again, as we move forward, we, you know, we continue to monitor the number of signs of putting on around the community. We know what they're important. We know that we need a safety mitigation is very important, but at the same time there's got to be a collaboration with the neighborhood to make sure we don't lose its charm at the same time. So again, I think Councilor Marks are bringing this forward and thank all the parties for moving this in the right direction. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Constable. Any further discussion?
[George Scarpelli]: If you guys could turn on your microphones, please. They're on. Okay, so if you can, I think that Councilor Falco brings up a good point. I think it's from the inception to present.
[George Scarpelli]: Just to get an update to where we were. I think it's important to see the taxpayers should see where that money's going from, from the beginning all the way to the present time. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scott Belli. I would second that motion. I think that understanding the, uh, there's a salary increase or any other input that goes to these positions. I think that be discussed in committee of the whole, um, as we move forward to a very difficult, uh, budget process. So it'd be interesting to ask some questions and possibly, um, you know, personal matters. Look at, uh, executive session to make sure we don't violate any open meeting laws or any personal information. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, Mr. President. Councilor Scarpelli. Uh, I too have a lifelong friend of and neighbor of Mr. Pacini. I think he'll be a great addition to the, uh, the team. Uh, but I, I think that, um, for my fellow colleagues and people that don't know who he is, I think some information, um, a resume or something that we can all share in his expertise.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Again, again, Mr. President, uh, I think that was the only piece having Mr. Pacini here and or a, uh, a resume that my fellow colleagues who look, look through, he's a, He's a valuable member of our community. And you can see that he's someone that has donated his expertise and his time to his kids and the people of Medford. And I think that his input and his involvement would be a great asset to the commission. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: You missed it.
[George Scarpelli]: That was a ceremonial purpose.
[George Scarpelli]: Richard Caraviello.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, great job. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, thank you, Mr. President. Thanks for Council President Carvell bringing this forward. But if I could, I recommend that since we haven't talked about it, and that you do hear rumblings on the streets where I've gotten a few residents come to me. different developers looking at different areas saying, you know what, before it goes to this department or that department, we're just going to just jump everything and just go right to 40B. So I think it's important. I'm going to amend this, and hopefully my fellow Councilors can agree that we call for a committee of the whole as soon as possible, that we get all these questions answered with all of our department heads and the city administration together so we can really start thinking and talking out loud about this. So I know what Councilor Caraviello is saying, that this might be a losing battle. I know what Councilor Falco is saying when we're talking about the funding that's being spent to fight this. And the biggest issue right now is you're seeing developers looking at Medford as, hey, I could come to this area and put up 12 units. And if it doesn't get approved, I'll just jump that and build 24 units and call it a 40B. Because we allow that. And so I think that we need to really have a conversation with everybody at the table as soon as possible so we can get these issues out moving forward in a direction that's really protecting our neighborhood. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, President Knight, President Felk, I mean, President Caraviello, President, everybody. The question I have is I heard that the city administration moved forward, and I think that, listen, if Chief of Staff Rodriguez, just to let us know what kind of custodial services we do have there. And does that extend to the fire headquarters too, or is it just to fire the new police station? And is it a full-time position, or is it someone that's moving throughout the city in different departments. Because I know that we do have different communities do have floating custodians that go from buildings to buildings that need only limited custodial services. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Hey, the Zoom's working out. It's working out for him. This is great.
[George Scarpelli]: to be redundant, but when you talk about great families and great members of this community, and people that really help build the fiber of who we are here in Medford, and the Brady family being that family, one of those families, it is sad to hear, and we pray for the Brady family, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Council Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: Before we adjourn. I just want to recognize a sense of normalcy we haven't seen here since March. I want to welcome City Messenger back. Thank you. Welcome back, Larry. So thank you. I think we're turning the corner. This is a sign. I have my water here. I finally have the correct placket in front of me. I know it was Council Penta for a little while, so I appreciate Larry being back. Thank you so much.
[George Scarpelli]: Papers, I mean, records.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. This is a quick question. This, when it says double, it's not two poles, correct? No, it is not. Okay, we just want to make sure because I know we've had issues. It's a single poll. Okay, I know we've had issues in the past with double polls. We're still waiting for some relief and taking a few down in the community. So just wanted to make sure so constituents that are listening don't misunderstand that there is two polls, so it's only one. Thank you very much. You're welcome.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Mr. O'Connor, quick question. With the change in the state regulations, when I know it used to be red and green and yellow, now it's the way they they explain it, it's a little different. It seems like neighbor communities like Melrose and Malden, you see them whenever the governor updates it, but Method's not in that high category. Can you shed some light on that?
[George Scarpelli]: It's odd because Somerville is one of the neighboring communities, and they're on that list, so we're doing something right. The other question I have is when we open up our businesses, restaurants, doctor's appointments, gyms, do we have contact tracing? Because I know that when we do the contact tracing, don't we have the restaurants or the gyms taking you know, the information of all the people that attend and their employees. Don't they all have to check in? And so there's an ongoing contact tracing list that goes on at those establishments?
[George Scarpelli]: All right, but, you know, and I bring this up because there were some incidents over the past few weeks with a few restaurants and that the information went out citywide and really put these establishments in a bad light in a sense where, you know, people lost confidence. So could there be something as we move forward so we don't really damage any other reputations for other businesses that we mandate as a city that they do a total check-in where we're responding to those people that were there? And because, again, sometimes, you know, the instant, you know, the word that went out was, I guess, important to get the word out so people can understand the situation's severity. But at the same time, it was also damaging. And especially with what we're seeing in this climate with our small businesses, I'd hate to see more businesses going through this right now. If there's something we can implement as a city that can get the word out to the patrons of those places. And it's not, you know, put out there where people can make their own determinations or be the judge and jury of these small businesses and try to work together with them. Could that be something we can do?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, no, but that'd be great. I think that should be something we should take initiative on and look at before we, as this is growing, we're seeing these spikes. If the state's going to mandate these regulations to small businesses like that, then I think that we have to do everything we can to support them and be partners. And if they're not doing what they're supposed to do, then they follow those consequences, but I appreciate that. The last thing, I know that as we move forward, and we're hoping we're seeing the light at the end of the tunnel, I know we talked months ago about opening up the chambers and what we need to do. And I know you said that you needed a plan for the council. And I asked for assistance from your department to send me some bullet points where you would like to see added into those guidelines as we move forward. I haven't gotten those bullet points for assistance with our health department. And I know that I talked to the city solicitor, the acting city solicitor about questions that we had about capacity. Now obviously, we're erring on caution with the numbers increasing. The budget season is going to come pretty quick. And we know what happened last budget season with all the confusion. And I'd like to have something in place, because April, May, it's happening. But as we're seeing the vaccinations coming through, and I want to make sure that we have a plan that we're hitting the ground running. So if you could really assist me with that, I'll be the Councilor on the point with that, Ms. O'Connor, to let that happen. But I really need the guidance from the health department to assist me with that. So I'd appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: Where were you a couple of months ago?
[George Scarpelli]: You weren't the same person I talked to a few months ago. But thank you. That's pretty easy.
[George Scarpelli]: That's pretty easy. Six feet now.
[George Scarpelli]: She's frozen.
[George Scarpelli]: She's frozen. They're not on yet. She's hanging on. I'm telling you, this is sabotage. Someone doesn't want us to read these.
[George Scarpelli]: It's sabotage.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Bears, thank you, Councilor, President Falco. This is a different time. I think when you talk about public access that was here in the past, you had a few TV shows that we loved and the community got involved, but when you're talking about the dedication and the tireless effort of Patrick Gordon and what you see, what he's done over the last 10 months, when our world changed in turn to Zoom, a zoom society. You're talking, there are days that Patrick's doing seven zoom calls a day. Now remember, it's a man who has a family and a staff of one and, and still, and still putting together one of the finest public access television programs, media centers in the state. So I think we have to understand that we're very lucky that we have probably one of the most state of the art facilities at Medford High School, which has been before the pandemic struck. the discussions with students and teachers and having that on site and learning from Patrick's expertise, I think it really, really shows with this award. I think that we'll be seeing many, many more. And I think we need to applaud his efforts. When you're talking about accomplishing things with nothing, that's what Patrick's doing. So I really, I think we need to really Go by and see him, send him an email, let him know how great he's been. Because I think it's important that we don't lose people like Patrick in our community. I think that in the past we've had some rocky roads and we've had some negative dialogue. Through it all, he stands above it and makes sure he brings the best product forward. And with this award, it just shows you that it's being recognized nationwide now. So again, congratulations and we should all applaud Patrick Gordon. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Roberta, thank you for your staff and your volunteers that are putting yeoman's work to make sure this committee really helps our community thrive. So first I want to thank you. But a question I had that a few members of the community contacted me about, these are all great projects. I know that we're in full support as we move forward. But if we had a project that was requested in the past, Is that automatically revisited, is that something that has to be reapplied by an organization?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, if you can, I know that I'll identify the phone calls that we're getting from Little League Baseball, and particularly Gillis Park. And I know they've applied, but is there any way that we can, is it practiced by the committee to reach out to those organizations that didn't get the funding and let them know why so they can revisit that process to move forward. Because if we didn't, we'd love to see that. If we did, this is great. But I think the understanding for organizations like Little League that are also another volunteer group that had some concerns about the projects moving forward. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: OK, that's great. So that answers that question. So I appreciate it. That helps the community understand the process. And for those who don't and that won't get approval, Usually they get the information with feedback, so they understand, correct? I know that- Correct. Right, okay, perfect.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, thank you, Roberta. That's the answer to those questions. And I appreciate, again, I appreciate all your hard work and all the volunteers that go behind the scenes and make this happen. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that tonight's a good example. I think that the pressure that the president's put under when everybody feels so passionate about something that, in essence, we all agree on. It's just the presentation of it and sometimes the protocol that needs to be followed by this body that not everybody understands. So it's tough to stand up there, I know that we butted heads in due respect. It's a tough position, but I want to applaud what you've done and it's been two years. So again, thank you and appreciate the lack of hair now that you have due to this position. Yeah, thanks.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so on the motion of Councilors,
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, and thank you for Councilor Marks for bringing this forward. You want to talk about an individual in this community where, you know, you're seeing so many So many social issues and so many variations of what's right and wrong in this world. And Brian Branson is what's true and what's real about Medford. He was and still is one of the most dedicated people to this community, their kids and their sports and mostly anything. One thing that it's funny that I've known Brian probably my whole life. And you don't realize he's a great family man. He's a proud dad. He's someone that's committed to his children. But at the same time, you wouldn't know that if you were a Mustang, because it seems like Brian's always given to Medford High and the blue and white. I am fortunate that I am on the Hall of Fame with Bryan Branson and to be on the plaque or on a committee or on a group that has Bryan Branson as a representative to me is an honor as a Hall of Famer. He is that type of person. I've often coached while Brian umpired games. And Brian's not afraid to tell you what's up. And he's a man of strong conviction. And I think he always taught sportsmanship and fair play. And how always to work hard and always love Medford. You know, one thing he doesn't realize, I don't know how In today's society, when you have individuals with different physical issues, I'm proud that this community rallies around young kids that have these disabilities, and we really champion that. Brian grew up in an era where I can remember that if you had a kid with vision issues or hearing issues, you didn't talk about it. That person never stood out. Brian Branson had his issues and never hid from it. He was always on the forefront. And that's why, to me, he was a hero. He let nothing get in his way. He didn't mind to be with any group in the high school or anywhere in this community. And he always stood strong as a Mustang. And I'm proud to call him my friend. So I know Brian's going through a tough time in his life right now, and he truly is a warrior, truly a warrior. And for Council Marks to bring this forward, when you talk about naming rights of different entities and you want to say why or why not, and Brian is a perfect example to say why. Why aren't we? Why wouldn't we? Because you want that name to go down in history. that kids will always talk about, and that story will always be told, and who Brian Branson is, and what he's done for our community, and the city of Medford, because he's left that type of impression. At least for one council, that's what he's left with me. And I know my children, when my son is around Brian, he understands why he's there. So when you wanna do something, go do something because nobody's watching, because that's what Brian Branson has always taught us. Go do something because you love it. Go do something because you have pride in something. I don't expect for anything else. And that's why I'm rambling on tonight because he wouldn't want this. He wouldn't expect it, but he deserves it. So I know I'm a little winded, but if anybody needs that wind, it's Brian Branson. So thank you. Council Marks for bringing this forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, thank you for my colleagues bringing this forward. I know that John was a great guy. The only difference between myself and my colleagues, something happened with my head and theirs. So he must have used a different tonic. that he lost my business at about 30. But I will tell you, my son's first haircut. I'll never forget the day making that trip to VIP and strapping John in. And I've gone through a lot of tough times with my son that really questioned Your father and son really shook you up a little. But watching John put my son in a headlock to give him his first haircut was something special. But he did it with such love that, you know what, he was in good hands. He was a great businessman. Like my colleague said, he could talk about politics in the city. He could talk about politics nationwide. He could talk about any sports program. As I coached high school sports, he knew my record. He knew what was going on with the team. Always kept involved and whenever you'd hear him speak to other clients and you want to jump in the conversation. So it really truly became that community meeting spot. I know that he's got some great barbers there now, but he's definitely going to be missed. Wish him luck, like Councilman Mox said. He must be going on 30 years old because he looks younger. I don't know how it works. A lot of my hair was left on that floor, Councilor Falco, and I blame him, but thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I think that I, for beginning, I think this is moving forward to initiate the involvement in food trucks in our community. I think that it's important. I think that you're seeing that as a positive trend. And I think it's important to add this aspect to our community. But again, my biggest concern, especially with the with the dire issues with our brick and mortar buildings right now, approving five dates without certainty. I think it falls into the confusion that I have is taking business away from those organizations that are drowning right now. So these are the questions that we have. That's why I believe it was in committee with the ordinance so we could talk about this and vet it out properly because I Like I said, I'm not against the food trucks, I think it's important. I would love to see someday an area where we line 20 food trucks down in a certain area like they do in other communities and followings come out to that area. But when you're talking about what's happening, even right now with the governor's order of restaurants and the limitations of people at a table. putting a food truck on a busy weekend day next to a establishment in Medford Square. And instead of people doing takeout out of that area to keep them going, and bringing in a food truck that might not even be part of, even registered in Medford. I find that a problem right now. So I can't, I wouldn't support this right now. I think it's important that we establish what we wanted to do. If there's a date, if there are events that the mayor is asking for, that's what we've done in the past. Until we finalize this, until we get through this pandemic, until brick and mortar establishments are on solid ground again. I apologize, but I just, as much as I like it, I just, there's too many variables right now that I get weighing against my decision to vote in favor of anything tonight. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate Councilor Marksx for bringing that point up. I think that's the last piece that, as we go through this process, that I want to applaud because I think that the word was, distributed to that area. I think that the administration did their due diligence. I think this council did their due diligence. I think that we are moving forward in a position where bringing jobs, especially possible unionized jobs, to our community. I think we've We have hit every target that we were put in this place to do. So I appreciate Mr. Moniker and his team for choosing Medford. I think that everything seems to be in a positive outlook. I think the administration has done a great job following through with this process. As my fellow colleagues have already mentioned, I will be supporting this unless I hear something really drastic from our neighbors. But I think that Council Marks really hit a nerve when he talks about Middlesex Ave and a forgotten road by our state. And what other way to do it as an elected official with probably one of the major issues and development growth areas that we'll see there for years. So using that as some leverage to make sure the state and our city administration understands there is a viable neighborhood that really needs some attention. So again, I thank Mr. Moniker and I look forward to seeing the jobs and the possible you know, money going through our businesses in that area as well. So thank you so much. And again, I look forward to the residents discussion.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Do we have the petitioner here tonight?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Thank you. Thank you very much. Did you say it's, is it Yang or Yang? Is it with a G at the end?
[George Scarpelli]: Y-A-N, okay, Yan, okay, thank you. We see that we do have everything in order. All the departments have signed off positively with this changeover, I know that. But we do have a question on the time of operations. What time is the previous business? It might be a conflict because depending on what the hours are will depend on a separate visit to the council with hours. So do you have the times that they have?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, perfect. I see everything in order, Mr. President. Move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Is Mr. Trotta here this evening?
[George Scarpelli]: You're doing a great job. Could you just give us a brief overview of what you're asking us for approval to?
[George Scarpelli]: It's simple, I know we've done this in the past with other clubs, and I know that the sensitivity has been very good to our, in supporting our communities, both on the line and Method Ensemble. I see everything in order, Mr. President. I move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: I know it's something we did say we will visit in March with Ellen and this administration, this council, to see if it's something as we move forward with the numbers increasing. So I wanted to add that, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that I had a great discussion with Mr. LaRusso, and I too received a lot of correspondence from our residents in supporting of a very fine and respected young man. In our discussion, and I know Mr. LaRusso would speak on any question that people would like to offer. I know that the questions I had from people that were a little nervous about when you hear a tattoo parlor that's coming to your neighborhood, the things they fear are these frightening, pictures of artwork that depict violence or sexual things in sexual nature and it really scares a community and I think that Mr. LaRusso and I had a great discussion and you know I believe he put it as his It sounds like an artist studio for the body, and understanding that it's by appointment only, that the building will be unassuming. I think that the biggest questions that we talked openly about being across the street from the church, there might be some negative concerns with that, but he reiterated his deep faith. And his support to the church and making sure that whatever he does as a business here in Medford, that it's done with class and with respect for that neighborhood. And again, He hit all the buzzwords for me that you have a well-respected individual that has the total best interests of all of the neighbors and making sure that he is putting forth a classy and respected organization in this community. I know that we typically do move, request to move this to a committee of the whole. So we do hear from other residents in making sure that there's some concerns that if they had, they can listen to a very educated and eloquent individual. can speak on behalf of his art prowess and realize that he is really, could be an important piece of not only the West Medford community, but I think a model for other neighborhoods that are looking to bring in the body art and the tattooing industry. So, thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Get Deacon Rumley to get a tattoo.
[George Scarpelli]: So again, Mr. President, I'm sorry we're going down this hole again. And Ms. Cuddy seems to be the spokesperson that has to take the brunt of this. I find it amazing that it has to be National Grid that comes before us because of an MWA problem that then reflects back to a National Grid problem. Why aren't we sitting together with National Grid, I mean with MWRA? Why don't we have all of the parties together in a room that they can understand what the constituents, what the residents of Riverside Ave have been hearing that is absolutely frightening them. The understanding that close to two years they're going to look at a major major concerns that they're going to be dealing with for 20 months, possibly. So this is why I can't support this, because we still haven't gotten the answers for this Councilor to go back to the constituents that live on Riverside Ave and talk to those people and say, we've dotted all the I's and crossed all the T's, and this is what we're going to have, and this is what's going to happen. Because this is a major project. So I don't know if Tim can answer this, Ms. Cuddy, I'm sorry, but we haven't talked to any representative from the MWRA and this community gives a lot of funding. And we need to get their representatives here so we can talk to them and say, what are we doing? Why can't this be done simultaneously? Why can't we look at the mitigation for the curbs where it's a city, it's MWRA, it's National Grid working together to make sure that we can use all three entities to fix a problem that could go away if there's a way to work together. Maybe it's not a million dollars for National Grid. Maybe it's a third. Maybe it's a third for the city of Medford. Maybe it's a third for MWRA. But we haven't talked about that. All we keep trying to do is push the same 13, 14 points that keep coming back that's not appeasing. Forget about me, because honestly, I live in North Medford. I live in the Heights. The people that are there every single day, that when they heard 20 months now, is absolutely frightening. So can anybody speak to that?
[George Scarpelli]: Well, and I can understand what you have to do for your position, but you also have to understand what I have to and we have to do in our positions. Ms. Cuddy, Tim, I think, what conversations, what discussions have we had with the MWRA that is this something that we can do? We're talking about a 20 month project that has to be approved by an organization, National Grid, that's saying they're only going to be here for six weeks. It seems like they're going to be in and out, but then the other organization that has nothing to do with this permit right now, it's going to take 20 months possibly. Can you help us so we can answer the questions to those residents?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so that's the fear that when you hear, now to a traffic engineer, a lag sounds perfect. To Mrs. Smith, who lives on Riverside Ave, who's 74 years old, that only place to park is her driveway, Tim. This is what I'm saying. I'm not trying to cause any, I'm not trying to be negative. I'm trying to find a way that we can say, okay, so the way it sounds, it's coming out. National Grid's going to do six weeks of work, rip up the road, leave. And just go over it with overlay. And then the residents are going to have to deal possibly up to 20 months with delays with this type of road that they have to drive on, walk on every single day.
[George Scarpelli]: OK, so thank you for clarifying. Like I said, that's one of the biggest questions I've been fielding. And I think I concur with Council Marks Maybe there is, have we had a discussion with all three entities to say, Ms. Cutty says that the amount of mitigation with how much money they're putting into it, it doesn't equate. But has there been discussion where the three entities have worked together to try to fix a wrong that is Riverside Ave curbing? Just in that, especially for me, that locust turn and probably up to the next, The next intersection, the next street, like I said, I don't think it's monumental. I don't think it's all 1,400 feet. So again, I'd like to hear, we could have that conversation to try to fix that wrong, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I haven't seen it.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Hi, Mr. Shakes. Good evening. Thanks for being here this evening. We see everything that is asked for you is in place. All the documents are in place. Everybody looks to have approved it moving forward. Could you just give us a brief synopsis of what was there prior and what you're doing at the site now?
[George Scarpelli]: OK. All right, in the hours of operations, following the city guidelines, everything looks like it's in place. I know before I make the motion to approve, if any councilors have any questions.
[George Scarpelli]: That's everything. I rest my case. I have nothing to add. Okay, so everything's in order. Everything's in order, Mr. President. Move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Is it on? Thank you, Mr. President. I'm not familiar with who's present. Are the chiefs present? Officer McGilvrey?
[George Scarpelli]: OK, so this is important because I think that Out of nowhere we received a letter from the mayor stating that we need to move forward with some concerns dealing with the 911 system. And that I believe it was a public health crisis, a safety crisis that we needed to address. It was something that put a red flag out to alert us and that this is the first time the council heard that. And I thought it was important that both the leaders of the police and fire come and just fill us in if there's things we should know that are this dire, that something's been going on and we need to adjust as a council and move some initiatives through to make sure that we're supporting them in any way. If anybody could share some comments or any insight into this. Would the other Councilors like to speak first or would you like to hear from- That's just to my question, so.
[George Scarpelli]: So thank you, Mr. President. So to revert back to the first comment we made, and just to be clear, this is why we asked for this meeting. No matter how it went out, the letter went out to the mayor, the word got out to the community that there was a safety crisis with 911. Whether it's with hiring, whether it's with policy, whichever it is, we needed to get answers, and that's it. And from what I've heard from the chief of police, from what I've heard from the chief of fire, from what I've heard from the union representation so far, is to me, exactly what we needed to share to our constituents that brought these questions and these concerns to us. No other reason. That's it. I'm not trying to dig anything up or trying to find something that's not there or say that it's not safe. It's refreshing that Lieutenant Rudolph, frightening but refreshing that he said that we don't have anybody qualified to run that office right now, and that's probably the most important public safety position right now. That's the first line of safety and help for all our constituents, whether it's with violence or whether it's with health. This is the reason why having the communication, having the chief of police and the chief of fire here to answer these questions publicly to us is why it's so important that we did this. No other reason. And I thank them for coming out and doing that. And understand, this won't be the last time, Mr. President, that this councilor will contact or put a resolution through if I feel that we need some answers by leaders in our community. So thank you very much, and I appreciate the answers that were given. And I think that we have a strong understanding of what now these concerns are and where we're moving to. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So I know that, obviously, to make it clear, this councilor didn't go put this paper on to get to an unresolved, it seems like this is, like it was being held hostage, now we're discussing the real issue, and that's not the true intent from this councilor. We had concerns about this issue, I wanna make sure that stands alone. But now that we're talking about it, Let's go a little bit through the timeline. We all want what's on that paper. I think it's important that we get that facilities position in. I think most of those things that we were given some information, the positions without any job descriptions. We got the job descriptions. We understand how important they are. Everything's in order. We talked to the Chief of Staff a few weeks ago. Chief of Staff Rodriguez mentioned that he would set aside $100,000. I think that one of the scenarios this council brought up is if we could look at a date certain saying like I believe he said 90 days and he said he would not do that. So now that we have the mayor on the call and I believe you said that the mayor said that she's already been in discussions moving that position that we're interested in moving it forward. And I would assume that our committee would support, I think that's what we're going with a few weeks ago, that if it was a date certain that we would support the paper knowing that we're coming to a resolution for the position that's needed in the elections office. If I'm right, if I'm wrong, forgive me, but Could we possibly look at a date certain this evening saying that the 90 days, I believe that's what the Chief of Staff Rodriguez said, that 90 days is the process. It looks like, if I could remember it then, but he wouldn't commit to that because he's, I believe that he's not the mayor and he wouldn't do that to the mayor. So I don't know if maybe the mayor can add some light to that. If it's not, I understand that. If she doesn't feel comfortable, that's fine. But if we can have that assurance tonight, I would move this off the table, and I would vote forward with, you know, because from what I gather from Cora Kirby's, we're hoping that three months will give us enough time for our next election, unless the special elections come up after the Georgia runoff. So if you can, Madam Mayor, that'd be appreciative.
[George Scarpelli]: Receive and place on file. 9-1-1, right, it's off of the paper. Yeah, so it's 9-1-1, it has nothing to do with the paper.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you, Mr. President. Uh, again, I echo the sentiments of my colleagues and the, uh, fact of really stretching this out for the fact that we have public input as we move forward with this. I think this is a great idea. I think this is, uh, you know, uh, be interesting to see if there's any data that shows the amount of method residents that worked in the whole foods plant. Um, prior to their closure and just so they could reinforce the need and the support that we'll be giving if voted with this TIF. So again, I think. all of our cows will bring up some good points. But, um, one thing we're seeing, especially during the COVID times, there's a lot of empty spaces and this is a big space. And, uh, as long as we do it correctly and get the input from our neighbors, um, I think this is, uh, an area that, um, we'd like to see some growth and some movement. So It'll be interesting to see if I could it would be interesting to see if our traffic engineer Has done we could ask them if we can't to invite him to the next meeting just to get a traffic assessment moving forward with this this company this company and its growth and and and again you know with the weight restrictions for You know, our major thoroughways, the Middlesex and Fellsway. And the fear that some neighbors have always stressed, even with Bianchi's, is that are the trucks going to be going down the side streets? And especially those side streets are full with children playing in a pretty tight-knit residential neighborhood and making sure we keep those streets safe. I'm sure this company will support us in moving forward any decision. But I'm excited for the process and appreciate them for coming to Medford. looking to make Medford their home. So, um, but again, supporting, uh, Councilor Marks is resolution, a thousand percent. I think that, uh, community, uh, involvement to get the communities impact behind this decision, I think would be very important.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I think Councilor Marks really hit it right on the head. Ms. Sacco was a great person. Two great sons, Eric and Brian. Brian's actually a teacher in the system now, and she handed those traits off to her children. And again, a great family. You know that if you drive down Ridgeway Road, you know that they were they were very very committed to that neighborhood and the safety of that neighborhood and just just great people and like we said we'll lose you too many of the patriarchs of this community and It's it's sad to see so our heartfelt sympathy to the family.
[George Scarpelli]: To the chief of staff, we don't have an active member of DPW that can at least empty the barrels. That's one of the options that we're looking into.
[George Scarpelli]: I found them in order, Mr. President, move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President and Lee Sharon. Thank you very much for all your hard work. I don't know how you run two city major departments and still have the time to do anything else, so I appreciate that. What I do have is I know that one of the questions I had were the people that were already purchasing their own kilowatts. And we can see the benefits with what the impact is to our community, how important it is. But I think that, is there a way? that we can educate those people, like Mr. O'Rourke said, that a lot of these people that I've talked to, I've asked them to look at their bill, and I think that they might have purchased Zoom Energy, for instance, and their year expired, and then it goes up, back up to National Grid's kilowatt price. So I think that's what, is there a possible way to add, put something on our site to also educate the people that have purchased several kilowatts through a third party, that's one thing. And the second thing is, is there an option or how is the process, is it if you are purchasing your electricity from a third party or you negotiated yourself. And that contract, what you've seen as I'm talking to some people is that they're forgetting that it's expiring. does that, could that automatically be picked up by the energy aggregation process or is there a, is there a time in between that like sort of a grace period?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so and I think Mr. O'Rourke made a good point. I think that educating all of the people in our community, and I think that might help us land more people that were purchasing their own kilowatt energy that this is, they're then. added on to national grids energy, is there something we could put on our site to educate them? I think that's important because the benefit is a lower price, but these are the issues and concerns that if they're not thorough with this, that they're going to, you could save money for 12 months and then all of a sudden realize you're not You're not. Now you're paying the top fee and, uh, top and all the money you saved, you've lost. So there might be, you know, way to capture some, some, um, some support with that, with residents that are opting out.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, this is a concern that was brought to my attention. Unfortunately, there was an email that was sent by the administration explaining some concerns that we have. I just want, basically what it is, is having the chief of police and chief of fire to come explain to the council that there are some 911 concerns and if that's If it's something that's really putting our community in serious jeopardy and some serious concerns, I think that we need to hear it from them directly to make sure that we know what's going on. Because as well as my council, I think we talked to hundreds of people. And this is the first time I've heard that there's been a concern. So I think that just having them give us a brief update in what they're seeing as a serious concern to our community. Like I said, I find it Disturbing that the council's finding this out now that there's something because if something's going on and we're finding out about it now and not being Surprised of it. I think it's it's it's you know partisan. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Regular? Okay. Again, regular meeting, but, and I could appreciate Officer Rudolph, but I think it's imperative that our leaders, our chiefs are here on Zoom. I think it's important that, you know, we, we, You know, if there is contradictory, we need to hear from, you know, the, you know, the, the leaders of, uh, two of the most important departments in our community. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I know that my comments were similar to my colleagues, but I think honesty is having an open dialogue so people can see all of our second registered sex offenders, not just level three. I think it's important that if we have people that can do something this sickening and dangerous that their next door neighbors need to be informed. And I thank Councilor Caraviello for bringing this forward. I think this is, he's right, it's terrible that we found out this way. And as a former teacher, I think that's a great point that Councilor Morell put forward in putting this on the websites. I think that parents can go to that anytime. and get it updated so we can, you know, protect our, our kids. And I appreciate that. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I will, Mr. President, thank you. President, Councilor Marks, and Councilor Morell, it was a deep conversation in the understanding of the process of the DOT moving forward with an aggressive plan for resolution for the Main Street, South Street intersection, as it was named one of the top 200 most dangerous intersections in the state of Massachusetts. We learned the process that we're seeing, that the first phase of collecting data and moving through that to its completion, which is hopefully a light system, you're looking between three to five years. We've also met with our community leaders here in the city, traffic engineer, I don't believe we had representation from MAPIT traffic and I don't think they were invited, but we're looking for immediate. Calming measures, traffic calming measures, low cost traffic calming measures that could be implemented ASAP. And we'll be holding another meeting relatively soon to get an update to see what we can move forward with the parties involved. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: One more.
[George Scarpelli]: I apologize. We're missed to leave these names. I think our state delegates being present at these meetings are very, very important and vital. And I know Representative Donato again stepped up, shared his input, and also assured us that he is leading the way with these initiatives. So I just appreciate his leadership and we are very lucky. in this community to have a leader like Representative Donato moving forward with this initiative. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, we'll take paper 20641, from the honorable president, I mean, from the mayor, in regards to the executive, moving to executive session, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, it has to be posted in advertising.
[George Scarpelli]: So I have a point of information if I can.
[George Scarpelli]: Before I vote on this, if I can, I know that we all want this. I think all of us made it loud and clear that we need this position. The Chief of Staff has told us that we're pulling 100,000 aside so we can fund this position, so we have that. Can we really realistically ask the Chief of Staff, what is the timeline for the administration? Are we looking at, is six weeks not enough, but are we looking at two months? Is that realistic? Is there a time limit that we can look this for time certain, date certain? I agree with my colleagues. I think if we could have a date certain, that would really help. So I pose the question to the chief of staff. How does this process go? What do you need, truly?
[George Scarpelli]: So we wouldn't entertain a date, sir?
[George Scarpelli]: Say 30 days, I mean three months is what, this is what we're trying to get to, Mr. Rodriguez. I think that we're looking maximum you're saying 90 days, so if we looked at three months and we can all agree to that. I think because we're pretty secure what we're looking for on the council, so that piece will go pretty quickly. It's getting the registrars, I think getting them met, meeting with them, finalizing the job description, and then moving forward with that. I think that our piece here for the council, I think. I think we're pretty clear what we want. That's why I'm a little... And getting the mayor to sign off.
[George Scarpelli]: She has some thoughts on this. No, I know.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, if we can, do you know when this project, the only thing that, as we're getting later in the season, I'm just a little concerned about the trench work that's being done and the sinkage that happens during the time of year when the hot top is laid and then with the frost, it sinks. So I'm a little concerned about, is the city engineer present? No.
[George Scarpelli]: OK, so if it's done in that time, it's safe to say that we're not going to see the significant road sinkage that we see happening sometimes, Tim.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so this isn't going off now? this project.
[George Scarpelli]: I apologize. I'm not too... I'm not... I'm asking the city engineer. All due respect, Ms. Cuddy, all due respect, I don't have much faith with the utilities when it comes to our streets. There are sink holes all over the community because we didn't do our due diligence. So I want to make sure that if we do find a way to approve this, And we normally don't have a clerk of the works that follows up on these issues as we move forward. What guarantees do we have that the road is going to be in good shape come spring? Or if not, who is National Grid going to come back to fix that and put it to where we feel it's acceptable? Tim.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, national group being the petitioner today, are they usually forthcoming with making those corrections if that happens?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Marks, for bringing this forward. And Mr. Silvio, I grew up with the Silvios. His youngest, Frank, was one of my closest friends and a solid member of our community, someone that loved South Medford. And as this family would tell you, if you're a politician, you don't win unless the Silvios are pushing for you. So we're going to miss Mr. Silvio. I know Mrs. Silvio, she's a fixture at the McGlynn as a lunch mother. And I know Mr. Silvio used to be there every day to pick her up and someone that we're going to miss seeing around the city. So our condolences to the Silvio family. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: It's 11 o'clock. So, okay.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can add to that amendment, I know that in the update of who's going back to school, I think that we've asked that at the last meeting, and parents have been calling us that I believe juniors and seniors are going back in the vocational school, and they're very confused. So if we can get an update with that, if that's okay as well.
[George Scarpelli]: My question was, I know that you were in sort of a hot seat last time. Just to be clear, all of our funding will be spent with the CARES Act, correct? Correct. Okay, so there's not going to be the biggest things, how are we leaving money on the table? That's not happening, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. And then I know I too have a couple of questions with when Council Marks brought up with the facilities and a little bit more detail. I don't know if it was a mistake, but I thought, or maybe my mistake, that when you were talking about the facilities position. That person's only working on city buildings, correct? Johnny McLaughlin's still in charge of the school buildings. Is that person now going to be overseeing all the buildings in the city?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, and I don't want to keep jumping around. I know that this is different topics, but again, I appreciate all the work we're doing, and I know this is getting difficult, so I'll leave more questions to our other resolutions, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Move approval, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I think, Mr. President, move approval. I think that... Are there any questions on this?
[George Scarpelli]: I'm confused.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Alicia. Again, I know the administration tried to reach out, and I just didn't have time to circle back with them. I have a tough time tonight without, these are some initiatives that we have talked about and waiting on. But there's a lot of vagueness to it in the sense that the job description of facilities manager, the facilities for $200,000, what that would entail. Because we took a tour of all the fire stations and it's going to be a lot more than 200,000. So I'd like to know more detail what what that would look like, what we're focusing on $200,000 for. And I know that Mr. Rodriguez talked about having the assessor, getting more information and understanding the administrative assessor that how are we going to, we see more tenfold in hiring that position. I want to know more about the 911 supervisor and what role they're playing and how that's working out so far before we commit to a supervisor position. So there's a lot of variables here that I don't know if I'm comfortable to vote on this money until I know more about that. And I don't think that can be done in today's meeting. put a lot of work to this, but at the same time, I do have questions.
[George Scarpelli]: I love the concept but again it when I'm voting on something I want to know more details of what this person is doing and where if this person just focus on just doing the fire stations there's a lot of the questions that we're talking about a building facility here, what we're doing with outside buildings, what are they going to be working with the school system? What are the roles that they're going to be doing combined? Is it going to be too daunting for one facilities manager that if they are working as part of the total facilities, being with the working, giving time to the schools, considering that that's a daunting task. So there's a lot of questions that, and I appreciate what you're saying, but again, the job itself. To me, it just needs more of an understanding what it's for, so I can wrap myself around and understand this. Because this is something we've all pushed, and this is something that we all want. But again, to look at the big picture, this just looks like, in a sense, another round of budgets. And because these are the changes we have, the additional money that we have, so it'll be nice to work on it. Well, I'd like to talk about it and get more details on it. That's all I'm saying. I appreciate you being on the task force. And we all know that we can spend $200,000 on one of the stations. But like I said, I know we need the facilities manager to outline that. But I do think that I need more information for what we're trying to do with that position and where we're going with it. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. So my question's simple. We've always done this for these recommendations. Curb to curb is what we're always, we're stressing. The permit, requested permits coming from National Grid. The only question I have before I vote no on this is why can't we have MWA, why isn't MWA asking for this permit as pot as this? Because right now, the answer I want to vote on this is to make sure that that street is put back the way we said. And what we just heard from National Grid and the representative, they're not doing that. So why should I even vote for that?
[George Scarpelli]: Again, not to beat a dead horse, but Councilor Marks makes a good point. We've just listened to our traffic engineer who said this doesn't happen. I too think that unfortunately, Ms. Cuddy, the MWRA is in front of us right now, National Grid is, so I cannot support this paper either. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Which we just discussed. And that cell phone, we asked a representative to have a cell phone. Yes, correct. And I believe Ms. Cuddy said. They haven't answered yet.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that... They've already said no, point of information. They've already said no, they're not going to. So I think that's futile, I believe.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President. I just have one. So again, could you just explain the patchwork? I just don't, I just want to make sure that the roads aren't left, uh, with divots later on. And, um, even if it is going across our parking lot. So is it just trench work? Is it not curb to curb?
[George Scarpelli]: All right, Tim, now being that it's later in the season and we're right in the cusp of the deadline, how long do we have a guarantee that if it doesn't sink or have issues later, even if it is three feet?
[George Scarpelli]: All right, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm afraid to go closer to Murray Hill Road. It's too dangerous.
[George Scarpelli]: Where the Agapinos live right there.
[George Scarpelli]: at Fellsway West. The last one we got people from Parris Street if you don't mind.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Bears. Bring light to this. I know that after hearing the news this week, my plan was to hold a subcommittee meeting, talk to the president, and I know we're meeting next week with the DOT to talk about the Main Street and South Street intersection, and I will follow up with the meeting. We have so many questions lately with the T right now, and now with the services being affected, I think we need to really get ahead of this right now. So I'll be asking the Council President to find some time for us, at least early December, for a subcommittee on transportation. So thank you again, Council Bias. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. I know that Council Member Mox helped me point out, we had communications to the Mayor from City Solicitor Kim Scanlon. The question that Councilor Scanlon had is at its regular scheduled meeting on October 6th. The Medford City Council requested the city solicitor give the city council an opinion on dealing with open meeting law violations for overcrowding due to fire department protocol on maximum capacity dealing with city council chambers. And she said that the question wasn't clear. So if I could just clear up the question to the city clerk to get back to the city solicitor. The question dealing with opening the council chambers for regular meetings during COVID in relation to the maximum number of people. The question is, what is the opinion of the city solicitor if we reached maximum capacity with rules to the fire department for overcapacity? How does that affect the open meeting law? And in the same scenario, if we put a number to the availability of the chambers using the six feet and so on and so forth, and post that, and we reach capacity, how does that affect the open meeting law. So I know that the city, the public health director has requested that I put together a plan. I'm still waiting for some information from her. to put that plan together. And hopefully City Solicitor Scanlon can get us this information. The good news is they waited long enough that the vaccine looks very promising. So not to make light of it, I'm really excited about it. I think that we're in a good place. Things are moving forward, hopefully with the you know, with these protocols put in place, I still, um, you know, we still have to find a way to open these chambers and obviously with the, the spike, um, making sure that we're doing it, um, thoroughly and, um, making sure that public health is number one priority. So if we could just reach back out to the city solicitor, I hope I made sense this time. I guess that was too difficult last time. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I see that everything is in order that Mr. Cullen has put forth. If he could just give us a quick synopsis and then we can move to our colleagues, if anybody has any questions before we move forward. Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, if you just give us just what we're trying, what we're looking to put forth here with the- Right, so Scott Cullinane, 122 Lincoln Road.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Yeah, well, I see everything in order, Mr. President, so I move forward in approval. I have no other questions. Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. During this very difficult time, one of the things we're hearing are the fears and concerns of what's happening with people that are really still being sheltered in their homes and looking at the different how to handle some of these serious issues. And the quickly we can push this ordinance forward and establish this committee, I think it would be so beneficial right now for our community especially. And making sure that mental health and other concerns that we see with substance abuse are really forefront and we have a group that would do that. We do have a wonderful group right now with Penny that's leading us, but as you move ordinance forward, it really puts some teeth into it. And I think this is a great step in the right direction. So whichever way we can move this quicker through, I would support it wholeheartedly. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If Mr. Rodriguez could just clarify what the difference of class four automotive repair is. What is the classification, what is it meant when it's class four automotive repair?
[George Scarpelli]: That's my question. Mr. Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: No. Is it heavy trucks, 16 wheels? No. I'm sorry?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, all right, because that was the question I did have with the traffic study. Some communities, we've seen huge traffic issues with people that permit the auto repair that go to a different class, meaning 16 wheelers. And you see them being parked on main roads and So that's why I wanted to get distinguished. So as long as you're telling me it's not, it's just a regular car repair business, I'd support that. But if it does, if it is for 16 wheelers and bigger, I think that I'd have a question with some safety issues and traffic issues, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, three feet divided to 1,700.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. To be honest with you, Councilman Mox hit so many of those questions I had right in the head. But I think that if you're looking at this area, you're looking at a certain time where, like you said, you're adding, we'll be adding 400 units. We'll be in the middle of Christmas rush. where you have a busy shopping center and hopefully the beginning of school where the parents would be traversing through that area with the school buses. So I think it does concern me with the time of year and when we're going to be doing this. But the question that I have is, as we're moving forward, what does the National Grid team have in place to inform the neighbors of any inconveniences to their day-to-day activities. I know that a lot of those homes don't have, obviously there's no parking on the street. So a lot of these homes park in their driveway. What do we have set up and planned? There's any inconvenience for senior citizens that need to park in their driveway and have notice that they cannot traverse their own homes. Do we have anything in place with them or notification system in place with them?
[George Scarpelli]: I can appreciate that, but that's not enough. Ms. Cuddy, I appreciate that. I think that really communication is the number one most important factor of this job being so large and how it impacts those neighbors. So I know that we've had, with other jobs of this magnitude, we've had, I know Eversource has a direct line that they can actually call the project manager. And when certain areas are going to be closed, they're notified either by robocall or by door knock. But I think it's important that we do that for Sometimes if the notification is going to the person that owns the home but not the person living in that home, I think it might pose an issue. So my recommendation for the city clerk, if we can make amendments to this, that we have a direct point person that our residents can talk to on a daily basis. I appreciate a hotline, but I've dealt with some other hotlines and I don't trust it to get back in a timely fashion when you're talking about this type of scope of work. So I look to amend this and ask the construction company and National Grid to have a dedicated person for these neighbors. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, with the scope of work, Ms. Cuddy, I think that what we feel comfortable and what we've done in the past is really having a dedicated person that's on the job. You mentioned a hotline. The hotline, I appreciate the person on the street that's going to be there, that's in charge of the job. But other companies, for example, Eversource, project managers that are on site that people could reach while something was going on in a minute's notice for the fact that for some issues where it is senior citizens and they have doctor's appointments or they have to make an emergency exits. There isn't any way to park there that they can move their cars. And say that they'll just park there to prepare themselves, the only place for people to park are the driveways. So if the driveways are affected and they're not known, they don't know what to do, I think a hotline is great. If it wasn't, I would approve anything when it's a small scope. But this being so large and so encompassing that we have, in other instances, had a direct line. throughout the day during that job. So I'm going to stick with that amendment, Mr. President. And thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Mr. President. Point of information, Councilor Scott Belli. Thank you. I apologize, Council President. Mr. Murphy, I know we talked the other day, and I don't want to put you on the spot. I know you guys are very busy. I know how daunting this is. The answer you gave me for the Roberts classroom was that we're looking at Wednesday and Thursday, Friday possibly of last week. They're still not yet in that room. So I know we're talking about the concerns of the kids, but like I said, we have three, it looks like three kindergarten classrooms and one room on the second floor that doesn't have a bathroom. Do you have an update with that?
[George Scarpelli]: If you please can check that because as of today, we have three teachers in one second floor acting kindergarten class. So I don't know where the confusion comes in or the information's falling by the wayside, but that's only one issue that leaves me to be a little concerned about the rest of the district. So please forgive my my apprehension.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Mr. Murphy, thank you for taking these questions. I know that the frustration sometimes parents reach out to us because we do have school age children and they feel the same pain. I know that if you can, again, please check on that Roberts Kindergarten. I'm not sure if that's accurate, if those kindergartens or three classes are in their classrooms. I don't think so. What we're seeing now is some of the other information we're talking about is really making sure people are informed. I know I had a great conversation today with Ms. Shulman, who's the head of guidance right now. And maybe talk with Mr. DeLaver and the principal at the high school and really allow him to I think that he was notorious for two a week and was very informative. And some of the things that parents or seniors are saying, the SATs went well today. We did have some parents that didn't know about it for one reason or another. I know we have another. senior evening on Thursday night that some parents don't know anything about with the guidance department to update those seniors. Because it's a very stressful time right now, and I only say that right now, that it's important because. You're talking early decision is due on Friday, and there's some easiness. So you can stress that back to your administration and your organization to really try to find a way to get more information out to make sure that while they're not in school, that they're informed of what's happening. So thank you so much. I appreciate your time, Mr. Marchion.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information if I can, Mr. President. Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. Alicia, I'm just a little concerned. I just don't... I work in a municipality where that is the flip-flopping. You do see it happening, but for example, I have 50 employees that are working 20 hours a week and we were told that we couldn't use that funding to pay for those employees. We got word last week that we could, so all we did is revert back all of those hours for reimbursement. Why does it seem so simple in some communities and why does it seem so difficult the way you're making it sound right now that it's really monumental? Is it that different?
[George Scarpelli]: No, I understand if somebody was infected, but we're talking about part-time employees. It's very simple for us just to say that this is what we spent prior to approving it, and now we're asking for the CARES Act for reimbursement to our budget, and it's being done.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I know what you're saying, but I'm confused, maybe I'm not saying it right. What I'm saying is this has nothing to do with an infection or anybody being infected. When we're running programs for a COVID-based program, we were told we can't pay salaries through that back then. We found out we could, and all we did is revert back to all those months and salaries that we paid, and we reimbursed that through the COVID money. And that's just my small department. It sounds like it's so difficult here. Do we have an incident command system in place? In Medford, do we have a team in place?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so that's what I'm saying, Dave. This is where I'm confused. Other communities have used the COVID money to directly put together an incident command system and a team together that focuses on what we're doing with our employees that have to do the day-to-day activities just to survive without the COVID. So it just seems like, I can understand why it seems so overwhelming to so many people. I'm just a little confused. Thank you for answering that, and I appreciate it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. That was the exact comments I was going to make that Councilor Knight made, that we really focused on the Community Preservation Act coming from taxes, revenue created by our residents, and focusing on making sure that our residents that are in need are the first ones that could use those fundings. And again, I appreciate the question and the answers, so I'll be supporting this paper tonight. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Just a quick question to Roberta. Roberta, thank you for everything you do. But if we do only do half, it's not daunting or anything out of the ordinary that you'd have to go back and come back in a month. And let's say it is the, I hope, God bless, we don't get the funding spent in a month. But it's not a daunting task to just come back to this council for the other half, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: So we have, I'd like to hear from her, John.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Hi Daniel.
[George Scarpelli]: If she can answer that question that I asked that, you know,
[George Scarpelli]: It's very simple. So if we split this in half, and I can understand why Council Marks is asking for that, how daunting is it? Is it, you know, would it be too difficult to come back in a month to ask for the other half? It's not a difficult...
[George Scarpelli]: It's not months.
[George Scarpelli]: It's not months, correct? It's weeks.
[George Scarpelli]: OK, thank you. OK.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. As we move forward and we're seeing the uptick with numbers and what we're hearing is that the state isn't really going to look going backwards at all. As we move forward and we look at the issues of opening school and opening of the city council for meetings that be interesting to know if there is money that's still needed to the school system and what type of money they've used moving forward. So, um, and to see if there's, if there's need that we need to address as a council to move some initiatives forward. So I put that out as a resolution and hopefully my colleagues agree.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. As we get closer, we see the unbelievable completion of that beautiful building, our police station, and something we should be very proud of. But again, it poses a bigger issue once that building is open and the crosswalk where we've been talking about. between south and main issues now with the police station. It's going to be interesting to see what type of plan we have in place, or is there any part of discussion about putting in? I know that what was discussed in the past were the rhino lights, the temporary crossing lights that could be installed. I don't know if that's going to happen. I know it was mentioned, and I know that we did call for a meeting, hopefully, talking to Representative Donato. We're trying to get something for next week. for next Tuesday at 530 just to discuss the top, one of the top 200 most dangerous intersections in the Commonwealth, Maine and South. Now that we have some money coming from the state and the state DOT now agrees that this is one of the most dangerous intersections, and we need to move forward as soon as possible. And again, with that conversation, to reiterate what I talked about last week, putting in the raised crosswalks as soon as possible to see how that can slow that traffic down. So I'm hoping we get some answers, and we move forward in a positive light. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: The hope is that the discussion tonight with this resolution, with the traffic engineer being part of that meeting next week, that'll be something we could draw out all at once. So I don't want to delay anything else as we're moving forward. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: have the traffic engineer on.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. First, let me thank Councilman Knight for bringing up a very major point, a very important point. I think that what we're hearing from the state and what's being talked about, the fiscal damage that we're going to see in a year is going to be pretty damaging. So I think it's important that the request that he put forth a while ago that we do meet and really understand where we are, especially with the the free cash and where we stand with that, and where we stand with our taxes and our collections and stuff. So I think it's important that we have an idea of where we are as we move forward, because let's not make this a secret. Things are going to get really, really, really tough soon. And we're going to have to make some hard decisions if we're not going to get the support that we need, both in the state and the federal side. So I think that's very important. Second, I know that. We're looking at the raised crosswalks. That's a great question, and it's something that was a great solution for the Central Ave location with Morrison-Parkes. Because before that pilot program, it was just a speedway. And then it made a huge difference, being on the school committee back then, that that was one of the huge concern with the kids in the neighborhood, and the bus stops, and so on. That is a huge concern. But you see in neighbor communities, I know Todd might be familiar with it, I know that on Powder House Boulevard, there was an awful accident and a pedestrian death there. And what they did there is they didn't put a raised sidewalk, but they put a raised roadway with arrows depicting the rise. And it really slows that traffic down in front of that school. And I can't see that being a major cost where it's actually, it was put into place very, very quickly. There were no decorative blocks, but there is a clear rise that slows down that area. I think that if we can look into that, Todd, I'd love to get an idea if we can even possibly do that in some of the locations, including South Street, Main Street, as we're waiting for get through and see what they can do, but I'm just afraid we're going to get to a situation where there's going to be a death in one of these areas. And we're going to be telling each other, we told you so. And I don't want that. So if there's a way that we can look into that and look at some of this money because I need some clarity on what we're seeing around the neighborhoods. And I know it might be like the 3,000, the 4,000, 5,000 hits with this. But if you do it 15 times in the community, it's $50,000. And it's something that looks temporary all over the city. We have light white paint around intersection streets with these white They're not cones, they're just sticks. And within the first week that I saw them, especially in South Medford, they were knocked over immediately. Can you explain, is that temporary? Is that, how are we going to deal with that when it comes to, the question I had with the raised sidewalk at South and Main during the winter was, well, with plowing, we can't do that. Well, with all these sticks all over the place, how are we going to manage that area in that situation?
[George Scarpelli]: That's good.
[George Scarpelli]: So with that, I appreciate that. So I really think something like that, where that's more cost efficient, but more importantly, It's long lasting. If you're looking at something that's $10,000, putting in that what they've done on Grove Street and add that to what you can do at. at Central Ave, using that example, that would drastically slow down that dangerous roadway by putting those cheaper, more efficient hurdles to slow that traffic down. But at the same time, not looking at, because I'll tell you the truth, Todd, I appreciate everything you guys are doing, and I appreciate trying these. But when you're looking at putting in ten different areas with this temporary $4,000 hits here and there, to me, I just think that it's not worth doing it right now until we're doing the full-time piece and using that money to something like the raised roadway in Central and other locations. I know it's my preference, but that's my concern. And I look at equity. We've been talking about Riverside Ave, Todd, for a while. And I don't see anything here with Riverside Ave. We have a major complex with two of the biggest schools in our community. And that's been some issues. We've had some issues there with both lack of cross lights, with traffic calming measures. And did we entertain anything on Riverside Ave?
[George Scarpelli]: So this- And I just want you to know, Todd, you came into a very difficult position. So, and I'm not, this is just conversation that I've talked to constituents about, and just to share comments. I think that you're doing a great job, and we are seeing a drastic difference. And I think people in our community see that. We've committed to traffic calming measures. And other than South and Main, I'm going to be honest with you, throughout the rest of the city, I think we've seen a huge support by your office in this community to say, let's try to find ways to make it happen. So I really appreciate that. So I don't want to, I'm not, if it sounds negative, I don't, I'm just looking at other avenues.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Is the petitioner available?
[George Scarpelli]: OK, thank you, Clodion. I see that everything is in order. I know that you are moving in. to the old Jumbo Pizzeria on Boston Ave?
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Do you have your hours of operations?
[George Scarpelli]: OK, I think that the hours of operations has to come in front of our board, too, just so you know that. The hours of operations have to be adjusted, just so you know.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so the license goes until 11 o'clock.
[George Scarpelli]: So you would have to petition to extend that. I just want to make sure you knew that. To extend that.
[George Scarpelli]: You're not allowed to open after 11.
[George Scarpelli]: PM. Without a special permit, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Right, that license goes with that business.
[George Scarpelli]: If you can't contact, just contact the clerk.
[George Scarpelli]: Tomorrow and he can fill you in.
[George Scarpelli]: This is terrible. OK, but I see everything is in order.
[George Scarpelli]: So I move approval after my colleagues have questions.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Knight, for your synopsis. I think that with that, if I could, can I amend the paper? I know that once our constituents read the agenda, if we could amend it and ask for a representative for both Uber and Lyft. That for their same practices, we know that they're very important to our community. But at the same time, their practices are stopping wherever they want and causing dangerous issues with possible road rage issues, I think that's one of the constituents that I talked to this week, is making sure understanding what is the reasoning for stopping in the middle of the street and with no regards to other vehicles or pedestrians or bike riders. So if we can make that amendment, thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I reviewed those minutes. I find them in order. Move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, I'm sorry. Again, I just wanted to reiterate my thanks to our team at LMH and thank them for always being on the other end of the phone. Again, I'd be remiss to say the backbone of communications, Sam Tarabelski. It's nice to see Sam back and And just reiterate, we have bumpy roads and to have the commitment of a partnership with Lawrence Memorial and Hallmark Health. And hopefully as we move forward to bigger projects, especially in our backyard up in the heights in the future, that this partnership stays strong and moves forward in a positive light. So thank you everyone for all your hard work and we still have some more to go, so I look forward to our future. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yep.
[George Scarpelli]: Could you just clarify that? I thought last time we talked, Mary Ann, you corrected me and said we were in the green, I believe.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Mary, could you just reiterate, I know that I don't want people getting nervous if they read this the wrong way. You said that the way it's read, that if you talk to two students, one is positive, one is negative. That's not the case, though.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, so there's only 25.
[George Scarpelli]: Right.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so one in two students aren't tested positive, right? That's just to make sure. Thank you. All right, thanks Marion.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Morell. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you so much, Marion, with all the information. Can you just, so where do we stand with youth sports? Are youth sports participating now? Have they been approved?
[George Scarpelli]: So LaConte rink is open then?
[George Scarpelli]: LaConte rink is open?
[George Scarpelli]: And one parent is allowed in the rink at a time with a child?
[George Scarpelli]: All right, and it looks like the kindergarten are back in school with their teachers, so far. Yes, yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so what I'm getting at, you're seeing a positive trend here moving forward. And I know that I asked the last subcommittee, I mean the committee, the whole meeting we had to give me some bullet points that I can present to you as a guideline. I had a great conversation, thanks to you, with President Asak from the Brockton City Council. And they enlighten me on some great avenues to take to open up the council chambers. She also enlightened me that the good news is we can use our COVID funding to help fund the opening for open meetings. like our city council meeting, so that was great news. So I know that I have a question later to our city solicitor to answer some of those questions. But now with the numbers that are increasing, I think that there's some pretty good strategies that I'd like to share with you down the line. If you can help me out with some of those bullets that I could share back with you to open the council chambers to a safe limit and open it to those people that want to come to our meetings in person. So my last question is, I think that, where do we stand right now with Halloween? I know that's going around. Has the mayor and the department talked about, as Halloween's coming soon, what protocols we're going to be reaching for or what that's looking like right now? Is that something being talked about?
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information if I can.
[George Scarpelli]: Mary Ann, I know that when we do our programs and we have the same situations where we bring in large crowds and so are you telling me that it's the custodian? I'm assuming that anybody that comes into our buildings for contact tracing, we have a log for everybody that comes in through that entrance. So we have a name, a phone number, and an email address, correct? Correct. All right. So do we have those logs?
[George Scarpelli]: So our custodians have those locks? Who has them?
[George Scarpelli]: That frightens me, because we do that with our Board of Health next door. You know how private and shaky some of these organizations are, that they sort of protect each other. I find it amazing that we don't have, as they walk through the doors, It's a simple check-in where we have clean pens, and then we have pens that are put into a separate area to be disinfected. And everybody comes in and signs that, and we hold on to that information. And if anything comes back from that church organization, that we know that we're contacting those people. I find it hard to believe that we trust outside organizations that want to keep that position in our facilities for future programming, that we would allow them to do that. I hope we consider that, because that's frightening to me. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't know if Councilmax is done.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I'm hearing it again. I, again, I don't, I hope you don't take this. I'm not, I appreciate.
[George Scarpelli]: And don't take this the wrong way, but it seems like there's a double standard. We met the other day, and you were so adamantly against opening up these chambers because of the fear of overcrowding. But at the same time, what you just said with these outside organizations, as passive as, as long as they keep six feet apart for 15 minutes, that's acceptable. So-.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, maybe you are, but I'm just, as I'm moving forward, because I'm trying to put two pieces together. You asked me to put a plan in place to find a way to open these chambers. So I'm trying to figure out, because I asked help from our office, because I'm not in a public health background. So I asked for just bullet points that can help me with that, and I hope you can maybe sometime during this week. But what I'm trying to get at is just, if I present with the president, the rest of the council, a plan in place that has these new guidelines that this now new phase is brought in with what I can Google the partners that we have and that are using our facilities that got approval. I don't mean to sound as trivial as it's going to sound, but if it's that easy, then It sounds that easy. I'm not being disrespectful in a way just to let other organizations in and then limit this.
[George Scarpelli]: Sure.
[George Scarpelli]: That's not the issue. No, but that's great.
[George Scarpelli]: No, that's great. And I'll get to that later on in the meeting today, but that's a great answer. That's all. No, that's great, that's a great answer because I think that that piece of the public health side to open this chamber, that's one of the two components we had a crossroads with last week. So thank you for enlightening me, and like I said, I'll go forward with Councilor Scanlon with the open meetings issues and concerns that we have. Okay, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Ken, the petitioner again. You're saying you have these emails? I can't hear you. I'm sorry. You're saying you have these emails?
[George Scarpelli]: So you have that. Do you have any other emails saying that you were on an agenda?
[George Scarpelli]: And then if I can, to our commission, are you familiar with this email that he's talking about? Because to me, this is a big issue. I think this is very important.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, so, and your idea that it was never construed that unless demolition is off the table, you're not welcome at a meeting?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I'd like to see that email. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Council President, and thank you, Councilor Marks, for co-sponsoring this resolution. I think those residents do a great job with their curb appeal. They do the best they can. Every time I drive by, they're out there with their push brooms, knocking all the debris away from their front doors. And they're very patient, and we know that our DPWs try valiantly to try to keep up with those potholes and they fill them on a, I think it's a weekly basis, but I think Councilor Mock said it perfectly. It's just, it's too far gone. It's not a huge stretch, but it does affect those homeowners. And truly in a negative way, especially with the way they live their lives, which is very orderly and very neat. So I hope that we could find a remedy for them and get that completely done. And again, like I said, it's not a big area. It's something we could just move in and move out. So I thank you so much.
[George Scarpelli]: I have it in front of me. Public Works. I'm the chair, I believe. It is Max Caraviellole.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll second that.
[George Scarpelli]: John. Yeah, Sam. I think I have two of Councilor Marks' three amendments, but I'm trying to. The second one I have is that there needs to be discussion of more
[George Scarpelli]: Real quick, I know I appreciate Councilor Bears bringing this forward. I think it's important that we do something, especially before the first snow falls. But Councilor Marksby, I think we all bring up good points and I appreciate it. If we could, it's ironic that my neighbor knocked on my door today. And something if we can add that we didn't realize until about seven months ago, the importance of our first responders. She was frantic thinking. If this is the way of the world, she might be gone four days out of a week. And if that happens during a snowstorm, she could be penalized for this. So as you go through the subcommittee, I know I'm not on it, but just point of discussion is really look at that as an option too, because I know it's tough. to distinguish what homeowners are first responders, but I think they'll be negatively impacted with this too. So not to say we don't need it. I know that other communities have great programs. I know the community that I work for, they have four sidewalk trucks and they send those out, like Councilman Mark said, all throughout the city. And they open up every main thoroughway and every park and every school and We're going to have to put our money where our mouth is again, and give our DPW the tools to put this to fruition. Because again, it is the safety of our pedestrians that we're asking for. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: No, just be discussed. I trust my colleagues to make that a point.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Paper 20585 and 28586, please.
[George Scarpelli]: make a motion to combine, Mr. President, if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: And, uh, they're all the same owner.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Is Mr. Kapoor president today?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I apologize for the delay. or shall I believe, it seems like all of these petitions, everything seems in order and all the paperwork is complete, but just a simple question. Are all these hours of business just transferring over? With the owner, correct? This is a change of ownership? Okay, so everything else stays the same. I know that the hours on Middlesex is 9 a.m. to 8 p.m., then we have Salem Street, 5 a.m. to 11, and then the Fellsway site is open 24 hours, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so strike. Middlesex, Mr. President? That's a 24-0. No, that's the one that's 9-8.
[George Scarpelli]: It's closed. All right, I find everything in order, Mr. President. I move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Before I go, I know what I forgot, I thought I had a note. I know that we normally, for new owners, we put just a review, especially for the 24 hours. If Councilor Knight can help me, is it a 60 day review? 90- We usually do a 30 and a 60. 30 and a 60 day review if we can. Those are the only restrictions, if we can, just to revisit as they're new owners to check their standing as we move forward. Thank you, sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: Should I apologize? Yes, I'm sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, on the Fellsway site.
[George Scarpelli]: So I guess what I'm saying is- Just an information point to the petitioner.
[George Scarpelli]: Does the petitioner understand that?
[George Scarpelli]: Good luck. Thank you. Sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Just a clarification, it's Dr. Menon. That's one of the partners. I might have made a typo there for the clerk. But I went back and I watched a few of the Board of Health meetings and I find it interesting that we do have a consortium of physicians that work with our Board of Health Director. And it would be nice, just like I said, simple as it is, just to get some ideas of what the health professionals that are working with our Board of Health Director in the process as we move forward and putting together a criteria. Something that will help, I believe, The Board of Health Director asked me to put together the plan, so as they move forward, I'd just like their input. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. And again, I'm going to reiterate this council's energy to reopen the council chambers for the residents that have reached out, not to eliminate Zoom, but just to add another avenue for those people that want to be heard and want an opportunity to come to this body. Talking to my sister colleague from Brockton, one of the things that they asked for with their city solicitor was, as we do here in the chambers, we have a limit of capacity through fire codes during our meetings. If we relate it to the COVID crisis and we have a set number and posted such, that would be, from what I've been told, might be the avenue that we need to reopen City Hall and making sure we're not violating any open meeting violations. So I ask this to be sent to the city solicitor to get her opinion and, again, to help me put together this protocol that the Board of Health Director has asked me to do. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, this is something that at one point I reached out to fellow colleagues that put this on the agenda as well. This is very troublesome and I don't want to wait until it's too late. As you, we had another pedestrian death as you saw, not in Medford, but in neighboring communities. And before we get to this horrifying scene, I'm shocked that we haven't been there yet. All I want to see is our, it's a very simple ask, is just put those raised crosswalks out. Slow traffic calming measures that we talked about months ago, and I'll revisit this next week as I ask for a committee meeting. We did get some great news today. As great as it is, I don't trust the speed of this outcome, but I'd like to share with everyone. I know everybody got it. Hi, great news. I got a call today from Mike So-and-so at MassDOT. They have identified the intersection of Main Street and South Street as a priority intersection that they would like to partner with us to move forward. The initial design intersection improvement. They would hire a consultant to do this work. in consultation with the city and would like to know if there are any consultants that have been working with us on this intersection. While we have previously been told that we would have to pay this initial design phase, they are willing to fund this initial because it is on the top 200 dangerous intersections in the state. And because of this nexus with the shared use path, in particular the south method connector, That would intersect Main Street right on the other side, Route 16. Therefore, they see it as an important mass trails connection. Mayor, please let me know, blah, blah, blah, Alicia Hunt. So I want to thank Alicia for doing her due diligence to secure this effort. It's sad that the reasons why aren't safety, it looks like it's connection, but we're looking at a dangerous intersection. I still want to move forward to ask our traffic department and our city administration to put the portable raised crosswalks. on those intersections to slow things down and give some information back to the dot as we proceed with this consultant. And great news, I know Councilor Marks last night spent the evening with the ever source team on the south street project. And they approved speed bumps, I believe in a second. So I wish it was that easy. I wish it was ever source to get. to make something happen that quickly, because this has been monumental to try to get anything done. A sign, paint, raise crosswalk, and I don't know what it has to take. And maybe, sadly enough, maybe it takes a death to make something happen. But this is something that we talked with with the last administration. This is something we talked with the mayor as she was partnered with us here as councils. And now as our leader in our community, I impressed on her to please put these out there, make this happen now, because I would hate to see something happen between now and the end of this consultant's report and changing that intersection. So it's finally been identified as a top 200 dangerous intersection in the state of Massachusetts, but we've all known that. So thank you for all your hard work. I appreciate it. This is great news. But I still move forward to make sure that we can do that, and I open to my colleagues, so. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Put it as a resolution next week that we call for subcommittee on D O D O T for this exact one, this exact reason. So we can set up a schedule and meet with them, bring them face to face with us and our state delegates and, um, and have that instead of, uh,
[George Scarpelli]: I amend that we call for a subcommittee with DOT, our state delegates, our traffic department, and our traffic engineer. And Alicia Hunts, I think she was on the forefront of this, to set up a timeline with the DOT to make sure this comes to fruition. And we'll try to do that as soon as we can with the Council of Presidents hope. Transportation. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, if Council March, if you could add one more line to that. I think that the question I've had is what steps is the city doing for our employees that were violated and are having issues with their personal information? What are they doing to support them, if that's okay? Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I see that Mr. Miller has all of their paperwork in order. I will move forward after maybe a brief, just a summarization from our petitioner and any questions from our Councilors.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So if you could just give us a brief overview, Mr. Martin, so we can, and we see all your paperwork is in order, but do you want to just give a little few sentences of what this is to explain to the rest of the council what we're doing?
[George Scarpelli]: That's great, so thank you, Mr. Martin. Again, I've put in the American Legion post. We appreciate everything you've done for our country and all the members, and I see that you've done everything that's required through our licensing department, so I move forward for approval. Thank you, Mr. President. Second, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Bears? Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: If you can, is this line, I'm not seeing if it's illuminated.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, my question was answered. I think that being consistent with the other signs, I think I would agree with my fellow councils. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, President Falco. I know my concern also falls with the number of signs. To have one sign that says free vacuums, I think we can all see, we all know the location, we all see the vacuums. But to have 13 signs, I'm just a little nervous of what would be added after that on those awnings, or what's hung on those awnings and the like. So I'd like to hear what my fellow councilors have to say, but I just think this might be a little excessive. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Easily. Easily.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, just to reiterate, I think that for what the Historical Commission has in front of them, it's a daunting task when you look at our community and its historical values. And we all, like Councilman Mark said, I think all of us And I think that the situation that we were put in with this situation had a lot to do with maybe the COVID and the opportunity for both parties to meet in a mutual and respectful manner. I think both the commission and the homeowner were great. We appreciate the opportunity to walk through the site. That piece was glaring, I think. What's important to me is to sit in front of a home, not behind these chambers, but with the people involved, all in front of each other, face to face. And it was something as simple as Council Marks' experience by working on this council for many, many years to just bring up a topic that maybe both parties can speak on. And this is what we're seeing, we're seeing the best of the worst case scenario avoided. So again, I applaud my colleagues and both the historical commission and the homeowner to reach an agreement. Because we've seen our share of greeted developers in our community. And I think this homeowner was very open and honest with us and And we'll work now with our commission to make sure that we are going to keep as much as the historical preservation that we can on that site. So again, I thank my colleagues and I believe that's a good example of good government. So again, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Got it. Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Like Councilor Mock said, I too supported this in 2016, but I will tell you, I think that because the process does take the time that it will take, unfortunately, this isn't something that this council created or this council This council delayed, I think I was one of the four councils voted for that in the past. But I think Councilor Knight brings up a very important point that we started our subcommittee meeting with. There's so much going on right now in our community that we, The focus has to be on the bigger things in our community right now. This is something that needs to be done down the line. I think that hopefully as you see things turn and people are back in this chamber and we get to move things forward. Kids are back in school and city business is done a little bit differently. I think that I'll go back. But as of tonight, I think there are too many variables and too many issues that our city is dealing with right now to even spend a minute focused on charter review, considering that, like I said, it is a two to three year process. And right now, I think we need to focus on issues that are in front of us right now. So, again, I thank both Councilor Marks and Councilor Knights viewpoints on both, but I will not be supporting this this evening. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that there's areas to agree and disagree, but this is something we agree on. Unfortunately, what we don't agree on is a timeline. I think that as one council who voted for this in the past, and knowing that it's something that needs to be done, like our zoning and many other things, historical issues. So I think that this is important, but I think right now, I think there's so much that supersedes it. That if it is offered sometime in the next fiscal year, it'll be something that I will totally support again, so I thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate Councilman Marks bringing that forward. But again, what people don't see behind the scenes is the work that Councilman Knight puts in when the camera's not on him. And I think that all the questions we had during those Those meetings and before those meetings, it was always Councilor Knight that was the go-to guy. So I think that he put in the hours and effort to really make us shine finally and get this through and moving it forward. So there's a lot of good reasons why we need this, whether you believe in it or not. But again, we appreciate your work, Councilor Knight, and thank you again.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpella. Mr. President, I appreciate Councilor Ike bringing this forward and this is a great initiative moving forward because I think Councilor Caraviello is right. But one thing that we've talked about and And in most other communities, if not all of the communities, they have, I know Councilor Marks has mentioned a thousand times, a clerk of works. That when there is any type of job, it's up to the city to make sure when that job is completed that there is someone there that signs off and then rechecks that in six months. And I think that's what we're lacking here. We're lacking that layer of follow through. So again, I don't know how we could move forward. I think that as we look as we move forward, and the tight budget's going to be even tighter, but I don't know if there's an avenue that our DPW director or our engineer can look into and find that person that's going to follow through with that. because I know with the short staff that we have, these things fall through the cracks. So again, I think that as we move forward looking for an effective way of having a clerk of the works that's going to follow through with these is going to be most effective, I think, than anything here. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you for my fellow council members. I'd like to send congratulations over to Richie. I think that, again, whenever there's a fundraiser and there's a young child going through some horrible issue and There's going to be a party. Richie's always the first one to call and donate and be there for the community. So I think that's why he's been around for 15 years. And I think that's why he'll be around for the next 15 years, because he's always there when people need him. I'm not speaking from experience, but the product's not bad either, so. Thank you for bringing it forward, and congratulations, Rich.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I know that I appreciate my fellow councilors bringing this forward. I know that everybody said a lot of great things, and I'd like to just reiterate those statements. And you know it's sad, but you know when a family lays and leaves a legacy behind, and that's what Teresa's done. I think that By the way they raise their children and how they conduct themselves in here in our city of Medford and the legacy that they're passing on is so important to see. So I thank them for sharing their mother with us. Mr. Maloney was one of the best and I think that we send our condolences and prayers. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: No.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. We reviewed Ms. Payne's paperwork, everything seemed in order, and has everything that's needed. Now, if you could just give us a brief synopsis, and then hear from our council colleagues and vote this through.
[George Scarpelli]: So we're just turning the permit over? To the same location, same business? Correct. OK, thank you. I move approval, Mr. President. Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I have a few. I know that the council has asked some great questions. Just to the superintendent, if I can, Mr. President, or Mr. Rodriguez. Legally, the money that was left in those accounts, it's okay to be used in this form. I know that sometimes when you get money in certain grants or You have to use specific reasons, I just want to reassure that they are being used for what's intended and we can still move forward with that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Mr. President, to the superintendent, I know probably one of the oldest schools is Curtis Tough School. Are we still planning on having a program running in a positive manner that it's always run? And how does that look with air quality testing? Is that one of the schools being looked at as we speak?
[George Scarpelli]: Madam Superintendent, what neighbor communities and other schools are using across the country. Have we looked at using the viability of the gymnasium? We probably have one of the biggest gymnasiums in the state, and to use those as classrooms. I think that could be a viable way to move some of those classes that have some issues that can't be repaired. But is that something that we're investigating too?
[George Scarpelli]: OK. And again, to the superintendent, through you, Mr. President, No one thought you're going to come into Medford, become the new superintendent, handle a pandemic and other issues and the concerns that we're seeing today in society. I know that with the race issues we have, I think that I've talked to some teachers and Already the staff in professional development, you've already started a dialogue that's talking about race and making sure that our teachers are prepared for our questions from our students. Because there are going to be a lot of questions, a lot of concerns, and I'm so happy to see that the team is moving forward. It brings me to the bigger point, I think that it was easy a few weeks ago to people in higher power to slam this council because they think that what was thought was that we were hurting the kids of the city of Medford. Now, as a father of two kids in that system, that's the furthest from my mind. So I wanted to applaud this council. Because this is our job, whether you like it or not, it's to look at every penny and making sure that we're using it for the right reasons. And look at the time we spent, it's almost been an hour, and we've been talking about, this is just scratching the surface, about what this money can be used for. And these questions, If not used for the reasons to get our children back in the school for any reason, who would they hold accountable? That would be us, because we would have proved it. So I applaud this council for taking the extra time to make sure that we dotted our I's and crossed our T's to make sure we can get our students and faculty into a safe, We've already heard that delaying it to two weeks didn't have any issues with moving that point forward. So again, I know that It's easy to beat people up, but we need to stay positive. And I think that with the steps you're taking and your team is taking, Superintendent, and Johnny McLaughlin, we're trying to do to get our kids back into a safe, healthy school. What this council's doing to make sure any funding we do have goes right to the proper locations, making sure that Aleesha Nunley's working with that COVID fund, making sure that we're doing what's right. And I appreciate it, and I thank you. I do want to end just with one thing, some of the, that we have you, Madam Superintendent. The biggest question I'm hearing right now is, please, when will the kids know their schedule? I know they're scheduled to start next week. If you can answer that final question, just to give them an idea, I think it'll be very helpful. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So again, Madam Superintendent, I thank you. And again, I just urge the community to, it's easy to stand on that soapbox and pound your chest, but let's all have a sense of a community and understand that this is the first time for a lot of communities. And the community I'm working in right now, this is exactly the issues they're going through. And it's been a mess. So we're all working together. We're doing this together for the first time. Let's just stay positive and make sure that we do what's best for our community and our children. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: While you're looking, I think it's very important that Councilman Marks brings up a good point. The difference between having meetings here, this is our job. This is open for the community to get things done, whether it's voting, whether it's councils, city school committee meetings. What Council Marks, I believe, is bringing up is an option. We have options whether to keep those schools closed and making sure that we're taking our precautions to the total responsibility that we have to make sure they're safe and clean. The difference of having people in this building, this is where we do the people's work. Not to rent for a outside church group that's not even from Medford, or whether it's from Medford or not, or whether it's an athletic program or a dance or whatnot. These are things that, what I'd like to ask the health director, and I'll do that via email if she's not on, is I'd like the protocol that she used to allow 400 people to enter our schools. But then limit this body to close the doors for the people that want to come to a podium. So everybody here in this room, everybody in this room, they've been putting themselves out there. They're shopping in supermarkets. They're handing out ballots. They're coming to these meetings. So we know. That if that's the case, this building should be open. So this is going to be interesting to see what our Board of Health Director is going to answer these questions, because I, too, agree with Councilor Marks. The job that's done in this room is the business. The job that's going outside in those schools right now, that's for profit. And I don't think that's the equivalent for safety. I just don't. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President. Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, I did have discussions with the union president, and I think they're waiting for the word on the air quality test as well. So I think everybody's on the same page, but I believe they haven't heard back from the administration about any of the results, and I think we're still waiting for those. So I think that once that's done, I think we'll have a better understanding what the teachers union And I think that for the discussions I've had with different teachers, if they get those assurances, I'm sure they want to get back to school too. So I've talked to many of them and they want to get back to the classroom. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I'd like to thank Councilman Knight for bringing this up. What a great young man and working for Method Recreation and the boys at Duggar Park and Eddie's family and friends. I know how important he was to everybody. And just a great, great young man. So my prayers to his family and our condolences. And I appreciate Councilor Marks bringing up Mr. Puccio's name. I know that it's tough when you don't have week after week meeting and people pass on in between. So this has been very difficult, but what a great person, left a great legacy. His kids are committed, they're men and women that are committed to our community and making sure that they're giving back. And that's because he instilled that sense of community, and I think that he'll solely be missed. So my condolences to the Puccio family too, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So I spoke with our state delegates with Councilor, Representative Donato and Representative Garbale. I think that I asked them for permission to hold a committee. a subcommittee meeting on transportation to bring them back because the exact words they used, that they were lied to by the administration of the T. So that's bothersome considering those gentlemen and And their partner in crime and Christine Barber have other people that make sure they get their funding needed to make sure their business runs. So these are the MO, this is the MO for the T that they promise and don't fulfill what they've asked, what they say when they come in. I know that we have many resolutions that can show that, so I did talk to our representatives and did talk to a few people that traversed that route. And if we can, I know that we're very fortunate we have our city clerk that knows all the ins and outs and the people that need to be called. So I'm going to call on Adam Hurtubisees, if he can, to help us again. To get those people that we need at a table, I think that before we do that, I think we need to do a ridership study that shows the numbers. I know the numbers are down right now, but that doesn't mean, that really doesn't mean anything because like we're saying, it's quality instead of quantity now. So we need those buses and We'll be calling for a subcommittee meeting. They're ready to go whenever you are, Council President, where we can find a date that's open and get those representatives at a table to answer a lot of questions. I mean, we're also waiting for the Department of Transportation to still give us an answer on, ready, south of Maine. So as we're seeing traffic pick up now, there was a lull, so there wasn't a outcry, but as you're seeing the traffic uptick that we're going to start seeing some issues again. It's something we need to do. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I also neglected to- I also neglected to offer that as amendment too, that our clerk reach out to the state delegates who already know and the representatives from the T to one, begin by putting a study, a ridership study together and be prepared to hold a subcommittee on transportation as soon as possible. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll take that former Chief of Staff too.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you for my colleagues for bringing this forward. I think that I too talked to City Clerk and our administration. I think this is important that I think Councilor Caraviellol hit the nail on the head. This isn't. the elections of old, and I know that when you see Adam Hurtubise like I did on election day, it hurt me just watching him pound the pavement. So his staff works super hard and he puts in the extra hours, but I think sometimes hard work and overdoing it hourly isn't the answer. I think it's making sure that we give him the tools that are going to make them successful. Because again, what you're seeing, especially in today's society, you're opening yourself up for a lot of negativity and a lot of negative feedback. So especially with this upcoming presidential election, we want to make sure that we have everything in order so we eliminate any of the negativity. So again, I appreciate it, and I thank Claire Kurterbees and the staff for doing the work that they do, and I concur with Councilor Marksley. I think it's a great idea. We move forward with it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Falco, to keep things positive, we are in a chambers where we are protected by glass, with an open seat, where I am at least 8 to 10 feet away from Councilor Knight. I'm 15 feet away from Councilor Morell. There's nobody else around me. No one else around me. There's PPE equipment all over the room that we can use.
[George Scarpelli]: We agree with Councilor Bears with having the opportunity to have many options that people need.
[George Scarpelli]: So even if there's people scattered out here, six feet apart, and even if it's the five people that can't make these meetings, this is the reason why we had the issue months ago at the budget meetings. Cuz people have an option to come to these chambers.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Mr. President. Point of information, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: The intent of the resolution was fine, but to respond that people and social media responding to our fellow colleagues and saying even that I'm masked, that's a joke, that's hypocrisy. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, President Falco, and thank Councilor Knight for bringing this up. I do have a concern to follow up with this. I got a few emails this week, a little too late to put it on the agenda, but it might help if we could, Councilor Knight would allow me to amend it to ask the, the code enforcement officer, if they can go out. I know that some of the Jersey barriers, I believe, in West Medford, I was told that it doesn't suffice for our residents in wheelchairs. So I believe we have a few people in West Medford that traverse that area, and unfortunately, couldn't make their way in front of a restaurant. So if we can ask our city administrations, please, just to go out there and measure just to make sure that we're in compliance. I think that beautification is important, but we still have to have safe pathways for our residents, especially our residents that need assistance to maneuver through that area. So if you can, I make that as a motion if we can. Thank you. I have no opposition. I have no opposition to the amendment, Mr. President. Thanks, Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, just to reaffirm what Councilor Knight said, we appreciate all the effort to keep the businesses afloat and keep them going, but is there a way that maybe we can use some of that money to commission some of our high school students, our talented artists that have gone out and painted these utility boxes. That might be an avenue that we could really help with those Jersey areas. They're so talented. You see it all over this community in different ways. Maybe that might be an avenue that we can really invite our our community and we have so many of these blocks that might be something that if there's a way that the city can make that work or if that that we could you know bring some kids in for community service or or uh anything that uh would help that but just a suggestion thank you thank you council Scarpelli uh let's see any other questions from the council comments from the council okay seeing and hearing now we have a comment uh question from
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Scarpelli. If we could if we can ask. As soon as this happens, if we could amend this paper, and ask the school committee superintendent to please. I'll be a little clearer with our administrators, our teachers, our students, and our parents. I think that there's so much going on with COVID and, you know, starting a school and what's been happening. Parents not sure who the teachers are going to be. You have administrators that don't know who's going into different classrooms. So if we can have an update sent to all the parties as quickly as possible to eliminate at least that fear and that unease in our kids and our parents and our teachers and administrators, I think it'd be very helpful. So thank you for bringing this forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Just on teacher reassignments and dealing with the budget. I think that's very important. So if we can do that, that's all. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. So, correct me if I'm wrong, Alicia, but could this money be allocated for any adjustments that are needed for getting the buildings prepared for COVID? Is that, you know, to get our kids back into the schools?
[George Scarpelli]: So- Bathrooms, stuff like that.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so Mike, and that's what I was coming to. I know that part of the issue that I've heard was that the HVAC system had to be updated at the high school to make sure it's safe for our students and teachers to return. Is that correct? So is it, is that- They could use it for that.
[George Scarpelli]: All right. Do you know if that's something they're looking at, do you know, or is that, you don't know?
[George Scarpelli]: This is what I'm getting at, Mr. President. And forgive me for all your hard work, Alicia, but I would rather, for one person, I'd rather see our school committee prioritize what we need to get us in the building and then come to the city council for appropriation for the fact that I think it's as much as individuals want their own individual projects go through. I think right now as a community, we all need to be working to make sure that the air quality is acceptable so our kids can get back to school. And I think that giving an open checkbook to the school committee, I don't have much faith in that. So that's why I probably won't be voting on this. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Good afternoon, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: All due respect, Alicia, I appreciate everything you do, and I know this really doesn't reflect on you at all, but here we are almost to September 1, and we're still talking about what the school committee has to do to prioritize to get our kids back in school, because we've heard nothing. And this is what I'm saying. I think that if putting a priority and getting their list to us to have us vote on it. We'll move that quicker. I think that's the way we should go because I, like again, like we're late in the game. We're really late in the game and we still have a lot of very confused parents and teachers and administrators out there. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Second, Council President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. There were some questions that when I asked, it was already taken care of. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Seconded, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Second, Mr. President. Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Flanagan? Good evening. Yes, good evening.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I hate to interrupt, but Mr. Mochi, if let's say my neighbor who has a house that is 80 years old and she's a senior citizen and she needs to redo her windows, we have to now wait and get approval from the historical mission to get approval to get these. This could be a huge burden, financial burden on our seniors. The only reason why I know this. as my brother-in-law purchased a home, didn't know it was a historical site, and what would have cost him $5,000 for windows turned into over $25,000. I find this a little scary.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President. Let me, let me, uh, thank you, Mr. President. This is difficult doing, uh, our meetings and zoom by phone. It's terrible. So you don't want to at times that someone's speaking, you have a difficult time to try to jump in. So I, I appreciate, and I understand the black lives matter, uh, statement and it means so much because as I talked about uh... and many meetings the the discussion that i've had with my my friends uh... of color and talking to my uh... uh... black colleagues in and and former players in players in talking about you know the the actual black lives matter uh... banner it it it's funny how You can hear, I forgot, I apologize, the last speaker who just spoke, you can hear the intense hurt in her voice and that breaks my heart because as I talk to my friends that are black and we debate these concerns or lack of concerns, You get, it falls into two sides, and that's what you're seeing happening in our community right now. You have people like the young lady who just spoke where, you know, how dumb are we? When it's affecting people in our community, how could we not want to support the Black Lives Matter sign? But at the same time, to bring in the politics of this, you do have organizations and my friends of color that have told me they felt that they're using this statement as a political movement. Whether it's Medford, whether it is in Medford, as I talk to them, there is a divide. There's a divide in the black community about the Black Lives Matter, from the people I've talked to, my friends that I've talked to, and it's sad to the fact where I'm getting texts right now from Black members in our community, I won't say their names, that are telling me that All Lives Matter means it should be thrown away. Of course it should be. I would never, ever use the All Lives Matter in the context we're speaking in right now. Because we do have racial issues in our country. But I think it's important that We still have to understand this is a governing body that wants to support everybody in our community. But we also want to make sure that, like council said, we go through the process. And again, it's comical because for me talking, you've got to be careful what you're going to say. And I've said this when I first started running for office. I'm going to do what's right in my heart for what I think is best for the city of Medford. When I was a school team member, it was best for the kids in Medford. Now it's for everybody in Medford. And I have to live with the decisions I make, right or wrong. But it's comical that in a past meeting that I had hundreds of phone calls from my former players and my friends of color that said, George, why didn't you respond to that woman that called you a racist? And I said, geez, I'm sorry, my dog was barking and I happened to let my dog out and I couldn't defend myself. And I find myself sitting back saying, to use my background and what I've done for people, white, black, yellow, green, what I've done for people I would never use as a platform. But when it affects your family and affects your kids, And they're being talked about or brought out for something somebody says, the people that don't know each other. It stopped dividing this community. And the point that I'm trying to make is very simple. Black lives do matter. And as I stand with my friends of color, they know George Scott probably knows that. As a city councilor, I know that I want to follow the process that Councilor Marks has put forth. But again, Medford needs to start to heal. And we need to start to bring Medford back together again. There's a reason why everybody moved to Medford. Medford is a great community. We love Medford, all of us. All of us. Whether you're fighting for your own social causes, or whether you've lived here for 35 years, it doesn't matter. We have to find a common ground to bring Metro back together. Because I've heard so many people, the disappointment in our elderly, in our people that have just moved to the city, to say that, why are we so divided? We need to come together. So we need it from the leadership. Now the male will follow this process, and then we will follow this process. And if the Black Lives Matter sign hangs in Medford, and that now sends a message to everybody in our community that we stand together with Black lives, that's the process we went through. And we shall be proud of that. But at the same time, to say, everybody say that this isn't a political statement, this is what's dividing us. Because A, it is, and then B, the people that are looking at it the other side, they're not looking at it as how to help our black brothers and sisters. It's being looked at to say, well, let's look at that political group that's breaking our community down. And in a sense, yes, it does make some people look racist. And I don't think that's the intent. Unfortunately, I'm not naive. Racism does exist. But I tell you, when I talk to my friends of color, and I talk to them, and how sad it is when they tell me that their kids are afraid to go to school because of one reason or another, or our white kids are afraid to go to school because they're put on a list that they've used a racial slur. It's dividing this community. We need to find something that's going to bring this together. So if we can follow through with Councilman Moxley's suggestions, and we make sure we dot our I's and cross our T's, and that's the resolution that we now hang the Black Lives Matter at Methodist City Hall, and that's the way we go. We need to find a way to stand together and heal and stop dividing. So believe me, I work in the community that first put that banner out, and I'm telling you, whatever you want to think, whether you're white or black, I heard from every single color that came to talk to me that looked at that as a platform instead of what's really intended for. And it divided people in that community, both black and white. And black people were for it, and black people were against it. So this is bigger, this is made up bigger than it really is. And it has, and it shouldn't. So all I beg to everybody in our community is let this take its course. And let's find a way to all come together and heal. Because when we voted on making making, um, uh, announcing, uh, racism, uh, public health emergency. I voted no on that. And I got feedback because I'm racist, but here we are here. We are months later. And like I said, nothing has been done as a community. We've done nothing to bring people together. I've asked for our black leaders in our community. I've asked for our black leaders in our schools to find a way that we can meet together with social distancing with the COVID. We could use that excuses to a blue in the face, but we need to meet together with the police chief, the superintendent of schools, the mayor, the city council, the school committee, everybody that makes the decision. So we all understand how we need to heal. And I know one council said, shame on you want, you want, now you want people to people of color to teach us what's wrong. Yes, we need to. Because that color of skin does not match theirs. And we've never lived what they're living through. So I apologize. Overly winded Mr. President, but I thought I knew that had to be said. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: And again, Mr. President, I'm going to say, if I can interject, and I appreciate Councilor Morell for saying that, but it's easy to say what you just said. But the truth of the matter is, it is a political statement. Unfortunately, it is. We could all say it's not, but unfortunately it is, on both sides. So we need to find a way to get through this and stop hailing from that. We have to acknowledge this stuff and move forward. Thank you. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Mr. President, if I can. And this is what I'm talking about, Mr. President. A figure of speech has turned into something that I now have to read about racism. I've worked 35 years helping kids of color of the Latino race, Asian individuals. I've helped hundreds, if not thousands of kids. I've sat in their living rooms. They sat in my living rooms. They've cried to me for issues of race. They've come to me for guidance. I've gone to them for guidance. When we talk about race, I don't look at a book and read a book about race. I sit with my brothers and sisters that I coached and taught for 35 years. So when I say the people that called me racist, are there ignorant people that don't know George Scarpelli? Just because this Councilor wears his heart on his sleeve and will say what needs to be said does not make me weak because I'm a white privileged man. It makes me understand what we need to do to move forward and that is what I've learned by talking to my friends of color that I've talked to that they've sat at my dinner table and had dinner with my kids. So my son and daughter walk into a room, they don't see a color and thank God for that because we've always had an open door policy in the Scarpelli house that everybody was welcome. I never looked at a kid because of his color, the color of their skin. So maybe I have to educate people in who I am as a person. I don't need a book. I'll read it just to enlighten me a little, but to understand when I deal with racism, I deal with racism standing across the boys and girls, the men and women that I've helped in my life. That's who George Scarpelli is. George Scarpelli, when I brought up the racial comment, That was offensive to all the kids that I've helped in their lives, getting them into college, helping them fill out the FAFSAs. I envisioned, I've sat through systemic racism for 35 years as a high school soccer coach, trying to help kids get into college universities. So these are the concerns that I have with people in the community right now that have tagged people like George Scapelli and others as racist when you don't know who they are as people. So yes, we need to grow. We need to help. We need to make movement because there are racial issues in this country, in this community. But please, let's find a way to come together and not divide. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Mr. President. Again, and this is why when people speak from their heart, it's taken from the people's vision that's across them that they want to correct. When I say this, I do not, I've never in my life used about me. What I'm telling you, the education that I've gotten about racism doesn't come from anybody else, but the people that I work with every day. So I don't question who I am as a person and I'm not trying to defend myself or protect myself. I'm trying to enlighten the people that don't know George Scott belly to let them know that I've gone out and I've listened to people and I understand what they want.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: The clarification, especially this evening, I think that it is time to move forward and pass this on to the next step so we can get this process to fruition. So it's something I know that the Mifflin Brewing Company has been waiting for. And I think that the truth of the matter is it is time and it would seem to be prohibited if we didn't try to find our ways to make sure that we take care of the organizations that stuck with us through thick and thin. So, you know, I wish them the best of luck as we keep moving forward with the light stabilizers that they need, but I'm willing to move forward with this this evening. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, so... Mr. President, I guess we've lost the feed too, I'm told.
[George Scarpelli]: The feed for the television.
[George Scarpelli]: I guess the quarters ran out.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: So bear with me if I don't hear.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Ditto, Mr. President. If I can indulge you. Yes, Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. And I appreciate you entertaining the option of Council night's resolution and tabling. So obviously, this is a lightning rod that we've gotten multiple emails, multiple phone calls. In times of disarray, and we're looking at these times, probably the worst budget in Medford history, we received phone calls from multiple people, emails, I'm sure my colleagues have, about the fear that they would not be heard. And the focus on myself, speaking for myself, was never was never to drown anybody out, to hurt our committee, to not to stop some sort of a process. We were elected as elected officials to make sure every person is heard. And believe me, I appreciate the 200 people to 300 people that are on calls, and we've been on calls together. But the understanding was very simple, just to make sure we can spend some time to make sure that we could find an avenue that everybody is heard. Now, that's no slight to you, Mr. President. I know you've tried very hard. But this is something we have to look at either with the mayor and the city administration, yourself, our Councilors, the four that haven't shown up to the budget. These are issues that we have to address. But I think what's important right now is that we work together to try to get this budget heard with the people in place. And again, I'm going to follow with my colleagues and say, as we move forward, I know the constituents that elected George Scarpelli understand my integrity, my desire, and my love for this community, that I'm going to do what's best for every single person. And to be honest with you, I'm sure that's true with everybody on our council. So to see and hear the negativity, because a group doesn't believe in the same beliefs that you do, that they want to make this a different issue. I've been saying this for weeks, council president. Please, please, to my colleagues in the city council, please, to my colleagues on the school committee, do not divide this community. And what has happened is something simple as a process, a simple process to make sure everybody is heard. has turned into an ugly creature in our community that I've been called, my credibility's thrown out, that this council of four members have been looking to do something underhanded, or that I'm stopping the process of something that a group wants to speak about, or the fact that I'm racist because of this, and the best one ever, my kids love this one, because of my weight. that some reason that I didn't show up to these meetings because of my weight. So it's absolutely comical. I love the city of Medford. I've done everything as a teacher, as a coach, as a volunteer, as a school kid member, as a city council to do what's right for the city of Medford. We've had some divide in this community. A few weeks ago, there were some issues about an issue that came through the school committee. that I will publicly say I don't disagree or I don't agree. But the problem that brought this issue forward was the lack of transparency that people that wanted to be heard couldn't be heard because things were pushed through. So whether you believe in the issue or not, that's not the point. The point is, when I started in this position, When we started together on the school committee, we made sure we were the platform for every single citizen. And what we saw and what we're seeing now is an organization dividing our community. And we need to find a way to fix that. We need to find a way to meet with organization people from that group and sit together. Because I've talked to a few of them just recently. and had great conversation, had to understand, to agree, to disagree. We're all on the same page.
[George Scarpelli]: When I find out that group, Mr. President, I'm sure I'll share with it because I haven't been directed exactly what that group is. This is what I've been told from phone calls and emails that I've been getting. So when I do find out, I would love to share with everybody in the community. But right now, this committee, our city council, right now, needs to find a way needs to find a way to bring this group together. I've had too many phone calls telling me, what happened to Medford? Why are we so, why are we split? So I think right now, Mr. President, with your leadership, I think moving this forward and people understanding, listen, you don't have to agree with me. That's okay, that's the process. But to understand, to think that I was delinquent in my duties, I applaud my duties because I work for every member, not for people that have their agenda and hope to push that agenda forward, Mr. President. So I thank you for listening to us. I understand this last week has been troublesome for everybody. We've had a lot of sleepless nights, but at the same time, I think we have something on the table that if you can, you and Councilor Caraviello can work the administration, And again, Councilor Knight, Councilor Marks said, I will gladly follow your lead moving forward. The people that have asked to be heard, they know that we put forth that concern, and we have to move on with that. So thank you for your time. Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that people, I think that point of information, I didn't name a Councilor. I didn't name an organization. If my fellow Councilor feels guilty about something, then he should feel guilty.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, thank you, just to reiterate what Councilor Caraviello said, I know the commission works very hard and they keep all of our citizens as a first priority and with the budget and financial impacts to each community member being negatively affected, keeping that at 3% is a blessing. So thank you so much to them and well done with this paper, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Ms. Donahue, I appreciate your comment, but again... Ms.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry. I see Donahue, I apologize. But just for clarification for myself, I think that the understanding that we had calls and emails about having the ability to try to do something in person, because we do have, even if it's one person, even if it's one person. This is great. Believe us, we love the idea that we have 246 people on Zoom, but if there's one person that can't access this that wants to be there in person and we can find a way to do both, why is that a concern? Why is that an issue?
[George Scarpelli]: that has contacted us, that feels that they have been constrained because of this, and they feel that being somewhere in person, that they make that choice to be there, using the social distancing format, using that in place for us. Do you think, is that a problem? I don't see that as a problem.
[George Scarpelli]: Absolutely not. I never said to limit that access.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, if I can, I don't know what the confusion is. I think and I support having a Zoom meeting that we're having as part of our deliberation, but adding the piece that those people that that don't want to do it this way, that have the ability, that want to come to a format in person with the council, with the finance team, in a safe format. Why is that an issue?
[George Scarpelli]: No, I'm going to disagree with you. I think that we have shown precedence in our community over the past few weeks. When we need to stand up when seeing injustice and we need to talk about issues, then we do that as a community. And we did that.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Mr. President. Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. So I believe it's Alicia. I heard you speak. I'm sorry, Alicia. I heard you speak, and I appreciate. I know you spoke in the City School Committee meeting, and you're a very educated woman. I believe you're a teacher. And if you were in a situation where you have your classroom of 20 students, and 19 were getting what they wanted, but you had one student that showed an and intention that they weren't being heard. How would you feel about that? Would you be as a teacher? Would you fight? Because I heard you speak. Would you fight and do anything you can to make sure that student is heard? Would you? It's yes or no.
[George Scarpelli]: It's a really simple question, and I'll get to that. I'll get to my, why the reasoning, but would you really fight for that person? I would fight, but I would start with a statement of intention. My response would be, my intention is my intention. It was my, I know we heard what you said, and Councilor Caraviello already stated that, and you said you weren't doing it that way. So I'm gonna take your word for it that it wasn't an action of intent insult. But what I'm saying is, We made decisions, at least I made decisions on my own, because like you said, for that one student, for that one representative of the community that voted for me or didn't vote for me, they want a voice. Not to say that it's not in Zoom, because I think all of us believe that if you feel that you're unsafe, you should be in Zoom. The question we had during this process is giving the voice to that one person that doesn't want or needs to be in that room. That's all. So I appreciate the comment. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Mr. President. Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. Again, please. We did not. I did not coordinate anything with anybody. Please stop doing that. This is the second time it's been said. We did not, this is something, as a matter of fact, one of the constituents who called me, and I appreciate you bringing it up, is a person with hearing issues that asked for this meeting in person because they felt more comfortable watching the facial reactions because it's not reflected on Zoom sometimes if you're not on the first screen or the second screen. So I applaud that, but please, I made my decision on my own. My fellow Councilors said it again. We did not do anything underlying that has been stated somewhere out there. All we're doing is making sure that everybody's involved. That's it.
[George Scarpelli]: So I know that's been said a few times. The one person is a figure of speech. It was many people. So just make that clear. I apologize if I'm confusing anybody, but this is one is just a figure of speech.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Sophie, for speaking tonight, but not at one time did I mention Let's make an unhealthy choice and put people in a small room and with COVID being such a dangerous situation. I'm a son of a mother that has diabetes. I'm one of only two caregivers. So I understand fully how to take precautions and be safe so I don't put her in harm's way. Believe me. So I never said that we're going to meet, that we should meet in a small room. That's not an intent. The intent again, because this is what I find a little disheartening. We're trying to not divide and to stay together. But the same thing keeps coming up. We had questions. So during the procedures, I talked about this at the beginning, we a month before the budget, months before the budget, wanted to have something in person. As the process carried on up until this past week, We were hoping something would come out that we could have both a Zoom and an in-person meeting to try to have Councilors in a safe location where they could be social distance away with a mask. We would have the constituent that has a question to approach the rail, which is more than 10 to 15 feet away, where they can take their mask off and interact with the council. And we have plenty of room that if we just that we would move our financial group and our speakers to one side. So the process is just even to evaluate that, to look into that. But personally, I didn't feel like that was heard. So I took the stand that I'm not going to show at a meeting where a person or people, not one person, God forbid I say one person, that people are not heard.
[George Scarpelli]: I we also have families We also have other things that are going on. I'm also Saturday night Sunday morning Sunday evening if I didn't return your email, I apologize, but I've been listen to the communities, communities applaud. I got a lot of emails. I got a lot of phone calls. I spent a lot of time away from my family. Like I said, I'm one of only two caregivers to my mom. So Saturday and Sunday, my sister's a teacher who just got moved by the way. So my sister's a teacher. So I try to find time that I could spend with my mom. So I tried as much as I could, many times I could to try to
[George Scarpelli]: Didn't have like 10 minutes to issue a statement? Again, I'm gonna share this with you, that unfortunately, Councilor Falco and I have worked together for over 11 years. We've worked very well together. But the conversation Councilor Falco and I had, unfortunately, There was a misunderstanding that he asked, George, are you coming to the Zoom? And I said, no. He was meaning my Somerville Zoom meeting in my municipal job that I work in. So that was a clear misunderstanding, something that we both didn't know. I was offended with Councilor Falco. I'm sure he was offended by my actions. But at the same time, these are the things that lost and
[George Scarpelli]: I was on all three I was waiting on all three and again, I wasn't going to go to those meetings I don't understand why you don't understand by going to those meetings. I
[George Scarpelli]: There's over 200 calls and emails and phone calls both for and against and there's a lot of people that were for that supported me I am I'm not calling me if I did if I spent all that time doing that it took time away from my family I'm not saying to answer each individual email.
[George Scarpelli]: So again, so Tuesday night, the meeting Saturday, Monday, today, tonight, I felt it was appeasable for I to make my comment and statement tonight. If that doesn't suit you, Sophie, there's nothing I can do about that. So we can agree to disagree and move on. My statement was made for tonight. That's it. So I can reach all the constituents that are on the call, that are at home watching the video. And if it doesn't suit you, and I don't have your support again, or ever, that's fine. That's life. And we move on. That's what being an elected official is. So we can move.
[George Scarpelli]: But I'll tell you what, if I had the same situation like this where constituents that felt that they weren't being treated fairly, then I would do the same exact thing.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. And Zach, thank you for your question and your concerns. I, whether you, whether you agree or disagree with me, that's, that's, that's democracy. But this is my statement. This evening is where I held for my statement. So that's what I did. And if it's not not to your standard, that's okay, too, because you know what? Whatever we need to do to find a way to break the divide and get everybody back together. This is what I said. Like again, I've been saying this for weeks. Please be careful to our community because what we're hearing what we're seeing was dividing us. So thank you very much. I appreciate it, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, if I can. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, and I appreciate your comments, Michelle. What I'd like to do is make it known that I'm actively securing a disinfectant and cleaning company that works directly with COVID. to work with ever format if we do decide to be in a location that's live, that they will disinfect before and after they will provide PPE for any participant that needs it and at no cost to the city. So I just want you to know if it does happen that I've already made some moves to try to make sure those concerns are covered. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Diane. Mr. Council President? Yes, Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, Diane, thank you very much. And again, if that's what it takes to heal, I apologize. to all of the community if I offended them in any way by the actions we had. So again, but I hope you understand there was no ill intent, there was no ill will, but I understand the reasons why people that did speak tonight have expressed that. So thank you for coming forward tonight. I appreciate that.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't mind. I don't mind Council Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: I too, I think that we talk about the new councilors and the older councilors. The truth of the matter is we're all councilors. And I welcome, I've worked with John. I think me and you have been gone through some really tough times, both in the school department and now in the council. And I think that You know, sometimes when a significant other butt heads, I think that, you know, you get angry with each other and I think that we need to mend some fences, I think. But I think that Councilor Morell and Councilor Beaz, you bring a vision that I think that we should be open to listen and I appreciate that. But, you know, for my fellow councilors that took a stand, the truth was, I think Dean, Dean said it right early Dean talking early when you know, sometimes it's tough to make a decision That's not going to be popular, but that's what we do for our job. So Brian just so to the inequities and I've had the fort I'm fortunate to work in a community where I teach kids of color I teach And I work with our multicultural community in Somerville. And we've faced as a soccer coach and head of recreation, we faced a lot of adversity and racism. And to be honest with you, I have a different insight than most. I would, you know, if I had time to read books and and it would help me, but the truth is, I sit down with a lot of kids and parents of color or Latino descent. we talk about different avenues. And I know that that's one of the reasons why I'm pushing for a forum. And I know that Councilor Rao made a comment that it's, you know, at the time that, you know, we don't need our people of color to be teaching us. But I, to be honest with you, I use that as a learning tool to help me understand these difficult times we're going through, and how I can relate as a privileged white man, and how I can help them. So it's been a very eye-opening last few weeks, and like Councilman Knight said, this is our job. We signed on to it. people might not agree with what I do, what I say, but it's what people entrusted me, that voted me in to do so. Thank you very much for bringing that full circle again, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you. I believe there was a in the chat room. Someone was very angry with me shame shame shame I because I guess I was muted when I said thank you council Morell for the kind words But I'll stop committee meeting Most of her back the regular business motion of council tonight to revert back to the regular order business second if I can Second my council appears quicker to be split scuttle
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, and thank you, Councilor Caraviello for bringing this forward. I know that to jump to my second piece, I did receive a bunch of emails that a school committee member sent out stating this year we are facing a $3.5 million budget that the cuts are right now, the school committee and superintendent cannot direct city funding, only the mayor and the city council. So what's happening is people taking that comment, whichever way that school member meant to put that out there, the way that it's going out to the public is again, it's starting that divide. It's what's wrong with the city council? Why are you not funding these people? Why, what are you doing? We need this. So again, it's been a very difficult last couple of weeks, but I tell you what, this is where we do not have to go as a community. This is so disheartening. I'm sorry, Councilor Falco, the One Medford, it's so farthest from the truth right now. It's so disheartening. That's what I've heard for the last three nights especially. I'm telling you that please, maybe the city solicitor, can reach out to the mayor with a highlight of what the role of the city council is during the budget in comparison to the school department. Because I know when we were on the school committee, we were given a tutorial and we understood exactly what the process was. Brings me to my first point. In the late 1990s, early 2000s, I was given my pink slip as a teacher in the city of Medford. It's probably the most devastating feeling you'll ever, ever feel. It's a helpless feeling. And I, too, are getting all the emails. I have former colleagues calling me and relatives calling me and saying, George, what are we doing? We'll know more as soon as we start our process on Saturday, I believe. if you correct me from wrong, I believe we're starting our process on Saturday on the city side.
[George Scarpelli]: But I want people to understand, we as a council will do everything we can to make sure that we're supporting our colleagues in city government. I think that as myself, I'm speaking for myself, but I have skin in the game like most of our councils here. We have children that are in the school system. My son's a senior. When I found out today, one of the cuts is we do not have a head of guidance at Medford High School. To me, that's appalling. I think that's terrible, especially what we're seeing, what's going to happen as kids return back to school. with the COVID crisis and not having someone in that position to lead what needs to be led is to me a very, very slippery slope. But again, again, I have to sit back as a Councilor and look at this objectively and say, this is very difficult. We're asking the school system to cut three and a half million dollars from a budget. So everybody's, I've also gotten contact that, you know, I got one email saying that we drastically underfund the school system for years while the city gets fatter and fatter. I don't know if it was meant literally, but I'm going to tell you something. We haven't been, we are on, we are on a thin line when it comes to fire, police, DPW. But we also will be looking at the same difficulties in the next few weeks. So I caution everybody to be alarmed, because I'm alarmed as a parent. As my former colleagues and friends, they're alarmed as teachers. The word gets out to the children, they're alarmed. My children are alarmed from what they've heard some of the teachers that were cut. So what I'm saying is, Let's stay focused. Let's try to get through the next couple of weeks the best we can, not pitting each other against each other, and try to find a way that we can all work together and try to do the best we can in these trying, trying times. We're no different than Brookline or Winchester or Somerville. Everybody's cutting, everybody. And I know we're all waiting for the governor to come down and say, if the federal government's not gonna do it, I'm gonna pull a billion dollars out of the rainy day account, and I'm gonna fund education. I'm gonna send funding right down to the cities and towns to bring them back. We can only hope, we can wish, but that's a possibility. But again, I'm gonna say it again, please, we've often had school commembers on this meeting in these falls. I hope somebody's here so they can bring it back to their colleagues. Please do not scream the sky is falling and point fingers. Let's take a deep breath as a community find a way to bring it all together, working together to do what's best for our whole community. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I thank you, Mr. President and Vice President Caraviello. I understand what you're saying, but I would, after we go through our process, I would also support the mayor in looking at free cash to assist us in this financial dilemma. But I think right now, not knowing what's happening and to take from ask her to come back and take more with the negative ramifications, especially with our bond rating. I can't support this. I think that, you know, I at least want to sit through Saturday's meeting to see how bad, you know, how bad things look on the city side. So that's the reason why I, not to say that I wouldn't support it moving forward, but right now, like I said, it's, we need to take a deep breath and hear all the sides and then figure this out. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you, Mr. President. Um, just to follow up. I know that my fellow Councilors talked about, uh, Mr. Rabbit and glowing terms, but again, I, I'd have to share those same sentiments. Um, he was someone who kept the city going and people want to know if everything's so difficult and numbers are so, so limited employment here, DPW, how do they make it work? people like Mr. Rabbit is the reason why it works. Like Councilor Knight and Councilor Marks said, he's the guy in the hole. And he's the one that's always coming out dirty, making sure that everything works properly. I saw him a few months back here right on Butler Street and he was, you know, digging right in there and going to work and making sure my neighbors had their water, just had a newborn. And he worked diligently to make sure that everybody was happy. So it's a sad day. It's a sad day because, you know, I remember going to his time and the amount of people that were there and the impact he made on people. And I know, Mayor, I believe Mayor Burke named the date after him in his honor, so he deserves everything he gets. He fought the battle hard, and his family should be proud in that he taught them how to live with dignity in this very difficult time. So God bless him and wish his family luck. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I didn't hear. Thank you. President Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you for the speaker for bringing this forward. Councilor Marks hit the nail on the head as I've been following, working in some of them, following what's going on in Cambridge. And I think it was Councilor Simmons in Cambridge stated that it's a little different in Cambridge. He feels that looking at different police departments, you have different levels. So I'm confident and I'm excited that talking with Chief Buckley, he is willing and ready to listen and move forward some of these important important issues, and I think we're going to be pleased, and I'm excited to see the changes. Again, I asked for a forum a couple of weeks ago. I'm still waiting for the city administration to get back to me. I think it's important that we bring the community members to the table and sit with our administration to make sure we find best practices. On a side note, I want to thank our men and women of the police force. Just this past Sunday, we had a shooting over on Salt and Salt Road, and talking to neighbors and family members that live in that area, the response from both the Medford police and state police were amazing. I know they have a good handle on what happened and who's doing it, who did that, and they're gonna work quickly, but I wanna give them a round of applause because, again, I don't think anybody, a speaker who brought this forward, I don't think anybody is saying that, is not saying that, Thank you for being the first ones in the fire, per se, and sticking your neck out in the hopes of saving lives here in Medford. And I think that we can't look past that. I think that this is a bigger piece, both on the police department side and what's happening in our society.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Falco, Councilor Knight has no, I think he's out.
[George Scarpelli]: In times of tragedy, it's so common there is offer of thoughts and prayers, and when the dust settles, the perpetual systematic failures continue without address. The conversation about race can no longer be a side issue.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. And thank you, James, for applying. And hopefully this works. Some, some of the comments I received is some of the, the artwork that could be posted on the windows and some might tasteful some might be a little questionable and being in that area. That was some of the questions I got from some residents. Do you plan on putting, you know, some, I know artwork is important and people can see your artwork. I think that's important. I think you should be able to do that in a sense. But I think what the fear of some of those neighbors are that some of that artwork might be a little too provocative or risque to put in an area where kids are walking by to go to CB Scoops or to a sub shop. So can you speak to that a bit?
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor. I believe I was just letting you be aware that Aleesha Nunley had her hand up.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Now, with phase two, all in and looking into phase three. And as we approach our official summer vacation, the question I had as I put this resolution through is getting some understanding of what's going on with the recreation department and what programs and the policies and procedures and what we're looking at for the pool rights pond. And since I, As for this resolution, I've had a great discussion with our director of recreation and he has been, Kevin has been great. I know that working with a group of three and spending a lot of his time distributing the food, he's been very busy in the community and I really appreciate their hard work. But I think that as we move forward, we have to get to a sense of normalcy and making sure that we are informed as we move forward of what the policies are at the pool, what the policies are at the pond, how are we going to handle separate camps and activities in the community are going to be very important for all constituents. I know that as we move forward to some sense of normalcy, we have a lot of questions that are coming back from the state level and what we can do at pools and ponds. The regulations right now, we're saying that it's 25% of occupancy at one time. So how we arrange that, I know that our recreation director is working very, very hard. He's got some great ideas, some ideas that we're using as well. And moving forward, I just want to make sure that he gets the assistance from the city administration like he's been getting so far. and getting the word out. So I think that really, it's really keeping everybody informed as we're working through the process. So whatever I just said, it's just adding some information. So I hope to get more information soon. So I just wanted to share that with you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President. Um, I, what have we done so far? Mr. Murphy, we talked to the administration about the, the, the fields. Cause as we're rolling out now that we can have passive activity, um, I know that, uh, you know, we're, we're going to be talking about another resolution coming down the line that I have. And I'll save that till later, but have, have we now started getting the fields in place? You know, if that's happened, you're meeting.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, to follow up with Kevin Bailey, our Director of Recreation, I know that as we're meeting with Mr. Murphy and the PACS Commission, they've told us that They've already started to reach out to little leagues and softball and different organizations. I'm just hoping that, I know it's been a tough time and the city administration has been inundated with so many different issues. I think that it's important that we call for a meeting with all of our youth organizations to make sure we review guidelines, policies and procedures, what's the expectations, and what we need to do moving forward as we get to some sort of COVID-19 normalcy. So I ask that move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. In such an awful time, there's so many different negatives that have come out, so many tragic issues with the COVID crisis. One side note, which is pretty, which was pretty devastating to many young men and women is the, um, the absence of a graduation. Um, and what, what Medford did to honor our seniors the past Wednesday, I think our school department should get a slap on the back and at least giving our seniors something that they can remember. And you know, if it's, um, a group of people that I wanted to mention, Nancy and Joe Donlan, Mr. Blauck, of course, Mr. DeLava, Peter Arcola, former Medford graduate, who owns New Image Entertainment, DJ'd the parade for nothing, came down to Medford, hopped in a trailer, who, by the way, was donated and driven by our favorite dad, Dave Crowley, who whenever you need something, if you see the marching band trailer coming by, it's Mr. Crowley and his dedication to our kids in Medford. And he drove the DJ around the city, and we saw our graduates waiting on main streets in the caps and gowns. And it was about a 10-minute procession of teachers just to come by just so they can wave and congratulate our seniors. Again, a few other people. I know that Mr. Cushing, Peter Cushing, our assistant superintendent. And I know, of course, Lisa Evangelista played a big part in this. But I think the head of guidance, Mo Lavin, Maureen Lavin, who really did a lot to get this going. She's done a great job as the head of guidance. And one thing she wanted to make sure is that we don't forget our kids. And I know it's a small gesture, but again, Method PD, again, helping leading the way, getting them around safely so we can acknowledge them. It was a feel-good story. I wish we could do more for them. But just acknowledging them is so important that it was a great, great morning. It was all over Facebook, live. And I know that families were up and down Fulton Street congratulating our seniors. So again, I just wanted to reach out and say congratulations. And thank you for putting something together for our seniors. And again, for our seniors, best of luck for everything you and you encounter for your future and best best of luck and best wishes. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, and I appreciate the time. question a resolution that It could be looked deeper and it could also be looked at by the public as just lip service so I think that I said I had a statement that that I too feel the murder of George Floyd is an incomprehensible horror that has occurred in our country I'm beyond saddened by the current state of the Union as a father husband son brother and more importantly a human being and It is unfathomable that yet again is discriminatory murders act has occurred. How are we here yet again? We need to have what needs to happen for the census acts of violence to stop. We're being ripped apart by this nation and controversies. These situations remind us that as a privileged white male, I need to first of all acknowledge that my privilege. Secondly, I need to be responsible for how I lead my life and model beliefs and behaviors that support the values of all people, that we're all created equal. So questions come about. It matters how we treat each other. It matters that we teach our children what we teach our children. It matters the words we use. It matters what actions we take. It matters what choices we make now that will actually create a better future. And yes, black lives do matter. In Medford, we need to see some change. We've heard that. And as we talk and bring this resolution forward, we realize that as we listen to young men and women that I've coached and taught, and they express their concerns of racism and inequalities, it opens your eyes. I love the city of Medford and I'm heartbroken that we have our residents continually traumatized and hurt by ignorance. But I'm also wanna make sure that we as a community learn to work together and make sure that we're in this, in looking some of these emails that we're getting a device of in splitting our community where, you know, the whole defunding of the police department and looking at what the budget looks like in the police department. I've talked to the chief. I know we have to look at change. We need to address the way that our police officers might need more professional development when it comes to conflict resolution. I understand we have concerns with how our police officers are being hired, but I think that as we move forward, like Councilor Knight said, I think we need more action. I think that with the mayor's leadership that we need to start a forum with members in our community, a black community that can come out and tell us, as my former students have come and talked to me about and shared those concerns. Now, great, like Councilor Beall says, yep, here's all the white people talking to 14 privileged white people that are in power here at our political level. but I don't see one person of color here. I've got a form letter from people that have concerns. A statement like this, I appreciate it, and I can understand that Councilor Morell and Councilor Beals want to go forward with this. But as I talk to my colleagues in Somerville, there is substance behind what they're going to do. So it's great to send out a statement and talk about this horror and talk about the change. When you sit with a young black man and a young black woman, they tell you that they're afraid sometimes to leave their house if they're gonna come home. And that's an awful way to think. But what I think we need more than ever right now is the action. I think that we should immediately form a community advisory group with our city administrators, our police department, our superintendent, our black leaders in our community, so they can lead us to what is actually wrong. I have two young children that opened up a lot of dialogue, but we need to start moving forward with a discussion, not with just a statement. So I thank you for hearing me and hopefully we see some movement. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I know for the last week, I appreciate everybody's comments and I'm open-minded, but at the same time, A statement is a statement. What I want to make sure that we do, I'm going to make the motion that we refer for a meeting immediately with the Board of Health, the mayor, the police chief, the diversity director, and our school superintendent to address items immediately. I'm going to put my money where my mouth is, and we need to go move forward with this. So I call for my president and our school city council to move that motion, to vote on that motion, and get the conversation started. Not what Somerville put out and what other communities are putting out. Let's do what Medford needs to do to make sure that we are protecting our friends of color and that have been hit with this racial injustice. I think we need to move forward with that. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: No, it's a B paper. I'm not moving to accept this. What I'm hearing from everybody is that we need action. So I agree. So my motion isn't to, um, it's to move forward to get the board of health, the, uh, the mayor's office, the police chief, the diversity director, the superintendent of schools to immediately meet with the suit, with the, with the method city council to start a process by bringing people of color to the table. working with them to make sure that we move to a positive resolution. And this isn't going to take, this isn't going to be a one week issue. This is something that we need to find a way to work both budgetary and socially to move this forward. So thank you, Mr. Clark. Thank you. I hope you got that.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Mr. President. One minute, please. So, okay, so- Almost done. the the imprehensible is that someone was was tragically killed. So that's what's imprehensible. And then the idea of, if you can repeat the comment that you made before, because I thought I misheard you speak, that we're not
[George Scarpelli]: One information, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I think my words are clear. I think that my record speaks for itself. I think that making a motion just to make a motion, as other communities did, I want to go further beyond that. So I think it's more important, yes, that we make that motion to meet with all the representatives to get this forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I think that I I appreciate school committee member Melanie McLaughlin. I think that as we start these conversations, one thing I realized and what I've heard and who I heard from the most and the loudest are our young people, young people of color that really stood up and said, this is what we need. This is the problem. These are the issues, these are the concerns. So I think as we move on with that group, I know that I need to withdraw that B paper. And I want to make that as a motion, please. And I think I misspoke. But having those young people at the table, so yes, we can listen to them. We can invite them to come in. This is what I've done in the last couple of weeks, especially as I'm talking to young men and women of color, I've asked them, as a privileged white man, what do you see? What can help us learn, teach us what we need to learn? Because there's a lot that we need to learn as a privileged white community. So maybe, as they said, listen to them. Bring them as part of the forum. It's the mouths of babes, they're gonna tell you how they feel, and we have to listen. So again, I made a mistake as I spoke early. I motion to move forward with the information that I spoke earlier, Mr. Clerk, and move forward with the resolution, with the motion. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I eliminated the B paper.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, and especially the youth. And the youth. We look to our leadership, our senior leadership, and have our high school students involved in these discussions, because that's what I'm hearing. As I've gone out and talked, I've heard a lot from our students, more than anything. So I would love to have them at that table. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, absolutely. Okay. It's a forum. That's what I'm asking for. A forum with a table where, especially as people have spoken, that people of color don't feel comfortable. in our forum that we need to reach those individuals and bring them to that table so they can share and help us move forward in a positive way, and make Medford a better place to live. So I think it's important that we do that.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I don't think you can.
[George Scarpelli]: I want this separate, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. Thank you, Councilor Bears. Again, with what I've heard, and this is why I'm so animated, is that as I work with uh, strong men of color. And we sit together and they say, you know, George, that's great. Um, we're going to, we're going to, you know, we're going to march and we're going to do this and we're going to do that. But you know what, as the next day comes on, something else is going to happen. It's going to be forgotten. Okay. Because remember when I was a young man, Rodney King was beaten and remember everybody stood up and marched and burned the city down. So I think it's important, and again, I'm gonna stress it. It's important that my friends, my neighbors that have talked to me and said, George, if you're an elected official, talk is great, marches are great, do something. So let's do something. That's why these meetings are important that we have right away. The budget's important, we know that, but we can't let another day go by without finishing this. So thank you. Thank you, council members.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Powell. Again, I support and reiterate what my fellow colleagues have said. But remember, again, we're talking about during the best times that we've seen economically. Our DPW has functioned on the most deplorable number of staff, one being the civil service and renegotiating and reworking that system. But the community should know, no matter what the city has given them, they've come out and done the best that they could do for what we have in Medford. So we really appreciate all their hard work and understand that times are gonna get tougher soon. And we appreciate everything they've done for us. It's been yeoman's work for sure, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Vice President Caraviello. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President, and I thank Councilor Caraviello for bringing this forward. To my Hall of Fame sister, Mae Magelbeck, I appreciate everything she's done for our community, and it's great for our new councils. If you ever meet Mae, she's going to tell you exactly what what is what's best for our community. And it's totally out of total respect and honor and love of our community. So I think she's one of the true gems of our community and a pillar of our community. So I wish her a happy birthday. I know that when we do bring May up, she brings a glow whether it's one of the awards she's received in the past, the council. So it's kind of sad that we're not with May, because we would have invited her up, I'm sure. But she really makes you feel great and understands why you want to work so hard for the city of Medford, because people like May wake up every day that have nothing, has nothing in the game, and making sure that she's volunteering and doing what is the best for our city. It's remarkable. So happy birthday, my friend, and many more. Thank you. Thank you Councilor Scarpelli, Councilor Marks.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Marks, for bringing this forward again. But I know we'll ask probably Mr. Rodriguez to speak in a minute. I know we had a recent conversation of the South Street concerns, and I've talked to the state delegations as well. They're waiting for the final number to come back to see how much it taking to pay for this. That's what I was told, to implement the lights. And that'll be the culmination of correcting that issue. But where we are today is something we've asked for. What I'm gonna do, I would like to make an amendment, if Councilor Marks allows me to, for putting an amendment to this resolution, that we look at the low-hanging fruit and implement these few initiatives, as well as hold a Committee of the Whole meeting with our traffic engineer, our chief of staff, and our police chief to talk about these simple concerns. One, the raised sidewalks to be implemented on South and Main. Yes. Councilor Scott. Can you slow down just a little bit so I can copy these all down? Yep. One is to implement the raised sidewalks. Crosswalks.
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry. The raised sidewalks we asked for and were questioned because of the plowing situation. That was the only concern back when we made this ad months ago. raised sidewalk on Main Street and South Street. On that intersection- Sidewalk or crosswalk? Excuse me, crosswalk. Main Street and South Street, the intersection, and on Main Street and South Street going toward South Medford. on the opposite side of Main Street. It was the narrowing to one lane and adding the traffic posts that go along the side where they would eliminate the parking in front of the police station. That would be eliminated to one lane. So it slows the traffic down to that area. And then paint along that lane. making sure that it is visible, that that is closed, it's not an active lane anymore, and that we look into what is in the study with the police department because the discussion was a crosswalk in front of the police station, which they would implement what's called a rhino light, which is a crosswalking light to be added during the construction, and then it's a simple one-touch when you need to cross to stop that traffic so they can cross in a safe manner. So these initiatives are difficult. I appreciate Council Marks, but I want to commit you the whole if we can to go over these very simple, very cost-effective, initiatives that we've been screaming for, for years. I apologize that, you know, I know Mr. Rodriguez is new, but this is, it's so frustrating when, you know, as the chairperson of the transportation subcommittee, we've had meetings after meetings after meetings with everybody involved. And as the council, as the council elected by the city of Medford, We are asking for, this is simple, right now, in a week, to implement raised crosswalks to those two locations to slow traffic. to narrow the opposite lane to one lane with markings and their three-foot posts that are reflectors. These are simple initiatives that are going to calm that area down. I don't want to hear closing that and making that a right turn only. That's not going to work. We know the state delegates are working on the funding and the process to put traffic lights, signal lights there. We've heard that. We're still waiting. I know they're trying hard. I know there's money involved. But Council Marks put a very thorough timeline of history of this issue. And what I'm imploring to our administration is simple. These initiatives that I made as an amendment are very simple. And truly, the chief will say no, the traffic engineer might say no, whatever might come down. We as a council need to really push these simple initiatives because this is what was told to us. months ago with the state delegates and representatives from DOT that said this is low-hanging fruit that can be done. Period. So I'm actually disgusted right now that we're talking about it again. And I look myself in the mirror and question why I haven't demanded this like I am right now. So what I'm asking for is a Committee of the Whole meeting, if we can, as soon as possible, with the traffic engineers, city administration, DPW director, and our chief of police and traffic. to implement these simple, simple fixes for south of Maine to slow this down. So if I can, I hope I'm rambling. I'm a little, I'm a little motivated, but I hope a clerk her to bees has that. And I moved to make that as an amendment.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Bears. Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Councilor Bears, but I believe the administration set out guidelines in an email, I believe tonight, if Clerk Hurtubise can correct me if I'm wrong, on a reopening plan and what steps they're taking for the safety of our city employees. So they can read it or it is an email. So thank you for putting that forward, Councilor Bears.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I can appreciate the intent of this resolution and the zoning change. But again, I think that council bring up many good points that we need to vet out to get to a final destination. I think that looking at Council's night's point that you know, the the recodification and hiring the consultant now is a very important point But I also agree with Councilor Marks when it doesn't mean that we're going to stand still in the future Zoning questions, but at the same time I think there are enough questions there that are alarming to our neighborhoods and when you're talking about what? can and what can can't happen so I I like the idea to revert it to the board and then get some clarity on a couple of concerns that I have. So again, I thank all the parties involved. This is why this council is doing what we're doing. It's to vet our important issues. And as we can see, this council isn't sitting back. We're making huge strides and moving forward in what our thoughts and beliefs are to move our city forward. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. And again, just to reiterate what my colleagues have said, you're talking about two great people, pillars of our community that have made sure that the political word was spread throughout the community and that we were represented properly here in Medford. And we thank them very much for all their hard work. And again, I echo Council night sentiments. It's uh, it's a sense of relief knowing that um, you know, um representative Donato's Statehouse working for us and and you see his work every single day. So I thank them both for a job well done
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, thanks, Council President, for bringing this forward. Maybe as we wait, we might ask for the temporary raised crosswalks. that were further down central to be maybe placed in that area to slow that, make that a traffic calming measure immediately. And then if I can, Council President, follow up with a resolution I put in months ago with the crosswalk on Locust Street in front of Wegmans. We've asked for some sort of crossing mechanism for for the kids and people that cross over Locust Street from the rink side. There is nowhere to cross in front of the stores. And if we can even put some cones or the traffic slowing cones that people have a chance to cross, because it is a dangerous area. If you don't mind, as a B paper, if we can add that or just add it to your amendment, I'd appreciate that. Mr. Clerk, did you get that?
[George Scarpelli]: No, that's a good idea.
[George Scarpelli]: I was hoping to put this on next week's resolution agenda but I appreciate bringing that stuff tonight. Amelia was a very special person I had the privilege of. being her son's soccer coach in high school and knowing her in that level, then working together at the Osgoode School. She's exactly what Medford's all about. A person that worked very hard in her own home and then made sure she gave back to the community any way she could. And what her and John did, has passed that on to her children. And you see John Jr. walking around working in the city and volunteering his time and doing whatever he can do for the kids in the soccer community, especially, but for all kids. So it's a sad day. I know that John Sr. has been fighting some issues, and he's pulling through. Thank God with that. But, you know, Amelia was a little bit of a shock. I think that it was a quick illness and, you know, it still hurts the same. So she's a great person, someone that I'll miss seeing around the basketball game. She was a devoted grandmother that didn't miss anything and made sure that she represented her family and the city of Medford well. So I send my condolences and I know that the Harris Park community will definitely miss Amelia Prestigiovanni for sure. So God bless her. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I find the records adequately, successfully approved.
[George Scarpelli]: Second that motion, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President and thank you for the I appreciate Councilor Marks bringing this forward. I know that We've talked to many residents who? felt a little slighted Tim with the taking of those parking spaces and We can understand the biggest the biggest draw for myself as well as the bike lane is the intersection of Ruben Street and High Street and having an identified crosswalk and a uh an area now that people are going to have to stop the way they're going to reconfigure that area so i think that is a huge plus it's a it's a to me a huge safety issue we have right now um and and with council mox's uh remarks with the with the with the turn I think it's very important and I too was I to talk to a few of the neighbors and the Request I appreciate how it's a mark soon as homework and getting chief Buckley to read to consider the parking overnight I think that's important. So Again, it's all the Brooks parents. We we heard you loud and clear It wasn't at any point that we thought that you know, we don't want to move forward with such you know an initiative, but we also have to make sure that They had to know that we got into this game really late. And again, once you've clarified the hundred residents that have been informed and have an end product with the taking of the land, the continuation of the bike lane to make it a true bike lane where I too shared Council Mark's concerns with the dangerous situations. And then looking into that evening parking and the configuration of the high movement, I think it's a no-brainer. So I too will support this project. And again, I thank all the Brooks parents that originally started this years ago, because I don't know if any of the parents that originally started this project are even in, you know, their children still go to the school. So again, I applaud those parents and moving forward with this initiative. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I agree with Councilor Marksley and Councilor Naidoo, but I remember, you know, Councilor Falco, I remember the tradition, it was the Friday of Father's Day weekend and then the vote of the school committee was that Monday. That was that's what the deal was and we didn't like it then and as this as the we started the process as city councilors We didn't like the process either. I I will tell you the reason why I would like to see this information from our department heads Because this is what other communities are doing. I've sat with my department. We've gone through a five percent ten percent twenty percent reduction With a level funded budget from last year. So it prepares us so we all know we're all frightened of what's going to happen or what could happen But at least we're prepared as a department that I am the assistant running that department and getting prepared to, as the time runs out and the state is dragging their feet and the federal government hoping for a buyout, I think we need the opportunity to see what's in front of us, to see what we need. And I don't think, you know, the fear is there anyway. I understand what Councilman Mark's saying. I don't think it's our privy to come out and say, okay, look at the budget fire. We're going to have to cut 20 people, God forbid. But it's also, understanding what we're going to see in front of us, not at the 12th hour like we have in the past. And believe me, I don't blame this administration at all. I appreciate the hard work they're doing, getting the auditor in front of us and talking to us and giving us forecasts, but I don't see what it will hurt to get this information in front of us right now from all our department heads so we can understand what we're doing. The school department's doing it. They understand the situation they're in. They're meeting with their department heads. They're understanding this situation ahead of time. Why wouldn't we, as a city, be prepared in the same situation for the same situation? So like I said, I know of other communities that are doing a 1-12 budget. They've already announced that. I know communities doing a quarterly budget. They've already announced that. But what we're seeing is at least they're getting minimal information, maximum information that they can receive, so they're prepared to move forward with their thought process. Because this isn't going to be easy. We all know that. We all know that if this stays status quo, this is going to be a difficult, difficult time for our community. And being nervous, you know, as a municipal employee, I'm nervous. I look at our numbers, I'm nervous that I might be losing my job. So it comes with the territory. But I think as city councillors, getting that information in front of us is going to be important. So that's why, you know, I understand, I don't want to put the fear on anybody. But unfortunately, sometimes understanding something maybe When your back's against the wall, this is when people push to our state delegates and reach out to the governor and reach out to the federal government, reach out so the president can hear us and say, listen, we need maybe not a trillion dollar bailout package, but maybe some kind of a package that we're focusing on our state and local local governments to support us and what's going on. So sitting back, I understand. I just don't think that that, I think we need, I don't think we need to go after it and help and scare people and the sky is falling mentality. But I think we need to be prepared as a council to see what shortfalls are coming with each department. I think that's important to what we have to do. So I support that initiative, Mr. Councilman Knight. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate Councilor Bears' initiative to try and think outside the box, but I too, I think using an analogy my dad told me is, you know, to pay off your car, remortgage your home, to look at the possibility to pay a $20,000 car loan over 30 years that now it piles on top of what your bills are, just doesn't, I can't see that this concerning us today, leaving this to our next generation to pay for that. So believe me, I appreciate that maybe there's some other ways that we can think of creating revenue sources and bringing money in and trying to focus on being You know being creative and gutsy to go out and do it, but I think bonding our way out of that I just I I can't support that so I just want to make sure I made it public.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: I second the amendment, the motion.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Marks. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, thank you, Councilor Bears for bringing this forward. It is a time that we need to, as a community, reflect and really, uh, you know, pay homage to those people that have lost their lives. But I think that with what Councilor Knight brought up, if I could ask the Chief of Staff, Mr. Rodriguez, I'm so excited these masks are going out, but it also raises a question. Are we hitting, are we reaching our most vulnerable population? I mean, I know it's nice that we're doing our home out in this pickup of flowers, But have we set some aside that are going directly to the senior centers, that are going directly to housing, that are going to the population that probably won't get to the homeless sites, pick them up? Have we done that, have thought of that yet?
[George Scarpelli]: All right, good. So we have identified that and that's what, okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Knight. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. And like Councilor Marks mentioned earlier and what Councilor Knight brought up, I think that I also was on the meeting with the school department and it's funny because I found myself instead of where we need to be in today's society, where as a unified front, as a mayor, a city council and school committee working together in the most trying times, It was disheartening that a member of the school committee made comments in the context that questioned what our goals are and what's driving the city council. And it left me presenting resolutions to support what we've done as a committee and to support what we'll try to do in the future. Because I talked to one constituent, you know, isn't this too early to be grandstanding politically? Isn't this destructive from another constituent? So it is. getting this information. I hope like Council Mark says this brings everything out. We as a committee work together with the school department being the amount of the budget that they do carry and that we work together. Council Falco and myself were part of the school committee that went through probably It's toughest times back in 2008, Councilor Falco, if you remember. And one of the things we did is we worked together with the city council, and we didn't leave that room at the high school until the mayor came back with $300,000 that we needed to make sure that our basic basic duties were being performed for our students in Medford. So we've been there. So I have two kids in the system right now. To say something that, whether it was meant one way or meant another way, has led us to put these resolutions in to move forward to make sure that our constituents see what we've done as a council, see how we've worked together in the past with the school committee. Listen, if we had an open bank of funds, I would love to give the school committee everything they need. But unfortunately, we're held as a group to make sure that we're holding the city fiscally responsible and making sure that we're looking at pieces of pie for everybody that's needed. And to be honest with you, we're looking at. budgets that have come to us, especially for me for the last two years on the council, that were passed unanimously to the school committee. So I was a little taken back when there were questions that evening. So, um, my hope is moving forward. The council Mark said, he's our leader. He's, he's been here the longest in years, not of age, but understanding to get through these times, we need to be together. We need to work as a group. We need to cross lines and make sure that we're doing what's right. And listen, I'm working in a municipal budget where I work, and we're already asking for furloughs, and we're already asking to hold back future raises, and we're looking at moving people out. So it's tough. These are tough times right now. So we have to use our our leadership roles in this community, why we were all voted for our positions, to make sure that we're doing what's best for our community, and rest assured that we're preparing our city to get through these tough times, because better times are coming, we know that. But we just have to work together to make sure that we get through this together. Like Councilor Knight said, Um, we were putting resolutions through the very similar, uh, working together and getting these out. I think that my comments are going to be saying every, every one of my resolutions that are in for the remainder of the evening are meant for. this point specifically, that we truly need to work together. And being contentious, it just, there's no place for it right now. There's too much going on in our society right now to have any negativity going on, especially in our leading governing body. So thank you for listening, and thank you for Councilor Knight for presenting the first half with these resolutions. So thank you. Thank you, Councilor. Scarpelli, Vice President Caraviello.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, um, I think that when, um, whether it's a slip of your tongue or meant a different way, the way it was presented, the way the constituents reach out to me and the questions they're having leave us to look at this in a way that we can then present them with hard numbers and making sure that we've done our due diligence and supporting the school department. So with that said, I I've talked about what we thought of and my perception of the comments, so I move approval. Second, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank Councilor Morell, Councilor Caraviello. Roberta, again, thank you for all your work. I think that this is what we're talking about as a community. No matter the tough times we have and what we're going through, this is why we push so hard for the Community Preservation Act and why we made sure that helping Roberta push for this program to be voted in and so we can look at these projects. So I don't think anybody should be feeling bad when they volunteer their time to make sure that our history is preserved. So I think that I fully support this initiative. And thank you again for all your hard work for everybody involved. So thank you. Thank you, Councilman Scarpelli. Councilman Marcus.
[George Scarpelli]: Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Weird bears get one.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate everybody for being here. I know I've talked to the chief of staff about this a few weeks ago, but again, I've been getting phone calls about Republic Parking and whether they're, you know, the question, the misconception that they're not in the business district or they are in the business district, that they're, are they essential? Are they non-essential? I'll give you a few examples. It's seeing that what I'm hearing is that they're going into the neighborhoods. and really bearing down on neighborhood parking where some parking issues, as I talked to some constituents, have never been an issue for years, and they're coming down and ticketing certain areas, and it doesn't limit to one area of the city. I hear in West Medford, I hear in South Medford, I hear in North Medford that, so really, if we can, is really, if we can get Mr. Rodriguez, if you can, look into really defining and putting something out there so our constituents understand what the process is. Because I think there is a misconception that it's not essential and it shouldn't be out there. They are essential, but they're not doing the business district, but they are obligated to go into the communities, into the neighborhoods. I think that's what I've been hearing, and if we can get that concern taken care of or addressed, that'd be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you again, Mr. President. With what's going on in our time today and the fear of budget decreases and the downfalls we're looking to have possibly, adding the lack of information gathered by the census and losing any sort of federal money because we haven't done our due diligence as a leadership and a community, I know that if we can, I want to make amendment, if we can reach out to state delegates to see if there is, I know there was talk about an extension, when they were going to, actually the kickoff I believe was April 1st, and now it's, I haven't heard, we haven't heard much about it. is could the city administration, could we look at non-essential employees that are getting paid, that aren't working at City Hall? Is there a way we can put a team together that can reach out right now via phone or other avenues to get people interested, get them involved in returning their census forms? I think that while there is a lull in one facet of government, I think that maybe we can look at a way to take advantage of our educated and capable employees within City Hall. to really mount an attack and get the information out that's needed to get the information back that we're going to need for our schools and our police stations and fire stations and DPW. It's going to be massively important. And I know that we did talk about it, but I just wanted to gather some information with that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I think if we can, I appreciate that, that'd be a great start. I think if we can invite the, I know each community has a representative from the Census Bureau. If we can invite them also, I don't know if Mr. Rodriguez could pass that along to Neil Osborne. I know that each, like I said, each community has someone that works for the Census Bureau as a contact person, if we can find out who that is and invite them to that committee, the whole meeting, to see what they're doing at the federal level too. So, thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry about that, yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, can I make a suggestion?
[George Scarpelli]: Maybe Councilor Knight could call in on his cell phone, or his house phone, where he can ask a question and still watch. It might be easier for him.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Bears. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, and I hate to keep beating a dead horse, Mr. President, but I appreciate Mr. Rodriguez talking about the capital plan. But again, I would love to make an amendment that we ask the city director of DPW to do an analysis to see what it would cost to start a crew. I know I worked with the former commissioner who's now passed, God bless him, stand Cody who helped me put together a plan where it was three full-time employees, the truck and the equipment, plus what the cement would look like, a hot top would look like. And I tell you, other than the upfront costs of maybe $500,000 the first year to get that going, it really started a program that even if it is part of the capital plan, and we do correct 80% of our sidewalks, which is great, and streets, let's say that's you know, if that works, but the hope is we still need a process moving forward that we're not going to fall back into that. Always maintaining. I think that's one thing we haven't done here in a long time with our infrastructure and our buildings and our facilities, that once we once we correct something, having a maintenance plan in place that we're correcting things before a $1,000 problem turns into a $15,000 problem. So I think this is what, like I said, I hate to keep beating on it, but I think it's something that I need to see from the director of DPW that can tell me, George, no way, this is why. Because the way I run my home, if I needed to fix something, if I can patch it for $2,000 for 10 years, instead of an upfront cost of $10,000, I'll find a way to do that at $10,000 if the means say. At least I weigh it. I don't think we weight this. We keep talking about it. This is now year five and we're saying the same thing in my time here on the council. So I appreciate everybody's hard work. I think the questions were well thought out. I thought that the biggest issue I have is that this was a contract from last administration. It's a two year contract. There was confusion when I talked to administration about how it was separate and why it was separated. There was some confusion there, but I can understand where we are right now. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President, can I make that amendment to B paper? Sure, we can do that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, thank you, Council Knight, but I think that Jimmy was a little, a few years younger than me. I graduated with Dave and grew up with David and hanging around the Taft Street home and being around the Maturana family, you realize that when Mr. Maturana died, when Guy died, you realize that a true legend left Medford and you could feel it. But what he did is he left a legacy of great, great, great children and, you know, And Jimmy was no different. Jimmy was just a great young man. If you remember Jimmy, when I started coaching and Jimmy was still playing football in Medford High School, you realize what kind of an aura he brought. People loved to be around Jimmy. And Jimmy was the type of kid that loved everybody. When the world loses somebody like that, it really hurts. I know that Jimmy's left. And as I talked to David this week, and we've read multiple Facebook posts and videos being sent from all over the world, sending their condolences, you realize what a real impact he's made. And he has two wonderful young boys and a beautiful wife that have sent out some really moving memories. and words and Jimmy's behalf. And Jimmy left a little note for everybody and telling us to keep smiling and keep moving forward. And you realize how great Medford is when you see the people that are coming back and supporting the Maturana family. Jimmy will always be missed, but Jimmy will never be forgotten. You know, everybody talks about what kind of a great athlete Jimmy was and what an impact he made in Medford High School sports. And they were huge, but what he did leave He's left an empty hole in a lot of people's hearts, and he's left nothing but a positive memory. I know he graduated my sister Lisa, and as soon as she heard the word, it was instant tears, because you knew that we lost a good one. I know that losing someone has been very difficult, especially today in society, but losing Jimmy Maturana is a huge, sad loss. something that I will do moving forward is always keeping Jimmy in light here in Method and Mustang country and keeping his memory alive for his sons to understand his legacy. And we send condolences to the family, the whole Maturana family and his wonderful wife and kids. So again, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Um, I was in meetings all day today. I work in Somerville and, um, you know, I would hope that, you know, as I talked to our administration, I know we had put in place, uh, some order of, um, masks, but can you hear me?
[George Scarpelli]: for some order of mass, but where, um, and we, unfortunately we can't make any amendments or resolutions off this because it has to be posted. But I think it might be something that we look into and, uh, moving this and more of a, um, um, strategic way in asking the city administration to assist some of our residents that can't afford to find the masks, that we can help. I know that in Somerville, we're distributing over 100,000 masks first to our senior citizen population. So I think that, unfortunately, the way of the world, being in the recreation world, being in the world of grouping and stuff, We've talked about today, the state's going to be mandating that we're going to have employees and kids coming to our camps and clinics that it looks like they'll have to be wearing masks. And unfortunately, I think that's just the way of the world. So the quicker we as a community understand how serious this is in the sense that it's needed to be safe for yourself and others, I think that we need to make a move as a council, hopefully by next week and working with the city administration and our health department that we put some mandates in place. So I thank Mr. Von Berg again for bringing this forward. And I know that I've had some constituents, you know, as we're talking, I was getting texts by one constituent who we love and know, but he's, you know, we're nervous. And I think that again, One thing that as we're going in my field, a lot of it is education and communication so we can go forward with making sure as we live our new life. coming forward when we get into phase two and phase three, we all have to understand there are going to be mandated changes that people aren't going to like. And whether their freedom has anything to do with it, we have to have mandates in place and rules in place that people have to do it. And again, with the sensitivity that Councilor Morell spoke of, uh having the means to assist those constituents that really don't have a means to get to have them get a mask and um you know as we talked to some of our low-income constituents and What one resident told us is easy. She actually downloaded a Facebook post to our recreation site and how to make a mask with her T-shirt into elastic. So there is effort. I think there is a way to really accomplish this, but I think this is something that sounds simple, but this has to be a monumental task by all the stakeholders here to start changing our thought process. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: One information, just so I don't forget, Mr. President, I just did get a text that thanks to the mayor, they are providing our seniors with masks. So they've already taken steps in that direction. So kudos to the mayor and the city administration. This is the direction we have to go to. So thanks. Apologize, Councilor Bears.
[George Scarpelli]: Just real quick. I know that Councilor Marks brought it up with the gloves. I think that, I also want to, let's educate the public in understanding that those people that are wearing the gloves and then they discard it all over the streets, have a little compassion for the people that are cleaning those, picking those gloves up because You're putting their lives in danger and catching the virus too if you can't do something simple as take the gloves off like I do and as you leave, put them into a dispenser or take them home and throw them in the garbage. But we're seeing too many left all over the streets. If you don't care about what it looks like in your community, at least have a little compassion and understanding that the people that are picking those up, you might be putting them in harm's way. And that's how you have to look at things. So I just wanted to add to that. That's my two cents, Mr. President. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate Mr. Hughes bringing that up, but I think the police are a little bit different when you're talking about if they're in a traffic situation where they need to direct people in a safety situation, that they have to know who they're directing. the conversation, too. I think it's important that we understand that, too, as a community. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Mr. Council. Adam did text me, he lost his service, so. Okay. Apologizes, yes. Okay, President Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. I, uh, when I first saw this, I was a little alarmed. I said, well, $500,000. I said that this is, uh, this is, you know, it's like, you know, Groundhog Day all over again. And I think that one of the things I made a motion for in the past few years of budget time is looking to see it incorporate a full-time cement sidewalk and pothole crew. And because we keep on putting money into these bonds, into these type of payments for contractors. When I did talk to the the director of DPW, Mr. Cairns, he did inform me that this is something that we did talk in phases and he refreshed my memory about where this is. The company for Council Marks, the company is already in the city. They already have the, there is a list, they're working off that list. They're already in. This will just have them continue what they're doing. So there is a list. They have their feet already, their boots on the ground, ready to work. And as soon as this is approved, the money's there, they will then follow through and continue with the sidewalk projects that were in place when we first initiated this process with the last regime. So again, wish somebody was here to talk to us, but I think that, you know... I also want to piggyback with what future resolution that's in, that Councilor Beaz is in, that we really need to know what our funding is going to look like after this pandemic. So, but again, I think that what Mr. Karens did tell me when I did my homework, he did say, George, this is something that we've already proved, brought me back to the place where we did prove this. And this is, he was a little confused at the time, because it was broken up into two payments. But the contract was awarded, I believe, Adam, for two years. It was a two-year project. So that's what Mr. Cairns told me. So again, I know that Councilor Knight has something to offer maybe, and we can revisit this next week. But I hope that helped. But that's the conversation I had with Mr. Cairns today.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate it. Thanks, Council President. I tend to understand with all the applicants that are here tonight that we'll be speaking on, and I can totally understand what's going on. And I've been in, like most of the councils, I've been talking to Medford families that are in dire straits right now. But I tend to agree with Councilor Knight that there's a possibility that Medford taxes that make up our community preservation money that will be left out because we have to do this through the federal government. I understand that. But if I can't, I see that Dave's still here, Mr. Rodriguez. I could tell you, I think if we really try it as a community, there's got to be a way that we can fast track an application to a Medford partnership with housing or method family network that you we can give I'm Guaranteeing we could find $250,000 to go to housing concerns of guaranteed method residents And has that been discussed at all? Has that been an avenue? Is this something that this is the the only way that it's it could be funneled through? because I think I think if there is another way, I think that we spend a little bit more time looking at different avenues that we know that 100% of the Medford tax payers' money that make up the preservation funding, that it goes directly to Medford residents. So nothing against any of the applicants that are on tonight that don't live in Medford. I completely, I understand how difficult it is. And the people that are here, that offer Medford can apply in a different avenue. and we can support them, what they need to survive this horrible time. But I hate to see that there's going to be a Medford family looking out when the money might be going somewhere else, because we didn't do our due diligence to see if we had other avenues in filtering that and funneling that money toward the people of our community that need it 100% of the need. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, if we can't make it a motion, if we can, the chief of staff can, if he can answer it or if we can go back to his staff and find to see if there's, we've exhausted, because I know other communities have other partnerships in place to help the residents of their community with rent and survival. And they're not using the community preservation money. So if I can hear that, that'll help me make my decision whether I want to vote for this or not this evening. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't want to cut you off, Dave, Mr. President. We looked at avenues within our community that have the ability to take that money and give it to the families of Medford that need it, that have been identified. I'm talking about this $250,000 that's being asked to go to possibly, that I understand that many Method families will get it, but if there's one family from Method that doesn't get it, but someone in a neighboring community does get this money because it has to be dished out this way to the federal government, I think that's unfair. So the question is, With this money, is there another way that we can make sure that the people that are in our meeting tonight that are from Medford that need this assistance, that we can guarantee that they're going to be one of the applicants that are going to be helped? Because one of these people that are asking for assistance tonight, they might be one of the people that don't get it because it's gone somewhere else. So I would hate to see that. So that's what I'm asking. My question is, did we do our homework to see if that $250,000 can go to another city partner to assure that 100% of that money that's raised by 100% taxpayer money goes to Method residents that are in need?
[George Scarpelli]: Just to follow that up, is there a venue, is there an avenue that the city administration can work with the CPC to take that money other than ABCD that we can then bring it directly to. I know that Roberta's come to us in the past of an emergency application that's, so let's say fictitiously, Marie Cassidy from Method Family Networks comes in and asks for $250,000 from CPC that we can approve that so 100% of the money goes to Method residents. Is that something that can be done?
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Mr. President. The question is pretty simple. Someone could tell me that money can go to a Method entity through CPC to get up to 100% of Method residents. Can someone just answer that yes or no? If it's no, it's no.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Mr. President. Roberta, all I'm asking is, I can appreciate what they're going to say, and I can appreciate, but what I'm saying is, before they even say anything, my answer could be answered if you could tell me that if the Medford Family Network or if another entity in Medford came to the CPC with an emergency application for $250,000 to help the families of Medford, could that be possible? It's nothing with an applicant's note. If you could tell me that, it'd be great.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I appreciate the response. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Mr. President? Point of information, Councilor Scarpellillo. First of all, thank you, Andre, for clarifying that. But you said something that intrigued me, and I understood it. But the point of information is, everybody's talking about sustainability, but when Council Marks asked, you know, how do we get to this point? How do we choose this? The response was there were families that need one to $2,000 just to get by this period. So are we really, is that truly what we're looking for? We're truly looking for the sustainability or is this just something that, like you said, just to get them through the next couple of months? Because if that's the case, do we truly need ABCD to divvy up this money or could we find, do a little bit more work to find another organization within our community that can use, apply for this money and then do that?
[George Scarpelli]: Like I said, the question that was mentioned earlier was that we're just trying to get through the one one month, two months here and there. That's what I just want to know. Thank you, Andre.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so thank you, that's why, because what was said earlier, it was a little contradictory. I just wanted to make sure that was the case. So thank you so much.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, everybody involved, Roberta, Tabitha, Andre, Danielle, I thank you all. I think that we need to do something. I agree that something has to be moved forward, but I think that the questions that are asked aren't in a negative fashion, in the sense that we don't want to help people. I hope you understand that. I think that it's making sure that we cross our T's and dot our I's. And I think you've done a great job. And I think that, you know, Andre, thank you for answering those questions. For me, it made me understand. I also agree with my fellow council, Councilor Marks, when he looks at the distribution. And I think that doing it in in to and doing it enough like Roberta said that it reaches enough people but then shows us Again, and I and our constituents that listen there are people here and we all know they're gonna need I know that council bear said earlier I've been filled in phone calls in a daily basis myself and you know, so I know Tabitha I could tell you right now the method family network Mike Durham who's our veterans affairs director our immigration you know, uh, uh, offices and reaching out to those families. We all know we're going to hit, hit that number easily. That's not going to be, that's not going to be the concern. I think that right now is making sure that those questions were answered. And I, I appreciate all your hard work to this because I think Nicole, uh, Councilor Morell is right. If we're not doing something, we're not doing anything. So, um, uh, this was thorough in the, the answers, but. I also agree with Councilor Marks. I think that showing us the process, I think will be very helpful. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Marks. Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, I don't know if Roberta can help, or Tabitha. How can we share this information? Can we give the people, the organization that contacted us, can we help this by offering an email or phone number? What's the best way that we can help as a council to spread that word, to get those organizations to come to you, to expedite this?
[George Scarpelli]: Tabitha, that's great. If you can email us all maybe contact information and we'll get the word out ASAP.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Henry is a very special person, very close with my dad back in the day and the days in youth soccer. And this is a great accomplishment and a great example for all of us and how to be husbands and great husbands. And Henry's a great example. So we want to congratulate them on a momentous occasion. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: full-time capacity, per se. This was our big meeting today and it was scary to hear. Maybe my fellow council can help me, but are we up for, is the trash collection, is that contract up too? Is that something that we have, and that's a big nut too. So there's a lot that's happening. And I think that really sitting down with the administration getting our arms around everything right now is gonna be imperative to make sure that everybody's custom living, it doesn't change. And that's teachers, police, fire, DPW, everything we need to survive in our community. So thank you for bringing this up Councilor Bears and thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. As I get up there in age and 50 years old, you start seeing the backbone of our community, those people that just gave to our community day in and day out, that made Medford how great it is today. And losing somebody like Joe Hurts, he was a great guy. I saw him at one of the debates. him and his son, a great family man, and will surely be missed. So our prayers go out to his family and we'll miss him. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, I think Council marks and Councilor Caraviello bring this forward. I know that what we saw to assist the these new city engineer was one of the biggest concerns we had when I started four years ago was the the issues of our streets deteriorating, we realized it was mostly the patchwork that was done by utilities. And I believe it was at the high school, at one of our meetings, where the meetings were held at the high school, and we held, I believe it was Comcast to the fire, and said that we wanted curb to curb. And the question we asked, we said, has that ever been approached by the city engineer at the time? And they said, no. Um, I believe they went to a side table, came back and decided to do it. And I think since that day, we've actually tried everything we could to move that initiative forward. So, um, you know, I, I think that, uh, as we move forward, we have so many streets that would need to be repaired, but going forward, unless we get ahead of this, I think this is the beginning of what deteriorates our roads and streets and our community. It starts with this, this patchwork, and then the neglect of them afterwards. So I thank you again, and I fully support both papers. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Before you lost me.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. I believe that's what was mentioned, that that goes to subcommittee like council Marks mentioned.
[George Scarpelli]: I was going to table this, Mr. President, so the sponsor is available.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, let's move it to subcommittee.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. For the information if I can, Councilor Knight has texted me. He's having, he's shut down completely. So maybe we table his resolutions to next week if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: Can we table this, please?
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, can we table that?
[George Scarpelli]: Don't have a table.
[George Scarpelli]: We haven't heard that in three years.
[George Scarpelli]: Motion to adjourn.
[George Scarpelli]: Good night, everyone. Thank you and good night.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. We reviewed all the paperwork and documents that are needed. Everything seems to be in order. Before we move on, could Ms. Burrell give us a little, for the people that don't know what we do at that site, could you just give us a little insight and we'll go from there.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so I see all the paperwork in order, Mr. President. I know that we have other very similar establishments that are open at that time. So sense of fairness, I think it just, it would be feasible that we move forward with this in favor. So I know my fellow colleagues will have some questions, but I would move for approval.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Council President. I just, I thank Councilor Morell for bringing that up and the fact that I am a member of the Somerville Retirement System, PARAC, and so that you've all answered it to the specifications that I as an employee for the City of Somerville understand that. So I think that it doesn't preclude anything yet, but what it does is it puts us in a position as a community to put our money where our mouth is, and that's what everybody's saying. But it doesn't actually, right now, there isn't anything that's prohibiting them from doing that. So this is just moving the paper forward to show the support. So I support this. I think it's a a great idea and it, you know, and it causes some more concern as you see what's going on right now in our environment. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I can't. It's really faint. Maybe just- Very faint, yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I see that Mr. Halam has everything in order. All the paperwork is in order. If he could just, before we reach out to our colleagues, would you like to give us a brief description of what your restaurant will look like, Mr. Halam?
[George Scarpelli]: We're good, okay. I know that we just recently lost the only Indian restaurant and it was a big loss to our community. So how many people will be working in that location?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: All right. Okay. That's it for me, Mr. President. I move approval. I know my colleague says some questions.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Caraviello. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate Councilor Morell and Councilor Villes coming forward with this. I've been following this and working for municipality and listening to my colleagues that are working on a daily basis. I think that what we've been hearing is the next seven to 10 days, the next seven to 14 days are the most dangerous days. They've come out and said some important pieces that we should listen to. And if you can't go to the doctor's office, you shouldn't go to the supermarket unless you have to. Don't have to go to the pharmacy. Don't go to the pharmacy. These are the seven to ten days to really stay in the house I think that's where I'm looking at it is if I had a loved one that's working for the city We're trying to to send the message out I I tend to think that we're a little if that's if the message isn't out yet I think this isn't the week to do it having anybody out in harm's way going door-to-door things out where we're interacting with other people and I think it's imperative that we follow what every guideline is telling us throughout this country now, is trying to keep people off the streets and not interacting in any way. And I think by doing that, It's just lending to one more person to be on the street. So that's why I don't support this right now. I think it's, you know, I wouldn't want one of my family members that's working for the city to knock on a door or hand it out in the door or touch a mailbox or do something where they have to put this message into people's boxes and then possibly get infected. So I think right now, especially what we're hearing, for the next seven to 14 days. Let's keep everybody off the street. Let's not add any more to this. Okay, thank you. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli. Councilor Marks.
[George Scarpelli]: If that's the way it was read, I would welcome that. But it says, the sheets that can be physically delivered to every Method resident. That's what it says.
[George Scarpelli]: So I think that doing something in one message is one thing, but to deliver it to every home right now, I can't support that. Thank you. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information. If I'm mistaken, I'm not saying it'd be difficult, but I thought Councilor Morell said there are people that don't have the means to get the information. So I'm taking it as we want them to go and deliver. That's all, that's all I was saying.
[George Scarpelli]: I mean, it could be mailed.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Council President. I applaud what you're trying to do. I think that, but I tend to agree with my fellow councilors. What you're putting, you know, as we keep going on 304, 305, it speaks to a lot of confusion. I mean, I'm versed in this and I still find it that, you know, you tend to on one, you could read it as contradicting another. So it's just something that I think I understand what you're trying to do, but I just think that right now the message is coming from the city and what we're trying to do with the state, it's getting convoluted. It's getting kind of mixed up here. So I think we should be careful. I think we really should. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: That subcommittee and talking about housing sustainability task force, guidance regarding housing resources, I think that does belong with everything that you're asking for. So I think maybe that might be the course that we go on. So that's what, you know, these all fall into that. I think I agree with them. And I think that that subcommittee can address all these to get a better defined message instead of boom, boom, boom, boom. Because I think that the separation of it is a little confusing. So that's my opinion. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: That's a scarpelli clarification I can Mr. President with this, including all of the resolutions that Mr. Councilor Bears that has to do relevant to housing resolution for now we're in the middle of the roll call so just in this one.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Vice President Caraviello. Councilor Scarpelli. First of all, I thank Councilor Bears for bringing this forward. I understand what Councilor Caraviello is saying, but this is something that I agree with Councilor Bears. I think that there is something out there that we're just sending some support. This isn't to the residents of the city of Medford. This is a delegation to say that we would support this and efforts for future, you know, with the additional crisis. I do want to, if I can, Councilor President or Councilor Bears, although you withdrew, you are still going to present those questions during the subcommittee. I just want to make sure that because I think they're important to think that clarifying it and making sure that it's it's in a better dialogue in that context. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I believe for Canada, I recall, I believe we asked Mr. Babuso to compile all the data and come back to us committee the whole meeting so we can all discuss the changes of the ordinance. Got it. I think that's what I recall from Councilor Morell.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I find the records flawless. Flawless.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that the gentleman was present at one of our meetings, but I think that I needed some confirmation, and a few of the questions we had were answered. I took a trip to the site. If the petitioner who's on today, if we can, is it Mr. Jankowski?
[George Scarpelli]: McHale?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so if I can, I'm just gonna unmute him. If we can, I know that, how are you, sir? Thank you again for your patience.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. So the petitioner, uh, what we're looking for, you already have cars on the lot, correct? Yes. Okay. So it, how just enlighten us how you're going to, um, arrange the sales in conjunction with all the cars that you have on that lot. Cause I, what I see is the only. piece that is the traffic issues of the number of cars on the lot right now, Mike. If you can explain that, that'd be a great help.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so it's really just going to, it's not going to, you're just going to move cars further back into the lot. Yes. Yeah. And I think that was, uh, Mr. President, that was the, the concerns we had being that, uh, there are some residential homes in that area and how it impacted. Truth of the matter is, as I took the tour there, it really doesn't look like it'll have any impact in that neighborhood. And it looks like they're housing cars anyway. We just need to be careful, Mike, that we're not overdoing it. I know the four cars in front sound good. It is mostly a commercial area. We do have other car dealerships up and down Mystic Ave. Every everything else is in order. Mr. President. I know that some of my colleagues have some questions, but I'll let them before I make my My my statement if they have any no, they don't want to ask questions.
[George Scarpelli]: I think he froze.
[George Scarpelli]: These are one of the hiccups, Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank Councilor Knight for that. I think that that was something I was gonna add in, but I appreciate you jumping in. So I think that I see everything else is in order, Mr. President, see we move forward favorably.
[George Scarpelli]: Have a good night.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate all the input from our constituents and Councilor Knight. We had some We had some families reach out to us at the time that, as Mr. Engbert has mentioned, that this might be just a reaction to. an issue on Forest Street and the reaction that I got back from some constituents are you have residents that are aging in place now and have might have the opportunity to possibly use that land to build and continue their family legacies and actually support our senior citizens to stay in our community and to To put this this limit into order. I think would drastically affect our community in a negative way. One of the things we talked about, and I know that Ms. Catalo brought it up, is that we have some zoning issues that we're looking into, but at the same time, we're chasing away what makes Medford what's so great about it, and that's the ability for families to move into our community. And we've done so much acceptance for these one and two bedroom condominium complexes, And now looking at the opportunity with the housing shortage, looking at affordable housing and having that opportunity to build on some lots, I think it would be a detriment to our community. So I agree with Councilor Knight. I think that we're at a holding pattern right now, at least until we go through our zoning concerns and we really jump into this full force. So that's my two cents, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, and thank you, Mr. Brody, for being here. Just to review, this is taking a spot from Circle Laundry, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, I can't see him.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so I do see everything in order, Mr. President, and this does fall in a commercial area. And I know that with the recent closing of a neighboring gym in the same area, that the five o'clock hours are really what our constituents are looking for, the five to seven o'clock hours. I wouldn't, if I can, could Mr. Brody just give us a little more insight of what type of health and fitness location this will be? Is it more of an individual? Is this more of a, how is it going to be set up, Mr. Brody?
[George Scarpelli]: And that's all inside, correct? It's nothing that we'll bring outside, any apparatus outside? That's correct. Okay, my biggest issue was looking at the traffic pattern impact and I see that the chief has followed up with no issues and the fire chief has followed up with no issues. So I yield to my colleagues if they have any comments.
[George Scarpelli]: Move forward then Mr. President, I appreciate Councilor Knight for that follow-up and as he always does, make sure it's thorough and we're protecting that future business and people that will be residing there. So I move forward and accept and move this paper, this license forward with favorability.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I believe that the petitioner is not ready. not here tonight, Mr. Clerk, I think that he wants to extend this.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President, before we discuss this item, can the clerk refresh my memory? I believe that we had this in front of us, but we're waiting on the permit to be approved, but we're waiting on one department to approve it. Am I mistaken? Is that a concern?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Councilor. Councilor Knight, so I know that I just wanted to make sure that we're following the proper protocol with this. Mr. Sandoval, I know that this is probably one of the most anticipated establishments in Medford right now. We can't wait to to see this establishment open. So I think that I see everything is in order, but I yield to my colleagues for their comments. Councilor Knight.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, on the motion of Councilor Scarpelli. To move forward with in favor with the amendments.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, can we amend this, if we can, to also add a piece that would, while this pandemic is ongoing and the fears of the unknown and people interacting in a negative way, I think putting a moratorium on all real estate and property owners are showing the properties. Right now, Mr. President, I think that's important.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information. I think what he said was with the closing of the courts It's a 60 to 90 day process when the courts are open now that the courts are closed that that The clock doesn't start ticking till that happens.
[George Scarpelli]: I think Council bass are bringing this point forward. He's, you know, I think the best interest looking out for all our constituents, but I do tend to side with constant night with this and maybe not. you know, a subcommittee. I think that there are so many questions as we're hearing right now. There are people for it, people against it, but there are still some questions, Adam, that I think that have to be addressed. And I think that, you know, as I'm sitting here and getting texts from landlords and homeowners saying, You know, George, I own a home, so I still have expenses. So I know we're not doing anything right now, and we're telling people to pay taxes now, but you're asking us as a council to forward an opinion to the state that we would support something that some of our constituents have just sent messages saying that they're very frightened and they're, you know, they're now in a level of stress that, you know, that I can understand that Matt and Alex and other people who just put forward that we understand that, you know, so I, you know, so I maybe not a subcommittee meeting or maybe calling for a subcommittee meeting where it's even before this next Tuesday's meeting so we can move forward with this so there's a better understanding with both the legislation that we're sending you having us read and the the impact that we can calm people down to say, you know, this is what we're looking for. I know that your intention by saying you're still paying your rent tomorrow, but we're still asking this committee, this council to support something that is now putting our homeowners that do have a mortgage in fear. So I think that, you know, there's enough questions here, everyone, that that we shouldn't jump on a vote right now. I do agree with that. Maybe I don't agree with, you know, holding it off to a subcommittee. I also think that maybe years past our subcommittees have been like this, but we're working pretty quick when we call for subcommittees when we have issues like this. And this is time sensitive. We can see that. This is We've never been in this pandemic before, this issue. So I agree with all of us that we need to move forward with this at haste, but at the same time, there's still some questions that we need to vet out before I will vote on this. So I just wanted to share that.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. Again, that's what I'm saying. This is such a fluid issue that people are concerned both ways. So this is something that, you know, that we vote on it right now because it's that, it's, you know, tonight, you know, there are constituents that want to hear this through. So, and they want to be part of that subcommittee or that next meeting that we can move forward on. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, to put an amendment, I know that both yourself, the mayor, and Councilor Knight did mention it, but I think that what we're seeing right now with the public safety officials and fire and police, I think that it's important that we look at right now their the automobiles and the apparatus that we're using on a daily basis. I know some communities right now are having their DPW trucks, the fire engines, police guides, being disinfected on a daily basis for the fact that if a fire truck goes to a call where there's a possible virus infection there, As they're coming back in they're bringing that into their apparatus and I think that having um, we should ask if we can mend this to ask the administration to look at daily, um, um disinfectants to every automobile apparatus, both police and fire and DPW, that they are all done on a daily basis because they're on the front lines and they're working, you know, one person, one police officer is dealing with and then leaving and another police officer. Remember, it's staying on surfaces between four to six, even 10 days. So it's important that we protect our public safety officials and and employees that are dealing with that. So I appreciate Councilor Knight bringing this forward. Like I said, make the amendment that we add, and we ask the city administration to ask for all the vehicles and apparatus be disinfected on a daily basis. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Make motion to adjourn. Motion to adjourn.
[George Scarpelli]: Be safe, everyone.
[George Scarpelli]: Good night, everybody. Meeting adjourned.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you Mr. President. If I can, there were some concerns earlier. I know there are some limitations, we do have limitations of the information we can give about the person that has already been diagnosed and found to have the virus. Is it safe to say or could we say that it has nothing to do with the schools? Because I think that was one of the concerns. Because I think the kids right now, they're feeling anxiety probably more than anybody right now. So just making sure if we could just say it has no one to do with the schools and we're safe from the schools.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you so much.
[George Scarpelli]: There is a suspension in communications from the mayor.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you so much. I think that you coming up, I know that it's a little nerve wracking when you're coming up to speak, but you did a great job in presenting. I know that we've had some of your student body here before, some of your friends, and they've brought up some great initiatives, and we're so excited that here again, and our goal is really to make Medford beautiful and share what we're truly about. And I think that the four categories you chose for Duggar Park, I think it's a great way to spread that love. So I think you guys have done a great job. I think this is a great initiative. I know that my son John is also doing some great things with a great historian, Mr. Ken Krause. So everything is nonstop and it's so exciting to see. So I fully support this paper and move forward for approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I talked to the petitioner. There were some questions. And I'm requesting a table till next week. Table till next week? Yes, please.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, through the chair, to Councilor Knight. In layman's terms, if people can understand, This resolution is really to have the voice of the people heard and not stifled, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: And in recent, as we can see, we had some discussions about open meeting laws. And I think that I applaud my fellow Councilor to look at these concerns under transparency to make sure that the people are heard and we're giving them the proper forum where we're not stifled and they're not stifled. So I applaud you with this resolution and I support it wholeheartedly. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I too applaud Councilor Knight for bringing this forward. I think that as a municipal worker. who's someone who doesn't take sick days, people that are out there might question even with this intent, you know, that this is compromising city funding, but what they make sure they understand the way that it works is when people retire with the bank of sick days, they're then bought out. So when you could look at, we're going through that right now where we have a custodian that is battling cancer, and he has a family of four, and he looks like, thank God, he's going to pull through, but without the sick bank process that we have in the community that I work in, that individual would have lost his home. So these are real issues, and this is what I think what Medford's all about, in helping your neighbor and your I'm actually shocked that I didn't know that we didn't have it in place. So I applaud Councilor Knight and I second the resolve, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I understand Councilor Marks' hesitation, but I think the meeting we just had in the subcommittee that outlined the limitations we have as a council now that limits our residents to come up and speak, I support this for the fact that being sponsored and having an avenue to make sure that the constituent has a voice and is on the agenda as we move forward. because I think this is going to be a huge culture change in understanding what we can talk about. So as Councilman Mark said, I know that the biggest issue we had in subcommittees where in the past a resident would come up, have a concern, a serious concern, but we would support that by having a dialogue. by the rule now, that violating the open meeting law, that limits that now. It eliminates that completely. We can't talk about it, so Mrs. Jones comes up and talks about some serious issue that we need the police involved in, something that I believe was emergency or natural disaster that we can speak on at the meeting. So it limits different speaking points. So with this, I support it for the fact that If there's an issue, we have a constituent that has a problem, we assign the number to it, we sponsor it as a council, and make sure that that issue is presented. So this is why I feel that it's needed. I think it's all in the same breath. I think we're all looking at making sure that our constituents are heard. And understand again that this is going to be a big change for what we're used to. when doing business, when people come to that podium, because what we were told by ruling of the attorney general is that we can't talk to you as a council in fear of violating the open meeting law on concerns and issues that are brought to that podium. So whether we like it or not, this is the reason why I support Councilor Knight's motion. And again, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Um, being close friends with both, um, the Morse brothers and understanding that, uh, what Mr. and Mrs. Morse have done left, uh, with, uh, teaching their children, uh, that community is very important. And to lose her was a great loss to Dennis and Hank, but I know that we wish them well and share our support with their family. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I can understand Councilor Knight's presentation, the understanding that we've had some recent, uh, recent concerns, but I, I too, with Council Marks, I know that the Fellsway has turned into, um, you know, front yard, um, parking areas and it does take away the appearance of the community. And I think, um, although in good intention, I don't think I can support this either. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Please, if we can. The motion to suspend the rules.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Petitions, presentations, and similar papers. I know that we've had a petitioner here waiting patiently. 20-100. Thank you, Councilor. Excuse me.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, and forgive us for... having you sit so long. So I know that all the paperwork is in order. You have everything in order. I know that this is a Lambert Street location. Have you worked in the field before? Have you been in the business before? Yes. Good. Okay. And what type of food do you bring to this location?
[George Scarpelli]: Is it just pizza or is it?
[George Scarpelli]: OK. All right. How many people will be working for you?
[George Scarpelli]: OK. Hours of operation?
[George Scarpelli]: OK. So that falls on the premise. Mr. President, I have no other questions. I move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Just public for the viewing public, I know that I've received some emails from constituents that are totally against this. Unfortunately, to their understandings that this is something that was voted on in 2016. And we are required as a city council and a city to provide, I believe, at least three licenses. Whether you're for it or against it, I just wanted to reiterate that this is a mandate after the vote that was taken and moving forward with it. And I know that Councilor Knight has already contacted us to move forward quickly and get a resolve and move this petition forward, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Our speaker this evening, I want to thank you because it's the first time I've heard of this rare disease. And your sister is very lucky to have a sister like you to make sure people are educated and learning what she has to deal with every day. So, congratulations and thank you for enlightening all of us. So, and I will also be wearing the ribbon. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. First of all, It takes efforts from young ladies like yourself to come out and have the courage to see something and follow through with it. And you could see greatness upon the both of you as you move forward. Because it's tough to even just stand up there right now and to come out and present such an important topic. And I think that's what, you know, Mr. Trotto, Mr. Skorka do with CCSR. I know that it's something my son loves doing. It's one of the reasons why a lot of kids are staying in Medford High, because they're seeing something that they can actually touch, they can go after and we give them that opportunity to do great things in our community. And I applaud our school system. It's what makes Medford as great as it is. It's programs like this, it's leaders like Mr. Skorka, Mr. Trotto, it's students like yourselves. And I applaud my colleagues that have already done the legwork to to get the resolution started and move the ordinance forward, and it's something I'll support a thousand percent. So, great job and congratulations.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I've never been there. But I will tell you, joking aside, I think that when we grew up, if you were a lifelong resident of Medford, you remember those businesses and those people that showed you what being a Medford Mustang and being from Medford was all about. And unfortunately, in this time, you lose the Tony Luccis of the world, and those businesses move on. And it's refreshing to see that my kids have memories of that type of establishment, that you always remember where you came from and you always have a place to go when the doors open welcoming everybody. So if you look at a lot of my Our family picture is where John and Gianna would, first day of schools, it would always be sitting at the table at CB Scoops. And it's something they still do today. And it's refreshing to know that we still have people like the Roaches and businesses like CB Scoops that continue that type of tradition and community involvement and give back like they do. So I congratulate them in ten more years. And I will do everything I can do in my power to make sure they stay in business. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: We're there. Everybody's coming.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I thank Councilor Knight. I think Councilor Knight has always been there for the working class and making sure that the job is done the right way. And I think it's a recall that Councilor Knight had these union workers approach us and having conversations with them and talking about what their roles are and having a company that has a shady past working on our buildings right now, especially what we're looking to do here in Medford with both the police station, the library, and as we move forward, hopefully, a fire station. I hope that we have better handle and who the subcontractors are coming in and working. So I think that if we can have a list or a verification that these are all approved, if we can, through the building department, that all the subcontractors that are working, I know the reason why that this is in the forefront is because we had picketers, but I want to make sure that they're doing their due diligence and approving all of our subcontractors through their company. So if we can have that as a, as a, uh, amendment, that'd be appreciated. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If you could just give us the location. Where is the location?
[George Scarpelli]: And what type of exercises and fitness programs do you look like you'll be?
[George Scarpelli]: And that would be inside the facility, nothing outside?
[George Scarpelli]: That's too bad, because I like space when I work out. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I offer them in Thank You console night console skypelly I Yield I my fellow Councilor mentioned what I wanted to propose. Okay. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I thank Councilor Marks for bringing this forward and Councilor Knight for adding his input. I think that, not to be redundant, but there are some great safety initiatives in place with the safe routes. You know, I love the Woburn Street Island. I think that's something that's really needed, a crosswalk in that area. And you'd hate to throw away you know, a great plan for a few sticking points. But I will tell you, the phone calls I did receive as well and emails are the same issues and concerns where you're talking about safety being the number one concern and you are, I had a phone call from an 80-year-old resident that had that same concern. response saying that it's safe routes. Now I have to park across the street if I want to park, and I have to cross one of the major throughways. Like I said, I won't be redundant, but I support this 100%. I think to revisit this is very important, and I think we need to really take a hard stop and to revisit this, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I think that was my initial input with this is that it's not something that we want to eliminate. but it's looking for alternatives. And I think that there could be something as simple as notifying those residents that might be elderly that do qualify for handicap placards that never had an issue with that in the past that can now apply for that. Or maybe it could be something that you look at different times where parking overnight might be an issue. That might be the biggest issue with them. And maybe making it so when it's the most dangerous times that they can look at different parking restrictions. So there's so many different variations to look at this. And again, I don't want anybody to be confused with my input with eliminating something, or saying we don't want this money, or we don't want to keep our bicyclists safe, or we don't want our students at the Brooks. Because to be honest with you, I got a lot of phone calls from parents from the Brooks that had some concerns. And one of the concerns with what Councilor Knight said is that when they do have a concern with, or an issue with the school, or they have something, there is overflow parking. Putting them further away from the school further away from that parking area That's what they're concerned about their safety is having their child and parents or grandparents walk now that extra area so I understand you know we have some You know allegiance to our bike riders, but that's not that it's not this isn't a for or against them. This is something that just to look forward to a dialogue that making sure that like Councilor Caraviello said is getting those neighbors because we're now a community of transparency and making sure that everybody knows what's going on. I think that's one of the things that The feedback I did get back was that the communication was really about taking of the land, but really not defined of taking of parking spots or having the input of those residents. And I think that is a huge piece that has to be sent in that motion. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Should you turn on his mic first?
[George Scarpelli]: Here we go.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Simple question to follow up with that. Again, the sidewalks would be repaired and repaved to the existing OBETA condition, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: The contractor will take care of that. Okay. And one thing we did have in the past, I think that making sure they follow in the proper timeline, in the past we've had different contractors that have worked for National Grid, not National Grid's fault, but had their Companies come out at odd hours and one night at 10 o'clock at night we had an issue with this. Make sure they follow the proper protocol of times. That would be appreciated. Okay, thank you. Okay, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, again, I'm sorry. How long is this process? How long is the project gonna take?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, and the neighbors will be informed. Exactly. Okay, thank you. Thank you. You're welcome, sir. Move approval. Second that.
[George Scarpelli]: communications director, I'm sorry, have they followed through yet with the implementation of communication director?
[George Scarpelli]: Because that's a great, that's one of the avenues that I think most communities use and they go out through social media, city website, maybe if there's someone now that's doing that, we could recommend that.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I won't be redundant. I know what my fellow Councilors said is very important. I know that as a former teacher and a coach, the avenues and the partnerships of the school is going to be vital. Working in my capacity in recreation in Somerville, one of the biggest partnerships we have are the school department. And one thing we realized is we realized how many of our young men that we, at the coaching side, how many kids have serious concerns, you know, that they come in in the morning with their free breakfast, free lunch, and then some of those kids don't eat again until Monday morning. So I know we took an active role in really You're looking at our athletic department, our guidance department, really looking at those individuals and using those avenues because there's a connection there where kids have trust in those people and to reach those families. And once that started, it really took off. And we've reached out to a few different organizations that will be hopefully working with Method soon about doing some food drives and really do some great things here in Method. So I'm really excited about this because where I was seeing it, it was really in a bubble. And now being the first in the Commonwealth, we're really bringing this out on the forefront. So I give the mayor a lot of credit and city staff and volunteers. I think this is amazing. So, um, kudos and I support this 100 100%. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you for being here this evening. Good evening. As I reviewed all your documents, everything seems to be in order. Now, again, this is, you have a similar, this is your second location, I believe? That's correct. We currently occupy the cafe at 200 Rivers Edge Drive. And it's inside the? Office building, that's correct. Okay, excellent. And I know I hear great things, and I'm sure that The hours of operations will be the same. That's right. It's Monday through Friday.
[George Scarpelli]: It's breakfast and lunch. OK. All right. So I yield to my colleagues before I rule.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I find everything in order. I move approval. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Gentlemen, I see, again, everything is in order. Can you give us a little brief synopsis so the public can know what you're presenting to us?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, and your focus of hours of operations?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. I see everything in order. I move approval, Mr. President, if my colleagues have anything to share.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Council marks I know that I appreciate my colleagues doing their due diligence. I know that this council, especially myself, we've looked at the biggest issue, which is. employees for the DPW and any way we can help lighten their load and, like Councilor Morell said, look at the whole footprint, our footprint and how we can improve. I think it's important though that we really dedicate a recommendation to the mayor as we move forward to budget season for that, I know I've been saying it year after year, but a sidewalk pothole. making it even a bigger piece, which is repaving and re-sidewalks. I know as you go on to the next resolution, it's in the same breath. So I think that we need the employees. I know that when Mayor Burke, before she left office, they've eliminated the civil service test for hiring. I think it's about time that we really put our money where our mouth is and make sure that We put the employees in place and the equipment that's needed to implement projects like this and really do something off the cuff here, something we haven't done or haven't seen in a long time. So I'm pretty excited about this initiative and I appreciate bringing it forward. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. If I could, this is really just to update South and Main Street. I know that we've had some serious issues there in the past week, but had a discussion with State Representative Donato. He has informed me that with the hard work of his Representative Donato and Representative Garbaly and Representative Barber. They are presenting a bond bill on Wednesday tomorrow for $5 million to help alleviate the issues on South and Main Street. I've contacted the Chief of Police and Traffic. and also meeting with the mayor tomorrow to try to expedite some of the, again, low-hanging fruit that we've asked for. Again, I think we dodged another bullet on Friday, but the stop sign on Toro and South, the raised sidewalks that we discussed on Main and South, and painting the walkways, I mean, painting the street with limiting the lanes, I think these are short budgetary measures. fixes, and I think that would make a huge difference in that area. I think the residents that I've talked to are frustrated. We are all frustrated, but we hope to have some movement and hopefully have some word, some definitive answers for everybody by next meeting on next Tuesday. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I find the records stupendous. Stupendous. I move forward.
[George Scarpelli]: We'll beat that one next week.
[George Scarpelli]: Good evening. Good evening.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: So as a coach for 32 years at the high school level, you really try to find inspirations for kids to follow. You, sir, are a true inspiration. So this city is proud of you, Mustang Country's proud of you, and I wanna congratulate you on a job well done, so thank you. Thank you very much. Nice job.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. To be redundant, I think it's important. So again, I thank Council Marks for bringing up such an important issue. I know that the emails and the phone calls I received, I think the frustration goes more in depth than just what we're seeing. The whole lack of information, the fear that's still out there that hasn't been answered. As we move forward, I wonder if we can put an amendment that we can have the Acton City Solicitor to see if we can extend that period. I know that the 20th is the date, I believe, so- Yesterday. Yesterday, so if there's a way that we can put a hold, if there's a way that the city can freeze that. There's some issues that if you have, some of the members in the audience where other communities have put a stop to this, there's something to be gained by understanding that. So having our city solicitor find any loophole that can stop this ASAP until we get the answers that Council Marks has brought up, I think it's very important. So I'd like to make that into an amendment if I can.
[George Scarpelli]: Yep.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, President Falco. For those who might look at the census as just an irritant piece of mailing that almost every family gets, every household, and then disregarded and thrown away, I assure to spread the main issues with the census is making sure that Medford gets as due when it comes to funding from the federal government for education, police, fire, and so on. I think it's important that as the process is now getting underway, that we get an idea of what our plan for our city administration is to get the word out. Neighbor communities I'm seeing are starting a ground roots effort where if you see what the census is doing, they're now offering $28 an hour for workers knowing that it's important to get these issues and these numbers verified. And as you can see, Medford is now a very diverse community. And with that diverse community comes people of questionable residency. And one of the concerns we have are those numbers count. Those numbers are very important. And we've met and I've talked to different census bureau members that have talked to me about this being a federal law and how this cannot hold against anybody whether their documentation is updated or not. But it's something that we need to make sure that our administration has a plan in place that will reach all of our families. And we have an opportunity that it's being sent out in a variety of different ways. The important thing that I'm finding out is that the census now, seldom are we gonna see paper versions of the census. You can now do it on the telephone, you can do it online. There are so many different ways to get this information that's so needed in our community. So I'd like to know, I know that from what I've heard that Neil Osborne is going to be spearheading this, but I'd really like to know his plan and what we can do as a council to make sure that they're doing everything possible to get the word out and the comfort level to all the residents of this community that this information is vital. to make sure we get everything that's due to us and from the federal government. So thank you for hearing me out, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I've had a few phone calls from butters. I know that although it's a shopping center, the people across the street are noticing various unhealthy issues pertaining to the donation bins. I'm all for the donation bin. I think it's very positive, but there's got to be a better way to locate it. Maybe if we can look into maybe moving it to the side of the building where the Sherman Williams painting store is, where it's not A, so congested, and B, it abuts sides of other buildings, but still has access to that. I think where it sits right now, it was just clothing. But now people coming all of the night just throwing it over the fence and leaving broken furniture. It looks like a dump. So I know the intent is well met, but I think that the execution of it has to be done with a little bit more respect for the abutters and for the people that are that will be using the second hand clothing and such, that it be handled in a more humane way, I should say. It's just disgusting. So if we can look into that, I'd appreciate it. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: No, I applaud the amendment, but I really think we should move on this either committee of the whole or subcommittee meeting on ordinances and that we write something up immediately and follow what our neighbors are doing to make sure that there is somebody watching these organizations because it's terrible. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Let's move on that.
[George Scarpelli]: I tell you what, Mr. President, the new chief of staff really works pretty quick because that's already moved. So I think that, uh, things are happening fast. So, um, I got a phone call today from the neighbor. It was nice. They tried to treat it as a Christmas ornament. But once Christmas, the lights still bothered them. So it's nice to see that it's finally gone. It's a message board that read this traffic changes ahead, which everybody knows now. So I'm glad to see they moved that. So thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I'm just, you know, I know Council Marks always is the sounding board for the Middlesex area of the Fellsway. But again, we have an area that neighbors have tried to call different entities and we're getting nowhere. And again, I did And State Representative Donato is working very hard to finalize the date with DOT and other state agencies on the meeting with Fountain Street, with the meeting with South and Main. And the list keeps growing, so I'm just adding this along the residents in that area. Especially with the winter months, the visibility and some of the sidewalks in that area really pose a real hazard. So they really want to see if there's, I know you've seen it in a few different areas. On Elm Street, I know that they just finally lit the underpass of 93 with new LED lights, so it's you know that they're capable so If we can get the word out to see who we can if we can ask the city Engineer or see if we can see who's who can look at that. Mr. Randazzo. Maybe see if we can get that done.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Falco. Just to shed a little light, I know this is part of my job duties and what people don't realize is that if there isn't a contingency plan in place, it takes up to three years to build a Zamboni. And what we had to do in the neighborhood community that I work in, you don't realize the trickle down effect. It costs a lot of money to run rinks. And it's vital that every minute that you can sell that ice so our youth programs can use that facility is important. So the idea of not having the Zamboni, I know that Councilor Knight, there's a rental, there's an emergency one that DCR has, but that's usually, either taken by another community and it's tough to find. So I know that in the past what we've done is we actually reach out to the Boston Bruins and it's something that we might look into that every two years they turn over, they have three Zambonis. So they turn over their three every two years. So it might be prudent to look into reaching out to the Boston Bruins in the garden to ask them if one is going to be available soon. Because it is an expensive piece, but you can't trade off The idea of Zamboni goes down for a month. What you lose, not just in your participation for your kids and the residents in the community, but the lack of revenue that is vital to make sure that you have the funding to keep that rink alive. So it's a very tricky combination. So I support Councilor Knight's recommendation with the Zamboni. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Hey. All right.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, if you just, if we can amend that, I know that I think the contract is found the ground that works for the rank that oversees the Zamboni. Maybe if we can ask him to do an assessment to really show us. how much time we have left on this yet morning to give us an estimate. So, you know, he says we can survive using bits and pieces. And, you know, maybe the last three years it might be something we can take a little bit later. But I highly doubt that. But at least that will give us the information needed to make a sound decision if it does come in front of us.
[George Scarpelli]: The company is called Farmer Brown.
[George Scarpelli]: Don't laugh. He monopolizes Zamboni's Council night. I rest my case, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: That's why it works. And then it also depends on, our first issue was the batteries. The batteries went on our first Zamboni, that cost the city $25,000. We had to pay that instead of buying the used one that we ended up buying for $60,000. So it was sort of a waste. So that's why thinking ahead is a great idea. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I know we have two more items, but I know we have a constituent that wanted to speak about a concern.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I know that to be honest, I was so naive when I became the chairperson of transportation and we had the state in to discuss this and it was so positive. And I came back and I said, everything's going to be taken care of within a month. That was eight months ago. And I can tell you something, I've gotten more phone calls and more issues with that area than anything I've dealt with in four years as a city councilor. It is so dangerous, not only for the people that live in the area, the pedestrians. I told you, it's like when we were kids, we played Frogger. That's exactly, it's a video game. People go across that and your life is in your hands. So I know that there are some things that we said we will wait for the state, but I think that, I know that Council Marks brought it up last week. There was a major accident. And what I'd like to do, I know that if we can, I'd like to send a report over to Chief Buckley and the mayor. Some of the things they said were low-hanging fruit. were those stop signs on Toro, Butler, and the raised sidewalk on that side. I think that if we can do that right now, that's something we can control as a city. So I think we should move on that as soon as possible. And I recommend that we direct the chief and we offer the mayor to please push that along to make sure that that issue is at least being heard. I think one of the biggest things is if you see some change, at least residents feel like, okay, that they're being supported. And I think that the other piece is the people that are driving those routes or walking those routes or riding their bikes in those routes are saying that it's more of a comfortable area and they have to slow down. So I think it's important, it's imperative. And I know, listen, Representative Donato, I've talked to him in the last 10 days, a hundred times, and he has been pushing. It's been very frustrating for him, especially as a state delegate, The conversation was the new year, was the holidays. So I think that he's really pushing for a meeting relatively soon. And as soon as we get that meeting up and running, I think it's going to be a very interesting meeting to see who shows up. Because I think this isn't just a South Street issue. I think the whole community's had it. people don't want to see those accidents because again I know that we said that when someone gets killed is when there's an uproar and then all of a sudden you see flashing lights and you see cones and paint. I don't want it to get to that level. So if we can move that along, Mr. President, I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, and I believe what was mentioned was the painting of the roadway to minimize to one lane, to look at the raised sidewalk, and the stop signs further up South Street, especially in Truro.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I thank Councilor Falcon for bringing this forward. Kevin's a wonderful young man, great family, and anything Kevin puts his mind to, he accomplishes, which is an amazing feat. If you know Kevin, Kevin's a big kid and loves giving back to the community. So I know just recently he just started coaching Little League and he takes that same type of passion to like what's what he does with the Eagles with the scouts. So I I second Council Falco's resolve and congratulate Kevin on a well-earned Eagle Scout. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Interesting. Interesting. We'll be here all night now. This is great. Good job.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: You're gonna repeat after me.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I appreciate Councilor Marks bringing that up. I had a lengthy discussion with Representative Donato right after our inauguration and it's been very frustrating. He has been working very hard to try to set up a meeting not only for the Salton Main but also for the residents that are looking for the sound barrier over on So the frustrating piece that he relayed to me was that The conversations will start back up, and we would call for a meeting first thing after the holiday because of scheduling concerns with the people from DOT. So this has been very frustrating. This is something that we talked about as part of our discussion, that I would put forth a resolution next week. I'm glad you did it this week. We could just add it through. I was giving the representative His due diligence, he was meeting with them this week, and then hopefully he's calling for a meeting on next week. So the sooner the better. So I appreciate bringing that forward. And it is something that we keep saying, until someone dies at that intersection is when you're going to see something happen. But if I could just follow that up with a B paper, if I can, and jump ahead and ask our new mayor and our police chief, I think a lot of the low hanging fruit can be accompanied here and followed up here with our traffic department. So raised sidewalk, illuminated stop signs, painting on some of those streets, we can have our department do that right away. I think that we're waiting for the state, obviously they've dragged their feet. I believe that we're also looking for the stop sign further up South Street. I believe at Toro, and that hasn't been done yet either. So if we can just follow that up with a letter to the mayor, administration, and the chief of police, that we look into that, and hopefully they can report back to us with some of those traffic calming measures. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Well, I think that here we are, our first meeting together in a new term. And I think it's an innovative approach. And since Councilor Knight brought this up, I've reached out to our colleagues in neighboring communities. And it's not far-fetched. It's what most communities do, by the way. They hold their council meetings the same evenings that the city halls are open. I think one big change that might have been overlooked when we changed the hours of city hall employees is that city hall closes at 1230 on Fridays. So you eliminate half of a day. And it's an important day for the fact of the open meeting law and when information has to be disseminated. So I think that you bring some great points, something that I'm thinking heavily on supporting, but I could see where there are benefits to moving the day. Like Council Knight says, I'm ready to work any night. I think that it's important, but You know, I think change is pretty good, too. And you bring up some great points. And like, again, I talked to some colleagues in neighboring communities, and they find it to see that they don't have as many resolutions coming in in the format that we're seeing here in Method, one of every four. So I think that's the transparency piece is important. I applaud you for making that effort, and we'll see where the votes lie. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you Mr. President. So I I know that he's a man that deserves to say things over and over again, but I won't. I know that I, too, remember our Method Municipal Law 101, I think, by Professor Rumley. And he tells you like it is. And it's so impressive. And one thing I realized, when you see Mark Rumley, he's a man of passion, love, and commitment to the city of Medford. That's one thing you realize. No matter if you think he's right or wrong, he's always about what's right for Medford. And he stands by that. So it is sad to see him go. I, too, hope that our mayor finds a place for him where he could share his wealth of knowledge. I know that his passion and love for his friends and colleagues here in City Hall, the way he speaks of people and members of this community, like Mr. Lee, his best friend, and what he gave to this community. I think Mark Rumley is, he probably won't concur with this but you speak in the same breath of Mr. Lee and Mr. Rumley and I think it's something that we'll miss so I too want to wish him luck and he's also a man that really wants to share his his beliefs and his support when times are down. At times in my life, as a coach or a municipal worker, we've hit bumps in the road and Mark would be the first person to call you and just lend his support and his wisdom. And I'll never forget that. He's always, he's been a friend when he's reached out and helped us in times of our confusion and need, so I appreciate that, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I know we have a community member that would like to speak. I think he's a historian, a new town city historian. And hmm.
[George Scarpelli]: Chairperson.
[George Scarpelli]: Very good. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I really do.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: come to order. The Secretary will call the roll.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Ms. Crow. Before I get started in this induction, I just want to make sure everybody understands and give them a round of applause. With every induction today, we give a common theme, and how great the parents are. And I see a lot of my former athletes that are here tonight that are being inducted. It makes me so proud. But I think we all owe our parents a round of applause. Thank them for everything they do. So, a few things I need to point out. It is amazing when you look at the names of Karen, and Faggiano, and Lopilato, and Andre, and Waldron, and the common theme is how great physical education teaches can make an impact in a kid's life. Thank you for giving me that opportunity. And Ben, that bucket of slush I did deliver, the Crasco family did steal it. That did happen. Another thing I'd like to point out tonight is Coach Sweat is wearing pink. For those people that know Coach Sweat, if you ever showed up to a softball practice with pink cleats or pink gloves, The common theme was always that we're coaching athletes and it's made a huge difference. So I want to thank all of our student-athletes being inducted today. Something that, for me as now an alumni and a member of this honorable committee, I will tell you if you walk into any Dunkin' Donuts in Medford for $2.20, You can get a medium, regular. It's all about turning up in Hall of Fame, so it's very important. Last thing you'll notice, I'm wearing Mrs. Andre's glasses because I forgot them. And I'm not embarrassed to do this. I can't see anybody in front of me, so this is great. It's my honor and privilege today to talk and call out one of my favorite student-athletes ever to come to high school. Kyle Andre, class of 2007. Cross-country, four letters, co-captain. Basketball, four letters, a guard, GBL All-Star, three-time co-captain, several 20-point games as a senior. Softball, four letters, outfield, co-captain, GBL All-Star, junior. Total letters, 12. She was awarded the Friends of Angel Torres, a great honor for our Mustang athletes. So, I have the privilege and the honor of being a head coach of multiple sports at Medford High School. Having this opportunity is one of the best opportunities of my life in announcing one of my all-time favorite Mustang athletes. It makes me super proud that Kyla's situation as a Mustang softball player came with many ups, but a lot more downs. As a freshman in softball, Kyla not only made our varsity team, but started in the center field and was one of the GBL's best lead-up hitters. Kyla led the team in stolen bases her sophomore year, and both seasons was top three in batting average. She was named to the GBL All-Star team her sophomore year, and her talent was shooting toward greatness. Kyla Erdovasi lived all four years a Mustang softball player. Let me tell you about her downs. In my opinion, Kyla was headed in the direction of being known as Medford High School's one of the greatest players until the end of her junior and senior basketball seasons, when both ended with Kyla tearing her ACLs in both knees, which put her on crutches for two final softball seasons. That's when her downs brought her to what I believe is true greatness, in my opinion. Knowing Kyla could not play her last two seasons, she never missed a game or a practice. Kyla was named captain her senior year, and Kyla was an honor roll student who dedicated herself to medical. She would come to practice as soon as practice was over, she'd run off to therapy, never making her softball team second. While doing that, Kyla still maintained a daunting academic schedule, earning honors every year. One question that has been asked was, how does Kyla receive a varsity letter while she is injured? My answer is simple. Kyla earned the right to finish both seasons on the field as a varsity player. I remember talking with that trainer and asking permission that Kyla could have the opportunity to lip off the center field position and record one inning to make her eligible for those well-earned varsity letters, and that's what she did. I remember the crowd as one of my proudest coaching moments, was announcing Kyle's name on senior day, and watching him bow to her number, was painted in center field, and that, in my mind, was a true example of what a true Mustang looks like. I'm so proud tonight. to announce a captain and an athlete that I think has done one of the most admirable, moved on to one of the most admirable positions as a teacher. As a coach, you want to teach your student athletes to be the best they can be. And I'm proud that Kyla has taken those thoughts and that attitude, and now she's probably one of the best special education teachers in Medford High School. And I'm so honored that she's doing that. I think it's as a coach, Something that Mr. Matatal and we talked about when we were coaching together is making those student-athletes into great people. And I've only said this to one other athlete, but... I had a son, and when I would talk about Claire, I knew C.J. Gard is someone that I've always simulated my son to be one day, one of my former student-athletes. My daughter, Gianna, someday could be like Alejandra and be the happiest father in the world. So, ultimately, I congratulate her, and welcome to the class of 2018 Method Mustang Hall of Fame.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I'm reviewing everything. It looks like everything's in order, but do you know the hours of operations yet?
[George Scarpelli]: The store in general.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, and I know the The Starbucks is coming in?
[George Scarpelli]: And those hours, will they run concurrent?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, Mr. President, I find everything in order. I move forward in favor of this paper.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. So I've heard a lot of things tonight. I've heard a lot of things the last few months. And one thing we realized This is a problem for 30 years. It's happening 30 years all over the city. And that's a problem with our facilities. The dual station was prior to my tour here on the city council. And one thing that forced me to run for city council is to make a difference. Because the words mediocre Medford was banging off my head over and over again. and making a change. And I hear it from everybody. We need a new library. We need a new police station. We need a new fire station. We need to refurbish the schools. We need to refurbish the high school. We're pushing things forward and trying to get things done the right way. Now, a few weeks ago, the word misled, I might have used that word, that statement when we talked about the funding of all three projects and keeping things on the timeline. And the vote at the time to freeze everything is to make sure we got all the answers that we needed to move forward. The answers I got were pretty loud and clear. I know where the mayor stands on this. I understand where we're trying to go and what we need to do to move forward. People have come up to the podium, said we need to be bold, we need to make strong choices, we need to do things that you're gonna feel uncomfortable about. It's not that I don't believe everything what everybody said. I call most firemen my friends. Do I think the firemen are important? Every day they came through the door to help my dad. I know their worth, and I appreciate them more than anybody can understand. So to throw those things around is a little distorted. The gun range, we understand that. They haven't had the gun range since they blew the boiler apart years ago. That was 30 years ago. Nothing's been done. Nothing has been done. So we sit and we meet and we talk about, let's have a meeting. Let's have another meeting. Let's have another meeting. Let's put this in place. Let's put this in place. So when we sat with the administration, we talked about the different avenues we can go to achieve what we want. A library, a police station, a new fire station, the refurbishing of the schools. You want to talk about bold, and I keep saying this, I'm bold. People want to threaten people, you want to threaten the council, get on the councilist to want to vote for debt exclusion. Because this is like a dog chasing its tail right now. Until we make bold decisions on what we have to do to make our city straight, it's not going to be done the way we're doing it right now. So I've already heard it. It's called the George Scarpelli Resolution, the debt exclusion resolution. I'll own it. And what does that mean? As we move forward with this process, it'll be explained to everybody in the community. But I didn't make a motion 45 days ago and sit there and say, let the time go by, then I'm going to vote for a police station to be built again. No, I visited North Reading. I visited Wilmington. I've visited communities that have done a debt exclusion. I've sat with groups of people. I've gone to Little League fields. I've sat with people that are the strongest, most conservative people in the world, and I explained what a debt exclusion is. Because I feel that's the only way that we can do what we promised, something I'm not hiding from, was one counts I promised to stand beside the firemen and women. So you want to talk about making a tough choice in Medford? How about being the council that's sitting there telling you, I'm ready to roll on a debt exclusion to get this project done. So if the councils that were questioned in that room, in the other room about, we need five votes, five votes to make it something we could put on the ballot. But we only have four, so it's not going to happen. Well, I challenge the community, I challenge the firemen and women to look at the council that don't want to vote for it and realize we can have meeting after meeting after meeting and get nothing done. Or we can take bold decisions and stand up And say, yeah, I'll take it. And if it's fear of losing an election, I'll lose the election. Because when it's all said and done, I want a library, I want a police station, and I want a fire station like we promised. I want my children to go to Medford High School that's refurbished that everybody's going to be proud of. And doing it with what we have right now on a tax roll, it's not going to happen. Doing it on our ordinary operating budget, it's not going to work. I've talked to thousands of people. We need a fire station, Councilor Scarpelli. We need a fire station. What are your plans? And I tell them my plans. This is what I think we need. Why do you want a fire station? Because the men and women are living in sub conditions. We need to get that built. We need them in that situation. So we do that. And I want you to see common sense, because common sense says, how do you want to do it? Well, let's bond it. Sure, let's bond it. Times are good right now, but in two years, when times are tough, guess what, everyone? We still have to pay a bond. So the people you're protecting, the people that you want to help with this, with building a fire station, making sure our firemen and women have everything they need, guess how we have to pay that bond back? By laying off the men and women you want to protect, in our schools, in the police department, and in the fire stations. So you want to talk about bold and making a decision? Here I am, I'm publicly doing it. You want a challenge? I'll challenge everyone in the community. We're not, we keep doing this 30 years. I've been seeing this for 30 years. All of our facilities are substandard and we need to find a way to get ahead of it. And from what I heard, what I've met with the administration, it's not going to happen traditionally. So we have to think outside the box. So again, do I love the firemen and women? Absolutely. And I know someday, hopefully not soon, they're going to be coming to my door and I want them trained because my children depend on you. And the policemen and women that protect us every day, of course, I think they need a gun range. And when my son and daughter need to do a project, they need to use the library. I've heard it all. But I'm telling you, people have come up to that podium and said, you people are going to have to make a tough decision. 45 days ago, we made a resolution to halt the police demolition, the building, so we can talk about this. And we did. And I'm secure enough that I know that the process we have, the process of sitting here behind this reel when you get this job and having meeting after meeting and after meeting and just hope things get done, if that's what you wanna do, go ahead, but I'm not voting for it. I'm gonna make a bold decision. I'm gonna step up to make sure the fire station's built. At least I'll try everything I can. If I have Councilors that don't wanna support that venue or that option, Because I also heard, we don't want to do it because of a debt exclusion, but it's a proposition to an afternoon override. It's more tax. No, it isn't. It's a tax that's focused on one job. And as I talked to the people in the community and we looked at what that job is and building a fire station, every person I talked to said, if you're telling me the way that it's broken down at a $600,000 home, appraisal, that $54 a year will go directly to a fire station, I'm going to support it because I know where my money's going. And knowing that as the money comes in with the philanthropist, hopefully, that the money that comes in goes back into that fire station and brings down that debt. And then as soon as that debt is paid off, that that tax is gone, but we have that station, I'm willing to take that chance. especially when we talk about the way it looks by excluding our seniors, our handicapped, our blind, our veterans, because that's what we got, that's what we asked for. We asked the administration to give us numbers so we can be creative in our decisions. And to me, making a decision behind this reel, at nights that, no, I don't sleep, because you have to make these decisions. It's not easy. It's not easy, just like it's not easy for you guys. But I know when I put my head down that we've already put out $2 million for a police station that's needed. And we know we can move forward with that project. And we can make bold statements by moving forward. I'm willing to do that. So if I offended anybody, I apologize. But that's George Scarpelli. And that's how I'm going to work. And that's how I'm going to push forward. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: The one thing we agree on. We agree, Mr. Buckley, because you know what? We both want action. But when you see over and over again, for 30 years being on the other side of that rail and now being behind this rail, you have to make decisions. You have to try to be bold about what you're going to do to make these things happen. So, and I agree, we need these, we need, our councils stand together with this, but I'm telling you, from what I've seen and what I've heard and what we've done, because this isn't, like I said, we didn't bring it up and go to sleep in 45 days. I've done my homework. I've gone out and knocked on doors. I've seen other facilities and other organizations, and I'm telling you, the way I feel my decision that I have to be, that I have to be secure in is that, that I've done my homework and understand to move things forward, this is what we need to do. Now it's not popular, tonight, but I think this is the way I feel secure and going.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Yes, I want to thank the for ordaining me as the writer of this resolution. But again, I think that, um... Trying to think outside the box and being creative and finding different ways to have, we use the word transparency and it's so important that if we can do something to get the word out to our constituents and have their voices heard. And being the debt exclusion, a valid question. I think that it's important that we get all the information that we need from our city solicitors so our writings are correct. And if I can also amend that, Mr. President, that if we can look at a timeline, if the city clerk can give us a timeline. If so, be that a valid question, what we need to do. step-by-step in making sure that if it does come to fruition, that we know when and how we have to do that. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: You know, if... Councilor Scarpelli, point it out to me. I agree. I think that now thinking of that, you brought up a good point. So after, I'd like to just let you know, after you're done, Councilor Marks, I'd like to table it and bring it and put it in as a full resolution next meeting and make sure that people see that. So thank you for making that point. So you withdrawing the motion? Well, let's first. Right. If I could just finish my comments. I'm sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate that too. But again, the debt exclusion is for this council to get the word out so the people can speak and maybe they can help us with their vision and their word. So it's not, a bold statement for any council, especially myself to say, let's do debt exclusion. It's to get the word out to the public to say, hey, maybe this is a way we can do this. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Council President. I think that Councilman Marks brings up a great point, We talk about leverage, and we talk about our operating budget. And if the citizenry sees the vote to do something like a debt exclusion, and they see that the money that would be earmarked to a certain job or a certain facility like the fire station, wouldn't it be great to know we can go back with the figure that's already been publicized and say to our administration, hey, Now that we've come to fruition with this vote, if it does happen, we now have money that we can look at and say, hey, this money was allocated through our operational budget. and let's focus now on our streets and adding park personnel and adding DPW personnel. So I think it's a great idea. I think that, you know, there's so many possibilities. That's why this Committee of the Whole meeting is going to be great just to banter about these wonderful ideas and whether it comes to fruition or not, so be it. It's a valid question and again, we're going to hear from the people who are going to make that decision. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: It's getting the word out. So, it could be a ballot question that the people that you can make that vote to say no, that's all.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I found the paperwork in order. I just, if I can, Your hours of operations, if you could just tell us.
[George Scarpelli]: OK. And there'll be due delivery? 11 to 10. And you'll be delivering? Yes, we'll be delivering. OK, yeah. Are there delivery plans?
[George Scarpelli]: So, Mr. President, I see everything is signed off and in order. I wish the gentleman at the podium much luck with him and his family and his endeavor here in Medford. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scott Belli. Thank you, Mr. President. I think Councilor Marks will bring that forward. I missed that. Again, I think that Councilor Knight's right. We might need to look at something more permanent. But again, I think the biggest sticking point was when it was affecting food trucks that were affecting our brick and mortar businesses. So I, too, would second that resolve from my colleague. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye. As amended.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor. President Caraviello, I apologize for the chicken scratch. This is, I've received many phone calls and emails over the last few weeks about the lack of community barrels placed throughout our main streets and roads. And what's happening, especially in front of most of our convenience stores that sell lottery tickets and such, what's happening when people are exiting those businesses that people don't find, uh, can't find a place to discard those from what I've been told. And they throw them down and they blow down the side streets and end up in front of a neighbor's houses. And, um, I took a tour down cherry street, um, just yesterday. And, uh, that street from what the residents sent me pictures that, uh, he would come home at night, uh, sweep the front of his house, leave for work, come back, send me the picture of the next day with the same type of litter, cigarette packs, wrappers, candy wrappers, and then mostly just scratch tickets and such. So I think that what we're seeing is even if you go through, traverse through our business districts, you don't see as many barrels, especially decorative barrels, that could be placed around our community. So I'd ask the city administration, the DPW director, to maybe give us a price and see if they can give us what we can do to place these most needed barrels throughout our community so we can look at it when it comes to budget time, or is that something we can look at for the city administration for our complete streets as we move forward with that? So again, I appreciate your time. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Again, thanks for everybody. I appreciate everybody's input. And I think that it's important that we as a city council really focus on making sure that the taxpayers get what they deserve when they pay their taxes. And that's basic necessities and making sure that our streets are cleaned. I think that's one of the frustrations of the neighbor that I talked to is that he's out there every single night And he's sweeping in front of his house every single night. But if we're not doing what we need to do as an administration, then that's a problem. So I think it's important that we get the prices for the barrels and the solar-powered barrels and also the cigarette dispensaries. But I also like the idea that we look at a formalized program of street sweeping. And I think that's something we need to look at as a budgetary item when it comes, comes up this, uh, the spring. So, uh, thank you again. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I could, I know that I forgot to do this, but if we can get the word to someone in the city to change the flag at Webster Park. I guess it's pretty tarnished and tattered, so.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can get that. McNally Park. Webster Street, McNally Park. Yes, please. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I apologize for stepping out for a second, but before I heard this writing, I wanted to just reiterate Councilor Longo-Curran's appreciation for getting this out and understanding that, you know, it's frightening to think where it is and where it could be. So, expanding it and making sure that our safety of our children, again, in another format is foremost and most important. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I just had a few phone calls in the last couple days, one before I left, that if we can just have the director of DPW, maybe some from the Water Department, do some testing. They've had some issues with discolored, rusty water in that area periodically. So if we can see, or if they can update any work that's being done so we can update our residents, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. First of all, I'm talking to the chair of the subcommittee on zoning and ordinances. I know that they've been drafting up a few of the ideas and presentations of what we're looking for moving forward with development. One of the biggest concerns that we hear now is the lack of housing and the lack of the type of housing that makes Medford the community that Medford is, which is housing for families. And I think that looking into the rules and the policies that we need to jump in a little bit deeper in seeing what we're doing to make Medford continue to thrive as a community of families and looking to possibly increasing our affordable housing to what is acceptable in our community. I know we're still at, I believe, 10%, but I think it's something that needs to be looked at. Another piece that's alarming, you can see it in our community next door, they're having huge concerns with residents there that were accepted into the affordable housing units in different condominiums and now are being told by the developers that are there that they now need to move out because of the popularity of of selling those condos as individual units and they're being asked to leave and given a mere $1,000 just to move out. So I think it's important that before I shouldn't say this before, but it's hitting us now. I think we need to take a more active role moving forward and ensuring that what we're doing to protect our residents here in Medford with our added development and how we're looking at affordable housing is presented in a way that we hold the values of our families in our community. So with that, I appreciate the time, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli. Councilor Knight.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Again, thank you, Mr. President. This came about with conversations indirectly with the new director of recreation, members of the park board and members of our youth organization and also my background in working with facilities management and playing fields and knowing what we're doing in our community where I work. and preparing our playing fields. One thing that we know that our DPW is drastically understaffed and I want to make sure that as the weather, if the weather continues the way it's going now, we might be playing at the beginning of March in a few weeks, hopefully so. But we need our playing fields in a position where our children can play in a safe environment and making sure that we're giving, making sure the city administration is preparing those fields and giving our DPW and parks department what they need to make sure that those fields are under, um, uh, supervised and make sure that they're, they're, they're, um, planned accordingly moving forward as we get closer to the season. Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Councilor Knife.
[George Scarpelli]: There's a petition here this evening, if you can come on up. Name and address of the record, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, Justin, the hours, it seems like the hours are gonna stay the same, and I know you provide a valuable resource to that neighborhood, especially to my son, so I appreciate that. But it seems like everything is in order, Mr. President. I move to accept this paper.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Dello Russo.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President, Councilor Knight for bringing that up. I know that As we're talking about such a serious situation, part of our discussion was the involvement of local politics and local municipalities to get involved, and really now pushing our state delegation to bring on to Washington what we think is something that needs to start at the local level, because we're seeing major major catastrophic situations not being addressed by our brothers and sisters in Capitol Hill. So I know that the President has made some moves today, but I think that we need to now start as a local government pushing our state delegation to making sure that they're presenting our views here in Medford that we can't stand for this type of violence. And say what you want about freedom of having guns, but there's a severe issue that's going on right now. And I think that the city of Medford should take ownership and start taking the lead that we can now push on to press legislation to change our gun laws in this country and making sure that the way people can purchase firearms are looked into in a more drastic, dire way because what happened this past week and what's happened for the last few years and so on, It needs to stop. It needs to stop today. And we need to take an active role as local government that if our senior delegation is not taking that step, I think we need, as a voice of Metro, to now start pushing that along to our government, our delegation in Washington. So I hope that our, my colleagues, support that and move forward with it. Thank you. Thank you. Councilor Lungo-Koehn.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I'm not going to... I won't be redundant what my colleagues have already issued, but I do have to. I know we have parents that need to talk, I have to express my displeasure, Roy. I know that how hard you work as an educator, one of the greatest superintendent minds in education in the Commonwealth. I think what we have with this situation is something that in many layers bothers me. As a former school team member, we were adamant that notification was paramount to whatever situations moving forward at that time, and obviously that didn't happen. I appreciate you coming out and saying that you're taking responsibility. And I appreciate you saying that this isn't a forum for personnel matters, but I know as a parent, as a parent of two children in the Medford Public Schools, we need to see something happen. There has to be something done, Roy. This isn't something we're going to push to the side. Something has to be done. Because I know we don't want to say it. We don't want to live in fear. I personally think the opposite now. We need to live in fear. These are scary times. Our kids are afraid. And this would have been a great learning process. Imagine getting into a classroom and teaching the situation of bringing this type of dangerous ammunition and weapons into our schools and understanding how we could teach our children how important and how scary this is because it is scary. Society today is scary. It's frightening. You know, I've talked to my kids about this just the other day. You know, Councilor Knight and I talked about this when I talked about our local government taking action. And then this happens. I'm so disappointed, so many different levels, because I'm going to beat the dead horse with this. It's bullets. It's ammunition to a weapon. of mass destruction, where kids have died just recently. So there is fear. There is heightened fear in this room and at home with our children. So I need you to understand. I know we don't want to be afraid and we don't want to, you know, we want to make sure that our kids feel safe in our schools. I absolutely agree with you, and we do a great job in our school system making sure we feel that way. But you know what, I think society has to realize, when things get done, it's out of fear. And this is fear, this is necessity now. And to have to start at this level, this is something that I'd have to put a huge black eye in what didn't happen in this role. This was bad. This was bad in so many different ways. that I'm sick of just even discussing. But moving forward, I know the parents need to talk, but we have so many members in our community, our school community, that you work so hard to protect and making sure that our students with mental issues and are disabled. These are our kids that are right in the front line of situations like this, that we need to get answers for to make sure they're protected. So, again, as a former colleague of many of those teachers there who taught with them and went through the lockdown situations in that course, I can understand, but we need to do more with this situation. We need to know that if it happens again, a bullet is enough, okay? A threat is enough that we have to let our children and our parents and our faculty know what's going on so we can prepare our children to make decisions what we think is right and safe for our children. So, again, believe me, I hate to be a heavy, but I tell you what, I am so sad and so disappointed that this wasn't presented in that fashion. I know Dan Tully, he's a very thorough individual, and I'm sure he brought it to the attention that it was going to be reported. and it wasn't. So I think we need to, you need to move on this. And I know that the investigation is one thing, but as a leader of our school system that I, that I entrust with you, we need to make, we need to make some hard decisions tonight. So thank you, Roy. Point of information.
[George Scarpelli]: No, sir. Councilor Scarpelli, good job. I apologize, I find the records in order to approve them. Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President, and welcome. And as I go through these, the paperwork looks like everything's in order. I know that the Board of Health had mentioned that there'd be a thorough cleaning. Absolutely. And so the business itself isn't doing a major change, but the question is the time. We know about your closings and everything's in order?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so I find everything in order, Mr. President. I move to accept this grant petition. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scalpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, thank you, Councilor Falco and this board. As I went and contacted a few of the neighboring communities that already have adopted this ordinance, it's astonishing that what we're saying is what they're seeing. The comment of the impact of the carbon footprint isn't even discussed yet. The discussion in Somerville that we're seeing is the education factor and what people are learning and what kids are picking up. And as you look and read in some of their community meetings that they've held, a lot of our seniors made the simple fact that they didn't remember plastic bags, they brought their own bags. This generation, our generation, our young generation, thanks to Mr. and Mrs. Lasky, I know I left my house this morning and John and I were talking, my son who's 14 years old, he wants to make sure he leads the initiative with Mr. Lasky to make sure we can swim in the Mystic Lakes, thanks to a project they did. So part of that, as I left, he said, Dad, what about doggie bags? What about the recycling of those bags? This starts a great discussion throughout our community and especially with our youth. I think this is a great initiative. I applaud our students at Medford High School and Mr. Toon, who leads that group, because I think that's where this all really starts. That's the base of this. So I really applaud that and commend you. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I could, I want to make sure that we make sure that our student, our Medford High School student is part of that committee with us and make sure that... That's clear in the resolution. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So the neighboring communities had a heavy public participation piece. I'm sorry? The neighboring communities that have adopted this had a very heavy public participation piece.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. And again, thank you, your team doing a great job with this. And we all know how Harris Park, the work it needs. I know that I receive phone calls right away. People, you know, what about car park? What about the baseball fields? And this is this is great because that's a dialogue. And we express to people that I believe the deadline is coming up soon for the new round. The 15th, correct? January.
[George Scarpelli]: One of the big pieces, I know, being part of the recreation committee that we put together, I think we should really pay close attention to making sure that part of these projects in the parks have inclusionary equipment for our special needs students. Is that spelt out in this? I don't know if the city can address that. I know the water is nice, but one thing that we talked about at the recreation meetings, we're trying to make more inclusionary parks and accessibility for our children.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, but it would be what was expressed in those meetings more of adaptive equipment. So a child with a wheelchair with special equipment.
[George Scarpelli]: Great.
[George Scarpelli]: But thank you. And again, I think this is what people were looking for when we, Roberta, started the dialogue with community preservation and looking into such important projects like this. So thank you very much. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Falco, for bringing that up. And I know that Kent Krause is in the crowd tonight. One thing we've all worked on is working with the school system, especially. Kent traverses the Brooks area, and that's one of the hot spots that we always get phone calls from. And I think that what we really need to make sure that there's a collaboration and there's discussion, both the city and the school side, in making sure that these areas are done and there's a line of communication open between both departments. Not to say there isn't, but sometimes they do fall through the cracks. We're expecting, and I know that even this Thursday, they've increased it to 12 to 15 inches. for this Thursday and getting those areas taken care of as soon as possible. work on a plan for this upcoming storm to make sure these common areas are taken care of. I know that, unfortunately, probably won't be here by Thursday, so I just wanted to make sure that that was out there. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you council Scott belly Thank you. I know council Falco not to repeat but I Joe deserves it. Joe Pace was a wonderful Italian-American, often the strongest voice in the North End while they were going through the big dig, and a person that loved his job and loved his family. I know Angela and Joe and Joey and You know, I spent a lot of time and donated a lot of time and effort in St. Francis Parish at the time. And they were, Joe's passing, Wilhurt, he was one of those individuals that left a mark. And I think everybody that you talked to had a positive story about Joe Pace. And I can say a few from my personal, but I'll leave that with the family and myself. We'll miss him and send our condolences to the family.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. The Conner family, well-known in the Spring Street area. Mr. Conner was a loving member of his community. He loved Medford. He was a member of the Mustang Association. He was also a past board member of the Wellington Club with Little League. I grew up with his son, Sean. Mr.. As of yesterday's wake had some great stories how mr.. Connor up until last week watched our program on Tuesday nights and made sure he always Sent message and what he thought This council should be doing so and I appreciated that he's a great person great family Great Mustang, so he'll be missed
[George Scarpelli]: I was supporting my colleague when we talked about getting this to the city solicitor. I think that the message is clear. I think that we've all spoken. We support the neighbors. Like I said, we've seen the work and we've mentioned that. So I think that if we can do that, I know it's great that you can come out here tomorrow, but I think we need our legal team to work with our code enforcement to make sure both of them are doing what's right. And if we need, then you need to get the chief of police involved and do what needs to be done for those residents. I think it's very important that all three entities are contacted.
[George Scarpelli]: I was confirming with my, I mean supporting my colleague when we talked about getting this to the city solicitor. I think that the message is clear. I think that we've all spoken. We support the neighbors. Like I said, we've seen the work and we've mentioned that. So I think that if we can do that, I know it's great that you can come out here tomorrow, but I think we need our legal team to work with our code enforcement. to make sure both of them are doing what's right. And if we need, then you need to get the chief of police involved and do what needs to be done for those residents. I think it's very important that all three entities are contacted.
[George Scarpelli]: So moved.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you for bringing this forward. And to this solicitor, I know John already brought this up, and I don't want to be redundant, but I actually had two phone calls today that residents were running to the building's office today to try to secure permits and possibly variances because they were looking at building up, because they're nervous, the same questions you had, probably I've been getting, and I think that's my concern, is that the home improvement jobs, the home improvement variances that people will be looking for, because, you know, facts are facts, the costs of housing now have gone up, so people want to take advantage of that while they can, and try to make their homes the best they can at this time. So looking at the fear of someone questioning it down the line or that don't belong, that don't live in that radius and that these people that they've grown up and the neighbors that they know that they might have talked to and let them know that this is what's happening, They'll be going to the appeal board and they'll be looking for something like this. They are just nervous that if it goes further out where people might not want a two family or a second floor built or that they would question out of fear that they wouldn't get this. This is one of their biggest concerns. So I like the idea that, you know, the idea that putting it for the six or more units, I think that that's probably our biggest fear that we've heard here is that, the fear that things are happening so fast, so quick, and notifying people. But my question is ultimately, it can't be, the ordinance can't be written, excuse me, I'm getting off track, but the question is that, If this, what we have in line right now, if this is adopted, it still goes to the state level, and the state level, it's just something that could be heard, but won't be, can't be used as judgment.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you very much for my trivial response, but I think, again, I know that my council colleague put together a very thoughtful ordinance. I think that the concerns that Councilor Falco brought up with the site plan review, I would definitely support this if, because I think we all sit here and understand the phone calls we get with the bigger developments that come out that are affecting the zoning that's affecting our our community so I will support this wholeheartedly if we can that I agree with what council Falco stated with site plan reviews, anything over six units, that this would be implemented. So I think that wouldn't affect the phone calls I got that were questioning and nervousness and the fear of our neighbors that how this could affect a homeowner who was looking to improve their home and their future. So I hope that helps with the other Brianna, but thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, point of information. Councilor Scott, point of information. Is this as amended with what we talked about with the three, you know, with looking into, you know, the site review and the three family? That would be, we send the whole paper. We send the whole thing, okay, all right, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: You mentioned that you wanted his public record, what you gave us, and that's what I find the issue, that's all.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you for bringing this forward. And to this solicitor, I know John already brought this up and I don't want to be redundant, but I actually had two phone calls today that residents were running to the builder's office today to try to secure permits. and possibly variances because they were looking at building up. Because when they're nervous, the same questions you had, probably I've been getting, and I think that's my concern, is that the home improvement jobs, the home improvement variances that people will be looking for because, you know, facts are facts. The costs of housing now have gone up, so people want to take advantage of that while they can and try to make their homes the best they can at this time. So looking at the fear of someone questioning it down the line or that don't belong, that don't live in that radius. and that these people that they've grown up and the neighbors that they know that they might have talked to and let them know that this is what's happening, that they'll be going to the, you know, the appeal board and they'll be looking for something like this. They're just nervous that if it goes further out where people might not want a two family or a, you know, a second floor built or that they would question out of fear that they wouldn't get this. This is one of the biggest concerns. So I like the idea that putting it for the six or more units, I think that that's probably our biggest fear that we've heard here, is that the fear that things are happening so fast, so quick, and notifying people. But my question is, ultimately, it can't be, the ordinance can't be written, excuse me, I'm getting off track, but the question is that If this, what we have in line right now, if this is adopted, it still goes to the state level, and the state level, it's just something that can be heard, but can't be used as judgment.
[George Scarpelli]: So that's what I'd say. Thank you very much for my trivial response. But I think, again, I know that Mike, a council colleague, put together a very thoughtful ordinance. I think that the concerns that Councilor Falco brought up with the site plan review, I would definitely support this if, because I think we all sit here and understand the phone calls we get with the bigger developments that come out that are affecting the zoning that's affecting our our community so I will support this wholeheartedly if we can that I agree with what Councilor Falco stated. site plan reviews, anything over six units, that this would be implemented. So I think that wouldn't affect the phone calls I got that were questioning and nervousness and the fear of our neighbors that how this could affect a homeowner who is looking to improve their home and their future. So I hope that helps with the other Brianna, but thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, point of information. Councilor Scott, point of information. Is this as amended with what we talked about with the three, you know, with looking into, you know, the site review and the three family? That would be, we send the whole paper. We send the whole thing, okay, all right, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: You mentioned that you wanted his public record, what you gave us, and that's what I find is the issue. That's all.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarbell. Sorry, spin the rules so we can hear. Take something off of the unfinished business. That would be 17-734. Motion by Councilor Scarbell
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. After extensive meetings with our friends from Eversource and a thorough review on many concerns and issues, they've been very responsive with Aside from all of the official approvals through the city engineer and all that need to be apprised of this daunting task of a huge project that will take us through a few different cities. If we can have, I think that we've gone over every issue to nauseam and I appreciate everybody's effort and Eversource's responses to all of our concerns and issues and I move to accept and place it on file. Move approval, excuse me.
[George Scarpelli]: Can we pull up paper 17-590, it's the Method Association, LLC, Middle Glen Mall, special permit extension hours, 30 day review for December 5th, if we can?
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, if I can make the motion that we now. 60 days. 60 days, next review.
[George Scarpelli]: The loop maybe? I'm sorry? The loop on cable access.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank you, Mr. President, again. I thank Typical Roberta sitting in the back and sitting down, but again, this is what people would be doing. She's definitely not the lazy one. But I will tell you, if you see what's going on in neighboring communities that have implemented the Community Preservation Act, and you see the small projects that are happening, it makes such a huge impact on the community. And it really makes a neighborhood a true neighborhood again. So I'm really excited to see that. I think that one of the conversations I've had with different organizations, a lot of the youth organizations, It's something as simple as getting the word out to their organizations. For instance, Little League, Babe Ruth, Girls Softball, Youth Socket. Those organizations talk about fields and some questions they've had because I know they've been trying to capture some funding through the city. But everybody that voted for the CPA had talked about, well, this could be a viable source. So I think this is another avenue that maybe we can tap into and reach out to those organizations. There's one group that contacted me and I directed them right to the site so I know that they're coming with a, it's not a huge project, but it's also a project that what I like to hear and like to see is that you have organizations that come coming in that will be asking for something that they'll work for as well. It's not just my hands out give it to me so we can take care of this one group and that's it. It's I think that what's nice to see is the the partnership to say hey listen this is what our community voted on and this is what how people have worked on to get make this happen but at the same time we want to we want to do something great for our community But we're willing to put in the work with you. So it's impressive to see the community stakeholders now as we move forward with this process. So I'm, for one person who worked very hard with the recreation group and this being one of the pieces that when you talked about arts and not just sports and fields but the whole gamut of what we can do. I think it's really exciting to see. So, again, I thank you for all your hard work. I know Roberta's still sitting back there, but thank you for everything you've done. And I'm, for one counts, I'm very excited to see what's coming in front of us. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Vice President. I can feel my phone blowing up already from Parris Street and Evans Street. This is being done because there's a major water leak. and those projects are still on course as we've talked about for the spring, correct? Yeah, nothing's been compromised. I can just only imagine. So, again, this is because there's a major water leak in that area that needs to be done.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Vice President. I received a few phone calls on automobiles that are being left in front of residential homes that are resided by some seniors and the cars are left there for days at a time. If we could just have someone from the Traffic Enforcement Office or Officer Hodden and maybe reach out and just take a few trips down there to Cherry Street and maybe do a little extra enforcement and making sure that these out of state cars aren't left here overnight for a long period of time. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Sorry, spin the rules so we can hear. Take something off of the unfinished business. That would be 17-734.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. After extensive meetings with our friends from Eversource and a thorough review on many concerns and issues, they've been very responsive with aside from all of the official approvals through the city engineer and all that need to be apprised of this daunting task of a huge project that will take us through a few different cities. If we can have, I think that we've gone over every issue to nauseam and I appreciate everybody's effort and Eversource's responses to all of our concerns and issues and I move to accept and place it on file. Move approval, excuse me.
[George Scarpelli]: Can we pull up paper 17-590, it's the Method Association LLC, Middle Glen Mall, special permit extension hours, 30 day review for December 5th, if we can?
[George Scarpelli]: the loop maybe? I'm sorry? The loop on cable access.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank you, Mr. President, again. I thank typical Roberta sitting in the back and sitting down. But again, this is what people would be doing. She's definitely not the lazy one. But I will tell you, if you see what's going on in neighboring communities that have implemented the Community Preservation Act, and you see the small projects that are happening, it makes such a huge impact on the community. And it really makes a neighborhood a true neighborhood again. So I'm really excited to see that. I think that one of the conversations I've had with different organizations, a lot of the youth organizations, It's something as simple as getting the word out to their organizations. For instance, Little League, Babe Ruth, Girls Softball, Youth Socket. Those organizations talk about fields and some questions they've had because I know they've been trying to capture some funding through the city. But everybody that voted for the CPA had talked about, well, this could be a viable source. So I think this is another avenue that maybe we can tap into and reach out to those organizations. There's one group that contacted me and I directed them right to the site, so I know that they're coming with a, it's not a huge project, but it's also a project that what I like to hear and like to see is that you have organizations that come coming in that will be asking for something that they'll work for as well. It's not just my hands out, give it to me so we can take care of this one group and that's it. I think that what's nice to see is the partnership to say, hey listen, this is what our community voted on and this is what hard people worked on to make this happen, but at the same time we want to do something great for our community but we're willing to put in the work with you. So it's impressive to see the community stakeholders now as we move forward with this process. So I'm, for one person who worked very hard with the recreation group and this being one of the pieces that when you talked about arts and not just sports and fields but the whole gamut of what we can do. I think it's really exciting to see. So, again, I thank you for all your hard work. I know Roberta's still sitting back there, but thank you for everything you've done. And I'm, for one council, I'm very excited to see what's coming in front of us. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Vice President. I can feel my phone blowing up already from Parris Street and Evans Street. This is being done because there's a major water leak. And those projects are still on course as we've talked about for the spring, correct? Yeah, nothing's been compromised. I can just only imagine. So again, this is because there's a major water leak in that area that needs to be done.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Vice President. I received a few phone calls on automobiles that are being left in front of residential homes that are resided by some seniors and the cars are left there for days at a time. If we could just have someone from the traffic enforcement office or Officer Hardin and maybe reach out and just take a few trips down there to Cherry Street and maybe do a little extra enforcement and making sure that these out of state cars aren't left here overnight for a long period of time. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So I would just sort of...
[George Scarpelli]: Aye.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scott Belli. Thank you, Councilor. Mr. President, Councilor Marksley, reiterating what I don't want to be redundant. You brought up the same points. I think that in today's Studies have shown that we want more people off the street and out of cars. And when we're prohibiting people or welcoming people to their nearest bus stop, I think that's exactly what we're doing. We're limiting them from using public transportation. So I second the resolve from Council Marks and I'd like to put a timeline to that, that we get a response back within two weeks if we can. And if not, I want to send this to subcommittee and ask, I want to give it to the timeline, give it a few weeks, and then what I'd like to do if we don't have the proper response, I'd like to hold a subcommittee meeting with the representative from the T. If that doesn't, if we don't get information back, because we know the lack of communications from the MBTA has been with this body. So I think that we need to hold their feet to the fire. And when you talk about that one area, it's a dangerous area. And to put a picnic bench out there, it It's disheartening when you talk to some of those neighbors that see what might happen, what goes on in that area on a negative note when they are waiting in between buses. So I second the resolve from Council Marks and amend it to see if we can put that within two weeks if we can. an answer back within two weeks. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Uh, thank my colleague for bringing this forward. I know that, uh, months and months and months ago when we first were presented, I was one of the councils that voted against it because of, uh, the lack of, uh, information that went out to our constituencies, to our community and with the opt out because I'm, uh, in discussion with, with neighbors where, where neighbors that, uh, that have been very conscious about purchasing their own energy and they're valid in understanding what the situation was. And when I did my homework in visiting a few communities, one of the biggest pluses were The plan that was put in place once it was passed by each community and the plan that notified our residents about the value of this process and the option of opting out. question that came about was who would fund the notifications, all of the work that needed to be done to let all of our residents know about the opt-out. With our last meeting and having the director from Melrose who came in and spoke so well on this issue, we answered a lot of questions that were brought to my attention that people had asked me about. And how would we find out who would pay? Well, it all comes under the company that would be awarded this project. if and when it happens. So my biggest concern wasn't the community aggregation plan because I think it's needed. I think it's something that every constituent can use in bringing their electricity bill down. I mean, not dramatically, but it does help. And again, the biggest piece was getting the notification out to our residents. And I was pleasantly surprised and optimistic now in making sure that When that plan is released to the public, it's going to be very thorough and with as much information and time needed for our residents to opt out. Because again, one of the issues we often hear is a lack of notification. Well, with this plan, it falls back on the company that's awarded this project. So that, in turn, goes back out to our residents. I appreciate Councilor Langel-Curran for bringing this up, and I second her motion.
[George Scarpelli]: I believe we tabled it because they didn't they couldn't complete all the questions we had and they didn't get to to explain their whole Communication plan.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that's a and then we're completing it next week So is there a way that we can get? So maybe the city engineer can give us some information.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I don't want to be redundant, but I will. Um, I think that, um, you know, the, the, the issues of, of having that master plan, I think it's very important. I think that we wouldn't be, um, We wouldn't be true to this position if we weren't looking at the bigger picture. But the truth of the matter is, as one person put it, to hold this valuable historic piece hostage, in a sense, would be frightening to me if we would lose it over the winter because we didn't fund it. Unfortunately, We weren't part of those discussions years ago, and I think the plan that was put in place, and with the CPA that's now in front of us, and what we talked about last week, using the Brooks Estates as a viable revenue source, I think it's something that, as someone that worked very hard on the recreation piece over the past few years, and talking to the friends from the Brooks states and looking into different avenues that we can capture funding, I think it's a positive move forward and the thought of possibly losing the Carriage House to me is unacceptable. So one thing we did preach over the last few years is our support to our historical sites and to, in my eyes, I feel that this Carriage House is one of the granddaddies of them all, so I'm going to support this paper. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scott Billy. Thank you, Councilor. Mr. President, Councilor Markswell, reiterating what, I don't want to be redundant. You brought up the same points. I think that in today's, um, Studies have shown that we want more people off the street and out of cars. And when we're prohibiting people or welcoming people to their nearest bus stop, I think that's exactly what we're doing. We're limiting them from using public transportation. So I second the resolve from Council Marks and I'd like to put a timeline to that, that we get a response back within two weeks if we can, and if not, I want to send this to subcommittee and ask, I want to give it to the timeline, give it a few weeks, and then what I'd like to do if we don't have the proper response, I'd like to hold a subcommittee meeting with the representative from the T. If that doesn't, if we don't get, information back, because we know the lack of communications from the MBTA has been with this body. So I think that we need to hold their feet to the fire. And when you talk about that one area, it's a dangerous area. And to put a picnic bench out there, it's it's disheartening when you talk to some of those neighbors that see what might happen, uh, what goes on in that area and a negative note when, um, when there is, when they, when they are waiting in between buses. So, um, I second the resolve from, uh, Councilor Marks and, um, amended, uh, well, to see if we can put that within two weeks if we can, um, an answer back within two weeks. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, my colleague, for bringing this forward. I know that months and months and months ago when we first were presented, I was one of the councils that voted against it because of the lack of information that went out to our constituencies, to our community, and with the opt-out. in discussions with neighbors, where neighbors that have been very conscious about purchasing their own energy and they're valid in understanding what the situation was. And when I did my homework in visiting a few communities, one of the biggest pluses were The plan that was put in place once it was passed by each community, and the plan that notified our residents about the value of this process and the option of opting out. So one other thing that I want to point out, question that came about was who would fund the notifications, all of the work that needed to be done to let all of our residents know about the opt-out. And with our last meeting and having the director from Melrose who came in and spoke so well on this issue, we answered a lot of questions that were brought to my attention that people had asked me about and how would we find out who would pay. Well, it all comes under the company that would be awarded this project if and when it happens. So my biggest concern wasn't the community aggregation plan because I think it's needed. I think it's something that every constituent can use in bringing their electricity bill down. I mean, not dramatically, but it does help. And again, the biggest piece was getting the notification out to our residents. And I was pleasantly surprised and optimistic now in making sure that When that plan is released to the public, it's going to be very thorough and with as much information and time needed for our residents to opt out. Because again, one of the issues we often hear is a lack of notification. Well, with this plan, it falls back on the company that's awarded this project. So that in turn goes back out to our residents. I appreciate Councilor Longo-Curran for bringing this up, and I second her motion.
[George Scarpelli]: I believe we tabled it because they didn't they couldn't complete all the questions we had and they didn't get to to explain their whole Communication plan.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that's a and then we're completing it next week So is there a way that we can get? Maybe the city engineer can give us some information.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I don't want to be redundant, but I will. I think that the issues of having that master plan, I think it's very important. I think that we wouldn't be true to this position if we weren't looking at the bigger picture. But the truth of the matter is, as one person put it, to hold this valuable historic piece hostage, in a sense, would be frightening to me if we would lose it over the winter because we didn't fund it. Unfortunately, we weren't part of those discussions years ago. And I think the plan that was put in place, and with the CPA that's now in front of us, And what we talked about last week, using the Brooks Estates as a viable revenue source, I think it's something that, as someone that worked very hard on the recreation piece over the past few years, and talking to our friends from the Brooks states and looking into different avenues that we can capture funding, I think it's a positive move forward. And the thought of possibly losing the Carriage House to me is unacceptable. So one thing we did preach over the last few years is our support to our historical sites. to, in my eyes, I feel that this Carriage House is one of the granddaddies of them all, so I'm going to support this paper. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: We do, I believe the motion is to table. I know that we had a meeting prior to this, it was very informative, but I think that we ran out of time and a lot of the Constituents' concerns need to be addressed before we vote on this, so I believe that we're recommendation to table this until meeting on December 5th, I believe. December 5th, Tuesday.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: most desirable sites in Medford when you talk about history and what the Brooks State talks about the Brooks Manor and the Carriage House and making sure that we continue with that and making sure that our kids' kids can follow with what we're trying to do here in Medford. One of the pieces that I wanted to bring along is as we had our discussions last year and looking into the recreation, full-time recreation program, and you look at the partnerships that, you know, I personally use in my community with recreation and look to see what kind of funding we can bring for both organizations, I think is a plus in the community I work for. And looking at the Brooks Estates, Excuse me, the Brooks, the manor and the carriage house, it was one of the biggest. attractions when we talked to different constituents. And I know that Councilor Knight mentioned it, but you talk about the trails, you talk about the area and what recreation really means. It's not just parks and playing games anymore, but when you're talking about snowshoeing and trail walking and then fishing and the other issues that people don't realize when you talk about nature and getting out and bird watching and covering insects. There's so many out-of-the-box thinking and using this wonderful location as a jumping point. I think that it's a historical piece, but this is new life that could be fed off that. So I'm really excited about it.
[George Scarpelli]: So John and I see the easy part. So this wasn't a big deal. No, I'm not going to say that. But again, we've all preached our historical sites and how important they are to Medford. And I think this is the granddaddy of them all. So thank you for all your hard work.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know I got a few phone calls this morning. I know that the Traffic Commission did their due diligence with their study on Oakland Street and stopping the incoming traffic coming from North Medford. And that uses a cut through, but what we're seeing this morning, I believe, that there was a confrontation with two cars going opposite directions. could have escalated because of that being used as a cut-through and the neighboring roads as well. So I know if we could just ask the, if we could make a motion to ask the Chief in the Traffic Commission to give us a report of what has been done and what studies have been done to remedy that and see if we can look into making that a one-way if that's possible, but it's something that has to be looked at, so thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Good evening. Good evening.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Good evening. Your name and address for the record.
[George Scarpelli]: We did discuss that. That's part of the 200 feet that we were told that Winthrop street will now have sidewalk throughout the, And that's national grid is going to take care of that. It's not a national grid. I believe it was ever source. That was already set. Is that something? And we'll be, that'll be part of next week's meeting too, I believe. So we can see this part of the MOU. I believe it was in the MOU. Good. Thank you all. Congratulations. Thank you. Anyone else?
[George Scarpelli]: Um, for one, I know that this council has worked very hard with making sure that our, uh, our natural grid never source and other utilities do what they need to do. So I find this disheartening. This will be the first time I'll see that, that announcement. So I think this is something that we'll, we'll get on as soon as we can. So thank you for coming out tonight and, uh, and sharing your opinions. Thank you. Um, we have a motion. Do you have any other, anyone else? Sorry. How's it going?
[George Scarpelli]: We appreciate it. Again, I think this is, we just had a Committee of the Whole meeting with the project being done with Eversource. And one of the biggest things we talked about is, as we move forward with that before we approve it, is having more of community input and making sure we have community meetings. So I find this disheartening that this has happened again to this neighborhood. So, um, I know that you have champions behind this rail. They're going to make sure that we can do what we can right now. So, uh, Mr. Vice president, if you can.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. On the motion, Vice President Mast, that we amend the paper that be forwarded, the mitigation, the Traffic Plan, and the Clerk of the Works. neighbor communication. So that's the four pieces I believe that we need to send to the administration. It's amended. Okay. So second, uh, Councilor Knight, all in favor.
[George Scarpelli]: All opposed. The ayes have it.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Vice President. I remember the resolution is very important. Consumers appreciate it. So we're going to, on the motion, seconded by Councilor Dello Russo that this go to subcommittee on economics. Business and economic development. Business and economic development. Name and address for the record. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Maybe at the end of the meeting, Mr. Cassin, if you could give us the name of that company that we can actually, not publicly, but ask the weights and measures director, Mr. Champoli, to look into that. That's what his job is, to make sure those ones
[George Scarpelli]: Leave a note.
[George Scarpelli]: They also do the oil trucks and all our cabs too. So, um, okay. On that, on that motion seconded by council dollar Russo to, uh, move this paper to subcommittee. On economic development, all in favor? Aye. All opposed? The ayes have it. If we can go to unfinished business, uh, 17-571, um, to dispose of its common vehicular license, City Bazaar, 466 Main Street, City Council since July 18th. So it's been tabled. Um, they're not coming. So we have the motion to, uh, to receive and place on file. Okay, on the motion to be seconded by Councilor Knight, all in favor? All opposed? The ayes have it. Next is 17-726, council meeting October 31st, 2017. Push to eight o'clock, city council October 24th. Motion to be seconded by Councilor Knight. All in favor? All opposed? And the motion passes. Yes, Councilor Knight.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. Next, records were passed to Who were they passed? I'm sorry. I took them from Councilor Marksley. Records were stolen by Councilor Knight. There were tabled records of meeting October 17th were passed to Councilor. Mungo Kern. She's not here. Records of the meeting, October 31st, 2017. We'll pass to vice president marks. How do you find those?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. On the motion table, those records all in favor. Opposed guys have it. So motion motion to adjourn. Councilor Del Russo seconded. Councilor Falco all in favor. Aye. And meeting is adjourned.
[George Scarpelli]: Good evening.
[George Scarpelli]: Good evening, your name and address for the record.
[George Scarpelli]: That's part of the 200 feet that we were told that Winthrop Street will now have sidewalk throughout the district.
[George Scarpelli]: It's not a national grid. I believe it was ever source. That was already set.
[George Scarpelli]: So it is incinerating and we'll be, that'll be part of next week's meeting too, I believe. So we could see this part of the MOU. I believe it was in the MOU. Good. Thank you all. Congratulations. Thank you. Anyone else?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Um, for one, I know that this council has worked very hard with making sure that our, uh, uh, uh, or natural grid never saw us and other utilities do what they need to do. So I find this disheartening. This will be the first time I'll see that, that announcement. So I think this is, uh, something that we'll, we'll get on as soon as we can. So thank you for coming out tonight and, uh, and sharing your opinions. Thank you. Um, we have a motion. Do you have any other, anyone else? Sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I think this is that we just had a Committee of the Whole meeting with the project being done with Eversource. And one of the biggest things we talked about is, as we move forward with that, before we approve it, is having more of community input and making sure we have community meetings. So, I find this disheartening that this has happened again to this neighborhood. So, I know that you have champions behind this rail that are going to make sure that we do what we can right now. So, Mr. Vice President, if you can.
[George Scarpelli]: On the motion, Vice President Obama, that we amend that, amend the paper that we forwarded, the mitigation, uh, the clerk of the works traffic plan and the clerk of the works, right? Neighbor communications. So that's the four pieces I believe that we need to send to the administration. It's amended. Okay. So second council night, all in favor.
[George Scarpelli]: All opposed. The ayes have it.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Vice President. I remember the resolution is very important. Consumers appreciate it. So we're going to, on the motion, seconded by Councilor Dello Russo that this go to subcommittee on economics. Business and economic development. Business and economic development. Name and address for the record.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Maybe at the end of the meeting, Mr. Cassin, if you could give us the name of that company that we can actually, not publicly, but ask the weights and measures director, Mr. Champoli, to look into that. That's what his job is, to make sure those,
[George Scarpelli]: Leave a note.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. They also do the oil trucks and all our cabs too. So, um, okay. On that, on that motion, seconded by Councilor Dello Russo. to move this paper to subcommittee on economic development. All in favor? Aye. All opposed? The ayes have it. If we can go to unfinished business, uh, 17-five, seven, one, um, to dispose of it's common vehic, vehicular license, city bazaar, four 66 main street city councils, July 18th. So it's been tabled. Um, they're not coming. So we have the motion to, uh, to receive a place on file. Okay, on the motion to be seconded by Councilor Knight, all in favor? All opposed? The ayes have it. Next is 17-726, council meeting October 31st, 2017. Push to eight o'clock, City Council October 24th. Motion to be seconded by Councilor Knight. All in favor? All opposed? And that motion passes. Yes, Councilor Knight.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. Next, records were passed to Who were they passed from? Mr. I'm sorry. I took them from. Records were stolen by Councilor Knight. There were tabled records of meeting October 17th were passed to council. Mungo current. She's not here. Records of the meeting, October 31st, 2017. We'll pass to vice president marks. How do you find those?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. On the motion table, those records all in favor. Opposed guys have it. So motion motion to adjourn council council Del Russo seconded council Falco all in favor. Aye. And meeting is adjourned.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. So I take it in the past year, what have we done, Mr. Kerens, to rectify this issue during the absence of this vehicle?
[George Scarpelli]: This vehicle assists us in making sure that we eliminate any flooding in neighborhoods, I believe, is that one of the?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. I think that, again, this is one of the initiatives I think we all have spoken about, making sure that our DPW is equipped with the proper equipment to make sure that our city can run as it should. So, um, especially thinking about the, what we've lost and revenue due to the fact that we've had to go and outsource it at $2,500 a day to me is, is frightening. So I, uh, strongly, um, accept this, uh, this motion and the purchase of this machine. Mr. President. Thank you. Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, um, Mr. President, real quick, I know that, uh, last week I did come in a little late and the, uh, there was a little confusion that the councils might not have, uh, word was some councils weren't interested in what was going on the zoning board meeting because they weren't attending that meeting. I appreciate my colleagues being there, but just for a public notification, I feel very strongly about this issue. I know we've talked about our zoning and reviewing our zoning. I appreciate council Lungo current for bringing this forward because I think this is very important and I support it. Um, but again, uh, what, what just to set the record straight, I wanted to be there just as much as any of the other Councilors. And, um, and this is one of the reasons why I support this. Um, I felt at the time that the job that that was given to us with what we had on the, on the calendar, uh, was minimal that I wanted to attend that whole meeting and listen to the concerns of those citizens that called me and emailed me so we can give them the answers that they needed. So just to just wanted to throw that out there to make sure people understood that, that for this Councilor, I feel just as strong as I think every council behind this rail about what's happening with zoning issues and what happened at that meeting because it went downhill pretty fast and that's not the way to do business in our community. So thank you. Thank you, Councilor Scott Peli. Name and address of the record, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Vice president. Councilor Scarpelli. Uh, thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate my colleague for bringing this up. If he doesn't mind, could we, could we amend that to maybe, um, I think it's such an important issue, especially when you're talking about, uh, jackhammering or maybe even worse, maybe that we should have the city engineer call for not only just going door to door, but then call for a community meeting for that area up in that, in that, that location. So we can answer all the questions. I think we're going to be similar questions throughout all the residents. And if my colleague doesn't, doesn't mind to add that on, I'd appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Good evening. Two years ago, I stood before you and I told you that I have a vision. of making Medford a better place to live, work, play, and raise a family. Well, hello, my name is George Scarpelli, and I'm running for re-election for the Medford City Council. Let me thank Henry and the Medford Ward and City Committee for holding this event this evening, and let me tell you a little bit about myself. I'm a lifelong resident of the city of Medford. I was born and raised on Parris Street by my wonderful parents, Lily and Aldo. I'm married to my beautiful wife, Dina, and I have two wonderful children, John, 14, and Gianna, 12, who both attend the Medford Public Schools. Growing up, I attended the Medford Public Schools and graduated in the class of 1987. I received my bachelor's degree from Salem State College in Education and then went off to Cambridge College to secure my master's degree in school administration. Many of you may know me because I've coached children or have while volunteering as a coach at Medford High School, or my Medford High School coaching career for 20 years, or as a teacher in the Medford Public Schools for over 15 years. Well, nine years ago, I was given the opportunity to oversee the recreation department for the city of Somerville, where I oversaw staffing of over 100 employees in a multi-million dollar budget. I'm a proud member of the Medford Mustang Hall of Fame and the Mass State Soccer Coaches Hall of Fame. I was a member of Medford's school committee for six years before running for seat on our Medford City Council last term. While walking the streets of Medford, I spoke with our residents and listened to their concerns and issues. I put a plan in place that if elected, I would attack these important issues head on. One of the top priorities was having more collaborative city council, a city council that the city of Medford would be proud of. One good example of that collaboration was a 7-0 unanimous vote for this past budget that was unheard of. A few key initiatives that I championed over the last year and a half was first the implementation of a year-round recreation department. Thanks to the mayor and the city administration for naming me the chairperson for a focus group on recreation, this leadership role involved involved working with committed volunteers in the community that worked to put the recreation program in place, which was unanimously voted in support of a full-time rec department. a recreation department that will provide programming for senior citizens to preschool-age children, a department that will provide programming for our school department, Friends of the Fells, our arts community, our vice commission, the Friends of Chevalier Theater, the Mystic River Association, our business community, and many other partners. Another important issue to me and the residents of Medford and across this country is the horrible opiate crisis, which has personally affected many of us. After attending too many heart-wrenching funerals, we knew this issue needed to be addressed as soon as possible. The Mayor and the City Council has attacked this sensitive issue with great force by adding funds and hiring a recovery coach who works with the Board of Health and the Police Department that has helped families and individuals affected by this horrible epidemic. Next is public safety. Concerns of our citizens making sure we as a council supported all of our public safety personnel on the police and fire departments. We move forward the process of building a new police station, purchasing of 12 new police cars, new safety gear for our firemen and women with new breathing apparatus and turnout gear. Finally, for the future, we have a plan in place for a new training tower and fire headquarters. My continued support to public schools, The city council secured educational funds through the budget that allows our class sizes to be arguably the best in the commonwealth, and to continue to give our teachers the ability to move our most important assets, our children, forward. This funding provided the resources necessary to add nine new programs in our vocational technical high school that included robotics, a restaurant, and a new media center. Also, we increased funding for capital improvement projects, Those are a few key points that I've championed in such a short time. I'm asking you to help me to continue with our shared vision for this next election season. We have accomplished a lot, but there is more hard work to go. I will continue to focus on existing successes, push forward with the full review of our zoning laws and assist us in smart growth and development, continue with the development of Medford Square, and continue to work with the Medford Community Preservation Community to assist in positive endeavors for affordable housing, historic community, recreation and arts. I thank you all again and respectfully ask for your vote on November 7th. I'm joining you on November 7th on the ballot, hopefully number one in your heart. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I find all the paperwork in order, and I move to accept and move forward with this.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli, you have the file. I do. Thank you, Mr. President. I find all the papers in order. So this is just a few questions to the petitioner. This is just a transfer. You're taking over. Are you maintaining the same business? So nothing's changing? No change. You understand the work hours and what we have for your hours of operations. Okay, I find everything in order, Mr. President. Move forward accepting this petition.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I follow my colleagues in this endeavor. I think that what we'll get back in fines and penalties would be tenfold, and I think it would be automatically. So I appreciate your work in making this come to fruition, and I support this wholeheartedly. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I thank my colleague for bringing this issue forward. I know that this has been one of the biggest questions as we go street to street and talking to residents and asking questions about our zoning laws and our ordinances. I think that months back, when we first brought this issue up, one of the biggest concerns was the amount of money that a consultant would cost. And I think we need that consultant. I think it's time that we do that. But as neighboring communities have done, something that I've mentioned here in the past, they've used the Metropolitan Planning Council, that kind of set an agenda that they could follow to look at our our changing of zoning laws. So I'd like to call for a meeting with maybe possibly bring in the Metropolitan Planning Council, a subcommittee meeting or a community of the whole meeting to bring that organization into just to ask them for some guidance in what they've done with other communities that had similar issues that we have here in Medford that some of our zoning and most of our zoning haven't been looked at in over 30 years. I second my colleague's resolve, and I'd like to make an amendment to that, if she doesn't mind, that we call for a meeting with maybe a committee of the whole meeting relatively soon. I know it's been a very difficult time for scheduling, but maybe set something up with a consultant from the Metropolitan Planning Council and ask them for some guidance. We're already a member of the council, and It's, it's free to us. So I think that that might be an avenue that we could research and move forward with. So again, I thank, thank council for bringing that forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Shame, Rick. Thank you. Again, thank you. Councilor Falco and I both were, I think we're all in attendance at the St. Francis traffic meeting. And one of the things that we talked about where the mayor is, and I believe Chief Sackler said that those wouldn't be an issue. And, it would be very helpful for those neighbors. So I think that, um, with the residents that, that asked and we brought it forward and it seemed like it was pretty positive. So if we can get that update and get those, get those installed as soon as possible, it would be greatly appreciated.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, one last thing. I know that, um, thank you Mr. President, but, uh, Councilor Falco's, uh, hard work and, uh, the new traffic, uh, engineer that will be coming in, I think that, That was one of the, so the residents know that one of the first priorities that they talked about is the Fulton Heights and what's happening there. That's a major cut through for 93. So it hasn't been forgotten. I think that that's one of the things that residents have been stopping me and Councilor Falco about that we live in the neighborhood that it's, where have we gone since that meeting? So it's still a hot topic and we won't let it die across the community. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye.
[George Scarpelli]: It would be appreciated. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I thank my colleague Brianna Longo-Curran for bringing this forward. I think that I had a problem about three months ago with a resident, a Haitian resident, a young teenager that was having some issues with a passport. to get to his grandmother's funeral in Haiti. And all I had to do was make one phone call to Henry. And the consulate called this young man back and made sure he could be back home with his family to rest his grandmother at peace. And these are just little things that Henry does. So I, too, he's a great man and a recognition well-deserved. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: At the podium, Paris Street, I talked to the city engineer today, it's ready for some work and repaving, so pretty excited about that.
[George Scarpelli]: Did you make- Finally, finally, I find those records in order and move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I find all the paperwork in order and I move to accept and move forward with this.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli, you have the file. I do. Thank you, Mr. President. I find all the papers in order. So this is just a few questions to the petitioner. As this is just a transfer, you're taking over, are you maintaining the same business? So nothing's changing?
[George Scarpelli]: You understand the work hours and what we have for your hours of operations. Okay, I find everything in order, Mr. President. Move forward, accepting this petition.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I follow my colleagues in this endeavor. I think that what we'll get back in fines and penalties would be tenfold, and I think it would be automatically. So I appreciate your work in making this come to fruition, and I support this wholeheartedly. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I thank my colleague for bringing this issue forward. I know that this has been one of the biggest questions as we go street to street and talking to residents and asking questions about our zoning laws and our ordinances. I think that months back, when we first brought this issue up, one of the biggest concerns was the amount of money that a consultant would cost. And I think we need that consultant. I think it's time that we do that. But as neighboring communities have done, something that I've mentioned here in the past, they've used the Metropolitan Planning Council, that kind of set an agenda that they could follow. to look at our changing of zoning laws. So I'd like to call for a meeting with maybe possibly bring in the Metropolitan Planning Council, a subcommittee meeting or a community of the whole meeting to bring that organization in to just to ask them for some guidance in what they've done with other communities that had similar issues that we have here in Medford that some of our zoning and most of our zoning haven't been looked at in over 30 years. I second my colleague's resolve, and I'd like to make an amendment to that, if she doesn't mind, that we call for a meeting with maybe a committee of the whole meeting relatively soon. I know it's been a very difficult time for scheduling, but maybe set something up with a consultant from the Metropolitan Planning Council and ask them for some guidance. We're already a member of the council, and It's, it's free to us. So I think that that might be an avenue that we could research and move forward with. So again, I thank, thank council for bringing that forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Shame, Rick. Thank you. Again, thank you. Councilor Falco and I both were, I think we were all in attendance at the St. Francis traffic meeting. And one of the things that we talked about where the mayor is, and I believe Chief Sacco said that those wouldn't be an issue. And, it would be very helpful for those neighbors. So I think that, um, with the residents that, that asked and we brought it forward and it seemed like it was pretty positive. So if we can get that update and get those, get those installed as soon as possible, it would be greatly appreciated.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, one last thing I know that, um, thank you, Mr. President, but, uh, Councilor Falco's, uh, hard work and, uh, the new traffic, uh, engineer that will be coming in. I think that, that was one of the, so the residents know that one of the first priorities that they talked about is the Fulton Heights and what's happening there as a major cut through for 93. So it hasn't been forgotten. I think that that's one of the things that residents have been stopping me and council Falco about that. We live in the neighborhood that it's where have we gone since that meeting? So it's still a hot topic and we won't let it die across the community. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I thank my colleague Brianna Longo-Curran for bringing this forward. I think that I had a problem about three months ago with a resident, a Haitian resident, that young teenager that was having some issues with a passport. to get to his grandmother's funeral in Haiti. And all I had to do was make one phone call to Henry, and the consulate called this young man back and made sure that he could be back home with his family to rest his grandmother at peace. And these are just little things that Henry does. So I, too, he's a great man and a recognition well-deserved. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: At the podium, Harris Street, I talked to the city engineer today, it's ready for some work and repaving, so pretty excited about that.
[George Scarpelli]: Finally, I find those records in order and move approval.
[George Scarpelli]: How's this guy belly? Thank you. Mr. President. I concur with all of my colleagues I did receive a phone call today and I did take a ride down to Willis and it's it's It is a mess. So I think that we really need to That's as a traffic engineer stats pretty soon. Hopefully these are one of the dangerous areas, I mean, Willis is notorious for many accidents up and down Willis Ave, so I think that I support this resolution, and I appreciate Council and I bring this forward. So thank you. Thank you. Name and address of the record, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, Scott Belly. Uh, thank you, Mr. President. I thank my colleague, um, for bringing this motion forward. I think, um, I think the mayor has done a very good job of getting, uh, constituents involved with different task force. I can attest to that with the recreation committee that worked so hard to see that through fruition. And I think that, uh, with so many questions and issues we have with development and so many educated, um, people in our community that if you went to the development hearing and you listened about the revitalization of Medford Square and the ideas from the different constituents, I think that would be a welcome attribute that that we should be using here in our community. So I think that I would second my fellow councilor's resolution. And I would hope the mayor's office will support that for the fact that a lot of the great things that are happening have come about with different task forces and committees that she started back in her beginning of her term. So I thank you for bringing that up.
[George Scarpelli]: If I could take these for a week to look in further depth, I'd appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I concur with all of my colleagues. I did receive a phone call today, and I did take a ride down to Willis, and I concur with Councilor Marks. It is a mess, so I think that we really need to, as a traffic engineer, start pretty soon, hopefully. dangerous areas. I mean, Willis is notorious for many accidents up and down Willis Ave. So I think that I support this resolution and I appreciate Councilor Knight bringing this forward. So thank you. Thank you. Name and address for the record, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, Scott Belly. Thank you, Mr. President. I thank my colleague for bringing this motion forward. I think the mayor has done a very good job of getting constituents involved with different task force. I can attest to that with the recreation committee that worked so hard to see that through fruition. And I think that with so many questions and issues we have with development and so many educated people in our community that if you went to the development hearing and you listened about the revitalization of Medford Square and the ideas from the different constituents, I think that would be a welcome attribute that that we should be using here in our community. So I think that I would second my fellow councilor's resolution, and I would hope the mayor's office will support that for the fact that a lot of the great things that are happening have come about with different task forces and committees that she started back in her beginning of her term. So I thank you for bringing that up.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli, how did you find those records? If I could table these for a week to look in further depth, I'd appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Comcast.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank my colleagues. I think everybody has brought up some valid points and issues, concerns. I appreciate Dave from Comcast. I don't believe Comcast has any issues. I have any issues with Comcast. I think you've done your due diligence. I think that the questions that were brought about this evening, I think that we've echo this my first meeting here at the council and what our roadways and sidewalks are looking at looking like with our utilities after they come in and use Medford for what they want and then just take off I think not I think excluding Comcast because they think that the conversation that we've had and the response that You put forth as your company. I think that's been very receptive But I do echo what a few of my colleagues are saying in Which is the biggest point is City engineer we can talk going back and forth about voting and not voting I see but I think that you know my recommendation will be just to table this and have an emergency meeting with the city engineer and to get these questions answered. Traffic plan, the positive aspect of bringing Wi-Fi in the square, that's a basic necessity I think everybody in our community should have, especially in Medford Square. But understanding that how many neighbors will be making sure that they've been notified, both on Ashland and our businesses up and down Salem Street. I don't want to delay this, I want to push it forward, but at the same time I think we need to have these questions answered by our city engineer and her department. So I find it, I want to move forward for our businesses and our community, but at the same I think that my colleagues have brought some valid points, unless we have some answers from our city side, and that's our engineer, about a traffic study, our timeline when we're doing the construction, our notification of our neighbors and our business owners, making sure that they were notified. making sure that the pedestrians that are walking those sidewalks during that construction, that it's a safe, traversed area because it does go to one of the busiest bus stops in Medford Square. If I could, is there a way through the chair that we can call for a meeting as soon as possible with the city engineer? Well, then my motion tonight would be to table and then move forward with trying to get the engineer and moving this forward. I don't want to delay it, so it does fall into construction questions. but moving it to get these answers, these questions answered and then hopefully be back at the table by next week and get all these answers that we need that we can bring to our constituents and make sure that the job goes without any issues and it's brought back to you know, with what we've set as a standard here as a council for all of our utilities that we're saying curb to curb and making sure that the construction timeline and notifications are done properly and thoroughly.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, if I can. Point of information. I'm sorry. This is the frustrating part. This is something that the engineer, that we should have had from the engineer. This is something that you, as the contractor, for Comcast, the business owner of Comcast doing that. So that's my frustration. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, that's the traffic.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I would rescind it. I appreciate Councilor Knight and Councilor Dello Russo's initiative. I think that, again, my biggest concern is that what we set forth, I think, not only curb to curb, I appreciate that, move forward with that, but the idea of when the construction will, what's the timeline for the construction, and where the making sure that the neighbors were notified and having the understanding that personally I would rather see it done at night, especially if there isn't a residential area that's being, you know, if we could put that forward, the recommendation that it eliminates some of that congestion in Medford Square and to help our business owners. the neighbors in that area, I'd be willing to take that off and make that as part of the amendment that goes forth to the city engineer.
[George Scarpelli]: And the, if I can, the notification to the neighbors again that they are given, you know, the proper timeline so they can understand what's going on in that section.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I believe I said it. Move on to the recommendations of Councilor Knight. Move for approval as amended.
[George Scarpelli]: I know we have a paper that's been tabled 17-593. I believe that Comcast Cable Communications Management LLC High Street, the position High Street and Hillside Ave for intersection. I believe that we're waiting on a question that maybe could be answered to move this forward. I believe the question was that we were asking for We can't take it off the table.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I apologize for jumping the gun, but I believe we're asking some clarification on this paper that we asked Comcast to report back to us to see if that job could be curb-to-curb also paving. So if you have any, can you respond to that?
[George Scarpelli]: My recollection is curb to curb.
[George Scarpelli]: We don't want to slow it down. OK, if we can, on the motion that we move forward with the same stipulations.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: It's zinc.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. My colleague asked the questions. Thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, thank you, Mr. President. I know in the past this council has looked at different concerns and issues like this and not holding Wegmans back, but could we do a 90 day trial period and move from there to see if that In that 90 days, if those 200 abutters feel that we report back to those neighbors, and if it's something that it has been a distraction, that we re-evaluate.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry, maybe not a pickup, but do they have a compactor that works?
[George Scarpelli]: So there is no noise.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. With the focus on just church business.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. The only reason why I can speak somewhat to this, my fellow council, that both the recreation and the assistant recreation director's position has been posted with the traffic engineer's position has been posted, and they're now accepting resumes for all three positions, which is very exciting.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, my colleagues. I think everybody has brought up some valid points and issues, concerns. I appreciate Dave from Comcast. I don't believe Comcast has any issues. I have any issues with Comcast. I think you've done your due diligence. I think that the questions that were brought about this evening, I think that we've made echo this my first meeting here at the council and what our roadways and sidewalks are looking at looking like with our utilities after they come in and use Medford for what they want and then just take off I think not I think excluding Comcast because they think that the conversation that we've had and the response that you put forth as your company, I think that's been very receptive. But I do echo what a few of my colleagues are saying, which is the biggest point is City Engineer. We can talk going back and forth about voting or not voting, but I think that my recommendation would be just to table this and have an emergency meeting with the City Engineer to get these questions answered. Traffic plan, the positive aspect of bringing Wi-Fi in the square, that's a basic necessity I think everybody in our community should have, especially in Medford Square. But understanding that how many neighbors will be making sure that they've been notified, both on Ashland and our businesses up and down Salem Street. I don't want to delay this. I want to push it forward. But at the same time, I think we need to have these questions answered by our city engineer and her department. So I want to move forward. for our businesses and our community, but at the same time, I think that my colleagues have brought some valid points, unless we have some answers from our city side, and that's our engineer, about a traffic study, our timeline when we're doing the construction, our notification of our neighbors and our business owners, making sure that they were notified. making sure that the pedestrians that are walking those sidewalks during that construction, that it's a safe, traversed area because it does go to one of the busiest bus stops in Medford Square. If I could, is there a way through the chair that we can call for a meeting as soon as possible with the city engineer? Well, then my motion tonight would be to table and then move forward with trying to get the engineer and moving this forward. I don't want to delay it so it does fall into construction questions. but moving it to get these answers, these questions answered and then hopefully be back at the table by next week and get all these answers that we need that we can bring to our constituents and make sure that the job goes without any issues and it's brought back to with what we've set as a standard here as a council for all of our utilities that we're saying curb to curb and making sure that the construction timeline and notifications are done properly and thoroughly. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry, this is the frustration frustrating part. This is something that the engineer that we should have had from the engineer. This is something that you as the contract of for Comcast, the business owner of Comcast doing that. So that's my frustration. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, that's the traffic.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I would present it. I appreciate Councilor Knight and Councilor Dello Russo's initiative. I think that, again, my biggest concern is that the What we set forth, I think, not only curb to curb, I appreciate that and move forward with that, but the idea of when the construction. will, what's the timeline for the construction and whether making sure that the neighbors were notified and having the understanding that personally, I would rather see it done at night, especially if there isn't a residential area that's being, you know, if we could put that forward, the recommendation that it eliminates some of that congestion in Method Square and to help our business owners and the, the neighbors in that area, I'd be willing to take that off and make that as part of the amendment that goes forth to the city engineer.
[George Scarpelli]: And the, if I can, the notification to the neighbors again that they are given, you know, the proper timeline so they can understand what's going on in that section.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I believe I rescinded and move on to the recommendations of Councilor Knight. Move for approval as amended.
[George Scarpelli]: I know we have a paper that's been tabled 17-593. I believe that Comcast Cable Communications Management LLC, High Street, the position High Street and Hillside Ave for intersection. I believe that we're waiting on a question that maybe could be answered to move this forward. I believe the question was that we were asking for If we can't take it off the table.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I apologize for jumping the gun, but I believe we're asking some clarification on this paper that we asked Comcast to report back to us to see if that job could be curb-to-curb also paving. So if you haven't, can you respond to that?
[George Scarpelli]: My recollection is curb to curb.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't want to slow it down. Okay, if we can on the motion that we move forward with the same stipulations, um, on the motion by Councilor Scarpelli, seconded by Councilor Russo.
[George Scarpelli]: It's you.
[George Scarpelli]: It's Zink. It's Zink.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. My colleague asked the questions. Thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, thank you, Mr. President. I know in the past this council has looked at different concerns and issues like this and not holding Wegmans back, but could we do a 90-day trial period and move from there to see if that, in that 90 days, if those 200 abutters feel that we report back to those neighbors, and if it's something that it has been a distraction, that we re-evaluate.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry, maybe not a pickup, but do they have a compactor that works?
[George Scarpelli]: So there is no noise.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilman Scarpelli. With the focus on just church business. I don't know if I missed it.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. The only reason why I can speak somewhat to this, my fellow council, that both the recreation and the assistant recreation director's position has been posted with the traffic engineer's position has been posted, and they're now accepting resumes for all three positions, which is very exciting.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scott, go ahead. I think that I echo Councilor Knight's, one of the biggest concerns we've had in this council in the last couple of years, two years that we've been on set. that whenever there's a utility company that comes in, the way they found the street and sidewalks in a better condition than, if the same or if not better condition, than it was left, because we have a huge issue with contractors coming in, representing the utilities, and then leaving sub-par work behind, and then the city is left, and the constituents are left holding the bag, so I think that it's very important that that piece discussion with the city's engineer making sure that the most approach.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate coming out tonight. I think that's one of the biggest things that we've talked about in this council. I'm sorry that you have a representative of this feedback, but until we make a stand, and really get the feedback back from the city solicitor and all of the utility companies that have been using our streets as trenches and then walking away and leaving our streets a mess. I think that with that and plan in place for those neighbors because those neighbors again, I echo the remarks of my colleagues that they've been impacted so negatively and They're just daily daily Lifestyles and to compound that with more construction road work without a comprehensive plan that they are familiar with from beginning to end I think would be would be negligent and my part as a city council representing those people to not make sure that those concerns are not just supported by yourself, but a plan that would show us and what we can do. So I too would like to table this until we get more information from our city solicitor and what we've asked for in the past for our utilities to make sure that what's being done on our roads, that utilities are being held accountable for what they're leaving there.
[George Scarpelli]: And again, I apologize that you could be the one situation where it would leave the street impeccable, but when you have two foot swaths being cut and then you see them dip and nobody comes back to fix them and then Again, someone comes in and builds a four foot swap path and nobody comes back and this is what we are hearing over and over again. And this is where it has been very frustrating for us. So thank you for your time. I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: I think everybody touched some great points. the more detailed agenda for our constituents and those neighbours that are going to be affected, I think would have to be something that's necessary.
[George Scarpelli]: How many more feet would that be if there was damage?
[George Scarpelli]: with the same issues that I've had. Again, this is a little different because it does affect constituents that need to move forward, but if approved, the same stipulation, would the residents, would you require that, would you input a plan that residents would hear, would understand the total agenda from beginning to end so they understand the complexities of the project and any issues or concerns that might come up.
[George Scarpelli]: We have had a point of contact. reaching out to the residents and same thing, holding a meeting or getting a detailed agenda for them, schedule for them so they understand what might happen. At least the abutters to this project understand the complexity of the job. Yeah, we could do that.
[George Scarpelli]: I should have never left metro. But I think that a lot of us have received some phone calls with these simple issues that are very big, and I think that this council has asked for meetings and we've had meetings with the republic pocket or have they changed their names again? So good. So the issues. I appreciate you coming up and talking about it because we've had a lot of concerns with, you know, I've had a person call that they got a ticket of 201 for blocking the sidewalk as they parked in the driveway. It's something that simple. So the understanding that our residents don't know what what's going on and when it's going on is very important that we meet again and really start pounding and putting some, you saw what had just happened when this council works together and putting restrictions and things happen. So I appreciate you coming out and sharing that because I think we need to do the same. So thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: We'll go after it now.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, if I can. The big issue was it was 11 feet, if you remember. It wasn't in inches. The sign was 5 by 8, which I think wasn't something that we had questioned about. The question we had that it rose to 11 feet. So now it's back down to the ground 5 by 8. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: The original didn't have that.
[George Scarpelli]: So Council Scarpelli again, I think this is why having that subcommittee. That meeting is so important. I'm spinning right now. I'll be honest with you. I'm trying to gauge. So the conversation would have been understanding what the ordinance is so you understood. The more in-depth conversation would would have been the acceptance of the size of the sign. If it's illuminated, would we accept it? So I don't know. I look for guides from my senior colleague on this committee.
[George Scarpelli]: I mean, Councilman, I might have a resolution, but I think maybe that's what I'm aiming for.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I too, I wouldn't, I just think, I concur with Councilor Knight putting some restrictions, but I think that has to be done in subcommittee. So again, I support the subcommittee, moving this to subcommittee and doing it relatively soon. which we can move pretty quickly, but I think we need that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. If we can, I don't know if we're still in suspension of the rules. We are still in suspension of the rules. If we can go to a paper in the committee to have friends from Wegmans, if we can follow them up. Do you want to report it out if we can, please? Yes, we can.
[George Scarpelli]: Chairman and Mr. Councilor Scott, if you could report that out please. I did. I sat as chair in that subcommittee prior to our meeting and if we can. I'm in the right direction.
[George Scarpelli]: We took up the sign. The issue was for the liquor, wine and beer sign that was tabled and moved to subcommittee. We voted in two in favor to move that paper forward in approval. So we now open it to the floor.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, thank you, Mr. President. I know Adam prides himself on wishing everybody every luck in the world, so I know that the person that deserves it more than anyone is his wife, and so we just congratulate them in making eight years. I said nine, but he corrected me. The rumor has it she might be mine now. You better ask your wife. Thank you. Congratulations. 20 years all together.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that Echo Council night's one of the biggest concerns we've had in this council the last two years that we've been on set. that whenever there's a utility company that comes in, the way they found the street and sidewalks in a better condition than, if the same or if not better condition than it was left, because we have a huge issue with contractors coming in, representing the utilities, and then leaving sub-par work behind, and then the city is left, and the constituents are left holding the bag, so I think that it's very important that that piece is done. the city's engineering and making sure that it comes to fruition.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I appreciate coming out tonight. I think that's one of the biggest things that we've talked about in this council. I'm sorry that you have a representative of this feedback, but until we make a stand, and really get the feedback back from the city solicitor and all of the utility companies that have been using our streets as trenches and then walking away and leaving our streets a mess. I think that with that and plan in place for those neighbors because those neighbors again, I echo the remarks of my colleagues that they've been impacted so negatively and They're just daily daily Lifestyles and to compound that with more construction road work without a comprehensive plan that they are familiar with from beginning to end I think would be would be negligent and my part as a city council representing those people to not make sure that those concerns are not just supported by yourself, but a plan that would show us and what we can do. So I too would like to table this until we get more information from our city solicitor and what we've asked for in the past for our utilities. to make sure that what's being done on our roads, that utilities are being held accountable for what they're leaving there.
[George Scarpelli]: communicate with a neighbor so we would you know all the people that are impacted we'd certainly be willing to do that and again I apologize that you know you could be the one situation where it would leave the street impeccable but when you have two foot swaths being cut and then you see them dip and nobody comes back to fix them and then Again, someone comes in and builds a four-foot swap path, and then nobody comes back. And this is what we're hearing over and over again. Yeah, I understand. And this is where it's been very frustrating for us. So thank you for your time. We appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: I think everybody touched some great points. the more detailed agenda for our constituents and those neighbors that are going to be affected. I think it would have to be something that's necessary.
[George Scarpelli]: How many more feet would that be if there was damage?
[George Scarpelli]: I echo the same issues that I've had. Again, this is a little different because it does affect constituents that need to move forward, but if approved, the same stipulation would the residents, would you require that, would you input a plan that our residents would hear, would understand the total agenda from beginning to end, so they understand the complexities of the project and any issues and concerns that might come up?
[George Scarpelli]: Well, we've had just point of contact. reaching out to the residents and same thing, holding a meeting or getting a detailed agenda for them, scheduled for them so they understand what might happen. Schedule of work. Right. That they would, you know, at least the abutters to this project understand the complexity of the job, so. Yeah, we could do that.
[George Scarpelli]: I should have never left Metro. But I think that a lot of us have received some phone calls with these simple issues that are very big. And I think that this council has asked for meetings, and we've had meetings with the Republic Park, or have they changed their names again? No, it's the Republic Park. So good. I appreciate you coming up and talking about it, because we've had a lot of concerns with, you know, I've had a person call that they got a ticket of 201 for blocking the sidewalk as they parked in the driveway. It's something that simple. So the understanding that our residents don't know what what's going on and when it's going on is very important that we meet again and really start pounding and putting some — you saw what just happened when this council works together and putting restrictions in, things happen. So I appreciate you coming out and sharing that, because I think we need to do the same. So thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: We'll go after it now.
[George Scarpelli]: Is the petitioner here?
[George Scarpelli]: The point of information, if I can, the big issue was it was 11 feet. Yes. If you remember, it wasn't in inches. The sign was 5 by 8, which I think wasn't something that we had questioned about. The question we had that it rose to 11 feet. Yes. So now it's back down to the ground 5 by 8.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: The original didn't have that.
[George Scarpelli]: So Councilor Scarpelli. Again, I think this is why. having that subcommittee. That meeting is so important. Sure. I'm spinning right now. I'll be honest with you. I'm trying to gauge. So, the conversation would have been understanding what the ordinance is so you understood. Sure. The more in-depth conversation would would have been the acceptance of the size of the sign. If it's illuminated, would we accept it? So I don't know. I look for guidance from my senior colleague on this committee.
[George Scarpelli]: I mean, Councilman, I might have a resolution, but I think that maybe that's what I'm looking for.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, I too, I wouldn't, I just think, I concur with Councilor Knight putting some restrictions, but I think that has to be done in subcommittee. So again, I support the subcommittee, moving this to subcommittee and doing it relatively soon. which we can move pretty quickly, but I think we need that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. If we can, I don't know if we're still in suspension of the rules. We are still in suspension of the rules. If we can go to a paper in the committee to have friends from Wegmans if we can. Mr. Marks is the chairman of that committee?
[George Scarpelli]: I sat as chair in that subcommittee prior to our meeting. And if we can, point me in the right direction. I apologize. It was tabled. We took up the sign. The issue was for the liquor, wine, and beer sign that was tabled and moved to subcommittee. We voted in two in favor to move that paper forward in approval. So we now bring it to the floor.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, thank you, Mr. President. I know Adam prides himself on wishing everybody every luck in the world, so I know that the person that deserves it more than anyone is his wife, and so we just congratulate them in making eight years. I said nine, but he corrected me. The rumor has it you might be nine now. You better ask your wife. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Welcome. I see that all the paperwork is in order. Can you just give us a brief description of the business that we're presenting to us tonight?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so the report calls that you're closing out, your hours are from what time to what time?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, but the permit reads. You're allowed 11. The hours of operation is 11, so. Right.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I see all the departments have checked off, Mr. President. Everything looks like it's in order. I move to accept and place on file. Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm also, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: The landlord has asked not to above that line. So we need the landlord.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I thank some of the other points that Ms. Hunt brought up and I appreciate all your hard work because this is the innovation and the progress that we see that we need in the progressive community. So I think that talking about the carports, I think that that being, when you look at other land use and other community buildings that that spend so much money in electricity. I used, in the earlier meeting, we used the ice hockey rink and the money that it costs to run an ice hockey rink or the lit fields and looking at different ways down the line that I know that Alicia's looking for. A carport, if you can just quickly just go over there real quick.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I just point out the innovation. I appreciate the hard work.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, but I don't have information Gina. I just saw you. We're not spending anything. They are occurring all of the cost Who is they?
[George Scarpelli]: Because of the rate we're going to...
[George Scarpelli]: Second.
[George Scarpelli]: Aye.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you for your presentation. What's the max amount of dogs you can house at one time?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Now, housing them outside, how many would you house outside during walk time?
[George Scarpelli]: As a dog lover and having my own dog, my wife won't let her out of her sight. But what I did do with so many concerns both for and against, I took a tour of a local kennel doggy daycare. And one thing that was very evident was a clean facility, but two things that were glaring was the smell of the urine and the dog and the barking.
[George Scarpelli]: And as I talked to the owner as much, as honestly as she could, when you, as she explained to me, when you bring 10 dogs into the play area, the recreation area, as she called it, They all set their scent, so there's constant urinating. And that was when it was pretty pungent, which they used a chemical spray that continually goes, and they used stone dust that they changed every quarter. And she said it's just been very difficult to mask that. So that's one of my concerns. The other thing is the noise issue. As she put it, when dogs do come to her facility, They are stressed for the fact that, especially new dogs. And we'll have dogs, as I witnessed, that would bark until they're exhausted. And no matter what they try to do as dog caretakers, it was very difficult for them to control. So she was very honest and open with me, and my question to you is that she finds it very difficult to tell me that she can guarantee anybody in her business where she runs that the dogs aren't going to be loud and the smell of the urine, not using maybe your product might be different, but it was pungent. Now, if you can help me with that, that would be great.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, I will tell you, I didn't witness that in that daycare.
[George Scarpelli]: I did not. Well, we, that's. I saw that, I mean, I'm just, I know it sounds, I appreciate the hard work. Yeah, no, absolutely. But I just, once they were let out, there's no guarantees that the dog's gonna stop barking, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Just to address that constituent, I did receive phone calls and emails from people from Linden and Locust Street. So, just like I received messages from the outside, so I think that we're, you know, they've sent their message to the people they elected to make sure that we understand where they stand. I appreciate everybody that came out tonight, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I just, you know, this is, I do not question the presentation. The presentation was great. What I do question, since I've been on the council for almost two years now, a very important topic that we've been talking about probably on a weekly basis, that's zoning. And people that have come up in support of this. were the same people that helped us see the negative impact of negative zoning and how one project can negatively affect a neighborhood or people in those neighborhoods. I made a decision then that I would make sure that I do my due diligence when it comes to my vote. I visited a county and I appreciate the due diligence, The smell and the noise that I heard, and that was 11.30 in the afternoon, personally that I saw, whether it's not their daycare, whether it isn't their daycare, from what I've witnessed, my opinion, and listening to the residents of Locust Street, not the Doherty's, the residents that live in there, that have repeatedly told me This isn't a dog-friendly unit. We don't allow dogs, we don't want dogs in here, and that's why they rent there. And talking to Linden residents that have the same concerns and same issues. So, way back when we decided to sue our own zoning board to protect the residents in that neighborhood, and now sitting before us, a situation that I have to put a vote on? that affects residents of our community, that I don't care if it's, the boarding issue doesn't bother me. During the day, that the residents that called me and talked to me, that talked about the noise of possibly 50 dogs in one area, I don't care what fencing, what proofing they have, my expertise of a dog owner, they get loud. And from what my experts telling me in my field that I work with turf specialists, whatever the turf specialist says, there isn't a turf out there that will mask the odor of 50 dogs laying their scent down during a hot summer day. So I did my homework. It's funny because I get angry with residents who come up here and point their finger and say, shame on you, we want to move Medford forward. So do we, but at what cost? At what cost? Because if it was my neighborhood, I'll speak open. I wouldn't want it, because it'll affect my neighborhood. So I will not support this. And I apologize because I think it's a great plan, but for that area and for what I've seen, I just don't, I can't support it.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scott Belli. If I can, just again, I hate to keep hopping on it, but Evans Street and Parra Street, is that on?
[George Scarpelli]: So how long before that project? Because I've been telling the people that it's any date, and this is... I have a bid opening tomorrow. We have a bid opening tomorrow for complete streets So what we're doing with complete streets is potentially funding. I
[George Scarpelli]: I don't know. My irritation is bad. This was supposed to be done years ago. The water lines were changed out. They were supposed to come in the next spring. Residents, I talked to every day. And then it was said that we're gonna do it recently, then it was gonna be done by the spring. And I was saying probably not the fall. So I just have to know, if you can just get back to me, just let me know. If it's not till next year, somebody just tell me that I can tell these residents that it's not next year because this is what makes us look bad as a community. When we sit there and we're told what we're supposed to be doing and it comes back and we get, you know, again, it's not ready yet. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, but the street was supposed to be done two years ago. That's what they told me. So, I think they told us. Maybe I'm wrong.
[George Scarpelli]: No.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, council Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. And I, I too received a number of phone calls from concerned, uh, business owners and citizens. And, uh, I think that, uh, when, uh, council council nights recommendation and going to a subcommittee or committee of the whole, whichever we decide, I think this council has gone, uh, in, in subcommittee for a number of, very big issues, and we've worked together with all the stakeholders to make sure we find a plan that works for everybody affected. And so I understand all of our concerns, and I think this administration has presented something to us that we can now bring to a consensus with different stakeholders, and then try to find what is best for our community as a whole. We concur with our Councilor Knight's recommendation to move this forward to subcommittee or committee of the whole. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President, I know there's some still perplexed faces. So I think that when we table When this body tables or sends something to the subcommittee, we act on this relatively quickly. So this isn't something that's going to wait a month or two months. This is something we'll get dates together that we can work together with all the stakeholders and move this forward relatively quickly. At least that's my hope, and I believe that's the rest of the council's hope. So hopefully we can sit together tonight and have something out by tomorrow with the council.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. to follow what Councilor Knight said, and especially after John's eloquent words. I don't want to keep pounding on these points, so I'll leave it to this. One thing I realized two years ago coming on this council with seven different personalities and seven different thought processes, we all had different goals for our community. And everyone behind this reel works very hard to work together. That's one thing I realized. The perception for the community, if you don't know or if you have your perception that this group doesn't work together, we work very, very well together. And I applaud what we bring to the city and how hard we're working. The city administration, what we've done together in putting out this budget, I thank you very much because it was a lot of work and the time that we put into it. you know, could cause some problems at home because we miss a lot of very important nights for our children and our families. But that's our job. That's why we get paid all that money, that $30,000 that we keep hearing. But sure, when people come to the people's podium, this is their podium. So when they come to this podium, I give them my full attention, my full respect. And sure, we all want to do better. We want to eliminate taxes, we want to fix the roads, we want to fix our streets, there's so many concerns that we have. But as a councilor that a year ago was appointed by former President Dello Russo, and I'll speak to this point personally because I think everybody's really touched upon many different points about this budget, but as Councilor Dello Russo went to the mayor and presented my name to be the chairperson for the focus group for recreation, I will tell you, for one councilor, I worked hand-in-hand with our administration. Every week, we met. Every week, every day, I talked to whether it be Joe Russo or Allie Fisk or Janine Camuso or Jen Devewood. I've talked to, sat and met with the mayor. We provided the community with input. We had a focus group that I have to applaud and One thing that we talked about when we hit the campaign trail and how many great people we have in our community that if you work together and bring in great minds that have some goals that can work together, what you can accomplish. I started back as one of my number one priorities bringing a full-time recreation program to the city of Medford. One thing we did with this administration, this lack of communication, I didn't see. For this point, I will talk on, we worked very closely. And I personally met with this, our focus group on a weekly basis for at least 10 to 11 months. And we presented numbers after studies, after deep consideration, after homework that was done and people bringing information back and presented it back to the mayor. And she brought, she came back to us with this budget that is now implementing a full-time recreation department. That's unheard of. So we had so many, there were so many questions that boy, I would love to do a lot of the fixes that people have asked for. But for this budget, you see the great process that we've gone through, the great initiatives that have been implemented. And I'm not gonna touch upon it, because I want to, but it's beating a dead horse. So I just want to speak on the recreation again, that for what we see, and the collaboration used by every department head to make this come to fruition for our community, for our babies, for our kids, for our seniors. You know, even I know that Council Marks, it's not what he wants. And, and with, with the arts, he's been an advocate for the art community and making sure that they are funded to the max. And I applaud him. The mayor has put a line item budget into the recreation budget. that will address some of those concerns. So there's a lot that, you know, that people have when they come to that podium and have an agenda that they want to press. And I respect that. But on a personal level, two years on the city council and bringing together this very important department that our community has been crying out for for years, it's happening. This is just a small example. of what I think we are looking for for the future. The way this council works, the way the city administration has worked for this department to make this happen, I applaud it and I thank them. So I know the recreation people have talked and publicly said that George Scarpelli keeps talking about the neighboring community all the time. And I just want to clear this up to the community. I'm not talking about Somerville Recreation. I'm sitting here talking about Method Recreation, okay? And it's going to be 10 times better than any recreation department. across the Commonwealth and I can see that because we have the commitment from our community. So, I'm very excited about this budget for what is positively put into this budget. We've looked at every single avenue to get what could be put out to our community and achieve some great goals. So, I thank you. I know it was a little winded. I apologize. But for this councilor, I appreciate all the hard work our city administration has done and I move forward with this budget.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I apologize. I too have to disclose that my sister, is a teacher at the Roberts, and she had that position well before I became a member of this council, but I just wanted to make sure that I followed suit with my colleagues and made sure the public knows that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Mr. President, again, I know that that is in our subcommittee and it doesn't have to be, we don't have to wait until July 18th, correct? No. No. So I think that the whole idea is finding out when the other two petitioners can do it. And I think for at least the two of us can sit down and figure out when we can do it so we can get the move this forward. The subcommittee can make a decision and then report it out in time for July 18th. Right, for the 18th. Very good.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you Mr. President. I too received a number of phone calls from concerned business owners and citizens and I think that when Councilman Knight's recommendation of going to subcommittee or committee of the whole, whichever we decide, I think this council has gone in subcommittee for a number of very big issues, and we've worked together with all the stakeholders to make sure we find a plan that works for everybody affected. And so I understand all of our concerns, and I think this administration has presented something to us that we can now bring to a consensus with different stakeholders and then try to find what is best for our community as a whole. So I would concur with our Councilor Knight's recommendation to move this forward to subcommittee or committee as a whole. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: when this body tables or sends something to the subcommittee, we act on this relatively quickly. So this isn't something that's gonna wait a month or two months. This is something we'll get dates together that we can work together with all the stakeholders and move this forward relatively quickly. At least that's my hope and I believe that's the rest of the council's hope. Yeah, so the date, hopefully we can sit together tonight and have something out by tomorrow with the council.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President, again. to follow what Councilor Knight said, and especially after John's eloquent words. I don't want to keep pounding on these points, so I'll leave it to this. One thing I realized two years ago coming on this council with seven different personalities and seven different thought processes, we all had different goals for our community. And everyone behind this reel works very hard to work together. That's one thing I realized. The perception for the community, if you don't know, if you have your perception, this group doesn't work together. We work very, very well together. And I applaud what we bring to the city and how hard we're working. The city administration, what we've done together in putting out this budget, I thank you very much. Because it was a lot of work and the time that we put into it. you know, could cause some problems at home because we miss a lot of very important nights for our children and our families, but that's our job. That's why we get paid all that money, that $30,000 that we keep hearing. But sure, when people come to the people's podium, this is their podium. So when they come to this podium, I give them my full attention, my full respect. And sure, we all want to do better. We want to eliminate taxes, we want to fix the roads, we want to fix our streets. There's so many concerns that we have. But as a councilor that a year ago was appointed by former President Dello Russo, and I'll speak to this point personally because I think everybody's really touched upon many different points about this budget. But as Councilor Dello Russo went to the mayor and presented my name to be the chairperson for the focus group for recreation, I will tell you, for one Councilor, I worked hand-in-hand with our administration. Every week we met. Every week, every day, I talked to, whether it be Joe Russo, or Allie Fisk, or Jeanine Camuso, or Jen Deverwood. I've talked to, sat and met with the mayor. We provided the community with input. We had a focus group that I have to applaud and One thing that we talked about when we hit the campaign trail and how many great people we have in our community, that if you work together and bring in great minds that have some goals that can work together, what you can accomplish. I started back as one of my number one priorities, bringing a full-time recreation program to the city of Medford. One thing we did with this administration, this lack of communication, I didn't see. For this point, I will talk on, we worked very closely. And I personally met with this, our focus group on a weekly basis for at least 10 to 11 months. And we presented numbers after studies, after deep consideration, after homework that was done and people bringing information back and presented it back to the mayor. And she brought, she came back to us with this budget that is now implementing a full-time recreation department. That's unheard of. So we had so many, there are so many questions that boy, I would love to do a lot of the fixes that people have asked for. But for this budget, you see the great process that we've gone through, the great initiatives that have been implemented. And I'm not gonna touch upon it, because I want to, but it's beating a dead horse. So I just want to speak on the recreation again, that for what we see, and the collaboration used by every department head to make this come to fruition for our community, for our babies, for our kids, for our seniors. You know, even I know that Council Marks, it's not what he wants. And with the arts, he's been an advocate for the art community and making sure that they are funded to the max. And I applaud him. The mayor has put a line item budget into the recreation budget. that will address some of those concerns. So there's a lot that, you know, that people have when they come to that podium and have an agenda that they want to press. And I respect that. But on a personal level, two years on the city council and bringing together this very important department that our community has been crying out for for years, it's happening. This is just a small example. of what I think we are looking for for the future. The way this council works, the way the city administration has worked for this department to make this happen, I applaud it and I thank them. So, I know the recreation people have talked and publicly said that George Scarpelli keeps talking about the neighboring community all the time. And I just wanna clear this up to the community. I'm not talking about Somerville Recreation. I'm sitting here talking about Method Recreation. Okay, and it's gonna be 10 times better than any recreation department. across the Commonwealth, and I can see that, because we have the commitment from our community. So, I'm very excited about this budget, for what is positively put into this budget. We've looked at every single avenue to get what could be put out to our community, and achieved some great goals. So, I thank you, I know it was a little winded, I apologize, but for this councilor, I appreciate all the hard work our city administration has done, and I move forward with this budget.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. I apologize. I too have to disclose that my sister is a teacher at the Roberts, and she had that position well before I became member of this council, but I just wanted to make sure that I followed suit with my colleagues and made sure the public knows that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President and again, I know that that is in our subcommittee and it doesn't have to be, we don't have to wait till July 18th, correct? Oh, no. So I think that the whole idea is finding out when the other two petitioners can do it. And I think for the least, the two of us can sit down and figure out when we can do it so we can get this whole subcommittee to make a decision and then report it out in time for July 18th. Right. For the 18th. Okay. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam Mayor. First of all, through the initiatives of our Mayor and then-Councilor, President Fred Dello Russo gave me the opportunity to be appointed to the focus group of recreation and to put together a wonderful group of constituents and stakeholders in our community that wanted to see a full-time recreation program come to fruition. After weeks of meetings and different initiatives that came through and thoughts and ideas through the survey process, we put together an unbelievable program. The summer pilot program is just a piece of what our community will see this fall and this winter, and it's so exciting. Again, I can't thank the mayor's office enough to give our community something that's been screaming for for years and all I can say is please reach out to our website and start registering for those programs and share some ideas and I can't wait to see what the future brings.
[George Scarpelli]: The board applauding that? Yeah. Is it, yeah, because we, I'm sorry to interrupt. I just, I, I just, I wasn't, I don't know if someone just put, put a port a party. I think that a building department should know through the permitting process, correct? The board of health. It's probably not a, it's not a legal one.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh yeah. Oh yeah, absolutely.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that we've talked about this issue in recent past, but I just wanted to revisit this. I had a few phone calls from a few constituents that were very concerned that we have a functioning Airbnb in our neighborhoods and probably more than one and we're not and we're really not Following what's happening in those those areas and and and look into You know any ordinances or Rules or any health codes that have to be passed. So if we can I don't know if we can Ask the If we can look at what subcommittee we can move this to, if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: It still is. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, and I appreciate that. I know that Councilor Knight does an unbelievable job with his homework, so I think it's very important. You know, the concerns loud and clear about the safety and letting our public safety officials, fire, police know what's going on. Um, and right now we don't have that. So I appreciate your effort and, uh, um, I will let those residents know that we'll have something soon. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I found the records in order. My motion will place on file.
[George Scarpelli]: One of the information's Councilor Scarpelli. Is it, yeah. Cause we, I'm sorry to interrupt. I just, I just, I wasn't know if it was someone just put, but a porta potty, I think that a building department should know through the permitting process. Correct? The board of health.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh yeah. Oh yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that we've talked about this issue in recent past, but I just wanted to revisit this. I had a few phone calls from a few constituents that were very concerned that we have a functioning Airbnb in our neighborhoods, probably more than one, and we're not, And we're really not following what's happening in those areas and look into, you know, any ordinances or rules or any health codes that have to be passed. So if we can, I don't know if we can ask the, if we can look at what subcommittee we can move this to if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, and I appreciate that. And I know that Councilor Knight does an unbelievable job with his homework. So I think it's very important. I think that the concerns loud and clear about safety and letting our public safety officials, fire, police know what's going on. And right now, we don't have that. So I appreciate your effort. And I will let those residents know that we'll have something soon. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I found the records in order. I motion to move and place on file.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank fellow Councilor John Falco for bringing that up. If I can amend that, if we can maybe add the digital speed monitor, maybe to slow people down. Also, I know that Again, we've worked both Councilor Falco and Councilor Kern have been working with Sergeant Hartnett on the traffic issues as that's a major cut through, especially with the future work that's being done up there. I think that might be something we need to rekindle for another subcommittee meeting with the hospital site and then bring Officer Hartnett. I know they did a report, a traffic study that counted the cars that went through that area and it was pretty It was pretty astronomical. So I think if we could put that, the, the machine there, if we can ask the chief to put that up there so people can see the speed limit and maybe that could deter some of the speeding. But thank you again for this resolution. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you. Um, again, thank you. Uh, my fellow councilors bringing this forward. I know that just to shed some light, this is one of the, uh, first meetings we had with, uh, the recreation focus group. We talked about, um, facilities. And one thing we did talk about and have met with the mayor's office is that, uh, a dual function, whether it's recreation, whether it's the art council or, um, or S or such other, Uh, facility, but I know that they've had, um, the building inspectors in there and for the sole purpose to see what we can do for housing. Um, such very important, uh, um, initiatives. So I think that they've, they've been doing that. So I too, if we can call for that committee of the whole meeting and, and get an update because I, you know, the, uh, the activity that was there could have been, uh, the, the builders that were looking in to see what needed to be done there. Obviously we know the police have been there. So, um, I know that the mayor's office has been actively, uh, searching and working with that site to see what's best for the city of Medford. So I'm pretty excited about the possibility. So thank you for your input. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I thank fellow Councilman John Falco for bringing that up. If I can amend that, if we can maybe add the digital speed monitor, maybe to slow people down. Also, I know that Again, we've worked both Councilor Falco and Councilor Kern have been working with Sergeant Hartnett on the traffic issues as that's a major cut through, especially with the future work that's being done up there. I think that might be something we need to rekindle for another subcommittee meeting with the hospital site and then bring Officer Hartnett. I know they did a report, a traffic study that counted the cars that went through that area and it was pretty It was pretty astronomical, so I think if we could put that, the machine there, if we can ask the chief to put that up there so people can see the speed limit and maybe that could deter some of the speeding. But thank you again for this resolution. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you. Um, again, thank you. Um, my fellow councilors bringing this forward. I know that just to shed some light, this is one of the, uh, first meetings we had with, uh, the recreation focus group. We talked about, um, facilities. And one thing we did talk about and have met with the mayor's office is that, uh, a dual function, whether it's recreation, whether it's the art council or, um, or such other, facility. But I know that they've had the building inspectors in there and for the sole purpose to see what we can do for housing. It's such a very important initiative. So I think that they've been doing that. So I, too, if we can call for that committee of the whole meeting and get an update because, you know, the activity that was there could have been the the builders that were looking in to see what needed to be done there. Obviously we know the police have been there. So, um, I know that the mayor's office has been actively, um, searching and working with that site to see what's best for the city of Medford. So I'm pretty excited about the possibility. So thank you for your input. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Just a quick question. Alicia, you just tell us how we notified our neighbors that what was happening and what were the, what could be the outcomes? How do we do that?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, perfect. Thank you. I second that. Mr. President, we'll forward it.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that I went out and visited the site and I talked to Mr. Moore and there Uh, there is equipment and if we can, um, I'd like to ask, uh, Mr. Mavuso, uh, to give us a report back and what the history has been and what is being done moving forward to make sure that, uh, this is being investigated properly. So the neighbors in that area aren't, uh, being woken up at five o'clock in the morning due to, uh, heavy trucking and beeping and, um, stump grinding during the weeknights and weekends and so on and so forth. Like I said, I know I've been out there, Mr. Barreto and Mr. Moore, and I've seen the house. I've tried to talk to the person and if we can just get a report back from Mr. I believe he has, and I believe he's already issued tickets. So if we could just get an update and, and if we can ask for a plan moving forward to make sure that the, those residents aren't being affected in such a negative way. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Vice president. I too went out in the site, talked to a few of the neighbors. I think if we can have, from beginning to end of Boston Ave that constituents get an update on when the jobs or work being performed is being done. I had a call and I talked to one of our friends that told us that they have to get up and leave an hour and a half early before the construction starts because the, if the construction starts walk before they leave, depending what time they come in, they're stuck in the driveway. So, and they're not getting much help or assistance or information from, uh, those, those developers or, um, the contractor. So if we can reach out to, um, uh, uh, engineering and see who's doing the work to inform our, uh, constituents on Devereux and Boston Ave all the way up and down, make and have a defined start time and end time to make their lives a little bit easier. It'd be greatly appreciated. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate Councilor Marksley bringing this up because it is the number one concern we have in our community. In a daily basis, I think that most communities don't go to the city council meetings and put potholes on their agenda. So I feel for that. But I think that going through the budget and being fiscally responsible to what we see, because I don't want to be in a position where we're being held accountable for losing other city necessities. So I think it's important that the budget season comes up. I'm supporting Council Marks, his process that during the budget time, I will stand by him with the million or more and looking into other avenues as free cash. But until we have that budget meeting, I think it's important that we hear what is upon us in the next week. I know that, uh, Saturday, I believe, uh, is going to be a very interesting day and long day, but it's going to be, uh, it's going to be something that I think all of us have heard and all of us sitting at a table would really stress the fact that streets and our roads are going to be on number one, one of our number one priority.
[George Scarpelli]: Discussion for a million dollars. Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I just wanted to thank the city administration, the mayor's office, for an unbelievable community day this Sunday. The weather was great. Yes, it was. The thousands of people that attended had nothing but positive things to say, so I just want to thank, I think hundreds of thousands, so I just want to thank them. Thank you, Mr. Councilor Marks. Yeah, he just reminded me, hundreds of thousands, so thank you. That was a wonderful event.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Just a quick question. Alicia, you just tell us how we notified our neighbors that what was happening and what were the, what could be the outcomes? How do we do that?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, perfect. Thank you. I second that, Mr. President. We'll move forward.
[George Scarpelli]: 17-511 petition by Robert Moore for
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that I went out and visited the site, and I talked to Mr. Moore, and there There is equipment, and if we can, I'd like to ask Mr. Mavuso to give us a report back and what the history has been and what is being done moving forward to make sure that this is being investigated properly so the neighbors in that area aren't being woken up at 5 o'clock in the morning due to heavy trucking and beeping. stump grinding during the weeknights and weekends, and so on and so forth. Like I said, I know I've been out there, Mr. Barreto and Mr. Moore, and I've seen the house. I've tried to talk to the person, and if we could just get a report back from Mr. — Has Mr. Mavuso been called yet? I believe he has, and I believe he's already issued tickets. So, if we could just get an update, and if we can ask for a plan moving forward to make sure that those residents aren't being affected in such a negative way. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Vice President. I, too, went out on the site, talked to a few of the neighbors. I think if we can have, you know, from beginning to end at Boston Ave, that constituents get an update on when the jobs or work being performed is being done. I had a call and I talked to one of our friends that told us that they have to get up and leave an hour and a half early before the construction starts because if the construction starts before they leave, depending what time they come in, they're stuck in the driveway. So, and they're not getting much help or assistance or information from those developers or the contractors. So, if we can reach out to uh, engineering and see who's doing the work to inform our, uh, constituents on Devereux and Boston Ave all the way up and down. And they have a, uh, defined start time and end time to make their lives a little bit easier. It'd be greatly appreciated. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate Councilor Marks to bring this up because it is the number one concern we have in our community. Um, if, if in a daily basis, I think that, um, most communities don't go to the city council meetings and put potholes on, uh, on their agenda. So I feel, I feel for that. I, but, uh, I think that, uh, going through the budget, and being fiscally responsible to what we see, because I don't want to be in a position where we're being held accountable for losing other city necessities. So I think it's important that the budget season comes up. I'm supporting Councilor Marks' process that during the budget time I will stand by him with the million or more and looking into other avenues as free cash. But until we have that budget meeting, I think it's important that we hear what is upon us in the next week. I know that Saturday, I believe, is going to be a very interesting day and long day, but it's going to be something that I think all of us have heard and all of us sitting at a table would really stress the fact that streets and our roads are gonna be one of our number one priorities, so.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah. Request. Request that we add a million dollars to the budget. Yeah. Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. I yield to the podium first, if you can. Thank you. Name and address of the record, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I just wanted to thank the city administration, the mayor's office, for an unbelievable community day this Sunday. The weather was great. The thousands of people that attended had nothing but positive things to say, so I just want to thank, I think hundreds of thousands, I just want to thank them Thank you, Councilor Marks. You just reminded me, hundreds of thousands, so thank you. That was a wonderful event.
[George Scarpelli]: So they're going to change from white to green, from white and green to burgundy and... It's going to match the photo from the next door neighbor sushi restaurant. Yeah, so all those lines will be the same color.
[George Scarpelli]: It'll be one on Main Street, one on North Forest. He already had one.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you, Mr. President. And again, this, uh, it seems like there's a common thread here. Um, I know I've been talking about this since I first arrived here in this council and, uh, the resident that called and I took a ride down to Clifton and, uh, witnessed the street that was, uh, dug up for utility work, uh, is now, uh, has been patched and now sinking. So again, If we can ask the, I believe it was Councilor Knight who asked the, correct me if I'm wrong, asked for the city engineer to give us an update of all the utility work that was done. And if we can ask the city engineer to please bring that, if she can bring that to the meeting next week, I think it'll be pretty eyeopening to see the concerns and the calls and the issues we've got, we've received from our constituents about the biggest areas of concern were mainly because of our utilities not doing what they've been promised to us to maintain a level that our constituents deserve. So, again, I'm not, I think I made a motion a while back that I wanted to halt all work in public utilities. that are asking, coming to this rail and asking for a permit to start work in our community. And if I don't, for one council, if I don't get the information that I need next week and we don't have a sit down with the public utilities and talking about our roads and our streets, I think that something has to be done with this council. motioning moratoriums or delays for those, uh, those organizations, because when they can't work and, um, they can't perform the duties that brings the money to their, to their, their, uh, businesses. And I think that's when we'll start to listen. So, um, I appreciate the opportunity to address, uh, a council with this concern.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Uh, I've received a few phone calls, emails, and, um, uh, concerns about, uh, the hood that this is the canopy. that is being built over on the gas station on Winthrop Street and the concerns of how large it is and concerns of what that canopy makes the changing of the neighborhood and what it looks like today. So I did contact the city uh, city administration talked to Paul Moki, talked to Jeff Fargo. Uh, they were very, very involved, although they didn't have to be. I know that Mr. Moki was out that site many times. Um, looking at the, um, the canopy, they realize that it's actually smaller than what, what is actually passed, which brings me to my number one concern. And, um, we hear it over and over again. It seems like every, every council meeting we talk about this is, what happens when it comes to our zoning. This was something that was passed at a meeting with the neighbors that were on site, and there were two, I believe there were two issues on that agenda. There was one that called for another bay, which was denied, and then the canopy. Some neighbors said that they didn't realize the canopy was on that, so they left the meeting. But the biggest concern I have is really not that we can do anything about this now because the cat's out of the bag. It's been approved is again, the way we're looking at our, uh, ordinances that our zoning board, uh, their tools they're given to make decisions. And, um, some questions, some of our residents were, did they see specs where they're, um, do they understand how, how big this would be and how much it would change the appearance of the neighborhood. And, um, I don't know if that was, that's the case. So I know that, uh, a city, um, uh, departments did their due diligence when it came to the fire department giving, um, permission for that, that canopy that needed to be there. I think the new laws state that there has to be some sort of fire apparatus that extinguishes any type of gas fire. And it's actually powdered from a form that, uh, extinguishes blazes that, uh, to do with gasoline. So public safety is number one. But, again, I think that we need to, again, I know I mentioned the Metropolitan Planning Council and working with them to try to start a dialogue in our zoning and reviewing our zoning so we can control or support what's going on in our neighborhoods. And so things like this issue aren't brought up after the fact and the concerns of our neighbors are heard too late. Everything was done, the up and up and the due diligence of our city departments maintained, making sure that the residents were contacted. That was one of the One of the concerns that was brought to my attention and from what I was told and shown that that was covered and the neighbors were at the meetings, but I think that we really have to, again, bring up the discussion of our zoning and our ordinances because it's issues like this that change the face of our neighborhoods. And until we do that, and this council does that and finds a way to get that done, Uh, we're going to keep hearing the same issue over and over again. So, um, again, thank you. Uh, I know that I'm rambling, but I, it's an issue that, uh, was brought to our attention and, uh, thank you again.
[George Scarpelli]: They were supposed to. Councilor Scarpelli, do you have any more? Again, no, that was just to answer. Thank you. Name and address of the record, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Just so I know Jean's going on, but tomorrow we have a meeting, a committee of the whole meeting at six o'clock that purpose of the meeting is to view presentation of Acela Corporation on the government legislative management program agenda minutes and video streaming.
[George Scarpelli]: That's just so you know that's happening tomorrow.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. The non-conforming, I believe, was one for code. And then the other one was for the addition of a bay.
[George Scarpelli]: So I think that, like I said, I think that the due diligence from our department, city departments, and making sure and understanding that that being an issue of fire apparatus, I know there might've been, the question was that a few phone calls that I got were questions about, could there have been something that was maybe smaller or more tasteful for that area? But from what I was told, there isn't. So it's what? It's too late. Well, it's not that it was too late. From what I gather is that, just from a phone call I just received before I came in, is that the understanding of that type of canopy, you need that for existing gas stations being that it's always been permitted. and always been a gas station that, um, that's what they had to maintain. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know how much my fellow colleagues love to discuss. So, um, the last piece is that the, um, the blasting that was conducted, I believe, last week over at the new site on the ledge over on Winthrop Street. Moving forward, I know that, I believe that it's the fire chief in his department that issues the permits, and I believe they notify, is it their department that notifies the neighborhood? Yeah, they have a detail there also. Right, so I just wanted to make sure that As I made my phone calls, from what I gathered, there will be more blasting down the line. So if we can, if we could just ask the chief, making sure that the school department was notified. I know Six Acres, with today's crazy world that we live in, that they know when they hear that type of work going on, that something's happening. And the other thing is the timeline, when that's going to happen. I know that some of the residents are a few senior residents that like to sleep in a little bit. We're woken with a big boom. So, um, if we can just make sure that, uh, everybody again is notified with any upcoming blasting if that, that needs to occur. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scapoli. All set, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, before we go to the records, if my council members can indulge me, I know that there's a couple of, um, um, announcements, uh, multi-use path project. There'll be a meeting. on Thursday, June 8th, 7 to 8.30 at the Andrews Middle School. I know that that's been a very interesting topic all over our community. It's a connector for, this is so the meetings at DCI will present and obtain feedback on concept design, alternatives to this clipper ship connector, a proposed multi-use pathway to be located along the north bank of the Mystic River, downstream of Method Square. So this is a very important meeting. I just wanted to give everybody a little extra time to make sure they're involved in such an important meeting. I know that the residents of Ship Ave were very concerned about being notified for these meetings. I think it's very important that they hear it. Again, talking to the residents, one of the biggest issues, the path being so close to their decks and backyards. And I just want to make sure that the DCR, one of his, one of their proposals might be a, a, a path moved all the way to the water. So it's actually over the mystic. So it's something they've done down the line down the road near assembly row. And it's really, really nice addition. So, and I think that might give, the residents that freedom and that they were asking for, for privacy. So that's one that I wanted to make sure. The other, I know that my, a few months back, former president Dello Russo pointed me to the mayor for the recreation commission, recreation focus group. I'm proud to say that the pilot program is, out and for print and online for all of our residents to now, um, sign up for a summer recreation programs, which, uh, have sports and arts and adventures in space programs, Lego programs, and, uh, detailed times where now, uh, the city administration has changed, uh, where we can purchase our pool and pond passes. And, uh, so it's more accessible for our constituents. and so on and so forth. It's a lot of detail and work that was done. I think that, you know, special thanks to Joe Russo, Allie Fisk from the mayor's office, did a great job for all the countless meetings for the last eight months. And then Julia Damon and Rachel Perry, who have been instrumental getting these programs in place so our residents can now register. We will be having meetings soon and discussion for a full-time program that the mail will present to us. We're now meeting talking about job descriptions and mission statements. So it's pretty exciting. It's something that we heard our constituents cry out and say that they really needed and wanted it. And I'm glad to say that it's happening and it's right in front of us. So please start registering for your programs. And send any questions or concerns our way so we can move things forward. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: It'll be one on Main Street, one on Forest. They already have one.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. And again, this, uh, it seems like there's a common thread here. Um, I know I've been talking about this since I first arrived here in this council and, uh, the resident that called and I took a ride down to Clifton and, uh, witnessed the street that was, uh, dug up for utility work, uh, is now, uh, has been patched and now sinking. So again, If we can ask the, I believe it was Councilor Knight who asked the, correct me if I'm wrong, asked for the city engineer to give us an update of all the utility work that was done. And if we can ask the city engineer to please bring that, if she can bring that to the meeting next week, I think it'll be pretty eye opening to see the concerns and the calls and the issues we've got, we've received from our constituents about the biggest areas of concern were mainly because of our utilities not doing what they've been promised to us to maintain a level that our constituents deserve. So again, I think I made a motion a while back that I wanted to halt all work for public utilities. that are asking, coming to this rail and asking for a permit to start work in our community. And if I don't, for one council, if I don't get the information that I need next week and we don't have a sit down with the public utilities and talking about our roads and our streets, I think that something has to be done with this council. motioning moratoriums or delays for those organizations, because when they can't work and they can't perform the duties that brings the money to their businesses, and I think that's when they'll start to listen. So I appreciate the opportunity to address our council with this concern.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Uh, I've received a few phone calls, emails and, um, uh, concerns about, uh, the hood that this is the canopy. that is being built over on the gas station on Winthrop Street and the concerns of how large it is and concerns of what that canopy makes the changing of the neighborhood and what it looks like today. So I did contact the city City administration talked to Paul Moki, talked to Jeff Fargo. They were very, very involved, although they didn't have to be. I know that Mr. Moki was out that site many times looking at the canopy. They realized that it's actually smaller than what is actually passed, which brings me to my number one concern. And we hear it over and over again. It seems like every council meeting we talk about this is, what happens when it comes to our zoning. This was something that was passed at a meeting with the neighbors that were on site. And there were two, I believe there were two issues on that agenda. There was one that called for another bay, which was denied, and then the canopy. Some neighbors said that they didn't realize the canopy was on that, so they left the meeting. But the biggest concern I have is really not that we can do anything about this now because the cat's out of the bag. It's been approved is again the way we're looking at our ordinances that our zoning board, uh, their tools they're given to make decisions. And, um, some questions, some of our residents were, did they see specs where they're, um, do they understand how, how big this would be and how much it would change the appearance of the neighborhood? And, um, I don't know if that was, that's the case. So I know that, Our city departments did their due diligence when it came to the fire department giving permission for that canopy that needed to be there. I think the new laws state that there has to be some sort of fire apparatus that extinguishes any type of gas fire, and it's actually powdered form that extinguishes blazes to do with gasoline. So public safety is number one. But again, I think that we need to, again, I know I mentioned the Metropolitan Planning Council and working with them to try to start a dialogue in our zoning and reviewing our zoning so we can control or support what's going on in our neighborhoods. And so things like this issue aren't brought up after the fact, and the concerns of our neighbors are heard too late. Everything was done, the up and up, and the due diligence of our city departments maintained, making sure that the residents were contacted. That was one of the One of the concerns that was brought to my attention and from what I was told and shown that that was covered and the neighbors were at the meetings, but I think that we really have to, again, bring up the discussion of our zoning and our ordinances because it's issues like this that change the face of our neighborhoods. And until we do that, and this council does that and finds a way to get that done, We're going to keep hearing the same issue over and over again. So, again, thank you. I know that I'm rambling, but it's an issue that was brought to our attention. And thank you again.
[George Scarpelli]: Just so I know, Jeanne's going on, but tomorrow we have a meeting, a committee of the whole meeting, at 6 o'clock, the purpose of the meeting is to view presentation of Acela Corporation on the government legislative management program agenda minutes and video streaming.
[George Scarpelli]: Just so you know, that's happening tomorrow.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Scarpelli. The non-conforming, I believe, was one for code. And then the other one was for the addition of a bay. Oh, that was denied.
[George Scarpelli]: So I think that, like I said, I think that the due diligence from our department, city departments, and making sure and understanding that that being an issue of fire apparatus, that I know there might have been, the question was that A few phone calls that I got were questions about could there have been something that was maybe smaller or more tasteful for that area. But from what I was told, there isn't. So it's what?
[George Scarpelli]: Well, it's not that it was too late. From what I gather is that, just from a phone call I just received before I came in, is that the understanding of that type of canopy, you need that for existing gas stations, being that it's always been permanent and always been a gas station. That's what they had to maintain, so. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know how much my fellow colleagues love to discuss. The last piece is that the blasting that was conducted last week over at the new site on the ledge over on Winthrop Street. Moving forward, I know that I believe that it's the fire chief in his department that issues the permits and I believe they notify, is it their department that notifies the neighborhood? Yeah, they have a detail there also. Right, so I just wanted to make sure that as I made my phone calls, From what I gather, there will be more blasting down the line. So if we can, if we could just ask the chief, making sure that the school department was notified. I know Six Acres, with today's crazy world that we live in, that they know when they hear that type of work going on, that something's happening. And the other thing is the timeline, when that's going to happen. I know that some of the residents are a few senior residents that like to sleep in a little bit. We're walking with a big boom. So if we can just make sure that everybody again is notified with any upcoming blasting if that needs to occur. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, before we go to the records, if my council members can indulge me and know that there's a couple of, um, um, announcements, uh, multi-use path project, there'll be a meeting. on Thursday, June 8th, 7 to 8.30 at the Andrews Middle School. I know that that's been a very interesting topic all over our community. It's a connector for, this is so the meetings of DCI will present and obtain feedback on concept design alternatives to this clipper ship connector, a proposed multi-use pathway to be located along the north bank of the Mystic River, downstream of Method Square. So this is a very important meeting. I just wanted to give everybody a little extra time to make sure they're involved in such a important meeting. I know that the residents of Ship Ave were very concerned about being notified for these meetings. I think it's very important that they hear it. Again, talking to the residents, one of the biggest issues, the path being so close to their their decks and backyards. And I just want to make sure that the DCR, one of their proposals might be a path moved all the way to the water. So it's actually over the Mystic. So it's something they've done down the line, down the road near Assembly Row, and it's a really nice addition. And I think that might give the residents that freedom and that they were asking for, for privacy. So that's one, that I wanted to make sure. The other, I know that my, a few months back, former president Dello Russo pointed me to the mayor for the recreation commission, recreation focus group. I'm proud to say that the pilot program is, out and for print and online for all of our residents to now sign up for summer recreation programs, which have sports and arts and adventures in space programs, Lego programs, and detailed times where now the city administration has changed where we can purchase our pool and pond passes. And so it's more accessible for our constituents. and so on and so forth. It's a lot of detail and work that was done. I think that, you know, special thanks to Joe Russo, Allie Fist from the mayor's office did a great job for all the countless meetings for the last eight months. And then Julia Damon and Rachel Perry who have been instrumental getting these programs in place so our residents can now register. We will be having meetings soon and discussion for a full-time program that the mail will present to us. We're now meeting talking about job descriptions and mission statements. So it's pretty exciting. It's something that we heard our constituents cry out and say that they really needed and wanted it. And I'm glad to say that it's happening and it's right in front of us. So please start registering for your programs. and send any questions or concerns our way so we can move things forward. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President, I thank my fellow council to bring this up. I think if we can, if we can make amendment to that to add one program that some communities are using now, especially with the local communities taking over local ice rinks and the expenses that are incurred during the cost of electricity for the compressors and what's adjacent at our site, which is the field at Hormel Stadium, What some communities are doing are actually bringing in elevated solar farms where they're parking spots that are underneath the solar panels. And it's something that some communities are doing that are raising money to fund those particular sites. So if we can, if you don't mind, if we can add, you know, public parks and recreational facilities that we can look into that, I think that, because if you look at the expense, especially at hockey rinks, and it's so well needed in our community. And looking to find a way to attract some sort of revenue or capture some sort of funding to help with that, alleviate some costs maybe to our youth hockey organizations and high school organizations. That looking at that type of program I think would be beneficial. So if you can, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, again, I thank fellow council and I for bringing this forward. As we move forward, I too have been, as we move forward with the MBTA and issues and concerns. Last week, I believe I got three out of the five business days, there were pitches again from High Street and Main with more construction work being done, moving the bus stop down 30 more feet. And again, buses being off the curb. I'm going to hope to put a resolution for next week. I'm sorry, but the concern is what we're asking for, and I appreciate the reason why I bring this up. is as we're asking the MBTA in this great job that they're doing with this great, you know, this great initiative that there's still the basic concerns that we have still have to be met. And I think that, uh, uh, I will move forward next week to put a resolution in to, uh, eliminate that bus stop until the construction is done on that side. So I do, whether that it's not an amendment, but just an update. But I think how it's a knife for bringing that forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. As a fellow Mustang Hall of Fame member, I look at my fellow leader and thank you for everything you do. I think that, I think my council of, um, colleagues have said so much and there's not much more that I can add, but just thank you. And, and really to reach out to the rest of the community and say, this is who we should emulate because methods are great city to live in. And it's people like yourself who give so much and ask for so little. And, um, um, I hope someone, really sees that torch and runs with it, as you're such a great role model. So thank you so much.
[George Scarpelli]: Um, I'd have to abstain from a vote for conflict of interest.
[George Scarpelli]: Um, if I can, if I know what the, the denial of the signs, I think that if you look at the rest of the square and keeping with the theme that we have right now, If you look across the street, I don't disagree with Council Marks and the petitioner looking for the number of signs, but if you look at the way that Andre Realty did what they did across the street, they have multiple signs, but the way they addressed it, it fits the look of the square where it's not illuminated, and they added decorative lights around it that would light the sign, but at the same time, keeps the same appeal and routine throughout our business community in Medford Square. So I'm not a fan of the lit sign. If you look across the other businesses in the square, I think you could see that it's tasteful. And with the different forms of lighting, I think you can accommodate what you're looking for to illuminate your sign with what the neighboring businesses have. So I too will not support the illuminated sign. I will entertain, you know, a few different signs location because it does wrap around so I can understand that need. But again, I can't, I will not support the big illuminated signs. Thank you, Councilor. Chair recognizes Councilor Lungo-Curran.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Right. I think the, the biggest confusion right now is the muddy water. Now with the other look, the other issue. So I don't, if you came to us with this being the only issue with two signs, I would support it. But with the other signs, one going above it now in my mind to, to prove that and then possibly have that as an option later, I can't support it. So I, I, I, I would go with the subcommittee so we can talk this out and listen to the, um, you know, the, what the landlord has to say and then, and find some other solutions. But when the time comes, I definitely support the two signs. I think that's gonna be needed.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, we don't know for the fact that there's a landlord issue. That's not with us.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Chair, we request a meeting relatively quick because I know the hardship here. So it wouldn't be something waiting weeks. I'd like to get this done as soon as possible if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I, I, I just, With the recent concerns that we've had in that area with traffic issues, I think would this sign be too big for public safety in the sense that for the traffic and deterring of drivers? I think that that's one of the most dangerous areas we've heard in a long time on this council with that corner with and being such a encompassing sign, I question whether that might be a little too large and a little deterrent for the traffic. I know we want to bring light to your church, and I applaud it, but at the same time, I think public safety has to be addressed in the sense that It's really, I don't know if you've been familiar with that area, with the Brooks School, with the traffic, with the speed at 30 miles an hour. People being deterred to look at such a daunting sign. I don't know if I can support that.
[George Scarpelli]: Now, if I recall, you also hang banners off that sign.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. Well, this is pretty big. Um, um, you're talking over 11 feet high from ground to the top. So I, you know, is it, were there any other sizes discussed something?
[George Scarpelli]: That wasn't a five day. No, that's why this, that's why the five day we would, this is 11 feet high.
[George Scarpelli]: It's the same exact one. Mr. President, can we refer this to the subcommittee as well, so we can clarify this?
[George Scarpelli]: So what we're doing is we're going to re we're going to call for a meeting relatively quickly. Okay. Hopefully, hopefully by next Tuesday.
[George Scarpelli]: So we can, we could see that the five foot sign and the five foot by eight foot sign and we could, we can talk about that in subcommittee and then bring it back out to the floor if everything works out so we can have this done by next week.
[George Scarpelli]: Just so we could see it. Right. Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Just bring that to us. When we, City clerk will contact you when we have that subcommittee meeting and you could bring those designs to us for what was denied and we can reverse that.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate, uh, council Longo current for bringing this up. But, uh, I think if we can add an, uh, add something, uh, an amendment to this, that we also look into how we distribute signs and who distribute signs for, uh, the city during traffic and pocket for other issues and concerns in the roads. I know that, uh, I did talk to a contractor today who said that they actually do this in other areas of the city. And there's really not a department that they can go to that has these signs when they legitimately close the street down. And they actually use City of Boston signs and cross off Boston, put it in Medford. So if we can get some information back from, I don't know if it's the engineering department, if it's the DPW, but if we can get some guidance there, really appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Counsel Scarpelli. I yell to the gentleman who approached the podium.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scott. Again, I, I, and I'll hop on this. I think that one of my, my biggest issues coming onto the council is the lack of respect from our public utilities, um, and replacing panels and still, that's still an issue. So, um, I'd like an update if we can, if we could med that to, to still, um, ask the DPW, um, if they can, um, identify, um, panels that haven't been replaced yet. Um, what, what I'm seeing is still, there was supposed to be what I've been told. We've been told is that they were supposed to be, uh, put back to what was originally there. Correct. And what we're seeing is concrete sidewalks that are now being, um, hot top to over. And, and as we all know that over time that disintegrates and it leaves a huge safety issue. So if we can ask the DPW for that, that'd be, that'd be wonderful. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: You're not going to be that lucky.
[George Scarpelli]: As a fellow Mustang Hall of Fame member, I look at my fellow leader and thank you for everything you do. I think that my council colleagues have said so much and there's not much more that I can add but just thank you and really to reach out to the rest of the community and say this is who we should emulate because Medford's a great city to live in and it's people like yourself who give so much and ask for so little and I hope someone really sees that torch and runs with it, as you're such a great role model. So thank you so much.
[George Scarpelli]: Um, I'd have to abstain from a vote for conflict of interest.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I know with the denial of the signs, I think that if you look at the rest of the square, and keeping with the theme that we have right now, if you look across the street, I don't disagree with Council Marks and the petitioner looking for the number of signs, but if you look at the way that Andre Realty did what they did across the street. They have multiple signs, but the way they addressed it, it fits the look of the square where it's not illuminated. And they added decorative lights around it that shows that would like the sign, but at the same time keeps the same appeal and routine throughout our our business community in Medford Square. So I'm not a fan of the lit sign. If you look across the other businesses in the square, I think you could see that it's tasteful. And with the different forms of lighting, I think you can accommodate what you're looking for to illuminate your sign with what the neighboring businesses have. So I too will not support the illuminated sign. I will entertain a few different signs locations because it does wrap around so I can understand that need. But again, I will not support the big illuminated signs. Thank you, Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: I think the, the, The biggest confusion right now is the muddy water now with the other issue. So I don't, if you came to us with this being the only issue with two signs, I would support it. But with the other signs, one going above it, now in my mind to prove that and then possibly have that as an option later, I can't support it. So I would go with the subcommittee so we can talk this out and listen to the you know, what the landlord has to say and then, you know, and find some other solutions. But when the time comes, I definitely support the two sides. I think that's going to be needed.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, we don't know for the fact that it's a landlord issue. That's not with us.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Chair, we request a meeting relatively quick because I know the hardship here, so it wouldn't be something waiting weeks. I'd like to get this done as soon as possible if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I just, with the recent concerns that we've had in that area with traffic issues, I think, would this sign be too big for, and for public safety in the sense that for the traffic and deterring of drivers, I think that that's one of the most dangerous areas we've heard in a long time on this council with that corner and being such a encompassing sign. I question whether that might be a little too large and a little deterrent for the traffic. I know we want to bring light to your church and I applaud it, but at the same time, I think public safety has to be addressed in the sense that it's really, it's, you know, I don't know if you've been familiar with that area, with the Brooks School, with the traffic, with the speed of 30 miles an hour, people being, you know, deterred to look at such a daunting sign. I don't know if I can support that.
[George Scarpelli]: Now, if I recall, you also hang banners off that sign.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. Well, this is pretty big. You're talking over 11 feet high from ground to the top. Were there any other sizes discussed?
[George Scarpelli]: That wasn't the 5'8 I made copies of? This looks a little bit bigger than the 5'8. No, that's why, the 5'8 we would. This is 11 feet high.
[George Scarpelli]: 4 by 5.
[George Scarpelli]: It's the same exact one. Mr. President, can we refer this to the subcommittee as well, so we can clarify this?
[George Scarpelli]: What we're doing is we're gonna call for a meeting relatively quickly. Okay. Hopefully by next Tuesday.
[George Scarpelli]: So we can see the five foot sign, even the five foot by eight foot sign, and we can talk about that in subcommittee and then bring it back out to the floor if everything works out so we can have this done by next week.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, just so we can see it, right. Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: No, no.
[George Scarpelli]: Just bring it to us. Just bring that to us. Our city clerk will contact you when we have that subcommittee meeting and you could bring those designs to us for what was denied and we can reverse that.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate Councilor Langelkern for bringing this up, but I think if we can add something, an amendment to this, that we also look into how we distribute signs and who distributes signs for the city during traffic and parking for other issues and concerns in the roads. I know that I did talk to a contractor today who said that they actually do this in other areas of the city. And there's really not a department that they can go to that has these signs when they legitimately close the street down. And they actually use City of Boston signs and cross out Boston, put in Medford. So if we can get some information back from, I don't know if it's the engineering department, if it's the DPW, but if we can get some guidance there, I'd really appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scott. I yell to the gentleman who approached the podium.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scott. Again, I, I, and I'll hop on this. I think that one of my, my biggest issues coming onto the council is the lack of respect from our public utilities, um, and replacing panels and still, that's still an issue. So, um, I'd like an update if we can, if we could med that to still ask the DPW if they can identify panels that haven't been replaced yet. What I'm seeing is still, they were supposed to be, what we've been told is that they were supposed to be put back to what was originally there, correct? And what we're seeing is, concrete sidewalks that are now being hot topped over. And as we all know that over time that disintegrates and it leaves a huge safety issue. So if we can ask the DPW for that, that'd be, that'd be wonderful. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I thank my fellow — thank you, Mr. President. I thank my fellow Councilors tonight for bringing this forward. Steven's a remarkable young man, and I think that he's embarking on the next chapter of his athletic prowess, which is the softball representation. He wants to make sure he wears his Medford uniform proudly at practices and great family, great young man. Can't wait to see him here. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. I too echo all of my councilor's words. But if you know Mr. McDevitt in the hallways of Medford High School, that you know he loved his love of BC. And his personality is what really resonated through all students who had and who didn't have him. So he was a great example of how you give back to our community. And like Councilman Mark says, I'm sure he's not done, but we appreciate all the hard work he has done for us. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I, too, want to congratulate the team. I know that I was a guest at one of the planning meetings, and To see the effort of that team bringing back the clippership day. That's been so so so forgotten and Needed and I think these are the days that really bring your community together and I appreciate everything they've done the chamber and and everybody that really pulled forward the the you know, the volunteers the DPW the police but You know, again, John and Topper, unbelievable. I know that Lou would like to see the birds disappear in Medford, so maybe if his son could do some sort of a magic trick, that would be greatly appreciated. So just thank you, and again, these are the days, these are the, those are the days, even when it was raining and miserable at times, still brought the community out, and I think that's so important. So kudos, congratulations on a job well done.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I thank my fellow — thank you, Mr. President. I thank my fellow council, Mr. Knight, for bringing this forward. Stephen's a remarkable young man. I think that he's — He's embarking on the next chapter of his athletic prowess, which is the softball representation. He wants to make sure he wears his Method uniform proudly at practices. Great family, great young man. Can't wait to see him here. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I too echo all of my councilor's words, but if you know Mr. McDevitt in the hallways of Medford High School, that you know he loved his love of BC, and his personality is what really resonated through all students who had him, who didn't have him. So he was a great example of how you give back to our community, And like Councilman Mark says, I'm sure he's not done, but we appreciate all the hard work he has done for us. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I, too, want to congratulate the team. I know that I was a guest at one of the planning meetings. To see the effort of that team bringing back the clippership day. That's been so so so forgotten and Needed and I think these are the days that really bring your community together and I appreciate everything they've done the chamber and and everybody that really pulled forward the the you know, the volunteers the DPW the police but You know, again, John and Topper, unbelievable. I know that Lou would like to see the birds disappear in Medford, so maybe if his son could do some sort of a magic trick, that would be greatly appreciated. So just thank you, and again, these are the days, those are the days, even when it was raining and miserable at times, still brought the community out, and I think that's so important. So kudos and congratulations on a job well done.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. If we can, if you can approach the rail. Come on up.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so I do everything, all the departments, everybody, everything looks in order. A few questions. Do you understand our city ordinances on what time of business operations?
[George Scarpelli]: Now, look, again, I think that everything seems in order. So this is just a purchase of pinkies, and I think that everything seems in order and in place and move for approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Again, you're just taking over an existing business, purchased the existing business? Yes, that's correct. And your business hours?
[George Scarpelli]: It is. Okay. Okay. So I see that all the departments have signed off on it. Again, I appreciate the clarification on the 3M hour and move for approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Uh, thank you, Mr. President. Uh, I think, uh, my colleague, uh, Michael Moxley bringing this forward and I appreciate all the business owners. I think that, As the chairperson of transportation, I think that I wholeheartedly support the temporary movement, but call for a subcommittee meeting and request the powers to be from the T to make this a full-time change. So I'll be looking for a meeting relatively soon. I think that we still haven't heard anything back about The resolution we put in about the Main Street and High Street issues again this week. There were work trucks again in front of that location, that T-stop. And again, it left the buses out onto High Street and off the curb. So I know they told us last meeting pretty arrogantly that that doesn't happen. And no one's called them. But some people are calling me again. And I think that we need to move quickly. on these issues. I know we've talked to the director of ADA and I know that we've heard some concerns, but there are other issues on the other side why people aren't speaking up. So we need to enforce that. And hopefully the clerk can reach out again to the department of transportation and the T to get a meeting as soon as possible. Thank you. Thank you. Counsel Scott, Billy. Also Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. If we could just ask for an update on the Evans and Parris Street. I think that was been mentioned, just an update on those locations too. We can update on Evans and Parris Street.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I know that back in the day when this resolution that Councilor Marks talking about was directly involved in the field of dreams committee and One of the biggest issues we had was that cell phone tower and the operation being built behind the high school. And one of the biggest benefits for that American cell phone tower company at the time was how quickly and how much money they would make off of selling parts of that tower. What would be interesting to me is to see where else on the line that the T would be looking to put other towers. Because if you can, I think that would be a direct correlation. If you see it just, you know, not just Medford, but you see it down the line, I think it might help us in really understanding that they're using, I mean, let's all, you know, state the facts, the T's in huge financial difficulties. So I'd like to see that maybe if there's a way to ask them in our conversations, are we just looking in Medford or are they looking all the way down the line? Because if I think they, if they are doing that, I think this would be just a clear punch in the face that shows that they're using this for a revenue stream rather than what might be just discussed. So that'd be interesting to see if we can reach out and ask that question. If it's just Medford, are they putting those towers elsewhere? It would be an interesting information. So thank you. Thank you, Councilor Scott.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. This is multifaceted, but I think that a few of the concerns that I'd like to address that we like answered from the Department of Public Works is looking at our ordinances and what we're asking our constituents to follow at our local ball fields and looking at the signs that are there now and making sure they're They're updated and the graffiti is removed from some of them or replaced if we can. And second that we look at, I've had a few phone calls that the private entities are using public land to advertise. One constituent called and mentioned that there was a painting company that was putting their signage in front of their public land in front of their home. And they thought the question was, is the city approving that? Is that something that I have to keep there? So, um, I'd like to get, uh, you know, what, if we can look into what department can answer that for us. And if there is no such, I think we can go to the code enforcement officer. We can look at the code enforcement officer and ask that, that they then remove all the signs located on islands and in front of homes that have patches of grass that they're just putting down these lawn signs of private entities for advertising. So if, other than the Scarpelli for council, I think that we should definitely look into that.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, when the news broke, I did contact Ms. Riccio and as she wept over the phone and the decisions she had to make, I think the key decision to make her in this move was that her family needed to come first. She had two children that she was commuting up to four hours a day, and her commute is now, would be 20 minutes. Her commitment to finishing the projects that she envisioned and she shared with us in the last month, she has already told her future employer that she would make sure that she needs to finish those jobs and make sure they are completed before she moves on. That's typical Heidi Riccio. Again, being one of the school committee members that brought her to Medford and to see her vision come to fruition is was amazing. So I'm going to miss her in many different ways. She's been a great example how you can use different avenues to grow a major part of our community. That's our vocational school. So thank you, Councilor Knight, for bringing this forward. And we also wish her luck. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli. Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor. Councilor Scapelli. Again, to that point, again, Mr. President, I know I forgot, but I wanted to make sure that when I talked to Ms. Riccio, one of the things she was so proud of was the fact that when we as a school committee years ago looked for a new director, I believe we classified the three finalists as used car salesmen. And then coming across Heidi Riccio, what she mentioned to me that Four years ago, method wasn't even in the world of vocational education, wasn't even on the map. And the interest gathered already from phone calls that vocational experts have been contacting her to apply for this job is astonishing. So I can't wait to see what happens, but I know she's definitely helping with that piece, moving it forward. So I want to let our parents know that it's definitely different than it was four years ago. There'll be a line at the superintendent's door waiting to pass in their resumes for an opportunity to be the director of that program. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. If we can, if you can approach the rail, come on up.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so I do everything, all the departments, everybody, everything looks in order. A few questions, do you understand our city ordinances on what time of business operations? What would your business?
[George Scarpelli]: Now, again, I think that everything seems in order. So this is just a purchase of pinkies, and I think that everything seems in order, and in place, and move for approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Again, you're just taking over an existing business, purchased the existing business? Yes, that's correct. And your business hours?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. So I see that all the departments have signed off on it. Again, I appreciate the clarification on the 3M hour and move for approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I thank my colleague, Michael Marks, for bringing this forward, and I appreciate all the business owners. I think that as the chairperson of transportation, I think that I wholeheartedly support the temporary movement, but call for a subcommittee meeting and request the powers to be from the T to make this a full-time change. So I'll be looking for a meeting relatively soon. I think that we still haven't heard anything back about the resolution we put in about the Main Street and High Street issues again this week. There were work trucks again in front of that location, that T stuff. And again, it left the buses out onto High Street and off the curb. So I know they told us last meeting pretty arrogantly that that doesn't happen, and no one's called them. But some people are calling me again. And I think that we need to move quickly on these issues. I know we've talked to the director of ADA, and I know that we've heard some concerns. But there are other issues on the other side why people aren't speaking up. So we need to enforce that, and hopefully the clerk reach out again to the department of transportation and the T to get a meeting as soon as possible. Thank you. Thank you. Councilor Scott Billy. Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. If we could just ask for an update on the Evans and Parris Street. I think that was been mentioned, just an update on those locations, too. We can update on Evans and Parris Street.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I know that back in the day when this resolution that council Mark's talking about was directly involved in the field of dreams committee and One of the biggest issues we had was that cell phone tower and the operation being built behind the high school. And one of the biggest benefits for that American cell phone tower company at the time was how quickly and how much money they would make off of selling parts of that tower. What would be interesting to me is to see where else on the line that the T would be looking to put other towers. Because if you can, I think that would be a direct correlation. If you see it just, you know, not just Medford, but you see it down the line, I think it might help us in really understanding that they're using, I mean, let's all, you know, state the facts, the T's in huge financial difficulties. So I'd like to see that maybe if there's a way to ask them in our conversations, are we just looking in Medford or are they looking all the way down the line? Because if I think they, if they are doing that, I think this would be just a clear punch in the face that shows that they're using this for a revenue stream rather than what might be just discussed. So that'd be interesting to see if we can reach out and ask that question. If it's just Medford, are they putting those towers elsewhere? It would be an interesting information. So thank you. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. This is multifaceted, but I think that a few of the concerns that I'd like to address that we like answered from the Department of Public Works is looking at our ordinances and what we're asking our constituents to follow at our local ball fields and looking at the signs that are there now and making sure they're They're updated and the graffiti is removed from some of them or replaced if we can. And second, that we look at, I've had a few phone calls that the private entities are using public land to advertise. One constituent called and mentioned that there was a painting company that was putting their signage in front of their public land in front of their home. And they thought the question was the city approving that. Is that something that I have to keep there? So, um, I'd like to get, uh, you know what, if we can look into what department can answer that for us. And if there is no such go to the code enforcement officer, if you look at the code enforcement officer and ask that, that they then remove all the signs located on islands and in front of homes that have patches of grass that they're just putting down these lawn signs of private entities for advertising. So, other than the Scarpelli for Council, I think that we should definitely look into that.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, when the news broke, I did contact Ms. Riccio and as she wept over the phone and the decisions she had to make, I think the key decision to make her in this move was that her family, needed to come first. She had two children that she was commuting up to four hours a day and her commute is now, would be 20 minutes. Her commitment to finishing the projects that she envisioned and she shared with us in the last month. She has already told her future employer that she would make sure that she needs to finish those jobs and make sure they're completed before she moves on. That's typical Heidi Riccio. Again, being one of the school committee members that brought her to Medford and to see her vision come to fruition was amazing. So I'm going to miss her in many different ways. She's been a great example how you can use different avenues to grow a major part of our community. That's our vocational school. So thank you, Councilor Knight, for bringing this forward. And we also wish her luck. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli. Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilwoman O'Connor. Again, to that point, again, Mr. President, I know I forgot, but I wanted to make sure that when I talked to Ms. Riccio, one of the things she was so proud of was the fact that when we as a school committee years ago looked for a new director, I believe we classified the three finalists as used car salesmen, and then coming across Heidi Riccio, what she mentioned to me that four years ago, Medford wasn't even, in the world of vocational education wasn't even on the map. And the interest gathered already from phone calls that vocational experts have been contacting her to apply for this job is astonishing. So I can't wait to see what happens, but I know she's definitely helping with that piece, moving it forward. So I want to let our parents know that It's definitely different than it was four years ago. There'll be a line at the superintendent's door waiting to pass in their resumes for an opportunity to be the director of that program, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I move to approve for Joan Cyr. I know that Joan's done so many great things in our community, and her dedication and commitment and her leadership is going to drastically be needed with such a huge endeavor, so I move forward to accept Joan Cyr. as one of our members.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Locren, for bringing this up. I, too, went to those meetings, and I think it's so important I think we also visited that whole neighborhood and visiting and looking into that. I believe that we also voted during budget time to approve some funding to increase. That would be something that if we can to maybe help us where we are with those monies. Have they been expended? Are we putting, I believe that we were putting the, the, um, the, not the monuments, but there was the, uh, uh, the plaques at historical locations. I know that we were looking to.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I thank a Councilor longer current for bringing this forward. Uh, this is, this issue is, is greater than what it reads itself. I think that what we're seeing in our community with our questions and zoning and a lack of true development plan, I think is it, This one key issue really sums up what we're seeing as probably the number one now major issue and concern in our community. I too was part of the subcommittee that saw this as an issue and moved it forward for 12 months with a possible another six months. So looking at that 18 months, that's something we wholeheartedly supported. and subcommittee, I think that it is still was brought back and then put to the city solicitor for final approval. I think that bringing this forward kind of gives you that kickstart that we need to get a final answer and whether it's in committee of the whole or in the open meetings to get this get this through. I think it's very important because what we are seeing is free reign throughout our community and making sure right now, looking at a historical community and tying that and holding that off where we have that control right now, I think is vital. So I appreciate my fellow council for bringing this up. I appreciate all the hard work and the emails that I did receive from multiple community members and concerns that were brought forth. I know that one member came behind this reel last week and we had a depth conversation because you can hear it in their voices. And when people seeing communities that that we know as of Medford changing right in front of your eyes and it looks like we have no control. So I think this is a great resolution to at least put a stop to this right now and give us a little bit more control as we look into the zoning and development concerns that we do have for our community. So I wholeheartedly second this, this motion and moving this forward. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank my colleague for bringing this forward. Just for clarity, Council Marks, we're looking to put an eight to ten month program like neighbor communities have, a street sweeping program that runs daily.
[George Scarpelli]: If I could, If I could, if you could allow me to make amendment to that paper and looking to ask the city administration for feasibility study, whether it's outsourcing or with hopes to provide what I would hope our DPW with the crew and machinery needed to perform that such act on that type of a basis. So I'd love to see more in depth numbers and It's something that I would love to see in our community. So thank you. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Again, I'm sure I apologize. I had to step out for a moment, but I know how tenacious Roberta was to have this issue come to fruition. And with your background and your expertise, I know how vital you were as we put the program in place. I echo my colleague's comments and very excited to see you as part of this program to see where we can, where we're going to go with this great initiative. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can. I did receive a few phone calls, obviously, that I've been championing this issue. The last meeting we had with the Department of Transportation, they put on the full court press, and the T had supervisors, enforcement, making sure that the bus stops were safe in front of Main Street and High Street. I've just been contacting recently And I've made it conscious effort to drive there and witness what's happening. There's construction now being done further out so the buses again cannot take that turn. And again, waiting and pulling out off the sidewalk. So if we can get a report back, because I'd like to, you know, possibly move on this and, uh, and, and get the final word on, um, eliminating that bus stop until the construction is done before somebody gets, uh, seriously injured. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, it wasn't me that was running. I was just tracking it. It was my wife. She did a great job. Very proud of her. She was exhausting but she did a heck of a job. Proud of her.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I move to approval for Joan Cyr. I know that Joan's done so many great things in our community, and her dedication and commitment and her leadership is going to drastically be needed with such a huge endeavor, so I move forward to accept Joan Cyr. as one of our members. Thank you. Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Locren, for bringing this up. I, too, went to those meetings, and I think it's so important I think we also visited that whole neighborhood and visiting And looking into that, I believe that we also voted during budget time to approve some funding to increase. That would be something that, if we can, to maybe help us where we are with those monies. Have they been expended? I believe that we were putting the, not the monuments, but there was the plaques at historical locations.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scott Beally. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I thank Councilor Lungo-Koehn for bringing this forward. This issue is greater than what it reads itself. I think that what we're seeing in our community with our questions in zoning and lack of true development plan, I think it This one key issue really sums up what we're seeing as probably the number one now major issue and concern in our community. I too was part of the subcommittee that saw this as an issue and moved it forward for 12 months with a possible another six months. So looking at that 18 months, that's something we wholeheartedly supported in subcommittee. I think that it is still was brought back and then put to the city solicitor for final approval. I think that bringing this forward kind of gives you that kickstart that we need to get a final answer. And whether it's in committee of the whole or in the open meetings to get this get this through. I think it's very important because what we are seeing is free reign throughout our community and making sure right now, looking at a historical community and tying that and holding that off where we have that control right now, I think is vital. So I appreciate my fellow council bringing this up. I appreciate all the hard work and the emails that I did receive from multiple community members and concerns that were brought forth. I know that one member came behind this reel last week and we had a depth conversation because you can hear it in their voices. And when people seeing communities that that we know as of Medford changing right in front of your eyes. And it looks like we have no control. So I think this is a great resolution to at least put a stop to this right now and give us a little bit more control as we look into the zoning and development concerns that we do have for our community. So I wholeheartedly second this motion and moving this forward. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scott Pelham. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank my colleague for bringing this forward. Just for clarity, Council Marks, we're looking to put an eight to 10 month program like neighbor communities have, a street sweeping program that runs daily.
[George Scarpelli]: If I could, If I could, if you could allow me to make amendment to that paper and looking to ask the city administration for feasibility study, whether it's outsourcing or with hopes to provide what I would hope our DPW with the crew and machinery needed to perform that such act on that type of a basis. So I'd love to see more in depth numbers and It's something that I would love to see in our community. So, thank you. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Again, I'm sure I've apologized. I had to step out for a moment. But I know how tenacious Roberta was to have this issue come to fruition. And with your background and your expertise, I know how vital you were as we put the program in place. So I echo my colleagues' comments. And I'm very excited to see you as part of this program, to see where we're going to go with this great initiative. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I did receive a few phone calls. obviously that I've been championing this issue. The last meeting we had with the Department of Transportation, they put on the full court press and the T had supervisors, enforcement, making sure that the bus stops were safe in front of Main Street and High Street. I've just been contacting recently that, and, I've made it a conscious effort to drive there and witness what's happening. There's construction now being done further out so the buses again cannot take that turn. And again, waiting and pulling out off the sidewalk. So if we can get a report back, because I'd like to, you know, possibly move on this and, uh, and, and get the final word on, um, eliminating that bus stop until the construction is done before somebody gets, uh, seriously injured. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: And again, if I could, it wasn't me that was running. I was just tracking it. Yeah, no, it was my wife. She did a great job. Very proud of her. She was exhausting, but she did a heck of a job. Proud of her.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm reviewing the records, and I see that all of our departments and paperwork are in order to move forward. The questions I have is there are no double poles involved with this? No, not at all. And all the sites are safe and in regulations for the handicapped accessibility?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Uh, just for, I, I see everything in order just off the record though on Fulton street, if there are the questions I had, there's a pole on Fulton street right at the corner of Salem and Fulton and they have, uh, it's obviously, uh, uh, one of your poles and it has, um, a cable line that's anchored to the sidewalk. And it's been pulled off of the sidewalk. And that cable is now almost into the street. It looked, and there was a cone over the existing hole, but that's been dangling there for weeks. I know that we put something in, if you can look into that, is that the type of, are we going to have that type of construction when we lay these poles in? Are these going fixed in and then being? No, that's obviously. Okay. Yeah. This is Salem and Fulton. Salem and Fulton, right. Actually right in front of the, uh, The oil, oil, uh, I think it's Jiffy Loop right at the corner. But if you can look at that, Mr. Jankowski, I really appreciate it. And I find everything else in order. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you, Mr. President. I too echo, uh, my fellow Councilors, uh, remarks. I know that, um, how much time we put into this, process and especially Joan and Roberta who have been directly involved. But I, I, I feel that the diversity and the, um, the different backgrounds and all of our appointees will lead us, um, and making great choices for our community moving forward. So I, uh, I applaud our representation and, um, and, uh, move forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. If I can't thank you for a vice president marks for bringing that up. I think it's a great event. Um, I think I believe so people understand it's not for the school, but it's actually for the tools that I believe that part of it is going for the our students as they graduate to assist them in purchasing the tools they need in their trade. I think that's what Ms. Riccio said. I thought that was very important. And the other thing is that evening right around the block is at John Brewer's is the HEMO fundraiser for the buzz off where I've been banned. They won't allow me in there, but I suggest everybody, everybody, Everybody there, there'll be two events that would be great to stop over and play a little musical bingo and then see some great people over at John Brewer's for a great cause for the buzz off. So, thank you. That's what I say, because you want to look good.
[George Scarpelli]: We're going to bring. We're going to bring.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm reviewing the records, and I see that all of our departments and paperwork are in order to move forward. The questions I have is that there are no double poles involved with this? No, not at all. And all the sites are safe and in regulations for the handicapped accessibility?
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, just for, I, I see everything in order just off the record though on Fulton street, if there are the questions I had, there's a pole on Fulton street right at the corner of Salem and Fulton and they have, uh, it's obviously, uh, uh, one of your poles and it has, um, a cable line that's anchored to the sidewalk. And it's been pulled off of the sidewalk. And that cable is now almost into the street. And there was a cone over the existing hole. But that's been dangling there for weeks. I know that we put something in. If you can look into that, is that the type of, are we going to have that type of construction when we lay these poles in? Are these going fixed in and then being? No, that's obviously, yeah. So that's Salem and Fulton? Salem and Fulton, actually right in front of the, the oil, oil, uh, I think it's Jiffy loop right at the corner. But if you can look at that, miss Jay Kosky, I really appreciate it. And I find everything else in order. Thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you, Mr. President. I too echo, uh, my fellow Councilors, uh, remarks. I know that, how much time we put into this process and especially Joan and Roberta who have been directly involved. But I feel that the diversity and the different backgrounds and all of our appointees will lead us in making great choices for our community moving forward. So I applaud our representation and
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, thank you for, Vice President Marks for bringing that up. I think it's a great event. I think, I believe, so people understand it's not for the school, but it's actually for the tools that, I believe that part of it is going for our students as they graduate to assist them in purchasing the tools they need in their trade. I think that's what Ms. Riccio said. I thought that was very important. And the other thing is that evening, right around the block is, at John Brewer's is, the HEMO fundraiser for the Buzz Off, where I've been banned. They won't allow me in there. But I suggest everybody there. There'll be two events. That would be great to stop over and play a little musical bingo, and then see some great people over at John Brewer's for a great cause for the Buzz Off. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: That's what I say, because you want to look good.
[George Scarpelli]: We're going to bring, we're going to bring.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. So, a few years back, as a member of the school committee, myself and Mr. Falco, I don't think we ever dreamed that the vision that, the reality that we are in today, and the vision that you've led us with, Dr. Riccio, is amazing. The thought process in my mind back then was trying to boost the programs that we had in place, the automotive, the electrical, the other wonderful programs. But what you've done here now, the leadership programs, the partnerships with different businesses, communities, and unions, the collaborations with all the stakeholders, the alumni involvement, the thousands of dollars that we're saving, keeping our kids in our community, and the money that we were losing at that time. The sense of pride that I feel for what you're trying to do and what you are accomplishing is immense. And you can feel it throughout the community. Again, I had two more phone calls today from parents asking me how can I get in touch with the vocational school where kids were not in vocational education. They were in private schools and wanted to come back to Medford and wanting to participate in the vocational experience. So as this program, as this request comes in front of us, I just see it as a continued commitment that I made back then to try to focus on helping the vocational school be the jewel that it's supposed to be. And with your leadership and the superintendent's leadership, I think we've done that. I think this is just an amazing program. I see the benefits in the community that I work in. Not to knock them, but they have one wonderful program. And they boast on that one wonderful program, and that program is the culinary arts program. And what that program does for that community's senior citizens and residents, that they can just walk across the street and take the senior bus to the vocational school and purchase and have a four course meal that normally they can't afford and to come into that culinary art setting and celebrate that and knowing that this is now going to be a reality in Medford and seeing the construction that's being done there and the access that the community will have there is second to none. And as I told the director this week that the only one piece of jewelry that they had on us is now going to go back. And we're now taking over everything. And so again, when you're talking about money well spent, I think this community, and with your efforts, and the way you've spelt it out for us, only shows and reinforces how, not just financially, but prideful enthusiasm that we're getting back tenfold. from our investment. So I thank you. I commend you. And, um, and I don't care what anybody says. Uh, no one has thanked me for bringing you to, to, to Medford. I think it was me personally. I drove all the way to your home and brought you here. So, um, that really didn't happen, but I appreciate it. Thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Oh, okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I, uh, thank, uh, Councilor, uh, Brianna Longo-Curran for bringing this forward. Brittany's, uh, been a superstar and, uh, she should be celebrated. So I, uh, appreciate this, um, this resolution, but I wanted to mention that I believe her father, Kenny, is now an ambassador in Kazakhstan. He's made such an impact in that country, I believe they want him to come back, and he's just an amazing person. So, congratulations.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you for, Councilor Dello Russo, bringing this Resolution forward. Mr. Junta was a great man. I know his sons well and he'll be missed.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can, I just want to just mention this weekend the Crystal Campbell scholarship presentation for the marathon team celebration for Crystal Campbell's scholarships will be given out this Saturday, April 8th from noon to two. If people would like to join us for a luncheon inside the Medford Senior Center, followed by a gathering at the Crystal Campbell Peace Garden. We're located at 101 Riverside Avenue here in Medford. if everybody, my fellow Councilors and the viewing public, if they, it's a great cause with the marathon, the anniversary of our marathon coming up and such a tragic event and this event celebrates when something really terrible happens, how great people rally around a cause and present scholarships in the name of Crystal Campbell. So I think it's very important and if, Anyone like to join me? I'll be there. So thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. So, a few years back, as a member of the school committee and myself and Mr. Falco, I don't think we ever dreamed that the vision that the reality that we are in today and the vision that you've led us with, Dr. Riccio, is amazing. The thought process in my mind back then was trying to boost the programs that we had in place, the automotive, the electrical, the other wonderful programs. But what you've done here now, the leadership programs, the partnerships with different businesses, communities, and unions, the collaborations with all the stakeholders, the alumni involvement, the thousands of dollars that we're saving, keeping our kids in our community, and the money that we were losing at that time. The sense of pride that I feel for what you're trying to do and what you are accomplishing is immense. And you can feel it throughout the community. Again, I had two more phone calls today from parents asking me, how can I get in touch with the vocational school where kids were not in vocational education. They were in private schools and wanted to come back to Medford and wanting to participate in the vocational experience. So as this program, as this request comes in front of us, I just see it as a continued commitment that I made back then to try to focus on helping the vocational school be the jewel that it's supposed to be. And with your leadership and the superintendent's leadership, I think we've done that. I think this is just an amazing program. I see the benefits in the community that I work in, not to knock them, but they have one wonderful program. And they boast on that one wonderful program, and that program is the culinary arts program. And what that program does for that community's senior citizens and residents, that they can just walk across the street and take the senior bus to the vocational school and purchase and have a four course meal that normally they can't afford and to come into that culinary art setting and celebrate that and knowing that this is now going to be a reality in Medford and seeing the construction that's being done there and the access that the community will have there is second to none. And as I told the director this week that the only one piece of jewelry that they had on us is now going to go back, and we're now taking over everything. And so again, when you're talking about money well spent, I think this community, and with your efforts, and the way you've spelt it out for us, only shows and reinforces how, not just financially, but prideful enthusiasm that we're getting back tenfold. from our investment. So I thank you. I commend you. And, um, and I don't care what anybody says. Uh, no one has thanked me for bringing you to, to, to Medford. I think it was me personally. I drove all the way to your home and brought you here. So, um, that really didn't happen, but I appreciate it. Thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I, uh, thank, uh, Councilor, uh, Brianna Longo-Curran for bringing this forward. Brittany's, uh, been a superstar and, uh, she should be celebrated. So I, uh, appreciate this, um, this resolution, but I wanted to mention that I believe her father, Kenny, is now an ambassador in Kazakhstan. He's made such an impact in that country, I believe they want him to come back, and he's just an amazing person. So, congratulations.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scapelli. Thank you for, Councilor Dello Russo, bringing this Resolution forward. Mr. Junta was a great man. I know his sons well, and he'll be missed.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can, I just want to just mention this weekend, The Crystal Campbell scholarship presentation for the marathon team celebration for Crystal Campbell's scholarships will be given out this Saturday, April 8th from noon to 2. If people would like to join us for a luncheon inside the Medford Senior Center, followed by a gathering at the Crystal Campbell Peace Garden, We're located at 101 Riverside Avenue here in Medford. So if everybody, my fellow councilors and the viewing public, if they, it's a great cause with the marathon, the anniversary of our marathon coming up. such a tragic event, and this event celebrates when something really terrible happens, how great people rally around a cause and present scholarships in the name of Crystal Campbell. So I think it's very important. And if anyone would like to join me, I'll be there. So thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Vice President Mox. I appreciate an opportunity for Mr. just, I know Mr. Petrell has left, but you know, it's amazing to me when you have milk and teach you the year award. recipients like Mr. Petrelis, who were named a few years ago, named the Teacher of the Year. And he's done so many great, great, put so many great initiatives in place. What's amazing is when we lost Hemo at the McGlynn, that class still today celebrates his birthday. Every year, they have a birthday cake. It's something that's so special that they took something as horrible as death, and they learned how to celebrate it. And Anthony carries that his memory, uh, he most memory alive with the buzz off. And, um, I think this is the only time this is when I really want here so I can be involved. But, uh, I appreciate everything he's done. And, uh, and I think the city should rally around. It's a great cause. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor. Councilor Scarpelli. I, uh, thank you, Mr. President. Thank you. Councilor Knight for bringing this up. I think what's great with resolutions like this and the next resolution is that, uh, you get the dialogue started and I think I'm, I'd second the, the subcommittee, uh, motion to move to subcommittee because these are the discussions that, that when they go into that other room that hopefully a televised soon that people can see the real work getting done. and understanding that, um, I got a few phone calls and some phone calls will jeopardize the security. Then we have other, I had a few phone calls saying that's great because a lot of people that do have the greats are keeping the greats down. And that's where the graffiti artists are really tagging those areas. And which that brings up another point in, I think is probably the greatest points is our ordinance is focusing on, on graffiti throughout the community. So I think, um, I think this is a great start for many different issues that we can, it could morph into. So, um, I second that motion to, uh, move to subcommittee. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor McLaren. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. The the spirit of this this resolution, I believe that I too got the phone calls and emails and And being on the school committee and understanding that at the time how important this initiative was for our PTOs and I think that the focus that I was really looking at with this this resolution is Really getting a database in place where as you see in different neighborhoods. I know in the Heights we have one next to a convenience store that's overflowing onto the sidewalk. And it really poses a real eyesore. And neighbors there had concerns where it butts their driveways. And so I think that's where really having understanding who the contact person is, how we can remedy some of these solutions. I think that's probably the biggest and most aggressive campaign with this resolution. I, too, support this to go to subcommittee. It needs to be vetted like President, excuse me, Councilor Lungo-Koehns mentioned. And again, I think that to all the phone calls and emails that, rest assured, this committee is all in favor of making sure that it doesn't affect with partners like we have with the Bay State Textiles. So we appreciate their effort. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you. I know that I apologize for not putting this on the agenda, but with the recent storm and the outages, mostly in north Medford and the Wellington area, I've received a few phone calls from people that live in the Fellsway and the Salem Street area that they've been They've come across a few loud noise booms and then brief power outages. If we can have the city administration discuss this with the national grid and see what might be causing this so we can let our constituents know what are these issues. So it's starting to alarm a few of our senior residents that have contacted me in the last couple of weeks. And this isn't something that's been happening, I take it, just for the winter season. But this has been happening for a while now. So it's alarming that it's a long period of outages. But the hearing booms, and then you would have a brief outage for a minute or so. And then it would kick back on. So if there's something going on here, we need to know what the National Grid is doing in that area. So if we can have the city administration reach out to National Grid and give us a report on those outages, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli. Councilor Dello Russo.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Vice President Mox. I appreciate an opportunity for Mr. just, I know Mr. Petrell has left. You know, it's amazing to me when you have Milk and Teacher of the Year award recipients like Mr. Petrelis, who were named a few years ago, named the Teacher of the Year. And he's done so many great, great, put so many great initiatives in place. What's amazing is when we lost Hemo at the McGlynn, that class still today celebrates his birthday. Every year they have a birthday cake. It's something that's so special that they took something as horrible as death and they learned how to celebrate it. And Anthony carries that, his memory, HEMO's memory, alive with the buzz off. And I think this is the only time, this is what I really want here, so I can be involved. But I appreciate everything he's done, and I think the city should rally around it, it's a great cause. Thank you. Thank you, Council.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Knight. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Knight, for bringing this up. I think what's great with resolutions like this and the next resolution is that you get the dialogue started. And I think I'd second the subcommittee motion to move to subcommittee because these are the discussions that that when they go into that other room, that hopefully it televised soon, that people can see the real work getting done. And understanding that, um, I got a few phone calls and some phone calls will jeopardize the security. Then we have other, I had a few phone calls saying, that's great because a lot of people that do have the greats are keeping the greats down. And that's where the graffiti artists are really tagging those areas and which that brings up another point. And I think is probably the greatest points is our ordinances focusing on, on graffiti throughout the community. So I think, um, I think this is a great start for many different issues that we can, it could morph into. So, um, I second that motion to, uh, move to subcommittee. Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli, councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilwoman O'Brien. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. At the spirit of this resolution, I believe, that I too got the phone calls and emails and being on the school committee and understanding at the time how important this initiative was for our PTOs. And I think that the focus that I was really looking at with this resolution is really getting a database in place where, as you see in different neighborhoods, I know in the Heights we have one, next to a convenience store that's overflowing onto the sidewalk. And it really poses a real eyesore. And neighbors there had concerns where it butts their driveways. And so I think that's where really having understanding who the contact person is, how we can remedy some of these solutions. I think that's probably the biggest and most aggressive campaign with this resolution. So I too support this to go to subcommittee. It needs to be vetted like President, excuse me, Councilor Lungo-Koehn has mentioned. And again, I think that to all the phone calls and emails that rest assured this committee is all in favor of making sure that it doesn't affect with partners like we have with the Bay State Textiles. So we appreciate their effort. So thank you. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you. I know that I apologize for not putting this on the agenda, but with the recent storm and the outages, mostly in North Medford and the Wellington area, I've received a few phone calls from people that live in the Fellsway and the Salem Street area that they've been They've come across a few loud noise booms and then brief power outages. If we can have the city administration discuss this with the national grid and see what might be causing this so we can let our constituents know what are these issues. So it's starting to alarm a few of our senior residents that have contacted me in the last couple of weeks. And this isn't something that's been happening, I take it, just for the winter season. But this has been happening for a while now. So it's alarming that it's a long period of outages. But they're hearing booms, and then you would have a brief outage for a minute or so. And then it would kick back on. So if there's something going on here, we need to know what National Grid is doing in that area. So if we can have the city administration reach out to National Grid and give us a report on those outages, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli. Councilor Dello Russo.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. From what you just said, Mr. Superintendent, for what Councilwoman Longo just mentioned, the confusion that I want to make clear is, you're telling us they'll tell us what we can do. But let's say something is needed today. And we're saying, let's say the HVAC needs to be done today. But they had that on their list as three to be funded. Are we gonna fund their request instead of what we think is, like the HVAC, that's probably the, Mike.
[George Scarpelli]: Chairman Scarpelli. If I can, the dates publicly for the project, when are you looking to start?
[George Scarpelli]: Monday. Yes. And the times of, uh, hours of work that would be under the direction of the engineering department from the city.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Now, has anyone in the engineering department talked about the, uh, I believe that street's going to be, dug up again in a few weeks, correct? Is it maybe a few months?
[George Scarpelli]: So again, I think just reiterating, just making sure that the sidewalk, you know, anything that's where people are walking, excuse me, the street, that it's put back where, and then revisited again in six months, making sure that there was no dippage or, you know, so any future holes later. Understood. Okay. Um, everything else I see that's an order. So I move for approval. Councilor Knight.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor. Councilor Scarpelli. If I can just add onto that, I know that it might be, I know that, uh, Mr. Karen's did respond to us about Evans street, but didn't respond back on Paris street. So if you can just, uh, if you could just reach back, uh, come back to us with a response on the repaving of Paris street. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Um, I too, um, have, have pushed for different avenues to oversee and review our zoning. And I'll say it again, I think the mayor mentioned it at her State of the City and reaching out to the Metropolitan Area Planning Council and getting their immediate sit down and set a plan with the city and the stakeholders to make sure that we could do what's right for our community and our vision. As Mr. McKillop said, Medford is the jewel, it's our term. You know, we have the Chevalier, we have the Mystic, we have the Fells, 93, Mystic Ave. There's so much to plan in those areas. So again, if we can put an amendment, I appreciate Councilwoman Kern for putting this in. reaching out to the mayor and asking them, reaching out again to the Metropolitan Area Planning Council to set a plan in reviewing what we need, how we need to even start our process in zoning because things are happening so fast, it's going too fast. And we need to slow it down so we can all share our vision and what we think Medford should be and will be in years to come. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I did not say I get the mayor's opinion. I said the mayor mentioned at a state of the city that we would reach out to the metropolitan area planning council to get them involved, to start dialogue, to get us moving for zoning in our community. That's what I said.
[George Scarpelli]: Absolutely not.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. From what you just said, Mr. Superintendent, what Councilwoman Longo just mentioned, the confusion that I want to make clear is, you're telling us they'll tell us what we can do. But let's say something is needed today. And we're saying, let's say the HVAC needs to be done today. But they had that on their list as three to be funded. Are we going to fund their request instead of what we think is, like the HVAC, that's probably the... So that's a discussion, Councilor, that we would have.
[George Scarpelli]: Chairman Scarpelli. If I can, the dates publicly for the project, when are you looking to start?
[George Scarpelli]: Monday? Yes. And the times of hours of work?
[George Scarpelli]: OK. Now, has anyone in the engineering department talked about the, I believe that street's going to be dug up again in a few weeks, correct? Is it maybe a few months?
[George Scarpelli]: So again, I think just reiterating, just making sure that the sidewalk, you know, anything that's where people are walking, excuse me, the street, that it's put back where, and then revisited again in six months, making sure that there was no dippage or, you know, so any future holes later. Understood. Okay. Um, everything else. See, that's an order. So I move for approval.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can just add on to that, I know that it might be, I know that, uh, Mr. Cairns did respond to us about Evans street, but didn't respond back on Paris street. So if you can just, uh, if you could just reach back, uh, come back to us with a response on the repaving of Paris street. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I, too, have have pushed for different avenues to oversee and review our zoning. And I'll say it again. I think the mayor mentioned it at her State of the City and reaching out to the Metropolitan Area Planning Council and getting their immediate sit down and set a plan with the city and the stakeholders to make sure that we could do what's right for our community and our vision. As Mr. McKillop said, Medford is the jewel. It's our term. You know, we have the Chevalier, we have the Mystic, we have the Fells, 93, Mystic Ave. There's so much. There's so much to plan in those areas. So again, if we can put an amendment, I appreciate Councilor Long and Kern for putting this in, but reaching out to the mayor and asking them, reaching out again to the Metropolitan Area Planning Council to set a plan in reviewing how we need to even start our process in zoning because things are happening so fast, it's going too fast. And we need to slow it down so we can all share our vision and what we think Medford should be and will be in years to come. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I did not say, I get the mayor's opinion. I said the mayor mentioned at a State of the City that we would reach out to the Metropolitan Area Planning Council to get them involved, to start dialogue, to get us moving for zoning in our community. That's what I said.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scott Belly. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I, Thank my fellow colleagues for bringing this issue up. I know that back in budget time when we discussed, we talked to each individual department. One of the things that we talked about was the implementation of the wash machine and having that implemented. I think one of the biggest concerns they had was that most of our stations don't have the capability from the electrical standpoint and plumbing standpoint to do what's needed to have that machine. So if we can ask, I'd like to see if you wouldn't mind that we can amend it to ask the building department to find out, Mr. Moki, if they can look into to see which departments, which fire stations can, that have the capability to make sure that because if it's that simple, it should be that simple. I mean, you know, these are dire issues that are very concerning. So I know that that was one of the concerns that was brought up when I've talked to the rank and file and what the reasoning was, why they couldn't put in the washing machine for the turnout gear was because the stations weren't compatible for the electricity and the water that was needed there. And then I, if we can reach out to the chief too, and, uh, have another amendment put on that. I thought there was discussion that there was a grant that was supposedly coming out for two more of these, uh, uh, wash machines and dryers. It never did. Okay. So again, if we can get an update on that and what happened with that too, or that'd be important. So again, and again, I follow up with what else would counsel Falco said, That was one of the biggest pieces. And then, um, that with the school committee looking at the schools now, obviously we didn't do, we couldn't do everything. It was impossible to do, but what it did was we finally had, and that wasn't it. I believe I, my answer to that was with the schools was, uh, it's a rolling, um, um, plan. So we're always doing capital improvement. So I think that if we can get, a list, not just in the fire departments, but in all of our municipal buildings, and what we see as more dire actions that need to be taken, and then categorize them so we know what needs to be done and what's really at its last legs that are going to cost us when it's too late. So I think that's important. That's one of the concerns I got back with when we talk about new buildings, new, new police station, new schools, what are the plans in place to make sure that we're, we have a plan in place for upkeep. So I think it's important that we, we, uh, ask the city administration that if we can have a, um, a plan in place and what, uh, a working plan in place with the city administration on all of our municipal buildings. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, I just said, I thank my colleague for bringing this up. I know this has been a bone of contentions with myself that making sure that we hold, um, um, these contractors, um, to what their intent intended to, uh, complete with the city's, road works and I think that if we can, I'd like to see if there's a way we can reach out to the community itself if they have some construction work. I know that we have a neighbour in the heights had contacted me that the contractor last year put down the hot top but didn't replace the cement on the sidewalk. So even if they could reach out to the city administration the C click fix. And if the, if there are any other locations that the community can help us with some of those addresses to be, to be helpful. But I appreciate Mr. Knight for bringing this up. It's a, it's, it's an issue that I hear way too often our community from neighbors. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Mr. Coughlin was, I think everybody here one way or another knew his uh, Mr. Kaufman himself is a former phys ed teacher and the method public schools. He was also a coach at the high school level. And also, um, he ran the pool for us for a little bit over on main street. Um, if you know, Jim, um, you know that, uh, he had a really, uh, look like mean exterior, but it wasn't, he was a great person. He was, um, a man who graduated Norwich with a military background that his sons and family have followed. I know that he meant so much to our community, and his wife, Paula, who also works in our system. I just want to reach out to them and give them our thoughts and prayers. And I know that yesterday, two days ago, during their week, I made a promise in that I'll be reaching out to the state delegation, something that they brought to my attention, that our cruisers do not have AEDs. And that's something that you just overlook and you don't know. And something that was alarming to me as I talked to the family is that the cruiser that was there, if they were fitted with the AED, that Jim possibly could have survived. I will make it a promise to reach out to state delegation to see if we could change this in the state. And that was the wishes of the family. And I made sure that I'd bring that up. And, uh, and it's a fight that I'll take on for Jim and the Coughlin family. And again, uh, we're going to miss him and, um, and, uh, prayers to the family. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Sounds good, thank you. Councilor Scott Belli. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I thank my fellow colleagues for bringing this issue up. I know that back in budget time, when we discussed, we talked to each individual department. One of the things that we talked about was the implementation of the wash machine and having that implemented. And I think one of the biggest concerns they had was that most of our stations don't have the capability from the electrical standpoint, the plumbing standpoint, to do what's needed to have that machine. So if we can ask, I'd like to see if you wouldn't mind that we can amend it to ask the building department to find out, Mr. Moki, if they can look into, to see which departments, which fire stations can, that have the capability to make sure that Because if it's that simple, it should be that simple. I mean, these are dire issues that are very concerning. So I know that that was one of the concerns that was brought up when I talked to the rank and file and what the reasoning was why they couldn't put in the washing machine for the turnout gear was because the stations weren't compatible for the electricity and the water that was needed there. And then if we can reach out to the chief too and have another amendment put on that. I thought there was discussion that there was a grant that was supposedly coming out for two more of these wash machines and dryers. It never did. Okay. So again, if we can get an update on that and what happened with that too, or that'd be important. So again, and again, I follow up with what else, what council Falco said, that was one of the biggest pieces. And then, um, that with the school committee looking at the schools now, Obviously, we couldn't do everything. It was impossible to do. But what it did was we finally had, and that wasn't it. I believe my answer to that was with the schools was it's a rolling plan. So we're always doing capital improvement. So I think that if we can get a list, not just in the fire departments, but in all of our municipal buildings, and what we see as more dire actions that need to be taken, and then categorize them so we know what needs to be done and what's really at its last legs that are going to cost us when it's too late. So I think that's important. that's one of the concerns I got back with when we talk about new buildings, new, new police station, new schools, what are the plans in place to make sure that we are, we have a plan in place for upkeep. So I think it's important that we, we, uh, ask the city administration that if we can have a, um, a plan in place and what, uh, a working plan in place with the city administration on all of our municipal buildings. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I just, I thank my colleague for bringing this up. I know this has been a bone of contentions with myself that making sure that we hold, um, um, these contractors, um, to what their intent intended to, uh, complete with the city's, um, roadworks. I think that if we can, I'd like to see if there's a way we can reach out to the community itself if they have, um, some construction work. I know that we have a neighbor in the heights that contacted me that the contractor last year put down the hot top but didn't replace the cement on the sidewalk. So even if they could reach out to the city administration and the see click fix and if the if there are any other locations that the community can help us with some of those addresses to be could be helpful, but I appreciate Mr. Knight for bringing this up. It's uh, it's it's an issue that I hear way too often our community from neighbors. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Mr. Coughlin was I think everybody here, one way or another, knew Mr. Kaufman himself as a former phys ed teacher in the Medford Public Schools. He was also a coach at the high school level, and also he ran the pool for us for a little bit over on Main Street. If you know Jim, you know that he had a really look like a mean exterior, but it wasn't. He was a great person. He was a man who graduated Norwich with a military background that his sons and family have followed. I know that he meant so much to our community and his wife, Paula, who also works in our system. I just want to reach out to them and give them give them our thoughts and prayers. And I know that yesterday, two days ago, during their wake, I made a promise in that I'll be reaching out to the state delegation, something that they brought to my attention, that our cruisers do not have AEDs. And that's something that you just overlook and you don't know. And something that was alarming to me as I talked to the family, is that the cruiser that was there, if they were fitted with the AED, that Jim possibly could have survived. So I will make it a promise to reach out to the state delegation to see if we could change this in the state. And that was the wishes of the family. And I made sure that I'd bring that up. And it's a fight that I'll take on for Jim and the Coughlin family. And again, we're going to miss him. and prayers to the family. So, thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Again. I echo what my colleagues have said, Reverend Noah. Your vision and your leadership within our community is going to be sorely missed. I just, something they all missed. I just hope that you remember that you left a Patriots fan and hopefully you don't become a Stalers fan. So, thank you very much and God bless. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Is there a timeline when we'd like to have that on?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Again, I echo what my colleagues have said, Reverend Nowart. Your vision and your leadership within our community is going to be sorely missed. I just, something they all missed. I just hope that you remember that you left a Patriots fan and hopefully you don't become a Steelers fan. So thank you very much and God bless. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can real quick, is there a timeline when we'd like to have that on? I know that's been.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, can we ask the, The petitioner can come forward. Hi, how are you? Fine, and you? So exactly, what will you be serving in this establishment? Caribbean, Haitian, and Spanish food. Okay, it's not ice cream though. It's not ice cream.
[George Scarpelli]: Should we serve an oxtail?
[George Scarpelli]: Your hours of operations?
[George Scarpelli]: OK. You know, if it's out, I believe it's 11, you have to ask. After 11? After 11, you have to ask as you move forward. OK. You'll have to ask for a special permit. But no, everything seems to be in order. I know with the growing Haitian community, Jamaican community, I think that it's wonderful food. I'm a connoisseur of food, so. OK. Yeah, so everything looks like it's in order, Mr. President. I move to approve and... Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: All those in favor?
[George Scarpelli]: I believe we said executive session to go over those sites. Because there was confidential issues?
[George Scarpelli]: And I believe the syncing.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Marks, for bringing that up. I wouldn't, someone that I think that's kept so many highlights in our community, Medford rivalry, is Steve Frecker, someone, the editor, who kept things going for so long when things were so tough, and he hung in there. So I appreciate all his hard work and what he's done for Malden and the Mercury. So we wish him well.
[George Scarpelli]: I believe we said executive session to go over those sites. Because there was confidential issues?
[George Scarpelli]: And I believe the sinking.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Councilor Marks, for bringing that up. Someone that I think that's kept so many highlights in our communities, especially the Malden-Medford rivalry, is Steve Frecker, someone, the editor, who kept things going for so long when things were so tough, and he hung in there. So I appreciate all his hard work and what he's done for Medford and Malden and the Mercury. So we wish him well. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I found the records in order.
[George Scarpelli]: Are they here? Okay. 412.5 Granite Ave, Milton, Mass. This is for Zam Zam's Restaurant, 42 Riverside Ave, Medford. If you can just give us a little brief description of your restaurant so this council knows.
[George Scarpelli]: OK, so I find everything is in order, Mr. President. So one question I did have is, hours of operations, what time are you open, what time are you closing? 11 to 10.30. OK. So you're familiar with meth or anything after 11 that you have to ask for a special permit?
[George Scarpelli]: OK. All right. Thank you. So, um, Mr. President, I find all the paperwork in order. So I moved to, uh, accept and place approval. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you. Councilor Dello Russo.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor O'Connor. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you very much. Just a quick question. I know that we've been talking about replacing and fixing the catch bases. Do you know how many we're looking to fix on our own?
[George Scarpelli]: Are we hoping to, to do all 38?
[George Scarpelli]: Yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. Can we ask the Deputy Chief, were they already ordered? Would they know, who would know if the turn out gear, because I thought they were already ordered, because I think that took some time. Name and address of the record, please.
[George Scarpelli]: The question of the turnout gear.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I, too, echo my colleague's remarks. I think that we all have someone that has talked to us in the past year with myself and the men and women that fought for our country. For some families that have really pushed this, it's been frightening for the fact that they're seeing their loved ones who fought for our country enter their final stages of their lives. One thing they wanna see is the honor of having their names put on that wall. So if there's anything that, if we can really push this through and make sure that we can make this happen for our men and women, and I echo Councilor Knight's remarks that this is something we should do every year because you never know what tomorrow brings. So I really appreciate Councilor Caraviello for bringing this up, and thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I have a petition for pictures licensed by Khalida Parveen, are they here? Okay. 412.5 Granite Ave, Milton, Mass. This is for Zam Zam's Restaurant, 42 Riverside Ave, Medford. Yes, sir. If you can just give us a little brief description of your restaurant, so this council knows.
[George Scarpelli]: And we're opening the new one. Okay, so I find everything is in order, Mr. President. So one question I did have is, hours of operations, what time are you open, what time are you closing? 11 to 10.30. Okay. So you're familiar with meth or anything after 11 that you have to ask for a special permit?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. All right, thank you, sir. Mr. President, I find all the paperwork in order, so I move to accept and place approval. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you. Councilor Dello Russo.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Lococo. I'm sorry, Councilor Scott-Bell. Oh, thank you. Thank you very much. Just a quick question. I know that we've been talking about replacing and fixing the catch bases. Do you know how many we're looking to fix on our own?
[George Scarpelli]: Are we hoping to do all 38?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. Let me ask the Deputy Chief, were they already ordered? Would they know, who would know that, if the turn out gear, because I thought they were already ordered, because I think that took some time. Name and address of the record, please. Point of order, Councilor Knight.
[George Scarpelli]: The question, the turnout gear. Have they already been ordered?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I, too, echo my colleague's remarks. I think that we all have someone that has talked to us in the past year with myself and the men and women that fought for our country. And for some families that have really pushed this, it's been frightening for the fact that they're seeing their loved ones who fought for our country enter their final stages of their lives. And one thing they want to see is the honor of having their names put on that wall. So if there's anything that, if we can really push this through and make sure that We can make this happen for our men and women, and I echo Councilor Knight's remarks that this is something we should do every year because you never know what tomorrow brings. So I really appreciate Councilor Caraviello for bringing this up, and thank you very much. Thank you, Councilor Scarpelli.
[George Scarpelli]: I find them all in order. I do have a few questions, Mr. President. Just real quick. Is there any work being done down Warren Street? Is it just down Boston Ave?
[George Scarpelli]: OK, it looks like you've contacted all the abutters and I appreciate that. A hynny'n edrych yn dda. Unwaith eto, rwy'n gwybod bod yr unig beth sy'n edrych yn wahanol i mi yw'r byd y bydd y ddinas yn darparu, ymstead o'r pwysau, y byddwn ni'n cael y pwysau.
[George Scarpelli]: Yn gyntaf, rwy'n gwybod ein bod ni wedi cael un o'r bywydwyr sydd wedi cael ychydig o gwestiynau. Roedd e'n dod ychydig yn ddiwethaf, ond roedd e'n eisiau gofyn y cwmni gas, ychydig o gwestiynau. Felly os ydych chi'n gallu, Mr. Richard, os ydych chi'n gallu.
[George Scarpelli]: Byddai'n Mae'r cymdeithasau yma wedi gwneud yr holl gwaith sydd ar gael. Mae'r adnoddau wedi'u hyrwyddo ac rydw i'n mynd ymlaen i'r cymdeithas y byddwn i'n ei wneud.
[George Scarpelli]: Nid, rwy'n credu, os gallwn ddysgu o'r bywydau, rwy'n credu bod hynny'n peth pwysig mwyaf ar hyn o bryd. Ms. Tucker, os gallwch chi ddweud. Yn ôl i mewn ac ysgrifennu eich syniad, nawr?
[George Scarpelli]: ymgeisyddol. Nid yw'n ystafell. Mae pobl yn mynd ymlaen, felly nid yw hynny'n bwysig. Nid yw hynny'n bwysig. Nid yw hynny'n bwysig. Nid yw hynny'n bwysig. Nid yw hynny'n bwysig.
[George Scarpelli]: Diolch, Mr. Prif Weinidog. Rydyn ni'n cael yr holl papurwaith mewn gilydd ar hyn o bryd ac nid yw'n edrych fel... Dyma brosiect newydd, ac nid ydyn nhw'n mynd i fod yn effeithio. Dim busnes, nid ydyn nhw'n mynd i fod yn effeithio gyda'r brosiect hon. Felly, rydyn ni'n mynd ymlaen.
[George Scarpelli]: Yn ogystal â'r adran honno, mae'r rhan hwn wedi'i gosod. Yn ogystal â'r adran honno, mae'r rhan hwn wedi'i gosod. Yn ogystal â'r adran honno, mae'r rhan hwn wedi'i gosod. Yn ogystal â'r adran honno, mae'r rhan hwn wedi'i gosod. Yn ogystal â'r adran honno, mae'r rhan hwn wedi'i gosod.
[George Scarpelli]: Diolch. Arweinydd Scarpelli. Diolch yn fawr, Mr. President. Diolch yn fawr, Arweinydd Knight, am ddod ymlaen yn ystod y pryd, ond rwy'n credu y bydd ein sub-gynghrair ad-hoc wedi gweithio'n ddiligrwydd gyda'r ymarferwyr, ac o'r hyn rydw i'n ymgysylltu gyda'r ymarferwyr yn eu dysgu, oedd y ffaith o fod yn mynd ymlaen yn gyflym, ac yn gofio mwy o amser, ac yn cymryd nhw ac yn arwain at beth sydd wedi bod, rhai broblemau, ac eu cyrraedd, er enghraifft, heddiw ddiwethaf, yn ddiwethaf, yn ddiwethaf, yn ddiwethaf, yn ddiwethaf, yn ddiwethaf, yn ddiwethaf, yn diwethaf, yn diwethaf, yn diwethaf, yn diwethaf, yn diwethaf, yn di Ac eto, rydych chi'n gweld beth yw'r partner gwych yw Tufts University, a Barbara, a Rocco, ac mae'r cyfathrebu agos y maen nhw'n gwybod each ar gyfer sefydliadau ffyrdd. Ac rwy'n deall pan fydd yna broblemau, mae Tufts yno i gefnogi ein gysylltiadurau a gweithio gyda nhw gyda'r sefyllfa hon. Ac eto, rwy'n gobeithio'r gwaith anodd, ac rwy'n gobeithio hefyd y dealltwriaethau yn edrych ymlaen ymlaen ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig ychydig
[George Scarpelli]: Rwyf am ddweud wrth y Cynulliad a'r cymuned y byddwn ni'n teimlo'n anhygoel iawn bod Barbara wedi'i ddweud i'n brifi y byddwn ni'n gweld eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwybod eich bod ni'n gwy Byddai'r mwyaf o bobl yn well, byddai'r cyllideb yn ymwneud ag ysgafn. Rwy'n credu y mae'n rhaid i ni ddweud rhywbeth hefyd. Rwy'n gwybod y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r drafodaeth y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r drafodaeth y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r drafodaeth y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r drafodaeth y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r drafodaeth y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r drafodaeth y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r drafodaeth y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r drafodaeth y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r drafodaeth y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r drafodaeth y byddwn yn ymwneud â'r drafodaeth y bydd unrhyw beth fel ymgeisydd ad-hoc sy'n gweithio gyda'n ymgeisydd y ddinas hwnnw, sy'n gofyn, sy'n gofyn gwestiynau i ni, ac rydyn ni'n gofyn y cwestiynau hygyrcheddol hwnnw yn ôl, ac rydyn ni, fel y sub-gynghrair o'r gysylltiad hwnnw, roeddwn i'n teimlo'n eithaf'n gryf o'r hyn rydyn ni'n dod ymlaen, ac rydyn ni'n deall y byddwn ni'n mynd ymlaen, ond roeddwn i'n barod i mynd ymlaen gyda'r Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: nid yn unig ar gyfer y gallu i arddangos yr ymgeisydd hwnnw, ond i arddangos y tu allan ac i ddod i'r bobl sy'n ddiddorol i'r ymgeisydd hwnnw. Un peth yr ydw i'n gallu cyflawni yw'r dealltwriaeth y bydd ei'r adroddiad o bryd mewn cymdeithas yn ymwybyddol. Felly byddwn ni'n mynd i'w gilio, ac eto byddwn ni eisiau ddiolch iddyn nhw
[George Scarpelli]: Cyngor Scarpelli. Cyngor Scarpelli. Cyngor Scarpelli. Cyngor Scarpelli. roeddent yn y ddinas hwnnw, ac mae'r credyd yn mynd i'r arbenigwyr ffyrdd, ac roedd y bobl sy'n mynd allan allan o'r adeilad hwnnw'n sicr, oherwydd y gwybodaeth gyda'r adeilad ffyrdd a'r gwybodaeth ar gyfer y bywydwyr o'r diwrnod hwnnw, ymgeisyddiaeth o le mae'r ffyrddau'n ffyrddio'n ffwrddio'n ymdrechion, ac eto. Felly, rwy'n credu bod hynny'n bwysig iawn y byddwn ni'n ymdrechu, ac rydyn ni, fel Cyngor, hefyd, yn edrych ymlaen at ein cyhoeddiadau gyda'r Airbnbs yma sy'n dod ymlaen ymhellach. Felly, diolch.
[George Scarpelli]: Yn ôl, rwy'n golygu, rwy'n golygu, rwy'n golygu, rwy'n golygu, rwy'n golygu, rwy'n golygu,
[George Scarpelli]: Rwy'n cofio Kenny fel bobl ifanc yng Nghaerfyrdd y byddwch chi'n ymwneud â hwnnw. Mae'n ymwneud â'r rhan fwyaf, ond mae'n ymwneud â'r hearth o lywodraeth. Pan oedd yn ymwneud ag ysbryd o'r cancer, roedd Kenny'n ymwneud â'r rhan fwyaf yng Nghaerfyrdd. Rwy'n gwybod y byddwn ni'n rhaid iddyn nhw. Rwy'n gwybod y byddwn ni'n rhaid iddyn nhw. Rwy'n gwybod y byddwn ni'n rhaid iddyn nhw. Rwy'n gwybod y byddwn ni'n rhaid iddyn nh He played for more on his loss and he's a great young man and I wish his family much prayers and condolences. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Second. Second, go Patriots.
[George Scarpelli]: I find them all in order. If I do have a few questions, Mr. President. Just real quick. Is there any work being done down Warren Street? Is it just down Boston Ave?
[George Scarpelli]: OK, it looks like you've contact all the abutters and I appreciate that. And that looks great. Um, again, I know it's just, the only thing that looks different to me is that, um, that the city will provide instead of paving that, um, we'd be compensated painfully quick.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I know we had one resident that just had a couple of questions. Um, uh, he came in a little late that just, just, uh, he wanted to ask the gas company a couple of questions. So if you can, um, Mr. Richard, if you can.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I see that, uh, Both, uh, organizations done, um, all the work that's needed. Uh, all the departments have been approved and, uh, I move forward to, uh, to move in place.
[George Scarpelli]: Yeah, no, I think if we can hear from the residents, I think that'd be the most important piece right now. Okay. Ms.
[George Scarpelli]: Are you happy?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Okay. Uh, again, so just so it won't affect any, uh, visual site. It's not in the corner if people take in. So that's not, that won't, that that's not going to affect it, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. We find all the paperwork in order right now and it doesn't look like this is a new project and No one will be impacted, no business or private resident will be impacted with this project, so we move forward.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I find that every department is signed off and approved. And again, this project is on the new Rivers Edge project and does not impact residents or any businesses. So I move forward to approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I can. Uh, thank you Mr. President. Again, thank uh, uh, council, uh, council night bringing this up. uh, some time ago, but I think that, uh, our ad hoc subcommittee, um, has worked diligently with the neighbors and, uh, and from what I gather with the neighbors and their discussion. was the fact that getting this move forward quickly, um, and spending more time and getting them, uh, and waiting for what, what has been some issues and, uh, their response, even in emails today, this evening, thanking us, this committee to actually go out and, and work toward this, this endeavor. And, and, and again, you, you see what a great partner Tufts University is and Barbara and Rocco and the, the, the, open communication that they have, know each other from first name basis and understanding when there are issues that Tufts is there to support our neighbors and working together with them with this situation. So again, I appreciate the hard work and I also appreciate my colleagues understanding and looking into this a little bit further because it is a, it is in a very important endeavor, but we worked very, very diligently on this and We heard from a lot of people and, um, asked a lot of questions. And, um, I know that councilor Falco chaired that committee and, uh, I thought that, um, I'm, I personally am ready to move forward and with, with the vote. And, uh, again, thank you for everybody's hard work.
[George Scarpelli]: Um, again, I appreciate that. It's something that I wanted to share with the council that the, and the community that we found very alarming that, uh, Barbara brought to our, our, um, our privy that, What we're seeing is our real estate agents really don't understand what our laws are in our community, because as they're moving forward and bringing residents in and renters in, they're actually pushing the more people, the better the rate would be in rent. So I think there's gotta be something too that we, I know that separately as part of a future discussion that we talk about making sure that we contact our real estate agents that are working within Medford and making sure they are familiar with our ordinances on residence requirements. So I just wanted to share that. I know that everybody has shared their information their input and I can respect it. I just, uh, again, I think this is, uh, something as a ad hoc committee that, um, works together and met with that city solicitor who, who, who asked, who asked us questions and we asked those prudent questions back and, um, and we, as this body's subcommittee, um, felt pretty strong in what we brought forward. So, but, can understand that we move forward. But I was ready to move forward with it as faith. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I, too. I appreciate not only for Reverend Noah's ability to reach his congregation, but reach outside and get to the people that don't particularly belong to his church. And one thing I can hold true is understanding that his message of peace and community is so evident. So we're going to miss him. And again, we just want to thank him and wish him luck.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank Council President Cabell for bringing that up. And I think that what's key to this is that they were registered in that city and, uh, the credit goes to the fire inspector and, um, the people that walked out of that, that building safe. It was because of the notification with the fire department and the notification for the residents of that evening that they had a clear understanding of where fire extinguishers, our exits were, and, um, and so on. So I think that's very important that we follow suit. And, um, we as a council also look into our ordinances, uh, with, uh, these Airbnbs that are now popping up everywhere. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I echo my condolences. I know her family will miss her forever, but I know she fought this fight and a public fight that most of us know about and may she rest in peace. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I remember Kenny as a young man at Morrison Park that he was truly a fighter then and a little undersized, but the heart of a lion. And when when faced with this battle of cancer, Kenny fought it with that same strength and he will be missed. I know his teammates and classmates and the Morrison Park family that he played for, mourn his loss. And he's a great young man. And I wish his family much prayers and condolences. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Second go Patriots.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. I did talk to the administration about this, and there has been no acceptance, so the RFP is off the table, so that's what I've been told.
[George Scarpelli]: I believe that they're also... Good communication.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scott Belly. If I could thank you for Councilor Marks for bringing this up. I know that this was brought up in the past and I talked to a constituent just a few weeks ago here in the council chambers. I did talk to, um, athletic director Maloney about this just recently. And, uh, he must've been reading his mind because they've already discussed this looking forward for the spring. that the vocational school is one of their projects is to relocate that stone next to one of the benches in front of the fence and, um, built on top of some sort of cement structure. So it sits upon something. So, um, the, I, I should have relayed that to everybody sooner, but I appreciate bringing that up. And, um, I second that we have a rededication to a great man and someone who I, as you become a member of the coaching staff at Medford High School, one of only five head coaches in the history of Medford High Soccer, and understanding that the Fran Pelosi's, the Bud Edgeley's, the Joe Barletta's, the Skipperata's, and having my name along with those great names is, much appreciated. So I appreciate that to bring that up and I hope to see that this spring. Thank you. I agree.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Again, I know that some of my fellow colleagues don't believe this is the way to go, but when you're talking about a consultant, I agree a thousand percent, but what always comes back from administration is cost and cost and what can we afford, and that's something that we should make a priority. But I'm gonna make a suggestion again. Something that has already been paid for, by becoming a member of the Metropolitan Planning Board that we are actually part of their board. We can actually ask them right now to come in now to ask for their guidance, because this is what they do. They're already working for us. We're using them at Medford Square, and they're leading us in that way. Why wouldn't we ask them to come to these meetings and give us some guidance? I believe the attorney that we hired actually told us this is, when I spoke to them, that this is the way we can go. So I know some members don't believe in it, but, um, because one of the, I'm going to guarantee everybody here, we're going to know that the first thing to say for a consultant, the budget, the money, it's just going to delay everything. And I agree with all of my fellow colleagues, but it would, it hurt us to ask someone from that board to be here in our corner to lend advice because this is what they do. We don't. So again, I, I, I, I strongly suggest that I agree with bringing an outside consultant, and again, that's going to take time. We're talking about pending issues that are affecting our neighborhoods every single day. And we can reach out to a board, a metropolitan board that we've actually worked with, that we have evidence that they're working with that, that we move on. We ask them to come in and lend some advice so we can have a vision, a direction, where to go with our audiences that haven't been looked at in over 30 years. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: That was my, I'm sorry. Thank you, Mr. President. I think that was the same question I had. Cause I thought that was a great idea at that meeting. I think a Councilor Marks as a, as an outside member was there and mentioned that putting in that plan. And I do remember, um, um, human diversity director talking about, the issues with the cabs. I don't know if something has changed since then, but I don't, I can understand your frustration, but I think that, um, something that we did try to work on and that was in our original plan. Um, and adding that, I don't think that that would hurt, but I, I, I do, um, I do want to make sure that what was structured that evening and add it in as a working document. That will stay. That will stay. I want to make sure of that. That will stay. That is correct.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank Councilor Markswell for bringing that up. I too got the email and I did put an email into our friendly transportation buddy, Tom. So hopefully we get something back soon. I did the same. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. And I know if we can with that, I know that a city solicitor is getting back to us about the recommendation cause I believe our constituents have asked about the AG's input and recommendation on the health care issue along with that. And again, I believe we're looking to try to have a meeting at St. Francis, so it would be easier for the neighbors in that area to get to that meeting. So if we can just add that to that, I'd appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. If we can, I know that the Chief mentioned, could we get the word out to our state delegation that we get an update from them that this committee, this council is requesting a timeline for the purchase of the land that we've been requesting for some time, and they've done such hard work. I think Council Marks is right about what we talked about. The tower coming down and the new tower being built was supposed to be simultaneous. So if we can do that, I appreciate it. There's a motion please. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. To our residents, I apologize for what you've gone through. I know that I got a phone call this week with a similar concern with a visiting nurse visiting a disabled resident. her car being towed and ticketed and not having notifications. So I know that there was something in the past that there was some concerns of timelines of posting, but I think that, you know, we've had going back and forth, but that posting that actually The actual posting on the street, I think is important. I think not everybody has the notification system in place. And some seniors don't see it. And then when you have visitors, they don't understand the process either. So I think that these are the concerns that we have. I think I know we talked about in the past, something I thought was a great idea in the past, was one of my colleagues brought this up as part of the new Medford people that are moving in, a welcome package. where you might have gotten some information about being notified via texting if you had A, B, or C. So maybe we can look into that. I know that... Park Medford has, we've had them in front of us numerous times and customer service issues and maybe it's time that we make it as a resolution that we call for a committee of the whole meeting with the Park Medford people and bring them back in especially, you know, when you're probably going to be getting into one of the busiest snow months in February and these issues coming about again. So I think that and then again during spring sweeping that we get some resolutions and some ideas that we can help our residents. And last but not least, I think that, do we, help me out Mr. President, do we have a liaison from City Hall for the Park Method concerns? So maybe that might be put out there too, that we have that liaison that the residents can go to. I think that's very important. So make it as a resolution that we look into some time. Relatively soon that we have a meeting with the representatives from. And we could bring them back in and get some ideas. I know that we've had some issues about permit parking residents parking. We've had some issues with the sweet street sweeping with the. Some of the guidelines, when they're ticketing, when they're not ticketing again. So if we can meet again, maybe get some, I know they have a huge turnaround there too. And I think I'd like to get an update and see what they've done to rectify their customer service issues that we've had in the past. So thank you. Again, sorry about that.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Uh, thank you, Mr. President. I think, uh, this came about, my suggestion came about a few months back when we had the issues concerning our, uh, repaving of sidewalk panels. And we did a little investigation from some of the communities from the south and that have pothole crews and cement crews. And I believe it was a team of three and one truck. And I think I still have the numbers that the homework that we did that showed what it would cost for that That truck and the crew that would work in multiple facets for the DPW, but focused on the day-to-day pothole and then in the spring and summer and early fall working on replacing panels, which would alleviate the every few years of the $250,000 payment out to an outside agency. So I think that a lot of the questions we're getting in the last couple of weeks about our DPW concerns about plowing and they don't plow, DPW doesn't get it out there and the complaints about they're not plowing our streets. And then when they plow our streets, the potholes are coming. And I know we're all not saying it's their fault, but the truth of the matter is, again, we have to revisit what they have for staffing and what we're giving them to work. So we have a big, beautiful DPW home, but if we don't have anything in that, what are we doing for them? So I think we as a council should actually look when it comes to budget time and add this to the resolution that, again, the DPW director looks into purchasing with the cost of a crew of three, and they would work as a pothole crew and a cement crew. Neighbor communities do to alleviate such issues. So where you're talking about six guys on the water department that's saying a lot being fictitious here and they're out correcting burst pipes. Of course they're not going to get out to do a pothole, and we know that. You're talking about individuals that we've been talking about, the sore covers that are falling in. We're talking about sidewalks that we're putting into our surprise budget annually to replace panels. Now we're talking about potholes as early as January. So I think we should actually take an active look at a resolution, not just I think if we can put that in a resolution that if we ask the DPW director to look into a feasibility study of What it would cost for three employees, because that's what other communities use, the truck that's used for both the hot top and the cement and the equipment that's needed. Because if I recall, and I don't have my paperwork in front of me, but I think at the time we were looking at $250,000 allotted for replacing of the panels, the cement panels. I believe that was last term. And when I presented that through a study, I think that a neighboring community would be drastically under $250,000 to put crews in place that can do multiple activities like that. So, I think we should start looking long and hard at what we're placing for outside services and looking to see how we can bring it and keep it in our own DPW house. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I'd like to bring this up. I've known Chris for a long time. What I will tell you is that when you see the impact he's made with kids, and you can see with my son John's friends, that's what they're talking about, what kind of a positive impact he made on their lives. As a youth hockey coach at Mefford Rec Hockey. And again, it's not just one game. You would see Chris and Billy Ivey, another Mefford resident, pounding the glass and were very visible at all the Bruins games. A great loss and a great person, so he'll be missed.
[George Scarpelli]: I can't thank you, Mr. President. I've been the chairperson for the focus group on recreation for the last three months. And the group has been working diligently making sure that we are covering all of our bases and making sure that we're getting all the information that the administration would need to bring a full time recreation department in the city of Medford. The reason why I bring this up, we'll have a full report soon. Uh, this week we'll be sending out a, uh, the administration will be sending out a survey that we're asking all of our constituents to spend about two or three minutes and it will be very helpful to see what, what, um, not just a few people, not just the 20 people that are on the focus group or myself, but what, uh, most of our constituents are looking for and, um, and give us a better idea in which direction we'll go when this council have to make, have to make a decision. Um, and the city administration has to make a decision to allow this wonderful opportunity. So look out for that. I know that, uh, it'll be on the city website. Uh, there'll be a press release soon and there'll be, um, there'll be doing a verse nine one one. I believe that, um, for all the students in, um, in the school systems that will have that online too. So, uh, thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. So we will, we will have it, uh, there'll be, um, uh, survey monkey, uh, attachment on the city's website. Um, we'll have hard copies at a few locations like the library and some other visible sites. And, um, we'll be doing reverse nine one one. So everyone, uh, from, uh, preschool to seniors have an opportunity to, uh, add their opinions and what they feel. or if they feel that a recreation department would do without to our community for our community. And, um, uh, we'll also be reaching out to all the schools via the, via the, uh, the student sites for their parents and students work together and to get the most information that we can get to make, uh, prudent decision moving forward. So pretty excited about it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, actually it should be going out by the end of this week and we'll, we've given two weeks as a timeline to, um, so it's a coordinated effort with, um, you know, with, um, reverse nine one one. uh, city's website and their, their, uh, the news, uh, uh, news release and, uh, and that's, we're looking for for this week. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, as a former colleague and fellow coach in the Method System, we often sat in meetings together with Coach Driscoll, and we'd be fighting for different awards for our Mustangs, and there wasn't a person that fought harder for their kid, his kids, than Coach Driscoll. He had a charisma about him and an aura about him that you could really appreciate today's world of coaching. He was special, and he'll definitely greatly be missed. He's laid the groundwork for a lot of great coaches today that he has mentored, and he'll be missed. The President Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that, uh, today you got another call about another water main break. I think it's, uh, it's important that, uh, we, we, it seems like it's a pretty, scary trend as we move forward. I know that the infrastructure is something that we all fear what's going on and how old our pipes are. So I want to just make sure that, uh, we're prepared as it moves forward to think that this is the, just the beginning of the winter and what's yet to come. Um, making sure that we're, um, prepared moving forward. So if we can have a report from, uh, DPW, maybe the city engineer to help us out to give us some guidelines of what, what, what's been happening, give us an understanding why. So I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Again, Mr. President, thank you. This is something that, as the chairperson of the Transportation Subcommittee, this is very frustrating for the fact that we're reaching out and trying to do our due diligence with Department of Transportation in getting some clarifications on what we've offered a temporary closing of that stop. until the work is done on that side, um, of, of main street and high street for the fact that, um, what's happening is with the construction, the buses are now stopping in the middle of main and high street and people are walking off the curb onto the street and onto the buses. Uh, the answer that we received back that if we put a halt to that, uh, that stop for a long period of time, that we would, um, we would lose, uh, the ADA accessibility grandfather clause that was in place. So, uh, I want to make sure that we're all sitting at the table, uh, because as I talked to, um, Diane McLeod and our engineer, there's no such thing as a grandfather clause of what they've told us. We need to move forward, sit at the table. I'll ask my fellow subcommittee members that we meet possibly next Tuesday before our regular meeting and bring everybody to the table and come to a conclusion with this. And again, it's going to happen when uh, somebody gets hurt and that's what I fear the most right now. And, um, so are you, do you want to have a meeting with this group next week? I'm hoping, I'm hoping if we could just at the end of the meeting, I'll talk to the members. I know if you could, I've been doing that.
[George Scarpelli]: And I'll actually, If we can ask where it is, is at reach out to our state delegation to assist us in making sure that someone's at that meeting, because that's one of the issues we're having is getting someone on the other end of that phone and making sure, um, the person that's coming to the table is the person that's going to answer those questions, not to go back and then revert back to us. So again, thank you for your quick response. And, um, thank you. Thanks.
[George Scarpelli]: As a new member and this being the first time this came across to this issue came across to myself and how do we normally I know that in With the school committee, we handle different situations a little bit differently. Do we often, have we done this in the past?
[George Scarpelli]: Chair recognizes Councilor Scarpelli. If I can I'd be remiss that I know this has been a tough time and you're talking about 16 inches of snow and obviously we will have hiccups but I will tell you I think all of us failed at many many phone calls. I personally probably about 30 in two days and some of those calls were The elderly people with health issues and one of the concerns that they couldn't get in touch with anybody at City Hall because City Hall is closed or DPW directly, but I will tell you, kudos to Brian Cairns, our director, and Steve Tenagula and his crew because I tell you what, When we did have a few issues, those people called me back within half an hour to tell me that someone did come out and did take care of some of their problems. So I wish it was that easy with everybody, but I know that when I reached out, especially for any handicapped or elderly or or medical issues, I think that has to be addressed. So I thank them, which if we can, could we also ask as part of this resolution that do we have a list of residents that have health issues that that I know that we talked about doing roadwork in closing down streets that we have a list of residents that have that are on dialysis that need to be that need to that need to be transported and I was wondering if we can ask if we have that in case of any type of Snowstorm, a natural disaster that we can assist our DPW or the community with any issues, can help them with that. So if we can ask that, if there is a list that exists, or maybe that we look into doing it. Very good. I'll have Reggie, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you Mr. President. I too want to congratulate Mr. Buckley for his appointment and if we can, if my colleague doesn't mind, to also reach out to Bill O'Brien, former president, and thank him for all the hard work he put into such a difficult and demanding position. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I yelled to a city solicitor.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Councilor Scott. Thank you, Mr. President. Uh, Again, I think this is a topic conversation that I think that with traffic and safety is one of our biggest issues. So I appreciate fellow Councilor Breanna Lungo-Koehn bringing this forward. But I think this is just a smaller picture of what we're looking at as a body of our ordinances that haven't been looked at in over 30 years. I know that I mentioned in the past, something that will not cost the city money is to really ask our partners and the metro area planning council to come in with us and just to revisit and get more of an idea of what we're, what we're talking about and what we're, what direction we're moving into and give us a better idea and how long, how our ordinances have been in place and whether they need to be moved on. So, I think this is definitely a big picture, but it's something that I'd like to see as, if we can, to move to subcommittee, committee of the whole meeting. We could talk about these issues in more of a, as a whole, not in pieces, but with the administration looking to see where our view, our vision is as we move forward in this community. I know what the administration has been trying to do with Method Square and doing some great things there, but I think that there is some confusion in what direction we want to go into. So if we can, I'd rather see this move to Committee of the Whole meeting and ask our partners in the Metro Area Planning Council to give us some guides. I know we use them now in multiple areas and they're here and we've already paid for their services and that's what maybe getting some guidance with their expertise and, um, and also our vision with what we're doing. So again, if we can, um, my, my recommendation is really going to look to either move this to a subcommittee or committee of the whole meeting. We could talk about this in depth before I put a vote yes or no to this. So thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Hi, too. I would like to share my congratulations to Representative Donato, and I know that he has been used as a role model for, I think, everyone behind this reel, one way or another, so we appreciate everything he's done for our community, We hope he continues for another 16 years and delivers more goods to our fair city. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor chair recognizes council Scarpelli. Thank you very much again, Barbara and the committee. And, uh, I know that, uh, one of the biggest pieces that I, I applaud both, uh, council Kaviello for spearheading this and moving this forward is the, the F the funding mechanism and reaching out to the grant funding. I think that's so important. I think when, we're talking about the big projects we are looking at here in the community and looking what we're trying to do here with the library is a model of success. And I, and I applaud everybody involved. Um, it's so exciting. Uh, so again, the plans look so exciting. It's, it's so, it's so new. It's, it's, it's, it's refreshing to see. I think that one of the only questions I have is as we move forward and looking at typical mistakes we sometimes make in this community is a building and designing of the roof. That's always seems to be the first issue that comes about when you talk about construction later on and having the flat roofs in New England. And so, but the way it looks like it's, it looks like it's sloped and we're, we're thinking ahead and making sure that we don't have, um, the same issues we have in today's, um, library. So, and I could assume that's correct.
[George Scarpelli]: And I think the last, I know you touched upon it, but having this indoor area being so, um, uh, open and, and, and, and, and new, um, I, I like to even look at, you know, and then a fellow council have already talked about it, so I don't want to be redundant, but the outside plants, I know we said that we'd haven't touched upon that yet, but as I, as we look at some of the designs, are we putting, um, interactive areas outside and, and so we can really bring the library outside and that's going to be part of the plan as we move forward. I know the front page, you know, we can see more trees and areas, but can you expand on that a little bit?
[George Scarpelli]: That's okay. But with the tree staying and I know that was important, but again, I applaud everybody's effort with this moving forward and I'm in total, uh, support 1000% and, uh, very excited by the way that being creative with the funding and, um, and there's the design especially. So thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Constance Scarpelli, if I can, not to be, um, just, just, I know nothing about this. Is there a way that we can refile to get more information?
[George Scarpelli]: Can I make the motion that we refiles? Maybe that would be better. So to request the administrator to update us on this matter, right? So we can understand if I don't, is that a suitable motion?
[George Scarpelli]: We'll make the motion that we revisit it anyway, even if it's with this.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Mr. President, I will not be in attendance tomorrow. We will be having a very important meeting with the focus group on recreation that I'm chairing. So I apologize for my absence, but I'm sure my fellow councilors will, uh, Keep me updated. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Motion to accept.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I'd just like to share the reputation that you have. and those local communities. I know that, um, working in Somerville and what Inman auto sales has done in both Everett and Somerville, um, and giving back to your community, being part of that community, not just being an auto dealer, but, but really being part of that community and, and supporting youth organizations and being, being positive to our, our community and growth. So, um, I'm excited about this, this partnership. I think that, uh, I hope that when, uh, when it's time that the Inman is there to help our community as much as you're out helping the communities in Somerville, Everton, what you're doing for them. So thank you for all the work you do there, and hopefully we welcome you to Medford.
[George Scarpelli]: I, uh, to be redundant, I won't bore everybody with such an eloquent statement from my colleague, but, uh, I too talked to Mr. Shea, Mr. Klein. I think that, uh, uh, talking to, to national grid, um, uh, the message has been sent and, um, my, my, my, uh, address to them is that this will, at least with this councilor, every time project comes forth, um, I will, um, table it until, um, we see some action and what they've done and past and past work and make sure that we have their commitment moving forward. So I too support, uh, moving this forward and, uh, uh, wishing Mr. Shea, uh, good luck.
[George Scarpelli]: It's the hospital site. Oh. And I think that with our ad hoc committee, that's been working very hard with trying to figure out the Malden site and what's happening there and thanking our traffic supervisors, the police department and Sergeant Hottnett and Brooks that um, doing performing that study and now finding that, um, it looks like that development at Lang Langwood has now passed its final hurdle with, uh, the fells, um, petitions that now they're going to start, uh, uh, moving forward with their development. So with what's going on, what's going on in that area and the fear and, uh, what's going to happen, with traffic and congestion is, is, um, something we need to make sure that we act, um, a more aggressive manner with our city administration. So I'd ask the mayor to, um, to, to reach out if we can, uh, have the mayor reach out to, um, uh, every, every and any department we need to, to see where we stand with this project. and what effects it's going to have, uh, in our neighborhoods. Um, it's, it's just when we talk about the Malden site, the Malden hospital site, it takes you back. And, um, now with this piling on it, uh, the development that's being proposed in those areas are frightening to our quality of life and Medford and especially, like I said, um, North Medford. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I received a few phone calls both from, uh, uh, neighbors, um, on, uh, not only just, in my, my neighborhood in North Medford, North Medford, but also in, uh, other, uh, neighborhoods that, uh, had their streets and sidewalks done over the last 10 to 15 years. And what they're, what we're seeing is the type of trees that were planted at the time, um, were at the time, uh, those residents that accepted those trees and were told that there, they weren't going to be the same type of rooting trees. that as the trees grow, the roots then raise the sidewalks and, uh, traverse into homes. Unfortunately, we're seeing that that's not the case. And, uh, relatively newer streets and sidewalks and our residential areas are now popping up and causing a very dangerous, uh, and hazardous situation. So there's nothing we can do about that. But as we move forward, um, I'm hoping we can make, uh, make the motion that, uh, we, we, meet with the city arborist to make sure that as they're preparing to purchase their new trees in the spring and what they'll be proposing for new construction road work that we're using the proper trees that will not affect the sidewalks and the roads in such a negative manner. We'll also be talking about this process again in the next 10 years. I also, if we can, as I was traveling talking to different uh, constituents. One of the questions came about is where we also stand. Um, we can amend that is where we stand as tree city USA. And as we're losing trees, how we're replacing them and, uh, throughout our community. So thank you for the opportunity this evening.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, sorry.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you very much, Mr. President. I know that as we've had discussions in the past, one of the biggest issues we've had with our public utilities and our utility companies is the work that they're, the, the, the, the road in the sidewalks that they're left after they perform work. I believe we've asked for our, um, um, DPW director to report back to us and give us an idea of what in the past, what was, what has been done and what has been replaced and what hasn't been replaced. So, One of the biggest concerns I've been hearing from our constituents is that where we've had excavation work being done, that there are, after the utilities leave, we have sinkholes and issues with our sidewalks that aren't being replaced the way that they were supposed to be. So where there was cement, there's now hot tub. And this is rampant throughout the city. I'll be honest with you. And this is one of the things that I find appalling since I've been here in just this short year that our public utilities are coming in and we have these, these recommendations that they need to follow and they're not being followed. So I as one, I, I, I will not vote until I get a better understanding with meetings with the public utilities and a DPW director and making sure that somebody is overseeing these, these entities and making sure that our streets are left the way they found them. So I know that it's probably not your doing with all of them, but unfortunately you're here tonight and I find it upsetting.
[George Scarpelli]: No, is he working with National Grid?
[George Scarpelli]: I know, but it's your job. So when the job is complete, you're coming in making sure. Because I'm going to give you just a personal example. Maybe about six months back, at 10 o'clock at night, there was a private contractor fixing sidewalk and a street on a dead end. When I approached him at 10.30 because the neighbors were calling because they're waking their kid, as they were using the compactor, I said, what are you doing here? And they said, we were here because National Grid did some work and we were told to come here tonight to replace it. And he said, would you like me to stop? I said, absolutely, I'd like you to stop. To this day, if you'd like to go in front of 18 Butler Street, it's not cement anymore. It's about an eight year old, eight year job of new sidewalks and new street, and it's now hot top there. So I haven't got an answer back from the DPW director, I haven't talked to anybody from National Grid except for you right now because you're here asking for this. And if you weren't here asking for this, I wouldn't be able to explain the frustration I felt so far on this committee that, and this is, I mentioned it once, I got five phone calls from South Medford and Main Street that replacement has now turned into sinkholes and patches weren't filled the correct way. So, you know, again, I apologize that you have to be the bearer of this bad news with my aggravation toward it, but I don't know how my colleagues feel about it, but this is something that I feel strongly about, so.
[George Scarpelli]: Counsel, if I will, if I can't, thank you, Mr. President. I'll just read. This is a from, to the honorable president and members of the city council, city hall. They have Mr. President, city council, every guy has the resolution 16-seven 84. Please be advised the following formation on September, September 12th, 2016. I met with DPW commissioner, Brian Karen's highway foreman, Steve Tanaglia, Electrical Inspector Steve Randazzo and the principal of the Method Vocational Technical High School, Heidi Riccio, to discuss the upcoming lighting of City Hall and surrounding squares. I conveyed to those involved the construction schedule for the City Hall as well as the impact the former lights had on the interior office of City Hall. As the structures were supported through the windows into the building, leaving openings between the sash and the windows, in addition, DPW Commissioner Gerrans has confirmed that there have been no light fixtures disposed of this year. Furthermore, we discussed possible options for the figures, such as Hormel Stadium's Royal Park and Route 60 Rotary, to name a few locations, after the reviewing multiple location installations currently taking place at Hormel Stadium on the rear side of the bleachers facing La Conte Rink. We will announce a lighting ceremony shortly in conjunction with the upcoming hockey game. I also want to thank the vocational school students, faculty, and assisting in the preparation of the LED lights, as well as Steve Randazzo for his design on the building. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact the office. Sincerely, Stephanie Burke, Mayor. I know that those lights, I know that, just to add to that, those lights are on, from what I've been told, and the communication, for a rededication is to give the, um, the vocational students and vocational school an opportunity to come back out and, and thank them for all their hard work in the past.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Chair recognizes Councilor Scarpello. If I can, just to reiterate, the mayor's office, when contacted with the situation, the lights that were on the side of the building, next to the dumpster, were taking off the roof during construction. So, I believe that everything was in place to find a location for them. Um, and I, and I think that, uh, in other words, there was never, right. There was never a time to throw them away.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. Just so Jean understands, from what I was told, just so to eliminate any other discussion, if it helps, that from what I gathered, those weren't the same lights. It was something totally different. So that's what I was told. So just so you know that. OK. OK?
[George Scarpelli]: Os gallwn, Mr. Prif Weinidog, mae gennym un o'n gweithwyr gymunedol, un o'n swyddfeydd polis, sy'n hoffi siarad.
[George Scarpelli]: I took a tour of the police station just recently, and until you do actually walk that walk, you realize what deplorable conditions our offices are in. Again, as I talked to some of the officers outside this evening in the rain, we talked about some very important pieces that this isn't something that just happened overnight in the last eight months of a new administration, this is something that's been going on for a long time, but it's something that needs to be rectified as soon as possible. Rwy'n gwybod mai rydw i wedi siarad gyda'r Gweinidog, ac rwy'n gwybod bod ganddyn nhw planau cyflymau i weithio gyda'r Deyrnas Gweinidog, ac i sicrhau bod y broblemau amgylcheddol a'r broblemau cysylltiedig a'r pethau y gallan nhw'n ymdrechu'n ddiweddarach. Ac rwy'n ymgyrchu gyda'n ffrind arall y byddwn ni'n rhaid i ni ddechrau diwethau'n fwy na'n ddiwethaf, ac yn sefydlu gyda'r Gweinidog, ac rwy'n ceisio ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r ffordd i ddod o'r Mae'n ymwneud â'r ysgolion sy'n ymwneud â'r ysgolion sy'n ymwneud â'r ysgolion sy'n ymwneud â'r ysgolion sy'n ymwneud â'r ysgolion sy'n ymwneud â'r ysgolion sy'n ymwneud â'r ysgolion sy'n ymwneud â'r ysgolion sy'n ymwneud â'r ysgolion sy'n ymwneud â'r ysgolion sy'n ymwneud â'r ysgolion sy'n ymwneud â'r ysgolion sy'n ymwneud â'r ysgolion sy'n ymwneud â'r ysgol Mae yna lawer sy'n rhaid ei weithio ar, ond rwy'n credu y mae angen i ni ddweud hynny. Rwy'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio y byddwch chi'n gobeithio ac yn sicrhau bod ein bywydau'n bwysig, gwybod y bydd eu hyfforddiadurwyr wedi'u cyhoeddi yn y Llywodraeth y byddwn yn eu cefnogi, yn enwedig o'r hyn rydw i wedi'i gweld yn ystod yr wythnosau diwethaf yn y stadion hwnnw. Rwy'n meddwl mai mae'n bwysig. Mae'n bwysig ac nid y dylem ni byw fel hynny. Felly, diolch. Diolch.
[George Scarpelli]: Pwynt o wybodaeth, Cyngor Scott Pally. Rwy'n gobeithio eich ffrwstriantio, oherwydd rwy'n credu, yn enwedig os ydych chi'n mynd ymlaen, ac ydych chi'n gweld beth sydd yno, mae'n ffrwstriantio, ond rwy'n credu mai dyma'r bwysigrwydd yw gofyn am y cyngor a'r cyngor gyda'r cyngor, ac yn dangos ar y cyngor hwnnw. Oh, byddwn i'n ymlaen. Byddai'n swydd da, ac rwy'n gobeithio y gallwn ni'n mynd ymlaen. Felly, rwy'n credu mai dyma'r dechrau. Rwy'n gallu deall y ffrwstriantiaeth
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. If I can ask Reverend Noah a quick question. Do we have a representative from the School Department?
[George Scarpelli]: Diolch yn fawr iawn. Rwy'n gweithio gyda hyn bob dydd. Rwy'n gweithio gyda'r cymuned gwahanol sy'n gweld y gofod a beth sy'n digwydd yn y cymdeithas hon. Felly, rwy'n credu ei fod yn bwysig iawn ein bod ni'n ymddangos, yn enwedig i'r plant yn ein cymuned, ac i gael iddyn nhw'n gwybod ein bod ni yma i'w cefnogi, ac i gael iddyn nhw'n gwybod bod unrhyw un yn mynd i'r gwrs. Mae unrhyw un sydd ganddyn nhw'n cefnogaeth a cefnogaeth. Ac rwy'n credu bod hyn yn ffordd da i ddechrau. Rwy'n gwybod ein bod ni wedi siarad ychydig o amser am wahanol ffordd o ystafellau gyda'n gilydd cymunedol a'n cymdeithaswyr. Ac rwy'n credu y gallai hyn fod yn amser da i edrych ymlaen i'r ystafell hwnnw, y gallwn ddod i mewn i'r Deyrnas Unedig, a gallwn ddod i mewn i'n ymgyrchu, a gallwn ddod i mewn i'n grŵpau o blant gwahanol, i gyd, i ddod i mewn i'r ystafell Ond mae'n rhaid i ni rannu y sŵn o gobeithio a chyfathrebu a deallu y bydd y byd angen y sŵn da, y cysylltiad, y smil, ac rwy'n credu bod hynny'n bwysig. Rwy'n gwybod bod hynny'n yr hyn rydw i'n fy nabod bob dydd. Ac rwy'n ddiolch i'r Prif Weinidog sy'n gysylltu hynny gyda ni, ac rwy'n diolch i'r holl gwaith anhygoel a'r gwaith anhygoel o'r Cymru. Ac rwy'n gwybod, yn gyntaf, yr ystafell sydd yno. Ac rwy'n credu y byddai unrhyw beth y gallwn ei wneud i ddarganfod yr holl bob un o'n bywydau ac i'w gwybod y byddwn i gyd yma i gyd. Rwy'n credu mai mae'n bwysig iawn. Felly, diolch. Diolch. Diolch.
[George Scarpelli]: Good evening. Keith Pemberton, 18 Cheever Road, Malden Mass, 02155.
[George Scarpelli]: Chair recognizes Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, thank you, Mr. President. I will not repeat what Councilor Fowle and Councilor Lungo-Koehn have already expressed, but I think again, this is so important for the constituents and especially the Fulton Heights area because the realization is coming closer and we need to make sure that We overturn every rock and we investigate every possible concern and issue that if that is developed for what they intend to develop in that area, the major impact is not going to be on Malden. It's not going to be on Melrose. It'll be in our neighborhoods in Medford. So I appreciate also wanted to uh, thank, um, Sergeant, um, hard net for being out and they've already started traffic studies in the area to help us further along. So we can hold a, I know that one of the questions, make sure the public wanted to reiterate to the public that we're looking to hold a, uh, one of our next meetings at, uh, St. Francis in that area to make sure more residents can come out and be heard. So, um, I just want to make sure I've mentioned that. And, uh, thanks for my colleagues for all their work. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Uh, just briefly, I just wanted to give, uh, my fellow Councilors and our constituents an update. Um, today, um, I know we've, we requested for the department of transportation and, uh, the MBTA to look at the bus stop over at high street in Maine and ask that it be temporarily, um, closed due to the construction concerns. Um, It hasn't happened. Today, I did drive by, and what I witnessed is something that I think is a very, very dangerous situation. They had barrels along the right lane, along the sidewalk, closing that area for the buses to get to the sidewalk, and buses stopping in the left lane to let riders walk up to that bus. Not only did I see I found concerns in the people walking off the curb and walking across an open street, but I found the way the bus was stopping, it really lent some safety concerns for pedestrians and the crosswalk behind them on high street. So I requested that, um, I'd like, I would request that we, we reach out to, um, uh, the MBTA department of, uh, the DOT to, um, call for a subcommittee with transportation and, uh, visit and question these concerns. Uh, the, the feedback I got back today was that, uh, that, that stop, if it was closed for a long period of time, it would lose his grandfather clause for ADA accessibility. And then if would be brought back in the future, it would, we would have to redesign the whole sidewalk. So that was something we never, we'd never heard in multiple meetings with, uh, their, their, um, their group and it bothers bothers me that they said that they did say that. So if I've talked to my fellow, uh, members of our committee and that's never been said. So we want to make sure that the, they're hearing us. Um, and, uh, another concern I had from a constituent was, um, a concern that I'd like to talk, uh, and address with them is the, the wait period, especially with the cold weather coming. uh, the, the amount of time that people are waiting, uh, at some of our bus stops, uh, here in the city and maybe bring that to light. And, um, I welcome any constituent to call me and, uh, if they're having any direct concerns at their stop, so we can bring those directly. I know I have, had a few, but if there are more out there, I'd like to bring that forward. So if we can, we can with, um, city clerk set up that meeting. Uh, if we can sit together and find a neutral time with that organization, it'd be great.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Um, I just, uh, had a brief discussion with, uh, Sergeant Hodnett and, uh, discussion and the implementation of that 25 mile an hour speed limit is, is being looked at right now actively in Medford. And what's interesting is, uh, the state, it seems like the state is pretty, um, pretty aware of our concerns and they're actually looking to abide by our recommendation of dropping all of our streets and roadways in the city of Medford, 25 miles an hour. So I know that's something that the city is looking at, but what I really, if you've listened to the tone of our council, especially the last few weeks, the consistent cry is resolutions for, can we have police here? Can we have police there? Can we have police? And what, again, I think we need to revisit the number of policemen we have on the streets right now. I think our biggest concerns that we should be talking about is the lack of offices on the streets. And with that, again, I'd like to amend the paper asking the chief, if he can, is to give us the numbers of actual offices on the streets. I know that the number of 104 have been thrown around, but I want to know the actual number of offices on the streets that we have on a weekly basis, because I think that's where the problem falls. You know, especially with the Brooks issue coming up, we see them actively there, but we've seen them on Salem Street with issues. So they're out there and they're out there doing the best they can. But talking to some of these police officers, a simple car accident in one side of the city could take two or three cruises off the areas that's needed for up to a half hour to an hour and 45 minutes. I think it's important that we need to address the bigger concern. It's nice that we're asking the chief to come back and give us all these reports and stuff, but the truth of the matter is I think we as a council have to take more of a proactive approach in getting more policemen on the streets. I think that would stop a lot of our phone calls. I mean, one thing we talked about that we've been talking about privately is how many times how many phone calls we've gotten, the biggest issues we've had. And one of the biggest issue is, is speeding and traffic issues. So I know that council faculties brought up, uh, you know, a traffic, um, engineer and that sounds great. And, and, and, and we've done some great things in the Brooks area, the Brooks school area. But the truth of the matter is to make this work, we need, we need an identified traffic department that's going to have their, you know, the, the, the wheels on the ground and working toward making sure that these can get done. And right now, I don't think we have the levels of policing that we need to get that done. So, um, I applaud my fellow Councilors because I think we're all working very hard to make sure that these issues are out and put forth. But I think we as a council should really sit with the chief and bring the mayor a true number of, of, of, uh, of police officers on the streets. So if you can amend that and asking the chief for, uh, an updated number of police officers on, on the streets and working directly with the traffic. Uh, not, not the sector cars that are sitting at a traffic light, but identified traffic offices. So that'd be appreciated. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, the Greenwood family have been part of the Memphic community for as long as I can remember. You can see Mrs. Greenwood, she battled through a very difficult disease and she'd still be out there in the street. making sure our kids are safe. And Bob worked very hard with our youth soccer organization, and I'm sure that his missus was right beside him. So she'll be greatly missed and send our condolences.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I'm sorry. Thank you, Mr. President. If I can, I know that a few weeks back we took a vote, we put a request into the Department of Transportation and we made a recommendation and requested that we eliminate the bus stop in front of High and Main Street until the construction on that side is complete. And from what I gather, I believe that the bus stop is still active. So if the city clerk can reach out to the Department of Transportation and I know Dan Fielding worked directly with him to make them aware of our decision and go from there. On that motion, all those in favor?
[George Scarpelli]: I was this. I'm sorry. Thank you. Mr. President. Thank you captain appreciate all you do I know that on the school committee we received many a calls when you're driving into school, there's no crossing guard. When we say reserves, do we have, for instance, substitute crossing guards that come in that could be called in when someone's not able?
[George Scarpelli]: OK, so is it possible if we can put an amendment on that to ask the mayor? I think this would be a great opportunity to maybe get the seniors involved in part of the tax break, looking to train our volunteers and getting volunteers, even different school systems, different areas. And maybe even asking the PTGs and the PTOs if there are parents that are in the area that if you wanted to volunteer and be trained in case of emergency, I mean, that'll help. I think anything would help right now. So maybe if we look into that and asking maybe the superintendent to look and talking to the chief and maybe the mayor about, um, asking us to school volunteers, if there are any, you know, uh, parents that are in the, in the area that want to be trained and used for emergency situations like this, maybe that could be something we can look at. So that can alleviate the issue.
[George Scarpelli]: Hi Joe.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, thank you. Uh, council Falco for all your suggestions. Uh, one of the few phone calls I did receive is if we could, uh, if we could amend this paper to ask the chief to look at, uh, the traffic commission to look at stop signs on Austin street at Irving street. I think that is a major area of concerns where kids are crossing. And, um, if we can amend that, if that's okay.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor. Councilor Scarpelli. Uh, thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Mr. Carnes. A few questions I have brought up from a few residents just a week ago is, um, the type of tree that, has been used in, in, in newer, um, street repairs and sidewalk repairs ended up having the same type of routing system that are now bringing up their sidewalks. Do you, are you familiar what kind of trees we're using?
[George Scarpelli]: All right. I think it's important that we really stress that to the arborist, because what's happening in some of the neighborhoods that have newer sidewalks, they're now starting to lift because of the old, um, what was, was told in the past, we're using a new pear tree, for instance, that the rooting system is different. So now, uh, I think it's important that as we think forward and, and with the arborist that we're not, we're not putting ourselves in the same position we are in, in 15 years after we have this, that, Now we have brand new sidewalks that are popping up and replacing those. I think that if we can just make sure that we have that answer for us. And then it's something that I offered as an idea and as the acting commissioner of DPW, other communities have actual sidewalk repair teams. And I know that I looked into a little bit of what we do every year and a year to year. uh, fix. Is that something that you would entertain as our commissioner looking to bring in a few staff people with the equipment needed? So we don't have these issues. I know one of the issues that why this wasn't moved forward from what I was told was that the bid, the bid wasn't, it was out there for a while. People weren't actually fighting on that bid. So that's why it took a little bit more time. But at the same time, we, we investigated the idea of maybe bringing in our own sidewalk crew that eliminates that? I mean, is it something that.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't disagree with you. I think they're great, but is that enough?
[George Scarpelli]: Right. So that's, we'll get to the same point. I think that our DPW staff and highway staff, they're amazing. I think for what they're trying to do with the number of people that we have working, have we, would it help if we made a motion to, to ask the mayor to look into, um, The hiring of more DPW workers for that alone, you know, the highway for sidewalk repair and catch basins. I mean, it's something we can do in-house, but if we look to hire and put that in place, would that be, you know, wish list is, you know, I'm asking.
[George Scarpelli]: So if we can, I don't know if we can make a motion to the mayor to look into, you know, the, the practice of maybe looking into our own, um, sidewalk crew and, and, and future hiring. through DPW and the highway department.
[George Scarpelli]: Whichever one passes, that's the motion for approval.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I was fortunate not only to be a student of Mr. English, he also mentored me as I started my journey as a teacher in physical education. I mean, just this evening at his wake, we talked to the the most popular phys ed teacher, Mr. Lou Ruggiero, and he talked to Mr. English, um, called him right away as soon as he was hired just to lend a support. And, uh, you know, I, I still remember as a young teacher, uh, running into a fisticuffs of two young men and him stopping and saying, uh, let me teach you how to do this, George. And it was comical that we He, we waited and he said, okay, now go. And I said, well, wait, he says, you get the kid on the top, I'll get the kid on the bottom. And that's typical Mr. English. If you know him, he was, uh, you know, and, and he always handled situations in such a, uh, cool and professional way. He was just a great person. And, uh, I know his family, um, graduated with the son, Danny and, uh, and his lovely wife, um, who, uh, Marlene, who's actually, former secretary at the Andrews Middle School, and just great people, great family, and he'll be missed. He'll be missed. Great person.
[George Scarpelli]: I think we can actually just one name that's been receptive anyways, uh, Dan fielding department of transportation. I think he has a direct line to the T if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, um, I, my, I'm sorry to hear that this has been such, um, such a negative experience, but, uh, in regards to the, the trash truck and moving those plants, as I believe, we took in the city, took an active stance to making sure that one of the biggest reasons having a child living very close, a newborn being very close in proximity to that, that, uh, dumpster. And, um, them, the idea of moving that is totally against what we, what we, why we put that there. So, and made sure that, that those plants were put in place. So if we can please ask for a, an update from the health department, and, and reaching out to the trash company to see that never happens again. I think that, um, or if not, that there are penalties and fines to that, that case. And then also look at the time when they are, um, picking up their trash because of the, uh, the ordinance and, and, and get back to us with the report on that. Appreciate that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. If we can, first of all, thank you so much for bringing this forward. I know the two men in front of me and what you've done for our community is frightening to think this world without you two. I know that you're both new grandparents and thanks to this process, it saves lives and I think it's so important. If we could request the mayor's office to maybe put some information on the billboard and really push that effort and get the word out, not just to Medford residents, anybody driving down 93, I think it's very important. So thank you very much for bringing this up and thank God you with us. So congratulations. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor chair recognizes council Scott. I believe that. Thank you, Mr. President. I believe the last conversation we had about this, uh, this issue, we're waiting on the park department to get back to us to see what affects having that area fenced off, how would it affect kids at play and permitting for that area before we gave up a viable athletic field to dogs. So I know that Council Marks has worked very hard with his group and I know, you know, they just had their fundraiser last week and, putting together a true dog park and, um, in our community. And, but, uh, I, I, I can understand, uh, Mr. Sino's, um, frustration. So I know if we can ask the park board for that, that information, then look into moving forward of putting in, um, that fence, if so be it. I know that we talked about that being a pilot program and, um, and then waiting for the health department, to get back to us, too, with some information. And the other issue was whether it was a business or not, whether someone was holding a private business on our field for dog training. I think that that has to be investigated, too. So I believe that's what we can have the health department was doing an investigation and some research to see if that was happening. So.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for that. Can we have the clerk look, uh, revisit that and go back to that? Um, you know, I can call in the morning. I know I have my paperwork at home on that date and see if we can send that out. If not, if we can ask again, for the Park Board to update us on those concerns.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I, too, would like to thank my colleagues Solongo Kern and John Falco. This is our neighborhood. And the phone calls I received over the past week, especially with the frustration of neighbors that are so upset that the talk of even moving out of that neighborhood where they've lived and their families have grown up for years over something this daunting is frightening. So I think what's important is we really need to inform our neighbors in that area in what is happening on a day-to-day, week-to-week basis, because their voices need to be heard. I think that it's so important that not only that project, but as you move further down the road on the other side of Highland, you have the New England Memorial site that still has to be vetted and figured out what was going to happen there. And, you know, with those two projects, the size of those two projects, that will destroy that neighborhood. I mean, one alone is frightening. So we need to figure out a way. I know that there was a moratorium in Malden to hold off on that site. And as obviously it's been lifted and they're moving forward. So we need to really get on board and ask our administration to have a sit down if not, uh, us request to sit down with the delegates from Malden to maybe educate us a little bit. Um, and what's going on because I knew there was, there were a few Malden, uh, representatives, uh, that were totally against this project. So it, it didn't flow too easily there either. So, um, I say we, you know, I, I, like I said, I echo my, my concerns. for my neighbors and my colleagues. So thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Mr. Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor Marks. I know that the Scaparrotti family, I remember them way back in the day, Walton Glenwood Baseball, so it's great to see the tradition carry on with the Walton Glenwood Pride. So congratulations. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Council Scott. If we can just, just follow up with that. If we just have a copy of that, that, um, just more deep so we can follow along with the detail.
[George Scarpelli]: You know, my penmanship is awful. So the shorthand, I missed half of that. So if you can, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: 16, six, seven, four, six, seven, five, and six, seven, six, please.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Mulkey, for being here this evening. I appreciate moving forward with this. I know that many residents have talked about the the jewel of our community, the center of our community being the piece that people look at and start to judge who we are as a community. So I'm happy this is moving forward, but one of the, I know that if you can, if there's a way that we addressing one of the biggest concerns is also the bathrooms. Is there motion, is there movement in what we're doing for the restrooms here?
[George Scarpelli]: We've,
[George Scarpelli]: All right. Excellent. Thank you. No, I know.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. I thank my fellow council, Mr. Marks for bringing this to, uh, to the table tonight. This is something that I would have added to the agenda after talking to the dot, um, coordinator this afternoon or early this evening before we came on board here. Um, one thing they've told us is that this, it was still, still closed even past the September 14th date and their hope was it will be reopened this evening. I did, like I said in the past, I did talk to a few members of the Disability Commission and they're having a meeting on Wednesday evening. One of the biggest concerns I still have with this stop that wasn't addressed is the safety of the buses pulling up. I know that they've tried to in the past move the buses forward, but they're still sticking out and they're still staying in the lane and people are still crossing off the sidewalk onto the bus. So I still feel that because of the construction, it's very dangerous. I know, but I did, um, I did promise, um, the, uh, disability commission that we would meet before we made anything final. I, I, I, I would, I would concur with my fellow council that we ask to keep this, um, that stop closed. And I'd call for a subcommittee meeting next Tuesday if we could. And with the, uh, um, I'm sorry. We can, but if we can have a meeting that we can hold a meeting with the, uh, disability commission and at least until this side of the project, but this isn't, isn't, believe it or not, isn't very a long time. Um, further to go on that side is, um, I think if we can do that, that'd be greatly appreciated on my end that if we can ask to keep that closed for now until next week and then have a meeting with the disability commission in, uh, explaining in depth what this is with the, uh, department of transportation.
[George Scarpelli]: They're saying it will be reopened this evening. That's what they told me tonight, this evening, this evening. They're saying that everything will go back as, as it was in the past. So, but there was also supposed to be done September 14th and that hasn't stopped. So, and again, that leads to one of the questions we had that was, uh, a big fear of mine was the safety of that stop during the construction, because I know in pretty demanding and loud voices, the DOT and the T has told us that it's not the project's fault that the buses aren't pulling all the way up and getting close to the sidewalk, that there's plenty of space. I've done that. I traverse that route every single day just for that purpose. And because of the extra barrels and the opening of that gate, there is absolutely no way the bus can go to that full length of what's needed under their law. So, um, that opens up, I think, a big safety issue. So I'm going to, um, concur with my fellow colleague, and I hope the rest of our committee would agree, and then have a meeting as soon as possible with the Department of Transportation and the Disability Commission to look into this process of closing it until the end of that construction period on that side.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Vice President Kern and I appreciate that. Mr. President, um, you know, I, I, when we were having discussions, deep, uh, discussions with our zoning and our ordinances and our building, I know that I made the motion that we asked the mayor, uh, about looking into the metropolitan planning board. I know we were doing that with Medford square, but they, they, you know, to, to add to that as part of a committee, the whole meeting, would be to investigate or bring someone in from the MPB to discuss looking into zoning and ordinances. And again, I know that I believe Councilor Falco mentioned to come in and do a whole study on that, but we have an opportunity on the money that we've already paid them to come in and do that study for us and to look at all of these issues as well as a whole. So I would, if we can amend that to also, um, ask the mayor to look into the metropolitan planning board to, um, join us in that committee, the whole meeting and help us guide a plan, uh, set a plan. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: This is what I do for a living. So I'm a little confused with this whole policy. This is why I think we need more clarification. But when people enter our pool, there's no question in our own standards that When a person walks through the door, that's a person that's going in the pool. We don't delineate who's not going to go in the pool, who's a parent, who can oversee. We have the same issues in our facilities. So I understand your frustration, but I really think that that's something that's not something that we should entertain. The number of people is what the key is going to be. It's not going to be 200 people, but only 100 are going to go in because they're children. That's something that's very difficult to do, especially when you're asking lifeguards. to maintain a safe level there. So it's very difficult. I don't disagree with what you're saying and the frustrations you feel because I've heard it. I've talked to a lot of people and I understand that. But at the same time, I think that what I'm reading and what I'm trying to understand, at least hopefully trying to understand, is that there hasn't been a safety ordinance in place in the past. And that was when I was working as a supervisor for recreation back in the days when we had a director of recreation. I think one of the biggest pieces we have that's fallen is having that person that we can direct every single day to. We had a director of recreation here that was at the pond every single day, that was checking the water levels with the head life guides, and that's difficult. We don't have that. So I think that as we're moving forward and having discussions about recreation in our community, having that person, unfortunately, Your family directly has seen the hiccups of change without people in place to help with that change. So I think moving forward, these are the issues we need to vet with the head of recreation that would oversee that day-to-day operations. Because the truth of the matter is, someone sitting at City Hall is not going to have an answer for you. What's the safety ratio? What's the rule? What's the law? that's designated for that area. Now, we have our director, she is certified with water safety, waterfront safety, pool safety, she has all those certifications that when you have a question, you call and she can answer those questions. Our biggest concern, we've talked about this in many areas, we need that person in place moving forward. So I think that that'll help, but you know, we have to look at least at the positive of this At least we're trying to look at an ordinance in place to make it positive for safety. But I agree with your frustration, believe me. And we have been up there. My wife takes my children up there, and we love it. And we haven't been there in the last few weeks, but I can understand your frustration. So believe us.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scott. I appreciate what you're saying, but as we talk about a pilot program, we're actually notifying everybody in the community now. It's not just your backyard anymore. Right. So what's happening is we're gonna be inviting everybody, and there are gonna be people that have dogs that aren't gonna have the same philosophy as you. And that's a little alarming to me, to be honest with you. And the reference, the way you're putting this, you're making it sound that there's a great community and I can appreciate that. And it is a great community. From what I hear that you maintain the park in ways, but we're opening it up to everybody, the whole community. So if people come into that area and don't go with your Facebook group or how is that gonna be handled? How are you gonna handle that?
[George Scarpelli]: Um, thank you. I'm a solicitor. I just, I just to go over a direct question to you. So I know that I know that Mr. Caraviello wants to say something quickly. I can yell to him.
[George Scarpelli]: That's it. But thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Now I've, I've had phone calls for and, um, against this, this, this, um, this process and, and I've had great dialogue with many different community members. And I concur with my fellow colleagues done such a great job and Mr. Marks and bringing a true dog park to our community. Again, I work in a community that has dog parks set aside all over the areas, and they're all fenced in, and they're a great option for their constituents. I also look at this process with a fence being something I wouldn't give in with. I think it's important that if you look at the area, it's a big enough area that if you throw a ball, that the dogs are going to be able to run freely in that area. So I can understand that. And I also feel that this is something that being a pilot program and being first time on the committee and understanding that this is the first pilot program that's coming to our desk and looking at a time limit on that. Would that time limit be complete? The pilot program will be complete as of January 1st, 2017 and then revisited.
[George Scarpelli]: So with that pilot program, putting in place safety being the number one concern, and the opportunity to have an area where our dog families can run. And I know that my wife will be there with our dog, because she has the 60-foot leash. And my wife's a marathon runner, so my dog runs with my wife six miles a day. So I know the importance. I mean, maybe she tells me I should take him out That won't happen. So, but I look at, I look at the situation and it's something our community needs. I think it's, it cries for something as long as it's policed the right way. I mean, the biggest concerns I had were without that fence and having a dog that the people that follow those ordinances and have the dogs on the leash and having a dog that might not be part of the program or part of this group that's there now that maybe is a little more rambunctious and jumping on that dog or that person. I think frightens me and I think that's my number one concern. Um, so if, if it is moving forward, I think that, uh, I wouldn't, I wouldn't entertain it without that. So, and then the case that I want to get to as a liability piece, I know that we say that we're not liable, but truth of the matter is we are correct.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Solisa.
[George Scarpelli]: Chair recognizes Councilor Scarpelli. Just a quick question. Part of that meeting just wanted to see, through the park board, what permits would be affected in the children's programs. Obviously it doesn't look, and St. Clement's, it doesn't look like the way that it's set up, it really is going to affect any program, but we want to see, I know that last year's talk was when I met with U Soccer, they were thinking of using that area as a rotating system for their U12, U10 soccer. So if that's not going to be the case anymore, we, we need to make sure that they're informed and, um, and, and this is vetted. I think this is, this is the biggest, the bigger issue. I don't think anybody here doesn't want to see, uh, growth and movement to what other communities are having. I don't think that that's the question I think, or the question that the community policing of the Tufts organization is an issue, but when you talk about a pilot program, which is what it's called right now, you're opening it up for everybody. And it might not be, you know, when you open up that type of area, you're gonna have people that might not want the same, or have the same philosophy or opinion that you have already established there. So these are issues that I like to see the idea of moving it in different parts of the neighborhoods and different areas. I don't see that being an issue, but I do think that doing it, you know, through the proper steps. I think that's the most important. So, um, yeah, making sure, I think there's going to be a key mending it that the tax department updates us with whose permit, who, what, what affected permits. Um, no, not just, I think moving forward too, because I, you know, ultimately I think that this program, I have no doubt that it'll be successful. if it's, if it moved through that, what effect will we have throughout the total year? You know, even if it's not looked at as a pilot program, it's implemented as a full program. How would it affect our programming for our children year round?
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. My quick question was, I know that we brought it up, we talked about some of our buildings already are using, and I don't know if we asked for or we got any information back that showed savings with the municipal buildings that already have this implemented. Do we have that?
[George Scarpelli]: Again, like I said, I'm all for the opportunity because I did it myself and we found a company and we're saving money. But again, that's still my only question is, you know, the process for everybody getting the word out. So it's a fine line.
[George Scarpelli]: I, I, I feel the frustration, but we're waiting on the study back from the T that affected a bunch of people that have contacted us to see where that would fall. So believe me, I feel the frustration. I've talked to the restaurant owner this evening and I just want to make sure that what we talked with my word with the people that have contacted me that this would be something that would be discussed with them and moving forward. So, you know,
[George Scarpelli]: I mean, I... I'll be honest, I'm a little disappointed that I found out about this tonight from my fellow council members.
[George Scarpelli]: I know the person personally, and I understand the trials and tribulations he's gone through. This isn't just the T stepping on and kicking him around. This is everybody. So I'm put in a pretty bad position and pretty disappointed in that. But I will tell you, I cannot vote for it because I also gave other people my word that I would vet through this process now as a newer Councilor. And understanding what the T's done, not happy with it. But not only the T, but our public utilities, very disappointed. But I will tell you, I cannot vote for it because of the fact that I have to stand by my word that I've talked to people that had concerns about moving this. And until that process is complete, again, I will contact a state representative because it seems it moves quicker when a state representative said Donato's involved. So maybe that can help us move.
[George Scarpelli]: Come on, circle around, guys.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm looking at this as the $33,000 that was appropriated from the bottom line, then the increase to the Roberts that you said was increased, I believe, to add their kindergarten needs. That's what I believe.
[George Scarpelli]: Correct. Okay. So, and I know the superintendent mentioned that there was an increase to the Roberts kindergarten aid positions to make that a full, um, number. I believe that's what it was.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I too commend my colleague to bring this. In front of us again, I think that it's important. I got two phone calls this week on some public utility work that was done over the last year by National Grid. And now there are two open sinkholes. So we forwarding that off to Mr. Cairns in the morning. And again, I hope this helps us give us an indication in who's not fulfilling their responsibilities as a utility company. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Councilor. Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. This is a great initiative and I think that it's something that's needed when you have an organized recreational program that we can identify in our community. And I think that the mayor has put together, I believe from what I hear is a task force looking into recreation in our community. I think that's been echoed throughout our streets and neighborhoods and our parks. And again, I'd like to, make an amendment to follow that up to the mayor's office and where we stand with a recreation task force to see initiatives like this follow through with. So if we can make an amendment to that motion.
[George Scarpelli]: So on the motion of Councilor Falco, Councilor Scarpelli. Yes. Thank you for bringing that up Councilor Falco. I believe I brought this up a few weeks ago with public utilities and doing work And one of the questions that I had, if we can, if we could just add to that, the engineering office and Mr. Caron's office, because from what I've been told, it has to go through their office to get approval. And I'd like to know if they are getting approval, because I still haven't heard yet from that original request that who approved that work on a school night at 1030 at night from National Grid. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: So Scarpelli, just so you know that it wasn't, it wasn't to be funded by the city of Metro, just so they're so eclectic. So I don't want you.
[George Scarpelli]: Chair recognizes Counsel Scott Pellett. I can't thank you, Mr. Romley. Um, one of the questions come about by a few residences. Can you define what a, a butter is for everyone?
[George Scarpelli]: So, and I appreciate that. Believe me, I appreciate your knowledge. And some of the things that we've learned going through this process in the last couple weeks, One of the concerns, as I did my homework, is filing this appeal as abutters, making sure that it's more than one, and actually recommending that to anybody who I talk to for the fact that the manipulation with developers and meeting with one abutter and working with them to set up certain side deals so things could be handled out of court. So I think that's welcomed. You know, what I heard over and over again was that having the abutters being the group that really pushes this.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry? The laboring oar. Correct. So it's that we see over and over again that I've gotten the response from. Obviously, another question that maybe you can or can't answer, the cost to the taxpayers. if we had to then ask the mayor? That's something I think we need to know. Roughly, in this type of case, is it, could you answer that?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, Mr. Warren, one more question today. I know it was a question that was someone brought to my attention. Silly question maybe, but the McGlynn school, the parents of the McGlynn school, would that be considered a butters? No. So thank you. No, because they're no. Thank you. That's all.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, thank you, Mr. President. If I can follow up with my fellow colleague, I, too, appreciate everyone coming out tonight because these are the issues that shape Medford and where we will go. This is something, as it's been evolving, we've been doing a lot of homework. A good read if anybody wants to see it is A Better City, a report of summer 2016 by the State of the Built Environment, Greater Boston Infrastructure. It tells you the growth of where we're going in the next 10 to 20 years. 10 to 20 years might sound like an eternity, but it isn't. It's something that we encourage our current administration to look at where we're going. And that is, I think, the first thing we need to look at. is the plan. I, too, am not for this project at 490 units. It's just way too big. I have my kids go to the McGlynn and the Andrews. I travel that route every day, probably twice a day. I know the impact it'll make. But more importantly, I think it's where we're going to go as a city and how we're going to grow. I know Councilor Falco made a huge push for revisiting our zoning laws. And they are outdated. And one of the biggest concerns is the amount of money that it would cost to revisit that. One thing that, traveling and digging to some homework, we're fortunate to be part of the Metropolitan Area Planning Council, which there's taxpayer money. that if we ask, our administration asks, and I'll make that recommendation, that our city, our administration asks the Metropolitan Area Planning Council that they look into coming in using state tax dollars to visit our zoning laws and get their guidance for change. What is a variance? A variance should be very difficult to get. To apply for variance, There are a few reasons to really look at a variance. Either there's a problem with the development or there's a problem with the zoning law. Here, I think it's a problem of both. And I think we need to, as a council, stick together and work together to make sure that these projects stop. I'll also make a motion tonight that, followed with the the Metropolitan Area Planning Council and asking our administration to look into that. And maybe the city solicitor could help me. But I believe if we ask for that, we can now ask for a six-month moratorium in variances of the Zoning Appeal Board for projects over 150 units. We don't want to stop development. I think development's very important. I think we need it. As you can see, even the Metropolitan Area Planning Council presses for development, but smart growth and development. So I feel very strongly about these issues. I appreciate everybody coming out. The questions I do have, and I think, I hope that we can call the city solicitor out going forward with our vote later on tonight and asking him, With our issues with the abutters, I think that was what I saw, what I heard when I talked to different communities, is really getting the butters on board. We can't piggyback off each other, that was already said. So we need to find a way that we can assist the abutters to make sure that they fight for this. The other piece of this is the impact that will pose for our city. and looking into what will happen if we approve that money going forward for an appeal. So I think these are very important questions, important questions that were said loud and clear tonight. So I appreciate everybody's time tonight. I think it's, it's, it's a very intriguing and very interesting piece of our future hearing method. And I think that, um, the decisions we make, not just as city council, but as an administration, will tell us where we're going to go here in Medford. And I have total faith that Medford's going to come out on top. So thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, yes.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes, I apologize. I'd like to make a motion that We asked the city administration to ask the Metropolitan Area Planning Council to assist us with the district local technical assistance using state tax dollars to do an overview of our city's zoning rules and regulations.
[George Scarpelli]: Correct. And then with that, I make a motion that we put a six-month moratorium on any future zoning variances to the Zoning Appeals Board for units over 150 at this type of size and this type of impact to our community.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Romley. The question I have, if we go this route and the information gets back to us within the next 20 days, we can appeal. The question is, will we have enough time to do that?
[George Scarpelli]: I'm saying if we have counsel, that counsel can ask for extension for that deadline.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, that's what the question was.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I, too, thank Vice President Longwood-Curran for bringing this forward. That area alone is, I believe I made a resolution a few months back when this was discussed about, I know Councilor Knight brought it up a bit, but the impact on the McGlynn and the Columbus schools. And when you're talking about 400 and some odd units, and families coming in, the impact that'll make and that's in the school department. Um, we still hadn't heard anything and what kind of an impact that would make. Um, and I too echo the remarks of council Falco and understanding where we want to go as a community and having a plan in place of our vision, whether it be two year or four year or 10 year. Um, I believe that's what neighboring communities have done and looking in the direction they want to go. I mean, I too have heard the stories in the last week that, you know, the new auto mile on Mystic Ave and what we could have done there as development. But I understand that I also agree with Councilor Knight that the Board of Appeals has their own process, but I think that we need a voice from the community to share their thoughts and their concerns because It is a major concern, I think, for me, is the safety of that area. And we talk about cut-throughs and traffic issues and the heights and the cut-throughs and how dangerous the areas are. What frightens me is how crazy that area is at the McGlynn School. And we talked about that being not a commuter school at a time when we were on the school committee. and the number of cars, and lack of parking, and the congestion in that area, and the effect it's going to have on the educational piece. I think that it needs to be weighed. So, again, I thank my colleagues, and it's good to see the community stand up and have that love of Medford and passion to see the other directions it might go in. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Chair recognizes Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Ms. Hunt, for everything you do. It's so important that you're involved in our community and pushing us in the right direction. But my question is, for those people that have been proactive and they've purchased their own electricity and they like their rate, What would happen to those people?
[George Scarpelli]: So if I'm with Zoom Energy and my rate is better, I can stay?
[George Scarpelli]: So wouldn't, okay. So I mean, that, that, that was my biggest fear is like what Councilor Caraviello said, the lack of information sharing is probably my biggest fear as well. And I'm making sure that we have those ants, those questions answered. Right. So we can, so constituents don't fall into that, that same situation. So,
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. If you can, can you tie in the second one? Sure. If we can, I should have put it together.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam President. If I can, I know it's been a long day and night for us, but I'm getting a little concerned and upset with our public utility companies that are coming into our community. and understanding when the hours of operations. We had an issue on Butler Street last Tuesday evening when National Grid did a service change. And that evening at 1030, the construction company for National Grid came in and put hot top down. I had a few phone calls. I live in the neighborhood. I went out, I talked to the gentleman, and they stopped. But I know I talked to the acting DPW director today, and what's alarming to me, they don't have a record in who was working there. And the other piece of this that we need some clarification on is that the street's relatively new. They did this over about less than 10 years ago. Now the sidewalk in front of 12 Butler Street is now half cement, half concrete, half hot top. So if we can, we just need some guidance in understanding what we're doing with our utilities. Because the more and more in the short time that I've been on this council, it's really irritating. And if they can get back to us, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: At night with two families with small children.
[George Scarpelli]: That's the whole street.
[George Scarpelli]: On the motion for approval, Chair recognizes Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I appreciate the residents. I did come out yesterday and walk the streets with a couple of your neighbors, and it is horrible. I mean, I concur with my colleagues in the fact that one of the neighbors told me that she was bringing her groceries in about a year ago, and when she came back out, her back tire was gone. because it was eaten by the sewer cover. So that is a dangerous street. I know that. But we do have, I know that the mayor announced tonight that we were graded, I believe, a 99 on the open streets grant process to move forward. So obviously there's money. I, as one, will really push for the Evans Street resurfacing it. That's not a pothole issue. This is a whole resurfacing issue. And I think that Lauren did do her job by closing out that pothole, but understanding that Evans Street isn't a pothole issue. It's the whole street. So, thank you again.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry. I believe you said working on it. Is it? So it's not definite that that's part of the, is that read into the, as an agreement?
[George Scarpelli]: I think that one of the biggest concerns are the questions from residents when the utilities do come in and they're supposed to lay the compact and make sure that it's left the way that they found it, that some of the areas in the community are still sinking now. Can we put an amendment to that to make sure that there's a certain timeline involved with the engineering department to give us help with the timeline, that if that does happen, that there's coverage? So you'd like an amendment to that? that there's a certain timeline allowed that if that, if this sinkage, that the, the, the department comes back to resurface that.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Scarpelli. If I can, Mr. President, thank you. You know, it's insightful when you listen to the history and what's gone on in the past here and as we move forward. I did my own investigation and you see what other communities are doing. And for this situation, I think we're in an unfortunate situation for the fact that this is what we have. Not to say you look at it lightly, but you look at different communities and different communities have cement crews in place already that when there is a concern, the concern is dealt with as a case-to-case basis, not something saved up to 600 pieces that unfortunately isn't, you know, something that happened just this week, but over the years. So we have identified locations, and you see the concerns in some of the comment sections. In some of the comment sections, you know, it says National Grid did X, Y, and Z. And, you know, I have concerns with that too. But at the same time, constituents that I've talked to that have these concerns are living with sidewalks that are dangerous. And stalling it now, I think it would be harmful to those constituents. But at the same time, it's something that we have to look at as a committee, looking at the budget and going forward. Because a lot of these concerns are made because of systematic negligence in a sense that we had some faults and we need to correct them. So, um, you know, I, I'd have to, I'd have to vote and move on with, with this project. So, um, thank you, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. I believe that the rink is under the city, still in the city side, but is run by, scheduled by the athletic director. That's the only difference. So we can ask if that money needs to go within the system, but I believe it's in the city's budget, but it's scheduled through the athletic director. So it's not a school. I believe that's what we talked about.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scarpellilla. From what I gather, it's not, community schools doesn't receive any monies. All they do is schedule. It goes, all they do is schedule the money and the financial part is through the city, it's a city account.
[George Scarpelli]: I believe it goes with everything, soup to nuts. It's with all the utilities and the staffing.
[George Scarpelli]: It is. I know. Thank you, Mr. President. I know this is in the privy of the DCR, but I received information that there was a pothole where a small child can fall right through and it was open and dangerous. I did try to call my contacts at the DCR and left message, but maybe the city has a, the DPW director has a better line of communications, but it is on the walking path located at the Satellites across the street from CKS and the courthouse where the McDonald Field sign is located. So if they can contact the DCR and in the sake of public safety and so someone doesn't lose a child. We appreciate it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can't, can we amend that to maybe find that employee that has done it already and then have him report, see if this Comcast will report back to us.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Mr. Carnes, for all your hard work. Part of the study that you looked into, one of the big issues I've been getting from phone calls from different constituents would be the work done by our utilities to go along with Council Marks. Have we looked at the repairs in correlation to what the utilities might have had a negative influence in these sidewalks? Have we done that?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so the tracking hasn't been done yet. I know you're new to the position and everything, but we don't have an actual tracking system in place that out of these 800 somewhat sidewalks that need to be repaired, that how many were ripped up at a time that were part of maybe the utilities errors or utilities non-professionalism in the sense that the reason why this is happening. So if we can, as we move forward, I think that's something that's very important and making sure that something that we talked about, even with the Craddock bridge and making sure that when those jobs are done, we have a point person. You know, I know you're only one person and we don't have a very big DPW crew right now and making sure that the jobs that are complete are complete to our specifications and are left the way we wanted them to be left. So I think that's important. The other piece is I did get a phone call. We talked to a few neighbors and constituents that road work that was done within probably the last 10, 15 years. Um, we have an issue being, being, uh, you know, proactive with this as we move forward. The talking to the city's arborists and making sure that we're not using the trees that, the rooting trees that bring up the sidewalks. That's one of the issues that I've been, I've been getting phone calls that we have relatively new streets of sidewalks, but because the trees are now growing into adult trees and now taking up sidewalks that you can see now that an inch, but you know, within the next five or 10 years, these are going to be the next issues we have. So, um, I don't know if there's any correlation that we can find that out moving forward, but I think it's something that's important that we could maybe ask the city's arborist moving forward with the sidewalks, looking into making sure that we are planting trees that are not the rooting system, trees that that raise our sidewalks. I know that I think it was the maple tree that they said they weren't, we're not going to put in anymore.
[George Scarpelli]: Is the list, maybe I'm wrong. Was that a priority? Is it, these are lists that I think Mr. Karen said that you were going to a priority in how long the years the list has been out there or the request has been out there.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so have we, I'm sorry, Gene, I apologize, so it's not something that someone's been waiting for for a little bit longer than others, or something that might be more damaging more safety-wise needs to be repaired. That hasn't been classified, I thought that was.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. And, again, this is, I think, one time or another, every councilor has talked about this issue, whether it be, is there enough staffing to field all these issues? Obviously, there's not. But one thing we're seeing is we have enough negative blogs in this community, and this is what it's turned out to be. something we talked about looking, maybe it shouldn't be see, click, fix, but just see, click. So we can grab that data to show where we need the assistance, what departments really need that help. In Somerville, it's a different process. The process is a 3-1-1 process. See, click, fix is a process before 3-1-1. So using the assistance of Harvard University, that will come into the community like they have in my office and working for free to put a process in place that will help your community function the way it needs to function. This is too big to what we're seeing is happening here. We need the assistance from people that have gone through it already. When we see that, when we collect that data, then you have a 311 system that's in place that I have 22 lights out at Dillboy Stadium. I go to my office, I go right to my email, 311, I put to the department, it goes to an office, within 15 minutes I get a response email with a ticket number. That ticket number goes directly to the department head. The department head then follows up with my department head, knowing that this is coming from in the city. This isn't a blog that goes around and saying, Well, you picked me out, so I'm going to start egging your house, or I'm going to come after your dog or whatnot. This is a system that's supposed to be set up to help this community grow. So I think going forward, I don't see click fix. It's not working right now. And I know it was at least in good spirit to get something going in a positive direction, but all it's turned into right now is negative banter. because I don't think we have the tools in place to fix. So, I support my colleagues in going forward with this, but I think that, I know council president has already set a date to meet with the mayor, and I think this is one of the tools that we can actually talk and sit with her and say, this is what we're hearing, this is what we're seeing, this is what other communities have done. let's not reinvent the wheel, but let's start a process, not just to complain and block negatively, but find a way down the line that there's a solution. So again, I appreciate Council Marks for bringing this up. I appreciate, I think every single one of us that have in one time or another put a resolution through that talked about this. So, um, and I think, I think we need it. I think we're all starving something positive. So, Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I find the minutes in order and move to place receiving place on platform. The motion's a motion of Councilor Scarpelli that the minutes be approved.
[George Scarpelli]: On that motion, Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, I echo my remarks from Councilor Knight. I actually challenge him because I will shave my head if he shaves his. And no, no, I, I, I, again, but on a serious note, I appreciate mom being here and I know that what that negative situation did to our school at the McGlynn, and our McGlynn family, my son and daughter both being around at the time. And with something negative and sad came out something positive with a lot of pride. And Hemo's name will never be forgotten in my home. And it's people like Mr. Petrellis and Mr. Richard and the fellow teachers that carry on this tradition, his name. And as Mr. Petrella says, next year we get a head start on this. Spread the word and let's challenge the whole community to get around issues like this. I think that this is what makes our system great because it's real and it deals with real people and how we can stand together and work together for a great cause. So thank you very much for being here tonight and good luck.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. Costa, thank you very much. Just a quick question. Did the North Shore Music Theater, did these representatives come and search you out? Or did we go out and commission? They came to us. They came to us.
[George Scarpelli]: Did they give you any indication of what they wanted to? get involved in?
[George Scarpelli]: I look forward to our subcommittee meeting and maybe attending your meeting on Thursday. What would that be and what time?
[George Scarpelli]: And again, again, this is something I think we all echoed. And if you looked at everybody's, um, uh, literature going out and running for office, everybody talked about the jewel of the city and the heartbeat of our community is the, uh, Chevalier theater. So we're pretty, pretty excited about this and appreciate it. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Uh, thank you, Mr. President. And, uh, uh, I did, I talked to a few of the, uh, city Councilors and, um, and talk to a bunch of the parents about the, uh, edgily field project and bubble project. I, happen to be one of the members on the Field of Dreams Committee when we look to, you know, an innovative way of bringing artificial turf facilities for our students and kids in the community. And it was highly successful. I think that with spearheaded by Bill Carr Jr. and his group that he put together, they reached out and went through walls to make sure that this dream came to reality. One thing we thought outside the box at the time, and people worked very hard, and at the time we had a cell phone company that came in and wanted to actually lease the land for one of the worst hotspots in the United States and bring a cell phone tower that would help fund that project. Unfortunately, that didn't work out, and it went out to Bond. And as we're moving forward with this project, I'm actually excited that Medford has the innovation and the forthright to think outside the box, because I think this is what we're looking for. The bubble, the questions I had were we, you know, our schools are a mess and let's put our funding to this and we're lacking this and we're lacking that. Clarification on that is that the RFP, from what was told to me yesterday, is the funding would come from one of the outside agencies that would come in and fund that, fund it completely. Another question was that, that if it bubbles, the overuse is going to ruin the turf. And studies have shown, from what I've done my research and being in my field, that actually it lengthens the turf because it's covered, not weathered. Some other issues are what funding would come in and what would happen. Well, we're talking about a maintenance plan that we're not very happy that. most of the things we're doing in our community that in the past that hasn't been a capital improvement plan and we're looking at an RFP going out for someone to come in, bubble an area that would normally sit dormant and have the opportunity, from what I've been told, that would open up the mornings for recreational space for our seniors and provide some walking programs and stuff that we've lost with the Meadow Glen Mall closing and having the physical education department using that. and then using the athletic teams, using that for practice. And then another piece of that is making sure that whatever entity came in to do this, it would give the Method residents an opportunity to participate in any program at half of the price. I believe that's what was told to me. There's a lot of questions we have, but these are the clarifications that I wanted to give that I made sure that I made some phone calls. I did talk to a few of the school kid members and they were heard. And I also hear that it will go out to vote on, on, um, on Monday at the school committee meeting because they did their due diligence. And I believe it was a subcommittee, but I believe there were at least five members there that shared their concerns. And, um, and put their input into this possibility. So I appreciate Vice President Lungo-Koehn for bringing this up. And again, I applaud what we're trying to do. I just hope, as we move forward, that we can set an identity of what we're doing with the funding to make sure that we're looking to do that and putting it back to the field. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: To answer that, when I did talk to them, that was one of the biggest questions. And having time there and finding a balance, just as we do with all of our fields and what we're trying to do when you rent a facility, there's got to be a balance. If someone's going to come in and and bid for a bubble that's going to cost $1.8 million and put what they're asking for, the RFP, bathrooms, locker rooms, concession stand, parking lots, you're talking about making sure there's a balance, if that's done. So, you know, again, this is where I think, where this isn't coming out of our taxpayers' pockets. This is an outside agency coming in and paying for future ventures, which will be probably $500,000 in field replacement within five to eight years on that facility.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I believe, because I watched that same meeting and I actually talked to a few school committee members, part of that is something that was stressed, that whatever programs go on at those times, whether it be four to 11 or eight to 11 on the weekends, whatever entity comes in and wants that situation, that's Medford residents will have an opportunity to participate in those programs. So in other words, where other in other ways, unless we start a cross country ski program, which I think is a great idea with community schools, they can do that up there. So thank you. Thank you. Councilor Knight has the floor.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. Just, just to follow up. I know this is, this is what a part of what I do for a living. So, um, To be honest with everyone here, the maintenance of a field, what was true to be a maintenance of a field was the vacuuming two times a year by Joe Crowley and what they do. I personally met with a company last week that has a true understanding of what you're supposed to do, and they would come in to do all the tests that are needed. And one test that's very important is a concussion impact test, whether our facilities are safe enough for our kids because of the pellets, what's added, what's not added. And it's something to the point where there was quoted for us was $6,000 and they would come in and what they would do is the true maintenance where they would suck up all the pellets, re-sweep the fibers so they're upright again, and then re-enter the pellets. And then with that, you would get a certified study that would make sure that you are covered by insurance and so on. So that's something, as we move forward, I know that one of the things we talked about and one of the things Mr. Carr said, When I talked to some of the school committee members, they're also coming out Monday with a detailed plan of all the facilities and funding and what each facility would cost. I personally think that we in Somerville, what we charge is $185 per hour flat fee. And that's something that I would like to see the school committee look at maybe increasing the fee for non-resident programs. So, the BSSCs, the club soccer programs that make money, that come in and fund that to help pay for maintenance and pay for turf recovery as we move forward. This is what we're doing and we hope that as Monday's meeting comes out, would spell out a lot of what we're trying to think of. This is easy, and I point back to a resolution I made last week, this is easy when you have a recreation department that oversees the fields, the maintenance, the budgeting, the rentals, the employees, soup to nuts. When we have one person doing six jobs, this is where it's difficult. So it's gonna come time that we should, and I'm anxious to see what we, have for a recreation plan going forward, but it's going to be interesting to see where we're going to go with this because. I want us to look outside the box and think maybe sometimes spending a little money is going to save us a lot of money as we move forward. So again, I appreciate Mr. Carr. I know everything you've done. I will tell you what I've been told what's done at Medford High School is something very important to me, many different levels. I was part of this program when it started. My son will be playing at the high school in a few years. It's very important that we do the right thing. hope that there's safe turf and safe fields for our kids to play on for years to come. So I would love to share what I know with the school committee with plans. And it's not $10,000, it's $6,000 per field for the whole plan. And that's every season coming in, doing two deep cleanings, doing two vacuums that what Crowley does now, and sweeping and adding pellets when needed. So it's a pretty intricate system. Thank you for listening. Thank you, Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I, I, again, I, I, I applaud my colleagues, this is a very hot topic, this is a very important topic, and I think that's something we all recognize, and what I recognized six years ago on the school committee, is the lack of a maintenance plan that needs to be in place, and I think that we should be working on that. But if we can recall back some odd years ago, and I think Mr. Carr can attest, the reason why we did these fields, and the reason why we could do these fields, at the time it wasn't going to be funded by the taxpayer. The whole idea was a grassroots effort by the community to come out and make sure that our kids that were playing on dangerous fields at the time were going to play on safe fields and given the opportunity for our community. And the only way to do that The realistic way to do that is to strike a balance where there was rentals and giving our opportunity for our kids to play on those fields. And that was the only way that there was the balance. Unfortunately, to say that we would go and just build this and make it happen wasn't going to happen. We know it. We lived it. There was no way the administration was going to let that happen. So we had to look at that, think outside the box, be creative, so our kids weren't playing on a dangerous field. Because you know what? Most of that time, those fields were closed because they were dangerous. Let's not forget that. To say that, you know, and not putting words in my colleague's mouth, but looking at books and looking at pens and pencils and paper, To me, that's not fair. For six years, I was on the school committee making sure that, trying to make sure we had checks and balances. We never let a teacher go. Our classroom size is the best in the commonwealth, and our programs are thriving. We have a beautiful science building, we have a beautiful pool, we have a beautiful place. Now, don't get me wrong, there are definitely issues there. Bubblers, you're right. Bathrooms, you're right. But I'd love to see a maintenance plan moving forward. Counsel, you're correct, a thousand percent. But to insinuate one rather than the other, it's not fair. We needed these fields to work. And the only way to make them work is find a balance from outside and what we have inside. And talking to these youth organizations, our youth organizations, sure, they'd like to be there every single night and play for free. But the realistic issues are, if we wanted them, this is what we needed to do. And this wasn't George Scarpelli's school committee member, this wasn't George Scarpelli's city councilor, this was George Scarpelli, a parent of a child that wanted to make sure that our kids played on safe fields. That's what Billy Carr started back then, and this is what we went forward. Now as we're moving forward, and you're talking in a bubble, whether it works or whether it doesn't, whether the RFP goes through, whether it doesn't, I applaud at least an effort that's creative, that's not coming out of taxpayers' pockets, to pay for turf that will be replaced within eight years. Because that's going to happen. Because in eight years, if we don't think outside the box, if we don't think of a maintenance plan to put in place so we can identify funding that goes directly to the replacement, we're going to be sitting here in eight years, hopefully, and we're going to be talking about where are we going to come up with $500,000 for each field at the time to replace a turf. That's all I'm saying. That's why I applaud that. This is what neighboring communities do. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: It was a rolling plan, if you remember, John. They were doing this as they go, which is wasn't possible.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam Vice President. Chair recognizes Councilor Scott Bally. If I can, shed some light on this. I know that, and I appreciate Council President, Vice President Lungo-Koehn bringing this up again. We are actively working with subcommittee on transportation just to shed a little light. We have met with the T and the DOT about talking about moving or eliminating or temporarily moving a few stops that were in question. And we had a subcommittee meeting last week. to discuss those issues that directly relate to this issue, and they're getting back to us hopefully very soon about looking into a study, what times would be appropriate. It would take that. So they're doing a time study and distance study. They're doing a ridership study and we're talking and filling everybody in. I know the, uh, disability commission is very involved and we're making sure that every resident is heard. So I wanted to make sure with that issue being said, that led me to a meeting, um, today with, um, um, our council liaison, uh, Lauren Felch. And she was very helpful. Um, part of the discussions and it was all, uh, predicated on the efforts of our, uh, resident, uh, Miss Anne Fretz, who's been working diligently for the neighbors in South Medford. Uh, when we had our first tour of that facility and that area of concern, one being Harvard street and having residents that were, um, were pregnant and, the trucks pulling up and idling in front of where the children's bedroom would be ended up being very dangerous. And I think that meeting today with Ms. Felch and talking about a simple fix and something we talked to the residents and that neighbor in particular and Anne and some other folks that putting planters along Harvard Street to something as simple as planters just to eliminate that concern and a decade of plantas that I got a word back this afternoon that that would happen relatively soon. The mayor supports that, and that's going to be done immediately. So I appreciate that. And the other issues, and like my fellow colleague, Vice President Lungo-Koehn mentioned, a meeting with the business owners in that area and the neighbors, I think that's something that they also discussed that they're trying to work with. We were hoping that I know the chief was trying to make it here tonight to answer some questions. I believe Kim Fowler is here from Department of Health to also answer a few questions about. another concern, which is the dumpster issue. And, um, I know they've already been working that Mr. Bavuso is, has already talked to the company today about the issue that you brought forward and really appreciate that. Um, I believe they were picking up the trash, I believe three or five o'clock in the morning. And one of the biggest issues that will come in front of this council with, With Ann's persistence and her devotion to these concerns, looking deeply into the ordinances both on trash pickup and for loading and, uh, at different, different businesses that reside in residential communities. So I think that that's going to be vetted out. And I think that's going to be coming to this body relatively soon. So, um, I appreciate the mayor's office today meeting with me and, um, listening and moving forward in a couple of these issues. And, uh, again, I appreciate and, and I know that you, you deserve to speak. And I know that this has been a lot of hard work on your end. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. And I think if we can, I'd like to, I'd like to meet, make a call tomorrow and maybe see if we can set something up with the mayor's office, the police chief. I know Ms. Fowler's here tonight and someone from her office that, you know, I, I want to move this in the right direction. I think, I think the response I got today is something positive. I think, you know, with what you're dealing with, I think it's very important, um, to follow up on a couple of issues that Mr, uh, uh, fellow, uh, colleague, Mr. Marks has worked so hard with is bringing the light of crosswalks and painting throughout our community and something that Mr. Falco and I were at the meeting, was it last Thursday with open streets with the grant possibility, excuse me, complete streets and one of the things we talked about was South Medford and the safety. One thing we talked about, Mr. Marks, so you know, as we talked about priorities and since you were the four on the four forefront of talking about the painted sidewalks and we're talking these crosswalks and the lighting and having visible lighting so people know that's going to attract the oncoming traffic that this is a highly community area that they have to pay attention. I think that's part of the complete street. So I think and I believe if Mr. Falco can correct me, I believe this all has to be in by by June. Correct. It has to be done within one year.
[George Scarpelli]: So, so to follow up and if we can, You've championed this and I appreciate it. And I think that let's move forward in a positive direction. Let's, let me, let's see if we can have a meeting and let's see if we can all get together and put all the stakeholders at the table that we're talking about the revitalization of, of a main street in South Medford. If we're talking about the crosswalks and the possibility of using complete streets to make sure those are the priorities and making sure that our streets are safe. Cause I think that's all of our intentions anyway. So, um, you know, you know, if all I can ask is this is new to me with this situation, give me another 48 hours. Let's see if we can do something positive. So, and I appreciate it.
[George Scarpelli]: If we can, and if I know what we brought up the top, Kim's right behind you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Chair recognizes council Scarpelli. If I can, I just want, I know that with this situation, you are due diligence and going out there and, and, uh, picking through trash at five o'clock in the morning is, uh, is very impressive. And I appreciate that effort. So again, thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: former Councilman Penta bringing this up. One of the discussions this morning was the irate member of this community and what they are recommending is that they will bring that ticket to the City Hall and the talk is that they will be refunded if that's the case. So I thank you for bringing that up. So I think that there were some mistakes and posting is one and I think that that's something that will be rectified. Thank you for Mr. Lester. who came about in front of us last week, so thank you. Thank you, Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor. Thank you, Mr. President. I contacted someone in administration today about this. And it's relatively easy. when you look at their payroll and what's going on. And I believe that what I was told was there are 11 residents that don't live in, they live in New Hampshire and they're all teachers. That's, that's what I was told today. If that, that would help. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Again, I did talk to the, uh, uh, a few school committee members. I, they had a subcommittee last night. Um, I believe Monday at their regular meeting, uh, there'll be a, um, to help with some of these, these questions. at the regular meeting, that there'll be a detailed line item that shows which facility is self-sufficient, which facilities are in need of funding, because from what I hear, there are, and so on and so forth. So I believe the school committee has done their due diligence, and that's something that, with this subcommittee, will be out. And I appreciate Vice President Lungo-Koehn, but I think that courses out of the barn and will be presented on Monday. So we could follow up with that and then we can agree to our colleague and then get that report right away. That'd be great for Tuesday.
[George Scarpelli]: That's great. We could see Monday because the subcommittee members that were on that committee I talked to. So most of the table next meeting was on Monday.
[George Scarpelli]: So again, I tabled the same paper until Tuesday night. I think that, Let's listen to that. Same motion for approval.
[George Scarpelli]: Counsel Scott. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, this is something that, uh, will be discussed Monday, I believe, and presented to us, uh, um, presented to the school committee on Monday. Um, so that's why I will not be voting for this. Again, we can revisit this on Tuesday, I would hope so, with the other papers.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can't thank you. Uh, Council mocks, I think that a few neighbors actually reached out after watching the meeting and they were nervous for Elderly they were and they had grandkids and they were talking about what's been happening Both in Flint and then and also in Boston now and so really brought light. I know that thank God It's not that that bad, but it sheds light and I appreciate you move forward with this And again, this is through the engineer just to reiterate that to be to be diligent diligent about this issue is that city engineer will report back to us and And it's aimed for MWRA and the city to apply for this. Correct? All right. Thank you. So I appreciate it. I second that motion. Thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, thank you. If I may, Mr. President, bring this forward. I just wanted to make sure that someone from the building department, you mentioned that, should be at this meeting. The building department should definitely be representative.
[George Scarpelli]: If we could just add those.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, thank you. As, well, when we reach this topic, I just wanted to share some concerns that I think we should look at also. The possibility of Illuminae not being completely filled yet, now with 400 and somewhat units, what impact will it make on the school department numbers? I think that we're, you know, our biggest concern Has that been discussed we
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Madam Vice President. Chair recognizes Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President. I know this is such an important issue and getting the word out. I know that, could this fall on the privy of reaching out to Mr. Evangelista and the PR at the school department, maybe to get the word out because I've reached out with a couple of concerns to get some information out to the public, and it was reported with great detail. So if we can maybe pass that along to her and the newspapers and Allison Goldner.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I've been getting some phone calls and I know that this is my fellow colleagues, Councilor, Vice President Lungo, her forte. expertise, but I know she's been very busy with many different matters. So I know that people have called and asked about some questions and concerns about what our plan is for our summer programs as they're trying to plan this summer's activities and childcare and so on. So I did talk to, um, uh, chief of staff, uh, this morning, uh, happened to meet pass for meeting and, um, where's, um, There is a plan that will be coming out relatively shortly with approved booklet and what's happening with the summer recreation plan. The other piece is that I'd like to ask the administration for, if we can, the discussions or plan that was put together through the arts and recreations transition team and see where we're going with that. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. To Mr. Carroll, I know that in the view in public, we will be having a subcommittee that is planned for May 3rd. Unfortunately, the Department of Transportation can only do meetings before a certain time, which is funny. Representative Donato really did a great job really pushing them along. It's been too long, and we hope to have a resolution on May 3rd and move some things forward. I've been by that site every morning, taking a few hundred pictures, and one of the things we're noticing is the buses that aren't even coming close to the curb and sticking out into High Street because of the construction work, which is a very dangerous situation. That's something that we'll be discussing with the Department of Transportation on the 3rd. So, again, sorry you have to go through this.
[George Scarpelli]: I want to, if I can, Mr. President, I just want to commend Lauren Felch in the mayor's office and Mr. Bavuso for a quick response because within 24 hours that was cleaned up and the homeowner was cited. So I think with that type of, that type of turnaround and that, that, that kick to the wallet, I think is going to be a real, real benefit to what we're having in this issue. So thank you precisely. Councilor Knight.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I follow along with my fellow Councilors. One of the biggest calls I've been getting and driving around is after the utility work comes in, the sinking of those areas, I think, that are very noticeable now. They're really noticeable when you see the new work on new streets, and then the little patchwork comes in. There was some that are really dangerous out there. So I think that I appreciate Councilor Knight for bringing this forward and I support this wholeheartedly. Thank you. Thank you, Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Being a superb athlete myself, Mr. President, I want to congratulate our residents who competed in this weekend's historical event, and especially a few people that we know personally. I know that Meg Richard, a personal friend of most of ours, really did a great job. I believe she ran for juvenile diabetes, which is very impressive. And our neighbor, Bella Giambuso, who's a mother of three and a Fulton Street resident. And you realize how important and what this means to the families. I was speaking to her son yesterday, and he said he's so proud of his mother that she really set a tone in what anything they set their mind to, that they can achieve those same goals. So I think that's what the marathon does. And I know that I have a marathon runner at home, and my wife Dina, and this is something that's so important. And they should be commended. So I congratulate them on a job well done.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor? Thank you, Mr. President. I received an email. from the parent president of the board, the band Parent Association. And I know they were asked to send quotes for the, I believe it was the new band trailer, and uniforms that were donated by Mayor McGlynn on his last wish list. So they're curious that when that would come about, because they believe that they were setting up time to drive down to Georgia to pick up that trailer, so if we can get some assistance on that, that'd be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. So the viewing public knows the lighting has been upgraded along the building, and the building, if I'm not mistaken, is separate entrance when the plan, if they were to put in public access for the rest of the building, so just to inform the public. Thank you, Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: Present.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, thank you chief for coming out tonight. Just a question since I have you here. Um, one thing I've been reading, It was on social media, I read an article about a firefighter who came home after a fire, and they talked about what was left after he took his gear off, and the chemicals still left on his person, and how dangerous that is. Something that I know that was mentioned in the past, it was a washer and dryer at each station. Is that something that's difficult to do? Is it something we can?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. Thank you very much. I fully support this endeavor and I appreciate you. It's time. Thank you, chief. You're welcome.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you for giving me one minute. I just wanted to talk about an evening last Friday night, a night for the Russos that Again, it was an outstanding turnout. Again, I want to thank my colleague Avnight for helping with the generous donation to the organization. We did a great job for the family. They were very happy. And again, it tells you how great Medford is, that when someone's in need, how great people rally around in one email. And many people came out to support. support the family. I just wanted to thank the city of Medford again for their, their, uh, their generosity and their support. Thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Again, I thank my colleague. I appreciate it. This is something that, as we were on the school committee when you brought this up and we had the roundtable discussion with not only the school department, but also the police department and the district attorney's office. And I thought it was a very important forum But again, sometimes things stall. And I think with this being such a noteworthy and important subject, I think that even talking with the chief at the time, one of the biggest issues is the effect on the middle school student and the lack of education, where the DARE program does stop in the fifth grade, and the lack of education. And talking about following that through with the most trying years, which is sixth, seventh, and eighth grade. there's been discussion and there's been, um, talk and maybe even wish that we look at, uh, the community policing and bringing that deer project and, and, and into the middle schools. If we can, I'd like to send, send, um, uh, an amendment to that, to this, to the, to the chief Sacco and ask for a cost analysis and, and adding, um, more, uh, deer offices that would go into our middle schools and provide a program that will extend the, uh, the elementary program. For again, I think that the most trying years are going to be our middle school years. So again, I appreciate my colleague for bringing that back to light, and I think it's very important. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: On the motion approved by Councilor Falco, Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. President, to follow along with that. Thank you, uh, Councilor Falco. But, uh, I know I, I had the recommendation of motion that asking for a list of equipment from our DPW a while back, still haven't received that. As we move to budget seizing, I think it'll be imperative that we know what we're in need of. And I know the trackless piece of apparatus is very important. We use it in the neighboring community. And one of the biggest things around the park areas is they go around the park areas, so it's very important. I could see the benefit, but at the same time, um, you know, uh, I I've heard, you know, there's talk that they're using plywood to patch our beds of our Sanders. So I'd like to get an update. I know that we've asked, but to get an update from our acting DPW director and what we, what we're looking for for equipment and you know, what, what their life expectancy are, if not have already passed. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, Mr. President, I know that Friday night we have a community event that is supporting a method family, it's a Russo family, we're at the elks, Friday night at 6 o'clock. I know that with the help of Councilor Knight and some others, we're putting together a fundraiser for a young family whose dad was in a severe motorcycle accident and left an assisted living. And we're now putting together, we've worked with different organizations and Friday night's a celebration and hoping that residents can come out and join us for a little food and dance and support the Russo family. So just want to let you know. You dancing? I'm definitely — I'm going to break dance. Everything I do, I break. So, I'm going to — so, very good. That's how you come from me.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I appreciate Councilor Caraviello for bringing this forward. But I think that, direct me from wrong, but I think that from what I'm reading, There has to be some change in the discussions, that there's some changing going on. I'm sure there would have to be some discussion with Republicans. And I know that the hope is still out there to revisit the whole process.
[George Scarpelli]: So I think we're all in agreement with that. But at the same time, I think doing this or voting for this resolution right now might put the cart in front of the horse and say, look, I'd like to instead maybe ask for a report
[George Scarpelli]: I know council, but I, I haven't, this is, this is what we're saying. They're talking about, you know, I'd like to know what the mayor, what's in place. I maybe, maybe it's a great, wonderful plan, but It seems like the transcript knows what's going on, but I really don't. So if we can, if we can get a report from the mayor and find out what we're really doing, because if we're going to, if the thought of the mayor's thought is to overhaul this and this is everybody's wish, that's great, but why put anything into it and do something twice? So that's, that's my only concern.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. Uh, I received numerous phone calls and emails and, uh, um, stopped the, uh, last Tuesday evening after the park board meeting and, uh, our youth organizations, I believe we're just informed that not only are they to rent quarter parties at our public parks, but now have to pay a, fee of $25 per port-a-potty per month, which is unheard of. So I've done some research in neighboring communities, and we're pretty fortunate in Medford that our youth organizations pick up the tap on the port-a-potties that are used, not just through the days and times of use through the organizations, but also throughout the whole summer and spring. My question, my concerns that were brought forward were why are we paying? Why do they need to have to pay the fee if it's looked at as a private organization and that's under the rules and regulations of the health department? And if not, then maybe we should meet with the powers to be above the park board in trying to figure out a way of aiding our youth organizations. One of the biggest issues that we're hearing is the lack of numbers in some of our youth sports, and maybe because of crude costs. And with this, it might sound like piddles, but if you keep adding on to it, we're going to, We're going to have to raise fees in which raising fees is going to now take our kids off the fields. So I find it really bothersome and I'd like to know how this falls into the structure of rules and regulations in the health department. And then if there are issues moving forward. We need to sit with the park board and try to figure out something that will assist our youth organizations, whether it's waivers or assisting in fees with the porter parties. And I've had one call said that, well, if it's going to be ours, we're going to put a chain around it. And that brings another issue, because when people try to lock up porter parties, that just invites destruction. And that's not a pretty sight. I know that in my profession, we oversee all of our parks and all of the porta-potties are paid through through the DPW and it's open to the community. So that's if we can. ask for that report and get some answers back because, uh, as a season comes upon us with a lot of questions.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, thank you, Mr. President. This is a gentleman that everybody knows but nobody knows in Medford, Jay Campbell. I've known Jay for a few years, being a parent of the McGlynn School. Jay helped our PTG raise some money through a fundraising effort with the Boston Celtics. He realized how big it was and it started to grow. So he contacted the Celtics and Reached out to every organization that is a fundraising organization in the city. And everybody from, I know the Joey Lopez Foundation, all the PTGs, a few of the basketball programs in the city. And everybody jumped right in. And last night was an amazing evening. Jay's intent isn't just to raise money, but getting the whole community involved. I believe Dean Bruno was named the citizen of the game for the Celtics for all of his efforts and what he's doing with his endeavors. And I believe almost every kid that was involved, every child that was involved, was part of the game, whether they played on the court, I know the Mephiti boys played the Mephiti girls team. I believe the girls won by 66 points, John. And high fives to the kids and the players. But it was something that, I forget about the money that was raised, but what a community event. It was nice to see when you're walking through the venue like the Boston Garden and seeing everybody so happy and involved. So I just want to thank Jay publicly. for everything he did. I know that's thankless, and it's, you know, he does it out of the goodness of his own heart. So, thank you, Jay. Thank you, Jay. Councilor Falco.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank my colleague for bringing that up, this topic up. It also reinforces what we've talked about when I've been talking to constituents with the safety summit, talking about getting the people out and listening to more community policing and possible substations around the community. There is an outcry to support the chief and the police department in making sure that we give them the tools that they need to make sure that this all falls into fruition with notification and more feet on the ground and looking at different locations where those hotspots are. One of the conversations talking about the T, mechanic building on the end of, uh, on Salem street, looking at being, being a great idea for a, for a substation. And the word from that neighborhood is looking at the, um, crime rate in that area and looking to use that to subdue, subdue the, the, the, um, the, the fair and that area. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: It's further amended by Councilor Knight.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can't follow up with this, I think it's very important research-driven policymaking. I think what other communities are doing are using interns and One thing that's been pretty consistent with our committee is a lot of it is looking to support efforts, whether it be DPW, police, fire, drug addiction issues, looking into the mayor possibly putting together a data team that would work for the city and that will collect data to support what we're trying to do throughout our community, not just with with the police department, but this, this brings, brings it to light. I know that just today, um, at my summer stat meeting, I sat in front of, um, the mayor and, and he, we went through, um, about a 12, um, 12 page, uh, report about my department that, that supported or didn't support our numbers in recreation. And that helps us understand where we need to fix some deficiencies and then carry on with our positive issues. So I think that if we can maybe reach out to the mayor and see if she can look into possibly researching what other communities are doing and collecting data, not just for one department, for all departments to support the needs of our community. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. Mr. President. I I think that some it's a I people don't realize that the DCR has just put on an RFP to take over the ranks that we saved for them over the past somewhat years. We now know how important recreational facilities are in our community and what it offers our constituents. And especially during the coldest months and having the opportunity to have the control of that facility. and keeping costs down for our youth organizations and their programming is very important. I think that what the new governor and his administration is doing by sending the new director of the DCR out and going from neighborhood to neighborhood and trying to take back their ranks for quote unquote to raise funding for that department now, which It's not going to happen, at least the way the format's set up now. My fear is that with an RFP, any private organization can come in to Medford, take over not just the La Conte rink, but the Flynn rink. do what they may with it and to support their own pocketbook. So I think we need to get on board with this before it's too late. People don't realize they're actively, there are private organizations walking the rinks now and ready to put bids on our rink. And the ramifications, I think, would be devastating to our recreational landscape and our youth organizations, both with learn to skate and learn to play for our youngest kids, our youth hockey organizations, our girls and boys high school hockey program, and our social skating, which is the open skate. So I think that we need to be apprised of what's going on, and we need to really push our state delegates to start knocking on the governor's door and saying, hey, the decision that's coming out, that came out this week, needs to be halted immediately. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scott Peli. Thank you, Mr. President. Again, uh, subcommittee on transportation met a few weeks back. and had a very productive meeting with both the powers to be here at City Hall and constituents to talk about issues both on both ends of Main Street. And we've reached out, I know the city clerk has reached out numerous times to get in touch with the liaison from the T that can answer some very important questions so we can move forward and making a decision. And I've made two phone calls myself today and still haven't gotten any information. So we need to move on this because this is where people get frustrated, where we've done our due diligence, but where other organizations are dragging their feet and halting our business moving forward. So if we can reach out and find some other avenue to contact Department of Transportation. If that person can't do that job, then maybe we'd need to speak to a supervisor and get that done. So, thank you. On that motion, all those in favor?
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I had my first faux pas as a city council member. Heavens. Heavens forbid. But I just wanted to make sure I clarified this. The John Howard event, first of all, went fabulously for John and It shows how great Medford is. He had over 500, 600 people coming through the doors at the Irish American celebrating what he's doing for his young student. The mistake I made was my daughter was very angry with me when I got home and said, Dad, it wasn't John who gave me the lead, one of the lead songs, but it was Aaron Keefe, one of my former students. And so I got yelled at, and if I didn't correct that tonight, I'd hear it tomorrow morning. So please forgive me, Aaron. And again, congratulations, John, again, for a wonderful evening. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scarpelli. Thank you, Mr. Jankowski. Thank you very much for being in this evening through, uh, you, Mr. President. Um, just, just to, for clarification that this is only going to affect one home, correct? That's correct. Okay. So, um, There's no need for notice anywhere else. I'm just curious.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I echo my colleagues' sentiments, but again, I also talk about what Councilor Falco mentioned in understanding that what has been going on for years, as Councilor Longo-Corin said, is that the building It's frightening to understand what else is wrong with it. And I know I made the suggestion that we look at other avenues and thinking of 21st century libraries and thinking of something like Springstep and doing that. And I think that, you know, as we look into growth in our community and thinking outside the box, I understand the frustration that, you know, I saw the pictures of the the kids on Facebook with an umbrella. I thought that was cute. But I think it's dangerous. What now is underneath that is what I feel. It's scarier than just the drip. So I think we need to get a more in-depth report back to us, because the air quality is now questioned, I think. So thank you. Thank you, Councilor. Welcome, my neighbor.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I know that as we're coming along and the weather starts to shift, we hope that we start looking ahead and figuring out uh, and asking our director, acting director of DPW to report back to us on a report and what, what is in place for, um, the multiple potholes that will be throughout our community and, um, get ahead of it before we are paying for, um, new rims and tires through Mr. Rumbley's office. So I'm hoping that we can be proactive and make sure that we have a plan in place. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry, just a feel-good story.
[George Scarpelli]: public information this Friday night, probably one of the most selfless acts I've ever heard in my life. John Howard, a teacher at the St. Joseph School, will be donating his kidney to a student that needs it. And to me, I think that is the most amazing situation. That gentleman is a hero. He stepped up on his own, from what I hear, went out, made sure he was compatible for what's needed for that fourth grade child. And thank God it was. And on Friday night, they're having a big meet and greet at the Irish American at 7 to 11. And if anybody can make it, I think we should all go down there and give that gentleman a a pat on the back and a recognition. This Friday night at the Irish American, kidney donor meet and greet. It's for John and Justin. To raise money. The surgery's okay, I guess it's for other reasons, but I appreciate what John's doing, and he's a great person. He runs the drama spotlight productions, and my daughter Gianna. I want to thank John for giving her a solo. I've listened to a song for the last three months. But thank you. Yeah.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor. I believe I was left off that. Um, yeah, George.
[George Scarpelli]: I just thank you again for coming out tonight and to have the wealth of knowledge that Council Pat brings us is applauded. But again, I think that I concur with my fellow colleague that we need to reach out to Tufts. I think that seems to be the quickest way and to try to find, put a halt to this and maybe ask them for an extension. as they go through their process to give the city it's time to do its due diligence and to this matter. And then moving forward, I think it's a huge piece. I know that I've talked to a few of the neighbors in the Carbonell house and that same situation. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Awesome. Councilor Scott-Powell. Mr. President, if we can, maybe with this wonderful information and the history. Maybe we can amend that to maybe meet with Barbara Rebell maybe soon and maybe instead of a letter, not knowing with the time sensitive constraints, maybe meeting with her and maybe she can help us move this along in a more rapid pace to assure that the residents and the history are told. So if we can.
[George Scarpelli]: The chair recognizes Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, I want to also thank my fellow colleague, Mr. President, Council Marks. I think this is something that, as we went through the process of our campaign, I think this is something that was in everybody's forefront of their goals. And I did some homework, and what I found what was interesting and might help some of these issues and questions is that this is a process that hasn't been looked at since the 80s, and having amendments of questions limited to whatever it may be is something that could be bothersome. And when you look at what needs to take place in such a daunting task of charter review that hasn't been looked at in so long, I talked to City Councilor in Melrose. I met with the Mayor of Somerville. Something that they've done, and they point to me into a direction that I think would be something we should talk about and maybe investigate and maybe look at this avenue. The Collins Center at UMass Boston for Public Management. I believe we've used that here in Medford to help with some issues with the Housing Authority and other issues, but if you look at the most recent information that I've gotten back is that looking at a process, a daunting process like this, going out to an organization that have gone to numerous communities and kind of narrowed and brought the community in as a professional organization, communities like such as Somerville, Everett, Amesbury, Melrose, They've used the Collins Center to come in and work with your community to really get the finite issues out on the table and it left that, the open and transparent process really to the whole community because that's part of their their workings is going out to the community and doing that type of work that, to be honest with you, committee of seven that are elected as we move forward, giving them the tools that will help the succeed to its fullest. I think it's something we should look into. Um, and again, I, I appreciate and I applaud my, my colleague. And, uh, I know that, you know, Mr. Ruggiero who's been working his tail off, um, you know, to make this, to make this come forth full circle. I think that, you know, let's not try to reinvent the wheel. Let's see, let's investigate as we go into this, into a meeting. And I applaud the committee, the whole meeting and, and look at maybe invite someone from the Collins Center and to talk to us. And, and, and, and even, even if it's not the way to go, but just guide us in that, that, that form that says, this is how we've done it in neighboring communities. And it's daunting, and we don't want anything missed, being that it hasn't been looked at in 30 years. And like I said, I applaud the constituents that have been working together to find the best possible outcome, and I applaud my fellow councilmen who's worked for years to try to get this on the ballot. And I think looking at all the details and making sure that we do this right, and we open it up in a more transparent process I think would be applauded. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Just so the discussions I had with the call center, just so you know, they reach out to the community. That's part of their whole, right? So that's, this is, it's exactly what you're saying. You're right. But this is exactly what they do. So maybe as you're going to enter community, the whole meetings, this is something we can entertain and look into. So I think it'll be helpful.
[George Scarpelli]: And I'm thankful for your suggestion. I appreciate it. But yeah, your, uh, your passion. Thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can just clarify. When we're talking about the Collins Center, people seem to think that what I'm saying, what the Collins Center does, is it eliminates our community. It doesn't. It doesn't. This is a daunting task that hasn't been looked at in 30 years. This is what they do in a number of communities, over 30 communities that they've done this, that have looked in the mirror and done the same thing. And all due respect to the, you know, the microgerios of the world who've worked their tails off to try to get 1,500 signatures, we're going in the right direction. To get the word out, and look at an organization like the Collins Center that work with public management as their profession in working with our community, that doesn't mean it excludes us or our community. It vets a lot of different issues and concerns that we just talked about. The number of amendments, how do we get started, why it takes so long. When you have an organization that's going to come in and aid us and supporting that, and putting things into place in an organized fashion, so then we can look at it diplomatically, so we can look at it with an open mind, so we can look at it where professionals have helped us. No one here has gone through a charter review. They have. As much as I love Medford, I agree it's going to come back to us. It's going to come back what is shared throughout our community. This is an important historical, like we've talked about, historical event if it's done right. So make it clear that this isn't an organization that I'm saying that we're gonna hand it off to somebody and then forget about it. No, I think this is the avenue that's gonna help us drive this initiative, like other communities have done. So if there's any confusion out there, I want to make sure it's clarified. This has nothing to do with alienating our citizens. This is getting them involved. We've already talked about three organizations that have worked their tails off to get this through, and it's gone nowhere. Nothing to get to their fault. They've worked their butts off. But here is something that is historical. Why do it halfway? Why not invest and investigate with an organization that has done this throughout multiple communities and led those communities to best practices for their citizens? That's why we look at an organization like the Collins, it doesn't have to be the Collins Group. Harvard University, Boston University, they all have organizations that we can tap into. And I think, to be honest with you, at many different levels, not just charter review. So thank you, I apologize.
[George Scarpelli]: I'll be honest with you, Mr. President. I watched this council work in previous years, and as I went door to door and talking to constituents, one of the biggest things that they talked about every single day is what just went on right there. That's a shame. So I will tell you, I will tell you, I have the floor, thank you. What I want you to know, what I want you to know is I applaud my colleague's passion for what, bringing that forward, bringing it forward. But as a new council, Councilor, who was elected by our constituency, and hopefully some of you in the audience. I don't really, to me the applause is nice, but This isn't a forum for an applause in that sense. I'm looking at doing something that's monumental in this community. And for one, I did some homework today. And I applaud that we should have a meeting. And I want to move this forward. But I have some reservations and some different input from other communities that helped and went through this process already. So as I-
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate the passion, again, but again, When this came forward the other evening, that the councilor explained to me how the process went and how he met with the mayor and how that process went. This is exactly what we didn't want in our community. That a councilor met with the mayor and tried to figure out five amendments. These are issues that we just talked about. So this is the process. I just, I just, when you make, when you're talking about this issue and making,
[George Scarpelli]: I don't want banter back and forth in a negative way, because that's what hurts our community. That's what hurts our community. There's so many positives we can go through. And charter review is a positive. And good communication with city government, the constituents in our community that make up our community. This is what we need to work together. This is what we need. So whether one council believes in one thing or the other, there's nothing wrong with that. This is what we were elected for, to have our own opinions. But personally, in my opinion, with such a huge issue in front of us, having this and talking about it in a committee of the whole, which was first presented by this Councilor, I thought it was a very good idea. And if we want to move forward to bring that to the public hearing after that, I welcome it. But I think having that meeting together, so we can vet out so many different issues openly, and then come onto the floor and then share those, I welcome it. But again, I appreciate the passion, but there's a difference between passion and ignorance. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I thank my colleague. I did, but I believe to answer a few of those questions, the superintendent on the request of a school committee member, Mia Mustone, one of the biggest concerns was the commitment of communication and making sure that is in print and delivered throughout the school system in a uniform manner, not only for major emergencies, but something as simple as snow days and making sure that every school has the same policy in place and when things go out. I think that was very important. Other than that, I know that if we can, I also want to make sure that we have that copy from the superintendent that he mentioned that will be done the first meeting of March in the school committee. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Just to be clear, Mr. President, the, the comment that was made was to get the information that was going to be presented the following evening to see what protocol was put in place. Now there was protocol in place that as a school team member, we reviewed, but at the time where the comment was mentioned, not talking to the superintendent will understand the protocol they followed. We wouldn't know that to the following evening. That's, That's what I believe my fellow councilors, Mr. Falcon and myself, were alluding to. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Are we going with the executive session discussion? Executive session.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Mr. Puccio. A very strong Medford family. I grew up on the Fellsway. Went to school with them. Their parents are great people and I know they're hurting immensely today, so I just wanted to send the condolences from our body to their family.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm afraid still didn't get to one person. But I believe Mr. Carroll is still.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, maybe a point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. Just so I'm clearing up a question myself, but I believe it was Chief of Staff slash Personnel Director. Correct. So it's two jobs. Correct. Okay, that's all.
[George Scarpelli]: Councilor Scott. Thank you. It's my question, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: I'm sorry, I took over. Thank you. Again, I understand why this is put forth, but again, like my fellow colleague, as a former school committee member, these are issues we've vetted. And this is why it's important that we let the due diligence of our elected officials present what needs to be presented tomorrow evening, because it is important. These, as a school committee member, we can list out a litany of answers to all these questions, but it's the job of the school committee to inform everybody tomorrow at their meeting that then would be processed through us, and then we could have that next discussion. But I think right now, putting the cart ahead of the horse, I understand the questions that you have, the parents have. I got the same calls and one of the biggest questions was the notification issue. Well, there's a lot of security issues when and why notifications have to be given. So that's not for me to tell you that right now, that's for the chief of police and the superintendent to talk tomorrow because I have questions too. I have questions about the presentation of the PR. and PR person, and when that was done. But again, we want to make sure that we're not, you know, putting our school base in a frenzy right now until we really know what has transpired. So I think that's very important. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scarpello. Just to clarify, I believe that this council, not to censor anybody, but the idea of systematically going through and understanding. Now tomorrow evening, I'll be there and I will ask those questions about communication and the protocol that my fellow councilmen and myself helped write and understand why that wasn't done. And then bring that forward in the following week. But what I think that at least this council's — this council's questioned issues are — Point of information, Mr. President.
[George Scarpelli]: How do you know — No, I'm sorry. I misspoke then. Understanding if the protocol wasn't followed through, we'll know tomorrow when we ask that.
[George Scarpelli]: Well, that's what I'll ask tomorrow.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, if I can add to that, I appreciate Councilor Knight bringing this forward. As we talk to DPW employees, one of the other issues that came about is not only the staffing level, but also their equipment and what their needs and what we have for aging equipment. And if we can add to that, get a list of any equipment or inventory that they might have needed to ask for in the past, We should be looking forward as it comes to budget time. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can. Thank you, Mr. President. We also amend that the chief also look at the speeding issues on Salem Street. And we're realizing that neighbors have called that they're cut through from Salem Street to the Fellsway and using the streets on the left of going toward Malden. Cutting through Cherry Street is probably one of the biggest streets that they're using as a cut-through, Power Street, Cherry Street. And the other one is on Spring Street. They're using, after the satellites, where the Super Red is. That's an area of concern. So I think that, and I know that I appreciate Councilor Brianna, my current focusing on the speed machine, this tracking, so really deter the speeding. So if we can amend that, Those two areas, too, I'd appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Linda, for coming out. I'm going to, maybe publicly, I'll come over for dinner, invite those same six kids. I'd love to come over and talk with them and get involved, okay? Yeah, well, I can imagine. But as we talk about these issues, I think one of the biggest things that we see, and I know that through your email and many emails, I think it's important that we talk about its transparency. The lack of of knowledge of what to do, where to go, who to talk to. It's confusing. I'm a city councilman and I question myself as I read into this more and we talk about the parking process and the whole permit parking and where the equity comes into play. Where in some neighborhoods where there's what was said earlier, parking permits that people are paying for but reliable, they don't have to go to that area because it's not meet it. So they don't need to enforce that area. I do have friends that live right at the corner, actually right across the street from the, um, from the church. And I know that's a huge issue. Um, but again, I think this has to go back to, um, meeting, having follow up with Councilor Marks as, as stated earlier, and bringing this up at, at a, at a forum where these should all be talked about and put out and answered by both reliable, the police chief, and a traffic commission so that we can get an understanding of the frustrations we hear. I mean, this is, you know, I wrote a bunch of different questions. After six, do we know that What are the rules that after six and on the weekends? I know that was brought up.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, and the church is all weekend.
[George Scarpelli]: So as I move forward, again, I looked at your neighboring communities and how they do it. having that centralized traffic and parking office, and having the hearing officer that you can actually talk to. And maybe it's not, you don't get the answer that you want, but at least you're talking to someone, the answer's final, and you're not running back and forth. I can only imagine how frustrating that was. The other issue is we talk about permits and the revenue that the city creates through parking permits. Now, does that mean Reliable now gets all of the permits? Is that, maybe someone can enlighten me, Mr. President, but now that permits, when I lived in West Medford, the permits, we came to City Hall, purchased our parking permit, and that revenue came back to the city somehow. Now, if this goes to Reliable, not only are they writing tickets, they're also making, are they making the revenue for the permits?
[George Scarpelli]: I appreciate that. And if we can also add to that amendment, um, the, uh, better outline and who to address concerns. I know I went online today, uh, and I went through the whole process you tried to go through and I found it very disheartening. So, and again, this falls back and sitting in front of people that can answer these questions and having the stakeholders involved, which again, I'm going to revert back to Councilor Marks and his, his opinion with having that summit. I think it's going to be very important both for public knowledge and a little finalization here with some of these issues. So again, I apologize that you had to go through such a ordeal and, and, but I can, I can see why so. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: It's just a point of information. Councilor Scarpelli. We recommend that we ask them at the earliest, earliest convenience, not the 10th, but any day other than Tuesday that we can meet or, you know, we've been on a Wednesday anyways, but give us a long night to further clarification.
[George Scarpelli]: The Chair recognizes Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, thank you very much. I appreciate the Mayor getting back to us with all this information. As you can see, I'm taking this very serious. My wife wants to know if I'm going for my doctorate degree. I've compiled a bunch of different data from different communities, Malden, Revere, Somerville, Cambridge, Chelsea, and talked to a few chief of staffs myself today. What Revere is doing is very similar to ours, which is the chief of staff slash personnel, and he's in the roughly $108,000. If you look at Somerville and their chief of staff, is one position, and then if you look at their purchasing director, I mean their personnel director, you're talking about a position where he's bringing in close to personnel's $109,000. So where it's $2,000, two positions, double the salary. I don't see it being a problem in my eyes as the mayor's starting her own program and her own child. What I'm more concerned of and looking at the budget constraints this year where there's none. What Councilor Falco mentioned last week, maybe giving us a heads up and understanding in the future how that's going to look. I think that's important that we see this year what we have in place. And I know you're saying you could do two jobs, but when you're talking about a business of Medford and what's entailed here, I just think it's just, I look at Mr. Rumley's position, for instance. Neighborhood community has city solicitor, paralegal, ISD paralegal, legal secretary, and four assistant solicitors. So I just don't, and these are communities that are very similar to ours. So I commend her with going this way and looking to save money and going forward. If we really talk about the changes that everybody wanted going through this election year, I think it needs to be a team approach and going after it where people aren't going to be spread so thin and people are focused on one major job. And I think that's important. And granted, I'm not going to be popular when you talk about funding, but when you talk about what neighbor communities do and how they thrive. Our chief of staff and a neighbor community could be focused more on building partnerships with outside businesses to create more revenue in our community with the tax base and bringing more jobs to Medford, where our chief of staff is focused on personnel matters on a day to day basis, which some issues as small as, coming into the office thinking we'll take 10 minutes, we'll take six hours and there's the whole day. So I, you know, I appreciate the answers. The answers are right on. That's what everything we've asked for. I appreciate that. But I think if we can like to make a motion that going forward that, um, we hope that the, um, look for the mayor, the mayor's office look more into more in depth in the, the positions and running a community, running a city like Medford. and what's really needed. Speaking for myself and working with the school department for the last six years, we saw the issues with having the principal doing the assistant principal's job to save money, and we needed it at the time. But we saw where it hurt us. And this is where, in the last few years, the budget was focusing, making sure that we had identified positions, focused on that position. it's making a huge difference in the day to day activities in the schools. And I can only imagine what happens in the city side. So again, I, I appreciate all of her, all the mayor's answers and, um, and, um, that's it. Thank you. Sorry. Thank you. Councilor.
[George Scarpelli]: As we move on talking about this, I appreciate Councilor Falco bringing this up, but if we can, too, as we look into the development, can we get an update, too, on the New England Memorial site and Stoneham, just as we tie, I take both get more information, especially for myself. And I'd really like to look into that as well. So if we have any information on that, that'd be helpful. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: All right. So that's a problem. So the protocol should be, Ms. Rodriguez should know this, that the PTG, it goes through the principal that they work with because there are a lot of, there are different, different issues that have to go through before you move, move on that availability for us and see what programs. And I'll be glad to meet with you after this and just grab your number and information. and make sure that that goes through because again, this also reverts back to a bigger issue and that's recreation. Have you gone to the subcommittee meetings on recreation and arts and recreation? Because I think this is important that these are the avenues that community schools and recreation, it's important that we can do that too, just to piggyback that. But I'd like to talk to you at the end if I can, and maybe I can help you with moving that forward. Sure. I know that in our standing as former school committee members, anything that goes from the PTG or outside agencies has to go through the principal first. And then any other information that goes through has to go to the superintendent's office.
[George Scarpelli]: Regarding the 3-1-1, it's a very slippery slope right now. The—understanding what the intent is, I think, has to be defined through the administration a little bit better. If it's implemented to collect data, then to look into hiring policies, because I agree with you, Counsel Marks, that I work in the system that within 48 hours of a 311 call to my office, I have to respond to that constituent. And then, if not, it's reverted to our summer stat. organization that the mayor sits on, and then that data is then pushed directly to us, and answers have to be given to why they weren't or were answered. So I think that an understanding of what the true definition of this program, when it is presented to the community, and how we handle it, because I firmly believe in what echo your thoughts and without the proper people on the streets doing the work. And a lot of times people answering that phone and moving it to department to department, um, is going to be essential making this work. If not, I think this could be, uh, an even more volatile issue than you even can think of because it, um, what we do is understanding that the, the three one system where it's implemented in some level, it's then, carried over. It's like having a 9-1-1 system without a police department. So it's, um, it's very important. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor. Is this a recommendation that we order a work of stoppage to the,
[George Scarpelli]: Chair recognizes Councilor Scarpelli. If I can, we still, another issue that concerns me is that with any big job as a project manager, have we identified what department is actually in charge of this project? Because I've looked into other communities that are working with DOT and it's, it's very simple when you talk about this type of issue is the liaison from the city that's there is the one that's enforcing and dictating what's going on there. Right. So I, do we, do we have that?
[George Scarpelli]: So it's not the DPW. Okay. So if I can, and being prudent and, and looking into all of those department heads coming ahead of us in front of us next week, if we can, and, and understanding our frustration and that we are making sure that our gun is loaded per se, that, that, that we need to, have them here to answer that. And, um, you know, even recommend a site visit. I know that we've also on the school side at times when there were issues with custodial services and cleaning services, we visited us, uh, our, and I think people need to know the frustrations with the business owners in that area that, that it's a voice that we asked for all those, the department heads of police, um, the engineering, DPW and the business owners with, of course, DOT, that we evaluate this issue and making sure that they understand at the podium that we're willing to do what needs to be done to make sure that our business owners and our constituents' issues are heard. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I think that's a good idea, if we can all community of the whole in asking for engineering, DPW, police DOT, uh, next week.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I'd like to applaud my fellow councilman, Mr. Falco. We were both on the school committee, and I remember our first meeting when the first budget we went through, we received a budget book, I believe Friday or Father's Day, and to vote on a Tuesday. So we learned relatively quick. that how we needed to work together collaboratively as a committee to make sure we get the answers that we need before we pass the budget onto the city council. Again, the mayor will present us with a budget, and I think what John's asking for and what we've done in the past with the school committee with having pre-budget meetings where department heads presented us with all of that information gave us the tools to make sure that we made the proper decisions. I know that the bone of contention that's been talked about recently is the PR person. The PR person is something we talked about back in May of 2011 as part of our pre-budget conversations. So it's important that this is how we, it's the first step that I think that led us in a direction on the school committee in a positive direction, making sure that we're working with transparency. So again, I just want to applaud your resolution and pretty excited about making this happen, so thank you. Thank you, Councilor. Chair recognizes Councilor Marks.
[George Scarpelli]: Just for clarity. as we move forward, the, the wishes of the school, this city council to ask for department heads to come to the rail or come to this meeting that would have to go through the mayor's office or that, that wouldn't be our privy, correct? That is correct. Okay. But we can, we can request the mayor's office that we ask for a pre-budget updates and from department as we move forward, just to make, make sure that we're clear. I think that Councilor Marks made that loud and clear, but we can always request. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, to add along, because we're talking about traffic and parking, if we can, too, through the chair, I've gotten some calls about some of the signs in Medford Square, the new signs that have been erected that I believe you need a master's degree to read them and to follow along. It's been very difficult for some of our seniors to follow along. I think there's six different bullets in one. I believe Ms. Reynolds would say it was a carry on sentence as it keeps going on and on. So if someone can look into that too, it's important to get clarification for that.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Councilor Scarpelli. Again, please, forgive my naive train of thought here, but what city department, and director is overseeing the building. That should be OCD. So if OCD, why don't we... The city engineer has called you the point person on this project. Well, I think that we, for immediate action, we make the amendment that we send the department that's directly in charge there in the morning to give us an answer ASAP.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you, Mr. President. I think it's important that we've discussed this and try to find a way to add this to the amendment, but look into, um, uh, and I thinking outside the box and looking at, you know, when you're talking about a roof and you're talking about bathrooms, when we're talking about the library infrastructure, how bad or how good it is, I'd like to see with that report is to also investigate, you know, other facilities within our community and see if there's ways that we can, You know, use different buildings. I'll give an example. If we look right next door to Springstep and said, if there's square footage there to put both a library and an arts center and use that to bring everything here with the infrastructure strong and new and updated, and then look at the land that has the library and look to sell that land off to a developer, I think that's something that I'd like to you know, entertain as we go forward that when you're talking about big, big money, uh, and you talk about how, how we, we reinvested into the schools and we built the so-called new schools and how we moved forward with that thinking outside the box and, and really looking to bring a library to the 21st century. I think it's important.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. President, I know when we were here as guests, they mentioned something about an email. Have they done that?
[George Scarpelli]: Just the question that I'm reaching out to my I had a few phone calls from a few constituents and asking if there is a Christmas tree pickup in the community and when and where, and if it'll be posted and where it will be posted so they can put their Christmas trees out on the sidewalk. Is it next week? Okay, just so if we know.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. So if maybe- Regular trash pickup?
[George Scarpelli]: Do you know where they post that? If we could ask where they can post it, if they can.
[George Scarpelli]: One can't help but do it there.
[George Scarpelli]: On the motion to approve, Mr. Schiappelli. I'd be remiss to say, Maria, that I just would, in honor of Mr. Brady. How about Homel? Okay, approved. That's the second item.
[George Scarpelli]: I know it's been difficult. I know the director of the commissioner of DCR just resigned, I believe, a few weeks ago. So I know your job must be very difficult right now. So is there a liaison that they have right now working with that our legislators can maybe push that along? I know it's daunting, believe me. I'm dealing with it right now.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, if you can, then maybe that'll help. But I know that we were trying to deal with the commissioner and she decided it was way too tough for her, so.
[George Scarpelli]: I don't know if we looked into this because I know we're doing it now with our parks and rink especially. We're losing so much. It's so expensive now for what the energy is asking it. at the rinks and lighting facilities. Have we looked into, I know that with the incentives with solar power, we've talked about they have solar farms, but what we're having in our department, a group come in and discuss putting the way the parking lot is in a rink. There'll be, there'll be bays and above the bays, there'll be bars with solar powered units that would help feed the rink. Has anyone discussed?
[George Scarpelli]: He didn't say you.
[George Scarpelli]: Point of information, Mr. Mayor. Mr. Schapiro. I know that the school system that I work in, we have the X2 system, where if a child does forget their ID, that the homeroom teacher would print a picture that's provided with them at the beginning of the year, and it's the student's information. And I think that, I concur with what Mr. Falco and Mr. Skerry were saying, that I think that's something that, because if you saw some protocols as a former teacher, then we were there. I know how hard you work in preparing us. There were safes that the teacher did stop the person, but a simple ID would have stopped everything. I don't have a pen that doesn't answer. You don't have your ID on, you get to the office, period.
[George Scarpelli]: That's not in place. That's what I'm saying. It's not Mr. Edwards' fault.
[George Scarpelli]: off to the left.
[George Scarpelli]: On a motion to approve by Mr. Skerry, seconded by Mr. DiBenedetto, Mr. Schapelli. Just a couple of questions that have happened in the past. I'm sure they're rectified, but being so close to playgrounds and structures, I know I work for Recreation Somerville and we have a few ball fields adjacent to a few dog parks. Now, I know some of the questions that happened in the past just to ease residents' minds, sometimes the smell of the urine from the dogs. That's not a big issue.
[George Scarpelli]: And I think the question in one of the other locations in Somerville is that you stoned us. It wasn't the irrigation, was it? Not the Washington Street.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, and that's why that was an issue. That's why that's an issue. OK, I just want to check. The questions with the watershed and the flood lines or the water lines with the lake, that doesn't seem to be a big problem, something we'll push through.
[George Scarpelli]: In addition, we've had preliminary meetings with the conservation commission and DEP. I'm a dog person. We have Gabby loves to run and I don't, so it's really nice to finally have an area. You don't realize how big Carr Park is until you're chasing your dog around for 25 minutes. Again, thank you very much.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Schiappelli. If I can, publicly, I just want to, representing my family, I just want to publicly thank this community. You want to know why Medford's a great place to live. And at the toughest time in my life, my family's life, my colleagues and friends and leaders of this community really stepped up. And where my mother's going through such a hard time and how hard my father fought. and the way that everybody surrounded her and the rest of our family. I can't thank everybody enough. For my colleagues, missing a lot of meetings last few weeks, and the superintendent keeping me apprised of what's going on. And with your leadership and your support, Mr. Mayor, I think that this is what makes Method great. I know that it's the toughest thing that I've had to deal with in my life, losing my best friend and my father, but having everybody around and just giving just a word or a hug or just this card. It meant so much to us. So again, publicly, I just want to thank everybody. And words can't describe what you've done for us. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: I just have one question, Mr. Mayor. I know that when we had that summit with everyone, I thought that was very informative. But have things changed? I know that we talked about the average age was much older at the time.
[George Scarpelli]: Um, just, just to work off of that, my, uh, my point is, is more personal in the sense that, Last year, a few of the overdoses were former soccer players. And if there's a way, this report's wonderful and it's informative, but it's cumbersome. This isn't what I've learned as a parent. Most parents are going to look at things that are going to hit you with bullets and see what's important. Something like this, these numbers are great, but the average parent isn't going to read it. maybe if there's a way that we can just get, you know, just an informative booklet or a trifle, just to get the word out for, you know, maybe doing professional development with your coaches. And I was a teacher and a coach for 15 years at the high school and the middle elementary school. And maybe there were signs that I could have noticed and I didn't. And there's a lot of guilt there. And You know, and being so, being a very important part of these kids' lives, maybe focusing on the front lines, not only with the PTGs, but I've been a little league coach and a youth soccer coach and a basketball coach and being involved with kids. I can't tell you how many hours I've spent with six, seven kids in a car. But if there's something maybe that in a conversation as we're driving and talking about prevention, you know, I'm a dad first and foremost. and I'm very involved with my children, and we talk about drug use, and we talk about everything from taking aspirin to smoking marijuana and heroin, because they knew these kids. And I don't want to belittle what's done, because I think it's important. This is a substance that gets us the grants and gets us the money that's needed to move forward. But if there's something we could dummy down in a sense, just so the average person can just have points that they can talk about, or maybe they hear something you know, where as mandated reporters, something that serious, but just something that, you know, well, let me talk to mom and dad and let me give them this brochure and who they can talk, contact in the community that says, Hey, why don't we talk here? Let's call Melby, right? Let's call, let's call, uh, Rachel at the high school. Let's, let's get the word out. So, I mean, maybe it's, maybe I'm looking at it pretty naively in the sense that, but looking at something that we get out, You know, think about it. We have 500 little league players, and we have, you know, 1,100 youth soccer players, and we have 400 lacrosse players, and I can go on and on and on, but looking at that youth program and talking to the presidents of those leagues and bringing them together and saying, hey, would this help? And part of a conversation when you talk with your coach is saying, we don't want you to be, you know, you're not going to be, you know, a therapist, but just get the word out. because the more in the front line I think is going to be most important.
[George Scarpelli]: There's stereotypes. In the neighboring community where I work in now, the biggest stereotype was overdoses with hockey players. And they think that my son's not playing hockey because he's going to overdose. And wrong in so many ways. That's so great that we're thinking that, being proactive, and like, again, as a former coach and working, a former coach in Medford and still a former coach in the neighborhood community, I'd love to be, you know, give any assistance possible because, like I said, on a personal level, there's a lot of guilt in the sense that we, did I miss something? And, you know, people like Rachel and I understand where that comes from. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I was going to pick up that question in January.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Scarpelli. If I can, I can understand completely how difficult this is moving forward. I have my own work. I see the waste. where my staff is trained that if a youngster wants a meal, and they're still hungry, or they just want an apple, they have to get the orange, the milk, everything, and just throw it away. And that's a disgrace. And this isn't us, this is the government as we go forward with this. The whole parameter, if they catch anybody, any school system, any one of our programs that do that, they take the funding away. And so I think it's really backwards, and what I really focused on, this will be an increase to us from the federal government for our free and reduced. I want to look at the kids that, it looks very close to 50-50, free and reduced, and just a regular parent who's paying for my children. I'm afraid the free and reduced is still going to be getting fed. But the increase is really going to hit the person's wallet at home that's working and has to pay for that on a daily basis. So that's where I find it very difficult as we move forward. I know the comparison of what we pay and other communities pay, but when people don't qualify for free and reduced, They're the ones paying out of their pocket, people that qualify for free and reduced. We're getting money from the federal government. That sounds great. I apologize, but I don't see that. The middle class worker that's out there busting their humps every day, and the fee really hits them hard. Okay, so that's why I, if we're federally mandated, then we have to do any sort of increase as we move forward with the presentation. I just find it alarming for what the federal government's telling us to do. And then what I've seen on a daily basis, I think it's districts. And I'll probably say that, but I still need to know more about this before I look at someone like myself that gives that money every day. Because I don't qualify, and so it's coming out of my paycheck. My kids have to eat every day, so.
[George Scarpelli]: But again, this is 50% of that's in the free and reduced that comes back, that we'll be automatically getting from them. Correct? Roughly it's 50% of our lunches in each school.
[George Scarpelli]: OK. Mr. Scappelli. When we know that something's going down, and I don't blame you. I'm not blaming you guys. We're getting this now, and we're getting that, we have equipment failing. Now that doesn't shock me, but we didn't know anything about it. Okay, so here we are, after we voted on the budget, now there's equipment failing. So I understand waiting and increasing building reserve, so we don't have it, but that should have been done five years ago. I'm looking at this right now, and I think that's what's bothering more than anything right now, What is going down? Do we have an estimate cost of what's going down? What are we looking at, hundreds of thousands, 50,000, 20,000?
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. What I'm saying is, we're looking at piecing together things and spending 5,000 to keep things going. Now we're saying as we look forward, we're looking at major repairs or major replacements? I mean, is there an idea? Do you have a report? Do you have something?
[George Scarpelli]: So if the classroom has a rug or a pillow or a stuffed animal, that was one of the biggest questions in the past.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Scarpelli. Again, I echo my colleagues. Pat's on the back so y'all deserve it. The one thing that we need is as you walk the streets and you talk to people and it's coming down to picking their high schools and parents are talking to us, geez, you know what? I wish the high school was, was newer. I wish it was, um, you know, I wish, I wish we had a different color for the front or something silly. When I tell them that, that it's not the, the exterior, that's the heartbeat. And what you do every day just reinforces what we're trying to do by showing everybody that this is a great place to learn. And, um, again, I commend you and that's, that's, that's impressive. So thank you very much. You make us look great.
[George Scarpelli]: Heidi's getting tired of all this.
[George Scarpelli]: Yes. Well done. Ms. Riccio, I think this is something that I've been talking about when a friend of mine who was working at Lawrence Vocational Tech and now who's at neighboring community talked about how schools would open up their vocational school and offer programs like this to our eighth grade students to see and get interested in vocational education. And also, just for the novice to explore some of programming, getting more involved. The nominal cost is something that will cover the teacher's pay, the equipment that's needed, and any upkeep for the building, correct?
[George Scarpelli]: Well, if you look at the top notch vocational schools in the region, I think they are, not only do they have a great high school program, but then an evening school too. So I applaud you and congratulate you again on moving us forward. So thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank God that you're with us and I appreciate everything that you're fighting to be back in the classroom, so thank you. But Hunter, you are an unbelievable role model. I want to make sure that your presence here today, it just again, again with the vocational school when you talk about greatness in Medford. So I want to commend you, because this is something that should be screamed from the rooftops. To have that incentive and have that dream and drive not to stop in what you believe in. This is a story that I'm going to go home and talk to my 12 year old son about, because that's very impressive. So I congratulate you, nice job. Thank you so much. Mrs. Cunha.
[George Scarpelli]: If I can, I, I don't, I don't, I'd like to table this, move this along because I think there's some information. We haven't seen the actual breakdown with the food services. You know, a breakdown has been for the last couple of years. I think we as a school community, before we raise it a nickel, have to look at that, those options. I think that maybe looking at other increases. I know that at some of the schools, the PTG run their, you know, their little, the little snack bar that kids, come in and invest a lot of money that can afford to go in and buy the extra cookies and buy the extra ice cream and do all that and so forth and so on. If we're at a point where we're looking to raise, because I didn't take this as this is the federal government. The federal government numbers are one way. This isn't pushed by the federal government. This is us. This is our initiative.
[George Scarpelli]: Right. But this isn't coming from the federal government telling us we need to push anything.
[George Scarpelli]: Okay. So what I'd like to do is maybe look at some other, you know, look at our numbers first before we do anything and then look at what we're doing in that other piece where I know the high school has the different, um, different areas to purchase different types of foods that maybe we can capture funding that way instead of, um, instead of doing this, because again, the free and reduced lunch, those kids are going to eat. We know that. It's the kids that are right in the middle. And again, that might be the difference. Fifty cents a day might be the difference of not having a meal one of those days and whatnot. I'd like to look at it, and I make a motion that we table this until we get some more information.
[George Scarpelli]: My information is to-.
[George Scarpelli]: If we have Jules presenting part of the budget, we wrap that with that, I think that would be very helpful. We can set up being redundant of what we're doing with them.
[George Scarpelli]: Nice job. Thank you very much for your report. Thank you. As a former phys ed teacher, I have a few questions. How are the numbers in the health class at the high school? I know in the past, they've been pretty astronomical.
[George Scarpelli]: Does that fill all their requirements? If they move to still everybody's safe place?
[George Scarpelli]: All right. Now I know that you're working a full teaching schedule and now this role, who's doing the evaluations of the teachers for?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, so are you doing those? No. No, so you're not yet. Okay. But who is, do you know?
[George Scarpelli]: I'm just saying, as a former phys ed teacher, it'd be nice to have an administrator with a background in physical education doing those evaluations. Not to disrespect anybody here, I think it's a great job, but I think it's important.
[George Scarpelli]: We'd have to evaluate that, but I don't disagree. The equipment, I know the equipment, we keep talking about the equipment at the high school. It's being used for school, uh, for classes and for afterschool. We see, we see different groups in there on the weekends, um, through community schools and it is $6,000 enough or are you talking about fitness center maintenance equipment?
[George Scarpelli]: Now, equipment for the other schools, how is it broken down for their budget for equipment?
[George Scarpelli]: OK. And with the addition of the adaptive physical education teacher, is that needed under that we fall compliant to special education, or is that just?
[George Scarpelli]: That's going to be interesting to hear, the breakdown of how many children. Because that might be something you can use hiring a split and adapted physical education teacher, and then looking to fill some of the other gaps that you have. So that might be something that we need to do. Then the other number, obviously, that sticks out is the $23,000 for the textbooks. As we move down, has it been, it's been piloted at the high school level?
[George Scarpelli]: And we're moving down to the pilot, this is what's going to be used to pilot the elementary level?
[George Scarpelli]: Okay, thank you. Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Felton. Mr. Scott Felton. If I can, as a former colleague of Ms. Castagnetti, she was a great role model, not only for just the ELL teachers, but all of our teachers. So we applaud her and thank her. One question I just had to have, I know in the past, it's a question we've always asked. We're in compliance with the Department of Education with all of our numbers and teaching teachers. across the board.
[George Scarpelli]: For all of our coverages that we have. There are no issues, no additions.
[George Scarpelli]: Right, so the Roberts is, this is, This is the one we're asking for the increased consent.
[George Scarpelli]: I know that's a tough part, especially as years end in different countries and they move.
[George Scarpelli]: They might be done in their countries, then move here. Right. And they're right in the middle of ours, so I know how difficult it is.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Anthony Petrellis. I've talked to Mr. Mr. Petrellis, the director of the program, and you know, he, he, he reached out to me with my background in recreation. And when we founded it years ago, his, his philosophies using what's there, even if we have the playground apparatus, if there were younger kids at the, um, at the high school, but he didn't think that was an issue. He says having them in a safer area, not doing the walk, having the pool open, the fields accessible to them, the gym space being larger, I think it all falls into to what we're looking for, for a safe environment for our kids.
[George Scarpelli]: And I believe in the promotion of the pool, having over 150 kids there. We're using that pool with no limitations in the sense that now they can see what we have and more kids will go to that area. So.
[George Scarpelli]: Very curious.
[George Scarpelli]: Mr. Scott Pellett. No, just again, just clarification. Are there any special ed programs that are working together with the summer program? I know we did a lot of that and it really helped financially for both outside placement offering that type of program. How does that look?
[George Scarpelli]: Through the summertime program. I know we had a lot of the special needs programs, uh, working conjunction with the summertime to, to offset any of the, um, you know,
[George Scarpelli]: They will automatically be enrolled in that program.
[George Scarpelli]: If they need to, right? Yes. OK. I think the other piece of this is you don't say it enough, because I know my colleague, Mr. Benedetto, has talked about the promotion of who we have. When you're talking about the teacher of the year, Anthony Petrellis, I had the opportunity to mentor him years ago. And we often talk now with recreational interactions with what we're doing with my full-time position. And I will tell you, he is a jewel. I think that sometimes you overlook What he does in the classroom is amazing. What he does for that program is one of the reasons why we get the numbers. Because I think people, myself included as a parent, who had Mr. Petrellis, the comfort level is so high. It's such a high level that it's easy just to bring him in no matter what the price was. So again, people have to know the people that are running these programs are who they are. They're pretty amazing, as well as our special ed programs. I know our other summer programs, our vocational programs, this is amazing. So I think this is Well done.
[George Scarpelli]: So we have to champion this. And I'd like to get, if we can, to the superintendent having a conversation. I know he's not too... He's very... I'm embarrassed if I brought this up, but the change in his life and what he's being asked across the state and what they're asking him to do because of this award, I think has to be championed from this committee, because that just shows one of our teachers, where he's being asked to teach at the collegiate level now in higher education and where he's going for different conferences, and again, that's He didn't just win the Teacher of the Year and get a check and then go to a basketball game. He's doing so much more in education because of that award. I think we need to get more information so people can know what he's doing. So, thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Thank you. I think a lot of credit, I had a conversation with Mr. Belson about eight years ago. And Mr. Belson said, one of the things he said to me was that he's done, in our eyes, he's done so much in this field. And he said, really looking at the community school piece and getting education, bringing it out, and making that a success is a big piece of his plan. I just want to commend you, Roy, because you know what? Unfortunately, our city doesn't have a full time recreation program. And the work that you put in this and the opportunity that you've given to our coaches, our teachers, our vocational school to do what we're doing now is for our children. I think it's something that I've heard over and over next door, but now they're coming back. So it's a lot to do with that. So I just want to commend you as what you do completely is impressive, so thank you.
[George Scarpelli]: Could you send us those? Yeah. I mean, and just, and just then we can get back to you. Those should be actually stolen, what I'm just saying. Just send us those and then that's it.